Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Traffic congestion

Traffic congestion refers to the condition on roadways where the volume of vehicles surpasses the available capacity, leading to speeds significantly below free-flow levels, frequent stop-and-go movement, and prolonged travel delays.^[1] This occurs predominantly during peak hours in densely populated urban areas, where recurring bottlenecks from high demand meet limited infrastructure, compounded by non-recurring events such as accidents or roadworks. At its core, congestion embodies a classic tragedy of the commons, as roads provided at zero marginal cost invite overuse until marginal utility equilibrates with widespread delay.^[2] Globally pervasive, traffic congestion imposes substantial economic burdens, with the INRIX 2024 Global Traffic Scorecard reporting that drivers in the most affected cities, such as Istanbul and London, endure over 100 hours of annual delay, aggregating to hundreds of billions in lost productivity, excess fuel use, and heightened emissions across studied regions.^[3] Empirical analyses link these costs primarily to the value of time squandered, far outweighing fuel and environmental externalities in magnitude.^[4] Key drivers include surging urbanization and vehicle miles traveled outpacing infrastructure provision, while attempts to expand capacity frequently provoke induced demand—wherein vehicle kilometers traveled rise proportionally with added lane miles—undermining long-term relief.^[5] Notable characteristics encompass the non-linear "horseshoe" relationship in traffic flow theory, where small demand increases beyond capacity trigger disproportionate speed drops, and spatial spillovers that propagate queues across networks.^[6] Controversies persist over mitigation strategies: supply-side expansions yield transient gains eroded by behavioral responses, whereas demand-management tools like pricing demonstrate capacity to curb peaks without inducing equivalent rebounds, as evidenced in recent cordon schemes.^[7]^[8] Overall, addressing congestion demands recognition of its roots in unpriced scarcity, favoring policies that internalize usage costs over perpetual infrastructure escalation.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

Traffic congestion refers to the degradation in roadway performance occurring when traffic demand exceeds the available capacity, manifesting as reduced vehicle speeds, increased travel times, and the formation of queues.^[9] This condition is empirically distinguished from free-flow traffic by metrics such as the volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio surpassing 0.8, which signals the onset of unstable flow, or average speeds falling below 70% of free-flow speeds as outlined in standards like the Highway Capacity Manual.^[10]^[11] Key characteristics include the development of stop-and-go patterns due to flow breakdowns, where small perturbations amplify into propagating shockwaves that reduce overall throughput below capacity levels.^[1] Queues form upstream of bottlenecks, with vehicles experiencing frequent acceleration and deceleration cycles that elevate fuel consumption and emissions per mile traveled. In severe instances, congestion leads to average annual delays of 43 hours per driver in the United States, as measured across major metros in 2024.^[12] Unlike gridlock, which denotes a complete vehicular standstill across intersecting streets where no movement is feasible, standard congestion permits intermittent progress amid variability in speeds and densities.^[13] Congestion is quantified using infrastructure-based tools like inductive loop detectors embedded in pavements to capture volume and occupancy data, or probe methods such as GPS-equipped vehicles that track real-time travel times and speeds across networks.^[14]^[15]

Core Principles of Traffic Flow

Traffic flow is described by three primary macroscopic variables: density k (vehicles per unit length), average speed v, and flow rate q = k \cdot v (vehicles per unit time per lane). These variables form the basis of the fundamental diagram, which illustrates how flow varies with density, typically rising to a maximum capacity at a critical density k_c before declining toward jam density k_j, where flow approaches zero. Beyond k_c, traffic flow becomes unstable, with minor perturbations amplifying into macroscopic waves of congestion due to drivers' reactive braking behaviors.^[16]^[17] The Greenshields model, proposed in 1935, assumes a linear relationship between speed and density: v = v_f (1 - k / k_j), where v_f is free-flow speed. This yields a parabolic flow-density curve q = v_f k (1 - k / k_j), with maximum capacity q_{\max} = v_f k_j / 4 occurring at k_c = k_j / 2. Empirical validations of this model on highways show reasonable fits for uncongested conditions, though deviations occur in dense traffic where nonlinear effects dominate.^[16]^[18] Bottlenecks arise from capacity reductions, such as lane merges, on-ramps, or traffic signals, which constrain flow below upstream demand, propagating queues backward in a manner analogous to compressible fluid dynamics in pipes. Hydrodynamic models treat traffic as a continuum, where conservation of vehicles leads to shock waves at these points, with queue lengths growing proportionally to the capacity deficit.^[19]^[20] Economically, roads exhibit public good characteristics with non-excludable access and zero marginal pricing, resulting in overuse as drivers impose unpriced congestion costs on others, driving demand beyond optimal capacity during peaks. This supply-demand imbalance mirrors bottlenecks in any resource with free entry, substantiated by transport economics analyses showing marginal social costs exceeding private costs by factors of 2-10 times in urban settings.^[21]^[22]

Causes

Recurring Congestion Drivers

Recurring congestion stems from predictable exceedances of roadway capacity by demand, particularly at structural bottlenecks where infrastructure geometry limits throughput during routine peak periods. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) analyses attribute approximately 40% of U.S. congestion to such bottlenecks, including interchanges, bridges, and underpasses, where high volumes interact with reduced lane configurations to cause inherent speed reductions and delays.^[23] These sites, often numbering in the hundreds for major urban networks, experience daily queues as vehicles approach capacity limits, independent of transient events.^[24] Peak-hour surges from commuter and commercial traffic patterns amplify these constraints, with volumes routinely pushing volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios above 1, initiating flow breakdown and upstream queuing.^[25] Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) assessments classify recurring drivers—including bottlenecks and signal operations—as responsible for 40-45% of urban delay hours, contrasting with non-recurring factors like incidents.^[6] This predictable overload manifests in stable but inefficient states, such as stop-and-go waves, where even minor capacity shortfalls propagate delays across corridors. Merge and diverge zones represent critical sub-bottlenecks, as ramp inflows and outflows necessitate lane changes and speed adjustments that fragment platoons and erode mainline capacity by up to 10-15% under dense conditions.^[26] FHWA identifies these areas as primary recurring hotspots due to their role in disrupting uniform flow, with weaving sections compounding turbulence through cross-stream interactions.^[27] Similarly, suboptimal traffic signal timing at intersections adds 5% to national delays by failing to synchronize progression, resulting in excess stops and idling even at moderate volumes.^[23] Frequent access points, such as driveways in suburban arterials, introduce additional interruptions, further eroding effective capacity through repeated deceleration cycles.^[28]

Non-Recurring Triggers

Non-recurring triggers encompass unpredictable events that disrupt traffic flow beyond predictable peak-hour bottlenecks, accounting for approximately 50-60% of total urban congestion according to Federal Highway Administration analyses.^[29] These include traffic incidents, adverse weather, construction work zones, and special events, which reduce roadway capacity and amplify delays through secondary effects like rubbernecking or chain-reaction braking. Unlike recurring drivers tied to fixed infrastructure limits, these triggers erode travel time reliability, with empirical studies showing they can double variability in commute durations on affected corridors.^[30] Traffic incidents, such as crashes, vehicle breakdowns, and debris, represent the predominant non-recurring cause, contributing 13-30% of total peak-period delay based on loop detector and simulation data from major U.S. metros.^[31] These events often block lanes abruptly, triggering upstream queues that propagate as shockwaves; minor perturbations, like a single braking vehicle, can induce "phantom jams" where density waves travel backward at 15-20 km/h, as observed in New York City loop detector records spanning multiple years.^[32] In high-volume settings, such incidents exacerbate base flows, with clearance times averaging 30-60 minutes for multi-vehicle collisions, per incident management logs.^[33] Adverse weather further diminishes capacity, with rainfall exceeding 0.25 inches per hour reducing freeway throughput by 10-17% and snowfall over 0.5 inches per hour by 19-27%, according to midwestern U.S. sensor data analyses.^[34] Snow and ice not only slow speeds—by 5-40% in heavy conditions—but also heighten crash risks, compounding delays through slick surfaces and visibility loss.^[35] Work zones, involving lane closures for maintenance or construction, similarly constrict capacity by 20-50% depending on taper length and merging dynamics, with national estimates linking them to 10% of non-incident disruptions.^[36] Special events, including accidents or gatherings, propagate disruptions via demand surges or blockages, often forming feedback loops where initial slowdowns induce widespread braking waves. Post-pandemic recovery has seen non-recurring impacts rebound alongside office returns, with U.S. office visitation rising 10.7% year-over-year in mid-2025, correlating to elevated incident volumes on commuter routes as traffic densities normalized.^[37] This resurgence underscores how reduced volumes during COVID-era remote work (2020-2022) had temporarily curbed such triggers, only for baseline flows to restore vulnerability by 2024.^[6]

Underlying Socioeconomic Factors

Agglomeration economies in urban areas drive traffic demand beyond physical infrastructure capacity, as concentrated employment and income opportunities amplify interpersonal interactions and commuting needs. Empirical analyses reveal that congestion costs scale superlinearly with city population, with a population elasticity of approximately 0.04 amplifying urban costs through intensified road usage.^[38] Studies of American urban areas further identify population size as a key scale factor exacerbating congestion, independent of local policy interventions, due to the nonlinear growth in trip generation from economic activity clustering.^[39] This dynamic persists even as road networks expand linearly, leading to persistent capacity shortfalls where a 1% population increase correlates with disproportionate rises in vehicle miles traveled (VMT), often exceeding 1.15% in scaling models.^[40] Zoning regulations that enforce separation of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses contribute to predictable peak-hour surges by necessitating longer commutes between home and work. This spatial mismatch induces concentrated travel demand during morning and evening rushes, as evidenced by transportation planning reviews linking such policies to heightened congestion vulnerability.^[41] Efforts to mitigate this through mixed-use developments have yielded mixed empirical results; while some analyses report VMT reductions of up to one-third in select regions, broader evidence indicates limited overall impact on solo driving rates, which remain above 75% for U.S. commutes despite decades of urban planning incentives for density and integration.^[42] The persistence of single-occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips at 73-76% of work commutes underscores that land-use reforms alone fail to alter entrenched incentives for private car use amid separated activity centers. In developing economies, rapid vehicle ownership growth intensifies congestion as rising incomes enable mass motorization, outpacing infrastructure development. Ownership rates, though starting low, surge with economic progress, leading to acute gridlock in cities where vehicle fleets double or more within decades; for instance, non-OECD countries saw petroleum consumption for transport rise sharply post-2000 due to this trend.^[43] Global data from the 2025 TomTom Traffic Index confirm post-pandemic recovery amplified this, with vehicle volumes and travel times increasing across most urban cores, reflecting a 5-10% rebound in VKT in many regions as remote work wanes and ownership expands.^[44]^[3] In parallel, congestion in these areas often exceeds that in wealthier nations due to inadequate road quality and enforcement, separating developmental trajectories where motorization fuels growth but erodes mobility efficiency.^[45]

Modeling and Prediction

Fundamental Traffic Models

Macroscopic traffic flow models treat vehicles as a compressible fluid, aggregating individual behaviors into continuum variables such as density (vehicles per kilometer), flow (vehicles per hour), and average speed, governed by conservation laws. The Lighthill-Whitham-Richards (LWR) model exemplifies this approach, deriving traffic dynamics from the continuity equation ∂ρ/∂t + ∂q/∂x = 0, where q = ρ v(ρ) follows a fundamental diagram relating flow to density, enabling simulation of wave propagation and congestion onset without stochastic elements.^[46] ^[47] In contrast, microscopic models resolve individual vehicle trajectories, capturing heterogeneity and local interactions that precipitate breakdowns. The Nagel-Schreckenberg cellular automaton discretizes roads into cells and updates vehicle positions via rules for acceleration, deceleration to avoid collisions, and probabilistic slowing to represent driver variability, reliably reproducing stop-and-go waves and capacity drops at high densities.^[48] Queueing theory complements these by modeling intersection delays; the M/M/1 queue assumes Poisson arrivals (λ) and exponential service times (μ), yielding average delay W = 1/(μ - λ) for λ < μ, applicable to signalized junctions where capacity constraints induce backups.^[49] Link-level delays in networks arise from volume exceeding capacity, formalized by the Bureau of Public Roads (BPR) function: travel time t = t_0 [1 + α (v/c)^β], with standard parameters α = 0.15 and β = 4, where t_0 is free-flow time, v is volume, and c is capacity; this deterministic curve shows sharp delay increases beyond v/c ≈ 0.8, reflecting saturation effects.^[50] Congestion onset hinges on critical density thresholds, typically 25 vehicles per kilometer per lane, beyond which small perturbations amplify into instabilities due to reduced headways and synchronization losses, as validated empirically via loop detectors in New York City revealing abrupt jamming transitions from localized clusters.^[20] ^[32] ![Speed-flow horseshoe diagram illustrating macroscopic traffic states][center] These frameworks distinguish deterministic flow laws—emphasizing capacity limits and phase transitions—from probabilistic extensions, providing causal insights into how density-driven feedbacks, rather than random events alone, trigger widespread congestion.^[20]

Empirical Simulation Techniques

Microsimulation models, such as VISSIM and AIMSUN, employ empirical data to replicate individual vehicle trajectories and driver behaviors, facilitating detailed forecasts of congestion propagation in urban networks. These tools calibrate parameters like acceleration, lane-changing, and gap acceptance using observed data from congested arterials and freeways, enabling scenario testing for bottlenecks and spillbacks.^[51]^[52] Real-time inputs from GPS probe vehicles and automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) systems enhance accuracy, as demonstrated in INRIX's machine learning models that predict speeds across global road hierarchies by analyzing historical patterns and live feeds.^[53] For instance, INRIX integrates such data to forecast 2024-2025 trends, projecting sustained delays amid rising vehicle miles traveled.^[3] Macroscopic dynamic assignment models aggregate empirical origin-destination (OD) matrices into time-sliced frameworks, simulating network-wide flow evolution and congestion waves via dynamic traffic assignment (DTA). These models process OD estimates derived from cell phone records and traffic counts, assigning paths based on evolving link costs to predict propagation from incidents or peaks.^[54]^[55] Validation relies on benchmarks like annual delay metrics; for example, U.S. drivers averaged 43 hours lost in 2024, aligning simulated outputs with probe-derived indices when calibrated against such aggregates.^[12] Despite these advances, empirical simulations face constraints in accounting for human variability, often underestimating induced demand where capacity expansions elicit latent trips, amplifying long-term congestion beyond initial forecasts.^[56] Integration of autonomous vehicles (AVs) poses further challenges, as models struggle to parameterize cooperative maneuvers or mode shifts without comprehensive trajectory datasets, leading to optimistic capacity assumptions unverified by current mixed-traffic empirics.^[57] Calibration gaps persist in rare events, where stochastic human responses—such as erratic merging—deviate from averaged behaviors, limiting predictive fidelity for extreme propagation.^[58]

Impacts

Economic Consequences

Traffic congestion generates substantial economic losses through valuation of time wasted, excess fuel expenditures, and diminished operational efficiency. In the United States, the total cost exceeded $74 billion in 2024, stemming primarily from over four billion hours of driver time lost in delays.^[3] This equates to an average of 43 hours per driver—roughly one full work week—valued at $771 per individual based on typical wage rates.^[12] These figures mark a 1.7% increase from 2023, reflecting persistent post-pandemic travel recovery and urban density pressures.^[12] Freight transport bears a disproportionate burden, with highway congestion imposing $108.8 billion in added costs on the U.S. trucking sector as of 2022 data, the latest comprehensive assessment available.^[59] Such delays elevate logistics expenses through idling fuel burn, accelerated vehicle depreciation, and scheduling disruptions, which propagate upstream to supply chain inefficiencies and higher consumer prices for goods. In urban exemplars like New York City, drivers logged over 24 billion vehicle-miles in 2024 amid ongoing congestion, underscoring limited short-term relief from demand-management measures like pricing tolls.^[60] Beyond direct outlays, congestion erodes broader productivity by constraining labor mobility and commerce velocity. Empirical analyses of U.S. metropolitan areas reveal that elevated delay levels correlate with subdued productivity growth, as firms face higher coordination costs and reduced access to clustered talent pools.^[61] For instance, regions with intensified congestion exhibit slower job expansion and diminished economic output, attributable to barriers in just-in-time delivery and inter-firm collaboration essential for agglomeration economies.^[62] These dynamics amplify opportunity costs, diverting resources from innovation to mere traversal and thereby hindering long-term regional competitiveness.^[63]

Public Health and Safety Ramifications

Traffic congestion heightens the incidence of rear-end collisions, which often result from sudden braking and shockwave propagation in stop-and-go queues.^[64] Analyses of naturalistic driving data confirm that such crashes and near-crashes predominate during congested periods, with following too closely and inadequate scanning as key precursors.^[65] While overall crash frequency may rise modestly, the severity of injuries in these low-speed impacts remains a primary safety concern, distinct from high-speed rural incidents.^[66] Delays from congestion impair emergency response efficacy, exacerbating injury and mortality risks for time-sensitive medical cases. A 2025 survey of first-responder agencies revealed that 49.5% experienced slower response times in 2024 compared to 2023, attributing much of the degradation to urban traffic impediments.^[67] Empirical assessments quantify average added delays at nearly 10 minutes per call in congested environments, hindering ambulance transit and correlating with poorer patient outcomes in cardiac and trauma scenarios.^[68]^[69] Prolonged queuing fosters driver frustration, empirically tied to elevated road rage manifestations that precipitate hazardous maneuvers. Surveys indicate aggressive driving behaviors, including tailgating and improper lane changes, occur in over 50% of road rage-linked fatal crashes, with congestion as a documented stressor amplifying such volatility.^[70] Up to one-third of drivers self-report perpetrating aggressive acts, often in dense traffic where perceived delays intensify physiological stress responses like cortisol spikes, indirectly heightening crash vulnerability.^[71] Idling vehicles in jams elevate in-cabin exposure to exhaust particulates, contributing to respiratory irritation and cardiovascular strain for occupants.^[72] However, these pollution effects, while verifiable in heightened PM2.5 concentrations during peaks, secondary to the direct toll of collision-induced trauma, which accounts for the bulk of congestion-attributable injuries and fatalities.^[73] Autonomous vehicle deployments since 2023 offer preliminary mitigation against non-recurring crash triggers in pilots, with data showing 88% fewer serious injury incidents relative to human-operated equivalents.^[74] Waymo's operational metrics further document 80-90% reductions in overall accidents per mile, potentially curtailing chain-reaction pileups that sustain queues.^[75] Such advancements, scaled beyond tests, could diminish human-error dominated safety deficits inherent to congested flows.^[76]

Environmental Realities

Traffic congestion elevates fuel consumption and emissions per vehicle-mile traveled (VMT) due to idling and stop-start cycles, with empirical models indicating 10-50% higher energy use in congested versus free-flow conditions.^[77] Local concentrations of NOx and CO increase by up to 48% of total health impacts from urban traffic, as slow speeds and stagnation hinder pollutant dispersion.^[78] While reduced speeds marginally lower aerodynamic drag, this effect is outweighed by idling inefficiencies, refuting notions that congestion conserves fuel overall; real-world data link higher congestion levels directly to greater CO2 output per VMT.^[79] Total emissions in congested networks rise not only from per-VMT penalties but also from sustained VMT volumes, yielding net environmental costs rather than savings.^[80] Micromobility adoption grew 17% year-over-year across 10 cities analyzed in the 2024 INRIX Global Traffic Scorecard, yet passenger cars remain predominant, accounting for most congestion-induced emissions amid persistent urban car dependency.^[3] Claims favoring transit mode shifts for emission cuts warrant scrutiny given systemic underutilization; U.S. bus load factors averaged 13.5% in 2022, far below capacity, implying limited displacement of vehicle trips and thus marginal CO2 reductions from such policies.^[81] Electric vehicles mitigate tailpipe NOx and PM2.5 entirely while halving primary energy use compared to gasoline counterparts, even under grid-dependent charging.^[82] In congestion, however, EVs incur battery drain from idling and reduced regenerative braking efficacy, preserving per-VMT inefficiencies that flow disruptions amplify.^[83] Data consistently prioritize flow optimization—via adaptive signals or eco-driving—over mode substitutions, with studies showing 16-40% CO2 cuts from smoothed traffic without assuming shifts to underused alternatives.^[84]^[85]

Historical Development

Pre-Automobile Urban Constraints

In the 19th century, major urban centers like London grappled with traffic constraints rooted in non-motorized transport, where horse-drawn carts, carriages, and omnibuses competed for space on narrow, unpaved or cobblestoned streets amid growing commercial activity and population densities exceeding 100,000 residents per square mile in core districts. Empirical records from the period, including parliamentary reports and illustrations, describe frequent blockages in commercial hubs such as the City of London and Westminster, where trade volumes—facilitated by expanding rail freight links—overwhelmed street capacities, leading to hours-long delays for goods and passengers.^[86]^[87]^[88] These constraints stemmed from fundamental limits of animal-powered mobility, with typical speeds for loaded carts averaging 4-6 miles per hour under optimal conditions, further reduced by urban regulations capping velocities at 2-4 mph in congested towns to prevent collisions with pedestrians and rival vehicles. By the 1890s, London's streets supported over 50,000 horses daily, generating bottlenecks exacerbated by the animals' need for frequent stops and the physical bulk of wagons, which occupied disproportionate road space relative to throughput—often halting flows entirely during peak market hours.^[89]^[90]^[88] The introduction of railways from the 1830s onward, including surface commuter lines and the 1863 opening of the London Underground, partially mitigated these pressures by diverting longer-distance flows to fixed tracks, enabling suburban expansion and reducing some radial congestion. However, central interchanges and last-mile distribution hubs persisted as chokepoints, as horse traffic remained indispensable for intra-urban goods movement and feeder services, underscoring the causal continuity of density-driven limits independent of propulsion technology.^[91]^[92]^[93]

Post-1900 Expansion and Intensification

The proliferation of automobiles in the United States during the 1920s outpaced road infrastructure development, laying the groundwork for intensified urban congestion. Registered motor vehicles grew from about 8 million in 1920 to roughly 26 million by 1929, driven by falling production costs and rising consumer affordability following Henry Ford's assembly line innovations. Meanwhile, total public road mileage increased modestly from approximately 2.9 million miles in 1921 to 3.3 million miles in 1930, with improved and paved roads expanding more substantially but still insufficient to accommodate the vehicle surge, resulting in bottlenecks in growing cities like New York and Los Angeles. This imbalance amplified travel demand as automobiles enabled longer personal trips, straining existing networks originally designed for horses and streetcars.^[94]^[95]^[96] Post-World War II suburbanization further exacerbated congestion through automobile-dependent sprawl. Federal policies, including low-interest loans via the GI Bill and expansive zoning ordinances that mandated single-use residential zones, incentivized outward migration from city centers, doubling the suburban population between 1947 and 1953. This shift increased average commuting distances, with many households now traveling 10-20 miles daily to urban jobs, overwhelming arterial roads. In response to peaking congestion—evident in reports of gridlock in metropolitan areas—the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 launched the Interstate Highway System, authorizing 41,000 miles of limited-access roads to facilitate higher-capacity travel, though construction lagged initial demand amid funding and land acquisition delays.^[97]^[98] Recent patterns underscore persistent demand growth outstripping supply. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the US plummeted by about 13% in 2020 due to COVID-19 lockdowns, marking the lowest levels since 2002, but rebounded sharply thereafter, surpassing pre-pandemic figures to reach a record 3.279 trillion miles in 2024 as remote work declined and economic activity resumed. This resurgence, coupled with limited highway expansions, has restored and intensified congestion in sprawling metro regions, where vehicle ownership rates exceed one per adult in most states.^[99]^[100] Globally, similar dynamics emerged in rapidly urbanizing economies. In China, urbanization rates climbed from 36% in 2000 to over 60% by 2020, spurring a vehicle fleet expansion to 281 million by 2019 and road networks from 1.67 million kilometers to 5.01 million kilometers, yet congestion indices in megacities like Beijing surged, with average delays tripling in major hubs during peak hours due to inadequate infrastructure scaling against induced sprawl and freight demands.^[101]^[102]

Mitigation Approaches

Infrastructure Augmentation

Infrastructure augmentation, primarily through adding lanes, constructing bypasses, or expanding highway networks, aims to increase roadway capacity to absorb growing vehicle volumes and alleviate bottlenecks. Empirical analyses indicate that such expansions yield measurable short-term reductions in congestion, often within the first few years post-completion. For instance, a study of U.S. highway widenings found considerable decreases in congestion levels over a six-year horizon following implementation, attributing this to temporarily elevated throughput before behavioral adjustments occur.^[103] Similarly, Federal Highway Administration evaluations of capacity-enhancing strategies, including lane additions, report potential travel time savings of up to 20 percent and temporary capacity uplifts of 25 percent on affected segments.^[104] These gains stem from basic traffic flow dynamics, where added supply directly eases density until demand responds. However, long-term efficacy is undermined by induced demand, wherein expanded capacity lowers effective travel costs, prompting increased vehicle miles traveled (VMT) that erode initial benefits. Meta-analyses of U.S. roadway projects consistently show elasticities near or exceeding 1.0, meaning a 1 percent increase in lane miles induces roughly equivalent VMT growth over time, returning congestion to pre-expansion levels or worse.^[105] This phenomenon arises from multiple channels: suppressed trips becoming viable, route substitutions from parallel roads, and land-use shifts extending trip lengths as development sprawls toward new accessibility.^[106] Case studies, such as expansions on major U.S. interstates, illustrate this pattern; while short-term benefit-cost ratios may hover around 1.2:1 based on immediate delay reductions, sustained underinvestment in parallel capacity—coupled with induced traffic—leads to planning shortfalls where total delay hours rebound despite added infrastructure.^[107] Critiques of augmentation strategies highlight systemic failures in anticipating these dynamics, often rooted in optimistic traffic forecasts that overlook causal feedbacks from cheaper driving. Government reports from agencies like the FHWA acknowledge that while targeted expansions can provide localized relief, broader network underinvestment exacerbates rebound effects, with U.S. freeway lane-miles growing faster than population yet delay hours surging 144 percent in major metros from the 1980s to 2010s.^[108] Proponents argue for bundled approaches with land-use controls to mitigate induction, but evidence suggests pure capacity plays alone fail to deliver enduring congestion abatement without addressing demand elasticity.^[109]

Market-Oriented Demand Controls

Market-oriented demand controls address traffic congestion by leveraging price signals to ration limited road capacity, compelling drivers to internalize the marginal external costs of their travel decisions, such as added delays imposed on others. Unlike command-and-control regulations that impose blanket restrictions regardless of individual circumstances, pricing mechanisms allocate usage to those valuing it most highly through voluntary adjustments in timing, routing, or mode, thereby minimizing deadweight loss and enhancing overall welfare. This approach aligns with economic first-principles of scarcity, where unpriced common-pool resources like roadways lead to overuse, and empirical implementations demonstrate sustained reductions in peak-period volumes without prohibiting vehicle access.^[110]^[111] Congestion pricing, often implemented via dynamic tolls varying by time and location, exemplifies this strategy by charging fees that approximate the congestion externality. Singapore's Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) system, operational since 1998, targets peak-hour flows with adjustable gantries, achieving initial goals of 25-30% reductions in targeted traffic volumes upon full rollout, with subsequent adjustments maintaining average speeds above 30 km/h in priced zones. Stockholm's 2006 congestion charge, applied to cordon crossings during peak periods, yielded an immediate 20% drop in taxed vehicle traffic, a figure that has held or slightly increased over time after accounting for external factors like economic growth. These outcomes reflect drivers' elastic responses—shifting 20-30% of trips off-peak or to alternatives—rather than coerced compliance, preserving personal mobility while curbing excess demand.^[112]^[113] New York City's congestion pricing program, launched in January 2025 with a $9 peak toll for passenger vehicles entering Manhattan's central business district, registered an approximate 10% decline in daily vehicle entries into the zone within initial months, alongside 8-13% faster speeds across local, arterial, and highway segments. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) fees extend this logic nationwide by taxing usage per mile, potentially with congestion multipliers, to better match revenues with wear-and-maintenance costs and discourage low-value trips; pilots indicate such systems could integrate dynamic pricing for peak avoidance, outperforming flat fuel taxes in signaling true marginal costs.^[114]^[115]^[116] Recent analyses affirm pricing's superiority over subsidies for internalizing externalities, as tolls directly penalize congestion generation while generating revenue for infrastructure, avoiding the distortions of subsidizing alternatives like transit that may not address root demand imbalances. A 2025 review frames congestion pricing as a Pigouvian tax optimally correcting overuse externalities, yielding efficiency gains absent in subsidy regimes that fail to vary with real-time scarcity. Empirical contrasts with command measures, such as driving restrictions, show pricing preserves higher-value trips and boosts net social benefits by 10-20% more through behavioral incentives.^[117]^[118]

Regulatory and Technological Interventions

Adaptive traffic signal control systems, which dynamically adjust signal timings based on real-time traffic detection via sensors and algorithms, have demonstrated measurable reductions in intersection delays. Evaluations by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration indicate improvements in travel time and control delay by approximately 10-15% across multiple deployments, with second-generation systems achieving up to 25% reductions in some empirical studies.^[119]^[120] These gains stem from responsive phasing that minimizes idle times during variable flow, though effectiveness depends on integration with broader intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and accurate data inputs. Real-time navigation applications, such as Waze, leverage crowdsourced data to suggest alternative routes, potentially alleviating localized bottlenecks by distributing flows. However, this rerouting often diffuses congestion to underutilized residential or arterial streets not designed for surges, exacerbating issues in those areas as reported in analyses of urban navigation impacts. Such shifts raise equity concerns, as traffic burdens are redistributed unevenly—highways decongest at the expense of quieter neighborhoods lacking infrastructure to handle redirected volumes, with minimal net reduction in system-wide delays.^[121]^[122] Autonomous vehicles (AVs) promise capacity enhancements through coordinated maneuvers like platooning, where vehicles maintain tight formations via vehicle-to-vehicle communication, reducing headways and enabling smoother merges. Microscopic simulations of freeway scenarios project throughput increases of 20-50% under mixed traffic conditions with moderate AV penetration, attributed to diminished human variability in acceleration and gap acceptance.^[123]^[124] Pilot programs from 2023 to 2025, including those by Tesla with Autopilot engagement, have logged crash rates as low as one per 5-7 million miles—far below the U.S. average of one per 0.67 million—indicating reliability gains that could indirectly ease congestion by sustaining higher speeds and fewer disruptions.^[125] Regulatory frameworks, however, impede AV deployment critical for realizing these benefits, with fragmented state-level testing rules and federal liability uncertainties causing delays in scaling pilots. European analyses highlight how stringent approval processes under regulations like EU 2022/1426 have postponed full autonomy rollouts, limiting empirical validation of congestion-relief potentials in real networks.^[126]^[127] Such barriers prioritize perceived safety over data-driven progress, despite AVs' superior incident avoidance in controlled trials.

Debates and Controversies

Induced Demand Dynamics

Empirical analyses of road capacity expansions reveal significant induced demand, where increased supply correlates with higher vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) or vehicle miles traveled (VMT). A seminal study by Duranton and Turner (2011) examined U.S. metropolitan areas and estimated the long-run elasticity of VKT with respect to highway lane-kilometers at approximately 1.0, indicating that a 10% increase in capacity generates roughly 10% more traffic volume over time, after accounting for land-use adjustments and network effects. Subsequent meta-reviews, such as the U.K. Department for Transport's evidence synthesis, report long-run elasticities ranging from 0.4 to 0.8 across international datasets, with a 10% capacity addition typically inducing 4-8% additional demand through mechanisms like trip generation, mode shifts from alternatives, and extended trip lengths.^[128] These findings hold in urban contexts, as evidenced by a Budapest case study tracking eight major expansions over five decades, which yielded an average elasticity of 0.5.^[106] Post-expansion rebounds are consistently documented in longitudinal data, where initial reductions in congestion dissipate as induced traffic fills the new capacity, often within 3-5 years. For instance, Hymel, Small, and Van Dender (2010) analyzed U.S. state-level data and found elasticities around 0.6-0.8 for VMT response to interstate expansions, confirming that rebound effects offset 60-80% of anticipated time savings.^[129] Meta-analyses synthesizing dozens of such studies affirm this pattern, attributing it not to mere redistribution but net VMT growth, with peer-reviewed estimates robust to controls for economic growth and population density.^[130] While some critiques question higher-end elasticities for potential omitted variables like parallel transit improvements, the consensus across econometric models supports partial-to-full induction, challenging assumptions of permanent relief from supply-side interventions alone.^[131] Causal realism, grounded in economic first principles, elucidates this phenomenon: roadways function as common-pool resources with zero marginal user cost, leading added capacity to lower the time-based price of travel and attract suppressed demand until congestion equilibrates at pre-expansion delay levels. This mirrors supply expansions in unpriced markets, where equilibrium quantity rises to absorb the increment, as formalized in traffic flow models like the Bureau of Public Roads function, which exhibits downward-sloping speed-flow curves converging to maximum throughput before steep congestion onset.^[132] Absent pricing to ration usage—such as congestion tolls that internalize externalities—the "build it and they will come" outcome emerges predictably from rational behavioral responses, including latent trips previously deterred by high costs, rather than exogenous inevitability. Empirical validation of these dynamics underscores the limitations of uncoordinated capacity growth in achieving sustained throughput gains.

Transit Promotion Critiques

Public transit systems in the United States capture less than 5% of work commutes nationwide, with the share falling to 4.2% based on 2017-2021 American Community Survey data, despite annual subsidies exceeding $69 billion in 2022 that equate to over $200 per capita.^[133]^[134] These figures underscore the limited appeal of fixed-route transit in sprawling metropolitan areas, where average trip lengths and low densities favor the point-to-point efficiency of solo driving over scheduled services that require walking to stops and transfers.^[135] In suburban and exurban contexts, transit's capacity utilization often remains below 20% during peak hours outside core urban districts, rendering it uneconomical compared to automobiles that achieve higher speeds and direct routing without reliance on centralized hubs.^[135] Critics contend that transit promotion reflects institutional biases in planning agencies, which prioritize rail and bus investments over evidence of consumer demand for personal vehicles' flexibility in timing, routing, and capacity for goods or family transport.^[136] Policy analyst Randal O'Toole has argued that such systems impose opportunity costs by diverting funds from road maintenance or tax relief, yielding minimal congestion relief given transit's marginal mode-share gains even after decades of expansion.^[135] These critiques highlight causal mismatches: subsidies fail to overcome inherent disadvantages in low-density environments, where first-mile/last-mile access dominates travel time, and where households value the autonomy of private options over collective scheduling.^[137] The rise of remote work since 2020 has intensified these challenges, with transit ridership recovering to only 79% of pre-pandemic levels by 2023 amid persistent hybrid schedules that eliminate peak-hour commutes.^[138] Studies indicate that sustained remote work reduces urban transit demand by up to 10-20% in commuter-heavy metros, as workers forgo daily trips, further eroding financial viability without adaptive shifts toward flexible, on-demand services.^[139]^[140] This trend aligns with empirical preferences for private mobility, which supports economic productivity through unrestricted travel patterns unburdened by system-wide dependencies.^[136]

Pricing Mechanism Disputes

Critics of congestion pricing often argue that it imposes a regressive burden on lower-income drivers who lack alternatives to personal vehicles, potentially exacerbating socioeconomic inequities without sufficient compensatory measures.^[141] However, empirical analyses indicate that while the direct toll may disproportionately affect low-income households initially, revenue-neutral mechanisms such as rebates or reinvestments in public transit can mitigate these effects, as demonstrated in Stockholm's program where toll revenues funded transit expansions that improved accessibility for non-drivers.^[142] In Stockholm, post-implementation equity evaluations revealed net welfare gains across income groups when revenues were recycled into transport improvements, countering vertical regressivity concerns.^[143] Disputes also center on perceived overestimation of driver evasion and underappreciation of indirect benefits to low-income commuters, such as reduced travel times on buses and other shared modes due to decongested roads. In New York City, following the January 2025 implementation, initial data showed a 7.5% traffic reduction and smoother flows on key arteries, enabling faster bus services that primarily serve lower-income riders, despite vocal opposition from drivers fearing evasion loopholes that proved minimal in practice.^[144] Congestion levels in the priced zone dropped from 24.7% to 16.9% in early 2025 compared to the prior year, yielding time savings that offset costs for transit-dependent populations.^[145] Broader empirical evidence from implementations in cities like London and Singapore underscores efficacy, with traffic reductions of 10-30% in priced zones leading to overall productivity gains that surpass localized equity grievances when revenues support inclusive infrastructure.^[146] These outcomes affirm that while disputes highlight valid implementation challenges, data-driven adjustments like targeted rebates ensure pricing mechanisms deliver net societal benefits without undue harm to vulnerable groups.^[147]

Global Patterns

Patterns in High-Income Economies

In high-income economies, traffic congestion persists despite substantial investments in road infrastructure and public transit, with average annual delays ranging from 40 to over 100 hours per driver in major urban areas. The INRIX 2024 Global Traffic Scorecard reports that U.S. drivers lost 43 hours to congestion in 2024, costing $771 per driver in time and productivity, while nationwide losses totaled $74 billion.^[12] In Europe, congestion levels vary but remain elevated; for instance, London drivers faced 101 hours of delay, the highest in the region and fifth globally, reflecting a 2% increase from prior years despite demand-management measures.^[148] These figures underscore a pattern where highway expansions often lead to recurring bottlenecks through induced demand, as added capacity attracts more vehicles without addressing underlying overuse.^[3] Congestion pricing in select Western cities has yielded measurable reductions, contrasting with broader reliance on supply-side infrastructure cycles. London's 2003 congestion charge initially cut traffic volumes by 30% and delays by similar margins within the zone, generating revenue for transit improvements while improving air quality.^[149] ^[150] Comparable schemes in Stockholm achieved 20-25% drops in peak-hour traffic, though long-term adherence to caps requires ongoing enforcement amid rebounding volumes.^[149] However, such targeted interventions cover limited areas, leaving peripheral sprawl and intercity routes vulnerable to unmanaged growth, as evidenced by persistent gridlock on London's M25 orbital despite expansions.^[148] In denser high-income nations like Japan and Germany, integrated rail networks reduce car dependency in cores, yet suburban sprawl sustains automobile reliance and congestion hotspots. TomTom's 2024 Traffic Index highlights Japan's urban areas, such as Sapporo, experiencing severe peak-day delays, while Germany's autobahns face bottlenecks near cities despite no general speed limits.^[151] Post-COVID recovery amplified these issues, with a 9% U.S. congestion rise and similar European rebounds as hybrid work patterns and e-commerce deliveries increased variable demand, pushing delays beyond pre-2020 baselines in many metros.^[152] ^[151]

Challenges in Rapidly Urbanizing Regions

Rapidly urbanizing regions in Asia and Africa experience acute traffic congestion as population inflows and vehicle ownership surge ahead of infrastructure expansion, often due to institutional delays in land acquisition, funding allocation, and regulatory enforcement that hinder timely road network upgrades. In India, urban centers like Hyderabad have seen vehicle density escalate from approximately 6,500 vehicles per kilometer in 2019 to nearly 9,500 by 2025, imposing severe strain on roadways already plagued by inadequate maintenance and pothole-ridden surfaces that reduce effective capacity.^[153]^[154] Similarly, Mumbai reports a private car density of 650 per kilometer of road, contributing to persistent gridlock amid governance bottlenecks in expanding arterial routes.^[155] In Indonesia, Jakarta exemplifies these dynamics, with vehicle numbers growing at 9% annually—adding over 1,100 new vehicles daily—and resulting in annual congestion costs equivalent to IDR 56 trillion (about USD 3.6 billion) from fuel waste and lost productivity.^[156]^[157] The city's ranking as the 19th most congested globally underscores how rapid agglomeration, without commensurate capacity investments, yields widespread gridlock, as empirical analyses link high urban densities to diminished mobility and economic output in developing contexts.^[158]^[159] Informal transport modes, prevalent in these areas, further exacerbate disorganized flows by competing for limited road space without structured scheduling or enforcement.^[160] China's 2020s smart city initiatives offer partial countermeasures, with pilots like Hangzhou's AI-driven City Brain reducing peak-hour delays by 11-20% through adaptive signaling, yet scaling remains uneven due to variances in local governance execution and data integration across sprawling metropolises.^[161]^[162] As of 2025, electric vehicle adoption in these regions proceeds unevenly, hampered by income disparities and charging infrastructure shortfalls that can create localized bottlenecks rather than easing overall congestion.^[163]^[164] Governance lags, including slow policy responses to urbanization pressures, thus perpetuate a cycle where economic clustering benefits are eroded by transport inefficiencies.^[165]^[166]

References

[1]
Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Trends and Advanced Strategies ...
Mar 23, 2020 · congestion usually relates to an excess of vehicles on a portion of roadway at a particular time resulting in speeds that are slower—sometimes ...
[2]
Traffic Congestion - UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies
Sep 29, 2025 · Roads get congested because they are free to use. This fact is the central concept to understanding traffic congestion. Without it, nothing else ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
INRIX 2024 Global Traffic Scorecard
Our Global Traffic Scorecard provides detailed of transportation insights and ranks the world's most congested cities. View our global traffic scorecard ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[4]
Evaluation of the public health impacts of traffic congestion
Overall, time wasted accounts for the bulk of the economic cost associated with traffic congestion, and the cost of time wasted increases from $56 billion in ...<|separator|>
[5]
The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities
We investigate the effect of lane kilometers of roads on vehicle-kilometers traveled (VKT) in US cities. VKT increases proportionately to roadway lane ...
[6]
[PDF] Congestion Pie Chart for Different Sources of Congestion
Traffic congestion – both recurring and non-recurring – is caused by a variety of factors and sources. Recurring congestion stems from capacity constraints, ...
[7]
The Short-Run Effects of Congestion Pricing in New York City | NBER
Mar 13, 2025 · We study the impacts of New York City's Central Business District (CBD) Tolling Program, the first cordon-based congestion pricing scheme in ...
[8]
Measuring induced demand for vehicle travel in urban areas
These findings offer persuasive evidence supporting the fundamental law of traffic congestion, and indicate that capacity expansion is not a viable long ...
[9]
Chapter 1 Page 2 - Freeway Management and Operations Handbook
Feb 17, 2017 · In the simplest terms, highway congestion results when traffic demand approaches or exceeds the available capacity of the highway system. As ...
[10]
Congestion Measures | KYTC - Kentucky.gov
LOS is based on a volume to capacity (v/c) ratio and has long been used as the primary measure of congestion for planning purposes. See the Highway Capacity ...
[11]
Traffic Congestion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Traffic congestion is defined as the delay experienced when traffic demand exceeds the capacity of a roadway section, particularly at bottlenecks where ...
[12]
INRIX 2024 Global Traffic Scorecard: Employees & Consumers ...
The key findings of the INRIX 2024 Global Traffic Scorecard provide a quantifiable benchmark for governments and cities across the world to measure progress ...
[13]
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gridlock
[14]
[PDF] Trade-offs between inductive loops and GPS probe vehicles for ...
The algorithm combines velocity measurements from GPS smartphones or inductive loop detectors with a model of traffic evolution, using a technique known as ...
[15]
Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Trends and Advanced Strategies ...
Mar 22, 2020 · When placed in vehicles and combined with electronic map information, GPS devices are the primary component of excellent vehicle location ...
[16]
5.2: Traffic Flow - Engineering LibreTexts
Apr 30, 2021 · Fundamental Diagram of Traffic Flow. The variables of flow, density ... The most widely used model is the Greenshields model, which posited that ...
[17]
Traffic Flow and Phantom Jams - FYFD
Traffic can flow smoothly until a critical density of cars is reached, at which point instabilities set in. Phantom traffic jams occur due to instabilities and ...
[18]
[PDF] 75 Years of the Fundamental Diagram for Traffic Flow Theory
Jun 16, 2011 · With this traffic flow model, all traffic states in the fundamental diagram ... relationship, Greenshields' model, Greenberg's model, and the bell ...
[19]
Critical analysis and perspectives on the hydrodynamic approach for ...
Analogy between traffic flow and fluid dynamics is proposed in the framework of a macroscopic fluid-dynamical representation, where traffic flow is modelled as ...
[20]
[PDF] continuum flow models - Federal Highway Administration
Looking from an airplane at a freeway, one can visualize the then we can obtain speed, flow, and density at any time and point vehicular traffic as a stream ...
[21]
[PDF] Economic Fundamentals of Road Pricing - World Bank Documents
It throws light on congestion pricing systems and issues surrounding short-run and long-nm marginal cost priing, scale economies and diseconomies, ...
[22]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY ...
We estimate an equilibrium model of residential sorting with endogenous traffic congestion to evaluate the efficiency and equity impacts of urban transportation ...<|separator|>
[23]
Chapter 3. Bottleneck Mitigation Concepts - FHWA-HRT-16-064
For at least 15 years, FHWA has stated that 40 percent of all congestion nationwide is attributable to bottlenecks, while another 5 percent is attributable to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
Traffic Bottlenecks - FHWA Office of Operations
Apr 8, 2022 · The LBR Program focuses on recurring bottlenecks; i.e., those that are operationally influenced by design or function, and impacted upon by ...
[25]
[PDF] Traffic congestion analysis using travel time ratio and degree of ...
Traffic congestion is classified using travel time ratio (TTR) and degree of saturation (DS). TTR is peak vs off-peak travel time. Peak-hour congestion is TTR ...
[26]
[PDF] Alternative Designs to Alleviate Freeway Bottlenecks at Merge ...
Merging, diverging, and weaving areas are major bottleneck locations on uninterrupted flow facilities and are a significant source of recurring congestion.
[27]
Recurring Traffic Bottlenecks (Fourth Edition) - FHWA Operations
Nov 20, 2019 · A localized section of highway that experiences reduced speeds and inherent delays due to a recurring operational influence or a nonrecurring impacting event.
[28]
Recurring Traffic Bottlenecks (Fourth Edition) - Chapter 1. Introduction
Nov 20, 2019 · This document focuses on traffic congestion caused by bottlenecks—which are specific locations on the highway system where the physical layout ...
[29]
[PDF] Incorporating Reliability into the Congestion Management Process
Non- recurring congestion is caused by disruptions, such as traffic incidents, weather, road construction and maintenance, poor signal timing, and/or special.
[30]
Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Trends and Advanced Strategies ...
Mar 23, 2020 · In the transportation realm, congestion usually relates to an excess of vehicles on a portion of roadway at a particular time resulting in ...
[31]
(PDF) Measuring Recurrent and NonRecurrent Traffic Congestion
Aug 6, 2025 · In the two applications, incident-related delay is found to be between 13 to 30 percent of the total congestion delay during peak periods. The ...
[32]
Understanding sudden traffic jams: From emergence to impact
We provide a formalism for understanding the phenomena of sudden traffic jams and show evidence of its existence using loop detector data from New York City.Missing: shockwaves | Show results with:shockwaves
[33]
Traffic Incident Management Gap Analysis Primer - FHWA Operations
May 13, 2020 · Non-recurring incidents dramatically reduce the available capacity and reliability of the entire transportation system and when an incident ...
[34]
[PDF] Impact of Weather on Urban Freeway Traffic Flow Characteristics ...
Rain. (more than 0.25 inch/hour), snow (more than 0.5 inch/hour), and low visibility (less than 0.25 mile) showed capacity reductions of. 10%–17%,19%–27%, and ...
[35]
Snow & Ice - FHWA Road Weather Management
Sep 6, 2024 · Freeway speeds are reduced by 3 to 13 percent in light snow and by 5 to 40 percent in heavy snow. Heavy snow and sleet can also reduce ...
[36]
Reducing Non-Recurring Congestion - FHWA Office of Operations
Mar 27, 2025 · Aggressive management of temporary disruptions, such as incidents, work zones, weather, and special events can reduce the impacts of these ...
[37]
RTO made its biggest post-pandemic comeback in July
Aug 14, 2025 · The latest report found that office visits in July of this year were up 10.7% compared to July 2024. Office visits in July 2025 were down 21.8% ...Missing: recurring congestion
[38]
Urban Growth and Its Aggregate Implications - Duranton - 2023
Dec 7, 2023 · Congestion amplifies these urban costs with a population elasticity, which we also estimate, of about 0.04. For agglomeration economies, our ...3 The Number And Sizes Of... · 5 Empirical Estimates Of The... · 9 Conclusions
[39]
(PDF) Traffic congestion and its urban scale factors - ResearchGate
Mar 3, 2021 · This study empirically investigates the causes of urban traffic congestion to bring into focus the variety of beliefs that provide support for policy ...
[40]
Population Density or Populations Size. Which Factor Determines ...
Another approach followed by other researchers used the urban scaling model to indicate that traffic congestion increases as population size of cities increases ...
[41]
[PDF] Land Use and Transportation Planning in Response to Congestion ...
Concerns over traffic congestion are producing an upsurge of interest in coordinating land development and transportation. This paper reviews land use and ...
[42]
Do mixed-use developments optimize VMT and emissions reduction ...
Oct 1, 2025 · We find that MXDs generate about one-third less VMT than conventional developments, with up to an 80% reduction in certain regions. Over time, ...
[43]
[PDF] Motorizing the Developing World - ACCESS Magazine
The number of motor vehicles in the world is expected to reach about 1.3 billion by 2020, more than doubling today's number. Fastest growth is in Latin America ...
[44]
14th edition of the TomTom Traffic Index
Jan 7, 2025 · The TomTom Traffic Index ranks 500 cities by average travel time and congestion. In 2024, 76% of cities saw decreased average speeds. ...
[45]
What Causes Traffic - and How It Separates Rich and Poor Countries
Oct 17, 2023 · New research co-authored by Wharton's Gilles Duranton looks at what causes traffic and how urban travel speed relates to GDP.Written By · What Causes Traffic Jams · Roadmap Of The Study
[46]
[PDF] The Lighthill-Whitham-Richards (LWR) Model - Traffic Flow Dynamics
▷ We have three main macroscopic quantities: density ρ, flow Q, and local speed V .
[47]
[PDF] Macroscopic traffic flow models - TU Delft OpenCourseWare
The kinematic wave model (or LWR model, or first-order model) assumes that the traffic volume can be determined from the fundamental relation between the ...
[48]
[PDF] A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic - HAL
Feb 4, 2008 · Kai Nagel, Michael Schreckenberg. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. ... Cellular. Automata. (Singapore: World. Scientific,. 1986) ...
[49]
A Queueing Model for Traffic Flow Control in the Road Intersection
The queueing theory is one of the basic mathematical tools for analysis of both interrupted and uninterrupted traffic flows. The studies of uninterrupted flows ...
[50]
[PDF] Multiresolution Modeling for Traffic Analysis: Case Studies Report
The BPR relationship suggests that if volume (or flow) increases relative to the capacity, the speed decreases (or the travel time increases). By definition, ...
[51]
A functional evaluation of the AIMSUN, PARAMICS and VISSIM ...
Aug 10, 2025 · From all of the studied simulators, the models AIMSUN [14], PARAMICS, and VISSIM are found to be suitable for congested arterials and freeways, ...
[52]
Comparative study on simulation performances of CORSIM and ...
VISSIM microsimulation model was calibrated by the use of neural networks and applied to simulate the change of the selected road to the pedestrian zone at a ...
[53]
Predicting the Speed Ahead: Real-Time Traffic Insights with INRIX
Sep 8, 2025 · INRIX has launched a new global machine learning model that delivers unmatched accuracy, scalability, and resilience for traffic prediction: a ...Missing: ANPR inputs
[54]
[PDF] Dynamic Traffic Assignment: A Primer
Mesoscopic models can reasonably depict the aggregate or macroscopic properties of traffic flows (such as average speed, density and flow rates) without ...
[55]
[PDF] An overview of dynamic traffic assignment models for practitioners
A DTA model uses smaller time-slices of the OD matrix, also called the ODT, instead of using a single OD matrix for the analysis period. The time-slices, which ...
[56]
[PDF] The Induced Demand Implications of Alternative Adoption Modalities ...
It is therefore of value and importance to model the likelihood of induced demand (arising from transportation automation) jointly with the modality in which ...
[57]
Comprehensive Review of Traffic Modeling: Towards Autonomous ...
Despite significant progress in AV traffic modeling, several challenges persist. These include the need for more accurate and scalable models, the integration ...
[58]
[PDF] Trajectory Investigation for Enhanced Calibration of Microsimulation ...
This report documents a novel methodology for calibrating microsimulation models using vehicle trajectory data, collected via drones and helicopters.
[59]
Trucking's Annual Congestion Costs Rise to $108.8 Billion
Dec 18, 2024 · Traffic congestion on US highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022 according to the latest Cost of Congestion study.
[60]
https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2025/10/22/heavy-traffic-driving-continues-to-rise-undermining-literally-every-effort-to-make-the-city-better
[61]
Traffic Congestion's Economic Impacts - jstor
While higher. ADT per freeway lane appears to slow productivity growth, there is no evidence of congestion-induced travel delay impeding productivity growth.
[62]
Traffic Congestion's Economic Impacts: Evidence from US ...
Aug 7, 2025 · (2012) reported that congestion significantly reduced job growth and brought on substantial loss of economic output and productivity in US ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[63]
[PDF] NCHRP Report 463 - Economic Implications of Congestion
This study examines how traffic congestion affects pro- ducers of economic goods and services in terms of business costs, productivity, and output, and how ...
[64]
What's really behind rear-end highway crashes?
Jun 10, 2017 · In a new study, U of M researchers found that because shockwaves—areas of suddenly stopping or slowing traffic—are usually the cause of rear-end ...
[65]
[PDF] Analyses of Rear-End Crashes and Near-Crashes in the 100-Car ...
Abstract. The 100-Car Study collected unique pre-crash data that might help to overcome the limitations of police reports and, thus, might help identify ...
[66]
Traffic Congestion and Safety: Mixed Effects on Total and Fatal ...
Oct 15, 2024 · This paper examines the effects of traffic congestion on total crashes, fatal or serious injury (FSI) crashes, and fatal-only crashes in peak periods.
[67]
Traffic congestion: The struggle affecting emergency first responders
Apr 2, 2025 · A recent industry survey found that 49.5% of first responder agencies reported slower response times in 2024 than in 2023. Furthermore, 41.7% ...Missing: ambulance | Show results with:ambulance
[68]
Emergency Medical Service Providers' Experiences with Traffic ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Traffic congestion, on average, resulted in nearly 10min extra response time. Most agreed that the most effective in-vehicle technology for ...
[69]
Traffic congestion, transportation policies, and the performance of ...
We examine a new external cost of traffic by estimating the relationship between traffic congestion and emergency response times.
[70]
Road rage statistics 2022 - Octo Telematics
Road rage is a factor in over 50% of fatal crashes, causing about 30 deaths and 1,800 injuries yearly. 78% of drivers report aggressive behavior. 80% ...
[71]
Road Rage: What's Driving It? - PMC - NIH
Up to one-third of community participants report being perpetrators of road rage, indicating that various forms of road rage are relatively commonplace.
[72]
Air pollution and health risks due to vehicle traffic - PMC
Traffic congestion increases vehicle emissions and degrades ambient air quality, and recent studies have shown excess morbidity and mortality for drivers.Missing: crash | Show results with:crash
[73]
A health risk assessment of PM2.5 emissions during congested ...
Traffic congestion has a substantial impact on human health and economy. · Our results showed an impact of 206 (95%: 116; 297) deaths per year (all-cause ...Missing: crash | Show results with:crash
[74]
Autonomous Vehicles Factsheet - Center for Sustainable Systems
Compared to the average human driver, Waymo had 88% fewer serious injury crashes and 93% fewer involving pedestrians.19 AVs crash reduction potential could save ...
[75]
we ideally want autonomous cars killing ~30k/year in the US to start ...
Dec 8, 2023 · Waymo's latest research shows its self-driving cars have 80-90% fewer accidents than human drivers, and in future could possibly save 34,000 ...<|separator|>
[76]
Autonomous vehicle lane-changing dynamics and impact on the ...
Another study analysed the same data and reported that the crash risk of autonomous vehicles was found to be 50% less riskier than that of human-driven vehicles ...
[77]
Influence of travel time on carbon dioxide emissions from urban traffic
Aug 10, 2025 · The results showed that in intense traffic conditions, the consumed fuel was 1.1–1.5 times more than normal. The proposed approach presented ...
[78]
Evaluation of the public health impacts of traffic congestion
Oct 27, 2010 · Overall, approximately 48% of the impact over the 83 urban areas is attributable to NOx emissions, with 42% attributable to primary PM2.5 ...Missing: CO2 | Show results with:CO2
[79]
Traffic Congestion and Greenhouse Gases - ACCESS Magazine
May 26, 2017 · As traffic congestion increases, so too do fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. Therefore, congestion mitigation programs should reduce CO2 emissions.Missing: empirical NOx
[80]
Real-World Carbon Dioxide Impacts of Traffic Congestion
Traffic congestion and its impact on CO2 emissions were examined by using detailed energy and emission models, and they were linked to real-world driving ...Missing: empirical NOx
[81]
[PDF] Transportation Statistics Annual Report 2023
Dec 1, 2023 · The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) provides high quality information to serve government, industry, and the public in a manner ...<|separator|>
[82]
Electric vehicles use half the energy of gas-powered vehicles
Jan 29, 2024 · Electric vehicles operate with only around 11% energy loss, meaning that most of the energy that goes into the car ends up turning the wheels.Missing: congestion | Show results with:congestion
[83]
Do electric vehicles reduce air pollution? - Sustainability by numbers
Aug 24, 2023 · Electric cars eliminate exhaust emissions of NOx and PM2.5, and reduce particulates from brake wear due to regenerative braking. If they are ...Missing: congestion | Show results with:congestion<|separator|>
[84]
Big-data empowered traffic signal control could reduce urban ...
Feb 27, 2025 · Overall, adaptive signals achieved a net CO₂ reduction of 16% (Fig. 2b), demonstrating that optimized signal timing not only improves traffic ...
[85]
Using Smart Traffic Lights to Reduce CO2 Emissions and Improve ...
Dec 25, 2023 · The simulations reveal that deploying smart traffic lights at a single intersection can reduce CO 2 emissions by 32% to 40% in the vicinity of the intersection.
[86]
Tackling congestion in 18th-century London
Sep 7, 2023 · 18th-century London had congestion from carriages, carts, and hackney coaches, causing traffic jams, especially around Westminster, and was ...
[87]
A London traffic jam in the Temple-Tower area in the 19th Century ...
photographs from Philadelphia and New York show major congestion involving pedestrians and horse-drawn vehicles. The best illustration is probably Gustave ...<|separator|>
[88]
The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894 - Historic UK
In 1900, there were over 11,000 hansom cabs on the streets of London alone. There were also several thousand horse-drawn buses, each needing 12 horses per day, ...
[89]
Lessons from a Horse-Powered Past for Transportation Planning ...
Dec 15, 2021 · A walk sets a pace of about 4 mph, a trot 8-12 mph, a canter at 10-17 mph, and a gallop at 25-30 mph. Most American cities set urban speed ...
[90]
In Victorian times were there traffic laws for horse-drawn vehicles?
Jul 26, 2016 · The 1865 Act (which unfortunately, isn't on the UK legislation web site) dropped the speed limits to 4mph or 2mph in town, and provided the ...How did the passengers in a 1700-1908 century horse drawn ...Were there posted speed limits on horses in medieval towns? Like ...More results from www.reddit.com
[91]
Pre-Automobile Transportation History (1830s–1890s) - Gala
This larger carriage pulled by two horses could carry about 12 passengers at speeds averaging under 5 mph, and although it was a very bumpy ride along the ...
[92]
https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-28
[93]
On the Surface 1900-1945 | London Transport Museum
In 1900, almost every vehicle on London's streets was horse-drawn. More than 300,000 horses were needed to keep the city on the move, hauling everything ...
[94]
https://www.ushistory.org/us/46a.asp
[95]
Public Road Mileage and VMT chart, 1920 - 2007
Nov 7, 2014 · U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration ... 3,272,000, 197,720, 197,720,000,000. 1930, 3,259,000, 206,320 ...
[96]
Federal and State Road Building in America during the 1920s and ...
Feb 3, 2023 · Road mileage doubled between 1920 and 1930 and then doubled again between 1930 and 1940. Until the closed car became more popular in the mid- ...
[97]
How Public Policy Encouraged Suburban Sprawl and Cultural ...
Jan 1, 2019 · These zoning ordinances prohibited apartments, duplexes, and retail from being built in proximity to single family houses. In general, these ...
[98]
History of the Interstate Highway System | FHWA
Aug 8, 2023 · June 29, 1956: A Day in History: The day that President Eisenhower signed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 was filled with the usual mix of ...
[99]
Maps and Data - Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled in the United States
Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, VMT in 2021, which reflects February 2020 through January 2021, was the lowest since 2002. VMT hasn't fully rebounded to ...
[100]
Americans Drove 1.0 Percent More in 2024
Mar 6, 2025 · Total driving on US roads, measured by vehicle miles-traveled (VMT), rose 1.0 percent in 2024 above the prior year. Americans drove 3.279 trillion vehicle- ...
[101]
Exploring the spatiotemporal pattern of traffic congestion ...
The empirical studies suggest that real-time traffic data is instrumental to help analyse the traffic congestion performance of urban society in greater depth.
[102]
(PDF) Urban traffic congestion in China: causes and countermeasures
Sep 9, 2025 · ... Traffic congestion increases travel time. According to “2010 China's New Urbanization. Report,” Beijing ranks rst among the top 50 cities ...
[103]
Do highway widenings reduce congestion? - Oxford Academic
This article documents that highway widenings considerably reduce congestion in the short run, defined here as 6 years.
[104]
[PDF] Efficient Use of Highway Capacity Summary
These benefits include a travel time reduction of up to. 20 percent, a temporary increase of up to 25 percent in freeway capacity, and a high motorist.
[105]
[PDF] Roadway Capacity and Induced Travel
An elasticity of 1.0 means that VMT will increase by the same percentage as the increase in lane miles. The studies typically obtain elasticity estimates by ...
[106]
Long-term evidence on induced traffic: A case study on the ...
Reducing urban road congestion by infrastructure development promises lower travel times, reduced pollution and wider economic benefits.
[107]
New Estimates of the Benefits of U.S. Highway Construction | NBER
Apr 1, 2019 · For about three-quarters of all highway segments, adding 10 additional lane-miles generates benefits valued at between $10 million and $20 ...Missing: short- | Show results with:short-
[108]
[PDF] Transportation For America - CONGESTION
Delay is defined as extra time spent traveling at congested rather than free-flow speeds. While FHWA only provides data on lane-miles of freeway, TTI's delay ...
[109]
[PDF] Induced Demand's Effect on Freeway Expansion - Reason Foundation
Jan 5, 2022 · Travel shifting from other modes to automobiles due to increased roadway capacity is legitimately induced demand.28 These mode shifts could ...Missing: term | Show results with:term
[110]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY ...
Congestion pricing reduces the trips with the lowest marginal benefit and leads to welfare gains. (the shaded red area). Driving restrictions, as a command-and- ...
[111]
The Political Economy of Congestion Pricing | Cato Institute
The MTA estimates that the congestion pricing initiative will remove about 80,000 vehicles—more than 10 percent of previous traffic—from the congestion relief ...<|separator|>
[112]
Congestion pricing-the example of Singapore - IMF eLibrary
Mar 1, 1976 · The Singapore Government, therefore, set itself the goal of designing a scheme to reduce peak-hour traffic by 25 to 30 per cent. It was ...
[113]
[PDF] Long-Term Effects of the Swedish Congestion Charges Discussion ...
When the charges were introduced in Stockholm in 2006, the traffic across the cordon was reduced by approximately 20% (Eliasson et al., 2009). In Gothenburg, ...
[114]
[PDF] The Short-Run Effects of Congestion Pricing in New York City
NYC would “lead to a substantial reduction in traffic congestion in the targeted area,” but the majority were uncertain as to whether traffic would increase on ...
[115]
Impact of New York City's Congestion Pricing Program | NBER
Jun 1, 2025 · The researchers analyze data from Google Maps Traffic Trends spanning September 2024 through February 2025 and compare NYC's traffic conditions ...
[116]
[PDF] A More Perfect User Fee: Examining the Viability of a Vehicle Miles ...
America's congestion problems have already been noted and the potential for differential pricing offered by a VMT system could be an effective solution. Fees ...<|separator|>
[117]
[PDF] Congestion Pricing: How? - Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Congestion pricing internalizes traffic externality and makes travelers pay their social costs instead of their private costs only, thus discouraging vehicle ...
[118]
Support for market-based and command-and-control congestion ...
Feb 26, 2021 · We examined support for two demand-side approaches to managing the traffic congestion externality: congestion pricing – a market-based approach, ...Missing: internalizing | Show results with:internalizing
[119]
[PDF] Adaptive Signal Control Technologies
Many studies have shown that adaptive signal control improves average performance metrics (travel time, control delay, emissions, and fuel consumption) by. 10 ...
[120]
[PDF] Assessment of the effectiveness of adaptive traffic signal control ...
Jul 5, 2025 · Second-generation systems demonstrated improved performance in reducing delays and conflicts, with some studies reporting 15-25% reductions ...
[121]
Traffic jam by GPS: A systematic analysis of the negative social ...
Aug 6, 2024 · The increased usage of navigation technologies has caused conflicts in local traffic management, resulting in congested residential areas ...
[122]
Navigation Apps Are Turning Quiet Neighborhoods Into Traffic ...
Dec 24, 2017 · Waze defends its practice of rerouting motorists from congested highways through residential streets in nearby communities. And the company ...Missing: equity | Show results with:equity
[123]
Impact on Platooning of Autonomous Vehicles using Macro to Micro ...
Traffic efficiency was improved through platooning in general. It is expected that the results of this study can be used as primary data to develop an optimal ...
[124]
The Impact of Autonomous Vehicle Platooning Intensity - MDPI
Feb 7, 2024 · This paper proposes a theoretical model to discuss the capacity of heterogeneous saturated flow. A crucial indicator, platooning intensity,
[125]
Tesla Vehicle Safety Report
For drivers who were not using Autopilot technology, we recorded one crash for every 1.10 million miles driven. By comparison, NHTSA and FHWA data from 2023 ...Our data strongly indicates · Tesla Canada · Tesla Hong Kong · Tesla AustraliaMissing: pilots | Show results with:pilots<|separator|>
[126]
[PDF] Analysis of the delayed roll-out of fully autonomous vehicles
May 13, 2024 · The most important regulations for the deployment of autonomous vehicles in Europe are. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426 and Regulation ...
[127]
Autonomous vehicles: The legal landscape in the US | Publications
Since 2013, only two federal bills have been introduced that touch upon autonomous vehicles, and only one has become law.
[128]
[PDF] Latest evidence on induced travel demand: an evidence review
For example, there may be congestion relief on some routes or between some origin-destination pairs that are not viewed as direct beneficiaries of the project.
[129]
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.100.3.1040
[130]
Induced Demand: An Urban Metropolitan Perspective - eScholarship
A meta-analysis is conducted with an eye toward presenting an overall average elasticity estimate of induced demand effects based on the best, most reliable ...
[131]
How much does new highway capacity 'induce' demand?
Oct 7, 2024 · It found consensus that the elasticity found in credible studies is 1.0—i.e., for every 5% increase in lane-miles, there will be a 5% increase ...
[132]
[PDF] Generated Traffic and Induced Travel
Sep 18, 2025 · In the short-run generated traffic represents a shift along the demand curve; reduced congestion reduces travel time and vehicle operating costs ...
[133]
Urban Transit Systems Labor Productivity - Bureau of Labor Statistics
Jun 26, 2025 · In the 2021 release of the ACS (2017-21 data), the share of workers commuting via public transportation fell to 4.2 percent. This drop in public ...
[134]
Transportation Subsidies in 2022 – The Antiplanner
Jan 9, 2025 · Public transportation received $69 billion in subsidies in 2022, compared with $90 billion in subsidies to highways and $20 billion to ...
[135]
Transit: The Urban Parasite | Cato Institute
Apr 20, 2020 · While ridership increased, much of the increase was because the elimination of fares attracted homeless people and other “problem riders.” ...
[136]
https://ti.org/antiplanner/
[137]
Why has public transit ridership declined in the United States?
Lower gas prices and higher fares contribute to lower transit ridership, as do higher incomes, more teleworking and minor changes to car ownership rates. The ...
[138]
Transit ridership up 16% in 2023: APTA report | Smart Cities Dive
Apr 10, 2024 · Public transit ridership across all modes recovered to 79% of pre-pandemic levels in 2023, the American Public Transportation Association ...<|separator|>
[139]
[PDF] Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Transit Ridership and ...
Aug 20, 2024 · If many former transit riders continue to work from home in hybrid or remote positions, 9-to-5 commuter ridership could be permanently reduced.
[140]
Remote work cuts car travel and emissions, but hurts public transit ...
Apr 9, 2024 · The researchers found that a 10% increase in remote workers could lead to a 10% drop in carbon emissions from the transportation sector, or ...<|separator|>
[141]
[PDF] Distributional effects of urban transport policies to discourage car use
Mar 1, 2023 · Most analyses find that congestion pricing schemes are vertically regressive, i.e. they disproportionately affect low-income groups. The spatial ...
[142]
https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/760/dot_760_DS1.pdf
[143]
(PDF) Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing: Quantitative ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The Stockholm congestion pricing scheme has shown that pricing of transport systems can reduce congestion and increase accessibility in the city ...
[144]
Congestion Pricing Takes on Manhattan Gridlock - NYU
Feb 11, 2025 · “We're already seeing a 7.5% reduction in traffic and smoother traffic flow across bridges and tunnels and the FDR and West Side highways ...
[145]
The data behind NYC's congestion pricing success - TomTom
Apr 1, 2025 · Comparing January through mid-March 2025 to the same period in 2024, congestion in the tolled area of Manhattan dropped from 24.7% to 16.9%.Missing: miles | Show results with:miles
[146]
Lessons Learned From International Experience in Congestion Pricing
Mar 29, 2021 · Areawide pricing in Singapore, London and Stockholm resulted in 10 to 30 percent or greater reduction in traffic in the priced zone and has ...
[147]
[PDF] Equity and Congestion Pricing: A Review of the Evidence - RAND
Feb 2, 2009 · Second, existing transportation fees and taxes, such as the motor-fuel tax, are often regressive, meaning that low-income drivers pay a higher ...Missing: disputes evasion
[148]
INRIX 2024 Global Traffic Scorecard: London most congested city in ...
Jan 6, 2025 · London topped the Traffic Scorecard in Europe – and placed fifth globally – with drivers losing 101 hours sitting in congestion, two percent increase in delays ...
[149]
Congestion Pricing Lessons from London and Stockholm - Vital City
Jun 13, 2024 · By April 2003, the percentage of people who believed that the congestion charge would not reduce traffic had dropped more than half to 15%.
[150]
[PDF] Congestion Pricing: Examples Around the World
nanced with revenues from the charging system, led to a 15 percent reduction in traffic in central London, and a 30 percent reduction in travel delays.<|separator|>
[151]
TomTom Traffic Index – Live traffic statistics and historical data
We've ranked more than 500 cities based on congestion and drive times for a typical trip. Here's the top 10. Rank by filter, World rank, City, Average travel ...Perth traffic · Traffic Stats · Bengaluru traffic · Auckland traffic
[152]
TomTom's Largest-Ever Traffic Index Uncovers Increased ...
Jan 7, 2025 · Overall, the U.S. experienced an 9% increase in congestion compared to 2023 (15.4 vs 14.1). Additional key findings include: New York, San ...Missing: Europe | Show results with:Europe
[153]
Hyderabad traffic crisis: Vehicle count nears 90 lakh - Times of India
Sep 1, 2025 · In 2019, there were approximately 6,500 vehicles per km; today, that figure has climbed to nearly 9,500 per km, placing immense pressure on the ...Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
[154]
Thirty and Still Dirty: Why Do Delhi's Roads Remain So Polluted?
Feb 20, 2025 · 1. Delhi roads are poorly constructed and maintained. · 2. The Delhi Metro is not enough to shift the city away from private vehicle ownership.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[155]
Highest private car density of 650 per km leads to gridlock | Mumbai ...
650 per km of road. Of these, one lakh were added during the Covid pandemic.
[156]
Growing traffic levels for Indonesia's capital - Global Highways
Official data suggests that vehicle numbers are increasing by 9%/year, equivalent to an additional 1,117 vehicles taking to the city's roads every day. The ...
[157]
[PDF] Achieving Indonesia's vision to expand and enhance active mobility ...
Road traffic congestion – Congestion costs in Indonesia are estimated to be as much as IDR 56 trillion annually (about USD 3.6 billion) in wasted fuel and lost.
[158]
[PDF] JAKARTA, INDONESIA - Asian Transport Observatory
This contributes to severe traffic congestion, with Jakarta ranking 19th out of 387 cities globally in terms of congestion levels.
[159]
Variable Returns to Agglomeration and the Effect Of Road Traffic ...
Aug 6, 2025 · This paper investigates the links between returns to urban density, productivity and road traffic congestion.
[160]
[PDF] Informal Transport in the Developing World - UN-Habitat
Problems blamed on the informal transport like traffic congestion, accidents, and environmental degradation are also examined. Chapter Three addresses ...
[161]
Big-data empowered traffic signal control could reduce urban ...
Feb 27, 2025 · In our study of China's 100 most congested cities, big-data empowered adaptive traffic signals reduced peak-hour trip times by 11% and off-peak ...
[162]
When Traffic Lights Get Smart: My 20-Year Tale of Two ... - LinkedIn
May 9, 2025 · In China: Hangzhou's "City Brain" (Alibaba's urban management AI) predicts traffic conditions 10-15 minutes into the future. It's like ...
[163]
Electric vehicle adoption: Urbanization, income, and inequality effects
The results suggest that income inequality hinders EV adoption, with a more pronounced negative effect in moderately urbanized regions. Higher per capita ...
[164]
Grid congestion stymies climate benefit from U.S. vehicle electrification
Aug 6, 2025 · With adequate transmission, full electrification could nearly eliminate vehicle operational CO2 emissions once renewable generation reaches the ...
[165]
The Realities of Current Urbanization in the Global South - Research
Urbanization in the Global South is rapid, with low resources, high informality, climate vulnerability, rising poverty, and inadequate infrastructure, leaving ...
[166]
Addressing the urban congestion challenge based on traffic ...
Nov 13, 2024 · With rapid urbanization and vehicle usage increase, urban areas face escalating traffic congestion [6,7]. Congestion costs extend beyond traffic ...