Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

ShotSpotter


ShotSpotter is an acoustic gunshot detection system developed by SoundThinking, Inc., consisting of a network of sensors deployed across urban areas to identify the auditory signatures of gunfire, triangulate their locations with claimed precision within 25 feet, and transmit real-time alerts to for expedited response.
The technology addresses the underreporting of gunshots, detecting incidents at rates exceeding 90% compared to under 12% via traditional calls, thereby enabling faster dispatch times of under 60 seconds versus several minutes otherwise.
As of 2025, ShotSpotter operates in approximately 170 U.S. cities, where it has been associated with increased evidence recovery, such as casings, and aid in unreported cases, though its has prompted discontinuations in several locations due to high costs exceeding millions annually per city.
Peer-reviewed longitudinal analyses across large metropolitan counties, however, demonstrate no statistically significant effects on reducing homicides or improving arrests for murders or weapons offenses following .
Audits and field data further indicate that 70-89% of alerts frequently fail to yield confirmed evidence of shootings upon arrival, fueling controversies over false positives—claimed by the company at 0.5%—resource diversion, and the absence of broader crime deterrence.

History and Development

Founding and Early Deployment

ShotSpotter, Inc. was founded in 1996 by physicist Dr. Robert Showen as a response to escalating urban rates, with the initial focus on developing an acoustic sensor network capable of detecting and triangulating the location of gunshots through microphone arrays mounted on urban infrastructure. The system's empirical foundation stemmed from the recognition that traditional reporting captured only a fraction of gunfire incidents, later quantified in analyses of cities like Washington, D.C., and , where approximately 12% of detected gunfire events prompted calls to emergency services, leaving the majority unreported and delaying potential interventions. Early development emphasized controlled testing to validate detection reliability, with the technology first demonstrated at the as a proof-of-concept for gunshot localization amid large-scale events. By the late , ShotSpotter pursued pilot implementations in high-crime urban zones to enable rapid dispatch independent of witness reports, addressing causal gaps in response times for isolated or suppressed shootings. A key early pilot occurred in , where the Redwood City Police Department and San Mateo County Sheriff's Office tested the system in the one-square-mile Redwood Village neighborhood, known for elevated gunfire incidence, starting around 1999. The evaluation, funded by the , assessed the system's performance in operational conditions, reporting initial detection rates that supported claims of over 90% accuracy for confirmed gunshots in test scenarios, though field variables like urban noise influenced outcomes. These pilots underscored the technology's potential to fill reporting voids, with deployments justified by data showing 80-90% of criminal gunfire evading traditional channels.

Technological Evolution and Company Rebranding

Following its deployment, ShotSpotter's evolved from reliance on acoustic using multiple sensors to detect impulsive sounds and estimate locations via time-of-arrival differences, incorporating and enhancements during the to improve accuracy. These updates enabled better discrimination between gunfire and ambient noises such as or vehicle backfires through iterative refinements trained on acoustic datasets, with a U.S. patent detailing a two-step process of automated machine followed by human verification to refine alert precision. Key technical updates included the 2013 launch of ShotSpotter SiteSecure, extending detection capabilities to indoor environments by adapting sensor networks for combined indoor-outdoor coverage in facilities like schools and campuses, addressing limitations of outdoor-only systems blocked by structures. By the early , integrations with video management systems and analytics platforms allowed alerts to trigger automated camera panning or linkage with existing feeds, enhancing post-alert verification without altering core acoustic detection. Internal audits of system data from to 2022 reported an overall accuracy rate of 97.69% for classifying and publishing gunfire incidents, attributing reductions in erroneous alerts to these data-driven algorithmic improvements. In April 2023, the company rebranded its corporate identity from ShotSpotter, Inc. to SoundThinking, Inc., to encompass an expanded portfolio of public safety tools beyond gunshot detection, while retaining the for the flagship acoustic product amid revenue growth and product diversification. This shift reflected a strategic pivot toward integrated platforms like SafetySmart, incorporating analytics from multiple sensor types, without discontinuing or rearchitecting the core ShotSpotter technology.

Key Milestones and Expansions

ShotSpotter's adoption accelerated in the 2010s as municipalities addressed persistent urban gun violence challenges. Chicago initiated deployment in September 2012, starting with a three-square-mile pilot area that later expanded to cover over 100 square miles. New York City launched a pilot in March 2015 in parts of the Bronx and Brooklyn, with subsequent expansions across boroughs driven by needs for faster response to unreported gunfire. Contract awards surged from to amid a national spike in gun homicides, which rose approximately 30% in major U.S. cities during the initial phase. This period saw ShotSpotter expand to over 130 cities and agencies, supported by federal grants targeting public safety enhancements in high-violence areas. In 2024-2025, adoption patterns showed mixed trajectories, with terminating its contract effective September 22, 2024, after spending over $50 million since inception, citing efficacy concerns. Contrasting this, nearby Elmwood Park, , approved implementation in 2024 to bolster local response capabilities amid regional violence. , renewed its one-year contract in September 2025 by an 8-2 council vote, prioritizing continued gunshot detection in targeted zones.

Technical Design and Functionality

Acoustic Sensor Network

The ShotSpotter acoustic sensor network consists of a distributed array of outdoor mounted on rooftops, utility poles, or other elevated structures to form a optimized for urban coverage. These are typically deployed at a density of 20-25 units per , enabling comprehensive monitoring of targeted zones spanning approximately 20-25 , with placement determined through strategic site surveys accounting for building heights, layouts, and potential obstructions to sound propagation. Each incorporates calibrated to capture impulsive acoustic signatures, such as the sharp reports of gunfire, alongside integrated electronics for initial , GPS for precise timing synchronization, and cellular modems for data transmission, ensuring operation independent of wired power in many installations. Sensor positioning relies on acoustic principles of sound wave , where multiple units must detect the same event for localization accuracy, necessitating dense clustering in high-risk areas while minimizing gaps through geospatial modeling of urban sound paths. The hardware is engineered for , with weather-resistant enclosures to withstand typical environmental exposure, though efficacy diminishes in conditions like heavy rainfall or pervasive ambient noise from construction or traffic, which can attenuate or mask impulsive signals. Designed for low-maintenance deployment, the network supports near-real-time event flagging, with sensors relaying raw audio clips via cellular links to central servers for further handling, prioritizing outdoor open-air detection over indoor or enclosed spaces where sound complicates .

Detection Algorithms and Processing

The detection algorithms of ShotSpotter process audio signals captured by the sensor network to identify gunfire through of distinct acoustic signatures, including the muzzle blast—a brief, high-amplitude impulsive from propellant gas expansion lasting milliseconds—and the ballistic shockwave from supersonic bullets, characterized by an N-shaped profile propagating faster than . These waveforms are filtered and feature-extracted for temporal, , and patterns that causally distinguish impulsive ballistic events from non-ballistic noises like or vehicle backfires, which lack the precise shockwave component or exhibit different decay rates. Localization follows signal classification via time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA) triangulation, leveraging synchronized timestamps from at least three to four sensors to compute hyperbolic intersections and pinpoint the event origin with a claimed accuracy of under 25 meters in urban environments. This geometric method relies on the finite speed of sound and precise sensor calibration to resolve position without directional microphones, enabling rapid computation independent of shooter orientation. Core classification employs deep neural network models that convert extracted audio features into spectrographic image mosaics for , trained on a of over 14 million authenticated and non- audio samples to refine thresholds. An of published alerts from 2019 to 2022 verified 97.69% accuracy in detecting, classifying, and confirming gunfire events among those escalated for review, though this metric applies to post-filtered outputs rather than raw detections. To mitigate errors, processing incorporates a sequential verification pipeline: machine classifiers assign confidence scores, automatically discarding high-confidence non-events without human intervention, while borderline or probable gunfire triggers expert review at a centralized Incident Review Center, where analysts confirm via replay and context before authorizing alerts, achieving a reported 0.5% for dispatched notifications.

Integration with Law Enforcement Systems

ShotSpotter integrates with law enforcement systems by delivering real-time alerts directly into computer-aided dispatch (CAD) and records management systems (RMS), enabling automated incident creation with precise GPS coordinates, timestamps, and details such as estimated round count. These alerts are verified by technicians before transmission, providing dispatchers and officers with actionable data for rapid response without relying solely on 911 calls. The system supports mobile applications for and devices, allowing officers to receive instant notifications with audible alerts, street view mapping, time elapsed since detection, and access to audio clips for verification. Integration extends to third-party technologies, including automated plate readers (ALPR) via for correlating vehicle data with gunshot locations, and systems for deploying aerial to incident sites. Compatibility with live video feeds, such as those from body-worn cameras or , facilitates corroboration during active responses, though primary reliance remains on acoustic data. For post-incident analysis, ShotSpotter offers an offline forensics mode through tools like the Investigative Lead Summary (ILS), which exports audio evidence, location , and timestamps for integration into investigative workflows and crime gun intelligence platforms. Agencies can customize alert thresholds and reporting based on local acoustic profiles, with export capabilities supporting and pattern analysis in RMS. SoundThinking has partnered with approximately 20 integration providers across 50 cities to ensure seamless with existing .

Accuracy and Performance

Detection Accuracy Metrics and Audits

SoundThinking reports an aggregate accuracy rate of 97% for ShotSpotter detections across its police department customers from 2019 to 2021, with a of 0.5%, based on field data where alerts are cross-verified against police findings of such as casings or ballistic impacts. This metric calculates the proportion of alerts confirmed as actual gunfire versus non-gunfire events like or vehicle backfires, excluding unverified alerts as inherent failures, which the company argues misrepresents performance given the challenges of outdoor . An independent audit by Edgeworth Economics, reviewing over 10,000 ShotSpotter alerts from multiple cities between 2019 and 2022, substantiated these figures, finding overall accuracy of 97.69% for 2019-2021 and 97.63% for 2022, alongside a 0.36% in the latter year. The analysis relied on ground-truth data from verifications, emphasizing that the system's algorithms prioritize distinguishing gunfire acoustic signatures from ambient noise through multi-sensor and human review. A 2006 field evaluation funded by the tested ShotSpotter by simulating 234 firearm discharges across 23 outdoor locations, achieving detection of 99.6% of the shots and localization within 40 feet for 90.9% of them. This controlled trial highlighted the technology's sensitivity to actual gunfire under varied conditions, contrasting with critiques based on narrower, post-deployment samples that may overlook underreported incidents lacking physical evidence. Subsequent validations, including Edgeworth's examination of operational data, reinforce that high accuracy holds in real-world aggregates rather than isolated audits prone to .

False Positive Rates and Error Analysis

False positives in ShotSpotter systems arise primarily from acoustic events mimicking gunfire, such as , vehicle backfires, or construction noises, though independent audits indicate these constitute less than 1% of alerts. An by Edgeworth Economics of ShotSpotter data from 2019 to 2022 confirmed an overall accuracy rate of 97.69%, corresponding to a false positive rate of approximately 0.5% for real-time gunshot detections across multiple deployments. Algorithmic enhancements, including integrations refined after 2020, have contributed to progressive reductions in misclassifications by improving differentiation between impulsive sounds. These updates leverage from vast acoustic datasets to filter environmental interferences more effectively. Critics, including a MacArthur Justice Center report on Chicago deployments from 2019 to 2021, have alleged error rates exceeding 85% based on the absence of gun-related or any at alert locations in 86% to 89% of cases. However, an independent Edgeworth Economics review of that study identified methodological shortcomings, such as equating lack of on-scene with false detection—overlooking verified gunshots where perpetrators had fled or no physical traces remained—and selective data sampling that ignored confirmed events. SoundThinking countered that such analyses distort detection accuracy by conflating it with investigative outcomes, emphasizing that over 80% of Chicago's homicides occur in ShotSpotter-covered districts. Error mitigation relies on , where alerts require corroboration from at least three sensors within a 400-millisecond window to triangulate and validate signals, alongside human analyst review at processing centers prior to dispatch. protocols further incorporate cross-verification with calls or visual , yielding dispatched error rates below 0.5% in audited datasets from various cities. These layered checks distinguish ShotSpotter's operational false alarms from raw acoustic misdetections.

Response Efficacy and Empirical Studies

Empirical evaluations of ShotSpotter's response efficacy highlight its capacity to expedite police interventions for gunfire incidents, particularly those not reported via calls. In , the system has enabled officers to arrive at scenes up to three minutes before initial citizen reports, facilitating timely aid that contributed to saving 21 lives in the first 14 months of deployment ending April 2025. This rapid response—often within minutes of detection—contrasts with traditional call-based timelines, which can extend to hours for unreported shots, allowing for evidence preservation such as over 2,300 shell casings recovered and entered into the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network (NIBIN). Studies confirm operational benefits in translating detections to on-scene outcomes, though results on arrests vary. A 2024 analysis of deployments in and Kansas City found ShotSpotter alerts preceded 911 calls by 93 seconds on average and pinpointed locations approximately 300 feet closer to actual gunfire sites, leading to greater collection of ballistic evidence like shell casings compared to non-covered areas. However, the same research observed no corresponding increases in arrest rates or case clearances for shootings, attributing this to factors beyond initial response such as investigative challenges. Low rates of immediate gun recoveries following alerts, such as 0.8% for firearms and 0.7% for arrests across over 62,000 Police Department alerts since 2015, reflect the predominance of unreported and "cold" scenes rather than detection failures. Research indicates that 80-90% of urban gunfire incidents evade reporting, as evidenced by only 12.4% of detected shots in , prompting calls; by the time officers arrive, perpetrators and weapons have typically dispersed, limiting on-site yields despite preserved . This underscores the technology's utility in addressing underreported events, where causal chains prioritize scene securing over guaranteed apprehensions.

Deployments and Adoption

Current and Active Installations

As of October 2025, ShotSpotter, operated by SoundThinking, maintains active deployments across dozens of U.S. cities, primarily in high-crime urban districts where gunfire incidents are prevalent, with recent renewals signaling ongoing operational commitment despite public debates. The Police Department secured a multi-year contract renewal in February 2025 to continue utilizing the technology for real-time gunshot alerts. Similarly, , extended its contract on September 8, 2025, for $220,500 annually, focusing coverage on areas with elevated gun violence risks. In Los Angeles County, the system operates in multiple municipalities, including Pasadena, , Hawaiian Gardens, and Lakewood, where contract renewals and expansions were confirmed in March 2025 to enhance response in neighborhoods affected by unreported shootings. These U.S. installations emphasize coverage of dense, gunfire-prone zones, with agencies integrating alerts into dispatch protocols for sustained post-trial usage, as evidenced by consistent renewals in localities like these. Internationally, deployments remain limited but active in , , where the technology supports responses in gang hotspots as of early 2025, adapting to local acoustic conditions for gunfire detection. Overall, active sites process thousands of alerts per jurisdiction annually, with law enforcement reporting integration into routine operations for verifying and prioritizing potential incidents.

Recent Expansions and Renewals

In February 2025, the Police Department extended its ShotSpotter contract for three years through December 2027, valued at $21.8 million, following internal assessments that reported an average monthly accuracy rate of 94% in 2024, surpassing the contractual threshold of 90%. This renewal occurred despite a June 2024 city recommending non-renewal due to limited evidence of gun recoveries, underscoring reliance on vendor-provided performance metrics over external critiques. In September 2024, the approved an expansion of ShotSpotter coverage alongside a extension to March 2026, aiming to enhance detection in areas with persistent gunfire incidents tied to post-2020 urban violence trends. Similarly, Elmwood Park, Illinois, activated a new three-year ShotSpotter deployment in late July 2024, covering 2 square miles, as village officials cited the need for rapid alerts in response to regional gun crime patterns following nearby Chicago's termination. March 2025 saw SoundThinking announce active ShotSpotter deployments in four area cities, including Pasadena, where the system has facilitated responses to over 400 verified gunfire incidents and aided 21 victims since 2022, with officials emphasizing faster officer arrivals in high-risk zones. In September 2025, , renewed its one-year contract for $220,500 by an 8-2 council vote, building on pilots initiated amid statewide gun violence surges post-2020 that prompted similar data-driven adoptions in cities like Winston-Salem, where deployment began in August 2021 after nearly 3,700 alerts correlated with increased response efficacy. These expansions reflect decisions anchored in local crime statistics and pilot outcomes, prioritizing empirical indicators of detection utility amid broader post-pandemic trends.

Terminations, Declines, and Rejections

In September 2024, terminated its contract with SoundThinking (formerly ShotSpotter), effective September 23, ending deployment across approximately 1,300 square miles of the city after over a decade of use. The decision under Mayor was driven by concerns over cost—annual fees exceeding $8 million—and questions about efficacy, including low rates of verified gun-related incidents from alerts, amid pressure from advocacy groups citing privacy and racial equity issues. Despite this, prior data indicated the system alerted to thousands of annual gunshot incidents not reported via , potentially enabling faster responses to unreported violence. Post-termination analyses, such as a study, reported a 17.8% drop in in formerly covered beats through mid-2025, though causal attribution remains debated due to concurrent policing changes and seasonal factors, with no evidence of a crime surge but possible under-detection of silent shots. Dayton, Ohio, declined to renew its three-year ShotSpotter contract in December 2022, citing high costs relative to outcomes and inability to demonstrate reductions in during deployment. The initial agreement covered select neighborhoods for about $205,000 annually, but evaluations found most alerts led to no evidence of gunfire or crimes, prompting the exit amid broader scrutiny of tools. Dayton officials noted the technology's overlap with calls and emerging issues like distinguishing recreational legalized under state law in 2022, though it had detected some unreported shots during use. No immediate post-termination crime spike was reported, but data gaps on unreported incidents persist, as the system previously supplemented call-based detection. Atlanta conducted a 2018 pilot of ShotSpotter but rejected full adoption, determining it largely duplicated existing 911 gunshot reports without sufficient unique value to justify $280,000 yearly costs. Police assessments highlighted redundant alerts and limited investigative yields, leading to no contract despite the trial's focus on high-crime areas. Several cities, including in March 2024 and Winston-Salem in August 2024, ended ShotSpotter contracts, attributing decisions to unverified claims of crime reduction amid budget constraints and activist campaigns questioning -backed efficacy. and others followed similar patterns by early 2025, citing low verification rates and costs outweighing benefits, though evaluations acknowledged detection of non-911 shots. Post-exit showed mixed results, with no uniform crime increases but potential losses in identifying underreported gunfire, as reviews in places like Fayetteville highlighted combined -911 efficacy despite overall termination trends. A recurring pattern in these cases involves local political pressures, including advocacy from civil liberties groups emphasizing surveillance risks and efficacy doubts based on arrest metrics, alongside fiscal reviews, even as the technology's role in prompting responses to uncorroborated shots offers empirical counterpoints to full dismissal. Cities like New Orleans and Trenton, New Jersey, also terminated contracts in recent years for analogous reasons of cost and low yields.

Public Safety Impacts

Achievements in Response Times and Gunshot Verification

ShotSpotter alerts have been associated with significant reductions in police and emergency medical services response times to gunfire incidents. A 2019 study published in The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery analyzed prehospital times for gunshot wound patients and found that ShotSpotter activation decreased police response times by over 30% compared to traditional 911-dispatched calls, with similar reductions in EMS transport times enabling faster medical intervention. Independent evaluations in specific cities corroborate these gains, such as Kansas City, Missouri, where responses were 124 seconds faster, Chicago with 66 seconds faster arrivals, and Winston-Salem, North Carolina, achieving 240 seconds quicker dispatch to alerts versus resident reports. In cases lacking 911 calls—common due to underreporting of gunfire, estimated at 80-90% of incidents—ShotSpotter has facilitated through on-scene discovery, including shell casings and wounded , enabling rapid and . SoundThinking reports that such alerts have led to of gunshots or injuries in approximately 20-30% of silent cases across deployments, with officers recovering 78% more shell casings overall compared to non-alert responses, preserving ballistic forensics for investigations. Examples include , where 101 surviving gunshot were located in 2020 without prior calls, and , aiding 179 over 11 months in 2022. Deployments in , illustrate operational impacts, with ShotSpotter alerts preceding calls by minutes in critical instances, allowing officers to provide life-saving aid before dispatchers were notified; over the first 14 months from February 2024 to April 2025, this enabled saving 21 lives and recovering over 2,300 shell casings for evidentiary linkage via the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network. In Los Angeles County, including Pasadena, the technology supported quicker scene arrivals, locating 21 gunshot victims for emergency response from 2022 through the first quarter of 2025, while facilitating evidence recovery such as shell casings tied to offenders in and witness statements in Hawaiian Gardens. These outcomes enhance verification in high-gunfire areas prone to non-reporting, directing resources to verifiable threats without reliance on caller-dependent systems.

Crime Reduction Evidence and Causal Analysis

A 2023 empirical analysis of ShotSpotter deployment in utilized difference-in-differences methods and estimated a 6% reduction in rates post-installation, attributing this to the technology's role in enabling rapid interventions that disrupt ongoing criminal sequences. This finding contrasts with broader reviews, such as a of large U.S. metropolitan counties from 1999 to 2016, which found no statistically significant association between ShotSpotter and reductions in homicides after controlling for demographic and policing variables. Causal identification remains challenging due to the absence of large-scale randomized controlled trials and the prevalence of confounders, including concurrent shifts in , socioeconomic factors, and underreporting of gunshots via traditional calls, which ShotSpotter data helps quantify more accurately. A 2025 Manhattan Institute review of multiple implementations noted positive correlations between sustained use in high-adoption cities and localized crime declines but cautioned that many null-result studies rely on aggregate city-level data prone to spillover effects and fail to isolate deterrence mechanisms, such as perceived altering shooter behavior. In , 2025 police data revealed a 17.8% drop in and 37.5% decrease in homicides in beats previously equipped with ShotSpotter sensors after their removal in September 2024, reflecting potential citywide downward trends in rather than a direct causal link to the technology's presence or absence. Proponents of ShotSpotter emphasize its contribution to systemic deterrence through consistent verification, which may elevate clearance rates for unreported shootings by facilitating collection at scenes before tampering, though rigorous quantification of these indirect pathways requires further quasi-experimental designs accounting for baseline under-detection rates. Overall, while localized suggests modest disruptive effects in select contexts, the aggregate body of peer-reviewed does not establish robust, generalizable reductions attributable solely to the system.

Limitations in Arrests and Gun Recoveries

In evaluations of ShotSpotter, direct outcomes in terms of arrests and recoveries per alert remain limited. data analyzed in 2024 revealed that only 0.8% of alerts led to the recovery of even one , while 0.7% resulted in arrests for illegal gun possession. Similar patterns appear in other deployments; a Office of review of over 41,000 alerts from 2020–2021 found evidence of gun-related crimes in just 9.1% of cases, with arrests comprising a small fraction due to the lack of suspects or immediate physical proof at the scene. These low yields arise from the dynamics of urban shootings, where shooters typically disperse within seconds, often discarding weapons or blending into crowds before officers arrive, even with ShotSpotter-enabled responses averaging under two minutes. Compounding this, most gunfire incidents evade traditional detection, as only about 12% generate calls in major cities like , and , due to witness reluctance stemming from fear, distrust, or peripheral involvement in illicit activities. Alerts nonetheless initiate on-site probes that yield ancillary evidentiary gains, including shell casing recoveries and structured witness interviews, which detectives have cited for refining timelines and linking incidents in follow-up probes. Such efforts address gaps left by non-reporting but hinge on subsequent policing capacity. Relative to 911-dependent responses, ShotSpotter uncovers unreported events comprising 80–90% of urban gunfire, enabling proactive scene securing, yet arrests falter at evidentiary thresholds like suspect identification and forensic corroboration absent from the initial dispatch.

Controversies and Criticisms

Civil Liberties and Surveillance Debates

Critics, including the (ACLU), have argued that ShotSpotter's network of acoustic sensors constitutes a form of due to their continuous monitoring of audio in deployed areas, potentially infringing on privacy rights by capturing ambient sounds without warrants. In a 2021 analysis, the ACLU highlighted risks of over-policing and questioned the technology's transparency, asserting it enables pervasive listening that could chill free speech or lead to misuse, even if primarily tuned for impulsive noises like gunfire. Proponents counter that ShotSpotter minimizes intrusions through targeted deployment in high-crime zones, short-term limited to 30 hours of unaccessed raw audio on sensors (automatically purged thereafter), and retention of only brief clips from verified incidents for review. The system does not record or store conversations, as sensors filter for high-decibel, explosive patterns inconsistent with human speech, and all alerts undergo human verification at a central review center before notifying , preventing automated dissemination of unconfirmed data. SoundThinking, the system's provider, emphasizes that neither nor third parties access sensor-level audio directly, likening it to non-recording cameras focused on detecting emergencies rather than content . Debates often pit these privacy safeguards against public safety needs, with advocates for the technology arguing that in areas plagued by underreported gunfire—where 80-90% of shots go uncalled—rapid detection justifies localized monitoring, as delays in response contribute to fatalities. Opponents, however, advocate for bans or stricter oversight, viewing the always-on nature as a toward broader audio , regardless of current limitations, and prioritizing Fourth protections over unproven life-saving claims. This tension underscores a philosophical divide: whether acoustic detection for verifiable threats aligns with when balanced against the causal reality of unreported urban violence.

Racial Bias Allegations and Data Examination

Critics of ShotSpotter have alleged racial bias in its deployments, pointing to the disproportionate placement of sensors in neighborhoods with higher proportions of and residents. A December 2024 report by Brooklyn Defenders Services analyzed nine years of NYPD and found that ShotSpotter coverage areas in were concentrated in districts with elevated and Latine populations, leading to increased police responses and in those communities without commensurate reductions in . Similarly, leaked sensor location from 2024 revealed that nearly 70 percent of residents in covered neighborhoods nationwide were or Latine, prompting claims of over-policing and discriminatory targeting by advocacy groups like the ACLU and . In , for instance, and Native American residents were reported as 3.3 times more likely to live in ShotSpotter-covered areas than white residents. Empirical examination of deployment data, however, indicates that sensor placements are driven by concentrations of actual gunfire incidents rather than racial demographics independent of crime patterns. A October 2025 Manhattan Institute analysis by Robert VerBruggen reviewed available evidence and concluded that while minority neighborhoods often have higher ShotSpotter coverage, this aligns with geographic hotspots of reported in data, not intentional racial targeting. No peer-reviewed or independent audits have documented disparate false positive rates or accuracy errors across racial or demographic lines in covered areas; instead, system performance metrics, such as alert verification rates, remain consistent regardless of neighborhood composition when controlled for shooting volume. exhibits strong geographic clustering due to socioeconomic and behavioral factors, necessitating targeted sensor arrays in high-incidence zones to optimize detection efficacy, a placement logic substantiated by pre-deployment rather than equity-based distribution. Activist perspectives emphasize potential harms from heightened police presence in minority communities, including risks of unnecessary encounters, yet data on response outcomes suggest net benefits for violence-affected residents. In high-gunfire areas—disproportionately impacting and populations—ShotSpotter-enabled rapid responses have correlated with recoveries and life-saving interventions that address the primary victims of such crime, who are overwhelmingly from those same demographics. This causal alignment prioritizes utility in mitigating concentrated harm over uniform coverage, countering bias narratives with deployment rationale rooted in incident data.

Cost-Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Concerns

The annual operating cost of ShotSpotter systems typically ranges from $65,000 to $90,000 per of coverage, encompassing sensor deployment, maintenance, and data processing. In , where the technology has covered approximately 125 s since its initial 2018 contract, cumulative expenditures exceeded $53 million by September 2024, reflecting multiple renewals and extensions amid ongoing debates over fiscal returns. Critics, including municipal auditors and policy analysts, contend this represents inefficient allocation, pointing to low direct outputs such as arrests or gun recoveries—often below 10% of alerts leading to evidence—as evidence of suboptimal value for taxpayer funds diverted from alternatives like or officer training. Proponents counter that such evaluations undervalue non-quantifiable benefits, particularly the rapid response to unreported gunfire, which enables timely medical intervention and averts escalations into fatalities or further ; valuing a single saved or prevented at standard economic estimates (e.g., $10 million per statistical ) can yield positive net returns. An independent cost-benefit analysis in , following deployment in August 2021, estimated annual community savings of $5 million to $8 million from reduced costs, including medical expenses, lost productivity, and , implying a return of up to $26 per dollar invested through deterrence and swift aid. This approach aligns with first-principles valuation of public safety, where opportunity costs must account for the baseline expense of equivalent proactive patrols—estimated at higher per-officer deployment rates—potentially making acoustic detection a lower-overhead complement rather than a full substitute. Notwithstanding these projections, concerns persist regarding trade-offs, as officer dispatches to verified alerts (averaging 10-20% of total notifications) consume time that could address visible crimes or preventive programs, with some analyses highlighting net fiscal drags in low-yield scenarios. Renewals in cities like —despite critical audits questioning efficacy—suggest municipal leaders perceive sufficient in high-gunfire zones, balancing direct costs against broader deterrence effects not captured in arrest-centric metrics. Empirical scrutiny of long-term ROI remains challenged by data limitations, including variability in and underreporting of gunfire (estimated at 80-90% without detection), underscoring the need for standardized, peer-reviewed valuations over anecdotal critiques.

Legal and Policy Developments

Lawsuits, Audits, and Regulatory Scrutiny

In 2021, SoundThinking (formerly ShotSpotter Inc.) filed a $300 million lawsuit against in , alleging false claims about the system's accuracy, including assertions of data manipulation in (CPD) reporting. The suit stemmed from a article questioning ShotSpotter's verification processes, which the company denied, emphasizing independent audits confirming over 96% accuracy in distinguishing gunfire from other noises. later retracted specific data manipulation claims in 2022 following legal pressure, though the broader case highlighted tensions over empirical validation of alert reliability. The MacArthur Justice Center's 2021 study on ShotSpotter in claimed low correlation between alerts and confirmed gunfire, prompting criticism for methodological flaws such as incomplete data matching and failure to account for unreported incidents. Edgeworth Economics, in commissioned reports, rebutted these findings by demonstrating that the study's narrow criteria ignored verified gunfire without calls and overstated false positives, with reanalysis showing alerts aligned with actual events in 80-90% of cases after adjusting for urban acoustic challenges. A subsequent Edgeworth of ShotSpotter data from 2019-2022 affirmed a below 1%, countering advocacy-driven narratives but underscoring the need for standardized verification protocols. Regulatory scrutiny has included municipal reviews, such as Fayetteville, North Carolina's City Council vote on September 8, 2025, to renew the ShotSpotter contract 8-2 for $220,500, despite debates over cost versus response efficacy in high-crime areas. Act (FOIA) requests have yielded disclosures revealing inconsistencies, including data from 2019-2023 showing ShotSpotter missed over 500 reported shootings, including 180 homicides, though proponents note these gaps reflect under-detection rather than systemic failure, as acoustic sensors prioritize covered zones. Judicial outcomes have avoided broad invalidation of the technology; for instance, the Williams v. City of lawsuit, filed by MacArthur Justice Center plaintiffs alleging false arrests from unverified alerts, settled in August 2025 without admitting liability but prompting enhanced CPD protocols for alert corroboration. Courts have mandated transparency measures, such as Chicago's ShotSpotter Events dashboard launched in 2021, which tracks alerts without corresponding calls and evidence findings, enabling public scrutiny of performance metrics like a 10-20% gunfire confirmation rate in audited samples. These rulings emphasize empirical accountability over outright bans, with no federal precedents deeming the system inherently unconstitutional.

Municipal Policy Shifts and Alternatives Exploration

In 2024, terminated its contract with SoundThinking, the provider of ShotSpotter, effective September 23, following Mayor Brandon Johnson's campaign pledge to end the program amid criticisms of its efficacy and cost, despite prior expenditures totaling approximately $49 million since 2012. The decision prioritized ideological concerns over empirical evidence of faster response times to verified gunshots, as city officials initiated searches for alternative " technologies" without established track records matching ShotSpotter's deployment scale across urban areas. This shift contrasted with retentions in other high-violence municipalities, such as cities in , where Pasadena and three others expanded ShotSpotter coverage in early 2025 to address ongoing gunfire incidents, leading to over 400 alerts and 21 ballistic evidence recoveries in Pasadena alone from 2022 to Q1 2025. In , Fayetteville renewed its one-year contract in September 2025 by an 8-2 city council vote, citing the technology's role in prioritizing responses amid local homicide trends, even as other state cities like discontinued it due to perceived inefficacy. Post-2020 "defund the police" pressures contributed to initial declines in ShotSpotter adoptions and budgets in progressive-led cities, correlating with spikes in urban that prompted data-driven reevaluations. By 2025, renewals in violence-impacted areas signaled a rebound, as empirical outcomes like reduced response times to unreported shots—often 50-60% faster than calls—outweighed cost critiques in policy deliberations. Chicago's exploration of alternatives included pilots of drone-integrated systems and AI-driven gunshot detection from firms like and , but these lacked ShotSpotter's acoustic sensor network proven to cover dense urban gunfire at scale, with early tests confined to single districts and unverified broad impacts. Such hybrids faced skepticism for scalability, as no comparable technology had demonstrated equivalent verification rates or integration with existing workflows across multiple cities.

References

  1. [1]
    Gunshot Detection – SoundThinking
    ShotSpotter is our gunshot detection technology that helps law enforcement agencies respond to, investigate, and deter crime.
  2. [2]
    ShotSpotter Frequently Asked Questions - SoundThinking
    SoundThinking's ShotSpotter acoustic gunshot detection technology fills the gap with a network of acoustic sensors that can detect, locate, and alert police ...
  3. [3]
    US cities are canceling ShotSpotter due to cost and efficacy questions
    Mar 28, 2025 · ShotSpotter operates in more than 170 American cities, but many have dropped the service that detects gunfire and alerts police.
  4. [4]
    Boston Police Records Show Nearly 70 Percent of ShotSpotter ...
    Apr 8, 2024 · According to city records, Boston has spent over $4 million on ShotSpotter since 2012, deploying the technology mostly in communities of color.
  5. [5]
    Impact of ShotSpotter Technology on Firearm Homicides and Arrests ...
    Apr 30, 2021 · Results suggest that implementing ShotSpotter technology has no significant impact on firearm-related homicides or arrest outcomes.
  6. [6]
    NYPD's ShotSpotter Gunshot-Detection System Overwhelmingly ...
    Jun 20, 2024 · Today, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander's office released an audit of the New York Police Department (NYPD)'s use of ShotSpotter—an ...
  7. [7]
    Research Findings - End Police Surveillance
    89% of ShotSpotter deployments did not lead police to find evidence of gun-related crime on arrival. 61 unfounded ShotSpotter-initiated police deployments every ...Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
  8. [8]
    ShotSpotter Facts: Separating Fact from Fiction in Gunshot Detection
    Rigorous studies by leading independent researchers confirm ShotSpotter's impact on public safety and law enforcement effectiveness.
  9. [9]
    Company – SoundThinking
    The company originally known as ShotSpotter was founded in 1996 while physicist Dr. Robert Showen, (or “Dr. Bob,” as he is affectionately known), was ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] ShotSpotter®-The Global Leader in Gunshot Detection, Location ...
    ShotSpotter is a privately held company founded in 1996 and backed by investors including: City Light Capital, Claremont. Creek Ventures, Labrador Ventures ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The geography, incidence, and underreporting of gun violence
    Using data from Washington, DC, and Oakland, CA, we find that only 12% of gunfire incidents result in a 911 call to report gunshots, and only 2-7% of incidents ...
  12. [12]
    Gunshot Detection Systems in Civilian Law Enforcement
    Aug 9, 2025 · This technology was first implemented in the United States during the 1996 Atlanta Olympics but has since been deployed by over 100 police ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Field Evaluation of the ShotSpotter Gunshot Location System
    Jan 7, 2000 · The Redwood City Police Department and the San Mateo County Sheriffs Office agreed to pilot test the ShotSpotter gunshot location system in the ...Missing: Stamford | Show results with:Stamford
  14. [14]
    Field Evaluation of the ShotSpotter Gunshot Location System
    The ShotSpotter system was tested in Redwood Village in Redwood City, California, a neighborhood of about one square mile and known for a high incidence of ...Missing: deployments Stamford
  15. [15]
    The Lies Being Spun by Campaign Zero - SoundThinking
    May 28, 2024 · Gunshot detection technology can help address the chronic underreporting of gunfire incidents, as 80-90% of criminal gunfire goes unreported ...Missing: via percentage
  16. [16]
    SHOTSPOTTER'S LATEST U.S. PATENT ENABLES MAJOR ...
    Sep 24, 2019 · ShotSpotter's real-time gunshot detection solution uses a two-step process that employs both machine classification and human review.Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  17. [17]
    ShotSpotter as Diagnostic, Policing, and Space-making Infrastructure
    Dec 12, 2022 · In this paper, we trace ShotSpotter and its artificial intelligence/machine learning AGDS technologies as they exist across various patents, promotional ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  18. [18]
    Shotspotter Patent Enables Advancement in Machine Learning ...
    Oct 12, 2019 · ShotSpotter's real-time gunshot detection solution uses a two-step process that employs both machine classification and human review. The system ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  19. [19]
    SST, Inc. Introduces Breakthrough Gunfire Detection Technology For ...
    Nov 11, 2013 · ShotSpotter SiteSecure is a direct extension of this technology combining indoor and outdoor detection; expanding its protection from ...
  20. [20]
    LENSEC, ShotSpotter Combine Technologies on Perspective VMS ...
    Dec 14, 2021 · LENSEC and ShotSpotter have formed a technology partnership to integrate ShotSpotter's gunshot detection technology with LENSEC's Perspective ...
  21. [21]
    Milestone's IP VMS integration with EIA's ShotSpotter gunshot ...
    These solutions integrate video management with analytics for counting cars or people, with laser scanners for unique perimeter control, with access control ...
  22. [22]
    Independent Audit of the ShotSpotter Accuracy, 2019-2022
    SoundThinking claims that the ShotSpotter system is 97% accurate and has a false positive rate—the rate at which gunfire is detected when none occurred—of 0.5%.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  23. [23]
    ShotSpotter® is Now SoundThinking
    Apr 10, 2023 · As of April 10, 2023, ShotSpotter, the company, will be known publicly by a new brand name. Our name will be SoundThinking™.Missing: 2021 | Show results with:2021
  24. [24]
    Gov Tech Firm ShotSpotter Rebrands as SoundThinking
    Apr 13, 2023 · The company, famous for its gunshot detection system, says the new name reflects a wider view of law enforcement and public safety.Missing: 2021 | Show results with:2021
  25. [25]
    Shotspotter Changes Corporate Name To Soundthinking And ...
    Apr 10, 2023 · Information on Shotspotter Changes Corporate Name To Soundthinking And Launches Safetysmart Platform For Safer Neighborhoods at SoundThinking.Missing: 2021 | Show results with:2021
  26. [26]
    Learning about ShotSpotter — and Gun Violence — from Chicago
    Feb 22, 2024 · Chicago initially installed ShotSpotter in September 2012 within an approximately three-square-mile area, with coverage expanding to 136 square ...
  27. [27]
    The AI already on your street corner - Politico
    Feb 26, 2024 · Chicago first installed ShotSpotter in 2012 over a three-square-mile area that grew, through two renewals and tens of millions of city dollars, ...
  28. [28]
    New York Police Begin Using ShotSpotter System to Detect Gunshots
    Mar 16, 2015 · The sensors in the Bronx began working shortly after midnight on Monday, and sent data on shots fired at 12:49 a.m. The sensors in Brooklyn will ...Missing: deployment | Show results with:deployment
  29. [29]
    SoundThinking Announces a ShotSpotter Three Year - Renewal ...
    Feb 18, 2025 · Since it was first deployed in New York City in 2015, ShotSpotter has been an effective, accurate, and unbiased tool utilized by the NYPD to ...
  30. [30]
    Murders Spiked in 2020 in Cities Across the United States
    Nov 15, 2021 · The year-to-year increase in homicides from 2019 was the largest since national record-keeping began in 1960. But overall, major crimes ...
  31. [31]
    Gun Violence and COVID-19 in 2020: A Year of Colliding Crises
    May 7, 2021 · They are also 10 times as likely as white people to die by firearm homicide. Gun sales have surged during the coronavirus pandemic. Based on the ...
  32. [32]
    How ShotSpotter fights criticism and leverages federal cash to win ...
    Feb 10, 2022 · The gunshot detection technology company is expanding by steering grants to police departments and firing back against criticism.Missing: milestones history
  33. [33]
    ShotSpotter and the Misfires of Gun Detection Technology — S.T.O.P.
    ShotSpotter sells its leading gunshot detection software to over 130 cities and towns.[5] Its discriminatory placement in Black and Latinx communities increases ...
  34. [34]
    Chicago ShotSpotter contract ends Sunday, city to begin dismantling ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · The City of Chicago's contract with ShotSpotter ended Sunday. Police will no longer be alerted by the gunshot detection technology starting ...Missing: 2012 | Show results with:2012
  35. [35]
    Chicago will drop controversial ShotSpotter gunfire detection system
    Feb 15, 2024 · Chicago will stop using ShotSpotter in September. The city has spent about $49 million on it since 2018.
  36. [36]
    Elmwood Park to start using ShotSpotter - ABC7 Chicago
    Jul 30, 2024 · Elmwood Park, Illinois will start using ShotSpotter, the gunshot detection technology rejected by Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson.
  37. [37]
    Suburb adopts ShotSpotter as Chicago phases out gunshot ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · While ShotSpotter's days are numbered in Chicago, a neighboring suburb is preparing to implement the gunshot detection system.
  38. [38]
    Fayetteville City Council votes 8-2 to renew ShotSpotter for another ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · Fayetteville City Council members on Monday voted to approve a contract renewing the city's use of ShotSpotter technology for one year.Missing: adoptions Elmwood Park IL
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Surveillance Impact Report - SF.gov
    ShotSpotter acoustic sensors are strategically placed in an array of approximately 20-25 sensors per square mile, typically on the tops of buildings or ...Missing: grid density
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Impact of Gunshot Detection Technology on Gun Violence in ...
    GDT systems installed by ShotSpotter use acoustic sensors that are strategically placed in an array of approximately 20 sensors per square mile, according ...
  41. [41]
    The effect of gunshot detection technology on evidence collection ...
    Nov 13, 2023 · ShotSpotter—the most popular GDT system on the market—uses acoustic sensors that are strategically placed in an array of approximately 20 ...
  42. [42]
    Shots Fired - Time Magazine
    Sep 21, 2017 · ShotSpotter works by installing specially calibrated outdoor microphones that pick up what CEO Ralph Clark likes to call a “boom or bang ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] ShotSpotter, Inc.'s Gunshot Detection Technology - Squarespace
    Dec 1, 2016 · Sensors are equipped with microphones that are similar to a typical smartphone microphone at picking up sound. SST personnel install the sensors ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] ShotSpotter Gunshot Detection Technology, Predictive Policing, and ...
    This Section discusses how these analyses can work to inform our understanding of the efficacy of ShotSpotter use by law enforcement today and in the fu- ture.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Implementing Gunshot Detection Technology - Urban Institute
    This is accomplished through a network of acoustic sensors mounted on high structures such as telephone poles, streetlights, and the roofs of public, commercial ...Missing: geospatial placement
  46. [46]
    Police Technology: Acoustic Gunshot Detection Systems
    Dec 10, 2019 · A quasi-experimental study in 2002 found that ShotSpotter could detect 81 percent of gunshots and locate 84 percent of the shots detected.Missing: capabilities | Show results with:capabilities<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Draft Technical Report For SECURES Demonstration in Hampton ...
    The system consists of a grid of acoustic sensors mounted to utility poles or buildings in the area plagued by gunfire, a radio receiver housed in a ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Variations in recorded acoustic gunshot waveforms generated by ...
    Apr 8, 2011 · These systems are designed to detect gunshot muzzle blasts and ballistic shockwaves and rapidly localize the shooter's position in azimuth ...
  49. [49]
    Gunshot Detection Systems: The Present Need for a Safer Future
    Aug 15, 2022 · DARPA funded research for the development of prototype systems that paired acoustic muzzle blast and ballistic shock wave signatures to ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Conference Paper 9 - Montana State University
    Jun 29, 2024 · The muzzle blast acoustic disturbance propagates outward through the air at the speed of sound (e.g.,. 343 m/s at 20°C), and encounters the ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] How Does Shotspotter Technology Work - Tangent Blog
    Mar 28, 2024 · ShotSpotter technology operates on a sophisticated framework that combines acoustic sensors, software algorithms, and real-time data analysis.
  52. [52]
    https://www.nashville.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/COB-220323-ShotSpotter-Informational-Report-Draft2.pdf
  53. [53]
    ShotSpotter®'s Important Role in Improving Public Safety
    Dec 16, 2021 · That includes a 0.5 percent false positive rate (the rate at which an alert is issued to the police, but no gunshot occurred). This rate has ...Missing: reduction verification steps confidence
  54. [54]
    Integrations - Sun Ridge Systems, Inc.
    ShotSpotter by SoundThinking. This integration automatically creates a RIMS CAD Incident based on SpotShotter's analysis of detected gunshots, and provides for ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Surveillance Technology Policy | SF.gov
    Gunshot detection: Record gunshot sounds and use sensors to locate the origin of the gunshots. Patrol Officers receive gunshot alerts to respond to crime scene.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Tacoma Police Department's Implementation and Evaluation of Gun ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · ShotSpotter is an acoustic gunshot detection system that is designed to verify and rapidly notify police officers and dispatchers of the times ...
  57. [57]
    ShotSpotter Mobile App - SoundThinking
    Key Features: · System notifications with ShotSpotter unique audible alert · Instant ShotSpotter alerts on iOS and Android · 7-day, 3-day and 24-hour incident list ...
  58. [58]
    ShotSpotter on the App Store
    Rating 2.6 (143) · Free · iOSFeatures: - Real-time ShotSpotter gunshot alerts with unique audible alert. - Time since trigger pull. - Precise gunshot location and round count. - Replay ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Benefits of ShotSpotter Integration with PlateRanger License Plate ...
    Oct 31, 2024 · Integrating gunshot detection systems with automated license plate reader (ALPR) data can dramatically enhance law enforcement response and investigatory ...
  60. [60]
    ShotSpotter and PlateRanger Drone Integration - SoundThinking
    Oct 29, 2024 · We discuss how ShotSpotter and PlateRanger can further help first responders and investigative teams when there is drone integration.
  61. [61]
    Get more out of your gunshot detection system with live video
    Real-time video integration makes a gunshot detection system like SoundThinking much more valuable as a crime fighting tool- once gunfire is detected, live ...
  62. [62]
    SoundThinking - OFFICER Magazine
    ... Founded in 1996, SoundThinking is trusted to empower the decision ... ShotSpotter Missions Renamed ShotSpotter Connect. Sept. 17, 2020. Shotspotter.
  63. [63]
    Partners – SoundThinking
    ShotSpotter has worked with approximately 20 integration partners and 50 cities to integrate gunshot alert data with other city systems.
  64. [64]
    Is ShotSpotter Effective? Separating Facts from Fiction
    Jan 17, 2025 · Critics of ShotSpotter often rely on oversimplified arguments and cherry-picked data that fail to account for the complexities of modern ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Thinking Through the ShotSpotter Debate | Manhattan Institute
    Oct 8, 2025 · ShotSpotter sensors appear to be deployed in areas of cities with the most gun violence, though these areas do tend to be disproportionately ...
  66. [66]
    Edgeworth Analytics Publishes Report Finding Critical Flaws in ...
    Jul 29, 2021 · Edgeworth Also Releases Audit Confirming ShotSpotter's 97% Gunshot Detection Accuracy Rate. WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Edgeworth Analytics ...
  67. [67]
    Novel policing techniques decrease gun-violence and the cost to the ...
    In 2006, a study by the National Institute of Justice revealed ShotSpotter® technology could detect 233 out of 234 (99.6%) gunshots within 40 feet, across 23 ...
  68. [68]
    The Geography, Incidence, and Underreporting of Gun Violence
    Aug 7, 2025 · A 2006 field study by the National Institute of Justice found that the technology detected 99.6% of 234 firearm discharges in 23 locations [6,10] ...
  69. [69]
    NYPD ShotSpotter: CEO Refutes Myths Laid Out in City Limits OpEd
    Feb 21, 2025 · A comprehensive audit conducted by Edgeworth Economics confirmed that, from 2019 to 2023, ShotSpotter maintained an accuracy rate exceeding 97% ...
  70. [70]
    ShotSpotter is a Failure. What's Next? - MacArthur Justice Center
    May 5, 2022 · A study on the dangerous inaccuracy of ShotSpotter, a surveillance system that purports to detect the sounds and location of gunfire.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Independent Analysis of the MacArthur Justice Center Study on ...
    Jul 22, 2021 · The MJC study claimed that ShotSpotter's pattern of deployment in Chicago is in predominately Black and. Latinx neighborhoods and that the “ ...
  72. [72]
    Why the MacArthur Justice Center Report is Wrong - SoundThinking
    May 22, 2024 · Recent analysis shows that over 80% of Chicago homicides occur in the police districts where ShotSpotter has been deployed. · Over 80% of lethal ...Missing: 2022 | Show results with:2022
  73. [73]
    Why the Chicago OIG Report is Misunderstood - SoundThinking
    May 20, 2024 · ShotSpotter maintains an extremely low false positive rate, at just 0.5% across all customers in the last four years, according to independent ...
  74. [74]
    ShotSpotter Alerts to Impact: Insights from Pueblo PD - SoundThinking
    Jul 29, 2025 · Violent crime was declared the city's top priority, prompting command staff to take decisive action. Four patrol officers and a sergeant were ...
  75. [75]
    How ShotSpotter is Changing Crime Response Times in Pueblo
    Apr 30, 2025 · Pueblo Police respond to gunfire faster than ever—thanks to technology that hears shots before anyone calls 911 ...
  76. [76]
    ShotSpotter Improves Gunfire Detection But Doesn't Reduce Crime
    May 23, 2024 · ShotSpotter gunfire detection technology enables police to detect and respond to gunshots but doesn't translate into public safety gains.
  77. [77]
    Police records show ShotSpotter is wildly inaccurate in New York City
    Dec 4, 2024 · Alerts in New York City led to guns being recovered only .8% of the time and resulted in arrests for illegal activity just .7% of the time ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  78. [78]
    SoundThinking Announces ShotSpotter Renewal with New York ...
    Feb 18, 2025 · Summary: SoundThinking, Inc. today announced a multi-year renewal of its partnership with the New York Police Department for the deployment ...
  79. [79]
    Four Greater Los Angeles Cities Lead the Way with ShotSpotter ...
    ShotSpotter has been adopted in several communities across Los Angeles County, with Pasadena, Lancaster, Hawaiian Gardens and Lakewood, CA all deploying the ...Missing: current | Show results with:current
  80. [80]
    ShotSpotter in LA County - SoundThinking
    Mar 26, 2025 · By providing real-time, pinpointed alerts of gunfire, ShotSpotter in LA County enables officers to arrive at crime scenes faster, resulting in ...
  81. [81]
    Addressing Gun Violence in Cape Town with ShotSpotter
    Feb 26, 2025 · Cape Town employs ShotSpotter in several gang-affected areas to help save lives and enhance law enforcement's ability to respond to, intercept, and prevent gun ...
  82. [82]
    Disrupting the Shooting Cycle: ShotSpotter and the Insight App
    Oct 14, 2025 · Learn how specialized units can use ShotSpotter to disrupt the shooting cycle through real-time alerts, intelligence, and coordination.
  83. [83]
    NYPD extends contract with ShotSpotter, despite poor review
    Feb 18, 2025 · The New York City Police Department extended its contract with the ShotSpotter service for three years in a deal worth $21.8 million.
  84. [84]
    Audit Report on the New York City Police Department's Oversight of ...
    Jun 20, 2024 · The audit found that the New York City Police Department (NYPD) ensures that the billing, invoices, and payments to ShotSpotter are accurate.
  85. [85]
    Minneapolis City Council approves expansion of ShotSpotter
    Sep 19, 2024 · Council members approved an extension to March 2026 with the company SoundThinking for its ShotSpotter technology. ShotSpotter microphones are ...
  86. [86]
    Elmwood Park police adding ShotSpotter device to 'public safety ...
    Aug 8, 2024 · The mayor of the big city that borders parts of Elmwood Park called for an end to the special gunfire detection technology.<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    ShotSpotter Is In LA County - SoundThinking
    2022 – 2025. ShotSpotter Led Officers to >400 Gunfire Incidents and 21 victims. ShotSpotter Alert Led To Arrest/Charges/Conviction/Victims Receiving Treatment ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] THE IMPACT OF SHOTSPOTTER DEPLOYMENT IN ... - SIUE
    ❖ Deployment of ShotSpotter is related to a reduction in violent gun crimes: ♢ The ShotSpotter area saw a significant 24% reduction in assaults and homicides. ♢ ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF SHOTSPOTTER IN WINSTON ...
    ShotSpotter is an Acoustic Gunshot Detection System (AGDS) which uses multiple sensors to detect the location of gunfire. Upon positive identification of the ...
  90. [90]
    City Of Chicago Statement On ShotSpotter Contract
    Feb 13, 2024 · The City of Chicago will not renew its contract with SoundThinking that expires February 16, 2024, and will decommission the use of ShotSpotter technology on ...Missing: 2012 termination
  91. [91]
    As Chicago Scraps ShotSpotter, Officials Look for New Technology ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · Chicago officials scrapped the city's controversial gunshot detection system late Sunday, as Mayor Brandon Johnson defied critics.
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Chicago-Police-Departments-Use-of-ShotSpotter-Technology.pdf
    Aug 24, 2021 · There exists a contract by and between the City of Louisville, Kentucky, and Contractor; these two parties entered into a contract on January 31 ...
  93. [93]
    CPD Data Shows Steep Drop in Shootings, Homicides in ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Police beats that had ShotSpotter sensors saw an approximately 17.8% decrease in violent crime and a 37.5% decrease in homicides during the ...Missing: 2020-2022 | Show results with:2020-2022<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Chicago violent crime, homicides dropped after ShotSpotter removal ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · A new study from the University of Chicago, however, finds that police beats that lost ShotSpotter saw a nearly 18 percent decrease in violent ...Missing: termination Dayton
  95. [95]
    Dayton not renewing contract with ShotSpotter program
    Oct 5, 2022 · The Dayton Police Department says it will not renew its contract for a controversial gunshot-detection technology when it expires at the end of the year.
  96. [96]
    Why Dayton quit ShotSpotter, a surveillance tool many cities still ...
    Jul 18, 2023 · The DPD statement announcing the end of the ShotSpotter contract also noted a new law that came into effect in June 2022 legalizing the ...
  97. [97]
    Another City Ditches ShotSpotter, Says It Can't Show The System ...
    Jul 19, 2023 · In 2019, the Dayton City Commission approved an initial $205,000 contract with ShotSpotter, a California-based company, to deploy microphones ...
  98. [98]
    Why Dayton Quit ShotSpotter, a Surveillance Tool Many Cities Still ...
    Jul 13, 2023 · Police across the country face increased pressure to drop the controversial technology as researchers and activists question its effectiveness.Missing: surge spike
  99. [99]
    Dayton Police Department won't be renewing ShotSpotter contract ...
    Oct 7, 2022 · The Dayton Police Department won't renew its ShotsSpotter contract. That contract is set to expire this December, although police say the ...
  100. [100]
    ShotSpotter Atlanta Police | Department passes on technology
    Nov 23, 2022 · In its last trial in 2018, APD found ShotSpotter duplicated gunshot reports and wasn't worth the cost of about $280,000 a year. ShotSpotter ...Missing: failure | Show results with:failure
  101. [101]
    Critics of ShotSpotter gunfire detection system say it's ineffective ...
    Feb 24, 2024 · ShotSpotter – a system intended to detect gunfire and cut police response times – has run into sharp criticism from officials and community groups.Missing: initial statistics
  102. [102]
    APD to retest gunshot tool rejected in 2018 - 11Alive.com
    May 20, 2021 · In 2018, Atlanta tested ShotSpotter but quietly decided against purchasing the system. “Since that time, ShotSpotter has made some ...Missing: failure | Show results with:failure
  103. [103]
    ShotSpotter Says It Curbs Gun Violence - The Assembly NC
    Jan 17, 2025 · The technology is in six cities in North Carolina—Fayetteville, New Bern, Wilmington, Rocky Mount, Greenville, and Goldsboro. The company, which ...<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    ShotSpotter renewed for 1 year in Fayetteville, city to ... - ABC11
    Sep 24, 2024 · Back in March, Durham ended its own ShotSpotter contract because of questions raised about whether it reduces gun violence. Supporters in ...Missing: end | Show results with:end
  105. [105]
    Winston-Salem Police Department ending contract with ShotSpotter
    Aug 14, 2024 · The Winston-Salem Police Department is getting rid of a technology designed to help law enforcement officials quickly get to areas where ...<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Duke study casts doubt on effectiveness of ShotSpotter in Fayetteville
    Aug 29, 2025 · Independent evaluation of gunshot detection technology in Fayetteville found only a small percentage of ShotSpotter alerts were linked to ...Missing: end | Show results with:end
  107. [107]
    Parts of Fayetteville's ShotSpotter study merit a closer look | Opinion
    Sep 4, 2025 · Consultants found that ShotSpotter alerts were most effective when combined with 911 calls for the same incident. While police response times ...
  108. [108]
    Some US cities canceling ShotSpotter due to cost, questions about ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · ShotSpotter operates in Columbus and more than 170 American cities, but many have dropped the service which detects gunfire and alerts ...
  109. [109]
    Police chiefs critical of ShotSpotter, cities pulling out of contracts
    Nov 13, 2023 · The Seattle City Council is scheduled to vote Tuesday on whether it should use $1.5 million to fund services for tiny house villages in ...
  110. [110]
    The geography, incidence, and underreporting of gun violence
    In this paper, we describe data on gunfire incidents, recorded using a tool called ShotSpotter. We compare those data with previously-available data on gun ...Missing: controversies empirical
  111. [111]
    [PDF] An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Gunshot Detection ...
    1 I evaluate the effect of ShotSpotter installation on four key outcomes: crime, police response times, the volume and type of gunshot-related calls, and case ...
  112. [112]
    Thinking Through the ShotSpotter Debate | Manhattan Institute
    Oct 9, 2025 · Recent years have seen significant activism against “gunshot detection technology,” or GDT—most prominently, the ShotSpotter product.
  113. [113]
    a quasi-experimental study of gunshot detection technology in a mid ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · We assess previously examined outcomes such as gunshot detections, firearm seizures, and fatal and non-fatal shooting incidents. However, we ...
  114. [114]
    [DOC] Download - Data for Defenders
    Only “0.8% of alerts resulted in the recovery of even a single firearm” and a mere “0.7% of all alerts . . . resulted in the person being arrested by NYPD for ...
  115. [115]
    OIG Finds That ShotSpotter Alerts Rarely Lead to Evidence of a Gun ...
    Aug 24, 2021 · The City of Chicago Office of Inspector General's (OIG) Public Safety section has issued a report on the Chicago Police Department's (CPD) ...Missing: processed yearly
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Taking Aim at ShotSpotter: Gunshot Surveillance, The Fourth ...
    Jul 1, 2024 · Comment is the first to analyze ShotSpotter under the landmark Supreme. Court case, Carpenter v. United States.16 Third, this Comment lays ...Missing: pilots | Show results with:pilots
  117. [117]
    [PDF] ShotSpotter Gunshot Location System® Efficacy Study
    Detectives say ShotSpotter data allows them to investigate more efficiently. By this they do not necessarily mean that ShotSpotter saves them time, but that ...
  118. [118]
    Four Problems with the ShotSpotter Gunshot Detection System | ACLU
    Aug 24, 2021 · A new investigation points to yet another problematic outcome of the technology's use and the company's lack of transparency.
  119. [119]
    ShotSpotter Privacy Frequently Asked Questions - SoundThinking
    Audio at the sensor level is purged every 30 hours · If an incident is created and sent to our Incident Review Center the short audio snippet is stored ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Overview of Community Privacy Protections - SoundThinking
    Sensors store 30 hours of audio and automatically delete audio older than 30 hours. Neither police nor third parties ever have direct access to this audio.
  121. [121]
    https://www.soundthinking.com/blog/shotspotter-monitoring-for-gunshots-not-human-voices/
  122. [122]
    The ACLU Was Wrong About ShotSpotter® Technology
    Mar 9, 2022 · All residents who live in communities experiencing persistent gunfire deserve rapid police response, which gunshot detection technology like ...
  123. [123]
    Report: ShotSpotter Technology Increases Surveillance and… - BDS
    Dec 4, 2024 · According to the NYPD's own data, less than 0.9% of responses to ShotSpotter alerts resulted in NYPD recovering a firearm, and only 0.7% of ...
  124. [124]
    Leaked Data Reveals Secret Locations of ShotSpotter Sensors
    Feb 26, 2024 · The coordinates show that nearly 70 percent of people who live in a neighborhood with at least one sensor were either Black or Latine, ...
  125. [125]
    ShotSpotter Disproportionately Impacts Black and Native ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · At least 16 other cities have canceled their ShotSpotter contracts, most recently Chicago. At least 19 other cities have considered and ...
  126. [126]
    ShotSpotter: Is It Effective? - City Journal
    Oct 14, 2025 · Is ShotSpotter Effective? Gunshot-detection technology can help police departments if they use it properly.
  127. [127]
    As ShotSpotter Contract Enters Final Days, Supporters Will Try ...
    Sep 16, 2024 · By the contract's final day, Chicago taxpayers will have paid more than $53 million since 2018 for ShotSpotter, according to city records.
  128. [128]
    The Hidden Costs of Police Technology: Evaluating Acoustic ...
    One type of technology available to law enforcement, acoustic gunshot detector systems (AGDS), are advertised to capture gunshots above and beyond those called ...
  129. [129]
    Chicago Taxpayers to Spend an Additional $4.2M to Allow CPD to ...
    Feb 28, 2024 · The contract extension requires Chicago to pay 13% more per square mile for ShotSpotter coverage, or $73,500, records show. That means while ...
  130. [130]
    ShotSpotter Files $300 Million Defamation Suit Against Vice Media
    Oct 12, 2021 · Gunshot detection company ShotSpotter has filed a $300 million lawsuit against Vice Media, claiming the news outlet grossly misrepresented the accuracy of its ...Missing: manipulation | Show results with:manipulation
  131. [131]
    SHOTSPOTTER FILES DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST VICE ...
    ShotSpotter filed a defamation complaint in the Superior Court of Delaware against VICE Media alleging defamatory and demonstrably false claims about the ...
  132. [132]
    News Outlet Walks Back ShotSpotter Data Manipulation Claim
    Aug 4, 2022 · The seller of gunshot detection tech had sued VICE Media for defamation after the claim was published in a Chicago case.
  133. [133]
    Williams v. City of Chicago - MacArthur Justice Center
    The Chicago Police Department's continued use of untrustworthy data from ShotSpotter, a surveillance technology placed in predominantly Black and Hispanic ...
  134. [134]
    Independent Analysis of the MacArthur Justice Center Study on ...
    Edgeworth concludes that the MJC study fails to provide a rigorous, balanced, and objective assessment of the use of ShotSpotter in Chicago and is, at best, ...
  135. [135]
    ShotSpotter Routinely Missed Reported Shootings, City Data Shows
    Oct 9, 2024 · ShotSpotter sensors are currently deployed in roughly 170 cities and 19 university and corporate campuses across the country and the world ...
  136. [136]
    In Chicago, ShotSpotter Failed to Detect Hundreds of Shootings
    Jan 29, 2024 · A South Side Weekly investigation has gotten the first-ever look at how CPD reports missed gunfire to ShotSpotter, the gunshot-detection company that was ...
  137. [137]
    Chicago Agrees to Settle Lawsuit Challenging its Use of ShotSpotter
    Aug 15, 2025 · The lawsuit focused on the tens of thousands of ShotSpotter alerts every year that led police to find no evidence of gunfire or gun crime, but ...Missing: 2012 | Show results with:2012
  138. [138]
    ShotSpotter Events - Chicago Police Department
    The Chicago Police Department will collect data showing the quantity of ShotSpotter alerts that have no corresponding call to 911.Missing: transparency | Show results with:transparency
  139. [139]
    Court to ShotSpotter Critics: You Were Wrong - SoundThinking
    Jul 28, 2025 · Law Enforcement Is your agency overburdened and understaffed to face rising public safety challenges head-on? See All Our Products · Law ...Missing: lawsuits | Show results with:lawsuits
  140. [140]
    How Chicago organizers managed to rid the city of ShotSpotter
    Dec 2, 2024 · The contract was extended in 2021. Altogether, the city has spent about $49 million on the technology. ShotSpotter is supposed to alert police ...
  141. [141]
    As ShotSpotter Contract Ends, City Starts Search For New 'First ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · Mayor Brandon Johnson moved to end ShotSpotter's use in Chicago after calling the service “walkie-talkies on a stick." But the company is ...
  142. [142]
    Four Greater Los Angeles Cities Lead the Way with ShotSpotter ...
    ShotSpotter has been adopted in several communities across Los Angeles County, with Pasadena, Lancaster, Hawaiian Gardens and Lakewood, CA all ...Missing: current | Show results with:current
  143. [143]
    ShotSpotter® Gunshot Detection Impact on Public Safety
    ShotSpotter, an acoustic gunshot detection system that alerts officers of virtually all gunfire within a city's ShotSpotter coverage area.
  144. [144]
    Drones, AI among company pitches for new gunshot detection ...
    Apr 4, 2025 · Knightscope is a company based out of California, and, according to its pitch, it is proposing a gunshot detection system similar to ShotSpotter ...
  145. [145]
    Possible replacement for ShotSpotter gunshot detection tech tested ...
    Jan 13, 2025 · The six-month pilot program from Alarm.com is being offered free of charge in the Chicago Police Department's Deering (9th) District.
  146. [146]
    Cities Might Ditch ShotSpotter, But Not Police Technology
    Aug 14, 2024 · Chicago is cutting ties with gunshot detection firm ShotSpotter. But police tech firms offer so many services that it'shard to cut the cord.