Although anecdotal reports of poisoning by cyanobacteria date back over a thousand years, the modern scientific understanding of cyanotoxins began in the mid-20th century, with the first isolation of anatoxin-a following livestock deaths in 1961 and microcystins identified in the 1980s.[1] Cyanotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by certain species of cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, that can cause adverse health effects in humans, animals, and aquatic life through ingestion, dermal contact, or inhalation.[2] These toxins are primarily released during harmful algal blooms (HABs) in freshwater, brackish, and sometimes marine environments, often triggered by nutrient pollution such as excess nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural runoff or wastewater.[3]Cyanobacteria capable of producing cyanotoxins include genera like Microcystis, Dolichospermum (formerly Anabaena), and Cylindrospermopsis, which thrive in warm, eutrophic conditions worldwide.[3]Cyanotoxins are classified into several chemical groups based on their toxicological targets, with hepatotoxins being the most prevalent and studied. Hepatotoxins, such as microcystins (over 200 variants identified, including microcystin-LR)[4] and nodularins, primarily target the liver by inhibiting protein phosphatases, leading to cell damage and potential tumor promotion.[3] Neurotoxins like anatoxin-a, which acts as a nicotinic agonist mimicking the neurotransmitteracetylcholine, and saxitoxins, which block voltage-gated sodium channels, disrupt nerve function, causing rapid paralysis and respiratory failure in exposed organisms.[2] Other categories include cytotoxins such as cylindrospermopsin, which inhibits protein synthesis and damages kidneys and the gastrointestinal tract, and dermatoxins like aplysiatoxin, responsible for skin irritations.[2] These toxins vary in stability; for instance, microcystins can persist for weeks to months in water, while anatoxins degrade more quickly under sunlight.[3]Human exposure to cyanotoxins occurs mainly through recreational water contact, drinking contaminated water, or consuming affected fish and shellfish, with documented cases leading to symptoms like nausea, vomiting, lethargy, and dermatitis.[2] Between 2016 and 2018, the U.S. reported 389 human illnesses and 413 animal cases, including 369 deaths primarily among dogs and livestock, highlighting the acute risks to pets and wildlife.[2] Regulatory guidelines, such as the World Health Organization's lifetime drinking water limit of 1 µg/L for microcystin-LR, and recreational thresholds (e.g., 8 µg/L in the U.S. EPA's advisory), aim to mitigate these risks, though monitoring challenges persist due to bloom variability.[2]Environmentally, cyanotoxins contribute to ecosystem disruption by bioaccumulating in the food web, affecting zooplankton, fish, and birds through sublethal effects like reduced reproduction and oxidative stress.[3] Concentrations in blooms can reach thousands of micrograms per liter, exacerbating water quality issues and leading to fish kills or biodiversity loss in affected water bodies.[3] Ongoing research emphasizes the need for advanced detection methods and bloom prediction to address the growing incidence of HABs driven by climate change and pollution.[2]
Introduction
Definition and Sources
Cyanotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, which are prokaryotic photosynthetic microorganisms capable of causing harm to humans, animals, and aquatic ecosystems.[5] The physiological roles of these compounds in producing organisms are not fully understood but may include chemical defense and allelopathy. They can accumulate in water bodies, leading to environmental and health concerns. Over 300 different cyanotoxins have been identified to date, encompassing a diverse array of chemical structures that vary in potency and specificity.[6]Cyanotoxins are synthesized intracellularly within cyanobacteria cells and are primarily released into the surrounding environment upon cell death and lysis, often during the senescence phase of harmful algal blooms.[7] The main producer genera include Microcystis, Anabaena (now classified as Dolichospermum in some cases), Nodularia, Cylindrospermopsis, and Aphanizomenon, among others, which are commonly found in freshwater, brackish, and occasionally marine systems.[5] These genera thrive under eutrophic conditions, where nutrient enrichment promotes their growth and subsequent toxin release.[8]In terms of general properties, cyanotoxins exhibit a range of solubilities, with many being water-soluble (hydrophilic) and others lipophilic, allowing them to partition between aqueous phases and biological tissues.[5] They demonstrate notable environmental stability, persisting in natural waters for weeks to months under typical conditions, though degradation can occur through photolysis, microbial activity, or chemical processes.[7] Unlike toxins from eukaryotic algae, such as those produced by dinoflagellates, cyanotoxins are exclusively associated with prokaryotic cyanobacteria, reflecting their distinct evolutionary and biosynthetic origins.[9]
Historical Discovery
The first documented instance of cyanotoxin poisoning dates to 1878 in Australia, when chemist George Francis reported the sudden deaths of approximately 40 sheep that had consumed water from Lake Alexandrina containing a dense bloom of blue-green algae, now recognized as cyanobacteria such as Nodularia spumigena.[10] This observation, published in Nature, marked the initial scientific recognition of cyanobacterial toxicity in livestock, attributing the fatalities to the ingestion of algal scums that caused rapid onset of weakness, convulsions, and death.[11] Similar anecdotal reports of livestock poisonings linked to cyanobacterial proliferations emerged in Europe during the late 19th century, though systematic investigations were limited at the time.[12]During the 1930s, experimental and observational studies began to elucidate the toxic potential of specific cyanobacteria, particularly neurotoxins produced by Anabaena flos-aquae. A notable incident occurred in 1931 along the Kanawha River in West Virginia, United States, where blooms of this species were associated with widespread fish kills and acute gastrointestinal illnesses affecting thousands of people, prompting early toxicological assessments that highlighted neuromuscular and paralytic effects.[13] These events spurred the first targeted research into cyanobacterial extracts, confirming their role in vertebrate poisonings through bioassays on animals.[14]The 1980s represented a breakthrough in cyanotoxin characterization, with the isolation of microcystin-LR, the predominant hepatotoxin, from Microcystis aeruginosa strains. Researchers employed fast atom bombardmentmass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance to determine its cyclic heptapeptide structure, enabling precise identification and toxicity studies that revealed its potent liver-damaging effects via protein phosphatase inhibition. This advancement facilitated broader screening of environmental samples and underscored microcystins as major contributors to cyanobacterial hazards. In the 1990s, the World Health Organization responded to growing evidence of human exposure risks by setting a provisional guideline value of 1 μg/L for total microcystins (equitoxic to microcystin-LR) in drinking water, based on toxicological data from animal studies establishing a no-observed-adverse-effect level for liver toxicity, with application of uncertainty and allocation factors.A pivotal event elevating public and scientific awareness was the 1996 Caruaru incident in Brazil, where microcystins from a Microcystis bloom contaminated the water supply used for hemodialysis at a clinic, resulting in visual disturbances, vomiting, and acute liver failure among 116 patients, with 52 fatalities by year's end. Post-mortem analyses confirmed microcystin concentrations up to 20 μg/L in the dialysis fluid, marking the first documented human deaths directly attributable to cyanotoxins and prompting international regulatory reforms. Mass spectrometry played a crucial role in these investigations, allowing rapid detection and quantification of toxins in complex matrices like water and tissues.[15]Up to 2025, research has intensified on climate-driven expansions of cyanobacterial blooms, with warming temperatures and altered hydrology expected to increase bloom frequency and duration in temperate lakes, as evidenced by satellite monitoring of global water bodies.[16] Concurrently, investigations from 2023 to 2024 have spotlighted emerging toxins like aetokthonotoxin, a biindole neurotoxin from the epiphytic cyanobacterium Aetokthonos hydrillicola associated with avian vacuolar myelinopathy, with PCR-based surveys detecting its producers in U.S. reservoirs and advancing LC-MS/MS detection methods for environmental monitoring.[17]
Occurrence and Environmental Context
Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms
Harmful cyanobacterial blooms, also known as CyanoHABs, are dense proliferations of cyanobacteria that form visible surface scums or mats in freshwater, brackish, and marine environments. These blooms typically arise in nutrient-enriched waters, where eutrophication from agricultural runoff and wastewater discharge provides excess nitrogen and phosphorus, promoting rapid cyanobacterial growth under favorable conditions like stagnant water and high light availability.Globally, CyanoHABs are prevalent in large lakes and reservoirs, with notable examples including recurring blooms in Lake Erie, USA, where nutrient inputs from the surrounding watershed exacerbate the issue, and Lake Victoria, Africa, where similar eutrophication drives extensive surface coverage. The frequency and intensity of these blooms have increased worldwide due to climate warming, which elevates water temperatures and extends growing seasons for cyanobacteria. In 2025, significant CyanoHABs occurred in Nordic countries including Norway, Sweden, and Finland, as well as the Baltic Sea and lakes in Finland, linked to prolonged summer heatwaves that promoted cyanobacterial growth.[18][19]Cyanotoxins produced by blooming cyanobacteria are initially stored intracellularly but are released extracellularly during bloom senescence—when cells age and lyse—or through grazing by zooplankton and other organisms, leading to widespread dissemination in the water column. Not all CyanoHABs produce toxins, as variability depends on species composition, environmental stressors, and genetic factors within the bloom-forming populations, such as genera including Microcystis and Anabaena.[20][21][8][22]Early detection of CyanoHABs relies on monitoring visual and ecological indicators, such as water discoloration ranging from green to blue hues due to high chlorophyll concentrations, oxygen depletion from microbial decomposition of organic matter, and subsequent fish kills as hypoxic conditions intensify. These signs signal the need for immediate water quality assessments to mitigate ecological disruptions.[23][24][25]
Factors Influencing Production
The production of cyanotoxins in cyanobacteria is regulated by a complex interplay of abiotic and biotic factors that influence both the growth of toxin-producing strains and the expression of biosynthetic pathways. Key environmental triggers include nutrient availability, where elevated phosphorus levels, often in combination with nitrogen, promote cyanobacterial dominance and subsequent toxin synthesis, as phosphorus is frequently the limiting nutrient in freshwater systems. High nitrogen-to-phosphorus (N:P) ratios can further favor non-nitrogen-fixing toxin producers like Microcystis species by reducing competition from diazotrophs. Temperature is a critical driver, with optimal ranges of 20–30°C enhancing microcystin production in strains such as Microcystis aeruginosa, as warmer conditions accelerate metabolic rates and bloom formation. Light intensity positively correlates with toxin biosynthesis, with moderate to high irradiance (typically 50–200 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) upregulating gene expression for hepatotoxins like microcystins, while extreme levels may inhibit it. Additionally, pH values between 7 and 9 support alkaline-tolerant cyanobacteria, indirectly boosting toxin output by favoring their proliferation in stratified waters.Genetic mechanisms underpin the variability in cyanotoxin production, primarily through dedicated biosynthetic gene clusters that encode non-ribosomal peptide synthetases and polyketide synthases. For instance, the mcy gene cluster in Microcystis aeruginosa directs the synthesis of microcystins, with its transcription modulated by environmental cues such as nutrient stress. Quorum sensing, mediated by autoinducers like acyl-homoserine lactones, induces toxin pathways at high cell densities, coordinating population-level responses that enhance bloom toxicity and competitive advantages. Stress responses, including oxidative damage from light or metal exposure, further activate regulatory elements like the NtcA transcription factor, which links nitrogen status to mcy gene upregulation, thereby fine-tuning production under adverse conditions.Cyanotoxin output exhibits significant strain-specific variability, as not all cyanobacteria possess functional biosynthetic genes; for example, only about 50–80% of Microcystis isolates produce microcystins, depending on genetic polymorphisms and prior evolutionary pressures. Biotic interactions, such as competition with non-toxic algae or grazing by zooplankton, can suppress toxin production in subordinate strains, though toxin release often deters herbivores and promotes dominance during blooms. Climate change amplifies these dynamics, with projections indicating a 20–50% increase in harmful cyanobacterial bloom frequency by 2050 due to rising temperatures, prolonged stratification, and intensified nutrient runoff from extreme weather events. These shifts are expected to elevate overall cyanotoxin concentrations in affected ecosystems.Recent research highlights emerging anthropogenic influences, such as microplastics, which can adsorb cyanotoxins and alter microbial communities to favor toxin-producing cyanobacteria. Studies from 2024 demonstrate that polystyrene and polyethylene microplastics enhance the expression of microcystin biosynthesis genes (e.g., mcyD) in Microcystis by providing attachment surfaces and leaching additives that stimulate growth, potentially increasing toxin yields by up to 30% under co-exposure scenarios. This interaction underscores the compounding risks of pollution on cyanotoxin regulation in polluted waters.
Chemical Classification
Cyclic Peptides
Cyclic peptide cyanotoxins constitute a prominent class of hepatotoxins produced by various cyanobacteria, such as species of Microcystis, Nodularia, and Planktothrix. These compounds are distinguished by their rigid cyclic structures, which enhance their stability and bioavailability in aquatic environments. Unlike alkaloid cyanotoxins that primarily target neurological functions, cyclic peptides exert their toxicity through interference with cellular signaling pathways in the liver.[26]The core structure of these toxins typically involves cyclic heptapeptides, as seen in microcystins, or pentapeptides, as in nodularins, both incorporating unusual amino acids that contribute to their potency. Microcystins feature a cyclo(-D-Ala-L-X-D-MeAsp-L-Z-Adda-D-Glu-N-Mdhb-) backbone, where Adda (3-amino-9-methoxy-2,6,8-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4,6-dienoic acid) is a β-amino acid essential for toxicity, and X and Z represent variable amino acids such as leucine or arginine. Nodularins share a similar motif but with a more compact cyclo(-D-MeAsp-L-Arg-Adda-D-Glu-Mdhb-) ring, where Mdhb is N-methyldehydroalanine. These structures yield molecular weights of approximately 900–1100 Da for microcystins and around 825 Da for nodularin-R. The cyclic nature and hydrophobic Adda residue enable strong binding to target enzymes while resisting enzymatic degradation.[26][27]Biosynthesis of cyclic peptide cyanotoxins proceeds via multimodular non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), frequently hybrid with polyketide synthases (PKS), which assemble the peptide chain through adenylation, condensation, and tailoring steps without ribosomal involvement. In Microcystis aeruginosa, this process is governed by the mcy gene cluster spanning about 55 kb, encompassing bidirectional operons with genes mcyA–mcyE (NRPS/PKS hybrids for chain elongation and Adda incorporation) and accessory genes mcyF–mcyT (for modifications like racemization and methylation). Similar nda clusters direct nodularin production in Nodularia spumigena. This modular architecture allows for structural diversity through domain shuffling and substrate specificity variations.[28][29]As hepatotoxins, cyclic peptides primarily inhibit protein phosphatases 1 (PP1) and 2A (PP2A) with high affinity (IC<sub>50</sub> values in the nanomolar range), causing hyperphosphorylation of keratins and other proteins, which disrupts hepatocyte microfilaments and leads to intrahepatic hemorrhage and tumor promotion. Microcystins and nodularins demonstrate exceptional persistence in natural waters due to resistance to hydrolysis and oxidation, with half-lives typically ranging from 1–2 weeks under ambient conditions, though microbial degradation can shorten this to days in biologically active systems. More than 300 microcystin congeners have been characterized, arising from amino acid substitutions and demethylations, while nodularins exhibit fewer variants (around 10). In harmful cyanobacterial blooms, concentrations can accumulate to 1000 μg/L or exceed 2000 μg/L in surface scums, posing significant risks to water quality.[26][30][31][27]
Alkaloids
Alkaloid cyanotoxins are small-molecule organic compounds characterized by nitrogen-containing heterocyclic rings and basic functional groups, distinguishing them from larger peptide-based toxins. These structures exhibit diversity, with anatoxins featuring bicyclic amine scaffolds and cylindrospermopsins incorporating tricyclic guanidine moieties linked to a uracil derivative.[32][33][34]The biosynthesis of these alkaloids relies on hybrid enzyme systems combining polyketide synthases (PKS) and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), which facilitate the iterative assembly of carbon chains and incorporation of nitrogenous units. For anatoxin-a, the process is governed by the ana gene cluster (comprising anaA through anaG and associated open reading frames), a 29 kb locus identified in producer strains like Anabaena sp. strain 37, enabling the formation of the bicyclic core through polyketide extension and cyclization.[35][36]Prominent examples include anatoxin-a, a secondary aminealkaloid that acts as a potent agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, leading to overstimulation and rapid paralysis; its intraperitoneal LD50 in mice is 0.25 mg/kg. Cylindrospermopsin, a guanidinealkaloid hepatotoxin and cytotoxin, primarily inhibits eukaryotic protein synthesis by interfering with ribosomal function and glutathione depletion, with an oral LD50 of approximately 2–6 mg/kg in mice. Saxitoxins, tricyclic guanidinium alkaloids produced by certain freshwater cyanobacteria, block voltage-gated sodium channels to cause paralytic effects, with an intraperitoneal LD50 of 10 μg/kg in mice. Aetokthonotoxin, a pentabrominated biindole nitrile discovered in 2021 from the epiphytic cyanobacterium Aetokthonos hydrillicola, represents a more recent addition; it functions as a putative neurotoxin by acting as a protonophore that uncouples mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation.[37][38][39][40]In cyanobacterial blooms, anatoxin-a concentrations can reach up to 1 mg/L in surface scums, posing acute risks during environmental proliferations. Notable global incidents underscore these dangers, including multiple dog deaths in U.S. lakes in 2023, such as a confirmed case in Clear Lake, California, linked to anatoxin exposure from algal mats.[41]
Other Toxins
Lipopolysaccharides (LPS), also known as endotoxins, are integral components of the outer cell wall in all Gram-negative cyanobacteria, distinguishing them as universal structural features across these organisms.[42] These molecules consist of a lipid A core anchored in the outer membrane, linked to a core oligosaccharide and an O-antigen polysaccharide chain, though cyanobacterial LPS often lacks typical bacterial components like heptose and 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (KDO), featuring instead unique elements such as 4-linked glucose in the core and odd-chain hydroxylated fatty acids in lipid A.[43] LPS are released into the environment primarily during cyanobacterial cell lysis, contributing to the toxicity of bloom decay products, and exhibit pyrogenic properties by inducing fever through inflammatory responses, as well as causing skin irritation and hypersensitivity upon direct contact.[44] Compared to LPS from pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria like Escherichia coli, cyanobacterial variants are generally less potent, with lower lethality (LD<sub>50</sub> of 40–425 mg/kg in mice versus 5–24 mg/kg for bacterial LPS) and reduced pyrogenicity, potentially due to structural variations in the lipid A region.[44]Another notable non-peptide, non-alkaloid cyanotoxin is β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), a non-proteinogenic amino acid produced by diverse cyanobacterial taxa, including both free-living and symbiotic species such as those in the genera Nostoc, Anabaena, and Microcystis.[45] BMAA acts as a neurotoxin by mimicking the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate, leading to excitotoxicity through overactivation of glutamate receptors.[46] Its biosynthesis occurs via non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)-like pathways, involving enzymes that assemble the molecule from serine and methylamine precursors, as identified through genomic analyses of producing strains.[47] BMAA has been linked to the high incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex (ALS/PDC) in Guam, where concentrations in cyanobacterial symbionts of cycads reached up to 37 μg/g dry weight, biomagnifying through the food web to levels of 3,556 μg/g in flying foxes and 6.6 μg/g in human brain tissues of affected individuals.[45] Unlike many cyanotoxins, BMAA biomagnifies across trophic levels in aquatic and terrestrial food webs, with up to 44-fold increases from phytoplankton to zooplankton, facilitating indirect exposure via seafood consumption.[48]Lesser-known cyanotoxins in this category include dermatoxins such as aplysiatoxins, polyketide-derived compounds produced by marine cyanobacteria like Moorea producens (formerly Lyngbya majuscula), which induce severe skin inflammation and blistering upon contact.[49] Recent reviews highlight their role in contact dermatitis during blooms, with structural analogs like debromoaplysiatoxin exhibiting similar protein kinase C-activating mechanisms, though production remains strain-specific and less widespread than major hepatotoxins.[50]These toxins differ from cyclic peptides and alkaloids in their primarily inflammatory or glutamate-mimetic actions, with LPS providing a baseline endotoxin presence in all Gram-negative cyanobacteria and BMAA uniquely capable of trophic transfer, underscoring their distinct ecological and exposure risks.[51]
Toxicity Mechanisms
Hepatotoxins
Hepatotoxins are a class of cyanotoxins that primarily target the liver, inducing damage through disruption of key cellular processes in hepatocytes. Microcystins and nodularins, the most studied hepatotoxins, exert their toxicity by covalently binding to and inhibiting serine/threonine protein phosphatases 1 (PP1) and 2A (PP2A), which are essential for regulating phosphorylation states of cellular proteins.[52][53][54] This inhibition leads to hyperphosphorylation of target proteins, including those involved in cytoskeletal integrity, resulting in structural collapse, blebbing, and loss of cell shape in liver cells.[53] The binding affinity is exceptionally high, with microcystin-LR exhibiting inhibition constants (Ki) below 0.1 nM for both PP1 and PP2A.[55]Uptake of these hepatotoxins into hepatocytes occurs via specific organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), such as OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in humans, which facilitate active transport across the sinusoidal membrane, concentrating the toxins in the liver and enhancing their hepatoselectivity.[56][57] Nodularins operate through a similar phosphatase inhibition mechanism, with IC50 values of 0.026 nM for PP2A and 1.8 nM for PP1, leading to comparable cytoskeletal and morphological disruptions in hepatic cells.[58] In contrast, cylindrospermopsin, another potent hepatotoxin, targets protein synthesis by inhibiting ribosomal biogenesis and function, a process mediated by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP450) activation, which generates reactive metabolites that further impair translation.[59][60]Both microcystins and cylindrospermopsin induce oxidative stress in hepatocytes, characterized by elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which damages mitochondria and triggers apoptosis through pathways involving caspase activation and DNA fragmentation.[61][62] This oxidative damage exacerbates phosphatase inhibition effects, promoting cell death and liver inflammation. In rodent models, acute exposure to microcystins via intravenous or intraperitoneal routes yields LD50 values of 50-100 μg/kg body weight in mice, manifesting as rapid hepatocyte necrosis.[30][63]Chronic low-dose exposure in rats promotes hepatic tumor formation, supporting the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classification of microcystin-LR as a possible humancarcinogen (Group 2B), based on evidence of preneoplastic lesion promotion.[26][64]Recent advances in synthetic chemistry have enabled the production of microcystin analogs, facilitating detailed mechanistic studies of phosphatase inhibition and hepatotoxicity without relying on natural isolates, as highlighted in reviews of cyanotoxin synthesis pathways up to 2023.[35] These analogs have been instrumental in elucidating structure-activity relationships, such as modifications to the Adda moiety that modulate binding potency and cellular uptake.
Neurotoxins
Cyanobacterial neurotoxins primarily target the nervous system, disrupting neurotransmission and leading to rapid onset of symptoms such as muscle paralysis, respiratory failure, and seizures. These toxins include anatoxin-a, saxitoxins, and β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), each with distinct molecular mechanisms that interfere with neural signaling. Unlike hepatotoxins that cause slower metabolic damage in the liver, neurotoxins induce acute neural disruption, often resulting in death within minutes to hours if exposure levels are high.[65]Anatoxin-a, a bicyclic alkaloid produced by genera such as Anabaena and Aphanizomenon, acts as a potent agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the neuromuscular junction, mimicking acetylcholine and causing persistent muscle depolarization. This leads to overstimulation followed by blockade of signal transmission, resulting in tremors, convulsions, loss of coordination, and ultimately respiratory paralysis due to diaphragmatic failure. The intraperitoneal LD50 for anatoxin-a in mice is approximately 250 μg/kg, highlighting its high acute toxicity. Binding occurs rapidly and competitively at cholinergic sites with high affinity, exacerbating the excitatory effects on the central and peripheral nervous systems.[37][65]Saxitoxins, a group of carbamate alkaloids synthesized by freshwater cyanobacteria like Anabaena and Aphanizomenon, bind to and block voltage-gated sodium channels in nerve and muscle cells, preventing sodium influx necessary for action potential generation. This inhibition halts nerve impulse propagation, causing progressive paralysis starting from peripheral muscles and leading to respiratory arrest and potential seizures in severe cases. Saxitoxins can transfer through aquatic food webs, accumulating in shellfish that filter-feed on toxin-producing cyanobacteria, posing risks via human consumption. The toxin exhibits high-affinity binding to sodium channels, with a dissociation constant (Kd) of approximately 10 nM, ensuring potent and reversible blockade at low concentrations.[65][66][67]BMAA, a non-proteinogenic amino acid generated by symbiotic cyanobacteria in plants like cycads and free-living species such as Nostoc, induces excitotoxicity by acting as a glutamate receptoragonist, particularly at NMDA receptors, leading to excessive calcium influx and neuronal damage. Additionally, BMAA is misincorporated into proteins in place of serine, causing misfolding, aggregation, and impaired cellular function, which contributes to chronic neurodegeneration. Acute exposure can trigger seizures and behavioral alterations, while long-term low-level exposure is associated with progressive neurological decline. Recent 2024 studies have strengthened links between BMAA exposure and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), demonstrating its role in TDP-43 and α-synuclein aggregation in neuronal models, as well as gene-environment interactions increasing ALS incidence risk.[65][68][69]
Dermatotoxins and Endotoxins
Dermatotoxins and endotoxins represent a class of cyanotoxins primarily responsible for inflammatory and irritant effects upon direct contact or inhalation during cyanobacterial blooms. Endotoxins, particularly lipopolysaccharides (LPS) embedded in the outer membranes of Gram-negative cyanobacteria, trigger immune responses by binding to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on immune cells, initiating signaling cascades that lead to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6).[70][71] This activation can escalate to a cytokine storm in severe cases, contributing to systemic inflammation.[72] High-exposure scenarios, such as ingestion or inhalation from bloom-contaminated water, may result in endotoxemia, characterized by elevated circulating LPS levels and fever-like symptoms.[72]Cyanobacterial LPS exhibits lower potency compared to neurotoxins and hepatotoxins, with median lethal doses (LD50) exceeding 100 mg/kg in animal models, reflecting its role more as an irritant than a direct cytotoxic agent.[72] Concentrations of LPS in bloom-affected waters vary with bloom density and environmental factors, particularly in dense accumulations of species like Microcystis aeruginosa.Dermatotoxins, such as aplysiatoxins produced by marine cyanobacteria including Lyngbya majuscula, exert their effects through activation of protein kinase C (PKC), a key enzyme in cell signaling pathways that promotes inflammation and epithelial disruption.[73] This PKC activation underlies tumor promotion in chronic exposures and acute skin blistering upon contact, as the toxins disrupt keratinocyte integrity and induce histamine release.[74] Structurally, aplysiatoxins are polyether lactones featuring a macrocyclic core with brominated aromatic rings, enabling their lipophilic interaction with cellular membranes.[75]Exposure to these dermatotoxins and endotoxins during blooms commonly manifests as contact dermatitis, with symptoms including redness, itching, and vesicular rashes on exposed skin; ocular and nasal irritation may also occur from aerosolized particles.[50] Chronic low-level exposures have been associated with heightened allergic responses, such as respiratory sensitization, in recent epidemiological studies monitoring bloom-prone areas.[76]
Health and Ecological Impacts
Effects on Humans
Humans can be exposed to cyanotoxins through multiple routes, including ingestion of contaminated drinking water, consumption of seafood such as fish and shellfish that bioaccumulate toxins, and recreational activities like swimming where dermal contact or inhalation of aerosolized water occurs.[77] Acute exposure primarily manifests as gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain, often linked to hepatotoxins like microcystins; neurotoxins such as anatoxins and saxitoxins can cause muscle weakness, tingling, numbness, and in severe cases, respiratory paralysis.[78] Dermal exposure may lead to skin rashes, itching, blisters, or conjunctivitis, while inhalation of cyanotoxin-laden aerosols can provoke respiratory irritation or hay fever-like symptoms. These effects typically resolve with supportive care, but high-dose exposures have resulted in hospitalization, particularly from liver enzyme elevation due to hepatotoxins.[79]Chronic exposure to cyanotoxins poses risks of long-term organ damage and disease. Microcystins, potent hepatotoxins, have been associated with liver cell damage and increased risk of hepatocarcinogenesis in epidemiological studies from regions with endemic exposure, such as parts of China where contaminated drinking water correlates with higher hepatocellular carcinoma rates.[80] Similarly, the neurotoxin β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), produced by certain cyanobacteria, has been linked to neurodegenerative disorders including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) through environmental correlations and detection in brain tissues of affected individuals.[81] These chronic effects stem from repeated low-level ingestion via water or food chains, potentially exacerbating oxidative stress and protein misfolding in vulnerable neural tissues.[82]Certain populations face heightened risks from cyanotoxin exposure due to physiological vulnerabilities. Children under six years old, pregnant and nursing women, the elderly, individuals with pre-existing liver conditions, and those undergoing dialysis treatment are particularly susceptible, as their higher water intake relative to body weight or impaired detoxification pathways amplify toxin impacts.[83] The World Health Organization recommends a provisional guideline value of 1 μg/L for microcystin-LR in drinking water to protect against both acute and chronic effects, a threshold adopted by many national standards.[64]Epidemiological data indicate a rising trend in cyanotoxin-related illnesses, with U.S. poison center reports showing a ten-fold increase in acute human poisonings since 1920, though underreporting likely underestimates the global burden.[84] Recent outbreaks, such as those in U.S. lakes from 2010 to 2022, have affected hundreds through recreational and drinking water exposure, leading to symptoms like gastrointestinal distress in exposed communities.[76] Economically, cyanotoxin events contribute to significant costs, including over $1 billion in the U.S. from 2010 to 2020 for prevention, treatment, and beach closures that disrupt tourism and recreation.[85] These impacts underscore the need for vigilant monitoring to mitigate public health risks.
Effects on Animals and Ecosystems
Cyanotoxins exert significant toxic effects on various animal species, leading to acute mortality and chronic health impairments. In livestock, exposure to cylindrospermopsin has caused fatal poisonings, as evidenced by an incident in northwest Queensland, Australia, where three cows and ten calves died after consuming water from a farm dam contaminated with the toxin-producing cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii.[86]Fish populations suffer from gill damage due to cyanotoxins, which disrupt osmoregulation and cause tissue necrosis, resulting in lethargy, respiratory distress, and mass die-offs during blooms.[87] Birds are particularly vulnerable to neurotoxins like anatoxin-a, which induces rapid paralysis and death; historical outbreaks in Denmark linked Anabaena blooms to multiple bird kills, with symptoms including staggering and respiratory failure.[88]Beyond direct toxicity, cyanotoxins disrupt ecosystems through bioaccumulation and trophic cascades. The neurotoxin β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) biomagnifies in food webs, accumulating at high concentrations in flying foxes (Pteropus mariannus) that feed on cycad seeds contaminated by cyanobacteria, reaching levels up to 3,556 μg/g in their tissues and posing risks to predators.[89] Eutrophication-driven blooms favor toxigenic cyanobacterial strains over non-toxic algae, shifting community structures in hypereutrophic lakes where low-to-moderate nitrogen doses promote the dominance of toxin-producers like Microcystis.[90] These proliferations exacerbate oxygen depletion, creating hypoxic dead zones as decomposing bloom biomass consumes dissolved oxygen, suffocating aquatic life and altering habitat suitability.[91]Recent studies highlight emerging impacts on amphibians from chronic cyanotoxin exposure. In 2024 research, low concentrations of microcystin-LR (as little as 0.5 μg/L) induced oxidative damage, inflammation, and histological changes in larval amphibians, potentially leading to developmental abnormalities and reduced survival rates, underscoring under-reported risks to amphibian populations.[92] Indirect ecological consequences include diminished fisheries productivity and heightened vulnerability of endangered species. Cyanotoxin blooms reduce fish yields by causing direct mortality and habitat degradation, leading to economic losses in recreational and commercial inland fisheries through decreased catch efficacy and population declines.[93] Endangered manatees (Trichechus manatus) in Florida face compounded threats from cyanobacterial proliferations in coastal lagoons, where toxins degrade seagrass beds essential for foraging and contribute to emaciation and mortality events linked to poor water quality.[94]
Detection and Management
Analytical Methods
Analytical methods for cyanotoxins encompass a range of laboratory and field techniques designed to detect and quantify these compounds in water, biota, and sediments, targeting major classes such as hepatotoxins (e.g., microcystins), neurotoxins (e.g., anatoxins), and others like cylindrospermopsins.[95]Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) serves as a primary screening tool, particularly for microcystins, offering rapid qualitative or semi-quantitative results with a sensitivity of approximately 0.1 μg/L due to its antibody-based detection of the ADDA moiety common to these toxins.[96] This method is cost-effective and suitable for high-throughput monitoring but requires confirmation for specificity, as it may cross-react with structurally similar variants.[95]For precise identification and quantification, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the gold standard confirmatory technique, enabling multi-toxin panels that simultaneously analyze diverse cyanotoxins with limits of detection (LOD) as low as 0.01 μg/L.[97] This approach separates congeners based on mass-to-charge ratios and fragmentation patterns, providing structural confirmation essential for regulatory compliance. Biosensors, including electrochemical and optical variants, facilitate rapid field testing by integrating biorecognition elements like antibodies or aptamers with transducers, yielding results in minutes without extensive sample preparation.[98]Sampling protocols emphasize integrated water column collections to capture vertical toxin gradients, often using depth-integrated samplers or multiple discrete depths during blooms to represent average concentrations.[99] Distinguishing intracellular toxins from extracellular forms involves filtration or centrifugation, while cell counts via microscopy complement direct toxin measurements; quantitative PCR (qPCR) detects toxin-encoding genes (e.g., mcyE for microcystins) to assess potential production risks, though gene presence does not always correlate with actual toxin levels.[100]Standardized protocols include EPA Method 545, which employs LC-MS/MS for quantifying cylindrospermopsins and anatoxins in drinking water with method detection limits around 0.07 μg/L for cylindrospermopsin.[101] For beta-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), a neurotoxin, advancements through 2024 incorporate automated amino acid analysis-high-performance liquid chromatography (AAA-HPLC) with fluorescence detection for enantiomer separation, as well as DNA aptamer-based biosensors for improved specificity in complex matrices like cyanobacterial extracts.[102][103]Key challenges in cyanotoxin analysis arise from congener variability, with over 300 microcystin variants requiring broad-spectrum methods to avoid underestimation, and matrix effects in biota or sediments that suppress ionization in LC-MS/MS, necessitating matrix-matched calibration or solid-phase extraction.[104][105] These issues underscore the need for method validation across diverse environmental samples to ensure accuracy.
Mitigation and Regulation
Mitigation and regulation of cyanotoxins focus on preventing exposure through source water management, water treatment processes, and establishing enforceable or advisory limits to protect public health, particularly in drinking water supplies. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides guideline values for cyanotoxins in drinking water to minimize risks from chronic exposure, with a provisional guideline of 1 μg/L for microcystin-LR, based on its potential as a liver carcinogen.[106] In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issues non-enforceable Health Advisories (HAs) under the Safe Drinking Water Act for unregulated contaminants like cyanotoxins, recommending levels such as 0.3 μg/L for microcystins (10-day HA for bottle-fed infants), 1.6 μg/L for school-age children and adults, and 0.7 μg/L for cylindrospermopsin (10-day HA for children). EPA has not established a numerical HA for anatoxin-a, though a Health Effects Support Document exists.[107] Some U.S. states, such as Oregon, have adopted regulations requiring routine testing and treatment for microcystins and cylindrospermopsin in surface water sources vulnerable to harmful algal blooms (HABs), with action levels aligned to EPA HAs.[108]Regulatory approaches emphasize monitoring and public notification to manage risks during HAB events. The EPA recommends that public water systems develop Cyanotoxin Management Plans, including routine source water monitoring for cyanobacteria cell counts and toxin levels, with immediate action if concentrations exceed HA levels, such as switching to alternative sources or enhanced treatment.[109] Internationally, the WHO advocates for a multi-barrier approach in water safety plans, integrating cyanotoxin guidelines with broader microbial and chemical standards to address sporadic blooms driven by nutrient pollution.[106] While no federal Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) exist for cyanotoxins in the U.S. as of 2025, the EPA's Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) prioritizes them; notably, in January 2025, EPA announced a preliminary regulatory determination not to regulate cylindrospermopsin from CCL 5, with ongoing research into long-term health effects.[110][111]Mitigation strategies begin with source water protection to reduce cyanobacterial growth, including nutrient management plans that limit phosphorus and nitrogen inputs from agriculture and wastewater, as these are primary bloom triggers.[112] In water treatment, conventional processes like coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration can remove up to 90% of extracellular cyanotoxins when optimized, but intracellular toxins require careful handling to avoid cell lysis during pre-oxidation.[112] Advanced methods, such as granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption, achieve over 95% removal of microcystins, while ozone or potassium permanganate oxidation effectively degrades many cyanotoxins without forming harmful byproducts when dosed appropriately.[113] Membrane filtration, including ultrafiltration, provides an additional barrier by rejecting toxin-laden cells, though it must be combined with disinfection to ensure microbial safety.[114] During blooms, utilities are advised to lower treatment plant flow rates and use polymer aids to enhance particle removal, minimizing breakthrough risks.[115]