Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Elphidium

Elphidium is a genus of benthic foraminifera, single-celled marine protists belonging to the phylum Foraminifera, known for their calcareous tests (shells) that are typically planispirally coiled, lenticular in shape, and composed of 7–20 chambers in the final whorl, with finely perforate walls and interiomarginal or multiple apertures, often featuring an umbilical plug and canal system.^[1] These organisms are epifaunal or infaunal, free-living, and primarily herbivorous, grazing on algae and diatoms while sequestering chloroplasts from their prey.^[1]^[2] First described by Pierre Marie Charles de Montfort in 1808, with the type species Nautilus macellus var. beta Fichtel & Moll, 1798, Elphidium encompasses over 100 species that are cosmopolitan in distribution, inhabiting a wide range of environments from marine and brackish waters to occasionally fresh or terrestrial settings, across salinities of 0–70 and depths primarily from 0–50 m, though some extend to upper bathyal zones on the continental slope.^[1]^[3] The genus is classified within the kingdom Chromista (or Rhizaria in some schemes), class Globothalamea, subclass Rotaliana, order Rotaliida, superfamily Rotalioidea, and family Elphidiidae, reflecting its evolutionary position among rotaliid foraminifera.^[1]^[3] Elphidium species are abundant in coastal and shelf sediments worldwide, from tropical to polar regions, and play key ecological roles as bioindicators of environmental conditions such as salinity, temperature, and oxygenation due to their sensitivity to these parameters.^[3]^[4] Their fossilized tests are significant in paleoceanography and stratigraphy, providing records of past oceanographic changes, sea-level fluctuations, and climatic shifts across geological periods including the Paleogene, Neogene, and Quaternary.^[3]^[5] Notably, Elphidium was among the first foraminifera observed under a microscope in the 18th century, initially mistaken for mollusks, highlighting its historical importance in the study of microfossils.^[6] Recent molecular studies have revealed genetic diversity and phylogeographic patterns within the genus, aiding in species delineation and understanding of cryptic speciation, particularly in coastal assemblages alongside genera like Ammonia.^[7]^[8]

Taxonomy and Classification

Etymology and Discovery

The genus Elphidium was named and described by French naturalist Pierre Denys de Montfort in 1808, within his comprehensive work on shell classification, Conchyliologie systématique et classification méthodique des coquilles, volume 1, page 14.^[9] The type species is Elphidium macellum (originally Nautilus macellus var. beta Fichtel & Moll, 1798), reflecting the era's focus on the external shell morphology without recognition of the protozoan nature.^[10] In the early 19th century, Elphidium and other foraminifera were frequently misclassified as mollusks due to their calcareous tests, initially placed alongside cephalopods in groups like Nautilidae in malacological treatises.^[11] This confusion stemmed from the limited microscopic capabilities of the time, leading Montfort to include it in a broad conchological framework rather than as a distinct protozoan group. By 1826, Alcide d'Orbigny addressed this by establishing the order Foraminifères and transferring Elphidium to it, still within the class Cephalopoda, marking the first systematic separation from mollusks.^[12] Fossil specimens of Elphidium were first recognized in Eocene deposits, with the genus's origins traced to the early Eocene, likely evolving from the morphologically similar genus Nonion.^[13] Early 20th-century taxonomic revisions by American micropaleontologist Joseph Augustine Cushman solidified Elphidium as a distinct foraminiferal genus, through detailed monographic studies that clarified species boundaries and its placement within Rotaliida, resolving lingering ambiguities from 19th-century descriptions.^[14]

Systematic Position

Elphidium is classified within the kingdom Chromista, subkingdom Harosa, infrakingdom Rhizaria, phylum Foraminifera, class Globothalamea, subclass Rotaliana, order Rotaliida, superfamily Rotalioidea, family Elphidiidae, and genus Elphidium.^[1] This hierarchy reflects the modern supraordinal framework for foraminifera, integrating molecular and morphological data to position Elphidium among the calcareous, multichambered forms. As benthic calcareous foraminifera, Elphidium exhibits a hyaline perforate wall structure typical of Rotaliida, enabling efficient ion transport and calcification in marine environments.^[15] Phylogenetic analyses based on small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) sequences reveal close relationships with genera such as Haynesina and Cribrononion, forming a monophyletic clade within Elphidiidae supported by both molecular and morphological evidence.^[13] These affinities highlight shared evolutionary traits, including trochospiral test coiling and supplementary skeletal structures, though morphological convergence has complicated subfamily delineations like Elphidiinae in some classifications.^[13] Genetic studies from the 2010s, including comprehensive SSU rRNA phylogenies, have solidified Elphidium's placement within Rotaliida while prompting revisions to family-level boundaries due to observed genetic divergence and cryptic speciation.^[15]^[13] For instance, Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses confirm robust support for the elphidiid clade but underscore debates over subfamily status arising from convergent test morphologies across related lineages.^[13] The genus has a temporal range spanning from the Early Eocene, with initial fossil appearances around 56–48 Ma derived from Nonion-like ancestors, to the Recent (Holocene), maintaining a persistent record in shelf and marginal marine deposits.^[13]^[16]

Species and Subdivisions

The genus Elphidium encompasses approximately 150 accepted species and numerous subspecies and synonyms, though taxonomic revisions indicate many described forms are synonyms due to extensive intraspecific morphological variability influenced by environmental factors, leading to ongoing debates over species boundaries.^[9] Early classifications, such as those by Cushman in the 1930s and 1940s, recognized numerous forms within species complexes, but modern genetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity, with fewer morphologically distinct but genetically separate lineages.^[17] For instance, a 2016 phylogeographic study across the Northeast Atlantic identified 17 genetic types within Elphidiidae, including several under Elphidium, suggesting that traditional taxonomy underestimates hidden speciation while overestimating some variant forms as separate taxa. Recent molecular studies have further highlighted cryptic speciation, aiding in refining species delineations.^[17] The type species, Elphidium macellum (Fichtel & Moll, 1798), features a planispiral, lenticular test with rounded periphery and approximately 10 chambers in the final whorl.^[18] Other prominent species include Elphidium crispum (Linnaeus, 1758), a widespread fossil form with 12–16 chambers, reticulate surface, and apertural pustules; Elphidium incertum (Williamson, 1858), an indicator of brackish conditions with 8–12 chambers and smooth, perforate walls; and Elphidium williamsoni Haynes, 1973, common on temperate shelves, distinguished by 10–12 chambers and a multiple-slit aperture with chamberlets.^[19] Additional accepted species with diagnostic traits are: Elphidium aculeatum (d'Orbigny, 1846), with spiny ornamentation and 9–11 chambers; Elphidium advena (Cushman, 1922), featuring arched sutures and 10–13 chambers; Elphidium gerthi (Franke, 1914), smooth with 11–14 chambers; Elphidium margaritaceum (Parker & Jones, 1865), pustulose and 12 chambers; Elphidium oceanense Fisher, 1965, with costae and 10–12 chambers; Elphidium selseyense (Heron-Allen & Earland, 1930), faintly keeled with 9–11 chambers.^[9] Subdivisions within Elphidium often involve subspecies reflecting regional or environmental variants, particularly in variable species like E. excavatum, where E. excavatum subsp. clavatum (Cushman, 1930) is recognized for its club-shaped final chamber and thicker test compared to the nominotypical form.^[20] The E. clavatum group, elevated to species rank by Loeblich and Tappan (1953), includes up to eight subspecies in early 20th-century works, such as E. clavatum terminatum, E. clavatum lobatulum, and E. clavatum nudum, differentiated by suture depth, chamber shape, and ornamentation intensity, though many are now considered ecophenotypes rather than distinct taxa due to overlap in genetic profiles.^[21] These subdivisions highlight persistent taxonomic challenges, where morphological convergence and variability have led to synonymy, with genetic evidence from Northeast Atlantic populations indicating that some subspecies represent single genetic types with broad adaptability.^[17]

Morphology

Test Characteristics

The test of Elphidium is planispirally enrolled, forming a lenticular to biconvex shape that is typically involute or partially evolute, with diameters ranging from 0.2 to 1.5 mm and a biumbonate profile often featuring umbilical plugs on each side.^[22]^[23] The wall is calcareous, composed primarily of low-Mg calcite arranged in a bilamellar structure that is finely perforate and optically radial or granular.^[22]^[24] Chamber arrangement in the final whorl includes 7 to 20 chambers that gradually increase in size, separated by deeply incised sutures that form interlocular spaces and appear flush to slightly depressed on the surface.^[22] The aperture is interiomarginal and typically multiple, consisting of a slit-like opening along the chamber periphery, often supplemented by additional areal pores.^[22]^[25] Ornamentation is diagnostic, featuring retral processes as small backward projections from chamber bases that span the sutures, along with surface elements such as canal system openings, pustules, spiraling striae, or ridges; some species exhibit umbilical bosses or plugs, and the peripheral rim is sharp or rounded.^[22]^[26] These external features, including the retral processes and suture patterns, are key for genus-level identification.^[25] Morphological variability within the genus includes ecophenotypic changes in test size, coiling tightness, and ornamentation, which are linked to environmental factors such as salinity fluctuations.^[4]^[27]

Internal and Cytoplasmic Features

The internal architecture of the Elphidium test features multiple apertures that connect to a series of interconnected chamber lumens, allowing for the flow of protoplasm throughout the organism. Septal faces between chambers contain pores formed by localized resorption of the septum, which facilitate cytoplasmic movement between lumens; these pores are often minute and increase in size toward earlier chambers. The complex canal system, including septal canals and anastomosing marginal canals, communicates with the test surface through fine pores or fissures, supporting internal transport processes. The cytoplasm in Elphidium is granular and fills the chamber lumens, with reticulopodia—fine, anastomosing pseudopodia—extending from apertures to enable locomotion across substrates and capture of particulate food such as diatoms and bacteria. Vacuoles within the cytoplasm, including digestive vacuoles, aid in processing ingested material, while the overall cytoplasmic volume contributes to the organism's buoyancy and metabolic functions in benthic environments. In species adapted to low-oxygen sediments, mitochondria exhibit modifications supporting anaerobic respiration pathways, such as fumarate reduction, enhancing survival in hypoxic conditions.^[28] Key organelles include a centrally positioned vesicular nucleus, which is single in the megalospheric generation but multiple in the microspheric form, reflecting dimorphic life stages. Elphidium species commonly practice kleptoplastidy, sequestering functional chloroplasts from diatom prey into the cytoplasm, where they remain photosynthetically active for weeks to months without evidence of host nuclear gene transfer from the algae. These kleptoplasts, containing thylakoids and pyrenoids, are distributed evenly in the endoplasm or peripherally near the cell membrane, providing supplementary energy in low-light habitats.^[2] Dimorphism influences cytoplasmic organization: megalospheric individuals, with a larger proloculus, accommodate greater initial cytoplasmic volume and a single nucleus, whereas microspheric forms have smaller initial chambers but overall larger tests with multiple nuclei and expanded cytoplasm across more chambers. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) reveal pore plugs occluding septal pores and canal openings, consisting of organic material that regulates ion flux and prevents uncontrolled leakage, crucial for maintaining internal homeostasis in varying salinities.

Biology

Life Cycle

Elphidium displays a dimorphic life cycle involving the alternation of two morphologically distinct generations: the megalospheric generation, characterized by a large initial chamber (proloculus) and serving as the sexual phase, and the microspheric generation, with a small proloculus and functioning in the asexual phase. This alternation ensures genetic diversity and adaptation in varying marine conditions.^[29]^[30] The full cycle typically lasts two years in shallow marine habitats, with distinct seasonal peaks in activity during spring, driven by optimal temperature increases and enhanced food availability that promote growth and reproduction. Juvenile stages involve progressive chamber addition to the test, leading to maturation; environmental triggers, such as salinity fluctuations, modulate the timing of these transitions by influencing reproductive readiness and generational shifts.^[31]^[32]^[33] The generational switch occurs as follows: the asexual microspheric phase produces amoebulae that develop into megalospheric individuals, which then undergo sexual reproduction to yield microspheric juveniles.^[32]^[31]

Reproduction

Elphidium exhibits a dimorphic life cycle with alternation between asexual and sexual reproduction, integrating these processes to maintain population dynamics. The microspheric form, which is the agamont stage, undergoes asexual reproduction through schizogony, a form of multiple fission where the multinucleate protoplasm divides to produce numerous amoebulae. These amoebulae encyst and subsequently develop into megalospheric juveniles, typically numbering around 200 per adult in stable environmental conditions such as spring and summer. This mode of reproduction predominates under favorable, low-stress settings, allowing rapid population expansion without genetic recombination.^[33] In contrast, sexual reproduction occurs in the megalospheric form, the gamont stage, where haploid isogamous flagellated gametes are produced via gametogenesis following meiosis. Each megalospheric adult can release approximately 500,000 gametes, often in a synchronized cloud during early morning hours. Syngamy between these gametes forms diploid zygotes that develop into the microspheric form, completing the alternation of generations. Gamete production involves significant cytoplasmic reorganization, with the protoplasm condensing prior to release, though the precise mechanisms remain tied to observations from early 20th-century studies. Genetic aspects of Elphidium reproduction reveal a mix of stability and variability. Asexual phases contribute to clonal propagation, potentially leading to low genetic diversity in stressed or isolated populations where sexual events are infrequent.^[33] However, recent molecular analyses indicate intra-genomic ribosomal RNA polymorphisms in species like Elphidium macellum, suggesting inter-specific hybridization that introduces genetic variation despite predominant asexual cycles.^[34] The dominance of asexual reproduction in certain contexts can mimic reduced diversity by limiting recombination.^[34] The output of sexual reproduction involves high gamete yields, but dispersal faces substantial mortality due to predation, environmental variability, and inefficient fusion. This high attrition underscores the reliance on sheer numbers for successful propagation, balancing the efficiency of asexual modes.

Ecology

Habitats and Adaptations

Elphidium species primarily inhabit shallow coastal environments, ranging from intertidal mudflats and estuaries to the upper continental slope at depths of 0-200 meters. These foraminifera thrive in brackish bays and marginal marine settings with salinities typically between 10 and 35‰, though the genus exhibits euryhaline tolerance across 0–70‰, including hypersaline lagoons and occasional freshwater or terrestrial settings, reflecting their adaptability to variable estuarine conditions.^[35]^[36]^[37]^[1] Key adaptations enable Elphidium to tolerate hyposaline conditions through osmoregulation involving cytoplasmic vacuoles that regulate ion balance and prevent cellular swelling in low-salinity waters. They exhibit low-oxygen affinity, facilitated by anaerobic metabolic pathways such as fermentation and denitrification, allowing survival in hypoxic sediments common to organic-rich mudflats. Feeding is opportunistic, with species like Elphidium williamsoni and Elphidium crispum consuming organic detritus, bacteria, and microalgae, often via pseudopodial networks that enhance nutrient capture in nutrient-poor environments. Microhabitat preferences include epiphytic attachment to algae in vegetated shallows or infaunal burrowing in anoxic sediments up to several centimeters deep, with broad temperature tolerance from -2°C in polar regions to 30°C in temperate zones.^[38]^[39] Under stress, Elphidium tests, composed of low-magnesium calcite, undergo dissolution in undersaturated carbonate waters, such as those with low pH from CO₂ enrichment, leading to etched or fragmented shells that compromise preservation. However, their opportunistic life strategy supports rapid recolonization following disturbances like storms, with populations recovering through high reproductive output and migration from adjacent unaffected areas within weeks to months. Recent studies in polluted estuaries, such as the Guadiana River in southwestern Iberia, highlight Elphidium's resilience to trace metal contamination, where species like Elphidium excavatum maintain dominance in metal-enriched sediments, serving as bioindicators of anthropogenic stress.^[40]^[41]

Distribution and Biogeography

Elphidium species exhibit a cosmopolitan distribution in marine environments from tropical to polar regions, ranging from intertidal zones to the upper continental slope, though notably absent from tropical deep-sea habitats due to their preference for shallow, shelf settings.^[4] Highest species diversity occurs on the North Atlantic and Arctic continental shelves, where up to 17 genetic types have been documented across biomes from the High Arctic to Iberia.^[7] This elevated richness reflects adaptations to variable shelf conditions, including salinity fluctuations and nutrient availability. Regionally, Elphidium is abundant in the Northeast Atlantic, particularly in areas influenced by river outflows such as the Baltic Sea and fjords, where lowered salinity and increased organic input favor their proliferation.^[7] In contrast, populations are sparser in the Indo-Pacific, where competition from diverse larger benthic foraminifera limits their dominance, with only a few species recorded in shallow subtropical shelves of the South-West Pacific.^[42] Phylogeographic studies reveal distinct genetic clusters, such as seven main clades in the Northeast Atlantic, with latitudinal gradients showing high-latitude specialists (e.g., clade E) and eurythermal types in boreal hubs; dispersal is constrained by their predominantly benthic lifestyle, despite potential larval stages.^[7] Elphidium dominates inner shelf zonation, typically in water depths of 0–50 m, with bathymetric gradients leading to species shifts toward outer shelf forms at greater depths, influenced by decreasing nutrient levels and increasing stability.^[43] Recent human-induced warming has prompted range shifts, including poleward migrations of temperate Elphidium assemblages observed in the 2000s–2020s, as seen in assemblage changes along European and Caspian coasts responding to rising temperatures.^[44]

Significance

Fossil Record

The genus Elphidium first appears in the fossil record during the Early Eocene Ypresian stage, approximately 50 million years ago, in Tethyan sediments, such as in New Zealand.^[16]^[45] These early records indicate shallow marine environments, where Elphidium species co-occurred with diverse benthic assemblages adapted to warm, oxygenated shelf conditions.^[45] The genus persisted through the Paleogene but remained relatively rare, with limited diversity and sporadic distributions in Eocene deposits across the Tethyan realm and beyond.^[46] Diversification accelerated during the Miocene, marking a period of species proliferation in neritic and paralic settings, with records of multiple taxa in coastal basins worldwide.^[47] Abundance trends shifted markedly in the Neogene, from rarity in Paleogene strata to dominance in Miocene and Pliocene coastal deposits, reflecting expanded shelf habitats.^[48] By the Quaternary, Elphidium exhibited mass occurrences in glaciomarine clays, particularly in high-latitude settings, where species like E. excavatum and E. clavatum formed dense assemblages indicative of cold, proximal marine environments.^[49] The genus has remained extant since the Pliocene, with continuous fossil records underscoring its persistence through glacial-interglacial cycles.^[50] Evolutionary patterns trace Elphidium's origin to ancestors within the Polystomellidae, a related foraminiferal family, with the transition reflected in the establishment of the Elphidiidae during the Eocene.^[46] Adaptive radiation in the Neogene coincided with global cooling climates and continental shelf expansions, enabling exploitation of newly available cold-water niches in polar and subpolar regions.^[51]^[52] Key fossil sites include Miocene assemblages along Antarctic margins such as the Ross Sea, and Pleistocene deposits in Arctic locales like the Kap København Formation in North Greenland.^[53]^[54] Preservation is biased toward calcareous tests in oxic sediments, favoring recovery from well-oxygenated shelf deposits over anoxic basins.^[55] During the Eocene-Oligocene transition, Elphidium endured minor species losses amid broader benthic turnover linked to cooling and Antarctic glaciation, yet demonstrated overall resilience with surviving lineages diversifying into the Oligocene.^[47]^[56] Elphidium fossils contribute to biostratigraphic dating of Neogene and Quaternary strata in marginal marine sequences.^[57]

Applications in Research

Elphidium species serve as valuable paleoclimate proxies through the analysis of their test chemistry, particularly δ¹⁸O and Mg/Ca ratios, which enable reconstructions of past salinity and temperature conditions. For instance, δ¹⁸O values in Elphidium tests reflect variations in seawater isotopic composition influenced by ice volume and temperature, while Mg/Ca ratios provide temperature-sensitive signals, though influenced by salinity in benthic settings.^[58] In Quaternary records, Elphidium excavatum has been used to infer sea-level changes, with its abundance and geochemical signatures indicating fluctuations in coastal environments during glacial-interglacial transitions.^[59] These proxies have contributed to understanding Holocene climate variability in estuarine systems, where paired δ¹⁸O and Mg/Ca data from Elphidium reveal shifts in precipitation-evaporation balances and thermal regimes.^[60] In biostratigraphy, Elphidium acts as a zonal marker in Cenozoic shelf sequences, with species assemblages facilitating age correlations from the Eocene to Holocene. Elphidiid foraminifera, including various Elphidium species, exhibit distinct stratigraphic ranges in neritic deposits, aiding in the subdivision of Paleogene and Neogene strata across regions like the North Sea and Far East.^[61] For example, the co-occurrence of Elphidium with other benthic taxa in Miocene to Pliocene sequences supports precise dating of shallow-marine facies, enhancing regional correlations in paratropical to boreal settings.^[47] Elphidium species function as ecological indicators in modern environmental monitoring, particularly for assessing pollution and eutrophication in coastal areas. In regions like the Susah (Susa) coast of Libya, variations in Elphidium diversity and abundance signal impacts from organic enrichment and heavy metal contamination, with reduced assemblages indicating stressed conditions.^[62] Genetic surveys of Elphidium populations further support biodiversity assessments, revealing adaptive responses to anthropogenic pressures in shelf environments.^[63] Recent studies have addressed gaps in Elphidium research by integrating morphological analyses with DNA sequencing to detect cryptic species, particularly post-2010 investigations in the Northeast Atlantic. These approaches have uncovered hidden genetic diversity within morphospecies like Elphidium williamsoni, improving taxonomic resolution and ecological interpretations.^[7] Such integrations also enhance reconstructions of glacial-interglacial cycles, where Elphidium-based proxies track bottom-water temperature and oxygenation shifts in Arctic and subpolar records.^[49] Methodological advances include the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for analyzing test repair structures in Elphidium, which indicate environmental stress from pollution or hypoxia. SEM imaging reveals deformities and repair features in species like Elphidium excavatum, correlating with exposure to heavy metals and serving as quantitative stress indicators.^[64] Stable isotope sampling protocols for Elphidium have been refined, involving gentle cleaning (e.g., methanol rinses and ultrasonication) to minimize contamination, ensuring reliable δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C measurements from single or multiple tests.^[65] These techniques, applied in high-resolution core studies, bolster the accuracy of paleoenvironmental inferences.^[66]

References

[1]
WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Elphidium Montfort, 1808
### Summary of Elphidium Montfort, 1808
[2]
Transcriptome Analysis of Foraminiferan Elphidium margaritaceum ...
Sep 19, 2012 · Foraminifera from the genus Elphidium are heterotrophic protists that graze on diatoms and sequester chloroplasts from their algal preys ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
[3]
Elphidium Foraminifera Genus
Elphidium belongs to the class Globothalamea, subclass Rotaliana, order Rotaliida, and family Elphidiidae. Elphidium aculeatum is the type specimen.
[4]
Molecular identification of Ammonia and Elphidium species ...
Mar 28, 2010 · Elphidium species occur from tropical to polar regions and from the intertidal zones to the continental slope (Murray 2006). Ammonia species are ...
[5]
Elphidium: Unveiling Oceanic History through a Microscopic Lens
Elphidium, a genus of single-celled protists belonging to the foraminifera group, holds a pivotal role in reconstructing the history of Earth's oceans. The ...
[6]
Foraminifer (Elphidium spp.) - SERC (Carleton)
Feb 23, 2015 · This genus, Elphidium, was the first foram sketched under a microscope. Originally, they were thought to be tiny mullusks (like snails and clams) ...
[7]
The genetic diversity, phylogeography and morphology of ...
Elphidium selseyense was originally described by Heron-Allen and Earland (1911) as Polystomella striatopunctata var. selseyensis from shore sands in Selsey Bill ...
[8]
A review of species names for Ammonia and Elphidium, common ...
Aug 5, 2025 · The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the taxonomic status of species currently assigned to Ammonia and Elphidium. This task has been ...
[9]
Foraminifera - The World Foraminifera Database - Elphidium Montfort, 1808
### Summary of Elphidium Montfort, 1808
[10]
Elphidium macellum - bforams@mikrotax
... Montfort, 1808, subsequently synonymized with the genus Elphidium de Montfort, 1808. Thus, Elphidium macellum is the type species of the genus Elphidium de ...
[11]
Alcide d'Orbigny and American micropaleontology - ScienceDirect
In this, his Tableau méthodique, he laid out the first classification for Foraminifera and proposed that they be placed in his new Order Foraminifères in the ...
[12]
A History of the Classification of Foraminifera (1826-1933). Part II ...
After Dujardin (1835) recognized Foraminifères as protozoans, d'Orbigny elevated the group to the rank of class (Loeblich and Tappan, 1964; Richardson, 1990) , ...
[13]
Molecular phylogeny of Elphidiidae (foraminifera) - ScienceDirect.com
The genus Elphidium hypothetically derived from the morphologically similar genus Nonion in the early Eocene, where the first fossils are found (Cushman, 1939).
[14]
DESCRIPTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE NEW FORAMINIFERAL ...
Jan 28, 2025 · A new calcareous boreal-to-Arctic foraminiferal species, Elphidium balticum n. sp., belonging to the order Rotaliida, is described from the Baltic Sea area.
[15]
An updated classification of rotaliid foraminifera based on ribosomal ...
Here, we investigate phylogenetic relationships of rotaliid foraminifera by sequencing complete or partial SSU and LSU rRNA genes for 80 phylotypes representing ...Missing: Rotallida | Show results with:Rotallida
[16]
Elphidium - Mindat
Aug 16, 2025 · Description. Elphidium is an abundant genus of foraminifera. Species can be found from coastal regions out to the continental slope, ...
[17]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2016.09.001
[18]
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=113276
[19]
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=113262
[20]
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=466569
[21]
elphidium clavatum cushman - jstor
ABSTRACT-The morphologically variable species Elphidium clavatum Cushman has been confus by numerous authors during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery
[22]
https://marinespecies.org/foraminifera/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=112162
[23]
Genus – Elphidium - University of Washington
E. frigidum is typically an Arctic species and is found in shallow water in Alaska and deeper, cool water off California. It is not common in Puget Sound.Missing: scientific | Show results with:scientific
[24]
High risk of extinction of benthic foraminifera in this century due to ...
May 3, 2013 · The tests of calcifying foraminifera are made of either high- or low magnesium calcite (Mg-calcite), while only a few taxa produce aragonite.
[25]
Wall structure and classification of fossil and recent elphidiid and ...
Wall structure and classification of fossil and recent elphidiid and nonionid Foraminifera. Hans Jørgen Hansen and Anne-Lise Lykke-Andersen.Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[26]
Morphology and taxonomy of the foraminiferal family Elphidiidae - jstor
as a genus close to Elphidium. A form in which early planispiral growth is. Cushman (1936, 1939) defined Elphidiella as followed by annular growth is shown ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[27]
The Ecological Significance of Elphidium clavatum in the Gulf of St ...
The highly abundant populations to approximately 50 m (temperature -2 to 12?C, salinity less than 32%0) exhibit wide variation in umbilical boss, angularity of ...
[28]
Two canonically aerobic foraminifera express distinct peroxisomal ...
The earliest stages of mitochondrial adaptation to low oxygen revealed in a novel rhizarian. Curr. Biol. 26, 2729–2738. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.025.
[29]
Benthic foraminifera and gromiids from oxygen-depleted environments
Aug 17, 2023 · Benthic foraminifera adapt to low oxygen with anaerobic metabolism, denitrification, symbiosis, and dormancy, and are key in nutrient cycling.
[30]
Unravelling the life cycle of 'Polystomella crispa': the roles of Lister ...
Mar 9, 2017 · The megalospheric form (having a large proloculus and a single nucleus) is the product of asexual reproduction, and the microspheric form ( ...
[31]
https://jm.copernicus.org/articles/31/121/2012/
[32]
Unravelling the life cycle of 'Polystomella crispa': the roles of Lister ...
The life cycle of Elphidium crispum (Linné) (formerly called Polystomella crispa) involves an alternation of generations, sexual and asexual, over a two-year ...Missing: 1942 | Show results with:1942
[33]
Studies on Polystomella Lamarck (Foraminifera) | Journal of the ...
May 11, 2009 · Experiments are described which constitute an attempt to carry the life cycle beyond the stage of sporulation. They are so far unsuccessful ...
[34]
Morphological Insights From Benthic Foraminifera for Environmental ...
Mar 22, 2025 · Using synchrotron radiation X-ray microcomputed tomography (SRµCT), we measured Elphidium clavatum in terms of diameter, height, surface area, ...Missing: diagnostic | Show results with:diagnostic
[35]
https://jm.copernicus.org/articles/37/403/2018/jm-37-403-2018.pdf
[36]
[PDF] Assessing proxy signatures of temperature, salinity, and hypoxia in ...
Sep 7, 2018 · Salinity is the main factor controlling the faunal assemblages: a much more diverse fauna occurs in the higher-salinity (∼ 32). Kattegat than in ...Missing: triggers | Show results with:triggers
[37]
The Adaptations of the Foraminifera and Ostracoda to Fresh Water ...
Aug 10, 2025 · They are also both highly tolerant to variations in salinity. The ﬁrst invasions of non-marine habitats by ostracods appear to have taken place.
[38]
[PDF] Distribution of Some Shallow-Water Foraminifera in the Gulf of Mexico
-Within a depth range of about 100 feet, it is possible to establish three rather well defined faunal zones that parallel the coast. The zonation is grada ...
[39]
Calcification, Dissolution and Test Properties of Modern Planktonic ...
Although foraminifera may to some degree osmoregulate, through a narrow tubular channel system, which resembles the contractile vacuole that is documented to be ...Missing: hyposaline | Show results with:hyposaline
[40]
Anaerobic metabolism of Foraminifera thriving below the seafloor
Jul 8, 2020 · The anaerobic energy metabolism of these active Foraminifera was characterized by fermentation of sugars and amino acids, fumarate reduction, and potentially ...Results · Fig. 2. Foraminifera Exhibit... · Fig. 6. Foraminifera Gene...Missing: osmoregulation hyposaline
[41]
Trophic strategies of intertidal foraminifera explored with single‐cell ...
Nov 15, 2022 · Among species of Elphidium living in mudflats, Elphidium ... Molecular phylogeny of Rotaliida (Foraminifera) based on complete small subunit rDNA ...Missing: Rotallida | Show results with:Rotallida<|separator|>
[42]
Short-term response of benthic foraminifera to fine-sediment ... - BG
Aug 11, 2023 · The observed unimodal distribution centred within the added sediment layer suggests that the migration started rapidly after the disturbance.
[43]
Foraminiferal Distribution in Two Estuarine Intertidal Mudflats of the ...
... polluted estuaries to recognise major deviations from the natural distribution due to anthropogenic pollution. Supplementary Materials. The following ...
[44]
Recent Elphidiidae (Foraminiferida) of the South-West Pacific and ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Elphidiidae is a family of mostly shallow-water benthic foraminifera that occur throughout the world at present and in sedimentary rocks of Cenozoic age.
[45]
RECONSTRUCTING HOLOCENE SEA-LEVEL CHANGE FOR THE ...
Mar 3, 2017 · Multivariate analysis of the subtidal foraminifera identified two foraminiferal zones: an inner shelf zone occupied by Elphidium hispidulum ...
[46]
(PDF) Responses of South Caspian Coastal Foraminifera to Warming
Oct 22, 2025 · Responses of South Caspian Coastal Foraminifera to Warming: Spatial Patterns and Assemblage Shifts ... Elphidium. excavatum, Elphidum littorale ...
[47]
Benthic foraminiferal communities of the Eocene platform, north ...
... Elphidium, Textularia, Lenticulina and Bulimina were previously used ... Deprez et al. Early Eocene environmental development in the northern Peri-Tethys ...
[48]
(PDF) Early Eocene environmental development in the northern Peri ...
Early Eocene environmental development in the northern Peri-Tethys ... Based on a study of this and other The early Eocene northern Peri-Tethys (Fig.
[49]
Late Paleocene to middle Eocene foraminiferal biostratigraphy of ...
Feb 4, 2016 · The first occurrence of Elphidium hampdenense at 59.7 m marks the base of the Heretaungan Stage. Hampden Formation (134.8–256.5 m) consists of a ...
[50]
[PDF] FOSSIL ELPHIDIIDAE OF NEW ZEALAND - ResearchGate
Elphidium advenum (Cushman) depressulum Cushman. HAYWARD et at. 1994, fig.30 ... Cushman,I.A. 1924: Samoan foraminifera. Publications of the. Carnegie ...
[51]
Biogeography and Species Durations of Selected Cenozoic Shallow ...
Jul 5, 2023 · In the Cenozoic, Tubulogenerina first appears in the Eocene of Europe, and the fossil record suggests that it dispersed to North America in the ...
[52]
Neogene benthic foraminiferal assemblages and ...
Dec 1, 2012 · Additionally, Elphidium sp. is common to this early Miocene record and has been associated with shallow water (Herman and Hopkins, 1980; ...
[53]
Benthic foraminiferal investigations in Middle to Late Quaternary ...
Sep 29, 2023 · Ten foraminifera species have been identified in subunit 8a, with a predominance of Cassidulina reniforme, Cibicides lobatulus and Elphidium ...
[54]
[PDF] Pliocene - GEUS Journals
SUBZONE 4e: The Elphidium oregonense Subzone. This Subzone was found in the boreholes TWB-12 and E-1. The most abundant species are. Elphidium excavatum ...
[55]
Cenozoic climatic changes drive evolution and dispersal of coastal ...
Oct 6, 2021 · Our results show that the evolution of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic coastal benthic foraminifera was linked to the tectonic and climatic history of the area.
[56]
Impact of the Mediterranean-Atlantic connectivity and the late ...
Mar 1, 2022 · The late Miocene was characterized by major changes in global ecosystems and climate. Between ~7.8–6.7 Ma a cooling of around 6 °C was reported ...
[57]
The geology of the central North Sea. UK offshore regional report
Although water depths fluctuated, deep-water basinal regimes were maintained in the central North Sea throughout Paleocene and Eocene times. ... Elphidium ...
[58]
a foraminiferal record from the central Ross Sea, Antarctica - JM
Sep 19, 2024 · Here we report on Lower to Middle Miocene foraminiferal assemblages from the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Site U1521 on the outer shelf of the ...
[59]
Foraminiferal stratigraphy in the Plio-Pleistocene Kap Kebenhavn ...
Jan 18, 1991 · Fossil foraminiferal assemblages occurring in fine-grained sediments of the Kap København Formation, Peary Land, North Greenland, are grouped ...
[60]
Recent sedimentary record from the inner Ría of Vigo (NW Spain)
Calcareous tests do not show substantial dissolution signatures, whereas ... The truly oxic subtidal layer at the inner Ría of Vigo is limited to the ...
[61]
Middle Eocene to Late Oligocene Antarctic Glaciation/Deglaciation ...
Aug 6, 2025 · During the Eocene-Oligocene transition, Earth cooled significantly from a greenhouse to an icehouse climate. Nannofossil assemblages from ...
[62]
The North Sea Basin: mid-Miocene to Early Pleistocene
Jan 1, 2016 · The distinctive shallow-water arctic species Elphidium oregonense through a short interval in the early Gelasian in a number of wells in ...
[63]
Multiproxy evidence of Holocene climate variability from estuarine ...
Oct 19, 2005 · ... Elphidium for interpreting paired δ18Oforam and Mg/Ca values. Ostracodes grow in 8 or 9 discrete molt stages and studies of the seasonal ...
[64]
(PDF) Late Quaternary sea-level change and evolution of Belfast ...
Late Quaternary sea-level change and evolution of Belfast Lough, Northern Ireland: new offshore evidence and implications for sea-level reconstruction. June ...
[65]
Multiproxy evidence of Holocene climate variability from estuarine ...
We reconstructed paleoclimate patterns from oxygen and carbon isotope records from the fossil estuarine benthic foraminifera Elphidium and Mg/ Ca ratios ...
[66]
(PDF) Foraminifera of the Family Elphidiidae from the Cenozoic of ...
Mar 15, 2022 · PDF | Representatives of the foraminiferal family Elphidiidae Galloway, 1933 are widely distributed in the Cenozoic deposits of the Far East ...
[67]
Diversity, Ecology, and Environmental Significance of Foraminifera ...
This research provides valuable insights into paleoenvironmental conditions and ecological dynamics within the Susah and Al Hamama coastal regions.
[68]
Recent Benthic Foraminifers from the Coast of Susa Area, North ...
This study deals with the taxonomy and environmental implications of recent benthic foraminifers from the coast on the Susa area in northeast Libya.
[69]
Morphological deformities in benthic foraminiferal assemblages from ...
Jul 26, 2024 · This study examines larger and smaller benthic foraminiferal assemblages at six localities from western Arabian Gulf, documenting their diversity, abundance, ...
[70]
Effects of sample pre-treatment on the δ 13 C and δ 18 O values of ...
Stable carbon and oxygen isotope ratios (δ13C and δ18O) of the epibenthic foraminiferan Elphidium macellum var. aculeatum were measured and compared both in ...
[71]
Proc. IODP, 323, Data report: benthic foraminiferal stable isotope ...
Sediment samples were freeze-dried and washed on a 63 µm mesh sieve and then dried in an oven at 40°C. Dry samples were sieved through a 250 µm mesh. Two ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols