Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sarcasm

Sarcasm is a form of verbal irony in which a speaker expresses the opposite of their intended meaning, typically to mock, criticize, or convey contempt, often through a tone or context that signals the insincerity of the literal words used.^[1]^[2] This rhetorical device relies on the contrast between what is said and what is implied, distinguishing it from straightforward communication by requiring the listener to infer the true intent.^[3] Originating from the late Greek sarkasmos, meaning "a sneer or mockery," derived from sarkazein ("to tear flesh" or "speak bitterly"), the term entered English in the 1570s as a "biting taunt or satirical remark," evoking the sharp, cutting quality of such expressions.^[4]^[1] Scholars in linguistics and psychology view sarcasm as a subtype of irony, particularly when directed at a person rather than a situation, serving functions beyond direct speech such as eliciting emotional responses, softening criticism, or fostering social bonds through shared understanding.^[5] Unlike literal language, sarcastic utterances demand contextual cues—like prosody, facial expressions, or situational awareness—for accurate interpretation, and miscomprehension can lead to interpersonal tension.^[6] In everyday discourse, sarcasm appears in diverse forms, including hyperbolic praise for poor performance (e.g., "Great job!" after a mistake) or understatement to highlight absurdity, often blending humor with aggression to "cut or give pain" without overt confrontation.^[7] The use of sarcasm varies across cultures and contexts, with some societies embracing it as witty banter and others perceiving it as rude or ambiguous, influencing its role in literature, comedy, and digital communication where textual markers like emojis aid detection.^[5]^[8] Despite its prevalence, sarcasm's evolutionary purpose remains debated, though research suggests it enhances creativity in exchanges by encouraging perspective-taking between speaker and recipient.^[9]

Origins and Fundamentals

Etymology

The term "sarcasm" derives from the Late Greek σαρκασμός (sarkasmós), meaning "a sneer" or "expression of ironical contempt," which stems from the verb σαρκάζειν (sarkázein), literally "to tear flesh" or "to speak bitterly," a compound of σάρξ (sárx), "flesh," and the intensive verb suffix -άζειν (-ázein).^[4] This etymon evokes the image of savage, flesh-ripping mockery, reflecting the word's original connotation of harsh, biting derision.^[1] The word entered Late Latin as sarcasmus in the post-classical period, preserving its sense of a cutting or satirical utterance, and was borrowed into French as sarcasme in the 16th century (first attested in 1546).^[4]^[10] It was borrowed into English in the 1570s, with the earliest recorded use appearing in 1579 in the anonymous glosses (attributed to E.K.) accompanying Edmund Spenser's The Shepheardes Calender, where it denotes an "ironicall Sarcasmus" in reference to derisive speech.^[11] Historically, the term's meaning evolved from this visceral, literal imagery of tearing flesh—symbolizing brutal verbal attack—to a more figurative form of verbal irony that conveys scorn or mockery without physical violence, though it retains the implication of emotional wounding.^[4] In ancient Greek rhetoric, sarkasmos was recognized as a term for ironic or contemptuous expression used to undermine opponents, appearing in rhetorical treatises from the 1st century BCE onward.

Definition and Characteristics

Sarcasm is defined as the intentional use of words or expressions to convey a meaning that is the opposite of their literal interpretation, typically employed to mock, criticize, or convey irritation indirectly.^[1] This form of verbal irony relies on the speaker's intent to subvert expectations, often through feigned praise or agreement that highlights an undesirable reality.^[3] For instance, stating "What a brilliant idea" in response to a foolish suggestion exemplifies this reversal, where the positive phrasing masks underlying disapproval.^[2] Key characteristics of sarcasm include its aim to amuse, wound, or reprimand through semantic incongruity, where the surface-level positivity clashes with the negative situation or target.^[12] It frequently pairs insincere compliments with contextual cues, such as tone or timing, to signal the non-literal intent, distinguishing it as a pragmatic device dependent on shared knowledge between speaker and audience.^[13] Sarcasm differs from related rhetorical devices like hyperbole, which exaggerates for emphasis without necessarily inverting meaning, and understatement, which minimizes truth for ironic effect but does not always imply mockery.^[14] For example, hyperbole might declare "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse" to stress appetite literally, whereas sarcasm could quip "Oh, great weather we're having" amid a downpour to deride the conditions indirectly.^[15] Understatement, by contrast, might softly remark "It's a bit chilly" during a blizzard, downplaying severity without the overt oppositional intent central to sarcasm.^[16]

Linguistic Expression

Verbal Usage

Sarcasm in spoken language operates through deliberate linguistic choices that create a gap between the surface-level utterance and the speaker's intended message, often to mock, criticize, or amuse. This verbal form relies on syntactic and semantic features to signal non-literal intent, allowing speakers to convey irony without direct confrontation. In everyday interactions, these patterns enable nuanced communication, where the success of sarcasm depends on the listener's ability to decode the implied criticism or humor. Syntactically, sarcasm frequently employs structures such as rhetorical questions and tag questions to underscore the ironic twist. A rhetorical question, for instance, poses an inquiry not for information but to imply the contrary, as in "Who wouldn't love this weather?" during a rainstorm, thereby expressing annoyance through feigned positivity.^[17] Tag questions similarly amplify sarcasm by attaching a seemingly confirmatory phrase to a statement, like "Great job on that, right?" after a clear failure, which invites agreement while subverting the praise to highlight incompetence.^[18] These constructions draw on conventional linguistic forms but invert their typical functions to mark ironic intent in speech.^[19] Semantically, verbal sarcasm hinges on the duality of literal and implied meanings, where the words' dictionary sense opposes the speaker's actual attitude, often requiring shared contextual knowledge for proper interpretation. For example, praising a poorly executed task as "brilliant" literally affirms excellence but implies ridicule, with comprehension relying on mutual awareness of the task's flaws.^[20] This layered interpretation demands pragmatic inference, as the implied negativity or mockery emerges from situational cues and common ground between speaker and listener.^[18] Vocal cues, such as exaggerated intonation, can briefly enhance this verbal delivery by emphasizing the semantic disconnect.^[21] In common contexts like casual conversations, sarcasm softens rebukes or builds rapport through witty exchanges; in debates, it undermines opponents via pointed rhetorical flourishes; and in comedy routines, it drives humor by amplifying absurdities. Literary examples abound, particularly in Jane Austen's novels, where verbal sarcasm critiques social norms through dialogue. In Pride and Prejudice, Mr. Collins's proposal speech satirizes clerical pretension with lines like "I know it to be the established custom of your sex to reject a man on the first application," feigning deference while exposing his obliviousness to rejection.^[22] Similarly, Mrs. Bennet's exclamations, such as "A single man of large fortune... What a fine thing for our girls!" mock mercenary marriage views by exaggerating their appeal.^[22] These instances illustrate how verbal sarcasm in literature mirrors its role in real speech, using syntactic subtlety for enduring social commentary.^[22]

Vocal and Non-Verbal Cues

Sarcasm in spoken communication is frequently marked by distinct vocal indicators rooted in prosodic variations, which alter the auditory delivery to signal insincerity. Studies on prosody reveal that sarcastic utterances often employ a lower pitch, slower speech rate, and louder volume relative to neutral or sincere speech, creating a deliberate contrast that underscores the ironic intent.^[23] For instance, a drawling elongation of syllables or exaggerated emphasis on key words can amplify this effect, as observed in analyses of naturalistic speech patterns.^[24] These vocal shifts serve as primary auditory cues, distinguishing sarcasm from literal statements in face-to-face interactions. Non-verbal cues further reinforce sarcastic delivery through facial expressions and body language that convey mockery or detachment. Common facial signals include smirks, eye-rolling, raised eyebrows, winking, and squinting eyes, which visually highlight the speaker's non-literal meaning. A notable expression is the "blank face," characterized by minimal or neutral facial movement, which contrasts with expected emotional responses and signals irony. Body language may involve exaggerated gestures, such as theatrical hand movements, or postures like crossed arms, which add to the performative quality of sarcasm. Gaze aversion, including reduced eye contact or horizontal shifts, also appears in sarcastic exchanges, potentially reflecting cultural norms around insincerity.^[25] Empirical evidence from acoustic analyses supports these vocal patterns, showing that sarcastic speech consistently features a slower speech rate compared to sincere equivalents and variations in fundamental frequency, such as changes in mean pitch (lowered in English, elevated in some other languages) and expanded range, to mimic exaggeration.^[6] ^[26] In cross-linguistic studies, these markers hold across English and other languages, with higher harmonics-to-noise ratios indicating clearer, more deliberate articulation in sarcasm.^[26] Such findings underscore how these cues integrate briefly with verbal elements to convey full sarcastic effect.

Written Forms and Punctuation

Sarcasm in written form presents significant challenges due to the absence of vocal tone, facial expressions, and body language, which often leads to misinterpretation of intent. Without these auditory and visual cues, readers may fail to discern whether a statement is literal or ironic, resulting in higher rates of misunderstanding compared to spoken communication.^[27] To mitigate this, writers commonly employ typographic strategies such as italics to indicate emphasis on a mocking word or phrase, or all caps to simulate raised volume and exaggeration, as in "Oh, great job breaking the vase."^[28] Efforts to create dedicated punctuation for sarcasm and irony date back to the late 16th century, when English printer Henry Denham proposed the percontation point (⸮), a reversed question mark intended to mark rhetorical questions that could convey ironic undertones.^[29] In the 17th century, philosopher John Wilkins suggested an inverted exclamation mark (¡) in his work on a universal language to explicitly denote irony.^[30] French poet Hervé Bazin revived the idea in 1966 with his "point d'ironie" (¿), an upside-down question mark aimed at signaling sarcasm, though none of these marks achieved widespread adoption.^[31] In modern online discourse, particularly on forums like Reddit since the early 2000s, the "/s" tag has become a standard indicator appended to sarcastic statements to clarify intent, such as "This is the best idea ever /s."^[32] The rise of digital platforms in the 2010s introduced visual alternatives to textual cues, with emojis like the face with rolling eyes (🙄), added to Unicode 6.0 in 2010, frequently used to denote sarcasm in social media messages. Similarly, animated GIFs depicting eye rolls or exaggerated reactions have proliferated on sites like Twitter and Tumblr since around 2012, serving as dynamic proxies for nonverbal sarcasm signals in text-based interactions.^[33]

Cognitive and Psychological Aspects

Mechanisms of Understanding

Comprehending sarcasm involves a series of cognitive steps that enable individuals to interpret utterances where the literal meaning diverges from the intended one. The initial step is detecting incongruity, where the listener identifies a mismatch between the spoken words, the situational context, and non-verbal cues such as tone or facial expression.^[34] This detection relies on the listener's ability to recognize that the utterance violates expectations of sincerity.^[35] Following this, inferring the speaker's intent requires engaging theory of mind (ToM), the cognitive capacity to attribute mental states like beliefs and intentions to others, allowing the realization that the speaker means the opposite of what was said.^[36] Finally, integrating contextual knowledge—such as shared background information or social norms—resolves the incongruity by embedding the utterance within the broader communicative scenario, leading to the sarcastic interpretation.^[12] The neural basis of sarcasm comprehension has been illuminated by neuroimaging and lesion studies since the early 2000s, highlighting the involvement of right hemisphere brain regions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research indicates activation in areas like the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), which supports ToM processes critical for inferring ironic intent.^[37] Lesion studies further demonstrate that damage to the right prefrontal cortex impairs sarcasm understanding more than left-hemisphere or posterior lesions, linking deficits to reduced emotional processing and social inference abilities.^[36] These findings underscore the right hemisphere's role in processing prosodic and contextual elements that signal sarcasm, with meta-analyses of social cognition confirming the TPJ's consistent activation across ironic language tasks.^[38] Developmentally, children typically begin grasping sarcasm around ages 6 to 8, as their ToM abilities mature and allow them to distinguish non-literal meanings from verbal irony.^[39] Prior to this, younger children often interpret sarcastic remarks literally due to immature incongruity detection and contextual integration skills.^[12] In autism spectrum disorders, sarcasm comprehension presents persistent challenges, primarily attributed to ToM deficits that hinder intent inference, even in higher-functioning individuals.^[40] These difficulties persist into adolescence and adulthood, affecting social interactions, though targeted interventions can improve detection in some cases.^[41]

Psychological Impacts

Sarcasm can exert positive psychological effects, particularly within close interpersonal groups, where it serves as a tool for bonding and relational maintenance. Individuals employing affiliative humor styles—characterized by efforts to enhance others' well-being through shared amusement—frequently use sarcasm in ways that preserve positive face for listeners, thereby strengthening social ties and contributing to higher relational satisfaction.^[42] Furthermore, engaging in or receiving sarcasm promotes abstract thinking and creativity, which can alleviate stress by fostering cognitive flexibility and problem-solving skills, as evidenced in controlled experiments where participants exposed to sarcastic exchanges outperformed those in sincere or neutral conditions on creative tasks. Despite these benefits, sarcasm often carries negative emotional consequences, being frequently interpreted as veiled aggression that erodes self-esteem and escalates conflicts in relationships. Empirical studies demonstrate that sarcastic statements amplify perceptions of criticality and hostility compared to literal equivalents, provoking feelings of offense, victimization, and anger among recipients. Gender differences exacerbate these impacts, with women typically viewing sarcasm more harshly than men; research shows women associate ironic remarks with negative emotions like anger and sadness, perceiving them as more aggressive and leading to greater relational tension. Over the long term, repeated exposure to sarcasm in professional environments, often manifesting as a form of workplace incivility, correlates with heightened anxiety and diminished psychological well-being. Meta-analyses of data from the 2020s reveal that such chronic toxic communication patterns contribute to emotional exhaustion, reduced job satisfaction, and sustained stress responses, underscoring the need for mindful usage to mitigate adverse mental health outcomes. These effects hinge on recipients' cognitive comprehension of sarcastic intent, which, when successful, can modulate but not eliminate the potential for harm.

Detection and Identification

Detecting sarcasm in real-time interactions often relies on contextual clues, such as situational irony, where the utterance contrasts with evident circumstances, facilitating recognition by highlighting the discrepancy between literal meaning and reality.^[43] Prior relationship dynamics also play a key role, as familiarity between speakers—such as in close friendships or family ties—can signal intended irony through shared history or expected banter, reducing ambiguity in interpretation.^[44] These elements provide external anchors that aid human listeners in discerning sarcastic intent beyond the words alone.^[45] Technological aids have advanced through natural language processing (NLP) models, particularly transformer-based architectures like BERT variants, which analyze textual patterns in social media for sarcasm detection.^[46] These AI systems incorporate contextual embeddings to capture irony markers, achieving accuracy rates of approximately 70-80% on 2025 datasets from platforms like Twitter and Reddit, where sarcastic posts often involve exaggerated positivity or echoic mentions.^[47] Seminal contributions, such as early lexicon-based approaches extended with deep learning, have evolved into multimodal frameworks that boost performance by integrating emojis and sentiment contrasts, though challenges persist in handling noisy online data. Recent 2025 multimodal frameworks, incorporating visual and textual cues, have improved accuracies to 85-90% on diverse datasets, helping mitigate cross-cultural barriers.^[48]^[49] Barriers to sarcasm identification include cultural mismatches, where expressions interpreted as sarcastic in one society—such as understated British irony—may appear literal in others, like direct Chinese communication styles, often leading to misunderstandings in cross-cultural interactions, as shown in comparative studies.^[50] Neurodiversity, particularly in autism spectrum conditions, further reduces identification accuracy due to difficulties in processing non-literal cues, with affected individuals showing up to 50% lower comprehension in controlled tasks compared to neurotypical peers.^[51] To address these, training methods like explicit coaching— involving direct instruction on sarcasm definitions, vocal cues, and contextual contrasts—have proven effective in improving sarcasm detection, particularly in children, through structured sessions with examples and feedback, as demonstrated in intervention studies.^[52] Such interventions draw briefly on underlying cognitive mechanisms like theory of mind to enhance practical recognition skills.^[53]

Relation to Irony and Humor

Sarcasm is widely regarded as a subtype of verbal irony within rhetorical theory, characterized by the deliberate use of words to convey a meaning opposite to their literal sense, often with a mocking or contemptuous intent.^[54] In this framework, verbal irony encompasses a broader category where speakers imply evaluations contrary to what is stated, but sarcasm specifically amplifies the ridicule, distinguishing it as a sharper variant aimed at derision rather than mere understatement or overstatement.^[55] This positioning aligns with classical rhetoric, where sarcasm functions as a tool for biting criticism, as opposed to the more neutral or playful forms of irony.^[56] A key distinction lies in sarcasm's contrast with situational irony, which arises from events or outcomes that contradict expectations without requiring speaker intent, such as a fire station burning down.^[57] Sarcasm, by contrast, demands deliberate speaker agency and is inherently verbal, relying on linguistic cues to signal the intended mockery; it cannot occur passively through circumstance alone.^[58] This intentionality underscores sarcasm's rhetorical purpose, making it a performative act rather than an accidental twist of fate.^[59] Sarcasm overlaps significantly with humor, particularly in enhancing wit through unexpected contrasts, though it carries risks of offense due to its aggressive undertone.^[60] In stand-up comedy, performers like George Carlin employed sarcasm to critique societal norms, as seen in routines mocking euphemistic language for death, where literal praise ("He's passed on to a better place") ironically highlights absurdity and hypocrisy, amplifying comedic impact while potentially alienating audiences.^[61] This integration bolsters humor's persuasive edge but differentiates sarcasm from benign jests by its potential for interpersonal sting.^[62] The psychological processing of sarcasm shares mechanisms with irony detection, involving inference of speaker intent and contextual evaluation in the brain's social cognition networks.^[63]

Role in Religion and Philosophy

In the Old Testament, prophetic sarcasm serves as a rhetorical device to expose idolatry and affirm divine sovereignty, often interpreted in Christian theology as a form of divine rebuke. A prominent example is found in 1 Kings 18, where the prophet Elijah taunts the prophets of Baal during a contest on Mount Carmel. As the false prophets fail to summon fire from their god despite fervent cries, Elijah mocks them, suggesting sarcastically that Baal might be "busy" or "deep in thought," or perhaps "on a journey" or "asleep" and needing to be awakened (1 Kings 18:27). This irony, bordering on sarcasm, underscores the impotence of Baal in contrast to Yahweh's power, ultimately leading to the prophets' defeat and execution.^[64] Scholars view this as prophetic satire, a deliberate ridicule intended to rebuke human folly and vice, aligning with God's use of sharp language to instruct and judge.^[65] In philosophical discourse, sarcasm intersects with irony as a tool for questioning assumptions and revealing truth, though it risks veering into mockery. Socrates' method, known as Socratic irony, involves feigning ignorance to expose contradictions in others' beliefs, as depicted in Plato's dialogues like the Gorgias. Here, Socrates' probing questions dismantle the sophist Callicles' defenses of power and rhetoric, leading Callicles to accuse him of sarcasm due to the ironic tone's cutting edge. This highlights how Socratic irony borders on sarcasm when perceived as personal attack rather than dialectical pursuit, yet it remains a non-aggressive means to critique societal pretenses without direct confrontation.^[66] Eastern philosophical traditions, particularly Zen Buddhism, employ paradoxical elements akin to sarcastic mockery in koans to disrupt conventional thinking and provoke enlightenment. Koans, such as the famous "What is the sound of one hand clapping?", use absurdity and ironic reversal to mock logical dualities, fostering a direct apprehension of reality beyond words. This paradoxical mockery echoes sarcastic humor's aggressive contempt by ridiculing attachment to rational constructs, yet it aims at transcendent insight rather than mere derision, distinguishing it from Western sarcasm while sharing its disruptive intent.^[67] In modern religious contexts, sarcasm appears in sermons as a means to convey moral lessons through vivid rebuke, though its appropriateness remains debated among theologians and preachers. Proponents argue it can humanize difficult truths, as seen in satirical applications of Isaiah's rebukes to contemporary ethical failings, enhancing persuasion when tied to scriptural authority. However, critics caution against it, viewing sarcasm as inherently hostile and incompatible with the Gospel's emphasis on gentleness, potentially alienating congregations and undermining trust in the preacher's message. Guidelines for preaching recommend avoiding sarcasm in favor of self-deprecating or illustrative humor to maintain reverence and focus on Christ-centered teaching.^[68]^[69]

Cross-Cultural and Historical Variations

Sarcasm manifests differently across cultures, often influenced by communication styles and social norms. In high-context cultures like Japan, where indirectness is valued to maintain harmony, sarcasm tends to be subtler and less confrontational compared to the more direct expressions common in low-context Western societies such as the United States. Japanese sarcasm, when used, relies heavily on contextual cues like tone or non-verbal signals rather than overt verbal irony, as direct mockery can disrupt group cohesion.^[70] In contrast, Western sarcasm often employs explicit verbal contrasts for humorous effect, leading to potential misunderstandings in intercultural interactions.^[71] Collectivist societies, such as China, exhibit lower tolerance for sarcasm as a form of humor, viewing it more as a tool for criticism than lighthearted banter. Research indicates that sarcasm usage is higher in individualistic cultures like the U.S. compared to China, where it may be perceived as aggressive or face-threatening in social exchanges.^[71] In Chinese contexts, collectivist values enhance sarcasm comprehension in close relationships but reduce its appropriateness in broader settings, prioritizing relational harmony over ironic expression.^[72] Historically, sarcasm evolved from ancient Roman satire, exemplified by the works of Juvenal in the early second century CE, where it served as a vehicle for bitter, moralistic critique of societal vices like corruption and excess. Juvenal's Satires employed indignant irony to denounce Roman decadence, influencing later satirical traditions with its harsh, personal invective.^[73] By the 20th century, sarcasm became a staple in political propaganda, particularly through cartoons and rhetoric that mocked adversaries to sway public opinion. Post-2010, digital globalization has blended sarcastic styles across borders via social media, with platforms amplifying hybrid forms that mix Western irony with local nuances, increasing its global usage and adaptability. Emerging research highlights sarcasm in non-Western languages, such as Arabic kināyah (rhetorical allusion), which often involves inversion for critique, distinct from literal sentiment. Studies on Arabic sarcasm detection underscore its prevalence in tweets, where cultural subtleties challenge computational models, revealing gaps in understanding figurative language beyond English.^[74]

References

[1]
SARCASM Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Etymology. from French sarcasme or Latin sarcasmos, both meaning "sarcasm," from Greek sarkasmos "sarcasm," from sarkazein "to tear flesh, bite the lips in ...
[2]
SARCASM | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
the use of remarks that clearly mean the opposite of what they say, made in order to hurt someone's feelings or to criticize something in a humorous way:.
[3]
sarcasm noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes
a way of using words that are the opposite of what you mean in order to be unpleasant to somebody or to make fun of them
[4]
Sarcasm - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from late Greek sarkasmos meaning "a sneer or mockery," sarcasm denotes a biting, satirical remark or expression used to convey bitter or ironic ...Missing: linguistics | Show results with:linguistics
[5]
Cross-cultural nuances in sarcasm comprehension: a comparative ...
Feb 19, 2024 · Sarcasm is a particular type of irony that is employed when the subject of the remark is an individual (Kreuz and Glucksberg, 1989) and is the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
Distinguishing Sarcasm From Literal Language: Evidence From ...
Nov 12, 2013 · We define sarcasm as a form of nonliteral language in which a statement means something different from the literal meaning of the statement ( ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[7]
Oh, SO Sarcastic: Diverse Strategies for Being Sarcastic
Mar 23, 2022 · Neither does Merriam-Webster's definition require irony: “A sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain” (Merriam ...
[8]
Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact - PMC
Most theorists agree that sarcasm serves some communicative function that would not be achieved by speaking directly, such as eliciting a particular emotional ...
[9]
sarcasm, n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English Dictionary
There is one meaning in OED's entry for the noun sarcasm. See 'Meaning & use' for definition, usage, and quotation evidence.
[10]
An Experimental Study on Sarcasm Comprehension in School ... - NIH
May 26, 2023 · Sarcasm is a type of counterfactual verbal irony characterized by several distinctive characteristics. First, sarcasm is directed at a specific ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[11]
[PDF] Sarcasm as Contrast between a Positive Sentiment and Negative ...
Sarcasm is often defined in terms of contrast or “say- ing the opposite of what you mean”. Our work fo- cuses on one specific type of contrast that is ...
[12]
What is the difference between understatement and verbal irony?
Understatement intentionally downplays the severity of the situation, while verbal irony involves stating the exact opposite of what you mean.
[13]
Difference Between Hyperbole and Understatement (Video)
Aug 8, 2025 · A hyperbole is obvious and intentional exaggeration, while an understatement is its opposite. Learn how writers use these figures of speech ...
[14]
Figurative Language
Apr 5, 2010 · Understatement (Meiosis) is the opposite of hyperbole. It is a kind of irony which deliberately represents something as much less than it ...
[15]
[PDF] Rhetorical Questions and Sarcasm in Social Media Dialog
Aug 15, 2017 · To better understand the relationship between. RQs and irony/sarcasm, we expand on a small ex- isting dataset of RQs in debate forums from our.Missing: tag | Show results with:tag
[16]
Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of ...
Although common ground and tag manipulations did not affect the degree of perceived irony, common ground did exert an influence on the appropriateness of ironic ...
[17]
(PDF) What is this, Sarcastic Syntax? - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · This study considers sarcasm as a linguistic genre, and explores the use of constructions to capture conventions of sarcastic speech.
[18]
[PDF] Recognizing sarcasm without language - McGill University
Like other forms of verbal irony, the expression of sarcasm in speech is characterized by indirect language meant to be interpreted non-literally by the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
The sound of sarcasm - ScienceDirect.com
It was concluded that sarcasm in speech can be characterized by a specific pattern of prosodic cues in addition to textual cues, and that these acoustic ...
[20]
[PDF] Satire and Social Criticism in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice
Nov 13, 2024 · This paper investigates the multifaceted role of satire in Pride and Prejudice, focusing on how Austen employs narrative techniques, character ...
[21]
Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm
Download PDF · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit ... Rockwell, P. Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm. J Psycholinguist ...
[22]
[PDF] The sound of sarcasm - McGill University
Lower, slower, louder: vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 483–495. Rockwell, P., 2001. Facial expression and sarcasm. Perceptual ...
[23]
[PDF] Insincere Utterances and Gaze: Eye Contact During Sarcastic ...
These included raised or lowered eyebrows; open, squinting, or rolling eyes; winking; nodding; smiling; and no expression at all or what these authors called ...
[24]
Detecting Sarcasm from Paralinguistic Cues: Anatomic and ... - NIH
Analysis of the vocal qualities of sarcastic speech suggests that it is characterized by an increased range and amplitude of fundamental voice frequency, higher ...Missing: indicators | Show results with:indicators
[25]
Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English
Sep 9, 2009 · Sarcasm was also spoken with a slower speech rate and a higher HNR (i.e., less vocal noise) than the other attitudes in certain linguistic ...
[26]
Sarcasm in Written Communication: Emoticons are Efficient Markers ...
Sarcasm (and irony in general) is especially likely to be misunderstood in written communication, as it involves deciphering a meaning that is often the ...
[27]
Why is sarcasm so difficult to detect in texts and emails?
Mar 8, 2018 · Sarcasm thrives in ambiguous situations – and that's the main issue. When delivered in person, sarcasm tends to assume a cutting, bitter tone.
[28]
Understanding Percontation Punctuation Marks - ThoughtCo
May 14, 2019 · The percontation mark is a late-medieval mark of punctuation used to signal the close of a rhetorical question.Missing: sarcasm | Show results with:sarcasm
[29]
The Centuries-Long Quest To Choose A Punctuation Mark For Irony ...
Jun 11, 2025 · In the 1600s, philosopher John Wilkins proposed an “irony mark” that was an upside down exclamation point. It was a visual cue that the meaning ...
[30]
Can irony really be conveyed with punctuation? - CSMonitor.com
Mar 3, 2023 · For centuries, wordsmiths have demanded punctuation marks that would convey irony and sarcasm in written text, much like verbal intonation or facial ...
[31]
Tone Indicators and How to Use Them - The New York Times
Dec 9, 2020 · For ages, posters on forums like Reddit have used “/s” at the end of a post to indicate sarcasm. But the history of tone indication is much ...
[32]
All the Feels: the Morphology of Reaction Gifs - JSTOR Daily
Mar 16, 2015 · From visual emojis depicting simple emotional states, it's a short step to emotion or reaction gifs, used to respond in playful ways to online discussions.Missing: sarcasm | Show results with:sarcasm
[33]
Context-prosody interaction in sarcasm comprehension: A functional ...
Jun 6, 2022 · During conversation, sarcasm is perceived as an incongruity between the context, content, and prosody of the utterance.
[34]
Assessing Theory of Mind by Humor: The Humor Comprehension ...
Necessary cognitive processes for incongruity detection may vary from recognition of simple visual resemblance to mentalizing, which requires ToM ability.
[35]
[PDF] The Neuroanatomical Basis of Understanding Sarcasm and Its ...
The present study offers findings regarding the neurobiology of comprehension of sarcasm and the cognitive processes underlying it. First, in the task that ...
[36]
[PDF] Understanding Sarcasm's Neural Correlates Through a Novel fMRI ...
We investigate the neural correlates of sarcasm in Spanish using a novel experimental paradigm designed to minimize cognitive load and enhance ecological ...
[37]
Social cognition and the brain: A meta‐analysis - Wiley Online Library
Apr 1, 2008 · This meta-analysis explores the location and function of brain areas involved in social cognition, or the capacity to understand people's behavioral intentions.<|separator|>
[38]
(PDF) Development of children's ability to distinguish sarcasm and ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Children can determine the non-literal meanings of sarcasm and irony by six years of age but do not distinguish the pragmatic purposes of these speech acts ...
[39]
Comprehension of irony in autistic children: The role of theory of ...
Nov 11, 2023 · This study explored irony comprehension in autistic children and examined the roles of ToM and EF in linking autism symptoms to deficits in irony comprehension.
[40]
(PDF) Teaching children with autism to detect and respond to sarcasm
Aug 6, 2025 · Figures · ironic utterances naturally begins to emerge around the age of 5 or 6, and continues to develop throughout middle childhood · children ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257692095_Teaching_children_with_autism_to_detect_and_respond_to_sarcasm
[42]
[PDF] Sarcasm Detection on Twitter: - Publications - Trinity College Dublin
The main contribution of the theory is to recognize that ironic language presupposes an ironic environment, described as a certain situational setting in the ...
[43]
[PDF] Enhancing Sarcasm Detection with Contextual Factors for Improved ...
Oct 21, 2025 · This fu- sion approach aims to improve sarcasm detection robustness across domains such as social media and political discourse, emphasizing ...Missing: clues | Show results with:clues
[44]
Sarcasm Analysis Using Conversation Context - MIT Press Direct
Exclamations: The use of exclamations (“!”) is standard in expressions of irony and sarcasm. They emphasize a sense of surprise on the literal evaluation that ...
[45]
A contextual-based approach for sarcasm detection | Scientific Reports
Jul 4, 2024 · Sarcasm, a form of communication characterized by irony and mockery, presents a unique challenge for natural language processing systems.
[46]
View of Deep Learning Multimodal Sarcasm Detection in Social ...
Among the 15 models tested, LSTM–composite demonstrated stable accuracy and strong generalization (76% accuracy, 73% precision, and 82% recall). Its high ...
[47]
(PDF) NLP-Based Extended Lexicon Model For Sarcasm Detection ...
Aug 8, 2025 · This research presents an NLP-based extended lexicon model for sarcasm detection, leveraging both textual features and emojis to enhance ...
[48]
Individual Differences in Sarcasm Interpretation and Use: Evidence ...
Oct 9, 2025 · From this, we propose that both cultural and individual differences factors modulate sarcasm interpretation and use: Participants from different ...
[49]
[PDF] Teaching children with autism to detect and respond to sarcasm
Sarcasm can be linguistically defined as a form of non-literal language in which someone subjectively states the opposite of what is objectively known to be ...
[50]
Teaching sarcasm: Evaluating metapragmatic training for typically ...
Jun 15, 2020 · In the training condition, children were taught what sarcasm was and what cues to look for as they interacted with the researcher over a set of ...<|separator|>
[51]
Sarcasm comprehension for individuals with high functioning Autism ...
Oct 6, 2025 · This study explores the effectiveness of a sarcasm detection tool based on Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) deep learning model, integrated with color ...
[52]
Introduction (Chapter 1) - Irony
Mar 6, 2018 · When someone has the intention to communicate something ironically, usually using language to do so, then that is an instance of verbal irony.
[53]
Studying Verbal Irony and Sarcasm - SpringerLink
This volume provides a comprehensive yet accessible introduction to the phenomenon of verbal irony and sarcasm and the methodological aspects of its study.
[54]
[PDF] Verbal irony in the wild - PhilArchive
Sarcasm is a type of verbal irony associated with biting criticism, with often positive literal comments delivered in a sneering tone.
[55]
[PDF] Exploring How Sarcasm is Marked in Text-based CMC - PDXScholar
The first issue one will encounter when doing research on sarcasm is that there is no predominantly agreed upon definition of sarcasm. Some scholars view irony ...
[56]
When It Pays to Be Insincere: On the Benefits of Verbal Irony
Oct 27, 2023 · A number of subtypes of verbal irony have been proposed based on its linguistic form, including sarcasm (irony that is sharp or bitter), ironic ...
[57]
A battle over the etic and emic “sarcasm” and “irony” labels
The primary goal of this paper is to tease out the concepts denoted by the etic and emic labels “irony” and “sarcasm” (i.e. as they are viewed by linguists, and ...
[58]
Sarcasm and Humour (Chapter 7) - Irony
Mar 6, 2018 · ... sarcasm is more aggressive than irony, and sarcasms are clearer than ironies. Then, I focus on the relationship between irony and humor.
[59]
George Carlin's Use Of Comedy - 710 Words - IPL.org
More about George Carlin's Use Of Comedy · Summary Of What Corporate America Can T Build By Sam Dillion · Self-Deprecating Humor In Decaf Poopacino By Dave Barry.
[60]
Truly Funny: Humor, Irony, and Satire as Moral Criticism - jstor
And irony and sarcasm frequently figure in ridicule, moral criticism, and other expressions of contempt, much as superiority theorists from Plato to Hobbes ...
[61]
It's no joke: Study identifies brain circuitry involved in our grasp of ...
a brain region associated with social cognition and identifying emotions — helps us understand sarcasm.
[62]
Enduring Word Bible Commentary 1 Kings Chapter 18
“Elijah's irony bordered on sarcasm” (Patterson and Austel). The words meditating and busy can be translated “to be engaged in business” and may be a ...
[63]
[PDF] PROPHETIC SATIRE AS A VEHICLE FOR ETHICAL INSTRUCTION ...
Satire has been defined as “the exposure, through ridicule or rebuke, of human vice or folly.”1 The satirist attempts to reveal his contempt, disgust,.
[64]
Of Which We May Speak: Meditations on Irony, Eccentricity, and Faith
Oct 15, 2016 · The mere fact of Kierkegaard's insistent and by-no-means-unmotivated linkage of irony to the person of Socrates, especially in light of the ...
[65]
(PDF) The Paradox of Koan - ResearchGate
... mockery of ironic humour, the aggressive contempt of sarcastic humour, the. mortal keenness of black humour, but above all the inclination to laugh, which. is ...
[66]
The Use of Satire in the Book of Isaiah and in Christian Ministry
Dec 9, 2019 · In this paper, I will briefly rehearse what satire is, catalogue and categorise some twenty likely instances of satire in Isaiah, and make some ...
[67]
[PDF] Humor in Preaching: Its Effects and Guidelines for its Beneficial Use
Oct 15, 2009 · An absence of humor in the testimony of Scripture may be indicative of a difficulty in using humor appropriately or its lack of relevance to the ...
[68]
Cross-cultural nuances in sarcasm comprehension: a comparative ...
Feb 20, 2024 · The study reveals nuanced differences in how cultural values shape the comprehension of sarcasm in Chinese and American contexts.1. Introduction · 3. Results · 4. Discussion
[69]
Humor easily crosses cultures, but be careful with sarcasm
Apr 13, 2021 · Humour such as wit, absurdity and self deprecation works in Japanese culture much more successfully than sarcasm, jokes or puns.Missing: high- context styles
[70]
(PDF) Saying What You Don't Mean: A Cross-Cultural Study of ...
Oct 9, 2025 · Some studies have shown higher sarcasm usage in United States, compared to other countries like China. [2] . Further, sarcasm interpretation ...
[71]
Cross-cultural nuances in sarcasm comprehension: a comparative ...
Feb 20, 2024 · Collectivism is also associated with improved sarcasm comprehension, especially in Chinese participants. However, Masculinity and Long-Term ...
[72]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38445055/
[73]
The Red Scare Through Political Cartoons & Satire | Harry S. Truman
It is an emotional propaganda. To the unwary it may resemble real-estate news, or perhaps a patriotic song, but it is the pap of Prussianism. As an example, we ...
[74]
(PDF) A Comprehensive Survey on Arabic Sarcasm Detection
Jan 17, 2023 · The sarcastic text frequently reverses the polarity of the sentiment. Therefore, detecting sarcasm in the text has a positive impact on the ...Missing: ta' neez
[75]
Analysis of Sarcasm in Social Media Tweets Semantic Perspective
Jul 10, 2025 · This study investigates the phenomenon of sarcasm in social media, particularly on Twitter, through a semantic and ethnographic lens.Missing: activism #sarcasmtwitter trends
[76]
Sarcasm Detection in Social Media: Techniques, Models, and Future ...
Aug 31, 2025 · This paper provides a systematic review of the mainstream approaches to sarcasm detection in social media developed over the past two years.Missing: activism #sarcasmtwitter trends