Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Equity swap

An is an over-the-counter financial between two counterparties in which one party agrees to pay cash flows based on the total return or price return of an underlying , of securities, or equity index, while the other party pays cash flows based on a fixed rate, , or another reference rate, typically calculated on a notional principal amount without the exchange of the underlying principal itself. Equity swaps are commonly used for hedging equity risk exposure, gaining synthetic access to equities without direct ownership, or speculating on equity performance, offering advantages such as reduced transaction costs, potential tax efficiency, and the ability to circumvent ownership restrictions on certain securities. The contracts are governed by standardized documentation, such as the 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions, which outline key terms including the equity notional amount, calculation agent responsibilities, settlement methods (cash or physical), and adjustments for events like dividends, corporate actions, or market disruptions. Payments are typically exchanged periodically, such as quarterly, based on the rate of return formula—multiplier times the percentage change in the equity price—netted between the parties to minimize cash transfers. In practice, an equity swap might involve a notional amount of $5 million tied to a stock index like the , where one party receives the index's total return (including dividends) and pays a floating rate like plus a , enabling the receiver to achieve equity-like returns without purchasing shares directly. These instruments are subject to regulatory oversight, including reporting requirements under frameworks like the Dodd-Frank Act, to mitigate in the .

Definition and Basics

Core Concept

An equity swap is a financial in which two parties agree to a series of future cash flows, with one leg based on the return of an or —typically including price appreciation and dividends—and the other leg tied to a fixed rate, a floating rate such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (), or returns from another asset class. The primary purpose of an equity swap is to enable parties to obtain exposure to the performance of without directly owning the underlying assets, facilitating uses such as on movements, hedging against , or exploiting opportunities across . In these contracts, a notional principal serves as the reference amount for calculating the magnitude of the cash flows, though it is not actually exchanged between the counterparties. Equity swaps emerged in the late 1980s, coinciding with the expansion of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets, and were notably introduced in 1989 by financial engineers at .

Key Components

The key components of an equity swap agreement establish the foundational terms that govern the exchange of cash flows between counterparties. The duration, or tenor, defines the overall lifespan of the contract, typically ranging from 1 to 10 years, and concludes on a predetermined fixed maturity date. Payment frequency specifies the regular intervals for calculating and settling the exchanged amounts, which are commonly set as quarterly, semi-annual, or annual based on the parties' agreement and the underlying reference rates. The equity leg obligates one party to pay the total return on the referenced asset, encompassing both price appreciation and any dividends or distributions, applied to a notional principal amount; this return can derive from a single stock, a basket of multiple stocks, or a broad equity such as the S&P 500. In contrast, the counterparty leg—frequently termed the funding or fixed/floating leg—requires the other party to provide payments typically based on a floating interest rate, such as the 3-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) plus a negotiated spread, or alternatively a fixed rate; while less common, this leg may reference returns from non-equity assets like commodities. Settlement under the agreement is almost always conducted via net cash payments in the designated currency, reflecting the difference between the legs' values at each payment date, whereas physical delivery of the underlying equity assets remains exceptionally rare due to the derivative nature of the instrument.

Mechanics

Cash Flow Exchanges

In an equity swap, cash flows are exchanged periodically between the two parties, with one leg based on the performance of an underlying equity or equity index and the other typically tied to a floating interest rate. The equity leg payment, known as the Equity Amount, is calculated by the Equity Amount Payer as the product of the Equity Notional Amount and the Rate of Return for the relevant Calculation Period. The Rate of Return, which measures the equity performance, is determined as [(Final Price - Initial Price) / Initial Price] multiplied by any applicable Multiplier, where the Initial Price is the price or level of the underlying at the start of the period and the Final Price is the price or level at the end of the period. The total return on the equity leg incorporates both price appreciation and dividends to reflect the full economic performance of the underlying asset. Dividends are included as an Aggregate Dividend Amount, typically gross cash dividends paid during the Calculation Period (excluding extraordinary dividends), and may be treated as reinvested on a specified date, such as the next Cash Settlement Payment Date, to simulate ongoing equity ownership. This ensures the Rate of Return captures reinvested dividends, providing a comprehensive measure of return that aligns with total return indices. If the Rate of Return is positive, the Equity Amount Payer pays the Equity Amount to the receiver; if negative, the receiver pays the absolute value to the payer. The counter leg, often a floating rate payment referred to as the Interest Amount, is calculated by the Interest Amount Payer as the product of the Notional Amount (typically matching the Equity Notional Amount), the Floating Rate for the period, plus or minus any Spread, multiplied by the Floating Rate Day Count Fraction. The Floating Rate is determined by reference to a benchmark such as SOFR (for USD), €STR (for EUR), or EURIBOR on the applicable Reset Date, which marks the start of each Calculation Period. The Day Count Fraction adjusts for the length of the accrual period, commonly using conventions like Actual/360 for USD SOFR-based rates. Netting occurs on each Cash Settlement Payment Date, where the party owing the larger amount pays the difference to the other, reducing and operational costs. These Payment Dates are typically set a specified number of Business Days after the corresponding Valuation Date, with Calculation Periods running from the or prior Payment Date to the next Payment Date or Termination Date. Reset Dates and accrual periods for the floating leg align with standard conventions to ensure consistency in rate fixings and accrual, such as quarterly resets for a three-month benchmark rate like . Disruptions, like non-business days, may adjust dates forward, with extensions possible up to eight Scheduled Trading Days for Valuation Dates. Equity swaps are frequently intermediated by investment banks, which act as counterparties to clients and simultaneously enter offsetting positions to their exposure. For instance, to manage from a client-facing equity swap, the bank may purchase the reference or use derivatives to replicate the total return, thereby neutralizing net exposure while facilitating client access to synthetic equity positions.

Valuation Methods

Equity swaps are initially priced such that their (NPV) is zero at , ensuring no opportunity exists between the leg and the leg (fixed or floating). This pricing is achieved by setting the terms so that the of expected cash flows from the leg—based on forward —equals the of the leg's payments. The forward is derived from the current spot of the underlying , adjusted for the risk-free and expected over the swap's term. The standard formula for the equity forward price F is: F = S \times e^{(r - q)T} where S is the current spot price of the equity, r is the continuously compounded risk-free rate, q is the continuous dividend yield, and T is the time to maturity in years. This formula accounts for the cost of carry, incorporating financing costs net of dividends, and is used to project future equity returns for the swap's equity leg. For total return swaps, the equity leg's value also includes the present value of projected dividends, summed and discounted using the risk-free curve. Ongoing valuation of an swap computes the NPV as the difference between the of the equity leg and the of the fixed or floating leg. The equity leg's is calculated by projecting future equity returns using updated forward prices and discounting them, often incorporating any accrued performance since the last reset date. The fixed leg is valued as a series of discounted fixed payments, while the floating leg is decomposed into agreements implied from the discount curve (e.g., based on for USD-denominated swaps) and then discounted. This approach ensures the swap's reflects current market conditions. Mark-to-market (MTM) revaluation occurs daily or periodically to determine the swap's current exposure, primarily for collateral posting under credit support annexes in ISDA Agreements. The MTM value adjusts the notional for equity price changes since the prior reset—typically as notional amount times (current equity price minus prior reset price)—netted against the updated value of the counterparty leg, and is used to exchange variation margin. Valuation sensitivities highlight the swap's exposures: it is delta-sensitive to equity price movements (positive for the equity receiver), rho-sensitive to shifts in interest rates affecting discount factors and forwards, and theta-sensitive to time decay in projections. Dividend yield changes also impact the equity forward, altering the leg's projected value; for example, higher-than-expected dividends reduce the forward price and thus the value to the equity payer. These sensitivities guide risk management but are computed using the core NPV framework.

Applications

Hedging Strategies

Equity swaps serve as a versatile tool for hedging equity risk, enabling parties to exchange the returns of an equity asset or for fixed or floating payments, thereby neutralizing exposure to price fluctuations without disposing of the underlying holdings. For instance, a stockholder facing potential declines can enter into a swap where they pay the equity's total return (including dividends and capital gains) to a in exchange for a fixed rate, such as plus a , effectively locking in current value and protecting against . This structure isolates the equity component, allowing the hedger to maintain for other purposes while mitigating . Institutions frequently employ index-based equity swaps for portfolio hedging, particularly to counter sector-specific or broad market downturns without the need to liquidate positions, which could incur transaction costs or disrupt long-term strategies. Surveys indicate that 29% of companies use equity derivatives to manage equity price , often as part of comprehensive derivative programs where 94% of respondents hedge various exposures, according to data from around 2009. A 2025 ISDA report shows that 87.1% of nearly 1,200 major companies across seven stock indices use over-the-counter derivatives. By swapping the performance of an equity index against a floating rate, portfolio managers can offset aggregate declines, preserving diversification and avoiding errors. Equity swaps also facilitate tax-efficient and regulatory-compliant hedging by deferring capital gains taxes and circumventing restrictions on direct short-selling. In a typical arrangement, a taxpayer with appreciated can hedge economic through a , transferring upside and downside to a while receiving fixed payments, without triggering a taxable realization event under pre-1997 U.S. rules. This approach avoids immediate taxation on built-in gains and enables compliance with regulations limiting short positions, as the swap provides synthetic short indirectly. Additionally, such swaps enhance in hedging contexts, allowing amplified reduction without additional commitment, as the notional amount determines rather than upfront funding. The adoption of equity swaps for institutional hedging surged in the 1990s, following the 1987 stock market crash, as investors sought more flexible alternatives to traditional portfolio insurance strategies that exacerbated the downturn. Market notional outstanding for equity-linked swaps grew rapidly from the late 1980s, reflecting their appeal for customized amid heightened concerns.

Synthetic Positions

Equity swaps enable investors to establish synthetic positions in equities, replicating the economic outcomes of direct or short-selling without the need for physical acquisition or borrowing of shares. This approach transfers the performance-linked cash flows of the underlying while the actual remains with the , providing flexibility for , portfolio adjustment, or . A synthetic long position is created when one party agrees to receive the total return of an or —comprising price appreciation and dividends—in for periodic payments based on a fixed or plus a . This structure mimics the benefits of holding the outright, allowing the to gain without purchasing the asset, which is particularly useful in restricted foreign markets where direct is limited or prohibited. For instance, institutional investors can use such swaps to replicate of shares in jurisdictions with controls. In contrast, a synthetic short involves the paying the total return of the equity to the while receiving fixed or floating payments in return. This setup profits from declines in the equity's value, as the net becomes positive when the asset underperforms, without the complexities of borrowing shares or facing short-sale restrictions. funds and traders often employ this to express bearish views on specific or sectors efficiently. Equity swaps facilitate access to illiquid or emerging markets by providing synthetic exposure to indices or assets that are difficult to trade directly due to regulatory barriers or low . For example, investors can obtain returns linked to Chinese A-shares, which have foreign ownership caps, bypassing the need for direct approvals or local brokerage accounts. This is especially valuable for funds and wealth funds seeking diversification into hard-to-reach markets. The cost efficiency of synthetic positions arises from lower initial capital requirements, as only a margin deposit—typically around 10% of the notional value—is needed, compared to the full purchase price for physical holdings. Additionally, swaps avoid ancillary expenses such as duties, custody fees, and costs associated with direct trades, making them a more economical alternative for large-scale exposure. In equity swaps, the underlying owner retains voting rights and other governance privileges, as the contract transfers only economic exposure rather than legal ownership of the shares. This separation allows the original shareholder to maintain control over corporate decisions while monetizing or hedging the asset's performance through the swap.

Examples

Single-Stock Swap

A single-stock swap is an equity swap where one party agrees to exchange the total return on a specific individual stock for payments based on a , typically plus a , allowing participants to gain or hedge to that stock's without directly owning or selling the shares. This is commonly used by seeking synthetic long or short positions in a single . For instance, an holding 1,000 shares of Company X, with a notional principal of $1 million equivalent to the initial stock value, might enter into a one-year single-stock swap with quarterly payment dates. In this agreement, to the position, the investor pays the total return on Company X shares to the counterparty and receives plus 0.5% on the notional amount. To illustrate the mechanics, suppose Company X's price rises by 15% over the year, and the stock pays a 2% , resulting in a total return of 17%. The leg payment by the investor would then be 17% of the $1 million notional, amounting to $170,000. Simultaneously, if the average rate over the period is 4%, the investor's receipt on the floating leg would be (4% + 0.5%) of $1 million, or $45,000, settled net against the payment. Thus, the investor's net would be a payment of $125,000 at the end of the term. These payments are calculated quarterly based on the stock's price appreciation, , and any dividends, with the floating rate reset at each interval using the prevailing index. Outcome variations depend on conditions. In a bull where Company X outperforms, such as the 15% appreciation scenario, the realizes a net on the swap that offsets the on the held shares, effectively converting the exposure to floating-rate . Conversely, in a bear , if the declines by 15% with no , the leg would require a of -15% (i.e., the receives $150,000 from the ), plus the $45,000 floating receipt, resulting in a net receipt of $195,000 that offsets the loss on the held shares. This demonstrates how the swap transfers the 's performance risk to the in exchange for the interest-like receipts. One key benefit of this structure is that it enables the to maintain economic exposure to Company X while avoiding capital gains taxes that would arise from selling the shares outright to reallocate funds or . Instead, the swap provides floating income-like stability through the SOFR-based receipts, allowing diversification or without triggering taxable events.

Index Swap

An index swap is a type of equity swap where one leg is based on the performance of a broad , such as the , providing to a diversified basket of equities rather than a single asset, which allows for larger-scale transactions and reduced idiosyncratic risk compared to single-stock swaps. This structure enables participants to gain or synthetic to overall movements, including appreciation and dividends in the case of total return indices, while the leg typically involves fixed or floating payments. The diversification inherent in indices like the , which tracks approximately 500 large-cap U.S. companies, makes these swaps suitable for institutional investors seeking broad participation without the operational burden of holding individual securities. Consider a scenario where an investor enters a three-year index swap with a $10 million notional amount, receiving the total return on the index in exchange for paying a fixed rate of 5% annually, with semi-annual settlements. The total return leg incorporates both price changes and dividends reinvested in the index, providing a comprehensive measure of market performance. For the first semi-annual period, if the total return increases by 8%, the equity leg payment received would be $800,000 ($10 million × 8%), while the fixed leg payment owed is $250,000 ($10 million × 2.5%, reflecting half the annual rate), resulting in a net receipt of $550,000. In a hedging context, a holding a diversified might enter an index swap to protect against market downturns by paying the total return and receiving the fixed rate, effectively locking in returns and offsetting losses in its underlying holdings. For instance, if the index declines by 10% in a period, the equity leg would require a payment of -10% (i.e., the fund receives $1 million from the ), plus receives $250,000 from the fixed leg, netting a $1.25 million inflow that offsets the depreciation plus provides the fixed rate return. This mechanism allows the fund to maintain its positions while mitigating downside exposure without liquidating assets. Index swaps have become common for achieving broad market exposure, particularly in the post-2008 era, when heightened market prompted investors to use such instruments for hedging against systemic risks and fluctuations. Following the crisis, the adoption of equity derivatives, including index swaps, grew as part of broader OTC market reforms that emphasized and transparency, enabling investors to efficiently handle large-scale equity price risks.

Risks and Mitigations

Market and Credit Risks

Equity swaps expose participants to significant , primarily arising from fluctuations in the underlying prices, rates, and payments. The leg of the swap is highly sensitive to changes in the asset's price, with a approximating 1, meaning the value changes nearly one-for-one with the underlying movement. variations impact the fixed or floating leg, potentially altering net cash flows, while unexpected changes in yields can affect the total return calculations embedded in the payments. Credit risk in equity swaps stems from the potential of the on periodic or final payments, particularly given the over-the-counter (OTC) nature of these contracts, which lack a central clearinghouse guarantee. This risk is heightened during periods of market stress when payment obligations may escalate due to adverse price movements. To mitigate , parties often enter into Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) under ISDA agreements, requiring the posting of variation margin and initial margin as to cover current and potential future exposure. Over-ization further reduces potential losses in the event of . Basis risk occurs when the equity leg does not perfectly replicate the intended exposure, such as using an swap to hedge a specific where constituent weights or performance diverge. is another concern, as the OTC structure limits trading, making early termination expensive due to wide bid-ask spreads and potential difficulty in finding counterparties. Post the , enhancements under the Dodd-Frank Act mandated central clearing for certain standardized swaps, reducing systemic by interposing a clearinghouse, though many equity swaps remain uncleared.

Operational Considerations

Equity swaps are typically documented under the (ISDA) Master , which provides the overarching legal framework for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions, including provisions for events of default such as failure to pay or . The is supplemented by the 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions, which outline specific terms for equity-related instruments like swaps, including calculation methods for returns, adjustments for corporate events, and provisions. Schedules to the Master customize equity-specific terms, such as the reference equity, notional amount, payment dates, and handling of dividends or voting rights, while incorporating standard events of default and termination events from the Master . Settlement risks in equity swaps arise primarily from the cash flows exchanged periodically or at maturity, particularly in cross-border transactions where one party may deliver payment without receiving the counterpart, known as Herstatt risk. This principal risk can lead to full exposure of the payment value if a counterparty fails mid-settlement. Mitigation often involves payment-versus-payment (PvP) mechanisms, where payments are synchronized through a third-party settlement system to ensure simultaneous delivery, reducing the window of exposure. Operational risks in equity swaps include errors in calculating periodic payments or final settlements, often stemming from inaccuracies in equity price data feeds or flawed valuation models. Such errors can result from delayed or erroneous inputs, manual processing overrides, or system failures in aggregating index components. Robust requires automated , redundant data sources, and regular to minimize these disruptions. Tax implications for equity swaps center on withholding taxes applied to dividend equivalents on the equity leg, where payments mimicking underlying dividends are treated as U.S.-source income subject to a 30% withholding rate under Section 871(m) of the Internal Revenue Code for foreign counterparties. This applies to notional principal contracts like swaps if they reference U.S. equities, with the withholding agent responsible for collecting the tax at the time of payment. Netting arrangements, such as combining gross dividend inflows and outflows under the swap, can optimize tax efficiency by reducing the net taxable amount, subject to applicable tax treaties. Termination of an equity swap can occur through mutual agreement between parties or upon triggers like events of default or termination events specified in the . Early unwind calculations determine the close-out amount as the replacement cost, representing the cost to the non-defaulting party to enter a similar with a , including any unpaid amounts and adjustments for market conditions. This amount is aggregated across all outstanding under the agreement and settled net, often supported by postings to mitigate credit exposure during the process.

Variations and Comparisons

Common Variations

Equity swaps can be modified to create specialized structures that address specific market needs or risk profiles. A standard structure within equity swaps is the total return swap, where the equity leg includes the full performance of the underlying asset, encompassing both price appreciation and dividends (often reinvested over the swap's term). This allows the receiver of the total return to gain synthetic exposure to the asset's complete economic return without owning it outright, often used for financing purposes where one party effectively borrows against the asset's performance by paying a floating or fixed rate on the other leg. In an equity-for-equity swap, both legs of the contract reference equity returns, typically swapping the performance of one , basket, or single against another to facilitate relative value trades. This structure allows investors to express views on the relative performance between two assets, such as outperforming one against another, without the need for a fixed or floating rate leg. It builds on the basic equity swap by replacing the non-equity leg with another equity reference, commonly used for portfolio rebalancing or sector rotation strategies. The barrier equity swap incorporates knock-in or knock-out features, making payments or deliveries contingent on whether the underlying price reaches or breaches predefined barrier levels during the swap's life. For instance, a knock-out barrier may terminate the swap if the price falls below a certain threshold, while a knock-in activates the full return only upon hitting the barrier, thereby adding path-dependency to the standard structure for cost-efficient conditional . These features are defined through specified knock-in/knock-out events and prices, allowing tailored for scenarios like extreme market movements. For cross-border applications, quanto equity swaps modify the standard structure by incorporating a fixed foreign exchange rate (quanto adjustment) into the payment calculations, ensuring that returns on a foreign leg are converted into the settlement without FX risk exposure. This variation addresses risk in international equity exposures, where the leg might reference a foreign asset while the counter leg is denominated in a different , with adjustments for disruptions like inconvertibility to maintain equivalence in value transfer. Such swaps are prevalent in global portfolios to both and FX risks simultaneously.

Differences from Other Swaps

Equity swaps differ from interest rate swaps primarily in their underlying risk exposure and payment structure. While swaps involve the exchange of fixed and payments based solely on movements, equity swaps incorporate the total return of an equity asset or , introducing price and risks absent in pure contracts. In contrast to credit default swaps (CDS), which provide protection against credit events such as borrower through periodic premium payments in exchange for potential loss reimbursement, equity swaps focus on the performance of equity returns rather than credit deterioration. Equity swaps lack the specific credit event triggers that define CDS, instead settling based on equity appreciation, , or total return without reference to default scenarios. Equity swaps represent a specialized form of total return swaps tailored to equity assets like stocks or indices, whereas total return swaps apply more broadly to non-equity underlying such as bonds, loans, or commodities, allowing synthetic exposure across diverse . This equity-specific focus in equity swaps enables targeted replication of or index performance, distinguishing them from the versatile applicability of general total return swaps. Regulatory treatment further sets equity swaps apart, particularly from swaps. Under U.S. rules established by the Dodd-Frank Act, equity swaps are classified as security-based swaps overseen by the when based on single securities or narrow-based indices, often exempting them from the CFTC's federal position limits that apply to swaps to curb excessive in physical derivatives. The market evolution of equity swaps highlights their ties to markets, emerging in the late and gaining prominence in the alongside the expansion of index funds, which facilitated synthetic equity exposure for institutional investors without direct .

References

  1. [1]
    2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions (Versionable Edition) and ...
    The 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions, as published in 2002, are available by download with a subscription to MyLibrary. They are stored in the Resources ...
  2. [2]
    Equity Swap Contract - Defintion, Example, Pros
    An equity swap contract is a derivative contract between two parties that involves the exchange of one stream (leg) of equity-based cash flows.What is an Equity Swap... · Advantages of Equity Swap...
  3. [3]
    Note 8: Derivative Instruments - SEC.gov
    Equity swaps – counterparties exchange the return on an equity security or a group of equity securities for the return based on a fixed or floating interest ...
  4. [4]
    December 31, 2019 (Unaudited) - SEC.gov
    (g) Equity Swaps. The Funds may enter into equity swap contracts for hedging or investment purposes. Equity swap contracts may be structured in different ways.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Security-Based Swaps
    Jun 9, 2022 · Shares will trade as equity securities subject to NYSE rules including, among others, rules governing trading halts, responsibilities of the ...
  6. [6]
    Equity Swaps Definition - Financial Edge Training
    Nov 5, 2021 · It is a derivative contract where one party agrees to pay the return on an equity index and the other agrees to pay a fixed or floating interest rate.
  7. [7]
    Understanding Interest Rate Swaps: Types and Real-World Example
    The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) has replaced LIBOR as the benchmark index for interest rate swaps.What Is an Interest Rate Swap? · Types · Example
  8. [8]
    Equity Swaps Explained: Definition, Mechanism, and Real-Life ...
    Equity swaps allow parties to trade cash flows based on the performance of equity indices, facilitating income diversification and risk management.
  9. [9]
    Financial Derivatives - International Monetary Fund
    Financial derivatives are used for a number of purposes including risk management, hedging, arbitrage between markets, and speculation. Financial ...
  10. [10]
    Equity Derivatives - Definition, Types, Why Invest
    Hedgers: Hedgers use financial equity derivatives to reduce their existing risk or future exposure. An example might be an equity fund manager who wants to ...
  11. [11]
    Notional Amount - Overview, Example, and Applications
    Aug 28, 2025 · The notional amount is the assumed principal amount that is used as the base amount when calculating the exchanged interest amount. The ...What is the Notional Amount? · Practical Example · Applications of Notional Amount
  12. [12]
    A Primer on Equity Swaps – BSIC | Bocconi Students Investment Club
    Oct 13, 2024 · Equity swaps evolved in the late 1980s and early 1990s, as a part of the broader development of over the counter (OTC) derivative markets.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Swaps - SURFACE at Syracuse University
    May 1, 2009 · History of Equity Swaps. Equity swaps were introduced in 1989 by financial engineers at Bankers. Trust (Chance, 2003). “An equity swap is an ...
  14. [14]
    Total Return Swap - Overview, Structure, Benefits
    Aug 28, 2025 · The total return to the receiver includes interest payments on the underlying asset, plus any appreciation in the market value of the asset.What is a Total Return Swap... · Structure of a Total Return...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] User's Guide to the 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions
    First Period is defined in Section 10.3(a) as the period from, and including, one Cash Settlement Payment Date or. Settlement Date to, but excluding, the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] NSFR and implications for Equity Markets - AFME
    Step 3 – The bank hedges market risk arising from the client-facing equity swap. To hedge the market risk on the swap, the bank purchases the reference asset ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] THE VALUATION OF EQUITY DERIVATIVES
    In an equity swap, the floating rate leg is valued by, first, decomposing it into a series of forward rate agreements and, second, using the implied forward ...
  18. [18]
    Total Return Equity Swap Pricing and Valuation - FinPricing
    Total return swaps or equity swaps give investors opportunity to capture the performance of an asset without actually owning it.Missing: appreciation | Show results with:appreciation
  19. [19]
    Pricing and Valuing Equity Swap Contracts - AnalystPrep
    Nov 19, 2021 · Equity Swaps. An equity swap is an OTC derivative contract in which two parties agree to exchange a series of cash flows.Missing: authoritative definition
  20. [20]
    Pricing models of equity swaps - Wiley Online Library
    This article provides a generalized formula for pricing equity swaps with constant notional principal when the underlying equity markets and set-.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The Treatment of Hedging in a Realization Income Tax
    May 11, 2023 · The equity swap is a variation on traditional transactions that also enable a taxpayer to dispose of economic risk in an asset without selling ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Demystifying the Enigma of Commodity & Equity Swaps
    Hence, equity swaps are used as a simple and cost-effective way to achieve leverage. Some hedge funds can and do use equity swaps for precisely that purpose.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Recent Growth of Financial Derivative Markets
    equity swaps but most concentrate on highly custom- ized equity index ... contracts gained popularity first and now appear to have reached the slow ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Overview of OTC Equity Derivatives Markets: Use Cases and Recent ...
    Jan 1, 2024 · An equity swap is a contract between two counterparties that involves one party receiving payments ... typically treated much like cash ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  25. [25]
    Empty voting and hidden (morphable) ownership - ScienceDirect
    Conversely, a long equity swap position conveys economic ownership without formal voting rights. Sometimes, investors use these techniques to hold more votes ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Single Stock Swaps Transactions
    Calculation Period. Payment Date(s). Settlement date(s) for the Floating Amount as agreed. Other terms. Method of Adjustment. Calculation Agent Adjustment.
  27. [27]
    Tax Efficiency: Maximizing Tax Benefits with Equity Swaps
    Mar 30, 2025 · However, by entering into an equity swap, the business owner can effectively replicate the returns of the shares while avoiding immediate tax ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Adjusted Interest Rate (AIR) Total Return Futures Explained
    Jun 3, 2024 · The financing payment for the period is based on the notional value of the equity index exposure and uses the agreed interest rate reference ...Missing: count | Show results with:count
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Equity-index-linked swaps - HKUST Math Department
    Enter into the “receive equity index” side of a one-year equity swap based on movements in the S&P 500 index plus a spread of 10 bps. • The swap is to have ...
  30. [30]
    5. Equity swaps - AnalystNotes
    One party pays the return on an equity. The other pays fixed, floating, or the return on another equity. Rate of return is paid, so payment can be negative.
  31. [31]
    Market Focus: Equity Derivatives - Global Finance Magazine
    Feb 6, 2012 · The ripples from the 2008 financial crisis continue to flow, even into equity derivatives. Since Lehman Brothers collapsed, industrial ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Evolution of OTC Derivatives Markets Since the Financial Crisis
    Derivatives play an essential role in economic activity by enabling issuers and investors to hedge against various risks (eg, interest rate, currency, credit ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Amendment to the Capital Accord to incorporate market risks
    Banks may also incur interest rate and equity risks outside of their trading activities. ... For example, an equity swap in which a bank is receiving an amount ...
  34. [34]
    Equity OTC Swap / Option | Key Risks & Features - Investec
    An Equity Swap, either a Price (PRS) or a Total Return Swap (TRS), contract ... Credit Risk. By entering into a bilateral contract a client is taking on ...
  35. [35]
    Negotiating Collateral Arrangements (Part Three of Three)
    To mitigate counterparty credit risk with uncleared swaps, parties enter into a credit support annex (CSA) setting forth the collateral arrangements between ...
  36. [36]
    CRE52 - Standardised approach to counterparty credit risk
    Jun 5, 2020 · As a general principle, over-collateralisation should reduce capital requirements for counterparty credit risk. In fact, many banks hold excess ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Disclosure Annex for Equity Derivative Transactions - BNY
    Payments under this. “equity leg” of the equity swap are made by the equity amount payer if the return is positive and by the equity amount receiver if the ...
  38. [38]
    Clearing Requirement | CFTC
    The final rules require certain classes of credit default swaps and interest rate swaps to be cleared by DCOs registered with the Commission.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] OTC derivatives: settlement procedures and counterparty risk ...
    Derivatives transactions may be settled through delivery of the reference asset or through cash settlement, that is, a payment from one counterparty to the ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Risk Management of Financial Derivatives | Comptroller's Handbook
    markets (e.g., interest rates and foreign exchange rates) and between the types of risk (e.g., price, credit, and liquidity risk). More information on ...
  41. [41]
    Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2016-45
    Nov 7, 2016 · Bulletin 2016-45 covers income tax, employee plans, estate tax, excise tax, and administrative items, including proposed regulations on related ...Missing: reputable | Show results with:reputable
  42. [42]
    [PDF] ISDA® - International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement introduced the Close-out Amount payment measure to offer greater flexibility to the party making the determination of the amount ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Broad-Market Equity Index Swaps Terms and Conditions - Tradeweb
    Feb 10, 2015 · An Equity Swap can either be a price return or total return. In a total return equity swap, dividends are included when calculating the amounts ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Variance Swaps - Derivatives Academy
    Variance swaps offer straightforward and direct exposure to the volatility of an underlying asset. They are liquid across major equity indices and large cap.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Equity: Standardization Matrix Definitions and Reporting Explanations
    For Portfolio Swaps this represents the number of open Portfolio Swap Agreements. This will be reflected as a count of live transactions (D) and a gross.<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    [PDF] 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions ISDA
    "Equity Swap Transaction" means a transaction that is. (a) an OTC equity swap transaction relating to a single index (an "Index Swap Transaction"), (b) an OTC.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The Taxation of Global Trading of Financial Instruments | OECD
    A transaction within a single legal entity across an international border ... complicated cross currency equity swap with an equivalent notional principal amount ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Chapter 18 SWAPS
    Jul 3, 2025 · Payment frequency: semiannual (April and October). Maturity = Swap term or Swap tenor = 3 years. Bank Ardiles. Swap Dealer. 6-mo ...
  49. [49]
    Credit Default Swaps | CFA Institute
    A credit default swap (CDS) is a contract between two parties in which one party purchases protection from another party against losses from the default of a ...
  50. [50]
    Introduction to Credit Derivatives and Credit Default Swaps
    Credit default swaps differ from total return swaps in that the investor does not take the price risk of the reference asset, only the risk of default. The ...
  51. [51]
    Understanding Total Return Swaps: Definition, Function, and ...
    A Total Return Swap (TRS) is an agreement where one party pays a set rate, while the other receives payments based on the return of a referenced asset, ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The definitions set forth in the CFTC Swaps Report Data Dictionary ...
    Equity swaps, which resemble total rate of return swaps, are an arrangement in which one party, the seller, agrees to pay the other party the difference in ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  53. [53]
    CFTC and SEC Adopt Final Rules Defining Swaps - Insights
    Jul 30, 2012 · The CFTC and SEC define swaps as instruments under CFTC jurisdiction, security-based swaps under SEC jurisdiction, and mixed swaps under both.
  54. [54]
    Position Limits for Derivatives - Federal Register
    Feb 27, 2020 · The Commission proposes new and amended federal spot month limits for 25 physical commodity derivatives; amended single month and all-months-combined limits.