Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Execution by firing squad

Execution by firing squad is a method of capital punishment in which a group of marksmen, typically three to five in number, simultaneously fire rifles or other firearms at the condemned individual from a short distance, usually targeting the heart to induce rapid blood loss and cardiac arrest, with the procedure often including restraints, a blindfold, and a single blank cartridge among the rounds to distribute psychological responsibility.^[1]^[2] Historically, this form of execution has been employed primarily in military contexts for offenses such as mutiny, desertion, and treason, dating back to colonial eras and gaining prominence during conflicts like the American Civil War and World War II, where it served both as discipline and retribution against enemies or collaborators.^[3]^[4] In contemporary practice, firing squads remain authorized in select jurisdictions, including the U.S. states of Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Utah as an alternative when lethal injection drugs are unavailable, with Utah conducting the most recent such executions in the United States as of 2025, marking a revival prompted by supply shortages and legal challenges to other methods.^[5]^[6] Proponents highlight its mechanical reliability—evidenced by no recorded botches in modern U.S. applications—arguing it achieves swift unconsciousness within seconds via massive trauma, potentially rendering it more humane than alternatives prone to prolonged suffering, though critics decry its visceral nature despite empirical data favoring its physiological efficacy.^[7]^[8]^[9] ![Map showing U.S. firing squad usage][center]

Historical Development

Origins and Early Military Use

The execution by firing squad originated as a military disciplinary tool following the proliferation of portable firearms such as matchlocks and arquebuses in the late 16th century, enabling armies to impose rapid, collective lethal punishment on offenders like deserters and mutineers to preserve unit discipline without prolonged individual confrontations. Unlike ancient precedents such as Roman decimation, where every tenth soldier in a delinquent cohort was stoned or clubbed to death by comrades to instill collective accountability, firing squads harnessed gunpowder's efficiency for instantaneous results, reflecting causal adaptations to technological availability rather than direct lineage.^[10]^[11] In the European colonial context, one of the earliest documented instances occurred in the Jamestown settlement on May 17, 1608, when English military authorities executed Captain George Kendall by musket fire for mutiny and suspected espionage against the Spanish, marking the first such punishment in the Americas and emphasizing the method's role in enforcing obedience amid precarious frontier operations. By the 18th century, professional European armies, particularly British forces, routinely employed firing squads for capital military crimes including treason and cowardice in the face of the enemy, prioritizing the procedure's brevity to swiftly restore order and deter contagion of indiscipline within ranks.^[12]^[13] During the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), firing squads saw formalized use by both Continental and British armies against deserters, with General George Washington approving hundreds of death sentences via shooting or hanging to counteract the high desertion rates—estimated at up to 20% annually in the Continental Army—that threatened operational cohesion. These executions typically involved a detachment of 8 to 12 soldiers from the condemned's regiment, positioned 10 to 20 paces away, firing volleys on officer command after binding and blindfolding the offender, thereby distributing moral burden while ensuring empirical certainty of death through multiple projectiles.^[14]^[15]

Expansion to Civilian Executions

In contexts of political upheaval and limited judicial infrastructure during the 18th and 19th centuries, military-style firing squads extended to civilian capital punishment as an expedient alternative to hanging, particularly where rapid enforcement was prioritized over formal proceedings.^[16] During the French Revolution, Committees of Public Safety in regions like the Vendée employed ad hoc firing squads against perceived counter-revolutionaries, often near the sites of alleged crimes, to achieve swift retribution and deter unrest amid the Reign of Terror from 1793 to 1794.^[16] This practice deviated from the centralized guillotine in Paris, reflecting causal pressures for efficiency in peripheral areas overwhelmed by insurgency, where assembling gallows or transporting prisoners posed logistical risks.^[17] In the United States, frontier justice in the Old West from the mid-19th century onward incorporated firing squads by posses and informal tribunals, especially in territories lacking established courts or execution infrastructure. Between 1854 and 1910, over 1,000 individuals were executed in the American West, with firing squads serving as a practical option alongside hangings for crimes like murder and robbery, often in remote mining camps or cattle towns where speed prevented mob interference or escapes.^[18] During the Civil War (1861–1865), both Union and Confederate military commissions applied firing squads to civilians accused of treason, sabotage, or aiding guerrillas, treating such cases under martial law to bypass slower civilian processes strained by wartime chaos.^[19] Historical accounts emphasize the empirical advantages of firing squads over hangings in these civilian applications: the method induced near-instantaneous death via cardiac rupture, typically within seconds, compared to hangings that frequently botched due to improper drops, resulting in prolonged strangulation lasting minutes and risks of decapitation or survival.^[20] This reliability minimized opportunities for crowd disruptions or prisoner rescues, as documented in frontier narratives where large gatherings around gallows scaffolds enabled riots, whereas compact firing lines in isolated settings reduced such vulnerabilities.^[18] In revolutionary and frontier settings, the approach thus prioritized causal deterrence—immediate enforcement to restore order—over the spectacle of hanging, which demanded public staging and heightened escape hazards in unstable environments.^[16]

19th and 20th Century Applications

In the American Civil War (1861–1865), both Union and Confederate forces employed firing squads as a standardized military punishment primarily for desertion and mutiny, with at least 185 documented executions by this method across the conflict.^[19] Union records indicate 267 soldiers executed for various military offenses, including desertion, often following courts-martial to maintain discipline amid high rates of absenteeism. These procedures were codified in military articles of war, emphasizing rapid execution by volley to deter further infractions in large armies.^[19] During World War I, firing squads saw extensive application in courts-martial for desertion and cowardice, particularly among British and Commonwealth forces, where approximately 307 soldiers were executed to enforce discipline under intense trench warfare conditions.^[21] Executions peaked in 1917 with 104 British cases, reflecting standardized protocols in field manuals that required blindfolds, stakes, and volleys from multiple rifles to ensure efficiency and visibility as a deterrent. Similar practices occurred across Allied and Central Powers armies, including Austro-Hungarian forces executing Serbian prisoners en masse.^[22] In the 20th century, dictatorships institutionalized firing squads for civilian political executions on a massive scale. Following the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), Francoist forces conducted thousands of post-victory executions of Republican sympathizers, with 1,706 documented in Barcelona alone between 1939 and 1952, often via summary courts-martial at sites like the Montjuïc cemetery parapet.^[22] In Mexico's Cristero War (1926–1929), the federal government executed numerous Catholic rebels without trial, including Jesuit priest Miguel Pro on November 23, 1927, using firing squads to suppress armed resistance against anticlerical policies.^[23] Soviet authorities during the Great Purge (1937–1938) carried out 681,692 documented executions, many involving NKVD firing squads or mass shootings of perceived enemies in standardized basement or quarry operations. Colonial administrations and independence conflicts further standardized the method for both military and civilian targets. In the Boer War (1899–1902), British forces executed Australian lieutenant Harry "Breaker" Morant by firing squad on February 27, 1902, for killing Boer prisoners, highlighting intra-imperial military justice.^[24] These applications underscored firing squads' role in enforcing control over large-scale insurgencies and purges, with procedures often involving multiple shooters for reliability in high-volume enforcement.^[25]

Decline and 21st Century Revivals

Following World War II, execution by firing squad experienced a marked decline in Western nations, including the United States, as international human rights frameworks emphasized restrictions on capital punishment and favored methods perceived as less visually confrontational. Many European countries curtailed or abolished the death penalty altogether in alignment with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and subsequent treaties, reducing reliance on traditional methods like shooting.^[26] In the U.S., states shifted toward lethal injection as the dominant method starting in the late 1970s, with firing squads authorized in only a few jurisdictions (Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah) but rarely invoked; between 1977 and 2010, Utah accounted for all three U.S. firing squad executions post-Gregg v. Georgia.^[3] This transition reflected not outright prohibitions—such as under the Geneva Conventions, which regulate but do not ban executions of prisoners of war—but a broader aversion to the method's perceived spectacle.^[27] The 21st-century revival of firing squads in the U.S. stems primarily from practical failures in lethal injection, including persistent drug shortages from pharmaceutical embargoes and a documented botch rate of approximately 7.12%, defined as executions involving prolonged procedures, equipment failures, or visible distress exceeding 10 minutes.^[28] Utah executed Ronnie Lee Gardner by firing squad on June 18, 2010, for the 1985 murder of an attorney during an escape attempt, marking the first such U.S. use since 1996 and chosen by the inmate amid lethal injection concerns.^[29] States like South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Mississippi have since expanded firing squad options as backups when injection drugs are unavailable, driven by execution delays averaging years due to supply issues.^[30] In March 2025, Idaho became the first U.S. state to designate the firing squad as its primary execution method via House Bill 37, signed by Governor Brad Little, effective July 2026 after facility renovations and training; lethal injection remains secondary only if shooting proves unfeasible.^[31] This move addresses Idaho's own lethal injection challenges, including a 2012 statute authorizing alternatives but highlighting the method's unreliability compared to historical firing squad success rates near 100% in verified cases.^[32] Elsewhere, nations such as Saudi Arabia maintain firing squads alongside beheading for capital offenses, including drug trafficking, with executions for narcotics surging post-2022 moratorium lift—over 50 in 2025 alone, disproportionately affecting foreign nationals.^[33]^[34] These practices persist amid international criticism but underscore the method's endurance where alternative protocols falter or cultural-legal traditions prioritize swift enforcement over perceived modernity.^[35]

Technical Procedure

Pre-Execution Setup and Preparation

The execution venue is prepared as an enclosed or semi-enclosed area, often featuring a sturdy wall or wooden panel reinforced with sandbags to absorb bullets, prevent ricochets, and contain blood and tissue.^[36]^[5] In contemporary indoor configurations, such as those adopted in South Carolina, the setup includes a metal chair with restraints positioned to face a wall containing a rectangular aperture through which the squad fires, surrounded by protective barriers for personnel safety.^[37] The firing squad comprises 3 to 12 marksmen, selected for marksmanship proficiency and positioned approximately 6 to 7 meters from the target, typically standing or kneeling in formation.^[38] Rifles are loaded by designated personnel, with one weapon containing a blank cartridge—indistinguishable to the squad—to diffuse individual responsibility and mitigate moral distress among participants, as the recoil from blanks differs subtly but not definitively from live rounds.^[39]^[40] The condemned is escorted to the site and secured to a chair or stake with bindings on the arms, legs, and torso to minimize movement.^[38] A cloth target, usually a white patch with a black circular marker, is placed over the heart region via clothing or strapping to guide aimed shots toward vital organs for rapid incapacitation.^[41] A blindfold is commonly applied at the condemned's option, primarily to reduce flinching or involuntary reactions that could compromise shot accuracy, though refusal is permitted in protocols allowing choice.^[42]

Execution Mechanics

The firing squad execution commences with the squad leader issuing sequential commands, typically "Ready" to load rifles, "Aim" to take positions and sight the target, followed by "Fire" upon a visual signal such as a dropped flag or handkerchief to synchronize the volley.^[5] This structure ensures coordinated discharge from multiple shooters, usually 3 to 12 members positioned 15 to 25 feet away, armed with military-grade rifles chambered in calibers such as .30-30, .30-06, or .308, loaded with single expanding or full-metal-jacket rounds for each participant except one issued a blank to obscure responsibility.^[5]^[43] Targeting focuses on the cardiac region, with a cloth or circular marker affixed over the heart to guide shots, aiming to deliver multiple high-velocity projectiles that penetrate the thorax, sever major vessels, and disrupt cardiac function through direct tissue destruction and associated pressure waves.^[44] The ballistic effects include rapid hydrostatic pressure propagation within vascular and fluid-filled structures, contributing to immediate neural disruption and circulatory collapse alongside exsanguination from vascular rupture, though the precise role of remote shock remains debated in forensic literature.^[45] Forensic analyses of successful historical cases indicate incapacitation occurs within seconds of impact on vital thoracic structures, with loss of consciousness from hypovolemic shock and cardiac arrest preceding clinical death by 1 to 2 minutes, as evidenced by pronounced absence of vital signs shortly after the volley in documented military and civilian executions.^[46] Multiple redundant hits mitigate single-missile failures, ensuring probabilistic termination of higher brain function via aggregated trauma rather than reliance on any isolated wound path.^[28]

Post-Execution Handling

A physician or coroner verifies death immediately after the firing squad volley by checking for absence of heartbeat, pulse, and respiration, with pronouncement typically occurring within one to two minutes due to the method's rapid trauma to vital organs.^[47]^[48] In the June 18, 2010, execution of Ronnie Lee Gardner in Utah—the most recent U.S. firing squad case—death was confirmed two minutes post-firing via medical examination.^[48] If vital signs persist, protocols in some military-derived procedures include a coup de grâce, entailing a single pistol shot to the base of the skull to ensure cessation, though no such intervention has been recorded in modern U.S. civilian executions.^[49] The body, often secured to a target-backed chair or frame to absorb projectiles, is then detached and removed for autopsy, embalming, or release to next of kin, with handling precautions for multiple entry wounds and potential fluid leakage.^[47] Post-verification, the execution site undergoes decontamination to address blood, tissue fragments, and spent casings, a process adapted in proposed indoor facilities—such as South Carolina's—to contain biohazards and ballistic residue via enclosed chambers and barriers.^[50] This contrasts with lethal injection's minimal mess but longer pronouncement times, often exceeding ten minutes amid monitoring for circulatory arrest.^[1]

Rationale and Empirical Advantages

Military Honor and Deterrence Value

In military traditions, execution by firing squad has been regarded as a "soldier's death," permitting the condemned to wear uniform and receive certain honors denied in methods like hanging, which were associated with civilian criminality. This distinction preserved a sense of martial dignity, particularly for officers, as exemplified in the execution of French Marshal Michel Ney on December 7, 1815, where he commanded his own firing squad while dressed in full military attire. Similarly, during the American Revolutionary War, British Major John André requested a firing squad execution in 1780, arguing it befitted his status as a soldier rather than a spy, though he was ultimately hanged; such preferences underscored the method's perceived honor in military codes, including Prussian regulations that reserved firing squads for military offenses to maintain an aura of honor.^[51]^[52] The deterrent value of firing squad executions in military contexts stems from their public or unit-witnessed nature, which reinforced discipline and loyalty by visibly enforcing consequences for offenses like desertion. During the American Civil War, approximately 500 soldiers from both Union and Confederate sides were executed, with two-thirds for desertion, and Northern armies observed declining desertion rates as executions increased, contrasting with sustained high rates in the South where such punishments were less frequent. Empirical analyses of World War I British Army data, where over 300 death sentences were issued for desertion and related offenses, indicate that actual executions within units reduced subsequent misconduct, supporting the causal link between swift, witnessed capital punishment and maintained order.^[19]^[53]^[54] By framing execution as a dutiful military procedure rather than a prolonged civilian trial, firing squads helped sustain unit cohesion and morale, avoiding the erosive effects of extended legal processes that could undermine command authority during active campaigns. This approach aligned with first-principles of military necessity, where rapid resolution of breaches preserved operational focus, as evidenced by historical protocols emphasizing immediate post-trial enforcement to deter emulation and affirm collective adherence to orders.^[55]

Comparative Humaneness and Speed

Execution by firing squad, when the shots accurately target the heart, induces unconsciousness through massive ballistic trauma resulting in cardiac rupture and immediate circulatory failure, typically within seconds. Electrocardiogram data from the 1938 Utah execution of John Deering recorded cessation of heart electrical activity moments after the volley, indicating rapid hemodynamic collapse that precludes prolonged awareness.^[56] This contrasts with lethal injection protocols, where successful sedation occurs in seconds via barbiturates but botched administrations—due to vein access failures, drug precipitation, or inadequate dosing—have left inmates conscious and in distress for 10-43 minutes, as documented in cases like Joseph Wood's 2014 Arizona execution involving 640 grams of drugs over nearly two hours.^[57] Historical botch rates underscore firing squad's reliability: analyses of U.S. executions since 1890 show a near-0% failure rate for firing squads in the modern era (post-1976), defined as instances of unintended prolonged suffering or procedural failure, compared to 7.12% for lethal injection based on comprehensive reviews of 1,000+ cases.^[58] Peer-reviewed examinations of lethal injection protocols report botch incidences of 5-8% across one-drug and three-drug variants, often involving convulsions, gasping, or extended consciousness from chemical imbalances.^[59] A notable exception occurred in South Carolina's April 2025 execution of Mikal Mahdi, where autopsy evidence revealed bullets largely missed the cardiac silhouette, permitting potential awareness for up to one minute amid peripheral wounds and secondary hypoxia; this isolated miss, attributed to alignment or marksmanship errors, does not alter the method's aggregate empirical edge over injection's systemic pharmacological vulnerabilities.^[60]^[61] From physiological mechanics, high-velocity rifle rounds (e.g., .30-30 caliber at 2,000+ fps) penetrating the thorax generate hydrostatic shock waves that shred myocardial tissue and disrupt aortic outflow, causing instantaneous pressure drop and cerebral perfusion failure; neural transmission halts absent oxygen delivery, debunking assertions of sustained agony in direct hits, unlike injections' dependence on gradual synaptic suppression prone to reversal by endogenous adrenaline.^[62] This causal pathway yields lower suffering potential empirically, as corroborated by forensic pathology on wartime ballistic casualties showing sub-second incapacitation from comparable thoracic impacts.^[63]

Reliability Based on Historical Data

Historical records of firing squad executions in the United States demonstrate a high degree of reliability, with no documented cases of botched procedures among the 34 instances carried out since 1900, where a botched execution is defined as prolonged suffering or failure to induce death promptly.^[64] This contrasts with other methods like lethal injection, which have exhibited failure rates due to procedural inconsistencies, but underscores the efficacy of firing squads when executed by trained marksmen adhering to protocols involving multiple shooters aimed at vital organs.^[4] The use of blank cartridges in one rifle further standardizes outcomes by distributing psychological burden evenly, reducing variance in shooter performance without compromising collective lethality.^[46] In U.S. military contexts from the Civil War era through the mid-20th century, firing squads were the predominant method, accounting for at least 185 executions during the 1861–1865 conflict alone, all resulting in immediate fatality upon impact to the chest or head.^[3] Protocols emphasizing rifle calibration, target placement over the heart, and synchronized volleys ensured death within seconds, as evidenced by eyewitness accounts and post-mortem examinations confirming cardiac rupture and massive hemorrhage as primary causes.^[46] This consistency persisted in later military applications, such as the 135 Army executions since 1916, where firing squads minimized deviations attributable to human error through rigorous training.^[65] Empirical data across broader historical applications, including over 140 civilian shootings since 1608, affirm fatality rates exceeding 99% under controlled conditions, with survival exceedingly rare and typically linked to protocol deviations rather than inherent method flaws.^[66] The brevity of execution—often under one minute from volley to cessation of vital signs—highlights causal reliability driven by ballistic physics over pharmacological uncertainties.^[46]

Criticisms and Empirical Drawbacks

Risks of Botched Executions

Botched executions by firing squad occur when the shooters fail to deliver a rapid death, typically due to bullets missing the designated target area over the heart, resulting in prolonged suffering from blood loss or organ damage rather than instantaneous cessation of vital functions. Such failures, though infrequent historically, highlight vulnerabilities in the method's reliance on human precision under high-stress conditions. In the United States, documented cases since 1900 remain limited, with estimates placing the overall botch rate for firing squads at approximately 3% from 1890 to 2010, compared to over 7% for lethal injection during the same period.^[67]^[28] A notable recent instance occurred during South Carolina's second firing squad execution on April 11, 2025, involving inmate Mikal Mahdi, where an autopsy revealed that all bullets missed the heart target, leading to an estimated 1-2 minutes of conscious suffering before death from hemorrhagic shock.^[61]^[60] This followed the state's first such execution on March 7, 2025, of Brad Sigmon, which proceeded without reported complications but underscored procedural challenges in indoor settings with automated rifles.^[68] Primary causes of such misses include human error from shooter stress, suboptimal lighting, or alignment issues with the target's cloth circle overlaying the heart, even when using multiple volunteer marksmen equipped with high-powered rifles like .308 caliber.^[60] These risks persist despite mitigations such as five simultaneous shots—one traditionally a blank to obscure responsibility—and backup protocols, as collective aiming deviations can still occur without mechanical safeguards like those in automated systems.^[69] Historical U.S. data indicates only a handful of partial failures since 1900, often involving incomplete incapacitation rather than total procedural collapse, contrasting with higher variability in alternative methods. For example, while pre-1900 cases like Utah's 1879 execution of Wallace Wilkerson involved extreme delays due to inadequate restraints and poor marksmanship, modern protocols have reduced but not eliminated aiming variances, as evidenced by the 2025 South Carolina autopsy findings.^[70]^[71] Critics cite these rare events to question reliability, yet empirical comparisons show firing squads outperforming lethal injections in speed and consistency when executed competently, with failures attributable to trainable human factors rather than inherent methodological flaws.^[72]^[73]

Psychological Effects on Participants

Reports from participants in execution processes, including those analogous to firing squads, document symptoms such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), nightmares, insomnia, and suicidal ideation, often persisting for years post-event. A 2022 NPR investigation, based on interviews with over 100 execution team members primarily in lethal injection scenarios, found that many experienced panic attacks and substance abuse as coping mechanisms, with inadequate institutional support exacerbating the distress. Similarly, qualitative accounts from prison guards describe acute PTSD onset immediately following executions, including hypervigilance and emotional numbing.^[74]^[75]^[76] However, these effects are predominantly observed among civilian correctional staff lacking prior exposure to lethal violence, contrasting with military firing squad participants who undergo rigorous conditioning to normalize killing. Studies on U.S. Army personnel indicate that assuming responsibility for others' deaths elevates PTSD risk, yet combat training—emphasizing dehumanization, obedience, and repetition—desensitizes soldiers, rendering structured executions less novel than unstructured combat killings. Reviews of combat-related literature confirm that perpetrators of killing report higher PTSD symptoms than witnesses, but volunteer selection for firing squads, often from experienced units, correlates with mindsets viewing the act as dutiful rather than aberrant, diffusing individual culpability through group action.^[77]^[78]^[79] Anti-death penalty advocacy groups, such as the Death Penalty Information Center, emphasize executioner trauma to argue against capital punishment, but their reports derive from self-selected civilian cases and overlook comparative data from military cohorts or civilian perpetrators of violence, where killing induces similar yet contextually managed effects. No large-scale empirical studies isolate firing squad-specific outcomes, but historical military protocols, including the use of blank cartridges in one rifle to enable psychological denial ("it might have been me"), aim to preserve unit cohesion by mitigating direct attribution of fatality. In combat veterans, elevated suicidal ideation links to weapon discharge and killing, yet firing squad rarity and pre-existing resilience training suggest effects align more with routine duty than exceptional pathology.^[76]^[80]

Legal and Ethical Objections

Legal challenges to execution by firing squad in the United States primarily invoke the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, with critics labeling the method barbaric due to its visual spectacle and association with military discipline.^[81]^[82] However, federal and state courts have consistently rejected such claims, affirming the method's constitutionality, particularly when employed as a backup to unreliable alternatives like lethal injection amid drug shortages and botched procedures.^[83]^[84] For example, the U.S. Supreme Court in 1878 upheld shooting as a valid punishment in military contexts, citing historical precedent, while the South Carolina Supreme Court in July 2024 ruled that firing squads do not constitute cruel punishment under state law.^[83]^[84] Recent legislative expansions, including Idaho's March 2025 law establishing the firing squad as the default method and authorizations in South Carolina (2021), Oklahoma, Mississippi, and Utah as alternatives, underscore judicial deference to states' practical needs over aesthetic objections.^[85]^[86]^[87] Ethically, abolitionist advocates, often affiliated with organizations like Amnesty International that oppose capital punishment outright, contend that firing squads inflict psychological trauma on participants and spectators, framing the method as a dehumanizing relic incompatible with modern sensibilities of dignified death.^[88]^[89] This perspective, however, overlooks physiological evidence indicating rapid cessation of consciousness—typically within seconds via hypovolemic shock, cardiac arrest, and spinal severance—contrasting with lethal injection's higher risk of extended suffering from venous access failures or insufficient sedation, as documented in post-mortem analyses.^[4]^[90]^[91] Proponents argue that ethical execution prioritizes causal efficacy over sanitized optics, ensuring state-sanctioned finality that delivers verifiable closure to victims' families, thereby upholding retributive justice without prolonging uncertainty through appeals or method failures.^[92] Such efficiency counters normalized abolitionism, which empirical reviews show discounts deterrence effects in high-execution jurisdictions, favoring ideological opposition over data on recidivism reduction and public safety.^[93]^[94]

Military Significance

Protocols in Modern Armed Forces

In the United States Armed Forces, capital punishment remains authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for 15 specified offenses, including espionage, mutiny, and aiding the enemy, with execution by firing squad as a traditional method alongside lethal injection or hanging.^[95] No military executions have taken place since the 1961 shooting of Private Eddie Slovik, rendering the procedure dormant but retained in military law, particularly for wartime espionage cases where rapid deterrence is prioritized.^[95] Protocols stipulate selection of a firing squad from military police units or qualified marksmen, typically consisting of 5 to 12 personnel positioned 10 to 20 feet from the condemned, who is restrained to a post or chair targeting the heart for instantaneous death.^[96] One rifle is loaded with a blank cartridge to obscure responsibility among participants, and medical confirmation of death follows immediately via pulse check.^[97] Internationally, protocols in modern armed forces are constrained by adherence to treaties like the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which many nations have ratified, effectively limiting or prohibiting military executions in signatory states such as those in NATO. Non-signatory forces, including North Korea's Korean People's Army, retain firing squad executions for military offenses like treason and desertion, often conducted semi-publicly with squads of soldiers using standard-issue rifles aimed at the torso from close range to ensure compliance with internal directives on swift punishment.^[98] ^[99] In such contexts, procedures emphasize rapid assembly and firing upon command, with no reported deviations in recent state media accounts of military purges.^[100] Training for firing squad personnel draws from routine marksmanship programs in modern militaries, where soldiers qualify annually on service rifles at distances of 25 to 300 meters, achieving hit probabilities exceeding 90% on vital zones under simulated stress to minimize malfunction risks.^[101] ^[102] These drills, mandated by regulations like U.S. Army Field Manual 3-22.9, incorporate dry-fire practice, live-fire accuracy tests, and psychological preparation for high-stakes scenarios, ensuring procedural reliability without historical botches in documented exercises.^[103] Adaptations for international humanitarian law include provisions for last rites, blindfolds, and avoidance of gratuitous suffering, aligning with customary rules on humane treatment in armed conflict even where capital punishment persists.

Notable Military Executions

During World War I, British and Commonwealth forces executed approximately 307 soldiers by firing squad for offenses including desertion and cowardice, with sentences carried out at dawn to maximize deterrence among troops.^[21] These executions occurred primarily on the Western Front, where courts-martial processed cases amid high desertion rates driven by trench warfare conditions, though many involved shell shock later recognized as a medical condition.^[104] In the American Civil War, both Union and Confederate armies conducted at least 185 firing squad executions, predominantly for desertion, to enforce discipline in large volunteer forces prone to absenteeism.^[3] Confederate executions intensified in 1864 under General Robert E. Lee’s orders, with examples including two deserters from Jubal Early’s division shot in the Shenandoah Valley to curb widespread evasion amid prolonged campaigns.^[19] World War II featured rare but symbolically significant U.S. military executions, such as that of Private Eddie Slovik on January 31, 1945, in Sainte-Marie-aux-Mines, France, for repeated desertion; he was the only American soldier executed for this offense during the war, approved by General Dwight D. Eisenhower to deter others amid high frontline stresses.^[105] The U.S. Army carried out a total of 10 such firing squad executions between 1942 and 1945 for various capital military crimes.^[106] Allied forces also executed Axis personnel post-war for war crimes, including German General Anton Dostler, shot by U.S. Army firing squad on December 1, 1945, in Aversa, Italy, after conviction for ordering the summary execution of 15 captured American commandos in March 1944, violating conventions on prisoners of war.^[107] Similarly, British military authorities executed German spy Josef Jakobs by firing squad on August 15, 1941, at the Tower of London—the last execution there—after his conviction under the Treachery Act for parachuting into England with espionage equipment; as a combatant, he faced soldiers rather than civilian hanging, seated due to an ankle injury from landing.^[108]

Civilian and State Usage

Patterns in Democratic Nations

In the United States, several states have retained execution by firing squad as a secondary method amid challenges with lethal injection drugs, reflecting a pragmatic response to supply shortages rather than primary preference. As of 2025, Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Utah authorize firing squads when lethal injection is unavailable or deemed unconstitutional.^[109]^[110] Idaho elevated it to default status effective 2024 following 2023 legislation, prioritizing reliability over optics in execution protocols.^[6] This selective retention underscores empirical advantages in speed and certainty, as historical data indicate lower botch rates compared to injections, though public perception limits broader adoption.^[85] European democracies largely phased out firing squads post-World War II, favoring less visually dramatic methods or full abolition amid shifting norms against capital punishment. France, for instance, employed firing squads primarily for military offenses until the mid-20th century but transitioned to guillotine for civilians and ultimately abolished executions in 1981, with the last occurring in 1977.^[111] Retention in military contexts was brief, as nations like France rehabilitated many World War I-era firing squad cases by 2008, signaling retrospective critique of the method's exemplary severity.^[112] Empirical reliability—evidenced by rapid incapacitation via central nervous system disruption—contrasted with democratic aversion to the method's perceived brutality, prioritizing humane optics over procedural efficacy.^[113] Across these rule-of-law states, patterns reveal firing squad's niche as a backup in jurisdictions facing methodological constraints, while comprehensive phase-out elsewhere stems from cultural and perceptual factors rather than inherent flaws in performance data. This divergence highlights causal trade-offs: democracies weigh visual deterrence and participant psychology against first-principles efficiency, often opting for alternatives despite evidence of higher failure in concealed methods like injections.^[114]^[115]

Applications in Authoritarian Regimes

In authoritarian regimes such as China and North Korea, execution by firing squad has been employed routinely for offenses including treason and political dissent, enabling rapid enforcement of state control without extended judicial processes.^[116]^[117] In China, firing squads remain a primary method alongside lethal injection for capital crimes, with estimates from human rights organizations indicating thousands of executions annually, many for non-violent political or economic offenses deemed threats to regime stability.^[118]^[119] This approach contrasts with slower trial-based systems by minimizing procedural delays, allowing regimes to process high volumes of cases efficiently during crackdowns.^[116] North Korea similarly utilizes firing squads for public executions targeting perceived traitors, with South Korean government analyses estimating nearly 1,400 such events since 2000, often involving groups to amplify deterrent effects.^[120] These spectacles, conducted in marketplaces or stadiums, serve to instill widespread fear among the populace, reinforcing loyalty in a context of limited internal dissent due to total information control.^[121] Empirical patterns show such methods facilitate mass suppression— as seen in reports of simultaneous executions of dozens—bypassing individual hearings that could strain resources or expose regime vulnerabilities.^[117] The scalability of firing squads in these systems supports causal deterrence by visibly linking disobedience to immediate, irreversible consequences, sustaining regime longevity amid instability without reliance on prolonged incarceration.^[120]^[121] Unlike resource-intensive alternatives, this method requires minimal infrastructure, enabling authoritarian states to maintain order through exemplary punishment rather than negotiation or reform.^[116] Reports from defectors and monitors indicate low executioner resistance, as participants are often ideologically aligned or coerced, further embedding the practice in state machinery.^[118]

Recent Developments in the United States

In the 21st century, the United States saw a resurgence in the authorization and use of firing squads for executions, primarily as a response to persistent difficulties obtaining lethal injection drugs and high rates of complications in those procedures. The last firing squad execution prior to this period occurred on June 18, 2010, when Ronnie Lee Gardner was put to death in Utah for a 1985 murder, marking the state's third such execution since resuming capital punishment in 1977.^[68]^[122] This trend accelerated in 2025, with South Carolina conducting the first firing squad executions in the U.S. in 15 years. On March 7, 2025, Brad Keith Sigmon, convicted of a 1999 double murder, was executed indoors at the Broad River Correctional Institution; five volunteer correctional officers fired three .308 Winchester rounds from 20 feet away at a heart-target on his chest, with one rifle loaded with blanks to obscure responsibility. Sigmon was pronounced dead within seconds, appearing to validate the method's efficiency compared to lethal injection's documented issues.^[68]^[69]^[123] Five weeks later, on April 11, 2025, Mikal Mahdi, sentenced to death for the 2006 murder of an off-duty police officer, underwent a similar procedure at the same facility, again using three aimed shots to the heart. However, an autopsy revealed that the bullets largely missed the target area, striking the upper chest and shoulder, which reportedly prolonged unconsciousness to 30-60 seconds—longer than the expected 15 seconds—and led defense attorneys to argue the execution was botched.^[60]^[61]^[124] Legislatively, Idaho enacted House Bill 37 on March 12, 2025, signed by Governor Brad Little, designating the firing squad as the state's primary execution method when lethal injection proves impractical, making Idaho the first to prioritize it over injections amid drug shortages and past botches. As of 2025, five states—Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Utah—authorize firing squads under specific conditions, often as backups to lethal injection, which has faced criticism for a complication rate exceeding 40% in some analyses due to vein access failures and drug reactions.^[86]^[31]^[3] Legal scholars like Fordham Law Professor Deborah Denno have testified and argued that firing squads offer greater reliability than lethal injection, which she describes as having deteriorated over decades due to untested drug protocols, positioning the method as a straightforward alternative to what she terms euphemistic but error-prone processes. These developments underscore a policy shift toward methods perceived as more certain, though the Mahdi incident highlights potential inaccuracies even with trained marksmen.^[125]^[126]^[14]

Global Variations and Ongoing Practices

Middle East and Asia

In the United Arab Emirates, firing squad serves as the exclusive method of capital execution under federal law, applied to offenses including murder, terrorism, and drug trafficking.^[127] This approach aligns with state practices in Sharia-influenced legal systems, where swift enforcement is prioritized for deterrence. Executions occur infrequently but decisively, with reports indicating at least one firing squad execution in 2017 for a convicted murderer. Iran maintains firing squad as a permissible execution method, particularly for military personnel or during wartime, though hanging predominates for civilian cases.^[127] Iranian authorities executed over 1,000 individuals in 2025 alone, with firing squads documented in instances involving drug offenses and political dissent, reflecting a policy of rapid retribution under qisas (retaliation) principles.^[128] Such practices, often conducted publicly, underscore the regime's emphasis on visible deterrence, though international observers like Amnesty International, which oppose capital punishment, report flaws in due process that may inflate execution numbers.^[129] In Asia, North Korea employs firing squads extensively for public executions targeting crimes such as treason, espionage, and consumption of foreign media.^[130] Reports confirm executions of teenagers by firing squad in 2022 for distributing South Korean films, with state media and defector accounts describing mass events to instill fear and compliance.^[131] The regime's opacity limits precise statistics, but human rights analyses estimate hundreds of annual public executions, correlating with suppressed dissent and low reported recidivism for capital offenses due to the method's immediacy and spectacle.^[121] China permits firing squad executions, though lethal injection has become predominant since the early 2010s; a notable case involved singer Zhang Yiyang's execution by firing squad in December 2024 for murder.^[132] Applied to severe crimes like drug trafficking and corruption, this method persists in remote or military settings for logistical efficiency. Indonesia has utilized firing squads for drug-related convictions, as evidenced by executioner testimonies from 2015 detailing procedures for multiple prisoners.^[133] In high-execution jurisdictions like these, empirical patterns show reduced prevalence of targeted crimes post-enforcement, challenging assumptions of inefficacy in abolitionist critiques by demonstrating causal links to policy compliance through credible threat of swift penalty.^[134]

Africa and Latin America

In Nigeria, military regimes frequently resorted to firing squads for public executions targeting armed robbery, treason, and coup attempts during periods of post-colonial instability. Between 1970 and 1979, over 500 individuals were executed publicly by this method under the Robbery and Firearms Decree, reflecting a emphasis on deterrence amid rising crime and political upheaval.^[135] In 1986, ten military officers, including General Mamman Vatsa, were put to death by firing squad in Lagos for an alleged coup plot against the ruling junta.^[136] Such practices underscored the method's utility in resource-constrained environments, requiring minimal infrastructure beyond available troops. Chad employed firing squads against Islamist insurgents in response to cross-border threats from Boko Haram, executing ten convicted members on August 28, 2015, one day after their terrorism trial concluded.^[137] In Somalia, the method persists for grave offenses in unstable regions, including the February 11, 2020, execution of two men convicted of gang-raping and murdering a 12-year-old girl.^[138] These instances highlight firing squads' role in rapid, collective punishment during insurgencies, where judicial expediency prioritizes security over prolonged appeals in under-resourced systems. South Africa's apartheid-era state favored hanging for capital crimes, though liberation movements like the ANC's Umkhonto we Sizwe conducted firing squad executions, such as three suspected infiltrators in 1989, amid guerrilla warfare.^[139] In Latin America, firing squads featured prominently in revolutionary upheavals and post-colonial military dictatorships, serving as a swift tool for consolidating power. Mexico's 1910 Revolution saw widespread use against rivals and deserters, continuing a tradition from the 1867 execution of Emperor Maximilian I by republican forces on June 19, which symbolized the rejection of foreign intervention. Captured soldiers like Wenceslao Moguel faced such fates in 1915, though rare survivals underscored the method's brutality in chaotic field conditions.^[140] Cuba's 1959 Revolution amplified this, with the Castro government executing an estimated 500-2,000 political opponents by firing squad in the early years, often at La Cabaña fortress under Che Guevara's oversight, to eliminate perceived counter-revolutionary threats.^[141] Later examples include Cuba's 1989 execution of General Arnaldo Ochoa Sánchez and three officers by firing squad on July 13 for alleged treason and drug trafficking, amid internal purges.^[142] Guatemala conducted the region's last state executions by this method on September 13, 2000, killing Roberto Girón and Pedro Castillo for murder, before abolishing capital punishment. Brazil, while constitutionally permitting executions only in wartime, has not carried them out since 1855, though informal "death squads" by police in favelas mimic summary shootings during instability.^[127] Across these contexts, the method's prevalence correlates with coups and civil strife, offering logistical simplicity—relying on standard military rifles—in settings lacking alternatives like lethal injection apparatuses.

Europe and Abolition Trends

In continental Europe, execution by firing squad was historically employed for both military and civilian capital offenses, particularly in France, Spain, and Italy, but has been nearly universally phased out since the mid-20th century amid broader abolitions of the death penalty influenced by the European Convention on Human Rights and its protocols. Protocol No. 6 (1983) prohibits capital punishment in peacetime across signatory states, while Protocol No. 13 (2002) extends this to wartime, compelling EU members to eliminate all methods including firing squads. By 2025, all Council of Europe states except Belarus have abolished or suspended executions, reflecting a regional consensus prioritizing human rights norms over retributive or deterrent rationales, though empirical analyses of capital punishment's efficacy—such as studies showing negligible deterrence effects—have played a secondary role to normative and perceptual pressures. France's last firing squad execution occurred on March 11, 1963, targeting Jean Bastien-Thiry, a military officer convicted of orchestrating an assassination attempt on President Charles de Gaulle; military executions by this method had been standard since the Napoleonic era but ceased with the full abolition of capital punishment in 1981. Spain conducted its final such executions on September 27, 1975, when five individuals convicted of murdering police officers were shot, following which a moratorium was enacted in 1978 and formal abolition in 1995 for ordinary crimes. Italy's last recorded firing squad executions took place in 1947 against mafiosi Francesco La Barbera, Giovanni Puleo, and Giovanni D'Ignoti, convicted of multiple robberies and murders, after which the death penalty—revived under Mussolini—was permanently abolished in 1948. These terminations aligned with post-World War II democratization and aversion to state violence reminiscent of fascist or wartime practices.^[17]^[143] The Soviet legacy stands as a counterpoint in Eastern Europe, where firing squads executed vast numbers during Stalinist purges, with approximately 681,692 documented deaths in 1937–1938 alone via this method for alleged political crimes, often following summary trials. Post-1991, Russia retained firing squad as the sole execution method until its final one in August 1996 against serial killer Sergey Golovkin; a moratorium imposed that year persists, effectively abolishing the practice despite legal retention for wartime offenses. This shift, amid Russia's Council of Europe membership (1996–2022), underscores how post-communist transitions prioritized international alignment, though narratives of Soviet-era mass squads continue to shape regional skepticism toward capital punishment.^[144] Exceptions persist in Belarus, Europe's sole active practitioner, where firing squad remains the mandated method for aggravated murder and terrorism, with at least four executions confirmed in 2022 despite UN human rights appeals. EU abolition trends emphasize optics of moral progress and compliance with transnational bodies like the Council of Europe, often sidelining data-driven trade-offs such as execution reliability or public support for retention in heinous cases—evident in surveys showing 40–60% favorability in countries like France and Poland. This differs from U.S. states' pragmatic revivals of firing squads since 2015, prompted by lethal injection failures, highlighting Europe's deontological focus versus America's occasional consequentialist adaptations.^[145]^[146]

References

[1]
Execution Method Descriptions | Death Penalty Information Center
On March 23, 2015, firing squad was reauthorized in Utah as a viable method of execution if, and only if the state was unable to obtain the drugs necessary to ...
[2]
How South Carolina firing squad works - Philadelphia - 6ABC
Mar 7, 2025 · It will be three people holding rifles about 15 feet (4.6 meters) away who will complete his punishment in what will be the United States' first firing squad ...<|separator|>
[3]
The US is killing someone by firing squad for the 1st time in 15 years ...
Mar 7, 2025 · It was a punishment for mutiny in colonial times, a way to discourage desertion during the Civil War and a dose of frontier justice in the Old West.Missing: current | Show results with:current
[4]
Is the Firing Squad a More Humane Method of Execution?
Mar 20, 2025 · Execution by firing squad is the most widely used method in the world, and it has been for a long time. It was also the first execution method ...
[5]
Methods of Execution | Death Penalty Information Center
Firing squad still remains as a method of execution in four states if lethal injection cannot be performed. The most recent execution by this method was that of ...
[6]
'Remarkable': States adding firing squad, more execution methods
Jun 5, 2025 · Those executions marked the first by firing squad in the United States since 2010 and only the fourth and fifth using that method in modern U.S. ...
[7]
"The Firing Squad as "A Known and Available Alternative Method of ...
The firing squad is the only current form of execution involving trained professionals, and it delivers a swift and certain death.Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
[8]
The Firing Squad as a 'Known and Available Alternative Method of ...
Aug 18, 2016 · There is also ample evidence suggesting that the firing squad is currently the most humane and reliable method of execution and that it meets ...Missing: humaneness | Show results with:humaneness
[9]
A Progressive Justice Billed This Method of Execution as “Relatively ...
May 12, 2025 · For example, in 2015, Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor pointed to evidence that “the firing squad is significantly more reliable than other ...
[10]
Roman Decimation: The Cruelest Form of Punishment in History?
Aug 14, 2022 · This was a punishment used when Roman legionaries deserted from battle or disobeyed their commander. It was an incredibly cruel punishment.
[11]
Decimation: The Brutal Military Punishment Of Ancient Rome
Jun 10, 2023 · In ancient times, decimation was used by Roman military leaders to brutally punish their own soldiers for cowardice and insubordination.
[12]
SC inmate to die by firing squad. Could other states follow?
Mar 6, 2025 · It is believed the first execution carried out in colonial America was done by firing squad, Denno said. From 1608, when Captain George Kendall ...
[13]
Crime and Punishment in the British Army in 1812. A. Capital ...
This article will explore the various types of crimes committed by a soldier and the levels of punishment he faced for his transgressions.
[14]
U.S. Firing Squad Executions Are Rare, but Their History Is Long
Apr 11, 2025 · The state passed a law in 2021 that made death by firing squad a legal option for people on death row. The legislation was prompted, in part ...
[15]
George Washington Convenes a Firing Squad
Feb 9, 2016 · Washington ordered a soldier to be shot for presenting a musket at an officer, but the soldier was pardoned before the execution.
[16]
Violence and the French Revolution (Chapter 7)
Firing squads were often set up near the site of the original crimes in order both to intimidate and to reassure. Another three military commissions ...
[17]
The guillotine falls silent | September 10, 1977 - History.com
The device soon became known as the “guillotine” after its advocate, and more than 10,000 people lost their heads by guillotine during the Revolution, including ...Missing: civilian | Show results with:civilian
[18]
Frontier Justice in the Wild West
Oct 1, 2007 · From 1854 to 1910, more than 1,000 men and two women were executed by hanging or a firing squad in the American West. While many were legitimate ...
[19]
Military Executions during the Civil War - Encyclopedia Virginia
The first executions for desertion in the Army of Northern Virginia took place at Mount Pisgah Church on August 19, 1862, when three men of Brigadier General ...Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
[20]
The Way of the Gun - The Atlantic
Mar 11, 2025 · The firing squad represents a faster and more reliable way to die than both the pseudoscientific methods produced in modernity (electrocution, gas, and lethal ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
Why Were These WWI Soldiers Executed by Their Own Country?
Jan 18, 2023 · 307 British and Commonwealth soldiers were executed by firing squad after courts-martial convicted them of cowardice or desertion.
[22]
The firing-squad parapet in Barcelona 1939-1952 - L'Ajuntament
Feb 24, 2019 · ... allies from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Set against a background of systematic, unmitigated repression, the executions by firing squad ...
[23]
What the executioner saw: The death of Blessed Miguel Pro
Nov 23, 2024 · Both men were executed, although none of the five accused men were ever granted a trial. ... When Miguel himself was marched to face the firing ...
[24]
Breaker Morant executed | National Museum of Australia
Sep 25, 2024 · Just before the end of the Boer War, lieutenants Harry 'Breaker' Morant and Peter Handcock were executed by firing squad for murdering 12 Boer prisoners of war.Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[25]
Death Penalty for Desertion - Warfare History Network
Some 266 British deserters were executed in World War I. Private John McCauley and his Scottish battalion were lined up to witness one such execution. He ...
[26]
History of the Death Penalty
The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century BCE in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon.
[27]
IHL Treaties - Geneva Convention (III) on Prisoners of War, 1949
If the death penalty is pronounced on a prisoner of war, the sentence shall not be executed before the expiration of a period of at least six months.
[28]
Botched Executions | Death Penalty Information Center
15%) went wrong in some way. Lethal injection had the highest rate of botched executions. In his book, he defines a botched execution as follows: Botched ...
[29]
Ronnie Lee Gardner Executed by Firing Squad in Utah - ABC News
June 18, 2010 -- When a prison official opened a curtain to reveal the death chamber to witnesses early Friday, convicted killer Ronnie Lee Gardner ...
[30]
Firing Squads Replace Scarce Lethal Injection Drugs In Some State ...
May 19, 2021 · Firing squads are also permissible in Mississippi and Oklahoma. Utah has carried out all of the nation's three executions by firing squad since ...
[31]
Idaho Governor Signs Legislation Authorizing Firing Squad as ...
Mar 17, 2025 · On March 12, 2025, Idaho Governor Brad Little (pictured) signed House Bill 37 into law, making the firing squad the state's primary method ...
[32]
https://www.idahocapitalsun.com/2025/03/12/idaho-will-be-only-state-with-firing-squad-as-main-execution-method-after-governor-signs-bill/
[33]
Saudi Arabia: escalating executions for drug-related offences
Jul 7, 2025 · New report draws attention to a startling surge in executions in Saudi Arabia and highlights the significant impact on foreign nationals.
[34]
Iran, Saudi Arabia Lead the World in Use of Death Penalty for Drug ...
Jun 18, 2025 · Nearly half of all known executions to date in 2025 in Iran (244) and Saudi Arabia (50) have been for drug-related crimes, tracking closely.
[35]
Saudi Arabia executing 'horrifying' number of foreigners for drug ...
Jul 8, 2025 · Hundreds put to death for non-violent drug offences over past decade, with little scrutiny of Saudis, says Amnesty.
[36]
Utah's firing squad: How does it work? - AP News
Mar 24, 2015 · The prisoner is seated in a chair that is set up in front of a wood panel and in between stacked sandbags that keep the bullets from ricocheting ...Missing: venue | Show results with:venue
[37]
How will death by firing squad be carried out in South Carolina?
Feb 21, 2025 · The firing squad chair is metal with restraints and is surrounded by protective equipment. The chair faces a wall with a rectangular opening 15 ...Missing: venue setup sandbags medical confirmation
[38]
Shot at Dawn! Execution by Shooting & Firing Squad
The traditional firing squad is made up of three to six shooters per prisoner who stand or kneel opposite the condemned who is usually tied to a stake or a ...
[39]
Conscience Bullets – Firing Squads and the use of blank cartridges
Jun 26, 2016 · A blank cartridge, having no bullet and therefore building up no pressure on firing, gives no recoil at all. As such, any firing squad member ...
[40]
South Carolina's heart of darkness: the firing squad and death penalty
Mar 4, 2025 · There have been only three firing-squad executions in the U.S. in the past 50 years. All of them took place in only one state: Utah. Setting a ...Missing: Revolutionary | Show results with:Revolutionary
[41]
How Utah's execution by firing squad works - Standard-Examiner
Apr 10, 2017 · The “execution team” is a five-person squad with a team leader and at least one alternate. All must be certified peace officers who have proved their firearms ...<|separator|>
[42]
Why do the states using a firing squad, have the condemned sit in a ...
May 27, 2024 · Primarily, the blindfold helps prevent the condemned from flinching. By not seeing the squad, the individual is less likely to move suddenly.Why is a condemned man given a blindfold before execution by a ...In states that execute by firing squad or hanging, why is the ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
[43]
What caliber bullets are, or were, used by Firing Squads in ... - Quora
Jun 12, 2019 · 30-30 for its firing squad executions. United States military executions during WWII by firing squad made use of M1 rifles chambered in .30–06.If you were to be executed by firing squad, which gun and ... - QuoraHow precise are the guns used in a firing squad execution? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
[44]
How a firing squad process works - WACH
Apr 15, 2022 · The inmate will be strapped into the chair, and a hood will be placed over his head. A small aim point will be placed over his heart by a member ...
[45]
[PDF] Scientific Evidence for “Hydrostatic Shock” - arXiv
This paper reviews the scientific support for a ballistic pressure wave radiating outward from a penetrating projectile and causing injury and incapacitation.
[46]
Firing Squad to Gas Chamber: How Long Do Executions Take?
Mar 25, 2015 · Firing squad: Less than a minute. Just three prisoners have been executed by firing squad since capital punishment was brought back in 1976. In ...
[47]
Federal & State Law | Mississippi Department of Corrections
(d) firing squad, until death is pronounced by the county coroner where the execution takes place or by a licensed physician according to accepted standards ...
[48]
Ronnie Lee Gardner's life ends with hardly a word - Deseret News
Jun 18, 2010 · The shots were fired at 12:15 a.m., and Gardner was pronounced dead two minutes later. From the time a curtain was opened to allow nine media ...Missing: aftermath | Show results with:aftermath
[49]
Tennessee Death Row Inmates Request Death By Firing Squad
Nov 6, 2018 · Should there be human error, procedure for military executions have a back-up plan: the 'coup de grace,' which consists of holding the muzzle ...
[50]
South Carolina plans to carry out a firing squad execution. Is it safe ...
Mar 5, 2025 · South Carolina's overview of its execution protocol states that the firing squad chair is surrounded by “protective equipment” and that the ...
[51]
"In no service or country is the ceremony so awful and impressive ...
It has been calculated that, between 1808 and 1814, Wellington executed at least 112 soldiers for such offences as desertion, mutiny, gross insubordination, and ...Missing: code | Show results with:code
[52]
British Military Law and the Death Penalty (1868-1918) - jstor
of honour pervaded the Prussian code and only executions for military offences were performed by the honourable method of a firing squad. Otherwise, death was.
[53]
Desertion, Cowardice and Punishment - Essential Civil War ...
Even after both sides began executing deserters, less than 400 actually faced a firing squad in either army. However, soldiers' diaries and letters reveal ...
[54]
Military Justice - 1914-1918 Online
Oct 8, 2014 · Thousands of soldiers were executed by firing squad for the crimes of desertion, mutiny and cowardice. The primary purpose of military justice ...
[55]
[PDF] The Deterrent Effect of the Death Penalty? Evidence from British ...
Using this result, I exploit variation in commutations and executions within military units to identify the deterrent effect of executions, with deterrence ...
[56]
The Harsh Reality of Execution By Firing Squad
Mar 12, 2015 · There is also a bizarre experiment from 1938 in which doctors monitored the electrical activity of the heart of a Utah man who was being ...
[57]
As Lethal Injection Turns Forty, States Botch a Record Number of ...
Dec 7, 2022 · On December 7, 1982, Texas strapped Charles Brooks to a gurney, inserted an intravenous line into his arm, and injected a lethal dose of ...
[58]
Botched Statistics on Botched Executions: Refuting Austin Sarat's ...
Introduction. In 2014, Austin Sarat presented findings on the botch rates of various execution methods. Sarat's statistics on death penalty botch rates have ...
[59]
[PDF] Lethal injection in the modern era: cruel, unusual and racist
Apr 1, 2024 · The rate of botched executions for the two most frequently used execution protocols, the one-drug and three-drug protocols, was 8% and 5 ...
[60]
A firing squad tried to shoot a prisoner's heart. Everyone missed. : NPR
May 8, 2025 · Mikal Mahdi died on April 11 after being shot by a three-person firing squad. But an autopsy revealed two wounds on his chest, not three. None ...Missing: ballistic hydrostatic shock
[61]
Revealed: Autopsy suggests South Carolina botched firing squad ...
May 8, 2025 · A South Carolina firing squad botched the execution of Mikal Mahdi last month, with shooters missing the target area on the man's heart, causing him to suffer ...Second firing squad execution · Second South Carolina man...
[62]
NewsNation: Prof. Deborah Denno Explains History and Efficacy of ...
Sep 14, 2023 · Denno explains that modern firing squads would work in a specific way, with an inmate strapped to a chair and surrounded by sandbags to prevent ...Missing: venue setup medical confirmation
[63]
The Return of the Firing Squad? - The Marshall Project
Apr 8, 2022 · With a scarcity of lethal injection drugs, South Carolina has brought back an archaic execution method. In other states, men on death row are asking for it.Missing: definition procedure current
[64]
Why executions by firing squad may be coming back in the US
Mar 24, 2023 · Utah is the only state to have used firing squads in the past 50 years, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Death Penalty Information Center ...
[65]
Facts and Figures - Death Penalty Information Center
Number of Executions. 135 people have been executed by the Army since 1916 ; Date of Last Military Execution. On April 13, 1961 ; Military Death Sentencing Rate.
[66]
The New York Times: Prof. Deborah Denno Says Death by Firing ...
Feb 21, 2025 · Historical data suggests that at least 144 American inmates have been executed by shooting since 1608, though it is not clear how many ...
[67]
Violent and sudden. What a firing squad execution looked like ...
The same policy group estimates a 3% failure rate for executions from 1890-2010, with lethal injection at more than twice that, at 7%. https ...
[68]
South Carolina inmate executed by firing squad for first time ... - CNN
Mar 7, 2025 · The execution of Brad Sigmon, 67, by the South Carolina Department of Corrections on Friday is only the fourth firing squad execution in the US ...
[69]
South Carolina executes second man by firing squad in 5 weeks - PBS
Apr 11, 2025 · It has been used to punish mutinies and desertion in armies, as frontier justice in America's Old West and as a tool of terror and political ...
[70]
Botched Executions in American History
A report in the Salt Lake City Tribune takes a different view of the suggestion that there have been no botched executions by firing squad.
[71]
How many firing squad executions have gone wrong in the U.S.?
Feb 27, 2025 · She says the first documented firing squad execution occurred in Virginia in 1608 and that there had been 30, mostly in California and Louisiana ...
[72]
Why death by firing squad may be making a comeback | CNN
Apr 10, 2025 · The search for a safe, reliable and humane method. The firing squad is among the country's oldest execution methods, according to Deborah ...Missing: humaneness | Show results with:humaneness
[73]
Firing Squad: The Future of Arizona's Death Penalty?
Apr 14, 2025 · ... lethal injection as the state's alternative to lethal gas. By law ... firing squads are cheaper, quicker, and have a lower failure rate.
[74]
People Involved In Executions Say Their Mental Health Has ... - NPR
Nov 17, 2022 · Workers said they were left with serious physical and mental consequences from participating in executions. BILL BREEDEN: For several months ...
[75]
Prison Executioners Face Job-Related Trauma - Psychology Today
Oct 11, 2018 · Many execution guards experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One guard explained his acute symptoms at the outset of his descent into PTSD.
[76]
Hidden Casualties: Executions Harm Mental Health of Prison Staff
Dec 5, 2024 · A 2022 NPR investigation found that corrections officers faced symptoms such as insomnia, nightmares, panic attacks, suicidal thoughts, ...
[77]
Association Between Responsibility for the Death of Others and ...
Nov 1, 2021 · This cohort study examines the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder, suicidality, depression, and functional impairment in US Army service members<|separator|>
[78]
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Killing in Combat: A Review of ...
Research identifies that those who kill during combat are more likely to report PTSD symptoms. Disparity exists over whether this relationship is statistically ...
[79]
The Psychology of the Executioner - Pacific Standard
Mar 12, 2015 · The mindsets of firing-squad volunteers and lethal-injection team members are the polar opposite with how most of those not involved in the process feel.
[80]
Firing a Weapon and Killing In Combat Are Associated with Suicidal ...
We hypothesized those veterans who fired a weapon or killed in combat would be more likely to endorse past 2-week SI and have higher levels of PTSD and ...Missing: squad | Show results with:squad
[81]
Why firing squads and other execution methods remain constitutional
Jan 27, 2015 · A State's refusal to adopt proffered alternative procedures may violate the Eighth Amendment only where the alternative procedure is feasible, ...
[82]
Death By Firing Squad Unusual, But Is It Cruel? - NPR
Apr 26, 2010 · Executions by firing squad may seem like a relic from the past ... issues and problems which is race and arbitrariness and sometimes mistake.
[83]
Limitations on Capital Punishment: Methods of Execution - Justia Law
In 1878, the Court, relying on a long history of using firing squads in carrying out executions in military tribunals, held that the “punishment of shooting as ...
[84]
South Carolina High Court Hears Challenge to Firing Squads and ...
Feb 1, 2024 · UPDATE: On July 31, 2024, the South Carolina Supreme Court held that execution by electrocution and firing squad are not “cruel or unusual” ...
[85]
Authorized Methods by State | Death Penalty Information Center
In March 2025, the Idaho Legislature passed and Governor Brad Little signed legislation that makes the firing squad the primary method of execution and lethal ...
[86]
Idaho will be only state with firing squad as main execution method ...
Mar 12, 2025 · Idaho Gov. Brad Little on Wednesday morning signed into law House Bill 37, which will make the firing squad the primary death penalty in Idaho.
[87]
Firing squad execution planned in South Carolina: Is the method ...
Feb 26, 2025 · By the numbers: Five states currently permit execution by firing squad: South Carolina – Approved in 2021 as an alternative if lethal injection ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[88]
Doctor, anti-death penalty advocates say firing squad poses moral ...
Aug 22, 2025 · Ahead of the Ralph Menzies execution, anti-death penalty advocates say the firing squad poses moral and logistical issues.
[89]
[PDF] Saudi Arabia's extensive use of capital punishment 1
The extensive use of the death penalty in Saudi Arabia is primarily perpetuated by legal and judicial factors. These include an extremely wide range of capital ...
[90]
Is The Firing Squad More Humane Than Lethal Injection?
Mar 2, 2017 · Last week, the Supreme Court responded to a petition from a death row inmate in Alabama containing an unusual demand: He wanted to be ...
[91]
Lethal Injection Is Not Humane - PMC - NIH
Apr 24, 2007 · This month's article by Koniaris and colleagues provides further evidence that lethal injection is far from humane.Missing: physiology | Show results with:physiology<|separator|>
[92]
"A Modest Proposal: The Federal Government Should Use Firing ...
While firing squads may shock the senses, this Note argues that they are in fact the only way to comport with the requirements of the Eighth Amendment.Missing: 8th challenges<|separator|>
[93]
[PDF] No, the Firing Squad Is Not Better than Lethal Injection
Jan 13, 2021 · more painful and far less humane than death by firing squad.”26 But the citation presented to support this claim does no such thing. It is ...Missing: reliability humaneness
[94]
Execution in Saudi Arabia is Continuous Torture
Oct 10, 2023 · As Saudi Arabia continues to issue and carry out death sentences, ranking prominently among the top five countries with the highest execution rates.<|separator|>
[95]
The Military's Death Penalty System
A service member is entitled to an Article 32 hearing before he or she can be charged with a serious crime and face a court-martial. Similar to a grand jury ...
[96]
[PDF] Procedure for Military Executions,No. 27-4, December 1947 - Loc
Military executions are by shooting or hanging, ordered by the authority, with the time and place determined by the authority. An experienced executioner is ...
[97]
[PDF] U.S. Army Corrections System: Procedures for Military Executions
Jan 17, 2006 · The proponent has the authority to approve exceptions or waivers to this regulation that are consis- tent with controlling law and regulations.<|separator|>
[98]
Witness to North Korea executions: 'He was only 22 and shot for ...
Sep 28, 2025 · He was only 22, but he was executed by firing squad on the charge of watching and distributing 70 songs and three South Korean television series ...
[99]
N. Korea Vice Premier executed by firing squad: S. Korean official
Aug 31, 2016 · North Korea's vice premier Kimong Jin was put to death by firing squads sometime last month for anti-party and anti-revolutionary crimes.
[100]
North Korea executed top official, says Seoul | News | Al Jazeera
Aug 31, 2016 · South Korean officials say Pyongyang executed the vice premier of education by firing squad last month.
[101]
Army Weapons Qualification Course - Military.com
Mar 27, 2014 · Training to become a marksman lasts approximately 2-3 weeks and ends with qualification testing, where you must pass with at least a minimum score to graduate.
[102]
Army Marksmanship Unit | U.S. Army
Become part of the US Army Marksmanship Unit (USAMU) and earn your place among the world's finest shooters while representing America.Missing: squad | Show results with:squad
[103]
[PDF] Rifle Marksmanship Diagnostic and Training Guide - DTIC
A Rifle Marksmanship Diagnostic and Training Guide was developed to assist Army drill sergeants diagnose and train. Soldiers in the Initial Entry Training ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[104]
Shot at dawn: Men and boys 'absent without leave' during World War 1
May 28, 2024 · 306 men, many of whom were still teenagers, were shot at dawn by their comrades between 1914 and 1919. Firing squads were made up of a six or a ...
[105]
The execution of Pvt. Slovik | January 31, 1945 - History.com
Eddie Slovik becomes the first American soldier since the Civil War to be executed for desertion—and the only one who suffered such a fate during World War II.
[106]
Military Execution by Firing Squad - Encyclopedia Virginia
A blindfolded prisoner, private William H. Johnson of Co. B, 1st New York Cavalry Regiment, awaits his fate as a firing squad prepares to execute him.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[107]
American troops prepare Major General Anton Dostler for execution.
Dostler was executed for having ordered the shooting of 15 U.S. soldiers captured behind German lines in March 1944. The Americans were on a sabotage mission ...<|separator|>
[108]
15th August 1941: Last execution at the Tower of London takes ...
Aug 15, 2024 · 15th August 1941: Last execution at the Tower of London takes place when German spy Josef Jakobs is killed by firing squad. Tap to unmute.
[109]
Map Shows US States Allowing Firing Squad Executions - Newsweek
Mar 10, 2025 · Along with South Carolina, Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Utah authorize the firing squad as a method of execution. Read More. U.S.. Donald ...Missing: 2021-2025 | Show results with:2021-2025
[110]
US inmate set to die by firing squad, which states allow this? - The Hill
Mar 7, 2025 · Death by firing squad is legal in several states. In total, five states allow the method of execution: South Carolina, Utah, Oklahoma, Idaho, and Mississippi.Missing: authorizing | Show results with:authorizing
[111]
French firing squad figures revealed | First world war - The Guardian
Nov 6, 1999 · To the names of the 1,357,800 French soldiers killed by enemy action in the first world war historians now have to add 550 deaths by French ...
[112]
Rehabilitation of soldiers executed by firing squad during the First ...
Nov 11, 2020 · In November 2008, France rehabilitated, politically, 675 soldiers executed between 1914 and 1918, including those 'shot as an example' after being convicted of ...<|separator|>
[113]
Among countries with capital punishment, why are firing squads ...
Jan 29, 2025 · They're seen as inhumane, as gunshot is generally quite a bit messier than injections. Personally, a firing squad is what I would choose if ...Missing: democracies | Show results with:democracies
[114]
Why are firing squads for US executions being debated? - WVTM
Mar 24, 2023 · Just 143 were by firing squad, compared with 9,322 by hanging and 4,426 by electrocution. Has the Supreme Court weighed in? High court rulings ...<|separator|>
[115]
Why This Physician Testifies in Favor of the Firing Squad
Feb 4, 2025 · James Williams, an influential medical expert for death row prisoners, explains how the method prevents "a prolonged and painful death."Missing: humaneness studies
[116]
China's authoritarian execution system spares no prisoner
Feb 18, 2021 · China has been branded the world's worst executioner as the state kills thousands of people every year using firing squads, lethal injections and mobile death ...
[117]
North Korea has carried out 1400 public executions since 2000 ...
Jul 6, 2015 · According to South Korean research, citizens are forced to witness public deaths in an effort to keep them in line. Daily NK reports.
[118]
Inside China's execution conveyor belt: How 'mobile injection vans ...
Feb 1, 2024 · Mobile death vans, firing squads, lethal injections: These are all methods used by China to carry out more state-sanctioned executions than all other nations ...
[119]
Global: Executions soar to highest number in almost a decade
May 29, 2024 · Death penalty 2023. Death sentences and Executions. read the report. © Amnesty International, (Photo: Stephane Lelarge).
[120]
Report: Nearly 1,400 Public Executions in N. Korea Since 2000 - VOA
Jul 1, 2015 · North Korea publicly executed close to 1,400 citizens since 2000, according to a South Korean government-run institute.Missing: firing squad
[121]
How North Korea executes people - Axios
Jun 11, 2019 · There were 19 reports of "public executions of more than 10 people at once." Almost all of the reported state-sanctioned killings were public ...<|separator|>
[122]
Brad Sigmon Executed by Firing Squad in South Carolina
Mar 7, 2025 · The court found that fewer than 1% of executions in the U.S. have been carried out by firing squad, with only 34 such executions since 1900—all ...
[123]
This is how South Carolina performs its firing squad execution - KBTX
Apr 10, 2025 · Mahdi chose a firing squad over lethal injection or electrocution, as Brad Sigmon did for his March 7 execution, which was the first time the ...
[124]
Lawyers for SC man executed by firing squad say bullets mostly ...
May 8, 2025 · Arden said that likely meant Mahdi took 30 to 60 seconds to lose consciousness, two to four times longer than the 15 seconds that experts ...
[125]
The US is killing someone by firing squad for the 1st time in 15 years ...
Mar 5, 2025 · “Lethal injection has only gotten worse over the decades,” Denno told The Associated Press in an interview. “The firing squad really stands out ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[126]
Kill Lethal Injection and Bring Back the Firing Squad - Time Magazine
Apr 28, 2015 · Denno is the Arthur A. McGivney Professor of Law at Fordham Law School where she has been writing, researching, and testifying in state and ...
[127]
Firing squad: Which countries use execution method
Mar 24, 2015 · Firing squads remain the preferred method of execution in Somalia and Equatorial Guinea and are known to have been used in Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.<|separator|>
[128]
Iran: Over 1,000 people executed as authorities step up horrifying ...
Sep 26, 2025 · Iranian authorities have executed over 1000 people thus far in 2025, the highest number of yearly executions in Iran that the organization ...Missing: squad | Show results with:squad
[129]
UN experts condemn 'staggering scale' of executions in Iran - BBC
Sep 29, 2025 · But the government has previously defended its use of the death penalty, saying it is limited to only "the most severe crimes". It comes on the ...
[130]
North Korea executes two for watching South Korean movies
Dec 9, 2022 · Two teenagers in North Korea have been killed by firing squad for watching and selling movies from neighbouring South Korea.
[131]
North Korea: Hundreds of public execution sites identified, says report
Jun 10, 2019 · A rights group found some of those executed had committed crimes like theft and watching South Korean TV.
[132]
Chinese singer Zhang Yiyang executed by firing squad for ...
Jul 22, 2025 · Chinese singer-actor Zhang Yiyang was reportedly executed by firing squad in December 2024 after being convicted of murdering his 16-year-old girlfriend.
[133]
Death penalty in Indonesia: an executioner's story - The Guardian
Mar 5, 2015 · The firing squad, made up of 12 Brimob officers, will be five to 10 metres away and will shoot their M16s when given the order. Only some of the ...
[134]
Southeast Asia's death penalty laws: The ultimate political game
Dec 16, 2024 · The plan had been to execute her by firing squad with other death row prisoners, including Australians Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran.
[135]
[PDF] Death sentences and executions for armed robbery
From 1970 to 1979 there were over 960 executions in Nigeria, some 500 of which were carried out in public by firing squad after trials by Robbery and Firearms ...
[136]
REMEMBERING THE 1986 COUP PLOT EXECUTIONS IN NIGERIA ...
Jul 5, 2025 · Gen. Mamman Vatsa and nine other military Officers were executed by firing squad in Lagos for allegedly plotting a coup against the regime of ...
[137]
Chad executes 10 Boko Haram fighters over deadly attacks - BBC
Aug 29, 2015 · Ten members of the Islamist militant group Boko Haram have been executed by firing squad in Chad. It comes a day after they were found guilty of terror charges.
[138]
Somalia executes two men by firing squad for girl's gang rape and ...
Feb 11, 2020 · Somalia executed two men by firing squad on Tuesday for the gang rape and murder of a 12-year-old girl, a government official said, ...<|separator|>
[139]
The ANC's use of the death penalty! | The Observation Post
Aug 23, 2022 · They were executed by a MK firing squad in 1989 at Milange. As to South African law and the 'Apartheid' state, no capital punishment was ...
[140]
Wenceslao Moguel shot - WCH - Working Class History | Stories
At 5 PM he was stood in front of a firing squad of nine soldiers with rifles. They opened fire, hitting him eight times, then an officer walked up with a ...
[141]
Carlos Alberto Montaner: Che Guevara
Che Guevara was in La Cabaña, the big political prison of Havana where most of the firing squad executions took place.
[142]
Cuban War Hero, 3 Others Executed by Firing Squad
Jul 14, 1989 · Cuban war hero Gen. Arnaldo Ochoa Sanchez, who fought alongside Fidel Castro in the revolution 30 years ago, was executed by firing squad at dawn Thursday.
[143]
[PDF] DEATH PENALTY NEWS - Amnesty International
The last executions in Spain took place on 17 September 1975 when five men convicted of murdering public order officials were shot by firing squad. Three years ...
[144]
How the death penalty was carried out in Russia - Russia Beyond
Nov 1, 2019 · Executions were exclusively by firing squad. In the new Russia that emerged after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1990, capital punishment has ...
[145]
Belarus and Ukrainan rebels keep death penalty alive in Europe
Every EU member state has abolished the death penalty in law or practice. The last country to do so was Latvia, which banned capital punishment in wartime in ...
[146]
Support For The Death Penalty In Europe - Brilliant Maps
Aug 14, 2025 · France, Guillotine, firing squad, 1977 ; Germany, Guillotine, hanging, firing squad, 1951 ; Georgia, Shooting, 1995 ; Greece, Firing squad, 1972 ...