Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), commonly referred to as FEHB, is a voluntary initiative administered by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that delivers comprehensive medical coverage to eligible civilian employees, retirees, former employees receiving annuities, and their dependents. Established under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act of 1959 and operational since 1960, the program enrolls over 8 million participants across approximately 180 private-sector health plans, including , health maintenance organizations (HMOs), and high-deductible consumer-driven options, fostering a competitive where enrollees select coverage tailored to their needs. The government subsidizes a significant portion of premiums—typically around 72% on average for self-plus-family coverage—while requiring employees to contribute the remainder, with no exclusions for pre-existing conditions and guaranteed renewability for those remaining federally employed or retired. Key to FEHB's structure is its emphasis on managed competition among private carriers, which negotiate benefits and rates annually under OPM oversight, enabling cost containment through enrollee choice and plan innovation rather than centralized . This model has sustained broad preventive and essential services, such as immunizations, cancer screenings, and prescription drug coverage, while maintaining relatively stable per-enrollee spending growth compared to broader private-sector trends over decades. Enrollment occurs during annual open seasons or qualifying life events, with seamless portability into for those with at least five years of service, distinguishing it as the nation's largest employer-sponsored health program by participant volume. Despite these attributes, FEHB has encountered challenges, including persistent premium escalations—projected to rise by 6-8% for many plans in recent years due to inflation and utilization—and administrative vulnerabilities to , as evidenced by staffing shortages at OPM impeding risk assessments and claim audits. Historical analyses have noted episodes of , where sicker enrollees gravitate toward richer plans, prompting periodic benefit standardizations, though the program's decentralized design has generally mitigated single-payer inefficiencies observed elsewhere. Overall, FEHB exemplifies a hybrid public-private framework that prioritizes consumer-driven competition, yielding empirical advantages in plan variety and administrative flexibility over fully government-operated alternatives.

Historical Development

Establishment in 1960

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program was created through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act of 1959 (Public Law 86-382), signed into law by President Dwight D. Eisenhower on September 28, 1959. This legislation established a voluntary, government-wide health insurance system for federal civilian employees, addressing the patchwork of limited coverage options previously available, which often included agency-specific or individual policies lacking standardization. The Act authorized the Civil Service Commission—later succeeded by the Office of Personnel Management—to negotiate contracts with private insurance carriers to offer comprehensive benefits, including inpatient and outpatient hospital care, surgical services, and physician visits, while prohibiting discrimination based on age, sex, or preexisting conditions. The program became effective on July 1, 1960, coinciding with the start of the first applicable pay period, and initially covered approximately 2.2 million eligible federal employees and their dependents out of a total federal civilian workforce of about 2.5 million. Enrollment was structured to allow employees a choice among competing plans, with the government contributing up to 50% of premiums (capped at a specified amount) and employees covering the balance through payroll deductions. This cost-sharing model, funded via a centralized FEHBP fund managed by the Civil Service Commission, aimed to leverage economies of scale for better rates and broader coverage than private market options available to federal workers at the time. At launch, the program featured a limited selection of nationwide carriers, including service benefit plans like Blue Cross and Blue Shield, alongside employee organization plans and high-option comprehensive coverage, marking the first major initiative to provide retiree health benefits alongside active employee coverage under uniform standards. By the end of the first enrollment period in , participation rates exceeded 50% among eligibles, reflecting demand for the program's portability and nondiscriminatory features amid rising healthcare costs. positioned FEHBP as a benchmark for employer-sponsored , influencing subsequent practices while remaining exempt from state insurance regulations to ensure nationwide uniformity.

Key Expansions and Legislative Changes

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program underwent initial legislative refinements in the 1960s and 1970s to clarify eligibility for survivors and annuitants, incorporating provisions for continued coverage upon the of an enrolled employee. These changes, in amendments to Chapter 89 of Title 5, U.S. Code, ensured that family members could maintain enrollment under specific circumstances, such as immediate family coverage for survivors receiving annuities. A major eligibility expansion occurred with the Civil Service Retirement Spouse Equity Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-615), which permitted certain former spouses of federal employees or annuitants to enroll in or continue FEHB coverage if the marriage lasted at least 10 years during federal service. In 1986, the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act (P.L. 99-251) introduced temporary continuation of coverage, enabling eligible separated employees—such as those involuntarily terminated or divorced—to extend FEHB enrollment for up to 18 months by paying the full premium plus a 2% administrative fee. These measures addressed gaps in continuity for non-retirees, increasing access without altering core plan structures. Subsequent changes focused on benefit equity and family coverage. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-343) mandated that FEHB plans apply equivalent financial requirements and treatment limitations to mental health and substance use disorder benefits as to medical/surgical benefits, building on earlier limited parity efforts from the 1990s. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-148) further expanded dependent eligibility, allowing unmarried children under age 26—including students and non-students—to remain on parents' FEHB plans regardless of tax dependency status, with provisions for married children in certain cases; this change boosted enrollment among young adults. More recently, the Postal Service Reform Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-108) established the separate Postal Service Health Benefits Program effective January 1, 2025, transitioning approximately 800,000 U.S. Postal Service employees and retirees out of FEHB while maintaining similar structures and carrier options.

Evolution Through the 21st Century

In the early 2000s, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) underwent adjustments to enhance coverage equity and administrative efficiency. The Federal Employees Health Benefits Children's Equity Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-394) extended eligibility for dependent children coverage to unmarried children under age 26 who were full-time students or incapable of self-support due to mental or physical incapacity, broadening family protections beyond prior age limits. Concurrently, regulations implemented premium conversion under Section 125 of the , allowing federal employees to pay FEHBP premiums with pre-tax dollars effective January 1, 2001, which reduced taxable income for enrollees while maintaining program funding stability. These changes coincided with rising premiums, averaging 9.3% in 2000 amid broader healthcare cost inflation, prompting oversight to balance carrier profitability and enrollee affordability. Mid-decade developments emphasized benefit standardization and parity. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) introduced consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) in 2006, featuring high-deductible options paired with personal health savings accounts or health reimbursement arrangements, aiming to incentivize cost-conscious behavior among enrollees while expanding plan variety to over 200 options by the late 2000s. A pivotal legislative shift occurred with the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA, P.L. 110-343), which mandated FEHBP plans to eliminate disparities in financial requirements (e.g., copayments, deductibles) and quantitative treatment limitations between mental health/substance use disorder benefits and medical/surgical benefits, effective for plan years beginning on or after October 3, 2009; OPM guidance ensured compliance without increasing overall premiums disproportionately. The Affordable Care Act (ACA, P.L. 111-148) of 2010 largely exempted FEHBP from mandates like essential health benefits packages and individual/community rating requirements, preserving its competitive, employer-sponsored model and multi-plan structure; however, certain provisions applied, including prohibitions on lifetime/res annual dollar limits and requirements for preventive services without cost-sharing, which OPM integrated via carrier negotiations to minimize disruptions. Enrollment grew steadily, reaching approximately 8.3 million beneficiaries by the 2020s, reflecting federal workforce stability and retiree participation. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-67) introduced a "self plus one" enrollment tier, allowing coverage for employees and a single family member, which increased flexibility and contributed to administrative efficiencies in premium calculations. A significant structural emerged with the Postal Service Reform Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-108), establishing the Postal Service Health Benefits (PSHB) Program as a separate entity within the broader FEHB framework, effective January 1, 2025; this separated U.S. employees, retirees, and dependents—previously comprising about 20% of FEHBP enrollment—into PSHB plans, requiring Part B enrollment for eligible annuitants to align costs and reduce federal subsidies, while maintaining OPM oversight and carrier competition for non-postal FEHBP continuity. This reform addressed longstanding actuarial imbalances in postal retiree liabilities without altering core FEHBP operations for other agencies, underscoring the program's adaptability to fiscal pressures amid rising healthcare expenditures, with average premiums increasing 12.3% for 2026 plans. Throughout the period, FEHBP's managed competition model sustained high satisfaction rates and plan innovation, with OPM negotiating rates to cap average employee premium shares at 25-30% of total costs.

Program Administration and Eligibility

Oversight by the Office of Personnel Management

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) administers the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) under the authority of chapter 89 of title 5, , which establishes the framework for federal employee , and implements this through regulations in 5 CFR part 890. OPM bears overall responsibility for program administration, encompassing the oversight of enrollment, premium processing, and benefit delivery for more than 8 million enrollees, including active employees, retirees, and eligible family members. OPM contracts directly with over 200 health insurance carriers, approving or disapproving their participation based on criteria such as financial stability, management capability, and ability to provide efficient contract administration. It conducts bilateral negotiations with carriers on proposed benefit changes and premium rates, with the process typically commencing approximately seven months prior to contract expiration and aiming to finalize agreements to align with the annual plan year starting January 1. OPM approves final benefit brochures and rate schedules to ensure they meet statutory standards for comprehensive coverage while containing costs. To maintain program integrity, OPM monitors carrier performance via audits of operations and financial data, evaluates overall program effectiveness through studies, and reports key findings to , including trends in utilization, costs, and quality. It enforces compliance with contractual obligations and federal laws by reviewing actuarial submissions, verifying accurate cost data, and imposing corrective actions for deficiencies, such as debarment for or non-performance. OPM also resolves disputes over denied claims or coverage between enrollees and carriers, providing an administrative review mechanism before potential judicial recourse. OPM manages the Employees Health Benefits Fund, a centralized account handling government contributions, employee premiums, and reimbursements, with oversight ensuring timely remittances from agencies and fiscal accountability. It issues annual guidance, including the FEHB Program Letter, to direct on policy updates, data reporting, and quality improvement initiatives, while coordinating with agencies on eligibility verification and enrollment support. Through these functions, OPM balances innovation with mitigation, such as reserves held by plans to cover unexpected claims.

Eligibility Criteria for Employees, Retirees, and Families

Eligibility for the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program extends to most federal civilian employees appointed in the , legislative, or judicial branches, unless specifically excluded or , with agencies responsible for determining eligibility. Employees in temporary positions qualify if they are expected to work at least 130 hours per month or the equivalent for at least 90 days, receiving full premium contributions if not covered under the Part-time Career Act. Other temporary or intermittent employees become eligible after one year of continuous service without breaks exceeding five days, though they must pay the full premium cost during that period. Exclusions apply to certain categories, such as noncitizen employees stationed outside the , employees of the , Farm Credit Administration-supervised corporations, and those hired on a , fee, or piecework basis without status. Retirees, classified as annuitants, may continue FEHB coverage if entitled to an immediate under a civilian retirement system such as the (CSRS) or (FERS), and if they have been continuously enrolled in an FEHB plan—or covered as a family member—for either the five years immediately preceding retirement or their entire period of eligibility if shorter. This five-year rule allows for brief interruptions if reenrollment occurs within 60 days of returning to federal service, and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) may waive it in exceptional cases, such as disability retirement or involuntary separation. annuitants qualify if the deceased employee was enrolled in Self Plus One or Self and Family coverage at the time of death and at least one eligible family member receives a survivor . Employees retiring under FERS Minimum plus 10 years of service also qualify provided the enrollment continuity requirement is met. Eligible family members include the enrollee's legally married and children under age 26, encompassing natural, , stepchildren, and foster children, regardless of dependency, , or student status. Documentation such as birth certificates, decrees, or orders must be provided within 60 days of enrollment or a qualifying life event to verify eligibility. Children aged 26 or older qualify as disabled family members if incapable of self-support due to a mental or that existed before age 26, supported by medical certification expected to persist for more than one year. Ineligible relatives include grandchildren (unless legally foster children), parents, in-laws, and domestic partners without legal ; former spouses may access temporary continuation of coverage under separate provisions but not standard family enrollment. Common-law spouses qualify only if recognized under state law, requiring proof of , financial interdependence, and other evidence.

Enrollment Processes and Open Season

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program permits enrollment and changes to coverage primarily during the annual Open Season, a designated period when eligible participants may select or modify plans without a qualifying life event. Open Season typically runs from the Monday of the second full workweek in through the Monday of the second full workweek in December, with changes taking effect on the first day of the first full pay period beginning in January of the following year. For the 2026 plan year, this period is scheduled from November 10 to December 8, 2025. During this time, participants can enroll in a new plan, switch options (such as from Self Only to Self Plus One or Self and Family), change plan types, or cancel coverage entirely, provided they meet eligibility criteria. Outside of Open Season, initial enrollment is available to newly eligible federal employees within 60 days of their appointment or eligibility determination, allowing selection of Self Only, Self Plus One, or Self and Family coverage. Qualifying life events—such as , birth or of a , , loss of other coverage, or relocation—trigger a 60-day window for changes, including adding or removing family members or suspending coverage under specific conditions like temporary abroad. Enrollment codes on Standard Form 2809 (SF 2809), the Health Benefits Election Form, designate coverage types: code 1 for Self Only, code 2 for Self and Family, and code 3 for (opting out). Failure to submit SF 2809 within the initial 60-day period for new employees results in automatic of coverage, coded as ineligible unless later corrected. Enrollment and changes are processed through agency human resources offices, the employing agency's system, or electronically via the Employee Personal (EPP) on the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) website or BENEFEDS portal for dental and vision components integrated with FEHB decisions. Participants must verify family eligibility, as coverage extends to spouses and eligible children under age 26, or longer if disabled and unmarried, with documentation required for additions outside standard processes. Automatic continuation of existing coverage occurs annually unless changes are made during Open Season, ensuring continuity but requiring active review of plan brochures for benefit updates and premium adjustments published by OPM. Retirees and annuitants follow similar procedures but may face additional restrictions, such as post-retirement suspension options only under limited circumstances.

Plan Options and Coverage Features

Types of Health Plans Offered

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program offers several types of health plans, primarily categorized as (FFS), health maintenance organizations (HMOs), and consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs), with variations such as preferred provider organizations (PPOs) and high-deductible options integrated into these structures. These plans provide enrollees flexibility in choosing providers and cost-sharing arrangements, with over 180 options available nationwide as of 2025, including nationwide FFS plans accessible to all and local HMOs varying by region. Fee-for-service (FFS) plans, including those with networks, allow enrollees to seek care from any licensed provider without , though using non-network providers may involve higher costs and processes. In non- FFS plans, the plan providers or enrollees directly after claims submission, often requiring paperwork and potentially leading to balance billing if provider charges exceed plan allowances. variants within FFS reduce out-of-pocket expenses for in-network use, eliminating claims filing for network services while maintaining broader access outside the network at greater personal cost. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) emphasize coordinated through a defined of providers, typically requiring selection of a (PCP) for referrals to specialists and limiting coverage to in-network services except in emergencies. Standard HMOs feature low copayments, no deductibles for in-network , and minimal administrative burden, but out-of-network coverage is generally unavailable without reciprocity agreements between plans. HMO variants with point-of-service (POS) options permit out-of-network at higher deductibles, , and claims requirements, offering a between HMO structure and FFS flexibility. Consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) and high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) promote enrollee involvement in cost management by pairing high deductibles with personal health accounts, such as health reimbursement arrangements () funded solely by the plan or health savings accounts (HSAs) allowing tax-advantaged enrollee contributions. These plans cover preventive services at low or no cost but impose significant deductibles—often starting above $1,500 for self-only coverage—before other benefits activate, alongside out-of-pocket maximums to cap catastrophic expenses; HSAs require HDHP enrollment and prohibit concurrent non-HDHP coverage like Part A. CDHPs differ from traditional plans by encouraging price shopping and accumulating funds for future use, though they may deter utilization of non-essential services due to upfront costs.

Core Benefits and Coverage Standards

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program requires all participating plans to offer a baseline set of comprehensive benefits, ensuring coverage for essential medical services without exclusions or arbitrary limits on required benefits. These standards, established by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) through regulations and annual carrier guidance, include inpatient and outpatient hospital care, surgical interventions, physician services, and emergency care, with plans prohibited from imposing lifetime or annual maximums on these core areas. Prescription drug coverage is mandatory at a minimum level equivalent to standards, featuring no lifetime or annual dollar maximums, deductibles not exceeding $600, and capped at 50%, encompassing medically necessary drugs including insulin, off-label uses, and injectables without broad categorical exclusions. and treatments must adhere to requirements, matching medical/surgical benefits in terms of deductibles, , copayments, and visit/day limits, with adequate provider networks and out-of-network access at in-network rates when timely care is unavailable. Additional required benefits encompass maternity care with minimum inpatient stays of 48 hours post-vaginal delivery or 96 hours post-cesarean (at patient option), infertility diagnosis and treatment including at least one form of artificial insemination, and non-experimental organ and tissue transplants such as bone marrow, cornea, kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas, with donor costs covered. Rehabilitative services, including physical, occupational, and speech therapies, must be provided for at least two months per condition, while preventive measures cover childhood and adult immunizations, well-child care, and allergy testing/treatment without limits tied solely to rehabilitation. Recent OPM guidance has expanded standards to align with federal health mandates, requiring cost-sharing-free coverage for U.S. Preventive Services Grade A/B-recommended services (e.g., certain cancer screenings), Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices vaccines, and including related monitoring; fertility preservation for iatrogenic (e.g., for at least one year); and obesity management via FDA-approved medications (at least one GLP-1 and two oral options) alongside intensive behavioral therapy programs. Plans must also cover such as glucose monitors and wheelchairs, home health services, and morbid obesity surgery, with brochures explicitly detailing compliance to facilitate enrollee comparison. These uniform standards promote portability and adequacy across diverse plan types, including , HMOs, and high-deductible options, while allowing variation in premiums, networks, and supplemental features.

Coordination with Medicare and Other Programs

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program coordinates with such that coverage priority depends on the enrollee's status and enrollment. For active federal employees under age 65 who become eligible for , FEHB remains the primary payer, with serving as secondary if the employee enrolls in Parts A and B. In contrast, for federal annuitants (retirees) aged 65 or older enrolled in Parts A and B, acts as the primary payer, followed by FEHB as secondary, and then any other coverage like as tertiary. This coordination ensures FEHB fills gaps in coverage, such as deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance, without requiring separate claims filing in most cases, as electronically transfers claim data to the FEHB carrier. Annuitants may suspend FEHB enrollment while covered under a plan or enrolling in , preserving the right to reinstate FEHB upon resuming federal benefits, though failure to maintain Medicare eligibility can lead to loss of FEHB reinstatement rights. Certain FEHB plans offer reimbursement for Part B premiums, typically up to 75% or full coverage depending on the plan, but this varies and is detailed in annual plan brochures; as of 2024, not all plans provide this benefit, and annuitants must weigh it against potential coordination advantages. For prescription drugs, FEHB plans generally provide creditable coverage equivalent to or exceeding standards, allowing enrollees to avoid Part D penalties if they later enroll, with FEHB coordinating to cover drugs not paid by Part D if both are active. FEHB also coordinates with other federal health programs, prioritizing based on payer rules. With (for members and families), FEHB pays primary for active civilian federal employees eligible for both, while TRICARE serves as secondary; for annuitants, (if applicable) pays first, then FEHB, with TRICARE last unless suspended. Similarly, for CHAMPVA (Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of ), FEHB is primary for active employees, coordinating to cover eligible services after CHAMPVA payments, and plan brochures specify non-duplication of benefits. functions as a payer of last resort in these scenarios, covering remaining balances after FEHB and other primary coverages. These rules, enforced by the Office of Personnel Management, prevent overpayment while maximizing coverage, though enrollees must verify specifics in their FEHB plan's annual materials to avoid out-of-pocket surprises.

Funding Mechanism and Costs

Government and Employee Premium Contributions

The government contribution to Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB) premiums is determined by a statutory formula under 5 U.S.C. § 8906, which limits the biweekly contribution to the lesser of 75 percent of the subscription charge for the selected plan or 72 percent of the weighted average subscription charges across all FEHB plans from the prior contract year, adjusted by a formula established in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. This "fair share" mechanism ensures the government covers a substantial portion—typically around 70-75 percent—of premiums program-wide, while employees or annuitants pay the remainder via payroll deductions or direct billing. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) calculates the weighted average annually by October 1, using enrollment data from March 31 and negotiated rates for continuing plans. For full-time employees and eligible annuitants, the share is funded from agency appropriations for active employees and OPM's appropriation for retirees, with no variation by plan type beyond the cap. Employees pay biweekly amounts exceeding this contribution; for instance, in plans where the total surpasses the 72 percent average , the enrollee share increases accordingly. Part-time career employees receive a prorated contribution based on hours worked relative to full-time (e.g., 36/80 hours yields 45 percent of the full share), while temporary employees under 5 U.S.C. § 8906a pay the full without . Annuitants maintain the same contribution structure if enrolled in FEHB for the five years preceding retirement or since their first opportunity. The maximum biweekly government contributions for 2025, reflecting 72 percent of the prior year's weighted average, are as follows:
Enrollment TypeBiweekly Government Contribution
Self Only$286.09
Self Plus One$627.62
Self and Family$687.12
These caps adjust annually with trends; for 2026, they rise to $324.76 (Self Only), $711.17 (Self Plus One), and $778.03 (Self and Family), illustrating the formula's responsiveness to overall cost increases while preserving the employee's share at or below 28 percent on average. Contributions for non-biweekly pay periods are prorated proportionally. The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program's premiums have historically risen in tandem with broader healthcare cost , reflecting factors such as medical advancements, provider reimbursements, and utilization patterns. From the program's in 1960 through the early , annual premium increases typically averaged 4-6 percent, aligning closely with private-sector employer-sponsored trends as reported by actuarial analyses. Over the decade ending in , the average annual FEHB premium increase was 3.64 percent, demonstrating relative stability prior to recent accelerations. These trends were influenced by the program's competitive structure, where carriers negotiate rates annually under Office of Personnel Management (OPM) oversight, with government contributions limited to 72 percent of the program-wide weighted average or 75 percent of a specific plan's premium, whichever is lower. In recent years, however, enrollee shares of premiums have experienced marked upward pressure, driven by post-pandemic surges in healthcare utilization, escalating prices, rising provider costs, and heightened demand for behavioral health services. For the 2023 plan year, the average enrollee share increased by 8.7 percent; this rose to 7.7 percent in 2024 and peaked at 13.5 percent in 2025—the largest single-year hike in over a decade—before moderating slightly to 12.3 percent for 2026. Overall program premiums increased by 10.2 percent in 2026, with the government share rising 9.2 percent on average, underscoring that enrollees absorbed a disproportionate portion due to the fixed contribution cap. For context, the weighted average biweekly FEHB premium reached $694.83 in 2025, with government contributions capped accordingly.
Plan YearAverage Enrollee Share Increase (%)Key Notes
202612.3Overall up 10.2%; post-2025 moderation but still elevated.
202513.5Largest in over a decade; driven by utilization rebound.
20247.7Continued rise from prior year.
20238.7Early signs of acceleration.
20223.8Pre-spike baseline.
2021~3.6 (overall)Stable amid .
20204.0Modest during initial COVID period.
Since 2016, the average annual enrollee share increase has averaged approximately 6.5 percent under major carriers like , exceeding longer-term norms and prompting concerns over affordability despite the program's cost-containment efforts. OPM data indicate these shifts occur after accounting for open-season enrollment changes, confirming underlying cost pressures rather than selection effects alone.

Efficiency and Cost Containment Measures

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) primarily contains costs through a market-oriented structure emphasizing competition among carriers and annual premium negotiations overseen by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Carriers submit detailed rate proposals, including utilization data and certified cost information, which OPM reviews and negotiates to moderate increases; for instance, in , OPM reduced proposed average premium hikes from 13.4% to 11.1% by encouraging offsets such as higher cost-sharing for new benefits. This process applies to experience-rated plans, where premiums are adjusted based on prior claims, fostering accountability. Competition drives efficiency by offering enrollees over 200 plan options annually, with the government contributing up to 75% of the premium for the second-lowest cost plan, incentivizing selection of lower-premium options. In 2002, 97 plans featured premiums at least 10% below the maximum government share, and enrollee shifts to these cheaper plans offset approximately 1% of annual premium growth from 1997 onward. This dynamic has historically moderated total premium growth to an average of 5.9% annually from 1991 to 2002, comparable to or below rates in large private employer plans (6.4%) and systems like CalPERS (5.8%). OPM further promotes containment via targeted strategies, including the FEHB Health Plan Assessment, which measures and rewards carriers for efficiency in areas like clinical quality and resource use. benefits incorporate cost-management tools such as formularies, tiered copayments, and for high-cost drugs, negotiated to align with commercial market trends while curbing utilization-driven inflation. High-deductible plans (HDHPs) paired with health savings accounts (HSAs) are encouraged to shift costs to enrollees for routine , reducing overutilization; these options have grown in availability since the early . Additional measures include initiatives providing enrollees with and on providers and procedures, enabling informed choices that pressure networks to control rates. OPM also incentivizes plans to adopt value-based designs, such as reduced copays for preventive services and , to lower long-term expenditures; however, these have not fully offset recent pressures from rising prices and specialty care demands, contributing to double-digit spikes in years like 2022-2026. Overall, FEHBP's avoidance of rigid in favor of competitive incentives has sustained lower administrative costs relative to benchmarks, though ongoing challenges like an aging enrollee base test these mechanisms.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Reforms

Adverse Selection and Risk Segmentation Issues

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) encounters , as higher-risk enrollees tend to select plans offering more comprehensive coverage or reduced cost-sharing, which inflates premiums for those options and can destabilize them. Historical episodes illustrate this dynamic: in 1981–1982, Blue Cross Blue Shield nearly withdrew after sicker beneficiaries, representing about 45% of federal enrollees, disproportionately joined, eroding the program's group insurance viability. A 1985 premium gap of 68% between Blue Cross's high- and low-option plans led to the high-option losing 50% of its by 1988 and temporarily exiting the program. Risk segmentation arises from enrollee sorting into plans aligned with anticipated needs, concentrating higher-cost individuals in fee-for-service (FFS) options while healthier participants favor health maintenance organizations (HMOs), amplifying premium disparities beyond benefit differences alone. For example, in 2003, premiums in Washington, D.C., varied from $2,749 to $4,178, attributable in part to uneven health status distributions across plans. Retirees, who pose elevated risks, constitute 84% of (PPO) enrollees versus 62% active employees in HMOs, further segmenting the . Between 2000 and 2002, over 100 plans exited due to low enrollment coupled with high-risk concentrations, underscoring segmentation's toll on plan viability. The program's structure tempers these effects through a capped , where the government covers roughly 72% of premiums up to the second-lowest-cost plan's level, shifting additional costs to enrollees for pricier selections and discouraging disproportionate high-risk enrollment therein. Analysis of enrollment data across metropolitan areas, where values vary with local price indices (e.g., 73% national plan uptake in high-wage areas versus 44% in low-wage ones), confirms this mechanism curbs . Community rating without medical underwriting sustains broad participation, while open seasons and guaranteed issue prevent exclusions, though the lack of formal adjustment intensifies selection pressures on benefit-variable plans. Overall, while risk segmentation persists—evident in FFS plans' higher costs from clustered high utilizers—empirical assessments find it limited enough to preserve program stability without mandating uniform benefits or direct risk transfers. has not provoked systemic collapse, but recurring plan withdrawals highlight ongoing vulnerabilities absent enhanced countermeasures like or adjusted subsidies.

Administrative and Fraud Risks

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) administers the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program, overseeing approximately 70 carriers that provide coverage to over 8 million enrollees, including employees, retirees, and dependents, through a network of subcontractors and providers. This decentralized structure introduces administrative complexities, as OPM relies on carriers for claims processing, eligibility verification, and detection, while conducting periodic audits and risk assessments. However, (GAO) evaluations have identified persistent gaps in oversight, including incomplete risk assessments and inadequate monitoring of member eligibility, which expose the program to improper payments and abuse. Fraud risks in FEHB encompass ineligible enrollments, provider overbilling, and internal schemes by carrier staff, with OPM's Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigating allegations such as billing for non-covered services or phantom claims. A notable case involved a employee who fraudulently enrolled ineligible family members—his sister and niece—for 12 years, contributing to broader improper payments estimated by to reach billions annually due to unaddressed eligibility lapses. OPM has implemented some controls, such as requiring carriers to report fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA), but found these efforts fall short of leading practices, as assessments conducted in 2020, 2023, and March 2024 omitted key stakeholders like carriers and failed to systematically evaluate high-risk areas like subcontractor oversight. Administrative challenges exacerbate these vulnerabilities, including staff shortages at OPM that have delayed or halted dedicated fraud risk reviews, with personnel responsible for FEHB assessments departing without replacements as of mid-2025. OPM does not routinely verify eligibility for existing members, relying instead on self-reported data from agencies and carriers, which OPM officials acknowledge heightens exposure; OIG audits have confirmed instances of ineligible participants draining program funds. recommended enhanced monitoring mechanisms, such as automated eligibility checks and carrier audits, but implementation remains incomplete, leaving the program's $60 billion-plus annual expenditures susceptible to waste. In response to findings, OPM has committed to aligning its practices more closely with guidelines, though timely execution is pending.

Debates on Sustainability and Broader Policy Implications

Critics argue that the FEHBP's structure, with the government subsidizing up to 75% of premiums for most enrollees without caps tied to overall spending growth, exposes federal budgets to uncontrolled escalation amid healthcare and an aging retiree population. Premium growth has outpaced general , with the average enrollee share rising 12.3% for 2026 following 7.7% in 2024 and 8.7% in 2023, driven by factors like utilization increases and provider costs similar to those in private markets. The has proposed replacing the current premium-sharing with fixed vouchers indexed to or CPI plus one , projecting savings of $30 billion over a decade by slowing federal contributions, as the program's open-ended liability contributes to long-term fiscal pressures without built-in restraints. Fraud and administrative vulnerabilities further undermine sustainability claims, with estimates indicating annual losses of approximately $1 billion from improper enrollments, such as ineligible dependents, due to fragmented verification systems across agencies. The GAO has repeatedly urged the Office of Personnel Management to implement centralized databases and robust , noting persistent gaps in oversight despite known risks, which exacerbate taxpayer burdens in a program serving over 8 million enrollees. Proponents counter that FEHBP's competitive model—featuring multiple private carriers—has contained administrative costs at around 3-5% of premiums, lower than many private employer plans, and premium trends align closely with large-group private insurance growth, suggesting relative efficiency absent government . Broader policy debates position FEHBP as a potential template for reforms like premium support, highlighting its success in fostering plan and enrollee choice without direct government provision, as evidenced in analyses proposing FEHBP-style defined contributions to replace and curb per-capita spending growth. However, single-payer advocates, such as Physicians for a National Health Program, contend it fails as a universal model due to risks of —where healthier individuals opt for cheaper plans, destabilizing risk pools—and higher administrative overhead compared to streamlined public systems, rendering it unsuitable for broad expansion without mandates and adjustments. These tensions underscore causal trade-offs: while FEHBP's private mitigates some pressures through and , scaling it nationally could amplify selection issues and fiscal exposure absent rigorous equalization, informing hybrid proposals but exposing limits of employer-like subsidies in entitlement programs amid rising deficits.

Impact and Empirical Outcomes

Enrollment Statistics and Coverage Reach

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) provides health coverage to nearly 8.3 million individuals, including active federal employees, retirees, and their dependents, through over 4 million separate enrollments as of recent reports. This figure encompasses approximately 8.2 million covered lives documented in 2021, with stability in enrollment scale persisting into 2025 amid minor fluctuations tied to workforce size and retiree growth. The program represents the largest employer-sponsored health insurance initiative in the United States, serving the majority of the roughly 2.2 million civilian federal workforce and a comparable number of annuitants. Enrollment remains voluntary for eligible participants, including full-time employees and most retirees, with high uptake driven by subsidies covering 72% to 75% of premiums on average. Historical participation rates among federal employees hovered around 82% as of 2014, reflecting broad acceptance due to competitive plan options and cost-sharing advantages over alternatives like spousal coverage or marketplace plans. Recent data does not indicate significant declines, though exact annual participation percentages are derived from carrier-submitted reports compiled by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Coverage reach extends beyond core federal personnel to select groups, such as employees of tribally controlled entities with approximately 34,000 enrollments as of , broadening access to over 63,000 lives in those sectors. Enrollees select from self-only, self plus one, or self and family categories, enabling dependent inclusion for spouses and children under age , which amplifies total beneficiary numbers relative to primary enrollees. Nationwide availability of plans, including and options, ensures comprehensive geographic reach, though eligibility excludes active-duty covered under separate programs.

Comparative Performance Against Private Sector Plans

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) plans have demonstrated superior clinical quality performance relative to national commercial benchmarks, as measured by standardized Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) metrics administered by the (NCQA). In assessments conducted by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), FEHBP program-wide averages for high-priority measures—such as controlling high and comprehensive care—exceeded the 50th percentile of commercial benchmarks in both 2020 and 2021, with many carriers achieving top-quartile results despite disruptions from the . These outcomes reflect the program's emphasis on competitive incentives among carriers to invest in preventive care and chronic disease management, contrasting with broader commercial sector averages where such measures often lag due to fragmented employer negotiations. Administrative efficiency in FEHBP benefits from centralized oversight by OPM, which negotiates rates and enforces uniform standards across experience-rated and community-rated plans, resulting in lower overall administrative burdens compared to typical employer-sponsored . Private insurers face higher administrative costs, estimated at 12-17% of premiums to cover , , and individualized employer contracting, whereas FEHBP's structure leverages government-scale to minimize these overheads, with carrier administrative loads embedded in bids kept competitive to retain . This efficiency contributes to FEHBP's ability to offer extensive plan choice—over 200 options annually—without proportional , unlike private markets where administrative fragmentation can drive up expenses by 5-10% relative to integrated programs. Premium growth in FEHBP has historically aligned closely with or trailed that of employer-sponsored plans, attributed to competitive that disciplines carriers against excessive rate hikes. For instance, while FEHBP total premiums rose by an average of 13.5% in 2025—the highest in over a due to post-pandemic claims surges—long-term trends from 2000-2020 showed annualized growth of approximately 5-6%, comparable to the 7% family premium increase reported for employer plans in 2024. Employee contributions remain advantageous, with federal workers bearing about 25-28% of premiums versus 20-30% in sector plans, enhancing value despite recent spikes. Employee satisfaction and access metrics further highlight FEHBP's edge, with Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys indicating satisfaction rates consistently above commercial averages, driven by broad provider networks and minimal risk selection. OPM data from 2021 showed FEHBP carriers outperforming peers on access to care and getting needed care metrics, with program enrollment stability—over 8 million participants—reflecting sustained preference amid private sector churn from narrow networks and higher out-of-pocket costs. These factors underscore FEHBP's model of defined contribution with carrier competition as a mechanism for delivering higher-quality, cost-contained coverage relative to decentralized private alternatives.

Employee Satisfaction and Health Outcomes Data

The Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) 2023 Federal Employee Benefits Survey, based on responses from 20,598 federal employees (21% response rate), found that 90% of participants rated the availability of Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) coverage as extremely or very important to them. Among the 81% of respondents enrolled in FEHB plans, 94% reported that their health benefits met their needs to a great or moderate extent. Perceived value was lower, with 66% viewing FEHB as excellent or good value for the cost, reflecting concerns over rising premiums. FEHB enrollment was cited as influencing recruitment decisions by 69% of employees and retention by 78%. OPM administers the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey annually to FEHB enrollees, measuring experiences with plan performance, including access to care and provider communication. National averages across FEHB plans typically exceed commercial benchmarks for metrics such as ease of getting needed care (around 83% satisfaction in sampled plans) and timeliness of appointments, though exact aggregates vary by plan type (e.g., HMO vs. ). These scores, reported as percentages of members rating aspects 8-10 on a 0-10 scale or selecting top affirmative responses, indicate generally positive experiences, with FEHB plans outperforming national commercial averages in coordinated care ratings by 5-10 percentage points in recent cycles. Direct empirical studies on broad outcomes under FEHB are limited, with most evidence derived from policy interventions like the 2001 mental health parity mandate. A randomized of seven large FEHB plans post-parity found no significant increase in total health spending (adjusted 1.01 for probability of high-cost users) and improved treatment initiation rates by 4.8 percentage points without compromising general medical care quality. Utilization data from FEHB show stable outpatient visit volumes, with linked to a 2.41-visit decline in behavioral health outpatient encounters per enrollee, suggesting effects rather than overall underutilization. Comprehensive population-level outcome metrics, such as mortality or management rates specific to FEHB versus non-federal cohorts, remain underexplored in peer-reviewed , potentially due to data silos and the program's focus on insurance administration over longitudinal tracking.

References

  1. [1]
    Healthcare - OPM
    The FEHB Program can help you and your family meet your health care needs. Federal employees, retirees and their survivors enjoy the widest selection of health ...Healthcare Compare 2025 Plans · Plan Information · Enrollment · FEHB Carriers
  2. [2]
    FEHB Handbook - OPM
    The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program became effective in 1960. ... OPM has the overall responsibility for the administration of the FEHB Program.
  3. [3]
    Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Carriers - OPM
    The Program now provides benefits to nearly 8.3 million federal enrollees and dependents and offers our 180 health plan choices to federal members. Guiding ...
  4. [4]
    Federal Employees Health Benefits - DCPAS
    The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program provides health care benefits for over eight million Federal civilian employees, retirees, and their ...
  5. [5]
    Health Insurance (FEHB) - Secret Service
    Federal Employee Health Benefits Overview · Guaranteed coverage · No medical examination · No restrictions due to pre-existing conditions · Government contributions ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: An Overview
    Feb 3, 2016 · The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program is the largest employer-sponsored health insurance program in the country.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program - KFF
    The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) offers a choice of health plans to federal employees and annuitants, using a premium contribution scheme ...
  8. [8]
    2026 FEHB and PSHB available plans and premium update
    Oct 16, 2025 · After reviewing the updates, I want to share two key stories: the enrollee premium contribution increase and the lineup of available plans. 2026 ...
  9. [9]
    OPM Should Take Timely Action to Mitigate Persistent Fraud Risks
    Jul 17, 2025 · OPM has taken steps to combat fraud, such as conducting fraud risk assessments, but it could do more. For example, we found that OPM hasn't ...
  10. [10]
    Evaluation of Parity in the Federal Employees Health Benefits ...
    Dec 30, 2004 · A number of analysts have pointed to adverse selection problems in the FEHB Program over the years (Price and Mays, 1985). Adverse selection ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
    This report summarizes the history of FEHBP and examines how well the program has served the federal workforce and its retirees. It then analyzes the advantages ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] public law 86-382-8ept. 28, 1959 - Congress.gov
    Approved September 25, 1959. September 28, 1959. [S. 2162]. Public Law 86-382. AN ACT. To provide a health benefits program for Government employees. Be it ...
  13. [13]
    S.2162 - Federal Employees Health Benefits Act of 1959 86th ...
    Titles for S.2162 - 86th Congress (1959-1960): Federal Employees Health Benefits Act of 1959. ... An Act to provide a health benefits program for Government ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Medicare and Federal Employees Health Benefits Programs
    The FEHB program enacted in 1959 applies to nearly all active civilian employees of the Federal. Government and to former employees who retired on an annuity ...
  15. [15]
    FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
    FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM. 1. HISTORY AND FUTURE OF THE FEDERAL PROGRAM-1964. Andrew E. Ruddock. THE Federal Employees Health Benefits. Program ...
  16. [16]
    Laws Affecting the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB ...
    Feb 13, 2013 · The program was created by the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act of 1959 (FEHBA; P.L. 86-382). FEHBA and its subsequent amendments ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Interim Final Rule: Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
    ... regulations merely implement the amendments to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act under the Civil Service Retirement. Spouse Equity Act of 1984, Pub ...
  19. [19]
    Laws Affecting the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB ...
    Jul 22, 2015 · Select a Congress to see the treaty documents received, considered, or pending. 81-119 (1949-2026), 119 (2025-2026), 118 (2023-2024) ...
  20. [20]
    Postal Service Reform Act; Establishment of the ... - Federal Register
    Apr 6, 2023 · The FEHB Program was established in 1960 and provides a choice of health plans, including fee-for-service plans and health maintenance ...Missing: expansions | Show results with:expansions
  21. [21]
    Handbook Changes - OPM
    " This reflects changes to the FEHB Program resulting from Public Law 106-394, the "Federal Employees Health Benefits Children's Equity Act of 2000," enacted ...
  22. [22]
    Health Insurance Premium Conversion - Federal Register
    Jul 19, 2000 · Under this regulation, Federal employees with health insurance through the FEHB Program will begin paying their insurance premiums with pre-tax ...
  23. [23]
    THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM - NTEU
    As you know, for the year 2000, FEHBP health insurance premiums increased dramatically, rising an average of 9.3%. The year 2000 also marked the largest federal ...Missing: evolution post-
  24. [24]
    Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental ...
    Nov 13, 2013 · This document contains final rules implementing the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] FEHB Program Carrier Letter - OPM
    Nov 10, 2008 · The overriding goal of parity is to increase enrollee insurance protection by equalizing the financial requirements and treatment limits for ...Missing: FEHBP | Show results with:FEHBP
  26. [26]
    Changes in Health Coverage - Insurance - OPM
    The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 established the Self Plus One enrollment type in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program.Eligibility & Enrollment · Self Plus One · Office ofMissing: century | Show results with:century
  27. [27]
    Postal Service Health Benefits Program: Additional Requirements ...
    Oct 24, 2024 · This final rule includes details on reconsideration of PSHB eligibility decisions, the Medicare Part B enrollment requirement, allocation of reserve credits.
  28. [28]
    Special Notices - OPM
    The PSHB Program coverage will replace Federal Employees Health Benefit (FEHB) Program coverage for these groups. Federal Retirees and CFC Deduction via Federal ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    5 CFR Part 890 -- Federal Employees Health Benefits Program - eCFR
    The employing office may make retroactive corrections of administrative errors that occur after December 31, 1994. (b) OPM may order correction of an ...Civil Monetary Penalties and... · Mandatory Debarments · Suspension · Title 5
  31. [31]
    Eligibility for Health Benefits - FEHB Handbook - OPM
    Generally, the responsibility for processing health benefits actions is divided between the personnel and payroll offices. References in this section to ...
  32. [32]
    Annuitants - OPM
    he/she has been continuously enrolled (or covered as a family member) in any FEHB plan(s) for the 5 years of service immediately before the date the annuity ...
  33. [33]
    Family Members - FEHB Handbook - OPM
    Family members eligible for coverage are the enrollee's: Child under age 26, including: A grandchild is not an eligible family member unless the child ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  34. [34]
    Open Season - OPM
    Open Season is November 10 – December 8, 2025. Sign up by December 08. Countdown to the Start of Open Season. 14 08 00 55. DaysHrsMinsSecs.Active Federal Employees · Federal Retirees & Other... · Uniformed ServicesMissing: processes | Show results with:processes
  35. [35]
    OPM Announces 2025 Open Season
    Oct 9, 2025 · This is the opportunity for eligible federal and postal employees and annuitants to enroll or make changes to their health, dental, and vision ...Missing: processes | Show results with:processes
  36. [36]
    Enroll - OPM
    During the annual Federal Benefits Open Season, anyone eligible to participate in the FEHB and PSHB Programs may enroll, change health plans or options, cancel ...
  37. [37]
    Active Federal Employees - OPM
    How do I enroll, change, or cancel my enrollment during Open Season? ... The Federal Employees Health Benefits health plan brochures are available online.Missing: processes | Show results with:processes
  38. [38]
    New Federal Employee Enrollment - OPM
    Eligible individuals can enroll in a dental plan and/or a vision plan. They may enroll in a plan for Self Only, Self plus one, or Self and family coverage.Health Insurance · Dental & Vision · Life Insurance · Long Term Care Insurance
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHB)
    If the employee does not submit SF 2809 within 60 days, the system will change the FEHB Eligibility Code to 3 (Waived). ... Enrollment Code = If employee changed ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Enrollment - OPM
    During the annual FEHB Open Season, anyone eligible to participate in the FEHB Program may enroll, change health plans or options, cancel your FEHB enrollment.Enroll in a Health Plan · New Federal Employee... · Eligibility & Enrollment · NoteMissing: processes | Show results with:processes
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Standard Form 2809 - Health Benefits Election Form - GSA
    Who May Use SF 2809. 1. Employees eligible to enroll in or currently enrolled in the FEHB. Program. Employees automatically participate in premium.
  42. [42]
    BENEFEDS | Federal Benefits Enrollment (FEDVIP, FLTCIP ...
    The 2025 Federal Benefits Open Season begins November 10. It's your annual opportunity to enroll in or change your Federal Employees Dental and Vision ...Missing: eligibility | Show results with:eligibility
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Federal Benefits Open Season Highlights 2026 Plan Year - OPM
    Health, dental, and vision enrollment will automatically continue from year to year unless a participant chooses to make a change during Open Season.Missing: processes | Show results with:processes
  44. [44]
    Federal Retirees & Other Annuitants - Open Season - OPM
    Most FEHB plans will see benefit and rate changes for the upcoming year. · You can supplement your health insurance coverage by choosing dental and/or vision ...Missing: processes | Show results with:processes
  45. [45]
    Plan Types - OPM
    Choose a Plan and Enroll. Different types of plans help you get and pay for care differently. Fee-For-Service (FFS) plans generally use two approaches.
  46. [46]
    Health Plans - FEHB Handbook - OPM
    Two types of plans participate in the FEHB Program: fee-for-service plans (FFS) and health maintenance organizations (HMOs).
  47. [47]
    Plan Types - OPM
    OPM offers Fee-For-Service (FFS), Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), Consumer-Driven Health Plans (CDHP), and High Deductible Health Plans (HDHP). FFS can ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Quick Guide to FEHB, FEDVIP, FLTCIP, FSAFEDS, and FEGLI - OPM
    What types of plans are available? ▫FFS with Preferred Provider Organization (PPO). ▫HMO. ▫Consumer Driven Health Plan (CDHP).
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Part One - FEHB Program Carrier Letter
    Prescription Drugs - All plans must provide at least a minimum coverage level for all ... These required benefits include: 1. Non-experimental bone marrow ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] FEHB Program Carrier Letter - OPM
    All plans must provide at least a minimum coverage level for all medically necessary drugs that require a ... These required benefits include: • Non ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] FEHB Program Carrier Letter - OPM
    Jan 15, 2025 · following minimum coverage requirements. All coverage requirements, as listed below, must be clearly outlined in plan brochures ...
  52. [52]
    Active Federal Employee - Medicare - OPM
    FEHB provides robust coverage that is compatible with Medicare. Your healthcare needs may be the deciding factor in determining if enrolling in Medicare now is ...
  53. [53]
    Understand which insurance pays first - OPM
    If Medicare is primary, Medicare automatically transfers claims information to your FEHB plan once your claim is processed. You generally don't need to file a ...
  54. [54]
    Annuitant - Medicare - Healthcare & Insurance - OPM.gov
    If you are enrolled in an FEHB HMO, you may go outside of the HMO network for Part B services and receive reimbursement by Medicare for services from a provider ...Missing: coordination | Show results with:coordination<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Resources - Healthcare & Insurance - OPM.gov
    Your FEHB plan brochure or PSHB plan brochure provide specific information on how its benefits are coordinated with Medicare.
  56. [56]
    Medicare Prescription Drug Plan - OPM
    Most Federal employees do not need to enroll in the Medicare drug program, since all Federal Employees Health Benefits Program plans will have prescription drug ...
  57. [57]
    FEHB Highlights: Coordinating Benefits with Other Types of Coverage
    Nov 28, 2023 · ... FEHB plans coordinate with other health coverage like Medicare, TriCare, and CHAMPVA ... FEHB coordinates with other health insurance programs.
  58. [58]
    How FEHB Coordinates with Other Health Coverage - FEDweek
    Apr 3, 2024 · The most common instances where OPM coordinates with other programs are the following: · * Tricare and CHAMPVA. · * Medicaid. · * Medicare. · * ...
  59. [59]
    5 U.S. Code § 8906 - Contributions - Law.Cornell.Edu
    The biweekly Government contribution for an employee or annuitant enrolled in a plan under this chapter shall not exceed 75 percent of the subscription charge.
  60. [60]
    Cost of Insurance - FEHB Handbook - OPM
    During each pay period in which FEHB enrollment is in effect, the enrollee or annuitant is responsible for paying all premiums in excess of the Government ...
  61. [61]
    5 CFR 890.501 -- Government contributions. - eCFR
    The Government contribution toward subscription charges under all health benefits plans, for each enrolled employee who is paid biweekly, is the amount ...Missing: split | Show results with:split<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Premiums - OPM
    All FEHB plans offer Self Only, Self Plus One, and Self and Family ... Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB). The 2026 biweekly maximum government ...Plan Premiums · Premium Rates(Web file) · Plan Information - OPM.gov
  63. [63]
    [PDF] FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM - NARFE
    The FEHB program provides private health insurance to federal employees, annuitants, and their dependents, offering choices among competing plans with shared ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  64. [64]
    Historical FEHB Premium Increases For Federal Employees Under ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · 2025 FEHB premiums are going up 13.5%, and that is after a 7.7% increase in 2024 and an 8.7% increase in 2023 in the enrollees' share of the premiums.<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    In 2025, FEHB enrollees will see largest health premium increase in ...
    Sep 25, 2024 · The government covers about 75% of an FEHB participant's premium, but the number is capped at 72% of the weighted average of the previous year's ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Federal and postal workers to see double-digit health care premium ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · The government's share of Federal Employees Health Benefits Program premiums will increase by an average of 9.2%, bringing the overall premium ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Federal Benefits Open Season Highlights 2025 Plan Year - OPM
    The 2025 Federal Benefits Open Season is Nov 11-Dec 9, 2024, including FEHB, PSHB, FEDVIP, FSAFEDS. FEHB average rate increase is 11.2%, PSHB 6.9%.
  68. [68]
    A closer look at 2025 FEHBP premiums - Government Executive
    Oct 9, 2024 · The 13.5% increase for 2025 marks the largest in recent memory. Just three years ago, the average enrollee increase was only 3.8%. It's unclear ...
  69. [69]
    NARFE: Large Premium Increases Highlight Need for FEHB/PSHB ...
    Sep 25, 2024 · This year's average increase in the enrollee share of FEHB premiums, 13.5%, is nearly double last year's 7.7% hike.
  70. [70]
    Why in 2025 FEHB program participants will see the largest ...
    Nov 28, 2024 · The significant premium increases under FEHB's 2025 plan follow increases of 7.7% in 2024 and 8.7% in 2023.OPM said the increases reflect ...
  71. [71]
    Average FEHB Premiums Are Up; Historic Annual Increases From ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · The total average increase for the enrollees' share of the 2025 FEHB premiums for current non-postal federal employees and federal retirees will be 13.5% next ...
  72. [72]
    Federal Employees' Health Plans: Premium Growth and OPM's Role ...
    OPM relies on enrollee choice, competition among plans, and annual negotiations ... During the past 5 years, premiums for the Federal Employees Health Benefits ...
  73. [73]
    PART 1615—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION - Acquisition.GOV
    OPM will require the carrier to submit its rate proposal, utilization data, and a certificate of accurate cost or pricing data required in 1615.406–2.Missing: approval | Show results with:approval
  74. [74]
    PG3 FEHB Accountability - Performance.gov
    The FEHB Program provides approximately 23 billion dollars in benefits annually for those covered under Self and Family enrollments. This may translate to ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] fehb.pdf - OPM
    The FEHB Program provides comprehensive health insurance, including FFS, HMO, CDHP, and HDHP plans. Most federal employees are eligible to enroll.
  76. [76]
    Transparency in Healthcare - OPM
    OPM is committed to increasing transparency in healthcare. Enhancing the availability and accessibility of price and quality information to Federal employees.Missing: FEHBP | Show results with:FEHBP
  77. [77]
    Ensuring Quality Healthcare - OPM.gov
    All FEHB plans support quality with educated health professionals, hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, accurate medical records, and open communication.
  78. [78]
    Federal health insurance premiums to see another large spike in 2026
    Oct 9, 2025 · The Office of Personnel Management announced Thursday that FEHB participants will pay an average of 12.3% more toward their insurance premiums ...
  79. [79]
    Stronger Controls Needed to Reduce Administrative Costs - GAO
    GAO discussed the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program's (FEHBP) fee-for-service (FFS) administrative costs, focusing on: (1) comparing FEHBP ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  80. [80]
    The Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan - PubMed
    Third, we discuss the problem of adverse selection in the FEHBP. We conclude that the FEHBP has experienced some selection problems, but not enough to ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Lessons for Health Reform from the Federal Employees Health ...
    Aug 2, 2009 · The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) has insured federal workers, dependents, and retirees for over half a century. Health ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Adverse Selection and the Capped Premium Subsidy in the Federal ...
    May 23, 2002 · The empirical analysis herein supports the contention that the premium subsidy in the FEHBP helps reduce adverse selection. References.
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Final Report: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management's Top ... - OPM
    Sep 27, 2024 · The oversight of the FEHBP relies on a complex relationship between OPM and the. FEHBP health insurance carriers and their subcontractors. The ...
  84. [84]
    Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Additional Monitoring ...
    Dec 9, 2022 · The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is responsible for administering the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program. OPM has ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] FEHB Fraud and Abuse Definitions - OPM
    Fraud is knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme or artifice to defraud any health care benefit program or to obtain by means ...<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    GAO: Billions wasted on federal health insurance program - POLITICO
    Feb 28, 2024 · For 12 years, a Department of Transportation employee fraudulently enrolled his sister and niece on his federal health benefits plan.
  87. [87]
    Comer Presses for Information on Billions Lost to Waste, Fraud, and ...
    Jan 23, 2023 · ' Making matters worse, GAO determined OPM's annual fraud risk assessment of the FEHB program fails to cover 'fraud risks associated with ...Missing: cases | Show results with:cases
  88. [88]
    [PDF] OPM Should Take Timely Action to Mitigate Persistent Fraud Risks
    Jul 17, 2025 · In this second review of the FEHB program, GAO found that OPM's ongoing efforts to manage fraud risks do not fully align with selected leading ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] FEHB Carriers - OPM
    Some examples of FWA reportable to the OIG include: • the identification of emerging fraud schemes,. • internal fraud, waste, or abuse by Carrier employees, ...
  90. [90]
    OPM staff shortages hinder fraud risk reviews of FEHB
    Jul 17, 2025 · OPM officials who were previously responsible for conducting FEHB fraud risk assessments have since left their jobs, the Government Accountability Office found.
  91. [91]
    Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Additional Monitoring ...
    OPM acknowledged in discussions with GAO that not verifying eligibility for current members carries a risk of fraud and improper payments. OPM's Office of the ...Missing: administrative | Show results with:administrative
  92. [92]
    Adopt a Voucher Plan and Slow the Growth of Federal Contributions ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · Under the program, the government covers up to 75 percent of the cost of enrollees' premiums for active non-postal employees and annuitants. The ...Missing: sustainability debates
  93. [93]
    Adopt a Voucher Plan and Slow the Growth of Federal Contributions ...
    Dec 13, 2018 · (The expected rate of growth for FEHB premiums is similar to that for private insurance premiums, which the agency estimates on the basis of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  94. [94]
    The FEHBP as a model for a new Medicare program - PubMed
    The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) is essentially such a system and is a good model for Medicare reform. The FEHBP has been highly ...Missing: universal | Show results with:universal
  95. [95]
    FEHBP is a flawed model for reform - PNHP
    FEHBP is a model that policymakers are examining as they consider ways of introducing more choice under Medicare or of developing new mechanisms for extending ...
  96. [96]
    The Federal Employee Health Benefits Program: A Model for ...
    Nov 1, 2003 · This analysis finds that FEHBP would represent a substantial improvement over the high premiums and limited benefits currently faced by small ...
  97. [97]
    Access to Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) for Employees ...
    Sep 3, 2021 · OPM is issuing an interim final rule to expand eligibility for enrollment in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program to additional tribal ...
  98. [98]
    The Benefits Federal Employees Love Most - Government Executive
    Jul 9, 2014 · The next highest enrollment was in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, which maintained an 82 percent participation rate. The Federal ...
  99. [99]
    reports summary of fehbp enrollment - OPM
    Table 1 - Summary of FEHBP Enrollment ; Report Category: Enrollment Reporting ; Frequency: Annual ; Required of: All ; Due Date: Apr 30 ; Reference: Contract § 1.7 ...
  100. [100]
    Access to Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) for Employees ...
    Apr 13, 2022 · As of January 2022, the total tribal enrollment in the FEHB Program is 34,333 with an estimated 63,000 covered lives. Overall, as of March 2021 ...<|separator|>
  101. [101]
    [PDF] 2020 FEHB Plan Performance Assessment - OPM
    FEHB Carriers' strong performance in these areas compared to their commercial insurer peers provides evidence that the FEHB is addressing its goals of ensuring ...Missing: FEHBP | Show results with:FEHBP
  102. [102]
    [PDF] 2021 FEHB Plan Performance Assessment - OPM
    FEHB Carriers' strong performance in these areas compared to their commercial insurer peers provides evidence that the FEHB is addressing its goals of ensuring ...Missing: FEHBP | Show results with:FEHBP
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Medicare versus Private Health Insurance: The Cost of Administration
    Critics of the private sector health insurance industry like to boast that Medicare administrative costs are about 2 percent of claims costs, while private ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] GAO-18-52, FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
    Oct 5, 2017 · This report describes, among other things: (1) how the number of plans and market shares of carriers participating in FEHBP changed in recent ...
  105. [105]
    2024 Employer Health Benefits Survey - KFF
    Oct 9, 2024 · Over the last 5 years, family premiums grew 24%, similar to the 28% growth in wages. Over the last ten years, the average family premium and ...Missing: FEHB | Show results with:FEHB
  106. [106]
    GAO-03-236, Federal Employees' Health Plans: Premium Growth ...
    During the past 5 years, premiums for the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP)--which is the nation's largest purchaser of employer-sponsored ...
  107. [107]
    Costs Compared: Public vs. Private Sector Health Plans - SHRM
    Jan 16, 2015 · Public workers' have generous health plans; they also bear a lower share of costs compared with employees in the private sector.
  108. [108]
    Comparing employee health benefits in the public and private ...
    Federal employees experience a $200 annual compensation gap relative to those in the private sector, but it is partly explained by advantage in purchasing power ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] 2023 Federal Employee Benefits Survey - OPM
    The Federal Employee Benefits Survey (FEBS) gathers employee feedback on the importance, adequacy (extent to which the benefit meets their needs), ...
  110. [110]
    FEHB Member Survey Results - OPM
    OPM reports each plan's scores on various survey measures by showing the percentage of satisfied members on a scale of 0 to 100. Also, we list the national ...Missing: FEHBP metrics
  111. [111]
    [PDF] SAMBA--Standard Option - 2024 CAHPS Survey
    Rate. (n). Rate. Rate. Rate. Rate. PATIENT EXPERIENCE. Getting Care. Getting Needed Care (% A+U). 83.46%. (294). 82.62%. 85.21%. 84.31%. 82.49%.
  112. [112]
    Behavioral Health Insurance Parity for Federal Employees
    Mar 30, 2006 · This article reports on the effects of parity of mental health and substance-abuse benefits on access, cost, and quality in seven large FEHB plans.
  113. [113]
    Economic Grand Rounds: The Price Is Right? Changes in the ... - NIH
    Likewise, outpatient behavioral health visits declined by 2.41 visits in the FEHB plans and by 2.08 visits in the comparison plans. With the exception of ...