Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cimmerians

The Cimmerians were an ancient nomadic people of likely Eastern Iranian linguistic affiliation who originated in the Pontic-Caspian steppe, particularly around and , and flourished during the 8th and 7th centuries BCE. Driven southward, possibly by encroaching , they migrated through the into and adjacent regions, conducting raids that disrupted established powers including , , and . Archaeologically associated with cultures such as (ca. 750–700 BCE) and Chernaya Gora (ca. 900–750 BCE) in the zone, the Cimmerians left no written records and are known chiefly through external accounts, including annals referring to them as Gimirri and historians like . Their prowess, centered on and mobility, enabled significant incursions: they defeated Urartian forces around 720–714 BCE, contributed to the downfall of Phrygian King in 696/695 BCE, and under leaders like Lygdamis (Dugdammê), sacked and killed Lydian King Gyges in 644 BCE, though they suffered a decisive defeat by Assyrians near Hubušnu in 679 BCE under Teušpa. Genetic analyses of steppe remains indicate Cimmerian populations shared ancestry with Bronze Age steppe groups like Srubnaya but exhibited eastern affinities, including Central Asian and western Siberian components, distinguishing them somewhat from later while reflecting broader nomadic heterogeneity in the region. By the late 7th century BCE, following defeats by Lydian King around 600–560 BCE, Cimmerian incursions ceased, and they faded from historical records, possibly assimilating into local populations or retreating northward. Their movements exemplify the disruptive impact of steppe nomads on sedentary Near Eastern civilizations during the late Bronze to early transition.

Name and Terminology

Etymology

The English term "Cimmerians" derives from the Latin Cimmerii, which in turn comes from the Ancient Greek Κιμμέριοι (Kimmérioi). This Greek form first appears in Homer's Odyssey (ca. 8th century BCE), portraying the Cimmerians as inhabitants of a remote, fog-shrouded land beyond the northern Oceanus where the sun never shines. In cuneiform records from the Assyrian Empire, the name emerges historically around 720–714 BCE as Gimirri or variants including Ga-mir, Gamir-ra, and Gi-mir-ra-a-a, often denoting nomadic raiders from the northern periphery. The Assyrian Gi-mir-a-a has been glossed as "people traveling back and forth," a descriptor aligning with their equestrian nomadic incursions across the Caucasus and Anatolia. Proposed etymologies link the name to an Iranian linguistic , given evidence of Eastern Iranian elements in Cimmerian and ; I. M. D'yakonov suggested derivation from Old Iranian gāmīra- or gmīra-, connoting a "mobile unit" or tribal formation suited to warfare. shifts (a/i) in the attested forms may reflect phonetic gradation in the source language. No indigenous self-designation survives, and alternative derivations—such as Thracian influences proposed by —remain speculative and unconnected to the core -Assyrian attestations. The name's opacity underscores the challenges in reconstructing pre-Scythian steppe ethnonyms from exonymous records.

References in Ancient Sources

The earliest surviving reference to the Cimmerians occurs in Homer's Odyssey (11.14), composed around the 8th century BC, portraying them as inhabitants of a perpetually misty land at the western edge of the world, beyond Oceanus and near the entrance to Hades, where the sun never shines brightly. This depiction aligns with a mythical geography rather than historical ethnography, associating the Cimmerians with remote, shadowy realms rather than specific geopolitical actions. The first historical attestations of the Cimmerians appear in Neo-Assyrian royal annals under the name Gimirri or Umman-Manda, beginning in 714 BC during the reign of (r. 722–705 BC), who recorded their assistance in defeating the kingdom of near after allying with local forces against Urartian king Rusa I. Subsequent annals under (r. 681–669 BC) and (r. 668–627 BC) describe Gimirri raids into and around 679–676 BC, including the defeat of Assyrian vassals and incursions toward Tabal, with leaders like Teushpa (Tugdamme in Greek sources) noted for mobilizing large forces estimated in the tens of thousands. These inscriptions portray the Gimirri as nomadic warriors from the north, equipped with horses and bows, whose movements disrupted frontiers but were eventually countered through tribute and military campaigns. Herodotus, in his Histories (ca. 440 BC), provides the most extensive account, situating the Cimmerians originally north of the and before their displacement southward by incursions around the mid-7th century BC (Hist. 1.73–104, 4.11–12). He recounts a divided : one faction fleeing westward into Minor, sacking in twice (ca. 696 BC and 652 BC under kings Lygdamis and another unnamed leader), while another probed but returned; this narrative frames their invasions as vengeful responses to Scythian pressure, culminating in settlements in (Gamir in terms). Herodotus attributes to them the destruction of Phrygian power and threats to , though his chronology conflates events and relies on oral traditions from Lydian and Scythian informants. Later Greek sources corroborate and expand on these raids. The poet Callinus of (mid-7th century BC) laments Cimmerian devastation in Asia Minor, while (ca. 570–488 BC) references King Lygdamis (Tugdamme) as leading assaults on . (Geography, 1st century BC–1st century AD) echoes on their expulsion and Anatolian settlements, naming a mountain Kimmerios in as a remnant of their sway and noting their earlier presence near the Cimmerian (7.3.18, 11.2.1). These accounts, drawn from periploi and local histories, emphasize the Cimmerians' role as disruptive nomads whose activities faded by the amid and Lydian consolidations.

Origins

Archaeological Associations

Archaeological evidence associating the Cimmerians with specific material cultures remains tentative due to their nomadic lifestyle and lack of indigenous writing, relying instead on chronological correlations with historical invasions recorded in and Urartian sources, as well as artifact distributions indicative of horse-riding warriors from the Pontic-Caspian steppe. In the northern Pontic steppe, Cimmerian presence is linked to the early transition around the 10th century BCE, marked by burials featuring horse sacrifices, iron weapons, and fittings consistent with equestrian nomadism; these align with the Srubnaya (Timber-Grave) culture's late phases and early precursors, though definitive attribution is debated. The emphasized nomadic breeding, with settlements scarce and focused in forest-steppe zones like the left bank of the River and Vorskla River basin, where bronze plaques depicting animal motifs and weaponry date to circa 900–700 BCE. Further associations appear in Transcaucasia and Anatolia, where eastward-influenced artifacts—such as stag-stelae, socketed daggers, and mace-heads with figural engravings—emerged during the 8th–7th centuries BCE, coinciding with documented Cimmerian raids; these items exhibit steppe-style metallurgy and iconography, including griffin and deer motifs, bridging Pontic origins to local Phrygian and Lydian contexts. Recent excavations at Büklükale fortress in central Anatolia, dated to the late 8th century BCE, uncover the earliest confirmed Cimmerian settlement beyond the steppe, including fortified structures with burn layers evidencing warfare, iron arrowheads, and horse gear suggesting prolonged occupation and conflict with local powers like Phrygia. In the , the Thraco-Cimmerian horizon features early iron implements, including horse bits and weapons, dated to circa 1200–800 BCE, interpreted as evidence of westward Cimmerian incursions influencing Thracian groups, though some scholars attribute these to broader Indo-European movements rather than exclusively Cimmerian agency. Gaps in occupation, such as depopulation along the and lower from the 10th century BCE, support migration narratives, with reoccupation by post-Cimmerian exodus around 700 BCE. Overall, while no singular "Cimmerian" pottery or defines the group, the convergence of types, equine , and destruction layers at sites like Urartian fortresses reinforces their role as mobile aggressors disrupting settled regions.

Genetic Profile

Ancient DNA analysis has provided limited but direct insights into the Cimmerian genetic profile through the sequencing of three individuals radiocarbon-dated to 1000–800 BCE from the western Pontic-Caspian steppe. These samples display heterogeneous autosomal ancestry, combining West Eurasian components (proximal to earlier steppe groups like Yamnaya) with elevated Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian admixture, alongside an increasing Near Eastern signal compared to contemporaneous Srubnaya-Alakulskaya populations. f4-statistics indicate greater genetic drift sharing between Cimmerians and the eastern than with the more proximal cis-Uralic Srubnaya-Alakulskaya, suggesting influxes from farther east. Y-chromosome haplogroups among nomads in the region, encompassing Cimmerians, are dominated by R1b lineages characteristic of Yamnaya-related steppe ancestry, reflecting patrilineal continuity from expansions. However, one Cimmerian (sample cim358) carried *, a haplogroup linked to Mountain populations and broader East Asian affiliations, highlighting potential -mediated eastern atypical for core western groups. Mitochondrial DNA profiles in these samples feature haplogroups (e.g., A, C, D, M lineages) more aligned with Central Asian and Far Eastern sources, contrasting with the predominantly European-derived mtDNA (H, U, ) of Srubnaya-Alakulskaya. Overall, Cimmerians exhibit no direct genetic continuity as ancestors to later in the Pontic-Caspian region but share a stable admixed substrate tracing to the eastern Pontic-Caspian , with Srubnaya-Alakulskaya, , and forming a broader nomadic influenced by recurrent eastern migrations. The small sample size limits definitive population-level inferences, underscoring the need for expanded sequencing from securely attributed Cimmerian contexts.

Linguistic and Ethnic Hypotheses

The predominant linguistic hypothesis identifies the Cimmerians as speakers of an Eastern Iranic language within the Indo-European family, closely related to dialects. This view draws on onomastic evidence from records, where royal names like Teušpâ (Teushpa) and Tugdammi (Tugdamme) exhibit features consistent with Iranic , such as possible derivations from denoting elevation or (ušpa "high" or rauda- "grow"). The ethnonym "Cimmerian" ( Gimirri) has been etymologized by scholars like János Harmatta as Old Iranic gaya-mira- ("union of clans"), aligning with nomadic tribal structures observed in societies. Their ethnic profile as nomads from the Pontic-Caspian , displaced southward around the 8th-7th centuries BCE, further supports parallels with Iranic groups like the , based on shared archaeological markers of horse-riding and weapon styles. Alternative ethnic and linguistic hypotheses propose origins, citing supposed name resemblances (e.g., to Thracian Kimmer- forms) and early presence near the , potentially linking them to Balkan Indo-European branches. This idea, rooted in Strabo's accounts of Cimmerian migrations through , suggests a possible satemized Indo-European bridging Thracian and Iranic traits. However, such proposals are undermined by Strabo's of distinct groups and lack of corroborating inscriptions, rendering the Thracian affiliation untenable in favor of the Iranic model, which better accounts for their nomadic lifestyle and interactions with Near Eastern powers. Some fringe theories associate Cimmerians with or Central Asian ethnicities, such as carriers of the (circa 1300-1000 BCE), based on metallurgical and migration patterns, but these lack linguistic substantiation and contradict the steppe-nomad consensus. Overall, the Iranic hypothesis prevails due to cumulative historical and comparative evidence, though the paucity of native texts—limited to foreign transcriptions—necessitates caution, with potential for elite multilingualism or substrate influences unresolvable without further epigraphic finds.

Historical Movements

Early Presence in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe

The Cimmerians established a presence in the western Pontic-Caspian steppe during the transition from the Late to the Early , around the 10th century BCE, as the region's first documented nomadic equestrian groups preceding the . This period corresponds to archaeological phases dated approximately 1000–650 BCE, during which nomadic cattle-breeding economies predominated, supported by horse domestication and mobility across the grasslands north of the and . Their arrival coincided with technological shifts, including the adoption of iron tools and weapons, which facilitated expansion in the steppe environment previously occupied by Srubnaya-related cultures. Archaeological evidence associates the Cimmerians with the Chernogorovka-Novocherkassk complex, spanning from the Prut River to the lower Don in modern Ukraine and southern Russia, featuring kurgan (tumulus) burials with horse sacrifices, bronze weaponry, and early iron implements indicative of a warrior-nomad society. These sites, concentrated between circa 900 and 650 BCE, reveal a material culture emphasizing mobility, with artifacts showing influences from both local steppe traditions and distant eastern motifs, such as geometric ornaments rather than the later Scythian animal styles. No evidence of large-scale sedentary settlements exists; instead, their lifestyle relied on pastoralism, raiding, and seasonal transhumance, enabling control over vast territories without fixed urban centers. Ancient DNA analyses of individuals from western steppe burials attributed to Cimmerians indicate a genetic profile with substantial eastern Eurasian steppe ancestry, clustering closer to populations from the region and than to preceding local groups like the Srubnaya. This suggests their early presence in the Pontic-Caspian area resulted from migrations or influxes from the eastern around 1000 BCE, rather than development, challenging earlier assumptions of purely local origins and highlighting transcontinental nomadic networks. Such genetic discontinuities underscore the dynamic population replacements in the , with Cimmerians representing an intermediate phase before dominance circa 700 BCE displaced them southward.

Displacement by Scythians

The displacement of the Cimmerians by the in the Pontic-Caspian occurred during the late 8th to early BCE, as groups expanded westward from their eastern origins, exerting migratory and military pressure on established Cimmerian territories between the and rivers. This event is detailed in ' Histories (4.11-12), where the cross the (modern ) River, prompting a Cimmerian council that results in internal division: one faction remains to fight and is annihilated, while the other flees southward, with the subsequently occupying the vacated lands. dates the invasion variably to circa 700 BCE or 630 BCE, aligning it with king ' campaigns, though the narrative reflects a simplified rather than precise chronology. Archaeological records corroborate this replacement through shifts in North Pontic kurgan burials and artifacts, where pre-Scythian nomadic assemblages linked to Cimmerians—characterized by earlier bronze weaponry and pottery—give way to Scythian "animal style" motifs, horse gear, and composite bows by the 7th century BCE. Genetic analyses of steppe burials further indicate an influx of eastern steppe ancestry associated with Scythians, overlaying prior western nomadic profiles attributed to Cimmerians, without evidence of large-scale admixture, suggesting displacement via conquest or expulsion rather than assimilation. Assyrian annals provide indirect confirmation, recording Cimmerian (Gimirri) incursions into Transcaucasia as early as 714 BCE—predating major Scythian (Ashkuzai) appearances in the region around 652 BCE—implying the steppe displacement initiated southward movements that destabilized Near Eastern frontiers. The causal dynamics likely involved ecological competition for pasturelands and resources in the steppe, compounded by Scythian technological advantages in archery and mobility, forcing Cimmerian fragmentation and exile without a singular cataclysmic battle, as no mass grave sites or synchronized destruction layers attest to total annihilation. This transition marked the end of Cimmerian dominance in their core homeland, redirecting their energies toward peripheral raids while Scythians consolidated control over the western steppe until Sarmatian advances centuries later.

Southward Migrations to West Asia

The Cimmerians initiated their southward expansion into around 715–713 BC, crossing the from the Ciscaucasian steppes and launching invasions into , , and frontier territories. Assyrian royal inscriptions under record these early incursions, noting Cimmerian forces—referred to as Gimirri—operating near the borders of Mannae and , prompting Assyrian interventions to curb their advance. In response to the threat, Urartian king Rusa I (r. c. 735–714 BC) mounted a preemptive campaign against the Cimmerians but suffered a decisive defeat, enabling the nomads to ravage Urartian lands and extend their plunder southward to the vicinity of Lake Urmia. This incursion weakened Urartu significantly, as evidenced by the destruction of key fortresses and the disruption of regional trade routes, with Cimmerian warbands exploiting the power vacuum left by Assyrian-Urartian conflicts. By the late 8th century BC, Cimmerian groups had penetrated deeper into Anatolia, targeting the Phrygian kingdom. Around 696–695 BC, they sacked the Phrygian capital Gordium, leading to the suicide of King Midas amid the collapse of his realm. Archaeological evidence from Gordion, including burn layers dated to this period via dendrochronology, corroborates the destruction attributed to Cimmerian raids, marked by hasty fortifications and abandoned elite structures. These migrations continued into the , with Cimmerians under leaders like Teushpa raiding and Tabal in 679 BC, as documented in Esarhaddon's annals, before forces under the same king repelled them near Halys River. Further incursions into and followed, pressuring local kingdoms and facilitating temporary Cimmerian settlements in western until their eventual dispersal by Lydian countermeasures around 625 BC.

Interactions in West Asia and Anatolia

Invasions of Transcaucasia and the Iranian Plateau

The earliest recorded Cimmerian incursions into Transcaucasia occurred around 715–713 BC, when nomadic groups raided the kingdom of Urartu and adjacent areas, including possibly Colchis, as documented in the annals of Assyrian king Sargon II. These invasions followed Assyrian military campaigns in the region and capitalized on Urartian vulnerabilities, with Cimmerian forces defeating Urartian king Rusa I in battle near the southeastern frontiers and subsequently looting settlements as far south as the basin of Lake Urmia. The raids disrupted Urartu's defensive networks and highlighted the mobility of Cimmerian horse-archers in mountainous terrain, though they did not lead to permanent settlements in Transcaucasia at this stage. By the mid-8th century BC, Cimmerian activity extended into the northwestern through alliances or opportunistic bases in the kingdom of Mannai, located south of and bordering . Mannaean records and reports indicate Cimmerians used Mannai as a staging ground for further raids, exacerbating local instability amid -Mannaean tensions. A major escalation came in 679 BC, when Cimmerian leader Teušpa mobilized forces from Mannai to besiege the fortress of Hubušnu and advance into -controlled Šubria, posing a direct threat to Median-influenced zones on the plateau. king responded decisively, defeating the Cimmerians, killing Teušpa, and scattering their remnants, which temporarily curtailed their plateau incursions but underscored their capacity to coordinate across ethnic boundaries with local actors like Mannaean rulers. These events, preserved in Esarhaddon's prisms, reveal Cimmerian tactics of rapid strikes and , contributing to the fragmentation of buffer states between and emerging Iranian powers.

Conflicts with Anatolian Kingdoms

The Cimmerians launched major incursions into the Phrygian kingdom in western during the late , with records attesting to their presence in the region as early as 714 BC following raids on . By approximately 696–695 BC, these invasions culminated in the sack of the Phrygian capital Gordium, which precipitated the collapse of the centralized Phrygian state and of its last king, , to avoid capture. sources, including , describe the Cimmerians' destructive path through , though they provide limited chronological detail and attribute the Phrygian downfall to broader nomadic pressures rather than a single leader. Following the Phrygian collapse, Cimmerian forces redirected their efforts toward , where King Gyges (r. circa 680–644 BC) initially repelled an invasion around 679 BC, securing his eastern frontiers. Facing renewed threats, Gyges appealed for assistance in the 660s BC, forging an alliance with Emperor , who documented the Lydian king's submission and tribute in exchange for support against the Gimirri ( term for Cimmerians). This partnership temporarily stemmed Cimmerian advances, but discrepancies between annals—emphasizing imperial victories—and accounts highlight interpretive challenges, with the former portraying Gyges as a tributary . A decisive Cimmerian offensive in the 640s BC, led by Lygdamis (identified with Tugdamme or Dugdammî), overwhelmed Lydian defenses, resulting in Gyges' death and the partial sack of around 644 BC. records under note the defeat of Cimmerian remnants after this campaign, crediting divine favor for halting further incursions into and , though the Lydian kingdom endured under Gyges' successors. These conflicts, corroborated by tablets and later Hellenistic historians like , underscore the Cimmerians' role as disruptors of Anatolian polities, exploiting power vacuums amid expansion.

Engagements with Assyrian Empire

The earliest recorded interactions between the Cimmerians and the Assyrian Empire occurred during the reign of Sargon II (r. 722–705 BCE), when Assyrian annals noted Cimmerian raids in the Lake Urmia region and against Urartu around 715–713 BCE, encroaching on Assyrian spheres of influence in eastern Anatolia and the Zagros Mountains. These nomadic incursions prompted Assyrian military responses, including campaigns in Tabal and Mannaea, where Sargon II engaged local kings allied with or threatened by Cimmerian movements; his death in 705 BCE during such a campaign in western Iran has been linked by some sources to clashes involving Cimmerian forces or their proxies. Phrygian king Midas appealed to Sargon for aid against the Cimmerians circa 710 BCE, highlighting the growing peril to Assyrian vassals in Anatolia. Under (r. 681–669 BCE), direct confrontations escalated. In 679 BCE, Cimmerian king Teušpa invaded Assyrian-controlled territories in and Tabal, besieging Hubušnu (modern Hupisna in ). decisively defeated the invaders, claiming in his inscriptions to have personally killed Teušpa and his nobles, while taking thousands of captives who were resettled and integrated into military service. Earlier in his reign, Cimmerians allied with rebels, raiding provinces like Parsua and Ellipi between 674 and 672 BCE, though countermeasures contained these threats. By 671–670 BCE, some Cimmerian contingents had shifted to serving as auxiliaries in the army during campaigns against . During Ashurbanipal's rule (r. 669–631 BCE), Cimmerian activity persisted as a peripheral challenge to western frontiers. In 665 BCE, they raided , prompting Lydian king Gyges to seek , which contributed to their repulsion. A more severe threat emerged under Cimmerian leader Tugdamme (Lygdamis), who around 644 BCE overran , capturing and forcing Gyges's suicide, before allying with Tabal and Treres forces to launch incursions into territories in and Tabal circa 640 BCE. records indicate Tugdamme planned broader invasions exploiting exhaustion from Babylonian wars, but he was defeated and killed in battle, succeeded briefly by Sandakurru, after which Cimmerian raids on domains subsided. These engagements demonstrated capacity to repel Cimmerian nomadic warfare through superior organization and fortifications, though the nomads' mobility strained imperial resources in .

Society and Culture

Ethnicity and Language

The Cimmerians constituted a nomadic ethnic group indigenous to the , emerging prominently in the BCE prior to their southward displacements. Ethnically, they are classified as Indo-European speakers, with scholarly consensus aligning them to the Iranic branch based on onomastic, cultural, and archaeological parallels to contemporaneous steppe nomads like early , though distinct in tribal identity and material markers such as horse gear and weaponry. Genetic analyses of skeletal remains linked to Cimmerian-influenced sites, including those from the cis-Uralic Srubnaya-Alakulskaya horizon (circa 2200–1800 BCE, predating but ancestral to Cimmerian populations), reveal Y-chromosome haplogroups like R1a-Z93, characteristic of steppe pastoralists, alongside minor admixtures of Q1a suggestive of eastern Eurasian contacts but not dominant. This genetic profile underscores their steppe origins without direct descent from or into later Scythian groups, emphasizing a shared Indo-European shaped by mobility rather than sedentary or non-steppe ancestries. Fringe hypotheses positing Turkic ethnicity, derived from selective interpretations of later medieval sources, lack support from primary linguistic or genomic data and contradict the Iranic onomastic evidence. The Cimmerian language remains unattested in native inscriptions or texts, rendering direct classification reliant on indirect evidence from foreign records, primarily annals from the 8th–7th centuries BCE. Surviving personal names, such as Te-ush-pa (Tushpa), Sandakšatru, and Gayamara (etymologized as Old Iranian Gaya-mira "union of clans"), exhibit phonological and morphological traits aligning with Eastern Iranian dialects, including satemization and stem formations typical of . These features, preserved in transliterations of interactions during incursions into and (e.g., 714 BCE under Rusas I), indicate a centum-satem transitional or early satem Indo-European form, distinct yet akin to Scytho-Sarmatian. Alternative Thraco-Cimmerian hypotheses, proposing links to Balkan via shared kw > p shifts in place names, find limited traction due to insufficient lexical matches and chronological mismatches with migrations. Absent corpus precludes grammatical reconstruction, but the Iranic attribution coheres with causal patterns of linguistic diffusion among nomads, where shared facilitated but did not erase tribal divergences.

Social and Tribal Organization

The Cimmerians maintained a tribal typical of early steppe nomads, characterized by decentralized leadership under kings or chieftains who coordinated raids and migrations rather than ruling a centralized state. Assyrian annals record Teušpa as a prominent Cimmerian leader defeated near Ḫubušsnu (likely in ) in 679 BCE during an incursion into territory. Similarly, Dugdammē ( Lygdamis), active in the 640s BCE, directed large-scale attacks on Ionian and Aeolian settlements, allying with Thracian Treres under their king Kobos before perishing in around 640 BCE; he was succeeded by Sandakšatru (Sa-an-dak-KUR-ru). These figures indicate chieftains emerging from warrior elites to unite tribes for opportunistic warfare, with no evidence of hereditary dynasties or fixed administrative structures. Ancient Greek sources, particularly (Histories 4.11-12), describe an internal schism among the Cimmerians during their displacement by circa 8th-7th centuries BCE: the aristocratic faction, numbering in the thousands and buried in a collective after mutual slaughter, opposed mass , while the common populace—estimated by at around 1,000,000 individuals—opted for southward migration into Asia Minor. This account, corroborated in outline by (1.3.21), points to between a mobile invested in defending pastoral territories and broader tribal masses prioritizing survival through relocation, though ' population figures likely exaggerate for narrative effect. Archaeological and textual evidence yields no named clans or subtribes, but the Cimmerians' coordination in cross-regional campaigns—spanning the to —suggests flexible confederations formed ad hoc under charismatic leaders, akin to contemporaneous polities without enduring imperial frameworks. Their governance emphasized martial consensus among equestrian warriors, with authority derived from prowess in horse-based raiding economies rather than sedentary institutions. Assyrian depictions portray them as Gimirri hordes, reinforcing a perception of tribal aggregates capable of but prone to fragmentation post-leadership vacuum.

Nomadic Lifestyle and Economy

The Cimmerians maintained a fully nomadic in the Pontic-Caspian during the early first millennium BCE, characterized by seasonal migrations to exploit varying pastures and avoid environmental hardships. This arose amid climatic shifts in the Final , transitioning preceding mixed pastoral-agricultural communities toward specialized nomadism, with groups following herd routes across the North steppes and adjacent regions. Archaeological evidence from this epoch, including burials and settlement patterns, indicates portable dwellings such as felt tents supported by wooden frames, enabling rapid relocation without fixed structures. Their economy centered on herding of , with as the cornerstone species for transport, breeding, and sustenance, supplemented by and sheep for , , , and hides. This horse-dependent system facilitated high mobility and underpinned social organization around tribal herds, distinguishing Cimmerians as among the earliest nomads in . Innovations in horse-riding and technology, evident in artifacts circa 900–700 BCE, enhanced herding efficiency and extended grazing ranges, though pressures likely contributed to southward displacements. Raiding sedentary societies formed a critical supplement to , providing plunder, captives, and tribute to offset resource scarcity. annals and Greek accounts record Cimmerian incursions into Transcaucasia and from the 8th century BCE onward, culminating in assaults on (circa 714 BCE), , and frontiers in the BCE, which yielded economic gains through booty extraction. Such predatory expeditions, leveraging and speed, integrated warfare into economic survival, though they provoked counter-campaigns that fragmented Cimmerian groups.

Warfare Tactics and Technology

The Cimmerians, as nomadic equestrians of the Eurasian steppes, revolutionized warfare through the widespread adoption of and during the 8th and 7th centuries BCE. Their military strategy emphasized mobility, surprise raids, and hit-and-run engagements, allowing small forces to harass and disrupt larger sedentary armies across and . Assyrian annals, such as those recording II's campaigns against Cimmerian leader of the around 715 BCE, depict them as swift horsemen capable of rapid incursions into and Tabal, evading fortified positions and supply lines. Central to their tactics was the composite , a powerful weapon constructed from wood, horn, and sinew, enabling archers to fire volleys of from horseback at high speeds. This technology, evidenced by "Cimmerian bows" referenced in trade records and archaeological arrowheads from burials, provided superior range and penetration compared to contemporary arms. Cimmerian horse archers operated in loose formations, feigning retreats to lure enemies into ambushes—a akin to later tactics—before unleashing arrow barrages to break cohesion. In close quarters, Cimmerians wielded iron short swords (akinakes), daggers, and javelins, with evidence from East sites like the yielding socketed spearheads and trilobate tips dated to circa 700 BCE. Their equipment included metal bits, cheekpieces, and saddles for stability during maneuvers, facilitating endurance rides over vast distances. While lacking heavy armor to maintain speed, elite warriors may have used scale protection, as inferred from belt fittings and harness ornaments in graves. These innovations, shared with neighboring nomads, pressured settled empires to adapt, prompting shifts toward integration by the late BCE.

Art, Crafts, and Material Culture

The Cimmerians' , adapted to a nomadic lifestyle, centered on durable metalwork for weapons, gear, and personal adornments, as revealed by kurgan burials in the Pontic-Caspian dating to the 9th–7th centuries BCE. dominated early artifacts, including daggers, socketed arrowheads, and mace-heads with figural motifs, often interred with deceased warriors to signify martial prowess. tools such as knives and scrapers accompanied these, alongside ceramics of the Koptyaki type in South Caucasian graves, indicating practical crafts for daily and funerary use. Decorative elements featured geometric motifs—circles, semicircles, spirals, squares, rhombuses, and crosses—etched or cast onto weapons, fasteners, utensils, and using techniques like , forging, stamping, and . Gold jewelry and plaques from graves, occasionally inlaid with glass, provided elite status markers, though less ornate than later goldwork, reflecting a focus on functional portability over lavish display. In , post-migration artifacts from sites like Büklükale ( BCE) include nearly seven combat-bent arrowheads, a small horse-rider , and items with proto-Scythian animal motifs, evidencing warfare and cultural continuity. Horse-bits adorned with bird or heads, found alongside over 250 socketed arrowheads from 7th– contexts, underscore craftsmanship linking to traditions. Gold rosettes parallel late Cimmerian steppe objects, suggesting syncretic influences in conquered regions. This corpus portrays a proto-nomadic aesthetic, prioritizing utility in mobility and combat over monumental or figurative excess.

Religious Practices

The religious practices of the Cimmerians remain largely obscure, as they left no indigenous written records, with inferences drawn primarily from archaeological findings in the Pontic-Caspian steppe and comparisons to related Iranic nomadic groups like the Scythians. Excavations of Cimmerian-associated kurgans from the 8th to 7th centuries BCE reveal burial rites featuring tumuli with stratified grave goods, including weapons, jewelry, and animal remains, pointing to rituals emphasizing social hierarchy and preparation for an afterlife. Horse burials and potential sacrifices figure prominently in these sites, reflecting a of the horse integral to steppe nomad spirituality, where equines symbolized mobility, warfare prowess, and possibly divine favor or conveyance to the —a practice shared with broader Indo-Iranian traditions. Symbolic artifacts, such as cross-shaped ornaments found in graves, likely represented cosmological motifs like the Center of the World or a tiered , akin to shamanic worldviews documented among Siberian and peoples. Shamanistic elements appear in the ritual use of grave construction materials and orientations, suggesting ecstatic mediation between human and supernatural realms, though no specific deities are attested in Cimmerian contexts from or sources. These practices underscore a pragmatic, warrior-oriented focused on ancestral and natural forces rather than temple-based , consistent with the nomadic of early societies.

Archaeological and Genetic Evidence

Sites in the Eurasian Steppe

Archaeological evidence for the Cimmerians in the Eurasian Steppe centers on barrow cemeteries (kurgans) from the early Iron Age, roughly 1000–700 BCE, concentrated in the Pontic-Caspian region encompassing modern Ukraine, Crimea, and the lower Don River basin in southern Russia. These sites reveal inhumation burials of nomadic warriors, often with flexed skeletons oriented south, accompanied by grave goods such as bronze daggers, horse bits, ceramics (including hand-made beakers, jars, and bowls), and rare ornaments like golden spirals or bronze armlets, reflecting a semi-nomadic economy reliant on pastoralism and raiding. Such assemblages are grouped under the "Cimmerian culture" or linked to the Novocherkassk culture (circa 900–650 BCE), characterized by influences from both local steppe traditions and Caucasian metalworking. The Suvorovo barrow cemetery, located on the eastern bank of Katlabukh Lake in Ukraine's region, exemplifies early Cimmerian presence with seven mounds yielding eight graves dated to the late 10th–9th centuries BCE. Burials featured rectangular or oval pit-graves with log-wall linings, contracted skeletons, and artifacts including bimetallic daggers, pottery tied to the contemporaneous Belozersk culture, and jewelry indicative of elite status. Similar barrows at Petrodolinskoe, , and Cotiujeni in the North-Western area show secondary inhumations and transitional features between the earlier Chemogorovsk (9th–mid-8th century BCE) and later stages. In the lower Don River steppes, Novocherkassk culture sites include burials and limited settlements with horse gear and weapons, supporting identification with Cimmerian groups displaced southward by Scythian incursions around 700 BCE. Crimean steppe kurgans, such as those around the lower Don and Kerch Peninsula, contain comparable early Iron Age layers with olenniye kamni (deer stones) and bronze bits, predating dominant Scythian overlays. Genetic studies from these steppe contexts, including three individuals dated 1000–800 BCE from western Pontic-Caspian kurgans like those near Glinoe village in Moldova's District, reveal haplogroups (e.g., A, C, D, M) with East Asian affinities alongside Y-chromosome Q1*, pointing to admixture from eastern sources and distinguishing Cimmerians as pre-Scythian nomads. Broader sampling across 38 genomes indicates a stable eastern Pontic-Caspian genetic profile as the origin for western nomadic expansions, including Cimmerian migrations, with continuity from Srubnaya groups but increased diversity by the . Over 60 such sites between the South Bug, , and rivers underscore the Cimmerians' initial base before westward and southward movements.

Evidence from West Asia

Excavations at Büklükale, located near the Kızılrmak River in central (modern ), have revealed structures and artifacts dated to the late BCE, proposed as the earliest known Cimmerian in the region following their migration from the Pontic-Caspian steppe. Discoveries include horse bits, iron weapons, and fragments consistent with nomadic cultures, distinguishing them from local Anatolian assemblages through stylistic affinities to steppe-derived material. These finds, uncovered since 2017 by Japanese-Turkish teams, suggest a semi-permanent base used during incursions into and , though definitive attribution remains tentative due to overlaps with contemporaneous influences. In western , chronological analyses of sites like Bayindir Höyük indicate Cimmerian activity around the BCE, evidenced by s and fibulae exhibiting hybrid steppe- traits amid destruction layers at Phrygian centers such as , dated circa 695 BCE. annals corroborate these raids, reporting Cimmerian forces under leaders like Teushpa clashing with Phrygian king (Midas) around 715-709 BCE, with archaeological correlates including burned s and imported steppe weaponry at affected settlements. Further east, in the Kingdom of (encompassing parts of modern and eastern ), sites like Teishebaini show fortification enhancements and scatters from the mid-8th century BCE, aligned with Cimmerian incursions documented in Urartian inscriptions as "Gimirri" attacks circa 714 BCE under Rusa I. Direct genetic evidence from n contexts remains scarce, with no samples unequivocally tied to Cimmerians recovered from or Near Eastern sites as of 2023. Preliminary analyses of steppe-adjacent remains suggest diverse haplogroups including R1b and , reflecting eastern steppe admixtures, but these predate or originate outside and lack regional confirmation. Broader Southern Arc genomic surveys (ca. 3000-1000 BCE) highlight Iranic nomadic influxes into via vectors, potentially ancestral to Cimmerian movements, yet without specific markers distinguishing Cimmerian incursions from later or ones. This paucity underscores the challenges of sampling nomadic transients, prioritizing textual and artefactual proxies over for evidence.

Key Genetic Studies and Findings

A pivotal genetic investigation into nomads from the Pontic-Caspian steppe, published in 2018, sequenced low- to medium-coverage genomes from 35 individuals, including three attributed to Cimmerian cultural contexts dated approximately 1000–800 BCE. These Cimmerian samples exhibited autosomal DNA profiles with predominant West Eurasian ancestry, incorporating Western Hunter-Gatherer (WHG) and (CHG) components characteristic of earlier steppe populations like Srubnaya-Alakulskaya, alongside minor Siberian (Northeast Asian, NEA) and Southeast Asian (SEA) s. Pairwise mismatch analysis indicated slightly elevated in these Cimmerians relative to the preceding Srubnaya-Alakulskaya group, suggesting possible heterogeneous origins or events. Principal component analysis (PCA) and f4-statistics revealed that the Cimmerians shared drift with eastern populations from the region and western , as well as western Siberian groups like Karasuk, rather than forming a direct continuation of local Pontic-Caspian lineages. One individual clustered closely with the broader continuum (SC), while the group as a whole displayed affinities leaning eastward, supporting a of or from farther east into the western . This pattern aligns with a stable genetic signature linking eastern Pontic-Caspian sources to subsequent western nomadic expansions, though Cimmerians did not appear as direct progenitors of later , who showed greater eastern . Uniparental markers further underscored eastern influences: among the three male samples with Y-chromosome data, two carried R1b haplogroups, common in western Bronze Age contexts, while the third bore Q1*, a lineage associated with East Asian origins near the . Mitochondrial DNA haplogroups included both West Eurasian types and East/Central Asian-derived lineages such as A, C, , and , indicating maternal from the east. Overall, these findings point to Cimmerians as a genetically diverse group with roots potentially extending beyond the core Pontic-Caspian region toward Central or eastern , consistent with archaeological of nomadic mobility, though the small sample size limits definitive conclusions on population-wide structure. Subsequent studies on related steppe nomads have not substantially expanded Cimmerian-specific ancient DNA datasets, leaving this 2018 analysis as the primary genetic benchmark.

Debates and Controversies

Migration Narratives and Herodotus' Account

Herodotus, in his Histories (4.11–12), describes the Cimmerians as inhabitants of the region north of the Black Sea who were displaced by Scythian invaders driven westward from behind the Aral Sea by the Massagetae. The Cimmerian aristocracy opted for collective suicide and burial near the Tyras River (modern Dniester), while the populace divided into two contingents: one fleeing across Europe toward the pillars of Heracles, the other migrating southward into Asia along the Black Sea's eastern coast, passing through Colchis and the Caucasus to reach Sinope. This account frames the subsequent Cimmerian incursions into Anatolia, including raids on Phrygia, Lydia (sacking Sardis circa 652 BCE under king Gyges), and Tabal, as consequences of this mass displacement. Assyrian royal annals, however, document interactions with the Gimirri (Cimmerians) earlier than ' implied timeline for the Scythian expulsion, with intelligence reports to noting their alliance with in Transcaucasia between 720 and 714 BCE, and a major defeat of their forces under Lygdamis near in 679 BCE. These records suggest initial Cimmerian movements into via a southern route through the Caspian Gates rather than Herodotus' coastal path, which scholars deem logistically unfeasible due to the impassable terrain of the eastern littoral. ' narrative, likely drawn from Ionian and oral traditions encountered during his travels, may reflect a later rationalization or folkloric elaboration, possibly influenced by Homeric depictions of Cimmerians as denizens of a foggy, underworld-adjacent realm ( 11.14). Archaeological discrepancies further challenge Herodotus' portrayal of a wholesale Cimmerian supplanted by in the Pontic , as "Thraco-Cimmerian" artifacts (e.g., from , 750–700 BCE) show continuity rather than abrupt replacement, and no distinct Cimmerian material traces appear south of the matching northern finds. Instead, southern Transcaucasian and Anatolian sites yield artifacts stylistically akin to early animal art from (circa 900 BCE), implying the Gimirri encountered by Assyrians were part of a broader Iranic nomadic continuum, potentially overlapping with or indistinguishable from (Ishkuza) groups. Earlier poetic sources like ' Arimaspea (circa 550 BCE) corroborate the -driven flight from but provide no independent verification, underscoring ' reliance on unverified hearsay for causal sequences. The chronological misalignment—Assyrian Gimirri active by 714 BCE versus ' Scythian dominance post-653 BCE (dated from their 28-year rule ending circa 625 BCE)—prompts theories of multiple Cimmerian waves or Herodotus' compression of events to fit ethnographic symmetries between and Cimmerians as archetypal nomad invaders. While influential in shaping classical perceptions, Herodotus' account prioritizes dramatic over synchrony with evidence, highlighting the limitations of fifth-century BCE in reconciling migrations with Near Eastern .

Alternative Ethnic Identifications

Some scholars have contested the mainstream identification of the Cimmerians as an Eastern Iranian nomadic group akin to the , proposing instead affiliations with populations based on their documented incursions into the western littoral and during the 8th–7th centuries BCE. This view posits that the Cimmerians may have originated from or intermixed with Thracian-speaking groups in the or northwestern Pontic region, evidenced by the "Thraco-Cimmerian" archaeological horizon—characterized by Hallstatt-influenced weaponry and gear found in sites like the Carpathian Basin and from circa 750–550 BCE—which some interpret as reflecting a Thracian core with nomadic overlays rather than purely Iranian origins. However, this hypothesis struggles against linguistic evidence, as no Thracian loanwords appear in Cimmerian-linked from records (e.g., Gimirri leaders like Tugdamme and Sandakhshatra, bearing Iranian-style names), and the cultural continuity with Pontic burials favors an eastern provenance. A separate, largely theory traces Cimmerian ethnicity to or proto-Celtic groups, stemming from Poseidonius of Apamea (c. 135–51 BCE), who equated them with the Cimbri tribe encountered by Romans in the 2nd century BCE Jutland campaigns, citing phonetic resemblance between Greek Kimmerioi and Latin Cimbri. This identification persisted in medieval traditions, where some and Germanic lore claimed descent from Cimmerian exiles, potentially linking them to C/D cultures in via hypothetical Danube migrations around 1200–800 BCE. Modern critiques dismiss this as unsupported by or artifacts; Y-DNA from Pontic Cimmerian-era burials aligns more with R1a-Z93 Iranian lineages than R1b, and no shared material motifs (e.g., Cimmerian geometric bronzework vs. curvilinear art) substantiate trans-European kinship. Such views often derive from biblical genealogies in 10, interpreting as a Cimmerian- , but lack empirical corroboration beyond name speculation. Debates also question whether the Cimmerians constituted a discrete ethnic entity or merely a proto-Scythian vanguard, with Assyrian annals (e.g., Esarhaddon's 679 BCE campaigns) and Herodotus (Histories 1.15, c. 440 BCE) distinguishing them by nomenclature and territory north of the Caucasus, yet archaeological indistinguishability—shared Novokubansk-type burials with akinakes daggers and scale armor from 750–650 BCE—suggests cultural synonymy rather than ethnic divergence. Proponents of merger argue that Scythian irruptions c. 650 BCE displaced rather than supplanted a homogeneous Iranian nomadic continuum, rendering "Cimmerian" a Greek/Assyrian exonym for early eastern nomads without implying separate ethnolinguistic stock. This perspective aligns with Neo-Assyrian texts conflating Gimirri with later Aškuzai (Scythians), though differentiation in Urartian inscriptions (e.g., Rusa II's 714–685 BCE records) preserves nominal autonomy. Empirical resolution favors distinction, as Cimmerian incursions peaked 722–695 BCE per Sargon II's prisms, predating Scythian hegemony.

Extent of Cultural Influence

The Cimmerians exerted influence primarily through the diffusion of associated with , including horse gear, weaponry, and burial practices, which prefigured elements of later in the Pontic-Caspian . Archaeological evidence from the North Pontic region identifies a "Cimmerian culture" dating to the 9th-8th centuries BCE, characterized by burials with bronze and iron artifacts such as akinakes daggers and socketed axes, which transitioned into the Early horizon around the BCE without sharp discontinuity. This suggests the Cimmerians as bearers of proto-Scythian traditions, with their displacement by incoming leading to partial assimilation rather than erasure, as indicated by shared motifs in horse harnesses and animal-style ornamentation persisting into Scythian assemblages. In the and Eastern , the Thraco-Cimmerian horizon of the 8th-7th centuries BCE reflects the spread of Cimmerian-derived artifacts, including Gáva-type urns, socketed sickles, and ornate bronze fittings, found in hoards from to , signaling technological and stylistic exchanges with Thracian groups rather than . These items, often linked to elite warrior burials, introduced advanced ironworking techniques and nomadic equestrian elements that influenced local C-D cultures, though the extent remains debated as diffusion via or elite emulation rather than wholesale cultural dominance. Further south in , Cimmerian incursions from circa 714-695 BCE left syncretic traces in nomadic complexes, blending steppe-style arrowheads, quivers, and stag motifs with Phrygian and Lydian bronze work, as seen in finds from sites like Büklükale, but without evidence of deep assimilation into sedentary societies. In the , their impact on and Urartian polities was predominantly disruptive—raids weakening defenses and prompting fortifications—yet prompted limited adoption of tactics, with annals recording Cimmerian forces employing composite bows and by 679 BCE, influencing military adaptations under . Overall, Cimmerian cultural reach was confined to elite warrior spheres and zones, yielding no transformative legacies in urban art or governance but seeding nomadic motifs that echoed in successor steppe cultures up to the .

Legacy

Impact on Successor Nomadic Groups

The Scythians displaced the Cimmerians from the Pontic-Caspian steppe around the late 8th century BCE, assuming dominance as the preeminent nomadic power in the region by circa 700 BCE. This transition involved the Scythians adopting and amplifying core Cimmerian elements of equestrian warfare, including the use of composite recurve bows and light cavalry tactics suited to open terrain, which enabled rapid raids and sustained mobility across vast distances. Assyrian annals record Cimmerian cavalry engagements as early as 715 BCE, setting a precedent for the mounted archery that defined Scythian military success against settled empires like Media and Persia in the 7th–6th centuries BCE. Genetic evidence from , however, indicates no direct paternal continuity between Cimmerians and , with Cimmerian samples (dated 1000–800 BCE) showing heterogeneous profiles including East Asian mitochondrial haplogroups (e.g., A, C, D) and Y-haplogroup Q1*, distinct from the predominant eastern Pontic-Caspian ancestry in early (800–100 BCE). Instead, parallels in reflect a broader Iranian nomadic rather than inheritance, as both groups shared pastoralist economies reliant on and kurgan burials with sacrifices. The Cimmerians' earlier migrations southward may have opened pathways for expansion into , indirectly facilitating their cultural imprint on successor groups through shared networks. By the BCE, began supplanting in the western , exhibiting genetic similarities to Cimmerians in eastern variants, such as elevated Central Asian affinities, suggesting localized persistence of pre-Scythian nomadic lineages amid waves of replacement. Sarmatian artifacts, including akinakes daggers and scale armor adaptations, evolved from Scythian prototypes that traced roots to Cimmerian weapon styles documented in Anatolian contexts around 700 BCE. This sequence underscores the Cimmerians' role in pioneering the archetype of expansive, horse-centric confederations that shaped steppe dynamics for centuries, though without verifiable ethnic absorption or unidirectional transmission.

Representations in Later Histories

In the Odyssey attributed to (ca. BCE), the Cimmerians are depicted as inhabitants of a fog-shrouded land at the world's edge, where perpetual darkness prevails and the sun's rays never penetrate, positioning them near the entrance to as symbolic guardians of the underworld. This mythological representation, echoed in later imagination as realms of otherness and obscurity, likely drew from early encounters with northern nomads but served to exoticize them as liminal figures beyond civilized ken. Strabo, in his Geography (ca. 7 BCE–23 CE), reconciled such mythic elements with historical migrations, describing Cimmerian incursions into and post-Trojan War alongside the Treres, and attributing their underworld association to their origins in the dismal northern territories near the Cimmerian Bosphorus. He critiqued earlier confusions, such as Thracian attributions, while affirming their role as raiders expelled southward, drawing on prior accounts like those of Hecataeus to map their path from the Pontic steppe to and beyond. Roman geographers perpetuated these portrayals with less emphasis on events and more on nomenclature; (ca. 77–79 CE) referenced the Cimmerian as a linking the of Azotus to Lake Maeotis, implying enduring toponymic traces without elaborating on the people's fate. Later and Byzantine texts, such as those of (ca. 4th century CE), occasionally invoked Cimmerians in ethnographic digressions on peoples but subordinated them to successors, reflecting a historiographical shift where their invasions were subsumed under broader narratives of mobility. By medieval chronicles, Cimmerian mentions virtually vanish, supplanted by accounts of Hunnic, , and Turkic migrations; isolated references in Byzantine sources treat them as archaic precursors to nomads, underscoring how their 8th–7th century BCE disruptions faded from amid recurrent invasions. This obscurity highlights the limits of ancient in preserving ephemeral nomadic legacies absent from Latin or institutional records.

References

  1. [1]
    CIMMERIANS - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    CIMMERIANS. a nomadic people, most likely of Iranian origin, who flourished in the 8th-7th centuries B.C..
  2. [2]
    Cimmerians - Livius.org
    Sep 24, 2020 · The Cimmerians were closely related and are archaeologically almost identical to the Scythians, who may have expelled them from their home ...
  3. [3]
    Ancient genomes suggest the eastern Pontic-Caspian steppe as the ...
    Oct 3, 2018 · From around 1000 BCE, pre-Scythian nomadic populations started to appear in the western Pontic-Caspian steppe including the Cimmerians known ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Cimmerians and Scythians - Herodotus reconsidered
    Feb 27, 2018 · The Cimmerians fled, passing the Caucasus on the side of the Black Sea, and reached Anatolia. There, they raided the prosperous kingdoms of ...Missing: invasions | Show results with:invasions
  6. [6]
    Cultures | Cimmerians - Ancient Mesopotamia
    The Cimmerians (also Kimmerians, Greek Κιμμέριοι Kimmerioi) are an ancient people, first mentioned in the late 8th century BC in Assyrian records.
  7. [7]
    (PDF) “The Cimmerians: their origins, movements and their difficulties”
    445 Şahin Yildirim New findings on the history and archaeology of ... scholars as being the same to which the Cimmerians should be placed somewhere people.
  8. [8]
    Human adaptation to past climate changes in the northern Pontic ...
    The beginning of the Early Iron Age in the Pontic steppe was connected with the Cimmerian culture (1000–650 BC). Its economy is characterized as nomadic cattle ...
  9. [9]
    Culture and history of the Cimmerians in the Pontic steppes
    The main area of their distribution was the forest-steppe on the Dnieper's left bank and, in particular, the Vorskla's basin. These plaques are dated by the ...
  10. [10]
    3. Cimmerian and/or Early Scythian finds from Anatolia
    The first Assyrian references on the Cimmerians date from 722-713 B.C.. During the reign of Sancherib (705-681 B.C.) the Cimmerians attacked Asia Minor and ...
  11. [11]
    Archaeological Evidence of the Relationship of the Cimmerians with ...
    Aug 4, 2025 · В статье предпринята попытка обзора результатов раскопочных работ последних десятилетий, связанных с активностью киммерийцев в центральной и ...
  12. [12]
    Excavations in Turkey Reveal the True Home of the Cimmerians
    Jun 24, 2023 · Büklükale is believed to be the earliest Cimmerian settlement in Anatolia, and the recovered artifacts provide vital insights into this culture.
  13. [13]
    Japanese archaeologist reveal 1st settlement of Cimmerians in ...
    Jun 19, 2023 · The discovered artifacts shed light on the Cimmerians and reveal evidence of warfare within the constructed fortress. Notably, an image of a ...
  14. [14]
    The Thraco-Cimmerian Hypothesis - The History Files
    Apr 6, 2024 · This concerns an Eastern Celtic 38 group (in DNA terms), part of the Indo-European Cimmerian-Scythian group which dominated the Pontic steppe.
  15. [15]
    (PDF) The Cimmerian Problem Re-Examined: the Evidence of the ...
    On the other hand, valuable evidence for the Cimmerians in Western Asia is provided by Oriental, mainly Assyrian, records . The written evidence can be to some ...
  16. [16]
    Ancient genomes suggest the eastern Pontic-Caspian steppe as the ...
    Oct 3, 2018 · We found evidence of a stable shared genetic signature, making the eastern Pontic-Caspian steppe a likely source of western nomadic groups.
  17. [17]
    Cimmerians in Eastern European History
    Aug 28, 2025 · The historically attested names of the Cimmerian leaders are unambiguously considered Iranian but have no reliable interpretation (KHRAPUNOV ...
  18. [18]
    (DOC) Cimmerians in East European History - Academia.edu
    AI. The Cimmerians' Iranian identity is well-supported by historical evidence and linguistic analysis. Cimmerians likely migrated from Europe to Asia Minor ...
  19. [19]
    Kingdoms of Europe - Cimmerians (Indo-Iranians?) - The History Files
    The topic of Cimmerians is a complicated one though, made more so by Y-DNA testing which shows that a handful of Cimmerian bodies were R1a (East Indo-Europeans) ...
  20. [20]
    Whence the cimmerians came? transcontinental communications of ...
    Jan 10, 2018 · The author identifies the historical Cimmerians with carriers of Karasuk archaeological culture and its derivatives.
  21. [21]
    An attempt to separate cimmerian culture from the ... - YSU Journals
    May 29, 2025 · Specifically, Cimmerian culture lacks a constituent of the “Scythian triad” – beast style. Instead, a geometrical ornament, especially, rhombus ...Missing: Chernogorkovka | Show results with:Chernogorkovka
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Phrygia, Gordion, and King Midas in the Late Eighth Century B.C.
    Oct 1, 2004 · Ancient historians inform us that Midas killed himself in despair after the Cimmerians destroyed his city and kingdom. Nonetheless, Phrygia ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    IM Diakonoff The Pre-history of the Armenian People - ATTALUS
    From their new bases the Cimmerians ventured to attack Assyrian territories in 679 B.C., but were beaten off (254). ... Urartu was so weakened by the Scythian ...
  26. [26]
    3 - Cimmerians and the Scythians: the Impact of Nomadic Powers on ...
    Herodotus writes that the Scythians, who themselves were forced out of Central Asia, forced the Cimmerians from their homeland, with the Cimmerians migrating ...
  27. [27]
    Gyges of Lydia - Livius.org
    Oct 12, 2020 · The new king of Lydia had nothing to fear from the east, where he defeated the Cimmerians in 679. Now, Gyges could embark upon a western policy, ...Missing: records | Show results with:records
  28. [28]
    Lydia and Phrygia - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    Oct 1, 2004 · The first Assyrian reference to Gyges was in the 660s and concerned attacks by the Cimmerians, nomadic invaders from the Caucasus who had ...
  29. [29]
    Esarhaddon - World History Encyclopedia
    Jul 8, 2014 · Esarhaddon met the Cimmerians in battle at Cilicia and defeated them. ... He claims in his inscriptions to have killed their king, Teushpa, with ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] turkic onomastics - Magnanimitas
    Sometimes, a group of researchers consider the Cimmerians to be a group of Iranian-speaking Scythians or the ancestors of the Bulgars [46, p. 15].Missing: affiliation | Show results with:affiliation
  31. [31]
    The North Black Sea Steppes in the Cimmerian Epoch - SpringerLink
    During this time specialised nomadic economies developed based on the horse, so that most of the steppe regions were occupied by groups of nomads with their ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Politico-Economic Impact of the Horse on Old World Cultures
    In the seventh century BC, Cimmerian cavalry attacked Urartu in Anatolia, then Assyria and Phrygia, while Scythian horsemen undertook devastating raids into ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    [PDF] On One of the Weapon Types of Cimmerian Time - SciSpace
    The subject of cimmerian weapons of East and centralEast Europe was initially raised by o. I. Terenozhkin in his article “Kimmeriiskie.
  35. [35]
    Cimmerian and Scythian Funerary Rituals in the South Caucasus
    Aug 5, 2025 · Bronze artifacts, stone knives and scrapers, and numerous arrowheads are accompanied by ceramics of the Koptyaki type. The bronze is mostly ...
  36. [36]
    Cimmerian, Scythian and Sarmatian arts 9th century BCE
    They decorated the Cimmerian warriors, their weapons, clothes, utensils and horse equipment. Cimmerian art has geometric motifs: circle, semicircle, spiral, ...Missing: crafts | Show results with:crafts
  37. [37]
    Archaeologists Reveal First Settlement of Cimmerians in Anatolia
    Jun 23, 2023 · Büklükale is thought to be the first settlement of the Cimmerians in Anatolia. The artifacts shed light on the Cimmerians and reveal evidence of warfare within ...
  38. [38]
    (PDF) A Reflection of the Cimmerian and Scythian Religious Rites in ...
    By conducting a comparison of historical, archaeological, ethnographic (shamanism) and mythological data, the author reconstructs the major elements of the ...
  39. [39]
    Cimmerians, Scythians and Sarmatians: the Iranian peoples of ...
    Mar 10, 2018 · Typical elements of the Aryo-Iranian culture and others more generally Indo-European (the sacrifice of the horse is a ritual cornerstone of ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Cimmerian Antiquities in the North-Western Black Sea Region
    A Suvorovo barrow cemetery is one of the earlier highlight sites of the. Cimmerian culture. It was located on the eastern bank of the Katlabukh lake. (Odessa ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    The first settlement of the Cimmerians in Anatolia may be Büklükale
    Jun 7, 2022 · Archaeologists have identified them with the Novocerkassk culture on the grass plains between the river Prut and the Lower Don (c.900-c.650 ...
  43. [43]
    (PDF) Cimmerians in the Western Anatolia: A Chronological Note
    Archaeological investigations in the 1970s and new excavations which began in 2009 have shown that construction of the theatre was initiated at the end of the ...
  44. [44]
    The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia ...
    Aug 26, 2022 · By sequencing 727 ancient individuals from the Southern Arc (Anatolia and its neighbors in Southeastern Europe and West Asia) over 10,000 years, ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Ancient genomes suggest the eastern Pontic-Caspian steppe as the ...
    Oct 3, 2018 · We found evidence of a stable shared genetic signature, making the eastern Pontic-Caspian steppe a likely source of western nomadic groups.
  46. [46]
    Cimmerians, Scythians, and Israel by Yair Davidiy - Brit-Am
    Our research indicates that a good portion of the exiled Lost Israelite Tribes joined with or became identified with the Cimmerians, Scythians, and related ...
  47. [47]
    (PDF) The Current State of the Cimmerian Problem - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · PDF | On Sep 1, 2001, A. I. Ivantchik published The Current State of the Cimmerian Problem | Find, read and cite all the research you need ...
  48. [48]
    «CIMMERO-SCYTHIAN» ANTIQUITIES FROM CENTRAL ANATOLIA
    Jun 6, 2022 · The study of early nomadic complexes from Anatolia shows their syncretic nature, which is influenced by artifacts of Cimmerian, Scythian, and Сentral Asian ...
  49. [49]
    The Scythians and Sarmatians (Chapter 4) - The Cambridge History ...
    While these two groups were ethnically close and their ways of life were very similar, each of them had their own historical destinies and characteristics, in ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    the geography of strabo. - Project Gutenberg
    [101] The incursions of the Treres, with Cimmerians, into Asia and Europe followed after the Trojan war. The text is here corrupt. The translation follows ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The natural history of Pliny
    ... Strabo also, in B. xii., says that these people afterwards established themselves in Thrace, and that gradually moving to the west, they finally settled in ...