Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chain of events

A chain of events is a sequence of interconnected occurrences in which each event causes or influences the subsequent one, ultimately leading to a particular outcome or result. This concept emphasizes , where an initial trigger sets off a series of linked actions and effects that unfold over time. In and semantics, a forms the basis of , representing an ordered progression from cause to effect that connects multiple outcomes in a logical . This framework has roots in ancient thought, where it illustrates how one can propagate through intermediaries to a final consequence, though modern views recognize that events often have multiple contributing causes rather than a single linear path. are essential for analyzing complex phenomena, such as in problem-solving methodologies, where they map the progression from root causes to observed effects. The notion of a chain of events is particularly prominent in and investigation, where it models the progression from an initiating incident through successive factors to an undesired result, such as or . Analysts use this approach to reconstruct sequences, identifying points of to prevent recurrence, as seen in and protocols that trace distractions or failures leading to mishaps. In broader applications, like environmental assessments, causal chain analysis links human activities to ecological impacts, aiding in policy development. Beyond technical fields, chains of events appear in narratives and historical accounts, where they structure the or by linking actions causally to drive the forward or explain developments. This sequential enhances comprehension, whether in —where rising actions build toward a —or in everyday describing how minor incidents escalate into significant consequences.

Definition and Core Concepts

Definition and Characteristics

A chain of events refers to a sequence of occurrences in which each event functions as the of the subsequent one, thereby forming a progression of that links initial conditions to eventual outcomes. This emphasizes the interdependent of , where the realization of later elements hinges on the prior ones, often modeled as a series of causal dependencies in philosophical analyses of causation. Key characteristics of a chain of events include its , where events follow in direct succession, with each prompting the next in a straightforward ; contingency, meaning the occurrence of any given is dependent on the fulfillment of the preceding one; potential for branching, in which a single can give rise to multiple subsequent paths rather than a singular outcome; and irreversibility in many real-world scenarios, where the progression cannot be undone without external . ensures a clear temporal order, while underscores the fragility of the sequence, as disruptions at any point can alter or halt the chain. Branching introduces , allowing for divergent effects from a , and irreversibility reflects the forward inherent in causal processes, distinguishing them from reversible interactions. For instance, consider a simple everyday sequence: spilling coffee on a document causes a stain, which prompts a cleaning effort that in turn leads to a delayed meeting, illustrating how mundane actions cascade into broader consequences through causal linkages. This example highlights the practical manifestation of a chain without requiring specialized contexts. A chain of events differs from isolated events, which lack any causal connection to others, and from cyclical patterns, where sequences loop back on themselves in repeating feedback rather than progressing linearly or branchingly. Isolated incidents stand alone without influencing subsequent developments, whereas cycles involve recurrent causation that can sustain systems over time, a topic explored further in systems theory.

Historical Origins

The concept of a chain of events, understood as interconnected sequences of causes and effects, traces its roots to ancient Greek philosophy, particularly in the work of Aristotle. In his Physics (circa 350 BCE), Aristotle articulated the doctrine of the four causes—material, formal, efficient, and final—which framed natural phenomena as teleological chains driven by purpose toward an end or fulfillment. This perspective emphasized that events do not occur in isolation but form purposeful sequences, where each link contributes to the realization of potentiality into actuality, influencing subsequent Western understandings of causality as inherently sequential and goal-oriented. During the medieval period, this Aristotelian framework was synthesized with by in his (1265–1274). Aquinas adapted the to affirm a divine , portraying chains of events as manifestations of God's providential order, where secondary causes (natural events) operate within the primary causation of the divine will. This integration preserved the notion of event sequences as ordered progressions but subordinated them to a transcendent purpose, linking earthly to eternal divine chains and shaping scholastic views on the intelligibility of the . The brought critical scrutiny to these ideas, most notably through David Hume's (1739), which challenged the necessity of connections in causal chains. Hume argued that observed constant conjunctions of s foster the illusion of inevitable sequences, but no logical necessity binds one to the next, reducing chains of s to habitual associations rather than inherent realities. This empiricist critique shifted focus from teleological or divine orders to probabilistic and psychological interpretations of event linkages, profoundly influencing of causation. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, scientific advancements reframed chains of events in empirical terms. Charles Darwin's (1859) introduced evolutionary theory, depicting biological development as branching chains of adaptive events driven by , where incremental variations accumulate over generations without predetermined purpose. Concurrently, Albert Einstein's special (1905) and general theory (1915) conceptualized as a of events, where sequences are relative to observers and governed by invariant laws, reinforcing the idea of interconnected event structures in physical reality. A pivotal milestone in applying chain metaphors to specific domains occurred in chemistry with Max Bodenstein's introduction of the "chain reaction" concept in 1913, describing self-propagating sequences in photochemical processes where intermediate products sustain further reactions. This formulation extended the abstract notion of event chains into quantitative models of propagation and termination, providing a mechanistic that permeated later scientific and popular discourses on sequential dynamics.

Philosophical Implications

Determinism and Causality

In deterministic , a chain of events represents a sequence where each occurrence is strictly necessitated by prior states of the , rendering true impossible and ensuring that the unfolds inevitably from the past. This view posits that the entire course of events forms an unbroken nexus, governed by unchanging laws, such that no alternative outcomes could arise given the same initial conditions. articulated this idea in his 1814 known as , envisioning an intellect of vast scope that, by knowing the precise positions and velocities of all particles at one moment, could derive both the past and states of the through principles. Determinism encompasses distinct types that underpin these chains, primarily causal determinism and logical determinism. Causal determinism asserts that every event is necessitated by antecedent events combined with the laws of nature, forming predictable sequences in a physically governed reality; for instance, classical mechanics exemplifies this through the interactions of objects following Newtonian laws. In contrast, logical determinism holds that future events are fixed not by physical causation but by the logical necessity inherent in true propositions about the future, implying that statements about tomorrow's occurrences are eternally determined by their truth value today. Laplace's early 19th-century formulation portrayed the universe as a flawless chain of causes and effects, emphasizing the mechanistic predictability of reality under causal determinism. More recently, philosopher has advanced , arguing that such deterministic chains are reconcilable with human agency, as emerges from the evolved capacity to navigate and anticipate causal sequences without requiring indeterminacy. The implications of deterministic chains include the theoretical predictability of all events if initial conditions and laws are fully known, allowing for complete foresight akin to Laplace's super-intellect. A classic illustration is the collision of billiard balls on a table, where each impact follows inexorably from the prior motion, velocity, and position under frictionless Newtonian dynamics, demonstrating how micro-level causes propagate through the chain to dictate outcomes. However, this classical framework faced historical critiques from the advent of in the early 20th century, where figures like challenged Niels Bohr's probabilistic interpretations, arguing that inherent uncertainties disrupted the rigid predictability of causal chains.

Indeterminism and Free Will

Indeterminism introduces uncertainty or probabilistic elements into chains of events, positing that not all outcomes are fully determined by prior causes, thereby creating opportunities for alternative possibilities within the sequence. This view challenges strict causal by allowing gaps where events may branch unpredictably, potentially accommodating as the capacity for agents to originate choices that alter the chain's trajectory. Philosopher Robert Kane, in his 1996 work The Significance of Free Will, develops a libertarian account of rooted in , where "self-forming actions" occur at key decision points, such as moral dilemmas, through indeterministic neural processes that amplify quantum-level uncertainties into macroscopic choices, ensuring the agent is the ultimate source of the action without reliance on prior deterministic causes. Philosophical perspectives on indeterminism and free will diverge between compatibilists and incompatibilists. Compatibilists, such as in his 1651 , argue that is compatible with deterministic chains, defining as the absence of external impediments to acting according to one's desires or will, even if those desires are causally determined. In contrast, incompatibilists maintain that genuine requires to break the causal chain, enabling true alternative possibilities; without it, actions remain necessitated by antecedent events, rendering choice illusory. A pivotal argument supporting this incompatibilist stance is Peter van Inwagen's Consequence Argument, articulated in his 1983 book An Essay on Free Will, which contends that under , every event in a chain—including human actions—is a of the fixed past and immutable laws of nature, over which agents have no control, thus eliminating the ability to do otherwise and negating . This argument uses reasoning to show that if the past and laws necessitate the present, no intervention can alter the chain's course, emphasizing the need for to restore agential power. Modern discussions link indeterminism in event chains to chaos theory's concept of sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where minute variations in early states can lead to vastly different outcomes, amplifying unpredictability even in deterministic systems and suggesting how small indeterministic inputs—such as quantum fluctuations—might influence larger-scale decisions without violating overall causality. Unlike fully deterministic chains, this sensitivity allows for effective indeterminacy in complex systems like human cognition, where tiny uncertainties in neural firings could propagate through decision-making processes. For instance, consider a at a deciding whether to take a job offer: might manifest in an unresolved , where probabilistic neural events tip the balance toward one path, unpredictably altering the subsequent chain of career events, personal relationships, and life outcomes, thereby exemplifying how operates through indeterministic agency.

Scientific Applications

In Physics and Natural Sciences

In physics and the natural sciences, chains of events represent sequences of causally linked occurrences governed by fundamental laws, modeling how initial conditions propagate through deterministic or probabilistic mechanisms to produce observable phenomena. These chains underpin the predictive power of physical theories, where each event acts as both an outcome of prior interactions and an input for subsequent ones, often visualized as trajectories in phase space or spacetime. In Newtonian mechanics, chains of events manifest as sequences of -response interactions, where an applied causes and alters motion, as encapsulated in Newton's second law, F = ma, which describes the transfer of momentum during collisions or other interactions. This law, formulated in Newton's (1687), enables the modeling of macroscopic event chains, such as a striking another, initiating a predictable sequence of velocities and positions without inherent . Albert Einstein's theory of (1905) reframes event chains within a four-dimensional continuum, where the implies that the order of non-causally connected events depends on the observer's frame, but causal propagation remains absolute. This leads to structures, formalized by in 1908, which delineate possible causal influences: future-directed chains are confined within the light cone originating from an event, ensuring no information travels and defining the boundaries of event sequences across inertial frames. Quantum mechanics introduces probabilistic elements to event chains through the evolution and collapse of the wave function, as governed by the , i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H} \psi, where \psi represents the and \hat{H} the operator. Proposed by in 1926, this equation describes the unitary of superposed states, allowing multiple potential outcomes to coexist until induces collapse, thereby branching event sequences into probabilistic paths rather than deterministic ones. In , event chains often involve irreversible processes driven by increase, as per the second law articulated by in , which states that heat flows spontaneously from hotter to cooler bodies, precluding perpetual motion machines of the second kind. This law models sequences like heat conduction through a , where initial gradients propagate as a chain of molecular collisions, culminating in and illustrating the in natural phenomena. A macroscopic illustration of physical determinism in event chains is the falling dominoes setup, where tipping the first domino initiates a cascade of topples, each governed by gravitational and frictional forces, approximating classical predictability on human scales despite microscopic quantum fluctuations. Experimental studies confirm that the chain's speed and stability depend on factors like domino spacing and surface friction, reinforcing the deterministic nature of such sequences under Newtonian rules.

In Biology and Systems Theory

In , chains of events represent sequential processes driven by selective pressures that lead to adaptations over time. described as a chain beginning with genetic mutations introducing variation within a , followed by differential survival and reproduction based on environmental , ultimately resulting in heritable adaptations. For instance, in the case of the during the , pollution darkened tree bark, favoring darker moths in a survival sequence that shifted dominance from light to dark variants within decades. This illustrates how incremental events in a chain can accumulate to drive or trait fixation, as evidenced in records showing transitional forms. Ecological systems further exemplify chains of events through interconnected food webs, where sequential interactions maintain balance. Predator-prey dynamics form cyclic chains, such as those modeled by Alfred Lotka and in the , where population fluctuations of s lead to predator booms, followed by prey declines and subsequent predator crashes, sustaining oscillatory patterns without external intervention. In ecosystems, for example, a chain might start with algal overgrowth due to nutrient runoff, disrupting , which cascades to reduced populations and weakened structure. These sequences highlight the fragility of , where disruptions in one link can propagate through the web, as observed in studies of impacts on marine chains. Systems theory integrates chains of events via feedback mechanisms that regulate biological homeostasis. Norbert Wiener's foundational work in (1948) distinguished open chains, which proceed linearly without self-correction, from closed chains incorporating to stabilize systems, such as hormonal regulation in the where insulin release counters blood sugar spikes to maintain equilibrium. In complex adaptive systems, simple event chains can yield emergent properties; Edward Lorenz's 1963 analysis of atmospheric models demonstrated how minor initial variations, like a butterfly's wing flap, amplify through nonlinear interactions to produce vastly different weather outcomes, a concept now central to in . Epidemiology provides a practical example of event chains in disease transmission, where susceptible individuals encounter pathogens, leading to infection, recovery, or death in sequential waves. The foundational model by Kermack and McKendrick () outlines this as a chain dividing populations into susceptible, infected, and recovered compartments, with transitions driven by contact rates, illustrating how early interventions can break the chain to curb outbreaks like pandemics. Such biological chains underscore the interplay of and stochasticity, informing conservation and strategies.

Narrative and Analytical Uses

In Storytelling and Literature

In narrative theory, chains of events form the backbone of dramatic structure, particularly through models like Freytag's pyramid, which outlines a sequence of rising action building toward a climax and subsequent resolution. Developed by German playwright in his 1863 treatise Technique of the Drama, this pyramid conceptualizes the plot as an interconnected series of escalating incidents driven by cause and effect, where each event propels the story forward to heighten tension before descending into denouement. This framework emphasizes the sequential nature of events as essential to audience engagement, mirroring the basic characteristics of chains where initial actions trigger subsequent ones in a logical progression. Literary devices such as and further exploit chains of events to construct cohesive plots, often drawing on ancient principles of dramatic . In Aristotle's (circa 335 BCE), —defined as a sudden arising from the plot's internal logic—illustrates how events must interconnect causally to achieve tragic impact, ensuring that outcomes feel inevitable yet surprising through a tightly woven sequence. reinforces this by hinting at future links in the chain, building anticipation and underscoring the deterministic flow from cause to effect in narratives. In historical narratives, chains of events appear as causal sequences that explain the progression of conflicts, as seen in ' History of the Peloponnesian War (5th century BCE), where the Athenian historian meticulously traces the war's origins and developments through interconnected political and military incidents to demonstrate human motivations and inevitabilities. This approach pioneered by prioritizing empirical cause-and-effect linkages over mythological explanations, influencing how later writers structure accounts of real-world sequences. Modern storytelling extends chains of events into interactive and speculative formats, such as the branching narratives in the series published by starting in the late 1970s, which allow readers to select paths that diverge and reconverge, exploring multiple outcomes from pivotal decisions. A prominent example is the 2004 film , directed by and , where protagonist Evan Treborn's attempts to alter past events unleash cascading alterations in the present, vividly depicting how minor initial changes propagate through a chain to radically transform lives.

In Accident and Risk Analysis

In accident and analysis, chains of events are systematically examined to identify the sequences of failures or incidents that culminate in accidents, enabling the development of preventive measures. This approach emphasizes tracing causal links backward from outcomes to root causes, revealing how multiple interdependent events align to breach safety barriers. techniques, such as the "5 Whys" method, originated at in the 1930s under and were later refined by as part of the ; it involves repeatedly asking "why" (typically five times) to peel back layers of an event chain until the fundamental cause is uncovered, thereby disrupting potential recurrence in industrial settings. Event tree analysis () builds on this by constructing forward-looking branching diagrams that map possible sequences from an initiating event—such as equipment malfunction—to various outcomes, including accidents or safe resolutions, quantifying probabilities along each path. Developed in the mid-1970s as part of the Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400) by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, ETA gained prominence in nuclear safety following the 1979 , where it helped model partial core meltdown sequences and inform regulatory improvements by the U.S. (NRC). This method highlights critical decision points in the chain, allowing analysts to prioritize interventions that reduce the likelihood of adverse branches. Complementing ETA, fault tree analysis (FTA) employs a top-down, deductive approach to decompose an undesired top event (e.g., system failure) into contributing sub-events and basic faults, represented as a logic tree of "and" and "or" gates to model failure chains. Pioneered in 1962 by H.A. Watson at Bell Telephone Laboratories for the Minuteman missile project, FTA was formalized in the 1960s and has since become a standard in and chemical industries for . By identifying minimal cut sets—shortest chains leading to failure—FTA supports targeted redundancies, such as backup systems, to break the chain at vulnerable nodes. In practical applications, particularly , the illustrates how chains of events enable accidents when latent weaknesses in multiple defensive layers align, akin to holes in slices of lining up to allow passage. Proposed by psychologist James Reason in his 1990 book , this model analyzes real-world incidents by layering organizational, supervisory, and active failures, as seen in the 1986 disaster where design flaws, managerial pressures, and procedural oversights formed a penetrating chain. Similarly, the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster exemplifies a catastrophic event chain: inherent reactor design flaws (e.g., positive ) combined with operator errors during a safety test—exacerbated by inadequate training and procedural violations—leading to a , graphite fire, and core meltdown, as detailed in the International Agency's (IAEA) official report. These analyses underscore the value of chain-of-events frameworks in fostering resilient systems across high-risk sectors.

Value and Decision Contexts

In Ethical and Moral Reasoning

In ethical and moral reasoning, chains of events play a central role in attributing moral responsibility, particularly through the concept of moral causality, where blame or praise is assigned based on the voluntariness of actions within a sequence. Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics (circa 350 BCE), argues that moral responsibility arises from voluntary actions, defined as those performed with knowledge of the circumstances and without external compulsion, thereby linking the agent's deliberate choice to the ensuing chain of consequences. This framework distinguishes voluntary acts, which originate from the agent's rational deliberation and character, from involuntary ones caused by ignorance or force, emphasizing that accountability traces back to the initiating decision rather than distant outcomes. Consequentialist theories, such as developed by and , evaluate moral chains by focusing on the overall outcomes rather than the initiating intentions, positing that the rightness of an action sequence is determined by its net contribution to pleasure or happiness. Bentham's hedonistic calculus in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789) assesses actions by their tendency to maximize pleasure and minimize pain across affected parties, viewing chains of events as morally justifiable if the aggregate good outweighs harm, even if intermediate steps involve difficult choices. Mill refines this in Utilitarianism (1861) by incorporating qualitative distinctions among pleasures, arguing that ethical evaluation requires tracing event sequences to their foreseeable impacts on human well-being, thereby justifying means by their ends in moral deliberation. In contrast, deontological perspectives, exemplified by Immanuel Kant's ethics, prioritize the moral quality of intentions at the chain's initiation over subsequent endpoints, asserting that responsibility stems from adherence to universal moral laws rather than results. In Groundwork of the (1785), Kant contends that actions derive moral worth from the agent's good will, motivated by duty and the , which demands maxims capable of universalization regardless of consequences; thus, intervening in a chain is wrong if it violates rational principles, even if it prevents greater harm. This approach limits blame attribution to the original intent, insulating agents from responsibility for unintended downstream effects unless they foresaw and endorsed them. Modern ethical discussions extend these ideas through dilemmas like the , introduced by in 1967, which probes moral intervention in causal chains by contrasting diverting a trolley to kill one person instead of five (often seen as permissible) with actively pushing someone to achieve the same result (typically impermissible), highlighting tensions between consequentialist outcome maximization and deontological constraints on agency. These variants test how responsibility distributes along event sequences, particularly when agents must initiate or alter chains to avert harm, revealing intuitive distinctions in moral culpability based on direct versus indirect causation. In , such chains underscore accountability for , as seen in the bioaccumulation of pesticides like documented by in (1962), where initial agricultural applications trigger a sequence of ecological disruptions and health harms, assigning primary moral responsibility to the originating actors—such as corporations or policymakers—for foreseeable cascading effects on ecosystems and .

In Economic and Decision Theory

In decision theory, chains of events are analyzed through expected utility theory, which evaluates sequences of outcomes by weighting their utilities according to associated probabilities, enabling rational choice under uncertainty. This framework, developed by and , posits that a decision-maker's preferences over lotteries—probabilistic chains of events—can be represented by a utility function where the expected utility of a chain is the sum of each outcome's utility multiplied by its probability. For instance, in a multi-stage decision process, such as choosing between investment options with sequential risks, the overall utility incorporates probabilities of transitional events like market fluctuations leading to gains or losses. In , event chains manifest as sequential moves in strategic interactions, where players anticipate future responses in a series of interconnected decisions. Repeated games extend the classic by modeling cooperation or defection as a chain of iterative choices, allowing reputations and strategies like tit-for-tat to influence outcomes over multiple rounds. This sequential structure highlights how early actions in the chain, such as initial cooperation, can trigger retaliatory or reciprocal events, altering paths in finitely or infinitely repeated scenarios. Economic models often depict disruptions as cascading event sequences that propagate risks through interconnected markets. The exemplifies this, beginning with an Arab oil embargo in that halted exports to the , leading to acute shortages, quadrupled oil prices by early 1974, and widespread inflation that contracted the U.S. economy by approximately 2.5 percent. Such chains underscore vulnerabilities in global trade, where an initial geopolitical event triggers supply constraints, price surges, and macroeconomic ripple effects like . Risk assessment in economic contexts employs simulations to forecast outcomes of event chains by generating thousands of probabilistic scenarios based on random sampling of variables. Originating in the 1940s during the , this method was pioneered by and to model complex probabilistic processes, later adapted for economic risk analysis without requiring explicit enumeration of all paths. For example, in an investment decision chain—starting with a market signal prompting a purchase, followed by potential or —Bayesian updating refines probability estimates of subsequent events by incorporating new evidence, such as price data, to revise prior beliefs and optimize portfolio allocation. This iterative process enhances predictive accuracy in volatile chains, as demonstrated in financial models where updated posteriors guide trading decisions amid uncertain sequences.

References

  1. [1]
    Causal chain - Oxford Reference
    The sequence of events leading up to some final effect, where each member of the sequence causes its succeeding member to come about.
  2. [2]
    Chain of events – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis
    A chain of events refers to a sequence of interconnected occurrences where each event is caused by the preceding one, leading to a particular outcome or result.
  3. [3]
    CHAIN REACTION definition | Cambridge English Dictionary
    a set of related events in which each event causes the next one, or a chemical reaction in which each change causes another.
  4. [4]
    Causal Chain - (Intro to Semantics and Pragmatics) - Fiveable
    A causal chain refers to a sequence of events where one event (the cause) leads to another event (the effect), ultimately connecting multiple outcomes in a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Causality | Research Starters - EBSCO
    ” Causality sometimes proceeds in a chain of causes and effects, with one event causing one effect, which then causes another effect. Causality is one of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    An Event Has Many Causes - The Information Philosopher
    Selecting the "one" cause of an event is an exercise in story-telling. The ancient idea of a "causal chain," with one event being the cause of the next event, ...
  7. [7]
    What is causal chain analysis? - TDA/SAP Methodology - IW:LEARN
    At its most basic, a causal chain is an ordered sequence of events linking the causes of a problem with its effects.
  8. [8]
    Accident Investigation Guide, 2005 Edition: Chapter 2 - Forest Service
    Oct 15, 2016 · Establish the sequence of events leading to the accident to answer the questions: who, what, when, where, and how. Identify any contributing ...
  9. [9]
    Chain of events model for safety management: Data analytics ...
    In chain of events model, an accident path is defined by a series of sequential events from initiating event to accident realization. In this study ...
  10. [10]
    Chain Of Events - Aviation Safety Magazine
    Distractions, interruptions and unexpected events occur, and can alter the outcome of an otherwise normal flight.
  11. [11]
    Sequence of Events: AP® English Literature Review - Albert.io
    2 Jun 2025 · The sequence of events refers to the specific order in which incidents occur within a narrative. This can follow a simple chronological path or ...
  12. [12]
    Sequence of Events in a Story: How to Order Scenes That Build ...
    Let's take a look at how sequencing events in a story will allow you to engage the three modalities that entertain readers and move the story forward.
  13. [13]
    Chain reaction Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary
    1. a series of events in which each event causes the next one : a series of events caused by one single event
  14. [14]
    Causation | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    The causal event is the conjunction of these two events. Had that event not ... There is a chain of counterfactual dependence, and indeed a chain of causation.What Is Causation and Why... · Semantic Analyses · Ontological Stances
  15. [15]
    The Structure of Causal Chains - jstor
    The important thing about envisioning causal chains as stretched across a time series of layered matrices is that doing so calls attention to the different ...
  16. [16]
    The links of causal chains - Kamp - 2022 - Wiley Online Library
    Feb 13, 2022 · The paper argues that causal chains which connect users in command of a name N with those present at the baptismal event in which N was introduced are branches ...
  17. [17]
    Backward Causation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 27, 2001 · The notion of backward causation, however, stands for the idea that the temporal order of cause and effect is a mere contingent feature.
  18. [18]
    Aristotle on Causality - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jan 11, 2006 · In the Physics, Aristotle builds on his general account of the four causes by developing explanatory principles that are specific to the study ...Missing: chains | Show results with:chains
  19. [19]
    David Hume - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Feb 26, 2001 · A master stylist in any genre, his major philosophical works—A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740), the Enquiries concerning Human ...
  20. [20]
    absolute and relational space and motion, post-Newtonian theories
    Aug 11, 2006 · For one thing, Galilean spacetime is a mathematical innovation posterior to Einstein's 1905 theory; before then, Galilean spacetime had not ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  21. [21]
    Award ceremony speech - NobelPrize.org
    In 1913 the German chemist Max Bodenstein put forth an idea which proved to be extremely fertile, the idea of chain reactions. This means, that if two molecules ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    a philosophical essay on probabilities. - Project Gutenberg
    This philosophical essay is the development of a lecture on probabilities which I delivered in 1795 to the normal schools whither I had been called, by a ...
  23. [23]
    Causal Determinism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jan 23, 2003 · Causal Determinism ... Causal determinism is, roughly speaking, the idea that every event is necessitated by antecedent events and conditions ...Winter 2023 EditionSummer 2021 Edition
  24. [24]
    Ancient Theories of Freedom and Determinism
    Oct 30, 2020 · Human beings are aggregates of atoms, and our decisions are caused by the motions of the atoms that make up our minds. If the atoms that make us ...
  25. [25]
    Compatibilism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Apr 26, 2004 · Compatibilism is the thesis that free will is compatible with determinism. Because free will is typically taken to be a necessary condition of moral ...Arguments for Incompatibilism · State of the Art · IncompatibilistMissing: chain | Show results with:chain
  26. [26]
    What Einstein Really Thought about Quantum Mechanics
    Sep 1, 2015 · Einstein accepted that quantum mechanics was indeterministic—as well he might, because he was the one who had discovered its indeterminism ...
  27. [27]
    Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will
    Aug 17, 2000 · We shall examine here the account advanced by Robert Kane. 2.3 Efforts of Will. Kane holds that a free decision or other free action is one for ...
  28. [28]
    Arguments for Incompatibilism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Oct 14, 2003 · Nomological and logical determinism are very different kinds of claims. Logical determinism is a claim about truth; nomological determinism ...
  29. [29]
    Chaos - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jul 16, 2008 · The mathematical version of this property is known as sensitive dependence and such sensitivity has implications for predictability of future ...
  30. [30]
    Free Will - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jan 7, 2002 · Several of these start with an argument that free will is incompatible with causal determinism, which we will not rehearse here. Instead, we ...
  31. [31]
    Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica by Isaac Newton
    Mar 2, 2009 · The work is a foundational text in the fields of physics and mathematics, addressing the laws of motion and universal gravitation.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES - Fourmilab
    This edition of Einstein's On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies is based on the English translation of his original 1905 German-language paper. (published as ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Space and Time - UCSD Math
    It was Hermann Minkowski (Einstein's mathematics professor) who announced the new four- dimensional (spacetime) view of the world in 1908, which he deduced from ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem
    1926. Page 25. Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. 133 und Radialquant, was heute allgemein als korrekt angesehen wird; allein es fehlt noch die zur ...
  35. [35]
    Ueber die bewegende Kraft der Wärme, und die Gesetze, welche ...
    Mar 24, 2008 · Ueber die bewegende Kraft der Wärme, und die Gesetze, welche sich daraus für die Wärmelehre selbst ableiten Lassen. by: Clausius, R. ... 79, 1850.
  36. [36]
    When dominoes fall, how fast the row topples depends on friction
    Jul 15, 2022 · It's a chain reaction: Each falling domino topples into the next, then the next and so on. And the speed of that cascade depends on friction, ...Share This · Models: How Computers Make... · Power Words
  37. [37]
    Freytag's Technique of the drama - Internet Archive
    ... FREYTAG'S. TECHNIQUE OF THE DRAMA. AN EXPOSITION OF DRAMATIC. COMPOSITION AND ART. Dr. GUSTAV FREYTAG. AN AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION FROM THE SIXTH GERMAN EDITION.
  38. [38]
    Aristotle: Poetics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    The Poetics of Aristotle (384-322 BCE) is a much-disdained book. So unpoetic a soul as Aristotle's has no business speaking about such a topic.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    History of the Peloponnesian War - Project Gutenberg
    Sep 7, 2021 · Thucydides, an Athenian, wrote the history of the war between the Peloponnesians and the Athenians, beginning at the moment that it broke out, ...
  40. [40]
    Turn to Page…: A History of Choose Your Own Adventure Books
    Dec 20, 2021 · In 1978, Bantam was beginning a new children's imprint, and Montgomery took the series to the publisher, asking if they would like to acquire.Missing: branching | Show results with:branching
  41. [41]
    The Butterfly Effect (2004) - PopMatters
    Jan 22, 2004 · How does any one of these events change or sustain history, fictional as that history may be? And what many other events are affected in turn?
  42. [42]
    Aristotle's Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    May 1, 2001 · Aristotle wrote two ethical treatises: the Nicomachean Ethics and the Eudemian Ethics ... ), 2010, Moral Psychology and Human Action in Aristotle, ...
  43. [43]
    Consequentialism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    May 20, 2003 · Classic utilitarianism is consequentialist as opposed to deontological because of what it denies. It denies that moral rightness depends ...
  44. [44]
    Kant's Moral Philosophy
    Feb 23, 2004 · According to Kant, what is most distinctive about motivation by duty is that it consists of bare respect for the moral law. What naturally comes ...Good Will, Moral Worth and Duty · Duty and Respect for Moral Law
  45. [45]
    Doctrine of Double Effect - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jul 17, 2023 · The Trolley Problems, Pushing a Bystander onto a Track to stop the trolley vs Diverting a Trolley onto a track with one person away from a track ...
  46. [46]
    Environmental Ethics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jun 3, 2002 · Consequentialist ethical theories consider intrinsic “value” / “disvalue” or “goodness” / “badness” to be more fundamental moral notions than “ ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Theory
    Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility theory introduces one operation for the combining two lotteries into a third lottery: convex combination. The convex combination ...
  48. [48]
    Prisoner's Dilemma - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Sep 4, 1997 · Particular attention is paid to iterated and evolutionary versions of the game. In the fomer, the prisoner's dilemma game is played repeatedly, ...5. Multiple Players... · 14. Indefinite Iteration · 16. Evolution
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Revealed Reputations in the Finitely-Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma
    Nov 19, 2014 · The sequential-move game allows us to focus on the second-mover and her opportunities for reputation building. We study this by varying the ...
  50. [50]
    Oil Embargo, 1973–1974 - Office of the Historian
    The full impact of the embargo, including high inflation and stagnation in oil importers, resulted from a complex set of factors beyond the proximate actions ...
  51. [51]
    Oil Shock of 1973-74 - Federal Reserve History
    The embargo ceased US oil imports from participating OAPEC nations, and began a series of production cuts that altered the world price of oil.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Bayesian Learning and the Pricing of New Information
    Investment decisions are almost always made under uncertainty. Over time, learning occurs, as the flow of information on the costs and ben-.<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    The Bayesian Method of Financial Forecasting - Investopedia
    The Bayesian method can help you refine probability estimates using an intuitive process. Any mathematically based topic can be taken to complex depths.