Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Eric Posner

Eric Andrew Posner (born December 5, 1965) is an American legal scholar renowned for applying economic analysis to legal domains including contracts, , constitutional constraints on executive power, and behavioral influences on regulation. As the and Distinguished Service Professor of Law at the , where he holds the Arthur and Esther Kane Research Chair, Posner has authored or co-authored over ten books and more than one hundred scholarly articles that emphasize pragmatic, incentive-based reforms over normative idealism. His education includes a BA and MA in from (summa cum laude, 1988) and a from (magna cum laude, 1991), followed by a clerkship for Judge Stephen F. Williams on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Posner's seminal contributions include Radical Markets (2018, co-authored with economist E. Glen Weyl), which advocates auction-based property rights and to mitigate market failures and democratic gridlock through empirical incentives rather than redistributional fiat; The Demagogue's Playbook (2020), a data-driven dissection of how populist leaders exploit institutional vulnerabilities for personal gain; and How Antitrust Failed Workers (2021), critiquing mid-20th-century for inadvertently harming labor by prioritizing over wage suppression dynamics. These works exemplify his fusion of law-and-economics methodologies—rooted in observable behaviors and transaction costs—with skepticism toward expansive regulatory regimes, as seen in The Twilight of Human Rights Law (2014), where he contends that treaties yield negligible compliance effects absent aligned national interests. While Posner's insistence on causal mechanisms over moral advocacy has earned acclaim for rigor in peer-reviewed outlets, it has provoked contention: critics from human rights circles decry his empirical dismissal of universal norms as undermining accountability, whereas antitrust skeptics fault his recent pushes for labor-focused interventions as overreaching beyond verifiable monopolistic harms. Such debates underscore his role in challenging academia's prevailing deference to deontological frameworks, favoring instead testable hypotheses derived from economic realism.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Eric Andrew Posner was born on December 5, 1965, to Richard A. Posner, a pioneering legal scholar who advanced the economic analysis of law, and Charlene Ruth Posner, a freelance editor. During Posner's infancy, the family lived in , where his father worked as an assistant to Commissioner Philip Elman from 1963 to 1965 and then to Thurgood Marshall from 1965 to 1967. In 1969, when Posner was three years old, the family relocated to following Richard Posner's appointment to the faculty, immersing the household in an academic setting focused on rigorous, data-driven legal scholarship. This environment, centered in , exposed Posner from childhood to the intellectual currents of that his father helped establish at the institution.

Academic Training

Eric Posner earned a B.A. and M.A. in from in 1988, graduating summa cum laude. His coursework in at Yale focused on analytical traditions, fostering skills in and conceptual precision that informed his later interdisciplinary approach to . Posner then pursued at , obtaining a J.D. magna cum laude in 1991. This program exposed him to foundational doctrines in areas, alongside emerging methodologies in economic analysis, laying groundwork for his expertise without extending into post-graduation practical experience.

Professional Career

Early Legal Experience

Following his graduation from Harvard Law School in 1991, Posner served as a law clerk to Judge Stephen F. Williams on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1991 to 1992. This clerkship immersed him in the appellate review of complex federal cases, including those involving , constitutional interpretation, and regulatory disputes, offering firsthand insight into judicial reasoning and the constraints of in decision-making. From 1992 to 1993, Posner worked as an Attorney Adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) at the United States Department of Justice. In this role, he contributed to formal legal opinions advising the executive branch on the constitutionality and statutory validity of proposed actions, often addressing regulatory policies, executive authority, and incentives shaping government operations. The OLC's emphasis on pragmatic analysis of legal texts and policy consequences aligned with Posner's subsequent scholarly focus on empirical realities over abstract theory. These early positions provided Posner with practical exposure to the interplay of , , and institutional incentives, bridging real-world legal practice with his later academic critiques of overly idealistic legal doctrines. By 1993, he shifted toward full-time legal scholarship, drawing on these experiences to inform his realist-oriented approach.

Academic Positions and Advancements

Posner commenced his academic career as an assistant professor at the in 1993. He served as visiting assistant professor at the in fall 1997 before joining its faculty as professor of law in 1998. Subsequent advancements at included appointment as Professor of from 2003 to 2012, followed by elevation to Distinguished Service Professor of in 2013, a position he continues to hold. In , he assumed the Arthur and Esther Kane Research Chair. Posner's teaching responsibilities at encompass bankruptcy , secured transactions, and contracts. He has also engaged in administrative roles supporting academic output, including editorship of The Journal of Legal Studies from 1998 to 2010 and membership on the Faculty Steering Committee of the Institute from 2008 to 2010. These institutional affiliations and leadership positions at the , a hub for rigorous analytical approaches to legal scholarship, have underpinned his sustained contributions to legal academia.

Scholarly Work

Foundations in

Eric Posner's scholarly foundations in draw from the paradigm, which employs microeconomic principles—such as rational choice modeling and incentive analysis—to evaluate legal rules' effects on and social welfare. This approach treats law as an instrument for designing institutions that minimize transaction costs and encourage efficient behavior, rather than as a vessel for unattached moral or distributive ideals. Posner critiques legal doctrines that lack grounding in observable incentive effects, arguing that reforms should prioritize empirical proxies for efficiency, like wealth maximization, over aspirational norms unsupported by causal evidence of improved outcomes. In contract law, Posner extends this framework by analyzing doctrines through their capacity to facilitate value-enhancing exchanges. He contends that rules enabling efficient —where parties terminate agreements when higher-value opportunities arise—optimize incentives by mimicking market pricing, allowing resources to flow to superior uses without excessive litigation. His Contract Law and Theory (2011) applies these insights to canonical cases, illustrating how approximate the value of promised performance while deterring opportunism, and critiques interpretive rigidities that ignore contextual economic signals, potentially leading to underinvestment in transactions. Posner further observes that apparent inefficiencies in rules, such as fault-based excuses, may serve broader incentive alignments by signaling credible commitments, though he subjects them to scrutiny for net welfare effects. Posner's economic lens on bankruptcy emphasizes rules that curb inefficient asset continuation or delays by properly calibrating and incentives. In examining the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, he highlights how interest-group bargaining embedded distributional compromises into the code, deviating from ideal efficiency by favoring protections that prolong distressed firms at expense, with aggregate costs estimated in forgone credit availability and . During the 2008 housing crisis, Posner proposed targeted exemptions to discourage strategic defaults—homeowners abandoning underwater mortgages despite ability to pay—which he calculated as destroying up to hundreds of billions in value through reduced lending incentives and neighborhood spillovers, advocating reforms to restore efficient risk pricing without blanket moralizing. A recurring theme in these analyses is the use of game-theoretic models to expose how legal defaults counteract coordination failures, as in Posner's early critique of inefficient social norms where rational actors sustain Pareto-inferior equilibria due to barriers; intervenes via targeted liabilities to shift equilibria toward efficiency without relying on unenforced ideals.

International and Global Law Critiques

In The Perils of Global Legalism (2009), Eric Posner contends that suffers from inherent weaknesses due to the absence of centralized enforcement mechanisms, rendering it ineffective for resolving cooperation problems among states without complementary exercises of power. He argues that global legalism—the optimistic belief that treaties and institutions can supplant traditional —ignores the reality that states treat legal obligations as optional when compliance conflicts with national interests, leading to that prioritizes symbolic gestures over substantive outcomes. Posner draws on game-theoretic models to illustrate how, absent credible sanctions or mutual benefits aligned with power asymmetries, international legal frameworks fail to alter state behavior beyond what self-interested bargaining would achieve. Posner further critiques treaties not as binding constraints but as instruments for signaling intentions, often violated without significant repercussions, as evidenced by historical patterns of non-compliance in regimes governing and . For instance, in analyzing post-World War II treaty systems, he highlights cases where states like major powers in pacts or trade agreements under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) disregarded provisions when domestic pressures or strategic gains outweighed reputational costs, demonstrating that compliance correlates more with convergent interests than legal compulsion. These empirical observations, spanning decades of , underscore Posner's view that treaties function primarily as coordination tools or pretexts for negotiation rather than enforceable rules, with violations rarely triggering effective retaliation beyond ad hoc bilateral pressures. Posner advocates for pragmatic bilateralism as a superior alternative to expansive multilateralism, particularly in domains like and where multilateral pacts have faltered due to free-rider problems and deficits. He points to failures in multilateral arrangements, such as those under of Nations or early post-Cold War frameworks, where collective commitments dissolved amid non-compliance by key actors lacking aligned incentives, contrasting these with successful bilateral deals backed by verifiable reciprocity or power imbalances. In , Posner notes that while multilateral forums like the facilitate dispute settlement, persistent non-—evident in over 600 unresolved disputes since 1995—highlights the need for tailored bilateral negotiations that incorporate credible threats of retaliation, yielding more stable outcomes than idealistic global architectures. This approach, Posner argues, aligns international cooperation with realist principles, prioritizing power dynamics over utopian legalism.

Behavioral and Empirical Approaches

Posner has explored the role of emotions in legal doctrine, arguing that traditional rational choice models in law and economics inadequately account for affective influences on behavior, such as in punishment where retributive sentiments deviate from deterrence-based rationality. In his 2001 article "Law and the Emotions," he proposes integrating psychological insights to model how emotions like anger or disgust shape legal outcomes, while cautioning against untested assumptions and advocating for controlled experiments to verify causal links, as in evidence law where emotional reactions to graphic images may bias juries. This approach refines behavioral economics by emphasizing empirical validation over anecdotal deviations from rationality. Posner's empirical orientation extends to cognitive biases in judicial and regulatory decision-making, where he critiques reliance on intuition and pushes for data-driven models to predict and correct errors, such as over-optimism in contractual enforcement due to affective forecasting failures. He argues that biases like availability heuristics can distort regulatory policies, but legal reforms should derive from falsifiable hypotheses tested against real-world data rather than psychological heuristics alone. For instance, in analyzing punishment, Posner uses behavioral evidence to show how emotional responses to crime severity lead to disproportionate sentences, advocating adjustments informed by econometric studies of recidivism rates. In co-authored and solo works, Posner refines by incorporating behavioral data on social norms, particularly in shaming penalties, where signaling models explain how public deters low-cost offenses more effectively than fines in certain cultural contexts, supported by historical and comparative examples from U.S. and European systems. Similarly, in , he applies empirical insights into reciprocity and emotional commitments to critique regimes, showing through game-theoretic simulations calibrated to rate data (e.g., post-1970s U.S. trends) that behavioral deviations like spiteful separations undermine without rigorous metrics. These analyses prioritize observable outcomes over normative intuitions, maintaining empirical rigor amid psychological complexities.

Domestic Policy Areas

Posner's contributions to antitrust law emphasize economic analysis to evaluate mergers and , advocating standards that prioritize and over non-economic populist concerns. In a analysis of merger enforcement, he argued that while consumer remains relevant, antitrust authorities should focus on preventing substantial lessening of under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, incorporating broader assessments to address potential harms like reduced or labor without veering into ideological interventions. He critiqued historical underenforcement, noting of rising that harms economic , and supported the Merger Guidelines' shift toward presumptions against mergers in concentrated markets based on structural data rather than speculative efficiencies. In financial regulation, Posner has promoted rigorous benefit-cost analysis (BCA) to quantify regulatory impacts, arguing that post-2008 reforms often impose high compliance costs—estimated in billions annually—without commensurate risk reductions, leading to unintended distortions like reduced lending. His 2013 framework for BCA in finance stresses empirical metrics, such as capital adequacy requirements derived from stress tests rather than arbitrary rules, to balance systemic stability against efficiency losses from overregulation. This approach critiques ad hoc rulemaking by agencies like the , where vague standards fail to account for quantifiable trade-offs, such as a 2015 study showing Dodd-Frank's elevating funding costs by 20-50 basis points without proportional benefits. Posner's work on labor markets highlights antitrust's empirical shortcomings in addressing power, where concentrated employers suppress ; a 2019 study he co-authored found U.S. labor markets exhibit markups averaging 58% above levels in many sectors, driven by non-compete clauses and no-poach agreements affecting 18-37% of workers. He advocates targeted using Herfindahl-Hirschman Index thresholds adapted for labor, critiquing overregulation in product markets that inadvertently bolsters employer power, while proposing data-driven remedies like banning certain covenants to restore without broad mandates. In a 2023 paper, Posner documented how lax antitrust has failed workers, with wage suppression costing billions annually, urging agencies to apply standard tools like market definition analysis—often national or regional for skilled labor—to curb these effects. Central to Posner's domestic policy innovations is the 2018 book Radical Markets, co-authored with E. Glen Weyl, which proposes market-based mechanisms to enhance efficiency and equity without traditional redistribution. The book introduces (QV), where voters purchase votes with credits at a quadratic cost (price rises with quantity squared), allowing intense preferences to outweigh diffuse ones; simulations show QV reducing policy volatility by aggregating signals more accurately than one-person-one-vote systems. Another mechanism, "common ownership self-assessment" (COSA), treats property as perpetual tradable shares auctioned continuously, aiming to liquidate underused assets and curb rents—e.g., applying to or to generate trillions in efficiency gains per empirical models—while funding public goods through revenue shares, bypassing coercive taxes. These tools, grounded in theory, seek to internalize externalities via prices, with Posner estimating QV could improve legislative outcomes by 20-50% in preference intensity matching based on experimental data.

Public Engagement and Views

Commentary on U.S. Politics and Institutions

In his 2020 book The Demagogue's Playbook: The Battle for American Democracy from the Founders to Trump, Eric Posner examines historical populist demagogues including and , arguing that U.S. constitutional design—featuring , an independent , and checks among branches—has empirically contained their disruptive potential by diffusing power and enabling institutional resistance, unlike in parliamentary systems with fewer veto points where demagogues have inflicted greater damage. Posner contends these safeguards, rooted in the Founders' deliberate fragmentation of authority, have preserved democratic stability across episodes of intense , as evidenced by Jackson's failed attempts to centralize executive control and Trump's inability to dismantle core institutional norms despite aggressive rhetoric and actions from 2017 to 2020. Posner has critiqued alarmist narratives of constitutional crisis during periods of executive-legislative friction, such as in his October 2017 analysis where he defined a true as requiring irreconcilable disputes over leading to systemic , which he found absent amid Trump's early tenure due to ongoing adherence to legal processes by and courts. In a December 2017 Foreign Policy piece, he dismissed contemporaneous claims of over executive actions like travel bans, attributing tensions to routine partisan disagreements resolvable through political channels rather than existential threats, and urged incremental reforms such as clarifying delegation doctrines over radical restructuring. Posner challenges populist anti-elite sentiments by highlighting elites' empirical role in bolstering institutional checks against demagogic overreach, as seen in his historical review where elite intermediaries in , courts, and bureaucracies historically moderated Jacksonian and Trump-era excesses, preventing the slide into unchecked observed elsewhere. He posits that while tensions exist between elite expertise and , evidence from U.S. history supports calibrated elite influence—such as and bureaucratic professionalism—as causal bulwarks for democratic endurance, countering narratives that equate institutional resistance with undemocratic obstruction.

Positions on Executive Authority and Free Speech

In The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic (2011), co-authored with , Posner argues that the traditional Madisonian framework of separated powers has eroded, with the modern assuming dominant policymaking roles due to the complexities of contemporary , including and economic regulation, where legislative gridlock necessitates executive initiative. He contends that while formal legal constraints like statutes and persist, they are often ineffective against a determined , which is instead disciplined by political , bureaucratic , and democratic elections rather than rigid constitutional . This shift, Posner maintains, reflects empirical realities: post-World War II expansions in administrative capacity and global threats have empirically favored unilateral presidential action for efficiency, as seen in responses to crises from to financial meltdowns. Posner has specifically endorsed enhanced executive authority in foreign affairs and emergencies, citing the need for decisive, centralized decision-making amid asymmetric threats and rapid-response requirements that cannot match. In a 2021 commentary, he traces the "imperial presidency" to historical precedents like Lincoln's measures and FDR's wartime mobilizations, arguing that such accretions of power are functionally adaptive for national survival rather than aberrations to be reversed. He cautions against overreach—urging, for instance, in a 2016 New York Times that incoming presidents like test executive boundaries incrementally to avoid backlash—but views expanded tools, such as unilateral directives in or sanctions, as pragmatically justified when legislative paralysis stalls effective policy. Regarding free speech, Posner critiques absolutist interpretations of the First Amendment, advocating instead for consequentialist restrictions where demonstrates net social harms, such as disruptions to institutional functions or escalations in violence. In discussions of , he has argued that bans can be neutrally enforced if calibrated to behavioral data showing causal links to unrest, rejecting deontological prohibitions on regulation in favor of welfare-maximizing analysis that weighs expressive benefits against tangible costs like eroded cohesion. On university campuses, Posner posits that speech codes—often targeting harassment or intimidation—do not suppress discourse but facilitate it by curbing behaviors that empirically deter participation, as evidenced by lower engagement in environments plagued by unchecked vitriol. Posner's op-eds exemplify this balancing act, emphasizing outcomes over abstract rights; for instance, he has supported targeted limits on in contexts like , where unchecked propagation demonstrably undermines order, while opposing broader absent rigorous cost-benefit justification. This approach aligns with his broader law-and-economics framework, prioritizing functional efficiency: free speech protections should yield to regulation when data indicate causal degradation of social stability, as in hate speech regimes that, per economic models, internalize externalities without chilling core political expression.

Controversies and Reception

Challenges to Human Rights Orthodoxy

In The Twilight of Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2014), Eric A. Posner contends that international treaties, despite widespread by over 150 countries for major instruments like the International Covenant on , have not demonstrably improved practices, as evidenced by persistent violations in signatory states such as Saudi Arabia's discrimination against women and child labor in and . Empirical studies, including those by (2002) on the Convention Against Torture and Emilie M. Hafner-Burton and Kiyoteru Tsutsui (2005) on general treaty effects, indicate no significant between and reduced abuses, with effects limited or absent in non-democracies. Posner attributes this to treaties' vagueness and overbreadth—encompassing around 400 rights without prioritization—coupled with feeble international enforcement, which relies on voluntary compliance rather than coercive mechanisms. Particularly in corrupt or weak states, such as those with underfunded judiciaries like Brazil or authoritarian controls in China, treaties fail because governments allocate scarce resources to political priorities over costly obligations like due process or education, and lack domestic capacity for implementation. Posner highlights data from Freedom House showing only modest global gains in "free" countries (from 29% in 1973 to 46% in 2012), uncorrelated with treaty adoption, underscoring that ratification often serves reputational purposes without behavioral change. Enforcement gaps exacerbate this, as international bodies possess insufficient authority or funding to compel adherence, allowing selective criticism of adversaries while overlooking allies. Posner critiques measurement by NGOs like and , arguing their indices suffer from unverifiability, subjectivity, and advocacy bias, prioritizing documentation of violations (e.g., over 1,000 annual extrajudicial killings in ) over causal analysis of treaty impacts. He contrasts this with the empirical rigor of , which employs randomized trials to assess interventions, and notes the scarcity of such studies in scholarship, where doctrinal parsing dominates over data-driven evaluation. research reinforces this, finding little evidence linking ratification to performance gains. As alternatives, Posner proposes shifting focus from universal impositions to human welfare enhancement through targeted economic strategies, such as conditional foreign to governments showing responsiveness and incentives that reward governance improvements without ignoring local constraints. These approaches, informed by welfare metrics like GDP growth and health outcomes rather than checklists, better address root causes in low-capacity states by leveraging material incentives over , as wealthier societies naturally demand protections. Tools like controlled experiments and selective sanctions or policies could yield incremental gains, avoiding the of comprehensive treaties that overlook trade-offs in resource-poor environments.

Critiques of Global Legalism

Posner's critiques of global legalism, as articulated in works such as The Perils of Global Legalism (2009), emphasize the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms in , arguing that state compliance stems primarily from coincident self-interests rather than binding legal obligations. He contends that utopian aspirations for through treaties and institutions overlook the reality of sovereign states prioritizing national advantages, leading to frequent non-ratification and violations. This perspective has garnered support from scholars appreciating its empirical grounding, particularly in exposing rhetoric-versus-reality disparities in climate agreements like the , where major emitters such as the and pursued exemptions or limited commitments aligned with economic self-preservation over collective enforcement. Empirical validations of Posner's anti-utopian stance highlight persistent enforcement gaps; for instance, data on international environmental treaties reveal compliance rates below 50% for emission reduction targets among developing nations, underscoring how —such as industrial growth in and —overrides rhetoric. Supporters, including policy analysts in realist traditions, praise this analysis for shifting focus from idealistic norms to pragmatic incentives, as seen in Posner and Weisbach's Climate Change Justice (2010), which demonstrates through cost-benefit models that efficiency-driven bargains yield more verifiable reductions than justice-based demands lacking coercive power. Such views have bolstered arguments against over-reliance on unenforced pacts, with Posner citing historical patterns where powerful states evade obligations, as in trade disputes under the where retaliation, not adjudication, enforces outcomes. Opposing internationalists have accused Posner of excessive cynicism, claiming his dismissal of legal norms undermines potential for gradual norm internalization and , as rebutted in responses emphasizing soft power's in sustaining alliances despite imperfections. Posner counters these idealist rebuttals with quantitative evidence, such as the low ratification rates—under 40% for certain multilateral conventions on by key powers—and documented violations exceeding 60% in monitoring reports for resource-sharing agreements, illustrating that without centralized authority devolves into symbolic posturing. This data-driven riposte reinforces his causal emphasis on power asymmetries over normative appeals. Posner's framework has influenced realist-oriented policy discussions, fostering skepticism toward institutions like the (ICC), whose jurisdiction remains limited to weaker states while major powers abstain, as evidenced by the U.S. non-ratification of the in 2002 and subsequent vetoes of expansive mandates. His arguments have resonated in think tanks advocating constrained international commitments, promoting instead bilateral or minilateral arrangements where verifiable aligns enforcement, as opposed to universal legalism prone to free-riding.

Ideological and Academic Debates

Posner's critiques of international regimes have drawn accusations from left-leaning scholars and advocates of promoting an elitist dismissal of moral imperatives in favor of pragmatic , potentially undermining global advocacy for progressive causes like in authoritarian states. Critics argue that his emphasis on empirical inefficacy—such as the lack of between treaty ratifications and improvements in indices—ignores the symbolic and normative value of rights frameworks in mobilizing domestic pressure, even if measurable outcomes lag. Posner rebuts these charges by citing data from sources like the CIRI , which show minimal advancements in personal integrity rights in developing nations post-ratification, attributing stasis to weak enforcement and resistance rather than advocacy shortcomings. From the right, Posner's advocacy for and market-oriented mechanisms in areas like executive authority and contract enforcement has garnered endorsements for prioritizing outcomes over ideological purity, aligning with conservative preferences for institutional over expansive judicial or international oversight. His support for cost-benefit analysis in regulatory policy, as co-authored with Masur, resonates with economically conservative scholars who view it as a bulwark against inefficient norms, though Posner maintains distance from populist strains by critiquing demagogic erosion of elite-led governance. In academic circles, Posner's integration of into legal analysis has achieved high reception, evidenced by over 38,000 citations for works blending rational choice with cognitive biases to explain inefficient norms. Proponents praise this as innovative for refining predictions in and antitrust law, where classical models overlook asymmetries like status signaling. Detractors, however, contend it risks overemphasizing paternalistic interventions that undervalue power dynamics and market self-correction, potentially amplifying regulatory overreach without superior empirical validation over neoclassical baselines.

Bibliography

Books

The Perils of Global Legalism (University of Chicago Press, 2009) critiques the expansion of as a solution to global problems, arguing that legalistic approaches overlook power dynamics and empirical incentives among states, favoring instead flexible, interest-based cooperation. The Twilight of Human Rights Law (, 2014) contends that the , with its broad treaties and weak enforcement, has produced negligible improvements in global welfare, urging a shift toward pragmatic, welfare-maximizing policies over aspirational norms. Radical Markets: Uprooting and for a Just Society, co-authored with E. Glen Weyl (, 2018), proposes market innovations such as tradable voting rights and quadratic funding to mitigate inequality and enhance democratic participation, prioritizing experimentally verifiable mechanisms to redistribute economic and political power without relying on traditional ideological frameworks. The Demagogue's Playbook: The Battle for American Democracy from the Founders to (All Points Books, 2020) analyzes historical patterns of demagoguery in U.S. politics, emphasizing institutional designs—like checks on executive authority and protections against factional capture—as essential bulwarks for preserving constitutional stability amid populist threats.

Selected Articles and Columns

Posner has authored numerous op-eds and columns in major outlets, often applying pragmatic, effects-based analyses to contemporary legal and policy debates. In , he published "The Politics of the Trump Trials" on August 9, 2023, contending that the criminal cases against former President involve intertwined political, partisan, and procedural elements, where prosecutorial motivations and public optics could undermine perceived legitimacy regardless of legal outcomes. Similarly, in a , 2024, column titled "What to Look for in Trump's First Trial," Posner emphasized that voter reactions to trial proceedings, rather than substantive evidence, would likely determine electoral impacts, highlighting causal links between media framing and sentiment. In , Posner co-authored "Corporate America Is Suppressing Wages for Many Workers" on February 28, 2018, with , arguing that non-compete agreements and no-poach deals causally reduce labor mobility and depress wages for non-elite workers, proposing antitrust enforcement as a remedy based on empirical patterns in wage stagnation. Another NYT piece, co-written with Daniel Hemel, critiqued proposed bills aimed at insulating from dismissal by President Trump, asserting on June 2018 that such measures would fail to constrain executive removal powers under existing statutes and historical . Posner's law review articles frequently advance causal frameworks for regulatory and antitrust policy. In "Antitrust Remedies for Labor Market Power," published in the Harvard Law Review in 2018 with Suresh Naidu and Glen Weyl, he proposed expanding antitrust tools to address employer collusion that empirically elevates markups and suppresses wages, drawing on economic data showing labor market concentration's role in inequality. The 2015 Yale Law Journal article "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Financial Regulations," co-authored with Weyl, advocated systematic cost-benefit evaluation for post-crisis rules, demonstrating through examples how unquantified regulations lead to inefficient outcomes without commensurable safety gains. In a 2023 University of Chicago working paper, "A Return to the Foundations of Merger Law," Posner critiqued modern merger guidelines for deviating from Clayton Act intent, arguing that lax enforcement causally enables market power accumulation evidenced by rising industry concentration since the 1980s.

Personal Life

Family and Private Interests

Eric Posner is the son of Richard A. Posner, a federal appeals court judge and legal scholar renowned for developing the framework that integrates economic analysis into legal reasoning. This parentage offered early immersion in empirical and consequentialist methods of legal scholarship, yet Posner's academic output demonstrates autonomy, as evidenced by his distinct focus on , , and distinct from his father's judicial . Public information on Posner's and pursuits remains minimal, underscoring his to compartmentalize affairs from scholarly and public activities. No verified details emerge on spousal or parental roles beyond this paternal lineage, consistent with a among academics prioritizing professional output over biographical disclosure. Such aligns with Posner's for evidence-driven , channeled primarily through institutional channels rather than or extracurricular platforms.

References

  1. [1]
    Eric Posner - Songs, Age, Net Worth, Music & Biography | Mabumbe
    Eric Posner ... Eric Andrew Posner (; born December 5, 1965) is an American lawyer and legal scholar. As a law professor at the University of Chicago Law School, ...
  2. [2]
    Eric A. Posner | University of Chicago Law School
    Education and Experience ; Harvard Law School. JD, magna cum laude, 1991 ; Yale University. BA, MA philosophy, summa cum laude, 1988. Experience ; University of ...
  3. [3]
    Eric A. Posner | Authors - Macmillan Publishers
    He has written more than one hundred articles on international law, constitutional law, and other topics, and as well as more than ten books, including Radical ...Missing: key works
  4. [4]
    Professor Eric Posner - The University of Chicago
    Eric Posner graduated from Yale College in 1988 and from Harvard Law School in 1991. After graduation, he clerked for Judge Stephen F. Williams, U.S. Court of ...
  5. [5]
    https://press.princeton.edu/our-authors/posner-eric-a
  6. [6]
    Eric Posner: Books - Amazon.com
    4.5 17K · 30-day returnsThe Twilight of Human Rights Law (Inalienable Rights) · by Eric Posner · Part of: Inalienable Rights (26 books) · Hardcover. Add to cart. Other format: Kindle.
  7. [7]
    Legal experts Posner and Stone critique human rights law
    Eric Posner, an esteemed professor at the University of Chicago Law School, criticized human rights law as a largely ineffective tool for advancing global ...
  8. [8]
    Eric Posner's Not Completely Wrong Critique of International Human ...
    Dec 3, 2014 · But I think Posner's critique reminds us that international human rights law clinics are outside the traditional box of law school clinics, and ...
  9. [9]
    Antitrust Overreach In Labor Markets: A Response to Eric Posner
    Mar 18, 2025 · In this article, I offer a response to the criticisms that Eric Posner has directed at my initial article, which questions the importance ...
  10. [10]
    Eric Posner Responds to Critiques on the Decline of US Antitrust ...
    Feb 16, 2024 · Starting in the 1970s, big business seized upon, funded, and advanced antitrust skepticism that emanated prominently from the Chicago School.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Response to Eric Posner
    Posner's distaste for moral argument is typical of a "law and economics" approach. My own theoretical perspective is more one of traditional political economy, ...
  12. [12]
    Eric A. Posner - NNDB
    Eric A. Posner. AKA Eric Andrew Posner. Born: 5-Dec-1965. Birthplace: Chicago, IL. Gender: Male Race or Ethnicity: White Sexual orientation: Straight
  13. [13]
    Richard Posner - NNDB
    Richard Posner, AKA Richard Allen Posner, Born: 11-Jan-1939, Birthplace: New York City, Gender: Male, Race or Ethnicity: White, Sexual orientation: Straight.
  14. [14]
    Posner, Richard A. 1939- | Encyclopedia.com
    Posner, Richard A. 1939-PERSONAL:Born January 11, 1939, in New York, NY; son of Max and Blanche Posner; married Charlene Ruth Horn (a freelance editor), ...
  15. [15]
    Richard A. Posner | University of Chicago Law School
    Richard A. Posner, Senior Lecturer in Law (retired), Biography, Education and Experience, EDUCATION, Harvard University LLB, magna cum laude, 1962.
  16. [16]
    Hon. Richard Posner - The Federalist Society
    From 1963 to 1965, he was assistant to Commissioner Philip Elman of the Federal Trade Commission. For the next two years, he was assistant to the solicitor ...
  17. [17]
    Richard Posner | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
    Jan 1, 2009 · In 1968 he began an academic career, teaching first at Stanford University and then at the University of Chicago Law School. At Chicago, where ...
  18. [18]
    The Mystery of Richard Posner - Law & Liberty
    Jan 16, 2023 · A law professor, public intellectual, and federal appellate judge, Posner was a giant. He wrote some sixty books, on topics ranging from sex to ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  19. [19]
    The Bench Burner | The New Yorker
    Dec 3, 2001 · Posner grew up in New York—first in Manhattan and then in Scarsdale. His mother's relatives were Jews from Vienna who looked down on his father ...
  20. [20]
    Eric Posner - Ballotpedia
    Eric A. Posner is an American lawyer and professor. As of May 2024, he was the Kirkland and Ellis Distinguished Service Professor of Law.
  21. [21]
    Eric Posner: MoloLamken LLP (ML) Law Firm / Attorneys
    Education. Harvard Law School, J.D., magna cum laude. Yale University, B.A., M.A., summa cum laude. Bar and Court Admissions. Maryland; Illinois. Jump to Page.Missing: background | Show results with:background
  22. [22]
    http://www.ericposner.com/articles/
  23. [23]
    https://aspenpublishing.com/products/posner-contractlaw2
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Contract Law's Inefficiency - SURFACE at Syracuse University
    Feb 10, 2011 · Contract law's inefficiency raises some major questions about the rationale for making the pursuit of efficiency the central project of contract.
  25. [25]
    The Political Economy of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978
    Eric Posner, "The Political Economy of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978," 96 Michigan Law Review 47 (1997).
  26. [26]
    The Housing Crisis and Bankruptcy Reform - Chicago Unbound
    The housing crisis threatens to destroy hundreds of billions of dollars of value by causing homeowners with negative equity to walk away from their houses.
  27. [27]
    "Law, Economics, and Inefficient Norms" by Eric A. Posner
    Law, Economics, and Inefficient Norms ; Authors. Eric A. Posner ; Publication Date. 1996 ; First Page. 1697 ; Document Type. Symposium Article ; Repository Citation.Missing: bankruptcy contracts
  28. [28]
    Eric A. Posner. The Perils of Global Legalism - Oxford Academic
    Nov 1, 2009 · ... arguments about the possibility for effective collective action among groups of states. In The Perils of Global Legalism, Eric Posner argues ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  29. [29]
    THE PERILS OF GLOBAL LEGALISM - Law and Politics Book Review
    Eric Posner's THE PERILS OF GLOBAL LEGALISM is both a laudable and interesting work that contributes an important and rather sobering perspective towards ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Eric Posner - Yale Law School
    Nov 14, 2001 · This Introduction discusses the assumptions of our analysis, sketches our theory in very general terms, and locates our position among the ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Limits of International Law Fifteen Years Later - Chicago Unbound
    Jun 22, 2021 · The Limits of International Law received a great deal of criticism when it was published in 2005, but it has aged well.
  32. [32]
    https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1220&context=gjicl
  33. [33]
    Eric A. Posner. The Perils of Global Legalism - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · Eric A. Posner. The Perils of Global Legalism ; considered, compliance is not beneficial to the. acting state. Posner ascribes a progressive ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Law and the Emotions - Chicago Unbound
    These and similar experiments would clarify the meaning of prejudice in evidence law, and enable judges to be more discriminating when withholding photographs ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics, and the Law
    Posner, "Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics, and the Law," 50 Stanford Law Review 1551 ... Posner, Altruism in Law and Economics, 90. AM. ECON. REV., May 1978, ...
  36. [36]
    Law and Social Norms on JSTOR
    Advocates of shaming penalties argue that public humiliation of the offender will, in some circumstances, deter criminal behavior in a highly cost-effective ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Signaling or Reciprocating? A Response to Eric Posner's Law and ...
    Ranging over topics as diverse as family law, shaming penalties, and flag desecration, Posner's is by far the most systematic and wide-ranging theory of the ...
  38. [38]
    Eric Posner: The Role of Consumer Welfare in Merger Enforcement
    Sep 7, 2023 · His research interests include financial regulation, antitrust law, and constitutional law. He has written a dozen books and more than a ...
  39. [39]
    Antitrust from Trump to Biden to Trump - ProMarket
    Mar 11, 2025 · Author Disclosure: Eric Posner worked on the 2023 Merger Guidelines while serving as counsel to the assistant attorney general of the Antitrust ...
  40. [40]
    Eric Posner Writes About a Market Power Standard for Merger Review
    Apr 7, 2023 · A common but controversial view of the law is that a merger will be blocked if it reduces consumer welfare (surplus).
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Financial Regulations - The Yale Law Journal
    Jan 22, 2015 · See Eric A. Posner, How Do Bank Regulators Determine Capital Adequacy Require- ments?, 82 U. CHI. L. REV. (forthcoming 2015). Page 5. the ...
  42. [42]
    Benefit-Cost Paradigms in Financial Regulation - Chicago Unbound
    Eric Posner & E. Glen Weyl, "Benefit-Cost Paradigms in Financial Regulation" (Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 660, 2013) ...
  43. [43]
    Benefit-Cost Analysis for Financial Regulation
    Benefit-Cost Analysis for Financial Regulation by Eric Posner and E. Glen Weyl. Published in volume 103, issue 3, pages 393-97 of American Economic Review, ...
  44. [44]
    How Do Bank Regulators Determine Capital Adequacy ...
    Eric Posner, "How Do Bank Regulators Determine Capital Adequacy Requirements?" (Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 698, 2014).
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Why Has Antitrust Law Failed Workers?
    See Ioana Marinescu & Eric A. Posner, A Proposal to Enhance Antitrust Protection. Against Labor Market Monopsony (Dec. 21, 2018) (Roosevelt Inst., Working Paper) ...
  46. [46]
    Enforcement of U.S. Antitrust Law in Labor Markets by Eric A. Posner
    May 31, 2023 · This paper provides a review of recent developments in the enforcement of U.S. antitrust law in labor markets. It surveys cases and regulatoryMissing: overregulation | Show results with:overregulation
  47. [47]
    [PDF] How Antitrust Failed Workers by Eric A. Posner
    Jul 10, 2023 · It is important to note that the effectiveness of tools and approaches used by antitrust continue to be in debate, but that debate falls outside ...
  48. [48]
    Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just ...
    Eric Posner and Glen Weyl demonstrate why private property is inherently monopolistic, and how we would all be better off if private ownership were converted ...Missing: quadratic | Show results with:quadratic
  49. [49]
    https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691177502/radical-markets
  50. [50]
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2003531
  51. [51]
    Is Donald Trump a Danger to Democracy? - The New York Times
    Jun 24, 2020 · In “The Demagogue's Playbook” Eric A. Posner argues that Trump should, like Andrew Jackson, be understood as a populist demagogue: someone ...
  52. [52]
    Book review of The Demagogue?s Playbook - The Washington Post
    Aug 7, 2020 · Eric Posner looks back at previous demagogues to evaluate President Trump ... In his new book, “The Demagogue's Playbook: The Battle for American ...
  53. [53]
    It's out! | ERIC POSNER
    Jun 30, 2020 · In this insightful book, Eric Posner shows us that although democracies are inherently vulnerable to demagogues, America has seen remarkably few of them. Until ...
  54. [54]
    Eric Posner Explores Populism and Demagoguery in Politics on ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · ... Trump and Andrew Jackson. They explore the rise of populism, its implications for democracy, and the role of elites and institutions.
  55. [55]
    Are we in a constitutional crisis (yet)? | ERIC POSNER
    Oct 26, 2017 · First, there must be significant disagreement among political actors about what the constitution empowers or requires them to do. The ...Missing: executive | Show results with:executive
  56. [56]
    Posner: There's no constitutional crisis - GoUpstate
    Dec 28, 2017 · “Constitutional crisis,” like “Russian collusion,” is not a technical legal term with an agreed upon meaning. What's clear is that the ...
  57. [57]
    Questions Around Elite Control: Talking to Eric Posner
    Jul 17, 2020 · Andy Fitch questions Eric Posner about elite control, corrosive populism, and his book "The Demagogue's Playbook."
  58. [58]
    Eric Posner's Democracy for the Few | The Nation
    Aug 24, 2020 · ... Eric Posner's Democracy for the Few. Magazine · Newsletters · Subscribe · Log ... regulatory state, Posner fils spent most of his early career ...
  59. [59]
    What the US Election Is Really About by Eric Posner
    Oct 14, 2020 · Eric Posner thinks the long history of American populism explains what Donald Trump and his supporters represent.
  60. [60]
    Introduction | The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic
    This introductory chapter presents an overview of the “modern executive” and describes liberal legal theory.Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  61. [61]
    "The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic," by Eric A ...
    Jul 9, 2011 · Although they suggest that the executive is “unbound” by law, they argue throughout that the executive is still bound--if not by law, then even more so by ...
  62. [62]
    Long Live the Imperial Presidency? by Eric Posner - Project Syndicate
    May 12, 2021 · Eric Posner offers a historical explanation for why the US executive branch continues to amass ever more power.
  63. [63]
    Has the U.S. Presidency Become a Dictatorship? (Update)
    Oct 9, 2024 · Eric Posner, a law professor at the University of Chicago, has been telling us how the power of the U.S. presidency has expanded, especially ...
  64. [64]
    And if Elected: What President Trump Could or Couldn't Do
    Jun 3, 2016 · Eric Posner is a professor at the University of Chicago Law School and a co-author of “The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic.” A ...Missing: speech | Show results with:speech
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Economic Perspectives on Free Speech - Chicago Unbound
    ... free speech-related issues, including desecration laws, hate speech laws, and libel and slander laws. Eric Rasmusen and Eric Posner both analyze laws against.
  66. [66]
    Podcast on Charlie Hebdo and freedom of speech | ERIC POSNER
    Jan 14, 2015 · Rauch: hate-speech laws cannot be enforced neutrally, resulting in hypocrisy and chilling effects. Hate-speech laws do not improve safety. Me: ...Missing: restrictions | Show results with:restrictions
  67. [67]
    Campus Free Speech Problems Are Less Than Meets the Eye
    Jan 8, 2016 · Speech codes may sound menacing, but they are actually designed to enhance speech, writes Eric Posner. No classroom instructor tolerates ...
  68. [68]
    The Latest Excuse for Curbing Free Speech? ISIS. - Reason.com
    Dec 17, 2015 · Law professor Eric Posner never misses a chance to scaremonger for limits on free expression.Missing: views restrictions hate
  69. [69]
    Against Human Rights, by Eric A. Posner - Harper's Magazine
    In the legal literature, a hundred papers parsing human rights doctrine to ever finer degrees are written for every paper that takes an empirical approach. ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] HUMAN WELFARE, NOT HUMAN RIGHTS - Eric Posner
    Finally, recent empirical studies suggest that states that ratify human rights treaties do not improve their human rights performance, or, at least, that ...
  71. [71]
    The twilight of human rights law - openDemocracy
    The twilight of human rights law. Posner.jpg. The international human rights regime is too expansive in scope and feeble in enforcement to ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  72. [72]
    The Perils of Global Legalism - The University of Chicago Press
    Eric A. Posner explains that such views demonstrate a dangerously naive tendency toward legalism—an idealistic belief that law can be effective even in the ...
  73. [73]
    The Perils of Global Legalism | Foreign Affairs
    Dec 19, 2009 · " Posner sees global legalism as utopian -- built on unsustainable premises about human nature and the practicality of transferring domestic ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  74. [74]
    Climate Change Justice: Posner, Eric A., Weisbach, David
    ``Taking a clear, unflinching, and rigorous approach, this book pierces simplistic views of climate change justice, and makes a strong case for addressing  ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  75. [75]
    Eric A. Posner and David Weisbach, Climate Change Justice
    They argue that a sensible justice perspective would allocate more emissions allowances to poor nations with much to lose from climate change, since that is a ...
  76. [76]
    CLIMATE CHANGE JUSTICE - Law and Politics Book Review
    In chapters 4-7 Posner and Weisbach thoroughly discuss, and mainly deflate, the leading ethical arguments connected to global climate change. Throughout the ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  77. [77]
    A new philosophy for international legal skepticism?
    Apr 30, 2024 · Specifically, it entails that international officials are sometimes morally permitted to tell noble lies regarding what the 'law' is, to refuse ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Global Legalism: The Illusion of Effective International Law
    POSNER, THE PERILS OF GLOBAL LEGALISM xii (2009). 2. Id. 3. Eric A. Posner ... He concludes The Perils of Global Legalism arguing that states will.Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  79. [79]
    Eric Posner on the Coming Death of the ICC - Opinio Juris
    Sep 20, 2013 · This, just the latest blow to the ICC, illustrates once again why the prospect of international justice through global courts is ever receding— ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  80. [80]
    What Happened to International Law? by Eric Posner
    Jan 16, 2025 · Eric Posner sees the web of treaties, conventions, and institutions as another victim of the anti-globalization backlash.
  81. [81]
    The case against human rights - The Guardian
    Dec 4, 2014 · The human rights movement shares something in common with the hubris of development economics, which in previous decades tried (and failed) to ...
  82. [82]
    The case against human rights - Glodem - Koç Üniversitesi
    Sep 6, 2019 · Eric Posner just delivered 'the case against human rights'.[1] Posner diagnoses the empirical inefficiency of the international human rights ...Missing: rebuttals inefficacy
  83. [83]
    New book takes international human rights laws to task
    Jun 1, 2015 · Posner points out countries interpret these restrictions in vastly different ways. At present, the U.S. does not ban offensive speech or images ...
  84. [84]
    America's Return to Realism by Eric Posner - Project Syndicate
    Sep 3, 2021 · Multiple international tribunals were created, leading to the establishment of a permanent International Criminal Court. Human rights treaties ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] The New Legal Realism - Chicago Unbound
    The first is ideological dampening: Repub- lican appointees show fairly liberal voting patterns when sitting with two Democratic appointees; and Democratic ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] THE COMMON POLITICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORIGINALISM AND ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · JONATHAN S. MASUR & ERIC A. POSNER*. Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) and originalism are rarely discussed together and seem to.<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    ‪Eric Posner‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬
    Rethinking cost-benefit analysis. MD Adler, EA Posner. Yale LJ 109, 165, 1999. 778, 1999 ; A theory of customary international law. JL Goldsmith, EA Posner. U.Missing: philosophy | Show results with:philosophy
  88. [88]
    [PDF] BEHAVIORAL LAW AND ECONOMICS: A CRITIQUE - AIER
    This paper, while acknowledging the fruitful insights generated by the behavioralist literature, emphasizes the weak- nesses of the literature, which include a ...
  89. [89]
    (PDF) Consumer Contracts: Behavioral Economics vs. Neoclassical ...
    PDF | In the past decade behavioral economics has established itself as a contender to the throne of neoclassical economics in the economic analysis of.
  90. [90]
    The Twilight of Human Rights Law - Eric Posner
    In The Twilight of Human Rights Law--the newest addition to Oxford's highly acclaimed Inalienable Rights series edited by Geoffrey Stone--the eminent legal ...
  91. [91]
    The Demagogue's Playbook - Macmillan Publishers
    In The Demagogue's Playbook, acclaimed legal scholar Eric A. Posner offers a blueprint for how America can prevent the rise of another demagogue.
  92. [92]
    The Politics of the Trump Trials by Eric Posner - Project Syndicate
    Eric Posner offers a preview of the political, partisan, and procedural factors that will matter most.Missing: op- ed
  93. [93]
    What to Look for in Trump's First Trial by Eric Posner
    Apr 22, 2024 · Eric Posner points out that optics, more than the law or the facts, will be what matters most for the election.Missing: 2023 op- ed
  94. [94]
    A Return to the Foundations of Merger Law by Eric A. Posner
    Feb 24, 2023 · Abstract. Section 7 of the Clayton Act prohibits mergers and acquisitions where “the effect may be substantially to lessen competition, ...
  95. [95]
    After Posner retired from 7th Circuit, a grim diagnosis and a brewing ...
    Mar 29, 2022 · Posner's son Eric Posner, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, did not respond to a request for comment. In his letter to ...Missing: married | Show results with:married
  96. [96]
    Why is Judicial Biography So Hard To Write?
    Sep 7, 2016 · We know almost nothing about Posner's family, or his self-conception as father, husband, or grandfather. Eric Posner, Posner's son, is nowhere ...