Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Citizenship Amendment Act protests

The Citizenship Amendment Act protests consisted of mass demonstrations across India from December 2019 through early 2020, triggered by the enactment of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, which modified the Citizenship Act of 1955 to grant expedited citizenship to non-Muslim immigrants—specifically Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians—from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who entered India on or before December 31, 2014, aiming to provide refuge to religious minorities persecuted in those Muslim-majority nations. Opposition arose primarily from concerns that the religion-based criteria violated India's secular and, when paired with the proposed , could systematically disenfranchise Muslims, though the government asserted the law targeted only illegal migrants from specified countries and preserved for all Indians regardless of faith. The movement originated in on December 4, 2019, amid fears of demographic shifts from Bengali-speaking migrants, before spreading to major cities with nonviolent sit-ins such as the 101-day blockade in , student-led actions at universities like , and nationwide strikes, but devolved into violence in states including and Uttar Pradesh, where arson, stone-pelting, and police responses resulted in at least 25 deaths in Uttar Pradesh alone and over 50 nationwide by early 2020. Clashes peaked with the February 2020 Delhi riots, linked to escalating tensions around the protests, claiming 53 lives mostly in , underscoring deep societal divisions over immigration, identity, and . Authorities restored order through deployments and court interventions, clearing sites like in March 2020 amid the lockdown, while the deferred CAA implementation amid over 200 petitions; rules were finally notified in March 2024, eliciting subdued responses compared to the initial uproar.

Background

Provisions of the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, amends the Citizenship Act, 1955, by inserting a proviso to section 2(1)(b), which defines illegal migrants as foreigners entering India without valid documents or overstaying permitted periods. This proviso exempts from the illegal migrant classification any person belonging to the Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian communities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, or Pakistan who entered India on or before December 31, 2014, provided they have not been exempted under specific passport or foreigners laws but are otherwise covered by the exemption. Under amended section 3, such exempted individuals are eligible for registration as Indian citizens, bypassing standard naturalization requirements related to illegal entry status. Section 5 is also amended to deem citizens of the specified countries from these communities as Indian citizens if they entered India as minors before the cutoff date and resided continuously for six months, with parental eligibility extending the provision. For naturalization under section 6(1), the aggregate residency period is reduced from eleven years to five years (including one year of immediate prior residence), excluding any period of illegal stay from the calculation for these applicants. The Act explicitly excludes its application from the tribal areas of , , , and as specified in the Sixth Schedule to the , as well as areas in those states and where the regime applies under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulations, 1873. Additionally, it inserts section 7B into the 1955 Act, allowing cancellation of Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder registration for violations of any Indian law notified by the , expanding grounds beyond previous provisions for fraud, disloyalty, or imprisonment exceeding two years. The amendments took effect on January 10, 2020, following presidential assent on December 12, 2019.

Rationale and empirical basis for CAA

The Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA) amends the Citizenship Act, 1955, to grant Indian citizenship on an expedited basis to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who entered India on or before December 31, 2014, provided they were not granted citizenship in any other country and faced religious persecution in their origin states. The Indian government's stated rationale is to extend refuge to these non-Muslim minorities, who constitute vulnerable groups in neighboring Islamic republics where state policies and societal pressures rooted in Islamic governance systematically target them for discrimination, violence, and marginalization, contrasting with protections unavailable to Muslim migrants presumed not to face equivalent religious persecution as the demographic majority. This approach aligns with India's post-Partition historical role in absorbing displaced non-Muslims, reflecting a targeted humanitarian response rather than blanket immigration policy, as the Act reduces the residency requirement for naturalization from 11 years to 5 for qualifying individuals while excluding economic or undocumented entrants irrespective of religion. Empirical evidence supporting the persecution basis includes stark demographic declines among these minorities, driven by documented patterns of forced conversions, desecrations, accusations, and . In , the Hindu population share fell from 22% in 1951 to 8.5% by 2011, with data and studies attributing over 90% of the absolute decline—approximately 12 million individuals—to amid recurrent anti-Hindu riots, land grabs under the Enemy Property Act (rebranded as Vested Property Act), and targeted killings, as reported in post-independence pogroms like those in 1964 and 1971. In , Hindus declined from 14.6% of the population in 1941 to 1.6% by 2017, correlating with laws disproportionately enforced against minorities (over 1,500 cases since 1987, with Hindus comprising a significant share despite their small numbers), forced marriages of Hindu girls (estimated 1,000 annually), and systemic under Sharia-influenced statutes. Afghanistan's Hindu and Sikh communities, numbering around 200,000 in the 1970s, dwindled to fewer than 1,000 by 2023 following resurgence, with U.S. State Department reports documenting executions, property seizures, and fatwas mandating conversion or exile under de facto rule. These trends are corroborated by international assessments of religious freedom, including U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom designations of Pakistan and Afghanistan as "Countries of Particular Concern" for severe violations against non-Muslims, such as kidnappings and honor killings in Pakistan (over 300 Hindu and Christian girls affected yearly) and the near-eradication of non-Muslim practices in Afghanistan post-2021. India's policy thus addresses causal factors of state-sponsored or tolerated Islamism—evident in constitutional Islamization in Pakistan (Article 2 declaring Islam the state religion) and Bangladesh's historical alignment with Islamist parties—without extending to Muslim migrants, whose influx (e.g., over 4 million excluded in Assam's 2019 National Register of Citizens, predominantly Muslim Bangladeshis) is largely economic or infiltrative rather than persecution-driven, as no parallel population collapse occurs for Muslims in these contexts. This distinction underscores the Act's empirical grounding in verifiable refugee flows tied to religious causality, fulfilling a first-order obligation to verifiable victims over undifferentiated asylum claims.

Context of illegal immigration and NRC

India has faced substantial inflows of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh since the 1950s, with acceleration following the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War, leading to demographic pressures particularly in border states like Assam. Estimates of the total number of illegal Bangladeshi migrants in India vary widely due to the clandestine nature of entries, but government assessments have cited figures around 20 million, contributing to security, economic, and cultural strains. In Assam, this migration has altered population composition, with the Muslim share rising from 24.68% in 1951 to 34.22% in 2011 per census data, fueling local anxieties over resource competition, unemployment, and loss of indigenous identity. These dynamics precipitated the Assam Movement (1979–1985), a mass agitation by the All Assam Students' Union demanding detection, disenfranchisement, and deportation of post-1966 immigrants, which culminated in the 1985 Assam Accord setting March 25, 1971, as the citizenship cut-off date for those entering without valid documents. The (NRC) in served as the primary mechanism to operationalize the Accord by verifying residents' citizenship status against the 1951 NRC and pre-1971 electoral rolls. Launched in 2013 under supervision, the process required applicants to prove ancestry or arrival before the cut-off, aiming to exclude illegal entrants amid ongoing border incursions—Indian authorities apprehended thousands annually along the Indo-Bangladesh frontier, with over 2,000 pushed back in early 2025 alone. The final NRC draft published on , 2019, included 31.1 million people while excluding approximately 1.9 million from 33 million applicants, reflecting challenges in documentation rather than targeting any single group. Subsequent disclosures indicated that among exclusions, around 700,000 were Muslims and 500,000 , underscoring that Hindus faced significant denials despite later CAA provisions. Illegal immigration's broader repercussions included heightened insurgency risks, as unchecked inflows enabled external influences and communal tensions, exemplified by the 1983 where over 2,000 were killed amid fears of migrant dominance. Proposals for a nationwide NRC gained traction post-Assam, driven by persistent infiltration— data show continuous detections, with over 14,000 Bangladeshi nationals deported since 2019—yet implementation stalled amid concerns over administrative feasibility and potential without safeguards like for persecuted non-Muslims. In , NRC exclusions triggered Foreigners Tribunals for appeals, but deportation remained limited due to Bangladesh's refusal to accept undocumented returns, leaving many in limbo and highlighting enforcement gaps. This context framed anti-CAA protests, where critics conflated NRC's citizen verification with discriminatory intent, despite of multi-faith exclusions and the crisis's root causes in porous borders and economic pull factors.

Chronology of Anti-CAA Protests

December 2019 outbreak

Protests against the Amendment Act erupted in India's northeastern states immediately following its passage by Parliament on December 11, 2019, with serving as the epicenter due to longstanding anxieties over illegal immigration from altering the region's demographic balance. Demonstrators, including members of indigenous groups and student organizations, contended that the law would undermine the (NRC) exercise in , which had identified nearly 1.9 million individuals as potential non-citizens in August 2019, by granting a pathway to citizenship for non-Muslim migrants who entered before December 31, 2014. On December 10, as the bill cleared the just after midnight, an 11-hour shutdown was observed across the Northeast, leading to clashes in where police used batons and to disperse crowds burning tires and blocking roads. Violence escalated in Assam over the ensuing days, with security forces firing on protesters in multiple locations including , , and . By December 16, at least four individuals had been killed in police firing during confrontations that involved and attacks on government property, prompting the of 175 people and detention of over 1,400 others. Overall, five deaths were reported in from such incidents between December 10 and 16, alongside the imposition of curfews and deployment of the in sensitive areas to restore order. Protesters in the region emphasized protecting indigenous culture and land rights, viewing the CAA as a concession to Bengali-speaking Hindu migrants excluded from the NRC, rather than solely a issue. By mid-December, the unrest spread to university campuses in northern , particularly (AMU) and in . On December 15, over 2,000 Jamia students marched peacefully against the but faced a heavy police response, including entry into the campus where , , and stun grenades were used, injuring more than 100 students and leading to dozens of arrests. Similar police action occurred at AMU on the same day, with forces firing and inside the premises amid protests that had begun earlier in the week. These campus clashes, captured in viral videos, drew national attention and solidarity from other institutions, framing the opposition as a defense of and constitutional values against perceived religious favoritism in the .

January 2020 escalation

On January 5, 2020, a group of over 50 masked individuals armed with rods, sticks, and possibly acid entered the (JNU) campus in and assaulted students and faculty during a student union meeting opposing the , NRC, and a proposed fee hike. Approximately 30 people were injured, including severe head injuries requiring hospitalization. The attackers were filmed vandalizing property and chanting slogans, prompting immediate allegations from students and left-leaning groups that the assailants were affiliated with the (ABVP), the student wing of the BJP; however, Delhi police investigations later identified internal student clashes between leftist and right-wing groups as a factor, with arrests made primarily of students from the protesting side. This incident triggered solidarity protests at over 20 universities across , including , , and IITs, amplifying the anti-CAA movement and drawing criticism of government inaction on campus safety. The Shaheen Bagh sit-in, initiated by Muslim women on December 15, 2019, to block a major arterial road in southeast Delhi, intensified in January as it entered its second month, symbolizing non-violent resistance and attracting global media coverage. Protesters, predominantly women and elderly "dadis" (grandmothers), maintained round-the-clock vigils with constitutional recitations and cultural performances, despite harsh winter conditions and traffic disruptions affecting thousands daily. Authorities attempted negotiations to clear the site, but demonstrators refused to vacate until the CAA's repeal, framing the law as discriminatory against Muslims when paired with NRC. The protest inspired similar women-led occupations in Lucknow, Kolkata, and other cities, shifting the movement's image toward peaceful, inclusive civil disobedience. On January 10, 2020, the notified the CAA rules, bringing the act into force and enabling fast-track citizenship applications for eligible non-Muslim migrants from , , and who entered before December 31, 2014. This implementation fueled immediate backlash, with protests erupting in southern states like and , where tens of thousands marched on January 4 demanding withdrawal, citing fears of exclusionary policies. In , the (AASU) planned demonstrations against Prime Minister Modi's visit on January 7, reflecting Northeast concerns over demographic changes despite CAA exemptions for tribal areas. Throughout January, protests saw sporadic violence and police interventions, including charges and in and , with reports of over 1,000 arrests nationwide by mid-month. On , , hundreds of thousands participated in marches across cities like , , and , waving tricolors and chanting against the law's perceived unconstitutionality, though some events faced counter-mobilization and isolated clashes. Cumulative deaths from protest-related violence reached dozens by month's end, primarily from earlier December unrest but with ongoing tensions in Muslim-majority areas. The began hearing challenges to the , scheduling further arguments for without granting interim stays.

February-March 2020 peak and Delhi riots

Protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act reached their most intense phase in February 2020, marked by widespread road blockades and clashes between demonstrators and counter-protesters. In Delhi, anti-CAA activists established new sit-in sites, including at Jaffrabad on February 22, mirroring the Shaheen Bagh model by blocking a major highway, which prompted local residents and pro-CAA groups to demand clearance due to disruptions in daily life and commerce. This escalation intertwined with ongoing university mobilizations, where student groups from institutions like Jawaharlal Nehru University and Jamia Millia Islamia continued anti-CAA campaigns, often facing accusations of leftist and Islamist influence in organizing violent disruptions. The peak violence erupted into the from February 23 to 26, triggered by confrontations in northeast neighborhoods such as Jaffrabad, Maujpur, and Shiv Vihar. Initial clashes occurred when pro-CAA demonstrators, including Hindu nationalist groups, marched against the blockades, leading to stone-throwing and ; reports indicate that anti-CAA protesters, predominantly from communities fearing disenfranchisement under a potential , initiated attacks with petrol bombs and firearms targeting opponents and police. The riots spread rapidly, resulting in 53 deaths—approximately 40 and 13 —over 700 injuries, and extensive , including the burning of shops, vehicles, and religious sites, with initial violence disproportionately directed against Hindu properties and individuals before retaliatory actions. Police investigations later uncovered evidence of premeditation, including conspiracy charges against anti-CAA organizers like student activist and AAP councilor , who allegedly coordinated from rooftops to incite mobs using weapons and incendiaries. Causal analysis from ground reports and charge sheets highlights how radicalized elements within the anti-CAA movement, fueled by narratives equating the law with anti-Muslim , exploited protest sites for mobilization, leading to one-sided aggression against perceived CAA supporters. filed over 758 FIRs, with convictions in several cases affirming rioters' roles in targeted communal attacks, though acquittals in others stemmed from evidentiary issues rather than exoneration of broader instigation patterns. By , the protest momentum waned amid the lockdown, with the sit-in dismantled on March 23 by authorities citing health risks, effectively curtailing the peak phase. This period underscored the protests' shift from peaceful dissent to violent confrontation, exacerbating communal tensions without altering the 's implementation trajectory.

Postponement and lull (2020-2023)

The nationwide protests against the (CAA) began to subside following the Delhi riots in February 2020, with the accelerating the decline. India's first confirmed case appeared on January 30, 2020, but the situation escalated rapidly by March, prompting to announce a 21-day nationwide starting March 25, 2020, which restricted public gatherings and effectively halted large-scale demonstrations. This , extended multiple times until May 2020, shifted public focus to health and economic survival, diminishing the momentum of anti-CAA mobilizations that had persisted in sites like until early March. The government's delay in notifying the CAA rules further contributed to the postponement of implementation, preventing the Act from becoming operational despite its passage in December 2019. Rules were not framed until March 11, 2024, a delay attributed to the scale of initial protests and the disruptions from the , which included over 1,500 days of inaction by the . During 2020-2023, no nationwide NRC update was pursued, and the absence of rules meant no applications for fast-tracked citizenship under were processed, effectively suspending the policy's effects amid ongoing legal challenges in the . Sporadic opposition activities occurred, such as small demonstrations by parties like in 2021 demanding repeal, but these lacked the mass participation of earlier phases and faced restrictions under protocols. Arrests of alleged protest organizers continued into the period, with charging over 700 individuals linked to earlier events, though street protests remained minimal due to enforcement of and cases. This period marked a strategic lull for both protesters, constrained by health crises, and the government, which avoided reigniting tensions while preparing for eventual rollout.

2024 implementation and sporadic renewals

On March 11, 2024, the Ministry of Home Affairs notified the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024, operationalizing the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019, after a delay of more than four years since its parliamentary passage on December 11, 2019. The rules established procedures for eligible non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan—specifically Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians who entered India on or before December 31, 2014—to apply for citizenship, requiring documentation such as proof of entry date and religious persecution. This implementation addressed a backlog of approximately 31,000 applications from qualifying individuals already processed under prior discretionary provisions. The notification prompted sporadic protests in select locations, including student demonstrations at University in , where police used to disperse crowds chanting against the on March 12, 2024. In , regional groups organized strikes and rallies, citing fears of demographic changes due to Bengali-origin migrants, with heightened security deployed to contain gatherings. Similar isolated actions occurred in and , led by opposition parties and Muslim organizations alleging religious discrimination, though these lacked the nationwide coordination and intensity of the 2019-2020 mobilizations. No large-scale violence or road blockades materialized, and protests subsided within days amid government assurances that the law targeted only foreign persecuted minorities without impacting Indian citizens. International observers, including and , condemned the rules as undermining secular principles by excluding Muslims, claims echoed in s but contested by supporters emphasizing the Act's focus on verifiable from theocratic regimes rather than domestic revocation. Through late 2024, no further significant renewals of activity were reported, with proceeding via an online handling initial applications quietly. In September 2025, the government extended procedural deadlines to December 31, 2024, to facilitate more applications from eligible minorities, but this adjustment did not trigger notable public opposition.

2025 developments

In May 2025, the Indian government granted the first set of citizenship certificates under the Citizenship Amendment Act to qualifying non-Muslim migrants from , , and who had entered before December 31, 2014. This step advanced the law's operationalization, following the notification of implementation rules in March 2024, amid ongoing legal challenges in the regarding its compatibility with constitutional equality provisions. On September 3, 2025, the , a regional political outfit advocating for Assamese indigenous interests, staged protests in against the central government's extension of the application deadline. Demonstrators contended that the extension undermined efforts to protect the state's demographic balance against influxes from Bangladesh, accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party-led administration of subordinating native concerns to electoral calculations in other regions. The action highlighted persistent Northeast opposition to the Act's provisions, which protesters viewed as diluting safeguards under the of 1985 limiting citizenship to those residing before March 24, 1971. These events represented limited, region-specific mobilization rather than the nationwide upheaval seen in prior years, with no reports of widespread violence or blockades. involving anti-CAA activists from earlier phases, such as Sharjeel Imam's ongoing incarceration since 2020 on charges related to protest speeches, continued to draw commentary but did not spur fresh demonstrations.

Pro-CAA Counter-Mobilization

Domestic rallies and campaigns

The (BJP) launched domestic counter-mobilization efforts shortly after the (CAA) passed in December 2019, organizing rallies and awareness campaigns to defend the law's aim of expediting citizenship for persecuted non-Muslim minorities from , , and while refuting claims of . These activities sought to engage supporters, clarify provisions excluding from eligibility, and contrast the Act with opposition narratives linking it to a nationwide (NRC). On December 30, 2019, the BJP's unit in held a large supporting both the and NRC, with participants marching to affirm the measures' role in safeguarding indigenous populations from . From January 5 to 15, 2020, BJP president spearheaded a nationwide campaign targeting 30 million families to distribute literature explaining the 's humanitarian intent and counter . personally canvassed homes in New Delhi's neighborhood, emphasizing that the law provided refuge without revoking any Indian . Public rallies reinforced these messages, including Shah's January 21 address in , , where he declared the irreversible amid protests and urged public discourse on its merits. A BJP-led pro-CAA rally in on January 27, 2020, attended by supporters including minister , highlighted solidarity but drew scrutiny for Thakur's call to "shoot " targeting anti-CAA demonstrators. Similar demonstrations occurred in , , and , where BJP affiliates rallied to frame the as protective of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian refugees fleeing , thereby aiding the party's electoral positioning in contested areas. After CAA rules were notified on March 11, 2024, BJP intensified application-assistance campaigns in immigrant-heavy regions. In , the party organized over 1,000 camps starting late October 2024, primarily in Bangladesh-border districts like Malda and , to help eligible Hindu refugees file claims and leverage the law for outreach to Hindu voters ahead of 2026 state polls. These efforts, coordinated with affiliates, processed initial applications from communities citing post-partition and recent migrations.

Government and BJP responses

The Indian government, led by Prime Minister and Home Minister , consistently defended the (CAA) as a humanitarian measure to grant citizenship to persecuted religious minorities—Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians—from , , and who entered before December 31, 2014, without revoking citizenship from any Indian nationals. In parliamentary debates following the Act's passage on December 11, 2019, Shah emphasized that the legislation addressed historical injustices faced by these groups due to in Muslim-majority neighboring countries, reducing the residency requirement for from 11 years to 5 years for eligible applicants. The government rejected opposition claims that the CAA discriminated against , asserting it was not linked to the (NRC) and contained no provisions to strip citizenship from any community. In response to widespread protests erupting in December 2019, Modi addressed the on February 6, 2020, refuting allegations of unconstitutionality and linking the to the visions of India's independence leaders, including and Sardar , who advocated sheltering partitioned minorities. He criticized opposition parties for spreading and inciting violence, noting that the Act fulfilled long-standing promises to protect refugees while maintaining India's secular framework. echoed this in multiple statements, declaring on March 14, 2024—after notifying implementation rules—that the was a sovereign right and would never be repealed, with 85% of potential applicants already possessing required documents like passports or voter IDs. The (BJP) mobilized counter-campaigns, including rallies and public outreach to clarify the Act's scope. On December 30, 2019, BJP units in organized processions supporting and NRC, framing them as tools to safeguard indigenous populations from illegal immigration. Amid violence during protests, such as the February , announced on March 12, 2020, that special investigation teams (SITs) under senior officers would probe 50 serious cases, vowing no leniency for perpetrators regardless of affiliation and crediting police for containing damage to 4% of Delhi's area. The government notified rules on March 11, 2024, via the , establishing an online portal for applications despite ongoing legal challenges and sporadic protests, prioritizing retrospective citizenship grants from December 31, 2014.

Overseas support

Members of the Indian diaspora in the United States organized several rallies in December 2019 to express support for the Citizenship Amendment Act, framing it as a humanitarian measure to aid persecuted religious minorities from neighboring countries. On December 20, a gathering occurred in front of the Indian Consulate in Houston, Texas, drawing significant participation from community groups emphasizing the Act's role in providing refuge without affecting Indian citizens' rights. Additional events followed in cities including Seattle on December 21, Austin and Dublin, Ohio, on December 22, and Raleigh, North Carolina, on December 22, where over 75 doctors and leaders attended to counter perceived misinformation about the legislation. In , supporters held demonstrations at on December 29, organized by the Overseas Friends of BJP-USA, with participants displaying placards stating "CAA is about " and "NRIs support ," alongside chants endorsing . A related event took place in on December 28, led by the American India Public Affairs Committee, where organizers described the Act as a "historic decision" and act of . These gatherings, involving groups like the Friends of India Society International, aimed to highlight the Act's focus on non-Muslim refugees from , , and , while planning further events in cities such as , , and . Advocacy organizations provided ongoing backing, with the Hindu American issuing statements in 2019 and 2020 asserting that the addressed long-standing persecution of minorities without altering criteria for India's Muslim population or imposing a . The group submitted testimony to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, criticizing narratives of and emphasizing the Act's necessity for refugees facing . In March 2024, following notification of the CAA rules, the and other Indian-American bodies reiterated approval, calling it "long overdue" for expediting for eligible persecuted groups. Comparable organized pro-CAA demonstrations were less documented in the , , or during the peak protest period, where activities abroad more prominently featured opposition events. U.S.-based efforts thus represented the primary locus of overseas counter-mobilization, coordinated through networks aligned with the Act's proponents.

Locations and Regional Dynamics

Northeast India (Assam focus)

Protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) in , with a primary focus on , began on December 4, 2019, immediately following the bill's introduction in the , reflecting longstanding regional anxieties over illegal immigration from and its impact on indigenous populations. Organizations such as the (AASU) and the Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuba Chatra Parishad (AJYCP) spearheaded the opposition, arguing that the CAA contravened the 1985 , which aimed to detect and deport post-1971 illegal migrants, and threatened the cultural, linguistic, and demographic integrity of Assamese society by potentially granting citizenship to non-Muslim migrants from neighboring countries. Unlike protests elsewhere emphasizing , those in Assam united Hindus, Muslims, and tribal groups against perceived threats to native land rights and resources, exacerbated by the recent (NRC) update that excluded nearly 1.9 million residents. The agitation intensified with statewide bandhs (shutdowns) and mass rallies, including an 11-hour regional shutdown on December 10, 2019, which saw hundreds blocking streets in and other cities. Violence erupted on December 10-13, 2019, as protesters clashed with police, leading to of vehicles and government buildings; authorities responded with curfews, suspensions in multiple districts, and deployment of the army. Five individuals—Sam Stafford, Dipanjal Das, Ishwar Nayak, Abdul Alim, and Dwijendra Panging—were killed, primarily in police firing during demonstrations in and nearby areas like Sribhumi and Lakhipur. While the CAA exempted tribal autonomous districts under the Sixth Schedule, protesters demanded a blanket exclusion for the entire Northeast to prevent any migrant influx, viewing the law as incompatible with Article 5 of the Indian Constitution and regional safeguards. In neighboring states like and , similar demonstrations occurred, but witnessed the most sustained mobilization, with AASU coordinating torchlight marches and cultural events to sustain pressure. The unrest subsided after interventions and assurances of review, though underlying fears persisted, resurfacing in limited protests following the CAA rules' notification in 2024.

Uttar Pradesh

Protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in began in mid-December 2019, shortly after the bill's passage by on December 11 and its assent by President Ram Nath Kovind on December 12. Demonstrations initially occurred in university campuses, such as (AMU), where students held marches and sit-ins opposing the law's exclusion of from fast-track for certain refugees. By December 15, protests spread to cities including , , and , with participants blocking roads and chanting slogans against the CAA and the proposed (NRC). Violence escalated on December 19–21, 2019, in multiple districts with significant Muslim populations, including Sambhal, Moradabad, Meerut, Firozabad, and Kanpur. In Sambhal, clashes began on December 19 when protesters attempted to march toward a temple, leading to stone-pelting, arson of vehicles and shops, and police deployment of tear gas and plastic bullets; two individuals died from gunshot wounds the following day. Meerut saw intense rioting on December 20, with reports of mobs setting fire to a police post and vehicles, prompting police firing that killed at least five Muslim men, according to families and eyewitness accounts; no FIRs were filed against officers a year later. Firozabad recorded six deaths from police action during similar unrest, including an 8-year-old boy. Uttar Pradesh police reported 19 total deaths across the state since December 10, attributing them to riot-related injuries and firing in self-defense against mobs armed with stones, petrol bombs, and firearms. Independent investigations and rights groups, however, documented 23 deaths, nearly all Muslims, with 22 resulting from police bullets, highlighting patterns of disproportionate force in Muslim-majority areas. Law enforcement under Yogi Adityanath's administration responded aggressively, arresting 1,113 individuals and placing 5,558 in by late December. Authorities demolished or issued notices for damages to over 200 properties linked to alleged rioters, recovering approximately INR 45 million (USD 630,000) in claims for public losses from arson and . Critics, including organizations, alleged targeted demolitions of Muslim-owned structures and denial of medical aid to injured protesters, while government officials maintained that many "protesters" were infiltrators inciting violence to destabilize the BJP-ruled state. Protests subsided by early 2020 amid curfews and internet shutdowns in affected districts, though sporadic arrests continued into 2020, including high-profile cases like that of activist , detained under the National Security Act for inflammatory speeches. The dynamics reflected broader tensions in a state with a 19% Muslim population, where opposition parties like the framed the as discriminatory, fueling localized mobilizations that often transitioned from peaceful assemblies to riots involving property destruction estimated in hundreds of crores.

Delhi (Shaheen Bagh and riots)

The began on December 15, 2019, in a Muslim-majority neighborhood of southeast , following clashes between police and students at nearby university protesting the (). Primarily organized by local women, the demonstration involved blocking both carriageways of a key stretch of National Highway 24 (Mathura Road), a vital connecting to and , with tents, barricades, and protest stages. Participants, numbering in the thousands at peak, demanded repeal of the and opposition to a nationwide (), arguing the laws discriminated against by excluding them from fast-tracked citizenship for non-Muslim refugees from neighboring countries. The blockade persisted for 101 days until March 24, 2020, when authorities cleared the site citing lockdown enforcement, despite initial reluctance due to the site's designation as a . It caused severe , diverting thousands of daily commuters and affecting access for over 500,000 residents in adjoining areas, including emergencies like ambulances delayed by up to hours. Local Hindu and non-protester residents petitioned courts for relief, highlighting economic losses from disrupted commutes and businesses, while the in February 2020 appointed negotiators to urge de-escalation, later ruling in October that indefinite occupation of public roads violated others' rights to movement under (1)(d) of the Constitution. Tensions from and related demonstrations escalated into riots in northeast from February 23 to 26, 2020, amid clashes between pro- and anti- groups in areas like Jaffrabad and Chand Bagh, where protesters had similarly blocked roads. Sparked by a February 23 speech from BJP leader calling for clearance of blockades if not removed peacefully, involved , stone-pelting, and targeted attacks on religious sites and properties, resulting in 53 deaths (including 36 , 15 , and 2 unidentified), over 200 injuries, and widespread destruction of shops and homes. imposed curfews and deployed forces, arresting over 2,600 individuals, but faced accusations of delayed response in Muslim areas and bias in investigations, with courts later acquitting dozens in cases citing insufficient evidence or fabricated charges. Official probes, including chargesheets exceeding 17,000 pages, attributed much violence to organized mobs opposing , with patterns of premeditated rioting like acid attacks and petrol bombs, though groups alleged disproportionate arrests of Muslim protesters. The riots, occurring weeks after Shaheen Bagh's peak, underscored fault lines between sustained non-violent blockades and sporadic escalations into communal unrest, with economic damages estimated in crores from looted businesses predominantly owned by in affected lanes.

West Bengal and other states

In , led opposition to the Act, participating in a march in on December 18, 2019, from to Jadu Babu's Bazar, and calling for a statewide mega against the law, which she described as unconstitutional changes to citizenship rules. On December 19, a in drew approximately 60,000 participants from diverse social, economic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, marking a broad coalition against the Act. Further actions included a on December 21 attended by workers and youth, as well as localized blockades, such as protesters burning tires to obstruct National Highway 60 in on December 16. Demonstrations in the state were predominantly peaceful, with publicly discouraging violence and stating that political leaders should act responsibly during . The government declared it would not implement the CAA, framing resistance as protection against perceived discrimination. In Kerala, protests featured coordinated actions by ruling and opposition fronts, including a statewide hartal on December 17, 2019, and joint sit-ins by leaders from the Left Democratic Front and United Democratic Front. The People's Long March took place in Ernakulam on December 23, with hundreds, including filmstars and theatre artists, marching from Kaloor Stadium to Cochin Shipyard against the CAA and National Register of Citizens. In January 2020, several million people formed a 620-kilometer human chain spanning the state to demand repeal of the law. In Karnataka, protests in on December 19, 2019, involved thousands demonstrating against the but turned violent, with stone-pelting, on vehicles and a vehicle, prompting to on the , killing two individuals. Authorities responded by suspending mobile internet, imposing curfews, and later inquiring into the incidents, with some footage suggesting premeditated elements among agitators. In , approximately 60,000 people rallied in on December 19. witnessed demonstrations, including thousands gathering in Chennai's Washermanpet area to oppose the CAA, NRC, and National Population Register.

Violence, Casualties, and Law Enforcement

Fatalities and injuries data

During the initial wave of protests in December 2019, at least 25 individuals were killed across multiple states, with Uttar Pradesh accounting for 23 deaths—predominantly Muslims succumbing to gunshot wounds amid clashes and alleged police firing on December 20-21. In Assam, five protesters died during violent demonstrations, including incidents involving gunfire and mob clashes. Isolated fatalities occurred elsewhere, such as two in Karnataka from bullet injuries during a protest on December 19. The February 23-26, 2020, riots in northeast , erupting from tensions surrounding demonstrations, resulted in 53 confirmed deaths—40 and 13 —along with over 200 injuries from stabbings, , and shootings. Police reported more than 100 injuries among their ranks in these events, amid accusations of both mob violence and inadequate response. Injuries nationwide exceeded 1,000, including over 260 police personnel in the December clashes alone, often from stone-pelting and confrontations. saw hundreds hospitalized from charges, bullets, and beatings, though exact figures remain disputed due to varying attributions between protester actions and security forces. Overall totals for fatalities hover around 80 when including , though some reports emphasize higher Muslim casualties in government-controlled areas, potentially reflecting selective enforcement patterns.

Patterns of rioting and property damage

Violence during the Citizenship Amendment Act protests occasionally escalated from demonstrations into riots characterized by , stone-pelting, and targeted destruction of , primarily in in December 2019 and in February 2020. These incidents typically began with gatherings defying administrative bans under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, progressing to attacks on police and before spreading to private assets. In , riots on December 19-20, 2019, in districts including , , and involved mobs setting fire to over 100 buses, train coaches, and police vehicles, alongside damage to offices and railway stations. The estimated public property losses exceeding Rs 200 , with specific incidents like the burning of 24 new buses in valued at Rs 12 . Authorities issued recovery notices to identified participants, totaling Rs 3.35 across multiple districts, though interventions later scrutinized the process for procedural lapses. The February 23-26, 2020, riots in northeast exhibited more communal dimensions, with mobs using petrol bombs and firearms to torch over 300 vehicles, loot shops, and raze buildings in areas like Shiv Vihar and . Affected parties claimed damages surpassing Rs 153 , encompassing structural losses of Rs 250 and broader economic impacts exceeding Rs 1,000 from disrupted businesses. Patterns included sequential waves starting from contested sites like Jaffrabad, escalating into block-level attacks on commercial hubs and residences, often amid chants opposing the . Over 535 were filed for property offenses, highlighting the scale of coordinated destruction. Across both regions, rioting followed a recurring sequence: initial defiance of dispersal orders led to clashes with , followed by retaliatory focused on high-value, easily ignitable targets like vehicles and markets. While some reports attributed damage to counter-mob actions, primary investigations pointed to anti-CAA groups initiating much of the violence, with and symbols bearing the brunt early on.

Police actions and controversies

During the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests from December 2019 onward, police forces deployed , charges, , and water cannons to disperse crowds in multiple locations, including university campuses and urban streets. In , where protests turned violent with incidents of arson and stone-pelting, police resorted to live firing in , resulting in at least 15 deaths reported by state authorities between December 19 and 21, 2019, primarily from gunshot wounds amid clashes in districts like , , and . Hospitals documented up to 11 fatalities in UP alone during this period, though police disputed the figures, attributing some deaths to cross-firing by protesters rather than official gunfire. Nationwide, at least 25 protesters were killed in clashes with , with the majority occurring in BJP-ruled states like , where documented patterns of excessive force but noted the protests often involved attacks on police stations and public property. At University in on December 15, 2019, police entered the campus following stone-throwing and protests spilling onto roads, using inside libraries and classrooms, which injured dozens of students and sparked widespread video evidence of baton charges against allegedly non-violent demonstrators hiding in reading rooms. Authorities justified the incursion as pursuit of rioters who had vandalized vehicles and pelted officers, denying unprovoked brutality, while student accounts and footage highlighted disproportionate aggression against unarmed individuals, leading to calls for judicial probes rejected by India's . Similar actions occurred at , where police fired and plastic bullets, injuring over 50 students. Controversies intensified with allegations of targeted harassment of Muslim protesters, including arbitrary arrests under laws—over 1,000 detentions nationwide—and selective enforcement, as reported by activists, though police cited evidence of coordinated violence, including petrol bombs and firearms recovered from crowds. In the February 2020 riots, which killed 53 people amid clashes between pro- and anti-CAA groups, faced accusations of delayed response and complicity with Hindu nationalist mobs in Muslim-majority areas like Northeast , with citing instances of officers allegedly standing by or joining attackers, contributing to 38 Muslim deaths. However, investigations revealed intelligence lapses and attacks on —resulting in injuries to over 150 officers—along with of premeditated violence by Islamist groups, including beheadings and , prompting to file charges against rioters while denying bias. A judge's criticism of inaction led to his abrupt transfer, fueling claims of institutional pressure, though subsequent probes, including by the , noted weakening cases against some accused due to evidentiary issues rather than proven fabrication. These events underscored broader debates on restraint versus necessity, with empirical data showing protester-initiated violence—such as bus burnings and assaults on stations—preceding many escalations, contrasting narratives from groups often aligned against the ruling government.

Protest Methods and Tactics

Non-violent demonstrations

Non-violent demonstrations against the (CAA) encompassed marches, rallies, and campus gatherings held across from December 2019 onward, often emphasizing constitutional concerns and secular principles. These events drew participants from student groups, , and diverse communities, contrasting with instances where protests escalated into confrontations. On December 16, 2019, tens of thousands of students and faculty participated in peaceful marches on university campuses nationwide, protesting the CAA's perceived incompatibility with India's secular framework. Similar gatherings occurred at institutions in , , , and other cities, with organizers calling for the law's repeal without reported disruptions to public order in many cases. In , a major rally on December 23, 2019, organized by the Joint Action Committee, attracted an estimated 80,000 to 100,000 participants who marched to Freedom Park, concluding without incidents of violence. Police facilitated the event by managing traffic, highlighting its orderly nature. Kerala witnessed coordinated non-violent actions, including the People's Long March on December 23, 2019, in , where hundreds of students, activists, actors, and filmmakers marched against the and proposed (NRC). This was followed by a statewide human chain on January 30, 2020, spanning 620 kilometers and involving millions, symbolizing unified opposition through passive assembly. Such demonstrations underscored regional mobilization, with participants framing the as discriminatory based on religion, though government defenders argued it addressed refugee persecution without affecting citizens.

Disruptive actions and blockades

Protesters at in initiated a on December 15, 2019, blocking a key connecting south to and thereby disrupting vehicular traffic for commuters, ambulances, and . The blockade persisted for approximately 69 days until its clearance by police on February 21, 2020, amid observations questioning the legality of indefinite road occupations for s. This action, primarily led by local Muslim women, extended into over 100 days in adjacent protest sites, forcing alternative routes and contributing to daily traffic snarls affecting thousands. In , anti-CAA demonstrators blockaded roads and railway stations, leading to the torching of buses and empty trains on December 14, 2019, which halted rail services and public mobility in multiple districts. Similar tactics involved squatting on railway tracks to enforce bandhs, as seen in on December 21, 2019, where protesters disrupted train movements and blockaded bus terminuses across cities like and . During the People's Long March in on December 23, 2019, participants established road blockades and halted trains to protest the and NRC, affecting connectivity in and surrounding areas. In , opposition groups coordinated blockades on highways and rail lines starting early December 2019, exacerbating transport disruptions in the Northeast amid fears over policies. These actions often coincided with calls for statewide shutdowns, prioritizing demonstration over minimal public inconvenience.

Symbolic and media strategies

Protesters against the Citizenship Amendment Act utilized symbolic forms such as posters, graffiti, murals, and banners to visually contest the legislation and associated . At in , the sit-in site transformed into an open-air where participants created hand-drawn illustrations, installations, and wall emphasizing themes of constitutional equality and resistance to perceived . These visuals often depicted women protesters, police actions, and slogans invoking India's secular ethos, with over 100 such posters documented by early 2020. Similar artistic expressions emerged at university campuses, including , where students painted ambitious murals on roads and walls amid clashes with police on December 15, 2019, symbolizing solidarity against violence and the . Banners and , such as those reading "No , No NRC" on overbridges and barricades, served to disrupt public spaces and reinforce the narrative of disenfranchisement fears, particularly among Muslim communities. While these efforts aimed to foster public discourse on , some posters incorporated religious imagery that critics argued promoted sectarian divides rather than universal . Media strategies involved amplifying these symbols through social media campaigns on platforms like and , where hashtags such as #IndiaAgainstCAA and #CitizenshipAmendmentAct garnered millions of engagements by January 2020, enabling rapid dissemination of and live updates. Organizers shared digital versions of posters and filters for broader participation, turning individual expressions into viral counter-narratives against government messaging. This online mobilization drew international attention, with outlets like highlighting artist contributions, though domestic coverage varied due to partisan media landscapes. Such tactics not only sustained domestic momentum but also pressured policymakers by projecting the protests as a defense of pluralism.

Participants and Motivations

Key organizers and student groups

Students at University in initiated prominent anti- demonstrations on December 13, 2019, with gatherings escalating into clashes by December 15, prompting police entry onto campus and use of , resulting in over 200 injuries. The Jamia Students' Union and affiliated groups coordinated these campus-based protests, which drew national attention and inspired solidarity actions elsewhere. At (AMU), student-led protests began on December 13, 2019, involving marches and effigy burnings of , leading to police deployment and reports of violence that injured dozens. AMU's student union played a central role in mobilizing participants, framing the as discriminatory against Muslims when paired with the (NRC). Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students, often aligned with left-wing organizations like the (SFI) and (AISA), organized solidarity marches and seminars against the starting mid-December 2019, emphasizing constitutional concerns over . Key figures such as , a former JNU student politician, and , a JNU alumnus, emerged as vocal organizers, with Imam advocating "chakka jam" road blockades in speeches that later led to charges. In , the (AASU), representing indigenous interests, led widespread protests against the from December 2019 onward, including torchlight marches and shutdowns, opposing the law's provisions for granting citizenship to non-Muslim migrants from neighboring countries, which they viewed as undermining efforts to detect and deport illegal immigrants. AASU's campaigns, involving thousands of members, highlighted regional fears of demographic changes rather than religious discrimination.

Demographic and ideological drivers

The protests against the of 2019 primarily drew participants from Muslim communities, particularly in urban centers like , where events such as the were led by women from Muslim-majority neighborhoods including Jamia Nagar, , and surrounding areas. These demonstrations featured extended participation by local residents, with women and families forming the visible core, often including children, in a locality with a demographic composition exceeding 90% Muslim as per local estimates. Student groups from institutions with significant Muslim enrollments, such as and , were prominent in initial clashes and sustained mobilizations, alongside left-leaning students from . Arrest records from during the protests and associated February 2020 riots reflect a demographic skew, with detentions and convictions disproportionately involving ; for instance, of the over 2,000 arrests in northeast Delhi violence—linked by authorities to anti-CAA agitation—courts sentenced multiple Muslim individuals to terms of up to 10 years, while Hindu arrests were fewer and often resulted in acquittals or lighter outcomes. Nationwide, participation extended to urban middle-class professionals and academics, but empirical data from protest sites and casualty figures—such as the 53 deaths in Delhi riots, with over 40 Muslim fatalities—underscore the concentration in Muslim-populated areas. In contrast, northeastern protests, especially in , involved indigenous ethnic groups like Assamese and tribal communities, motivated less by religious identity and more by demographic preservation against perceived Bengali migrant influxes. Ideologically, the protests were propelled by assertions of secular constitutionalism, with participants framing the CAA as a breach of India's equality principles under Article 14 by explicitly excluding from fast-tracked for persecuted minorities from neighboring countries. Opponents, including student activists and groups, argued it presaged a religiously discriminatory regime when paired with the (NRC), potentially rendering Indian vulnerable to despite official clarifications that the Act targeted only pre-2014 immigrants and preserved existing rights. This narrative resonated among left-liberal intellectuals and advocates, who positioned the movement as resistance to Hindu-majoritarian policies under the BJP government, invoking broader critiques of nationalism as exclusionary. In and the northeast, ideological drivers centered on ethno-cultural autonomy, rejecting the CAA's provisions as enabling unchecked demographic shifts that threatened and linguistic identities, independent of religious framing. While some analyses attribute participation to anti-BJP polarization, empirical patterns reveal layered motivations, with secular-left coalitions amplifying minority fears amid unsubstantiated claims of mass disenfranchisement.

Claims of foreign funding or coordination

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) of India alleged in January 2020 that the Popular Front of India (PFI), a now-banned Islamist organization, channeled funds to affiliates fueling anti-CAA protests and violence, particularly in Uttar Pradesh, with investigations uncovering Rs 120.5 crore credited to related bank accounts suspected of being used for protest logistics and incitement. The ED's findings linked these transactions to coordinated efforts by PFI-linked entities to organize demonstrations and procure materials for unrest, prompting referrals to the Ministry of Home Affairs for further scrutiny of potential terror financing under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. PFI rejected these accusations as baseless, asserting that the funds were for legitimate welfare activities and not protest-related. Indian intelligence agencies reported evidence of Pakistani involvement in the protests, including electronic intercepts from December 2019 to early 2020 indicating operatives directing anti-CAA activities to exacerbate communal tensions and destabilize the government. These claims pointed to cross-border coordination, with funds allegedly routed through proxies to sustain prolonged sit-ins and riots, aligning with Pakistan's historical pattern of supporting insurgent narratives against policies. BJP leaders, including parliamentarians, echoed these assertions, attributing protest persistence to financing by entities opposed to India's , such as terrorist organizations. In the context of the February 2020 Delhi riots—stemming from anti-CAA agitations—police investigations uncovered remittances from totaling significant sums received by rioters' associates, used for acquiring weapons and , as detailed in chargesheets and verified through bank trails. Separate probes into the media outlet, raided in and charged in , revealed that entities funneled approximately Rs 38 between and , part of which supported anti-CAA narratives, protest coordination, and procurement of arms for violence, according to witness statements and financial audits submitted to courts. Critics of these allegations, including affected groups and opposition figures, have dismissed them as politically motivated attempts to discredit dissent, though judicial proceedings have upheld the probes' evidentiary basis without conclusive foreign state sponsorship proven in public records. No independent international verification has confirmed direct governmental foreign funding, but the patterns of transfers and offshore links raised by agencies underscore suspicions of external amplification beyond domestic opposition.

Economic and Societal Impacts

Disruptions to infrastructure and commerce

The sit-in, a prominent anti-CAA in southeastern , involved protesters occupying and blocking the arterial road linking to and from December 15, 2019, until its clearance on March 24, 2020. This blockade spanned over three months, forcing commuters to navigate extensive detours via alternative routes, which added significant time to daily travel for residents and workers in the National Capital Region. The acknowledged the resulting public inconvenience, stating that genuine protests must not obstruct public roads indefinitely. Emergency services faced critical delays due to the road occupation, with reports of ambulances being obstructed or slowed by protesters. On , 2020, an transporting a woman in critical condition requiring support was reportedly denied prompt passage through the site, exacerbating her health risks. Authorities permitted limited access for emergency vehicles and school buses, but persistent blockages undermined these measures, highlighting vulnerabilities in infrastructure access during prolonged demonstrations. Local commerce suffered substantially from the disruptions, as the led to the closure of over 250 shops in and adjacent areas, resulting in job losses for numerous workers dependent on foot traffic and supply chains. Business owners reported diminished customer access and halted operations, with aggregate losses estimated at ₹150 crore by February 2020, attributed to severed connectivity and reduced economic activity in the vicinity. Beyond Delhi, anti-CAA protests in regions like and prompted government-imposed internet shutdowns and curfews to contain unrest, indirectly amplifying commercial disruptions. These measures, enacted in December 2019 and early 2020, impeded e-commerce deliveries, digital transactions, and remote work, leaving small vendors and laborers without income during peak shutdown periods. In , widespread bandhs and road occupations further stalled trade and transport, compounding infrastructural strain in a state already sensitive to migration-related economic pressures.

Communal polarization effects

The Citizenship Amendment Act protests, often concentrated in Muslim-majority areas and framed by critics as discriminatory against , elicited significant backlash from Hindu nationalist groups and the general Hindu populace, who viewed the demonstrations as obstructive and ideologically motivated opposition to a policy aiding persecuted non-Muslim minorities from Islamic neighboring countries. This perception fueled counter-protests and rallies supporting the , exacerbating divisions along religious lines as pro-CAA gatherings emphasized national security and historical injustices against , , and others fleeing . Prolonged blockades, such as the 101-day sit-in at in from December 2019 to March 2020, disrupted daily life for thousands, particularly affecting Hindu commuters and residents, which amplified grievances and narratives portraying the protests as prioritizing minority over public convenience. These tactics contributed to a hardening of positions, with and public discourse amplifying claims of anti-Hindu bias in the protests, leading to increased communal rhetoric and sporadic clashes between demonstrators and supporters of the . The peak of this polarization manifested in the February 2020 Northeast riots, triggered by tensions over an anti-CAA road blockade in Jaffrabad, where clashes between pro- and anti-CAA groups escalated into widespread violence from February 23 to 26. The riots resulted in 53 deaths—36 , 15 , and 2 unidentified—along with over 200 injuries and extensive property damage targeting mosques and homes in Muslim areas. Official investigations attributed the violence to premeditated elements on , but the events reinforced mutual , with Hindu communities citing prior disruptions as provocation and Muslim groups alleging targeted pogroms. Post-riots data indicated a surge in communal incidents, with over 210 recorded clashes between Hindus and Muslims during the BJP's second term, the deadliest being the Delhi events linked to CAA disputes. This escalation entrenched polarized identities, as evidenced by heightened vigilance in mixed neighborhoods and electoral shifts favoring parties emphasizing Hindu unity in response to perceived threats from Islamist mobilization. While some analyses attribute the divides to underlying Hindu nationalism, empirical patterns of protest tactics and retaliatory violence suggest causal links to the confrontational nature of the demonstrations themselves.

Long-term policy deterrence

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) rules, essential for its operationalization, were notified by the Government of India on March 11, 2024, over four years after the Act's passage on December 11, 2019. This delay followed nationwide protests that began immediately after enactment, encompassing non-violent sit-ins, road blockades, and episodes of violence resulting in over 100 deaths, including the February 2020 Delhi riots. Critics, including opposition parties and human rights groups, attributed the postponement to the scale of public backlash, which highlighted fears of religious discrimination and linkage to a National Register of Citizens (NRC). However, government officials maintained that the timing reflected administrative and legal deliberations, not capitulation to unrest. Implementation proceeded post-notification, with the reporting that thousands of eligible non-Muslim migrants from , , and —primarily , , Buddhists, Jains, , and Christians who entered before December 31, 2014—received citizenship by April 2, 2025. Union Home Minister reiterated in March 2024 that the would not be repealed, emphasizing its focus on protecting persecuted minorities without impacting Indian Muslims or requiring any citizen to prove citizenship. This persistence suggests the protests exerted short-term pressure via legal challenges in the but failed to achieve long-term reversal of the core policy, as the Act's provisions took effect without further concessions. In parallel, the protests amplified concerns over a nationwide NRC, envisioned as a comprehensive citizen verification exercise akin to Assam's 2019 update, which excluded 1.9 million residents pending appeals. Although asserted in December 2019 that a pan-India NRC would occur independently of the and exclude no Indian citizen regardless of religion, no such rollout has materialized as of October 2025. Analysts link this inaction to the demonstrated potential for mass mobilization and communal tensions during the protests, which framed NRC-CAA as a discriminatory tandem targeting , thereby raising political costs for the (BJP) ahead of elections. The government's focus has shifted to related measures like the National Population Register (NPR) updates tied to the deferred 2021 census, now slated for 2026-27, without committing to NRC linkage. Overall, while the protests did not deter CAA enactment or its eventual execution, they appear to have induced caution on expansive exercises like nationwide NRC, preserving the policy's selective application to amid ongoing litigation and public scrutiny. This outcome reflects a balance where empirical risks of unrest—evident in economic disruptions and —tempered broader ambitions without altering the government's stated objective of addressing illegal from neighboring countries.

Legal and Judicial Proceedings

Supreme Court challenges

Petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA), were filed in the Supreme Court of India shortly after its passage by Parliament on December 11, 2019, and presidential assent on December 12, 2019. The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) submitted the first writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution on December 19, 2019, arguing that the CAA violates Articles 14 (equality before the law), 15 (prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion), and 21 (right to life and personal liberty) by excluding Muslims from expedited citizenship pathways for migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who entered India before December 31, 2014. Subsequent petitions, totaling over 200 by 2024, echoed these claims, contending that the religion-based criteria render the law discriminatory and under-inclusive, potentially facilitating exclusion when linked to the National Register of Citizens (NRC). In early hearings, a Constitution Bench declined to grant interim stays on the CAA's implementation. On , 2020, the Court, comprising Justices S.A. Bobde, , and Surya Kant, heard arguments from 60 consolidated petitions and refused to halt the law, observing that it did not appear ex facie unconstitutional and directing the Union government to respond to specific queries on its scope and interaction with existing frameworks. The cases faced prolonged delays amid the and judicial backlog, with limited substantive progress until the notification of CAA rules on March 11, 2024, which operationalized the amendment by establishing procedures for eligible applicants. Renewed urgency followed the rules' notification, prompting fresh pleas for stays. On March 15, 2024, the agreed to examine interim relief applications, listing them for hearing on March 19, 2024, before a bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, along with Justices and . During the March 19 hearing on 237 petitions, the bench rejected requests to suspend the rules, emphasizing the need for balanced consideration of faced by targeted minorities and directing the Centre to file counter-affidavits within three weeks, with petitioners' rejoinders due shortly thereafter; the next listing was scheduled post-April 9, 2024. As of October 2025, the petitions remain pending without a final verdict, with the Court yet to rule on the merits despite arguments from petitioners highlighting and from the government defending the as a humanitarian measure for non-Muslim refugees fleeing state-sponsored , without impacting Indian citizens' rights or the NRC process. The extended litigation reflects broader debates on the Act's alignment with secular constitutional principles, though the absence of stays has enabled rule implementation, including initial citizenship grants to eligible applicants in 2024.

Interim stays and ongoing status

The Supreme Court of India refused to grant an interim stay on the implementation of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, in its initial hearings following the law's passage in December 2019, despite petitions seeking urgent suspension on grounds of alleged unconstitutionality. In December 2019, the court declined requests for an early hearing or stay, bundling over 200 petitions for consideration by a constitution bench, citing the need for deliberate review rather than precipitous action. Following the notification of the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024, on March 11, 2024, which enabled the law's operationalization, petitioners renewed applications for an interim stay, arguing potential irreparable harm to secular principles and equality under Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution. On March 19, 2024, a bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud rejected the stay, emphasizing that the rules' enforcement did not preclude judicial scrutiny and directing the Union government to file responses within three weeks, with hearings deferred to April. This refusal allowed the government to proceed with a dedicated online portal for processing applications from eligible non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who entered India before December 31, 2014. As of October 2025, the constitutional challenges to the remain pending before the , with no final verdict delivered despite multiple adjournments and referrals to larger benches for resolving preliminary issues like the need for a five-judge bench. The court has continued to list the matters for hearing, including a scheduled on for potential reference to a three-judge bench, but implementation of the rules has not been halted, reflecting the judiciary's reluctance to intervene absent invalidity. Over 237 petitions, including those from , activists, and , contest provisions like Section 2(1)(b), which fast-tracks for specified religious minorities, yet the absence of a stay has enabled administrative processing of claims, with relaxed documentation requirements noted in government clarifications by May 2025.

Related litigation on NRC

The has overseen the (NRC) process primarily in , directing its updating in 2013 following a litigation filed in 2009 by challenging . The final NRC list, published on August 31, 2019, excluded approximately 1.9 million individuals, prompting multiple petitions alleging procedural errors, arbitrary exclusions, and lack of due process in verification. These challenges intensified amid the (CAA) protests, as critics argued that NRC exclusions, combined with CAA's religious criteria, could systematically disenfranchise without providing them equivalent citizenship pathways. In response to claims of "large-scale errors" in the Assam NRC, including mismatched documents and unaddressed discrepancies, the Supreme Court issued notices to the central government and Assam authorities on a September 2025 plea seeking time-bound reverification of the list. Earlier, in August 2025, the Court admitted a writ petition filed by Hitesh Dev Sarma, the former state NRC coordinator, demanding comprehensive revision of the draft NRC and re-verification of at least 20% of entries to rectify alleged inclusions of foreigners and exclusions of genuine citizens. Sarma's petition highlighted forensic audits revealing potential infiltration in the data, though Assam's government has opposed blanket re-verification due to logistical burdens and past expenditures exceeding ₹1,600 . No final orders on these reverification pleas have been issued as of October 2025, with proceedings ongoing. Related foundational litigation includes challenges to Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which implements the 1985 by setting a March 25, 1971, cut-off date for citizenship in the state, underpinning the NRC's eligibility criteria. On October 17, 2024, a five-judge Bench upheld Section 6A's validity in a 4:1 majority, rejecting arguments that it violated equality principles or enabled demographic changes through immigration. Justice Bhushan R Gavai's majority opinion affirmed the provision's alignment with and the Accord's protective intent for Assamese, while Justice dissented, citing risks of arbitrary application. This ruling indirectly bolsters the Assam NRC framework but has fueled ongoing debates in CAA-NRC linked challenges, where petitioners contend it entrenches discriminatory cut-offs when paired with exclusions for Muslims. Petitions have also targeted ancillary NRC aspects, such as camps for declared foreigners excluded from the . In one case, activist challenged the conditions in Assam's camps as inhuman, seeking their closure or reform, though the Court has deferred broader relief pending Foreigners Tribunals' adjudication of exclusions. Nationwide NRC proposals, referenced in CAA protest narratives as a , have not advanced to , with the government stating in 2023 no such exercise is underway, averting direct litigation but leaving Assam-specific disputes as the primary judicial battleground.

Broader Reactions and Debates

Domestic political and civil society views

The (BJP)-led government enacted the (CAA) on December 11, 2019, defending it as a humanitarian provision to grant expedited citizenship to persecuted non-Muslim minorities—Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians—from , , and who entered before December 31, 2014, without revoking rights of Indian citizens. accused opposition parties of disseminating misinformation, asserting the law addressed historical injustices against religious minorities in Islamic-majority neighbors while excluding Muslims due to their ability to seek refuge in those countries. Regional allies like the and (at the time) endorsed the measure, viewing it as consistent with protecting co-religionists abroad. Opposition parties, including the , , and Communist parties, condemned the as religiously discriminatory and a departure from 's secular constitutional framework, organizing a nationwide on December 19, 2019, to protest its passage. Critics argued it, when paired with the (NRC), could systematically marginalize 's population by creating a religion-based citizenship pathway absent for Muslims fleeing the same regions. Public opinion surveys reflected polarization: a Mood of the Nation poll in August 2020 found 50% of respondents supported the , with only 15% deeming it discriminatory, while a January 2020 IANS-C Voter survey showed 70% approval in northern but lower support in the Northeast. Civil society responses diverged regionally and ideologically. In the Northeast, groups like the opposed the CAA not primarily on religious grounds but due to apprehensions of increased altering demographics and cultures, leading to violent clashes in and exclusion clauses for tribal areas. Nationwide, student unions at universities like and , alongside Muslim-led initiatives such as the , framed protests as resistance to and minority exclusion, drawing participation from feminists, Dalits, and secular activists. Conversely, pro-CAA civil groups, including Hindu organizations, rallied in support, emphasizing the act's focus on verifiable persecution data—such as the decline of Hindus in from 23% in 1947 to 2% by 2019—and decrying protest tactics like road blockades as disruptive to public life. A January 2020 Mood of the Nation poll indicated 43% viewed CAA-NRC linkage as a from economic woes, underscoring broader societal with sustained unrest.

International responses and critiques

The High Commissioner for Human Rights, , expressed concern over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in December 2019, urging Indian authorities to respect the right to peaceful assembly during protests and adhere to international standards on the . In March 2020, the UN High Commissioner's office sought to intervene in proceedings challenging the CAA, arguing it violated India's obligations under , including the International Covenant on , by introducing religious criteria for citizenship. The UN reiterated in March 2024 that the CAA remained "fundamentally discriminatory" in nature, particularly when paired with the , and called for its repeal while condemning the government's response to 2019-2020 protests, which included arbitrary detentions and excessive force. The government voiced concerns about the shortly after its passage in December 2019, with the State Department stating it was monitoring the law's implementation for potential impacts on religious freedom and equal treatment under the law. In March 2024, following rules for implementation, the reiterated its position, describing the Act as discriminatory and emphasizing close monitoring, prompting to dismiss the remarks as "misplaced, misinformed, and unwarranted," asserting the law addressed of minorities from neighboring countries without affecting citizens. The on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) highlighted the in its 2023 annual report as contributing to systematic violations, recommending 's designation as a Country of Particular Concern, though this reflected the commission's advisory role rather than official policy. The drafted multiple resolutions in January 2020 criticizing the for its selective exclusion of and urging member states to raise the issue in bilateral talks with , though votes on these were postponed amid diplomatic sensitivities. rejected these interventions as interference in internal matters, emphasizing the 's focus on granting refuge to non-Muslim minorities fleeing in , , and , without revoking from any Indian nationals. and , prominent non-governmental organizations, condemned the as discriminatory and a threat to , linking it to protest suppressions that resulted in dozens of deaths, though these groups' assessments have faced for overlooking the Act's targeted relief for verified persecuted groups amid regional Islamist extremism.

Fact-checking common protest narratives

Claim that the CAA-NRC combination would strip Indian Muslims of citizenship. The Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019, amends the Citizenship Act, 1955, to provide an accelerated path to citizenship for non-Muslim religious minorities—Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians—from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who entered India before December 31, 2014, and faced persecution on religious grounds. It does not alter the citizenship status of any existing Indian citizen, regardless of religion, nor does it mandate exclusion based on faith for those already holding citizenship documents. The National Register of Citizens (NRC), implemented only in Assam as of 2019, requires residents to prove citizenship via documents predating March 24, 1971, and excluded approximately 1.9 million people, including both Hindus and Muslims, without any religious criterion. Nationwide NRC rollout has not occurred, and the CAA explicitly relaxes residency requirements for eligible non-Muslims in potential NRC contexts, serving as a safeguard rather than a tool for disenfranchisement. Critics' assertions of targeted statelessness for Muslims lack empirical basis, as neither law retroactively revokes citizenship, and Muslims remain eligible for naturalization through standard processes without religious bar. Claim that anti-CAA protests were entirely peaceful and met only with disproportionate police violence. While some demonstrations, such as the Shaheen Bagh sit-in, remained non-violent for extended periods, multiple anti-CAA protests from December 2019 to March 2020 involved significant violence initiated by protesters, including arson, stone-pelting, and clashes resulting in deaths and property damage. In Assam, protests turned violent shortly after the bill's passage on December 9, 2019, with attacks on government offices and vehicles. The February 2020 Delhi riots, linked to anti-CAA tensions, saw 53 fatalities—predominantly Muslims—and over 200 injuries, with investigations attributing much of the violence to mobs targeting properties and police, including documented cases of protesters firing on forces and setting fire to buildings. Over 30 deaths occurred nationwide during protest-related unrest, alongside arrests for rioting in Uttar Pradesh and elsewhere, contradicting narratives of unilateral state aggression. Police responses included tear gas and lathi charges, but reports confirm protester-initiated attacks in several instances. Claim that the CAA is inherently discriminatory against by excluding them from eligibility. The targets non- from three specified Muslim-majority countries where they constitute religious minorities subject to documented , such as forced conversions and laws disproportionately affecting in (where their population declined from 23% in 1947 to 2% by 2019) and similar patterns for others in and . are excluded from this fast-track not due to animus but because, as the majority faith in those nations, they do not qualify as persecuted minorities fleeing religious oppression; however, from any country, including , can apply for Indian citizenship via the standard 11-year residency route without religious restriction. This distinction aligns with India's historical of sheltering Partition-era refugees and others from religious strife, while secular constitutional provisions for equal treatment do not preclude affirmative relief for unequally persecuted groups. Challenges to the 's constitutionality remain pending before the as of October 2025, with no final verdict invalidating it.

References

  1. [1]
    The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019 - PRS India
    It defines an illegal migrant as a foreigner: (i) who enters India without a valid passport or travel documents, or (ii) stays beyond the permitted time.
  2. [2]
    Changes to India's Citizenship Laws - Congress.gov
    Apr 18, 2024 · The Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019. India's Citizenship Act of 1955 prohibited illegal immigrants from becoming citizens. Among numerous ...
  3. [3]
    Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) 2019 - Latest Rules
    Aug 31, 2025 · CAA 2019 seeks to grant citizenship to illegal migrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan who are Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and ...Key Features of the CAA, 2019 · Criticism on CAA, 2019Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  4. [4]
    Shri Amit Shah Modi Government will not spare anyone ... - PIB
    Mar 12, 2020 · Shri Shah said that vested interests are misguiding and instilling a fear in Indian Muslims that CAA would take away their citizenship. The hate ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  5. [5]
    Citizenship Amendment Act 2019: A timeline of events, controversies
    Mar 12, 2024 · Anti-CAA protests ... On December 15, student-police clashes broke out at Aligarh Muslim University and Delhi's Jamia Millia Islamia University ...
  6. [6]
    Data | How many people died during anti-CAA protests? - The Hindu
    Jan 6, 2020 · Among the metros, only Mumbai witnessed protests where no violence or police action were recorded to have taken place. Delhi witnessed violent ...
  7. [7]
    India citizenship law protests leave 22 dead - CNN
    Dec 21, 2019 · At least 15 people have died in violence in India's Uttar Pradesh ... Violent protests erupt in India over citizenship bill. 02:51. New ...
  8. [8]
    CAA rules notified: A timeline of events - Hindustan Times
    Mar 11, 2024 · February 23, 2020: Communal violence breaks out in northeast Delhi. March 24, 2020: Delhi Police remove protesters from Shaheen Bagh in view of ...
  9. [9]
    India's citizenship protests - Reuters
    Mar 30, 2020 · As of March 20, 2020, at least 76 people have been killed in clashes during the Citizenship Amendment Act protests across the country.
  10. [10]
    https://ddinews.gov.in/national/protest-parts-country-over-citizenship-amendment-act-sporadic-violence
  11. [11]
    [PDF] THE CITIZENSHIP (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2019 NO. 47 OF 2019 An ...
    The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, amends the 1955 Act, allowing certain people from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, or Pakistan to be exempt from illegal migrant ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] the citizenship (amendment) bill, 2019 - PRS India
    Dec 4, 2019 · "Provided that any person belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or. Christian community from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan, who ...
  13. [13]
    CAA: 12 key points to remember - Press Information Bureau
    Dec 19, 2019 · The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) enables migrants/foreigners of six minority communities from three specified countries who have come to India ...Missing: summary source<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Indian Citizenship Online
    Citizenship Amendment Act of 2019. It is specifically for individuals who entered India on or before ; 31st December, 2014, and belonging to ; Hindu or ; Sikh or ...
  15. [15]
    CAA: India's new citizenship law explained - BBC
    Mar 11, 2024 · The CAB amended the 64-year-old Indian Citizenship law, which currently prohibits illegal migrants from becoming Indian citizens. It defined ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  16. [16]
    Causes of the Decline of the Hindu Population in Bangladesh
    Sep 1, 2024 · Multiple factors contribute to the decline of the Hindu population in Bangladesh, including political, social, religious, and demographic changes.
  17. [17]
    India Activates Discriminatory Citizenship Law - Human Rights Watch
    Mar 15, 2024 · The law fast-tracks citizenship requests from non-Muslims fleeing religious persecution from India's Muslim-majority neighbors – Pakistan, Afghanistan, and ...
  18. [18]
    https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-report-on-international-religious-freedom/afghanistan/
  19. [19]
    India: Government Policies, Actions Target Minorities
    Feb 19, 2021 · Authorities in India have adopted laws and policies that systematically discriminate against Muslims and stigmatize critics of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Illegal Immigration From Bangladesh to India: Toward a ...
    Jun 29, 2016 · Illegal immigration from Bangladesh to India, which includes both refugees and economic migrants, continues unabated. There is no reliable ...
  21. [21]
    Illegal Immigration to India: Implications and the Way Forward
    May 1, 2025 · Though accurate data is hard to come by, estimates suggest that around 20 million illegal Bangladeshi immigrants- a figure quoted by the then ...
  22. [22]
    Socio-Economic and Political Consequence of Illegal Migration int
    Illegal migration into Assam from Bangladesh has been posing a serious security threat to the identity of Assamese people. It adversely affects the social, ...
  23. [23]
    Illegal Migration into Assam
    Illegal migration into Assam was the core issue behind the Assam student movement. It was also the prime contributory factor behind the outbreak of insurgency ...
  24. [24]
    Office of the State Coordinator of National Registration (NRC), Assam
    The National Register of Citizens (NRC) is a register containing names of Indian citizens. It is being updated to include those in the 1951 NRC or electoral ...
  25. [25]
    Over 2,000 illegal immigrants 'pushed back' into Bangladesh since ...
    Jun 2, 2025 · More than 2,000 alleged illegal Bangladeshi immigrants are estimated to have been “pushed back” across the border by Indian authorities ...
  26. [26]
    Over 19 lakh excluded from Assam's final NRC - The Hindu
    Aug 31, 2019 · More than 19 lakh of the 3.29 crore applicants in Assam were left out of the final National Register of Citizens (NRC) that was published on Saturday.
  27. [27]
    Assam: Government Reveals Religion-Wise Break-Up of NRC ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma told a local channel that amongst 16 lakh people excluded by the NRC, 7 lakh were Muslims, and 5 lakh Bengali Hindus.
  28. [28]
    More than 14000 Bangladeshi nationals sent back since 2019
    Apr 29, 2022 · The report found that the maximum number of illegal migrants entering or leaving India is from South Bengal border. A majority -- 11,034 ...
  29. [29]
    India's Anti-Immigrant Crackdown Is Breaking Assam Families | TIME
    Sep 5, 2021 · Assam residents who are declared illegal immigrants technically face deportation, but officials from Bangladesh have repeatedly said they will ...
  30. [30]
    Military deployed as protests rage in India against citizenship bill
    Dec 12, 2019 · Security personnel use batons to disperse students protesting against the government's Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB), in Guwahati on December ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    In India's northeast, protesters rally against citizenship bill - Al Jazeera
    Dec 10, 2019 · Hundreds of protesters closed streets as part of an 11-hour shutdown across the region against the controversial bill.Missing: CAA timeline
  32. [32]
    Assam CAA protest: 4 dead in police firing, 175 arrested, more than ...
    Dec 16, 2019 · Assam CAA protest: 4 dead in police firing, 175 arrested, more than 1400 detained · Assam is witnessing one of the worst violent protests by the ...
  33. [33]
    Assam: Sporadic protests, police warning, CM's assurance after ...
    Mar 12, 2024 · The state had witnessed violent protests against the legislation in December 2019, resulting in five deaths in police action. There's fear among ...
  34. [34]
    Two shot dead in Indian protests over citizenship bill - The Guardian
    Dec 12, 2019 · There were violent clashes with special forces and police, who fired teargas as protesters burned cars and tyres, pulled down political ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    India citizenship law protests: All the latest updates | News - Al Jazeera
    Dec 18, 2019 · Supreme Court delays hearing of pleas challenging the new law to January 22 amid widespread protests across the country.
  36. [36]
    Anti-CAA protest: report documents chilling testimonies of students
    Dec 21, 2020 · In AMU, the report notes, the police, and RAF officials entered the campus on December 15 and fired tear-gas shells, rubber bullets, and stun ...
  37. [37]
    In photos: The world's largest democracy is in upheaval - Quartz
    Yesterday (Dec. 15) violent agitations reached the national capital, with Delhi's Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) turning into a battle ground. The police lobbed ...
  38. [38]
    JNU: Students across India protest against campus attack - BBC
    Jan 6, 2020 · Students across India have been protesting against an attack on a prestigious Delhi university by masked men wielding sticks on Sunday. At least ...
  39. [39]
    Protests Rage Across India After Prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru ...
    Jan 8, 2020 · Three ABVP members were detained a day earlier for interrupting protests against the JNU attack and Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) at the ...
  40. [40]
    Shaheen Bagh protesters pledge to fight, seek rollback of CAA law
    Jan 15, 2020 · One month on, protesters say they will continue to fight against new citizenship law that discriminates against Muslims.Missing: JNU | Show results with:JNU<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    India citizenship bill: Women protest in Delhi - CNN
    Jan 15, 2020 · Posters against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) hang from an overpass in Shaheen Bagh, New Delhi, on January 13, 2020. CNN. Like his wife ...Missing: escalation JNU
  42. [42]
    Women spearhead India's protest movement – DW – 01/22/2020
    Jan 22, 2020 · In Shaheen Bagh, what began as a small, peaceful sit-in and candlelit vigil organized by local women, has grown into regular large-scale ...
  43. [43]
    Morning news digest — January 11, 2020 - The Hindu
    Jan 11, 2020 · Morning Digest: CAA comes into effect from Jan. 10, Kochi's Maradu flats to be knocked down today, and more. A select list of stories to read before you start ...
  44. [44]
    Tens of thousands march in southern India to protest citizenship law
    Jan 4, 2020 · The Hyderabad protesters held placards with slogans including "Withdraw CAA immediately," and "India's only religion in Secularism."
  45. [45]
    Citizenship Amendment Act: AASU plans protest against PM Modi
    Jan 7, 2020 · Citizenship Amendment Act: AASU plans protest against PM Modi. Students say they will oppose Modi's visit to Assam for opening 'Khelo India'.
  46. [46]
    India's Republic Day celebrations marked with protests, blasts
    Jan 26, 2020 · Hundreds of thousands of Indians protested across the country on Sunday against a citizenship bill that many fear is discriminatory against ...
  47. [47]
    New citizenship law protests in India ahead of Trump's visit
    Feb 23, 2020 · Protest against CAA-NRC in Jafrabad, Delhi. India's Citizenship Amendment Act has triggered weeks of sometimes violent protests against Prime ...Missing: peak | Show results with:peak
  48. [48]
    Explainer: What do we know about the violence that left 53 dead in ...
    Mar 6, 2020 · What set off the riots? It is impossible to point to one moment and say this is what sparked the riot. Eyewitness and reporting from the area ...
  49. [49]
    “Shoot the Traitors”: Discrimination Against Muslims under India's ...
    Apr 9, 2020 · Indians protesting against the new citizenship law and verification policies at Shaheen Bagh, a Muslim-majority neighborhood in Delhi that became the iconic ...
  50. [50]
    Delhi Riots | What Happened In February 2020 - LawChakra
    Sep 3, 2025 · The riots were triggered amid protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and counter-protests, eventually escalating into violent ...
  51. [51]
    Three years since the 2020 Delhi anti-Hindu riots - OpIndia
    Feb 24, 2023 · Seven days after the anti-Hindu riots started from Chand Bagh in Delhi, an OpIndia team reached Brijpuri, to meet the riot victims. Some Hindu ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Five years on, Delhi riots scars linger, justice remains elusive
    Feb 25, 2025 · '53 dead, 2,619 arrested': Five years on, Delhi riots scars linger. Northeast Delhi's February 2020 communal clashes resulted in 53 deaths ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  53. [53]
    Violent Protests Against Indian Citizenship Law Kill Over 20 People
    Feb 25, 2020 · The worst communal violence in decades over a controversial Indian citizenship law has lead to the deaths of 22 people in New Delhi.<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    http://feministlawarchives.pldindia.org/wp-content/uploads/report-from-ground-zero-delhi-riots-2020-gia-new-delhi.pdf
  55. [55]
    In 17 of 93 acquittals in Delhi riots cases, courts red-flag 'fabricated ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · At least 53 people were killed and over 700 injured during the riots in northeast Delhi in February 2020 amid protests over the Citizenship ...
  56. [56]
    Coronavirus clears long-running India citizenship protest - BBC
    Mar 23, 2020 · A long-running protest led mostly by Muslim women in the Indian capital has been cleared amid measures to curb the spread of coronavirus in the ...Missing: February peak
  57. [57]
    Revisiting India's citizenship law – DW – 12/11/2020
    Dec 11, 2020 · But, while the renewed protests are set to begin, there is still ambiguity over when the CAA will be implemented. The Home Ministry missed its ...Missing: reaction | Show results with:reaction
  58. [58]
    Protests in a Pandemic: A Timeline of Protests in 2020
    Beginning 23 February, multiple waves of bloodshed, property destruction and communal violence took place in north-east Delhi, leading to the death of 53 people ...
  59. [59]
    The Case of Anti-CAA Movement in India - UTS ePress
    On 19 December 2019, a nation-wide bandh was called by opposition political parties to protest against CAA, and many citizens joined the anti-CAA movement to ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  60. [60]
    How the coronavirus lockdown impacted anti-citizenship law ...
    Jun 18, 2020 · Arrests. During the lockdown, when public protests are not possible, the government has begun indicting and detaining anti-CAA protestors. The ...
  61. [61]
    TOI Explains: What changes now that CAA rules are notified
    Mar 12, 2024 · The delay is mainly for two reasons: outbreak of mass protests in several parts of the country, leading to clashes between the agitators and the ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  62. [62]
    Centre notifies Citizenship Amendment Act rules, four years after ...
    Mar 11, 2024 · The Indian government on Monday notified Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) rules, even as protests against the law continue in the country.
  63. [63]
    Modi 2.0: Pandemic upsets CAA-NRC 'chronology' | India News
    May 30, 2021 · The opposition parties also staged demonstrations demanding a roll back of the legislation, saying that CAA discriminates on religious lines.
  64. [64]
    Pandemic, Protests, and Workers: India and Sri Lanka Considered
    Feb 17, 2024 · The success of the establishment in dissipating the mobilisational energy of the anti-CAA protests was seen by many as leading to a period of ...
  65. [65]
    Citizenship Amendment Act rules notified, four years after the law ...
    Mar 11, 2024 · The rules state that the applicants will have to provide six types of documents and specify “date of entry” in India. Updated - March 12, 2024 ...
  66. [66]
    Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024, notified - SCC Online
    Mar 11, 2024 · The Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024 will enable the persons eligible under CAA-2019 to apply for grant of Indian citizenship.<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    CAA: Why is India's citizenship law contentious? - Reuters
    Mar 12, 2024 · India this week implemented the contentious 2019 Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), sparking sporadic protests and a war of words between ...Missing: rules | Show results with:rules
  68. [68]
    Sporadic protests in India over contentious citizenship law - Reuters
    Mar 12, 2024 · Sporadic protests have erupted in India against a citizenship law that has been criticised for discriminating against Muslims.
  69. [69]
    Citizenship (Amendment) Act: Why CAA in 2024 could be different ...
    Mar 12, 2024 · A strike has been called by various groups and parties in Assam while sporadic protests have been reported at some places. Security has been ...
  70. [70]
    CAA rules implementation | Reactions - The Hindu
    Mar 14, 2024 · Implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act has sparked protests in several States, including Assam and Kerala ; March 14, 2024 19:45.<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    India's Citizenship Amendment Act: Why is it controversial? - DW
    Mar 13, 2024 · Sporadic protests erupted this week after the announcement regarding the law's implementation, but there have been no reports of damage or ...
  72. [72]
    India: Citizenship Amendment Act is a blow to Indian constitutional ...
    Mar 14, 2024 · The CAA removes barriers for acquiring Indian citizenship for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from the neighbouring ...
  73. [73]
    MHA extends CAA cut-off date to 31 December 2024, easing ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · MHA extends CAA cut-off date to 31 December 2024, easing citizenship process for persecuted minorities. Originally, under the Citizenship ( ...
  74. [74]
    World Report 2025: India | Human Rights Watch
    In May, the Indian government granted the first set of citizenship certificates under the discriminatory Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), which the parliament ...
  75. [75]
    Assam Jatiya Parishad protests extension of CAA deadline
    Sep 3, 2025 · Assam Jatiya Parishad protests against CAA extension, accusing BJP of endangering Assamese identity for political gain.
  76. [76]
    https://maktoobmedia.com/india/not-a-setback-but-a-resolve-that-continues-sharjeel-imam-friends-stand-firm-after-bihar-poll-withdrawal/
  77. [77]
    Amit Shah leads BJP's door-to-door campaign on CAA - The Hindu
    Jan 5, 2020 · BJP president Amit Shah on Sunday led the party's door-to-door 10-day campaign to spread awareness about the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, ...Missing: support | Show results with:support
  78. [78]
    BJP holds rally in support of CAA and NRC - The Hindu
    Dec 30, 2019 · The BJP Karimnagar district unit leaders took out a massive procession in support of Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register ...
  79. [79]
    Amit Shah: Let them protest, but we won't budge on CAA | India News
    Jan 22, 2020 · Union home minister Amit Shah on Tuesday sharpened his attack on anti-CAA protesters, saying the government was not scared of agitation, and ...
  80. [80]
    India's Citizenship Amendment Act - Part II: The Protests
    Apr 1, 2020 · On the evening of January 5, a masked mob entered the campus carrying sticks, stones and metal rods and attacked the students and staff of the ...
  81. [81]
    https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/kolkata/bjp-1000-caa-camps-west-bengal-bangladesh-districts-sir-polls-10322916/
  82. [82]
    https://sundayguardianlive.com/news/bengal-bjp-to-hold-1000-caa-camps-for-hindu-refugees-158068/
  83. [83]
    English rendering of PM Modi's reply to the motion of thanks on ... - PIB
    Feb 6, 2020 · It was said that what the government was saying on the CAA was not Gandhiji's sentiment. ... violence, arson, it is your government there - what ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  84. [84]
    'CAA will never be repealed… no provision to take away anyone's ...
    Mar 14, 2024 · 'CAA will never be repealed… no provision to take away anyone's citizenship': Amit Shah. "CAA does not violate Article 14 (right to equality).
  85. [85]
    No Compromise, CAA Will Never Be Taken Back: Amit Shah ... - NDTV
    Mar 14, 2024 · "This is our sovereign right to ensure Indian citizenship in our country. We will never compromise on it and CAA will never be taken back," ...
  86. [86]
    CAA: “Everyone will get equal rights” says Amit Shah ... - The Hindu
    Mar 14, 2024 · Home Minister says 85% of potential CAA applicants have the required documents; promises citizenship will be granted with retrospective effect, ...
  87. [87]
    CAA implemented: Home minister Amit Shah shares full document ...
    Mar 11, 2024 · Home minister Amit Shah announced the implementation of Citizenship Amendment Act, allowing non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh ...
  88. [88]
    Indian diaspora in United States hold rallies in support of CAA
    Dec 25, 2019 · The Indian diaspora in the US from several organizations showed their solidarity to recently enacted Citizenship Amendment Act of Government ...Missing: overseas | Show results with:overseas
  89. [89]
    Indian-Americans hold events in New York in support of CAA
    Dec 30, 2019 · NEW YORK: Members of the Indian diaspora held events at different places here to express their support for the amended Citizenship Act, ...
  90. [90]
    India's Citizenship Amendment Act: A First Step Opportunity to Better ...
    Why we think the CAA is NECESSARY. For over 16 years, the Hindu American Foundation has worked closely with persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, ...
  91. [91]
    USCIRF pepetuates misinformation on India's CAA
    The Hindu American Foundation has submitted a written statement for the record for the US Commission on International Religious Freedom's March 4, 2020 hearing ...
  92. [92]
    'Was long overdue': Hindu American groups applaud CAA rollout
    Mar 12, 2024 · The Hindu American Foundation has welcomed the CAA and stated that it doesn't modify the rights of Indian citizens or impose a religious ...
  93. [93]
    CAA long overdue, say Indian American groups - Deccan Herald
    Mar 11, 2024 · CAA long overdue, say Indian American groups. Under CAA, the central government can grant citizenship to non-Muslim migrants - from Bangladesh, ...Missing: diaspora | Show results with:diaspora
  94. [94]
    In no circumstances will CAA be acceptable in Northeast India
    May 29, 2021 · AASU has been opposing CAA stating that it is against the accord. Synopsis. Assam witnessed bitter protests against Assam in 2019 and early 2020 ...
  95. [95]
    Citizenship Amendment Bill Negatively Impacts Indigenous Peoples ...
    Jan 2, 2020 · The protests were seen mostly in India's northeast regions, particularly in Assam and Tripura, home to more than 230 different Indigenous ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    Aasu Remembers 5 Who Died During Anti-caa Agitation In 2019
    Dec 13, 2022 · The five youths who were killed were Sam Stafford, Dipanjal Das, Ishwar Nayak, Abdul Alim and Dwijendra Panging. Their families want those behind their ...
  97. [97]
    Citizenship Bill: Tensions rise as protests flare in Assam - Al Jazeera
    Dec 12, 2019 · At least two people have been killed in India's Assam state, according to reports, as police clashed with protesters opposing a new law that would make it ...
  98. [98]
    Citizenship Amendment Act: Uncalled for Protests
    Dec 23, 2019 · It is only after much debate, analysis, and due democratic process that it was enacted into a law on 12 December 2019. The CAA is a narrow ...
  99. [99]
    India's Citizenship Act Protests Grow Violent in Uttar Pradesh | TIME
    Jan 1, 2020 · Protesters say that by granting citizenship to these communities but discriminating against Muslims, Modi's Hindu nationalist government is undermining India's ...
  100. [100]
    Anti-CAA protests: At least 11 killed in Uttar Pradesh violence, say ...
    Dec 21, 2019 · At least 11 people, including an 8-year-old boy, have lost their lives in Uttar Pradesh as the protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act turned violent ...
  101. [101]
    Anti-CAA protests: 1,113 arrests, 5,558 preventive detentions, 19 ...
    Dec 26, 2019 · Nineteen persons have died in Uttar Pradesh since December 10 during the violence in the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, the State police said ...<|separator|>
  102. [102]
    A Report On The Police Violence In Uttar Pradesh Against Anti-CAA ...
    The first report on the violence in Sambhal, published in full below, documents the events of 19th and 20th December 2019, which led to the tragic deaths of two ...
  103. [103]
    A year on, no FIRs against Meerut police for men killed in CAA ...
    Dec 31, 2020 · In 2019, twenty-two Muslims, including a 7-year-old, lost their lives in Uttar Pradesh within just two days—20 and 21 December—in the anti-CAA ...
  104. [104]
    Three years since anti-CAA protests: Law and lawlessness
    Jan 21, 2023 · Among other losses, the violence that ensued led to the deaths of at least 23 Muslim men across the state, of which, 22 died as a result of ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] the struggle for equal citizenship in uttar pradesh and its costs: | apcr
    The investigation against allegations of 'rioters' who posed as protestors to incite violence during peaceful anti-CAA protests has reached nowhere even after 2 ...
  106. [106]
    India: The UN must condemn crimes against peaceful protesters
    Mar 2, 2020 · In December 2019, after the violence broke out in Uttar Pradesh, the state government sent notices seeking to recover INR 45 millions' (USD ...
  107. [107]
    'I'll destroy your family': India's activists tell of false arrest and torture ...
    Feb 1, 2020 · Last Wednesday, hours before he was due to address an anti-CAA rally in Mumbai, activist Dr Kafeel Khan was arrested by Uttar Pradesh Police ...
  108. [108]
    Shaheen Bagh's 101-day protest: Timeline of sit-in against CAA
    Mar 24, 2020 · The protest site at Shaheen Bagh in Delhi was cleared on Tuesday morning after 101 days amid the nationwide lockdown over coronavirus pandemic.
  109. [109]
    Shaheen Bagh: The women occupying Delhi street against ... - BBC
    Jan 3, 2020 · Hundreds of Muslim women are braving the Delhi winter to protest against a new Indian citizenship law.
  110. [110]
    Why Shaheen Bagh protests are an important moment in India's ...
    Feb 3, 2020 · For more than 50 days, people in Shaheen Bagh – a Muslim working-class neighbourhood – have been protesting against a new citizenship law that ...
  111. [111]
    Celebrating The Spirit Of Resistance: Shaheen Bagh Two Years On
    The protest lasted 101 days and nights throughout one of Delhi's coldest winters in recent memory and only ended because of the imposed lockdown after the COVID ...
  112. [112]
    Shaheen Bagh protest: Hundreds of south Delhi residents on road to ...
    Jan 13, 2020 · It's been 28 days since residents of Shaheen Bagh have occupied both carriageways of Road No. 13 in protest against CAA and NRC. Ravi Yadav, a ...
  113. [113]
    Shaheen Bagh stalemate: Here's the Inside story of citizens' protest ...
    Jan 19, 2020 · Traffic jam in Delhi due to Shaheen Bagh protest. (Photo: PTI). advertisement. Buses connecting Faridabad and Noida are also facing problems ...
  114. [114]
    2020 Delhi riots: Court acquits 6 men; slams police for 'false' case
    Aug 27, 2025 · 2020 Delhi riots: Court acquits 6 men; slams police for 'false' case ... NEW DELHI: Acquitting six men in a 2020 northeast Delhi riot case, a ...
  115. [115]
    2020 Delhi Riots: 4 Years Later, Northeast Delhi Moves On
    Feb 21, 2024 · NEW DELHI: Delhi Police had arrested 2,619 people in connection with the riots in northeast Delhi in Feb 2020, which had left 53 people dead ...
  116. [116]
    Delhi Riots 2020: 17,000-Page Chargesheet Names Only Anti-CAA ...
    Sep 16, 2020 · Delhi riots in Feburary this year left 53 dead, 200 injured and hundreds homeless. ... New Delhi: Fifteen people, all linked to protests against ...Missing: actions | Show results with:actions
  117. [117]
    Delhi Court Orders Charges in Violent 2020 Riots Involving Murder ...
    Nov 24, 2024 · A Delhi court has ordered the framing of serious charges against 25 accused in a 2020 riot case, involving murder, arson, and attacks on police ...
  118. [118]
    2020 Riots: Court Acquits 2 Men | Delhi News - Times of India
    Sep 19, 2024 · 2020 riots: Court acquits 2 men ... New Delhi: A Delhi court on Thursday acquitted a man and his son accused of rioting and other offences in a ...
  119. [119]
    India's Citizenship Law Triggers Mass Protests And Violence ... - NPR
    Dec 16, 2019 · The mass demonstrations followed violence that erupted Sunday night, as police stormed a public university in New Delhi.
  120. [120]
    how the anti-CAA movement took shape in West Bengal - The Hindu
    Jan 11, 2020 · On December 19, Kolkata saw a 60,000-strong rally bringing together people across social, economic, cultural and religious groups against ...
  121. [121]
    India: Protests against anti-Muslim citizenship law in Kolkata - WSWS
    Dec 31, 2019 · WSWS reporters attended an anti-CAA protest rally held in Kolkata on December 21 and distributed WSWS articles in English, Hindi and Bengali.
  122. [122]
    Implement CAA over my dead body, says Mamata Banerjee
    Dec 16, 2019 · A group of people laid siege on the National Highway 60 at Chatra in Birbhum and protested against CAA and NRC by burning tyres. Dec 16, 2019 14 ...
  123. [123]
    Do not support violence during anti-CAA protests: Mamata Banerjee
    Jan 9, 2020 · "We don't support violence during anti-CAA protests. Political parties and leaders should behave in a more responsible way. Violence is not the ...
  124. [124]
    Mamata Banerjee to wield paintbrush during her protest against ...
    Jan 24, 2020 · Mamata Benerjee has been vocal in her opposition to CAA and has declared that she will not implement the law in her state.
  125. [125]
    CAA protests updates | 21 people injured in Seelampur violence
    Dec 17, 2019 · Political parties and other organisations opposing the NRC and Citizenship Amendment Act have called for a hartal in Kerala on December 17.
  126. [126]
    Ruling, Oppn fronts hold joint protest in Kerala against CAA
    Dec 15, 2019 · Various leaders of the LDF and the Congress-led UDF and state ministers were among those who took part in the three-hour long protest at the ...
  127. [127]
    Hundreds, including filmstars and theatre artists, take to streets ...
    Dec 23, 2019 · Kerala. Hundreds, including filmstars and theatre artists, take to streets against CAA in Kochi. Two marches were held in the city led by the ...
  128. [128]
    Citizenship Act stir: Multiple protests in Kochi organised today
    Dec 22, 2019 · Citizens from all walks of life are expected to take part in the 'People's long march' from Kaloor Stadium to Cochin Shipyard at 1 pm.
  129. [129]
    In Kerala, millions form human chain to protest India's 'anti-muslim ...
    Jan 31, 2020 · Several millions of people formed a 620 km human chain from the north to the south of Kerala demanding the withdrawal of the controversial Citizenship ...
  130. [130]
    Two die in police firing in Mangaluru as anti-CAA protests rock the ...
    Dec 20, 2019 · Two persons were killed in police firing in Mangaluru on Thursday as protesters across the country took to the streets against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act ...
  131. [131]
    Internet suspended in Mangaluru after police firing at CAA protest ...
    Dec 20, 2019 · Police lobbed tear gas shells, resorted to baton charge and fired in the air to disperse people protesting against the amended Citizenship Act ...
  132. [132]
    CAA protest: Was Mangaluru violence pre-planned? CCTV footage ...
    Dec 24, 2019 · On December 19, two people were killed in Mangalore in police firing after protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act turned violent.<|separator|>
  133. [133]
    Protests rage across India over citizenship law: Live updates - CNN
    Dec 19, 2019 · As many as 60,000 people protested against the citizenship law in the city of Malegaon in Maharashtra state Thursday, police told Agence France- ...
  134. [134]
    CAA 2019 News Photo PROTEST AGAINST CAA-NRC-NPR
    PROTEST AGAINST CAA-NRC-NPR: Thousands of protesters gathered and sitting on the narrow streets of Washermanpet to protest against Citizenship Amendment Act ...
  135. [135]
    Profiles: The 23 People Who Died in Uttar Pradesh during the CAA ...
    Jan 21, 2020 · Date: December 20, 2019. Asif (33) an orphan and a street vendor was also killed in the violence. His three children, aged 10, 6 and 3, and ...
  136. [136]
    25 people were killed during anti-CAA protests: Here are their names
    Dec 25, 2019 · Twenty-five people have reportedly lost their lives in the ongoing protests against the recently passed Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA)
  137. [137]
    Delhi victims: Profiles of those killed in violence around India's CAA ...
    In February, 53 people were killed amid protests against India's new citizenship law. Here are the stories of the victims.Missing: causes | Show results with:causes
  138. [138]
    Delhi Riots Death Toll at 53, Here Are the Names of the Victims
    The Wire: The Wire News India, Latest News,News from India, Politics, External Affairs, Science, Economics, Gender and Culture.
  139. [139]
    India protests: At least six killed in Uttar Pradesh - BBC
    Dec 20, 2019 · At least 13 people are now reported to have died overall in clashes sparked by a controversial government bill, seen by critics as anti-Muslim.
  140. [140]
    India: Protests, Attacks Over New Citizenship Law
    Apr 9, 2020 · India's discriminatory new citizenship law and policies have spurred violence against Muslims, Human Rights Watch said in a report released
  141. [141]
    Two years on, property damage in anti-CAA protests in UP
    Jan 22, 2022 · All 46 were also booked under IPC Sections 146 (rioting), 186 (obstructing a public official), 152 (using criminal force and deterring public ...Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
  142. [142]
    Return money recovered from anti-CAA protesters: Supreme Court ...
    Feb 19, 2022 · Return money recovered from anti-CAA protesters: Supreme Court to Uttar Pradesh. Amit Anand Choudhary / TNN / Updated: Feb 19, 2022, 02:49 ...
  143. [143]
    Northeast Delhi riot-hit sought Rs 153 crore as relief, panel okayed ...
    Nov 21, 2024 · Victims of the 2020 riots sought Rs 153 crore as compensation from the North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission (NEDRCC), but the latter has recommended ...
  144. [144]
    Long road to rebuilding: How riots ravaged northeast Delhi
    Mar 1, 2020 · The riots have led to property and business losses of over Rs 1,000 crore, including structural damages worth Rs 250 crore, multiple ...
  145. [145]
    CAA protest: Delhi cops report 535 cases of property damage
    Sep 22, 2022 · ... damage and award compensation relating to the ensuing riots. 1x1 polls. Police were responding to a PIL filed by an advocate and a law ...Missing: patterns incidents
  146. [146]
    Over 500 cases lodged for property damage 'during anti-CAA ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · Over 500 cases lodged for property damage 'during anti-CAA protests', HC told ... riots that broke out in north-east Delhi following the protests.
  147. [147]
    India: Deadly Force Used Against Protesters - Human Rights Watch
    Dec 23, 2019 · At least 25 people have been killed and hundreds have been arrested. Police have used excessive force only against demonstrators protesting the law, including ...
  148. [148]
    India protests: students condemn 'barbaric' police - The Guardian
    Dec 17, 2019 · Students from Jamia Millia Islamia University continue demonstrations on 17 December. 1:54. Police storm Indian university campus in violent ...
  149. [149]
    Indian police accused of targeting Muslims over anti-CAA protests
    Apr 22, 2020 · Indian police accused of targeting Muslims over anti-CAA protests. Activists arrested, others charged under anti-terror law for protesting ...
  150. [150]
    Delhi 2020 religious riots: Amnesty International accuses police of ...
    Aug 27, 2020 · Contains some violence and some upsetting scenes. Delhi riots: 'Police killed my brother'. "The riot that seemed far from spontaneous saw almost ...
  151. [151]
    More than a dozen killed, hundreds injured as New Delhi riots ...
    Police fired teargas and pellets to scatter demonstrators protesting against the citizenship law in the Jafrabad neighborhood of northeast Delhi on Tuesday. A ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  152. [152]
    Nationwide crackdown on peaceful protests against the Citizen ...
    Jan 24, 2020 · Since the passing of the Act on 11 December 2019, the country has witnessed a series of protests including in Kolkata, Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, ...
  153. [153]
    In one voice, 80000 Bengaluru citizens reject CAA - Times of India
    Dec 24, 2019 · An officer estimated that 80,000 to 90,000 people joined the protest. Three inspectors known for their skill of public interaction stayed put at ...
  154. [154]
    Rally dwarfs all previous anti-CAA stirs in Bengaluru - Deccan Herald
    Dec 23, 2019 · The 'Peace Protest' on the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) organised by the Joint Action Committee attracted close to one lakh people in the city on Monday.
  155. [155]
    Hundreds join march against CAA, NRC - The Hindu
    Dec 23, 2019 · Hundreds of youngsters, including college students, social activists, actors and filmmakers, took to the streets of Kochi on Monday.
  156. [156]
    Key road shut due to Shaheen Bagh protest reopens after 69 days
    Feb 21, 2020 · A key road near Delhi's Shaheen Bagh – where protests have been on for two months against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act CAA – was re ...
  157. [157]
    Can protesters block a road indefinitely: SC on Shaheen Bagh
    Feb 11, 2020 · Can't block roads for protest: SC on anti-CAA stir at Shaheen. The Shaheen Bagh protest has resulted in prolonged closure of a busy road ...
  158. [158]
    Shaheen Bagh Protest Blockades Excessive And Deliberate ... - NDTV
    Feb 14, 2020 · On both ends of the protest site, there are heavy traffic blockades. But has the administration been excessive in the traffic blocks and diversions, and is it ...
  159. [159]
    Anti-CAA Protest Highlights: 5 Empty Trains Set Ablaze in West Bengal
    Dec 14, 2019 · Kolkata: Protests against the Citizenship Act intensified on Saturday as mobs torched buses, set afire railway property and blockaded road ...<|separator|>
  160. [160]
    CAA protests: Violence continues unabated in UP, Bihar bandh ...
    Dec 21, 2019 · In order to enforce the day-long bandh, they squatted on railway tracks, disrupting train movement, and blocked bus terminuses at various places ...
  161. [161]
    People's march against CAA & NRC - Frontline - The Hindu
    Jan 1, 2020 · Protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens have snowballed into a mass movement across India.<|separator|>
  162. [162]
    Protests against CAA in several cities, violence in UP and Bihar
    Dec 21, 2019 · They squatted on railway tracks, disrupting train movement, and blocked bus terminuses at various places to enforce the day-long bandh. The ...
  163. [163]
    India Has Become a Gallery of Protest Art, Despite a Crackdown
    Jan 17, 2020 · The protest site at Shaheen Bagh in south Delhi has turned into a massive open-air art gallery, featuring graffiti, posters, and artwork by the people here.
  164. [164]
    The Art of Resistance: Delhi's Shaheen Bagh has turned into an ...
    Jan 23, 2020 · Even before you glimpse the women sitting under the tent in Shaheen Bagh, you see the posters depicting their iconic protest. Forty days ago ...
  165. [165]
    10 Posters At The CAA Protests In Delhi That Scream Resistance
    Dec 20, 2019 · Posters are a part of “Protest Art” that provides activists to get creative with their forms of resistance. These can be really powerful in ...Missing: strategies banners graffiti
  166. [166]
    Art in the time of CAA - The Caravan
    Mar 17, 2020 · Ambitious murals appeared on the road and on the walls of the Jamia campus, even as student protests against police violence accelerate.
  167. [167]
    Meet the artists resisting India's new citizenship law - Al Jazeera
    Jan 29, 2020 · Young artists transform public spaces to raise awareness about new law which goes against country's secular ethos.
  168. [168]
    Hinduphobic poster emerges from Shaheen Bagh: Here is what it ...
    Jan 16, 2020 · The imagery of the poster clearly points towards the establishment of Islamist supremacy over Hindus and the deep-seated Hinduphobia we have seen throughout ...
  169. [169]
    A Tale of Two Sides: Study of Protesters and Counter-protesters on ...
    In this work, we investigate the user's perception of the #CitizenshipAmendmentAct on Twitter, as the campaign unrolled with divergent discourse in the country.
  170. [170]
    The tale of two sides in the 2019 anti-CAA protest—An analytical ...
    The 2019 anti-CAA protest in India witnessed massive Twitter participation from people on both sides. It was unique compared to most online social movements.
  171. [171]
    Shaheen Bagh and the new wave of protest art that's sweeping ...
    Feb 16, 2020 · Shaheen Bagh and the new wave of protest art that's sweeping across India. From posters and murals to installations and Instagram filters ...
  172. [172]
    https://dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/16-225.pdf
  173. [173]
    Delhi Police Arrests Jamia Student Over Anti-CAA Violence In ...
    May 18, 2020 · He is a close associate of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Meeran Haider and Safoora Zargar who had been key organisers of anti-CAA protests," the ...
  174. [174]
    The story of Jamia, the “anti-national” university born of deep Indian ...
    On Dec. 15, the university's students protesting against India's new and discriminatory citizenship law were brutalised by Delhi police personnel. They ...
  175. [175]
    A year on, looking back at student protests against the citizenship law
    Dec 28, 2020 · Along with the Muslim woman at Shaheen Bagh and elsewhere, students play a key role in the public pushback against the Citizenship Amendment Act ...
  176. [176]
    How Campuses Mediate a Nationwide Upsurge against India's ...
    How Campuses Mediate a Nationwide Upsurge against India's Communalization. An Account from Jamia Millia Islamia and Shaheen Bagh in New Delhi. Jean-Thomas ...
  177. [177]
    What the students of JNU, AMU, Jamia really want - Mint
    Jan 1, 2020 · Rahim Yusuf was also one of them, protesting against the way police handled the peaceful protest against CAA and NRC at Jamia Millia Islamia on ...
  178. [178]
    Citizenship Amendment Act: The students versus the regime - BBC
    Dec 17, 2019 · The demonstrations were triggered by the perceived police brutality at two leading universities in Delhi and the northern city of Aligarh.
  179. [179]
    Campus protests over citizenship law revive bitter memories
    Mar 14, 2024 · The government's CAA announcement and subsequent unrest brought back bitter memories of the 2019-2020 unrest when police stormed the Jamia ...
  180. [180]
    Shaheen Bagh: Muslim women contesting and theorizing citizenship ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · This paper documents an important slice of global South COVID-19 history, of primarily Muslim women's protests against the Indian Government and Legislature
  181. [181]
    To better understand the Shaheen Bagh protest, we ... - The Caravan
    Jan 20, 2020 · Shaheen Bagh, a neighborhood in south Delhi, has been the site of a women-led protest against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019.<|separator|>
  182. [182]
    https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/12/793
  183. [183]
    2023 Report on International Religious Freedom: India
    Christians and Muslims were arrested under laws banning forced religious conversions, which religious groups said in some cases were used to harass and imprison ...
  184. [184]
    Indian Muslims and the Anti-CAA Protests: From Marginalization ...
    The iconic Shaheen Bagh protest was started on the December 15 and by January 2020 the protests had spread all over India and notably the template of a sit-in ...Missing: domestic | Show results with:domestic
  185. [185]
    Citizenship Protests in India: Possibilities and Challenges of ...
    Mar 9, 2020 · Muslim homes in several towns of Uttar Pradesh (UP), ruled by a notorious BJP monk, were reduced to rubble; hospitals denied treatment to bullet ...
  186. [186]
    Three Streams in the Anti-CAA Movement - The India Forum
    Jan 14, 2020 · The protestors in the north-east, the Muslim community and a vast number of agitating students are all united against the CAA.Missing: outbreak timeline<|separator|>
  187. [187]
    ED claims radical Islamist group PFI pumped in money to finance ...
    Jan 28, 2020 · ED claims radical Islamist group PFI pumped in money to finance anti-CAA protests · ED report claims Rs 120.5 crore credited to accounts related ...
  188. [188]
    ED finds 'financial links' between PFI and anti-CAA protests in UP
    Jan 27, 2020 · It is suspected and alleged that these funds were used by PFI affiliates to fuel the anti-CAA protests in various parts of Uttar Pradesh and ...
  189. [189]
    Totally baseless: Popular Front of India on claims of funding anti ...
    Jan 27, 2020 · The Kerala-based Popular Front of India has strongly rejected allegations that it had provided financial funding for protests against the ...Missing: foreign | Show results with:foreign
  190. [190]
    Indian agencies point to Pak link in anti-CAA protests
    Mar 6, 2020 · HT learns that Indian intelligence agencies have picked up cross-country electronic chatter where people believed to be Pakistani operatives ...Missing: ISI | Show results with:ISI
  191. [191]
    Anti-CAA protests: Intelligence Agencies point to a Pakistan link
    Mar 7, 2020 · The intelligence agencies have specific evidence that connects the terror-state of Pakistan to the anti-CAA protests | OpIndia News.
  192. [192]
    Those opposed to India are funding anti-CAA protests: MP - The Hindu
    Jan 27, 2020 · Those opposed to India and terrorist organisations have been funding the anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests, Member of Parliament ...Missing: foreign | Show results with:foreign
  193. [193]
    Check veracity of reports on Delhi riots or anti-CAA protests funding
    Jul 15, 2020 · The Delhi Police, in its investigation in the Delhi riots case in February 2020, have found that funds were received allegedly from Oman and the ...
  194. [194]
    Inside NewsClick Scandal: Witnesses detail Chinese funding's role ...
    May 2, 2024 · Witnesses have disclosed that rioters received funds from sources in China via the media platform to procure firearms for instigating unrest and arson.<|separator|>
  195. [195]
    Shaheen Bagh anti-CAA sit-in removed amid coronavirus lockdown
    Mar 24, 2020 · Police in New Delhi break up the longest-running protest against a new citizenship law amid coronavirus lockdown. Shaheen Bagh, India.
  196. [196]
    Supreme Court on Shaheen Bagh: 'Protests genuine but see if it can ...
    Feb 17, 2020 · The Supreme Court on Monday appointed an interlocutor to convince the Shaheen Bagh protesters to lift the road blockade and move it elsewhere.
  197. [197]
    Man pleads, but Shaheen Bagh 'protestors' don't let an ambulance ...
    Jan 29, 2020 · A woman's health deteriorated when Shaheen Bagh 'protestors' didn't let an ambulance pass during the road blockade. | OpIndia News.<|separator|>
  198. [198]
    Shaheen Bagh mediators see no reason to keep parallel road shut
    Feb 22, 2020 · Only emergency vehicles like ambulances and school buses are being allowed to pass through the stretch, the police said. "When several adjoining ...
  199. [199]
    Shaheen Bagh protests render many jobless, cause ₹150 crore loss
    Feb 22, 2020 · Over 250 shops closed and roads blocked since December: Shaheen Bagh protest cause loss of Rs 150 crores, per reports.
  200. [200]
    CAA Protest News - The Economic Times
    CAA Protest News: Read latest CAA protest News, caa protest updates, today caa protest news on Economic Times. Stay up-to-date with top caa protest news, ...
  201. [201]
    “No Internet Means No Work, No Pay, No Food”: Internet Shutdowns ...
    Jun 14, 2023 · Denying access to the internet has become a default policing tactic by Indian authorities, including to shut down protests or criticism of the government.
  202. [202]
    Anti-citizenship law protests: Latest developments and reactions
    Dec 16, 2019 · * The protesters demanded scrapping of the Citizenship(Amendment) Act, claiming it was against the spirit of Assam Accord of 1985. Protests in ...
  203. [203]
    How Polarized India Erupted Into Violence - Chatham House
    Feb 27, 2020 · The outbreak of communal violence in Delhi this week is the worst in India's capital for decades. It both reflects and will reinforce India's polarization.
  204. [204]
    69 killed in 79 days since Parliament passed Citizenship ...
    Feb 28, 2020 · ... Forensics ... killed so far in the communal riots in Delhi. Several areas in ...<|separator|>
  205. [205]
    India Votes 2024: A resurgent Hindu nationalism sets the ... - ACLED
    ACLED records over 210 clashes between Hindus and Muslims in the second term of the BJP government. The deadliest of these took place in February 2020 in the ...
  206. [206]
    Fresh violence erupts in Indian capital during anti-CAA protests
    Feb 24, 2020 · India's Home Minister Amit Shah called an urgent meeting of top officials of Delhi over the violence in Jaffrabad. People supporting the new ...
  207. [207]
    India: Biased Investigations 2 Years After Delhi Riot
    Feb 21, 2022 · The Delhi police filed 758 First Information Reports – police registrations needed to begin criminal investigations – into the riots. But ...
  208. [208]
    Why is India's Citizenship Amendment Act so controversial?
    Mar 12, 2024 · Security forces conducted flag marches in areas near Delhi's Shaheen Bagh, which became a hub of protests over the CAA in 2019 and 2020.Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  209. [209]
    Thousands given citizenship under CAA: Minister Rai - The Hindu
    Apr 2, 2025 · Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai said in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday (April 2, 2025) that “thousands were granted citizenship” under the ...
  210. [210]
    National Register of Citizens - Wikipedia
    The Government of India announced plans to implement it for the rest of the country in 2021, but it has not yet been implemented. In 2019, the Government passed ...Legal and regulatory provisions · Implementation · CAA and NRC protests
  211. [211]
    NRC not religion-based exercise, all intruders will be thrown out
    Dec 17, 2019 · Home Minister Amit Shah said that neither the NRC exercise nor the CAA will hurt Indian Muslims. "No Indian citizen needs to worry at all, no ...
  212. [212]
    citizenship, borders and law the future of nrc and caa in india ...
    Jul 19, 2025 · Moreover, the possibility of linking the CAA with a nationwide NRC has caused fears of widespread disenfranchisement, particularly among India's ...
  213. [213]
    Census 2026–27 May Trigger NPR and NRC Rollout
    Jun 8, 2025 · The 2026–27 Census may update the NPR, setting the stage for NRC. Political and legal implications remain under watch.
  214. [214]
    The Deeper Implications of India's Protests Against the Citizenship Act
    Jan 23, 2020 · In short, although the protests may continue for a while more, we can expect the government to remain firm on its policy decision. Longer Term ...
  215. [215]
    Citizenship Amendment Act - Supreme Court Observer
    The CAA makes illegal migrants eligible for citizenship if they (a) belong to the Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian community and (b) are from ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  216. [216]
    CAA: Writ Petition Summary (Indian Union Muslim League)
    The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) filed a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the constitutionality soon after the Bill was passed in ...
  217. [217]
    Over 200 Petitions Against CAA — Here Are The Arguments Five ...
    Mar 20, 2024 · A total of 237 petitions have been filed in the highest court against much talked-about CAA. Here's a look at the main contentions raised by five key ...
  218. [218]
    CAA: Legal issues and status of judicial proceedings | Explained
    Mar 14, 2024 · These petitions primarily challenge the law for violating Article 14 of the Constitution which guarantees all 'persons' (not only citizens) ...
  219. [219]
    Citizenship Amendment Act protests - Wikipedia
    The protests started in Assam on 4 December 2019, after the bill was introduced in parliament. Later on, protests erupted in Northeast India, and subsequently ...
  220. [220]
    CAA Act: SC agrees to hear plea for stay of Citizenship Amendment ...
    Mar 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court agreed to hear on March 19 pleas to stay the operation of the controversial Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), 2019 and its rules.
  221. [221]
    Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, seeks response by April 9
    Mar 19, 2024 · SC seeks response from Centre in three weeks and would take up hearing on April 9, 2024. Hearing a batch of 200 petitions seeking a stay on CAA ...
  222. [222]
    No stay on CAA Rules, Supreme Court tells Govt to respond to pleas
    Mar 19, 2024 · The bench asked the Centre to file its reply by April 2, after which the petitioners would have to respond by April 8. Appearing for the Centre, ...
  223. [223]
    Citizenship Amendment Act: Navigating Controversy, Legal Debates ...
    Aug 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court of India has been overburdened with petitions challenging the legality of the CAA, creating a complex landscape of legal ...<|separator|>
  224. [224]
    Citizenship Amendment Act | Supreme Court refuses to stay the CAA ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · The Court set a three-week deadline for the Union to respond to stay applications against the citizenship Rules; case to heard next after ...
  225. [225]
    No Stay On CAA, Top Court Asks Centre To Respond To Petitions In ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · The Supreme Court on Tuesday afternoon refused to stay implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act, or CAA.
  226. [226]
    SC refuses to stay CAA implementation, asks Centre to respond to ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · SC refuses to stay CAA implementation, asks Centre to respond to pleas within 3 weeks. The court said since the Centre is not willing to make a ...
  227. [227]
    implementation of citizenship amendment act: a legal and social ...
    May 26, 2025 · As of May 2025 the documentation has been relaxed as far as it is concerned though Supreme Court continues analyzing constitutional challenges ...
  228. [228]
    Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (Assam Accord)
    The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act which grants citizenship to Bangladeshi immigrants in Assam.
  229. [229]
    Supreme Court issues notice on plea for time-bound reverification of ...
    Sep 2, 2025 · Supreme Court issues notice on plea for time-bound reverification of Assam NRC over “large-scale errors” · The complete draft NRC was published ...
  230. [230]
    Supreme Court Admits Writ Petition for Revision of Draft NRC
    Aug 22, 2025 · New Delhi: In a significant move, the Supreme Court has admitted a writ petition for revision of the draft National Register of Citizens (NRC) ...
  231. [231]
    Supreme Court admits petition seeking re-verification of Assam NRC
    Aug 23, 2025 · New Delhi: The Supreme Court has admitted a writ petition demanding a revision of the draft National Register of Citizens (NRC) and its ...
  232. [232]
    What the Supreme Court's Section 6A verdict means for Assam
    Oct 17, 2024 · In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India on October 17 upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
  233. [233]
    [PDF] SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP - Supreme Court of India
    Oct 17, 2024 · addressed multiple petitions that had been filed challenging the exemptions provided under law, which allowed a private, non-aided.<|separator|>
  234. [234]
    Petition against Assam's Detention Camps in SC | CJP
    Petition against Assam's Detention Camps in SC Harsh Mander moves apex court to put an end to the inhuman conditions in which 'Declared Foreigners' are lodged.
  235. [235]
    India protests: PM Modi defends citizenship bill amid clashes - BBC
    Dec 22, 2019 · Prime Minister Modi accuses opposition parties of "spreading lies" about the controversial bill.Missing: domestic views support
  236. [236]
    https://www.livemint.com/news/india/caa-protests-why-are-people-opposing-the-citizenship-amendment-act-11710227537653.html
  237. [237]
    The Case of Anti-CAA Movement in India | Cosmopolitan Civil ...
    On 19 December 2019, a nation-wide bandh was called by opposition political parties to protest against CAA, and many citizens joined the anti-CAA movement to ...
  238. [238]
    CAA Protests: Why are people opposing the Citizenship Amendment ...
    Mar 12, 2024 · Sporadic protests have broken out across the country after the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government implemented the Citizenship ...
  239. [239]
    Every second polled Indian supports CAA, finds Mood of the Nation ...
    Aug 7, 2020 · Fifty per cent of those polled in the MOTN survey said they support CAA, while 15 per cent think it is discriminatory.
  240. [240]
    https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-briefing-notes/2019/12/press-briefing-india
  241. [241]
    Most Indians say CAA, NRC are attempts to divert attention from ...
    Jan 23, 2020 · The MOTN poll found that 43 per cent of the respondents believe that CAA and NRC are attempts to divert attention from serious economic issues ...
  242. [242]
    Press briefing on India | OHCHR
    Dec 13, 2019 · We call on the authorities to respect the right to peaceful assembly, and to abide by international norms and standards on the use of force ...
  243. [243]
    India defends CAA after UN rights chief approaches Supreme Court
    Mar 5, 2020 · Unfazed by criticism, India's Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi last month said his government stands by its CAA decision “despite ...
  244. [244]
    US, UN express concern about India's religion-based citizenship law
    Mar 13, 2024 · "As we said in 2019, we are concerned that India's Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019 (CAA) is fundamentally discriminatory in nature and in ...
  245. [245]
    'Concerned, closely monitoring': US after CAA implementation in India
    Mar 15, 2024 · United States expresses concerns over India's Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) implementation, focusing on religious freedom and equal treatment.
  246. [246]
    "Misplaced, Misinformed, Unwarranted": India On US' CAA Remarks
    Mar 15, 2024 · The government on Friday rejected the United States' "will closely monitor" comment on India's implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act, or CAA.
  247. [247]
    USCIRF Raises Alarm Over India's Exclusionary Citizenship ...
    Mar 25, 2024 · The CAA was initially passed in 2019; however, the Indian government delayed its implementation following large-scale, months-long protests ...
  248. [248]
    MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on India's Citizenship (Amendment ...
    Jan 22, 2020 · K. whereas the Government of India's response to the protests has included the imposition of a curfew, a shutdown of internet services, ...
  249. [249]
    Why did European Parliament delay a vote on India's CAA, Kashmir?
    Jan 31, 2020 · European Union parliamentarians have voted to postpone a vote that criticises India's Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and its lockdown in Kashmir.
  250. [250]
    India snubs EU Parliament over anti-CAA resolution, says matter is ...
    Jan 26, 2020 · India on Sunday reacted strongly to six resolutions drafted by the European Parliament lawmakers on India's Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) ...
  251. [251]
    Misinformation is being spread by Al Jazeera English regarding the ...
    Mar 11, 2024 · ▶️CAA will not take away the citizenship of any Indian citizen irrespective of religion. It's not against any single religion/ community ▶️It's an ...Missing: strip | Show results with:strip
  252. [252]
    Explained Will Muslims be affected after the Citizenship Amendment ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · On March 12, the Ministry of Home Affairs clarified that there is no bar on Muslims from anywhere in the world to seek Indian Citizenship.