Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Qipao

The qipao (Chinese: 旗袍; pinyin: qípáo), also known as the cheongsam, is a one-piece women's garment originating from the loose, long robes known as qizhuang worn by Manchu women as formal attire during China's Qing dynasty (1644–1912). It features a high mandarin collar, frog fastenings, and originally full-length coverage, reflecting Manchu ethnic influences imposed on Han Chinese society under Qing rule. Following the that ended imperial rule, the qipao evolved in Republican-era urban centers, particularly , into a more form-fitting silhouette with shortened hemlines and high side slits by the and , incorporating Western tailoring techniques to symbolize women's social emancipation and modern aesthetics amid rapid industrialization and cultural shifts. This transformation elevated it from ethnic minority dress to a of Chinese femininity and elegance, popularized among the emerging and exported via , , and communities. Peaking in popularity from the to the before wartime and communist policies curtailed its extravagance, the qipao persists today as a high-fashion staple for formal occasions, weddings, and cultural festivals worldwide, often customized with embroidery or modern fabrics while retaining its core structure as a marker of refined heritage. Its global adaptations have sparked debates over cultural appropriation, though empirical adoption patterns show it as a voluntarily embraced rather than imposed .

Terminology

Etymology and Regional Names

The term qipao (旗袍) derives from , where (旗) refers to the "banners" of the Manchu military and administrative system established during the early in 1644, and páo (袍) means "robe" or "gown," thus literally translating to "banner gown" or "Manchu gown." This nomenclature originally denoted the loose-fitting, one-piece robes worn by Manchu women as part of ethnic dress mandated under Qing sumptuary laws, distinguishing them from attire. In Cantonese-speaking regions, the garment is commonly called cheongsam (長衫 or 長袍), a of chēung sām, meaning "long robe" or "long gown," reflecting a broader description of its form rather than ethnic origin. The term gained prominence in , Province, and diaspora communities during the , particularly after the when the dress evolved into its fitted, modern silhouette in and spread via film and . While qipao and cheongsam are often used interchangeably in English to describe the same garment, qipao predominates in Mandarin contexts like and , whereas cheongsam prevails in Cantonese-influenced areas such as and . Other regional variations include sāamfuk (衫褲) in some dialects for two-piece ensembles resembling early qipao styles, though these are less common today and typically distinguish separates from the signature one-piece form. The adoption of these names underscores the garment's adaptation from Qing-era Manchu origins to a Republican-period (1912–1949) symbol of modernity, with terminology reflecting linguistic and cultural divides rather than substantive design differences.

Historical Origins

Manchu Foundations in the Qing Dynasty


The qipao originated as the traditional one-piece robe worn by Manchu women during the Qing Dynasty (1644–1911), established after the Manchu conquest of Ming China in 1644. Known as the "banner gown" (旗袍, qípáo), the term derives from the Manchu Eight Banners military and administrative system, under which the conquering ethnic group was organized, with women of banner households required to wear this garment as a marker of identity. The robe's design reflected Manchu nomadic heritage, prioritizing practicality for equestrian activities, featuring a straight silhouette, high stand-up collar, side slits for mobility, and closure on the right side with looped fabric fastenings and knotted buttons.
Early Qing emperors, starting with the (r. 1644–1661), enforced Manchu dress codes on to preserve ethnic distinctions, mandating the qipao for women in official and daily contexts within banner communities, while women faced pressure to adopt it publicly but often retained their (short jacket over skirt) ensembles privately. The garment was typically constructed from , sometimes embroidered with motifs symbolizing status, and extended to floor length, though looser and less body-conforming than later iterations, allowing layering underneath. Informal variants like the changyi and chenyi emerged prominently during the Qianlong Emperor's reign (1736–1795), incorporating subtle influences such as wider sleeves while maintaining core Manchu elements like the lack of beneath to signify non-laboring status. This foundational attire underscored Manchu cultural dominance, with the qipao serving as both everyday wear for all social strata within banner families and ceremonial dress for , often paired with elaborate hairstyles like the dual-wing chignon. Despite gradual —evident in mid-Qing adoptions of Han-style and colors—the robe retained its distinct one-piece form, distinguishing it from Han multi-piece ensembles and laying the structural basis for subsequent evolutions.

Republican-Era Invention and Popularization

The modern qipao emerged in during the 1920s, evolving from earlier Manchu-influenced robes into a form-fitting garment with a high , asymmetrical closure, and side slits for mobility. This transformation was spurred by the in 1919, which advocated women's emancipation, education, and rejection of confining traditional attire like loose changpao and foot-binding, leading urban women to pair modified robes with and heels for practical everyday wear. By the late , 's cosmopolitan environment fostered further innovations, incorporating Western influences such as shorter hemlines above the ankle, fitted bodices to accentuate the figure, reduced sleeve lengths, and decorative elements like patterns, reflecting consumerism, cultural hybridity, and feminist ideals. Popularization accelerated through adoption by film stars, socialites, politicians' wives, and the urban in cities like , where it symbolized modernity, sensuality, and national identity amid Republican China's push for progress. In 1929, the Republican government designated the qipao as the official national dress for women, endorsing its role in unifying and promoting a modern Chinese femininity. The 1930s represented the garment's peak, becoming ubiquitous daily wear for women across social strata in major urban centers, with tailors producing thousands of variations using and imported fabrics.

Mid-20th Century Transformations

During the early 1940s, the qipao adapted to wartime austerity in amid the (1937–1945), featuring shortened hemlines to mid-calf or knee length, lowered or absent collars, reduced or eliminated sleeves, simplified frog fastenings, and subdued colors to reflect economic constraints and practicality. Fabric scarcity elevated prices, curtailing elaborate designs previously common in urban centers like . In the late 1940s, prior to the Communist victory, the garment briefly revived with tighter silhouettes, knee-length cuts, and decorative elements such as sequins, beading, lace, and zippers, becoming ubiquitous among urban women who often owned multiple pieces. The establishment of the in 1949 marked a sharp decline in mainland usage, as the qipao was supplanted by utilitarian and Lenin suits and stigmatized as a relic of and Western influence, rendering its wear potentially . The Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) intensified suppression, with qipao wearers facing accusations and persecution for bourgeois tendencies, effectively eradicating the style from public life in the mainland. In contrast, Hong Kong and Taiwan preserved and adapted it; fleeing Shanghainese tailors bolstered production in Hong Kong, where 1950s–1960s versions emphasized second-skin tightness and featured in cinema, such as depictions of 1960s daily and formal wear. In these regions, 1940s innovations like bodice darts to accommodate brassieres enhanced bust shaping, aligning with shifting body ideals. Overseas Chinese communities similarly upheld it as a marker of cultural identity.

Late 20th and Early 21st Century Shifts

Following the (1966–1976), during which traditional attire like the qipao was largely suppressed in favor of Mao suits, the garment experienced a revival in starting in the 1980s amid economic reforms and a reevaluation of . This resurgence aligned with Deng Xiaoping's opening-up policies, which encouraged a return to pre-communist aesthetics and fostered consumer interest in traditional clothing as symbols of national identity. Designers in began incorporating brighter colors and intricate patterns, adapting the qipao for contemporary wear while retaining its form-fitting silhouette. By the late 1980s and into the 1990s, diversification emerged with variations in length, sleeve styles, and fabric choices to suit urban professional and ceremonial contexts, moving away from its earlier everyday status. The qipao transitioned from suppressed relic to a marker of cultural revival, often featured in fashion shows and media, though it remained more formal than casual attire. In , the establishment of the Cheongsam Salon further institutionalized its promotion, hosting exhibitions and promoting craftsmanship amid growing domestic appreciation. Into the early , amplified the qipao's reach, with adaptations incorporating modern materials such as synthetics, elastic blends, and even or for markets, alongside shorter hemlines and asymmetrical designs to appeal to younger consumers. This period saw its integration into international fashion, bridal wear, and pop culture, symbolizing both and fusion, though purists critiqued hybrid versions for diluting authenticity. By the , renewed global recognition positioned the qipao as a versatile icon, worn in communities for festivals and by designers deconstructing its elements for collections.

Design and Construction

Core Structural Elements

The qipao's core structure centers on a high , an upright band encircling the neck that typically measures 4-5 cm in height with rounded corners at the for comfort and . This collar, often padded and sculpted rather than folded, provides rigidity and frames the wearer's face, enhancing posture and formality. The garment features an asymmetrical front with a right-over-left overlap running diagonally from the shoulder to the hip, fastened by pankou—handcrafted fabric loops and knots serving as frog buttons. These fasteners, usually numbering three to five and placed along the , ensure secure closure while adding ornamental detail derived from traditional tailoring. In modern constructions, hidden zippers or press studs may supplement or replace them for practicality. The and integrate into a single, elongated tailored for a close fit, achieved via curved side seams hand-finished to the body without or gathers in traditional forms. Custom patterns based on precise measurements—such as shoulder slope and waist position—guide the assembly from straight fabric panels cut on for optimal drape and shape retention. Two high side slits, often starting at mid-thigh or hip level, permit leg movement essential for wearability, particularly in earlier ankle-length versions. Edges and openings are reinforced with techniques like rolled (gun) or , frequently in self or contrasting fabric, to prevent fraying and define seams structurally. This framework, emphasizing verticality and , distinguishes the qipao from fuller-skirted garments.

Fabrics, Materials, and Craftsmanship

Traditional qipaos are primarily crafted from , selected for its smooth texture, natural sheen, and ability to conform to the body's form. Mulberry silk, produced by the silkworm, dominates due to its fine quality and historical precedence in textiles. , a woven silk incorporating raised patterns often with or silver threads, imparts a luxurious, ornate appearance suited to ceremonial wear. brocade variants enhance the garment's elegance with a glossy surface and intricate jacquard motifs. During the Republican era (1912–1949), fabric choices evolved toward lighter, more versatile materials to align with modern aesthetics, including printed crepe for subtle patterns, velvet backed with crepe for added structure and lining with plain for comfort. Lace integrations and semi-transparent appeared in some designs, reflecting Western influences while retaining foundations. Padding with wadding provided in cooler variants, as seen in garments with synthetic exteriors lined in lightweight . Craftsmanship emphasizes meticulous hand-sewing, with curved seams tailored to achieve a fitted without excessive , often employing steam shaping for precision. and bias binding, such as silk tape for edges, ensure and refined finishes. Fastenings consist of pankou—hand-knotted buttons formed from bias-cut strips glued, stitched, turned, and pressed into flat ribbons, shaped as straight knots or elaborate florals like . These elements, combined with optional in floral or symbolic motifs, highlight the garment's artisanal heritage, transitioning from Qing dynasty's heavy, multi-layered elaborations to streamlined techniques.

Evolving Styles and Variations

During the Republican era (1912–1949), the qipao shifted from loose, robe-like Manchu origins to a more tailored, body-contouring form, with hemlines rising from floor-length to mid-calf or knee by the mid-1920s under Western influences such as flapper dresses. Side slits deepened to 30–50 cm for walking ease, and the garment adopted a straight cut that transitioned to curved darts for a fitted silhouette by the 1930s. Shanghai tailors pioneered these changes, producing over 10,000 qipaos annually by 1937 in the city's garment district. The 1930s marked the peak of stylistic refinement, with classic iterations featuring high collars (5–8 cm tall), frog fastenings along the right shoulder, and sleeve variations from full-length to cap or sleeveless for warmer climates. Embellishments included subtle and limited to 10–20% of the surface to maintain elegance, while hemlines stabilized at ankle level with slits reaching thigh height in urban styles. Hong Kong-style adaptations emerged around 1925, incorporating Western bias cuts for better drape and figure enhancement. Post-1949 in , socialist policies favored looser, calf-length qipaos with minimal ornamentation for practicality, peaking in production at state factories like those in by the . In contrast, and overseas variants retained glamour, adding padded shoulders and shorter sleeves in the , with annual exports exceeding 100,000 units from workshops. Since the economic reforms, modern qipaos have diversified into mini-length (above-knee) versions, asymmetrical slits, and fusions with elements like zippers or lace panels, as seen in collections from 2000 onward. Sleeveless and off-shoulder designs proliferated in the , with synthetic blends replacing pure in 40% of urban productions for affordability. These adaptations reflect global trends, with over 500 designers in specializing in customized variations by 2020.

Cultural and Symbolic Importance

During the Republican era (1912–1949), the qipao emerged as a symbol of Chinese modernity and national identity, reflecting efforts to forge a unified cultural aesthetic amid Western influences and anti-imperialist sentiments. The Nationalist government in 1927 designated the qipao as the national dress for women, promoting it as an embodiment of the "new woman" who rejected feudal practices like foot-binding while retaining elements of traditional elegance. This adoption aligned with broader nationalist campaigns to standardize dress as a marker of sovereignty and progress, distancing China from Qing-era impositions and envisioning a cohesive Han-centric identity. In contemporary , the qipao's revival since the late has intertwined with state-sponsored , positioning it as an icon of ethnic pride and cultural continuity, often showcased in official events and diplomacy. However, its Manchu origins from Qing bannermen attire create tensions with revivalist movements, such as the advocacy, which view the qipao as a symbol of foreign domination rather than authentic Han heritage. Proponents of argue for reclaiming pre-Qing clothing to purify from "barbarian" influences, leading to debates over what constitutes true . Among communities, the qipao serves as a enduring of ethnic , worn during cultural festivals and ceremonies to assert ties to ancestral amid pressures. In places like and , it functions as a visual signifier of Chineseness, bridging generational and diasporic experiences while reinforcing against local multicultural contexts.

Role in Gender Norms and Social Change

During the Republican era (1912–1949), the qipao emerged as a emblem of women's , evolving from loose Manchu robes into a form-fitting garment that accentuated the natural female silhouette and facilitated greater mobility, contrasting sharply with the restrictive practices of foot-binding and voluminous traditional attire. This shift aligned with the May Fourth Movement's push for modernization, education, and reconfiguration, where urban women adopted the qipao to signify entry into public spheres like work and schooling, rejecting Confucian ideals of seclusion and subservience. By 1927, the designated it as the national dress for women, formalizing its role in constructing a modern Chinese that blended indigenous elements with Western tailoring influences, such as shorter hemlines and integrated undergarments. The qipao's design innovations, including high side slits and elbow-length sleeves, embodied a "natural curves" movement that promoted healthy, unbound bodies, directly challenging the aesthetic of deformed feet prevalent until the early 20th century's bans and cultural campaigns. However, its sensuality provoked backlash; in 1934, provincial regulations in areas like sought to curb overly revealing styles, highlighting tensions between progressive liberation and conservative moralism amid rapid . Figures like , who popularized a refined version in , exemplified how the garment conferred agency and to educated elites, fostering a hybrid that empowered women to negotiate personal expression against state and societal norms. Following the 1949 Communist victory, the qipao receded as Maoist policies emphasized through unisex uniforms like the suit and practical trousers, aligning with proletarian equality that de-emphasized feminine adornment in favor of labor-oriented attire. This reflected a ideological toward struggle over gendered distinction, with traditional dresses deemed bourgeois remnants. Its partial in the post-1978 , particularly in and urban , signaled a reclamation of feminine aesthetics amid , underscoring the garment's enduring adaptability to oscillating social norms—from enforced to consumer-driven individualism.

Domestic and Diasporic Appreciations

In mainland China, the qipao is valued for its representation of feminine elegance, modesty, and historical continuity, frequently donned during cultural festivals and formal events to evoke national heritage. The garment's revival since the late 20th century has positioned it as a staple in contemporary fashion, with events like the inaugural China Qipao Culture Festival in Shenyang on May 24, 2019, drawing participants to showcase its craftsmanship and symbolism. Similarly, the Hangzhou Qipao Festival promotes its global wear among women, highlighting its enduring appeal in modern society. Among younger demographics, the qipao garners appreciation for blending tradition with trendiness, often featured in embroidered forms at social gatherings. In and , the qipao symbolizes nostalgia and , reinforcing its domestic cultural resonance despite stylistic evolutions. Its aesthetic features continue to influence women's dress choices, celebrated for embodying strength and identity rooted in Republican-era innovations. Among communities, the qipao functions as a key emblem of ethnic identity and cultural preservation, worn during celebrations, weddings, and pageants to affirm ties to ancestral traditions. In , it has historically marked personal and collective identity, evolving through the 1950s-1960s as a reflection of local distinctiveness. Singapore's viewed the cheongsam as a signifier of aligned with promoted in the late , integrating it into until the 1970s. Globally, it serves as an icon of Chineseness, fostering pride and continuity in settings through formal and ceremonial use.

Modern Applications and Adaptations

Everyday and Ceremonial Wear in

In contemporary , the qipao has largely ceased to function as everyday wear since the 1950s, supplanted by practical Western-influenced amid rapid and the shift toward Mao suits during the mid-20th century. Modern adaptations marketed as "daily qipao" exist, featuring looser fits, stretch fabrics, and shorter hemlines for casual outings, but these remain niche and uncommon in urban daily life, where , t-shirts, and attire predominate. Surveys and anecdotal reports indicate that while some women in cities like or might wear simplified versions occasionally for shopping or social dinners, it is not normalized due to its form-fitting nature restricting movement and its association with formality. Ceremonially, the qipao retains prominence for events symbolizing and festivity. During celebrations, women often select embroidered silk qipaos in red or gold to embody prosperity and tradition, though not universally—participation varies by region and family customs, with urban youth favoring hybrid modern styles. In weddings, it serves as bridal attire or for tea ceremonies, typically in vibrant red with phoenix motifs for auspiciousness; a 2023 analysis noted its use in over 20% of urban Chinese weddings incorporating traditional elements, reflecting post-1980s revival efforts by designers and state media promoting ethnicity symbols. Formal banquets, galas, and national holidays like the parade also feature qipaos among performers and dignitaries, as seen in public appearances by figures such as in 2014 state visits, underscoring its role in diplomatic and patriotic displays. This ceremonial persistence stems from post-Cultural Revolution cultural restoration policies since 1978, which encouraged revival of pre-1949 attire to foster , though everyday adoption lags due to climate impracticality in humid summers and the garment's labor-intensive tailoring. The qipao has influenced Western fashion since the 1930s, when Shanghai's modernized versions blending traditional silhouettes with Western tailoring gained international attention through films and expatriate communities. This led to its adoption by celebrities such as , , and , who wore variations that highlighted the garment's fabrics and embroidered details, merging Eastern with global appeal. Designers like and drew inspiration from its form-fitting structure and mandarin collars during the 1950s and 1960s in and , incorporating similar high necks and side slits into evening wear collections. On red carpets, the qipao's elements have appeared in gowns by luxury houses, with Carolina Herrera creating custom pieces for Zhang Ziyi at the 2015 Met Gala and Tom Ford dressing Rita Ora for the same event, emphasizing elongated hemlines and pankou frog fastenings. Taylor Swift wore a nude, sparkly Zuhair Murad qipao-inspired gown at the 2012 Grammy Awards, while Chinese actresses Gong Li (in a green-blue version at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival) and Fan Bingbing have showcased elaborate interpretations at international festivals, amplifying its visibility. Western fast-fashion brands like Zara and Shein have adapted motifs such as jacquard prints and frog buttons into affordable dresses, proliferating qipao-like styles in markets outside Asia since the 2010s. In recent years, particularly from onward, trends reflect a resurgence driven by cultural pride among younger generations and communities, with enthusiasts numbering over 6 million by influencing broader Asian garment revivals. Designers like have integrated qipao silhouettes into shows, incorporating contemporary fabrics, tech collaborations, and even NFTs for digital adaptations. Shanghai Tang and Sau Lee modernize the form with gender-fluid cuts, bold colors, and accessible wearability, while brands like Qipology focus on bridal fusions retaining traditional knots alongside strapless necklines. By , cross-cultural fusions include softer pastel palettes and relaxed fits, though increased has reduced overt red-carpet uses compared to prior decades.

Wedding and Formal Contexts

In Chinese weddings, brides frequently don a red qipao during the tea ceremony, a ritual where the couple serves tea to elders to express respect and seek blessings, following a primary Western-style white gown for the main event. The color red embodies good luck, joy, and prosperity, core elements in Chinese matrimonial symbolism rooted in ancient traditions associating it with warding off evil and inviting fortune. Wedding qipaos often incorporate intricate embroidery, such as and patterns denoting the groom and , respectively, to signify marital and auspicious union. Designs may feature extended trains, as in the "" qipao with a 7-meter train showcased in museum exhibitions, enhancing ceremonial grandeur. Some brides prepare multiple qipaos: one for the formal serving and another for the , allowing adaptation to event phases while upholding cultural motifs. Beyond weddings, the qipao functions as formal attire for banquets, diplomatic receptions, and state ceremonies in , valued for its refined form-fitting silhouette that balances with . Female government officials and diplomats wear it at international events to embody national heritage, as seen in Republic-era gowns adapted for modern protocols. constructions with collars, frog fastenings, and side slits predominate, often in red or neutral tones for versatility across occasions like cultural festivals or official dinners. In diasporic communities, it persists in similar formal roles, reinforcing ethnic identity during celebrations.

Controversies and Criticisms

Disputes Over Ethnic and Historical Origins

The precursor to the modern qipao was the qizhuang, a loose-fitting, one-piece robe worn by Manchu women during the early Qing dynasty (1644–1912), characterized by a high collar, side slits for mobility, and floor-length hem, designed to accommodate horseback riding in the Manchu nomadic tradition. This garment was imposed on Han Chinese women through Qing sumptuary laws, which mandated ethnic Manchu dress to enforce cultural assimilation and suppress Han customs, including pre-Qing Han styles like the ruqun (upper jacket and skirt ensemble) prevalent in the Ming dynasty (1368–1644). The term "qipao" itself derives from "Qi" (banner), referencing the Manchu Eight Banners military-social system established in 1601, underscoring its ethnic Manchu specificity rather than broad Han origins. Following the Qing collapse in 1912, the qipao underwent significant transformation in urban Republican China, particularly from the 1920s onward, where Han women and designers narrowed the silhouette, raised hemlines to mid-calf by 1929, and incorporated Western tailoring for a form-fitting aesthetic symbolizing and . This evolution dissociated the garment from its Manchu connotations in popular perception, with adopters framing it as a progressive Chinese style amid the May Fourth Movement's push against feudal traditions, though archival evidence confirms continuity from Qing Manchu precedents rather than invention ex nihilo. Contemporary disputes center on ethnic authenticity, particularly among revivalists since the early 2000s, who argue the qipao represents Manchu cultural imposition on conquered populations, rendering it an alien artifact unfit as emblematic "" dress; proponents of this view prioritize pre-Qing ethnic attire, citing Qing mandates as coercive erasure of sartorial identity. In contrast, mainstream narratives in the since the 1950s have rebranded it as a unified national garment, blending Manchu roots with adaptations to align with multi-ethnic state ideology, though critics highlight this as politicized revisionism overlooking the 268-year Manchu dominion's ethnic hierarchies. These debates have intensified online, with nationalist forums decrying qipao promotion as dilution of heritage, while historical analyses affirm its hybrid Manchu--Western genesis without negating the foundational Manchu ethnic imprint.

Claims of Cultural Appropriation

In May 2018, Daum, an 18-year-old student at Cross High School in , , posted photographs on of herself wearing a red qipao purchased during a in ; the images drew online accusations of cultural appropriation from some Asian American commentators who argued that a non-Chinese individual wearing the garment disrespected its cultural significance. Daum defended her choice, stating she selected the dress from a thrift store in because she admired its beauty and fit, without intending harm, and noted the garment's high collar and embroidered details as reasons for her appreciation. The backlash, which included Twitter posts labeling the act as "yellowface" or theft of cultural elements, primarily originated from English-language social media users in the United States, amplifying debates on platforms like Reddit where opinions divided along lines of viewing the qipao as a sacred ethnic versus a widely exported item. In contrast, responses from internet users on largely rejected the appropriation narrative, with thousands expressing support for Daum and viewing her wear as flattering dissemination of Chinese aesthetics, as evidenced by comments such as "Chinese clothes look beautiful on foreigners" and criticisms of over-sensitivity. Broader claims of qipao appropriation have targeted Western fashion designers and brands, such as and , for incorporating stylized qipao silhouettes—often shortened or altered for runway shows—into collections, with critics in communities arguing these adaptations commodify and dilute the garment's historical ties to Republican-era without crediting origins. Such assertions, frequently voiced in opinion pieces and academic discussions influenced by postcolonial frameworks, contend that non-Chinese adoption exoticizes or sexualizes the qipao, transforming it from a of into a fetishized , though of widespread harm remains anecdotal and contested by garment historians noting the qipao's own 1920s evolution via Western tailoring influences like figure-hugging dresses. These appropriation debates, often amplified by U.S.-centric media and groups sensitive to minority , contrast with commercial realities where qipao-inspired designs appear in from brands like and luxury lines without equivalent outcry in source markets; Chinese state media and exporters, for instance, promote global qipao sales as cultural , with exports reaching millions of units annually by 2020, underscoring a divergence between protectiveness and domestic economic embrace.

Sexualization, Objectification, and Rejection by Revivalists

The qipao's form-fitting silhouette, high side slits, and emphasis on the female figure, which emerged prominently during the and in under Western fashion influences, have contributed to its portrayal as a garment evoking sensuality and exotic allure in global media and fashion. This evolution from looser precedents to a body-hugging , often with curved seams and narrow cuts, positioned the qipao as a symbol of modern but also invited associations with , as seen in depictions and mid-20th-century Orientalist imagery that reduced it to a of curvaceous Eastern allure. In contexts, the qipao has frequently been fetishized, framing women as mysterious and hyper-sexualized figures, a tendency critiqued as reinforcing by blending cultural with subservience and . Such representations, including in and , prioritize the garment's visual appeal over its historical role in everyday or ceremonial wear, leading to critiques that it commodifies wearers as objects of desire rather than agents of cultural expression. Chinese revivalists, particularly within the that gained traction in the 2000s, have rejected the qipao as emblematic of this sexualized modernity, favoring pre-Qing Han-style attire perceived as more authentically ethnic and modest with its layered, flowing designs. Advocates argue the qipao's tight fit and Manchu origins—adapted into a 20th-century form ill-suited to traditional virtues—alienate it from identity, dismissing it as a Westernized or Qing-imposed style that prioritizes bodily accentuation over cultural purity. This stance reflects broader efforts to reclaim non-sexualized traditional clothing amid rising , with proponents viewing the qipao's global image as a distortion that undermines efforts to revive looser, symbolically layered garments from imperial eras.

Comparable Attire

Regional and International Parallels

The Vietnamese áo dài represents a prominent regional parallel to the qipao, featuring a high mandarin collar, fitted bodice, and high side slits that allow mobility while accentuating the female form. Originating in the 18th-century Nguyen Dynasty as a loose tunic, the áo dài underwent modernization in the 1920s and 1930s into its current form-fitting style, paralleling the qipao's evolution from Manchu robes to a sleek Shanghai silhouette during the same era. Both garments symbolize cultural elegance and national identity, often crafted from silk for formal wear, though the áo dài is typically worn over trousers and features forked panels extending from the waist rather than a unified dress with a single prominent slit. In the Philippines, the terno offers another Southeast Asian analogue, with its tailored upper garment emphasizing a slender waist and graceful posture, much like the qipao's emphasis on bodily contours. Evolving from 19th-century pia dresses influenced by Spanish colonial attire, the terno incorporates distinctive pañuelo overshirts and butterfly sleeves (sobrera), distinguishing it from the qipao's simpler sleeve variations and frog fastenings. Scholarly comparisons underscore shared roles in fashion nationalism, where both dresses have been revived post-colonialism to assert ethnic pride and modernity—the qipao in Taiwan and Hong Kong contexts, and the terno in Philippine independence narratives—often tailored to highlight feminine poise in ceremonial settings. Beyond these, the Indonesian kebaya provides a looser parallel through its fitted, translucent blouse (baju kebaya) paired with a , promoting an elongated, modest silhouette akin to early qipao forms. Dating to the 15th-century era and refined under Dutch colonial influence by the , the kebaya prioritizes embroidered translucency and brooch closures over the qipao's full-length seamlessness, yet communities in and have hybridized it into kebaya cheongsam styles for festive occasions like since the mid-20th century. Internationally, direct traditional equivalents to the qipao are scarce, as its combination of high collar, side slits, and body-hugging cut stems from specific East Asian tailoring traditions without precise counterparts in European, African, or American indigenous attire. Conceptual similarities appear in 19th-century Western fitted bodices, such as the Victorian tea gown's emphasis on corseted elegance, but these lack the qipao's integrated length and cultural symbolism, deriving instead from stays and crinolines for structured formality.

References

  1. [1]
    Cheongsam (Qipao) - China Highlights
    The qipao originated from Manchurian costume during the Qing Dynasty (1644–1912). · The qipao was the official formal dress during the Qing Dynasty era. · Both " ...
  2. [2]
    How the Qipao Became the Quintessence of Chinese Elegance
    Feb 21, 2022 · The qipao has its roots in the long robes worn by Manchu women during the Qing Dynasty (1644 – 1912).
  3. [3]
    The Feminist Roots of the Chinese Qipao - ELLE
    May 9, 2024 · the qipao evolved from a square-cut, looser-fitting style—initially related to Manchu dress—to the sheath style in the 1930s ...
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Say Yes To The West: Globalization Of The Qipao | USC China
    Aug 18, 2021 · Chinese dresses like the qipao or cheongsam have become global fashion icons and proliferated into western clothing stores.Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  6. [6]
    What Is a Qipao in Chinese Fashion? - ThoughtCo
    May 12, 2025 · Qipao, also known as cheongsam (旗袍) in Cantonese, is a one-piece Chinese dress that has its origins in Manchu-ruled China back in the 17th century.Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  7. [7]
    Objects That Matter: Qipao | catalogued on FRD
    In Mandarin Chinese, “qipao” translates to the “gowns of the banner people.”[1] It is also referred to as a cheongsam, a Cantonese term for long robe.[2] While ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    More Than a Dress: A Brief History of the Cheongsam – Pearl River ...
    Oct 25, 2019 · Cheongsam is from Cantonese and translates as “long gown” while qipao is from Mandarin and literally means “banner robe.”
  9. [9]
    CHEONGSAM Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    noun cheong· sam ˈchȯŋ-ˌsäm : a dress of southern Chinese origin with a slit skirt and a mandarin collar
  10. [10]
    Cheongsam in Singapore - Article Detail
    The cheongsam is believed to have evolved from a long robe worn by Manchu women during the Qing dynasty (1644–1911) in China. The long gown was cut in a single ...
  11. [11]
    The difference between qipao and cheongsam - The Pankou
    May 7, 2016 · The difference between qipao and cheongsam is that one is Mandarin and the other Cantonese. Both describe the same traditional Chinese ...Missing: regional | Show results with:regional
  12. [12]
    Cheongsam | Fashion 101 Wiki - Fandom
    The word keipo (qipao) is either a more formal term for the female chèuhngsāam, or is used for the two-piece cheongsam variant that is popular in China. ...Missing: regional | Show results with:regional
  13. [13]
    Chinese Qipao | In Search of Costumes from Many Lands
    Initially worn by Manchu women during the Qing dynasty, the qipao is a one-piece floor length dress with side-slits, a round collar, and a curved asymmetrical ...Missing: clothing | Show results with:clothing
  14. [14]
    Chinese dress in the Qing dynasty - Powerhouse Museum
    Manchu women's informal wear comprised two styles of long robe known as changyi and chenyi, which came into vogue during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (1736 ...Missing: qipao | Show results with:qipao
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Qipao and Female Fashion in Republican China and Shanghai ...
    The name and notion of qipao had a robust existence and enjoyed national recognition, but different stages of qipao stood in strong contrast to one another; ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Cox 1 The Qipao: Defining Modern Women in the First Half of the ...
    Through these changes the qipao became a cultural symbol for Chinese women both domestically and abroad. it meant to be a modern woman changed along with the ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Sinicization of Manchu Women in the Qing Dynasty
    Oct 4, 2025 · The evolution leaned to a more Chinese-inspired fashion, culminating in a period during the mid-Qing when Manchu women started adopting Han ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  18. [18]
    The Shanghai Dress - Education - Asian Art Museum
    The qipao is a stylish, sophisticated form-fitting dress that emerged in 1920s Shanghai. Meet Jane Zhu: she's studied qipao patternmaking and construction ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    The Cheongsam: From Egalitarian Origins to Fashion Icon
    Apr 10, 2025 · During the 1920s, celebrities, aristocrats, and politicians made the cheongsam become more popular among the general public. The 1930s and 1940 ...
  20. [20]
    Republican-China Cheongsams and Traditional Craftsmanship
    Both traditional Chinese silk and imported western fabrics can be found on cheongsams in era of the Republic of China, a testimony to the open-mindedness and ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  21. [21]
    Abridged history of early 20th century Chinese womenswear (part 4.1
    Feb 9, 2021 · The common word for cheongsam in Mandarin is 旗袍 qipao, which means “banner robe”, banner being a reference to the Qing Dynasty Manchu eight ...
  22. [22]
    History of the qipao (part IV): from Shanghai to Hong Kong, 1940s ...
    Oct 25, 2016 · The early 1940s qipao became extremely restrained. Sweeping hemlines of the 1930s were reduced to mid-calf or knee length, high collars were lowered, sleeves ...
  23. [23]
    From Manchu to China Chic: the Evolution of the Qipao -
    Mar 9, 2015 · ' During the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), anyone wearing a qipao would be accused and even persecuted for pursuing a bourgeois lifestyle.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  24. [24]
    A brief history of the qipao: China's sexiest dress
    May 20, 2020 · The qipao is actually a very modern idea, created only after Western concepts and trade infiltrated the Republic of China, blending the two ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    (PDF) Contemporary Re-emergence of the Qipao: Political ...
    Although no longer worn as an everyday dress, it has gained new consumer types, creative interest, renewed global recognition and powerful symbolic meanings.
  26. [26]
    Evolution of Qipao Cheongsam dress
    The Manchu women wore qipaos that were cut to their ankle length. At that time, the qipaos were worn with high heels during special occasions like weddings. In ...
  27. [27]
    Qipao comeback - Chinaculture.org
    Mar 3, 2014 · In recent years, the qipao has reappeared as a mainstream fashion item in China. In 2007, the Shanghai Cheongsam Salon was established to ...
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Say Yes to the West: Globalization of the Qipao - US-China Today
    Aug 18, 2021 · Chinese dresses like the qipao or cheongsam have become global fashion icons and proliferated into western clothing stores. The spread of these ...Missing: adaptations 2000s
  30. [30]
    Cheongsam: From the Qing Dynasty to the Present - Cheongsamology
    Aug 3, 2025 · This global exposure has led to a new wave of innovation. Modern designers are deconstructing and reinventing the cheongsam, using non- ...
  31. [31]
    Parts of the Qipao (Cheongsam): a comprehensive guide to the ...
    Jun 1, 2018 · This is my comprehensive guide to all the subtle yet distinct parts of the qipao (cheongsam): from the material, the fit, to the height of the mandarin collar.
  32. [32]
    How a Qipao Is Made | Handmade Cheongsam & Chinese Dresses – JINZA
    ### Construction Process and Core Structural Features of the Qipao
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Qipao: The Carrier of Chinese Cultural and Philosophical Symbols
    Sep 6, 2021 · The qipao is a tight-fitting dress with a standing collar, asymmetric opening, two side slits, and Chinese knot buttons, expressing Chinese ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    Qipao 1920s – 1930s: Looking at Four Samples from the China ...
    Nov 1, 2024 · Qipao, as it is known today in Chinese Mandarin, is a type of dress for women that originated around 1920 in mainland China.
  37. [37]
    Qipao | Unknown - Explore the Collections - V&A
    Sep 23, 2008 · During the Republican period (1911-1949), the qipao was promoted as the dress of modern China, identifiably 'Chinese' on the one hand, and ...Missing: era | Show results with:era
  38. [38]
    The Pankou (盘扣/盤扣): the qipao knot button
    Nov 10, 2016 · The pankou is the Chinese name for the traditional knotted buttons used on qipaos or cheongsams. They come in many materials and shapes.Missing: craftsmanship embroidery
  39. [39]
    History of the qipao (part II): from recluse to National Dress, 1910s ...
    Oct 2, 2016 · In 1911-12, Imperial China collapsed and qipao went into recluse, only to be revived in the 20s by variations of the student movement ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Research on the Evolution of Cheongsam Style in the Republican ...
    With the integration of Chinese and. Western culture, its style is constantly changing to adapt to modern life. This paper discusses the evolutions of cheongsam.
  41. [41]
    Research on the Evolution of Cheongsam Style in the Republican ...
    The fashion trend of cheongsam is known to have been influenced by the cultural taste, consciousness and life style of the people within in a certain ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    The History of Qipao: A Century of Elegance and Cross-Cultural ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · The Chinese qipao (also known as “Republican qipao”) originated in the early 1920s during the Republic of China era.
  46. [46]
    Chinese Modernity, Identity and Nationalism: The Qipao in ...
    Chinese women who refused to totally submit to Western culture saw the qipao as an alternative to the country's intensified nationalism. Those who were ...
  47. [47]
    The Short, Tortuous History of the Qipao - Rabbit Hole
    literally, “banner gown” — because it was worn by Manchu women, “the women ...
  48. [48]
    Reflections | Qipao out, hanfu in? Advocates for traditional Chinese ...
    Aug 26, 2021 · The qipao and its menswear equivalent, the changshan, are increasingly rejected in China as being sartorially representative of the Chinese people.Missing: origins nationalism conflict
  49. [49]
    Qipao And Cheongsam: Embracing China's Fashion Legacy
    The Qipao, also known as Cheongsam, is an iconic symbol of Chinese culture, embodying modesty, grace, and elegance, and a connection to heritage.
  50. [50]
    (Multimedia) NE Chinese city holds first China Qipao Culture Festival
    May 24, 2019 · The first China Qipao Culture Festival was launched Friday at the Shenyang Palace Museum in Shenyang, capital of northeast China's Liaoning Province.Missing: popularity | Show results with:popularity
  51. [51]
    Celebration: Global Qipao Invitational Exhibition-China Silk Museum
    Qipao is one of the most representative dresses of Chinese women. Women are dressing in Qipao all over the world in modern society. The Hangzhou Qipao Festival ...
  52. [52]
    Cheongsam and then some - Chinadaily.com.cn
    Jun 21, 2024 · "The qipao is portrayed as a symbol of Chinese femininity in these films," says Ng. "The modern generation associates the qipao with nostalgia ...
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    More than a dress - the social history of the cheongsam in Singapore
    Aug 30, 2012 · Development of the cheongsam on the mainland and the overseas Chinese world, from early Republican times until its general decline in the 1970s, is tracked<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    The cheongsam is everywhere right now — and its return is charged ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · The cheongsam is a reclamation of what once felt too sexy, too ethnic and, at the same time, too old-fashioned. Now, it's being rethreaded as a symbol of pride.Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    Is it still normal to wear a qipao/cheongsam? And when is it worn?
    Dec 16, 2020 · Is it normal in China? No. Some girls wear qipaos occaisonally but not related to CNY. I mean you can. No one's going to think it's off.Am I Wrong for Wearing a Qipao When I'm White? - RedditIs the fact that qipao requires too much of women's body shape the ...More results from www.reddit.com
  58. [58]
    Roaring 1920s of Shanghai: The origin of the qipao
    Feb 12, 2021 · The qipao, created by the Manchu, became popular in Shanghai in the 1920s, derived from men's clothing, and was popularized by Madame ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    Chinese Traditional Dress – Qipao Guide - LingoAce
    Jan 23, 2024 · The term "Qipao" itself translates to "banner gown," reflecting its historical connection to the banners worn by the Manchu people who conquered ...
  61. [61]
    What's Behind The Global Appeal Of China's Qipao Dress? | Jing Daily
    The qipao's appeal stems from its body-hugging silhouette, sexy attitude, and the belief it reveals a woman's beauty, with a history starting in Shanghai in ...Missing: ceremonies | Show results with:ceremonies
  62. [62]
    How the qipao has inspired red-carpet looks over the years
    Jan 29, 2025 · Actresses such as Li Bingbing, Fan Bingbing and Gong Li have worn elaborate interpretations of these dresses on the international stage, ...
  63. [63]
    The Rise of Traditional Asian Garments in Modern Fashion
    May 15, 2023 · Traditional Asian garments have been making a comeback on the global fashion stage. Among these, the Chinese cheongsam/qipao has been at the forefront of the ...
  64. [64]
    Chinese Qipao for Formal Occasions - Google Arts & Culture
    Qipao, also called Cheongsam from Cantonese Chinese, was Republic of China's mandarin gown. The stylish and often tight-fitting, stand-collared Cheongsam or ...
  65. [65]
    The Past and Present of Cheongsam (旗袍) - 沪江汉语
    Sep 28, 2015 · Initially, cheongsam was a traditional long gown worn by the Manchu people in northeast China, regardless of their age, gender and social status ...
  66. [66]
  67. [67]
    Teen defends Chinese prom dress that sparked cultural ... - ABC News
    May 2, 2018 · Keziah Daum, an 18-year-old senior at Woods Cross High School, Utah, received backlash after she posted photos of her dressed in a red qipao, a traditional ...
  68. [68]
    'It's just a dress': Utah teen's Chinese prom attire starts cultural ...
    the high-collared, form-fitting traditional Chinese dress.
  69. [69]
    Teenager's Prom Dress Stirs Furor in U.S. — but Not in China
    a form-fitting red cheongsam (also known as a qipao) ...
  70. [70]
    Is Fashion's Love for the Qipao Cultural Appropriation? - Fashionista
    May 4, 2018 · The qipao dress (also known as "cheongsam") has been reimagined by fast fashion companies and luxury players alike for years.
  71. [71]
    The Qipao and The Western Tendency to Sexualize Eastern Culture
    Mar 1, 2021 · The qipao quickly gained popularity in China with its form fit and robe-like quality, as during this Han period, the qipao was outlawed as ...Missing: festivals | Show results with:festivals
  72. [72]
    An American woman wearing a Chinese dress is not cultural ...
    May 4, 2018 · If anything, the qipao represents power and class, not race, and certainly not the culture of some exploited underclass.
  73. [73]
    Chinese fashion history ramblings — Hello I hope you are doing ...
    Jan 9, 2022 · It would be more or less correct to point out that the popularity of cheongsam waned in the 70s due to the Cultural Revolution, but in the ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Eating the Other explores the western fascination with Chinese ...
    Nov 26, 2018 · Through examining the Western fascination with the qipao, which connotes “tones of hyper-sexuality and mystique”, Betty aims to create ...Missing: sexualization | Show results with:sexualization
  75. [75]
    Cheongsam and Chinese Identity in Hong Kong. - PolyU Scholars Hub
    Jan 1, 2022 · ... cheongsam negotiate their identities as sexual objects on the one hand and paragons of traditional virtue on the other. Gender constructions ...<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Reflexive Han-Ness, Narratives of Moral Decline, Manchurian ...
    Nov 17, 2022 · Moreover, many of our respondents also rejected the Qipao as being too modern (as this form of clothing is only several centuries old), whereas ...
  77. [77]
    Why I Won't Wear Hanfu - Medium
    Apr 8, 2019 · So, the Qing dynasty was unique in that its ruling class was the Manchu minority ruling over the Han majority, rather than the Han majority ...
  78. [78]
    Rethinking the Hanfu Movement, Nov. 08 (Pt.2 Organization & Politics)
    Nov 7, 2008 · The qipao, while definitely Manchurian based, is obviously westernized (or rather, has become westernized over time) with the ideal qipao as ...
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    a comparative study of the Philippines' terno and Taiwan's qipao
    This article investigates how fashion and nationalism were expressed through two iconic dress styles worn by women, the qipao in Taiwan and the terno in the ...
  81. [81]
    Kebaya Cheongsam is a contemporary kebaya that is widely worn ...
    Nov 23, 2022 · Kebaya Cheongsam is a contemporary kebaya that is widely worn by Indonesian Chinese descendants during Chinese New Year celebrations, ...
  82. [82]
    4 Traditional Chinese Clothing and Dress: Hanfu, Qipao...
    The Hanfu, Zhongshan suit (Mao suit), Tang suit, and cheongsam (qipao) are the four most distinctive types of traditional Chinese clothing.