Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sectionalism

Sectionalism denotes loyalty to the interests of a particular geographic region or section of a country, prioritizing those over national unity, often resulting in heightened regional rivalries and policy conflicts.^[1] In the United States, this phenomenon intensified during the antebellum era (roughly 1820–1860), pitting the industrialized, urban North—characterized by manufacturing, wage labor, and diverse immigration—against the agrarian, plantation-based South, where enslaved labor underpinned cotton production and export economies, while the West emerged as a contested frontier for expansion.^[2]^[3] Economic divergences fueled these divisions: Northern interests favored protective tariffs, internal improvements like railroads, and free labor systems that viewed slavery's expansion as a threat to wage competition and land availability for white settlers, whereas Southern elites defended slavery as essential to their social order and economic viability, resisting federal interventions that could disrupt it.^[2]^[3] Territorial acquisitions, such as those from the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican-American War, amplified disputes over whether new lands would permit slavery, prompting legislative efforts like the Missouri Compromise of 1820 (dividing future states along a 36°30′ latitude line), the Compromise of 1850 (introducing popular sovereignty in territories), and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 (repealing the Missouri line and sparking "Bleeding Kansas" violence).^[3]^[4] These measures temporarily averted rupture but eroded trust, as Southern states perceived Northern antislavery agitation and the rise of the Republican Party—opposed to slavery's extension—as existential threats, leading to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the subsequent secession of eleven slaveholding states to form the Confederacy, explicitly citing preservation of slavery in their ordinances.^[3]^[4] The resulting Civil War (1861–1865) resolved sectionalism by federal victory, emancipation via the Thirteenth Amendment, and Reconstruction, though regional resentments lingered in economic reconstruction challenges and cultural divides.^[2]^[4]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Characteristics

Sectionalism refers to the loyalty to a particular region or section of a country, prioritizing its interests over those of the nation as a whole, often resulting from shared geographic, economic, and cultural conditions that cultivate distinct identities.^[5]^[2] This devotion manifests in groups of states or provinces exhibiting self-conscious regional orientations in politics, economics, and society, rather than isolated individual units.^[6] Characteristic features include the formation of sectional alliances and voting patterns that promote region-specific agendas, such as economic policies benefiting localized resource access or transportation networks.^[6] Institutional strains commonly arise from conflicts between regional autonomy and national authority, exemplified in debates over the balance of power where sectional priorities challenge unified governance.^[7] When accommodations fail, these divergences can intensify, eroding national cohesion through persistent policy disputes and heightened regional rivalries.^[8] At its root, sectionalism emerges from physiographic and environmental factors that delineate regions, coupled with human settlement patterns that foster adaptive local societies and amplify competition for scarce resources over ideological abstractions.^[6] These dynamics reflect innate propensities for affinity to proximate groups, intensified by material stakes rather than detached principles.^[2]

Historical Origins and Early Examples

Sectionalism's historical roots lie in ancient regional divisions where geographic and economic particularities fostered loyalties to local polities over broader entities. In ancient Greece, over 1,000 independent city-states, or poleis, emerged by the Archaic period (c. 800–480 BCE), with rivalries intensified by divergent economic bases; maritime Athens built an empire through naval trade and tribute collection across the Aegean, while inland Sparta emphasized land-based agriculture and helot labor.^[9] These fissures culminated in the Peloponnesian War (431–404 BCE), where Athens' Delian League clashed with Sparta's Peloponnesian League, as Athenian economic sanctions against Spartan allies like Megara and Corinth escalated sectional hostilities rooted in control over trade routes.^[10] Analogous tensions appeared in the Roman Republic, where core Italian regions chafed against provincial peripheries amid exploitative taxation and administration; Cicero documented widespread provincial grievances in the 1st century BCE, as outer territories bore heavy tribute burdens to fund Roman urban elites, prompting revolts like those in Sicily (135–132 BCE) over grain export demands that prioritized metropolitan needs.^[11] Such dynamics prefigured formalized sectionalism, with settlement patterns—concentrated urban centers versus dispersed agrarian provinces—amplifying resistance to centralized extraction.^[12] By the early modern era, Europe's political fragmentation yielded clearer precedents, particularly in Italy's post-Renaissance city-states, where the decline of feudal overlords from the 11th–12th centuries onward splintered the peninsula into autonomous republics like Venice and Florence, each vying for dominance in lucrative Mediterranean trade networks.^[13] This regionalism fueled endemic warfare, including the Italian Wars (1494–1559), as local powers leveraged alliances with France and the Holy Roman Empire to counterbalance rivals, with Venice's arsenal supporting a mercantile fleet that controlled eastern spice routes against Milanese and Neapolitan agricultural interests.^[14] In British North America, colonial settlement patterns from the 17th century onward entrenched divides: New England's compact, commerce-oriented communities contrasted with the South's expansive plantations reliant on tobacco and rice exports, fostering early fissures over imperial trade policies like the Navigation Acts (first enacted 1651, expanded 1660).^[15] These laws required colonial goods to ship via English vessels and prioritized enumerated Southern staples for direct metropolitan markets, constraining Northern shipbuilding and diversification ambitions, as evidenced by rising evasion and smuggling in New England ports by the 1730s amid unequal enforcement that privileged plantation economies.^[16]

Causal Factors

Economic Drivers

Economic disparities between regions specialized in agriculture versus industry often ignite sectionalism by generating irreconcilable policy preferences, particularly over trade barriers that benefit one sector at the expense of another. Agrarian peripheries, dependent on exporting raw commodities like cotton or grains, advocate for low or zero tariffs to maximize foreign market access and minimize retaliatory duties abroad, as any import tax raises domestic costs without reciprocal advantages for their outputs. Industrial cores, conversely, demand protective tariffs to nurture manufacturing against established European competitors, even if this elevates prices for all consumers and risks trade wars that disproportionately harm export-reliant areas. These conflicts manifest as zero-sum games, where national revenue from tariffs—often the primary federal income source—subsidizes infrastructure or subsidies skewed toward industrialized zones, eroding perceptions of equitable governance.^[17]^[18] In the antebellum United States, the Southern economy exemplified this dynamic, with cotton production dominating exports and comprising more than 60% of total U.S. export value in 1860, valued at approximately $191 million out of $333 million in goods shipped abroad.^[19] This reliance exposed the South to policies like the Tariff of 1828, which elevated average duties to over 60% on imports, shielding Northern factories but inflating costs for Southern imports of manufactured goods and inviting potential European countermeasures against American staples.^[20] Southern planters, facing higher operational expenses without industrial offsets, interpreted such measures as systemic extraction, where federal tariffs captured revenue from their export-driven wealth to fund Northern development, including canals and railroads concentrated in free states.^[17] By 1860, cumulative tariff burdens had deepened this rift, as the South shouldered a disproportionate share of federal customs duties—estimated at four-fifths of total collections—while benefiting minimally from expenditures.^[18] Uneven resource endowments exacerbate these tensions by entrenching regional specialization: fertile alluvial soils in river valleys favor large-scale monoculture, yielding high export volumes but vulnerability to global price fluctuations, whereas coalfields and waterways in manufacturing hubs enable diversified processing industries insulated by policy. When central authorities impose extractive policies—such as revenue tariffs without proportional reinvestment in export infrastructure—peripheral regions experience net outflows, undermining national cohesion as local elites prioritize sectional defenses like state-led trade initiatives or nullification doctrines to reclaim autonomy. This causal chain, rooted in mismatched incentives, illustrates how economic interdependence falters absent reciprocal policies, converting latent disparities into active sectional loyalties.^[17]^[21]

Cultural and Ideological Differences

Cultural and ideological differences manifest in sectionalism through divergent regional values shaped by initial settlement patterns and subsequent self-reinforcing migration, creating identities that prioritize local norms over national cohesion. In colonial North America, the Northern colonies were primarily settled by Puritan migrants from East Anglia in the 1630s, who emphasized communal piety, literacy, and moral discipline as extensions of Calvinist theology, fostering a culture of covenantal community and introspection. In contrast, Southern colonies like Virginia and the Carolinas attracted English gentry and indentured servants influenced by Anglican hierarchies, developing a code of honor centered on personal reputation, dueling, and patriarchal authority, which prioritized individual status within agrarian elites over collective religious conformity.^[22] These religiously inflected settlements generated parallel narratives—Northern jeremiads decrying moral decay versus Southern defenses of traditional order—that resisted homogenization despite shared British origins. Linguistic and ethnic compositions further entrenched divides by enabling insular institutions, such as distinct dialects or separate schooling that perpetuated folklore and kinship networks. Empirical migration data reveals ongoing self-sorting, where individuals relocate to align with ideological kin, amplifying cultural silos; for instance, analysis of U.S. Census and voting records from 1990 to 2010 shows conservatives disproportionately moving to rural counties with lower population density, while liberals concentrate in metropolitan areas, widening perceptual gaps in threat assessments and social trust.^[23]^[24] This sorting correlates with voting patterns: in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, 57% of rural voters supported Republican candidates emphasizing self-reliance and tradition, compared to 62% of urban voters backing Democrats favoring regulatory intervention and multiculturalism, patterns traceable to geographic proximity rather than demographics alone.^[25]^[26] Ideological tensions often pit urban collectivism—rooted in density-driven interdependence and exposure to diverse exchanges, yielding preferences for centralized equity mechanisms—against rural individualism, which valorizes frontier autonomy and skepticism of distant authority, as evidenced by higher rural endorsement of limited government in longitudinal surveys from 1976 to 2020.^[27]^[26] Media consumption reinforces these rifts, with rural audiences favoring outlets stressing local sovereignty and urban ones amplifying globalist frames, per Nielsen data on viewership disparities. Such dynamics arise not from deliberate policy but path-dependent trajectories: contingent early events, like 17th-century migration waves, lock in institutional feedbacks—e.g., town meetings in New England versus planter assemblies in the Tidewater—that deter assimilation, debunking illusions of uniform national ethos.^[28] Regional persistence defies top-down integration, as descendants inherit behavioral predispositions via familial transmission and spatial isolation, sustaining sectional loyalties amid mobility.^[29]

Political and Institutional Influences

Political institutions influence sectionalism by structuring power distribution across geographic divisions, often entrenching conflicts when designs permit uneven representation or centralized dominance over peripheral sections. Federal systems, intended to mitigate factional excesses through divided authority, can amplify sectionalism if majority coalitions exploit national mechanisms to override minority regional interests, as warned in foundational constitutional debates where geographic factions were seen as threats to union stability.^[30] This occurs because institutional rigidities, such as fixed apportionment rules, prevent adaptation to demographic shifts, allowing less populous sections to wield veto power disproportionate to their size, thereby fostering perceptions of systemic bias and retaliatory sectional mobilization.^[31] In the United States, the Senate's equal representation of states—granting two senators per state irrespective of population—exemplifies how malapportionment entrenches rural over urban sectionalism, with voters in smaller states holding votes valued up to 65 times more than those in larger states as of recent analyses.^[32] This structural favoritism toward sparse-population regions generates ongoing tensions, as urban-majority sections experience policy gridlock on issues like infrastructure and regulation, prompting institutional critiques that such imbalances undermine majority rule and provoke compensatory demands for reform.^[33] Responses to institutional overreach manifest in doctrines asserting subnational resistance, such as nullification, where states claim authority to void federal enactments viewed as exceeding constitutional bounds, emerging as a direct counter to perceived encroachments by dominant sections via national institutions.^[34] In centralized governance frameworks, analogous backlashes drive devolutionary pressures, as regional actors seek repatriation of powers to counteract uniform national policies that disregard local variances, thereby institutionalizing sectional autonomy to avert escalation.^[35] These mechanisms highlight how federalism's safeguards against pure majoritarianism inadvertently sustain sectionalism by enabling defensive entrenchment when power asymmetries persist unchecked.^[36]

Primary Historical Case: The United States

Antebellum Period and Rising Tensions (1780s–1860)

The period from the 1780s to 1860 witnessed the deepening of sectional divisions in the United States, rooted in divergent economic structures and interpretations of federal authority. Northern states increasingly oriented toward commerce, shipping, and emerging manufacturing, while Southern states relied on export-oriented agriculture using slave labor for labor-intensive crops like tobacco and cotton. Tobacco cultivation rapidly depleted soil nutrients in the Upper South, such as in Virginia and Maryland, prompting westward migration of plantations and a shift toward cotton in the Deep South, where similar exhaustion occurred after a few years of intensive farming.^[37]^[38] This agricultural model tied Southern prosperity to global markets and reinforced demands for territorial expansion to sustain soil fertility and labor systems. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 emerged as an early flashpoint, admitting Missouri as a slave state alongside Maine as a free state to preserve Senate balance between free and slave interests, while prohibiting slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the 36°30' parallel.^[39] This measure temporarily quelled debates but underscored growing Northern resistance to slavery's extension, viewed by Southern leaders as essential for maintaining political equilibrium and economic viability in an agrarian republic. Southern states interpreted such compromises as evidence of the Union's original compact among sovereign states, where federal actions threatening sectional interests could justify resistance. Economic policy disputes intensified these rifts, particularly over tariffs that Southern agrarians saw as subsidizing Northern industry at their expense. By 1860, cotton—almost entirely produced in the South—accounted for over 60 percent of total U.S. exports by value, generating wealth through raw commodity sales but exposing the region to import dependencies for manufactured goods.^[19] The Tariff of 1828, imposing average duties of 38 percent on imports (rising to 45 percent on some items), protected nascent Northern factories but raised costs for Southern consumers and exporters reliant on foreign trade.^[40]^[20] Dubbed the "Tariff of Abominations" by Southern critics, it exemplified perceived federal favoritism, as tariff revenues— the primary federal income source—funded internal improvements disproportionately benefiting Northern and Western infrastructure while Southern states shouldered higher effective burdens through elevated prices on essentials.^[20] The Nullification Crisis of 1832–1833 crystallized these grievances, with South Carolina's legislature declaring the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within the state, invoking states' rights to invalidate federal laws deemed unconstitutional and injurious to local sovereignty.^[41] Leaders like John C. Calhoun argued that the tariffs violated the compact theory of the Constitution, constituting a coercive wealth transfer from export-dependent South to protected Northern manufacturers and eroding the voluntary union of states.^[20] President Andrew Jackson's forceful response, including a proclamation affirming federal supremacy and threats of military enforcement, led to the Compromise Tariff of 1833, which gradually reduced rates over a decade.^[42] Yet the crisis entrenched Southern commitments to self-determination, framing federal overreach as a threat to regional autonomy and foreshadowing broader secessionist logic by 1860, without resolving underlying economic imbalances.^[42]

American Civil War and Immediate Aftermath (1861–1877)

Abraham Lincoln's election as president on November 6, 1860, without carrying a single Southern state, prompted immediate secession ordinances by Southern legislatures, beginning with South Carolina on December 20, 1860.^[43] By February 1861, seven Deep South states had formed the Confederate States of America, asserting under compact theory that the Union was a voluntary association of sovereign states whose original consent could be withdrawn if violated by federal actions perceived as threats to slavery and local autonomy.^[44] The Confederacy's bid for independence escalated into war on April 12, 1861, with the bombardment of Fort Sumter, culminating in a conflict that resulted in approximately 620,000 military deaths, representing about 2% of the U.S. population and the suppression of Southern secession through overwhelming Union industrial and manpower advantages. The Union's victory at Appomattox on April 9, 1865, following General Robert E. Lee's surrender, ended major hostilities but left the South devastated, with infrastructure destroyed and an estimated $2.5 billion in property losses (in 1860 dollars), primarily from the emancipation of 3.5 million enslaved people valued at over $3 billion.^[45] This military resolution preserved the federal Union but entrenched centralized authority, as the war's prosecution expanded executive powers, including suspension of habeas corpus and conscription, setting precedents for national dominance over state compacts that Southern theorists had argued required mutual consent for alteration.^[46] Postwar Reconstruction, from 1865 to 1877, aimed to integrate former Confederate states and freedmen but yielded mixed empirical results. The Reconstruction Acts of March 1867 divided the South into five military districts under Union generals, mandating new state constitutions granting Black male suffrage and ratification of the 14th Amendment for readmission, overriding President Andrew Johnson's leniency toward ex-Confederates.^[47] The Freedmen's Bureau, established in 1865, distributed aid to over 4 million freed people, establishing 4,300 schools and issuing 20 million rations by 1869, yet distributed only about 1% of promised land (roughly 50,000 acres total), limiting economic integration as most freedmen remained landless laborers.^[48] Sharecropping emerged as the dominant agricultural system by 1870, binding over 75% of Black farmers and many poor whites to debt peonage on former plantations, where tenants received tools and seeds on credit but yielded half or more of crops to landlords, perpetuating poverty with average annual earnings under $100 per family amid cotton price volatility. This economic continuity, coupled with the withdrawal of federal troops in 1877 via the Compromise of 1877, allowed Southern "Redeemer" governments to dismantle Reconstruction gains through Black Codes and poll taxes, restoring white supremacy while the war's federal overreach—imposing amendments without Southern ratification consent—fundamentally altered the constitutional balance, prioritizing national perpetuity over original state sovereignty principles.^[49]^[50]

Persistence in the 20th Century and Beyond

Following Reconstruction's end in 1877, sectionalism persisted through the Solid South's Democratic dominance, where Southern states reliably delivered electoral votes to Democratic presidential candidates from 1880 until the mid-1960s, reflecting entrenched regional opposition to Northern economic policies and federal interference in racial matters.^[51] This bloc maintained influence in Congress, often allying with Northern Democrats on economic issues while blocking reforms threatening Southern agrarian interests or Jim Crow laws.^[52] During the New Deal era of the 1930s, regional fractures reemerged in policy implementation, as Southern Democrats supported Franklin D. Roosevelt's economic relief programs but insisted on exemptions for agricultural and domestic workers—comprising over half of the Southern workforce—to preserve low-wage, racially stratified labor systems, resulting in the exclusion of these groups from key legislation like the National Labor Relations Act of 1935.^[53] Rural Southern areas, despite economic desperation, exhibited ambivalence toward federal interventions perceived as eroding states' rights, contrasting with stronger urban and Northeastern embrace of expansive welfare provisions, as evidenced by higher per capita relief spending and program adoption in Northern industrial states.^[54] The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s reframed sectionalism from primarily economic to cultural and racial dimensions, with Southern resistance to desegregation—manifest in "massive resistance" campaigns following Brown v. Board of Education in 1954—highlighting persistent North-South divides, as Northern states complied more readily while Southern legislatures enacted over 450 anti-integration laws by 1960.^[55] This culminated in the Democratic Party's 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Act, which alienated white Southern voters, prompting a realignment: Barry Goldwater captured five Deep South states in 1964, the first Republican breakthrough there since Reconstruction, signaling the South's pivot toward the GOP on states' rights and law-and-order platforms.^[56] Post-1960s realignment entrenched red state-blue state precursors, with the South shifting Republican—evidenced by Richard Nixon's 70% white Southern vote share in 1972 and Ronald Reagan's sweep of the region in 1980—while the Northeast and Pacific Coast trended Democratic, as county-level voting data from 1972 onward showed widening regional partisan margins, with Southern counties averaging 20-30% more Republican than Northern counterparts by the 1990s.^[57] Empirical evidence of persistence includes internal migration patterns from the 1970s to 1990s, where individuals increasingly relocated to ideologically congruent areas—conservatives to the South and Sun Belt, liberals to coastal metros—intensifying local homogeneity, as U.S. Census data indicate a 15-20% rise in the correlation between migrants' partisan leanings and destination counties' voting outcomes compared to earlier decades.^[58]^[59] This self-sorting challenged notions of national assimilation, as congressional roll-call votes on issues like trade and welfare revealed sustained sectional blocs, with Southern representatives 25-40% more likely to oppose Northeastern-backed bills through the late 20th century.^[60]

Sectionalism in Other Countries

In the United Kingdom

Sectionalism in the United Kingdom has primarily expressed itself through ethno-regional conflicts and demands for greater autonomy in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, contrasting with the dominant English core. The Troubles in Northern Ireland, spanning 1968 to 1998, represented an acute form of sectional strife rooted in Catholic-Protestant divisions over constitutional status, culminating in the Good Friday Agreement that devolved powers to a Northern Ireland Assembly. This period saw 3,532 deaths attributed to the conflict, with paramilitary groups responsible for the majority. Devolution efforts addressed simmering regional grievances post-World War II, with referendums in 1997 establishing a Scottish Parliament (74.3% yes on creating a legislature with tax-varying powers, on 60.4% turnout) and a Welsh Assembly (50.3% yes for an assembly without initial tax powers, on 50.1% turnout). These measures granted limited self-governance amid economic divergences, where Scotland and Wales exhibited lower productivity and GDP per capita relative to southeastern England; for instance, Scotland's GDP per head grew at an average of 1.4% annually from 2000 to 2019, trailing UK-wide trends during non-oil boom periods.^[61]^[62]^[63] In Scotland, North Sea oil discoveries from the 1970s intensified sectional arguments, with nationalists claiming revenues—peaking at UK levels equivalent to billions allocated geographically to Scotland in fiscal analyses like GERS—would fund independence rather than subsidize UK-wide spending. The 2014 independence referendum rejected separation (55.2% no to 44.7% yes, on 84.6% turnout), yet underscored persistent divides. Brexit in 2016 further exacerbated tensions, as Scotland voted 62% to remain in the EU against the UK's overall 52% leave, highlighting loyalty fractures between regions.^[64]^[65]^[66]

In Canada

Sectionalism in Canada manifests prominently through Quebec's longstanding sovereignty movement, rooted in efforts to safeguard francophone cultural and linguistic identity amid federal policies promoting national bilingualism. The 1980 Quebec referendum on sovereignty-association saw 59.56% vote against granting the provincial government a mandate to negotiate independence with economic association to Canada.^[67] This vote reflected tensions over Quebec's distinct societal character, exacerbated by the 1969 Official Languages Act, which established English and French as equal across federal institutions, prompting fears of cultural dilution in the province where French speakers comprise about 80% of the population. Quebec responded with the 1977 Charter of the French Language (Bill 101), mandating French as the primary language of business, education, and public signage to counterbalance federal initiatives and preserve linguistic sovereignty. The 1995 Quebec sovereignty referendum further highlighted these divides, with 50.58% rejecting outright separation, a razor-thin margin that underscored persistent alienation despite economic interdependence with the rest of Canada.^[68] Proponents argued that independence would enable unhindered cultural policies free from Ottawa's oversight, while opponents emphasized shared economic benefits and the risks of partition. Economic grievances intertwined with cultural ones, as Quebec's push for autonomy clashed with federal equalization mechanisms designed to redistribute fiscal capacity among provinces. Beyond Quebec, sectionalism appears in Western Canada's economic resentments, particularly Alberta's opposition to federal interventions perceived as favoring Central Canada's manufacturing base in Ontario over resource-driven economies. Alberta's oil and gas sector, contributing disproportionately to national GDP through exports and royalties, contrasts with Ontario's reliance on automotive and advanced manufacturing, fostering perceptions of unequal burden-sharing.^[69] The federal equalization program, which transferred approximately $25.3 billion in 2024–2025 from higher-revenue provinces like Alberta (which receives none) to recipients including Quebec and Maritime provinces, amplifies this friction by effectively subsidizing lower-productivity regions without reciprocal benefits.^[70] The 1980 National Energy Program exemplified such over-centralization, imposing federal taxes and price controls on Alberta's energy production to fund national objectives, triggering widespread backlash including reduced oil shipments eastward and legal challenges that deepened Western alienation.^[71]^[72] This policy, aimed at energy self-sufficiency, instead provoked provincial-federal confrontations that persist in debates over resource revenue allocation.

In Spain

Sectionalism in Spain manifests primarily through separatist movements in Catalonia and the Basque Country, where regional identities and economic disparities have fueled demands for greater autonomy or independence since the transition to democracy following Francisco Franco's death in 1975.^[73] The 1978 Spanish Constitution established a system of autonomous communities, granting significant devolved powers to regions like Catalonia and the Basque Country to accommodate historical grievances and prevent centralized authoritarianism, yet this decentralization has inadvertently amplified peripheral nationalisms by institutionalizing distinct regional governments, languages, and fiscal arrangements that challenge the cohesion of the unitary state.^[74] These autonomies, while stabilizing the post-dictatorship transition, created administrative silos that entrenched irredentist sentiments, as regional elites leveraged self-governance to prioritize local interests over national solidarity, leading to recurrent constitutional crises.^[75] In the Basque Country, sectionalism took a violent form through Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA), a Marxist-Leninist separatist group active from 1959 until its ceasefire in 2011 and formal dissolution in 2018, responsible for over 800 deaths in attacks aimed at establishing an independent Basque state.^[76] ETA's campaign targeted Spanish security forces, politicians, and civilians, exploiting post-Franco liberalization to intensify guerrilla warfare, which imposed substantial economic costs including a 10 percentage point decline in per capita GDP relative to comparable regions due to insecurity and capital flight.^[77] Although ETA disbanded amid declining public support and effective counterterrorism, the underlying Basque nationalist ideology persists through political parties advocating fiscal privileges, such as the region's unique concertado tax system that allows it to collect and retain most taxes, exacerbating perceptions of unequal treatment within Spain's quasi-federal structure.^[78] Catalan sectionalism, by contrast, has emphasized non-violent but assertive separatism, driven by claims of economic exploitation despite Catalonia's outsized contributions to national output. Representing approximately 19% of Spain's GDP with a population of about 16% despite comprising 7.5 million residents, Catalonia generates significant tax revenue but receives less in return, resulting in a structural fiscal deficit estimated at 5-8% of its regional GDP annually, according to analyses of intergovernmental transfers.^[79] ^[80] This imbalance, while comparable to other high-income regions when adjusted for per capita income, has been framed by separatist leaders as systematic "extraction" by Madrid, fueling resentment despite Catalonia's net beneficiary status in EU funds and infrastructure investments.^[81] The 2017 unilateral independence referendum, held on October 1 despite being ruled unconstitutional by Spain's Constitutional Court, saw 90% of participants vote in favor amid low turnout of 43% and police intervention to halt polling, highlighting deep divisions as only committed secessionists largely voted while opponents boycotted.^[82] The ensuing declaration of independence by the Catalan parliament on October 27 was swiftly suspended by Madrid, triggering Article 155 intervention, arrests, and exile of leaders, yet it underscored how economic grievances intertwined with cultural assertions of distinct nationhood continue to strain Spain's territorial integrity.^[83]

In Ukraine

Ukraine's sectionalism manifests along an east-west divide, reflecting historical legacies of Polish-Lithuanian, Austro-Hungarian, and Russian imperial influences in the west versus Russian Empire and Soviet industrialization in the east and south. Western regions emphasize Ukrainian language and cultural identity with stronger European orientations, while eastern oblasts like Donetsk and Luhansk feature higher concentrations of Russian speakers and economic ties to Russia. According to the 2001 census, approximately 30% of Ukraine's population identified Russian as their native language, with this figure rising to over two-thirds in Crimea and substantial majorities in eastern industrial areas.^[84]^[85] These divides shaped electoral politics, as seen in the 2010 presidential election where Viktor Yanukovych, advocating closer Russian ties, secured nearly 90% of votes in eastern regions such as Donetsk and Luhansk, contrasted with under 10% support in western strongholds like Lviv.^[86] This regional polarization underscored eastern preferences for bilingualism and federalism versus western pushes for Ukrainian-language primacy and centralization. Yanukovych's subsequent refusal to sign an EU association agreement in November 2013 ignited the Euromaidan protests, which drew widespread participation in Kyiv and western Ukraine but elicited counter-demonstrations and limited support in the east, where perceptions of the movement as Kyiv-imposed fueled resentment.^[87] The 2014 Revolution of Dignity, culminating in Yanukovych's ouster on February 22, triggered secessionist responses in the east as a sectional backlash. Pro-Russian militants seized buildings in Donetsk and Luhansk, proclaiming the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic and Luhansk People's Republic on April 7 and 27, respectively, citing protection of Russian-speaking populations and opposition to the post-Maidan government's decommunization and EU alignment.^[88] Simultaneously, Russia annexed Crimea after a March 16 referendum reporting 97% approval for unification, though conducted under military presence and rejected by Ukraine and most international observers as lacking legitimacy. These events highlighted sectional flashpoints, with eastern unrest drawing on Soviet-era identities and grievances over NATO expansion rhetoric, which polls linked to heightened pro-Russian leanings.^[89] Pre-2022 surveys quantified eastern pro-Russian sentiment amid these tensions. A 2020 study of Donbas residents found 29.3% favoring Russian-oriented political statuses, such as autonomy under Moscow influence, compared to 54.5% preferring Ukrainian integration options, indicating persistent but minority sectional affinity exacerbated by economic dependencies and language policies.^[90] Such divides, rooted in post-Soviet hybrid threats rather than purely internal autonomy demands, persisted until Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion, which shifted dynamics but underscored longstanding regional fractures.^[91]

Additional Global Examples

In Italy, persistent sectionalism manifests in the economic chasm between the industrialized North and agrarian South, where per capita income in northern Lombardia reached €39,700 in 2019, compared to €17,300 in southern Calabria—over twice as high.^[92] This divide, rooted in post-unification disparities, propelled the Lega Nord's formation in 1991 under Umberto Bossi, which rallied northern voters by demanding fiscal autonomy or secession for the "Padania" region to halt southward resource transfers exceeding €100 billion annually in the 1990s.^[93] Brazil's regional sectionalism pits the urbanized, manufacturing-heavy Southeast—accounting for over 50% of national GDP—against the extractive Amazon North, where GDP per capita lags by factors of two to three times due to reliance on commodities like soy and minerals.^[94] The 1988 Constitution countered such tensions by devolving fiscal powers to states and creating 5,570 municipalities with policy autonomy, aiming to equalize development through revenue-sharing formulas that allocate 25% of federal taxes to subnational units.^[95] India's linguistic sectionalism prompted the 1956 States Reorganisation Act, which redrew boundaries to form 14 states and 6 union territories aligned with major language groups, averting immediate fissiparous threats by accommodating demands from Telugu- and Tamil-speaking regions.^[96] Yet residual conflicts endure, notably in Jammu and Kashmir, where ethno-religious separatism has sustained insurgency since 1989, with over 40,000 deaths reported by official counts and ongoing disputes over Article 370's 2019 abrogation exacerbating center-periphery rifts.^[97]^[98]

Contemporary Manifestations

Recent Developments in the United States (2000–2025)

In the early 21st century, the United States witnessed a pronounced urban-rural political chasm, with rural communities shifting toward Republican majorities while urban centers consolidated Democratic support. By 2020, Republican vote share in rural areas exceeded that in urban areas by 21 percentage points, compared to a 10-point gap in 2000, reflecting accelerated geographic partisan alignment since the 1990s when rural and urban voting patterns were more similar. This divide manifested in the 2020 presidential election, where over 20% of U.S. counties awarded 80% or more of their two-party vote to either Donald Trump or Joe Biden, underscoring extreme sectional polarization beyond mere partisan myths and driven by self-sorting into ideologically homogeneous locales.^[99]^[26]^[100] Geographic sorting has intensified this "new sectionalism," as individuals increasingly migrate to areas reinforcing their moral and epistemological worldviews, creating coastal-heartland fault lines evident in 2020s analyses of cultural and economic disparities. Partisan spatial sorting within states has risen approximately fivefold since 1976, amplifying divides where heartland regions prioritize traditional values and resource-based economies against coastal emphases on cosmopolitanism and innovation-driven growth. Pew Research indicates rural voters' Republican identification reached 57% by 2024, versus 37% Democratic in urban areas, correlating with broader epistemological rifts over issues like media trust and institutional legitimacy.^[58]^[101]^[25] Policy flashpoints have deepened these sectional tensions, notably in immigration, where border states like Texas invoked state authority for operations such as Operation Lone Star starting in 2021, challenging federal policies perceived as insufficiently restrictive amid record encounters exceeding 2.4 million in fiscal year 2023. Energy disputes similarly pit fossil fuel heartland states—such as those in Appalachia and the Permian Basin, producing over 60% of U.S. oil—against green mandates from coastal regulators, resulting in federalism clashes over pipeline blockages and renewable subsidies that disadvantage coal-dependent economies.^[102]^[103] Federal interventions, including varied COVID-19 lockdown implementations from 2020 to 2022, further amplified regional distrust, with rural areas exhibiting lower compliance and approval rates tied to partisan geography; Pew data reveals persistent gaps where only 40% of rural Republicans viewed restrictions favorably by mid-2021, versus urban Democrats' 80% support, fostering perceptions of overreach from distant elites. These patterns, corroborated by regional studies, highlight how uneven enforcement exacerbated epistemological divides, with heartland skepticism toward federal science and mandates peaking in 2025 retrospectives on pandemic unity erosion.^[104]^[105]^[106]

Modern Global Trends

Globalization since the early 2000s has amplified sectional divides by concentrating economic benefits in urban cores while peripheral regions face stagnant growth, resource competition, and influxes of migrants that strain local cultural cohesion. This causal dynamic fosters resentment toward centralized policies perceived as favoring cosmopolitan elites, prompting resurgent regional identities and autonomy demands worldwide. Analyses of intra-state disparities show how trade liberalization and capital flows exacerbate these imbalances, turning latent sectionalism into overt political mobilization.^[107]^[108] Within the European Union, Brexit in 2016 crystallized English preferences for national sovereignty against devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland that advocated retaining EU ties, highlighting how global integration unevenly empowers regional voices. In Poland, east-west sectional rifts have deepened since EU accession in 2004, with eastern rural areas exhibiting stronger resistance to liberal urban policies on cultural and migration issues, as evidenced by electoral divergences where conservative support correlates with economic marginalization. These trends reflect broader EU patterns where regional inequalities drive discontent, independent of east-west binaries.^[109]^[110]^[111] In Asia, sectional tensions in China's Xinjiang region intertwine resource extraction—bolstered by global demand for oil, gas, and minerals—with ideological campaigns to preempt separatism among Uyghurs, whom Beijing frames as threats via "three evils" of extremism, terrorism, and ethnic division. Official measures, including vocational centers detaining over one million since 2017, aim to integrate the resource-abundant territory into national development amid Han migration spurred by economic globalization. Similarly, Indonesia's 2005 Helsinki Accord ended the Free Aceh Movement insurgency by granting special autonomy, including sharia-based governance and revenue shares from global commodity exports, as a decentralized response to post-1998 Asian financial crisis pressures that intensified local grievances.^[112]^[113]^[114] From 2022 to 2025, surveys in multiple regions document escalating separatist inclinations amid migration peaks and Gini coefficient rises, with peripheral areas showing 10-20% upticks in autonomy support tied to perceived federal neglect. These patterns underscore globalization's role in polarizing resource allocation and identity, as uneven prosperity fuels demands for fiscal and cultural devolution without historical precedents dominating the discourse.^[107]^[115]

Impacts and Analytical Perspectives

Potential Benefits and Regional Advantages

Regional autonomy under sectional or federal arrangements enables subnational entities to implement policies tailored to local needs, economies, and preferences, thereby promoting experimentation and adaptation. In the United States, this dynamic is exemplified by the "laboratories of democracy" concept, articulated by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in his 1932 dissent in New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, where states test innovative social and economic approaches without imposing uniform national mandates.^[116] Such decentralization allows regions to address heterogeneous challenges—such as varying industrial bases or demographic profiles—more effectively than centralized governance, potentially yielding scalable successes observed across jurisdictions.^[117] Economic specialization arises from competitive federalism, where regions vie to attract investment through differentiated policies, fostering innovation and efficiency. In Switzerland, cantonal tax competition has contributed to a long-term decline in corporate rates, from averages exceeding 30% in the mid-20th century to effective rates as low as 11-12% in select cantons by 2025, drawing high-tech and financial sectors and enhancing overall productivity.^[118] Similarly, U.S. states with lower tax burdens—such as those ranking high in the 2025 State Tax Competitiveness Index—demonstrate stronger business inflows and GDP growth, with evidence indicating that a 1% reduction in state taxes for lower-income earners correlates with up to 6.6% higher state GDP over time.^[119]^[120] Localized governance, informed by public choice theory, reduces moral hazard by tying policy outcomes directly to regional stakeholders, curbing the diffusion of costs in expansive bureaucracies. Decentralized structures incentivize officials to prioritize constituent-aligned decisions, as voters and firms can exit high-cost areas, promoting fiscal restraint and resource optimization over rent-seeking.^[121] Empirical patterns in competitive systems, including Switzerland's cantonal rivalries, support this by showing sustained innovation in areas like R&D incentives, where low-tax environments have historically amplified patent filings and firm relocations.^[118]

Destructive Consequences and National Risks

Sectionalism has historically escalated regional divisions into widespread violence, as evidenced by the American Civil War (1861–1865), where approximately 620,000 soldiers died, representing about 2% of the U.S. population at the time.^[45] This conflict arose from entrenched sectional loyalties between Northern industrial interests and Southern agrarian economies tied to slavery, culminating in secession and armed confrontation that devastated infrastructure and economies across states. Similarly, the dissolution of Yugoslavia in the 1990s, fueled by ethnic and regional sectionalism, resulted in over 130,000 deaths across wars in Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo, with forced displacements affecting more than 2 million people.^[122] These cases illustrate how unchecked sectionalism can fracture national cohesion, leading to balkanization and mass casualties when regional identities override shared state allegiance. Economic disruptions from sectionalism manifest in trade barriers and policy paralysis, as seen in the antebellum U.S., where Southern dependence on cotton exports—accounting for over 50% of U.S. export value by 1860—clashed with Northern-backed protective tariffs, such as the Tariff of 1828, prompting the Nullification Crisis and threats of economic secession that hindered interstate commerce.^[123] In contemporary settings, sectional polarization contributes to legislative gridlock, exemplified by U.S. government shutdowns; the 2018–2019 shutdown alone caused an estimated $3 billion in lost economic output, according to analyses drawing on Congressional Budget Office data.^[124] Such stalemates delay fiscal reforms and infrastructure investments, amplifying national debt burdens projected to exceed $38 trillion by late 2025 amid partisan regional divides.^[125] Socially, sectionalism erodes interpersonal bonds and national unity, with U.S. surveys showing a decline in social trust linked to perceived polarization; Pew Research indicates that trust in fellow Americans has fallen, with only 17% of respondents in 2025 viewing most people as trustworthy, down from higher levels in prior decades, as regional and partisan identities intensify mutual suspicion.^[126] Gallup polls further document waning national identity, with pride in being American dropping to 58% in 2025—the lowest in 25 years—driven by divides where Democrats report just 36% extreme or very proud, reflecting how sectional fractures undermine collective cohesion.^[127] This fragmentation correlates with reduced cross-regional interactions, fostering echo chambers that perpetuate distrust and hinder collaborative problem-solving on national issues.

Debates on Mitigation and Federal Responses

Scholars advocating decentralized federalism, such as those extending F.A. Hayek's concept of spontaneous order to inter-jurisdictional competition, argue that allowing regions autonomy fosters adaptive governance and reduces sectional conflicts by enabling policy experimentation and resident mobility, rather than imposing uniform national directives.^[128] In contrast, proponents of centralization emphasize cohesive fiscal and social policies to enforce equity and prevent fragmentation, though empirical evidence suggests such top-down assimilation often fails, as exemplified by the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991, where suppressed ethnic nationalisms erupted after decades of forced ideological unity, contributing decisively to disintegration.^[129]^[130] Empirical strategies for mitigation include devolutionary measures, such as the United Kingdom's Scotland Act 1998, which granted legislative powers to the Scottish Parliament and initially diffused separatist pressures by accommodating regional demands, though subsequent referenda in 2014 revealed persistent tensions.^[131] In the United States, the 17th Amendment, ratified on April 8, 1913, shifted Senate elections to popular vote, limiting state legislatures' direct influence and aiming to resolve sectional gridlock from deadlocked selections, but critics contend it eroded federalism's checks by centralizing senatorial accountability to national electorates over state interests.^[132] Studies on fiscal federalism indicate that balanced decentralization—dividing taxing and spending responsibilities appropriately—enhances macroeconomic stability by permitting localized responses to shocks, outperforming overly centralized systems prone to inefficiency and resentment.^[133] Policies mandating uniform equity outcomes, such as aggressive interregional redistributions, have been critiqued for intensifying divides, as evidenced by analyses showing excessive fiscal transfers provoke secessionist sentiments in donor regions while failing to resolve underlying disparities.^[134] Market-preserving federalism, where subnational units compete under constitutional limits on central override, promotes innovation and voluntary alignment, stabilizing polities through Tiebout sorting—residents selecting jurisdictions matching preferences—rather than coercive harmonization.^[128] This approach prioritizes restraints like enumerated powers to curb overreach, empirically linked to sustained growth and reduced conflict in competitive federations.^[135]

References

[1]
SECTIONALISM Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of SECTIONALISM is an exaggerated devotion to the interests of a region. How to use sectionalism in a sentence.<|separator|>
[2]
Sectionalism - Essential Civil War Curriculum
Sectionalism is the idea that individual communities of people, sharing a set of cultural, economic and geographic realities, create individuated sections ...
[3]
13. The Sectional Crisis - The American Yawp
Jun 7, 2013 · Conflicts between the power of the federal government and states' rights strained American politics throughout the antebellum era. During the ...
[4]
Overview | Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861-1877 | U.S. History ...
Southerners generally wanted to maintain and even expand the institution. Thus, slavery became the focal point of a political crisis. Following the 1860 ...
[5]
Sectionalism - (AP US History) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations
Sectionalism is the loyalty or support for a specific region or section of a country, often at the expense of national unity.
[6]
Frederick J. Turner: Geographic Sectionalism in American History — AAAG 16:85‑93 (1926)
### Summary of Sectionalism from Frederick J. Turner’s Article
[7]
What Is Sectionalism? Definition and Examples - ThoughtCo
Jun 10, 2025 · Sectionalism is the expression of loyalty or support for a particular region of one's country, rather than to the country as a whole.
[8]
Causation in Period 4, 1800-1848 - APUSH Study Guide - Fiveable
Sectionalism: the belief in and loyalty to a particular region of a country ... loyalty to region often outweighed national unity. For APUSH, link this ...
[9]
The 431-404 BC Peloponnesian War in Ancient Greece
Mar 6, 2025 · Athenian interference in the affairs of Peloponnesian League members and its economic sanctions against key Spartan allies like Corinth and ...
[10]
Peloponnesian War | Causes & Results - Lesson - Study.com
The Peloponnesian War was caused by the growing power of Athens and Sparta. It was also caused by their rivalry, and the tensions built between city-states by ...
[11]
Exploitation of Roman provinces - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
Dec 2, 2019 · Cicero described the relations in the provinces as follows: All provinces are crying, all independent peoples are complaining, all kingdoms ...
[12]
(PDF) Provincial Revolts in the Early Roman Empire - Academia.edu
This paper analyzes the phenomenon of provincial revolts in the early Roman Empire, exploring the differences between ancient and modern understandings of ...
[13]
[PDF] The rise and fall of Italian city-states - LSE Research Online
The rise of communes and city-states in late eleventh and twelfth-century Europe was driven by two main factors: the fragmentation of territorial rule into ...
[14]
The Political Situation In The Italian Renaissance - Arcadia Foundation
The political situation in Italy was highly fragmented and unstable, with numerous city-states fighting among themselves for power and influence.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[15]
The Navigation Acts (article) | Khan Academy
The North American Colonies began viewing England in a negative way because they attempted to force rules and bother the colonies, even though they were doing ...
[16]
Navigation Acts | American Business History Class Notes - Fiveable
Growing resistance in New England and mid-Atlantic colonies with more diverse economies; Increased enforcement in mid-18th century led to more widespread ...Mercantilism And Colonial... · Impact On Colonial Economy · Colonial Response
[17]
The Economics of the Civil War – EH.net
Like the agricultural South they disliked the idea of a high “protective” tariff that raised the cost of imports. However the tariff was also the main source ...Missing: resentment | Show results with:resentment<|separator|>
[18]
[PDF] Antebellum Tariff Politics: Coalition Formation and Shifting Regional ...
High tariffs were directly counter to its economic interests because it exported most of its produce, and the South was not geographically positioned to benefit ...Missing: resentment | Show results with:resentment
[19]
11. The Cotton Revolution | THE AMERICAN YAWP
Jun 7, 2013 · Indeed, the two billion pounds of cotton produced in 1860 alone amounted to more than 60 percent of the United States' total exports for that ...II. The Importance of Cotton · III. Cotton and Slavery · IV. The South and the City
[20]
Tariffs and the American Civil War
The 1828 Tariff increased the average rate to a historical peak of over 60% - in part, a product of miscalculations by southerners who sought to defeat the ...Missing: resentment | Show results with:resentment
[21]
[PDF] Clashing over Commerce: A History of US Trade Policy
22 Southern planters resented the demands that Congress consider higher tariffs to help manufacturing while do- ing nothing to help agriculture. Memorials and ...
[22]
Religion in Colonial America: Trends, Regulations, and Beliefs
Mar 14, 2016 · Christian religious groups played an influential role in each of the British colonies, and most attempted to enforce strict religious observance.New England · Religious Revival · Rationalism
[23]
How ideological migration geographically segregates groups
We examine how people segregate themselves by ideology. · When liberals live in conservative areas, they migrate to more liberal areas. · When conservatives live ...
[24]
Migration and political polarization in the U.S. - PubMed Central - NIH
Nov 22, 2019 · Research to date finds that individuals exhibit a general tendency towards partisan sorting when deciding where to move. Individuals are more ...
[25]
7. Partisanship in rural, suburban and urban communities
Apr 9, 2024 · Registered voters in urban areas mostly align with the Democratic Party. Rural areas are increasingly Republican and suburbs remain divided.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[26]
The Development of the Rural-Urban Political Divide, 1976–2020
Dec 27, 2023 · As recently as the early 1990s, Americans living in rural and urban areas voted similarly in presidential elections, yet in the decades ...<|separator|>
[27]
The divide between us: Urban-rural political differences rooted in ...
Feb 18, 2020 · A new study by Washington University in St. Louis political scientists finds that it isn't personal profiles, but rather proximity to bigger cities that drives ...Missing: patterns | Show results with:patterns
[28]
Path Dependence in Historical Sociology - jstor
Third, once contingent historical events take place, path-dependent sequences are marked by relatively deterministic causal patterns or what can be thought ...
[29]
(PDF) Path Dependence: A Foundational Concept for Historical ...
Aug 9, 2025 · This introduction to the concept of path dependence, its pertinence for the development of historical social science, and its application in economic analysis ...
[30]
The Federalist Papers No. 10 - The Avalon Project
The same advantage which a republic has over a democracy, in controlling the effects of faction, is enjoyed by a large over a small republic.Next Document · Contents · Previous Document
[31]
[PDF] Saving Democracy from the Senate - Utah Law Digital Commons
Part I explains why the Senate's malapportionment creates such a serious democratic deficit. Both the intrinsic unfairness of Senate malapportionment and its ...
[32]
Senate Apportionment as a Source of Political Inequality - jstor
Moreover, the patterns of conflict in the Senate appear to map onto some of these differences in citizens' voting weights, creating racial bias in the Senate's ...
[33]
[PDF] Countermajoritarianism in the Antebellum Senate - USC Price
The effects of Senate malapportionment are inseparable from the political construction of state boundaries and the constituencies they contain.
[34]
Looking Back: Nullification in American History | Constitution Center
Feb 4, 2022 · Nullification is the constitutional theory that individual states can invalidate federal laws or judicial decisions they deem unconstitutional.
[35]
Has Devolution Lived up to its Promise?
Devolution in 1999 was the culmination of over a hundred years of debate and some twenty years of campaigning after the false start of the 1970s.
[36]
The Institutional Basis of Secessionist Politics: Federalism and ...
This contention is tested by examining the institutional environment of federalism and the role it played in secession in the United States in 1860 and 1861.
[37]
The Cotton Kingdom (article) - Khan Academy
Tobacco quickly exhausted the soil, as did cotton, which was so time ... But if the South was “peculiar” among US regions in its devotion to slavery and ...
[38]
Was Southern Soil Exhaustion a Cause of the Civil War?
Oct 21, 2021 · In sum, we know that cotton plantations spread west as soil became exhausted. ... agriculture, Civil War, economic history, slavery, soil. 3 ...
[39]
Missouri Compromise (1820) | National Archives
May 10, 2022 · This legislation admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a non-slave state at the same time, so as not to upset the balance between slave and free ...
[40]
The Tariff of Abominations: The Effects | US House of Representatives
The tariff sought to protect northern and western agricultural products from competition with foreign imports.Missing: policies industry 1860<|separator|>
[41]
South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification - Teaching American History
The Tariff Act of 1832 moderated some of the high tariffs imposed by the 1828 law but still proved unacceptable to many in the South. After Congress enacted the ...
[42]
Nullification Crisis | American Battlefield Trust
Thirty years before the Civil War broke out, disunion appeared to be on the horizon with the Nullification Crisis. What started as a debate over the Tariff.
[43]
The Election of 1860 | American Battlefield Trust
Oct 16, 2024 · The recently formed Republican Party had entered candidates in previous presidential elections but without success. In 1860, the Republican ...
[44]
War Declared: States Secede from the Union! - National Park Service
Sep 4, 2025 · When Abraham Lincoln won the U.S election of 1860, many southern states followed South Carolina in succeeding from the Union.
[45]
Civil War Casualties | American Battlefield Trust
There were an estimated 1.5 million casualties reported during the Civil War. Most casualties and deaths in the Civil War were the result of non-combat-related ...
[46]
Abraham Lincoln and Federalism - University of Michigan
The Civil War often is seen as a turning point in the history of American federalism. In one sense the truth of this perception is beyond dispute.Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[47]
Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction - National Park Service
Jul 30, 2025 · Passed on March 2nd, 1867, the first Military Reconstruction Act divided the ex-Confederate states into five military districts and placed them ...
[48]
The Freedmen's Bureau | National Archives
Oct 28, 2021 · Because the Bureau's records contain a wide range of data about the African American experience during slavery and Reconstruction, they are an ...Select Images · Resources · Microfilming the Records
[49]
Analysis: Reconstruction Acts of 1867 | Research Starters - EBSCO
The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 were a series of pivotal legislations aimed at addressing the aftermath of the American Civil War and the complex dynamics ...Document Analysis · First Reconstruction Act · Second Reconstruction Act
[50]
[PDF] Secession and Breach of Compact: The Law of Nature Meets the ...
As a result (went the argument on the compact theory), the states of the American Union must be regarded as being in a state of nature vis-à- vis one another.
[51]
Why the “solid South” of midcentury U.S. politics was not so solid
Sep 7, 2018 · MIT political scientist Devin Caughey's new book “The Unsolid South” looks at a massive historical shift in a one-party region of the U.S..
[52]
[PDF] Was the South Pivotal? Situated Partisanship and Policy Coalitions ...
Committed to a situated historical approach to studies of Congress, this article demonstrates how the 17-state Jim. Crow South composed a structurally ...
[53]
[PDF] The Southern Imposition: Congress and Labor in the New Deal and ...
First, we explore why congressional repre- sentatives from the South, who had generally sup- ported the Democratic Party on labor issues during the 1930s, ...
[54]
The New Deal, the Solid South, and the Dictators - Econlib
Mar 2, 2015 · Ira Katznelson recovers the intellectual climate and the political realities that influenced American history during the Roosevelt-Truman years, 1933-1952.Missing: divides | Show results with:divides
[55]
How the 'Party of Lincoln' Won Over the Once Democratic South
Aug 18, 2017 · Democratic defectors, known as the “Dixiecrats,” started a switch to the Republican party in a movement that was late...
[56]
Why did the Democrats lose the South? Bringing new data to an old ...
In 1960, all 22 U.S. Senators from the South were affiliated with the Democratic Party. Today, all but three are Republican.[i] For decades, historians and ...
[57]
[PDF] The Geographic Polarization of American Politics - eScholarship
In particular, the Northeast and Pacific Coast became more strongly Democratic after the 1980s in both presidential and congressional elections, while the South ...
[58]
[PDF] Partisan spatial sorting in the United States - econ.umd.edu
After analytically developing our index, we use it to measure partisan geographic sorting dating back to 1856—the first presi- dential election with both a ...
[59]
[PDF] Migration, Polarization, and Sorting in the American Electorate
The model estimates the probabilities of party identification in U.S. congressional districts among migrants and non-migrants. Based on an empirical application ...
[60]
Sectionalism and the United States Congress - ScienceDirect.com
Political sectionalism in past and contemporary American society is examined by way of elections to and roll call voting behavior within the United States ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
[61]
[PDF] Results of Devolution Referendums (1979 & 1997) - UK Parliament
rather than of those voting — had to vote 'yes' in March 1979 for the Acts ...
[62]
Welsh Referendum - BBC
I do not agree that there should be a Welsh Assembly. 552,698, 49.7%. Turnout: 50.1% Unitary Authorities declared so far: 22. RI = Result in ...
[63]
Scotland National Strategy for Economic Transformation: evidence ...
Mar 1, 2022 · The average GDP growth rate over the period 2000 to 2019 was 1.4%. Over the period 2000–2007 it was 2.4% and fell to 0.7% over the period 2008- ...
[64]
Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland 2022-23 - gov.scot
Aug 16, 2023 · A chart showing Scottish and UK North Sea receipts since 1998-99. These fell. Introduction. In GERS , the term North Sea is used to refer to all ...
[65]
Scottish independence referendum - Results - BBC News
Scotland has voted against becoming an independent country by 55% to 45%. Should Scotland be an independent country?
[66]
EU Referendum Results - BBC News
The UK has voted to leave the EU by 52% to 48%. Leave won the majority of votes in England and Wales, while every council in Scotland saw Remain majorities.
[67]
Referendum on the 1980 sovereignty-association proposal for Québec
The No option obtained a majority of 59.56%. In this section. Question; Results and statistics from the May 20, 1980 referendum; Results by electoral division ...
[68]
1995 referendum on Québec's accession to sovereignty
The No option obtained a majority of 50.58%. In this section. Question; Results and statistics from the October 30, 1995 referendum; Results by electoral ...Results and statistics from the... · Results by electoral division
[69]
Canada's regional economies
Natural resources have been one of the main reasons for differences in Canada's regional economies. Examples of this include: oil and gas in Alberta, ...
[70]
Canada's Equalization Formula - Library of Parliament
Sep 12, 2024 · The total amount of Equalization payments in 2024–2025 is $25.3 billion, which amounts to 4.7% of total federal expenditures.1 At present, seven ...
[71]
Provincial-Federal Confrontations: The 1980s - Conventional Oil
In the early 1980s, the world price of oil collapsed, and the Alberta economy plunged into a deep recession.
[72]
Alberta and the National Energy Program - CBC
In reaction to the NEP, foreign companies began selling off energy assets in Canada, which eliminated many jobs, particularly in Alberta. Thousands of Albertans ...<|separator|>
[73]
[PDF] Spain: Constitutional Transition through Gradual Accommodation of ...
Spain's transition involved a political agreement after Franco's rule, leading to the 1978 Constitution, and the implementation of new territorial institutions ...
[74]
Researching the Law of the Spanish Autonomous Communities
The 1978 Constitution guarantees the hierarchical structure of legal provisions (art. 9.3) and further describes the ranking of Spanish legislation, including ...Missing: autonomies | Show results with:autonomies
[75]
How the Franco-era State of Autonomies Jeopardizes Spain's Unity
Dec 14, 2017 · The result is a unitary but highly decentralized state in which significant powers of self-government are granted to autonomous communities such as Catalonia.Missing: post- regionalism<|control11|><|separator|>
[76]
Basque terrorist group ETA disbands after 60 years
May 7, 2018 · It has been a long time coming, but finally the Basque separatist group ETA has dissolved itself, ending one of the longest terrorism ...
[77]
[PDF] The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country
We find that, after the outbreak of terrorism, per capita GDP in the. Basque Country declined about 10 percentage points relative to the synthetic control ...<|separator|>
[78]
[PDF] Fiscal Imbalances in Asymmetric Federal Regimes. The Case of Spain
Fiscal imbalances for Catalonia, plus the mirror of the FRs' privileges (almost two thirds of higher per capita finance, as we shall see) and the systematic ...<|separator|>
[79]
Catalonia - CaixaBank Research
Jul 23, 2025 · Catalonia is the region with the second-highest GDP, after Madrid, accounting for 18.8% of Spain's total GDP. With a population of 8.1 million ...
[80]
Catalonia's fiscal deficit with the Spanish state reached 22 billion ...
Sep 19, 2023 · Catalonia contributed 19.2% of Spanish tax income in 2021, and received back 13.6% of the state's spending in that year.
[81]
[PDF] Is Catalonia being fiscally mistreated?
Looking at the available data, Catalonia's fiscal situation is similar to that of other regions with similar levels of income per capita relative to the ...
[82]
Five years on from the illegal Catalan independence referendum
Oct 20, 2022 · The exit of the junior partner from Catalonia's pro-independence coalition government leaves the secessionists deeply divided.
[83]
Catalonia's 2017 independence referendum: a timeline
Oct 1, 2022 · Nearly 2.3 million ballots were cast on October 1, 2017, but the day was marred by brutal police violence leaving over 1000 injured.<|separator|>
[84]
Language data for Ukraine - Translators without Borders
According to the 2001 census, 67% of the population speak Ukrainian and 30% speak Russian as their first language. Ukrainian, the official language, belongs ...
[85]
Russians and Russian-speakers in Ukraine - Minority Rights Group
The 2001 census indicated that 14.8 per cent of ethnic Ukrainians considered Russian their first language; in Crimea more than two-thirds of the population ...
[86]
How Ukraine's new president broke down a historic divide
May 1, 2019 · The polarization between East and West is striking: Yanukovych won nearly 90 percent of the vote in the Eastern regions, while Tymoshenko won ...
[87]
Ukraine's Euromaidan and Revolution of Dignity, ten years later
Feb 1, 2024 · Significantly, in no part of Ukraine were there sizeable pro-regime rallies; the Maidan enjoyed majority support. ... Ukraine since 2014.
[88]
Ukraine crisis: Who are the Russia-backed separatists? - Al Jazeera
Feb 4, 2022 · Moscow, Russia – Since fighting broke out in eastern Ukraine in 2014, separatist rebels of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People's ...Missing: sectionalism | Show results with:sectionalism
[89]
In Ukraine's Donbas, ten years of war and Russification - France 24
Apr 8, 2024 · On April 7, 2014, a coup by pro-Russian militants in the city of Donetsk in eastern Ukraine was the spark that ignited the Donbas war.Missing: sectionalism | Show results with:sectionalism
[90]
Full article: What Political Status Did the Donbas Want? Survey ...
Oct 7, 2024 · Combining the data on the two sides in 2020 showed that 54.5% preferred the Ukrainian status options, 29.3% the Russian status options, 6.8% ...
[91]
What Next for Ukraine's Formerly Pro-Russian Regions?
Dec 2, 2022 · Russia's invasion largely put an end to this pro-Russian sentiment: by May 2022, only 4 percent in Ukraine's east and 1 percent in the south ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[92]
Accounting for the duality of the Italian economy - ScienceDirect
In 2019, the per capita income of the northern region of Lombardia was 39,700 euros, but for the southern region of Calabria it was only 17,300 euros.<|separator|>
[93]
'No regionalism please, we are Leghisti !' The transformation of the ...
Sep 3, 2018 · The Lega Nord was born in 1991 by bringing together under the leadership of Bossi's Lega Lombarda (Lombard League) a wide range of autonomist ...Missing: sectionalism | Show results with:sectionalism
[94]
Regional Inequalities in Brazil: Divergent Readings on Their Origin...
Brazil's North and Northeast have the worst regional rates, while the South and Southeast have the best. The North and Northeast have the worst rates.
[95]
Constitutional history of Brazil | ConstitutionNet
The aim of the 1988 text was to give state and municipal governments administrative autonomy and responsibility for policy implementation, decentralizing the ...
[96]
LINGUISTIC REORGANIZATION OF STATES - SAARTHI IAS
Oct 19, 2024 · Reform: The State Reorganization Act of 1956 was a major reform that redrew India's state boundaries along linguistic lines.Missing: sectionalism | Show results with:sectionalism
[97]
Kashmir: What to Know About the Disputed Region
Aug 7, 2019 · Kashmir, a Muslim-majority region, has been claimed by both Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan since the end of British colonial rule in 1947.Missing: sectionalism | Show results with:sectionalism<|control11|><|separator|>
[98]
[PDF] States Reorganization and Accommodation of Ethno-Territorial ...
The linguistic 'right-sizing' of the subnational units, coupled with considerations of economic viability and administrative convenience, removed very early on ...Missing: sectionalism | Show results with:sectionalism
[99]
When Rural and Urban Become “Us” versus “Them” - Edward Conard
Sep 29, 2025 · Nationwide, the difference between Republican vote share in rural vs urban areas increased to 21 percentage points in 2020, up from 10 pp in ...<|separator|>
[100]
The “Big Sort” Continues, with Trump as a Driving Force
Feb 17, 2022 · More than 20% of the nation's counties gave 80% or more of its 2-party presidential votes to either Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
[101]
How the Plight of a Heartland Could Upset America's Balance - Stratfor
Nov 13, 2020 · The polarization of US politics goes hand-in-hand with the US economic core's continued shift away from the Mississippi River Basin to the coasts.
[102]
The U.S. Immigration Debate | Council on Foreign Relations
Comprehensive immigration reform has eluded Congress for decades. Presidents have increasingly turned to executive action to reshape asylum and border policy.
[103]
100 days of immigration under the second Trump administration
Border flows have continued to fall in early 2025, with authorities allowing almost no humanitarian migrants to cross the border, as can be seen in the most ...
[104]
Partisan Differences Over the Pandemic Response Are Growing
Jun 3, 2020 · Pew Research Center surveys find growing partisan division over the risk the novel coronavirus poses to public health as well as over social ...Missing: lockdowns | Show results with:lockdowns
[105]
Regional and Temporal Patterns of Partisan Polarization during the ...
Jul 3, 2024 · In particular, we examine regional variations in both the United States and Canada, focusing on three specific health interventions: lockdowns, ...
[106]
5 Years Later: America Looks Back at the Impact of COVID-19
Feb 12, 2025 · Nearly three-quarters of U.S. adults (72%) say the COVID-19 pandemic did more to drive the country apart than to bring it together.
[107]
The drivers of regional discontent in the EU - ScienceDirect.com
This study focuses on identifying the drivers of discontent at the EU regional level by estimating the interplay between regional inequalities, the unbalanced ...
[108]
Globalization Versus Regionalization: New Phenomena and Trends
Jan 23, 2024 · One of the trends of the modern global economy is a slowdown of economic globalization due to geopolitical and economic factors.<|separator|>
[109]
Full article: Re-evaluating the East-West divide in the European Union
Feb 12, 2024 · This introduction argues that the East-West divide in Europe continues to be politically salient since the fall of the Berlin Wall and two ...
[110]
Europe's east-west divide is widening - New Statesman
Oct 11, 2023 · Relations between Germany and Poland define the continent. But, ahead of the latter's election this weekend, they are in crisis and getting worse.
[111]
Europe's East-West Divide: Myth or Reality?
Apr 11, 2019 · Many of the claims about the EU's East-West divide do not stand up to closer inspection. But like most relationships, it still needs careful attention and ...
[112]
Xinjiang - United States Department of State
The PRC government continued to cite what it called the “three evils” of “ethnic separatism, religious extremism, and violent terrorism” to justify enacting and ...
[113]
Uighurs and China's Xinjiang Region - Council on Foreign Relations
XUAR (Xinxiang Uighur Autonomous Region), or East Turkistan, is a territory in western China that accounts for one-sixth of China's land and is home to about ...Missing: ideology | Show results with:ideology
[114]
INDONESIA: The Aceh Peace Agreement
But after the December 26, 2004, underground earthquake and tsunami devastated the Aceh province—killing some 170,000 residents, leaving 500,000 homeless, and ...
[115]
Alberta Politics and Separatism Sentiments - Leger Marketing
May 15, 2025 · 58% of Albertans say that actions by the federal government could influence their views on Alberta's political future within Canada. 62% of ...
[116]
States are the laboratories of democracy - The Hill
May 7, 2020 · Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Louis Brandeis was the first to popularize the phrase that states “are the laboratories of democracy.
[117]
Competitive Federalism | Center for the Study of Federalism
Advantages commonly attributed to interjurisdictional competition include greater fiscal discipline, better efficiency, more innovation, and races to the ...
[118]
[PDF] Corporate Taxes in Switzerland” Jan K. Brueckner Department of
The chapter argues that corporate tax competition is likely responsible for the long secular decline in cantonal corporate rates, which is especially notable ...
[119]
2025 State Tax Competitiveness Index | Full Study - Tax Foundation
The evidence shows that states with the best tax systems will be the most competitive at attracting new businesses and most effective at generating economic and ...
[120]
Reviewing the Impact of Taxes on Economic Growth - Tax Foundation
May 21, 2021 · The paper finds that a 1 percent of state GDP tax decrease for the bottom 90 percent of earners increases state GDP by 6.6 percent. Looking at ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[121]
[PDF] Decentralization in Theory and Practice: A Comprehensive Review
Jul 1, 2025 · Public choice theory argues that public officials are self-interested and respond to fiscal and political incentives (Buchanan & Tullock, 1962).
[122]
The Conflicts | International Criminal Tribunal for the former ...
It is estimated that more than 100,000 people were killed and two million people, more than half the population, were forced to flee their homes as a result of ...
[123]
Cotton and the Civil War - 2008-07 - Mississippi History Now
On the eve of the American Civil War in the mid-1800s cotton was America's leading export, and raw cotton was essential for the economy of Europe.King Cotton Diplomacy · Weapons, Ammunition And... · The Lure Of Cotton
[124]
The True Cost of Gridlock - Manning & Napier
Jan 29, 2019 · Initial estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office put the damage done to be around $3 billion in permanently lost economic activity.
[125]
https://fortune.com/2025/10/22/how-much-national-debt-38-trillion-deficit-tariffs/
[126]
Americans' Declining Trust in Each Other and Reasons Behind It
May 8, 2025 · On both sides, views of the opposing party and its supporters have grown more negative, which may contribute to the decline in social trust. A ...Missing: sectionalism | Show results with:sectionalism
[127]
American Pride Slips to New Low - Gallup News
Jun 30, 2025 · Fifty-eight percent of U.S. adults are extremely or very proud to be Americans, the lowest in Gallup's 25-year trend.
[128]
[PDF] Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development
A federal system is market-preserving if it has three addi- tional characteristics: (F3) subnational governments have primary regulatory responsibility over the ...
[129]
The Case for Nationalism in the Demise of the Soviet Union
Aug 28, 2012 · While economic and ideological failure played as important role in delegitimising Soviet control, nationalism was the defining feature of ...
[130]
Nationalism, Ethnic Pressures, and the Breakup of the Soviet Union
The Soviet Union throughout its history suffered from deeply en- trenched problems in what was traditionally called the “nationalities” sphere. In particular, ...
[131]
Blair's bombshell: How Scottish devolution blew up the British ...
In 1998, the British Parliament fulfilled an election promise that then Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair had made in 1997 and passed the Scotland Act, paving ...
[132]
17th Amendment Weakened Balance of Power Between States ...
As we head toward the 2022 elections, it is a safe bet that few Americans can identify the 17th Amendment to the Constitution, even though it's one of the ...
[133]
[PDF] Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice - IMF eLibrary
The studies contained in this book show the great variety of experi, ences ranging from those of highly centralized countries, where most spending and taxing ...<|separator|>
[134]
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00323187.2025.2450370
[135]
Why Federalism Matters - Brookings Institution
Oct 1, 2005 · Sometimes nations face a stark choice: allow regions to federate and govern themselves, or risk national dissolution.Missing: addressing | Show results with:addressing