Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ear candling

Ear candling, also known as ear coning or thermal-auricular therapy, is an practice in which a hollow, cone-shaped —typically made of fabric soaked in , , or soy wax—is inserted into the external auditory and lit at the opposite end, with the intent of generating and negative to extract cerumen, toxins, and other impurities from the ear. Proponents attribute ancient origins to cultures including the tribe, ancient , , and others, claiming benefits such as improved hearing, relief, and balancing, though historical for such practices remains unsubstantiated and largely anecdotal. Empirical studies, including controlled trials measuring and residue , have demonstrated that ear candling produces no significant vacuum effect, fails to remove , and instead deposits wax into the ear , rendering it ineffective for cerumen management or any therapeutic purpose. The procedure carries substantial risks, including thermal burns to the ear, face, and ; occlusion of the ear by melted wax; tympanic membrane ; and potential ignition hazards, with clinical surveys reporting multiple injuries among users. Health authorities, including the U.S. and , have condemned ear candling as unsafe and lacking evidentiary support, leading to regulatory actions against its promotion as a medical treatment.

Technique and Materials

Procedure

Ear candling involves the insertion of a lit, hollow cone-shaped into the external auditory while the subject lies on their side. The , typically constructed from or fabric rolled into a and coated with or , measures approximately 10 inches in length with a narrow end about 0.5 inches in diameter. A second person often assists by holding the steady to prevent movement. The narrow end of the candle is gently inserted into the , ensuring it fits snugly but without deep penetration to avoid contact with the . A protective barrier, such as aluminum foil or a , is placed beneath the candle to collect any falling drippings. The wider end is then ignited, producing a low flame that burns downward. The burns for 10 to 15 minutes or until the nears a pre-marked safety line, at which point it is extinguished in . The process is repeated on the opposite if desired. Afterward, the 's residue is examined, though this step pertains more to evaluation than the core procedure. Self-application is possible but increases risks due to lack of assistance.

Components and Variations

Ear candles are typically composed of a hollow, tapered cone or tube made from fabric such as , , , or , which is soaked or coated with including , paraffin, or soy wax. These materials form a rigid approximately 9 to 12 inches (23 to 30 cm) in length, with a narrow insertion end featuring a small opening and a broader ignition end. The fabric provides the cylindrical framework, while the ensures controlled burning and structural integrity during use. Variations in composition primarily involve the type of wax employed: , derived from beehives and often blended with for burn consistency; , a byproduct refined to food-grade standards; or soy wax, produced via and sometimes bleached. Some commercial products incorporate additives like essential oils, herbal extracts (e.g., or ), or powdered plant materials to purportedly enhance aroma or therapeutic claims, though these do not alter the core burning mechanism. Structural variations include shape differences beyond the standard conical form, such as cylindrical tubes or prismatic designs (square or triangular cross-sections), which may affect airflow or fit in the . Named variants encompass ear candles, often marketed with traditional herbal infusions; basic ear cones without additives; and natural ear cones emphasizing unrefined . Lengths can range from 8 to 15 inches depending on manufacturer specifications, and some include internal filters to contain residue, though efficacy of such features remains unverified in controlled testing. Homemade versions, constructed via dipping fabric strips in melted wax, introduce further inconsistency in material purity and uniformity.

Purported Mechanisms and Benefits

Claimed Physiological Effects

Proponents of ear candling assert that the procedure generates a gentle through the burning of the , which draws out accumulated , , debris, and toxins from the , thereby cleansing it and preventing blockages. This purported suction is claimed to relieve pressure in the Eustachian tubes, reduce inflammation, and alleviate symptoms of conditions such as sinus infections, ear infections, and vertigo by improving drainage and airflow. Additional physiological benefits touted by advocates include enhanced hearing acuity, either through the direct removal of obstructive wax or by stimulating circulation and balancing fluids, potentially reversing mild or mitigating by quieting persistent ringing sensations. Some practitioners further maintain that the warmth from the flame promotes relaxation of surrounding tissues, eases congestion and pain, and may diminish frequency by detoxifying the and reducing neural irritation. These effects are often described as cumulative, with repeated sessions yielding progressive improvements in auditory clarity and overall health.

Alleged Broader Health and Spiritual Outcomes


Proponents claim ear candling facilitates spiritual purification by cleansing the aura and harmonizing energy fields surrounding the body. According to alternative therapy practitioners, the warmth and smoke from the candle purportedly remove energetic blockages, promoting a sense of inner peace and heightened meditation capability. These assertions often link the procedure to ancient rituals, suggesting it opens spiritual centers and purifies the mind alongside the physical body.
Beyond spirituality, advocates allege broader health outcomes such as systemic , where the process supposedly draws out toxins not limited to the , thereby enhancing overall and immune function. Some sources describe it as balancing the body's energy systems, potentially alleviating stress-related conditions and improving mental clarity through improved sensory function. However, these claims originate primarily from holistic providers and lack substantiation from controlled studies, with scientific reviews consistently finding no for such effects.

Scientific Evaluation

Studies on Efficacy

A study published in 1996 examined the of ear candling for cerumen removal using tympanometric measurements in an ear canal model, which demonstrated no significant or suction effect from the burning candle. In a limited clinical component involving eight ears, no cerumen was removed post-procedure, and candle wax was deposited into the in some cases. The same investigation included a survey of 122 otolaryngologists, reporting 21 instances of ear injuries associated with candling, reinforcing the absence of therapeutic benefit. Subsequent analyses, including a 2007 review in the Canadian Family Physician, concluded that no evidence supports ear candling as an effective treatment for cerumen impaction, , or other claimed conditions, emphasizing potential harm over any plausible mechanism. A 2006 commentary in the Journal of Laryngology & Otology described ear candling as unsupported by scientific principles, with physical tests confirming that observed residue results from melted candle wax rather than extracted ear contents. No randomized controlled trials have demonstrated for ear candling in removing cerumen or alleviating related symptoms. Professional guidelines from the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, updated in , explicitly advise against its use, citing insufficient evidence for cerumen removal and risks of canal damage. A submission to Australia's , incorporating a brief of eight relevant papers, found consistent lack of across studies, attributing perceived benefits to effects or misattribution.

Explanations for Perceived Effects

Users of ear candling often report perceived removal of and impurities based on the dark residue found in the burned tip. Chemical and microscopic of this material reveals it to consist primarily of the 's own , , and combustion byproducts, with no detectable components of human cerumen or debris. This misattribution reinforces belief in the procedure's efficacy, as the visible residue is erroneously linked to extraction from the rather than the 's self-degradation during . The warmth generated by the flame near the may produce a transient soothing , akin to a mild application, which some interpret as therapeutic relief for conditions like ear fullness or discomfort. Tympanometric studies in controlled models demonstrate that no significant or is created to draw material from the , undermining claims of suction-based extraction. Subjective improvements in symptoms such as , sinus pressure, or hearing clarity are consistently explained by the placebo effect, where anticipation of benefit yields reported symptom reduction absent objective physiological changes. Clinical trials and reviews find no measurable alterations in cerumen volume, auditory function, or toxin levels post-procedure, attributing perceived outcomes to psychological expectation and ritualistic elements of the practice. This aligns with broader patterns in alternative therapies, where sensory cues and sustain perceived value despite empirical null results.

Health Risks and Adverse Events

Documented Injuries and Complications

Ear candling has been associated with various and obstructive injuries, primarily due to dripping molten , ash fallout, or direct contact during the procedure. A 1996 survey of 122 otolaryngologists reported 21 cases of injuries linked to ear candle use, including burns to the and external auditory , as well as canal occlusion from solidified candle . Similar complications were documented in a series of 22 patients treated for ear candling-related issues, where 8 cases (36.4%) involved burns, 2 cases (9.1%) featured burns to both the canal and tympanic membrane, and 1 case (4.5%) resulted in tympanic membrane requiring surgical intervention. Additional case reports highlight acute presentations such as sudden and otalgia following self-administered candling, often necessitating endoscopic removal of impacted wax and evaluation for underlying thermal damage. In pediatric instances, a 4-year-old experienced exacerbated by candling residue mistaken for , contributing to a broader review of 14 treated complications including 13 auricular and canal burns, 7 partial canal occlusions, and 1 perforation. These injuries underscore the risk of hot wax ingress, which can cause second-degree burns or exacerbate cerumen impaction, leading to conductive hearing deficits. Rare but severe outcomes include facial scalds from overturned candles and potential for hair ignition, as noted in clinical observations where improper positioning allowed flame proximity to flammable materials. secondary to breached barriers, such as perforated tympanic membranes, have also been reported, though less frequently quantified in . Overall, these documented events, drawn from otolaryngologic practices, indicate that ear candling poses tangible risks without corresponding therapeutic value, prompting bodies to advise against its use.

Factors Contributing to Harm

The insertion of a lit ear candle into the auditory canal exposes delicate ear structures to direct from the flame and molten wax, which can drip unpredictably during combustion, causing burns to the external , , face, or . In a survey of 122 otolaryngologists, 13 of 21 reported injuries involved burns, with some requiring hospitalization due to the severity of damage from hot wax contact. Mechanical trauma arises from the rigid, tapered end of the candle pressing against the ear canal walls or tympanic membrane, potentially perforating the eardrum or compacting cerumen deeper into the canal, exacerbating blockages. The same survey documented one case of eardrum perforation and seven instances of ear canal occlusion from candle wax fragments, highlighting how the procedure's purported suction fails to occur, instead allowing debris ingress. Falling ash and soot from the burning candle further contribute to canal irritation or obstruction, as the incomplete seal between candle and ear promotes particle entry rather than vacuum formation. Variability in candle materials and manufacturing—often unregulated or composites—leads to inconsistent burning rates and increased wax , amplifying drip risks even when instructions are followed. The U.S. has classified ear candles as unapproved devices posing inherent risks of severe burns and damage, irrespective of user technique.

Historical and Cultural Origins

Attributed Ancient Practices

Advocates of ear candling often claim the practice originated in ancient civilizations, including , , , , , , and pre-Columbian , with purported uses for ear complaints, spiritual purification, and holistic healing. Specific attributions include its employment by ancient for "cleansing, purifying, and healing on a basis," later extended to physical benefits, and by , , and as part of interconnected wellness rituals. Proponents further assert the technique dates back roughly 2,500 years, linking it to , , and Native American traditions, sometimes extending to , Aztec, or even mythical origins. Despite these attributions, no archaeological artifacts, ancient texts, or verifiable historical records substantiate ear candling as a practiced method in these cultures. The Tribal Council has explicitly denied any association, stating that the people neither endorse nor have ever engaged in the procedure, countering widespread claims of its popularization by the tribe of the Southwest. Such origin stories appear rooted in modern promotional narratives rather than empirical historical evidence, with critics noting the implausibility of ancient societies employing hollow candles in this manner absent supporting documentation.

Modern Popularization and Attribution to Cultures

Ear candling, also known as thermal-auricular therapy, experienced a resurgence in popularity during the amid the growth of alternative and holistic health practices in Western countries. A company, Biosun, initiated , testing, and commercial of ear candles during this decade, marketing them internationally for purported therapeutic uses such as removal and energy balancing. This commercialization aligned with broader trends in wellness, where such treatments were promoted through spas, naturopathic clinics, and direct-to-consumer kits, often emphasizing non-invasive, natural approaches over conventional . By the 1990s and 2000s, ear candling had become widely available in health stores and online, with campaigns highlighting anecdotal benefits despite emerging scientific . Proponents frequently attribute the practice's origins to ancient cultures, including the Native tribe of the American Southwest, ancient , , Romans, , and Mayans, claiming it was used for spiritual purification or ceremonial healing thousands of years ago. However, these historical claims lack verifiable archaeological or documentary evidence and appear rooted in promotional narratives rather than empirical records. The Tribal Council has explicitly denied any association, with public relations officer Vanessa Charles stating in 2004 that ear candling "is not and has never been a practice conducted by the tribe or any of our religious traditional people," emphasizing that such attributions misrepresent traditions for commercial gain. Independent analyses describe the origins as ambiguous or spurious, with no substantiated links to pre-modern societies beyond unverified oral histories promoted by candle manufacturers. This pattern reflects a common dynamic in alternative therapies, where modern inventions are retroactively tied to exotic or ancient pedigrees to enhance perceived legitimacy, often without rigorous historical validation.

Regulatory Framework

Government Warnings and Classifications

The U.S. (FDA) classifies ear candles as unapproved medical devices when promoted for therapeutic uses such as removal or treatment of ear infections, deeming such claims false and misleading due to lack of . The has issued public warnings since at least 2010, highlighting risks including burns, obstruction from candle residue, and potential perforation, and has enforced actions such as import alerts for products lacking validated efficacy data and warning letters to manufacturers and distributors. Health Canada similarly warns that ear candling provides no proven medical benefits and can cause serious injuries like burns and worsened earwax impaction, advising consumers to avoid the practice entirely. The agency prohibits the sale or import of ear candles for medical purposes, classifying them as illegal therapeutic products without licensing or evidence of safety or efficacy. Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) excludes ear candles from its regulatory framework for therapeutic goods, treating them as non-medical items unfit for health claims, though they remain available for non-therapeutic purposes without endorsement for safety or effectiveness. In other jurisdictions, such as certain Canadian territories like Nunavut, local governments echo national bans by issuing advisories against sales for health reasons, reinforcing classifications as hazardous pseudotherapies.

Restrictions on Sales and Promotion

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies ear candles as unapproved medical devices under Section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, prohibiting their importation, marketing, or sale with therapeutic claims such as earwax removal or treatment of ear infections. The FDA issues import alerts, such as Alert 77-01, to detain shipments of ear candles labeled for medical use, and has pursued enforcement actions including warning letters, injunctions, and product seizures against distributors promoting unsubstantiated health benefits. A 2011 federal court ruling dismissed a challenge by ear candle promoters against FDA warning letters, affirming restrictions on advertising claims that imply efficacy or safety for medical purposes. In , prohibits the importation of ear candles and deems their sale for medical reasons illegal, viewing them as posing undue health risks without proven benefits. This ban extends to promotional materials implying therapeutic value, with authorities issuing public advisories against such marketing to prevent consumer harm. Australia's () excluded ear candles from the therapeutic goods regulatory framework effective April 2023, barring their supply, listing, or promotion as treatments for any medical condition, in alignment with international precedents citing inefficacy and safety concerns. In the , while ear candles may bear as general consumer products, regulations under the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive restrict advertising that makes unverified health claims, with national authorities enforcing against misleading promotions; however, enforcement varies by member state and has not resulted in a uniform sales ban.

References

  1. [1]
    Ear candles--efficacy and safety - PubMed
    A limited clinical trial (eight ears) showed no removal of cerumen from the external auditory canal. Candle wax was actually deposited in some. A survey of 122 ...
  2. [2]
    Ear Candling to Remove Wax: Is it Real or a Hoax?
    Jul 23, 2023 · The origins and history of ear candling remain ambiguous. Various cultures, such as China, Egypt, the pre-Columbian Americas, Tibet, and the ...
  3. [3]
    Ear candles: a triumph of ignorance over science
    Mar 8, 2006 · The inescapable conclusion is that ear candles do more harm than good. Their use should be discouraged. Keywords. CerumenTherapy. Information.
  4. [4]
    Case Report - Canadian Family Physician
    No evidence suggests that ear candling is an effective treat- ment for any condition. On this basis, we believe it can do more harm than good and we ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Knowledge, Attitude and Complications Related to Ear Candling
    Jul 26, 2021 · Since there is no scientific basis for this treatment and its use may result in serious injuries, the Food and Drug Administration in the USA ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] It's Your Health - Ear Candling - à www.publications.gc.ca
    Ear Candling Is Ineffective. There is no scientific evidence to support the medicinal claims of heating of the ear canal and the creation of a suction effect ...Missing: peer- reviewed
  7. [7]
    Earwax blockage - Diagnosis & treatment - Mayo Clinic
    Sep 20, 2025 · This involves lighting one end of a hollow, cone-shaped candle and placing the other unlit end into the ear. The idea is that the heat from the ...Missing: steps | Show results with:steps
  8. [8]
    How Ear Candles Work: Efficacy and Safety - Healthline
    Nov 20, 2018 · Ear candling is thought to remove earwax and treat health conditions. However, there isn't reliable scientific proof of its benefits.
  9. [9]
    Ear Candling: Should You Try It? - WebMD
    Ear candling is a lousy way to remove wax. At its worst, it can cause serious harm to your ear. It's also risky to hold a lit candle close to your face.What's The Claim? · Featured · What Are The Facts?
  10. [10]
    Ear candling: Safety and side effects - MedicalNewsToday
    The FDA warn people to avoid using ear candles and coning practitioners. Ear candling may be dangerous for children and older adults. Last medically reviewed on ...What is ear candling? · Proposed benefits? · Is it safe?
  11. [11]
    Treating Minor Ear Problems - U.S. Pharmacist
    May 22, 2012 · The typical ear candle is a rigid 9- to 10-inch long hollow tube made of beeswax-coated fabric.10,12 One tip is tapered with a small hole. The ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Knowledge and Perception of Facial Candling for Allergic Rhinitis ...
    Aug 3, 2020 · According to the definition of the American Academy of Audiology, an ear candle is made from cloth soaked in beeswax or paraffin blended from ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Amongst ear candle makers is a variety of waxes used in the ...
    Soy wax has an oily content, it is created through hydrogenation utilizing toxic elements which are later removed which necessitates the bleaching of the newly ...
  14. [14]
    Worth knowing about ear candling & ear candles | Amplifon AU
    They are 20 to 30 cm long and are made of beeswax, essential oils, gauze and powdered plant parts, and cotton. Ear candles are used for relaxation, against ...Missing: materials | Show results with:materials
  15. [15]
    How to Make a Ear Candle: A Comprehensive Guide
    Materials Needed to Make a Ear Candle · Beeswax or paraffin wax · Cotton or muslin cloth strips · Essential oils (optional) · Scissors · Double boiler or microwave- ...
  16. [16]
    how do ear candles work? | Earpros US
    Sep 25, 2023 · They are typically made from a combination of natural materials, including beeswax or paraffin, and a fabric or paper cone. The composition of ...Missing: components | Show results with:components
  17. [17]
    Do ear candles work? - Verified Hearing
    Oct 16, 2023 · Any of the ear candle types could come in any shape, such as cylindrical and prismatic of the square or triangular forms, although the ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  18. [18]
    Ear Candling - Does It Really Work?
    Nov 26, 2021 · There are 3 different types of ear candles; Hopi ear candles, ear cones and natural ear cones, all of which have a 'chimney' that is meant ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  19. [19]
    Ear candling: Should general practitioners recommend it? - PMC - NIH
    No evidence suggests that ear candling is an effective treatment for any condition. On this basis, we believe it can do more harm than good.
  20. [20]
    Ear Candling: Is It a Safe and Effective Earwax Removal Method?
    May 30, 2023 · Proponents of ear candling claim that this procedure can remove earwax buildups, clear up sinus congestion, improve hearing problems, or even reduce migraines ...
  21. [21]
    The Hidden Risks and Dangers of Ear Candles
    Jun 3, 2025 · Proponents claim that as the candle burns, a vacuum is created, drawing out impurities, excess earwax, and even toxins from the ear canal.
  22. [22]
    A Deep Dive into This Ancient Practice and Its Spiritual Benefits
    Oct 18, 2024 · Aura Cleansing: The gentle warmth of the ear candle is said to cleanse the aura, the energetic field that surrounds the body. As blockages in ...
  23. [23]
    The amazing historical tradition and benefits of Hopi ear candles...
    Jan 18, 2019 · Ear candling, a traditional therapy used by the Ancient Greeks, was popularised by the Hopi Native American Tribe of the American South-West.
  24. [24]
    Ear Candling | CreativeHealingCen
    Many cultures considered coning a spiritual practice for clearing the mind and senses. They claimed it cleared the mind and body so you could meditate and open ...
  25. [25]
    Ear Candling - Therapeutic Touch By Kim
    $$90.00Ear Candling was used to assist in opening the body's spiritual centers, thus cleansing the spiritual body through the physical. It is still believed today ...
  26. [26]
    Ear Candling Detox treatment | SWEETSPOT WELLNESS
    ... Ear candling is an ancient healing modality used by many indigenous cultures. The original use of ear candles is for aura and spiritual cleansing for ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Ear Candling -- The Healing Benefits - Radiant-Wellness
    Ear Candling is a complementary modality to assist in the body's own ability to drain, eliminate toxins and to enhance the focus on wellness. Even more ...Missing: chakra | Show results with:chakra
  29. [29]
    Native American Ear Candling & Facial Cupping
    Ear Candles were used for cleansing, purifying and also spiritual healing. ... Benefits of Ear Candling. Clears the mind and senses; May improve hearing ...
  30. [30]
    Experts Update Best Practices for Diagnosis and Treatment of ...
    Jan 3, 2017 · DON'T use ear candles. There is no evidence that they remove impacted cerumen, and candling can cause serious damage to the ear canal and ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Options for the future regulation of 'low risk' products
    May 4, 2017 · It appears the scientific evidence suggests that ear candles do not work; that the residue left after burning which is used as evidence of ...
  32. [32]
    The Ugly Truth Behind Ear Candling - FOCUS
    Nov 20, 2019 · The hot wax can cause burn injuries to the ear and face and damage the ear canal. Additionally, the candle could push the natural ear wax even ...What Is Ear Candling? · What Do Experts Say About... · What Are Safer Methods To...
  33. [33]
    Ear candles: a triumph of ignorance over science - PubMed
    Furthermore, ear candles have been associated with ear injuries. The inescapable conclusion is that ear candles do more harm than good. Their use should be ...Missing: explanations perceived
  34. [34]
    What Is Ear Candling and Does It Work? - Bay Audiology
    Dec 6, 2022 · While the placebo effects of ear candling are pretty rampant, there's no scientific evidence to suggest ear candling is effective in any way. ...
  35. [35]
    Ear candles: debunking the myths - Alto Hearing
    Jun 21, 2023 · Once lit, the heat generated from the flame is said to create a vacuum effect, drawing out impurities, excess ear wax, and toxins from the ear ...Missing: explanations | Show results with:explanations
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Ear candling: Study of 22 cases and review of the literatures
    Jun 27, 2022 · Conclusion: In our study we found nothing beneficial in favour of ear candling rather it caused complications of burn and worsening of tinnitus, ...
  37. [37]
    Full article: Ear candling: A case report - Taylor & Francis Online
    We describe a case of ear candling presenting as hearing loss, and review the literature. Ear candling is considered as an alternate medical therapy for ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Where there's smoke there's fire—ear candling in a 4-year- old girl
    Fourteen had treated complications of ear candling, including 13 burns of the auricle and canal, 7 partial canal occlusions from candle wax and 1 eardrum ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Ear Candling: A Non-Proven Method for Benefits - Clinics in Surgery
    Aug 29, 2016 · Ear candling is dangerous and serves no purpose and there is actually no scientific evidence showing effectiveness for use.Missing: peer- reviewed<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    (PDF) Ear candling Should general practitioners recommend it?
    Aug 7, 2025 · [3] There is currently no scientific proof that ear candling is beneficial. In fact, it may cause more harm than good. ...
  41. [41]
    Import Alert 77-01 - accessdata.fda.gov
    ... risk of causing potentially severe skin/hair burns and ear damage. ... Desc: Ear Candles (a.k.a.; Ear cones and Auricular candles). Notes: 9/1/1998.Reason For Alert · Guidance · Charge
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Ear Candling: A Dangerous Pleasure?
    Dec 14, 2010 · Ear candling is claimed to create negative pressure for drawing cerumen from the ear and to ... the ancient Tibet, China, India, Egypt, and pre- ...
  43. [43]
    Ear Candling: A Fool Proof Method, or Proof of Foolish Methods?
    Dec 12, 2005 · Ancient Greeks used ear candling for "cleansing, purifying, and healing on a spiritual basis" and later for "physical benefits." American Hopi ...
  44. [44]
    The Ancient Art and History of Ear Candling
    Jul 28, 2017 · A gentle and non- invasive procedure, dating back approximately 2,500 years to the ancient Egyptians, Chinese, and American Indian cultures.
  45. [45]
    Ear Candling - hearing loss
    Dryer1 stated that people from Tibet, China, Egypt, the Pre-Columbian Americas, and possibly even the mythical city of Atlantis, participated in ear candling.
  46. [46]
    Ear Candling -- Playing With Fire - Mercola.com
    Feb 3, 2009 · No one seems to know for certain, The Hopi Tribal Council has publicly stated that the Hopi people do not and have never practiced ear candling.<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Debunking the myth surrounding Hopi Ear Candling
    Apr 2, 2024 · Multiple studies have found no evidence to support the use or benefits of Hopi candles and ear candling to improve hearing.
  48. [48]
    Does Ear Candling Work? + 6 Safe Ways to Remove Ear Wax
    Sep 7, 2023 · Like many old natural medicine practices, ear candling resurged in popularity in modern culture in the 1980s. ... Popular Posts. All Time ...
  49. [49]
    Hopi Ear Candling - Body Aura Therapies
    In the 1980s a German company Biosun started research and testing and producing them for the world market. A Typical Treatment: approx one hour: A consultation ...
  50. [50]
    History of Thermo-Auricular Therapy (Ear Candling) - Pain relief
    Evidence suggests that the practice of ear treatments became popular from the Native American Hopi Indian tribe of North Arizona which reached the rest of the ...Missing: modern popularization
  51. [51]
    Ear Candling: Ineffective and Risky | FDA
    Aug 27, 2015 · Home · For Consumers · Health Fraud Scams; Ear Candling: Ineffective and Risky. Health Fraud Scams. Ear Candling: Ineffective and Risky.
  52. [52]
    Ear candling - Canada.ca
    Feb 16, 2023 · Health risks · nearby objects catching fire · serious burns · injuries caused by hot wax dripping into ears, or onto skin or hair · candle wax ...Missing: efficacy studies
  53. [53]
    Medical devices reforms: Low risk products - other therapeutic goods
    Apr 13, 2023 · Ear candles were excluded from the therapeutic goods regulatory framework. For more information about consultations on reforms to low risk ...
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    Judge Snuffs Out Holistic Candlers Lawsuit - FDA Law Blog
    Mar 21, 2011 · Judge Richard Leon of the US District Court for the District of Columbia granted FDA's Motion to Dismiss a lawsuit filed in April 2010 by a group of ear candle ...Missing: sales | Show results with:sales
  56. [56]
    The future regulation of low risk products
    Apr 13, 2023 · The Government has decided that ear candles will be excluded from the therapeutic goods regulatory framework. Ongoing activities. Class I ...
  57. [57]
    Ear candling - Wikipedia
    Ear candling, also called ear coning or thermal-auricular therapy, is a pseudoscientific alternative medicine practice claiming to improve general health ...