Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ekalavya

Ekalavya is a character from the ancient Indian epic , portrayed as the son of Hiranyadhanus, a chieftain of the Nishada , who attains exceptional proficiency in through self-directed practice before a clay image of the guru Dronacharya, from whom he had been denied formal instruction due to his tribal origins. In the narrative recounted in the , Ekalavya's skills surpass those of , prompting Dronacharya to invoke the customary guru dakshina by demanding the young archer's right thumb, which Ekalavya severs without hesitation to honor the implicit teacher-student bond. This act preserves Dronacharya's pledge to make Arjuna unrivaled in while exemplifying Ekalavya's profound devotion and discipline. The episode underscores themes of perseverance and sacrificial loyalty in the Mahabharata's exploration of dharma, though later traditions and some recensions depict Ekalavya's subsequent alliance with forces opposed to the Pandavas, leading to his demise in conflict. Scholarly examinations of the critical edition highlight the story's roots in the epic's core text, distinguishing it from interpolations that expand Ekalavya's role in the Kurukshetra War. Ekalavya's legend has inspired educational models in India, such as the Ekalavya Model Residential Schools, emphasizing autonomous learning, yet analyses caution against anachronistic impositions of modern egalitarian ideals onto the epic's context of stratified martial training and strategic alliances.

Textual Origins

Primary Account in the Mahabharata

Ekalavya is depicted in the Adi Parva (Sambhava Parva, sections 123–135) of the Mahabharata as the son of Hiranyadhanus, king of the , a forest-dwelling tribal confederation considered among the lowest social groups in ancient Indian society. Desiring mastery in , the young approached Dronacharya, the martial preceptor of the Kuru royal s in Hastinapura, seeking admission as a . Dronacharya refused Ekalavya's request, bound by his exclusive commitment to train the sons of the royalty—particularly the and Kauravas—and by his personal vow to ensure that , his favored disciple, would remain unrivaled in among all contemporaries. Undeterred, Ekalavya retreated to the , fashioned a clay idol of Dronacharya, and installed it as his symbolic , venerating it with daily rituals of worship and obeisance while rigorously practicing in its presence. Through this devoted self-discipline, he attained exceptional proficiency surpassing even the pupils. Ekalavya's skill was dramatically revealed when he encountered a —belonging to the Kuru hunting party—and silenced its barking by embedding seven arrows into its mouth without injuring its vital parts, demonstrating precise control and speed. , witnessing this feat during a hunt and recognizing a rival whose dexterity exceeded his own, expressed distress to Dronacharya, recalling the guru's promise of his supremacy. Confronting Ekalavya, Dronacharya invoked the tradition of guru dakshina (preceptor's fee), demanding the prince's right as payment for the implicit discipleship through . Without hesitation, Ekalavya severed his thumb with a knife and offered it, thereby fulfilling the obligation and impairing his drawing hand, which preserved Arjuna's unparalleled status as the foremost archer. The Mahabharata narrative emphasizes Ekalavya's immediate compliance and satisfaction in discharging his perceived debt to the , concluding the episode without further elaboration on his subsequent life in this parva.

Variations in Puranas and Regional Texts

In the Devi Bhagavata Purana (Eighth Skandha), Ekalavya appears as the son of the Nishada king Hiranyadhanus and encounters Parashurama in the Dandaka forest during the sage's period of austerities, depicting him as a formidable tribal warrior with established martial credentials independent of the Mahabharata's archery training episode. This framing integrates Ekalavya into broader Puranic cosmology, linking his prowess to interactions with avatars and ascetics, though it does not alter the core devotional motif. Regional tribal , particularly among communities like the Bhils and , expands Ekalavya's legacy by portraying him as an ancestral of mastery and guardianship, with narratives highlighting his post-sacrifice exploits in protecting tribal domains from external threats. These oral traditions often amplify his tribal heritage, presenting him as a symbol of self-reliant defiance rooted in hunter-gatherer , diverging from the epic's royal-tutor dynamics to foreground communal . Despite these adaptations, versions in Puranic references and folk retellings preserve uniform emphasis on Ekalavya's guru bhakti—manifested through idol worship and voluntary disfigurement—and the thumb sacrifice as an of total , reflecting enduring textual fidelity to over skill acquisition alone.

Core Narrative Elements

Ekalavya's Background and Quest for Knowledge

Ekalavya was the son of Hiranyadhanus, a king of the , a tribal in ancient described in the as dwelling in forested and hilly terrains. The sustained themselves through hunting, fishing, and gathering, activities suited to their peripheral existence beyond the core Vedic settlements, while maintaining internal autonomy under chieftains who exercised princely authority over their domains. This positioning outside the framework did not preclude martial traditions, as tribal leaders like Hiranyadhanus commanded respect and resources amid regional power dynamics. Ekalavya's pursuit of advanced skills arose from the exigencies of tribal life, where proficiency in ensured in defending kin groups and vital such as deer populations against rival claimants or predators in contested woodlands. Motivated by these practical imperatives rather than lofty aspirations unmoored from context, he sought tutelage from Dronacharya, the esteemed preceptor engaged exclusively in imparting weaponry to the royal scions, including the and Kauravas, under the kingdom's patronage. Dronacharya's curriculum prioritized allegiance to the ruling house, embedding education within networks of feudal obligation and hereditary entitlement prevalent in the polity. Upon presenting himself at Dronacharya's , Ekalavya formally requested initiation as a , embodying a direct appeal across social divides characteristic of fluid yet stratified ancient polities where exceptional resolve could prompt such overtures. The preceptor's refusal underscored entrenched norms restricting elite instruction to those bound by or ties to the throne, thereby preserving strategic advantages for the central authority amid surrounding tribal autonomies. This encounter highlighted the interplay of survival-driven ambition with institutionalized barriers, setting the stage for Ekalavya's independent path without implying inherent inequities beyond contemporaneous conventions.

Self-Training Through Devotion

Ekalavya constructed a clay image of Dronacharya in a remote clearing and installed it as the focal point of his regimen, venerating the with daily rituals as if it were his living . This symbolic preceptor served to channel his resolve, enabling structured self-discipline in the absence of direct tutelage. Through persistent practice before the , Ekalavya honed the mechanics of —fixing the arrow to the string, precise aiming, and controlled release—achieving a of hand and accuracy born of repetitive exertion and mental focus on the imagined master's oversight. His relied on intrinsic , where amplified determination, yielding technical mastery comparable to or surpassing that of Dronacharya's formal pupils. Ekalavya's proficiency manifested in feats requiring split-second precision, such as when a stray intruded upon his session by barking; he responded by loosing seven arrows in swift succession into its open mouth, embedding them densely enough to prevent further sound or closure without wounding the animal. This demonstration underscored the causal efficacy of solitary, devotion-driven training in surmounting skill barriers typically addressed through institutional guidance.

The Guru Dakshina Demand and Its Aftermath

Drona, having promised unrivaled mastery in , observed 's exceptional skill during an encounter in the forest, where the Nishada prince had precisely filled a dog's mouth with arrows without injury. Recognizing the potential eclipse of Arjuna's supremacy, invoked the implicit guru-shishya relationship forged by Ekalavya's devotional practice before the clay idol, demanding the youth's right thumb as guru dakshina to fulfill traditional obligations. Ekalavya, embodying unwavering loyalty, instantly complied by severing his right with a and presenting the bloodied offering at Drona's feet, without or delay. This mechanical transaction—rooted in the cultural norm of dakshina as non-negotiable tribute—directly curtailed Ekalavya's precision in nocking and drawing the bow, as the opposable is essential for stable grip and release in . The immediate consequence reinforced the hierarchy within the court, safeguarding Arjuna's preeminence and the strategic military advantage of royal-trained warriors over tribal autodidacts, thereby aligning with Drona's commitment to his princely pupils. Ekalavya's self-inflicted ensured no rival could immediately challenge the established order, though his foundational prowess persisted in adapted forms.

Interpretations and Philosophical Implications

Traditional Perspectives on Devotion and Dharma

In classical Hindu interpretations, Ekalavya exemplifies guru bhakti as a force capable of forging mastery without formal discipleship, highlighting the transformative power of unwavering devotion. By erecting a clay idol of Dronacharya in the forest and practicing archery before it with intense faith, Ekalavya internalized the guru's essence, achieving proficiency that rivaled his formally trained peers. This method underscores the traditional view that true transmission of knowledge occurs through the disciple's sincere reverence, transcending physical presence or explicit consent, as devotion invokes the guru's subtle grace (kripa). Ekalavya's self-imposed validates the principle of sadhana—rigorous personal effort—elevated by , where the idol serves as a focal point for mental and imaginative . Traditional commentators, drawing from the Mahabharata's intent, portray this as evidence of individual in dharma's pursuit, emphasizing that exceptional outcomes stem from internal resolve rather than institutional access. His attainment demonstrates causal efficacy: devotion aligns the practitioner's actions with cosmic order, yielding results independent of societal barriers. Dronacharya's subsequent demand for the right thumb as guru dakshina aligns with dharma's contextual imperatives, as the guru upheld his vow to the Kuru patrons to cultivate unparalleled martial excellence in Arjuna, thereby preserving equilibrium against potential threats from non-allied tribes like the Nishadas. This act prevented the dilution of specialized skills intended for royal defense, reflecting the guru's duty to prioritize sworn obligations over unsolicited trainees whose prowess could shift alliances adversely. Ekalavya's immediate compliance without grievance exemplifies sacrificial alignment with dharma, where the thumb's offering symbolizes the surrender of ego (ahamkara) to the guru's authority, ensuring balanced retribution for appropriated knowledge. The episode's outcomes reinforce causal realism in traditional readings: Ekalavya's pre-sacrifice mastery affirms self-reliance's validity, while the impairment curbs dominance without negating his devotion-forged abilities, as he later contributed valorously in battle. This portrays not as rigid equality but as proportionate justice, where unearned emulation incurs a calibrated , fostering in hierarchies essential to ancient societal stability. Such perspectives prioritize Ekalavya's voluntary as heroic fidelity, over any narrative of loss, aligning with Vyasa's broader thematic emphasis on duty-bound resolve amid ethical complexities.

Strategic and Realpolitik Defenses of Dronacharya's Actions

Dronacharya's refusal to formally train and subsequent demand for the thumb as guru dakshina can be viewed through the lens of royal loyalty and state security, given his role as to the princes funded by Hastinapura's resources. As a warrior bound to the court, Drona prioritized preventing the creation of an uncontrolled martial asset that could bolster adversarial forces, particularly since Ekalavya hailed from the Nishada tribe, whose kingdoms often aligned with anti- powers like under . Historical textual accounts indicate Nishada forces, including elements under leaders like Manimana, participated in coalitions opposing dominance, heightening the risk of Ekalavya's skills being weaponized against his patrons if left unchecked. Preserving Arjuna's unparalleled supremacy served as a strategic bulwark for stability and the eventual at , where Arjuna's mastery—augmented by divine weapons like and tactical acumen—proved decisive in neutralizing key foes such as , , and , thereby enabling the ' righteous victory. Drona's earlier vow to Arjuna of unequaled prowess underscored this causal necessity: diffused elite skill distribution risked diluting the kingdom's defensive edge and inviting internal anarchy or external conquest, as uneven power hierarchies in ancient Indian polities often precipitated fragmentation. Commentators note that without such hierarchy, the war's outcome—pivotal for upholding against —could have favored aggression, underscoring Drona's calculus in curbing a potential rival. Formal gurukul training under imposed accountability through oaths of allegiance and ethical indoctrination in , contrasting the perils of self-taught warriors who, unbound by such ties, might deploy advanced techniques for personal or tribal vendettas rather than state interests. In the Mahabharata's martial context, self-reliance like Ekalavya's clay idol practice evaded oversight, fostering unpredictable threats akin to rogue elements in feudal warfare, where loyalty lapses could cascade into broader betrayals—as evidenced by later Nishada engagements against heroes, including Arjuna's confrontation with Ekalavya's son. This approach aligned with Drona's mandate to forge disciplined Kshatriyas aligned to royal , mitigating misuse of weaponry in an era where innovations demanded controlled proliferation to avert societal destabilization.

Modern Critiques Framing Caste Discrimination

In contemporary anti-caste scholarship and Dalit activism, the Ekalavya episode is frequently recast as an allegory for varna-enforced exclusion from knowledge systems, with Dronacharya's rejection framed as prejudice against the Nishada tribe's perceived low status, symbolizing barriers erected by upper varnas to maintain dominance over education and martial skills. This view amplifies Ekalavya's self-training and subsequent disfigurement as emblematic of systemic sabotage, where the guru dakshina—his right thumb—is not an act of devotion but a deliberate crippling of subaltern potential, reinforcing Brahminical hegemony in interpretive works from 2017 onward. Such readings, prevalent in left-leaning discourses, posit the narrative as evidence of birth-determined rigidity, ignoring that Ekalavya held princely lineage as son of Hiranyadhanus, ruler of the Nishada kingdom, which textual accounts describe as a entity rather than a servile . The Mahabharata's refusal rationale centers on Drona's to Arjuna's unrivaled prowess and to the Kuru , not explicit varna prohibitions, a detail empirical analysis of the confirms without reference to hereditary pollution. Furthermore, the epic's portrayal of merit overriding origins—Karna, raised in a suta family yet tutored by to rival gods in , and Vidura, offspring of a sudra mother who ascends as chief advisor through wisdom—demonstrates narrative flexibility incompatible with absolute determinism. Causally, these modern framings risk prioritizing structural grievance over the story's depiction of autonomous mastery and elective , as Ekalavya voluntarily offers his post-achievement, diverging from interpretations that recast him as passive ; this shift, often unmoored from primary textual fidelity, aligns with academic tendencies—systemically biased toward paradigms—to foster dependency narratives rather than self-reliant emulation of the protagonist's initiative.

Cultural and Societal Impact

Symbolism in Literature, Arts, and Folklore

Ekalavya's archetype of devoted self-instruction recurs in , often centering the clay idol of as a emblem of resourceful ingenuity amid exclusion. Nandalal Bose's 1913 painting depicts the archer honing skills before this improvised , illustrating visualization's role in mastery and the triumph of inner resolve over formal barriers. Similarly, Y.G. Srimati's circa 1945–1946 work portrays Ekalavya's rigorous practice, emphasizing solitary discipline's efficacy in skill acquisition. These representations balance tragedy with agency, portraying the thumb's severance not merely as loss but as a deliberate act affirming hierarchical respect. In sculpture, Ekalavya symbolizes sacrificial humility's duality—profound loss intertwined with moral adherence. Gieve Patel's piece, featuring a defenseless thumbless hand, confronts viewers with the physical toll of devotion, evoking vulnerability while underscoring the epic's tension between personal ambition and . Abstract interpretations, such as Sukanta Chowdhury's indigo-toned , abstract the figure to highlight enduring resilience, transforming mythic handicap into a of adaptive strength. Literature and theater adapt Ekalavya's tale to explore resilience's , with the guru dakshina epitomizing unparalleled . Sudipta Bhawmik's play dramatizes the Nishada youth's idol-based training, foregrounding tribal ingenuity against elite denial and framing the sacrifice as humility's zenith. Films like Eklavya: The Royal Guard (2007) invoke the legend's narrative frame to probe loyalty's consequences, narrating Ekalavya's devotion as a cautionary of unyielding fidelity. Regional extends Ekalavya's legacy beyond the , recasting him as a forest embodying prowess and post-sacrifice guardianship. These oral expansions, rooted in tribal Nishada traditions, depict his survival as valor's persistence, safeguarding against encroachment and symbolizing marginalized communities' latent power.

Embodiment in Educational Initiatives

The Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRS), administered by the , were introduced in 1997–98 to deliver free, high-quality boarding to Scheduled (ST) students from classes VI to XII in remote and aspirational districts. The program's nomenclature draws from the legendary figure's archetype of unyielding self-discipline and innovative learning, positioning the schools as embodiments of autonomous skill acquisition to bridge educational gaps for tribal communities historically marginalized from mainstream opportunities. Post-2018 enhancements, including increased funding and centralized management via the National Education Society for Tribal Students (NESTS), accelerated expansion, with 728 schools approved nationwide by 2025 and approximately 479 operational, serving blocks with over 50% ST population and 20,000-plus residents. These institutions prioritize holistic growth that parallels Ekalavya's devotional self-training, integrating core academics in and sciences with vocational modules in , handicrafts, and to cultivate practical self-sufficiency. Cultural preservation components, such as tribal instruction and traditional , counter assimilation pressures while fostering against dependency, aligning with the legend's causal emphasis on internalized mastery over external validation. Boarding facilities, equipped with modern labs and sports amenities, enforce disciplined routines to instill habits of independent achievement, targeting employability and transitions for students from forested and hilly terrains. Empirical outcomes reflect partial validation of the Ekalavya-inspired model of disciplined : has scaled to benefit around 3.5 ST students by 2025, enhancing secondary rates in isolated areas where prior was negligible. However, metrics reveal persistent hurdles, including a fivefold rise in dropout rates since quadrupled—reaching notable levels among Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs)—due to socio-economic pulls and infrastructural variances, indicating that self-reliant requires complementary and for sustained causal . Despite these, the program's structural focus on merit-based progression has demonstrably elevated pass percentages in board exams for participants compared to non-EMRS tribal peers in analogous locales.

Role in Contemporary Social Debates

In contemporary Indian social discourse, the Ekalavya narrative is frequently invoked by proponents of and policies as an emblem of systemic denial of educational opportunities to marginalized communities, particularly Scheduled Tribes and Dalits, to justify quotas as for historical inequities. For instance, commentators argue that Ekalavya's exclusion from formal under Dronacharya exemplifies the barriers lower castes faced, paralleling debates on merit versus where upper-caste access to resources is seen as perpetuating disadvantage. This framing gained prominence in discussions around the recommendations in the 1990s and persists in critiques of elite institutions, with Ekalavya symbolizing the "sacrificed thumb" upon which is allegedly built. Critics of this interpretation, often from perspectives emphasizing individual agency, contend that the story's selective politicization overlooks Ekalavya's voluntary and self-directed mastery of , which surpassed Arjuna's skills through rigorous practice without institutional support, thus underscoring causal factors like personal and discipline over immutable barriers. Textual analysis reveals Ekalavya's Nishada tribal affiliation as a potential concern amid Kuru-Panchala rivalries, rather than purely caste-based rejection, challenging rigid narratives propagated in and , where systemic left-leaning biases may amplify victimhood at the expense of empirical textual nuance. Moreover, the depicts notable —such as Karna's rise from suta origins to kingship and Vidura's advisory role despite low birth—evidencing fluid dynamics inconsistent with claims of absolute hereditary rigidity, as supported by epic scholarship highlighting dharma's emphasis on conduct over birth. Right-leaning rebuttals prioritize the legend's lessons in and the perils of , interpreting Dronacharya's demand as a test of true that Ekalavya passed through sacrifice, thereby influencing arguments against quotas that undermine merit by fostering dependency rather than emulating Ekalavya's autonomous excellence. This view posits that the story causally rewards perseverance amid adversity, cautioning that modern equity policies risk inverting by prioritizing group identity over verifiable competence, as evidenced in ongoing judicial and policy debates like the 2023 rulings on caps. Such interpretations counter prevailing academic tendencies to retroject contemporary onto ancient texts, advocating first-principles evaluation of outcomes like Ekalavya's post-sacrifice prowess as proof that opportunity arises from effort, not mandated access.

References

  1. [1]
    Marginalized yet Empowered: A Study of Ekalavya and Karna from ...
    Jul 29, 2019 · The paper analyses two such characters: Ekalavya and Karna from the Mahabharata, comparing their individual situations amidst the grandeur of the epic.
  2. [2]
    Ekalavya: Significance and symbolism
    Oct 7, 2025 · Ekalavya is depicted as a self-taught archer from Indian mythology, embodying determination and aspiration. He learned archery through devotion, ...
  3. [3]
    the ekalavya relation: translation, colonialism and modernity
    In the Mahabharata, the legendary hero with so-called “tribal'(?) origin, Eklavya, after bein; refused by the royal preceptor Dronacharya, the military-trainer.
  4. [4]
    The Mahabharata, Book 1 - Sambhava Parva - Sacred Texts
    Then Drona, O king, addressed Ekalavya, saying, 'If, O hero, thou art really my pupil, give me then my fees.' On hearing these words, Ekalavya was very much ...
  5. [5]
    Ekalavya, Ekalavyā: 9 definitions - Wisdom Library
    Sep 16, 2024 · Ekalavya (एकलव्‍य): He was a young prince of the Nishadha tribes, who achieves a skill level parallel to the great Arjuna, despite Drona's ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Nishada: Significance and symbolism
    Aug 29, 2025 · Nishada in Hinduism denotes a mixed caste primarily associated with occupations like fishing, originating from unions between Sudra and Kshatriya families.
  9. [9]
    niShAda-s and shabara-s of jambudvIpa: What you see is what it is
    Jul 9, 2012 · Hunter-gathers are common among them and it is ... tribal India that is very different from the tribal situation in Papua or Australia.
  10. [10]
    Ekalavya: The Unsung Hero of the Mahabharata - Vedadhara
    Ekalavya was a young Nishada boy who wanted to learn archery from Dronacharya, the teacher of the Pandavas and Kauravas.
  11. [11]
    THE EKALAVYA CONFUSION - Dialogue With Dharma - Substack
    Apr 5, 2023 · Ekalavya to kaurava princes (Sambhava Parva of Adi Parva in Mahabharata( Sec. CXXXIV)). Ekalavya was son of Hiranyadhanus. Who was him ...
  12. [12]
    Mahabharat Episode 63: How Ekalavya Lost His Thumb
    He complains to Dronacharya about the situation, and Dronacharya asks Ekalavya to cut off his own right thumb as a guru dakshina . Ekalavya offers his thumb ...
  13. [13]
    Ekalavya's right thumb and the importance of opposable thumbs
    Apr 17, 2023 · Ekalavya cut off his thumb to show devotion. Opposable thumbs allow for firm grips and manipulation, unique to humans. Dronacharya likely knew ...
  14. [14]
    The Story of Eklavya and Dronacharya
    Eklavya was the son of a poor hunter. He wanted to learn archery to save the deer in the forest that were being hunted by the leopards.Missing: Vishnu Purana Devi
  15. [15]
    Ekalavya and Arjuna - Radha name
    Sep 5, 2025 · Initially Ekalavya's guru rejected him because he considered him to be born of a low caste, yet due to his faith in Dronacarya, he established ...Missing: traditional Hindu
  16. [16]
    The History of Ekalavya11 | On Hinduism - Oxford Academic
    The Ekalavya story is not only about feats of archery but also about social reform and the virtue of devotion to the guru. The Dalits use the story of Ekalavya ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    In Drona's defence - the case of Ekalavya - Reflections
    Nov 23, 2016 · One must go to the original Mahabharata and acquaint oneself with ... Critical Edition from Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute (BORI).
  18. [18]
    Dharma and Caste in the Mahabharata | The India Forum
    Feb 1, 2021 · The Pandavas, amazed by this incident, sought out Ekalavya, who introduced himself with his parental identity and as a shishya of Drona. The ...
  19. [19]
    Nishada - AncientVoice - Wikidot
    Jan 13, 2010 · Nishada was the kingdom of the Nishada Tribe, a tribe of people who the Vedic people considered as out-casts.
  20. [20]
    Who were the allies of the Kauravas in the Kurukshetra War? - Quora
    May 5, 2015 · Nishada tribes around Magadha- There were several Nishada kingdoms. The Nishada kingdoms under Manimana joined the Pandavas. Kamyaka ...
  21. [21]
    Advanced Archery in the Age of the Mahabharata - Indica Today
    Jun 26, 2020 · Ekalavya tried to excel in archery. Arjuna took archery to the next level by shooting with both hands and by learning to shoot the targets ...
  22. [22]
    HISTORY The Nishada Kingdom (Sanskrit - Facebook
    Jun 7, 2021 · The son of Ekalavya received Arjuna in battle. The encounter that took place between the Kuru hero and the Nishadas was furious. Unvanquished in ...Missing: alliances anti-
  23. [23]
    (PDF) Ancient Indian War & Self-Protection Technology
    Sep 1, 2024 · 3.3.7.1 Study of combat strategies and tac cs employed by ancient Indian warriors: (1) Terrain U liza on: Book: Ancient Indian T ...Missing: accountability | Show results with:accountability
  24. [24]
    Eklavya and the Adivasi-Dalit Rejection of Brahminism | Velivada
    Apr 27, 2017 · The myth of Eklavya is taken by many in the Adivasi and Dalit communities as an example of the social havoc Brahminism attempts to wreak.Missing: discourse symbolism
  25. [25]
    Ekalavya: A Progressive Reading | HuffPost Religion
    Jul 6, 2015 · Ekalavya: A Progressive Reading. Hindu scriptures, like all religious texts, can be interpreted to support whatever worldview one chooses. We ...Missing: bhakti | Show results with:bhakti
  26. [26]
    Eklavya and Karna: An Understanding of Discrimination of ...
    Apr 27, 2020 · Eklavya and Karna: An Understanding of Discrimination of Marginalised in Indian Education System ... caste and religious discrimination. Many ...
  27. [27]
    Ekalavya, Arjuna and Drona - - Boloji
    Feb 11, 2022 · In present political discourses of certain quarters, Ekalavya is taken as representative of the 'Dalit', and Drona in this particular episode ...
  28. [28]
    Issues and Analysis on Nishada Kingdom for State ... - Abhipedia
    Various ancient texts associate the Nishadas with hunting and fishing. ... A mountain range in ancient India is named Nishada, mentioned along with ...
  29. [29]
    On 'Dharma and Caste in Mahabharata' - The India Forum
    Mar 5, 2021 · ... caste system. Egalitarianists rightly see the Eklavya episode as not showing Eklavya's brave and unrequited devotion to his teacher but as a ...
  30. [30]
    The Gita is universal and still endorses caste inequality. But story of ...
    Aug 14, 2021 · The Gita's messages of universalism may resonate with modern notions of inclusion, but the text also endorses caste inequality and, by extension ...
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Eklavya Practicing Archery before an Icon of Dronacharya - India ...
    In this unprecedented rendering of the subject, Eklavya is shown majestically releasing his arrow in front of the monochromatic clay icon of his guru. View more.Missing: construction Ganguli
  33. [33]
    Eklavya - The Guild
    Gieve Patel depicts the epic tragedy of Eklavya by representing a thumbless hand. The sculpture gives us a visual shock because this hand is defenseless.<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    Plays - Sudipta Bhawmik
    Ekalavya, a tribal (Nishaad) hunter developed his archery skills in front of an idol of the great Kuru weapons teacher Dronacharya. Witnessing the tribal boy's ...
  36. [36]
    Eklavya: The Royal Guard (2007) - IMDb
    Rating 6/10 (3,604) The film opens with the unmistakable voice of Amitabh Bachchan narrating the legend of Eklavya from the Hindu epic, the Mahabharata. Eklavya, a child of ...
  37. [37]
    Ekalavya : The Legend of the Archer and a Perfect Disciple
    Jul 2, 2015 · Ekalavya was a forest boy who had some god gifted characteristics that made him different from other kids. He had a spark in himself that made ...
  38. [38]
    Eklavya Model Residential Schools - Drishti IAS
    Jul 11, 2025 · About: EMRS is a flagship initiative launched by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) in 1998 to provide free, quality residential education to ...
  39. [39]
    Eklavya Model Residential School - Officers Pulse
    May 21, 2021 · About EMRS The scheme of Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRSs) was introduced in the year 1997-98 with an objective to provide quality ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    reforms in emrs operations - Press Release: Press Information Bureau
    Aug 21, 2025 · In addition to the 288 EMRSs sanctioned under Article 275(1), a further 440 EMRSs were proposed across the country, bringing the total to 728 ...
  42. [42]
    Government to establish 728 Eklavya Model Residential Schools for ...
    Apr 4, 2025 · The Ministry has set a goal of establishing a total of 728 EMRSs across India, benefiting approximately 3.5 lakh tribal students.
  43. [43]
    Curriculum - Eklavya Model Residential School
    We emphasize a strong academic foundation through the following core subjects: Mathematics: Developing analytical and problem-solving skills. Science: Fostering ...Missing: holistic STEM
  44. [44]
    Union government to establish 440 Eklavya Model Residential ... - PIB
    Apr 2, 2025 · Skill development and vocational training programs to enhance employability. Further, National Education Society for Tribal Students (NESTS) has ...Missing: self- reliance
  45. [45]
    Eklavya Model Residential Schools: Transforming Tribal Education
    Reducing Dropout Rates: Address high dropout rates among tribal children by providing a conducive learning environment. Holistic Development: Equip students ...Missing: improvements | Show results with:improvements
  46. [46]
    Dropout of Children from EMRS - PIB
    Aug 7, 2025 · ... tribal students, several facilities are being provided in Eklavya Model Residential Schools. These include well-equipped classrooms with ...
  47. [47]
    Eklavya Schools: As Fund Allocation Went Up By 4 Times, Dropout ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · So far, 479 EMRSs have been made functional out of the 728 approved. However, as per information provided by Union Minister of State for Tribal ...Missing: improvements | Show results with:improvements
  48. [48]
    India's Tribal Schools Fail Their Most Vulnerable Students - Frontline
    Jan 7, 2025 · Why a third of India's 716 Eklavya Model Schools for tribal children remains 'non-functional' · Enrolment of “Particularly Vulnerable Tribal ...Missing: improvements | Show results with:improvements
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Impact of Ekalavya Model Residential Schools in Enhancing the ...
    The basic purpose of these schools is to provide Scheduled Tribe (ST) students the best opportunities in education at par with the non-ST students ...
  50. [50]
    Eklavya and the merit debate | The Indian Express
    Sep 18, 2013 · Caste discrimination is still rampant in 21st century India. That attitudes have not changed is evident in the unrelenting atrocities ...Missing: contemporary | Show results with:contemporary
  51. [51]
    The Republic of Reservations - Round Table India
    Jan 31, 2019 · We need to recall that the edifice of merit is constructed on Eklavya's thumb. The autarchic Indian society was rudely jolted by colonialism ...