Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Digital Audio Tape

Digital Audio Tape (DAT), also known as R-DAT, is a digital audio cassette format developed by that employs helical-scan recording technology on small cartridges similar in size to compact cassettes but capable of storing high-fidelity data. Introduced in 1987 with the DTC-1000ES recorder, DAT supported standard recording at 48 kHz sampling rate and 16-bit depth, delivering sound quality comparable to compact discs while enabling longer play times through efficient data compression and variable-speed modes. Despite its technical advantages for professional applications such as studio mastering and archival preservation, widespread consumer adoption was curtailed by industry-imposed requirements, particularly the Serial Copy Management System (SCMS), which permitted only first-generation digital copies to mitigate concerns over unlimited perfect duplication of copyrighted material. This regulatory friction, combined with the contemporaneous dominance of optical media like and the eventual shift to computer-based workflows, confined DAT primarily to professional environments and contributed to its obsolescence by the early 2000s.

History

Development and Early Prototypes

Sony initiated research into digital audio recording in the late 1970s, adapting (PCM) techniques to video tape recorders for high-fidelity storage without analog degradation such as tape hiss, wow and flutter, or generational loss. This built on earlier PCM processors like the 1977 PCM-1, which converted analog audio to digital for recording on consumer video decks, achieving compact digital archiving superior to open-reel analog tapes in (over 90 ) and (up to 20 kHz). The motivation stemmed from analog formats' inherent limitations, including signal-to-noise ratios below 70 on compact cassettes and vulnerability to physical wear, prompting a shift to bit-exact digital replication for professional and consumer use. ![Sony PCM-7030 digital audio processor][float-right] By the early 1980s, focused on a dedicated format, developing (DAT) prototypes that employed helical-scan technology derived from video recorders, featuring a rotating with multiple heads to achieve high linear speeds and data densities on narrow 3.81 mm . This mechanism, refined from and systems, enabled rotary head scanning at angles across the , supporting sampling rates of 48 kHz and 16-bit resolution for CD-quality audio while minimizing track crosstalk through precise servo control. Prototypes emphasized engineering goals of lossless storage, with error correction via Reed-Solomon codes to ensure durability against dropouts, far exceeding analog cassettes' susceptibility to magnetic print-through and oxide shedding. Sony led the technical prototyping, integrating subcode tracks for indexing and copy management precursors, while collaborating loosely with industry partners on digital standards but retaining dominance in DAT's core specifications. Standardization efforts culminated in International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) adoption around 1987, formalizing DAT's parameters despite competing proposals, as Sony's prototypes demonstrated superior fidelity and compactness over linear digital alternatives like .

Influences from Predecessor Formats

The Digital Audio Tape (DAT) format emerged as a response to the persistent limitations of analog technologies, notably the Compact Cassette introduced in 1963, which exhibited inherent issues such as tape hiss from magnetic saturation and bias requirements, speed variations causing wow and flutter (typically 0.1-0.2% in consumer decks), and degradation of 3-6 dB per generation during copying. These analog shortcomings, rooted in mechanical transport inconsistencies and electromagnetic noise accumulation, underscored the need for a digital alternative capable of exact replication without fidelity loss, influencing DAT's adoption of (PCM) to quantize audio signals into streams for error-resistant storage. Early digital audio experimentation further shaped DAT's architecture, drawing from PCM adaptor systems like Sony's 1976 VCR-PCM processor combination, which encoded 44.1 kHz, 16-bit audio onto helical-scan videotape for professional mastering, and the portable Sony PCM-F1 released in 1981, which facilitated consumer-accessible digital recording on Betamax or VHS media with adaptive delta modulation for bandwidth efficiency. These precursors demonstrated the viability of digital audio on rotating-head tape mechanisms, directly informing DAT's helical-scan design using 4 mm tape width and a drum with two heads rotating at 2,000 rpm to achieve high linear tape speeds equivalent to 8.5-16.7 m/s for data rates up to 96 kHz sampling. Pioneering efforts such as Soundstream's 1975 system, which produced the first commercial 16-bit PCM recordings for classical music releases like the 1976 Telarc LP of Tchailkovsky's 1812 Overture, validated digital's superiority in dynamic range (over 90 dB) and absence of tape saturation, though its custom instrumentation tape format highlighted the demand for more compact, standardized consumer solutions. In parallel, the (CD), jointly developed by and and commercially launched in 1982, established PCM standards at 44.1 kHz/16-bit for optical playback but remained strictly read-only, prioritizing mass-replicated distribution over editable recording and lacking DAT's provisions for variable-speed or higher-resolution modes like 48 kHz for broadcast. This distinction positioned DAT as an evolution beyond CD's playback focus, inheriting PCM encoding while integrating tape's for archival and multi-generation workflows favored by audio engineers, thereby bridging analog tape's usability with digital precision.

Commercial Introduction and Initial Adoption

The first commercial Digital Audio Tape (DAT) recorders were introduced in Japan on March 2, 1987, led by Sony's DTC-1000ES model, which retailed for between $1,300 and $1,600 USD. These units quickly faced high demand, resulting in back-orders despite the premium pricing, as they offered compact with audio fidelity matching compact discs (CDs). DAT cassettes, resembling scaled-down compact cassettes, provided standard capacities of up to 120 minutes in standard play mode, appealing to early adopters seeking lossless digital backups of analog sources or CD dubs. By 1988, DAT recorders had expanded to European markets, where they gained traction among engineers and broadcasters for their reliability in mastering and archival applications. Initial reviews highlighted the format's superior noise-free reproduction and editing precision, positioning it as a bridge between analog tape and emerging digital workflows prior to CD's market dominance. Professional studios adopted DAT for two-track mixdowns as early as the late 1980s, valuing its helical-scan mechanism for stable, high-density storage without generational loss. In contrast, the U.S. market rollout was postponed until 1990 due to regulatory pressures from the (RIAA), which lobbied over concerns of perfect digital copying eroding music revenues, mandating features like Serial Copy Management System (SCMS) for consumer devices. This delay limited early transatlantic adoption, though professional sectors in began integrating DAT for pre-CD era mastering, citing its empirical advantages in and over analog formats.

Technical Specifications

Recording Technology and Mechanism

Digital Audio Tape (DAT) employs a helical-scan recording system, adapted from video cassette recorder technology, in which data is written diagonally across the tape using rotating heads on a cylindrical drum. This method contrasts with linear analog recording by enabling higher data densities through increased head-to-tape relative velocity and finer track spacing, while minimizing tape transport speed to reduce wear. The 3.81 mm wide tape, typically featuring a thin magnetic layer of metal evaporated or high-coercivity particulate material such as barium ferrite in dual-layer coatings, supports reliable high-density digital storage. The tape wraps around the drum at a 90-degree , with the —approximately 30 mm in —rotating at 2000 . Two or more heads, mounted 180 degrees apart on the upper drum, scan the moving tape in the opposite direction, laying down slanted tracks at an of about 6 degrees and a of 13.6 micrometers. This configuration achieves an effective recording speed far exceeding the linear tape velocity of roughly 8.15 mm/s, allowing dense packing of digital bits without excessive mechanical stress. Servo mechanisms, utilizing control tracks and phase-locked loops, ensure precise synchronization of drum rotation, capstan speed, and head alignment to prevent tracking errors during playback. To combat errors from media defects, dropouts, or misalignment—common in magnetic recording—DAT incorporates Reed-Solomon error-correcting codes with interleaving, distributing data across multiple frames to handle burst errors effectively. This scheme corrects symbol errors in blocks, yielding post-correction bit error rates low enough (typically below 10^{-12} in ideal conditions) for transparent digital audio reproduction, far surpassing analog formats' susceptibility to noise accumulation. The interleaved coding, akin to but distinct from CIRC, interleaves inner and outer parity checks for robust recovery.

Audio Sampling and Data Rates

Digital Audio Tape utilizes to encode audio signals digitally, adhering to standards that support sampling rates of 32 kHz at 12-bit depth, or 32 kHz, 44.1 kHz, and 48 kHz at 16-bit depth for two-channel recording. These rates align with or surpass parameters (44.1 kHz/16-bit), enabling capture of frequencies up to approximately 20-24 kHz while providing a theoretical of about 96 dB at 16-bit resolution. The raw for standard 48 kHz/16-bit audio calculates to 1.536 Mbps (48,000 samples/second × 16 bits/sample × 2 channels), though the format incorporates cross-interleaved Reed-Solomon coding for correction, subcode , and optional timecode, elevating the effective channel rate.
ModeSampling RateBit DepthChannelsTypical Use Case
Long-play32 kHz12-bit2Extended recording time
Standard stereo44.1/48 kHz16-bit2High-fidelity consumer/pro
Multi-track32 kHz12-bit4Professional editing
Professional DAT implementations extend to four-channel modes at 32 kHz/12-bit for multitrack applications, alongside variable-speed shuttle modes (up to 8× normal speed in some devices) to support precise editing without analog-like pitch artifacts. Measured performance includes dynamic ranges exceeding 90 dB (often 92-96 dB in playback) and total harmonic distortion under 0.005%, outperforming analog cassette formats (typically 60-70 dB dynamic range with cumulative noise) by avoiding generation loss, wow/flutter, and hiss accumulation in playback chains. This digital fidelity ensures consistent reproduction limited primarily by quantization noise rather than tape saturation or bias errors. DAT's causal advantages over analog include bit-perfect intra-tape absent copy-restriction flags, preventing signal across duplicates, though physical durability caps overwrites at dozens to hundreds of passes due to helical-scan head- and , beyond which dropout errors rise. Empirical tests confirm no audible artifacts in successive digital transfers until mechanical failure, contrasting analog's drop per .

Hardware Features and Compatibility

Digital Audio Tape (DAT) hardware utilized rotary-head helical scanning technology with a tape speed of 8.15 mm/s for recordable cassettes, enabling high-density digital storage on small cartridges measuring approximately 73 mm × 54 mm × 10.5 mm. Cartridges contained metal-evaporated or metal-particle tape, typically ranging from 60 to 120 minutes in length at standard speed, though lengths up to 180 minutes were available but prone to issues like tape breakage due to thinner media. Consumer DAT decks featured digital inputs and outputs via RCA connectors for uncompressed PCM transfer, alongside analog RCA inputs for hybrid operation, with automatic tracking via servo mechanisms to maintain head alignment during playback. Professional models, such as the PCM-7030, incorporated balanced XLR connectors for analog audio, AES/EBU digital interfaces, and support for synchronization in studio environments, facilitating precise editing and multi-track integration. These pro units often included options for longitudinal timecode tracks, enhancing compatibility with video and broadcast workflows, but required careful calibration to avoid dropout errors from head wear or contamination, unlike the error-resistant optical discs. Portable DAT recorders, weighing around 1-1.4 kg including batteries, supported operation on rechargeable nickel-hydrogen packs or cells, with power consumption typically 4-7 during recording, enabling 2-4 hours of field use but demanding regular maintenance for transport mechanisms. was limited; standard decks handled tapes up to 120 minutes reliably, but non-standard longer or thinner tapes risked tension issues and servo errors, while pre-recorded DATs at 12.225 mm/s speeds were incompatible with recordable formats without speed adjustment.

Applications and Uses

Professional Recording and Mastering

Digital Audio Tape (DAT) gained significant traction in professional recording studios from the late onward, prized for its high-resolution digital capture that delivered a noise floor approaching theoretical limits—typically exceeding 90 signal-to-noise ratio in standard modes—far surpassing analog tape's practical limits of 60-70 due to inherent hiss and saturation effects. This made DAT ideal for location recording, where portability combined with lossless fidelity preserved transient details without the generational degradation of analog multitrack dubbing, enabling cleaner overdubs and mixes. In mastering workflows, DAT served as a stable intermediate format for pre-mastering and final delivery to CD replication plants, supporting direct digital transfers via interfaces like AES/EBU, which bypassed additional analog stages and reduced cumulative errors such as phase shifts or low-level distortion. Studios integrated DAT with early workstations (DAWs) for track-based , leveraging subcode markers for precise cueing and splicing, a marked over analog's destructive editing processes. Compared to analog multitrack, DAT's fixed sampling at 48 kHz (with optional higher rates in professional variants) incorporated filters that minimized foldback , while its nature eliminated instabilities like and flutter, though it introduced potential sensitivity mitigated by professional-grade clocking. Empirical tests in the confirmed DAT's superior preservation of high-frequency content and , with no print-through artifacts, making it a staple for archival-grade captures in broadcast and label environments. By the early 2000s, DAT's role diminished as hard-disk recording systems proliferated, offering random-access editing, unlimited undo capabilities, and scalability without tape logistics; adoption surveys indicated a sharp decline post-2000, with and similar DAWs rendering linear tape obsolete for most studio tasks.

Consumer and Amateur Recording

Digital Audio Tape (DAT) decks for consumer use, introduced in the late 1980s, were marketed primarily to audiophiles and enthusiasts for applications such as capturing live bootlegs and producing tapes. However, high equipment costs, typically ranging from $1,200 to $1,500 for models like those from Technics in 1990, restricted widespread adoption among average households. These prices positioned DAT as a premium format, appealing mainly to dedicated users rather than the mass market, with consumer sales remaining a small fraction of overall DAT deck shipments dominated by professional purchases. Consumer DAT recorders incorporated features enhancing usability for amateur recording, including subcode channels for embedding track identification and , as well as built-in sampling rate conversion between 44.1 kHz (for compatibility) and 48 kHz (for alignment). These capabilities allowed home users to record from diverse sources without additional , supporting modes from 32 kHz at 12 bits up to 48 kHz at 16 bits for varied quality needs. While some listeners perceived DAT's digital reproduction as "clinical" compared to the perceived warmth of analog tape, objective measurements demonstrated DAT's superiority in , dynamic range exceeding 90 , and flat up to 20 kHz, free from analog hiss and wow-and-flutter. Pre-recorded DAT releases saw minimal consumer uptake, with limited titles like Sony's initial classical offerings priced at $19.95 each in , compounded by expensive blank tapes costing several dollars per cassette and the absence of affordable, ubiquitous playback devices. This scarcity reinforced DAT's niche role in home archiving and rather than everyday playback, as users favored more accessible formats like compact cassettes or for prerecorded music.

Computer Data Storage

Digital Data Storage (DDS) represents an adaptation of DAT technology for non-audio computer data applications, primarily backups and archiving, developed collaboratively by and in 1989. This format repurposed the helical-scan recording mechanism of DAT cassettes into a reliable, compact medium for enterprise and small-system , interfacing via controllers to host computers. The inaugural DDS-1 specification supported 1.3 uncompressed (2.6 compressed at 2:1 ratio) on 60-meter cartridges or 2 uncompressed (4 compressed) on 90-meter cartridges, with transfer rates around 183 kB/s native and average access times of 20 seconds enabled by fast-search capabilities. These drives connected through SCSI-1 interfaces, facilitating integration with Unix workstations, servers, and early PCs for automated backup operations. DDS's appeal in enterprise archiving stemmed from its cost-effectiveness per —far lower than contemporaneous hard drives—and inherent offline storage advantages, such as immunity to online threats like and reduced risk of catastrophic from disk array failures. Evolving generations extended capacities progressively: DDS-2 to 4 uncompressed (8 compressed), DDS-3 to 12 uncompressed (24 compressed), and up to DDS-5 (DAT 72) with 36 native (72 compressed). Despite these strengths, DDS formats exhibited limitations inherent to magnetic tape, including sequential access patterns that rendered random data retrieval significantly slower than random-access hard disk drives—often by orders of magnitude for non-linear operations. Additionally, tape media faced risks of signal degradation over extended periods (decades) without stable temperature and humidity control, potentially leading to bit errors or complete data inaccessibility if exposed to environmental stressors. These factors positioned DDS as a complementary rather than replacement technology for , excelling in write-once archival scenarios but less suited for frequent, high-speed access needs.

Pre-Recorded DAT Releases

Pre-recorded Digital Audio Tape () releases were extremely limited, with major labels such as producing only a small number of titles between 1987 and the early , primarily targeted at professional and markets in and select . reluctance stemmed from fears of widespread copying, leading record companies to withhold broad support for consumer pre-recorded software despite DAT's technical capabilities matching quality at 44.1 kHz/16-bit resolution. By the late , announcements from majors indicated no firm plans for , resulting in fewer than a few dozen commercial cassettes overall, far short of the thousands available on competing formats like compact discs. The available titles focused predominantly on classical and genres, appealing to niche audiences valuing DAT's potential for high-fidelity playback without analog degradation, though this offered little practical advantage over for unaltered playback. Examples include samplers and GRP jazz releases, often priced comparably to premium at around $15–$20, but hampered by the scarcity of compatible consumer players, which remained expensive and professionally oriented. Sales were negligible, as CD adoption surged with ubiquitous hardware and lower media costs, rendering pre-recorded DAT economically unviable despite parity in audio fidelity. Ultimately, the failure of pre-recorded to gain traction—representing less than 1% of audio media sales by the mid-1990s—shifted emphasis to blank tapes for custom recording among enthusiasts and studios, where DAT's editing and multitrack features provided unique value absent in replicated discs. This pivot underscored the format's niche role, as pre-recorded versions could not justify premiums over optical alternatives amid player shortages and industry copy-protection disputes.

Controversies and Opposition

Music Industry Lobbying Against DAT

The (RIAA) initiated aggressive lobbying efforts against Digital Audio Tape (DAT) in the following its commercial launch in in March 1987. RIAA president Jay Berman testified before a House subcommittee in May 1987, warning that DAT recorders would enable consumers to make unlimited perfect digital copies of prerecorded music from or broadcasts, rendering purchases of original recordings obsolete after acquiring a single deck and blank tapes. The association threatened legal action, including lawsuits for contributory , against any companies importing, manufacturing, or distributing DAT equipment, which stalled consumer-market introductions and confined early US availability to professional sectors. To bolster its case, the RIAA cited a 1983 internal study estimating $3.8 billion in annual US revenue losses from analog home taping onto cassettes, portraying DAT as an amplified piracy vector that would exacerbate such harms. However, the study's methodology drew scrutiny for relying on survey respondents' speculative assertions about whether they "would have" purchased taped albums, rather than observable market behaviors or econometric evidence of displaced sales. Industry advocates pushed for legislative remedies, including royalties or excise taxes on blank DAT media and recorders to fund artist compensation, while equating consumer copying with theft despite the absence of similar mandates during the cassette era's dominance. Opposition was publicly framed as a safeguard for musicians' incomes against technological obsolescence of paid content. These tactics disregarded historical precedents, as widespread analog cassette duplication in the and did not precipitate revenue collapse; recorded music shipments grew from roughly $2.3 billion in 1980 to $7.7 billion by 1990, propelled by the transition and expanded consumer access. Empirical patterns indicated that format innovations often stimulated demand through improved quality and portability, yet RIAA projections emphasized catastrophe from digital fidelity, prioritizing short-term sales preservation over broader market expansion. The , conducted via congressional testimony and direct pressure on manufacturers, exemplified efforts to preemptively constrain tools based on unverified causal assumptions about copying's net economic impact.

Copy Protection Debates and SCMS Implementation

The Serial Copy Management System (SCMS) was adopted by DAT manufacturers in a agreement to facilitate entry into the U.S. market, embedding copy status bits in the stream to permit one generation of digital-to-digital copying from an original source while blocking subsequent digital copies from that first-generation duplicate. This hardware-enforced mechanism was later mandated for consumer digital audio recorders under the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, which required compliance to shield manufacturers from infringement lawsuits. SCMS operated by transmitting three-bit codes indicating copy permission: originals allowed unlimited copies, first copies allowed none further, and analog-derived sources allowed one copy. Debates surrounding SCMS centered on its adequacy as a piracy deterrent, with proponents, including the , asserting that unrestricted digital copying would equate directly to lost by enabling perfect, infinite reproductions. However, this premise overlooked empirical patterns from the analog home taping era, where cassette duplication proliferated alongside record industry growth—such as the sector's best year in 1978 despite widespread taping—and where tapers proved to be high-volume purchasers whose sharing expanded audience reach and conversions to legitimate buys. Critics contended that SCMS represented a causal in assuming all copies displaced , ignoring how via personal copies often stimulated rather than supplanted it. SCMS's technical flaws further undermined its effectiveness, as it exclusively restricted serial digital copying and left analog dubbing unaffected, allowing high-fidelity duplicates via digital-to-analog conversion followed by re-digitization on non-SCMS professional gear or consumer workarounds like computer sound cards. Devices ignoring or stripping SCMS bits emerged, and the system's reliance on compliant failed against multi-generation schemes through analog intermediaries, rendering it porous to determined duplication without addressing incentives for . The embedded requirement also imposed added manufacturing complexity on DAT decks, contributing to elevated costs that burdened consumers and proscribed simpler, cheaper designs, all while not halting unauthorized copies through alternative paths.

Economic and Innovation Impacts

The delay in the United States market entry for Digital Audio Tape (DAT) recorders until late 1990, amid lobbying by the (RIAA) against unrestricted digital copying, allowed competitors like Sony's (introduced in 1992) and technology to capture emerging consumer digital recording demand. DAT's high initial pricing, exceeding $1,000 per unit, compounded this disadvantage in a market where analog cassettes had sold billions of units globally by the late , while compact discs approached similar volumes. In contrast, DAT's total global shipments remained under 2 million units lifetime, reflecting stifled consumer penetration rather than inherent technical flaws. The imposition of Serial Copy Management System (SCMS) via industry agreements and the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act further eroded DAT's viability by restricting serial digital copying, which diminished its appeal for home users seeking unlimited backups from —a core promised utility. This regulatory burden correlated with sluggish adoption, as evidenced by the format's confinement to professional studios where copy restrictions mattered less, while consumer alternatives proliferated without equivalent mandates initially. Market data indicate DAT recorder shipments declined sharply post-SCMS implementation, benefiting established optical media incumbents by preserving revenue models centered on prerecorded sales over editable digital formats. Opposition-driven constraints arguably chilled innovation in magnetic digital storage, redirecting manufacturer resources toward compressed optical rivals like , which embedded encoding to deter without hardware flags, and , which evaded early scrutiny. This shift retarded advancements in high-capacity, rewritable helical-scan technologies that could have bridged professional and consumer needs more efficiently than nascent optical writables. Proponents of unrestricted markets contend that without SCMS-like interventions, competitive pricing, bundling, or voluntary —rather than mandated hardware—would have curbed excessive through consumer preference for lossless quality and convenience, fostering broader evolution. Empirical outcomes, with DAT's niche legacy versus the trillions of subsequent digital streams and burns, underscore how prioritized short-term label revenues over long-term format dynamism.

Decline and Legacy

Factors Leading to Commercial Failure

The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 required manufacturers and importers of digital audio recording devices to pay royalties of 2% of the transfer price (with a minimum of $1 per device) and 3% for digital recording media, which raised the retail costs of DAT equipment and tapes at a time when compact disc prices were declining due to increased production and market saturation. These added expenses, combined with mandatory Serial Copy Management System (SCMS) restrictions on unrestricted copying, deterred widespread consumer adoption by making DAT less competitively priced against analog cassettes and emerging optical formats. In the mid-1990s, the introduction and rapid proliferation of technology provided a more accessible alternative for recording, with blank CD-R discs costing under $1 each by 1997 and offering playback, optical durability, and compatibility with existing CD players—advantages over DAT's sequential mechanism, which required rewinding for track navigation and was prone to dropouts from defects or head-tape contact issues. DAT's helical-scan design, while efficient for linear recording, suffered from reliability concerns including signal loss due to surface imperfections and mechanical sensitivities in consumer-grade decks, further limiting appeal to non-professional users. By the late , DAT production began to contract as consumer demand remained negligible, with major manufacturers shifting focus to optical and file-based media; , the format's originator, halted production of consumer DAT recorders in 2005 after failing to achieve significant beyond niche applications. This decline reflected DAT's inability to capture more than a fractional portion of the market, overshadowed by cheaper, more versatile competitors amid falling prices for CD burners and the onset of compression technologies.

Comparison with Alternative Formats

Digital Audio Tape (DAT) offered uncompressed pulse-code modulation (PCM) audio at sampling rates of 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz and 16-bit depth, providing fidelity equivalent to or exceeding compact discs (CDs), whereas Digital Compact Cassette (DCC), introduced by Philips in 1992, relied on MPEG-1 Layer I compression, resulting in potential audio artifacts despite achieving near-CD quality in practice. DAT's rotary-head mechanism enabled higher linear tape speeds for improved signal-to-noise ratios without an analog stage, delivering purer digital reproduction compared to DCC's stationary-head design, which incorporated backward compatibility with analog cassettes via a magnetic track. However, DCC's compatibility fostered niche loyalty among cassette users, while DAT's lack of such interoperability limited consumer appeal; both formats ultimately succumbed to optical media's random access and durability advantages. In comparison to (MD), launched by in 1992, DAT maintained superior audio fidelity due to its uncompressed storage, avoiding the lossy compression employed by MD, which reduced data rates to fit 74 minutes on a 2.5-inch magneto-optical disc and introduced perceptible degradation under critical listening. MD's strengths included compact size, editability through track splitting and seamless , and shock-resistant buffering for portable use, making it more suitable for casual consumers despite DAT's capacity for up to in standard mode and professional-grade linearity. DAT's sequential tape access hindered quick navigation, contrasting MD's disc-based , though DAT's higher density allowed for extended recording times in lower-speed modes without quality loss equivalent to MD's . Relative to , which proliferated in the mid-1990s via affordable drives, DAT provided greater storage density—up to 2 hours per cassette versus 74 minutes per 650-700 MB disc—and suitability for linear backups in workflows, but suffered from mechanical wear on tape and heads during repeated playbacks. CD-R's optical nature ensured non-contact reading for longevity and for efficient editing, outpacing DAT's sequential retrieval, while plummeting CD-R media costs and drive ubiquity rendered DAT's specialized hardware economically unviable for widespread adoption. DAT's digital purity remained unmatched for archival fidelity, yet its tape-based mechanics and market timing amid optical dominance precluded competitiveness against CD-R's versatility in both audio and data applications.

Modern Archival and Niche Uses

In contemporary archival practices, Digital Audio Tape () serves niche roles primarily through the preservation and migration of pre-existing recordings to stable digital formats, rather than as a medium for new captures. Institutions and specialized services employ legacy DAT decks to transfer masters—often recorded at 16-bit/48 kHz—from the format's peak era, converting them to archival standards like () to mitigate risks of obsolescence and signal loss. The Smithsonian Institution's guidelines emphasize systematic cleaning of playback equipment and error-checked to preserve sonic fidelity, underscoring DAT's utility for safeguarding irreplaceable cultural artifacts despite the format's discontinuation. DAT's magnetic media demonstrates under optimal conditions (e.g., temperatures below 20°C and under 50%), with tapes from the late remaining playable in professional restoration workflows as of the 2020s, provided they avoid environmental stressors like -induced binder . This , empirically validated through transfer success rates in archival projects, positions DAT as a transitional bridge for audio , though migration to solid-state or cloud-based storage is standard to extend accessibility beyond the medium's projected 20-30 year physical lifespan. Related Digital Data Storage (DDS) variants, adapted from DAT technology, endure in limited legacy IT contexts for retrieving archived backups from pre-2000s systems, valued for their compact density (up to 80 GB per cartridge in later generations). However, DDS has been supplanted by Linear Tape-Open (LTO) for modern bulk data needs due to LTO's superior capacity (e.g., 18 TB native in LTO-9) and lower cost per gigabyte. No broad consumer resurgence mirrors analog cassette revivals; blank DAT production halted in 2015, with applications confined to dwindling stockpiles in audio engineering and data recovery firms.

References

  1. [1]
    Chapter10 Studio Recorders Go Digital - Sony History
    In 1987, Sony introduced a superb sound quality recording system, DAT (Digital Audio Tape). The sound quality of a DAT equals a CD. Based on DAT technology ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Digital Audio Tapes: Their Preservation and Conversion
    Developed by Sony in 1987, DATs were quite popular in recording studios and were one of the first digital recording systems to become employed in archives in ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992
    Although some commentators have argued that the SCMS is a more viable copyright protection device than royalties, 27 this. Comment limits its discussion to the ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Digital Audio Recording Technology: Challenges to American ...
    Dec 10, 2022 · The inception of digital audio recording technology ("DAT") raises new challenges for American copyright law. A significant copyright issue ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] A Statute Bytes the Dust in Recording Industry Ass'n of America v ...
    In particular, Digital Audio Tapes. ("DAT") had the potential to erase the technological barriers that had protected copyright owners from the threat of serial ...
  6. [6]
    Sony History Chapter7 Making Digital Audio a Reality
    Nakajima was one of the first to actually produce digital sound. He achieved this by sampling sound waves at defined intervals.Missing: 1979 1980 1981
  7. [7]
    The Extraordinary Evolution of Sony Digital Audio Processors
    Aug 18, 2024 · The PCM-1600, introduced in 1979, used U-matic video tape recorders to store digital audio data, providing unmatched precision and sound quality ...
  8. [8]
    History of the Brilliant Digital Audio Tape (DAT) Format
    Mar 7, 2024 · Digital Audio Tape (DAT or R-DAT) emerged as a digital audio recording and playback format by Sony, in 1987. Resembling a Compact Cassette in appearance.Dat Recorder Technology · Sony Pcm-1630 Processor · Recorders
  9. [9]
    Sony DAT: A Complete History of the Format
    Apr 3, 2025 · Sony launched the Digital Audio Tape (DAT) in 1987, envisioning it as the successor to the aging compact cassette format.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  10. [10]
    Q. Are wow and flutter key to that analogue tape sound?
    I have come to the conclusion that wow and flutter are a lot more important in the sound of tape and analogue recordings than they are usually given credit for.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Sony PCM F1 Digital Audio Converter | Stereophile.com
    Jun 9, 2021 · The quick and flippant answer to that is: Unbelievably Well (see Sidebar 1). Better than any analog recording including direct-to disc.
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    COMPARING DATS AND CDS - Deseret News
    Jun 19, 1988 · The biggest difference between CD and DAT right now is that DAT is a medium for recording and playback, while CD is playback-only. If a system ...
  14. [14]
    DAT RECORDER DEBATE ERUPTS - Los Angeles Times
    Jun 22, 1987 · Even at prices ranging from $1,300 to $1,600 apiece, DAT recorders are already back-ordered in Japan, where they first went on sale March 2. But ...
  15. [15]
    Digital Machine May Be Obsolete by Time It Arrives : Marantz's New ...
    Dec 6, 1988 · Also, these machines only play back prerecorded tapes; they do not record. DAT recorders are on sale in Japan and Europe, where a model can cost ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Digital audio tape machines will soon be sold in US, despite some ...
    Jan 19, 1988 · Ford Motor Company has announced plans to offer DAT players in some 1988 ... DAT recorder sold include an anti-taping chip. In the spring of 1987 ...Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption
  18. [18]
    The challenge of introducing digital audio tape technology into ...
    Extensive lobbying in the US Congress has significantly delayed DAT's introduction into the United States, and the equipment is still not widely available to ...
  19. [19]
    Digital Audio Tape (DAT) transfer to WAV, mp3 or audio cd.
    The technology of DAT is closely based on that of video recorders, using a rotating head and helical scan to record data (hence DAT is sometimes called R-DAT or ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  20. [20]
    [PDF] DAT - Pro Sony
    Sony DAT72 &. DAT160 are incredibly small, reliable and affordable and feature super thin dual magnetic layer and Helical Scan technology to achieve data ...
  21. [21]
    5.5.5 Common Systems and Characteristics: Cassette Systems
    DAT or R-DAT, Timecode is not part of the R-DAT standard but may be implemented in Sub-Code. Some pre-recorded DATS use ME tape, Cassette with 3.81mm metal ...
  22. [22]
    DAT Tape Storage - Pctechguide.com
    The cylinder head is tilted slightly in relation to the tape, and spins at 2,000rpm. The tape moves in the opposite direction to the cylindrical spin, at less ...
  23. [23]
    Sony PCM-7040 Digital Audio Tape Recorder - Vintage Digital
    Recording System: Rotary-head DAT recording · Tape Speed: 8.15 mm/s · Recording Time: 124 minutes (with Sony PDP-124) · Scanner Rotation Speed: 2000 rpm (standard ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    What is DAT in Computing? (Digital Audio Tape) - 60sec.site
    Feb 17, 2024 · The format uses a powerful error detection and correction scheme, known as Cross Interleaved Reed-Solomon Code (CIRC). CIRC ensures that any ...Missing: method | Show results with:method
  25. [25]
    Digital Audio Tape - InSync - Sweetwater
    Nov 26, 2004 · The DAT standard allows for four sampling modes: 32kHz at 12 bits, and 32kHz, 44.1kHz or 48 kHz at 16 bits. Certain recorders operate outside ...
  26. [26]
    Akai AD-93 (DAT) Digital Audio Tape Recorder (Jun. 1988)
    Jun 29, 2018 · Frequency Response: 2 Hz to 22 kHz, ±0.5 dB. Dynamic Range: Record, 90 dB; playback, 96 dB. S/N: 92 dB. THD: 0.005% or less at 1 kHz, 0 dB.
  27. [27]
    The Excellent Yamaha DTR2 Digital Audio Tape Recorder
    Audio performance is highly impressive, with a specified total harmonic distortion plus noise of just 0.003% at 1 kHz, a dynamic range of 92 dB, and a ...
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    How many times can DAT tapes be erased/recorded? - Tapeheads.net
    Nov 30, 2015 · Magnetically, there is no upper limit. But with the rotary head system and the loading mechanism, there is a little physical wear on the tape, ...How many record passes before tape starts to go bad?DAT tape transferred to cassette tape shell. | Tapeheads.netMore results from www.tapeheads.net
  30. [30]
    Re-using TAPES - Hewlett Packard Enterprise Community
    May 12, 2020 · The tape life ( archive storage ) for a DLT IV and DDS tape is upto 30 years. The durability ( Average head passes ) for a DLT IV is 1,000,000 and for a DDS ...dat drive life expectancy - Hewlett Packard Enterprise CommunitySolved: DDS3 DAT tape ejected immediately - HPE CommunityMore results from community.hpe.com
  31. [31]
    Digital Audio Interfaces - The White Files
    A digital audio interface allows equipment to be interconnected without degrading signal quality. Common types include S/PDIF and AES/EBU.Missing: features | Show results with:features
  32. [32]
    [PDF] DA-40 - TASCAM
    Digital audio inputs and output shall be provided on AES/EBU format on XLR connectors, and in SPDIF format on coaxial connectors. The DAT recorder shall be ...
  33. [33]
    Sony PCM-7030 Digital Audio Tape Recorder - Vintage Digital
    The use of time code enables the rapid location of the required point on the tape. When the time code reader/generator option is added, such advanced operations ...
  34. [34]
    Sony PCM-7030 DAT Recorder - BS Broadcast
    The Sony PCM-7030 DAT recorder offers high quality 2-channel digital recording with SMPTE time code. Sony PCM-7030 DAT Recorder for spare parts. Specifications.
  35. [35]
    TASCAM DAP1 Portable DAT Recorder - zZounds.com
    Free delivery 45-day returnsPower Consumption: 4.2 W DC (2 Hours of Playback/Recording) using included battery pack. Weight (including battery pack): 3.1 lbs. Dimensions: 11-7/8 x 7-11 ...
  36. [36]
    DAT Tape Speeds - Sweetwater
    Apr 27, 2007 · Tape speed in DAT machines is 8.15 mm/sec for recordable tapes, but is 12.225 mm/sec for pre-recorded DAT tapes.Missing: lengths ROTOM
  37. [37]
    DAT Tape Manufacturer/Optimum Length Reccomendation...
    Mar 29, 2008 · I would stick with 60 or 90 minute tapes. It is my understanding that 120 tapes are thinner, and you do not want to deal with a broken or scrunched dat tape.
  38. [38]
    Introduction of Digital Audio Tape (DAT)
    The first commercial DAT recorder, the Sony DTC-1000ES, appeared in March 1987, capable of recording and playing back two-channel PCM audio with precise ...Missing: Japan | Show results with:Japan
  39. [39]
    When did DAT overtake analog tape in recording studios - Gearspace
    Mar 8, 2022 · DAT for 2-track mixdown replaced most Sony PCM 1600 or the cheaper PCM-F1 in the late 80s/ early 90s. Some studios I knew were still using ...Missing: adoption broadcasters
  40. [40]
    Analyzing Audio DAC Jitter Sensitivity - Analog Devices
    Oct 11, 2012 · Audio DACs respond differently to jitter in the low-frequency and high-frequency bands, thus it helps to separately specify tolerance to these ...
  41. [41]
    25 Products That Changed Recording - Sound On Sound
    Alesis ADAT (1992)​​ Hard disk recording was in its infancy and hard drive prices were still prohibitively high, so tape was the only viable option.<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Record Industry Decries Sales of DAT Recorders - Los Angeles Times
    Jan 22, 1990 · Matsushita's Technics division even announced a price of $1,200 to $1,300 for DAT recorders, which are considered the next major advance in ...
  43. [43]
    All About Digital Audio: Part 4
    The most obvious difference between DAT and video transports is that the tape wrap around the head‑drum is only 90 degrees, as opposed to the 270 degrees of a ...Missing: type | Show results with:type
  44. [44]
    DAT Tapes and Tips – DELTAMEDIA INTL INC
    As we said, a DAT cassette is about half the size of a standard analog cassette, measuring 73 x 54 x 10.5 mm. Its tape is 3.81 millimeters (1/8") wide. On one ...
  45. [45]
    Why do some of us dismiss digital audio? - Music & Hi-fi Appreciations
    Mar 11, 2025 · They argue that digital sound is clinically precise but emotionally lacking. This is often attributed to the perceived absence of harmonic ...
  46. [46]
    Digital sound - Lenard Audio Institute
    Dec 12, 2008 · Analogue sound quality is measured by frequency response. The lower the frequency response the lower the quality. Digital audio does not ...
  47. [47]
    DAT Sound Systems on Way to U.S. Market - Los Angeles Times
    Jun 5, 1990 · Sony will market a classical line of prerecorded DAT tapes, offering 10 titles at $19.95 each. Blank DAT tapes won't be cheap either.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] DDS - Pro Sony
    The tape is wound at an angle around the rotary head so that data is recorded on the tape diagonally, instead of linearly. As a result, tape speed is much ...
  49. [49]
    History (1989): Hewlett-Packard First Big Computer Firm to Offer ...
    Aug 1, 2019 · The 5.25-inch form factor drive stores 1.3GB. It features a built-in SCSI controller, a 20s average access time due to a fast-search facility ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] HPJ-1994-12.pdf - The Hewlett Packard Archive
    Dec 6, 1994 · The Digital Data Storage or DOS format for tape drives was developed in 1989 to ... The HP C1553A DDS-2 digital audio tape autoloader contains.<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Tape drives - FreeBSD Documentation Archive
    Jul 2, 1996 · This is a DDS-1 tape drive. DDS-1 is the original DAT tape format. Native capacity is 2GB when using 90m tapes. Data transfer rate is 183kB/s.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] HP DDS Drives Technical Reference Manual - HPE Community
    • Small Computer System Interface (SCSI-1), ANSI X3.131-1986. This is the INCITS authorized standard for SCSI implementation, available through INCITS.
  53. [53]
    Backup hardware showdown: Tape vs. Disk - BackupAssist
    Tape clearly is the better option for archiving, long-term data storage and off-site storage of backups. Disk offers considerable advantages for short term ...
  54. [54]
    Overview - IBM 36/72 GB DDS Gen5 SCSI-2 LVD tape drive
    Jan 24, 2019 · This sinle drive tape has 36 GB(1) drive capacity, up to 72 GB in compression. The Digital Data Storage Generation 5 tape drive compliments the ...
  55. [55]
    Tape vs Disk Backup: Advantages and Disadvantages - NAKIVO
    Jun 1, 2023 · Disk-based backups generally provide better data security than tape. Physically accessing hard disks contained in a drive array is harder than ...
  56. [56]
    Tape Vs Disk: Which Backup Storage Is Better - Zmanda
    Jun 30, 2025 · Reliability: Data Integrity Issues with Tape Storage​​ Tape media can degrade over time, and physical damage like scratches or dust can render ...
  57. [57]
    Advantages/Disadvantages of using tape instead of disk [duplicate]
    Jul 25, 2011 · Tapes offer long-term archival storage, ease of off-site transfer and storage, large capacity, and small size. Their differences do not point to ...
  58. [58]
    From Studio To Street - The Story Of DAT (SOS Nov 90)
    R-DAT for short — in 1983, in prototype form. By the end of 1990 ...History · Dat Format · Figure 1. Dat Tape Format
  59. [59]
    Sony DAT and Philips DCC, Worth It? - Tapeheads.net
    Oct 26, 2016 · There were many (well maybe not many, but more than two) pre-recorded tapes released in the format, mostly jazz and classical. I have maybe ...
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    HD DVD owners - what now? | Page 8 | AVForums
    I think you can count the number of pre-recorded DAT releases on the fingers of two hands. ... how many HD DVD players were available on e-bay the other ...
  62. [62]
    Price Range: DAT Recorders vs DAT blank tapes | Steve Hoffman ...
    I just remember how many times I needed to ... I just remember how many times I needed to service ... pre-recorded DAT tapes. Just out of interest ...
  63. [63]
    WHATEVER HAPPENED DAT?- LOOKING BACK TO 1987
    DAT or Digital Audio Tape for short, was a signal recording and playback medium developed by Sony and introduced in 1987.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  64. [64]
    MUSIC INDUSTRY GIRDS FOR WAR OVER NEW TAPES - The ...
    ... DAT tape and machines come from Japan," RIAA President Jason Berman testified before a House subcommittee in May. "It will therefore be these foreign ...
  65. [65]
    DATS, FIGHTING TO BE HEARD - The Washington Post
    threatens Jay Berman, president of the Recording Industry Association of. America. He charges that DAT recorders will be used to ''rob the. Advertisement.Missing: Jason | Show results with:Jason
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Disc, DAT and Fair Use: Time To Reconsider?
    Digital audio tape (DAT) is to the digital compact disc (CD) what the analog cassette tape is to the LP record. DAT recorders are a new generation of cassette ...
  67. [67]
    DIGITAL AUDIO TAPE - A HEARING - The Washington Post
    Jul 5, 1987 · The 1983 RIAA study that generated the $1.5 billion figure asked tapers if they "would have" purchased any album from which they recorded. Of ...
  68. [68]
    Digital Tape Compromise Seen as a Sign of Changing Audio Times
    Jul 28, 1989 · ... DAT players in 1987, the Recording Industry Assn. of America has attempted to block DAT marketing. The RIAA, which acts as the federal lobbying ...
  69. [69]
    Charted: 50 Years of Music Industry Revenues, by Format
    Oct 20, 2023 · The music industry has undergone a remarkable transformation in formats. See how its revenues have evolved, from vinyl and CDs to streaming.
  70. [70]
    DIGITAL AUDIO TAPE TO ARRIVE AS INDUSTRY SOUNDS ITS ...
    The Athens agreement settled the legal question - for now - by instituting the Serial Copy Management System. SCMS will allow one DAT copy to be made from a ...
  71. [71]
    S.1623 - Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 102nd Congress (1991 ...
    Passed House amended (09/22/1992). Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 - Amends Federal copyright law to set forth definitions relating to digital audio recording ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Technological Change and Home Copying
    mandating a new DAT format called Serial. Copy Management System (SCMS). SCMS would permit direct, digital-to-digital copying of digital recordings and ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] The Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. (RIAA)
    DAT is a taped version of compact ... incorporating performance standards known as the Serial Copy. Management System (SCMS), which would control digital to.Missing: implementation details
  74. [74]
    How home taping fuels the record industry - Forbes
    Jul 11, 1997 · In the late 1970s, the recording industry sought to stop home taping by introducing a technology called the “spoiler signal.
  75. [75]
    DAT Copy protection - diyAudio
    Jul 28, 2006 · But lets face it, the scms copy protection is a BIG joke.it is easy bypassed.connect the cd or dat digitally to a computer soundcard, and ...Missing: workarounds | Show results with:workarounds
  76. [76]
    A Lot of DAT Going On Lately... - Audio improv
    Oct 29, 2017 · A DAT made from an analog source can be copied once, but the copies can't be copied. There are no restrictions on copies made from the analog ...Missing: workarounds | Show results with:workarounds
  77. [77]
    Sony DTC-2000ES DAT recorder - Stereophile.com
    Sep 20, 2013 · Gordon Holt Sep 20, 2013 First Published:Nov 01, 1994. Introduced nearly eight years ago as the first recordable digital format for consumers, ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Chronology - Technology And The Music Industry - PBS
    May 27, 2004 · 1987. Protests over the Digital Audio Tape ; The Digital Audio Tape (DAT), introduced shortly after the CD, meets with immediate resistance from ...
  79. [79]
    Everything You Need to Know About Private Copy Royalties
    Oct 27, 2022 · When Congress passed the Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA) in 1992 ... audio recording devices pay a 2% royalty on their transfer price. The ...<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    The History of Data Storage: A Look at Removable Computer Storage
    Apr 13, 2017 · By the late 1990s technology improved, prices lowered, and recordable CD burners—CD-Rs—became commonplace. Early CD-R models could only ...Open-Reel Tapes And Magnetic... · The Click Of Death · Recordable Cds And Dvds
  81. [81]
    DAT = dropouts - Tapeheads.net
    May 21, 2021 · Dropouts are momentary loss of signal due to defects in the tape surface. There are other causes of signal loss, generally involving poor head contact, poor ...Missing: fragility | Show results with:fragility
  82. [82]
    How Sony paved the way for modern music production - Engadget
    May 7, 2021 · That is, until Sony discontinued new recorders around 2005, signaling the natural decay of its use. DAT didn't make all of this happen on its ...Missing: penetration | Show results with:penetration
  83. [83]
    6 Discontinued Sony Formats (And Why They Failed) - SlashGear
    Sep 30, 2024 · Sony eventually discontinued DAT production in 2005, long after it had earned its status as a prosumer oddity.Missing: penetration | Show results with:penetration
  84. [84]
    DCC compared to other systems - DCC-FAQ
    Pro: Digital Audio Tape carries uncompressed audio at 32000, 44100 or 48000 samples/second. Contra: In Long-Play mode, the sample rate is fixed to 32000. The ...
  85. [85]
    SoundStageSolo.com - The Formats Time Forgot
    Apr 1, 2024 · For professionals, DAT was a better option than MiniDisc, given its lack of compression. For consumers, MiniDisc was the better option since, ...Missing: capacity comparison
  86. [86]
    The Rise and Fall of Digital Compact Cassette (DCC)
    Jan 31, 2024 · The skepticism about the necessity of a fresh audio format also played a pivotal role in hindering DCC's adoption. Many consumers questioned ...
  87. [87]
    DAT vs. MINIDISC - York University
    Developed by SONY and Phillips in the mid-80s, DAT records up to 120 minutes of uninterrupted music on a tape which is 2/3 the size of a cassette. The tape ...Missing: fidelity capacity comparison
  88. [88]
    DAT vs. Minidisc--What are the pros/cons of each (sound quality ...
    Minidisc is inferior in terms of sound quality to DAT. DAT can exceed the quality of a CD, a Minidisc can get, maybe 80% of the quality of a CD.Missing: share | Show results with:share<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Archiving to CDR: some considerations - Robert Auld
    Optical disc recording technology offers a much more stable medium for digital data than tape. The recordable CD, in particular, has become very popular due to ...
  90. [90]
    DAT Recorders Tapes & Tips - DeltaMedia
    On most models you can switch between 48 kHz and 44.1 kHz. Some units can also record at 32 kHz. A rate of 44.1 kHz is preferred if your tapes will be ...
  91. [91]
    Mixdown Formats - Sound On Sound
    The sound quality is surprisingly good, given that the data compression uses less than a quarter of the storage space of an equivalent-length CD, but most ...
  92. [92]
    Digital Audio Tape (DAT) Transfer to CD | Audio Restored
    Digital Audio Tape was developed by Sony and introduced in 1987 as a potential successor to analogue compact cassettes for sound recording and playback, ...
  93. [93]
    Preservation Self-Assessment Program (PSAP) | Audiotape
    Common Size(s): Tape width: 4mm: Cassette: 73mm × 54mm × 10.5mm; Description: Digital Audio Tape (DAT) is a digital magnetic tape-based recorded sound format.
  94. [94]
    DAT Tapes: The Complete Guide | EverPresent
    The tapes use a helical-scan recording method, like video cassette recorders, which allows them to record at very high densities. ... All Sony DAT machines ...
  95. [95]
    Tape Storage in 2023: What Do You Need to Know?
    Oct 11, 2023 · Other formats include Digital Linear Tape (DLT), Digital Audio Tape (DAT) and Advanced Intelligent Tape (AIT). Tape Backup Advantages. Tape ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-