Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment

![Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII)][float-right] The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) is a G7-led multilateral initiative formally launched on June 26, 2022, at the G7 Summit in Elmau, Germany, designed to mobilize up to $600 billion in public and private financing by 2027 for infrastructure projects in developing and low-income countries. Originating from earlier concepts like the Build Back Better World proposal, PGII prioritizes investments in four key areas: climate and energy security, health systems and pandemic preparedness, digital connectivity, and gender equality, with an emphasis on transparent, sustainable, and debt-sustainable projects adhering to international standards such as those promoted by the Blue Dot Network. Positioned explicitly as an alternative to China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which has financed over $1 trillion in projects since 2013 often criticized for opacity and debt burdens, PGII seeks to leverage G7 expertise and private capital to deliver "high-standard" infrastructure without the geopolitical strings or environmental shortcuts associated with BRI lending. The United States pledged to mobilize $200 billion over five years, primarily through federal financing agencies like the Development Finance Corporation and by catalyzing private investment, though empirical progress has been limited, with only $30 billion in U.S.-directed funds as of mid-2023 and few large-scale projects completed amid challenges in private sector buy-in and inter-G7 coordination. Critics, including economic analysts, have highlighted the initiative's reliance on unproven private leverage ratios and domestic fiscal constraints in G7 nations as barriers to matching BRI's scale, resulting in modest outcomes that underscore the difficulties of values-driven financing in competition with state-directed models. Despite these hurdles, PGII has facilitated targeted investments, such as undersea cable projects for digital access and clean energy pilots, consolidating prior Western efforts like the EU's Global Gateway into a unified framework to address empirical infrastructure deficits in regions like Africa and the Indo-Pacific.

Background and Rationale

Geopolitical Context and Response to China's

![World leaders at the 2021 G7 Summit in England](./assets/G7_leaders_roundtable_meeting_on_Day_1_Carbis_Bay_summit_(2) China's (BRI), launched in 2013, represents a cornerstone of Beijing's , committing over $1 trillion in financing across more than 140 countries to enhance connectivity between , , , and beyond. While BRI projects have facilitated and in recipient nations, they have drawn substantial criticism for contributing to debt distress, with 80% of China's government s to developing countries directed toward nations currently in or at high risk of debt distress as of 2024. Instances such as Sri Lanka's 99-year lease of the port to a Chinese following defaults in 2017 have fueled concerns over unsustainable lending practices and opaque contract terms that prioritize Chinese firms and standards. Although some analyses, such as those from , argue that deliberate "debt-trap diplomacy" lacks empirical support and that has restructured debts without asset seizures in most cases, the initiative's reliance on non-concessional s and limited has exacerbated fiscal vulnerabilities in borrower states, prompting geopolitical apprehension among Western powers. In the broader context of intensifying U.S.- strategic competition, BRI is perceived by the and its allies as a mechanism for expanding geopolitical influence, fostering economic dependencies, and enabling dual-use infrastructure that could support objectives, thereby challenging the rules-based . This view gained traction amid reports of BRI's opacity in , environmental safeguards, and labor practices, contrasting with international standards upheld by multilateral institutions like the . By 2021, as China's lending peaked and then contracted due to domestic economic pressures and global backlash, nations identified an opportunity to offer a values-aligned alternative, emphasizing private-sector leverage, , and governance reforms to counterbalance Beijing's state-driven model without matching its scale. The initiative's expansion into sectors like digital infrastructure and health has further heightened fears of technological fragmentation and risks in the Global South. The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII), initially announced as Build Back Better World (B3W) at the Summit in , , on June 12, 2021, emerged directly as a democratic counter to BRI, aiming to mobilize $600 billion in infrastructure investments by 2027 through coordinated public and private financing focused on high-impact projects in low- and middle-income countries. Unlike BRI's emphasis on quantity and speed, PGII prioritizes transparency, anti-corruption measures, and alignment with climate goals, seeking to address infrastructure gaps estimated at $15 trillion globally by 2040 while mitigating risks of predatory financing. Rebranded as PGII in 2022 to broaden appeal beyond partners, it incorporates extended collaborations with entities like the Union's and Japan's Partnership for Quality Infrastructure, reflecting a concerted Western strategy to reclaim influence in developing regions amid declining BRI momentum. This response underscores a causal shift from reactive to proactive competition, leveraging multilateral coordination to promote over geopolitical leverage.

Precursor Initiatives: Blue Dot Network and Build Back Better World

The emerged in November 2019 as a trilateral initiative led by the , , and to certify global infrastructure projects adhering to high standards of , , and fiscal responsibility. This voluntary scheme, primarily private-sector driven with government backing, aimed to build investor confidence by verifying projects against established principles without providing direct financing. Subsequent participants included the in 2020, followed by , , the , and Türkiye, expanding its scope to promote quality infrastructure in emerging markets. Building on such standards efforts, the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative was announced on June 12, 2021, during the Summit in , , by the under President Biden alongside other leaders. B3W sought to mobilize private-sector investment for infrastructure in low- and middle-income countries, targeting sectors like , health systems, digital technology, and gender equity, with an emphasis on countering non-transparent financing models. The plan envisioned leveraging up to $40 trillion in infrastructure needs by 2035 through coordinated efforts, including a dedicated taskforce for harmonization. These precursors laid foundational principles for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII), with B3W directly rebranded and formalized as PGII at the 2022 Summit in , committing to $600 billion in investments over five years. The Blue Dot Network's certification framework complemented B3W and PGII by providing a mechanism to ensure project quality and attract capital, addressing gaps in global standards amid competition from state-driven models.

Establishment and Key Milestones

Formal Launch at the 2022 G7 Summit

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) was formally launched by the leaders of the nations—, , , , , the , and the —along with the , during the held at in the , , from June 26 to 28, 2022. The initiative, rebranding the earlier Build Back Better World (B3W) proposal, aimed to provide an alternative to China's by funding high-standard infrastructure projects in low- and middle-income countries. The launch was announced on June 26, 2022, with U.S. President and other heads of state emphasizing values-based investments focused on , health systems, digital technology, and . At the summit, leaders committed to mobilizing up to $600 billion in public and private infrastructure investments by 2027 to address global infrastructure gaps, with the pledging $200 billion in grants, loans, and private sector commitments over five years. This funding was intended to leverage public resources to attract private capital, prioritizing projects that adhere to principles of , , and debt sustainability, while countering non-transparent lending practices associated with other initiatives. The PGII framework incorporated standards from precursor efforts like the , ensuring infrastructure meets rigorous criteria for environmental protection, labor rights, and measures. The launch communiqué, issued on June 28, 2022, invited extended partnerships with non-G7 countries such as , , and representatives to broaden participation and impact. U.S. Treasury Secretary highlighted the initiative's role in promoting democratic values and economic resilience amid global challenges like the . Early focus areas included accelerating clean energy transitions, expanding digital connectivity, and strengthening health infrastructure in developing regions.

Advancements at the 2023 Hiroshima Summit

At the Hiroshima Summit held from May 19 to 21, 2023, leaders convened a dedicated side event on May 20 for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII), hosted by , the , and the . Participants included G7 heads of state or government, representatives from partner nations such as , , , the Republic of , and , as well as executives from private entities including Citi, , and , alongside the president. The event focused on mobilizing public and private capital for high-standard infrastructure projects in developing countries, reaffirming the G7's collective pledge to unlock up to $600 billion in financing by 2027 to address global infrastructure gaps and support . Key announcements emphasized concrete progress and new funding mobilizations. The reported having channeled $30 billion into PGII through grants, federal financing mechanisms, and leverage since the initiative's 2022 launch, with Biden unveiling additional projects to enhance and in priority regions. Japan committed over $65 billion in infrastructure assistance and private capital mobilization over five years, including targeted facilities such as the Asia Climate-Smart Environment Support Facility () with up to $1.5 billion for climate mitigation and adaptation, the Support Facility for Agriculture and (SAFE) with up to $1 billion, and the Facility for Advancing (FAFI) with up to $1.5 billion for micro, and vulnerable populations. These pledges aligned with PGII's emphasis on transparent, debt-sustainable investments contrasting with less accountable alternatives. The summit produced a PGII factsheet documenting early implementation successes, including support for just energy transitions in countries like , , and through coordinated Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs). Leaders endorsed an annual PGII Investor Forum to de-risk investments, facilitate matchmaking between financiers and viable projects, and iteratively improve the partnership's operational model for greater participation. These steps built on the initiative's foundational standards for environmental , labor protections, and measures, aiming to deliver localized benefits in sectors such as digital connectivity, clean energy, and health infrastructure.

Commitments at the 2024 Apulia Summit and Beyond

At the 2024 Summit held in , , , from June 13 to 15, leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the Partnership for Global and Investment (PGII), pledging to mobilize up to $600 billion in public and private financing by 2027 for sustainable, inclusive, and resilient projects, with particular emphasis on and the region. This built on prior progress, with partners announcing more than $50 billion in new commitments since the 2023 Summit to support in emerging markets. U.S. President Joe Biden and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni co-chaired a PGII side event attended by G7 leaders, private sector representatives, multilateral development banks, and development finance institutions, where participants confirmed plans to launch and scale investments in PGII economic corridors worldwide, including in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Key announcements included enhanced support for flagship corridors such as the Lobito Corridor in southern and central Africa, with the U.S., EU, and Italy committing $320 million for an 800-kilometer rail section, alongside $250 million from the U.S. Development Finance Corporation and $900 million from the U.S. Export-Import Bank for related energy and transport projects; the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC); the Luzon Economic Corridor in the Philippines, backed by over $14.75 million from the U.S. and Japan for project preparation; and the Trans-Caspian Transport Corridor (Middle Corridor). Additional initiatives encompassed the Africa Global Infrastructure Initiative (AGII), with $100 million from the Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet to leverage $1 billion in private investment for renewable energy and e-mobility in Africa; private sector pledges like Microsoft's $5 billion for digital infrastructure in emerging markets and BlackRock's over $350 million through its Climate Finance Partnership; and U.S. efforts to mobilize more than $30 billion in new investor capital from partners including Global Infrastructure Partners and Brookfield. The leaders also endorsed complementary frameworks such as the EU's , Italy's Mattei Plan for , and the African Virtual Investment Platform (AVIP) in partnership with the and , set to pilot in select countries starting in 2025 to improve transparency and investment flows. Commitments aligned PGII with broader goals like the 's and high-quality infrastructure standards via mechanisms including the certification and the FAST-INFRA Initiative. Beyond the summit, on October 24, 2024, development ministers launched the PGII during their ministerial meeting to streamline coordination, track flagship projects, and enhance implementation across economic corridors and regional priorities. Future efforts will continue emphasizing Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs), such as those for ($9.3 billion), ($15.8 billion), ($21.6 billion), and (€2.5 billion), alongside green industrialization in countries like and . The U.S. targeted mobilizing $200 billion by 2027, underscoring PGII's role in countering gaps while adhering to principles of and leverage.

Objectives and Guiding Principles

Primary Goals and Focus Areas

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) seeks to mobilize up to $600 billion in public and private financing by 2027 to address infrastructure gaps in low- and middle-income countries, emphasizing high-quality projects that adhere to standards of , , , and measures. This initiative prioritizes investments that support economic growth, regional connectivity, and strategic interests, while promoting alternatives to debt-trap financing through de-risking mechanisms like guarantees and . PGII's core focus areas align with four pillars: climate and , digital connectivity, and health security, and and equity. In climate and , the partnership targets resilient energy , such as solar, wind, and projects, alongside critical minerals supply chains to enhance access and reduce vulnerabilities from dependencies. Digital connectivity efforts emphasize secure telecommunications, including / networks, Open RAN technologies, cybersecurity, and expansion to foster economic corridors and . and health security initiatives aim to build sustainable systems for production, , and to mitigate pandemics and improve outcomes in underserved regions. integrates across sectors by prioritizing women's participation in development, in care and sustainable industries, and equitable access to economic opportunities. Cross-cutting priorities include developing integrated economic corridors—such as the in —to link transportation, ports, , and for multi-sector growth, while addressing through resilient agricultural systems and market linkages. These efforts leverage public funds to attract private investment, with an emphasis on open-access and responsible practices like sustainable , distinguishing PGII from initiatives with lower environmental and standards.

Standards for Transparency, Sustainability, and Debt Management

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) mandates adherence to rigorous standards in , , and management to deliver high-quality that avoids opacity, environmental harm, and fiscal overextension. These standards draw from established frameworks, including the G20 Principles for Quality Infrastructure Investment, which integrate requirements for accountable governance, environmental safeguards, and fiscal prudence. PGII projects must incorporate performance metrics, policy alignment with host countries, and coordination among partners and multilateral institutions to enforce these benchmarks, with a focus on mobilizing up to $600 billion in public and private capital by 2027 while prioritizing resilient outcomes. Transparency standards require open , anti-corruption protocols, and full disclosure of financing terms and project risks to enable scrutiny and efficient execution. G7 commitments include building capacity in recipient nations for monitoring compliance, ensuring investments respect sovereignty over resources and promote local labor standards without hidden liabilities. This approach contrasts with less verifiable financing models by emphasizing verifiable accountability, as supported by U.S. agencies like the , which conditions aid on governance reforms. Sustainability criteria prioritize climate-resilient designs, such as clean energy transitions and emission reductions, alongside social inclusivity and biodiversity protection. Projects must undergo environmental impact assessments and align with international labor and human rights norms, fostering long-term economic benefits like job creation in sectors including digital connectivity and health infrastructure. Examples include PGII-backed initiatives like renewable energy in Vietnam and green hydrogen in Namibia, which integrate nature-based solutions to mitigate degradation. Debt management emphasizes fiscal viability through blended financing that catalyzes private investment, limiting official loans to de-risk projects rather than supplanting domestic resources. Standards mandate debt sustainability analyses prior to commitments, using tools like the World Bank's Debt Management Facility to evaluate repayment capacity and prevent accumulation of non-concessional debt. partners address vulnerabilities by promoting transparency in debt reporting and supporting reforms that enhance host-country revenue generation, aiming to close gaps in principle implementation observed in prior global efforts.

Participants and Governance

Core G7 Members and Extended Partners

The core participants in the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) are the (G7) member states: , , , , , , and . These nations initiated the program at the 2021 G7 Summit in , , rebranding and formalizing it as PGII in 2022 to counterbalance China's through high-standard, transparent financing. Each G7 member commits resources aligned with national development agencies, such as the U.S. Finance Corporation and Japan's Overseas and Quality Support Mechanism, focusing on sectors like digital , , health systems, and in low- and middle-income countries. PGII operates as a G7-led framework with extended partners, designated as the G7+, which includes the , , , and the Republic of Korea. These partners were incorporated to broaden investment capacity and geopolitical alignment, participating in joint commitments such as the 2023 Hiroshima AI Process for responsible infrastructure and the Lobito Corridor rail project in Africa, which mobilizes over $4 billion in private capital for mineral transport from , , and to global markets. The EU contributes via its strategy, aiming for €300 billion in investments by 2027, while and South Korea emphasize Indo-Pacific connectivity, and focuses on South-South cooperation. This expanded structure enables coordinated financing from multilateral development banks and private investors, targeting up to $600 billion in mobilized capital by 2027, though actual disbursements remain below targets as of 2024 due to coordination challenges among partners. Additional countries, such as and select African nations, engage opportunistically through project-specific invitations rather than formal membership, reflecting PGII's selective expansion to align with strategic priorities like and debt sustainability. Governance involves annual summits for high-level endorsements, with working groups under the U.S. Special Coordinator for PGII facilitating partner input on standards for (ESG) compliance.

Coordination Mechanisms and Investor Engagement

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) coordinates efforts primarily through -led mechanisms, including a dedicated that steers projects and operationalizes commitments across partner countries. This group, supported by senior officials for strategic direction, aligns initiatives with international standards such as the Principles for Quality Infrastructure Investment and facilitates collaboration with multilateral development banks (MDBs), development finance institutions (DFIs), and partner governments. Coordination occurs at annual summits and ministerial meetings, such as the Development Ministers' gathering in , , on October 22-24, 2024, where African partners discussed enhanced implementation, and the 2024 Summit in , , which hosted the third PGII Leaders' Forum. In the United States, a Special Coordinator within the Department of State leads domestic efforts and liaises with counterparts to advance shared priorities in emerging markets. A PGII Secretariat, established in 2024, further supports implementation by tracking progress, coordinating investments, and reporting to the working group on flagship initiatives like the Lobito Corridor and Trans-Africa Trade and Connectivity Corridor (TCTC). An Expert Group on Development Finance advises on mobilizing resources, contributing to proposals such as the 2024 Joint Action for Sustainable Infrastructure Investment in Africa. These structures emphasize de-risking tools, data-sharing platforms like the African Union Commission/OECD African Virtual Investment Platform (piloting in 2025), and country-led partnerships to ensure alignment and avoid duplication. Investor engagement focuses on catalyzing private capital, which forms the bulk of the $600 billion mobilization target by 2027, through levers like guarantees, grants, and blended instruments to de-risk projects. PGII hosts investor forums, such as those at the 2024 Summit, to solicit private sector input and has spurred commitments from firms including ($4 billion for infrastructure), ($5 billion for digital infrastructure), and . Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are prioritized, as seen in Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) that have engaged groups like the (GFANZ) to secure $10 billion in private funding for Indonesia's energy shift. Collaborations with public development banks and MDBs enable co-financing, exemplified by loans totaling $547.9 million and guarantee platforms expanded to $20 billion annually by decade's end.

Implementation and Projects

Mobilization of Public and Private Capital

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) prioritizes leveraging limited public funds to catalyze larger-scale investments in projects across developing regions, aiming to address a global financing gap estimated at trillions of dollars while adhering to high standards for and . leaders committed to mobilizing up to $600 billion in total financing by 2027, with a heavy emphasis on capital to multiply public contributions through mechanisms such as credit enhancements, , and arrangements involving multilateral development banks. This approach contrasts with grant-heavy models by focusing on returns to ensure scalability, though actual has lagged pledges due to perceived risks in emerging markets. Public capital mobilization centers on bilateral and multilateral commitments, exemplified by the ' pledge of $200 billion over five years from 2022, encompassing loans, guarantees, and equity from agencies like the U.S. Finance Corporation (DFC). For instance, in the Lobito Trans-Africa Corridor project connecting , the of Congo, and , the DFC has committed over $700 million in financing since 2022, including loans for rail rehabilitation and port upgrades to facilitate mineral exports, with these funds designed to attract co-investors by mitigating commercial risks. Similarly, partnerships with institutions like the (IDB) Invest have scaled investments in the , blending public resources to unlock private funding for energy and digital infrastructure. Private capital engagement is facilitated through investor forums and targeted de-risking tools, as demonstrated at the September 2024 PGII Investor Forum, where participants including Brookfield Asset Management and other firms discussed pipelines exceeding initial commitments. announced approximately $2.5 billion in PGII-aligned investments by mid-2023, focusing on completed or announced projects in climate-resilient such as initiatives in . These efforts integrate private actors via public-private partnerships (PPPs), where export credit agencies provide guarantees to cover up to 95% of potential losses, enabling firms to deploy capital in sectors like clean energy and ; however, critics note that private participation remains below targets, with only a fraction of the $600 billion goal realized as of late 2024 due to regulatory hurdles and geopolitical uncertainties.
Key Mobilization MechanismDescriptionExample Commitment
Blended FinancePublic funds de-risk private loans/equityDFC-IDB Invest scaling in ($ billions targeted)
Risk GuaranteesCoverage for political/commercial risks export agencies backing up to 95% losses in PPPs
Investor ForumsPlatforms for deal pipelines2024 yielding discussions on $10+ billion facilitation
Overall, PGII's strategy relies on coordinated actions to align incentives, with extended partners like the contributing through its initiative to amplify private flows toward $600 billion, though empirical progress metrics indicate a need for accelerated deal flow to meet the 2027 benchmark.

Notable Projects and Regional Focus

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) directs investments toward economic corridors in low- and middle-income countries, with primary emphasis on and the region to enhance connectivity, trade, and resource extraction while adhering to standards for and . In , initiatives target and improvements to address deficits, including rail and port upgrades that facilitate mineral exports without exacerbating debt burdens. The focus prioritizes digital , clean energy, and transport links to counterbalance regional dependencies on non-Western financing models. A flagship project in southern and central Africa is the Lobito Corridor, which upgrades a 1,700-kilometer rail line from Angola's port through the and , aiming to connect and mines to global markets via the Atlantic. The announced $4 billion in support in 2023, including $250 million from the Development Finance Corporation for rail rehabilitation, with private sector involvement from and ; a summit co-hosted by the and on December 5, 2024, advanced multi-year financing commitments exceeding $500 million for complementary road and energy infrastructure. This corridor is projected to reduce transport times for minerals by up to 40% compared to routes, supporting annual freight volumes of 50 million tons by 2028. In the , the Economic Corridor in the , announced in April 2024 by the , , and the , encompasses $15.4 billion in investments for rail systems, modern ports, and clean energy projects to boost and agricultural exports. Complementary efforts include the Trans-Caspian Transport Corridor, linking and the to via , , and , with PGII backing for port and rail enhancements to diversify energy and freight routes away from Russian dependencies; initial commitments in 2024 totaled over €1 billion from partners for feasibility studies and integration. infrastructure features prominently, such as a $1 billion Microsoft-G42 investment in for data centers and subsea cables, announced in 2024, to expand broadband access to 20 million users.
ProjectRegionKey ComponentsInvestment Scale (as of 2024)
Lobito CorridorSouthern/Rail upgrade, ports, mining logistics$4+ billion public-private
Economic Corridor (), ports, clean energy$15.4 billion
Trans-Caspian /Ports, , digital links€1+ billion initial
Kenya Digital InvestmentData centers, subsea cables$1 billion
These projects integrate with broader efforts, such as Italy's $8.2 billion Mattei Plan for African energy corridors, emphasizing gas pipelines and renewables to align with PGII's debt-sustainable lending criteria. While receives targeted digital and energy funding, such as in , the aggregate focus remains on (over 40% of announced corridors) and to address estimated $1.7 trillion annual gaps in partner nations.

Achievements and Measured Impact

Funds Committed and Realized Investments

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) has set a collective target of mobilizing up to $600 billion in public and private investments by 2027 to address gaps in developing countries, with an emphasis on leveraging private capital alongside government financing. This figure represents an aspirational goal rather than firm public commitments from members, as aggregate country-specific pledges beyond the remain limited in public disclosure. The , aiming to mobilize $200 billion over five years, reported over $60 billion mobilized as of June 2024—more than double the amount from the prior year—encompassing grants, federal financing from agencies like the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and Export-Import Bank (EXIM), and leverage. Earlier, in May 2023, U.S. mobilization stood at $30 billion. Other contributions include Italy's $320 million allocation for rail upgrades in the Lobito Corridor project in . Realized investments under PGII have focused on specific projects, often blending public guarantees with private funds, though comprehensive disbursement data across the partnership is not centrally tracked or reported. Examples include commitments from private entities like , , and Brookfield totaling $4 billion for general . The Partnership has invested over $350 million in equity across countries including , the , , , , and others.
Project/InitiativeFunding AmountDescriptionSource
Corridor (Italy)$320 millionRail infrastructure upgrades in
Debt Facility (DFC)$250 millionDebt financing for
Solar Farms in ()$900 million development
Acrow Bridge Project ()$363 millionBridge
Digital ()Nearly $5 billionBroadband and connectivity in Kenya, , , ,
Green Industrialization (GEAPP)Up to $100 million (catalyzing $1 billion)Philanthropic capital for green projects
These investments prioritize sectors like , digital connectivity, and , but progress toward the overall $600 billion target has been incremental, with much of the mobilized capital dependent on participation amid challenges in scaling execution.

Contributions to Infrastructure Gaps and Strategic Goals

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) targets persistent deficits in low- and middle-income countries, where annual financing needs for sustainable are estimated at $3-6 through 2030, encompassing sectors such as clean , , digital connectivity, and health systems. By prioritizing private-sector alongside public funds, PGII seeks to address a projected $40 cumulative gap in developing economies by 2035, focusing on projects that enhance economic and service delivery without exacerbating debt burdens. This approach contrasts with state-led models by emphasizing mechanisms, where initial public investments catalyze private capital, as evidenced by the G7's collective pledge to mobilize up to $600 billion by 2027. In practice, PGII has directed resources toward region-specific gaps, such as the Trans-Africa Corridor, where over $560 million in new U.S. funding announced on December 5, 2024, supports rail and port upgrades connecting , of Congo, and to global markets, expected to unlock at least $200 million in additional private for and regional . Similarly, the Clean Energy Fund for Africa and initiatives have committed initial equities exceeding $350 million across , the , , , and , targeting and grid modernization to bridge electrification shortfalls affecting over 700 million people without reliable access. These efforts align with empirical assessments of bottlenecks, where inadequate and networks constrain GDP growth by up to 2% annually in and . Strategically, PGII advances objectives of fostering a rules-based by promoting aligned with high standards, thereby mitigating risks of opaque lending practices that have led to debt distress in over 60 countries. It counters geopolitical dependencies by enabling diversified supply chains in critical minerals and digital , as in the project, which reduces reliance on single corridors vulnerable to political coercion. Through coordination with extended partners, PGII supports broader goals of and , including progress toward UN by integrating climate-resilient designs that avoid lock-in to dependencies. U.S. commitments alone aim for $200 billion mobilized by 2027, underscoring a focus on long-term viability over short-term volume.

Criticisms and Challenges

Doubts on Scale, Feasibility, and Execution

Critics have questioned the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment's (PGII) scale relative to its stated ambitions and competitors like China's (BRI), noting that the G7's $600 billion mobilization target by 2027—primarily through leverage—represents a significant reduction from the initial Build Back Better World (B3W) proposal's $40 trillion goal. This pledge, announced in , relies heavily on catalyzing non-public funds, yet as of mid-2024, realized investments remain limited, with progress reports emphasizing flagship projects rather than aggregate disbursements approaching the target. Feasibility concerns stem from the challenges in attracting private capital to high-risk emerging markets, where PGII's emphasis on stringent standards for , , and labor practices elevates costs and extends timelines compared to less conditional alternatives. Analysts argue that without robust de-risking mechanisms or incentives, participation lags, as evidenced by the initiative's dependence on existing finance institutions like the U.S. Finance Corporation, which have finite capacities. Moreover, coordinating commitments across members and extended partners—such as the , , and —involves divergent national priorities and regulatory hurdles, complicating unified action. Execution has faced delays and fragmentation, with few large-scale projects reaching completion by 2024 despite announcements of initiatives in sectors like clean energy and digital infrastructure. The absence of a centralized PGII fund or streamlined approval processes has led to siloed efforts, where public commitments translate slowly into on-ground implementation, particularly in regions like and where infrastructure gaps are acute. Critics, including those from think tanks, highlight that PGII's project pipeline, while growing, has not demonstrated the rapid deployment seen in the BRI, raising doubts about its ability to deliver tangible outcomes before the 2027 deadline.

Geopolitical Risks and Domestic Priorities

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) carries inherent geopolitical risks arising from its role as a Western-led counterweight to China's (BRI), potentially escalating tensions in regions like the , , and where overlapping interests create zero-sum dynamics. Recipient nations may experience heightened pressure to align with standards on and , risking economic or exclusion from Chinese financing, as seen in cases where BRI participants have faced distress and subsequent geopolitical leverage from . Such competition could exacerbate vulnerabilities and invite hybrid threats, including cyberattacks or local against PGII projects in politically volatile areas. Implementation in geopolitically sensitive corridors, such as the , amplifies these risks, as disruptions from regional conflicts—like those in the —could derail connectivity goals and undermine investor confidence. Moreover, PGII's emphasis on private-sector involvement exposes it to aversion among investors wary of competing directly with state-backed Chinese lending, which often disregards environmental or hurdles. Domestically, PGII contends with competing national priorities in countries, where fiscal constraints and voter demands for internal investments limit sustained commitments. In the United States, critics have highlighted the irony of advancing PGII abroad while domestic infrastructure initiatives, such as the 2021 allocating $1.2 trillion, face delays and funding shortfalls amid a national debt surpassing $35 trillion by mid-2024. European members, grappling with post-Ukraine energy crises and green transition costs estimated at €1 trillion annually through 2030, prioritize regional security over global infrastructure outlays. Electoral cycles further complicate execution, as shifts toward isolationist or cost-conscious policies—evident in recent domestic debates—could erode multilateral resolve, with PGII's $600 billion pledge (largely leveraged rather than direct aid) appearing modest against BRI's scale and vulnerable to budget reallocations. This tension underscores a broader challenge: aligning foreign strategic goals with inward-focused electorates skeptical of overseas spending amid and .

Comparative Analysis with Belt and Road Initiative

Structural and Philosophical Differences

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) operates as a multilateral framework coordinated by the G7 nations—comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States—along with the European Union and invited partners, emphasizing collaborative public-private partnerships to mobilize capital. In contrast, China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched in 2013, functions primarily as a bilateral endeavor driven by the Chinese government through state-owned enterprises and policy banks like the China Development Bank and Export-Import Bank of China, which have extended over $1 trillion in loans to more than 140 countries by 2023. PGII targets $600 billion in total investments by 2027, with $200 billion in public funds leveraging $400 billion from private sources, focusing on selective, high-standard projects rather than the BRI's broader volume of commitments exceeding $5 trillion in planned scope. Structurally, PGII integrates certification mechanisms like the Blue Dot Network to enforce transparency, labor standards, and environmental safeguards, whereas BRI projects often prioritize speed and scale with less uniform oversight, leading to documented cases of opacity in procurement and debt terms. Philosophically, PGII prioritizes sustainable development aligned with international norms such as debt sustainability assessments under the G20 Common Framework and avoidance of predatory lending practices, aiming to address infrastructure gaps without compromising recipient sovereignty or fiscal stability. This contrasts with the BRI's foundational emphasis on export-led growth for China, facilitating overcapacity offloading in sectors like steel and cement while securing resource access and geopolitical leverage, as evidenced by instances of asset concessions following debt defaults, such as Sri Lanka's 99-year lease of Hambantota Port to Chinese firms in 2017. PGII extends beyond physical "hard" infrastructure—BRI's core focus on ports, railways, and power plants—to include "soft" domains like digital connectivity without backdoors for surveillance and health systems resilient to pandemics, reflecting a commitment to universal values over unilateral influence. BRI's approach, while delivering rapid connectivity in underserved regions, has drawn scrutiny for environmental degradation and corruption risks in up to 35% of projects per independent audits, underscoring divergent priorities between volume-driven expansion and quality-oriented resilience.

Performance Metrics and Long-Term Viability

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) has set a collective target of mobilizing up to $600 billion in public and private financing by 2027 to address gaps in low- and middle-income countries, with the committing to catalyze $200 billion of that total, primarily through leverage. However, as of mid-2024, realized investments have fallen short of this ambition, with announced projects—such as the Lobito Trans-Africa Corridor involving rail and port upgrades in , of , and —representing commitments in the range of tens of billions rather than the pledged scale, and many still in feasibility or environmental assessment phases without full financial closure. Independent evaluations, including compliance tracking, indicate full adherence to broad mobilization pledges by participating nations like , but these metrics emphasize policy commitments over disbursed capital or completed , highlighting a gap between rhetoric and on-ground execution. Performance indicators reveal modest progress in project pipelines, with over a dozen flagship initiatives announced since 2022 focusing on sectors like clean energy, digital connectivity, and climate-resilient transport, yet completion rates remain low due to protracted and risk assessments required for high-standards adherence. Impact assessments are preliminary, showing potential benefits in targeted areas such as retrofitting, but quantifiable outcomes—like gigawatts of power added or kilometers of road built—are sparse, as many efforts prioritize upstream reforms over immediate . Critics from think tanks note that actual private capital inflows have been constrained, with investor forums in yielding discussions but limited new pledges, underscoring execution hurdles in de-risking volatile markets. Long-term viability faces structural challenges, including reliance on fragmented coordination versus centralized models elsewhere, which has slowed scaling and private sector engagement amid geopolitical risks and high perceived hazards in recipient nations. While PGII's emphasis on , , and local ownership could foster enduring partnerships by mitigating distress—unlike some alternatives—sustained success requires enhanced de-risking tools, such as guarantees from finance institutions, and consistent political backing across electoral cycles to bridge the estimated at trillions globally. Absent accelerated , the initiative risks limited strategic influence, though its quality-focused approach may yield higher in delivered projects compared to volume-driven efforts.

References

  1. [1]
    FACT SHEET: President Biden and G7 Leaders Formally Launch ...
    Jun 26, 2022 · Today, President Biden will announce that the U.S. aims to mobilize $200 billion for PGII over the next 5 years through grants, Federal ...Missing: purpose | Show results with:purpose
  2. [2]
    Statement by Secretary Yellen on President Biden's Announcement ...
    Jun 26, 2022 · PGII will mobilize billions of dollars of investment and support for policy and technical assistance toward four priority areas: climate and ...Missing: purpose | Show results with:purpose
  3. [3]
    Comparing the Belt Road Initiative and the Partnership for Global ...
    Nov 14, 2022 · The BRI has largely supported “hard” infrastructure projects such as ports, roads, dams, railways, electric power plants and telecommunication facilities.
  4. [4]
    Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment at the G7 Summit
    May 20, 2023 · To date, the United States has mobilized $30 billion through grants, federal financing, and leveraging private sector investments towards PGII.Missing: purpose | Show results with:purpose
  5. [5]
    Building Bridges? PGII versus BRI - Brookings Institution
    Sep 29, 2022 · PGII versus BRI is a false dichotomy. Ironically, if successful, PGII could achieve something potentially more meaningful than initially intended through its ...
  6. [6]
    The PGII consolidates Western connectivity initiatives
    Jul 8, 2024 · This article analyses the consolidation of Western connectivity initiatives under the G7's consolidated PGII since 2022 and evaluates the current status of its ...
  7. [7]
    China's Massive Belt and Road Initiative
    The Belt and Road Initiative is a massive China-led infrastructure project that aims to stretch around the globe. · Some analysts see the project as a disturbing ...
  8. [8]
    Debt Distress on the Road to “Belt and Road” - Wilson Center
    Jan 16, 2024 · Ten years into the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), 80% of China's government loans to developing countries have gone to nations in debt distress.Missing: transparency | Show results with:transparency
  9. [9]
    Debunking the Myth of 'Debt-trap Diplomacy' - Chatham House
    Aug 19, 2020 · Critics of the BRI accuse China of pursuing a policy of 'debt-trap diplomacy': luring poor, developing countries into agreeing unsustainable loans to pursue ...3. Governing the Belt and Road · 5. Malaysia and the BRI · 4. Sri Lanka and the BRI
  10. [10]
    It's a (Debt) Trap! Managing China-IMF Cooperation Across the Belt ...
    Oct 17, 2018 · The IMF has scrutinized multiple aspects of the BRI, repeatedly warning of unsustainable debt levels, predatory lending, and the lack of project ...
  11. [11]
    Findings | China's Belt and Road: Implications for the United States
    The trajectory of BRI in Kenya belies fears of a neocolonial debt trap, but the initiative's lack of transparency has exacerbated Kenya's ...
  12. [12]
    The G7's New Global Infrastructure Initiative - CSIS
    Jun 15, 2021 · G7 leaders unveiled an initiative to support global infrastructure, launched as China's Belt and Road Initiative pulls back.
  13. [13]
    The G7's $600 billion response to China's Belt and Road Initiative is ...
    Nov 8, 2022 · A values-driven, high-impact, and transparent infrastructure partnership to meet the enormous infrastructure needs of low- and middle-income countries.Missing: context | Show results with:context
  14. [14]
    FACT SHEET: President Biden and G7 Leaders Launch Build Back ...
    Jun 12, 2021 · President Biden and G7 partners agreed to launch the bold new global infrastructure initiative Build Back Better World (B3W).
  15. [15]
    The Belt and Road Initiative and Partnership for Global Infrastructure ...
    This paper examines the impact of BRI on competitive strategies of the United States and its partners in response to China's growing influence.Missing: achievements controversies
  16. [16]
    Connecting the dots on the Blue Dot Network - Lowy Institute
    Nov 12, 2019 · The US, Australia, and Japan have joined together to establish a trilateral “Blue Dot Network” to help develop infrastructure “in the Indo-Pacific and around ...
  17. [17]
    A hidden key to the G7's infrastructure ambitions: Blue Dot Network
    Jun 12, 2021 · In November 2019, the United States, Japan, and Australia launched the Blue Dot Network (BDN)—named for the view of earth from space as a mere ...
  18. [18]
    About Us - Blue Dot Network
    The Blue Dot Network is a voluntary, private-sector-focused and government-supported certification scheme for infrastructure projects.
  19. [19]
    Blue Dot Network launched to increase infrastructure investment in ...
    Apr 9, 2024 · The United Kingdom was the first country to join after the initiative was created in 2019. Spain, Switzerland and Türkiye have also since ...
  20. [20]
    Opportunities for Increased Multilateral Engagement with B3W - CSIS
    May 6, 2022 · The G7 unveiled the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative, which seeks to leverage the private sector for $40 trillion in infrastructure investment by 2035.
  21. [21]
    Future Considerations for the Partnership on Global Infrastructure ...
    Jun 29, 2022 · At the center of PGII is a different approach to financing infrastructure projects: using limited official finance to catalyze greater volumes ...Missing: criticisms controversies
  22. [22]
    Infrastructure Investment 101: What is the Blue Dot Network and ...
    Aug 15, 2024 · Founded in 2019, the Blue Dot Network is a seven-country agreement to certify infrastructure projects meeting agreed-upon standards. The Network ...
  23. [23]
    G7 summit, Schloss Elmau - consilium.europa.eu
    Jun 26, 2022 · The G7 Summit 2022 took place from 26 to 28 June at Schloss Elmau in Germany. The G7 demonstrated unity in its belief in democracy and the ...
  24. [24]
    Launch of the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment
    At the G7 Leaders' Summit in Schloss Elmau, Leaders formally launched the Partnership for Global Infrastructure (PGII) to mobilize hundreds of billions of ...
  25. [25]
    How the G7's $600 billion can have rapid impact - E3G
    Jul 8, 2022 · At the G7 Leaders Summit in June, leaders agreed to “collectively mobilise up to $600 billion in public and private investments” for infrastructure between now ...
  26. [26]
    G7 Leaders' Communiqué (28/06/2022)
    Jun 28, 2022 · We, the Leaders of the Group of Seven (G7), met in Elmau on 26-28 June 2022, at a critical juncture for the global community, to make progress ...
  27. [27]
    FACT SHEET: The 2023 G7 Summit in Hiroshima, Japan
    May 21, 2023 · G7 leaders have exceeded the $14 billion commitment announced at the 2022 G7 Elmau Summit, mobilizing $14.9 billion for food security. The ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] 2 G7 Hiroshima Summit - Discussions and Outcomes in the Field
    Prime Minister Kishida pointed out the marked increase in the estimated Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) financing gap while the year 2023 marks the midpoint.
  29. [29]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Apulia G7 Leaders' Communiqué Preamble - consilium.europa.eu
    The G7 Partnership for Global. Infrastructure and Investment (PGII), including initiatives such as the EU Global Gateway, offer a framework we will use to ...
  31. [31]
    Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment at the G7 Summit
    Jun 13, 2024 · This marked the third consecutive G7 side event on PGI since the G7 Leaders launched the initiative in 2022 at Elmau. During the Fasano Summit ...Missing: formal | Show results with:formal
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Factsheet on the G7 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and ...
    Oct 24, 2024 · The PGII represents a strategic opportunity for developing countries to accelerate progress towards achieving the. Sustainable Development Goals ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Factsheet on the G7 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and ...
    Through this partnership, the G7 aims to mobilize up to USD 600 billion by 2027 in order to narrow the infrastructure investment gap in partner countries. Since ...Missing: purpose | Show results with:purpose
  34. [34]
    Memorandum on the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and ...
    Jun 26, 2022 · The PGII will mobilize public and private resources to meet key infrastructure needs, while enhancing American competitiveness in international ...
  35. [35]
    Priority Areas—Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the ...
    PGI focuses on developing economic corridors – geographic areas with integrated investments that are designed to stimulate economic development.
  36. [36]
    Factsheet on the G7 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and ...
    May 20, 2023 · Through this partnership, the G7 aims to mobilize up to USD 600 billion by 2027 in order to narrow the infrastructure investment gap in partner ...Missing: achievements criticisms controversies<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment - Federal Register
    Jun 30, 2022 · Through the PGII, the United States and like-minded partners will emphasize high-standards and quality investments in resilient infrastructure.
  38. [38]
    Infrastructure initiatives | BMZ
    All of the PGIIG7 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment 's projects meet high standards in terms of transparency, good governance, the climate ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    MCC Statement of Support for the Partnership for Global ...
    Jun 26, 2022 · ... Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment ... high standards for transparency, governance, and environmental and social performance.
  40. [40]
    Statement from DFC CEO Nathan on the Launch of the G7 ...
    Jun 26, 2022 · G7 Leaders formally launched PGII to mobilize hundreds of billions of dollars and deliver quality, sustainable infrastructure that makes a ...Missing: purpose | Show results with:purpose
  41. [41]
    Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global ...
    Through PGI, the U.S. government alongside our G7 partners aims to mobilize $600 billion over the next five years in global infrastructure investments that will ...Missing: primary goals
  42. [42]
    FACT SHEET: Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment ...
    Dec 3, 2024 · Through PGI—a bipartisan initiative in partnership with G7+, for strategic, values-driven, and high-standard infrastructure and investment ...
  43. [43]
    EU contribution to the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and ...
    The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) is a shared G7 commitment to advance public and private investments in sustainable, inclusive, ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  44. [44]
    Remarks by Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo at the ...
    Sep 25, 2024 · Along with mobilizing private capital toward PGI investments, we have also put private capital mobilization at the heart of our multilateral ...
  45. [45]
    Africa: The impact of the G7's multi-billion dollar plan on the ...
    Jul 25, 2022 · In 2022, the US announced it would mobilise USD 200 billion over the next five years as part of the PGII, in the form of grants, financing and ...
  46. [46]
    FACT SHEET: Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment ...
    Dec 3, 2024 · This will further expand DFC's portfolio of investments in Angola – more than $700 million in commitments – all of which have been committed ...
  47. [47]
    Readout of 2024 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and ...
    Sep 27, 2024 · Readout of 2024 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGI) Investor Forum · Mark Carney, Chair, Brookfield Asset Management · Jim ...
  48. [48]
    2024 G7 Apulia Summit Final Compliance Report: PGII
    Jun 9, 2025 · At the 2024 Apulia Summit, members “reaffirm[ed] [their] commitment to mobilize up to USD 600 billion through the PGII by 2027 towards ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] 2024 JOINT ACTION PROPOSAL FOR SUSTAINABLE ...
    the declaration of Prime Minister Kishida Fumio at the G7 Hiroshima Summit in May 2023, which stated that the G7 would contribute to the sustainable ...
  50. [50]
    The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) is a ...
    Oct 23, 2024 · Since its launch at the G7 Elmau Summit in 2022, the PGII has been delivering investments across key priority areas to help address climate ...Missing: formal | Show results with:formal
  51. [51]
    FACT SHEET: Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment ...
    Dec 5, 2024 · Through PGI—a bipartisan initiative in partnership with G7+, for strategic, values-driven, and high-standard infrastructure and investment in ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) A West's ...
    Sep 20, 2022 · 20 September 2022​​ of $125 billion in 2015 to around $50 to 55 billion in 2021. 15 Several partner countries renegotiated their loans with China ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) and ...
    Mar 6, 2023 · Since its announcement, the PGII has attracted international comment on its geostrategic implications and comparative analysis due to its scale, ...Missing: achievements criticisms
  54. [54]
    Annex I Factsheet on the G7 Partnership for Global Infrastructure ...
    Oct 22, 2024 · On the occasion of the 2024 G7 Summit in Borgo Egnazia, aPGII side event was held with the participation of G7 Leaders, private sector ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Will the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment be a ...
    Jul 28, 2022 · Given today's geopolitical and economic landscape, the PGII also faces significant obstacles. Other than the fact that its planned spending ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Attracting Investors: How the Partnership for Global Infrastructure ...
    Oct 17, 2022 · 61 The. Blue Dot Network is a multilateral effort to certify infrastructure projects that meet certain quality standards.62 Projects ...Missing: precursors | Show results with:precursors
  57. [57]
    Enabling a Better Offer: How Does the West Counter Belt and Road?
    May 16, 2024 · BRI has undergone revisions over the years. A 2021 Study by AidData found that 35% of BRI projects experienced implementation issues such as ...
  58. [58]
    Doing as the Romans do: Recommendations for the infrastructure ...
    Jul 2, 2024 · The 2024 G7 Leaders' Summit in Apulia, Italy, in June 2024 again reaffirmed the group's commitment to PGII and investments across Africa ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    IntelBrief: G7 Countries Have a Plan to Counter China's Belt and ...
    Jul 5, 2022 · Still, numerous challenges exist for the PGII in terms of how effective of an alternative it will prove to be when competing with China's BRI.
  60. [60]
    West Still Lacks Adequate Response to BRI - Wilson Center
    Jan 11, 2024 · The BRI is a flawed model with often-questionable outcomes, it is usually the “least worst” (and sometimes only) route to financing major infrastructure ...
  61. [61]
    Unveiling the global trading risk of China's Belt and Road initiative
    Jul 24, 2025 · To counter the BRI, Western nations have launched the G7's Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment, offering alternative ...
  62. [62]
    Infrastructure and geopolitics: four key shifts - Control Risks
    Apr 1, 2025 · ... Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII). The original memorandum of understanding for IMEC included plans for pipelines ...
  63. [63]
    The G7 Exposed the Health Dangers of a Multi-Crisis World
    Aug 6, 2024 · Domestic politics within G7 countries threaten the group's ability to catalyze collective action. The G7, and the cooperative efforts it ...
  64. [64]
    G7's $600 billion PGII met with skepticism, mockery - Global Times
    Jun 27, 2022 · Economists expressed skepticism over the feasibility of such a program, citing reasons such as the US' strained government debt status, poor infrastructure ...
  65. [65]
    The Belt and Road Initiative and the Partnership for Global ...
    Nov 14, 2022 · A new working paper by Oyintarelado (Tarela) Moses and Keren Zhu describes the development and compares the features of the BRI and the PGII.
  66. [66]
    A Comparative Analysis of the Belt and Road Initiative with Other ...
    This review investigates how global and regional infrastructure initiatives—namely PGII/BDN, GG, FOIP/PQI, and 3SI—compare with the BRI in terms of development ...
  67. [67]
    Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) A West's ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · PGII is aimed to deliver game-changing projects to close infrastructure gaps in developing countries; it conforms with the Biden ...Missing: achievements controversies
  68. [68]
    Why the West's alternative to China's international infrastructure ...
    Dec 22, 2023 · As geopolitical rivalry intensifies, Western states have moved to compete with China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    How Southeast Asia Will Benefit from the G7's Infrastructure and ...
    Jul 29, 2022 · Critics have pilloried the Group of Seven's Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment for its lack of scale and tardiness.