Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Common operational picture

A common operational picture (COP) is a single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command that facilitates collaborative planning and assists all echelons to achieve situational awareness. This shared visualization provides commanders and units with a unified understanding of the operational environment, integrating real-time data to support decision-making in dynamic military contexts. The is a cornerstone of modern processes, enabling enhanced and coordination across joint, interagency, and multinational forces. By presenting a tailored view of the —drawn from sources such as , , and (ISR) assets—it helps mitigate risks like , optimizes , and maintains operational tempo during missions. In sustainment operations, for instance, a offers visibility into nodes, supply statuses, and distribution challenges, ensuring seamless support to forward units. Key components of a COP include running estimates across warfighting functions (e.g., movement and maneuver, , fires), prioritized information requirements, and integrated data from digital and analog systems. At tactical levels, such as operations, it is often constructed using map boards and communication tools synchronized with higher echelons via orders and updates, while strategic levels leverage automated platforms for broader synchronization. Specialized variants, like the sustainment COP or COP (eCOP), focus on domain-specific elements such as hubs or assessments to address unique needs. The concept has evolved with technological advancements, from analog representations in earlier doctrines to digital systems that support global integration and real-time collaboration in complex environments. In multinational settings, developing a shared requires standardized formats and communication protocols to overcome challenges, ultimately enhancing collective mission success.

Definition and Purpose

Definition

The common operational picture (COP) is formally defined in U.S. military doctrine as a single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command that facilitates collaborative planning and assists all echelons to achieve situational awareness (as defined in JP 1-02, as of 2025). This display typically includes operational details such as the positions of friendly and enemy forces, status of critical infrastructure, and environmental conditions, presented in a unified format across participating units. The concept was historically formalized in the 2001 edition of Joint Publication (JP) 1-02, the Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. The term "common" emphasizes the shared nature of the COP, ensuring that multiple users and commands access the same synchronized to avoid discrepancies in understanding. "Operational" highlights its focus on pertinent to tactical and operational levels of activity, rather than strategic or long-term . The "picture" aspect refers to its visual and graphical representation, transforming raw data into an intuitive, map-based or diagrammatic format for rapid comprehension, distinct from unprocessed feeds. While closely related, the COP differs from situational awareness, which is the broader cognitive state of understanding the operational environment; the COP serves as the enabling tool or artifact that supports and enhances this awareness through its standardized display.

Purpose and Benefits

The common operational picture (COP) primarily aims to deliver a unified, representation of the operational environment, fostering that underpins collaborative planning, dynamic mission execution, and cohesive actions across echelons from tactical to strategic levels. By integrating data from multiple sources into a single, shared view, the COP enables commanders to align independent unit efforts with broader objectives, ensuring synchronized operations without centralized . This shared understanding supports decentralized execution while maintaining unity of effort in and multinational contexts. Among its key benefits, the enhances by streamlining information flow, which improves coordination in multi-unit environments and minimizes risks such as or operational confusion during complex maneuvers. It accelerates decision-making cycles through customizable, prioritized displays of relevant data, allowing leaders to respond swiftly to developments and exploit fleeting opportunities. Furthermore, the strengthens by facilitating real-time visualization of threats, including enemy positions and environmental hazards, thereby enabling proactive defensive measures and . In practice, the COP empowers commanders to visualize the via integrated graphical depictions, bridging tactical engagements with strategic oversight and reducing miscommunication across forces—for example, during joint air-ground operations where synchronized threat tracking prevents unintended engagements. Precursors to the modern COP proved instrumental in historical contexts like the , supporting unified command views through early shared information systems. This capability has continued to link multi-domain activities in modern exercises to heighten overall operational effectiveness.

History

Origins in Military Doctrine

The concept of a common operational picture traces its early conceptual roots to early 20th-century military strategies that prioritized centralized information sharing to improve command decisions amid expanding battlespaces. During , U.S. exemplified this approach in the 1918 St. Mihiel offensive, where he directed over 1,500 aircraft under a unified control structure to deliver , enabling commanders to visualize and respond to the operational environment cohesively. Such efforts highlighted the need for integrated as a foundational element of effective command, influencing subsequent doctrinal developments in joint operations. The formalization of the common operational picture (COP) occurred within U.S. Department of Defense doctrine through Joint Publication (JP) 1-02, the Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, issued on April 12, 2001. This publication defined the COP as "a single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command," positioning it as a doctrinal tool for promoting collaborative planning and enhancing across military echelons. The definition persisted through periodic amendments, including those incorporated in the October 17, 2008, edition of JP 1-02, which maintained the core emphasis on shared operational information while refining terminology for broader joint applicability. Post-Cold War doctrinal evolution integrated the into frameworks supporting multi-service operations and networked warfare, driven by lessons from conflicts like the 1991 , recognized as the inaugural "information war" that leveraged unified command systems for synchronized joint efforts. By the mid-1990s, the concept appeared in key joint publications such as JP 6-0, Joint Command, Control, Communications, Computer Systems, and Intelligence (May 30, 1995), which stressed the 's function in fostering and information fusion to enable commanders to maintain a cohesive view of the in increasingly complex, multi-domain scenarios. This progression solidified the as an essential doctrinal component for achieving unity of command in post-Cold War .

Technological Development

The development of the Common Operational Picture (COP) emerged alongside advancements in command and control (C2) systems during the 1990s, transitioning from analog maps and manual coordination to digital platforms. The U.S. Army's Maneuver Control System (MCS), initiated in the late 1980s and fielded in the early 1990s, represented an early milestone by providing a digital battlespace visualization that integrated tactical data for maneuver units, laying foundational technology for automated situational awareness. This shift was driven by the need for real-time data sharing in joint operations, as evidenced by the Army Tactical Command and Control System (ATCCS), which began development in the early 1990s to enhance interoperability across battlefield functional areas. In the early 2000s, the Global System (GCCS) marked a significant leap, becoming the U.S. Department of Defense's primary platform for fusing sensor data into a shared . Developed as a successor to the World Wide Military System (WWMCCS) and fielded starting in the late with full operational capability by 2003, GCCS enabled a graphical representation of the using distributed client-server architecture and common operating environment standards. Concurrently, the (DARPA) introduced the Command Post of the Future (CPOF) in 2004 as an innovative tool, which was adopted by the under the MCS in 2006 to support collaborative planning and real-time tactical plotting. By 2012, over 17,000 CPOF units had been deployed across components, integrating data from systems like Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below/ (FBCB2/BFT). Mid-2000s advancements focused on incorporating (GPS) and satellite data to enhance positional accuracy and real-time tracking within COP systems. Following the end of GPS Selective Availability in 2000, which improved civilian and military precision to within meters, integration into platforms like GCCS and CPOF allowed for automated geolocation of forces using satellite feeds, as demonstrated in operational use during the mid-2000s where GPS coordinates generated precise situational overlays. This era's technological maturation was supported by doctrinal formalization in Joint Publication 3-0 (2001), which emphasized COP as a critical enabler for joint operations. The 2010s saw the rise of mobile and tactical applications, exemplified by the (ATAK), developed by the U.S. starting in August 2010 based on open-source technology. ATAK provided dismounted soldiers with a portable on smartphones and tablets, enabling real-time sharing of geospatial data, , and sensor feeds, and was rapidly adopted by U.S. Special Operations Forces for field operations. By the 2020s, COP technologies evolved toward cloud-based architectures and (AI) enhancements for scalable, resilient operations. The U.S. began fielding cloud-enabled versions of its Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) in 2022, optimizing for forcible entry units to deliver distributed COP amid contested environments. In 2025, companies like Systematic launched cloud-based iterations of their SitaWare systems, allowing global military users to access unified operational views without on-premises hardware. integration advanced COP generation by automating and , as outlined in U.S. War College , which highlighted for predictive and course-of-action development in scenarios. These developments, including -enhanced all-domain awareness, addressed limitations in data volume and latency, ensuring COP adaptability through 2025.

Components and Elements

Core Data Elements

The core data elements of a common operational picture (COP) form the foundational information layers that enable commanders to visualize the operational environment and make informed decisions. These elements are derived from a variety of sources, including sensors, reports, and fused all-source analysis, ensuring a shared understanding across forces. Primary elements focus on the dynamic aspects of the , while supporting elements provide contextual depth without delving into processing technologies. Primary elements include real-time locations, status, and planned movements of friendly forces, often referred to as , which encompasses ground, maritime, and air units to support and combat power focus. Enemy positions and threats, or red force tracking, detail adversary unit locations, dispositions, capabilities, intentions, and potential courses of action, derived from intelligence collection such as and geospatial data to assess vulnerabilities and tactics. Terrain and environmental data, including digital elevation models and natural features, serve as the base layer for , while information—covering current conditions and forecasts—influences mobility, sensor performance, and operational effectiveness for both friendly and adversary forces. Supporting elements augment the primary layers by addressing operational sustainment and context. Infrastructure status encompasses critical facilities like roads, ports, airfields, and utilities, enabling assessment of logistical nodes and potential disruptions. Logistics data tracks supply lines, resource allocation, and transportation status, including time-phased force deployment details to maintain operational tempo. Event timelines capture incidents, movements, and assessments such as battle damage evaluations and air tasking orders, providing chronological insights into evolving threats and friendly actions. These data elements must exhibit key characteristics to be effective: timeliness, achieved through near-real-time updates to reduce uncertainty and support rapid ; accuracy, ensured by high-fidelity sourcing and validation to minimize errors in dispositions and environmental impacts; and , tailored to the commander's priorities and critical requirements for focused .

Supporting Technologies

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) serve as a foundational technology for creating and maintaining a common operational picture (COP) by enabling , , and of operational data across diverse environments. GIS platforms integrate geospatial layers, such as terrain models and infrastructure overlays, to provide a unified view of the or incident area. Real-time data feeds from (GPS) devices ensure accurate tracking of personnel, vehicles, and assets, while sensors and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) deliver continuous streams of imagery and environmental data to populate the COP dynamically. For instance, UAVs equipped with high-resolution cameras and multispectral sensors contribute low-altitude, on-demand that enhances in remote or contested areas. Specialized software platforms facilitate the aggregation and distribution of COP data within (C2) architectures. Similarly, WinTAK, part of the Team Awareness Kit (TAK) suite, provides a collaborative geospatial that supports data import from formats like KML and GPX, enabling real-time sharing of tracks, markers, and 3D models across networks for tactical . These platforms ensure automated synchronization with C2 systems, allowing seamless propagation of updates like unit positions to all authorized users. Display methods for COP vary by operational context, ranging from large-scale video walls in command centers that aggregate multiple data streams into a centralized overview to mobile devices that deliver personalized views via apps like those in the TAK family. Three-dimensional () visualizations, often rendered through GIS extensions, allow operators to interact with models, simulating line-of-sight and mobility analyses for enhanced . Integration with systems supports automated refreshes, ensuring displays reflect live feeds without manual intervention. As of 2025, emerging technologies are advancing COP capabilities through intelligent processing and immersive interfaces. Artificial intelligence (AI) enables data fusion by algorithmically combining inputs from disparate sensors into coherent representations, as demonstrated in the U.S. Space Command's pilot project that leverages machine learning to process vast datasets for space domain awareness and create a unified COP. Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) provide immersive 3D views, allowing users to navigate virtual environments overlaid with real-time operational data for collaborative decision-making in tactical scenarios. Cloud computing enhances scalability by enabling distributed storage and access to COP data, with the U.S. Army's Command Post Computing Environment (CPCE) migrating to cloud architectures to support redundant, large-scale operations in contested environments.

Implementation and Processes

Building a COP

Building a common operational picture (COP) involves a systematic to synthesize diverse into a coherent, shared view of the operational . This foundational ensures that commanders and decision-makers across units can align their understanding and actions effectively. The draws on core data elements like friendly and enemy positions, logistics status, and environmental factors, supported by technologies such as networked information systems. The key steps in constructing a COP start with identifying relevant data sources. These include sustainment elements in the , such as regional hubs, distribution nodes, lines of communication, and unit boundaries, as well as and friendly activities. Next, information is aggregated into a unified , combining commodity-specific estimates like bulk nodes, critical munitions status, and capacities to depict movements over defined time horizons, such as 24 to 96 hours. Validation follows to ensure accuracy and timeliness, using operation orders to set criteria like stockage objectives and color-coded assessments, with cross-checks against systems like the Automated Maintenance System for reliability. Finally, the COP is disseminated via secure channels, maintaining both and analog versions—such as maps with acetate overlays—for sharing with supported units to enhance operational reach. Core principles guiding COP construction emphasize across systems to enable seamless data exchange. This is achieved by employing standardized data protocols, such as MIL-STD-6016 for , which facilitates real-time tactical information sharing among and allied forces. Prioritizing real-time updates is essential, using mechanisms like protocols to ensure timely delivery and conflict-free information streams. Views should be customized for user roles, providing tactical-level details for field commanders versus strategic overviews for higher echelons, often through a neutral integrator to balance perspectives. Best practices include developing standard operating procedures for tools to foster shared understanding and responsiveness. Integrating all warfighting functions and priorities of support, such as through agent-based retrieval and deconfliction of data from databases and message streams, helps avoid information silos. Time-based planning, like mapping commodity travel over 48 to 120 hours depending on , further ensures the COP influences operational decisions effectively.

Integration Methods

Integration methods for a common operational picture () primarily involve algorithms that combine inputs from multiple sensors to create a unified , with track correlation serving as a foundational technique for resolving overlapping detections. Track correlation algorithms match and merge tracks from disparate sources like and electro-optical sensors by estimating association probabilities based on kinematic and attribute similarities, thereby reducing false positives and enhancing accuracy in dynamic environments. For instance, in operations, these algorithms fuse tracks across air, maritime, and ground domains to maintain a consistent representation, as outlined in U.S. guidance on COP synchronization. API-based interoperability facilitates real-time data exchange between heterogeneous systems by defining standardized interfaces for querying and updating elements, enabling seamless integration without proprietary protocols. These allow applications to pull fused data streams, such as position reports or threat assessments, directly into tools, promoting plug-and-play connectivity in settings. In practice, API gateways manage and data normalization to ensure secure, low-overhead access across networked platforms. Service-oriented architectures (SOA) provide a modular framework for linking legacy systems to modern infrastructures, encapsulating disparate components as reusable web services that communicate via XML or protocols. SOA enables the orchestration of legacy command-and-control systems with contemporary sensors, allowing for scalable integration in tactical environments like those used by U.S. Marine Corps programs. By decomposing functions into loosely coupled services, SOA supports dynamic composition of the operational picture, facilitating updates without full system overhauls. Advanced techniques leverage for within data feeds, where algorithms identify outliers in streams, such as unexpected track deviations, to refine the COP's reliability. These models process high-volume inputs in near , flagging potential intrusions or faults that could distort the shared picture, as demonstrated in U.S. applications integrating into COP development. Complementing this, enables low-latency processing at the tactical edge, where distributed nodes fuse data locally from UAVs or ground s before transmission, minimizing demands and supporting resilient COPs in contested . Standards such as NATO's Shared Operational Picture (SOP) framework ensure cross-alliance compatibility by mandating interoperable data formats and protocols, allowing multinational forces to synchronize COPs through shared schemas for tracks, , and assets. The Communications and Information Agency's NCOP system, for example, implements these standards to deliver a federated view across allied commands, enhancing collective . As of April 2025, advanced this capability with phase 3 of the NCOP program (NCOP-BMD), adding defense features for improved threat tracking in multinational operations. This adoption of SOP promotes standardized layers, including geospatial referencing via GIS technologies, to align diverse national systems.

Applications

Military and Defense

In military and defense contexts, the common operational picture (COP) serves as a foundational tool for during joint operations, enabling commanders to track friendly forces in and coordinate actions across units. The U.S. Army extensively employed COP systems, particularly through (BFT) technologies, during operations in and , where over 1,200 BFT installations in combat vehicles, command posts, and helicopters provided a shared view of troop positions to reduce incidents and improve . This integration fed data directly into COP displays, allowing for dynamic updates on force locations and operational status amid complex urban and insurgent environments. Naval forces leverage COP for , fusing sensor data from ships, aircraft, and satellites to monitor vessel movements and potential threats across vast ocean areas. The U.S. Navy's SeaVision platform, for instance, delivers an unclassified web-based COP that supports real-time sharing of information with partners, enhancing detection of illicit activities such as or . Similarly, the Naval Research Laboratory's system provides near-real-time global situational awareness by querying and filtering vessel data, contributing to a comprehensive operational view that informs fleet decisions. A prominent example of COP integration in multinational exercises is NATO's Steadfast Defender 2024, the alliance's largest military drill since the , involving over 90,000 troops from 32 nations to test rapid deployment and collective defense. During the exercise, allies refined technologies for sharing a common operating picture, enabling seamless communication and coordination across languages and systems to simulate high-intensity conflict scenarios. In cyber-physical operations, COP facilitates threat mapping by overlaying digital network intrusions onto physical battlefields, as outlined in U.S. Army cyber doctrine, where a cyber COP visualizes attacks on to support integrated responses in contested environments. These applications have yielded enhanced synchronization in multi-domain operations (MDO), encompassing land, air, sea, space, and cyber domains, as emphasized in U.S. Army from the 2020s. Field Manual 3-0 (2022) underscores the COP's role in providing a view of friendly and adversary activities, enabling of effects to exploit temporary windows of advantage against peer competitors. This doctrinal evolution supports unified action, where synchronized MDO reduces decision timelines and amplifies in large-scale operations.

Civilian and Emergency Management

In civilian and emergency management, the Common Operational Picture (COP) serves as a vital tool for coordinating responses to crises outside military contexts, providing a shared, real-time view of incidents to enhance decision-making and resource allocation. In Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs), COP systems integrate data from multiple sources to support disaster response, particularly for natural disasters like hurricanes. For instance, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) employs COP within its Response and Recovery Federal Interagency Operational Plan (FIOP) to maintain situational awareness across federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial partners, stabilizing community lifelines such as energy and transportation during events like hurricanes. This approach, managed through FEMA's Crisis Management System and geospatial tools like ArcGIS Online, facilitates rapid assessment of outages and restoration efforts, drawing from interagency inputs including the Federal Communications Commission's Disaster Information Reporting System. Law enforcement agencies have adapted COP technology since the to manage events and incidents, focusing on public safety and . In the United States, departments such as Baton Rouge, Camden County, and have implemented COP platforms that display on hotspots, officer locations, and incident statuses, enabling proactive and faster responses. For example, 's Strategic Decision Support Centers integrate COP with systems like for gunshot detection, contributing to a 48% reduction in shootings and homicides in pilot districts by 2019. These adaptations emphasize civilian-oriented outcomes, such as building community trust through transparent data sharing at public meetings, while addressing challenges like officer training and buy-in. A key example of COP integration in public safety involves linking it with (CAD) systems for real-time incident tracking, allowing dispatchers and responders to visualize and respond to calls more efficiently. In Baton Rouge, the Public Safety Common Operational Platform fuses CAD data with geographic information systems to notify commanders of incidents up to 20 minutes faster, improving coordination during events like shootings. Similarly, County's Real-Time Tactical Operation Intelligence Center combines CAD with automatic vehicle location and license plate readers to monitor protests and school zones, enhancing resource deployment without relying on exhaustive surveillance. This integration supports broader public safety ecosystems by streamlining data flow across agencies. In the realm of national , frameworks extend these applications to safeguard critical systems against threats, providing emergency managers with layered visualizations of risks. The framework, for instance, offers a multi-level —including maps, scorecards, and controls—for at strategic, operational, and tactical scales, enabling rapid threat response with query times under 1.1 seconds. It integrates data streams like BGP routing and geolocation to contextualize attacks on , supporting responses through tools compliant with standards such as MIL-STD-2525D. Adaptations of COP for local agencies often feature scaled-down versions that prioritize inter-agency sharing, as outlined in Department of (DHS) guidelines updated in 2025. The DHS COP Program, operated by the National Operations Center, delivers accessible dashboards via the Geospatial Information for remote users at state and local levels, fostering in and disaster scenarios. This includes sharing operational views for transportation incidents and general hazards, aligning with FEMA's authorized equipment standards to ensure without overwhelming smaller entities. Such guidelines emphasize continuous updates and multi-jurisdictional access to build in civilian crises.

Challenges and Limitations

Technical Challenges

One of the primary technical challenges in developing and maintaining a common operational picture (COP) is data overload from multiple sensors, which leads to saturation and overwhelms processing capabilities. The proliferation of sensors in network-centric operations generates increasing data rates that exceed legacy architectures' capacity, necessitating advanced management tools to and prioritize relevant . Similarly, in updates arises from limitations, particularly at tactical levels where from units strains transmission systems, resulting in delays that can compromise timely . Compatibility issues with legacy systems further complicate COP implementation, as modern sensor networks must integrate with obsolete protocols and interfaces through protocol translation and data format conversion. These challenges are addressed via wrapper services and standardized agreements, but they persist in multi-domain environments requiring time synchronization and uncertainty propagation. Specific problems include false positives in automated threat detection, where sensor fusion techniques can misidentify benign activities as threats, though methods like feature-level fusion have demonstrated substantial false alarm reductions in spectral and radar data applications. Scalability for large-scale operations poses additional hurdles, particularly in 3D visualizations, where frameworks must handle varying scenario complexities from small units to theater-level actions while optimizing performance through level-of-detail rendering to avoid processor overload. Mitigation trends involve advances in AI filtering to automate data processing and reduce overload, such as models that enhance development by fusing inputs and detecting objects with up to 80 targets processed per hour, though challenges like AI hallucinations—evidenced by 46.6% factual errors in generated outputs—persist. However, persistent issues remain in contested environments, where GPS jamming degrades the accuracy of position-dependent data in the by 30-60% for precision-guided systems, disrupting overall . integration methods, such as hierarchical edge processing, attempt to address these by distributing computation, but bandwidth constraints in jammed scenarios limit their effectiveness.

Organizational and Human Factors

One of the primary organizational barriers to effective Common Operational Picture (COP) implementation is resistance to information stemming from security s, which often physically separate data across domains and delay dissemination in multi-agency environments. In coalition defense networks, and sensitivity of defense information limit external , frequently relying on non-automated methods like or portals rather than integrated systems. This reluctance is compounded by legal ownership concerns and policies that prioritize protecting operational details, hindering the creation of a unified COP. Similarly, training gaps for operators in interpreting complex visual displays persist, as current systems demand specialized skills to navigate dense symbology and updates, yet many programs lack sufficient focus on rapid recognition and . For instance, interdisciplinary workshops have identified the need for better user-developer interaction to address interpretation challenges in tactical visualizations. Cultural silos between agencies further exacerbate these issues, with departmental restrictions and ingrained preventing even basic data exchange, such as unpatched vulnerabilities, across federal networks. Human factors play a significant role in COP limitations, particularly cognitive overload from dense displays that flood operators with unfiltered data, leading to cluttered interfaces and impaired . In visualizations, overlapping objects and high information density increase workload, complicating perception and projection of threats, as evidenced in simulations where operators struggled with occluded icons under MilSTD 2525B standards. Trust issues in shared data accuracy across hierarchies also undermine COP reliability, as differing organizational perspectives and unverified sources create mismatches in multi-stakeholder operations, requiring negotiation to align interpretations. In , for example, limited mutual understanding of procedures erodes confidence in COP elements like resource locations, with verbal dominance over digital tools reflecting persistent trust gaps. Policy aspects introduce additional hurdles, including regulatory constraints on data privacy that impact civilian COP applications, such as those in emergency response where GDPR mandates stringent consent and secure handling amid urgent needs. In emergency communication systems akin to s, challenges include unsecure data transmission and inadequate access controls, which can conflict with rapid information flows required during incidents. As of 2025, evolving doctrines for multi-national operations, such as the August 2025 update to 's Allied Joint Publication-3 (AJP-3), emphasize standardized reporting and interoperability to overcome national caveats and doctrinal differences, yet persistent gaps in tactical-level unification continue to challenge development in contexts.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms - DTIC
    A single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command that facilitates collaborative planning and ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] cjcsi 3152.01 - Joint Chiefs of Staff
    Sep 23, 2020 · (DoD Dictionary). Common Operational Picture – A single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command that ...
  3. [3]
    Developing a common operational picture for sustainment - Army.mil
    A sustainment common operational picture (COP) provides sustainment commanders with a clear picture of the sustainment situation at any given time.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The Common Operational Picture at the Company and Below
    At its essence, the common operational picture (COP) is a tool which feeds commanders information to inform decisions. In its entirety, this is comprised of ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Developing a Common Operational Picture for Sustainment
    A sustainment common operational picture (COP) provides a clear picture of the sustainment situation at any given time and is critical to increasing operational ...
  6. [6]
    Engineer Common Operating Picture (eCOP)
    Oct 15, 2025 · The Engineering Common Operating Picture (eCOP) serves as a planning, management and historic engineering activity tool enabling leadership to ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Creating Shared Understanding: Tools, Challenges, and Minimum ...
    Jan 31, 2023 · • Common Operational Picture (COP): “a single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command that facilitates ...
  8. [8]
    Developing a multinational logistics common operational picture
    Sep 10, 2015 · Odierno wrote, "The Army Operating Concept (AOC) describes how future Army forces will prevent conflict, shape security environments, and win ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
    This edition of JP 1-02 has been published in two basic parts: a. Terms and definitions. These are annotated with the source publication. b. Abbreviations and ...
  10. [10]
    https://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/dod_dictionary/
  11. [11]
    https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/jp-doctrine/jp1_02(05).pdf
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Knowledge and Information Management Focus Paper 3rd Edition ...
    The Common Operational Picture (COP). Joint Pub 3-0 defines the COP as “A single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Common Operational Picture in Joint Vision 2020 - DTIC
    May 28, 2002 · The term COP refers to a generic, commonly used name of one of a few systems that are defined in joint doctrine as the Common Operating ...Missing: JP | Show results with:JP
  14. [14]
    Duncan - Proposing a Common Operational Picture - Canada.ca
    May 27, 2024 · Within Canada's joint doctrine publications, the term “common operational picture” is often used but rarely examined in any detail.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] An Assessment of the Common Operational Picture - DTIC
    The Common Operational Picture (COP) is an automated command, control, communications, computer, and intelligence (C4I) system providing enhanced viewing of.
  16. [16]
    https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/jp-doctrine/jp1_02(02).pdf
  17. [17]
    https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/jp-doctrine/jp1_02(10-08).pdf
  18. [18]
    The Next Generation of Command Post Computing - ResearchGate
    Aug 9, 2025 · 2.1 Maneuver Control System. The Maneuver Control System (MCS) was the primary command and control system for Army maneuver elements in.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] ARCHIVED REPORT Maneuver Control System (MCS)
    The MCS provides the Common Operational Picture. The COP depicts information provided by all the BFAs and includes a situation map that uses Defense Mapping ...Missing: DARPA 2004
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Army Tactical Command and Control System Development Problems
    Jun 3, 1991 · For fiscal year 1990, the contract was valued at $70 million, and it has additional option years that have not been priced. Overall, the Army ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    GCCS - Intelligence - GlobalSecurity.org
    Global Command and Control System (GCCS). Primary Purpose, GCCS is the nation's premier system for the. command and control of joint and coalition. forces. It ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    U.S. Army's common operating picture tool continues to evolve
    Dec 6, 2012 · First introduced by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2004 and adopted by the Army under the Maneuver Control System ...Missing: MCS | Show results with:MCS
  23. [23]
    The System: Celebrating 20 Years of GPS
    Apr 1, 2015 · April marks the 20th anniversary of GPS FOC. US Air Force Space Command declared Full Operational Capability (FOC) for the GPS constellation April 27, 1995.
  24. [24]
    Common Operation Picture (COP) - Defense Update:
    Nov 22, 2005 · The situational picture presents all elements with precise locations, generated by reported GPS coordinates received from each element.
  25. [25]
    Android Team Awareness Kit - Wikipedia
    Android Team Awareness Kit (ATAK, also as Android Tactical Assault Kit, and ... ATAK began in August 2010 and was originally based on NASA WorldWind Mobile.Development and usage · ATAK versions · Commercial licensing · Users
  26. [26]
    The development of the ATAK app and TAK – what's to come
    ATAK is the Android Tactical Assault Kit, developed by AFRL for Android OS. ... ATAK was delivered as a field-ready device for the US military in 2010 ...
  27. [27]
    Army fielding enhanced common operational picture suite, looks ...
    Jan 20, 2022 · Army fielding enhanced common operational picture suite, looks towards cloud-enabled mission command ... advantage and decision dominance.Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
  28. [28]
    Systematic makes global military system available in the cloud
    Jul 17, 2025 · Danish software company Systematic has launched a new cloud-based version of its global command and control system SitaWare.
  29. [29]
    "Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning ...
    Jul 15, 2025 · By automating processes like common operational picture generation and leveraging AI for course of action analysis, military planners can ...Missing: cloud- 2020s
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Reimagining Military C2 in the Age of AI – Revolution, Regression ...
    The ability to gain and maintain all-domain awareness through AI-enhanced, tailorable all- domain Title 50-Title 10 common intelligence and common operational ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] autonomous aerial drones connecting public safety: opportunities
    With the advent of automated airspace monitoring technologies ... (GIS), and Common. Operating Picture (COP) systems, either directly or through intermediaries.
  32. [32]
    Review of approaches to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles ... - NIH
    UAVs, GIS technologies, remote sensing and artificial intelligence are comprehensively capable of revolutionizing traditional approaches to the detection ...
  33. [33]
    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5404b7d2e4b0feb6e5d9636b/t/6756e114612dee018d9a5981/1733746981789/WinTAK%2BSUM%2B5.2.pdf
  34. [34]
    [PDF] abcs army battle command system (abcs) layer 4 common - DTIC
    Mar 31, 1995 · The ABCS establishes a common operating methodology and ... the commander with a complete picture on which to base operational decisions.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] WinTAK - Squarespace
    Aug 8, 2024 · Common Operating Picture (COP) Refresh ... saved in C:\Users\username\Pictures\ WinTAK\Video Screenshots\ folder. To start the ...
  36. [36]
    APPENDIX A: Army Battle Command systems Descriptions
    ABCS · Real-time situational awareness for commander, staff, and soldiers. · A shared common picture of the battlespace. · Graphical displays with friendly and ...
  37. [37]
    Common vs. Personal Operational Pictures: Create Visual Intelligence
    A Common Operational Picture (COP), displayed on an overview video wall, and the Personal Operational Picture (POP), composed through an operator workstation ...Missing: methods 3D
  38. [38]
    Hands-on ATAK, WinTAK, WebTAK, and iTAK - CritComm Insights
    Aug 22, 2023 · The TAK software suite of ATAK, iTAK, WebTAK, & WinTAK provides a Common Operating Picture (COP) based on an extensible framework that ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Using Virtual Reality to Facilitate Common Operational Pictures ...
    Apr 21, 2021 · The idea is to use 3D visualization of the terrain and virtual reality to increase commander situational awareness, at a tactical and ...Missing: video | Show results with:video
  40. [40]
    SPACECOM prepping data fusion pilot to create 'common ...
    Jun 24, 2024 · US Space Command is putting together a pilot project aimed at showing how data can be fused to create a common “picture” for operators to work from.
  41. [41]
    Army researchers envision cross-reality future | Article - Army.mil
    Jun 17, 2020 · ADELPHI, Md. -- Army researchers laid out a plan that uses cross-reality technology to establish a common operating picture for Soldiers.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] A Common Operating Picture for Air Force Materiel Sustainment
    Schwer- punkt, which means “focal point,” is a notion drawn from physics and. German military doctrine that emphasizes achieving the commander's intent ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Common Operational Picture (COP) and Common Tactical ... - DTIC
    These associations allow the data to be. “grouped” according to similar “keys”, or attributes, in the data. The data is then formatted, and passed to LEIF ...
  44. [44]
    ASSIST-QuickSearch Document Details
    The purpose of MIL-STD-6016 is to describe the approved standards to achieve compatibility and interoperability between command and control and communications ...
  45. [45]
    (PDF) Exploring fusion architecture for a common operational picture
    Aug 10, 2025 · We explore an architecture for refining the fusion for building a more accurate picture. It uses a central processing center to fuse tracks ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] A Common Operating Picture Framework Leveraging Data Fusion ...
    The Video and Sensor Analytics layer applies algorithms to the ingested video data (FMV, WAMI, CCTV / Fixed Camera, Open Source Video, etc.) to identify key.
  47. [47]
    COP-IDS | Leading Naval Integrated Navigation & Tactical Solutions
    COP-IDS (Common Operational Picture – Image Display Server) is a powerful ... Promotes interoperability across coalition and government systems. Use ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Service Oriented Architecture Support in Various ... - IAENG
    Abstract— Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is a promising approach ... Tactical domain ability provides a common operational picture (COP) in different.
  49. [49]
    SSC Atlantic's Tactical Service Oriented Architecture Gives Marines ...
    ... Service Oriented Architecture. The TSOA program, managed by Marine ... TSOA provides a user-friendly, common operational picture that gives Marines ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning ...
    Jul 15, 2025 · This section examines how ML and data technologies can improve critical components of common operational picture (COP) and course of action (COA) ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Artificial Intelligence for Decision Support in Command and Control ...
    An idea listed in the information compiling subcluster was automatic common operational picture ... Machine learning can also be used to develop tactics for ...
  52. [52]
    5 Ways Edge Servers Improve UAV Military Programs, Applications
    Nov 16, 2020 · 3. Enhanced common operational picture (COP). With local data analysis improved and network latency and traffic reduced, commanders and other ...
  53. [53]
    EdgeAware - Booz Allen
    Jan 12, 2024 · 3D Handheld Common Operational Picture. EdgeAware fuses aided target recognition (AiTR) and cyber capabilities with a solution from Reveal ...
  54. [54]
    Thales selected by NATO to deploy NCOP operational situational ...
    May 19, 2022 · The NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCI Agency) has selected Thales to deploy the NCOP 2 system, which will provide shared ...
  55. [55]
    NATO initial common operational picture capability project
    Aug 9, 2025 · The purpose of the COP capability is to provide military forces a comprehensive view of the battle space, thereby enhancing situational ...
  56. [56]
    NATO Common Operational Picture NCOP | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (1) The NCOP is intended to enable NATO and national forces to establish and share a common view of the battlespace (ie common operational picture)
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Blue Force Tracking to Expand Across Force
    More than 1,200. BFT systems were installed in combat vehicles, command posts and helicopters for operations in. Iraq and. Afghanistan. Users from the. Army, ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Blue Force Tracking: Building a Joint Capability - DTIC
    Mar 15, 2008 · At least twelve different BFT/BFSA systems are being used in operations ongoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. This capability has proven to have ...
  59. [59]
    Seeing the Full Picture: SeaVision Supports Maritime Domain ...
    May 13, 2024 · SeaVision is the US Navy's unclassified, web-based maritime situational awareness tool that enables African partners to view and share maritime information.
  60. [60]
    PROTEUS Provides Global Maritime Domain Awareness
    Jan 20, 2022 · PROTEUS is used to identify, query, and filter maritime vessels based on user-defined criteria and provides near-real time global maritime situational ...
  61. [61]
    NATO Allies Get on Same Page During Biggest Exercise
    Jun 27, 2024 · They were operating and refining the technologies that allowed allies to share a common operating picture and communicate in their own languages ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] FM 3-0 - Intelligence Resource Program
    Oct 1, 2022 · Army forces require a joint common operational picture (COP) of friendly forces and their operations, including those of allies and partners ...
  63. [63]
    Multidomain Dominance | Article | The United States Army
    Aug 14, 2024 · Multidomain operations are the combined arms employment of joint and Army capabilities to create and exploit relative advantages that achieve objectives.Missing: 2020s COP
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Response and Recovery Federal Interagency Operational Plan
    The Response and Recovery Federal Interagency Operational Plan (FIOP) guides federal departments and agencies (hereafter “federal agencies”) in executing ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Common Operational Picture Technology in Law Enforcement
    This report's sole purpose is to provide the law enforcement community with illustrative examples of COP technology use and implementation in three law ...
  66. [66]
    Common Operational Picture Technology in Law Enforcement
    Dec 16, 2019 · This study provides examples of current COP technology use in US law enforcement, and it identifies challenges and successes that other agencies ...
  67. [67]
    Study on Cyber Common Operational Picture Framework for ... - MDPI
    In the military field, the Common Operational Picture (COP) recognizes the general situation, updates data on changing situations, exchanges data with internal ...
  68. [68]
    DHS Common Operating Picture (COP) - Homeland Security
    May 15, 2025 · The DHS COP Program provides strategic-level situational awareness of incidents and events of interest to the Homeland Security Enterprise.Missing: agency | Show results with:agency
  69. [69]
    Common Operating Picture Emergency Responders
    Apr 10, 2025 · A common operation picture (COP) is a continuously updated overview of an incident compiled throughout an incident's life cycle.Missing: JP 1-02 2001
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Network-centric Operations: Challenges and Pitfalls - Air University
    Our military operations already suffer from information overload, and the promised proliferation and increasing data rates of sensors and posting of ...
  71. [71]
    Tactical Edge Sensor Fusion at Scale - Ambush
    Sep 22, 2025 · Integration Challenges. Legacy System Compatibility. Modern sensor networks must integrate with legacy military systems using obsolete protocols ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Feature Level Sensor Fusion - DTIC
    The two fusion processes were applied to spectral and radar sensor data and were shown to provide substantial false alarm reduction. The approaches are easily ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Interactive 3D visualizations for studying combat experiences and ...
    Scalability: The visualization framework needs to accommodate scenarios of varying size and complexity, from small unit actions to large scale operations.<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    GNSS Jammers and Its Impacts in Military Defense - VisionSpace
    This analysis examines the technical foundations of GNSS jamming techniques, their operational impact on military environments, and the emerging countermeasures ...