Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cooper Union speech


The Cooper Union address was a speech delivered by Abraham Lincoln on February 27, 1860, at the Cooper Institute in New York City, where he presented a detailed historical and constitutional argument against the expansion of slavery into the federal territories. Lincoln examined the records of the 39 framers of the Constitution, determining that a majority—21 signers—had expressed opposition to slavery's extension in at least one instance, thereby refuting claims by Senator Stephen A. Douglas and others that the founders unanimously supported popular sovereignty on the issue without congressional restriction. He asserted that the Republican Party's stance aligned with the framers' intent, emphasizing that fidelity to their principles, rather than innovation, justified prohibiting slavery's spread, and famously concluded with the exhortation, "Let us have faith that right makes might." The address, Lincoln's first major Eastern engagement, drew an audience of about 1,500, including influential , and received widespread acclaim, with the full text published in newspapers like the , amplifying his national profile. This oration played a crucial role in positioning as a leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination at the subsequent convention, where he secured the endorsement by demonstrating intellectual rigor and moderation on the question. Its emphasis on original constitutional interpretation and restraint against Southern demands underscored Lincoln's strategic approach to preserving the Union amid sectional tensions.

Historical Context

Antebellum Political Divisions

The antebellum period witnessed escalating sectional conflicts between Northern states, increasingly industrialized and reliant on free labor, and Southern states economically dependent on plantation slavery, with disputes centering on slavery's extension into western territories acquired through the and . These tensions manifested in constitutional debates over federal authority under Article IV, Section 3, which empowered Congress to "make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory," interpreted by antislavery advocates as permitting restrictions on slavery while proslavery forces claimed property rights under the Fifth Amendment protected slaveholders nationwide. A pivotal escalation occurred with the Kansas-Nebraska Act of May 30, 1854, sponsored by Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas, which organized the territories of Kansas and Nebraska while repealing the Missouri Compromise of 1820—a measure that had barred slavery north of 36°30' latitude in the Louisiana Territory. Douglas's doctrine of popular sovereignty allowed territorial settlers to vote on slavery's legalization, ostensibly deferring to local democracy but effectively reopening northern territories to potential enslavement and sparking "Bleeding Kansas," where pro- and antislavery migrants clashed violently from 1854 to 1859, resulting in over 200 deaths and underscoring the act's failure to quell divisions. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in on March 6, 1857, intensified these rifts by holding that Congress possessed no authority to ban slavery in the territories, nullifying the as unconstitutional, and denying citizenship to , thereby affirming slaveholders' rights to transport "property" without restriction. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney's posited that territorial exclusion violated , a stance Republicans rejected as a departure from the framers' intent—evidenced in the of 1787 and early congressional actions—to contain slavery's spread, framing the decision as judicial overreach enabling unlimited expansion. Southern responses to Republican opposition hardened into disunion threats, explicitly linking a 1860 Republican presidential victory to territorial restrictions with inevitable secession to safeguard slavery. Alabama's William Lowndes Yancey, a leading "fire-eater," proclaimed in 1858 that the 's anti-expansion stance constituted an existential assault on Southern rights, advocating immediate secession conventions as the remedy. Mississippi Senator similarly cautioned in 1860 that electing a would engender calamity, rendering Union submission untenable and secession a justifiable defense of constitutional slave protections. Such , echoed in Southern legislatures and newspapers, established a direct causal pathway from perceived Northern against slavery's growth to the brink of national fracture.

Lincoln's Pre-1860 Career and Eastern Outreach

Abraham Lincoln's political career gained renewed momentum in the mid-1850s following the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act on May 30, 1854, which repealed the and permitted slavery's potential expansion into northern territories, prompting his re-entry into public life after a period focused on law practice. In response, Lincoln delivered a major address in , on October 16, 1854, articulating opposition to the act's provision, which he viewed as undermining the principle of free soil in the territories. He secured election to the Illinois House of Representatives on November 7, 1854, but soon shifted focus to a U.S. bid, aligning with emerging anti-slavery elements that coalesced into the by 1856. Lincoln's candidacy for the U.S. Senate from Illinois in 1858 marked a pivotal escalation, culminating in his June 16 "House Divided" acceptance speech at the state Republican convention in Springfield, where he warned of deepening national divisions over slavery's extension. This set the stage for seven joint debates with incumbent Senator Stephen A. Douglas from August 21 to October 15, 1858, across Illinois towns including Ottawa, Freeport, and Alton, which drew widespread newspaper coverage and elevated the slavery issue to national discourse. Despite Lincoln's loss in the January 5, 1859, state legislative vote that elected Douglas—by a margin reflecting Democratic control of the assembly—Lincoln captured 47% of the popular vote through Republican gains, signaling his viability and thrusting him into broader Republican circles. Post-election, sustained his ascent through targeted speeches in Republican strongholds like and , leveraging networks of party activists to position himself as a principled moderate on containment, while declining to concede ground on moral opposition to the institution. His profile surged amid anticipation for the 1860 presidential nomination, where New York Senator dominated as the presumed frontrunner due to his early anti-slavery advocacy and organizational strength. To gauge Lincoln's appeal in the East, the Young Men's Central Republican Union—a group formed to foster party unity and scout presidential alternatives—extended an invitation in late for him to lecture in the region, motivated by desires to dilute Seward's influence and test Western candidates' resonance with urban, commercial Republican constituencies wary of radicalism. This outreach represented a deliberate effort to broaden the party's national base beyond Midwestern roots, assessing Lincoln's capacity to bridge sectional divides within Republican ranks.

Preparation and Research

Invitation and Initial Planning

In October 1859, received and accepted an invitation from Republicans to deliver a , initially intended for Henry Ward Beecher's Plymouth Church in on a political topic related to inventions and current issues. The church's destruction by fire shortly thereafter postponed the event, prompting the Young Men's Central Republican Union—a group of influential —to take sponsorship and reschedule it for , , at the Cooper Institute in , shifting the focus explicitly to a political address. This invitation stemmed from Lincoln's rising national profile after his 1858 Senate campaign debates with , as Eastern Republican leaders sought to evaluate Midwestern candidates amid preparations for the presidential nomination. Lincoln departed Springfield, Illinois, on February 23, 1860, via rail, arriving in on February 25 after a journey that included stops and connections through the Midwest and Northeast. Upon arrival, he stayed modestly at the hotel and began initial consultations with local figures, including members of the sponsoring union and newspaper editors, to gauge audience expectations and venue logistics for the anticipated crowd of about 1,500. With the set for May in , speculation swirled around Lincoln's presidential prospects, yet his preparations remained unpretentious, relying on carried notes and handwritten drafts rather than elaborate rehearsals. Recognizing the Eastern audience's preference for erudition over folksy , Lincoln deliberately abandoned his customary extemporaneous stump-speaking approach—characterized by direct emotional appeals and audience interaction—for a meticulously structured, document-based designed to demonstrate depth and restraint. This strategic pivot aimed to counter perceptions of him as a provincial rail-splitter unfit for national leadership, positioning the speech as a substantive engagement with skeptical elites who favored candidates like .

Empirical Analysis of Founding Documents

Lincoln undertook a systematic review of primary sources to ascertain the framers' intentions on congressional over in the territories, focusing on the 39 signers of the U.S. Constitution. By analyzing their recorded speeches, votes, and writings in congressional proceedings, he identified that at least 21—a clear —had expressed or acted in favor of prohibiting 's extension into federal territories. Only one signer, Charles C. Pinckney of , advocated explicitly for allowing to spread into territories where it was not already established, as evidenced in his statements during constitutional debates. Central to this effort was Lincoln's consultation of Jonathan Elliot's six-volume Debates on the Federal Constitution (1836–1845), which compiled verbatim records of the Constitutional Convention and . This archival material enabled a granular assessment of individual framers' positions, revealing no broad endorsement for unrestricted expansion; instead, the data showed repeated affirmations of federal power to restrict , as in votes against compromises permitting its introduction. To refute the (1857) assertion that the framers viewed territorial slavery as constitutionally protected property, Lincoln cross-referenced state-level precedents and early federal enactments. He highlighted that eight of the 13 original state constitutions either banned slavery outright or authorized its prohibition, demonstrating a foundational aversion to its proliferation. Complementing this, the of July 13, 1787—passed unanimously by the Confederation Congress with votes from 17 of the 23 framers who participated—explicitly forbade slavery in the , serving as a binding precedent against expansion. This evidence-based approach exposed how Democratic advocacy for and non-interference overlooked the framers' demonstrable anti-expansion consensus, as gleaned from the ordinance's near-unanimous support and the signers' documented restraint on slavery's geographic reach. Such disregard, Lincoln's review implied through the archival pattern, precipitated unchecked territorial policies favoring slavery's growth, diverging from the founders' calibrated limits.

Delivery and Structure

The Event on February 27, 1860

The speech was delivered on the evening of February 27, 1860, in the Great Hall of the Cooper Institute (now ) at in , a venue established as a center for and public lectures aimed at working-class advancement. The hall accommodated an audience of nearly 1,500 attendees, comprising a diverse cross-section of New Yorkers including merchants, lawyers, intellectuals, and skeptics drawn from the city's predominantly Democratic population, many of whom were initially doubtful of the Western lawyer's abilities. Abraham Lincoln, attired in a recently purchased suit yet retaining a plain, unpretentious appearance that contrasted with Eastern sophistication, presented the address by reading carefully from prepared manuscript sheets on blue foolscap paper, delivering it soberly over nearly an hour without reliance on extemporaneous oratory or theatrical flourishes. This methodical approach emphasized logical progression and evidentiary reasoning, diverging from the era's typical reliance on pathos or rhetorical bombast to engage listeners. To ensure accuracy, reporters transcribed the speech verbatim during delivery, and Lincoln personally supervised revisions to the proofs before its publication in the New-York Tribune on February 28, 1860, enabling swift nationwide dissemination through newspaper reprints and campaign pamphlets.

Rhetorical Organization and Key Excerpts

Lincoln's Cooper Union address employs a disciplined tripartite structure, commencing with an address to the New York Republican audience to frame his inquiry modestly, transitioning to a methodical historical refutation grounded in the actions of the Constitution's framers, and culminating in bifurcated appeals to Southern audiences and fellow Republicans. This organization channels the speech from contextual setup to evidentiary core and exhortative close, prioritizing specific historical records over abstract assertions. The opening segment establishes Lincoln's intent as non-agitational, responding to Senator Stephen Douglas's challenge that the framers unanimously opposed federal interference with in the territories. He declares, "The facts with which I shall deal this evening are mainly old and familiar; nor is there anything new in the general use I shall make of them," signaling reliance on established to resolve disputes rather than inflame them. This preface underscores a commitment to dispassionate examination, avoiding broad moral declarations in favor of targeted historical scrutiny. The central portion pivots empirically with the directive, "Let us, to the argument, then!"—shifting to verifiable deeds of the thirty-nine constitutional signers. Lincoln refutes claims of unanimous framer support for unrestricted expansion by tallying that twenty-one—a majority—had endorsed federal prohibitions, as in the of 1787 and subsequent congressional acts. He cautions against inferring contrary intent from outliers, noting it "would be unsafe to set down even the two who voted against the prohibition, as having done so because, in their understanding, any proper division of local from federal authority..." This segment privileges concrete votes and enactments, such as George Washington's signing of enforcement legislation in , over generalized interpretations that might accommodate pro- doctrines. Actions, he asserts, "speak louder than words," with responsible conduct under oath amplifying their weight. The closing divides into direct entreaties: first to Southerners, urging them to engage principles without threats—"Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations"—and then to Republicans, exhorting fidelity to evidenced : "Let us have faith that right makes might, and in that faith, let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it." This conclusion reinforces the speech's evidentiary foundation, framing steadfast opposition to slavery's territorial spread as a logical outgrowth of precedents rather than .

Core Arguments

Historical Evidence from the Framers

In the address, conducted a detailed empirical examination of the 39 delegates who signed the on , 1787, to demonstrate that a majority opposed the expansion of into federal territories. He tallied that only eight of these framers owned slaves, and even among them, none endorsed the unlimited spread of the institution beyond its existing boundaries in the Southern states. This count underscored Lincoln's broader contention that the framers viewed as a localized evil to be contained rather than perpetuated nationwide, drawing on their recorded actions and votes rather than mere personal circumstances. Lincoln specifically addressed potential exceptions among the slaveholding signers, such as South Carolina's John Rutledge and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, who defended the constitutional clause permitting the international slave trade until 1808. However, he refuted interpretations portraying them as advocates for unchecked territorial expansion, noting the context of their advocacy as a temporary compromise to facilitate constitutional ratification amid Southern apprehensions, not a mandate for introducing slavery into undeveloped western lands. The other six slaveholding signers—primarily from Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia—either supported or acquiesced to measures restricting slavery's growth, aligning with non-slaveholding framers like James Madison and Gouverneur Morris, who explicitly criticized the institution during convention debates. The constitutional text itself reflected these compromises without endorsing expansion: the three-fifths clause counted enslaved persons for representation and taxation, the fugitive slave provision protected Southern property interests, and the slave trade allowance deferred abolition until 1808, all extracted as concessions to secure Southern support for the document. Absent were provisions affirming a duty to extend , contrasting sharply with the of July 13, 1787—drafted concurrently with the —which explicitly prohibited in the north of the , establishing a causal precedent for congressional authority to limit the institution in domains. At least 21 framers, including key figures like and Nathan Dane, endorsed or influenced this ordinance, evidencing their intent to hem in geographically. Causally, argued that the framers' framework preserved by balancing slave and free interests through , avoiding the perpetual sectional strife that unrestricted expansion would provoke. Permitting slavery's indefinite spread into territories would disrupt this equilibrium, fostering endless disputes over new states' status and eroding the republic's foundational stability, as each addition tilted power dynamics and invited dissolution—precisely the disunion the framers averted by prioritizing restriction over proliferation.

Direct Address to Southern Audiences

In the address, directly appealed to Southern audiences by affirming commitment to non-interference with in the states where it already existed, framing this restraint as a pragmatic necessity rather than abolitionist zeal. He stated, "Wrong as we think is, we can yet afford to let it alone where it is, because that much is due to the necessity arising from its actual presence in ." This countered Southern accusations of Northern aggression, emphasizing over eradication and aligning with constitutional limits on power over state institutions. argued that such demonstrated moderation, not fanaticism, as Republicans sought only to prevent 's extension into territories, a policy he traced to the framers' own practices. Lincoln refuted Southern claims that Republicans incited slave insurrections or posed an existential threat, dismissing evidence like John Brown's 1859 Harper's Ferry raid as unconnected to party doctrine. He challenged accusers to provide proof beyond isolated acts by individuals disavowed by Republicans, noting that Southerners themselves had not quelled such events through their governance. Drawing historical analogies, he likened Republican restraint to the founders' debates over slavery, where a majority of framers—21 of the 39 Constitution signers—had supported congressional prohibitions in the Northwest Territory and opposed its unchecked spread, viewing it as incompatible with free labor and republican virtue. This evidence, Lincoln contended, showed that opposition to expansion was not novel radicalism but adherence to precedent, urging Southerners to recognize Republicans as defenders of the original constitutional balance rather than innovators. Realistically assessing the stakes, Lincoln warned that yielding to demands for slavery's territorial expansion would invite perpetual concessions, eroding the principles of self-government by subordinating majority will to minority veto on this issue alone. He posited conservatism as "adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried," casting Southern insistence on popular sovereignty without restrictions as the true departure from framers' policy, which had prioritized federal oversight to avert moral and economic contagion. Such acquiescence risked transforming territorial governance into a arena of mob-like factionalism, where slavery's proponents could dominate nascent communities, ultimately threatening the Union's republican character by normalizing institutional favoritism over equal application of law. Lincoln implored Southern listeners to weigh this causal chain, suggesting that principled resistance to expansion preserved the founders' vision more faithfully than escalation toward disunion.

Republican Principles and Responsibilities

In the Cooper Union address, Lincoln urged Republicans to maintain their principled opposition to the expansion of into federal territories, grounding this stance in the historical record of the framers' intentions as evidenced by their votes and writings. He argued that only if empirical analysis of the founding era falsified the interpretation—showing a majority of framers favored unrestricted territorial expansion—would the party be justified in altering its position; absent such proof, equated to abandoning duty and constitutional fidelity. This evidence-based commitment framed not as innovation but as adherence to original constitutional limits on , where the framers had restricted it to existing states while empowering to exclude it from territories. Lincoln defended the against accusations of by portraying it as the national heir to the founders' legacy, asserting that the party's restraint—opposing 's spread without interfering in states where it existed—aligned with the framers' balanced rather than disrupting the . He emphasized that Republicans inherited a where was tolerated as a local evil but not entitled to perpetual growth, countering claims of irresponsibility by insisting the party upheld law over expediency to preserve national integrity. This positioning rejected calls for silence on 's moral wrongness, tying Republican responsibilities to a causal chain: principled non-expansion would check its political power, averting the 's erosion through unchecked demands for supremacy. The speech's logic fortified Republican resolve by prioritizing duty informed by historical precedent over fears of disunion or personal peril, with Lincoln declaring, "Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations against us, nor frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the nor of dungeons to ourselves." He called for steadfast action, resolving to "stand by our duty, to see it through to the bitter end," as yielding would invite bitterness and reproach, while fidelity to evidence-based principles promised the moral force to sustain the republic's foundational commitments. This underscored the party's role in embodying republican responsibilities: defending constitutional against encroachments that subordinated free labor and to slavery's demands.

Contemporary Reception and Criticisms

Immediate Audience and Media Reactions

The audience of approximately 1,500 attendees, including prominent figures such as and , warmly received Abraham Lincoln's address on February 27, 1860, with frequent interruptions of applause and cheers throughout the delivery. Upon its conclusion, spectators rose en masse, shouting and waving hats and handkerchiefs in a prolonged ovation. Contemporary accounts noted that Lincoln's initially unassuming appearance gave way to a commanding presence that elicited enthusiastic standing cheers described as akin to a "." William Cullen Bryant, who chaired the event and introduced Lincoln, lauded the speech in the New York Evening Post on February 28, 1860, as a forceful and logically compelling effort, remarking, "When we have such a speech as that of Abraham Lincoln… we are tempted to wish that our columns were indefinitely elastic." Northern press coverage was extensively positive and amplified the speech's reach; the New York Tribune published the full text on February 28, 1860, hailing it as "one of the happiest and most convincing political arguments ever made" amid resounding cheers that filled the hall. The New York Times similarly reported vehement cheers upon Lincoln's entrance and repeated applause during the address, while the Evening Post featured complimentary editorials. These outlets, along with subsequent reprints in papers like the Chicago Press and Tribune and Albany Evening Journal, disseminated the speech widely in Republican strongholds, markedly elevating Lincoln's national profile. The address's emphasis on empirical historical analysis and temperate reasoning contrasted with the era's often inflammatory , drawing acclaim for intellectual rigor but also observation from some observers, such as Lincoln's associate William Herndon, that its power derived from logic rather than vivid imagery or fervor, which might have tempered enthusiasm among those preferring more vehement . Southern access remained constrained by circulation limits and sectional divides, yielding scant immediate coverage beyond previews anticipating opposition to positions on .

Southern Objections and Northern Defenses

Southern newspapers and political leaders condemned Abraham Lincoln's February 27, 1860, address at as an endorsement of slavery containment tantamount to gradual abolition, arguing that barring slaveholders from federal territories would confine and ultimately extinguish the institution by denying it room for growth and economic viability. This stance, they claimed, defied the property rights of slaveholders affirmed in the 1857 decision, which ruled that lacked authority to exclude slavery from territories and recognized slaves as protected property under the Fifth Amendment. Southern defenders of the ruling, including editors in pro-slavery outlets, insisted that policies like those outlined by Lincoln threatened to nullify this judicial protection, equating non-expansion with an unconstitutional assault on equal territorial access and Southern constitutional guarantees. Critics further objected that Lincoln's interpretation of the framers' intent—positing that a majority of signers opposed 's extension into territories—ignored Southern readings of the as mandating federal safeguarding of where local laws permitted it, potentially tipping the balance of power toward free states and eroding slave state influence in national affairs. Echoing broader sectional , Southern voices warned that enforcing such would provoke disunion, as it violated the compact of and the presumed equality of states in territorial governance, with some editorials framing victory under these principles as a for to preserve 's survival. Northern Republican defenders rebutted these charges by emphasizing that Lincoln's address upheld strict non-interference with slavery in existing states while asserting Congress's enumerated power to regulate territories, directly countering Dred Scott's implications without challenging state sovereignty. They argued that the speech's empirical review of founders' votes and actions—revealing only eight of 39 framers explicitly favored unrestricted expansion—vindicated Republican restraint as faithful to original intent, exposing Democratic inconsistencies where territorial sovereignty claims clashed with the Court's denial of legislative bans on slavery. Publications like the hailed the address as a logical against , portraying Southern demands for guaranteed expansion as the true innovation against constitutional precedent, and urging steadfast adherence to principles over to avoid rewarding threats of dissolution.

Long-Term Impact

Path to Republican Nomination

Following the February 27, 1860, delivery of the Cooper Union address, the speech was rapidly disseminated in printed form, with versions appearing in newspapers like the and soon after in pamphlets produced by the Young Men's Union of New York. These pamphlets, including an annotated edition edited by Charles C. Nott and Cephas Brainerd, circulated widely across the North and Midwest by spring 1860, reaching delegates and influencers who had previously viewed as a regional figure lacking national stature. This distribution countered the frontrunner William Seward's organizational advantages in the East, as New York Republican leaders—initially aligned with Seward—began endorsing 's intellectual rigor and electability after reviewing the text, marking a pivotal shift in sentiment among skeptics of his Western origins. At the in from May 16 to 18, 1860, the address served as tangible evidence of Lincoln's viability, with delegates referencing the printed speech to justify swings in support. On the first , Seward led with 173.5 votes to Lincoln's 102, but lacked the required two-thirds of 233; by the third ballot, Lincoln surged to 233.5 votes as key delegations from , , and —bolstered by Eastern endorsements influenced by the speech—defected, citing its demonstration of principled anti-slavery arguments rooted in constitutional history. This empirical pivot elevated Lincoln from a compromise contender to the consensus nominee, prioritizing substantive merit over entrenched party machinery.

Influence on the 1860 Election and Civil War Prelude

The Cooper Union address, disseminated widely through newspapers and pamphlets following its delivery on February 27, 1860, bolstered Lincoln's candidacy by articulating a restrained stance against slavery's expansion into federal territories, appealing to moderate Northern voters wary of abolitionist extremism. Printed in the New York Tribune the next day and circulated in form exceeding 100,000 copies by committees, the speech reached audiences in electoral battlegrounds such as , where secured 49.0% of the popular vote in November 1860, contributing to his statewide electoral haul of 35 votes. This dissemination reinforced the party's platform at the May , framing opposition to territorial slavery as fidelity to the framers' majority views—evidenced by 's tally of only one signer of the favoring unrestricted expansion—thus mitigating Southern accusations of aggression and aiding consolidation of free-state support. In the 1860 presidential contest, amassed 1,865,908 popular votes (39.8% nationally) and 180 electoral votes, sweeping the North while carrying zero Southern states, an outcome historians attribute in part to the speech's intellectual rigor in defending non-interference with existing slavery while rejecting its nationalization. Harold Holzer's analysis posits that by positioning and Republicans as constitutional stewards rather than innovators, the address influenced voter perceptions in states like (Lincoln: 56.7% popular vote) and , where anti-expansion sentiment translated into narrow but decisive margins, solidifying the victory essential for on March 4, 1861. Quantitative traces of direct voter shifts remain elusive, but contemporary leaders, including New York editor , credited the speech's printed reach with elevating 's profile among Eastern skeptics, enabling the party's unified campaign against fragmented Democratic opposition. The address's exposition of irreconcilable sectional demands—Southern insistence on 's protection everywhere versus territorial exclusion—intensified prelude-to- debates, as its arguments permeated the fall campaign and post-election conventions. Following Lincoln's victory, South Carolina's December 20, 1860, ordinance cited hostility to as justification, echoing objections to the speech's rejection of compromise doctrines like Douglas's . Yet, causal underscores that the address did not fabricate divisions but clarified them: by marshaling historical evidence against Southern claims of framers' pro-slavery unanimity, it exposed demands for federal safeguards as extensions beyond constitutional bounds, rendering illusory any appeasement short of capitulation. Scholarly consensus, including Holzer's, affirms this evidentiary framing hardened resolve without inventing conflict, as proceeded irrespective of the speech's content, driven by the mere prospect of Northern electoral dominance. Critics alleging it precipitated overlook that it advocated restraint—preserving where entrenched—while truthfully delineating limits that pro-slavery forces deemed insufficient, thus accelerating the crisis inherent to the Union's polarized structure.

References

  1. [1]
    Address at Cooper Union | Teaching American History
    Lincoln's speech was a triumph and helped him secure the Republican nomination for president in 1860.
  2. [2]
    Cooper Union Address - Lincoln Home National Historic Site (U.S. ...
    Apr 10, 2015 · In the speech Lincoln examined the 39 signers of the Constitution and explained that 21 of the signers, a majority, had voted at least once, ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary<|separator|>
  3. [3]
    12.3 Primary Source: Abraham Lincoln, Cooper Union Address (1860)
    In his Cooper Union speech, Lincoln embraced Webster's nationalist theory of the Union, insisted that slavery was wrong, and declared that Congress had both the ...
  4. [4]
    The Cooper Union Address: The Making of a Candidate - Lincoln ...
    May 11, 2021 · His primary source had been the six-volume Debates on the Federal Constitution by Elliott. He also consulted the official record of the ...
  5. [5]
    Abraham Lincoln's Speech at Cooper Union | February 27, 1860
    Feb 20, 2024 · On February 27, 1860, Abraham Lincoln gave one of the most effective speeches of his career, one we now know as the Speech at Cooper Union.
  6. [6]
    Cooper Union Speech (February 27, 1860) – Lincoln's Writings
    Jun 10, 2013 · Lincoln articulated many of his central themes: slavery's incompatibility with republicanism, its immorality, and the threat of a 'middle ground' doctrine ...Missing: key impact
  7. [7]
    Trigger Events of the Civil War | American Battlefield Trust
    ... sectional divide began to open as the South became increasingly committed to slavery. Once called a “necessary evil” by Thomas Jefferson, proponents of slavery ...
  8. [8]
    Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) | Civil War on the Western Border
    With the opening of Western territories, there was heightened debate between the North and South over the issue of slavery. Attempts to resolve the political ...
  9. [9]
    The Kansas-Nebraska Act - Senate.gov
    The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise, created two new territories, and allowed for popular sovereignty. It also produced a violent uprising ...
  10. [10]
    Popular Sovereignty | Civil War on the Western Border
    In 1854, Stephen Douglas most famously attempted to implement the measure with the Kansas-Nebraska Act. A major consequence of popular sovereignty's ...
  11. [11]
    Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) - National Archives
    Apr 21, 2025 · It has been settled by the decisions of the highest court in Missouri, that by the laws of that State, a slave does not become entitled to his ...
  12. [12]
    William Lowndes Yancey | American Politician & Southern ...
    Secession precipitated the American Civil War. Secession had a long history in the United States—but as a threat rather than as an actual dissolution of the ...
  13. [13]
    Anti-Secessionist Jefferson Davis at Faneuil Hall (U.S. National Park ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · To Davis, electing a Republican president would lead to national calamity and be a cause for secession. Davis placed the responsibility upon ...
  14. [14]
    Lincoln Chronology - Lincoln Home National Historic Site (U.S. ...
    May 12, 2021 · May 30 - The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed. The passage of this act brought Lincoln back into politics. November 7 - Lincoln was re-elected ...
  15. [15]
    With Malice Toward None: The Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial ...
    In a brilliant speech at Peoria, Illinois, on October 16, 1854, he laid out his objections to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The speech revived his political career.Missing: pre- milestones
  16. [16]
    Pre-Presidential Political Timeline - Abraham Lincoln Online
    Gives famous anti-Nebraska Act speech in Peoria, Illinois. NOVEMBER 7, 1854. Wins election to Illinois House of Representatives. NOVEMBER 10, 1854. Decides to ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  17. [17]
    June 16, 1858: "A House Divided" Speech | Miller Center
    In this speech he famously states "a house divided against itself cannot stand" in describing the coming national conflict over slavery. Presidential Speeches | ...
  18. [18]
    The Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 - National Park Service
    Feb 16, 2017 · Although Lincoln lost the election, these debates launched him into national prominence which eventually led to his election as President of ...
  19. [19]
    Lincoln-Douglas Debates | American Battlefield Trust
    Mar 15, 2019 · These debates reinvigorated Lincoln's political career and propelled him to the spotlight among Republicans. Simultaneously, Douglas used these ...
  20. [20]
    Lincoln After Losing 1858 Senate Race - National Park Service
    Apr 10, 2015 · November 19, 1858: Letter to Henry Asbury. The fight must go on. The cause of civil liberty must not be surrendered at the end of one or ...
  21. [21]
    On this day, Abraham Lincoln is GOP nominee in an upset
    May 18, 2017 · On May 18, 1860, former Congressman Abraham Lincoln upset the Republican front runner, William Seward, at the party's second convention in Chicago.
  22. [22]
    The Emergence of Abraham Lincoln - Washington Monthly
    Dec 9, 2019 · Lincoln's sponsor, the Young Men's Central Republican Union, had come into existence to provide a forum for potential alternatives to ...
  23. [23]
    Cooper Union Address - Abraham Lincoln Online
    Cooper Union Address. New York, New York February 27, 1860. In October 1859 Abraham Lincoln accepted an invitation to lecture at Henry Ward Beecher's church ...
  24. [24]
    Abraham Lincoln at The Cooper Union | cooperedu
    On February 27, 1860 Abraham Lincoln, at the invitation of an organization calling itself "The Young Men's Central Republican Union", delivered a masterful ...
  25. [25]
    Lincoln at Cooper Union | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History
    01) In March 1860, just a few weeks after returning home from his triumphant visit to New York to deliver his Cooper Union address, Lincoln went on the road yet ...
  26. [26]
    Before the Speech - mrlincolnandnewyork.org - Abraham Lincoln
    The Cooper Union speech offered Mr. Lincoln an opportunity to define himself before the Eastern mandarins of the Republican Party.
  27. [27]
    Summary of Lincoln's Arguments at Cooper Union
    Apr 10, 2015 · Rufus King voted for the prohibition of slavery and against all compromises and Charles Pinckney voted against the prohibition of slavery and ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  28. [28]
    Chapter 249: Abraham Lincoln Delivers His Famous Cooper Union ...
    The most telling bill by far is the 1789 Northwest Ordinance, with 17 of the 23 Founders casting a vote, and all approving a federal ban on slavery north of the ...Missing: research | Show results with:research
  29. [29]
    The Speech That Won Lincoln New York
    Feb 27, 2014 · On February 27, 1860, Abraham Lincoln stood before a crowd at Cooper Union on 8th Street in New York City, attempting to convince a strongly Democratic city.
  30. [30]
    The Speech That Made Lincoln President : NPR
    Jun 8, 2004 · Excerpt of Sam Waterston performing Lincoln's 1860 Cooper Union speech. Audio will be available later today.
  31. [31]
    Lincoln's Cooper Union Address
    The speech was one of the most remarkable ever delivered in the city of New York. It was a masterly exposition of the history of the early days of the Republic, ...Missing: details attire
  32. [32]
    Abraham Lincoln: New York Daily Tribune February 28, 1860....First
    Nov 2, 2019 · Abraham Lincoln: New York Daily Tribune February 28, 1860....First printing Of Cooper Union Speech. 8 pp. with inside page "first" printing of ...
  33. [33]
    Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Volume 3 [Aug. 21, 1858-Mar. 4, 1860]. | Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln | University of Michigan Library Digital Collections
    ### Extracted Tripartite Structure of Lincoln's Cooper Union Address
  34. [34]
    Abraham Lincoln "Cooper Union" Speech Text - Voices of Democracy
    Abraham Lincoln, “Speech of Hon. Abraham Lincoln at Cooper Institute, New York City” New York, NY (27 February 1860)Missing: invitation | Show results with:invitation
  35. [35]
    Cooper Institute Address (1860) - The National Constitution Center
    In his Cooper Union speech, Lincoln embraced Webster's nationalist theory of the Union, insisted that slavery was wrong, and declared that Congress had both the ...Missing: invitation | Show results with:invitation
  36. [36]
    After the Speech - mrlincolnandnewyork.org - Abraham Lincoln
    Mr. Lincoln's speech drew strong editorial support from the man who had introduced him. William Cullen Bryant wrote in the New York Evening Post:
  37. [37]
    https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jala/2629860.0026.207/--lincoln-at-cooper-union-the-speech-that-made-abraham-lincoln?rgn=main;view=fulltext
  38. [38]
    Analysis: Cooper Union Address | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Lincoln's speech at Cooper Union would include historical analysis about the founding generation's view of slavery expansion, direct addresses to both ...
  39. [39]
    Southern Reaction to the Republican National Convention
    Jul 21, 2010 · The Fayetteville (NC) Observer, which supported the Constitutional Union party, called Lincoln an “ultra abolitionist.” Republicans “[had]…
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Speech that Help Make Lincoln President
    Lincoln at Cooper Union evokes the era of mass-participation politics, before sound bites and campaign commercials replaced serious debate and stemwinder ...Missing: key impact
  41. [41]
    The Speech that Made Abraham Lincoln President, by Harold Holzer
    In the Cooper Union speech, Lincoln argued that the intentions of the nation's founders established that the federal government could regulate slavery in the ...
  42. [42]
    https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Hunter-Critical-Essay-PDF-4.4.18.pdf
  43. [43]
    The Election of 1860 | American Battlefield Trust
    Oct 16, 2024 · Meanwhile, Southern states took steps toward secession with South Carolina declaring itself out of the union on December 20, 1860. The Secession ...Missing: quote | Show results with:quote
  44. [44]
    [PDF] report documentation page - DTIC
    Mar 22, 2023 · 20 Harold Holzer, Lincoln at Cooper Union: The Speech That Made Abraham Lincoln President (New York: Simon. & Schuster, 2004), 5-6. 21. Harold ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    [PDF] abraham lincoln, “speech of hon. abraham lincoln at cooper institute ...
    Apr 4, 2018 · Abraham Lincoln's speech at Cooper Union is a distinctive illustration of the Greek concept Kairos—seizing the opportune moment to issue an ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact