Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Elliptic coordinate system

The elliptic coordinate system is a two-dimensional orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system in the Euclidean plane, characterized by families of confocal ellipses and hyperbolas that serve as its level curves. In this system, the coordinates (\mu, \nu) transform to Cartesian coordinates (x, y) via the equations x = c \cosh \mu \cos \nu and y = c \sinh \mu \sin \nu, where c > 0 is a fixed scale parameter representing half the distance between the foci located at (\pm c, 0). The coordinate \mu (ranging from 0 to \infty) parameterizes the confocal ellipses, starting from the degenerate ellipse (the line segment between the foci) at \mu = 0 and expanding outward, while \nu (ranging from 0 to $2\pi) parameterizes the confocal hyperbolas, which branch into the first and third quadrants or second and fourth quadrants depending on the value. The scale factors for both coordinates are equal, h_\mu = h_\nu = c \sqrt{\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu}, ensuring orthogonality and making the system conformal, which simplifies the Laplacian and other differential operators. This coordinate system finds applications in , particularly for boundary value problems exhibiting elliptical symmetry, such as solving Laplace's or Helmholtz's equation inside elliptical domains for electrostatic potentials or . It is also employed in the analysis of integrable dynamical systems, like billiards confined to elliptical tables, where the confocal property preserves integrability under reflections. In three dimensions, the elliptic system extends naturally to elliptic cylindrical coordinates by adjoining a linear z-coordinate, with z unchanged and scale factor h_z = 1, facilitating solutions for cylindrical geometries with elliptical cross-sections, such as in propagation. Further generalizations include prolate and , which are obtained by rotating the elliptic system about an axis to form surfaces of revolution for axisymmetric problems in and .

Two-Dimensional Fundamentals

Definition

The two-dimensional elliptic coordinate system is an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system in the plane, parameterized by μ and ν, which transform to Cartesian coordinates (x, y) via the equations x = a \cosh \mu \cos \nu y = a \sinh \mu \sin \nu where a > 0 is the interfocal distance parameter. These equations arise from the geometry of confocal conic sections, with constant-μ curves forming ellipses and constant-ν curves forming hyperbolas. The coordinate μ ranges over [0, ∞), functioning as a radial-like parameter that quantifies progression from the innermost degenerate ellipse (the line segment joining the foci at μ = 0) to larger enclosing ellipses as μ increases. The coordinate ν spans [0, 2π), serving as an angular parameter that traces the elliptic "longitude" around the foci. The foci of this system are fixed at the points (±a, 0) on the x-axis, ensuring the confocal property where every and in the coordinate grid shares these two points. This formulation is motivated by elliptical geometry and facilitates the solution of boundary value problems with elliptical symmetry, such as those governed by in or hydrodynamics.

Geometric Interpretation

The elliptic coordinate system in two dimensions provides a geometric framework where points in the are parameterized by distances relative to two fixed foci located at (\pm a, 0). Constant \mu curves correspond to confocal ellipses centered at the , sharing the same foci, with the semi-major axis along the x-direction given by a \cosh \mu and the semi-minor axis by a \sinh \mu, where \mu \geq 0. These ellipses are highly elongated near \mu = 0, degenerating to the between the foci as \mu \to 0, and become less elongated, approaching circular shapes as \mu increases. Constant \nu curves, for $0 \leq \nu < 2\pi, form confocal hyperbolae also sharing the foci at (\pm a, 0), with branches opening along the y-direction. These hyperbolae have asymptotes oriented at angles \nu and \pi - \nu relative to the positive x-axis, reflecting the angular parameterization that traces the curve's orientation. The confocal nature ensures that every ellipse and hyperbola in the family intersects at right angles, establishing the orthogonality of the coordinate system at all intersection points. This perpendicularity arises from the geometric properties of confocal conics, where the tangent directions satisfy the condition for orthogonal trajectories. The coordinates \mu and \nu directly relate to the distances d_1 and d_2 from a point to the foci, with \mu determined by \cosh \mu = (d_1 + d_2)/(2a), capturing the sum of distances characteristic of ellipses, and \nu by \cos \nu = (d_1 - d_2)/(2a), adjusted via the imaginary unit i in some formulations to align with hyperbolic differences. This distance-based interpretation underscores the system's utility for problems with elliptical or hyperbolic symmetry, such as potential theory around elongated objects. The parametric equations x = a \cosh \mu \cos \nu, y = a \sinh \mu \sin \nu serve as the foundation for visualizing these curves.

Scale Factors and Metrics

In μ-ν Coordinates

In the μ-ν formulation of the two-dimensional , the position is parameterized by
x = a \cosh \mu \cos \nu, \quad y = a \sinh \mu \sin \nu,
where a > 0 is a scale parameter, \mu \geq 0, and $0 \leq \nu < 2\pi. These parametric equations define confocal and as level curves of μ and ν, respectively.
The scale factors are derived from the partial derivatives of the position vector \mathbf{r} = (x, y). Specifically,
h_\mu = \left| \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial \mu} \right| = a \sqrt{\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu},
obtained by computing
\left( \frac{\partial x}{\partial \mu} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial y}{\partial \mu} \right)^2 = a^2 (\sinh^2 \mu \cos^2 \nu + \cosh^2 \mu \sin^2 \nu) = a^2 (\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu).
Similarly,
h_\nu = \left| \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial \nu} \right| = a \sqrt{\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu},
since the system is orthogonal and the expressions symmetrize under differentiation with respect to ν. An equivalent form is h_\mu = h_\nu = a \sqrt{\cosh^2 \mu - \cos^2 \nu}, reflecting the identity \cosh^2 \mu - \sinh^2 \mu = 1 and \cos^2 \nu + \sin^2 \nu = 1.
The line element in these coordinates is
ds^2 = h_\mu^2 d\mu^2 + h_\nu^2 d\nu^2 = a^2 (\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu) (d\mu^2 + d\nu^2). The infinitesimal area element follows as the product of the scale factors:
dA = h_\mu h_\nu \, d\mu \, d\nu = a^2 (\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu) \, d\mu \, d\nu.
For the Laplacian operator applied to a scalar function Φ, the general orthogonal form simplifies due to h_\mu = h_\nu = h:
\nabla^2 \Phi = \frac{1}{h^2} \left( \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial \mu^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial \nu^2} \right) = \frac{1}{a^2 (\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu)} \left( \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial \mu^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial \nu^2} \right). This form facilitates separation of variables in elliptic coordinates for solving partial differential equations like .

In σ-τ Coordinates

The σ-τ coordinates provide an alternative parametrization of the , related to the standard μ-ν form by the transformation σ = cosh μ ≥ 1 and τ = cos ν ∈ [-1, 1]. This mapping preserves the confocal property of the coordinate curves, with constant-σ surfaces corresponding to ellipses and constant-τ surfaces to hyperbolas, but offers bounded ranges for both parameters, facilitating analysis in regions enclosed by an ellipse. The Cartesian coordinates in terms of σ and τ are given by the parametric equations
x = a \sigma \tau,
y = a \sqrt{(\sigma^2 - 1)(1 - \tau^2)},
where a is half the focal distance. These equations directly follow from substituting the transformation into the standard elliptic parametrization. The relation to distances from the foci at (±a, 0) is d₁ + d₂ = 2a σ and |d₁ - d₂| = 2a |τ|, highlighting how σ scales the sum of distances and τ modulates the difference in a bounded manner.
The scale factors for σ and τ are
h_\sigma = a \sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2 - \tau^2}{\sigma^2 - 1}},
h_\tau = a \sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2 - \tau^2}{1 - \tau^2}}.
These ensure orthogonality and are derived from the metric tensor in the transformed coordinates. The infinitesimal area element is then
dA = h_\sigma h_\tau \, d\sigma \, d\tau = a^2 \frac{\sigma^2 - \tau^2}{\sqrt{(\sigma^2 - 1)(1 - \tau^2)}} \, d\sigma \, d\tau.
This form simplifies integrals over elliptic regions by aligning with the bounded parameter space.
The σ-τ formulation is particularly advantageous for boundary value problems in bounded domains, such as solving inside an ellipse, where the finite ranges of σ and τ enable efficient spectral expansions or finite-difference schemes without dealing with unbounded hyperbolic or trigonometric domains. For example, in , the separability of the Laplacian persists, but the bounded τ interval aids in representing solutions via Fourier-like series over [-1, 1].

Three-Dimensional Extensions

Elliptic Cylindrical Coordinates

The elliptic cylindrical coordinate system extends the two-dimensional elliptic coordinates in the xy-plane by incorporating an unchanged z-coordinate, resulting in a prismatic three-dimensional system suitable for problems with elliptical cross-sections invariant along the z-axis. In this system, the coordinates are denoted as (\mu, \nu, z), where the Cartesian coordinates are related by x = a \cosh \mu \cos \nu, \quad y = a \sinh \mu \sin \nu, \quad z = z, with a > 0 a fixed scaling parameter representing half the distance between the foci. The ranges are \mu \geq 0, $0 \leq \nu < 2\pi, and -\infty < z < \infty, covering the entire three-dimensional space without singularities except along the degenerate axis. The coordinate surfaces consist of elliptic cylinders for constant \mu (as \nu and z vary, by linearly extruding along the z-axis the ellipses in the xy-plane with foci at (\pm a, 0)), hyperbolic cylinders for constant \nu (as \mu and z vary, by linearly extruding confocal hyperbolas along the z-axis), and transverse planes for constant z. These surfaces maintain confocality in the transverse plane, extended uniformly along the z-direction. The scale factors are h_\mu = a \sqrt{\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu}, h_\nu = a \sqrt{\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu}, and h_z = 1, reflecting the equal scaling in the \mu and \nu directions due to the cylindrical symmetry. The infinitesimal volume element is then dV = h_\mu h_\nu h_z \, d\mu \, d\nu \, dz = a^2 (\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu) \, d\mu \, d\nu \, dz.[2] The Laplacian operator in elliptic cylindrical coordinates, essential for solving elliptic partial differential equations, takes the form \nabla^2 \psi = \frac{1}{a^2 (\sinh^2 \mu + \sin^2 \nu)} \left( \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial \mu^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial \nu^2} \right) + \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial z^2}.[2]

Spheroidal Coordinates

Spheroidal coordinates represent a class of three-dimensional orthogonal curvilinear systems that introduce rotational symmetry around an axis to the two-dimensional , facilitating the solution of axisymmetric problems in fields such as potential theory and wave propagation. These coordinates feature two primary variants—prolate and oblate—differentiated by the placement of foci and the resulting surface geometries, with both systems employing confocal quadrics as coordinate surfaces. In prolate spheroidal coordinates, denoted as (\mu, \nu, \phi), the foci are positioned along the z-axis at (0, 0, \pm a), where a > 0 is the focal distance. The coordinate ranges are \mu \geq 0, \nu \in [0, \pi], and \phi \in [0, 2\pi). The relations to Cartesian coordinates are: \begin{align*} x &= a \sinh\mu \sin\nu \cos\phi, \\ y &= a \sinh\mu \sin\nu \sin\phi, \\ z &= a \cosh\mu \cos\nu. \end{align*} $&#36; [](https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ProlateSpheroidalCoordinates.html) Constant-$\mu$ surfaces form prolate ellipsoids of revolution, elongated along the z-axis, while constant-$\nu$ surfaces are hyperboloids of two sheets, and constant-$\phi$ surfaces are half-planes containing the z-axis. The scale factors for this system are: \begin{align*} h_\mu &= a \sqrt{\sinh^2\mu + \sin^2\nu}, \ h_\nu &= a \sqrt{\sinh^2\mu + \sin^2\nu}, \ h_\phi &= a \sinh\mu \sin\nu. \end{align*} [](https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ProlateSpheroidalCoordinates.html) Oblate spheroidal coordinates, also using $(\mu, \nu, \phi)$ with $\mu \geq 0$, $\nu \in [0, \pi]$, and $\phi \in [0, 2\pi)$, place the foci in the xy-plane at $(\pm a, 0, 0)$. The Cartesian relations are obtained by interchanging the roles of hyperbolic and circular functions: \begin{align*} x &= a \cosh\mu \sin\nu \cos\phi, \ y &= a \cosh\mu \sin\nu \sin\phi, \ z &= a \sinh\mu \cos\nu. \end{align*} $$ Here, constant-\mu surfaces are oblate spheroids, flattened along the z-axis, constant-\nu surfaces remain hyperboloids of two sheets, and constant-\phi surfaces are azimuthal half-planes through the z-axis. Unlike the prolate case, the oblate system swaps the hyperbolic functions in the radial-like coordinate \mu with trigonometric ones in the angular coordinate \nu, leading to scale factors of the form h_\mu = h_\nu = a \sqrt{\cosh^2\mu - \sin^2\nu} and h_\phi = a \cosh\mu \sin\nu. Both prolate and oblate systems degenerate to spherical coordinates in the limit a \to 0, where the ellipsoidal and hyperboloidal surfaces collapse to spheres and cones, respectively. Prolate spheroidal coordinates arise as a rotational extension of elliptic cylindrical coordinates, particularly in the limit where \nu is fixed to model axisymmetric extensions along the z-direction. The Helmholtz equation separates in both prolate and oblate spheroidal coordinates, enabling analytical solutions for axisymmetric wave problems, though detailed derivations appear in subsequent sections on mathematical properties.

Advanced Generalizations

Ellipsoidal Coordinates

The , denoted by (\lambda, \mu, \nu), provides a three-dimensional orthogonal for points in \mathbb{R}^3 with triaxial , where the coordinates are confocal with a family of ellipsoids and hyperboloids sharing the same foci. These coordinates arise from the intersection of three confocal quadrics, generalizing the two-dimensional elliptic system to full 3D by incorporating three distinct semi-axes. Specifically, for focal parameters a > b > c > 0, the coordinates satisfy \lambda \geq -c > \mu \geq -b > \nu \geq -a, ensuring coverage of the space without singularities except at the foci. The parametric relations for a point (x, y, z) are determined as the roots \lambda, \mu, \nu of the cubic equation derived from the quadric form: \frac{x^2}{u + a} + \frac{y^2}{u + b} + \frac{z^2}{u + c} = 1, where u is the variable, and the equation is rearranged into a standard cubic polynomial whose roots yield the coordinates. Equivalently, in an alternative parameterization with h^2 = a^2 - b^2 and k^2 = a^2 - c^2, the cubic becomes \frac{x^2}{s^2} + \frac{y^2}{s^2 - h^2} + \frac{z^2}{s^2 - k^2} = 1, solved for s^2 to obtain \lambda^2 \geq k^2 \geq \mu^2 \geq h^2 \geq \nu^2 \geq 0. These roots correspond to the parameters of the confocal quadrics passing through the point, linking the system directly to the geometry of confocal quadrics in 3D. The coordinate surfaces are defined as follows: surfaces of constant \lambda form ellipsoids \frac{x^2}{a + \lambda} + \frac{y^2}{b + \lambda} + \frac{z^2}{c + \lambda} = 1 for \lambda > -c; constant \mu yield one-sheeted hyperboloids for -b < \mu < -c; and constant \nu produce two-sheeted hyperboloids for -a < \nu < -b. The scale factors, or Lamé coefficients, are given by h_{\lambda} = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{ \frac{ (\lambda - \mu)(\lambda - \nu) }{ (\lambda + a)(\lambda + b)(\lambda + c) } }, with cyclic permutations for h_{\mu} and h_{\nu}, reflecting the metric's dependence on coordinate differences and focal parameters. The volume element is then dV = h_\lambda h_\mu h_\nu \, d\lambda \, d\mu \, d\nu, confirming the system's utility in integration over triaxial domains. Orthogonality is inherent to the ellipsoidal system, as the confocal quadrics intersect at right angles, resulting in a diagonal metric tensor with no cross terms between the coordinate directions. This property stems from the geometric configuration of the quadrics, ensuring the basis vectors are mutually perpendicular everywhere except at degenerate focal points. As a degenerate case, the system reduces to spheroidal coordinates when two focal parameters coincide, such as b = c for axisymmetric prolate or oblate forms.

Higher Dimensions

In n-dimensional Euclidean space \mathbb{R}^n, the elliptic coordinate system generalizes through the use of confocal quadrics, forming an orthogonal coordinate framework that extends the two- and three-dimensional cases. A family of confocal quadrics is defined by the equation \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{x_k^2}{\lambda + a_k} = 1, where a_1 > a_2 > \cdots > a_n > 0 are distinct parameters determining the focal structure, and \lambda parameterizes the surfaces, which include and of various sheets depending on \lambda's value relative to the a_k. The n-dimensional elliptic coordinates u_1 > u_2 > \cdots > u_n for a point \mathbf{x} = (x_1, \dots, x_n) are the roots of the higher-order equation derived from the position: specifically, solving \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{x_k^2}{\lambda + a_k} - 1 = 0 for \lambda, which, after clearing the denominator by multiplying through by \prod_{k=1}^n (\lambda + a_k), yields a of degree n whose roots are the u_i. These coordinates label the intersection of n orthogonal confocal quadrics passing through the point, providing a natural where the u_i interlace the focal parameters a_k (i.e., -a_1 < u_n < \cdots < u_1 < \infty) and cover the space in $2^n hyperoctants excluding the coordinate hyperplanes. This root-finding framework relates conceptually to distances from focal hypersurfaces, as in lower dimensions the coordinates encode sums or differences of distances to foci, but in higher dimensions, it manifests through the spectral properties of the quadratic form aligned with the confocal family. In four dimensions (n=4), the system extends the three-dimensional ellipsoidal coordinates by introducing a fourth coordinate u_4, with the point lying at the intersection of four confocal quadrics: two ellipsoids and two hyperboloid families sharing the same focal points a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4 along the principal axes. The Cartesian components are recovered via x_k^2 = \prod_{i=1}^4 (u_i + a_k) / \prod_{j \neq k} (a_k - a_j ) (up to sign choices in each octant), ensuring orthogonality. The scale factors for the metric in n-dimensional elliptic coordinates generalize from lower-dimensional forms, yielding a diagonal metric tensor with components h_i^2 = \prod_{j \neq i} (u_i - u_j) / \prod_{k=1}^n (u_i + a_k) (adjusted for the specific parameterization), often involving the Jacobian of the transformation from Cartesian to elliptic coordinates to compute volumes and gradients. These arise from differentiating the defining equations and reflect the increasing geometric complexity as dimension grows. A key challenge in higher dimensions (n > 3) is the increased complexity of for partial differential equations like the Laplace equation; while separable in principle due to , the solutions involve integrals over hyperelliptic Jacobians of g = n-1, leading to transcendental mappings and non-Abelian varieties that complicate explicit computations compared to the elliptic curve cases in 2D or 3D. Related higher-dimensional systems include generalizations of toroidal coordinates, which employ confocal quadrics of type (e.g., products of circles and hyperboloids in 4D), offering alternative orthogonal frameworks for regions with beyond ellipsoidal ones.

Mathematical Properties

Orthogonality and Confocality

The is an curvilinear , meaning that the coordinate curves intersect at right angles everywhere in the domain. This property arises because the associated with the system is diagonal, with off-diagonal elements g_{\mu\nu} = 0 for \mu \neq \nu, where \mu and \nu are the elliptic coordinates. To outline the proof of orthogonality, consider the standard parametrization in two dimensions: x = c \cosh \mu \cos \nu, y = c \sinh \mu \sin \nu, where c > 0 is a scaling constant related to the foci. The tangent vectors are given by \mathbf{e}_\mu = \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial \mu} = (c \sinh \mu \cos \nu, c \cosh \mu \sin \nu) and \mathbf{e}_\nu = \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial \nu} = (-c \cosh \mu \sin \nu, c \sinh \mu \cos \nu), with position vector \mathbf{r} = (x, y). Their dot product is \mathbf{e}_\mu \cdot \mathbf{e}_\nu = -c^2 \sinh \mu \cosh \mu \sin \nu \cos \nu + c^2 \cosh \mu \sinh \mu \sin \nu \cos \nu = 0, confirming perpendicularity. This holds generally for the system's geometry, ensuring the coordinate basis vectors are mutually orthogonal. Confocality is a defining feature of the elliptic system, where all coordinate curves—ellipses of constant \mu and hyperbolas of constant \nu—share the same pair of foci at (\pm c, 0). This common focal structure stems from the coordinate definitions based on the sum and difference of distances to the foci, leading to the confocal conics. The property facilitates separability of elliptic partial differential equations, such as , by aligning the coordinate curves with natural symmetries in problems involving elliptic boundaries. Compared to non-confocal systems, the elliptic coordinates offer significant advantages in handling boundary conditions for geometries with confocal ellipses and hyperbolas, as the shared foci reduce the of matching solutions across interfaces without introducing cross terms in the governing equations. This simplifies analytical treatments in fields like , where non-confocal alternatives might require more cumbersome transformations. The orthogonality and confocality extend naturally from the two-dimensional case to higher-dimensional generalizations such as elliptic cylindrical coordinates (with an added axial direction), prolate and , and full , preserving the diagonal metric and shared foci across these systems.

Separation of Variables

In two-dimensional elliptic coordinates (μ, ν), ∇²Φ = 0 admits by assuming Φ(μ, ν) = M(μ)N(ν), yielding ordinary differential equations of the form \frac{d^2 M}{d\mu^2} - \kappa M = 0, \quad \frac{d^2 N}{d\nu^2} + \kappa N = 0, where κ is the separation constant chosen to ensure periodicity in ν. The solutions are such as (√κ μ) and (√κ μ) for the radial-like M(μ), and cos(√κ ν) and sin(√κ ν) for the angular N(ν), with values of √κ for single-valuedness over the elliptical domain. For the ∇²Φ + k²Φ = 0 in the same coordinates, separation introduces a non- from the factors, resulting in the for the angular part: \frac{d^2 N}{d\nu^2} + (a - 2q \cos 2\nu) N(\nu) = 0, with separation a and q = (c k / 2)^2, where c is the focal . The radial is the modified Mathieu equation: \frac{d^2 M}{d\mu^2} - (a - 2q \cosh 2\mu) M(\mu) = 0. Eigenvalues a_m(q) are determined by boundary conditions ensuring periodicity and even/odd symmetry, with solutions given by angular Mathieu functions ce_m(q, ν) and se_m(q, ν) for N(ν), and radial Mathieu functions Ce_m(q, μ) and Se_m(q, μ) for M(μ), serving as complete eigenfunction sets for elliptical boundaries. In three-dimensional extensions, such as elliptic cylindrical coordinates (μ, ν, z), separation of Laplace's equation first isolates the z-dependence as Z''(z) + γ² Z(z) = 0, yielding trigonometric solutions cos(γ z) or sin(γ z) (or exponentials for evanescent modes). The remaining equation in μ and ν then reduces to a Helmholtz-like form with effective wavenumber γ, leading to Mathieu functions as above for the transverse part, with eigenvalues adjusted by γ. Similarly, in spheroidal coordinates (ξ, η, φ), separation includes an azimuthal factor e^{imφ} satisfying a simple trigonometric equation d²Φ/dφ² + m² Φ = 0, while the ξ and η equations yield radial and angular spheroidal wave functions S_{mn}(c, η) and S_{mn}(c, ξ), which generalize Legendre functions and connect to Mathieu functions in the cylindrical limit. These separated solutions form orthogonal bases suited to boundary conditions on elliptical cylinders or spheroids, such as constant-μ or constant-ξ surfaces.

Applications

In Potential Theory

In potential theory, elliptic coordinates are invaluable for solving in geometries featuring confocal elliptic boundaries, such as those encountered in and gravitation. These coordinates transform the into separable ordinary differential equations, enabling exact analytical solutions that align with the natural symmetry of elliptical or ellipsoidal domains. This separability is particularly advantageous for steady-state problems where boundaries conform to families of confocal quadrics. A key application arises in , where the potential around charged elliptical can be determined precisely. For instance, in two-dimensional configurations involving an infinite charged elliptical , in elliptic cylindrical coordinates yields solutions expressed as series of Mathieu functions, which satisfy the conditions on the conductor surface. This method provides closed-form expressions for the potential field, avoiding approximations needed in non-conformal systems. In gravitation, elliptic coordinates similarly simplify the computation of potentials for elliptical mass distributions. The gravitational potential exterior to a homogeneous elliptical body can be expanded using these coordinates, leveraging the confocal property to express the field in terms of elliptic integrals or that capture the mass's asymmetry. An illustrative example in three dimensions is the potential between two confocal ellipsoids, where allow the solution to to be constructed as a product of radial and angular functions, facilitating the modeling of layered or hollow ellipsoidal structures. Historically, found early use in 19th-century investigations of Earth's , particularly in oblate spheroid models that approximated the planet's flattened shape. Pioneering works employed these coordinates to derive the external potential and anomalies for such figures, influencing geodetic standards and contributing to the understanding of Earth's figure of . Compared to Cartesian coordinates, elliptic systems offer numerical advantages for elongated bodies by aligning the grid with the principal axes of , which reduces truncation errors and issues in series expansions or finite-difference schemes. This efficiency is evident in simulations of prolate or configurations, where fewer terms suffice to achieve high accuracy in potential evaluations.

In Wave Propagation

The elliptic coordinate system facilitates the analysis of wave propagation problems by allowing the in the , leading to solutions expressed in terms of Mathieu functions. This approach is particularly advantageous for domains with elliptical symmetry, where plane waves or other excitations interact with boundaries of elliptic shape, enabling exact or semi-analytical treatments of and modal phenomena. In acoustics, the of plane waves from elliptical obstacles, such as rigid or elastic , is solved by expanding the scattered field in elliptic coordinates. The separates into and modified Mathieu equations for the radial and components, with conditions applied at the surface to determine expansion coefficients. For instance, in the case of a rigid elliptic in a viscous medium, the dilatation and fields are represented as products of Mathieu functions (ce and se) and radial Mathieu functions (Mc and Ms), incorporating parameters like q = (kc)^2/4 for the wave number k and interfocal distance c. This yields the far-field scattered , revealing effects such as viscosity-induced . Numerical results from such models show good agreement with experiments for normally incident waves, highlighting the role of in backscattering cross-sections. Recent extensions include transformation acoustics in elliptic coordinates for designing acoustic cloaks and lenses as of 2023. For electromagnetic waves in elliptical waveguides, which employ elliptic cylindrical coordinates, the propagation modes are derived from the separated using Mathieu functions. The eigenfunctions consist of radial and angular Mathieu functions parameterized by (kd/2), where d is the interfocal distance, allowing classification into even (cosine-type) and odd (sine-type) modes like TM_{c01} or _{s11}. This formulation captures cutoff wavelengths and dispersion characteristics, with applications extending to metamaterial-filled elliptical structures where negative alters mode confinement. Studies demonstrate that Mathieu-based solutions provide precise field configurations, outperforming approximations for high-eccentricity guides. In , prove essential for problems involving deformed potentials, such as the under axial perturbations. The separates in these coordinates (ξ, η, φ), yielding identical equations for ξ and η with separation constant g, alongside the m; solutions involve spheroidal wave functions akin to Mathieu forms. A notable feature is quantum , where the joint spectrum (energy E, g, l_z) exhibits a defect near the threshold for large principal quantum numbers n > √a (a being the separation), arising from a pinched in that prevents global action-angle quantization. This affects level clustering and has implications for molecular dissociation dynamics. Additionally, quantum scattering in elliptic cavities, modeled as billiards, uses elliptic coordinates to solve the time-independent , reducing it to Mathieu equations with Dirichlet boundaries; eigenvalues are computed via shooting methods, revealing chaotic signatures in semiclassical limits through parity quantum numbers. A classic example is the vibration modes of elliptical membranes, governed by the 2D ∇²ψ + k²ψ = 0 with fixed boundaries. Separation in elliptic coordinates (u, v) yields the angular Mathieu equation d²S/dv² + (a - 2q cos(2v))S = 0 and radial counterpart d²R/du² - (a - 2q cosh(2u))R = 0, where q = k² f²/4 and f is the semi-focal distance. Mathieu functions provide the normal modes, with frequencies determined by zeros of radial functions at the boundary u = u₀; this dates to Mathieu's original 1868 work and enables exact eigenvalue spectra, contrasting with numerical methods for non-elliptic shapes. Radiation patterns from antennas with elliptical apertures are analyzed using elliptic coordinates to expand aperture fields, facilitating computation of far-field intensities. The coordinate system's confocal property aligns with the aperture geometry, allowing efficient modal decomposition; such patterns exhibit elliptical symmetry, influencing polarization and beamwidth for applications in radar and communications.

References

  1. [1]
    Lecture 22. Laplace operator in different coordinates
    Elliptical coordinates on plane are (μ,ν): {x=ccosh(μ)cos(ν),y=c ... hyperbolas with the same focai; so we have confocal ellipses and hyperbolas.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] COORDINATE SYSTEMS , ox ox - LSU Math
    For instance, rotating the (z = G)-plane of the elliptic cylindrical system about the major axis generates the prolloite spheroidal system; rotating about the ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Elliptical Coordinates - Digital Commons @ UConn
    Jun 14, 2006 · FIG. 1: The Elliptical Coordinate System for Diatomic. Molecules. The ellipse is the locus of constant λ. The µ coordinate is not depicted.
  4. [4]
    Fourier Transform in Elliptic Coordinates: Case of Axial Symmetry
    ... elliptic coordinates (µ, ν) is: x = a cosh µ cos ν; y = a sinh µ sin ν. (1). The coordinates (µ, ν) vary within the following ranges: µ ≥ 0; 0 ≤ ν < 2π. (2).
  5. [5]
    Elliptic Cylindrical Coordinates - Wolfram Demonstrations Project
    , is built around two foci separated by. 2a . Holding coordinate. u. constant ... Constant Coordinate Curves for Elliptic Coordinates » · Vector Analysis ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] MATHEMATICAL METHODS FOR PHYSICISTS
    Mar 3, 2017 · Through six editions now, Mathematical Methods for Physicists has provided all the math- ematical methods that aspirings scientists and ...
  7. [7]
    Charged Disc - Galileo and Einstein
    The foci of all the ellipses are at a,−a, the ellipses are said to be "confocal". The lengths of the major and minor axes are 2acoshμ, 2asinhμ respectively. ...Missing: elliptic | Show results with:elliptic
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Elliptic coordinates and Laplace's equation
    Nov 9, 2022 · The correspondence between rectangular and elliptic coordinates is given below. x = a cosh μ cos ν y = a sinh μ sin ν. The value of a can be ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Applied Mathematics 2130 Lab 2009F–1: Elliptic coordinates
    The elliptic coordinates (σ, ν) are related to the Cartesian coordinates by the equations x = 1. 2. ( σ +. 1 σ. ) cosν, y = 1. 2. ( σ −. 1 σ. ) sinν. (2). The ...
  11. [11]
    Elliptic Cylindrical Coordinates -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    coordinates are confocal elliptic cylinders centered on the origin. The Helmholtz differential equation is separable in elliptic cylindrical coordinates.
  12. [12]
    Prolate Spheroidal Coordinates -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A system of curvilinear coordinates in which two sets of coordinate surfaces are obtained by revolving the curves of the elliptic cylindrical coordinates ...
  13. [13]
    Oblate Spheroidal Coordinates -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A system of curvilinear coordinates in which two sets of coordinate surfaces are obtained by revolving the curves of the elliptic cylindrical coordinates.
  14. [14]
    Helmholtz Differential Equation--Prolate Spheroidal Coordinates
    As shown by Morse and Feshbach (1953) and Arfken (1970), the Helmholtz differential equation is separable in prolate spheroidal coordinates.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Geometry 3 - Confocal quadrics, their discretization, and related topics
    Feb 22, 2022 · Theorem 6.22 for (smooth) confocal coordinates to Definition 2.3 of discrete orthogonal nets. Thus, consider applying the factorizability ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] arXiv:1204.0267v2 [cs.CE] 3 Apr 2012
    Apr 3, 2012 · written as (λ, µ, ν); each ellipsoidal coordinate is a root of the cubic x2 s2. + y2 s2 − h2. + z2 s2 − k2. = 1. (6) with h2 = a2 − b2. (7) k2 ...
  17. [17]
    On a discretization of confocal quadrics. I. An integrable systems ...
    Confocal quadrics lie at the heart of the system of confocal coordinates (also called elliptic coordinates, after Jacobi). We suggest a discretization which ...
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of elliptic cylindrical coordinates based on the provided segments, consolidating all relevant information into a single, comprehensive response. Where information varies or is incomplete across segments, I’ve included the most detailed and consistent data available, supplemented with notes for clarity. To maximize density and organization, I’ll use tables in CSV format where appropriate (e.g., for definitions, scale factors, volume elements, and Laplacians), followed by a narrative summary and a list of useful URLs.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Math 321 Vector and Complex Calculus for the Physical Sciences
    Jan 25, 2018 · tangent vectors are orthogonal to each other at each point. In that ... This map gives orthogonal, confocal elliptic coordinates (x, y) for the.
  21. [21]
    8.A. Separation of variable in elliptic and parabolic coordinates
    Elliptic and parabolic coordinates, and also elliptic cylindrical and parabolic cylindrical coordinates are described in Subsection 6.3.4.
  22. [22]
    DLMF: §30.2 Differential Equations ‣ Properties ‣ Chapter 30 Spheroidal Wave Functions
    ### Summary of Separation in Prolate Spheroidal Coordinates for Laplace Equation
  23. [23]
    Lamé and Mathieu functions - Book chapter - IOPscience
    The Lamé equation appears in the method of separation of variables applied to the Laplace equation in elliptic coordinates.
  24. [24]
    Calculation of the electrostatic-potential distribution in ohmic ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · We have developed an analytical method based on Mathieu functions to solve Poisson's equation in homogeneous right elliptical cylinders.Missing: elliptic | Show results with:elliptic
  25. [25]
    Theory and Application of Mathieu Functions - Google Books
    Title, Theory and Application of Mathieu Functions ; Author, Norman William McLachlan ; Edition, reprint ; Publisher, Clarendon Press, 1951 ; Original from, the ...
  26. [26]
    Elliptic Mass Distributions versus Elliptic Potentials in Gravitational ...
    ... ELLIPTIC POTENTIALS IN GRAVITATIONAL LENSES ... coordinates from a physically meaningful mass distribution to an elliptic potential with large ellipticity.
  27. [27]
    External gravitational field of a homogeneous ellipsoidal shell
    May 31, 2023 · The gravitational potential of a homogeneous ellipsoidal shell results from the difference of the external potential fields of the two confocal ...
  28. [28]
    Verified solutions for the gravitational attraction to an oblate spheroid
    We simplify historic formulae and derive new analytical solutions for the gravitational potential and force outside a constant density oblate.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Gravity field due to a homogeneous oblate spheroid - Smallpond.ca
    The problem of the gravity potential due to a uniform oblate ellipsoid has been treated by many mathematicians in the last two centuries. It is nec- essary to ...
  30. [30]
    Spheroidal and ellipsoidal harmonic expansions of the gravitational ...
    Mar 3, 2016 · A much better suited geometrical fit is achieved by a triaxial ellipsoid. This is also mirrored in the fact that the associated harmonic ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] arXiv:0811.1970v2 [math-ph] 13 Nov 2008
    Nov 13, 2008 · These functions have been introduced by Emile Mathieu in 1868 by investigating the vibrating modes in an elliptic membrane [1]. Details (tables ...Missing: 2D | Show results with:2D
  32. [32]
    Acoustic scattering by a rigid elliptic cylinder in a slightly viscous ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Mathieu functions having a large imaginary parameter. Expressions for the far scattered field are summarized in. Sec. IV. An independent ...Missing: obstacles | Show results with:obstacles
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Acoustic scattering by an elastic elliptic cylinder in water
    Aug 10, 2025 · The acoustic scattering from an elastic elliptic cylinder immersed in water and excited by a normally incident plane wave is considered in ...
  35. [35]
    Request Rejected
    **Summary:**
  36. [36]
    [PDF] arXiv:0710.5558v1 [cond-mat.other] 30 Oct 2007
    Oct 30, 2007 · For the elliptical waveguide prob- lem, the angular Mathieu functions must be periodic with period 2π and of integer order, otherwise the ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] arXiv:1612.00823v1 [math-ph] 2 Dec 2016
    Dec 2, 2016 · the separation of the hydrogen atom in prolate spheroidal coordinates has a lattice defect due to quantum mon- odromy. The quantum ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Elliptic Quantum Billiard - arXiv
    Jacobi [9] showed that elliptic coordinates separate the geodesic flow on the ellipsoid, which contains our billiard as a limiting case. The same coordinate ...
  39. [39]
    Analysis of antennas with elliptical apertures using Fourier-Bessel expansion
    - **Summary of Antenna Analysis with Elliptical Apertures**: