Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chorleywood bread process

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP) is an industrial dough production method developed in 1961 by researchers at the British Baking Industries Research Association in Chorleywood, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom, relying on high-speed mechanical mixing to rapidly develop gluten structure in the presence of added oxidants and enzymes, thereby eliminating extended bulk fermentation and enabling the use of flours with lower protein content. This process shortens overall production time from flour to baked loaf to approximately 3.5 hours, compared to traditional methods requiring overnight fermentation, and incorporates higher yeast levels along with conditioners such as ascorbic acid and hard fats to achieve consistent, soft-textured white and brown breads suitable for large-scale manufacturing. Adopted widely since its inception, CBP accounts for over 80% of bread production in the UK by the 1970s and remains dominant in industrial baking globally, facilitating affordable, uniform loaves but drawing criticism for yielding products with diminished flavor, denser crumb, and potential reductions in nutritional bioavailability due to altered starch gelatinization and protein denaturation, though compositional analyses indicate equivalence in macronutrients like protein and ash to conventionally baked bread. Its development addressed post-war demands for efficient use of domestic wheat varieties lower in gluten strength, marking a shift from artisanal bulk fermentation to mechanized, additive-enhanced processing that prioritized volume and shelf stability over traditional organoleptic qualities.

History

Origins and Development

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP) was invented in 1961 by a team of researchers at the British Baking Industries Research Association (BBIRA), based in , , . The principal contributors included Bill Collins, George Elton, and Norman Chamberlain, who conducted experiments to accelerate dough development amid post-World War II economic pressures. The process addressed key limitations of traditional baking methods, which relied on extended bulk (typically 2–3 hours) to build strength in doughs made from strong, high-protein flours. In the and early , faced supply constraints due to reliance on imports of variable-quality , often lower in protein content, while for affordable surged with and rising living standards. BBIRA's focused on intervention: high-energy mixing at speeds up to 400 for 3–5 minutes imparted sufficient work to the to replace , enabling the use of weaker flours without compromising loaf volume or structure. Initial trials incorporated additives such as ascorbic acid (as an oxidant), fats, and extra to enhance gas retention and stability during the shortened timeline, reducing overall production from 12–18 hours to under 2 hours. These innovations stemmed from empirical testing of and network formation, prioritizing causal factors like and over time-dependent enzymatic action. By 1965, the method gained widespread adoption in bakeries, facilitated by BBIRA's dissemination of technical specifications and equipment adaptations.

Initial Adoption and Expansion

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP), finalized in 1961 by the British Baking Industries Research Association, transitioned to commercial application in the by 1965, marking a shift toward mechanized, high-speed mixing in industrial . This adoption was driven by economic pressures, including post-war shortages of imported strong wheat and the need to utilize abundant lower-protein domestic varieties, which traditional methods could not process efficiently. Large-scale producers, facing rising labor costs and consumer demand for affordable , implemented CBP to reduce and proofing times from hours to under two hours total, enabling lines that prioritized volume over extended dough development. By the late 1960s, CBP had achieved dominance in the UK baking sector, with industrial facilities converting to the process to meet surging output requirements—eventually supporting daily production of around 9 million loaves by the early 1970s through optimized energy input and minimal ingredient variability. Small and medium bakeries initially resisted due to equipment costs and the need for precise control of mixing energy, but subsidies and technical support from flour millers accelerated uptake, transforming the industry from craft-based to industrialized within a decade. International expansion began in the mid-1960s, primarily to nations with analogous agricultural constraints, such as , , and , where CBP facilitated similar adaptations to local wheats and boosted export-oriented baking. By the 1970s, adoption extended to high-consumption markets in and beyond, including , with further proliferation in the and to over 30 countries facing scalability demands, though saw selective implementation limited to specific industrial segments. This global diffusion was propelled by licensing from research bodies and demonstrations of cost savings—up to 50% reductions in processing time—outweighing initial infrastructural hurdles in regions without strong artisanal traditions.

Technical Description

Core Process Mechanics

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP) employs a no-time system that relies on intensive mechanical development to achieve structure and gas retention, eliminating the need for traditional bulk . This approach uses a high-speed enclosed , such as the Tweedy model operating at hundreds of , to impart controlled into the , typically within 2 to 5 minutes. During mixing, energy input is standardized at 11 to 13 per () of —or equivalently 42 kilojoules per ()—which is 5 to 8 times higher than in conventional methods, enabling rapid oxidation and of proteins for extensibility and elasticity. Mixers often incorporate pressure at the start to enhance oxidants like ascorbic acid and partial toward the end to refine air bubble size, while cooling jackets maintain dough temperature near 30°C to optimize consistency and prevent overheating. Additional is incorporated during mixing to achieve a softer suitable for high-volume production. Post-mixing, the developed undergoes minimal floor time or proceeds directly to dividing and moulding, followed by a final proving stage of approximately 45 to at controlled humidity and temperature to allow activity and volume expansion. then occurs in conventional ovens at temperatures around 220–230°C for 20–30 minutes, depending on size, yielding a in under 4 hours from input to cooled product. This sequence prioritizes mechanical shear over enzymatic or biological development, resulting in uniform crumb structure through precise energy control rather than extended resting.

Ingredients and Additives

The Chorleywood bread process utilizes the fundamental ingredients common to most yeast-leavened breads: , , , and . However, it incorporates approximately double the amount of yeast compared to traditional bulk fermentation methods—typically 1.5-2% of weight—to accelerate proofing within a shortened timeline of 1-2 hours. This formulation also employs higher water absorption rates, often 60-65% of weight, enabling the use of lower-protein flours that would otherwise require longer development in conventional processes. To compensate for the mechanical damage inflicted on the flour's structure during high-energy mixing (delivering 11-13 Wh/kg of energy), a range of improvers and processing aids is essential. Oxidizing agents, such as ascorbic acid () at levels of 50-200 parts per million, promote bond formation in proteins, enhancing strength and elasticity without extended resting periods. Historically, served a similar oxidizing and bleaching role but was banned in the in 1990 due to evidence of its carcinogenicity in . Emulsifiers and fats, including distilled monoglycerides, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglycerides (), or partially hydrogenated at 0.2-0.5% of weight, stabilize gas cells, improve crumb softness, and extend by retarding . Enzymes like fungal alpha-amylase (to hydrolyze starches into fermentable sugars) and proteases (to increase extensibility and promote Maillard browning for crust development) further optimize the rapid process, typically added at trace levels tailored to characteristics. Reducing agents such as L-cysteine may also be included to facilitate relaxation during mixing. Preservatives like calcium propionate are commonly incorporated in commercial applications to inhibit growth, addressing the vulnerability of the soft-textured loaves to spoilage despite their mechanical uniformity. These additives collectively enable consistent production with weaker domestic wheats but distinguish CBP from additive-minimal methods reliant on natural for and structure.

Advantages

Economic and Production Efficiency

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP) markedly improved production efficiency by minimizing dough development time through high-speed mechanical mixing under controlled and temperature, eliminating the need for extended bulk typical of traditional methods. This "no-time" approach reduced the overall cycle from to baked loaf to approximately 2-3 hours, compared to 3-4 hours or more in conventional processes, enabling continuous high-volume output in industrial bakeries. The intensified mixing develops networks rapidly, allowing shorter proofing periods of about 60-90 minutes, which supports and reduces equipment downtime. Economically, the CBP lowered costs by accommodating weaker, lower-protein domestic varieties unsuitable for older methods, thereby reducing dependence on costly imported strong and stabilizing supply chains amid shortages. It also enhanced dough yield through improved water absorption rates—up to 2-3% higher than traditional doughs—maximizing output per unit of and minimizing . These efficiencies translated to bulk at reduced labor and energy inputs, with bread prices falling as the process enabled 98% of commercial loaves to be made this way by the late , fostering industry consolidation and consumer affordability.

Product Consistency and Accessibility

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP) achieves high product consistency through intensive mechanical dough development, which standardizes formation and air incorporation, resulting in uniform loaf shape, size, and crumb structure across batches. This uniformity stems from the process's reliance on precise of mixing , typically 4.5 watt-hours per kilogram of , minimizing variations from flour quality or environmental factors. Consequently, bakers can deliver consistent soft, fine-textured that meets exacting standards demanded by large-scale users, such as manufacturers. In terms of , CBP facilitates economical by reducing time from traditional bulk fermentation methods—eliminating hours of resting—and enabling the use of lower-protein domestic , which lowers input costs while supporting local . This efficiency translates to lower prices for consumers, with large-scale operations meeting high demand through labor-saving and space-efficient workflows. By 2011, the process underpinned the majority of sliced , making affordable, shelf-stable loaves widely available in supermarkets. Overall, these attributes have democratized access to consistent baked goods, prioritizing volume and reliability over artisanal variability.

Criticisms and Controversies

Flavor and Nutritional Shortcomings

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP), employing high-energy mixing and periods of 1 to 3 hours, produces bread with inferior flavor complexity due to curtailed microbial activity that generates key volatile compounds such as alcohols, esters, and acids. These metabolites, formed during extended in traditional methods (often 12 to 24 hours), underpin the nuanced and aroma absent in CBP loaves, which exhibit uniformity but lack depth and crust character. Nutritionally, the process's brevity limits , preserving higher levels of this that minerals like iron, , and magnesium, thereby reducing their . In vitro assessments reveal CBP achieves only a 75% reduction in (IP6) from , versus complete degradation in , correlating with 8-fold lower iron release post-digestion and a 4.8-fold diminished response in intestinal cells for fortified CBP . CBP bread also demonstrates suboptimal effects on , evoking greater gas production in models and minimal bifidobacteria proliferation compared to long-fermented alternatives, potentially exacerbating digestibility issues through undegraded fructans and structures.

Health and Digestibility Claims

Critics of the Chorleywood bread process (CBP) argue that its short fermentation period—typically 1 to 2 hours compared to 12 to 24 hours in traditional methods—limits the activity of natural enzymes and bacteria that degrade anti-nutritional factors like , potentially impairing mineral such as iron, , and magnesium. A 2017 study comparing iron across processes found that CBP bread exhibited lower fractional of iron (mean 7.5%) than sourdough-fermented bread (mean 11.2%), attributing this to reduced phytate during brief proofing. Similarly, the absence of extended in CBP is posited to leave proteins less broken down, contributing to digestive discomfort in sensitive individuals. In vitro research on supports claims of heightened digestibility issues with CBP bread, particularly for those with (IBS). A 2014 study exposed fecal samples from IBS patients to breads made via CBP, traditional long , and processes, revealing that CBP bread stimulated significantly higher gas production (indicative of fermentation distress) by microbiota, with short-chain profiles suggesting poorer tolerance compared to fermented alternatives. This aligns with observations that high-energy mixing in CBP alters dough structure, potentially creating denser networks resistant to enzymatic breakdown in the gut, though direct causation remains understudied. Counterarguments emphasize that CBP bread's macronutrient profile—protein, fat, ash, and vitamins like nicotinic acid—mirrors that of conventionally fermented , as determined in analyses shortly after the process's introduction. Proponents note no population-level evidence linking CBP specifically to widespread intolerance rises since the , attributing such trends more to increased consumption and varieties than processing alone. Nonetheless, emerging microbiota-focused reviews highlight CBP's reliance on additives like emulsifiers, which may disrupt gut ecology in ways long-fermented breads avoid, underscoring a need for further clinical trials on digestibility beyond compositional equivalence.

Broader Impacts

Industry Transformation

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP), developed in 1961 by the British Baking Industries Research Association, marked a pivotal shift in the UK baking sector from labor-intensive, time-consuming traditional methods to mechanized, high-speed production. This innovation addressed post-war demands for affordable bread by utilizing lower-protein domestic wheat, intensive mixing to develop gluten rapidly, and shortened fermentation times, enabling dough processing in under two hours compared to the conventional 3-5 hours. Industrial adoption accelerated immediately, with large-scale bakers integrating the process to achieve and uniformity suited to distribution. By the 1970s, CBP had become the standard for commercial breadmaking, facilitating a surge in output and a decline in artisanal baking as small independent operations struggled to compete on cost and speed. Production efficiencies reduced flour usage per loaf and minimized waste, lowering retail prices and enabling the dominance of pre-sliced, wrapped loaves in retail chains. Estimates indicate that by 2011, approximately 80% of UK bread was produced via CBP, with figures for shop-bought sliced bread reaching 97-98% in subsequent assessments. The process extended beyond the , influencing industrial in countries like , , and , where similar mechanization prioritized volume over extended proofing. This transformation consolidated the industry around fewer, larger facilities, with major players like Allied Bakeries and supermarket suppliers centralizing operations, while fostering innovations in additives and machinery for even faster throughput. Overall, CBP's emphasis on reshaped supply chains, making a commodity product accessible daily but at the expense of regional baking diversity.

Societal and Economic Effects

The Chorleywood bread process (CBP) substantially reduced bread production costs in the UK by minimizing bulk fermentation times from hours to minutes and substituting mechanical mixing energy for biological development, enabling high-volume output from automated factories. This efficiency lowered retail prices, making bread more affordable for consumers amid post-war economic pressures and rising demand. Large-scale plants could supply supermarkets at competitive rates, fostering industry consolidation as smaller operations struggled to match costs. Economically, CBP increased the viability of lower-protein UK-grown in blends, reducing reliance on costly imports and providing benefits to domestic growers by expanding the for home-produced grains. By the early , the process underpinned around 80% of bread output, supporting a where alone generated annual sales exceeding £1 billion, dominated by a few major producers. This shift prioritized scale over artisanal methods, with automated facilities requiring less skilled labor per loaf compared to traditional . Societally, CBP facilitated widespread access to consistent, shelf-stable , aligning with and the growth of , but it accelerated the decline of independent high-street bakeries unable to compete on price or volume. Critics, including groups, contend this eroded local employment in trades and diminished community-based , favoring corporate supply chains over diverse, craft-oriented options. The resulting ubiquity of uniform loaves influenced patterns, embedding mass-produced as a dietary staple while reducing exposure to varied traditional varieties.

Current Status and Alternatives

Ongoing Use and Adaptations

The (CBP) continues to dominate industrial bread production in the , enabling large-scale manufacturers to produce consistent, high-volume loaves with minimal time through high-speed mechanical . This method supports the use of lower-protein flours, which are more cost-effective, while maintaining loaf volume and texture via precise energy inputs during mixing. In 2022 analyses of modern winter s adapted for mechanical processing, mixing quality improvements allowed CBP to achieve stable loaf volumes despite varying protein contents, demonstrating ongoing refinements in selection and handling. Adaptations of CBP have incorporated advanced ingredients and techniques to address nutritional and functional demands, such as oleogel-based fat replacers tested in 2024 to reduce saturated fats while preserving crumb structure in high-speed mixed doughs. High-shear mixing inherent to CBP facilitates greater water absorption in formulations, supporting lower-calorie products by enabling hydration without added sugars or fats, as explored in 2022 equipment innovations for bakery new product development. These modifications extend CBP's applicability beyond traditional white bread to include variations with enzymes for extended shelf life and optimized oxidants for dough strength, ensuring compatibility with contemporary supply chains prioritizing efficiency over extended bulk fermentation. Internationally, CBP principles influence no-time dough systems in mechanized baking, with adaptations like continuous mixing variants reducing batch variability in commercial operations.

Revival of Traditional Methods

The Real Bread Campaign, established in 2009 by baker Andrew Whitley through his Bread Matters initiative in partnership with the Sustain advocacy group, spearheaded efforts to promote traditional bread-making techniques as alternatives to the Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP). This campaign defined "real bread" as loaves produced without chemical additives, processing aids, or the high-speed mechanical mixing central to CBP, emphasizing instead natural leavening and extended fermentation times akin to pre-industrial methods. Advocates highlighted the sensory and potential health benefits of these revived practices, such as , which involves wild yeast and for slower development, contrasting the rapid 3.5-hour CBP cycle. By 2014, the campaign had influenced public discourse, linking CBP's dominance—producing over 80% of —to diminished flavor and digestibility, thereby encouraging bakers to adopt bulk and handmade processes. The movement accelerated in the with rising artisan bakery numbers; the retail value of artisanal grew from £600 million in 2005 to £700 million by 2015, driven by demand for additive-free products. popularity surged further during the 2020 , with home baking kits and starter cultures seeing exponential demand as individuals sought control over ingredients and processes eschewing industrial shortcuts. Scientific interest corroborated the revival, with studies noting sourdough's ecological and sensory advantages, including enhanced flavor compounds from prolonged microbial activity, prompting industrial and home-scale adoption of traditional starters. Events like Real Bread Week, organized annually by the campaign since 2011, fostered community baking and policy advocacy for clearer labeling, sustaining momentum against CBP's uniformity. Despite CBP's persistence in mass production, these efforts have diversified the market, with global sourdough sales projected to reach $6.9 billion by 2032 from traditional method enthusiasts.

References

  1. [1]
    Chorleywood Bread Process blog from Campden BRI
    Oct 25, 2019 · The Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP) uses high shear mixing, a fast-acting oxidizing agent, and hard fat, resulting in cheaper, softer bread.
  2. [2]
    Production methods - Federation of Bakers - UK.COM
    The modern commercial process used in large bakeries is known as the Chorleywood Bread Process and was developed in the early 1960's by the Flour Milling ...
  3. [3]
    The Chorleywood Bread Process | Request PDF - ResearchGate
    The introduction of the Chorleywood Bread Process was a watershed in baking. It sparked changes in improver and ingredient technology, process and equipment ...
  4. [4]
    Studies on the composition of food | British Journal of Nutrition
    5. It was concluded that bread made by the Chorleywood Process cannot be distinguished from conventional bread in its content of protein, fat, ash and nicotinic ...
  5. [5]
    Chorleywood Bread Process fundamentals | Request PDF
    Appreciation of crumb structure formation helped lead to the development of the Chorleywood Bread Process which in its most recent form mixes dough at high ...
  6. [6]
    Chorleywood: The bread that changed Britain - BBC News
    Jun 7, 2011 · The Chorleywood loaf has twice the amount of yeast of a traditional loaf, it has enzymes and oxidants added and while certain chemical additives ...
  7. [7]
    Obituary: Bill Collins, co-inventor of the Chorleywood Bread Process
    Mar 10, 2021 · Bill Collins, co-inventor of the Chorleywood Bread Process, has passed away. Here, Baketran director Stan Cauvain talks about how his former ...
  8. [8]
    Modern History of Bread - 20th Century UK - Federation of Bakers
    1965. The Chorleywood Bread Process, first developed in 1961, came into general use. This substantially reduced the long fermentation period by introducing high ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  9. [9]
    Baker Perkins in the Bakery Business
    The Chorleywood Bread Process. First developed in 1961, *British Baking Research Association's Chorleywood Bread Process came into general use in 1965. This ...
  10. [10]
    The future for breadmaking - ScienceDirect.com
    It is over 50 years since the launch of the Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP) (Cauvain and Young, 2006a) and in the UK the Food Standards Agency has come to the ...
  11. [11]
    Great British Food Revival: The lost art of bread-making - BBC
    Mar 9, 2011 · The Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP) allows 9 million loaves a day to be produced ensuring there is a bread available to suit those on all ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  12. [12]
    The long and winding road to Chorleywood | Real Bread Campaign
    Mar 4, 2019 · By the mid-1800s a Hungarian system of roller milling flour was introduced, along with American wheat, although it took time to adapt parts of ...
  13. [13]
    Baking and the Chorleywood Connection - Three Rivers Museum
    Apr 22, 2021 · Chorleywood was home to the BBIRA, which developed the Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP) using a mixer designed there, transforming bread baking.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Chorleywood Bread Process Woodhead Publishing
    The Chorleywood Bread Process is an innovative method developed in the UK that uses intense mechanical working of dough with high-speed mixers to produce bread ...
  15. [15]
    Chorleywood Baking Process - BAKERpedia
    Origin. The Chorleywood Baking Process (CBP) was developed by the British Baking Industries Research Association (BBIRA) in 1962 in Chorleywood, United Kingdom.Missing: Advisory | Show results with:Advisory
  16. [16]
    [PDF] THE CHORLEYWOOD BREAD PROCESS | BakeTran
    The Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP) is a no-time dough making process using mechanical development, with mixing in 2-5 minutes, and a defined energy input.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Worst Thing Since Sliced Bread: the Chorleywood Bread Process
    The Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP), a method developed in the UK that took less time and was able to use home grown wheat of lower protein, represents perhaps ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  18. [18]
    Effects of oxidising improvers, an emulsifier, fat and mixer ...
    Both ascorbic acid (AA) and the emulsifier, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglycerides (DATEM) gave substantial improvements in loaf volume, and a marked ...
  19. [19]
    I Researched Bread Additives as an MD/PhD — Now I Bake My Own ...
    Jan 31, 2024 · The Chorleywood process arguably leads to lower-quality bread. Bakers can use lower-quality flour and a higher proportion of water. They also ...
  20. [20]
    Mechanical Dough Development in Bread Making: Benefits and ...
    Dec 19, 2023 · Mechanical dough development (MDD) is a bread-making process that relies on high-speed, high-energy mixing to rapidly develop gluten structure in dough.
  21. [21]
    Some thoughts on the Chorleywood bread process - Matt Webb
    Nov 23, 2020 · The Chorleywood process, invented in 1961, uses high-speed mixing, doubled yeast, and 'improvers' to reduce fermentation time to 3.5 hours.
  22. [22]
    Advantages Of Chorleywood Bread Process - IPL.org
    Advantages of Chorleywood Bread Process. It enables the baking of bread on large scale. With this the cost of baking bread is reduces, hence benefiting the ...
  23. [23]
    How white sliced British bread took over the world -
    Sep 24, 2014 · A revolutionary new way of making bread: 40% softer, a lot cheaper, totally uniform and with a much longer shelf life.
  24. [24]
    The bread we eat - Grain.org
    But it has given its name to a process that has affected the quality of mass-produced bread in Britain and many other countries for more than 40 years. In 1961, ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  25. [25]
    Assessment of iron bioavailability from different bread making ...
    Aug 1, 2017 · The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three commercial baking processes (sourdough, conventional yeast and Chorleywood Bread ...
  26. [26]
    Effect of Breadmaking Process on In Vitro Gut Microbiota ...
    Breads fermented by the traditional long fermentation and sourdough are less likely to lead to IBS symptoms compared to bread made using the Chorleywood ...
  27. [27]
    Assessment of iron bioavailability from different bread making ... - NIH
    The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three commercial baking processes (sourdough, conventional yeast and Chorleywood Bread Making Process ( ...
  28. [28]
    Digestibility of gluten proteins is reduced by baking and enhanced ...
    The baking process reduces the digestibility of wheat gluten proteins, including those containing sequences active in celiac disease.
  29. [29]
    Designing healthier bread through the lens of the gut microbiota
    In addition to being an important source of dietary fiber and phytochemicals, bread is the largest contributor to the intake of common food additives in the ...
  30. [30]
    Chorleywood Process | Real Bread Campaign
    July 2011 saw the 50th anniversary of the launch of the Chorleywood Process, the system by which around 80% of UK loaves are made.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  31. [31]
    Bread | Ethical Consumer
    Jun 11, 2018 · Yet the majority of UK households (97%) purchase 'wrapped and sliced' bread that has been produced using the Chorleywood Process (CHP) and ...
  32. [32]
    The Chorleywood Experiment: Give us this day our daily bread...
    Aug 22, 2023 · And so it was in 1961, that those dedicated boffins developed the Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP). Traditionally bread had been made from ...
  33. [33]
    The Chorleywood Process and the rise of Real Bread
    Apr 23, 2014 · The Chorleywood Bread Process (CBP) was created to eliminate overnight fermentation and use lower-protein wheat, reducing production time to 3. ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    End-Use Quality of Historical and Modern Winter Wheats Adapted to ...
    Sep 23, 2022 · Mixing quality showed significant improvements, and loaf volume and firmness remained constant, even in the presence of a decrease in protein ...
  35. [35]
    Development of Oleogel-Based Fat Replacer and Its Application in ...
    May 27, 2024 · The oleogels were prepared with modifications to the methods described previously [29,30]. ... Chorleywood bread process and a hearth bread baking ...
  36. [36]
    In the mix: what role could equipment play in healthier bakery NPD?
    Jun 29, 2022 · One such example is the high shear mixing involved in the Chorleywood Bread Process which “enables water to be incorporated into the flour ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    [PDF] rheology and the continuous breadmaking process
    (71-79). Commercial Systems. The Chorleywood Bread Process was the first breadmaking system in which an effective rheological parameter, the work ...
  38. [38]
    About us | Real Bread Campaign
    The Real Bread Campaign was co-founded by Andrew Whitley of Bread Matters, and Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming, the charity that runs the ...
  39. [39]
    Real Bread Campaign
    The Real Bread Campaign finds and shares ways to make bread better for us, better for our communities and better for the planet. Whether your interest is ...Map · Recipes · The Loaf Mark · About
  40. [40]
    Real Bread Is On The Rise - Colin Tudge
    Feb 21, 2024 · The Chorleywood process sped things up with highspeed mixing and various additives so that suddenly it was possible to make many batches of ...
  41. [41]
    Report: State of the UK's artisan bakery sector
    Nov 9, 2022 · In fact, according to the report, the estimated retail value of bread categorised as 'artisanal' rose from £600m in 2005 to £700m in 2015 ( ...
  42. [42]
    The pandemic-fueled sourdough frenzy isn't over - NPR
    who made her pandemic-era sourdough hobby ...Missing: rise 2010s 2020s
  43. [43]
    A review of sourdough starters: ecology, practices, and sensory ...
    May 10, 2021 · Recently, however, naturally fermented sourdough bread has regained popularity at the industrial, artisan, and home-baking scales (De Vuyst & ...
  44. [44]
    Global Sourdough Market | BBM Magazine
    The sourdough industry is estimated to reach 3.156 million dollars in 2024 and 6.900 million dollars in 2032. Sourdough bread has gained immense popularity in ...<|control11|><|separator|>