Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

First Republic Bank

First Republic Bank was a San Francisco-headquartered regional commercial bank established on July 1, 1985, that specialized in providing customized deposit, lending, and wealth management services primarily to high-net-worth individuals and businesses.^[1] The institution grew rapidly over decades by cultivating client loyalty through personalized, high-touch service and competitive interest rates on large uninsured deposits, amassing total assets of $232.9 billion and deposits of $104.5 billion as of March 31, 2023, with the majority of deposits exceeding federal insurance limits.^[2] Its business model emphasized relationship banking in affluent markets across major U.S. cities, but this reliance on jumbo, uninsured funding sources exposed it to liquidity vulnerabilities during periods of market stress.^[2] In early 2023, amid contagion from the failures of other regional banks like Silicon Valley Bank, First Republic experienced a massive deposit run as clients withdrew over $100 billion in funds, eroding its liquidity and revealing substantial unrealized losses on its portfolio of long-term securities purchased in a low-interest-rate environment.^[3] Regulators closed the bank on May 1, 2023, appointing the FDIC as receiver; the agency facilitated its sale to JPMorgan Chase, which assumed all deposits and substantially all assets, resulting in an estimated $15.6 billion loss to the Deposit Insurance Fund and marking First Republic as the second-largest U.S. bank failure by asset size in history.^[4]^[5] The episode underscored the risks of concentrated uninsured deposit bases and inadequate interest rate risk management in a rising-rate regime, prompting regulatory scrutiny of supervisory practices that had rated the bank's liquidity as strong prior to the crisis.^[2]^[3]

Founding and Early History

Establishment and Initial Growth

First Republic Bancorp was established in 1985 in San Francisco by James H. Herbert II, who served as its initial leader, with the bank commencing operations that July as a de novo institution capitalized at $8.8 million.^[6]^[7] From inception, it differentiated itself through a private banking model centered on high-net-worth individuals, offering personalized services such as jumbo mortgages and tailored deposit products in an era of banking deregulation following the Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982, which expanded lending flexibility for thrift-like activities.^[8] The bank's foundational strategy emphasized relationship-based banking over volume-driven retail operations, prioritizing responsive client service and long-term referrals, which accounted for a significant portion of early loan originations from affluent California clients.^[7] It introduced products like home equity lines of credit and money market checking accounts to build deposit relationships with wealthy depositors, avoiding mass-market competition by focusing on bespoke financial solutions rather than broad consumer lending.^[7] Initial growth involved organic expansion within California, starting with four office locations in 1985 and adding lending operations in Los Angeles by 1987, followed by a depository office there in 1989, all while maintaining a client-centric approach that fostered repeat business from high-value customers.^[7] This branch buildup targeted affluent regions, leveraging San Francisco's financial hub status to gather core deposits and originate large loans without relying on aggressive marketing or interstate branching, which was limited until further federal reforms in the 1990s.^[6]

First Public Offering and Early Challenges

First Republic Bank, after operating as a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch from 2007 until a management-led investor buyout in July 2010, completed its initial public offering on December 8, 2010. The IPO involved selling 11 million shares at $25.50 each on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker "FRC," raising approximately $280.5 million in gross proceeds before underwriting discounts. This capital infusion enabled the bank to pursue further expansion in private banking and wealth management services, building on its established model of serving high-net-worth individuals in key markets like San Francisco and other West Coast regions.^[9]^[10] Post-IPO, the bank encountered early operational hurdles amid a protracted economic recovery from the 2008 financial crisis, including pressure on asset quality from subdued real estate markets and intensified competition from larger national institutions vying for affluent clients through scaled digital offerings. These conditions tested the bank's conservative lending practices, which emphasized jumbo mortgages and low-risk profiles for elite borrowers, yet deposit growth remained robust due to its high-touch, relationship-driven approach that prioritized client retention over volume. By maintaining low loan loss provisions—reflecting cumulative net losses minimal since its 1985 founding—the institution demonstrated resilience, achieving steady asset expansion without significant dilutions to its personalized service ethos.^[2] Strategic adaptations in the early 2010s, such as deepening integration of wealth management to offset deposit volatility from economic cycles, helped mitigate competitive threats, though the bank navigated tighter regulatory scrutiny on capital adequacy post-crisis. This period underscored First Republic's differentiation via bespoke services for technology executives and professionals, fostering organic deposit inflows from a loyal, high-balance clientele despite broader industry consolidation.^[11]

Expansion and Strategic Developments

Major Acquisitions and Mergers

First Republic Bank pursued selective acquisitions in the 2000s and 2010s to strengthen its wealth management capabilities and extend its geographic footprint beyond California. In February 2002, the bank completed the acquisition of Froley, Revy Investment Company Inc., a Los Angeles-based investment firm, for approximately $17 million in cash and stock, following an initial 18% stake purchase in January 2000; this move enhanced its private wealth management offerings by integrating specialized investment advisory services.^[12]^[13] To support lending operations and regional expansion, First Republic acquired Bank of Walnut Creek through the merger of its parent BWC Financial Corp. on October 16, 2006, adding commercial banking assets and client relationships in the East Bay area of California.^[14] Earlier that year, on February 2, 2006, it purchased First Signature Bank & Trust, a Portsmouth, New Hampshire-based institution and subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services, which facilitated entry into Northeastern markets including Boston and New York City by incorporating trust and private banking operations aligned with the bank's high-service model.^[15] In the 2010s, acquisitions focused on scaling wealth management amid growing demand from high-net-worth clients. The bank acquired Luminous Capital Holdings LLC, a Los Angeles-based registered investment advisor managing about $5 billion in assets, in November 2012 for $125 million in cash, integrating its multi-office platform to deepen expertise in customized portfolio management.^[16] Similarly, in June 2015, First Republic agreed to acquire Constellation Wealth Advisors LLC, a New York City-based multi-family office overseeing $6.1 billion in assets, for approximately $115 million, further solidifying its presence in the competitive Eastern wealth market through added advisory teams and family office services.^[17]^[18] These transactions were integrated with minimal disruption to preserve First Republic's emphasis on personalized client relationships, enabling seamless incorporation of acquired teams and assets into its core operations; by 2020, such strategies contributed to total assets exceeding $100 billion, reflecting expanded lending and deposit bases across diversified regions including Seattle, where the bank had established operations.^[7]

Ownership Transitions and Relisting

In September 2007, Merrill Lynch acquired First Republic Bank for $1.8 billion in cash and stock, integrating it as a subsidiary and resulting in its delisting from public markets, which shifted control to the investment bank's oversight amid broader industry consolidation. This transition allowed for operational adjustments under Merrill's private structure, though it coincided with the onset of the global financial crisis, limiting aggressive expansion during that period.^[19] Following Bank of America's acquisition of Merrill Lynch in January 2009, which inherited First Republic, the bank was sold in July 2010 to a consortium of private investors including General Atlantic and others for an undisclosed amount, marking a brief return to private ownership that facilitated internal restructuring free from quarterly public reporting pressures.^[19] This private phase, lasting mere months, emphasized stabilizing core private banking operations and preparing for renewed public capital access.^[20] First Republic relisted on the New York Stock Exchange in December 2010 through a second initial public offering, pricing 11 million shares at $25.50 each and raising approximately $280.5 million, which provided capital to support post-financial crisis recovery and geographic diversification.^[9] The proceeds enabled the bank to extend its presence beyond California into markets like Boston, New York, and Nevada, leveraging its established model of attracting low-cost, uninsured deposits from high-net-worth individuals to fund lending growth without heavy reliance on higher-cost wholesale funding.^[10] This relisting capitalized on improving economic conditions, with the bank's shares trading under the ticker "FRC" and reflecting investor confidence in its differentiated deposit base, which averaged over 70% uninsured but remained stable due to client relationships.^[21]

Business Operations and Model

Core Services and Products

First Republic Bank's core services centered on private banking tailored to high-net-worth individuals, encompassing customized deposit accounts, lending products, and wealth management solutions designed to foster long-term client relationships.^[2] The bank emphasized personalized advisory services, including investment management through its subsidiaries, trust administration, and brokerage offerings, which integrated seamlessly with core banking to provide holistic financial planning.^[22] Private business banking extended these services to corporate clients, offering specialized lending and treasury management.^[3] A hallmark product was single-family residential (SFR) lending, primarily nonconforming jumbo mortgages exceeding conventional size limits, often featuring interest-only repayment terms and competitive rates to accommodate affluent borrowers' real estate needs.^[2] These loans were customized with elevated loan-to-value ratios, frequently backed by clients' deposit relationships and overall wealth profiles rather than solely collateral value, distinguishing the bank's approach from standardized commodity lending.^[8] Foreign exchange services complemented this portfolio, providing efficient currency hedging and international transaction support for clients with global assets.^[22] The operational model prioritized in-person advisory through a network of physical branches located in high-income urban centers such as San Francisco, New York, and Los Angeles, enabling dedicated relationship managers to deliver bespoke service without heavy dependence on digital platforms prior to 2023.^[2] This branch-centric strategy supported cross-selling of products like wealth advisory and trust services, where teams conducted comprehensive reviews of clients' financial positions to recommend integrated solutions.^[3]

Client Demographics and Competitive Positioning

First Republic Bank's deposit base was heavily concentrated among high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs), including technology executives, venture capitalists, and ultra-wealthy clients primarily in coastal hubs such as the San Francisco Bay Area, New York, Los Angeles, and Boston.^[8]^[2] These clients, often with business and philanthropic interests tied to the technology and finance sectors, contributed to a high proportion of uninsured deposits, reaching approximately 68% of total assets by early 2023 due to average account balances far exceeding the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit.^[8]^[2] The bank's strategy targeted this demographic through tailored private banking services, minimizing reliance on small-business lending or mass-market retail deposits in contrast to institutions like Silicon Valley Bank, which emphasized venture-backed startups.^[23]^[3] In competitive positioning, First Republic differentiated itself as a relationship-oriented bank serving the upper echelons of wealth, prioritizing personalized advisory services, trust and wealth management, and brokerage offerings over commoditized products.^[2]^[23] It attracted HNWIs with preferential loan pricing and low-fee structures designed for comprehensive "full relationship" banking, fostering deep client ties that emphasized concierge-level support rather than transactional volume.^[8] This model yielded superior client loyalty metrics, including a Net Promoter Score averaging 72 to 73 in surveys measuring referral likelihood and satisfaction, roughly double the U.S. banking industry average and outperforming many national banks in personalized service delivery.^[2]^[24] Compared to larger national banks, First Republic's niche focus on the top 1% of depositors enabled it to avoid broad retail competition while building a reputation for operational excellence in private banking, though this specialization inherently amplified sensitivity to the preferences of a narrow, affluent cohort.^[25]^[26]

Financial Trajectory

Growth Metrics and Performance Indicators

First Republic Bank's total assets grew from $22.4 billion as of December 31, 2010, to $232.9 billion by March 31, 2023, representing a compound annual growth rate exceeding 15% over the period, primarily fueled by sustained deposit inflows from high-net-worth individuals and expansion in secured lending such as jumbo mortgages and private banking facilities.^[27]^[2] This expansion reflected the bank's strategy of leveraging client relationships in wealth management to fund asset growth, with loans outstanding reaching $173 billion by the time of its seizure, underscoring the scale of its lending activities prior to distress.^[28] The deposit base expanded to a peak of approximately $173 billion in late 2022, enabling low-cost funding that supported net interest income growth; quarterly reports prior to 2023 showed deposits consistently increasing year-over-year, with minimal reliance on wholesale funding due to sticky, relationship-driven balances from affluent clients.^[29]^[30] Net interest margins were maintained above 3% through much of the growth period, benefiting from deposit costs below peer averages and yields on a high-quality loan portfolio concentrated in collateralized real estate loans in premium markets like San Francisco and New York.^[31]^[32] Profitability metrics demonstrated resilience, with return on equity averaging 9.7% over the ten years ending in 2022, surpassing typical regional bank benchmarks of 7-9% amid low charge-off rates—often under 0.1% annually—attributable to the over-collateralization of loans backed by high-end properties and stringent underwriting for ultra-wealthy borrowers.^[33]^[2] Revenue from net interest and fee income scaled accordingly, reaching $6.75 billion in 2022, with net income of $1.67 billion, reflecting efficient operations and minimal credit losses during the expansion phase.^[34]

Asset Composition and Funding Structure

First Republic Bank's asset portfolio as of December 31, 2022, totaled approximately $212.6 billion, with loans comprising the largest component at $166.9 billion, or roughly 78% of total assets.^[35]^[36] This loan portfolio was heavily weighted toward residential mortgages, which accounted for about 60% of loans, including nonconforming jumbo mortgages often featuring interest-only repayment periods and home equity lines.^[37]^[2] Commercial real estate exposure remained limited relative to residential lending, with single-family residential loans serving as the core product to attract high-net-worth clients through competitive terms tied to deposit or wealth management relationships.^[2]^[3] The remainder of assets included held-to-maturity securities, which the bank allocated to generate yield while maintaining a conservative classification to avoid mark-to-market volatility.^[2] These securities, though not the dominant holding, complemented the loan-focused strategy by providing liquidity buffers and income from longer-duration instruments such as U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities.^[38] Funding relied predominantly on customer deposits totaling $176.4 billion, exceeding loans and reflecting a relationship-driven model that prioritized sticky, low-cost funds from affluent individuals over wholesale sources.^[36] Uninsured deposits formed the majority, supported by client loyalty fostered through integrated banking and wealth services, which minimized turnover and borrowing needs.^[3] This structure achieved an average deposit cost of 99 basis points in late 2022, with total funding costs at 112 basis points, remaining below 1% in the low-rate environment prior to significant Federal Reserve hikes.^[35] Wholesale funding and other borrowings played a supplementary role, enabling the bank to sustain growth without heavy dependence on volatile market-based liabilities.^[39]

Vulnerabilities and Risk Profile

Interest Rate and Liquidity Exposures

First Republic Bank's exposure to interest rate risk stemmed primarily from its portfolio of long-duration, low-yielding fixed-rate assets, including securities and loans originated during periods of near-zero federal funds rates. The Federal Reserve's aggressive rate hikes, elevating the target range from 0.00-0.25% in early 2022 to 5.25-5.50% by mid-2023, precipitated substantial unrealized losses on these holdings. As of December 31, 2022, the bank's securities portfolio reflected $5.3 billion in unrealized losses, with held-to-maturity (HTM) securities alone accounting for $4.839 billion and available-for-sale (AFS) securities contributing $471 million; broader fair value declines extended to $27.5 billion across assets, including $22.2 billion on loans.^[3]^[2] This vulnerability was exacerbated by a pronounced asset-liability duration mismatch, where approximately 99.5% of deposits had durations of one year or less, contrasted against only 18.9% of loans and securities sharing that short-term profile as of December 31, 2022. The bank's business model emphasized adjustable-rate mortgages and match-funded structures earlier, but a shift toward fixed-rate loans—reaching 66-75% of new single-family residential originations by Q3 2022—increased sensitivity to rising rates without commensurate hedging adjustments. Management monitored these risks through economic value of equity (EVE) simulations, yet breached risk appetite limits for three consecutive quarters in 2022, including a -117% equity decline under a +200 basis points shock, without implementing corrective measures such as enhanced derivatives or portfolio repricing.^[3]^[2] Liquidity strains arose from this mismatch, as eroding asset values limited the bank's ability to liquidate holdings without realizing losses, while short-term funding reliance amplified rollover risks in a higher-rate environment. Pre-failure stress testing indicated resilience to hypothetical $100 billion deposit outflows, and liquidity ratings were deemed strong in supervisory reviews through 2022. However, the absence of robust hedges and overreliance on low-cost, short-duration liabilities left the institution exposed to duration gaps that regulatory metrics, such as liquidity coverage ratios, did not fully capture under rapid rate normalization scenarios.^[3]^[2]

Deposit Concentration and Uninsured Risks

First Republic Bank's deposit base totaled approximately $173.5 billion as of early March 2023, prior to the onset of significant outflows triggered by the Silicon Valley Bank failure.^[40] Of this amount, nearly 70 percent consisted of uninsured deposits exceeding the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's $250,000 coverage limit per depositor, exposing the bank to heightened liquidity risks from potential mass withdrawals.^[41] This elevated uninsured share stemmed from the institution's business model, which prioritized attracting high-net-worth individuals through preferential lending terms and personalized services, resulting in a deposit portfolio dominated by large, concentrated balances rather than diversified retail holdings.^[2] The bank's client demographics amplified these vulnerabilities, with a heavy reliance on deposits from affluent technology sector professionals and venture capital participants, primarily in the San Francisco Bay Area.^[26] This geographic and sectoral concentration created correlated withdrawal risks, as clients sharing similar economic exposures—such as equity in volatile tech firms—were likely to react synchronously to adverse signals from peer institutions like Silicon Valley Bank.^[36] Sophisticated depositors, often monitoring market developments and institutional peers closely, demonstrated a propensity for rapid fund transfers via digital platforms, heightening the potential for contagion absent broader diversification.^[42] Historically, First Republic's uninsured deposits exhibited stability under routine conditions, sustained by strong client relationships and the inertia of high-balance accounts tied to ongoing private banking services like jumbo mortgages.^[3] However, this stickiness proved fragile against amplified panic dynamics, where social media dissemination and real-time news coverage of comparable bank stresses could synchronize behaviors across the high-net-worth cohort, overriding typical loyalty factors.^[8] Regulatory assessments prior to the crisis had flagged the perils of such undiversified funding but noted no immediate supervisory actions to mandate mitigation, underscoring the model's inherent exposure to episodic runs among informed, uninsured depositors.^[2]

The 2023 Failure

Context of the Broader Banking Turmoil

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 10, 2023, initiated a wave of contagion fears across the U.S. regional banking sector. SVB, holding approximately $209 billion in assets as of year-end 2022, failed due to substantial unrealized losses on its long-term securities portfolio—stemming from the Federal Reserve's interest rate hikes—and a rapid depositor run that withdrew billions in largely uninsured funds over just days.^[41]^[43] This exposed systemic vulnerabilities in banks with mismatched asset-liability durations, heavy reliance on uninsured deposits exceeding the FDIC's $250,000 limit, and limited hedging against rate volatility, prompting market-wide reassessment of balance sheet risks.^[43] Signature Bank's seizure by regulators on March 12, 2023, amplified these concerns, as it suffered a 20% deposit flight in the days following SVB's downfall, driven by similar exposure to uninsured tech and real estate deposits.^[44] To mitigate escalating panic and potential systemic spillover, the Federal Reserve launched the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) on March 12, enabling eligible depository institutions to obtain one-year loans collateralized by qualifying securities at their par value, thus avoiding liquidity crunches from mark-to-market losses.^[45] Concurrently, the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve, and FDIC issued a joint statement guaranteeing full repayment of all deposits at SVB and Signature—beyond standard insurance—while clarifying that shareholders and unsecured creditors would bear losses, with no taxpayer bailout intended for the Deposit Insurance Fund.^[46] These interventions temporarily stanched immediate outflows at the failed institutions but failed to fully dispel contagion dynamics, as investors and depositors scrutinized peer banks for analogous unrealized losses estimated at over $600 billion industry-wide.^[43] Regional banks with elevated uninsured deposit ratios—often above 80%—and concentrated client bases in volatile sectors faced stock plunges exceeding 50% in mid-March, heightening liquidity strains amid elevated interbank borrowing costs. First Republic Bank, despite its reputation for personalized wealth management services, entered this fraught environment with a comparable risk profile, experiencing initial market stability relative to the most afflicted peers before succumbing to sector-wide pressures in subsequent weeks.^[47]

Onset of Deposit Outflows and Bank Run

In the first quarter of 2023, First Republic Bank experienced rapid deposit outflows totaling approximately $102 billion, primarily from uninsured high-net-worth clients responding to media reports on the bank's liquidity strains following the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.^[48]^[49] These withdrawals accelerated in mid-March, reducing total deposits from $176.4 billion at the end of December 2022 to $104.5 billion by March 31, 2023, despite subsequent liquidity support.^[50]^[51] On March 16, 2023, a consortium of 11 major U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, deposited $30 billion into First Republic to restore depositor confidence and slow the run.^[52]^[53] This private-sector intervention temporarily eased outflows but proved insufficient, as client withdrawals continued amid ongoing concerns over the bank's funding stability.^[54] The deposit exodus triggered a severe stock price decline, with shares falling more than 90 percent from early March peaks by late in the month, reflecting investor fears of sustained liquidity pressures.^[55] To offset the outflows, the bank drew heavily on emergency facilities, borrowing up to $109 billion from the Federal Reserve between March 10 and 15, and an additional $10 billion from the Federal Home Loan Bank, with total borrowings peaking at $138.1 billion on March 15.^[56]^[57] These measures maintained operational liquidity but highlighted the intensity of the bank run.^[58]

Regulatory Intervention and Asset Sale

On May 1, 2023, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation closed First Republic Bank at the recommendation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation after the bank had depleted its liquidity sources, including emergency borrowing facilities and a prior $30 billion deposit infusion from major peers. The FDIC was immediately appointed as receiver for the institution, which held total assets of approximately $212 billion, making it the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history by asset size after Washington Mutual in 2008.^[59]^[60]^[61] As receiver, the FDIC executed a purchase and assumption agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., transferring all deposits—totaling over $100 billion—and substantially all assets, including approximately $173 billion in loans and $30 billion in securities. JPMorgan Chase assumed the deposits at full value, ensuring uninterrupted access for all depositors, while the FDIC retained loss-sharing arrangements on certain commercial loans to mitigate potential shortfalls. This resolution prevented broader systemic disruption amid ongoing deposit outflows exceeding $100 billion in the preceding weeks.^[59]^[62]^[63] The transaction incurred no direct costs to taxpayers, with losses covered by the Deposit Insurance Fund—financed through bank premiums—and absorbed through the deal structure, though the FDIC estimated a $13 billion hit to the fund. Regulators expedited approval by invoking flexibility under existing authorities, bypassing standard merger review timelines to stabilize the institution within hours of closure.^[59]^[64]^[65]

Causal Analyses and Debates

Managerial and Operational Shortcomings

First Republic Bank's business model heavily depended on the stability of its uninsured deposits from high-net-worth clients, assuming strong loyalty based on long-term relationships averaging eight years and multiple services per account, without implementing diversified funding sources or comprehensive contingency plans for potential outflows.^[2] By December 2021, uninsured deposits constituted 75% of total deposits and 64% of total assets, rising to a peak of $119.5 billion in 2022, exposing the institution to acute liquidity vulnerabilities during stress.^[2] Management's overconfidence in this assumption overlooked the risks of rapid withdrawals, as evidenced by stress tests projecting only $22.65 billion in outflows over 30 days under a realistic worst-case scenario, far underestimating the actual $103.09 billion lost by April 28, 2023.^[3] The bank's management delayed and ultimately avoided hedging interest rate risks, relying instead on anticipated loan repricing— with approximately 50% of the loan portfolio adjusting annually—and deposit growth as a natural offset, despite warnings from economic value of equity (EVE) simulations.^[2] This approach led to substantial unrealized losses, including $22.159 billion on loans by December 2022, amid a 425-450 basis point rise in rates that year, without building adequate capital buffers to absorb such declines.^[2] Breaches of EVE risk appetite statement limits occurred in Q2 through Q4 2022, with declines as severe as -117% under a +200 basis point shock by December, yet senior management and the board opted for monitoring rather than corrective actions like balance sheet restructuring or hedging instruments.^[2]^[3] Board oversight of liquidity monitoring proved inadequate, as the institution maintained a high concentration of long-duration, fixed-rate assets—such as single-family residential loans comprising 61% of the portfolio ($79.2 billion in 2021)—funded by low-cost uninsured deposits, exceeding the bank's operational capabilities to manage under rapid asset growth of 21% annually from 2018 to 2022.^[2] Despite supervisory feedback, the board did not enforce timely diversification or enhanced stress testing calibrated to social media-amplified runs, contributing to a $40 billion single-day outflow on March 13, 2023, and overall first-quarter losses exceeding $100 billion.^[2] The FDIC's assessment highlighted that this risk appetite, predicated on historical depositor behavior, failed to prepare for contagion effects, resulting in unexecuted elements of the March 20, 2023, Go-Forward Plan aimed at shrinking the balance sheet and bolstering capital.^[2]

Macroeconomic Pressures and Policy Influences

The Federal Reserve's aggressive monetary tightening from March 2022 to July 2023, raising the federal funds rate by 525 basis points in response to persistent inflation, significantly devalued banks' holdings of longer-duration fixed-income securities purchased in a low-rate environment.^[66] ^[67] This rapid shift exposed systemic duration mismatches in banking models reliant on funding short-term liabilities with longer-term assets, as bond prices inversely correlate with yields, leading to widespread unrealized losses across institutions.^[68] The policy-induced repricing amplified liquidity strains during periods of stress, as banks faced pressure to realize losses or seek alternative funding amid higher borrowing costs.^[69] Contagion from the March 10, 2023, failure of Silicon Valley Bank triggered rational deposit flight among informed, uninsured depositors at similarly positioned regional banks, with outflows accelerated by digital wire transfer capabilities enabling near-instantaneous runs.^[2] ^[70] First Republic experienced $25 billion in single-day deposit withdrawals on March 10, representing severe spillover effects from SVB's collapse, as market participants reassessed risks in a higher-rate regime where asset values had deteriorated.^[36] This dynamic underscored how modern banking's reliance on transactional, tech-savvy depositors—facilitated by real-time transfer technologies—intensified macro pressures, transforming isolated vulnerabilities into system-wide liquidity crunches.^[71] The Federal Reserve's Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), launched on March 12, 2023, allowed eligible institutions to borrow against high-quality securities at their par value for up to one year, aiming to mitigate fire-sale incentives amid rate-hike-induced mark-to-market losses.^[72] First Republic drew on the BTFP as a key borrower, yet sustained deposit runs overwhelmed this backstop, culminating in its seizure on May 1, 2023.^[73] Policy analyses debate whether the BTFP merely delayed failures by substituting one form of liquidity support for another without addressing underlying fragilities in leveraged balance sheets under tightening, revealing the constraints of emergency facilities when confronted with persistent outflows in a high-rate environment.^[74] ^[36]

Supervisory and Regulatory Critiques

The FDIC's internal review of its supervision of First Republic Bank from 2018 to its failure on May 1, 2023, identified shortcomings in addressing interest rate risk and uninsured deposit vulnerabilities, despite prior warnings in supervisory letters.^[2] Examiners noted the bank's high uninsured deposit ratio—reaching 75% by December 31, 2021—but did not sufficiently probe their potential instability, treating them as stable based on historical loyalty rather than stress-testing for rapid outflows.^[2] Similarly, interest rate sensitivity was flagged in the September 2022 supervisory plan as "elevated" due to long-duration assets mismatched against short-term deposits, yet no Matters Requiring Board Attention (MRBAs) or supervisory recommendations were issued until March 31, 2023.^[2] The bank's CAMELS ratings remained at a composite "2" through March 30, 2023, with liquidity rated "1" as late as May 2022, despite economic value of equity (EVE) breaches exceeding risk appetite limits in Q2-Q4 2022, including a projected -117% decline under a +200 basis point shock by December 2022.^[2]^[5] The FDIC Office of Inspector General's material loss review corroborated these lapses, citing missed opportunities for earlier rating downgrades—such as Management from "1" to "2"—and inadequate forward-looking assessments of liquidity risks, where uninsured deposits comprised 68% of total deposits by December 31, 2022, leading to $103.6 billion in outflows exceeding worst-case stress scenarios.^[5] These delays stemmed from over-reliance on the bank's management track record and insufficient headquarters challenge to field examiners' leniency.^[2] Post-Dodd-Frank amendments in 2018, via the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, exempted mid-tier banks like First Republic (assets under $250 billion until its rapid expansion) from enhanced prudential standards, enabling deposit-fueled growth from $76 billion in assets in 2018 to $212.6 billion by December 31, 2022, without commensurate scrutiny of funding concentrations.^[75] Regulators underutilized Dodd-Frank tools such as stress testing and liquidity coverage ratios for these institutions, contributing to a lighter supervisory touch that deferred action on emerging mismatches.^[75] Debates persist on whether under-enforcement fostered complacency or if stricter rules would have hindered hedging strategies; the FDIC review posits that earlier interventions, like 2022 MRBAs on EVE breaches, might have prompted contingency planning, though the post-SVB contagion's velocity—triggering a "3" composite rating downgrade on March 31, 2023, and "5" on April 28, 2023—limited preemptive efficacy.^[2]^[5] The OIG recommended re-evaluating guidance on uninsured deposit assumptions and non-capital triggers to enable timelier downgrades, highlighting empirical gaps in real-time monitoring of reputational risks.^[5]

Post-Failure Outcomes

Acquisition by JPMorgan Chase

On May 1, 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) placed First Republic Bank into receivership due to its inability to meet liquidity needs amid sustained deposit outflows, and immediately facilitated its sale through a purchase and assumption agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.^[59] Under the terms, JPMorgan acquired all of First Republic's deposits—totaling approximately $103.9 billion as of April 13, 2023—and substantially all of its assets, valued at around $229.1 billion, including $173 billion in loans and $30 billion in securities, while assuming certain other liabilities but excluding an immaterial portion of venture banking-related loans.^[59]^[76] JPMorgan agreed to pay the FDIC $10.6 billion for the franchise, a payment that, combined with the accounting treatment of the acquired assets and liabilities, resulted in the recognition of a one-time post-tax gain of approximately $2.6 billion for JPMorgan in the transaction.^[77]^[78] The deal included loss-sharing provisions where the FDIC agreed to absorb a portion of potential losses on acquired single-family residential mortgage loans and commercial loans, with estimates indicating up to $13 billion in shared losses borne primarily by the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund rather than imposing direct costs on JPMorgan or taxpayers.^[79]^[80] This backstop mitigated risk for JPMorgan on higher-risk credits, enabling the bank to integrate First Republic's portfolio without full exposure to unrealized losses from interest rate-sensitive assets accumulated during prior low-rate environments.^[76] The FDIC's involvement ensured all depositors retained full access to their funds, including uninsured amounts exceeding the $250,000 limit, thereby averting broader contagion in the wake of earlier 2023 bank failures.^[59] Strategically, the acquisition aligned with JPMorgan's aim to bolster its private banking operations by incorporating First Republic's specialized focus on affluent clients, jumbo mortgages, and deposit-rich relationships, which featured low-cost, sticky funding from high-net-worth individuals.^[76] This added approximately 84 branches, primarily in high-wealth markets like California, enhancing JPMorgan's West Coast footprint and wealth management scale without significant upfront capital outlay beyond the $10.6 billion payment.^[76] The FDIC-orchestrated process prioritized rapid resolution to maintain financial stability, drawing on JPMorgan's prior involvement in a $30 billion deposit backstop consortium for First Republic, positioning it as the preferred bidder in a competitive auction.^[81]

Integration Process and Client Retention

Following the acquisition, JPMorgan Chase initiated a multi-phase integration of First Republic Bank's operations, prioritizing the migration of core banking systems and client data to its proprietary platforms while addressing compatibility issues between the two institutions' technologies. This process encountered significant hurdles, including a "tangled mess" of disparate tech stacks that delayed full system convergence and led to temporary disruptions in client access to debit and credit cards for some 800,000 accounts during the transition.^[82]^[83] Cultural differences also posed challenges, as First Republic's boutique, relationship-focused model clashed with JPMorgan's larger-scale operations, prompting efforts to retain key personnel through incentives amid fears of advisor attrition.^[82] By late 2024, however, CEO Jamie Dimon reported that integration was "mostly over," with remaining redundancies leading to the planned layoff of 335 staff on contracts expiring January 10, 2025.^[84]^[85] Client retention proved robust despite these obstacles, with JPMorgan securing approximately 90% of First Republic's core banking clients by October 2024, bolstered by the continuity of high-value loans and deposits totaling around $92 billion.^[84]^[86] In wealth management, retention stood at about 75% of advisors and associated clients by December 2024, with remaining teams rebranded under the JPMorgan Private Bank to preserve personalized services for high-net-worth individuals.^[87] Core deposits from First Republic increased JPMorgan's totals by 20% post-integration, stabilizing thereafter and contributing to lending revenue growth of 11% in the second quarter of 2024, driven largely by the acquired portfolio.^[88]^[89] Physical infrastructure integration accelerated in 2025, with JPMorgan converting over 30 former First Republic branches into branded "J.P. Morgan Financial Centers" tailored for affluent clients, including 14 new openings across California, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York in May 2025.^[90] These centers, emphasizing luxury amenities and advisory services, expanded JPMorgan's footprint in premium markets, with plans for 31 operational by the end of 2026.^[91] The inflows from retained deposits and loans directly enhanced JPMorgan's earnings, supporting a 6% profit increase to $13.42 billion in the first quarter of 2024 and broader annual net income of $58.5 billion.^[92]^[93]

Implications for Industry Practices

The failure of First Republic Bank, which relied on approximately 70% uninsured deposits, has prompted banks to intensify liquidity stress testing regimes, simulating rapid outflows under contagion scenarios akin to those experienced in March 2023.^[41] Empirical data from the event revealed that even stable uninsured deposits can flee amid perceived systemic risks, leading institutions to diversify funding sources toward insured deposit caps or brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) to mitigate run risks.^[2] Post-failure analyses indicate a measurable shift, with regional banks increasing reciprocal deposit programs—capped at FDIC-insured limits—to stabilize liquidity without fully sacrificing low-cost funding advantages.^[94] Debates persist on the perils of uninsured deposits versus their benefits as cheap, relationship-driven funding, influencing refinements to frameworks like the Basel III endgame. While some analyses argue uninsured deposits are not inherently volatile—citing First Republic's historical stability—the 2023 outflows underscored their susceptibility to social media amplification and peer failures, prompting regulators to weigh higher liquidity coverage ratios against competitive disadvantages for smaller banks.^[95] These insights have informed U.S. proposals for enhanced net stable funding ratios under Basel III, aiming to curb over-reliance on short-term uninsured liabilities without stifling intermediation.^[96] Industry responses include voluntary adjustments to internal liquidity adequacy assessments, prioritizing diversified deposit bases over pure cost minimization.^[97] The episode highlights the universality of interest rate risk across banking models, emphasizing causal factors like unhedged duration mismatches over moral attributions such as executive "greed," and advocating robust, principles-based hedging strategies rather than recurrent bailouts. First Republic's balance sheet, heavy in long-term fixed-rate assets, amplified losses from the Federal Reserve's rate hikes, a vulnerability examiners noted could have been offset through derivatives or portfolio sales—practices now more rigorously stress-tested in regulatory scenarios.^[2] This has spurred broader adoption of interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) frameworks, with heightened scrutiny on hedge effectiveness and scenario modeling to ensure resilience independent of monetary policy support.^[98] Consequently, banks are recalibrating asset-liability management toward dynamic hedging, reducing dependence on ad-hoc liquidity injections that distort market discipline.^[96]

References

[1]
Oversight of Financial Regulators - FDIC
May 18, 2023 · First Republic Bank Closing. First Republic Bank was established on July 1, 1985. The bank focused on offering banking services to high-net ...
[2]
[PDF] FDIC's Supervision of First Republic Bank - September 8, 2023
Sep 8, 2023 · FDIC's decision to increase First Republic's Liquidity component rating to a “1,” signifying strong liquidity levels and well-developed funds ...
[3]
[PDF] Material Loss Review of First Republic Bank - FDIC OIG Homepage
Nov 3, 2023 · The proximate cause of First Republic's failure was contagion effect from Silvergate Bank's announcement on March 8, 2023, that it would self- ...
[4]
First Republic Bank | FDIC.gov
Aug 7, 2025 · Home Resources Resolutions Bank Failures Failed Bank List. Bank Failures. Failed Bank Information for First Republic Bank, San Francisco, CA.Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
[5]
[PDF] Material Loss Review of First Republic Bank - FDIC OIG Homepage
Dec 31, 2023 · The FDIC recorded a final estimated loss to the DIF of $15.6 billion on June 5, 2023.
[6]
[PDF] 2021 First Republic Bank Annual Report
Since 1985, First Republic has grown organically from its initial $8.8 million de novo capitalization to become the nation's 14th largest commercial bank by ...
[7]
[PDF] ANNUAL REPORT 2010
Dec 31, 2010 · Founded in 1985, First Republic Bank and its subsidiaries provide private banking, private business banking and private wealth management, ...<|separator|>
[8]
Focus: How First Republic's courtship of the wealthy led to meltdown
Mar 27, 2023 · Founded in 1985 by James "Jim" Herbert, son of a community banker in Ohio, First Republic focused early on providing big loans at cheap rates.
[9]
First Republic IPO prices at midpoint-underwriter | Reuters
Dec 8, 2010 · Prices at $25.50 vs $24-$27 range-underwriter · Sells 11 mln shares, raises about $280.5 mln-underwriter · Will trade on NYSE under symbol "FRC".
[10]
First Republic Rises After IPO; Bona Film Retreats - Bloomberg.com
Dec 9, 2010 · The San Francisco-based private bank gained $2.42 to $27.92 in New York Stock Exchange trading. The company sold 11 million shares for $25.50 ...Missing: date details
[11]
The Failure of First Republic Bank | Corporate Finance Institute
May 7, 2023 · When it failed, the lender had assets of $229bn, which made First Republic the second-largest bank failure in the US, displacing Silicon Valley ...Background and History of... · Bank Run and FDIC Intervention
[12]
First Republic buys LA firm for $17M - San Francisco Business Times
Feb 1, 2002 · First Republic Bank Friday said it purchased Los Angeles investment firm Froley, Revy Investment Company Inc. for $17 million in cash and ...
[13]
First Republic Acquires Investment Firm - ThinkAdvisor
May 21, 2002 · First Republic bought 18% of Froley, Revy about two years ago, then in February exercised an option to buy the remaining 82% for about $18.5 ...
[14]
BWC Financial 2025 Company Profile - PitchBook
BWC Financial was acquired on 16-Oct-2006. Who acquired BWC Financial? BWC Financial was acquired by First Republic Bank (National Banks). Data Transparency.
[15]
First Republic ups presence in Northeast - WealthBriefing
Feb 2, 2006 · San Francisco-based First Republic Bank has completed its acquisition of First Signature Bank ... (which absorbed Bay Isle), Froley, Revy ...
[16]
First Republic Bank buys Luminous Capital - InvestmentNews
Nov 8, 2012 · Luminous Capital Holdings LLC, a fast-growing registered investment advisory firm based in Los Angeles, sold itself to San Francisco-based First ...
[17]
First Republic To Acquire Constellation Wealth Advisors
Jun 17, 2015 · The purchase will include substantially all of the assets of Constellation Wealth Advisors. First Republic expects the transaction to be ...
[18]
First Republic Buys Constellation Wealth Advisors
Jun 17, 2015 · First Republic Bank announced plans Wednesday to buy Constellation Wealth Advisors, an independent multi-family office firm with $6.1 billion in assets, for $ ...
[19]
JPMorgan Ends First Republic's Turmoil After FDIC Seizure
May 1, 2023 · Ownership passed to Bank of America when it bought Merrill Lynch in 2009, and changed again in mid-2010, when investment firms including General ...
[20]
First Republic Bank | Private Equity - GI Partners
Founded in 1985 by the same management that runs the bank today, First Republic Bank (NYSE: FRC) is a private banking and wealth management company that ...
[21]
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/first-republic-bank-prices-ipo-at-2550-share-2010-12-09
[22]
[PDF] 2020 First Republic Annual Report - AnnualReports.com
Founded in 1985, First Republic Bank and its subsidiaries provide private banking, private business banking ... Te real strength of First Republic Bancorp, in ...
[23]
Servicer Evaluation: First Republic Bank | S&P Global Ratings
The bank focuses largely on private banking for high-income individuals and businesses. First Republic differentiates itself from most other commercial banks ...
[24]
This Bank Is Better at Customer Service Than Just About Anyone Else
Jun 1, 2021 · First Republic also has a net promoter score (a measure of the likelihood of clients referring their bank to others) of 73, double the U.S. ...Missing: national | Show results with:national<|separator|>
[25]
First Republic: A Customer Service Franchise Disguised As A Bank
Oct 4, 2016 · We consider First Republic a retail business with a superior franchise. It's an upscale retail and commercial bank that does good old-fashioned banking.
[26]
The Limits Of Customer Love: A Cautionary Tale From First Republic ...
May 3, 2023 · First Republic's high-net-worth customers had deposit levels that tended to far exceed the FDIC-insured maximum of $250,000 per account. As a ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
[27]
First Republic Bank (FRC) - Total assets - Companies Market Cap
Total assets by year ; 2011-12-31, $27.79 B · 24.19% ; 2010-12-31, $22.37 B · 12.22% ; 2009-12-31, $19.94 B ; 2006-12-31, $11.63 B · 24.84%.
[28]
First Republic Becomes Second-Largest Ever US Bank Failure
May 1, 2023 · The US regulator struck an agreement for JPMorgan Chase & Co. to take over the bank's assets including $173 billion of loans and $30 billion ...
[29]
Troubled First Republic Bank seized and sold to JPMorgan Chase
May 1, 2023 · The failure of First Republic Bank shows how deregulation has made the too big to fail problem even worse. A poorly supervised bank was snapped ...Missing: founding causes<|separator|>
[30]
What went wrong with First Republic Bank? - UNSW BusinessThink
May 2, 2023 · In First Republic's Q1 earnings, it reported that deposits fell by $70 billion (from around $170 billion to $100 billion). However, the ...
[31]
First Republic Bank is on the edge of a precipice - The Economist
Apr 26, 2023 · In the last quarter of 2022 First Republic earned a net interest margin—the difference between what it collects on loans and pays for funding—of ...
[32]
At First Republic, narrowing margins overshadow red-hot loan growth
Oct 14, 2022 · Increased funding costs took a larger-than-expected bite out of First Republic Bank's net interest margin, but the effect was more than ...
[33]
First Republic Bank - ROE - Wisesheets
The mean historical ROE of First Republic Bank over the last ten years is 9.71%. The current 9.99% ROE has changed 2.88% with respect to the historical average.
[34]
First Republic Bank Financial Statements 2010-2025 | FRCB
Fifteen years of historical annual and quarterly income statements for First Republic Bank (FRCB).Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
[35]
First Republic Reports 2022 Results - Business Wire
Jan 13, 2023 · Loans totaled $166.9 billion at December 31, 2022, up 23.6% compared to a year ago. The increase was driven by growth in substantially all loan ...
[36]
[PDF] United States: First Republic Bank Emergency Liquidity Program, 2023
Apr 15, 2025 · The program provided $30 billion in uninsured deposits to First Republic Bank for 120 days to ensure liquidity and buy time for restructuring, ...
[37]
First Republic's Collapse by the Numbers: High Risk Factors ... - Trepp
May 10, 2023 · In addition, First Republic had some 60% of its loan composition in residential lending, according to Trepp data. These were very safe loans ...
[38]
The First Republic Takeover: What Happened? - CFA Institute Blogs
May 2, 2023 · First Republic's investment of its significant uninsured deposits in jumbo loans left it illiquid in a rising interest rate environment.Missing: transitions delisting relisting
[39]
[PDF] First Republic Bank 2022 IDI Plan - Public Section - FDIC
Where You Can Find More Information. In accordance with the Exchange Act, First Republic files annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports.
[40]
First Republic clients pulled $100B in deposits during panic - AP News
Apr 24, 2023 · First Republic reported first-quarter results Monday that showed it had $173.5 billion in deposits before Silicon Valley Bank failed on March 9.
[41]
Lessons Learned from the U.S. Regional Bank Failures of 2023 - FDIC
May 17, 2024 · Less than two months later, on May 1, 2023, First Republic Bank of California, with $213 billion in assets at year-end 2022, was closed by the ...
[42]
First Republic's pain had a lot to do with its reliance on wealthy ...
May 1, 2023 · About two-thirds of First Republic's deposits were uninsured. That's far less than the 94% uninsured that Silicon Valley Bank had, but First ...
[43]
[PDF] svb-review-20230428.pdf - Federal Reserve Board
Apr 28, 2023 · This report examines the failure of SVB, its holding company Silicon Valley Bank Financial Group. (SVBFG), and the oversight provided by the ...
[44]
Central Bank Lending Lessons from the 2023 Bank Crisis
On March 10, New York-based Signature Bank experienced a similarly rapid flight of 20 percent of its deposits. It was closed by regulators on March 12. At the ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
[45]
Press Releases - Federal Reserve Board
Mar 12, 2023 · The additional funding will be made available through the creation of a new Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), offering loans of up to one year ...
[46]
Joint Statement by Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
Mar 12, 2023 · Depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13. No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank ...
[47]
First Republic, other regional bank stocks sink after failure of Silicon ...
Mar 10, 2023 · First Republic, other regional bank stocks sink after failure of Silicon Valley Bank ... Regional and midsized bank stocks fell sharply on Friday ...
[48]
First Republic Bank Lost $102 Billion in Customer Deposits
Apr 24, 2023 · It was founded in 1985 by Jim Herbert, who is still the bank's executive chairman at 78. The company distinguished itself by offering ...<|separator|>
[49]
First Republic clients pulled $102 billion amid banking panic
Apr 24, 2023 · Depositors pulled about $102 billion out of First Republic Bank in the first three months of 2023, a total that spiked as the bank's customers rushed to ...Missing: Q1 | Show results with:Q1
[50]
First Republic Bank saw deposits fall by over $100bn as it scrambles ...
Apr 24, 2023 · Deposits fell to $104.47bn from $176.43bn in the fourth quarter despite the lender getting a $30bn lifeline in combined deposits from US banking ...Missing: Q1 drop
[51]
First Republic Stock Plunges After $100 Billion Bank Run in Q1
Apr 25, 2023 · Deposits plunged from around $176 billion to just over $104 billion in the three months ending March 31, despite the US's biggest banks ...
[52]
Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve ...
Today, 11 banks announced $30 billion in deposits into First Republic Bank. This show of support by a group of large banks is most welcome ...
[53]
Major US banks inject $30 billion to rescue First Republic Bank
Mar 16, 2023 · Large U.S. banks injected $30 billion in deposits into First Republic Bank on Thursday, swooping in to rescue the lender caught up in a ...Missing: infusion | Show results with:infusion
[54]
First Republic customers withdrew more than $100B in Q1
Apr 25, 2023 · First Republic said total deposits were $102.7 billion as of April 21, down 1.7% from March 31, a decline the bank attributed primarily to ...
[55]
Fate of First Republic Hangs in Balance as Shares Plummet Again
Mar 20, 2023 · The most imperiled bank on Wall Street, First Republic, slid closer to the precipice on Monday as its shares fell 47 percent, down nearly 90 percent since its ...
[56]
First Republic shares fall despite unprecedented Wall Street rescue ...
Mar 16, 2023 · First Republic Bank's (FRC.N) shares fell 17% in extended trading on Thursday, despite an unprecedented show of support in the bank.Missing: price plunge
[57]
First Republic Reports First Quarter 2023 Results - Business Wire
Apr 24, 2023 · Total borrowings peaked on March 15, 2023, at $138.1 billion. At that time, the Bank had $34.0 billion of cash on its balance sheet. Total ...
[58]
United States: First Republic Bank Emergency Liquidity Program, 2023
Apr 15, 2025 · First Republic Bank, a California-based institution with $212.6 billion in assets, lost $25 billion in deposits on Friday, March 10, 2023.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[59]
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Columbus ... - FDIC
May 1, 2023 · All depositors of First Republic Bank will become depositors of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, and will have full access to all of ...
[60]
California Financial Regulator Takes Possession of First Republic ...
The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced today that regulators have taken possession of First Republic Bank.
[61]
First Republic Bank fails, taken over by JPMorgan - CNBC
May 1, 2023 · The bank is taking on $173 billion in loans and $30 billion in securities as well. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation agreed to absorb ...
[62]
First Republic Acquired by JPMorgan - CRE Finance Council
May 1, 2023 · Acquisition of the substantial majority of First Republic Bank's assets, including ~$173 billion of loans and ~$30 billion of securities ...<|separator|>
[63]
acquired - SEC.gov
JPMorgan Chase acquires substantial majority of assets and assumes certain liabilities of First Republic Bank · JPMorgan Chase to protect all deposits -- insured ...
[64]
Regulators seize First Republic in 3rd major U.S. bank failure in '23
May 1, 2023 · The FDIC reports the failure will cost its Deposit Insurance Fund approximately $13 billion and also said it's entering into a loss-share ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
[65]
Regulators seize First Republic Bank, sell assets to JPMorgan
May 1, 2023 · Barely a week later, California regulators on Monday seized First Republic and put it into FDIC receivership alongside the sale of its assets, ...Missing: early | Show results with:early<|control11|><|separator|>
[66]
The US Banking Sector since the March 2023 Turmoil in - IMF eLibrary
Mar 5, 2024 · Between March 2022 and September 2023, amid stubbornly high inflation, the Federal Reserve increased the effective federal funds rate by 525 ...<|separator|>
[67]
A timeline of the Fed's '22–'23 rate hikes & what caused them
Apr 12, 2024 · The Fed hiked interest rates a total of 11 times starting in March 2022, making borrowing more expensive for banks, businesses, and people in an ...
[68]
How Fed Rate Hikes Impact Your Bond Portfolio's Performance
Discover how Fed rate hikes affect bond prices, yields, and portfolio duration. Learn strategies to mitigate risks and maximize your investment performance.
[69]
https://pilotglossary.com/blog/first-republic-bank-crisis-explained
[70]
First Republic shares dive on contagion fear, dragging U.S. regional ...
Mar 13, 2023 · Bank of America slashed its price target on the stock to $90 from $140. The banking rout, which follows several Fed interest rate hikes over ...
[71]
[PDF] Contagion Effects of the Silicon Valley Bank Run
Amidst mounting concerns, SVB experienced a steady decline in deposits over the four quarters leading up to its eventual failure. The pace of withdrawals.
[72]
What did the Fed do after Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank ...
The Hutchins Center explains how the Federal Reserve has responded to the March 2023 failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.<|separator|>
[73]
Fed data shows failed bank First Republic was key central ... - Reuters
May 4, 2023 · The Fed reported that discount window borrowing fell to $5.3 billion on Wednesday from $73.9 billion the week before, while the BTFP saw loans ...
[74]
[PDF] Rushing to Judgment and the Banking Crisis of 2023;
Mar 1, 2025 · March 10, 2023. First Republic experiences $25 billion of deposit withdrawals, 14% of its deposits. March 12, 2023. The FDIC (with the ...
[75]
The Failure of Dodd-Frank - The American Prospect
Sep 19, 2023 · The core problem was that bank regulators, overly influenced by industry, failed to use the tools that Dodd-Frank gave them.
[76]
JPMorgan Chase acquires substantial majority of assets and ...
Acquisition of the substantial majority of First Republic Bank's assets, including approximately $173 billion of loans and approximately $30 billion of ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
[77]
JPMorgan To Pay FDIC $10.6 Billion For First Republic, This is What ...
May 1, 2023 · JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) will pay $10.6 billion to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to buy First Republic Bank (FRC)—after ...Missing: premium | Show results with:premium
[78]
JPMorgan's deal for collapsed First Republic explained - Reuters
May 1, 2023 · JPMorgan Chase & Co will buy most of First Republic Bank's ... * JPMorgan Chase will pay $10.6 billion to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC).Missing: premium | Show results with:premium
[79]
Regulators close First Republic Bank, JPMorgan named as the ...
May 1, 2023 · Regulators close First Republic Bank, JPMorgan named as the buyer of $330B assets and deposits, FDIC on the hook for $13B. Ingrid Lunden. 1:18 ...
[80]
JPMorgan takes over First Republic - LinkedIn
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will share losses with JPMorgan on its ... It's estimated that FDIC will take a hit of $13B in the long run.
[81]
Insight: How JPMorgan's Dimon won the First Republic deal | Reuters
May 2, 2023 · The bank was bought by Merrill Lynch in 2007 right before the financial crisis. It became public again in 2010, after Merrill Lynch itself ...
[82]
A Tangled Mess of Tech: JPMorgan's Tall Task to Integrate First ...
Aug 31, 2023 · Meanwhile, the bank also faces a more classic challenge of merger integration: First Republic is trying to keep key bankers—and thus its high- ...
[83]
JPMorgan's First Republic backlash - LinkedIn
Many former First Republic clients who were recently transitioned into JPMorgan Chase accounts are underwhelmed by their new bank.Missing: process | Show results with:process
[84]
JPMorgan's Lake Says First Republic Integration Is Mostly ... - Sahm
Oct 12, 2024 · JPMorgan's Lake Says First Republic Integration Is Mostly Over, Says Bank Retained 90% Of First Republic's Banking Clients.
[85]
JPMorgan Chase sheds 335 staff as integration winds down
Nov 25, 2024 · Redundancies are scheduled to begin on January 10, 2025, marking the conclusion of 18-month contracts offered to many employees after the ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
[86]
JPMorgan aims to amass 15% of US consumer deposits, boost ...
Jul 11, 2024 · JPMorgan acquired failed lender First Republic last year, adding $92 billion in deposits. The purchase was made after a series of bank ...
[87]
JPMorgan Retained 75% of First Republic's Brokers, Clients: Exec
Dec 11, 2024 · JPMorgan Chase has retained around 75% of advisors and clients from its May 2023 acquisition of First Republic Bank's wealth management division.Missing: process | Show results with:process
[88]
JPMorgan borrows from First Republic playbook to add affluent clients
May 20, 2024 · Core deposits, which rose 20% following the acquisition, are now steady, and JPMorgan was able to retain about 85% of First Republic's client ...
[89]
JPMorgan Chase & Co. Earnings Release - Second Quarter 2024 ...
Jul 12, 2024 · Lending revenue was $1.9 billion, up 11%, predominantly driven by the impact of the First Republic acquisition, lower losses on hedges of the ...
[90]
JPMorganChase Accelerates Affluent Offering by Opening 14 New ...
May 27, 2025 · The new Financial Centers are primarily former First Republic locations that were acquired in May 2023. They include some of the most ...Missing: conversions | Show results with:conversions
[91]
JPMorganChase Accelerates Rollout of Branches for Affluent
May 27, 2025 · The bank plans to continue adding JP Morgan Financial Centers and to have 31 in operation by the end of 2026, according to the release.Missing: process | Show results with:process
[92]
JPMorgan Chase (JPM) earnings Q1 2024 - CNBC
Apr 12, 2024 · The bank said first-quarter profit rose 6% to $13.42 billion, or $4.44 per share, from a year earlier, boosted by its takeover of First Republic ...
[93]
[PDF] Resolute Annual Report 2024 - JPMorgan Chase
Apr 7, 2025 · (d) Total net revenue included a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares, and total noninterest expense included a $1.0 billion.
[94]
[PDF] Material Loss Review of Republic First Bank - FDIC OIG Homepage
Nov 12, 2024 · These were three of the four largest bank failures in U.S. history ... This mainly occurred because the cause of Republic Bank's failure– ...Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
[95]
What to do About Uninsured Deposits? - Bank Policy Institute
Oct 5, 2023 · [8] Its call reports indicate that First Republic's uninsured deposits declined by more than 50 percent in the first quarter. The decline would ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
[96]
[PDF] Report on the 2023 banking turmoil
The next day, SVB experienced a bank run as withdrawals of uninsured deposits rapidly accelerated. These deposit outflows reflected fundamental concerns about ...
[97]
Remarks By Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions Graham ...
Jul 25, 2023 · In May, First Republic Bank was closed by regulators and sold. As ... uninsured deposits in the standardized liquidity rules and in a bank's ILST.Missing: collapse | Show results with:collapse<|separator|>
[98]
[PDF] Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) - AFME
Heightened regulatory scrutiny and more frequent stress testing are measures that regulators use to ensure banks effectively manage interest rate risk, and ...