Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Link 16

Link 16 is a high-capacity, secure, jam-resistant, nodeless broadcast-type RF that employs a (TDMA) protocol to enable near-real-time exchange of tactical surveillance, targeting, and identification information among military platforms. Standardized under NATO's STANAG 5516, it operates in the upper ultra-high frequency (UHF) L-band and utilizes (JTIDS) or (MIDS) terminals for secure, encrypted communications between aircraft, ships, ground forces, and command centers. Primarily used by members and approved partner nations including since June 2025, Link 16 facilitates the sharing of messages, digital pictures, voice data, and updates to support joint operations and reduce risks. Developed in the 1980s by the and allies to replace aging tactical data systems like Link 11, Link 16 was first deployed in the late 1980s and achieved widespread adoption across allied forces by the . In October 1994, it was designated as the U.S. Department of Defense's () primary for command, control, intelligence, and multi-service , with high-level commitment from all military branches and agencies. The system's evolution includes enhancements for anti-jam capabilities through frequency hopping and platform integration, such as in fighters, bombers, and , supported by billions in investments for rapid fielding starting in 2000. Key capabilities of Link 16 include high data rates up to 115.2 kbps, time-synchronized messaging for low-latency exchanges, and nodeless architecture that allows flexible network participation without central hubs. Traditionally limited to line-of-sight transmissions, recent advancements have extended its reach via relays, as demonstrated in 2024 tests involving Norwegian F-35 aircraft and P-8 Poseidon planes, and further advanced by the U.S. Space Development Agency's launch of the first 21 Tranche 1 satellites on September 10, 2025, enabling space-based Link 16 with initial warfighting capability expected in 2027. Its emphasis on has made it a of NATO's tactical networks, with ongoing updates like version 5.3 ensuring compatibility in modern contested environments.

Overview and Standards

Definition and Purpose

Link 16 is a high-capacity, secure, jam-resistant, nodeless broadcast-type that employs (TDMA) to enable the exchange of tactical data, including position reports, surveillance information, and targeting details, among military platforms. This system facilitates near-real-time sharing of voice, text, imagery, and sensor data, supporting integrated battlefield operations across air, naval, surface, and ground assets. The primary purpose of Link 16 is to enhance and in joint military operations by interconnecting diverse platforms from and allied forces, thereby promoting and coordinated decision-making in dynamic environments. Developed as a successor to earlier tactical data links like Link 11, it addresses limitations in data rates and security by providing faster, more robust communication capabilities tailored for modern networked warfare. Key benefits of Link 16 include its resistance to through advanced techniques and protocols, ensuring reliable secure communications even under conditions, which is critical for NATO's multinational operations. By standardizing data exchange formats, it reduces risks and improves overall operational effectiveness across allied forces.

Standardization and Protocols

Link 16 is governed by NATO (STANAG) 5516, which defines the protocols, message formats, and network operations for secure, jam-resistant data exchange among and allied forces. This standard ensures interoperability across multinational operations by specifying the (JTIDS) and (MIDS) implementations. Complementing STANAG 5516, the U.S. military's MIL-STD-6016 provides equivalent specifications tailored for American forces, detailing the (Tactical Digital Information Link J) message structures and Link 16 network protocols to support joint and combined environments. Both documents emphasize encrypted, (TDMA)-based communications to facilitate real-time tactical picture sharing without centralized nodes. The core of Link 16's data exchange relies on J-series messages, which are binary-formatted packets categorized by function to transmit tactical information efficiently. For instance, the J3.2 message reports air surveillance tracks, providing initial and updated positional on targets, including location, velocity, and , to build a . Similarly, messages like J3.3 handle surface track reporting for maritime assets. These messages operate within fixed 70-bit word lengths or variable formats, allowing up to two to three times more information exchange than legacy systems like Link 11. Mission-related communications use formats such as J12.0 for assigning tactical missions to units, specifying tasks like engagement or to coordinate . Network Participation Groups (NPGs) organize Link 16 communications by allocating dedicated time slots for specific data categories, enabling scalable participation based on unit roles. NPG 7 supports functions, where units exchange track data for —merging reports from multiple sensors to resolve ambiguities and enhance accuracy—using messages like J3.2 for air tracks and J3.3 for surface ones. For platform position, NPGs 5 and 6 handle Precise Participant Location and Identification (PPLI) via J2-series messages (e.g., J2.2 for units), transmitting , status, and identification to support and network synchronization among up to 125 participants. With 22 defined NPGs out of 512 possible, this structure prioritizes critical data flows while minimizing interference. Interoperability across Link 16 systems is overseen by the (MIDS) International Program Office (IPO), a U.S.-led multinational effort involving allies to standardize terminals and ensure seamless integration. The MIDS IPO coordinates testing, certification, and waveform updates to maintain compatibility for operations, including tactical data links in air, sea, and ground domains. This framework supports the deployment of MIDS terminals, which implement STANAG 5516 and MIL-STD-6016 to enable secure data sharing without proprietary barriers.

Technical Specifications

Frequency and Waveform Characteristics

Link 16 operates within the L-band portion of the , specifically the 960–1,215 MHz range, which supports line-of-sight communications while minimizing interference with other systems. To enhance resistance to jamming and interception, the system employs (FHSS) technology, pseudorandomly selecting from 51 frequencies spaced 3 MHz apart within the 969–1,206 MHz sub-band, at a hopping rate of 76,923 hops per second. This approach avoids protected bands, such as those centered at 1030 MHz and 1090 MHz used for (IFF) interrogations and replies. The waveform is a pulsed transmission using (MSK) modulation on the chips, combined with cyclical code-shift keying (CCSK) for symbol modulation, resulting in a constant envelope signal that optimizes efficiency and spectral containment. This MSK-based pulsed structure allows for robust performance in contested environments, with each pulse formatted to carry variable numbers of Link 16 words depending on the selected mode. The design prioritizes jam resistance through the technique, enabling reliable data exchange without requiring directional antennas in many applications. Supported data rates are 31.6 kbit/s for single-pulse formats, 57.6 kbit/s for double-pulse formats, and 115.2 kbit/s for quadruple-pulse formats, reflecting the trade-offs between throughput and error correction in different operational scenarios. Transmission power is capped at a maximum of 200 watts (+1 dB) at the terminal's antenna output port to comply with spectrum management rules, while L-band antennas—typically omnidirectional with gains around 0–5 dBi—are required to achieve line-of-sight ranges of up to 300 nautical miles under optimal conditions.

Data Structure and Network Management

Link 16 utilizes a (TDMA) architecture to enable secure, jam-resistant data exchange among multiple participating units. The network divides time into repeating 12-second frames, each comprising 1536 time slots allocated at a rate of 128 slots per second, with each slot lasting 7.8125 milliseconds to support collision-free transmissions across up to 127 simultaneous networks. These slots are grouped into three interleaved sets (A, B, and C) of 512 slots each, further organized into 16 buckets of 96 contiguous slots for efficient . Terminal initialization begins with the receipt of an Initial Entry message (J0.0) transmitted by the designated on a known time slot, providing essential data for coarse and network participation. Platforms are then assigned specific roles and time slots through preloaded Network Design Loads (NDLs), which define Time Slot Blocks (TSBs) with recurrence rates such as every 3, 6, or 12 seconds, ensuring deterministic access based on requirements. Relay functions facilitate network entry and exit by retransmitting messages from prior slots (typically 5 to 32 slots earlier), using paired-slot relays or repromulgation to extend connectivity beyond line-of-sight while platforms join via or depart through deassignment commands. To maintain precise network timing, Link 16 incorporates and mechanisms that counteract delays and ensure alignment across participants. , implemented as a silent initial portion of each time slot controlled by the Traffic Security (TSEC) cryptovariable, introduces variable delays (with a minimum 10 μs step size) to enhance security by randomizing transmission start times and preventing predictable patterns. proceeds in two phases: coarse alignment via the NTR's J0.0 message, followed by fine synchronization using Round-Trip Timing (RTT) interrogations or Passive Precise Participant and (PPLI) messages, achieving clock errors below 36 μs (with confirmation under 54 μs) relative to the NTR's high-quality time base (deviation of 50 ns). Throughput in Link 16 is managed through variable data rates within each time and prioritization schemes to optimize under constraints. Each can carry 3, 6, or 12 data words (70 bits each) in , packed-2, or packed-4 formats, yielding effective rates up to approximately 115 kbps per network depending on , with overall scaled by slot assignments across up to 512 possible Network Participation Groups (NPGs). Message prioritization occurs via dedicated NPGs (e.g., NPG 4 for , NPG 7 for ) and Priority Injection time slots, which preempt lower-priority traffic to ensure timely delivery of critical data like Precise Participant Location and Identification (PPLI), while flow control discards redundant messages during congestion to preserve .

Development History

Origins and Early Development

The origins of Link 16 trace back to the late 1960s, when the U.S. Department of Defense sought to upgrade the existing Link 11 tactical data link system, which had been operational since the early 1960s but suffered from vulnerabilities to jamming and limited data capacity. In response, the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) program was conceptualized through studies by MITRE Corporation, including a 1967 report on control and surveillance of friendly forces that proposed time-division multiple access (TDMA) techniques for secure, jam-resistant communications among joint forces. This laid the groundwork for a more robust network to enable real-time sharing of tactical information across air, sea, and ground platforms. Formal development of JTIDS, which became the foundation for Link 16 (also known as Tactical Digital Information Link J or ), began in 1975 under U.S. auspices to address the shortcomings of predecessor systems like Link 11 by providing higher data rates, , and anti-jam features. The JTIDS Program Office was established in 1976 to oversee the effort, focusing on integrating command-and-control systems across the , , , and Marine Corps. Early prototypes, such as Class 1 terminals, were tested in the late 1970s and installed on platforms like the E-3 AWACS aircraft, marking the shift toward a joint interoperable network. NATO adopted the JTIDS/Link 16 technology in the 1980s to enhance alliance-wide . The protocol was formalized through (STANAG) 5516, ratified on January 15, 1997, which defined the protocol for tactical data exchange. In 1987, endorsed a military operational requirement for a jam-resistant tactical link and procured Class 1 JTIDS terminals for its AWACS fleet, integrating the system into multinational exercises. This adoption extended the U.S.-led development to allied forces, emphasizing secure in operations. Throughout its early development, JTIDS/Link 16 faced significant challenges in balancing security requirements—such as daily rekeying of cryptographic variables and resistance to —with the need for increased message capacity and seamless interoperability among diverse U.S. services and partners. Line-of-sight limitations constrained throughput in complex environments, while varying implementation protocols across platforms risked data mismatches. These issues were iteratively addressed through testing, culminating in the system's first operational use during the 1991 , where Link 16-equipped platforms like AWACS and exchanged data to improve , despite some transmission gaps.

Key Milestones and International Involvement

In the , the (MIDS) program advanced toward full operational capability for Link 16 terminals, with engineering and manufacturing development commencing in 1994 following a U.S. Defense Acquisition Board review. This phase built on earlier (JTIDS) efforts, enabling the deployment of low-volume terminals for space-constrained platforms like fighters. NATO's ratification of STANAG 5516 during this decade established the standardized protocol for tactical data exchange via Link 16, promoting interoperability across allied forces. The 2000s saw crypto modernization initiatives to bolster Link 16's security against evolving threats, including National Security Agency-mandated upgrades implemented through MIDS-LVT Block Upgrade 2 (BU2), which enhanced while maintaining with legacy systems. The MIDS International Program Office (IPO), led by the U.S. Navy with participation from , , , and , facilitated expansion to non-U.S. allies by coordinating production and integration, ultimately enabling adoption by more than 15 nations through cooperative agreements and exports. In the , Link 16 integration progressed with advanced platforms, notably the F-22 Raptor, which received initial receive-only datalink capability in 2020 via Software Update 6, allowing pilots to access shared tactical information without compromising . Full transmit functionality followed in 2021 through the Raptor Agile Capability Release, enabling two-way J-series message exchange with joint forces. Link 16's international adoption has been widespread among members, such as the and , which integrated it into air defense systems like the in the early 1990s. Non-NATO partners including and have also incorporated the system into platforms like the F/A-18 and F-15, enhancing coalition interoperability. These exports are governed by U.S. (ITAR), which restrict technology transfer to safeguard .

Hardware Implementation

Terminals and Radios

Link 16 hardware implementations primarily utilize terminals based on the and its successor, the . JTIDS terminals, developed in the 1970s and 1980s, include variants such as Class 1 (airborne, e.g., for large aircraft like the E-3 AWACS, weighing approximately 250 pounds or 113 kg including ancillary equipment) and Class 2 (ground/mobile, around 128 pounds or 58 kg for the full unit), featuring larger form factors (e.g., 19 x 11 x 15 inches for Class 2) and higher power consumption up to 500 watts compared to modern systems. These were designed for secure, jam-resistant communications but were bulky and power-intensive, paving the way for more compact MIDS terminals. The (MIDS) Low Volume Terminal (LVT), particularly the LVT(1) variant, serves as a compact hardware solution for Link 16 operations in such as the F-16 and F/A-18, featuring a /transmitter (LRU) weighing approximately 42.5 pounds (19.3 kg) and a remote LRU at 9 pounds (4.1 kg). This design emphasizes space and weight constraints typical of airborne platforms, with dimensions for the main terminal measuring 7.62 x 7.5 x 13.5 inches and power consumption ranging from 150 watts at low time slot duty factor (TSDF) to 350 watts at higher operational loads, supporting variable transmit power up to 200 watts (PEP) while maintaining compatibility with (TDMA) structures. Environmental specifications include conductive and resilience to high-vibration and temperature extremes encountered in tactical fighters. The MIDS Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) extends Link 16 functionality through a multi-waveform, four-channel architecture that integrates the Link 16 waveform alongside other protocols like Tactical Targeting Network Technology (TTNT), suitable for airborne, maritime, and ground applications. Weighing 50.6 pounds (23 kg) for the receiver/transmitter and 6.5 pounds (2.9 kg) for the remote power supply, the MIDS JTRS maintains a form factor of 7.6 x 7.5 x 13.5 inches for the main unit, enabling seamless upgrades from legacy MIDS LVT systems with reduced power demands compared to earlier JTIDS terminals. It supports enhanced throughput modes for Link 16 while adhering to NATO standards for secure data exchange. For ground-based operations, terminals like the AN/USQ-140(V), a MIDS LVT(2) configuration, provide Link 16 connectivity in command posts and fixed or mobile installations, offering greater robustness for terrestrial environments with weights around 38-50 pounds per depending on the . These s feature dimensions similar to airborne variants but incorporate enhanced shock and environmental protection for dust, humidity, and extended stationary deployment, with power requirements scalable to 200 watts PEP transmit output and overall consumption optimized for generator or battery integration in field conditions. Maritime adaptations, such as shipboard MIDS LVT variants, prioritize corrosion resistance and , with total system weights exceeding 1,400 pounds in rack-mounted setups to handle saltwater exposure and vessel motion. Across form factors, all terminals comply with MIL-STD environmental standards for temperature ranges from -40°C to +71°C and high-altitude operations up to 70,000 feet.

Software Interfaces and Compatibility

The Common Link Integration Processing (CLIP) software serves as a key component for integrating Link 16 into various platforms, particularly those lacking native tactical data link support. Developed primarily by Northrop Grumman under U.S. Air Force and Navy programs, CLIP handles the translation and processing of Link 16 J-series messages, isolating host platforms from underlying data link changes to ensure seamless operation. It interfaces with mission computers to format and distribute processed data, enabling the display of tactical information such as tracks, threats, and assignments across crew stations via integrated displays. This software facilitates interoperability by providing a standardized method for message interpretation and presentation, supporting joint and coalition operations without requiring extensive platform modifications. Link 16 systems interface with , , and command-and-control () systems through established protocols like and Ethernet to enable data exchange within host platforms. The multiplex data bus is commonly used for real-time communication between Link 16 terminals and onboard , such as in where it connects to mission computers for track data input and output. Ethernet interfaces, often via IP-based networks, support higher-bandwidth integrations in modern upgrades, allowing Link 16 data to flow into broader network architectures like those enhanced by CLIP for display and processing. These interfaces ensure that Link 16-derived is fused with sensor data from and elements, promoting coordinated tactical decision-making. Backward compatibility with legacy tactical data links, such as , is achieved through dedicated gateways that translate messages between networks. These gateways, like the Multi-Link Service Gateway, enable Link 16 platforms to interoperate with older systems by converting J-series messages to compatible formats, maintaining operational continuity in mixed environments. For instance, gateways facilitate the exchange of track and status information between Link 16 and Link 11B units, supporting joint missions without full network replacement. Certification processes for Link 16 emphasize rigorous testing to verify compliance with standards and ensure seamless integration across multinational forces. The Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) conducts evaluations under directives like CJCSI 6610.01F, assessing message handling, network participation, and data accuracy in simulated and live environments. Tools such as the Integration Exerciser () are used in these tests to validate gateway functions and interface compatibility, confirming that systems meet STANAG 5516 requirements before fielding. This certification is mandatory for operational approval, focusing on end-to-end performance to mitigate risks in coalition scenarios.

Operational Platforms

Aircraft

Link 16 has been integrated into various U.S. , enabling secure, real-time data exchange for enhanced and coordination. The F-15 Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, and F/A-18 Hornet/Super Hornet are equipped with full transmit and receive capabilities through (MIDS) terminals, allowing these platforms to share tactical pictures, including target tracks and sensor data, among networked forces. The F-22 Raptor initially featured receive-only functionality but has been upgraded to include transmit capabilities via software enhancements like the Raptor Agile Capability Release, facilitating two-way communication with other Link 16-enabled assets. Strategic bombers such as the B-1 Lancer and B-52 Stratofortress incorporate Link 16 through the Common Link Integration Processing system, supporting long-range mission planning and with fighter elements. Internationally, Link 16 integration extends to several allied platforms, promoting interoperability in multinational operations. The , operated by the and Germany, supports Link 16 for networked air combat, including data sharing with assets. France's is equipped with Link 16 terminals, enabling the multirole fighter to exchange tactical information in coalition environments. The multinational F-35 Lightning II incorporates Link 16 alongside advanced datalinks like MADL, allowing seamless integration with legacy systems for joint strike missions across U.S. and partner air forces. In aircraft operations, Link 16 plays critical roles in air-to-air targeting, AWACS data sharing, and drone control. For air-to-air engagements, it provides precise target coordinates and identification data, enabling fighters to engage threats without activating onboard radars, thus maintaining and reducing detection risks. AWACS platforms disseminate surveillance tracks via Link 16 to participating aircraft, creating a shared picture that supports beyond-visual-range intercepts and defensive maneuvers. Additionally, Link 16 facilitates control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), as demonstrated in tests where fighters like the F-35 directed autonomous drones such as the XQ-58 for collaborative strikes and . Integrating Link 16 into fighter aircraft presents challenges, particularly size and weight constraints in compact airframes. Early terminals were bulky, weighing up to 300 pounds, which limited installation to larger platforms and required miniaturization efforts like the MIDS-Low Volume Terminal (LVT) for single-seat fighters. These adaptations balance power demands and aerodynamics while preserving the system's jam-resistant waveform for high-threat environments.

Ships and Naval Systems

Link 16 has been extensively integrated into U.S. Navy surface combatants, with the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers serving as a primary platform for its deployment. These destroyers employ (JTIDS) terminals, such as the AN/URC-107(V), to enable secure, real-time exchange of tactical data including radar tracks, weapon status, and targeting information across naval task forces. This integration enhances fleet coordination during joint exercises, as demonstrated in operations like Vigilant Osprey, where Arleigh Burke-class vessels utilized Link 16 to share with allied units. Similarly, Nimitz-class aircraft carriers are outfitted with - Low Volume Terminal Class 2 (MIDS-LVT(2)) shipboard terminals, optimized for maritime environments to support Link 16 waveform operations and interface with carrier-based aircraft and escort ships. These terminals facilitate the carrier strike group's , allowing seamless data relay in high-threat scenarios. Internationally, allies have adopted Link 16 on key naval platforms to ensure . The Royal Navy's Type 45 Daring-class destroyers incorporate the system within their Fully Integrated Communications System (FICS45), which handles data links for voice, intercom, and tactical networking in multinational operations. This enables Type 45 vessels to participate in exercises with shared tactical pictures. The French Navy's nuclear-powered aircraft carrier conducted a pivotal Link 16 trial on October 11, 2001, involving the Cassard and four E-3 AWACS aircraft, successfully demonstrating high-bandwidth secure data exchange for carrier group synchronization. Subsequent deployments have relied on this capability to integrate with allied forces during missions. In naval contexts, Link 16 supports critical functions such as surface-to-air coordination, where ships relay air defense tracks and close-air support requests to enhance engagement effectiveness against aerial threats. For , it enables data relay of detections and acoustic among surface vessels, submarines, and helicopters, allowing coordinated prosecution of underwater targets through automated cueing and search planning. The system's (TDMA) protocol briefly referenced here permits multi-ship networking by allocating precise time slots, minimizing collisions in dense fleet formations. Shipboard adaptations of Link 16 emphasize durability in electromagnetic-intensive environments, featuring high-power antennas engineered for resistance to () from radars, electronic warfare systems, and propulsion equipment. These antennas, operating in the 960-1215 MHz band, maintain amid shipboard , with rugged designs tested for extreme conditions to ensure uninterrupted tactical data flow. Such modifications are essential for platforms like destroyers and carriers, where EMI mitigation directly impacts operational reliability.

Ground and Missile Defense Systems

Link 16 plays a critical role in ground-based air and systems by enabling real-time track sharing and among U.S. platforms such as the Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) missile system. The system integrates Link 16 to receive and disseminate radar tracks for threat detection and engagement coordination, allowing it to cue interceptors against incoming ballistic and cruise missiles within a networked . This integration supports the 's (IAMD) architecture, where Link 16 facilitates data exchange between batteries and other sensors to enhance and response times. Similarly, the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system uses Link 16 for track sharing with allied assets, forwarding forward-based mode radar data to enable cueing for THAAD, , and other elements in the Defense System (BMDS). In ground vehicles like the , Link 16 provides mobile access to the , allowing combat teams to receive air pictures and integrate with higher echelons during maneuver operations. Beyond static missile batteries, Link 16 supports key operational roles in ground defense, including warning, fire , and command post networking. For warning, the network disseminates early tracks from ground radars to ground forces, enabling rapid alerting and defensive posturing across integrated architectures. In fire , Link 16 allows ground units to share target for counter-battery fire and precision strikes, integrating tracks to support time-sensitive targeting. Command posts leverage Link 16 for networked battle management, fusing from multiple sources to coordinate defenses and allocate resources in contested environments. These functions are enabled through standardized sets, such as J-series messages for , which are briefly referenced in ground protocols without altering core network operations. Internationally, employs Link 16 in ground radars like the AN/TPS-75 for shared air defense pictures among allied forces, enhancing collective defense through interoperable track exchange during multinational exercises. In , Link 16 integrates with systems such as and to connect with U.S. forces, providing a for joint operations against regional threats. This compatibility allows seamless data sharing for threat warning and interception coordination between Israeli ground-based interceptors and American networks. For dismounted troops, portable Link 16 terminals like the Battlefield Awareness and Targeting System-Dismounted (BATS-D) provide handheld access to the , enabling joint terminal attack controllers to receive real-time and direct . The BATS-D, certified for secure operations, allows ground soldiers to view the and transmit targeting data directly to networked assets, reducing risks in dynamic environments. These lightweight radios extend Link 16's reach to infantry units, supporting close-quarters coordination in missile defense scenarios.

Limitations and Challenges

Technical and Operational Constraints

Link 16 operates strictly on a line-of-sight () basis due to its use of L-band frequencies (960–1215 MHz), which limits direct communication range to approximately 300 nautical miles (nm) at or equivalent altitudes without platforms. This constraint necessitates airborne, surface, or satellite to extend coverage beyond LOS horizons, particularly in scenarios involving curved geometry or low-altitude operations. The system's bandwidth is inherently constrained by its (TDMA) structure and design, yielding effective data rates of 31.6 kbps, 57.6 kbps, or up to 115.2 kbps depending on the waveform configuration. These rates are sufficient for formatted tactical messages, such as track updates or surveillance reports, but insufficient for transmitting raw data like high-resolution , sonar returns, or video feeds, requiring platforms to preprocess and distill information prior to dissemination. The aggregate throughput, even with stacked networks, rarely exceeds 1 Mbps, further emphasizing reliance on symbolic or summarized data rather than unfiltered streams. Network capacity is bounded by the TDMA frame, which allocates 128 time slots per second (or 1,536 slots per 12-second frame), supporting a practical maximum of 128 active terminals per network to avoid excessive . In dense operational environments with numerous participating units—such as air, sea, and ground forces—slot contention arises as multiple terminals compete for transmission opportunities, leading to potential delays, dropped messages, or reduced update rates when demand exceeds available slots. Environmental factors exacerbate LOS vulnerabilities, with terrain features like hills, mountains, or urban structures causing signal masking that blocks direct paths and fragments network connectivity. Weather conditions, including heavy precipitation or , can further degrade , inducing or that diminishes signal reliability over the limited range. These effects are particularly pronounced in littoral or rugged terrains, where LOS paths are obstructed more frequently than in open maritime or high-altitude settings.

Security Vulnerabilities and Jamming Risks

Link 16 incorporates robust mechanisms to protect content and . The system utilizes Traffic Encryption Keys (TEK) filled as , which encrypt the data stream and also seed the pseudorandom frequency hopping sequence for (TRANSEC), ensuring that both communication content and parameters are safeguarded against . keys, representing unencrypted , are processed separately in compliant equipment to maintain separation between classified and encrypted domains, with the KGV-8 cryptographic device handling the red-to-black conversion for Link 16 operations. This dual-key approach aligns with NSA standards for COMSEC keying material in both legacy and modernized terminals. To counter electronic warfare threats, Link 16 employs (FHSS) techniques, where the carrier frequency changes pseudorandomly across 51 possible channels in the 960–1,215 MHz band, making it difficult for jammers to target the signal consistently. The waveform further enhances anti-jam resilience through a pulsed structure, transmitting data using a pulsed structure with up to two 6.4 μs pulses per 13 μs hop (double-pulse mode), employing (MSK) modulation at the chip level, which spreads energy and leverages a processing gain of approximately 25 dB against narrowband jamming. These features provide inherent resistance to interference, allowing operations in contested environments where adversaries deploy electronic attack systems. Despite these protections, Link 16 faces notable security vulnerabilities, particularly in its legacy cryptographic implementation prior to the 2020-era modernization efforts. The original TEK algorithms, based on older standards, introduced delays in and distribution, potentially exposing networks to exploitation during prolonged operations or periods. Additionally, the (TDMA) slot structure is susceptible to denial-of-service attacks through slot overload, where excessive transmissions—either from benign or adversarial flooding—can saturate the 12-second frame, reducing throughput and delaying critical updates. Criticisms of Link 16 highlight escalating risks from advancing adversary jamming capabilities, as near-peer threats like those from China and Russia have developed high-power, wideband jammers that challenge the system's FHSS limits in high-threat scenarios. Legacy bugs in pre-modernized terminals, including outdated crypto handling, have been cited as exploitable weaknesses, compounded by delays in U.S. Air Force upgrades as of 2022, which temporarily left some aircraft radios vulnerable to electronic and cyber threats; upgrades were completed by early 2025. By 2025, the U.S. Department of Defense completed cryptographic modernization for most Link 16 terminals, incorporating NSA-approved algorithms to address prior weaknesses, though full fleet-wide implementation continues. These issues underscore the need for ongoing enhancements to maintain operational security against evolving electronic warfare tactics.

Recent Developments and Future Directions

Modernization Upgrades

In 2020, the U.S. advanced the cryptographic modernization of Link 16 terminals in accordance with CJCSM 6520.01B, which implements directives from CJCSI 6510.02D to upgrade all Link 16 systems for enhanced security and compatibility with legacy equipment. This effort mandated the transition to modernized devices supporting up to 32 simultaneous cryptonets, increased key storage capacity to 1,000 per secure data unit, and integration with the Key Management Infrastructure to replace outdated paper-based and legacy electronic systems. These upgrades addressed vulnerabilities in older cryptographic protocols while ensuring , allowing seamless operation across modernized and non-modernized terminals during the phased rollout. By 2023, the U.S. launched the XVI mission to demonstrate Link 16 tactical communications capabilities, enabling secure data links from low-Earth orbit to unmodified ground users as part of broader network resilience enhancements. This initiative, deployed via a commercial 12U with a modified Link 16 radio, proved the feasibility of extending tactical data exchange without requiring hardware changes on existing platforms, thereby improving operational flexibility in contested environments. Concurrently, (formerly Raytheon Technologies) advanced cybersecurity through demonstrations of survivable (JADC2) integrations incorporating Link 16, focusing on secure data sharing and anti-jam protections during exercises like Northern Edge. In 2024, , through its Data Link Solutions joint venture, secured a potential $1 billion indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract from the U.S. Navy to modernize Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS JTRS) terminals, enhancing Link 16's jam resistance and data throughput for improved and network capacity. These upgrades incorporate advanced frequency hopping and error correction to boost resilience against threats while increasing the volume of exchanged information, supporting platforms across air, sea, and ground domains. Internationally, the U.S. approved to totaling approximately $340 million for Link 16 enhancements, including $75 million in upgrade planning and $265 million for MIDS JTRS Variant 5 terminals to bolster secure tactical data links amid regional security needs.

Space Integration and Potential Successors

In 2024, the (SDA) achieved a significant breakthrough by demonstrating space-based Link 16 communications, enabling beyond-line-of-sight (LOS) connectivity through satellites. This test involved Norwegian F-35 aircraft and P-8 Poseidon exchanging tactical data over a Link 16 network relayed via SDA's satellites, marking the first operational integration of the in space for NATO-approved partners. The advancement addressed traditional LOS constraints by using satellite relays to extend the network's reach, allowing seamless data sharing among air, surface, and space assets in real-time scenarios. Complementing this, SDA conducted tests in 2024 on laser communications relays to enhance Link 16's bandwidth capabilities within the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture (PWSA). These optical inter-satellite links demonstrated high-speed data transfer rates far exceeding traditional radio frequency methods, with successful demonstrations of laser connectivity between satellites built by different vendors. By integrating laser relays, the system supports higher-volume tactical data flows, such as sensor feeds and targeting information, while maintaining compatibility with existing Link 16 terminals on the ground and in the air. By 2025, began evaluating the potential sunsetting of Link 16 due to its identified vulnerabilities, including bandwidth limitations, security risks, and increased susceptibility to in contested environments. Despite these concerns, Link 16 integration continued in satellite constellations, with launching operational Tranche 1 satellites equipped for Link 16 and K-band communications to ensure interim resilience. As potential successors, Link 22 emerges as a complementary beyond-LOS designed to interoperate with Link 16 while addressing its deficiencies, particularly for and operations across surface, subsurface, land, and air domains. Additionally, optical networks are under development for contested environments, leveraging laser-based architectures to provide jam-resistant, high-bandwidth connectivity that could phase out reliance on Link 16's radio frequency foundations. These systems enable through airborne and space nodes, enhancing survivability against .

References

  1. [1]
    Tactical Data Exchange - Link 16 (STANAG 5516 Ed 4:2008)
    Link-16 is a high capacity, secure, jam-resistant, nodeless broadcast-type RF data link that uses a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) protocol. It provides ...
  2. [2]
    Link 16 tactical data link communication via space: 'A ground ...
    Dec 6, 2024 · Link 16 is an encrypted, secure, tactical data link network. The system is used by NATO and approved partners. Via the system, military aircraft ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Understanding Link 16 Guidebook - mcsprogram
    Conceived in the 1980s to replace aging tactical data systems. Standardized by NATO to promote interoperability among member nations. Evolved through multiple ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Tactical Data Links, Air Traffic Management, and Software ...
    In October 1994 Link 16 was designated as the DOD's primary tactical data link for all military service and defense agency command, control and intelligence ( ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Technical Advice and Lexicon for Enabling Simulation (TADIL-TALES)
    Link 16 is the primary NATO standard for the tactical datalink. NATO. STANAG 5516/MIL-STD-6016 describes the TADIL J message formats and Link 16 network ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] SISO-STD-002-2021
    Nov 8, 2021 · NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) 5516 [8] and MIL-STD-6016 [7] describe the Link 16 message formats (Link 16 messages are also known as ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] ADS-B to Link-16 Gateway Demonstration - DTIC
    2 Air Track message. The J3. 2 is the primary message used to report initial and updated positional information on aircraft that are airborne.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Understanding Voice and Data Link Networking
    The Link 16 J-series messages allow the reporting of two to three times as much exchangeable tactical information as the Link 11 and Link 11B M-series messages.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] mids -lvt link-16 introduction - IDLSoc
    Sep 25, 2006 · Link 16 Overview: J Series Messages. Network Management. Track Management. Electronic Warfare. J0.0 Initial Entry. J7.0 Track Management. J14.0 ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] TADIL J: Introduction To Tactical Digital Information Link J and Quick ...
    Oct 24, 1997 · This publication introduces Tactical Digital Information Link (TADIL) J. It is a guide for warfighters who have limited or no experience or ...
  11. [11]
    Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) Program ...
    MIDS is a U.S.-led program for Link 16 data communications, aiming for interoperability among coalition forces, and is important for NATO and allied air forces.
  12. [12]
    Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) - NAVAIR
    MIDS is a system for developing tactical data links, and is the most widely-fielded family of Link 16 terminals, with multi-band, multi-mode, networkable, ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) Program ...
    The MIDS program was created to put small, lightweight, Link 16 terminals on U.S. and NATO fighter aircraft. With Fighter Data Link (FDL) and Low Volume.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Performance Analysis of the Link-16/JTIDS Waveform With ... - DTIC
    For Link-16/JTIDS, data demodulation consists of two parts: MSK chip demodulation and CCSK symbol demodulation. The receiver structure of a Link-. 16/JTIDS ...
  15. [15]
    Link 16 - Signal Identification Wiki
    Dec 24, 2023 · Part of JTIDS/MIDS (STANAG 5516) · Defined in MIL-STD-6016 · Frequency: 960–1,215 MHz · TDMA-based · Can use FHSS · Data rate: 31.6/57.6/115.2 kbps ...
  16. [16]
    Link 16 Spectrum Issues: JTIDS/MIDS Tutorial - Studylib
    Background Link 16 Description Frequency Spectrum Implications Link 16 ... 1 Mbps – Omnidirectional broadcast – High Capacity – US DOD Primary data ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF MANUAL
    Aug 17, 2020 · Link 16 has been evaluated and is approved by the Director, NSA, for operation in the SECRET HIGH security mode if all network participants are ...Missing: correlation position
  18. [18]
    [PDF] A Slot Allocation Algorithm for Survivability of Tactical TDMA Networks
    For network design purposes, Link 16 time slots are grouped into 12 second frames; time slots occur at the rate of 128 slots / second, or 1536 time slots in one ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] LINK 16 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) FEATURES ...
    Apr 26, 2005 · This document outlines the EMC certification process and requirements for Link 16 systems, which are used by the Department of Defense. ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The Role of Standards in Fostering Capability Evolution - RAND
    Link 16 is used by dozens of U.S. and NATO military assets, including airborne, ground, and naval plat- forms that are called Joint Tactical Information ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] TACTICAL DATA LINKS
    Link 16 is an encrypted, jam-resistant, nodeless tactical digital data link network established by JTIDS-compatible communication terminals that transmit and ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Combined Annual Report to Congress on Standardization of ... - DTIC
    Nov 1, 2014 · A common data link language (LINK-16/TADIL-J), as defined by STANAG 5516, is required for US JTIDS and STANAG 4175 MIDS to be fully implemented ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS)
    Dec 31, 2022 · ... Link 16 interoperability requirements ... Jun 2015. Responsibilities for the Link-16 waveform were transferred to MIDS program office from.
  24. [24]
    PMA/PMW-101 - NAVAIR
    The MIDS IPO, which manages the MIDS Low Volume Terminal (LVT) program, is an international cooperative development between France, Germany, Italy, Spain and ...Missing: nations | Show results with:nations
  25. [25]
    DSCA 18-13 | Defense Security Cooperation Agency
    Jul 13, 2018 · MIDS-LVT is a hardware defined radio developed by a consortium of five countries (United States, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain) under a ...
  26. [26]
    F-22's Agile Developers to Deliver First Link 16 Capability Next Year
    Nov 1, 2019 · With Link 16, the new approach means F-22 pilots will be able to get some capability while waiting for more, rather than all or nothing.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  27. [27]
    The Wonders of Link 16 For Less: MIDS-LVTs - Defense Industry Daily
    Aug 9, 2019 · Estimated completion date is in December 2026. For more on this and other stories, please consider purchasing a membership. If you are already a ...Mids/ Link 16 Contracts &... · Fy 2011 · Fy 2007
  28. [28]
    DDTC - State Department
    Read about the laws and regulations that govern defense trade, including the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) ...Understand The ITAR · ITAR Compliance · DECCS Industry Portal · About DDTC
  29. [29]
    [PDF] MIDS-LVT(1) LINK 16 TERMINAL - L3Harris
    SPECIFICATIONS ... > Weight: - MIDS-LVT RT LRU. 42.5 lb; 19.28 kg. - MIDS-LVT RPS LRU. 9.0 lb; 4.08 kg. POWER AND COOLING. > Power Source Alternatives: 115 VAC; ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] CJCSI 6232.01F.pdf - Joint Chiefs of Staff
    Jan 12, 2023 · Surface-based Link 16 terminals will be located such that TACAN, conventional DME (DME/N) and precision DME (DME/P) beacons will be protected ...Missing: J12. | Show results with:J12.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] MIDS JTRS Data sheet
    The world wide leader of Link 16 solutions for air, ground, and maritime applications. The unspoken bond between allies. MIDS JTRS terminal. Positioned for ...
  32. [32]
    Viasat Receives Sole-Source Link 16 Communications Indefinite ...
    Jun 21, 2018 · Viasat's AN/USQ-140(V) terminal, which will provide assured, real-time, jam-resistant secure transmission of data, voice and position and ...
  33. [33]
    Link 16 LRU Terminal Comparison chart
    Weight lbs (Kg), Term 9.9 (4.4 kg), Term 39.7 (18.0) ; TACAN, N ; Voice, Y ; Max Power Output (W), 200W ; LxWxH in (cm), Overall 6.60x4.96x55.6 (16.76x12.60x14.12) ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Acquisition of the B-1 Fully Integrated Data Link - DoD
    Sep 22, 2008 · The Common Link Integration. Processing (CLIP) software is being provided to the contractor as Government-furnished equipment in the B-1 FIDL ...
  35. [35]
    Data Link Processing and Management | Northrop Grumman
    Northrop Grumman's Tactical Data Link Integration Exerciser (TIGER) offering provides an interoperable stimulation/simulation system with Link 11, Link 16, Link ...
  36. [36]
    Northrop Grumman's Common Link Integration Processing
    Apr 18, 2012 · CLIP, an Air Force program that also includes Navy platforms, provides a common approach to integrating tactical data links and Internet ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] LINK 16 FLIGHT-LINE TOOL (LiFT™) MIDS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
    INTERFACES. LiFT interfaces to the MIDS Platform A and Platform I MIL-STD-1553 interfaces, Platform ... The. Link 16 Initialization File Editor (LIFE) ...
  38. [38]
    MIL-STD-1553 Protocol - Abaco Systems
    Avionics. Abaco provides extensive, in-depth support to avionics designers with a broad and deep line of avionics interfaces, test platforms, tools and software ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Tactical Data Link Gateways Introduction - DTIC
    Dec 22, 1999 · The Army uses Link 11B and Link 16 to jointly connect in the air defense mission. While the end goal for a common joint theater data link is ...Missing: backward | Show results with:backward
  40. [40]
    [PDF] cjcsi 6610.01f - Joint Chiefs of Staff
    Jan 8, 2021 · Joint Interoperability Test Certification. Joint Interoperability ... Standards within the scope of JINTACCS including Link-11, Link-11B, Link-16, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Why Developing Link 16 Solutions Requires Tcg Boss | Curtiss-Wright
    Tactical data link (TDL) test and certification centers worldwide rely on TCG BOSS to test and validate Link 16 solutions for use in US and NATO operations.
  42. [42]
    Fighters benefit from Link 16 > Air Force > Article Display - AF.mil
    Sep 26, 2003 · ... F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-22 Raptor, according to officials. “The F-16's will probably have initial operating capability within a year ...Missing: transmit | Show results with:transmit
  43. [43]
    [PDF] F/A-18E/F Super Hornet - DOT&E
    Distribution System for Link 16 tactical datalink connectivity,. Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System, and IDECM. The software enables the F/A-18E/F to perform ...
  44. [44]
    https://www.curtisswrightds.com/media-center/blog/why-developing-link-16-solutions-requires-tcg-boss
  45. [45]
    RAF Aviator: Typhoon Beats Rafale at Dogfight - TURDEF
    Jul 16, 2023 · Eurofighter is also compatible with Link 16 and future ... Eurofighter Typhoon and F-35 Lightning II, but the question remained unanswered.
  46. [46]
    Detect and pursue - Dassault Aviation
    The Rafale is equipped with a Link 16 or with a non-NATO customer-specific solution depending on the customers' requirements. Its interoperability, as part of a ...
  47. [47]
    F-35 Lightning II - Northrop Grumman
    F-35 Lightning II is a stealthy, supersonic, multi-role fighter ... Link 16, joint precision and approach landing systems, and the cutting-edge ...
  48. [48]
    High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile Targeting System - AF.mil
    R7 employs a new digital receiver and GPS hardware capability, along with using Link-16 connectivity between aircraft, which will allow precision targeting ...
  49. [49]
    Link-16 Lands in Ukraine: Real-Time Warfare Just Got a Lot More Real
    Jun 22, 2025 · They scan hundreds of kilometers of airspace and beam that data via Link-16 to friendly aircraft. Those fighters can now fly radar silent, ...Missing: roles | Show results with:roles
  50. [50]
    Third Marine XQ-58 Valkyrie Flight Test Uses Link 16 For Control
    Sep 26, 2024 · The US Marine Corps says it has demonstrated new capabilities for operating future drones with high degrees of autonomy in expeditionary operations.
  51. [51]
    Supporting Real-Time Warfare with Link 16: Sponsored Content
    Apr 1, 2020 · Link 16 is designed to deliver actionable information to warfighting entities to make operational decisions based upon the situational awareness ...Missing: roles | Show results with:roles
  52. [52]
    A New Era in Close Air Support (sponsored whitepaper) | Shephard
    Jun 23, 2020 · Situation Awareness Data Link (SADL) and other traditional Link 16 radios had their own set of challenges. Large size, high cost, complexity ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Arleigh Burke class Guided Missile Destroyer DDG US Navy
    AN/USQ-118(V)1, Link 11 - AN/URC-107(V): Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS), Link 16. Underwater Communications: - AN/WQC-2A sonar ...
  54. [54]
    Navy Completes Joint and Combined Exercise Vigilant Osprey
    Jun 2, 2020 · Exercise participants utilized Link 16, a tactical data link system that enhances tactical capabilities by allowing players to share real ...
  55. [55]
    MIDS-LVT Terminals | L3Harris® Fast. Forward.
    L3Harris is delivering a family of combat-proven, fully qualified, and EMC-Certified Link 16 MIDS terminals to US Forces and coalition partners.
  56. [56]
    Daring Class - Royal Navy
    The Type 45 destroyers are fitted with a Fully Integrated Communications System (FICS45), which provides voice, intercom, data links and conference calls ...
  57. [57]
    What Makes The French Aircraft Carrier Charles de Gaulle So ...
    Apr 15, 2025 · Back in October 2001, the aircraft carrier first participated in the trial of the Link 16 data network alongside a French frigate and four AWACS ...
  58. [58]
    Let's Get Linky! - Armada International
    Jul 17, 2017 · The MIDS-LVT and MIDS-JTRS (Joint Tactical Radio System) terminals are now the 'industry standards' as far as Link-16 terminals are concerned.<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Information Management in Next Generation Anti-Submarine Warfare
    Jun 1, 2016 · The search plans and sensor points will automatically be broadcast via Link 16 and other future networks. The ability to direct multiple ASW ...Missing: functions | Show results with:functions<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Network Centric Warfare Fundamentals - Air Power Australia
    The Link-16/TADIL-J messaging format. Like most modern digital communications protocols, the Link-16 protocol transmits data in discrete and tightly defined ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] NPS-TE-23-028.pdf - DAIR - Acquisition Research Program
    The primary focus of this study will be on the network bandwidth limitation of Naval vessels that prevent large amounts of sensor data from travelling beyond- ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Netwars Based Study of a Joint Stars Link-16 Network - CORE
    Mar 9, 2004 · The Link-16 network is limited to 128 time slots per second for transmission and reception. All communication is physically accomplished over a ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] afttp 3-4.7 - Air Force - AF.mil
    Jun 3, 2025 · limitations also include environmental factors that impact weather and night employment ... awareness data link ([SADL], Link 16, Link-11).
  64. [64]
    [PDF] NSA-NAG-16F.pdf - Public Intelligence
    BLACK key. Encrypted key. cold start. Procedure for initially ... NOTE: (U) Although the procedures are identical for transferring RED and BLACK key from.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Performance Analysis of a JTIDS/Link-16-type Waveform ... - DTIC
    Link-16 is a tactical data link. It provides presumably secure and jam-resistant tactical information for land, sea, and air platforms. The communication ...
  66. [66]
    Anti-jamming Performance Analysis of Link-16 Waveform
    Aug 9, 2025 · The duty cycle of the pulses per unit of time directly affects anti-jamming performance. Specifically, as the jammer's duty cycle ρ decreases, ...Missing: Doppler | Show results with:Doppler
  67. [67]
    Data Link 16 - BAE Systems
    Link 16 is a standardized communications system for transmitting and exchanging real time tactical data using links between network participants.
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Internet Protocol (IP) Over Link-16 - CORE
    Mar 25, 2003 · The raw throughput is actually greater than the number of data bits offered at the host terminal because of the overhead bits added to the ...
  69. [69]
    Pentagon contemplating eventual sunsetting of Link 16 as ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · Discussions about the eventual phaseout of Link 16 tactical data links are ongoing as the Pentagon's Space Development Agency works to build ...Missing: history | Show results with:history<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    US Air Force Addresses High Cost of NGAD, Link 16 Cryptographic ...
    Kendall said that the service has devoted funding in the last few months to rectify a delay in fielding Link 16 cryptographic modernization for aircraft radios.Missing: legacy exploited
  71. [71]
    House cyber panel seeks review of delayed Air Force Link 16 upgrade
    Jun 8, 2022 · Link 16 is jam-resistant data link used by the Air Force, NATO and others that enables an exchange of information and the crafting of a common ...Missing: vulnerabilities | Show results with:vulnerabilities<|control11|><|separator|>
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Standards Guide for Foreign Partners 2023 - DoD CIO
    Feb 7, 2024 · Description: This manual outlines procedures for production, distribution, and use of Link 16. COMSEC keying material (KEYMAT) for legacy and ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] SMALL SATELLITE PORTFOLIO - Air Force Research Laboratory
    • Scheduled for launch February 2023. • Proving Link-16 tactical data link from space with unmodified terrestrial users. • Commercially provided CubeSat.
  74. [74]
    SpaceX Rideshare Mission To Launch Cubesat With Link 16 ...
    May 3, 2023 · A SpaceX rideshare mission will launch dozens of small microsatellites and nanosatellite to a sun-synchronous orbit, including a Viasat-built 12U cubesat.
  75. [75]
    RTX demonstrates new survivable JADC2 capabilities at scale at ...
    Jun 26, 2023 · RTX (NYSE: RTX) demonstrated advanced and foundational Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) capabilities in the first of two tests conducted during the ...Missing: cybersecurity | Show results with:cybersecurity
  76. [76]
    Data Link Solutions receives up to $1 billion IDIQ award for MIDS ...
    Dec 11, 2024 · “This award enables Data Link Solutions to modernize thousands of MIDS JTRS terminals and provide new capabilities that support a variety of ...
  77. [77]
    Data Link 16 - BAE Systems
    Link 16 is a standardized communications system for transmitting and exchanging real time tactical data using links between network participants.
  78. [78]
    Link 16 Coverage From Space, Laser Communications Relays ...
    Sep 17, 2024 · While traditional Link 16 radios have a line-of-sight range of around 200 to 300 nautical miles, putting relay systems in space has the huge ...
  79. [79]
    Link 16, Lasers Provide Top Comms on Proliferated Warfighter ...
    Nov 19, 2024 · Link 16 will continue to be the top option for communications provided by that satellite constellation because it's the foundation that ...Missing: Stryker vehicles
  80. [80]
    Space Development Agency launches first 'operational' satellites for ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · The 21 satellites lofted today on a SpaceX Falcon 9 were all built by York Space Systems and provide Link 16 and K-band communications.Missing: breakthrough | Show results with:breakthrough
  81. [81]
    About - LINK 22
    Link 22 was developed to replace and overcome the known deficiencies of Link 11 and to complement and interoperate easily with Link 16. This program is called ...Missing: LOS | Show results with:LOS
  82. [82]
    [PDF] How an Airborne Mobile-Mesh Network Can Overcome Space ...
    Figure 1 demonstrates how an adversary can employ kinetic weapons against key nodes—satellites, their ground sites, and even DCGS facilities (outlined in red ...Missing: optical | Show results with:optical