Call forwarding, also known as call diversion, is a telephony feature that enables the redirection of incoming telephone calls from the originally dialed number to a different designated telephone number or destination, such as voicemail.[1] This service allows users to manage their availability by routing calls away from a busy, unanswered, or unavailable line, ensuring continuity in communication without the caller needing to redial.[2]Invented in 1963 by Ernest J. Bonanno, an engineer at Automatic Electric Laboratories, call forwarding emerged as a key advancement in telephone switching systems, predating widespread mobile telephony and enabling users to receive calls remotely from landlines.[3] By the late 20th century, it became a standard supplementary service in public switched telephone networks (PSTN), formalized through international standards such as those from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T), including recommendations for unconditional forwarding (I.252.4) and conditional variants like forwarding on busy (Q.732.2) or no reply (Q.732.3).[4][5][6] The feature operates via signaling protocols that instruct the network switch to reroute calls, often activated through specific dial codes (e.g., *72 for activation in North America) or user interfaces in modern VoIP systems.[7]Call forwarding encompasses several types to suit diverse needs: unconditional forwarding, which redirects all incoming calls immediately regardless of the line's status; conditional forwarding, including variants like forwarding on busy (when the line is engaged), no reply (after a set number of rings), or not reachable (when the phone is off or out of service); and advanced forms such as sequential or simultaneous ringing to multiple numbers.[8] These capabilities have evolved with digital technologies, integrating into mobile networks, IP-based systems, and business PBX setups to enhance mobility and customer service efficiency.[9]
Fundamentals
Definition and Terminology
Call forwarding is a supplementary service in telecommunications systems that enables the redirection of incoming calls intended for a served user's telephone number to another designated number, allowing the served user to manage call routing without manual intervention during the call setup.[10] This feature operates within public switched telephone networks (PSTN), integrated services digital networks (ISDN), and mobile networks like the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), where it is provisioned as part of basic telephony services.[11] The service assumes a standard telephonyinfrastructure, such as circuit-switched PSTN or cellular networks, where call signaling protocols handle the redirection transparently to the calling party.[10]While terms like "call diversion" or "call redirection" are sometimes used interchangeably in everyday contexts, call forwarding specifically refers to the network-mediated rerouting of active incoming calls based on subscriber-configured rules, distinct from signaling-level redirections in protocols such as SS7 or SIP that may occur for routing purposes without subscriber involvement.[11] In GSM networks, the feature is formally termed Call Forwarding (CF), though "divert" appears in user-facing descriptions for activation commands.[10] This distinction ensures clarity in technical specifications, where call forwarding emphasizes the supplementary service aspect tied to user subscription and control.Key terminology includes the served user, the subscriber whose number is configured for forwarding; the forwarded-to number (FTN), the destination telephone number (often stored in international format) to which calls are redirected; and the originating number, the calling party's identifier that initiates the incoming call.[10] Forwarding can be unconditional, where all incoming calls are redirected immediately regardless of the served user's availability, or conditional, where redirection triggers only under specific circumstances such as line busy, no reply after a timer, or subscriber unreachability.[11] These terms form the foundation for understanding service provisioning in standards like GSM 03.82 and ITU-T Q.82, requiring prior subscription to the relevant basic service group.[10]
History
Call forwarding emerged in the early 1960s as a feature within electromechanical switching systems of the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), enabling the redirection of incoming calls to an alternative destination number. This capability was developed by engineer Ernest J. Bonanno at Automatic Electric Laboratories, as detailed in his 1961patent filing for a call forwarding arrangement that utilized relay-based switching to route calls based on subscriber instructions.[3] By the late 1960s and into the 1970s, call forwarding began to be deployed commercially across PSTN infrastructures by various providers, leveraging electromechanical switches such as crossbar and step-by-step systems to support basic unconditional redirection, which proved essential for business and residential users needing to manage calls remotely without manual operator intervention.[3]The 1980s marked a pivotal era of standardization for call forwarding, driven by the adoption of Signaling System No. 7 (SS7), a protocol suite developed by AT&T in the 1970s and formalized as a global standard by the International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee (CCITT, now ITU-T) in 1980. SS7's common channel signaling enabled efficient call setup, teardown, and supplementary services, including call diversion through Integrated Services Digital Network User Part (ISUP) extensions for features like call forwarding busy, no reply, and unconditional.[12] These advancements, specified in ITU-T recommendations such as Q.763 for ISUP messages and later ETSI EN 300 356-15 for diversion services, allowed networks to handle forwarding across interconnected PSTN operators with improved reliability and reduced signaling overhead, facilitating widespread implementation in both fixed-line and emerging digital exchanges.[13]In the 1990s, call forwarding expanded significantly into mobile networks with the rollout of the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), a second-generation (2G) standard developed under the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). Phase 1 of GSM specifications, frozen in 1990, incorporated call forwarding as a core supplementary service, defined in ETSI GSM 02.82 and GSM 03.82 for stage 1 and 2 descriptions, covering unconditional, busy, no reply, and not reachable scenarios. Commercial GSM launches began in 1991 across Europe, with ETSI's technical specifications enabling seamless integration via the Mobile Switching Center (MSC), which routed forwarded calls using SS7-compatible signaling; by the mid-1990s, this feature had become standard in over 100 GSM networks worldwide, enhancing mobility for subscribers.[10]The shift to digital voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in the 2000s further evolved call forwarding by embedding it within application-layer signaling protocols, notably the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) outlined in RFC 3261, published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) in June 2002. SIP's redirect mechanisms, using 3xx response codes and Contact headers, supported flexible call diversion in IP-based systems, allowing endpoints to reroute sessions without network proxies, as exemplified in RFC 3261's scenarios for forwarding to alternative user agents.[14] This integration enabled VoIP providers to offer advanced forwarding across hybrid PSTN-IP networks, with SIP's extensibility paving the way for multimedia session handling beyond traditional telephony.Post-2010 developments integrated call forwarding into cloud-based private branch exchange (PBX) systems and smart assistants, leveraging scalable IP infrastructure for dynamic, policy-driven redirection. Services like Google Voice, launched in 2009 but enhanced throughout the 2010s, exemplified this trend by providing cloud-hosted forwarding with features such as conditional routing and voicemail integration, achieving widespread adoption for personal and business use by mid-decade. Cloud PBX platforms, building on VoIP standards, introduced automated forwarding based on time, location, or user status, transforming the feature into a cornerstone of unified communications ecosystems.[15]
Types
Unconditional Forwarding
Unconditional call forwarding (CFU), also known as call forwarding unconditional, is a supplementary service in telecommunications networks that redirects all incoming calls to a predefined destination number without any conditions based on the served subscriber's status, such as whether the device is busy, unanswered, or unreachable.[16][17] This redirection applies to all calls or specific basic service groups (e.g., voice or data services) for which the subscriber has registered the forwarding.[18] The service ensures that calls are not offered to the original device at all, providing a blanket redirection mechanism.[17]In public switched telephone networks (PSTN) and integrated services digital networks (ISDN), CFU operates via signaling system No. 7 (SS7) protocols to reroute calls at the network switch before alerting the original line.[16] In mobile networks, it functions similarly but uses components like the Gateway Mobile Switching Center (GMSC) and Home Location Register (HLR); when an incoming call arrives at the GMSC, the HLR provides the forwarded-to number (ftn) in response to a routing information request, prompting the network to redirect the call signaling directly to the destination without involving the served subscriber's Mobile Switching Center (MSC) or Visitor Location Register (VLR) for initial setup.[18] This process uses standardized messages like REGISTER_SS for ftn storage and ACTIVATE_SS for enabling the service, ensuring efficient redirection within or across Public Land Mobile Networks (PLMNs).[17]Common use cases for CFU include scenarios of temporary unavailability, where a subscriber redirects calls to an alternate number or voicemail during absences, such as travel or maintenance periods.[17] It also supports number migration, allowing seamless transition of calls to a new endpoint without interrupting servicecontinuity.[18] In network operations, CFU helps prevent infinite loops by imposing limits on tandem forwardings, typically restricting them to 1-5 sequential redirections before failing the call setup.[17]The primary advantages of CFU include its simplicity in setup and activation, often via Man-Machine Interface (MMI) commands, and its reliability in guaranteeing call delivery to the intended destination.[17] However, it has drawbacks such as the potential for missed notifications on the original line, since no alerting occurs, and possible conflicts with other services like call barring, which may block activation.[18] Additionally, forwarded calls may incur extra charges depending on the network provider's policies.[17]
Conditional Forwarding
Conditional call forwarding, also known as conditional call diversion, is a supplementary service in telecommunications networks that redirects incoming calls to an alternative number only when predefined conditions are met, allowing the original device to attempt to receive the call first.[19][20] This contrasts with unconditional forwarding by preserving the possibility of user interaction before redirection occurs.[20]In PSTN and ISDN networks, the primary subtypes include call forwarding on busy (when the line is engaged) and call forwarding on no reply (after a set number of rings).[19] In mobile networks, an additional subtype is call forwarding on not reachable (CFNRc), which engages when the subscriber is out of coverage or otherwise unreachable, such as due to no paging response or device detachment from the network.[20] Call forwarding on busy (CFB) activates when the called party's line is engaged, detected by the network through user-determined user busy (UDUB) or network-determined user busy (NDUB) signals.[20] Call forwarding on no reply (CFNRy) triggers if the call receives no answer after a specified timer expires.[20]Trigger mechanisms rely on network-detected events. For CFNRy, the no-reply timer is configurable in 5-second increments between 5 and 30 seconds, using the previous setting or an operator default if not user-specified.[10] CFB and CFNRc (in mobile networks) use real-time status checks, such as busy tones or failed location updates, to initiate forwarding without user intervention.[20] In mobile systems, these events are managed by the Visitor Location Register (VLR) or Home Location Register (HLR).[20]In many systems, these subtypes can be combined into a single "all conditional" service, allowing simultaneous registration and activation of busy, no reply, and (in mobile) not reachable forwarding using a shared supplementary service code, which simplifies management across basic service groups.[21] These features were standardized in GSM specifications, such as ETSI GSM 03.82, to ensure interoperability in global mobile networks, while similar services in PSTN/ISDN follow ITU-T Q.732.[10][19]
Activation Methods
Keypad Codes
Keypad codes for call forwarding are entered using dual-tone multi-frequency (DTMF) signaling on telephone keypads to activate, deactivate, or manage the service without additional equipment. These codes typically begin with a prefix such as * or # to invoke supplementary services, followed by a two-digit service code indicating the type of forwarding, and often end with # for confirmation. The structure allows users to specify a forwarding destination number inline, enabling quick setup during dialing.[22]In many traditional landlinetelephony systems, unconditional call forwarding is activated by dialing *72 followed by the 10-digit forwarding number. Listen for a confirmation tone or series of beeps, after which the call ends automatically to confirm activation. Deactivation uses *73, which immediately cancels the forwarding without needing the destination number. These codes are widely supported in North American public switched telephone networks (PSTN) and similar systems globally for basic feature access.[23][24][25]For mobile and GSM-based systems, standardized Man-Machine Interface (MMI) codes provide a structured approach, as defined in 3GPP TS 22.030. For unconditional forwarding (service code 21), registration and activation to a specific number uses *21 [number] #, while simple activation without changing the number is *21#. Deactivation is #21#, and status interrogation (checking if active and the current number) is *#21#. Similar patterns apply to conditional forwarding, such as service code 67 for busy forwarding (*67 [number] # to activate). To change the forwarding number, users redial the registration code with the new destination.[22]If an invalid code or unsupported number is entered, the telephony system typically responds with a reorder tone (a fast busy signal) to indicate the error, preventing unintended service changes and prompting the user to retry. This auditory feedback is a standard error-handling mechanism in DTMF-based feature activation across PSTN and mobile networks.
Mobile and App-Based Activation
Mobile and app-based activation methods provide user-friendly alternatives to traditional keypad dialing, allowing call forwarding to be configured directly through smartphone interfaces, carrier applications, or online portals. These approaches leverage graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for easier setup, often integrating with device contact lists and enabling remote management without needing to be physically at the phone. Additionally, native operating system settings offer built-in options: on iOS devices, users can go to Settings > Phone > Call Forwarding to toggle and enter a destination number for unconditional forwarding; on Android, open the Phone app, navigate to Settings > Calls > Call Forwarding, and select options like Always forward or Forward when busy/unanswered, entering the number accordingly. These device-level settings work across carriers supporting the feature.[24]In GSM networks, mobile users can activate unconditional call forwarding using Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD) codes entered via the phone's dialer, such as 21 followed by the forwarding number and terminated with # (e.g., 211234567890#). This command registers and activates forwarding immediately upon confirmation from the network. Similar USSD codes apply to conditional forwarding, like 67number# for forwarding when busy. CDMA networks, historically used by carriers like Verizon, employ feature codes such as *72 followed by the forwarding number for activation. Users can check status or deactivate using corresponding codes like *#21# or *73. These mobile-specific codes serve as a quick fallback when app access is unavailable.[26][24]Carrier apps enhance accessibility by offering intuitive GUIs for setup. For instance, Verizon's My Verizon app allows users to navigate to the device settings, select "Manage Call Forwarding," enter the target number, and toggle the service on or off without dialing codes. Google Fi provides similar functionality through its app or web portal, where users go to "Phone settings" under the "Account" tab, select "Call forwarding," and add or edit numbers for simultaneous ringing or forwarding, verifying via SMS if needed. These apps support both unconditional and conditional options, with real-time status updates.[24][27]For VoIP services, activation occurs via in-app menu toggles. In Skype, users access call forwarding through the settings menu under "Calls," selecting "Forward calls to" and choosing a contact or number, which applies to incoming calls on the Skype Number. Zoom Phone enables forwarding in the app or web portal by editing call handling rules—users click "Phone" > "Settings," then under business or closed hours, select "Forward to a phone number" and input the destination, supporting options like always forward or after hours. These methods integrate seamlessly with the app's ecosystem for voice and video calls.[28][29]Unlike landline systems, which typically require on-device or carrier hotline activation, mobile and app-based methods support remote configuration from any internet-connected device, allowing changes while traveling, and often auto-populate forwarding numbers from integrated contact lists for convenience. This enables dynamic management, such as temporarily forwarding to a colleague's mobile during meetings.[24][27]
Regional and Technical Variations
North American Implementations
In North America, call forwarding is standardized within the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) through specifications developed by Bellcore, now known as Telcordia Technologies. Key documents include GR-580-CORE, which outlines requirements for Call Forwarding Variable (CFV), allowing subscribers to redirect calls to another number on a variable basis, and GR-586-CORE, which details subfeatures such as conditional forwarding for busy or no-answer scenarios. These standards ensure interoperability across the North American Numbering Plan (NANP), where vertical service codes (VSCs) like *72 for activation of unconditional forwarding and *73 for deactivation provide consistent access throughout the PSTN. The NANP integration facilitates seamless forwarding to any valid 10-digit number within the plan, supporting both landline and interconnected VoIP services.[30][31][32]Carrier implementations exhibit variations while adhering to these core standards. For instance, AT&T employs *72 followed by the forwarding number for unconditional call forwarding on landline services, but for wireless customers, it utilizes GSM-derived codes such as 21 [forwarding number] # for immediate (unconditional) forwarding and 61 for no-answer conditions, reflecting adaptations for mobile networks. In contrast, Verizon maintains traditional VSCs like *72 for unconditional forwarding and *90 for busy or *92 for busy/no-answer on its Fios Digital Voice landline service, while emphasizing app-based activation through the My Verizon app for mobile users to simplify management and integrate with device settings. These differences arise from carrier-specific network architectures but ensure compatibility with NANP dialing.[23][33][34][24]Regulatory oversight by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandates call forwarding support to enable local number portability, as required under the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Carriers must provide transitional portability methods, including Remote Call Forwarding (RCF), where incoming calls to a ported number are temporarily forwarded to the new provider's location until full network emulation is achieved, with implementation deadlines set in the late 1990s. A unique aspect of North American implementations is the integration with 911 emergency services; FCC E911 rules require that forwarded calls to 911 route to the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) serving the caller's actual location, using Automatic Location Identification (ALI) to transmit the originating party's position data rather than the forwarding destination, preventing misrouting in emergencies.[35]
European and International Implementations
In Europe, call forwarding is primarily governed by ETSI standards for GSM networks, which define it as a set of supplementary services including Call Forwarding Unconditional (CFU), Call Forwarding on Mobile Subscriber Busy (CFB), Call Forwarding on No Reply (CFNRy), and Call Forwarding on Not Reachable (CFNRc).[10] These services enable redirection of incoming calls based on predefined conditions, with activation typically using standardized USSD codes such as *21 followed by the destination number and # for CFU.[36] The ETSI specifications, outlined in documents like GSM 02.82 and GSM 03.82, ensure interoperability across GSM Phase 2+ systems.[37]Support for call forwarding extends to advanced 3GPP networks, including UMTS and LTE, through specifications like TS 23.082, which detail the stage 2 procedures for implementing these services in packet-switched environments.[18] In UMTS and LTE, forwarding is integrated into the core network signaling, allowing for efficient handling of diversions without disrupting session continuity.[38] Regional variations exist; for instance, in the United Kingdom, BT implements activation for unconditional forwarding using the code 21 followed by the destination number and #, aligning with GSM norms but tailored for fixed and mobile lines.[39]Internationally, call forwarding in Asia-Pacific regions adapts to Next Generation Network (NGN) architectures, where it functions as a core voice telephony service alongside features like call waiting, supporting broadband convergence in countries such as India and the Philippines.[40] During international roaming, forwarding persists across borders via the IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS), as specified in 3GPP TS 22.279, enabling users to maintain diversion settings seamlessly between home and visited networks without reconfiguration.[41]Challenges arise in non-North American Numbering Plan (NANP) countries due to diverse national numbering schemes, which often feature variable-length numbers and require explicit international prefixes for cross-border forwarding to prevent routing errors.[42]
Forwarding Delay and Network Handling
Call forwarding involves specific delays and network mechanisms to ensure efficient call redirection. For unconditional forwarding, the process occurs immediately upon receiving an incoming call, with no ringing at the original destination before redirection. In contrast, conditional forwarding, such as on no answer, relies on a configurable ring-no-answer timer that typically ranges from 15 to 60 seconds, allowing the original device to ring for the specified duration before triggering the forward. This timer is adjustable in systems like Cisco Unified Communications Manager (default 12 seconds, configurable up to 60 seconds) and Microsoft Teams (up to 60 seconds in 10-second increments).[43][44]The network handles call forwarding through standardized signaling protocols that redirect the call path. In Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) networks, forwarding is signaled via a 302 Moved Temporarily response or a new INVITE request, often including a Diversion header to indicate the original destination and reason (e.g., unconditional or no-answer). This header facilitates interworking with traditional networks by mapping to ISDN User Part (ISUP) parameters. In ISUP-based circuit-switched networks, signaling uses Continuity Progress (CPG) messages with event code 6 for forwarding indications or a dedicated Redirect message to alter the call route. These mechanisms ensure the call is seamlessly diverted without unnecessary loops, with systems like Cisco supporting up to 15 hops to prevent infinite redirection.[45][46][43]If the forwarded destination is unreachable—such as an unregistered device or out-of-service number—networks typically fallback to alternative handling to avoid call failure. Common behaviors include redirecting to voicemail with a Diversion reason of "unavailable" in SIP, or invoking Call Forward Unregistered (CFU) in systems like Cisco Unified Communications Manager to route to voicemail or the public switched telephone network (PSTN). In some cases, the caller receives a busy signal if no further fallback is configured.[45][43]Performance in call forwarding varies by network type, with latency influenced by signaling overhead. Circuit-switched networks like traditional PSTN offer low, predictable latency due to dedicated paths, often under 500 milliseconds for redirection. Packet-switched VoIP networks introduce variable latency from packet routing and processing, but modern implementations achieve signaling times below 1 second, aligning with overall VoIP call setup tolerances of under 150 milliseconds round-trip. Factors like network congestion can increase this in packet-switched environments compared to the fixed paths of circuit switching.[46][47]
Applications and Uses
Personal Scenarios
Call forwarding serves as a vital tool for individuals seeking to maintain connectivity in daily life, allowing them to redirect incoming calls from one device or line to another for enhanced convenience and accessibility. In personal contexts, users often employ this feature to ensure they do not miss important communications while managing multiple responsibilities or locations. For instance, forwarding calls from a home landline to a smartphone enables seamless integration across devices, creating a unified communication experience without the need to monitor separate lines.[48]One common personal scenario involves redirecting home calls to a work or mobile number during travel, which helps individuals stay reachable without incurring high roaming fees or relying on multiple devices. Travelers can forward their primary number to a local SIM or secondary phone abroad, providing a backup in case of deviceloss or theft and allowing them to answer calls on the most cost-effective line, such as under plans offering low international rates. This approach is particularly useful for vacations, where users forward landline calls to their mobile to receive updates from home without constant device switching.[49][50]Another key application is in family safety situations, such as forwarding a home phone to a parent's mobile when leaving children at home, ensuring quick response to any calls from the child in case of need. This setup promotes peace of mind by linking household communications to a reachable device, allowing parents to monitor and respond promptly. Similarly, in medical alert configurations, personal emergency systems utilize call forwarding to route alerts from a wearable pendant to family members or 911, enabling two-way voice communication for immediate assessment and assistance during health crises.[50][51]The primary benefits of these personal uses include improved reachability, as individuals can consolidate calls to a single device, reducing the burden of carrying multiple phones and minimizing disruptions from outages or poor signal areas. By protecting personal numbers through selective forwarding—such as to voicemail for non-urgent calls—users maintain privacy while ensuring critical contacts are handled efficiently. Overall, call forwarding enhances everyday accessibility, supporting lifestyles that involve frequent movement or shared responsibilities without compromising connectivity.[52][53]
Business and Enterprise Uses
In business and enterprise environments, call forwarding serves as a foundational element in managing high-volume communications, particularly in customer service operations where calls are routed through queues to ensure efficient distribution among agents. For instance, in contact centers, incoming calls can be placed into virtual queues and forwarded sequentially or simultaneously to available representatives based on predefined rules, preventing bottlenecks during peak hours.[54][55] This approach is commonly implemented in platforms like Microsoft Teams, where call queues integrate forwarding to maintain service levels even when agents are occupied.[56]Executive forwarding represents another key scenario, allowing high-level personnel to delegate incoming calls to administrative assistants or specialized teams without interrupting workflows. In such setups, calls directed to an executive's line are automatically rerouted to the assistant's device, who can then handle, screen, or transfer them as needed.[57][58]Enterprise systems like Webex and Dialpad enable this through configurable filters that prioritize urgent calls while forwarding routine ones, enhancing decision-making efficiency in corporate hierarchies.[59]Advanced enterprise features often combine call forwarding with hunt groups and automatic call distribution (ACD) systems to optimize routing logic. Hunt groups distribute calls across a predefined set of extensions, forwarding to the next available member if the initial recipient is busy or unavailable, which is particularly useful for sales or support teams.[60][61] Similarly, ACD incorporates forwarding as part of intelligent algorithms that match callers to agents based on skills, availability, or load, as seen in solutions from Genesys and Vonage.[62][63]Integration with customer relationship management (CRM) systems has further elevated call forwarding's role since the 2010s, enabling intelligent routing tied to customer data. For example, Salesforce's telephony integrations allow forwarded calls to pull up relevant records automatically, facilitating context-aware responses during transfers.[64][65] Providers like AVOXI and Global Call Forwarding offer softphone extensions that embed forwarding directly into CRM interfaces, supporting seamless transitions between agents or departments.[66][67]These applications yield significant benefits, including reduced caller wait times through balanced distribution and the provision of 24/7 coverage without proportional increases in staffing. By leveraging conditional forwarding types—such as busy or no-answer triggers—organizations achieve improvements in response efficiency.[68] This scalability supports remote and hybrid work models, ensuring continuous accessibility while minimizing operational costs.[69][70]
Limitations and Considerations
Costs and Billing
Call forwarding billing typically involves charges for both the incoming call to the forwarding number and the subsequent leg to the forwarded destination, often resulting in what is known as double billing for the total duration. For instance, in traditional mobile networks, the forwarding device incurs airtime usage for the initial ring period before diversion, plus the full length of the forwarded conversation, effectively doubling the billed minutes compared to a direct call.[71] VoIP providers like Twilio structure this explicitly as two separate legs, charging $0.0085 per minute for inbound calls and $0.013 per minute for outbound forwarding within the US.[72] Some services mitigate this by maintaining the connection without additional per-minute fees beyond the base plan, though the original call leg still applies. Carrier policies vary significantly, with many US providers including call forwarding at no extra cost within unlimited plans, a trend that accelerated after 2015 as carriers like Verizon shifted to all-inclusive voice services. Verizon, for example, imposes no monthly fee for call forwarding on current unlimited plans, though airtime deducts from any metered allowances if applicable.[71] In contrast, international forwarding often triggers surcharges; Verizon prohibits forwarding to non-US numbers entirely, while other carriers like those supporting global VoIP may add per-minute international rates, rates varying by destination (e.g., starting at $0.01 per minute to Canada via VoIP.ms premium routes).[71][73] Flat-fee bundles are common in business VoIP setups, with Global Call Forwarding offering plans starting at $7.95 per month including a set number of minutes before per-minute overages.[74]Hidden costs can arise from the forwarding delay, where the initial unanswered ring time—typically 15-30 seconds—consumes airtime on the forwarding line before diversion occurs, adding unexpected usage to metered plans. This is particularly relevant for mobile users, as the entire call duration, including rings, counts toward billable airtime even on forwarded calls.[71]In the European Union, regulations under the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), implemented since 2020 following the GDPR era's emphasis on consumer rights, mandate transparent pricing for all telecom services, including call forwarding, requiring providers to clearly disclose tariffs, surcharges, and total costs without hidden fees.[75] This aligns with regulations capping direct intra-EU call charges at €0.19 per minute (+VAT) and broader roaming rules that prohibit surcharges, applying domestic-equivalent pricing to voice services including forwarding, as of 2025 (with the regulation extended to 2032 and wholesale voice caps decreasing to €0.019 per minute).[76][77]
Privacy and Security Issues
Call forwarding introduces significant privacy and security risks, primarily through unauthorized redirection of calls that can enable number harvesting and interception by malicious actors. In call forwarding scams, fraudsters often trick users into activating the feature via phishing tactics, such as instructing them to dial codes like *72 followed by a scammer-controlled number, thereby diverting incoming calls and allowing the collection of sensitive information from subsequent interactions.[78][79] This unauthorized forwarding facilitates number harvesting, where scammers exploit the redirected calls to gather personal data, including voice patterns or one-time verification codes, for further identity theft or financial fraud.[80] Additionally, misconfigured call forwarding services can amplify spoofing attacks, where attackers disguise their identity by leveraging forwarded calls to bypass caller ID verification, making it appear as if legitimate entities are initiating contact.[81][79]To mitigate these vulnerabilities, carriers and service providers implement security measures such as PIN-based protection for call forwarding activation, requiring users to enter a unique code to enable or modify forwarding settings, which prevents unauthorized changes even if physical access to the device is gained.[82][83] In VoIP-based forwarding, encryption protocols like Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) provide robust safeguards by applying cryptographic keys to protect the media stream during transit, ensuring that forwarded calls remain confidential and resistant to eavesdropping.[84][85] These measures extend to mobile activation, where carrier-enforced PINs add an extra layer against remote exploits.[86]Privacy concerns arise from the potential exposure of forwarding destinations in carrier logs, which may retain records of redirected numbers and call metadata, inadvertently revealing user patterns or contacts to unauthorized parties during data breaches or legal requests.[87] Such logging practices must comply with regulations like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) of 2018, which mandates transparency in data handling for call-related services, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), requiring explicit consent for processing personal communication data across borders.[88][89] Non-compliance can result in fines, emphasizing the need for providers to anonymize or limit retention of forwarding logs to protect user privacy.[88]Effective mitigation involves carrier-led audits to detect anomalous forwarding patterns and user best practices, such as regularly deactivating the feature when not in use and monitoring account activity for unauthorized changes.[90][91] Providers conduct periodic security audits of VoIP infrastructures to identify misconfigurations, while users are advised to enable two-factor authentication and avoid responding to unsolicited requests for forwarding codes.[92][79] These combined efforts help reduce the incidence of abuse and safeguard sensitive communications.
Technical Limitations
Call forwarding can lead to technical issues such as redirection loops if two numbers forward to each other, causing infinite ringing until network timeouts. Public switched telephone networks (PSTN) typically limit forwarding hops to 5-10 to prevent such loops and resource exhaustion, as per ITU-T recommendations.[19]