Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

EPROM

EPROM, or erasable programmable , is a type of that retains its data without power and can be programmed multiple times by applying to store information, followed by erasure using ultraviolet light through a built-in window. Invented by Dov Frohman at in 1971, it emerged from observations during quality control testing of SRAM chips, where trapped electrons in layers suggested a mechanism for non-volatile storage that could be cleared with UV exposure. The first commercial EPROM, 's 1702 chip, stored 2048 bits (256 bytes) and was announced that year, marking a shift from one-time programmable ROMs to reusable alternatives that accelerated prototyping in early development. At its core, EPROM operates using floating-gate metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), where programming traps electrons on an isolated gate to represent data bits, altering the transistor's for reading; erasure via intense UV (typically 253.7 nm ) for 10-20 minutes dissipates this charge across the entire chip, resetting it to a blank state. Unlike later electrically erasable variants, EPROM requires physical removal from the circuit and exposure in an erasure unit, limiting its use to bulk reprogramming rather than selective byte-level changes, with typically lasting 10 to 20 years under normal conditions and unlimited read cycles. This design provided key advantages in the 1970s and 1980s, including cost-effectiveness for low-volume production and storage in embedded systems, as it avoided the need for custom mask sets in fabrication. EPROM played a pivotal role in the microprocessor era by enabling engineers to iterate designs rapidly—reducing prototyping time from weeks to hours—fueling the growth of 's business alongside products like the 8080 processor and supporting applications in calculators, peripherals, and early personal computers. By the late , it inspired refinements such as (electrically erasable PROM), invented at in 1978, which eliminated the UV step but introduced wear limits from electrical stress. Though largely supplanted by in the 1990s for its block-level erasure and higher density, EPROM's legacy endures in understanding evolution and remains relevant in niche legacy systems or educational contexts.

Overview

Definition and Principles

Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM) is a type of non-volatile that retains stored data without an external and can be programmed electrically while being erased through exposure to (UV) light. It was invented by Dov Frohman-Bentchkowsky at in 1971. Unlike mask ROM, which is permanently programmed during the manufacturing process using photolithographic masks to define fixed connections, EPROM enables field programmability, allowing users to erase and reprogram the device multiple times in practical settings. At its core, EPROM operates using an array of floating-gate metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), where each memory cell consists of a single transistor with an isolated polysilicon floating gate embedded within the gate oxide layer. Binary data is represented by the presence or absence of trapped electrons on the floating gate: an unprogrammed cell (logical '1') has few trapped electrons, resulting in a low threshold voltage that permits channel conduction under normal read conditions, while a programmed cell (logical '0') has electrons injected onto the floating gate, raising the threshold voltage and blocking conduction. Programming injects these electrons via channel hot-electron injection, where high voltages applied to the gate and drain accelerate electrons from the channel into the floating gate, typically taking several hundred milliseconds per byte. Data stability is maintained by the thick gate oxide layer (approximately 100-200 nm), which electrically isolates the floating gate and minimizes charge leakage through quantum tunneling, enabling retention times of 10 years or more under normal conditions. The fundamental principle governing data storage in EPROM is the shift in the transistor's threshold voltage due to the stored charge on the floating gate. This shift, denoted as \Delta V_{th}, is given by the equation \Delta V_{th} = -\frac{Q_{stored}}{C_{ox}}, where Q_{stored} is the charge trapped on the floating gate (negative for electrons) and C_{ox} is the capacitance of the gate oxide layer. To derive this, consider the floating gate as a capacitive node coupled to the control gate and channel; the trapped charge Q_{stored} induces an offset voltage across the oxide, which adds to the base threshold voltage V_{TO} of the transistor, effectively shifting the voltage required to invert the channel by \Delta V_{th} (with the sign convention yielding a positive shift for electron injection). For typical EPROM devices, this results in a shift from about 1 V (erased) to 8 V (programmed), distinguishing the logical states during readout. In contrast to later variants like EEPROM, which employ thin oxides for electrical erasure via Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, EPROM relies on UV-induced photoemission for charge removal, necessitating physical exposure through a quartz window.

Historical Development

The EPROM was developed at Corporation in the early 1970s amid the growing need for flexible memory solutions in microprocessor-based systems. In 1971, engineer Dov Frohman-Bentchkowsky invented the technology while investigating charge trapping issues in the Intel 1101 (SRAM) during quality control tests. He recognized that electrons trapped in the layer could provide non-volatile storage and proposed using light to erase the charge, leading to the floating-gate design. That same year, announced the first commercial EPROM, the , a 2048-bit (256-byte) device demonstrated at the International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC). The marked a significant advancement over one-time programmable PROMs and mask ROMs, enabling engineers to iterate and logic designs rapidly without costly mask changes, which typically took weeks. This reusability accelerated the prototyping of early microprocessors like the and 8080, contributing to the explosive growth of the in the 1970s. Subsequent generations increased capacities and densities, with the technology remaining a cornerstone until the rise of electrically erasable variants in the late 1970s.

Operation

Programming Mechanism

The programming of an EPROM involves injection to trap negative charge on the floating gate of individual memory transistors, thereby altering their to represent stored data. To initiate programming for a specific bit, a —typically ranging from 12 to 25 V depending on the device—is applied to the control gate, while the is biased at approximately 6 to 7 V, and the source and are grounded. This configuration generates a high lateral in the near the , causing electrons in the current to accelerate and gain exceeding 3.1 eV, the barrier height at the silicon-silicon dioxide interface. A fraction (about 10^{-3} to 10^{-4}) of these "hot" electrons then inject perpendicularly into the floating gate, where they are permanently trapped by the surrounding insulating oxide layers, increasing the transistor's from around 2-3 V (erased state, logic 1) to over 5-7 V (programmed state, logic 0). The process requires applying voltage pulses of 1 to 10 ms duration per bit, often repeated up to 25 times if shows insufficient charge injection. EPROM are programmed using dedicated external devices known as EPROM programmers, which incorporate zero-insertion-force (ZIF) sockets to securely hold the without pin damage. These programmers sequentially each memory location via the 's and pins, applying the precise high-voltage to the appropriate lines (e.g., V_PP for programming voltage) while maintaining standard supply voltage (V_CC) at 5-6.25 V during . Following each , the programmer performs a read-verify at low voltage to measure the cell's shift and confirm , iterating as needed until the programmed state is achieved or a maximum retry limit (e.g., 10-25 attempts) is exceeded to prevent overstress. This byte-oriented or word-oriented ensures reliable writing across the entire array, though total programming time can span seconds to minutes for larger capacities. The injected electrons remain trapped on the floating gate until ultraviolet erasure, rendering the programmed non-volatile and stable for 10-20 years or more under normal conditions. However, excessive programming pulses can induce risks such as localized degradation or trap generation due to sustained high and hot carrier stress, potentially leading to increased leakage currents, reduced , or diminished erase uniformity in subsequent cycles. Programmers mitigate this through built-in limits on pulse counts and thresholds.

Erasure and Reading Processes

The erasure of an EPROM is achieved by exposing the chip to (UV) light at a of 253.7 nm through its transparent window, which allows the light to reach the die. This process generates photoelectrons within the floating gate structure, effectively neutralizing the trapped charge and resetting all bits to the erased state, typically logic "1". The required integrated UV dose is approximately 15 watt-seconds per square centimeter, which corresponds to an exposure time of 15 to 20 minutes under a standard UV source with an intensity of 12,000 to 15,000 µW/cm² positioned about 1 inch from the chip. Erasure affects the entire memory array simultaneously, with no capability for selective bit or byte-level erasure. During normal operation, reading data from an EPROM occurs at standard TTL-compatible voltages using a single 5 V (VCC = 5 V ±10%), with no high voltages required as in programming. The process relies on sense amplifiers to detect the of each floating-gate : an uncharged gate (erased "1") results in a low (around 2-3 V), allowing the to conduct and produce a logic high output, while a charged gate (programmed "0") raises the threshold (over 5-7 V), preventing conduction and yielding a logic low. Access times for reading typically range from 200 to 350 , enabling rapid data retrieval suitable for systems. A key aspect of the reading process is the read cycle, which begins with address to select the target location via row and column lines: the row activates the appropriate word line to gate the , while the column enables the bit lines for the desired outputs. Once enable () and output enable () signals go low with stable addresses, the sense amplifiers are clocked to detect and amplify the currents, buffering the logic levels for output after a delay of 60 to 120 ns from OE assertion or 200 to 350 ns from address setup. This sequence ensures non-destructive readout, preserving the stored charge on the floating gates. Erasure limitations include the need to remove any protective labels and expose the quartz window directly, which risks contamination from dust or handling if not performed in a clean environment, potentially affecting subsequent programming reliability. Additionally, partial or under-erasure is ineffective and can lead to misleading verification results, as incompletely neutralized charges may pass basic tests but cause data errors in operation, necessitating full exposure for consistent results.

Design and Construction

Physical Structure

The physical structure of an EPROM chip is characterized by its internal architecture, which features a dense of floating-gate metal-oxide-semiconductor () transistors arranged in a grid-like NOR configuration. Each cell comprises a single floating-gate , where the floating gate— a polysilicon layer isolated from the channel—is surrounded by a thick layer, typically 30-35 nm (300-350 Å) in thickness, to promote stable charge retention over extended periods by minimizing electron tunneling. The control gates of these transistors connect to word lines (row address lines), enabling row-wise selection, while the drains link to bit lines (column address lines) for handling, with source regions often shared among cells in the to optimize space. This layout supports the non-volatile storage essential to EPROM functionality. Externally, EPROM are housed in dual in-line packages (), either for durability or for cost-effectiveness, with a prominent transparent window centered over the die to allow (UV) light penetration for bulk erasure. Standard pinouts vary by capacity; for instance, larger like 64 Kbit devices commonly use a 28-pin format, allocating pins for (power), Vpp (programming voltage), address inputs (A0-A15), data I/O (D0-D7), output enable (), and chip enable (). The window, measuring approximately 5-10 mm in , is sealed with a removable UV-opaque label to block and prevent unintended erasure, and many designs include a thin overlay on the for diffused protection against direct handling damage. The evolution of EPROM die sizes reflects broader scaling trends, with early 1970s models like the 1702 employing an 8 µm process node, yielding die areas on the order of several square millimeters due to metal-gate NMOS technology. By the 1990s, advancements reduced process nodes to approximately 1 µm using self-aligned polysilicon gates, shrinking die areas dramatically—often to under 1 mm² for multi-megabit capacities—while preserving the quartz-windowed package for .

Materials and Manufacturing

EPROM fabrication relies on established materials to enable charge storage and UV erasability. The primary substrate is p-type (100)-oriented with a resistivity of 5-50 ohm-cm, providing the base for transistor structures. (SiO₂) serves as the (typically 300-350 Å thick) and field oxide (0.8-1.2 μm thick), acting as an insulator between the substrate and gates while supporting charge trapping. forms the floating gate (2000-2600 Å thick) and control gate (4000-5000 Å thick), doped for to facilitate tunneling during programming. Aluminum, alloyed with 0.8-1.2% and 0.6-1.2 μm thick, provides interconnections for signal routing. The package incorporates a window, transparent to UV wavelengths below 400 nm, allowing erasure without disassembly. The manufacturing process follows CMOS N-well technology for modern devices, beginning with wafer preparation and to define N-wells and active areas. dopes the substrate— for p-type regions (1-4×10¹³/cm² at 25-50 keV) and for n-type (4-6×10¹⁵/cm² at 70-100 keV)—forming the channels and junctions. grows the , followed by low-pressure (LPCVD) of the first layer for the floating gate, which is patterned via . The inter-poly oxide (400-600 Å) and second poly layer are then deposited and defined, with additional implants for / regions. Metal layers are sputtered and patterned using , followed by passivation with phosphosilicate glass () and oxynitride. Wafers are backgrinded to 500-600 μm, tested, singulated into dies, wire-bonded to leads, and encapsulated in or housings with the window. Early EPROMs, such as the Intel 1701, employed NMOS processes for simplicity, but production shifted to in later generations to achieve lower power dissipation and higher density. Reliability hinges on oxide integrity, verified through electrical testing to ensure minimal leakage and support exceeding 10 years at standard temperatures. The gate oxide's thickness and quality prevent charge loss, while manufacturing controls like defect screening maintain for hundreds of program/erase cycles. requires precise UV dosage control, typically 15 W-s/cm² at 253.7 nm wavelength, to fully discharge floating gates without inducing oxide damage or shifts. Overexposure risks degrading the SiO₂ layers, reducing long-term retention.

Variants and Evolution

Generations and Capacity Progression

The evolution of EPROM technology closely paralleled advancements in semiconductor manufacturing, with capacity densities increasing exponentially in line with principles, roughly doubling every 18-24 months through reductions in cell size and process node scaling. The initial commercial EPROM, Intel's introduced in 1971, offered 2048 bits (256 × 8 organization) using PMOS technology on a process exceeding 10 µm, marking the shift from one-time programmable ROMs to erasable variants. By 1974, the Intel improved to 8,192 bits (1,024 × 8) with NMOS fabrication on an approximately 8 µm process, enabling byte-wide data access suited for emerging 8-bit microcomputers and facilitating faster prototyping in systems like early personal computers. From 1977 to 1980, capacities progressed to 16 Kbits with devices like the TMS2716 (2,048 × 8), fabricated on 6-8 µm processes, as improvements allowed denser floating-gate cell packing without altering the core UV-erasable . This era saw the transition from word-oriented to predominantly byte-wide configurations, enhancing compatibility with buses and broadening adoption in applications. In the early , standardized pinouts for the 27xxx EPROM series in 28-pin packages, promoting interoperability across manufacturers and accelerating market growth by standardizing packages for densities up to 256 Kbits. The 1980s brought further scaling, with 64 Kbit devices like the 2764 (8,192 × 8) on 2-3 µm processes by mid-decade, followed by 1 Mbit capacities in the late 1980s, exemplified by the AT27C010 (131,072 × 8) using on 1-1.5 µm nodes, which reduced power consumption and improved reliability. Cell size reductions, driven by finer and optimized floating-gate geometries, were primary enablers, shrinking from over 100 µm² in early devices to under 10 µm² by the decade's end. Experimental efforts explored storage to boost density beyond states, though these remained limited in production EPROMs due to programming complexity. Entering the 1990s, EPROM densities reached 4-16 Mbits, as in NEC's 16 Mbit device on a 0.6 µm process in 1990, benefiting from sub-micron scaling that quadrupled effective capacity per die area compared to counterparts. Mainstream production waned around 2000, supplanted by electrically erasable for its superior reprogrammability and cost-efficiency at higher densities, though EPROMs persisted in niche UV-erasable roles. Overall, capacities advanced from 2 Kbits to peaks near 32 Mbits, underscoring a of sustained innovation until dominance.
Year RangeRepresentative DeviceCapacity (bits)Approximate Process NodeKey Advancement
1971-19742K to 8K>8 µm (PMOS/NMOS)Introduction of erasable floating-gate cells; byte-wide access
1977-198016K6-8 µmDenser NMOS integration for prototyping
1980s64K to 1M2-1 µm ()JEDEC pinout ; power-efficient scaling
1990s4M to 16M1-0.6 µmSub-micron nodes enabling multi-megabit densities

Types and Specialized Forms

EPROMs are primarily categorized into ultraviolet (UV)-erasable variants and one-time programmable (OTP) forms, with the former featuring a quartz window in ceramic packaging to allow erasure via UV exposure, while the latter omits this window for cost efficiency and permanent programming. The standard UV-erasable EPROM, exemplified by the 27C series from manufacturers like AMD and Intel, supports repeated reprogramming after erasure with ultraviolet light at a dosage of approximately 15 W-seconds/cm², making it suitable for development and prototyping where flexibility is needed. In contrast, OTP EPROMs, also based on the same floating-gate architecture, are housed in opaque plastic packages without the erasure window, rendering them non-erasable after programming and ideal for high-volume production to reduce manufacturing costs by 20-30% compared to windowed versions. Specialized forms of EPROM include windowless variants optimized for applications, where the absence of the window prevents accidental erasure and enhances reliability in sealed environments, such as in automotive or modules. Multi-chip modules incorporating EPROM dies alongside other components, like logic or , emerged in the late for compact system-on-package designs, though they remained less common due to the dominance of single-chip solutions. Early experimental bipolar PROMs, developed prior to widespread adoption around 1975, utilized fuse-based programming but were rare and quickly supplanted by more efficient floating-gate technology. Packaging variants of EPROMs evolved to support diverse mounting and density needs, with the (DIP) serving as the foundational through-hole option in 28- to 48-pin configurations for prototyping and legacy systems. Surface-mount alternatives like the plastic leaded chip carrier (PLCC) in 32- and 44-pin formats offered easier automated assembly, while thin small-outline packages (TSOP) in 32-pin versions enabled higher board densities in portable devices by reducing footprint by up to 50% compared to DIP. Pin-compatible families, such as the 27xxx series (e.g., 2716 to 27C080), maintained consistent 24- or 32-pin footprints across capacities from 2K to 1M bits, facilitating straightforward upgrades without circuit redesign. In the , OTP EPROMs captured a significant portion of the market in consumer devices for small to medium production runs, often comprising over 40% of shipments in embedded applications like remote controls and appliances, due to their balance of reprogrammability during testing and permanence in final products. Unlike UV-erasable EPROMs, OTP variants lack any mechanism, relying solely on high-voltage programming pulses to set floating gates irreversibly, which simplified supply chains but limited post-deployment modifications.

Applications and Legacy

Primary Uses

EPROMs found widespread application in firmware storage for early personal computers during the 1980s and 1990s, particularly as chips in systems like the PC, where the system board supported socketed 8K x 8 EPROM modules to hold essential code for , I/O drivers, and bootstrap loaders. These chips enabled developers to program and update low-level system software without requiring permanent mask ROMs, facilitating prototyping and revisions in the nascent PC market. In embedded systems, such as household appliances and industrial controllers from the same era, EPROMs stored code for tasks like device initialization and control logic, leveraging their non-volatile nature to retain programming across power cycles. In niche modern contexts, EPROMs persist in legacy industrial controls where compatibility with older equipment demands their radiation-tolerant properties, as demonstrated by studies showing EPROMs exhibiting superior hardness against total ionizing dose compared to some variants. They also continue in other radiation-exposed environments, such as , due to reversible radiation effects after erasure and . Among hobbyists, EPROMs are used for vintage hardware or custom projects. Prototyping remains a key role, allowing engineers to test in socketed configurations before committing to production. EPROMs were often integrated as socketed components in systems for field updates, permitting on-site erasure via UV exposure and reprogramming without full hardware replacement, and frequently paired with RAM for hybrid memory architectures in resource-constrained designs. Throughout the 1980s, EPROMs were prominent in 8-bit microcomputers, with home systems like the Commodore 64 using socketed ROMs that could be replaced with EPROMs for customization, enabling flexible storage up to 128K densities. By the 2000s, however, EPROMs were largely supplanted by flash memory in consumer devices due to the latter's electrical erasability and higher densities, marking the end of their prevalence in mainstream electronics.

Advantages, Limitations, and Comparisons

EPROMs provide high reliability due to their non-volatile nature, with times typically ranging from 10 to 20 years under standard operating conditions, making them suitable for long-term applications. They are also cost-effective for low-volume , as they eliminate the need for expensive mask sets required in mask ROM fabrication, allowing flexible updates without significant upfront investment. Compared to mask ROM, EPROMs offer simple through electrical programming followed by UV , enabling iterative development and prototyping at reduced costs. Despite these strengths, EPROMs have notable limitations, including bulky packaging due to the required window for UV exposure, which increases size and cost relative to windowless alternatives. The manual UV erasure process is time-consuming, often requiring 10 to 20 minutes of exposure to , and necessitates specialized equipment, preventing in-system reprogramming. Additionally, the window is sensitive to damage , fingerprints, or scratches, which can block UV and render the device unerasing. Programming cycles are limited to approximately 100-1000 due to cumulative stress on the , beyond which reliability degrades, though UV erasure cycles are effectively unlimited. During read operations, power consumption ranges from 50 to 100 mW, which is higher than some modern non-volatile memories. In comparisons, EPROMs surpass PROMs by allowing reprogramming via UV erasure, whereas PROMs are one-time programmable only, offering greater flexibility for design changes. Relative to EEPROMs, EPROMs are less expensive and achieve higher densities at similar technology nodes but require external UV erasure instead of electrical byte-level erasing, making EEPROMs preferable for frequent, in-system updates despite their higher cost per bit. Against , EPROMs lack block-level electrical erasure and in-system programmability, with flash enabling faster erasure (<1 second) and more cycles (>10^6), contributing to EPROM's obsolescence by the as density and cost curves favored flash for higher volumes.

References

  1. [1]
    What is EPROM (erasable programmable read-only memory)?
    Oct 21, 2022 · EPROM technology was first developed at Intel in 1971 based on the idea that the floating gate of a MOSFET transistor could be used for the cell ...
  2. [2]
    A Success…Out of Quality Control Issues - Intel
    His findings would lead him to invent erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM). EPROM dies could retain information without a continuous power supply, ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Reusable Programmable ROM Introduces Iterative Design Flexibility
    1971 Intel announced the 1702, a 2048-bit user-erasable, PROM (EPROM) designed by Dov Frohman that could be reused multiple times by erasing the pattern with ...
  4. [4]
    Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EPROM)
    The EPROM was invented by Dov Frohman of Intel in 1971. An EPROM retains its data for about ten to twenty years and can be read an unlimited number of times.
  5. [5]
    2018 Museum Fellow Dov Frohman-Bentchkowsky: Silicon, Science ...
    Apr 18, 2018 · Intel introduced the first EPROM in 1971, and it proved to be the perfect companion to the first commercial microprocessors that Intel also ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] 9 rom, eprom, and eeprom technology
    The EPROM device is programmed by forcing an electrical charge on a small piece of polysilicon material (called the floating gate) located in the memory cell.
  7. [7]
    Channel-Hot-Electron Injection - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The channel hot-electron (CHE) injection methodology requires both a large gate and a large drain voltage to be applied to the EPROM cell. Thus, a large current ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    [PDF] EPROM/ROM Memory Programming/Verify Specification
    Program Memory Cells: When programming one word of EPROM, a programming pulse width (TPW) of. 100 µs is recommended. The maximum number of programming attempts.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Benefits of Atmel's RAPID™ Programming Algorithm
    Hot-electron injection is where electrons, flowing as a current between the drain and source of a saturated. EPROM cell, gain enough energy from the high ...
  11. [11]
    Impact of temperature on non-equilibrium Fowler-Nordheim ...
    High-field Fowler-Nordheim electron injection to the drain of EEPROM's is studied using a specific time-resolved measurement technique.Missing: EPROM hot
  12. [12]
    [PDF] 27C64 65,536-Bit (8,192 x 8) UV Erasable CMOS PROM Military ...
    The recommended erasure procedure for the 27C64 is ex- posure to short wave ultraviolet light which has a wave- length of 2537 Angstroms (–). The integrated ...Missing: process details
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 2716.pdf
    DESCRIPTION. The M2716 is a 16,384 bit UV erasable and elec- trically programmable memory EPROM, ideally suited for applications where fast turn around and.
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    The World's First EPROM: The 1702 - Explore Intel's history
    EPROM inventor Dov Frohman introduced EPROM's capabilities in a live demonstration at the International Solid State Circuits conference in 1971 ... Intel ...
  17. [17]
    Process Technology History - Intel - WikiChip
    The table below shows the history of Intel's process scaling. Values were taken from various Intel documents including IDF presentations, ISSCC papers, and ...
  18. [18]
    US4830974A - EPROM fabrication process - Google Patents
    An EPROM fabrication process using CMOS N-well technology with a two polysilicon floating gate stack and a double layer of conductive lines providing a ...
  19. [19]
    US4665426A - EPROM with ultraviolet radiation transparent silicon ...
    However, quartz windows are relatively expensive; other UV transparent materials do not have the high resistance to moisture, hydrogen, and ionic ...
  20. [20]
    W29C020-90 Datasheet(PDF) - Winbond - ALLDATASHEET.COM
    · Ten-year data retention · Software and hardware data protection · Low power consumption - Active current: 25 mA (typ.) - Standby current: 20 mA (typ ...
  21. [21]
    Moore's Law Milestones - IEEE Spectrum
    Apr 30, 2015 · In the article, Moore predicts an annual doubling of component density on an integrated circuit at minimum manufacturing costs. Moore later ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Certain EPROM, EEPROM, Flash Memory, and Flash ... - usitc
    In 1981, SEEQ proposed to JEDEC,34 a committee of the Electronic Industries. Association with responsibility for setting industry standards, that the ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Atmel AT27C010 - Microchip Technology
    The Atmel® AT27C010 is a low-power, high-performance 1,048,576-bit, one-time pro- grammable, read-only memory (OTP EPROM) organized as 128K by 8 bits.
  25. [25]
    New ultra high density EPROM and flash EEPROM with NAND ...
    This new structure is able to shrink cell size without scaling of device dimensions and cell area per bit can be reduced by 30% compared with that of a 4M ...
  26. [26]
    List of semiconductor scale examples - Wikipedia
    Mitsubishi Electric, Toshiba and NEC introduced 16 Mb DRAM memory chips manufactured with a 600 nm process in 1989. · NEC's 16 Mb EPROM memory chip in 1990.
  27. [27]
    One-Time Programmable - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A special version of EPROM is OTP (One Time Programmable). Here the EPROM is packaged in plastic, without a window. Therefore, OTP can be programmed only once ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] EPROM Products Advanced Micro Devices - Bitsavers.org
    The information in this publication is believed to be accurate in all respects at the time of publication, but is subject to change without notice.
  29. [29]
    EPROM Selection Guide: Types, Features, Applications | GlobalSpec
    Oct 29, 2024 · Erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM) chips are programmable, reusable computer chips that can be erased using ultraviolet light and ...Selection Criteria · Eprom Faqs · How Do Eproms Differ From...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] TMS370 Microcontroller Family - Texas Instruments
    EPROM devices in a non-windowed plastic package are one-time programmable (OTP) devices that are used for small production runs. In the TMS370C0xx, TMS370C3xx, ...
  31. [31]
    Pioneers of Semiconductor Non-Volatile Memory (NVM): The First ...
    May 18, 2020 · EPROM devices were programmed electrically but could only be erased and reused after physically exposing the chip to UV radiation through a ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Memories worldwide, 1991-1992
    ... EPROM: Includes erasable programmable read- only memory. Induded are ultraviolet EPROM. (UV EPROM) and one-time programmable read-only memory (OTPROM). EPROMs ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] IBM PC Technical Reference - Bitsavers.org
    ... BIOS ..................................... 3-2. Use of BIOS ... EPROM. Six module sockets are provided, each capable of accepting an 8K x 8 device. Five ...
  34. [34]
    Radiation hardness of COTS EPROMs and E2PROMs | Request PDF
    Aug 7, 2025 · Results obtained for CMOS-based EPROM (NM27C010) and E2PROM (NM93CS46) components provide evidence that EPROMs have a greater radiation hardness ...
  35. [35]
    Memory Issues in Space & Medical Applications
    Nov 26, 2014 · Radiation causes soft errors in any charge-based memory technology: DRAM, flash (NAND and NOR), SRAM, EEPROM, and EPROM. Cross section of a ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The Rise of the Flash Memory Market: Its Impact on Firm Behavior ...
    In 1991, the company made the strategic decision to shift focus from EPROM to flash memory (ICE 1992, 6-49). More firms decided on the “partially in” strategy.
  38. [38]
    EPROM data retention lifetime? Older instruments possibly due to fail?
    Aug 4, 2022 · EPROMs generally had a 10-year data retention guarantee. Reliability depends primarily on how well the EPROM was programmed and storage/operating temperature.Erasing and Reprogramming old EPROMsErasing EPROMs with sunlight - Electronics Stack ExchangeMore results from electronics.stackexchange.comMissing: oxide integrity
  39. [39]
    EPROM data life? - UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration ...
    Sep 25, 2012 · This 2004 Microchip datasheet for their 27C256 claims > 200 years data retention. ... 2716 and 2732 could be expected to retain data for 10 years.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Reliability issues of flash memory cells
    The cell is programmed by channel hot electron injection at the source side, and is erased by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling of electrons from the floating gate to ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Chapter 10: Programmable Devices - Digital Commons @ NJIT
    The electrically erasable programmable read-only memory, EEPROM, or E2PROM, functions like an EPROM, but it can be erased and reprogrammed electrically. The ...