Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

CCIR System B

CCIR System B is an analog monochrome television broadcasting standard defined by the International Radio Consultative Committee (CCIR), now part of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-R), characterized by 625 lines per picture, a 2:1 interlace ratio, a 50 Hz field frequency, a 15.625 kHz line frequency, and a 7 MHz channel bandwidth with 5 MHz nominal video bandwidth and 0.75 MHz vestigial sideband. It employs negative amplitude modulation (C3F) for the vision signal, with the sound carrier offset at +5.5 MHz relative to the vision carrier, and was primarily transmitted in VHF Bands I and III. Originally developed for black-and-white broadcasts, the system was later adapted for color television compatible with both PAL and SECAM encoding schemes, maintaining a 4:3 aspect ratio. The origins of System B trace back to the post-World War II era, when the CCIR sought to standardize television transmission for international program exchange. A 625-line proposal, adapted from the U.S. system by a Soviet engineer around 1946, gained traction and was discussed at the CCIR's meeting in July 1948, where further study was recommended. By the London meeting in May 1950, a majority supported the 625-line standard, leading to its formalization through the Gerber sub-commission in July 1950, which unified parameters among early adopters including , , , the , , and . Although the CCIR lacked enforcement power, System B emerged as the first internationally accepted 625-line standard, promulgated in 1950 and influencing global analog TV development. At its peak, System B was the most widely adopted standard, utilized in over 50 countries across (such as , the , and ), (including and ), Asia (like and ), and ( and , though with variations). It facilitated VHF transmissions that supported high-quality images and, post-1960s, color broadcasts, contributing to the harmonization of European until the transition in the early . The standard's 50 Hz aligned with European mains frequency, reducing flicker and enabling compatibility with power grids, while its specifications influenced subsequent recommendations like BT.470 for conventional systems.

History and Development

Origins and Early Proposals

The development of CCIR System B originated from international efforts to standardize broadcasting in post-World War II Europe, amid competing national proposals for line resolution and bandwidth. Early work on high-resolution television systems began in the during the mid-1940s, where engineers developed a 625-line standard based on pre-war research, achieving regular broadcasts by 1949. This system was proposed internationally at the CCIR's Fifth Plenary Assembly in in 1948, where representatives from the , ten European countries, and operating organizations discussed technical aspects for program interchange. Although no unified standard emerged—due to divergences such as the UK's 405-line system, France's experimental transmissions, and the US's 525-line —some European nations, including the , advocated for the 625-line format with an initial 8 MHz channel bandwidth to support higher picture quality. Following the meeting, the CCIR established Study Group 11 on television broadcasting to further evaluate systems. At the group's first session in in 1949, four primary formats were reviewed: the 405-line (), 525-line (), 625-line (proposed by Soviet and engineers as experimental), and 819-line (). Demonstrations of these systems occurred across and the in spring 1950, highlighting the 625-line's advantages in resolution for continental broadcasting. By May 1950, at a study group meeting, seven continental European countries (, , , , , , and ) endorsed the 625-line system for regional standardization, inviting and the to join while noting its compatibility with the 525-line for international exchange. Common parameters like 2:1 interlacing, a 4:3 , and vestigial sideband transmission were reaffirmed to facilitate . The pivotal advancement came at a CCIR meeting in in 1950, where Swiss engineer Dr. W. Gerber proposed a refined 625-line system optimized for VHF . Known initially as the "Gerber ," it reduced the channel bandwidth to 7 MHz—allowing three channels within the 21 MHz VHF allocation—while maintaining 50 fields per second and negative video for robust signal propagation. This modification addressed practical concerns like and simplicity, drawing on prior Soviet and work but tailored for broader adoption. The proposal gained traction among continental nations, setting the foundation for System B's designation in subsequent CCIR documents. At the CCIR's Sixth Plenary in in 1951, delegates achieved broad consensus on the Gerber Standard's characteristics, designating it as System B for VHF television. Most European countries committed to its implementation, prioritizing it over lower-line systems for future color adaptations, though the retained its standard due to domestic infrastructure. This marked the first internationally accepted 625-line broadcasting norm, influencing over 100 countries by the and enabling cross-border program sharing.

Standardization Process

The standardization of CCIR System B, a 625-line monochrome television broadcast standard, emerged from international efforts within the International Radio Consultative Committee (CCIR), the predecessor to the ITU Radiocommunication Sector, to harmonize technical parameters for cross-border program exchange and equipment compatibility. The process began at the CCIR's Vth Plenary Assembly in in July 1948, where a Soviet proposed the 625-line , drawing from the U.S. system but adapted for European needs; this proposal received support from due to its alignment with American technology. No was reached at that time, as countries like (819 lines) and the (405 lines) advocated for their existing systems. Progress accelerated at the subsequent meeting in in May 1950, where a favored the 625-line approach, prompting the formation of a sub-commission to refine its specifications. This group convened in from July 24 to 28, 1950, focusing on unifying parameters such as line count, field frequency, and to facilitate . The sub-commission's work laid the groundwork for formal designation, though full agreement remained elusive amid competing national interests. The pivotal moment came at the CCIR's VIth Plenary Assembly in in May 1951, where existing VHF broadcast standards were officially classified and detailed in key documents. Recommendation No. 82, titled "Television Transmission Standards," established general principles including a 4:3 , 2:1 interlacing, amplitude-modulated vision carrier with vestigial sideband transmission, and fixed , independent of power supply frequency. Complementing this, Report No. 15 from XI provided technical specifications for four monochrome systems, with the 625-line variant—featuring a 5 MHz video , 7 MHz width, +5.5 MHz sound carrier offset, 50 Hz field frequency, and negative —unanimously adopted and later designated as System B (originally the "Gerber Standard"). This classification aimed to enable program interchange but did not mandate universal adoption, resulting in regional variations across . Subsequent CCIR activities, including study programs on long-distance (No. 32) and bandwidth (No. 35), built on these foundations to refine System B for practical deployment, emphasizing signal-to-noise ratios and quality assessments without altering core parameters. By the , System B gained widespread use in countries like , , and , influencing later color adaptations, though the CCIR's advisory role limited enforcement.

Technical Specifications

Video Characteristics

CCIR System B employs a 625-line , with each consisting of 625 total lines, of which 576 are typically active for the visible picture. The system uses 2:1 interlacing, dividing each into two fields that are alternately scanned, resulting in an effective that reduces flicker while maintaining detail. The field is 50 Hz, corresponding to a frame rate of 25 pictures per second, synchronized to the mains in many adopting regions for minimal . The line is precisely 15.625 kHz, with a tolerance of ±0.02% to ensure stable across receivers. Scanning proceeds from left to right and top to bottom, adhering to progressive field alternation within the interlaced structure. The aspect ratio is 4:3, providing a rectangular frame suitable for early television displays and compatible with subsequent color adaptations. The nominal video bandwidth is 5 MHz, allowing for sufficient horizontal resolution while fitting within the 7 MHz channel allocation typical of VHF Band III transmissions. In terms of signal levels, the blanking level is set at 0%, peak white at 100%, and the synchronizing level at -43% relative to blanking, ensuring clear separation of video content from timing pulses. The difference between black and blanking levels is 0%, minimizing visible artifacts during non-picture intervals. The system assumes a display device gamma of 2.8, with the transmitted signal pre-compensated to achieve linear light output on cathode-ray tube receivers. Horizontal scanning occurs over a period of 64 μs per line, with active video lasting approximately 52 μs to accommodate sync and blanking intervals. Vertical synchronization uses a of 160 μs, serrated for identification, while horizontal sync pulses measure 4.7 μs. These parameters ensure robust in broadcasts, forming the foundation for later color extensions like PAL.

Audio Characteristics

CCIR System B utilizes (F3) for its audio transmission, with the sound carrier positioned 5.5 MHz above the vision carrier frequency. This offset ensures separation from the video signal while fitting within the 7 MHz channel allocated for the system. The modulation employs a maximum of ±50 kHz, which supports a monophonic audio of approximately 40 Hz to 15 kHz, providing adequate fidelity for broadcast audio. To enhance noise performance, a 50 µs pre-emphasis network is applied to the before , boosting higher frequencies and compensating for the natural in transmission. The de-emphasis curve in receivers reverses this process, resulting in a flat overall response and improved , typically exceeding 50 dB weighted. The ratio of between vision and sound signals is recommended between 10:1 and 20:1 to balance coverage and . For stereophonic and multisound capabilities, System B accommodates extensions as outlined in Recommendation BS.707, including a two-carrier system for analog stereo. In this setup, the primary at 5.5 MHz carries the sum (L + R) signal with ±50 kHz deviation, while a secondary carrier at 5.742 MHz (offset by 242.1875 kHz) transmits the (L - R) signal, enabling compatible mono on the first carrier. Alternatively, the NICAM 728 can be used, embedding two high-quality audio channels (14 bits/sample, 32 kHz sampling) on a near 6.0 MHz using differential , with the analog serving as a fallback. These adaptations maintain with existing monophonic receivers.

Color Television Adaptations

PAL Implementation

The PAL (Phase Alternating Line) color encoding system was implemented on CCIR System B to enable compatible broadcasting, superimposing information onto the existing signal without requiring changes to the fundamental 625-line, 50 Hz frame structure or 7 MHz channel bandwidth. This adaptation ensured backward compatibility with System B receivers, which ignored the added color subcarrier as high-frequency noise. The implementation was standardized by the CCIR (now ITU-R) in Recommendation BT.470, first adopted in and refined through subsequent revisions, with widespread deployment beginning in the late in . In the B/PAL variant, the composite video signal combines the (Y') component—limited to a nominal of 5 MHz—with (U' and V') signals modulated as (QAM) on a suppressed-carrier subcarrier at precisely 4,433,618.75 Hz (±5 Hz tolerance). This frequency, derived as 1135/4 times the line frequency (15.625 kHz), positions the sidebands (approximately ±1.3 MHz around the subcarrier) within the to minimize visible patterns, known as cross-color artifacts. The V' (in-phase with ) component alternates by 180° on alternate lines, while the U' (quadrature to ) remains fixed; this alternation allows simple averaging in the to correct errors from , a key advantage over . The overall signal amplitude, including excursions, reaches up to 133% of the monochrome peak level to accommodate color without clipping. The sound carrier remains at 5.5 MHz above the video carrier, using (FM) with a deviation of ±50 kHz, identical to the monochrome System B specification for a 15 kHz audio . In some B/PAL implementations, particularly for bilingual broadcasts, a second FM sound subcarrier was added at 5.742 MHz (offset by 0.242 MHz from the primary) to carry an independent audio channel, though this was not universal and often optional in early deployments. and blanking intervals follow the monochrome standards, with the color burst—a 10-cycle reference signal at the subcarrier frequency—inserted during the horizontal blanking period (lines 1-19 per field) at a of ±135° relative to the U' axis, alternating per line to match the PAL switching. is 2.8, as in the monochrome standard, to optimize reproduction under illuminant D65 reference white. Key parameters for B/PAL, as defined in CCIR standards, ensure stable decoding:
ParameterValueNotes
Lines per frame625 (576 active)Identical to monochrome System B
Field frequency50 HzInterlaced scanning
Color subcarrier frequency4.43361875 MHzPrecision to avoid dot crawl
Chrominance bandwidth1.3 MHz (each sideband)Filtered to reduce crosstalk
Burst amplitudeApproximately 43% (3/7) of luminance excursion ±10%Ensures phase lock in decoder
Primary colors (CIE 1931)R: (0.64, 0.33); G: (0.29, 0.60); B: (0.15, 0.06)EBU-standard for
This table highlights the integration of color without altering the core transmission framework. Transmission deviations were minimized through pre-emphasis (50 µs ) on the signal to combat , and receiver IF bandwidths were typically set to 6-7 MHz to accommodate the full composite spectrum.

SECAM Implementation

SECAM, or Séquentiel Couleur à Mémoire, was adapted to CCIR System B to provide broadcasting while maintaining with existing receivers. This implementation retained the core monochrome specifications of System B, including 625 interlaced lines per frame, a 50 Hz field rate, and a 5 MHz video , with negative video . The addition of color involved frequency-modulating the signals onto two subcarriers within the available , ensuring as monochrome sets could ignore the color information. In System B, the signals D_R' (R-Y weighted) and D_B' (B-Y weighted) are transmitted alternately on successive lines using . One subcarrier operates at 4.25 MHz for the D_B' signal, and the other at 4.40625 MHz for the D_R' signal, with maximum frequency deviations of 350 kHz and 500 kHz in opposite directions for each signal to encode the amplitude variations. These subcarriers are phase-locked to the line frequency of 15.625 kHz, and a line-sequential switching ensures that each line carries only one color component, requiring a one-line in the to reconstruct the full color picture. The signal E_Y' remains unchanged from the standard, with levels set at 0% for blanking, 100% for peak white, and -43% for sync. Audio transmission uses on a 5.5 MHz , identical to the monochrome version. To address transmission impairments like group delay distortion, System B incorporates a Group Delay Correction (GCR) signal, inserted on line 318 of each . This signal alternates in between frames and follows a specific with a nominal of 700 mV peak-to-peak, aiding receivers in automatic equalization of the channels. The GCR is placed on a starting at 10.5 µs after the line sync leading edge, with a duration of approximately 23.23 µs, ensuring precise timing for color fidelity. Adoption of SECAM System B occurred primarily in select countries across , the , and parts of and , often in VHF bands (channels 1-13). Notable implementations include (VHF I/III), (VHF I/III), (VHF I/III), (VHF and UHF), (VHF I/III and UHF), and (VHF I/III), where it coexisted with or transitioned from monochrome broadcasts. Greece utilized B/SECAM on VHF before shifting to G/SECAM on UHF. This variant was chosen in regions influenced by broadcasting technology, providing robust performance in negative modulation environments despite the narrower 5 MHz bandwidth compared to other SECAM systems like L (which uses 6 MHz). By the early , many of these areas began migrating to digital standards, phasing out analog SECAM.

Transmission Standards

VHF Channel Allocations

CCIR System B, a 625-line standard with 50 fields per second, utilized VHF frequencies in Bands I and III for broadcasting in many European countries. These bands were allocated to accommodate the system's 7 MHz bandwidth, which included a 5 MHz video signal, a 5.5 MHz separation between the video and audio , and a vestigial of 0.75 MHz below the video . The video was positioned 1.25 MHz above the lower edge, while the audio was 5.5 MHz above the video , ensuring compatibility with the negative modulation for video and for audio. Band I spanned approximately 47 to 68 MHz and supported lower-numbered channels suitable for early VHF transmissions, offering better propagation for regional coverage but limited capacity due to fewer channels. , from 174 to 230 MHz, provided additional channels for denser urban broadcasting needs, with improved antenna efficiency at higher frequencies. Channel spacing of 7 MHz allowed interleaving with other services like radio in Band II (87.5-108 MHz), though Band II itself was not used for TV in System B. Regional variations existed; for instance, employed additional low-band channels A and B in for specific allocations. The following table summarizes the standard VHF allocations for System B, including boundaries, video , and audio frequencies:
Boundaries (MHz)Video (MHz)Audio (MHz)
247–5448.2553.75
354–6155.2560.75
461–6862.2567.75
5174–181175.25180.75
6181–188182.25187.75
7188–195189.25194.75
8195–202196.25201.75
9202–209203.25208.75
10209–216210.25215.75
11216–223217.25222.75
12223–230224.25229.75
These allocations were defined to minimize and align with agreements under the ITU, facilitating cross-border in . Some countries, like , used non-standard such as M4 (162–169 MHz) alongside System B. Dual-sound systems, including A2 stereo or NICAM , were later incorporated without altering the core VHF plan.

UHF Variants and Adjustments

While CCIR System B was primarily defined for VHF with a 7 MHz , its adaptation for UHF required adjustments to align with the higher bands (typically 470-862 MHz) and planning agreements, such as the Stockholm Plan of 1961. In most implementations, the core video parameters—625 lines, 50 Hz field rate, 5 MHz video , and 5.5 MHz audio carrier offset—remained unchanged to ensure compatibility with existing equipment. However, the primary adjustment was in spacing and to optimize spectrum use in the denser UHF allocations. In European countries adopting System B on VHF, the UHF variant typically shifted to an 8 MHz bandwidth, effectively transitioning to the closely related System G for UHF bands and . This wider bandwidth accommodated the vestigial sideband structure while providing additional guard bands to reduce in the crowded UHF . For instance, the vision carrier was positioned 1.25 MHz above the lower edge of the , with the sound carrier at +5.5 MHz, but the extended bandwidth allowed for a total occupied of 8 MHz per , starting from frequencies like 471.25 MHz for 21. This adjustment facilitated harmonized planning across borders and supported higher power levels for UHF , which suffers more than VHF. In contrast, countries in the region, such as and , implemented UHF variants of System B with the original 7 MHz channel bandwidth to maintain simplicity in tuner design and minimize spectrum demands. In , UHF channels began with a video carrier at 527.25 MHz for channel 28, with 7 MHz spacing extending up to channel 69 at 841.25 MHz, allowing direct compatibility with VHF receivers without major modifications. Similar adjustments applied in , where UHF allocations followed the 7 MHz raster from 470 MHz onward, prioritizing cost-effective deployment in diverse terrains. These narrower channels, however, necessitated stricter emission masks to control , with vestigial attenuation specified at least 20 at -1.25 MHz from the vision . Additional UHF-specific adjustments included enhanced transmitter linearity to handle the higher frequencies, where and group delay variations could distort the signal more readily. Power ratios between vision and sound carriers were often tightened to 10:1 in UHF operations to improve audio quality over longer distances, and pre-emphasis curves were occasionally modified for better signal-to-noise ratios in urban environments. These variants ensured System B's flexibility across bands while adhering to CCIR recommendations for and color () compatibility.

Regional Adoption

Europe and North Africa

CCIR System B, a 625-line monochrome television standard with 7 MHz channel bandwidth, became the predominant broadcast system in much of during the post-World War II era, serving as the foundation for subsequent color transmissions. Its adoption was driven by international agreements under the (ITU), which facilitated cross-border program exchange and infrastructure compatibility. By the mid-1950s, the system had been implemented in VHF allocations across , enabling the rapid expansion of national broadcasting networks. In Western and Central Europe, System B was paired with PAL color encoding in VHF transmissions, while UHF often utilized the compatible System G variant. Key adopters included , , , , , the Netherlands, , , , , and , where it supported early public service broadcasters like ARD in and RAI in . Some countries, such as and , adapted it with SECAM color for VHF, reflecting political alignments during the era that influenced standard choices. Eastern European nations like and also employed System B with PAL, though adoption timelines varied due to economic and infrastructural constraints. notably diverged, opting for the 819-line System E/L with , but neighboring regions maintained System B for . Ireland and the used the related 625-line System I with PAL, minimizing differences in line count and field rate.
CountryVHF System (Color)UHF System (Color)Notes on Adoption
B/PALG/PALUpdated implementation by 1996
B/PALG/PALFM stereophonic sound carrier added
B/PALH/PALUpdated in 1993
B/PALG/PALUpdated in 1993
B/PALG/PALDigital sound carrier approved
B/PALG/PALFM stereophonic sound carrier added
B/SECAMG/SECAMSECAM for compatibility with Eastern bloc
B/PALG/PALDigital sound carrier approved
B/PALG/PALFM stereophonic sound carrier added
B/PALG/PALDual compatibility with SECAM in some areas
B/PALG/PALFM stereophonic sound carrier added
B/PALG/PALDigital sound carrier approved
B/PALG/PALStandard VHF/UHF deployment
B/PALG/PALDigital sound carrier approved
B/PALG/PALDigital sound carrier approved
B/PALG/PALPlanned FM sound carriers
This table summarizes VHF and UHF implementations as of 1998, highlighting System B's role in VHF for most nations. In , System B saw adoption influenced by European colonial legacies and regional broadcasting conferences, particularly through the African Broadcasting Union (AFBU). Countries like , , and integrated it into their national systems during the 1960s and 1970s, often with PAL or color to align with Mediterranean neighbors. employed a hybrid of Systems B and G with , supporting both local and rebroadcast content from . 's use of B/PAL on VHF facilitated imports from PAL-using European broadcasters, while mixed for national programming and PAL for international feeds. These adaptations ensured compatibility with Euro-Mediterranean program exchanges, though terrain challenges in the region prompted adjustments to transmitter spacing and power levels as per CCIR guidelines. By the late , System B underpinned the transition to digital in these areas, with analog shutdowns occurring progressively from the onward.

Asia, Africa, and Oceania

In , CCIR System B gained widespread adoption for VHF analog television during the mid-20th century, primarily paired with the PAL color standard to support 625-line, 50 Hz interlaced scanning for enhanced image quality and international compatibility. Countries including , , , , , and the implemented the system from the late 1950s onward, influenced by CCIR recommendations to standardize spectrum usage at 7 MHz channel bandwidths. In , System B was officially adopted for transmissions under Indian Standard IS 4545-1968, enabling the launch of experimental broadcasts in on September 15, 1959, by , which evolved into for national coverage by the 1970s; color PAL broadcasts commenced in 1982 during the . Similarly, initiated regular System B/PAL services in 1962, while followed in 1964, fostering regional media development amid post-colonial infrastructure growth. In , System B was embraced by numerous nations, especially in sub-Saharan and North African regions, often with PAL encoding to align with European influences and facilitate equipment imports. Adoption accelerated post-independence in the 1960s, with leading as the continent's first television broadcaster via the Western Nigeria Television Service (WNTV) launched on October 31, 1959, using System B for 625-line signals to promote and political messaging. Other adopters included (1965), (1962), (1960), and , where the 7 MHz VHF channels supported early national networks amid limited infrastructure; for example, Nigeria's federal expanded System B/PAL coverage nationwide by 1977. Some countries like and initially used System B with before partial shifts to PAL, reflecting geopolitical ties to France and broader CCIR efforts. By the 1980s, the system underpinned across over 20 African states, though challenges in tropical climates prompted CCIR curve adjustments for reliable signal planning. Oceania saw more limited but influential adoption of CCIR System B, centered on and , where it formed the backbone of VHF services using PAL color from the outset of television introductions. Australia pioneered 625-line System B broadcasts on September 16, 1956, with Sydney's TCN-9, bypassing earlier 405-line standards to match global trends and enable efficient 7 MHz channel allocations across its vast terrain; color PAL was introduced progressively from March 1, 1975. followed suit in 1960 with System B/PAL VHF transmissions via the New Zealand Broadcasting Corporation, extending to remote Pacific islands. Smaller nations like , , and the adopted the system in the 1970s-1980s for national reach, supported by Australian and British technical aid; however, UHF variants like System G emerged later for expanded capacity. This framework persisted until digital transitions, with Australia's analog VHF shutdown in 2013 marking the end of System B era.

Americas and Other Regions

In the Americas, CCIR System B saw no significant adoption, as the region standardized on the 525-line, 60 Hz for broadcasting. This system, with its 6 MHz channel bandwidth and compatibility with the color encoding developed in the United States, dominated (including the U.S., , and ), , and most of . The choice reflected early U.S. influence through the 1941 monochrome standard and subsequent 1953 color extension, prioritizing compatibility with existing infrastructure and equipment across the hemisphere. South American countries adapted color systems to fit the System M framework rather than shifting to the 625-line, 50 Hz parameters of System B. implemented PAL-M, retaining 525 lines and 60 fields per second while applying phase-alternating line color encoding, which allowed reuse of NTSC-compatible receivers with minor modifications. In contrast, , , and adopted PAL-N, a 625-line system with a narrowed 6 MHz video to match regional spectrum allocations, but this was distinct from System B's 7 MHz VHF configuration and sound carrier spacing. These variants ensured economic alignment with North American imports while addressing local broadcast needs, avoiding the full European-style System B. In other regions, such as the , CCIR System B found limited but notable use, often integrated with or color standards to support regional interoperability. Bahrain employed System B with encoding on VHF channels, facilitating broadcasts aligned with CCIR specifications for 625 lines and 5 MHz video . Similarly, the utilized System B/G hybrids with , extending VHF coverage in while accommodating UHF extensions akin to European practices. These implementations in the supported cross-border viewing with neighboring Asian and African nations using compatible 625-line systems.

System G

CCIR System G is an analog television transmission standard developed under the auspices of the Comité Consultatif International des Radiocommunications (CCIR), now part of the (ITU), for 625-line and color . It specifies a nominal video of 5 MHz within an 8 MHz channel, making it suitable for ultra-high frequency (UHF) bands where wider spacing reduces interference compared to VHF allocations. The system employs for the video signal with a negative-going characteristic (C3F) and for the sound carrier, positioned 5.5 MHz above the vision carrier. Vestigial sideband filtering limits the lower sideband to 0.75 MHz to optimize spectrum efficiency while preserving image quality. In relation to CCIR System B, System G functions as its UHF counterpart, sharing core parameters such as 625 lines per frame, a 50 Hz field frequency, and a 15.625 kHz line frequency, but adapting to 8 MHz channels instead of System B's 7 MHz VHF spacing. This design choice accommodated the propagation characteristics of UHF signals, which require broader channels to mitigate in denser urban environments. Both systems support compatibility with color encoding standards like PAL and , with System G's PAL implementation using a 4.43361875 MHz subcarrier for , achieving a bandwidth of approximately 1.3 MHz within 3 dB. variants maintain sequential color transmission without phase alternation, ensuring with receivers. Adoption of System G was widespread in regions requiring UHF expansion alongside VHF System B deployments, particularly in and parts of and the . For instance, it was employed with PAL color in countries including , , the , , and , enabling national broadcasters to utilize UHF for additional channels without altering receiver designs. In SECAM-using areas, System G supported color transmission in nations such as and , where it complemented VHF standards amid diverse regional frequency planning. By the mid-1990s, over 20 countries had implemented System G for UHF, reflecting its role in harmonizing international program exchange under CCIR guidelines. Key technical parameters of System G are outlined below for clarity:
ParameterSpecification
Lines per frame625
Field frequency50 Hz
Line frequency15.625 kHz (±0.02%)
Video bandwidth5 MHz
Channel bandwidth8 MHz
Sound carrier offset+5.5 MHz
Vestigial sideband width0.75 MHz
Video modulationNegative (C3F)
Sound modulationFM (F3E, 50 kHz deviation)
Color subcarrier (PAL)4.43361875 MHz
These specifications ensured reliable reception over UHF distances, with pre-emphasis and de-emphasis curves tailored to minimize noise in terrestrial transmissions. System G's flexibility allowed variants like System H in Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands, which adjusted the lower sideband to 1.25 MHz to optimize use of the 8 MHz UHF channel bandwidth.

System H

System H is a variant of the CCIR analog television standards, primarily developed for use in UHF bands in specific European regions. It shares core parameters with System B, including 625 lines per frame and a 25 frames per second rate (50 fields per second with 2:1 interlacing), but features adjustments in channel spacing and carrier frequencies to optimize spectrum utilization in its deployment areas. The system employs negative video modulation with amplitude modulation for the luminance signal and frequency modulation for the audio, ensuring compatibility with PAL color encoding where the subcarrier frequency is precisely 4.43361875 MHz, with quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) and line-alternate inversion of the (R-Y) color difference signal. The channel bandwidth for System H is 8 MHz, accommodating a 5 MHz video bandwidth with 1.25 MHz vestigial lower sideband to reduce interference while maintaining signal integrity. The vision carrier spacing to the sound carrier is 5.5 MHz, identical to System B, but System H was tailored for denser channel packing on UHF, featuring a narrower guard band of 0.25 MHz between channels compared to System B's 0.5 MHz. This design allowed for more efficient use of the UHF spectrum in countries like Belgium and the Netherlands, where it was adopted for UHF transmissions. Audio pre-emphasis follows the 50 μs standard, and the overall RF parameters enable interoperability with System B/G receivers through simple tuner adjustments. Adopted in the mid-20th century, System H facilitated the transition to color broadcasting in , , and the , supporting PAL with a luminance-chrominance separation that minimized cross-talk. Its specifications emphasized robustness against in urban environments, with the vestigial configuration providing a between bandwidth efficiency and picture quality. Unlike broader European standards like System G (used in UHF across much of ), System H's regional focus allowed for customized frequency plans, while maintaining the foundational 625-line resolution established by CCIR recommendations. The system's legacy lies in its role as a bridge between VHF System B and UHF deployments, enabling seamless program exchange within countries before the shift to digital formats.
ParameterSpecification
Lines per frame625
Field rate50 Hz
25 Hz
Channel bandwidth8 MHz
Video bandwidth5 MHz
Vestigial sideband1.25 MHz (lower)
Vision-sound spacing5.5 MHz
Video modulationNegative AM
Sound modulation (50 μs pre-emphasis)
Color systemPAL (4.43361875 MHz subcarrier)
Primary regions, Netherlands, Luxembourg

Legacy and Digital Transition

Analog Shutdown Timelines

In and , where CCIR System B was widely adopted for VHF , analog shutdowns began in the mid-2000s as part of the broader shift to (DTT) under standards. led the region with a complete analog switch-off in 2006, followed closely by and in 2007, both achieving nationwide transitions by November of that year. and completed their shutdowns in 2008, with Germany's phased rollout concluding on December 4 after starting in earlier that year. followed in early 2009, marking the end of analog in most using System B. These early transitions were driven by spectrum reallocation needs and directives aiming for efficiency in . Further south in , shutdowns extended into the early 2010s, reflecting coordinated efforts outlined in 2009 guidelines that categorized member states by target dates. The Netherlands finalized its analog termination in 2006, while achieved over 90% coverage by April 3, 2010, with full nationwide completion by 2010. completed the process on December 4, 2012, after a phased approach starting in in 2008. Austria's transition spanned 2007 to 2011, with the final analog signals ceasing in remaining areas by June 2011. , using System B on VHF, shut down analog progressively from 2008 to 2010 across its regions. By 2013, nearly all Western European nations employing System B had fully migrated to digital, freeing VHF spectrum for mobile services and improving signal quality for rural areas. In North Africa, transitions lagged behind Europe due to varying infrastructure readiness and regional priorities, but followed similar ITU-aligned timelines post-2015. Tunisia completed its analog shutdown on September 17, 2015, after launching DTT in 2010 and achieving 95% coverage. Morocco initiated DTT in 2007 and shut off analog signals by June 17, 2015, achieving nationwide completion. Algeria's process was more protracted; digital broadcasting began in 2009, but analog signals persisted until a full switch-off in June 2020, with completion in some regions by November 2020. Egypt, employing System B with PAL encoding, planned its transition for 2020-2021 but faced delays; partial shutdowns occurred in urban centers by 2021, though rural analog broadcasts continued into the mid-2020s as of 2025 amid ongoing DTT expansion. Libya's efforts have been disrupted by political instability since 2011, with no verified nationwide analog shutdown as of 2025, though pilot digital services launched in 2010. These transitions in North Africa emphasized affordability, with subsidies for set-top boxes to reach low-income households. [Note: For Egypt and Libya, based on partial reports; statuses as of 2025.] Across , , and —regions where System B supported PAL in diverse terrains—shutdown timelines varied widely, often phased over years to accommodate vast populations and remote areas. In , , a key adopter of System B/PAL, began its switchover in April 2013 on the and completed it nationwide on December 1, 2013, after extensive public awareness campaigns that achieved 98% digital readiness. , another System B user, aligned with regional ITU goals but implemented a phased full shutdown starting in 2021, completed by 2022. In , implemented a city-based rollout starting in 2012, with analog off in and by October 2012, expanding to 15 cities by 2016; remaining terrestrial analog transmitters were phased out by March 31, 2022, except for 50 strategic low-power sites. Indonesia's transition, using System B/PAL, featured four phases, with the first analog shutdown on April 30, 2022, and nationwide completion on November 2, 2022, despite calls for delays from broadcasters. finalized its analog end on October 31, 2019, after regional pilots, boosting DTT penetration to over 90%. completed urban shutdowns by 2018, with rural areas following by 2020. In , progress has been uneven; achieved full analog switch-off on October 1, 2022, as the first African nation to adopt complete Japanese ISDB-T standards. targeted 2016 but postponed repeatedly, achieving partial shutdowns by 2020 in major cities like , with nationwide goals set for 2025; as of November 2025, the nationwide switch-off remains ongoing. shut down analog in on December 14, 2015, but extended rural transitions to 2021. Countries like and completed phases between 2017 and 2020, often with international aid for decoder subsidies. These later timelines highlight challenges like funding and geography, but have enabled spectrum reuse for in developing markets. In the Americas and other regions, CCIR System B adoption was limited, primarily in former colonial outposts or test markets, leading to fewer dedicated shutdowns. , which adapted a variant (System N/PAL) rather than pure B, completed analog off in 2019 as part of harmonization. Other areas, such as parts of the (e.g., and using B/PAL), aligned with Arab states' 2017-2020 targets, though conflicts delayed Syria's full transition beyond 2020. Overall, by 2025, most System B regions have transitioned, though pockets in and conflict zones persist, underscoring the global push for digital efficiency as mandated by 1 agreements.

Historical Significance

CCIR System B, a 625-line monochrome television standard with a 7 MHz bandwidth and negative video modulation, emerged from post-World War II efforts to standardize for international compatibility. (See History and Development for detailed origins and standardization process.) Its adoption accelerated in the early 1950s, particularly in , where it became the dominant standard for black-and-white television, supplanting varied national systems like 's format. By the 1961 Conference, following preparatory work at the 1961 meeting, System B's technical basis was solidified for continent-wide frequency planning and coordination, facilitating VHF/UHF networks. Countries such as , the , and rapidly implemented it, while political dynamics influenced its spread; for instance, national interests led to fragmented adoption in , with resisting until later transitions due to protectionist policies favoring domestic standards. Despite these challenges, System B's compatibility provisions, inspired by earlier proposals like Valensi's 1938 compatibility concept, allowed for gradual color enhancements, such as PAL in many adopters by the mid-1960s. The historical significance of CCIR System B lies in its role as the first widely accepted 625-line standard, bridging the gap between divergent national systems and laying the groundwork for global interoperability. It enabled coordinated use across and beyond, supporting the expansion of and international exchanges via satellites in the and , even as color standard debates at in 1966 failed to achieve unity, resulting in systems like and PAL built atop it. This standardization effort, though politically contested, protected emerging industries in adopting nations and influenced subsequent digital transitions by establishing key parameters for 50 Hz that persisted into the analog shutdowns of the and , underscoring the CCIR's enduring impact on radiocommunications infrastructure.

References

  1. [1]
    None
    ### Summary of CCIR System B from Rec. ITU-R BT.470-6
  2. [2]
    [PDF] 1 The CCIR, the standards and the TV sets' market in France (1948 ...
    This paper tries to understand how a unified standard of television was chosen by the CCIR, which nations were favored and what were the consequences for the ...
  3. [3]
    Current Economic Developments - Office of the Historian
    These countries invited France and the UK to consider joining them in standardizing television for Europe on the 625 line system. Later in 1950, countries ...
  4. [4]
    Television Standardization | Nature
    AT the Stockholm meeting of the International Consultative Committe on Radiocommunication (C.C.I.R.), held in July 1948, a number of study groups were ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Electronics-1950-08.pdf - World Radio History
    ... Dr. Gerber of the Swiss delegation, to meet at the CCIR headquarters in Geneva. All member nations of the study group, including those committed to other ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Documents of the VIth Plenary Assembly (Geneva 1951): Volume I
    TELEVISION STANDARDS. (Recommendation No. 29). The C.C.I.R.,. CONSIDERING : That a study of television standards was recommended by the C.C.I.R. at its Fifth ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Code: DE68 Subject: TELEVISION ENGINEERING - IETE - elan
    Give detailed specifications of CCIR-B standards in respect to video characteristics, composite video signal characteristics and radio frequency characteristics ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    [PDF] characteristics of systems for monochrome and colour television - ITU
    ... System B as specified in the Annex to Recommendation 653 to reduce the possibilities of data loss, the following values are preferred [CCIR, 1982-86c and d]:.
  10. [10]
    None
    ### Summary of CCIR System B (UHF Variants, Channel Bandwidths, and Adjustments)
  11. [11]
    [PDF] ETS 300 732 - Television systems - ETSI
    May 20, 1996 · This draft European Telecommunication Standard (ETS) is applicable to 625-line PAL/SECAM systems B,. G, H, I, L, D and K broadcast on the VHF ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] REPORT ITU-R BT.2043 - Analogue television systems currently in ...
    This report provides information on analogue television systems currently in use worldwide, listing systems used in different countries and geographical areas.Missing: list | Show results with:list
  13. [13]
    [PDF] tr 022 - terrestrial digital television planning and ... - EBU tech
    VHF System B (Italy). Channel. Channel boundaries. MHz. Vision carrier. MHz. Sound carrier. MHz. A2 Sound carrier. MHz. A. 52.50. 59.50. 53.75. 59.25. 59.49. B.
  14. [14]
    The 625-line System - Consumer Electronics [Book] - O'Reilly
    The aural (sound) carrier frequency is 5.5 MHz above the visual carrier frequency. The chrominance (colour) subcarrier frequency is 4.43361875 MHz above the ...
  15. [15]
    Consolidated CCIR System-B Standards - Consumer Electronics ...
    Video Characteristics. Number of lines per picture, 625. Interlace ratio, 2 : 1. Field frequency, 50 fields/sec. Picture frequency, 25 pictures/sec.
  16. [16]
    The advent and growth of television broadcasting in Nigeria
    The history of television broadcasting in Nigeria revolves around the suitability of the medium for political propaganda and for educational broadcasting.
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Introducing television to Australia, 1956 | naa.gov.au
    This fact sheet provides information on National Archives records about the introduction of television in 1956.
  19. [19]
    Australia - BroaDWcast
    Aug 10, 2025 · Australia began its television service from 16 September 1956; this was the commercial Channel Nine network. Other stations followed: ABC (Channel 2)
  20. [20]
    [PDF] International TV systems and Standards - Philips Semiconductors ...
    Jun 1, 1995 · B. PAL. CCIR. Indonesia. B. G. PAL. IN. Iran (Islamic Rep. of). B. SECAM. CCIR. Iraq. B. SECAM. CCIR. Ireland. A,I. A, I. PAL. IR. Italy. B. G.
  21. [21]
    World Analogue Television Standards and Waveforms
    ### Summary of CCIR System B Adoption (Outside Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania)
  22. [22]
    None
    ### Countries with G in UHF Column and Color System
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Nearly 50 Countries Switch Off Analog TV - ATSC : NextGen TV
    Jul 7, 2015 · While the U.S. completed its transition six years ago, several European countries had already switched off analog TV, including Luxembourg (2006) ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Digital television transition | TV and Radio Schedules Wikia | Fandom
    Analog channels were first shut off on 10 September 2018 in the areas of Durrës and Tirana, but they were restored later in the day because the supply of DVB-T2 ...
  27. [27]
    Digital television in New Zealand - Radio Spectrum Management
    New Zealand completed the transition from analogue to digital television on 1 December 2013.
  28. [28]
    India's Analog TV Transmitters To Be Phased Out By 2022 - Indiatimes
    Oct 11, 2021 · Prasar Bharti will phase out all analogue terrestrial TV transmitters by March 31, next year, with only 50 of them being placed in strategic locations.
  29. [29]
    Indonesia Officially Ends Analog TV Broadcasts: Kominfo
    Nov 3, 2022 · Indonesia's Kominfo Ministry officially ended analog television broadcasts at 24:00 Jakarta time, Wednesday, November 2, 2022.
  30. [30]
    Malaysia to turn off analogue TV completely on 31 Oct - SoyaCincau
    Sep 25, 2019 · The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has announced a complete switchover from analogue TV to digital TV on the 31st October 2019.
  31. [31]
    Botswana celebrates the end of analog TV broadcasting - JICA
    Oct 12, 2022 · Botswana celebrates the end of analog TV broadcasting: the first complete transition to Japanese standards of digital terrestrial broadcasting.<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    CCIR 50th Anniversary: 1929-1979
    The past two decades have been notable in the CCIR for devel opment of the technical and operational arrangements for inter national satellite systems. These ...