Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Commercial bank

A commercial bank is a for-profit depository institution that accepts demand and time deposits from individuals and businesses, extends credit through loans and other instruments, processes payments via checks and electronic transfers, and offers ancillary financial services such as foreign exchange and safe deposit boxes.^[1]^[2] Unlike investment banks, which focus on capital markets activities like securities underwriting and mergers advisory for large corporations, commercial banks primarily serve retail customers and smaller enterprises by channeling savings into productive investments, thereby allocating capital across the economy.^[3]^[4] Under a fractional reserve banking framework, these institutions maintain reserves against only a portion of deposits—historically mandated by regulators like the Federal Reserve—while lending the balance to generate interest income, a mechanism that amplifies the money supply through the multiplier effect but exposes the system to liquidity risks during economic stress.^[5]^[6] Commercial banks form the core of the payment system, handling trillions in daily transactions and enabling commerce, while their lending decisions influence business expansion and consumer spending; globally, they generated over $2 trillion in revenue from such operations in 2021.^[2]^[7] Subject to federal and state oversight—including capital adequacy standards, deposit insurance via the FDIC, and anti-money laundering rules—these entities have evolved since the late 18th century in the United States, with the Bank of North America established in 1782 as the first chartered commercial bank, though periodic panics have prompted reforms like the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 to curb speculative excesses.^[8]^[9]^[10]

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition and Principles

A commercial bank is a profit-oriented financial institution that accepts deposits from individuals and businesses, maintains accounts such as checking and savings, and extends credit primarily in the form of loans to support personal, commercial, and industrial activities.^[11] These institutions operate within a regulated framework to ensure stability, distinguishing them from non-depository entities like investment firms, and they play a central role in channeling savings into productive investments, thereby contributing to capital allocation in the economy.^[12] As of 2023, commercial banks in the United States held approximately $18.2 trillion in assets, underscoring their scale in facilitating everyday transactions and long-term financing.^[13] At their core, commercial banks function under the fractional reserve banking principle, requiring them to hold only a fraction of depositors' funds—typically dictated by reserve ratios set by central banks, such as the 0% requirement in the U.S. since March 2020—as liquid reserves while lending the remainder to generate interest income.^[14] This system enables maturity transformation, converting short-term, on-demand deposits into longer-term loans, which expands the money supply through the credit creation process; for instance, a single $100 deposit can theoretically support up to $1,000 in loans under a 10% reserve ratio via successive lending and redepositing.^[14] However, this leverage amplifies both economic growth—evidenced by banks' role in originating over 70% of non-financial credit in advanced economies—and vulnerability to liquidity crises if withdrawals exceed reserves.^[15] Profitability drives commercial banking operations, with revenue derived mainly from the spread between deposit costs and loan yields, alongside fees for services like payment processing; in 2022, net interest income accounted for about 60% of U.S. commercial banks' earnings.^[12] Risk management principles, including credit evaluation and diversification, are essential to mitigate defaults, which averaged 1.5% of loan portfolios in stable periods for major U.S. banks.^[16] Regulatory oversight enforces these principles through capital adequacy rules, such as those under Basel III, mandating banks to maintain a minimum common equity tier 1 ratio of 4.5% plus buffers to absorb losses and prevent moral hazard.^[17]

Distinctions from Other Financial Institutions

Commercial banks differ from central banks primarily in their operational mandate and customer base. Central banks, such as the Federal Reserve in the United States, function as monetary authorities responsible for implementing national monetary policy, regulating the money supply, and serving as lenders of last resort to the banking system, without accepting deposits from or providing retail services to the general public.^[18] In contrast, commercial banks operate as profit-driven intermediaries that accept deposits from individuals and businesses, offer checking and savings accounts, and extend loans for commercial and consumer purposes, thereby facilitating everyday economic transactions.^[11] Unlike investment banks, which specialize in capital market activities such as underwriting securities issuances, facilitating mergers and acquisitions, and providing advisory services to corporations and governments, commercial banks emphasize deposit mobilization and credit extension to a broad clientele including small businesses and households.^[3] Investment banks typically do not hold insured deposits or engage in routine payment processing for retail customers, focusing instead on fee-based transactions in wholesale markets.^[3] This separation, reinforced by regulations like the U.S. Glass-Steagall Act (1933–1999) and subsequent reforms, limits commercial banks' involvement in high-risk securities activities to maintain stability in deposit-funded operations.^[19] Commercial banks also diverge from thrift institutions, such as savings banks and savings and loan associations, which prioritize long-term savings deposits and residential mortgage lending over diversified commercial loans and transaction accounts.^[20] Thrifts historically channeled funds into housing finance, often under specialized charters with stricter asset restrictions, whereas commercial banks maintain broader portfolios including business loans and short-term credit.^[20] Similarly, credit unions operate as member-owned cooperatives offering comparable deposit and loan services but without profit motives, typically serving specific occupational or community groups with lower fees and dividends distributed to members rather than shareholders.^[21] In distinction from shadow banking entities—non-bank financial intermediaries like hedge funds, money market funds, and finance companies—commercial banks benefit from explicit government-backed deposit insurance (e.g., FDIC coverage up to $250,000 per depositor in the U.S.) and access to central bank liquidity, enabling them to perform maturity and liquidity transformation with public confidence.^[22] Shadow banks, lacking such safeguards, fund longer-term assets through short-term wholesale borrowing without traditional deposits, exposing them to greater run risks and regulatory arbitrage, as evidenced during the 2007–2008 financial crisis when shadow banking vulnerabilities amplified systemic stress.^[23] Commercial banks' regulated status imposes capital requirements and prudential oversight absent in shadow banking, prioritizing stability over the higher yields often pursued by unregulated intermediaries.^[24]

Historical Development

Origins in Medieval and Early Modern Europe

The precursors to modern commercial banking arose during the Crusades in the 12th century, when the Knights Templar established a network of preceptories across Europe and the Levant to safeguard pilgrims' funds and valuables. These warrior-monks issued receipts for deposits, enabling secure transfers of funds between distant locations via letters of credit, effectively functioning as an early international banking system that minimized the risks of carrying cash on perilous journeys.^[25] By the 1240s, the Templars extended services to include loans and estate management, amassing significant wealth through fees and interest, though their operations ceased after the order's dissolution in 1312. In the 12th and 13th centuries, merchant banking formalized in Italian city-states such as Florence, Genoa, Lucca, Venice, and Rome, where trade expansion necessitated credit and exchange mechanisms. Lombard merchants from northern Italy introduced the "banco"—a bench for moneychanging and lending—that lent its name to banking, handling bills of exchange to finance commerce without physical coin transport.^[26] These operations evolved into deposit-taking and loan-making for merchants, with families pooling capital for ventures; by the 1290s, firms like the Bardi and Peruzzi in Florence had branches across Europe, extending loans to popes and kings, though vulnerabilities to sovereign defaults were evident, as seen in the Bardi's collapse amid Edward III's unpaid debts in the 1340s.^[27] The Medici Bank, established in Florence in 1397, exemplified advancements in commercial banking through its branch network spanning Europe, use of double-entry bookkeeping formalized by Luca Pacioli in 1494, and diversification into trade finance and currency exchange.^[28] These private merchant banks prioritized short-term commercial lending over long-term investment, distinguishing them from usurers or pawnbrokers, and laid groundwork for fractional reserve practices by lending out deposited funds.^[29] In early modern Europe, public deposit banks emerged to regulate chaotic coinage and support mercantile trade, marking a shift toward institutionalized commercial banking. The Banco di Rialto in Venice, opened in 1587 under state oversight, accepted public deposits and facilitated giro transfers among merchants, imposing monopoly conditions to ensure stability.^[30] The Bank of Amsterdam, founded on January 31, 1609, by municipal decree, further innovated by assaying deposits into standardized "bank money" accounts, enabling reliable exchange rates and book-entry transfers that reduced fraud in international trade; it operated without direct coin convertibility for accounts, prefiguring modern deposit banking until liquidity strains in the 18th century.^[31] These institutions, backed by civic authority, catered to commercial needs like deposit safety and payment settlement, fostering economic growth amid expanding Atlantic and Asian trade.^[32]

Expansion During the Industrial Revolution

The demands of industrial entrepreneurs for capital to fund machinery, factories, and expanding trade networks drove the proliferation of commercial banking in Britain during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Prior to 1750, banking was dominated by London private partnerships offering short-term credit primarily to merchants and government; however, the acceleration of manufacturing and commerce necessitated localized financial services, leading to the emergence of provincial "country banks" that accepted deposits and issued notes for regional transactions. These institutions, often partnerships limited to six partners under the Bubble Act of 1720, grew rapidly to meet the liquidity needs of industrializing districts, with their numbers roughly doubling between 1775 and 1800 as private banks in London expanded to around 70 by 1800.^[33]^[33] Country banks played a pivotal role in supporting early industrialization by providing short-term loans to firms, facilitating payments, and enabling risk-sharing, though they focused on commercial rather than long-term industrial finance due to legal constraints on note issuance and capital structure. Empirical evidence links their density to heightened innovation, as districts with more banks between 1750 and 1825 exhibited greater patenting activity, suggesting banks eased liquidity constraints for inventors and small manufacturers amid rising coal, textile, and iron production. By the early 19th century, approximately 300 such banks operated across England and Wales, often insecure due to unlimited liability and frequent failures, yet they underpinned the credit multiplier effects that amplified trade credit in industrial hubs like Manchester and Birmingham.^[34]^[35]^[36] Legislative reforms catalyzed further expansion by permitting joint-stock banking, which allowed larger capital pools and branching networks suited to financing railroads and canals from the 1820s onward. The Banking Act of 1826 legalized joint-stock companies beyond a 65-mile radius from London, followed by the Act of 1833 extending this nationwide with limited liability provisions in 1858, resulting in over 140 new joint-stock banks by 1844 that dominated provincial lending. This shift enabled commercial banks to scale operations, with branch networks reducing risks from localized shocks and supporting the integration of national markets, though critics like Alexander Gerschenkron argued British banks lagged continental models in directing long-term investment to heavy industry.^[33]^[37]^[34] As the Industrial Revolution diffused to continental Europe and the United States post-1830, similar commercial banking expansions occurred, often adapting British models to local needs; for instance, in the U.S., state-chartered banks surged to over 700 by 1837 to finance canals and early railroads, while Prussian joint-stock banks like the Disconto-Gesellschaft (founded 1851) mobilized savings for steel and machinery. In Britain, however, the established country and joint-stock banks continued to prioritize bill discounting and deposits over equity finance, reflecting a causal reliance on retained earnings and merchant networks that sustained growth without the investment banking emphasis seen elsewhere. This pattern underscores how commercial banks' expansion was instrumental yet supplementary to self-financed entrepreneurship in Britain's precocious industrialization.^[38]^[36]^[34]

20th Century Growth and Transformations

The early 20th century saw rapid expansion in the number of commercial banks, particularly in the United States, where the count rose from approximately 12,427 in 1900 to a peak of over 30,000 by 1921, driven by economic growth, agricultural demand for credit, and unit banking laws that restricted interstate branching.^[39]^[40] This proliferation supported industrial financing and local lending but exposed the system to vulnerabilities, as evidenced by recurring panics, including the 1907 crisis that prompted the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913 to provide a central lender of last resort and stabilize currency.^[41] The Great Depression triggered massive bank failures—over 9,000 U.S. banks collapsed between 1930 and 1933, eroding public confidence and contracting credit availability—which led to foundational regulatory transformations.^[42] The Banking Act of 1933, known as Glass-Steagall, separated commercial banking from investment banking to mitigate conflicts of interest and speculative risks funded by deposits, while establishing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to insure deposits up to $2,500 initially, reducing runs on solvent institutions.^[43] These measures stabilized the sector, with surviving banks focusing on core deposit-taking and lending functions amid a shift toward government-backed securities and reduced risk appetite.^[44] Post-World War II economic expansion fueled commercial banks' growth through suburbanization, automobile loans, and mortgage financing, with U.S. bank assets growing from $167 billion in 1945 to over $1 trillion by 1970, reflecting broader consumer credit demand and interstate branching allowances in some states.^[45] Globally, banks adapted to decolonization and reconstruction, expanding operations in emerging markets, though European systems emphasized universal banking models integrating commercial and investment activities under fewer restrictions.^[46] Deregulation accelerated in the late 20th century amid inflation, competition from non-bank lenders, and technological pressures. The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 phased out interest rate ceilings on deposits, enabling banks to compete for funds and expand services like NOW accounts.^[47] The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 repealed key Glass-Steagall provisions, permitting affiliations between commercial banks, investment banks, and insurance firms, which spurred mergers and the rise of conglomerates like Citigroup, with total U.S. bank assets surpassing $6 trillion by 2000.^[48]^[49] Technological innovations transformed operations, starting with mainframe computers in the 1950s for back-office processing and culminating in automated teller machines (ATMs) deployed widely from the 1970s, which reduced branch dependency and enabled 24-hour access.^[50] Electronic funds transfers and early computerized clearing systems, such as those via the Fedwire network upgraded in the 1980s, enhanced payment efficiency and supported the credit card boom, with U.S. banks issuing over 300 million cards by the 1990s.^[51] These shifts, combined with telecommunications advances, allowed banks to scale globally, though they also introduced new risks like system interdependencies.^[52]

Post-2008 Financial Crisis Evolution

The 2008 financial crisis exposed vulnerabilities in commercial banking, particularly excessive leverage and reliance on short-term funding for long-term assets, prompting a global regulatory overhaul. In the United States, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted on July 21, 2010, imposed enhanced prudential standards on large commercial banks, including annual stress testing and living wills to facilitate orderly resolution of failing institutions. Internationally, the Basel III framework, finalized by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2010 and phased in from 2013, mandated higher minimum capital ratios—raising the common equity tier 1 (CET1) requirement from 2% to 4.5% plus a 2.5% conservation buffer—and introduced liquidity coverage ratios (LCR) to ensure banks hold sufficient high-quality liquid assets for 30-day stress scenarios. These measures aimed to mitigate systemic risk by compelling commercial banks to bolster balance sheets against deposit runs and asset devaluations observed in 2008.^[53]^[54]^[55] Commercial banks adapted by deleveraging and reallocating portfolios toward lower-risk assets, with U.S. institutions increasing CET1 ratios from an average of 5.5% in 2009 to over 12% by 2020, reflecting compliance with Basel III's risk-weighted asset calculations. Lending practices tightened, as evidenced by a post-crisis contraction in credit extension—U.S. commercial and industrial loans declined 10% from 2008 to 2010—due to higher capital charges on riskier exposures and the Volcker Rule's prohibition on proprietary trading, which curtailed income from market-making activities previously supplementing deposit-lending spreads. Smaller commercial banks faced elevated compliance burdens relative to their scale, contributing to industry consolidation; the number of U.S. federally insured commercial banks fell from 7,107 in 2008 to 4,577 by 2023, driven by mergers and failures amid elevated funding costs. Globally, similar trends emerged, with European commercial banks raising liquidity buffers under Basel III, though implementation lagged in some jurisdictions until 2019.^[56]^[57]^[58] By the mid-2010s, commercial banks demonstrated resilience, with U.S. net interest margins stabilizing around 3% and non-performing loan ratios dropping below 1% by 2019, supported by economic recovery and central bank policies like quantitative easing that compressed yields but preserved funding access. However, persistent low interest rates eroded profitability for deposit-heavy models, prompting diversification into fee-based services such as wealth management, though regulatory scrutiny limited high-margin activities. The 2018 Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act rolled back Dodd-Frank requirements for banks with assets under $250 billion, easing capital and liquidity mandates for mid-sized commercial institutions to foster lending without systemic risk. Recent Basel III "Endgame" proposals, advanced in 2023, seek further capital hikes—up to 19% CET1 for the largest U.S. banks—amid debates over their impact on credit availability, with critics arguing they could constrain growth in a high-interest environment. As of 2024, U.S. commercial banks reported quarterly net income of $68.5 billion in Q3, underscoring operational stability but highlighting pressures from deposit competition and unrealized losses on securities portfolios.^[59]^[60]^[61]

Operational Functions

Deposit Acceptance and Management

Commercial banks accept deposits as a core function, providing depositors with secure storage for funds while generating a stable, low-cost funding source for lending activities. Deposits are typically received from individuals, businesses, and other entities through physical branches, electronic transfers, automated teller machines, and digital platforms, with funds credited to accounts upon verification of the depositor's identity and compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. This process relies on the bank's balance sheet, where deposits represent liabilities offset by assets such as loans and reserves.^[11]^[62] Deposits are categorized primarily into demand deposits, which permit immediate withdrawals without notice and include checking accounts used for transactions, and time deposits, which lock funds for a fixed period in exchange for higher interest rates, such as certificates of deposit (CDs) with maturities ranging from months to years. Savings accounts fall between these, offering limited withdrawals and modest interest to encourage longer-term holding. As of 2023, U.S. commercial banks held approximately $18 trillion in deposits, with demand deposits comprising about 40% of total liabilities, reflecting their role in facilitating daily payments.^[63]^[64]^[13] Management of deposits involves balancing inflows and outflows to maintain liquidity, often through asset-liability matching and interest rate strategies. Banks monitor deposit betas—the sensitivity of deposit rates to market changes—to adjust pricing competitively, retaining stable "core" deposits from loyal customers while competing for volatile corporate funds amid rising rates, as seen in 2023-2024 when U.S. banks faced outflows exceeding $1 trillion due to higher-yielding alternatives. Liquidity is ensured via high-quality liquid assets and stress testing under frameworks like the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, with funds allocated to meet reserve requirements—currently at 0% federally but managed internally for operational needs—and to mitigate risks from deposit runs.^[65]^[66] Regulatory oversight, primarily through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in the U.S., insures deposits up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank per ownership category, reducing run risks as established by the Banking Act of 1933 and reinforced post-2008. Less-than-well-capitalized banks face restrictions on accepting brokered deposits—funds sourced via intermediaries—to prevent excessive risk-taking, with violations subject to enforcement actions. Internationally, similar schemes like the UK's Financial Services Compensation Scheme cap coverage at £85,000, emphasizing systemic stability over full guarantees to avoid moral hazard.^[67]^[68]^[69]

Lending and Credit Creation

Commercial banks engage in lending by extending credit to borrowers such as individuals, businesses, and governments, primarily in the form of loans, mortgages, and lines of credit, after evaluating the borrower's creditworthiness through assessments of income, collateral, and repayment capacity.^[70] This process allocates capital from savers to productive uses, facilitating economic activities like business expansion and consumer purchases.^[71] In practice, lending decisions are driven by profitable opportunities and borrower demand rather than solely by available deposits, with banks creating new deposits simultaneously with loan issuance.^[71] The core mechanism of credit creation occurs when a commercial bank approves a loan: instead of transferring existing deposits, the bank credits the borrower's account with the loan amount, effectively generating new bank deposits that function as money in the broader economy.^[71] This expands the money supply, as the new deposit can be spent and redeposited elsewhere, potentially amplifying through interbank lending, though the initial act is unilateral creation by the lending bank.^[72] Unlike textbook depictions of banks intermediating pre-existing deposits under strict reserve constraints, empirical operations show banks lend first based on credit assessment, acquiring reserves from the central bank afterward to meet regulatory requirements.^[73] For instance, in the U.S. fractional reserve system, banks maintain reserves against deposits but can expand lending until capital adequacy limits or funding costs bind, with central banks providing liquidity as needed.^[70] The theoretical money multiplier, derived from reserve requirements (e.g., a 10% reserve ratio implying a multiplier of 10), posits iterative deposit expansion from initial reserves, but empirical evidence indicates this channel is weak or inactive in modern economies with ample central bank reserves.^[74] Post-2008 quantitative easing flooded systems with reserves, rendering reserve ratios non-binding for lending; instead, credit creation responds endogenously to loan demand, constrained by bank capital, profitability, and risk appetite.^[71] Studies confirm banks can create deposits "out of nothing" via loans, as verified through controlled experiments tracing loan funds, which do not draw from other banks' deposits but originate anew.^[73] Lending inherently involves credit risk, where defaults lead to non-performing loans eroding bank capital; for example, during the 2008 crisis, U.S. banks wrote off over $200 billion in loan losses by 2010 due to subprime mortgage failures.^[70] To mitigate this, banks employ provisioning, diversification, and stress testing, while regulations like Basel III impose risk-weighted capital ratios (e.g., 8% Tier 1 capital minimum) to ensure solvency against potential losses. Excessive credit creation can fuel asset bubbles, as seen in the pre-2008 housing boom where loose lending standards amplified U.S. mortgage debt from $5 trillion in 1995 to $14 trillion by 2008.^[70] Thus, while credit creation supports growth, its cyclical nature underscores the need for prudent risk management to prevent systemic instability.^[71]

Payment Processing and Settlement

Commercial banks facilitate payment processing by originating, routing, and receiving electronic transactions for customers, including automated clearing house (ACH) transfers, wire payments, and card authorizations, while participating in interbank clearing and settlement to finalize fund transfers. In retail payment systems like ACH, banks submit batched payment files to operators such as the Federal Reserve's FedACH or The Clearing House's Electronic Payments Network (EPN), which validate, sort, and net obligations across participants before settlement.^[75]^[76] The ACH network processed 31.5 billion payments valued at $80.1 trillion in 2023, with commercial banks handling origination for direct deposits, payroll, and vendor payments, thereby enabling efficient low-value, high-volume transfers.^[77] For wholesale and large-value payments, commercial banks utilize real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems to transfer funds irrevocably, minimizing counterparty risk through immediate debiting and crediting of reserve accounts. The Fedwire Funds Service, accessible to depository institutions including commercial banks, recorded 193.3 million transactions totaling $1,087 trillion in value during 2023, supporting interbank settlements, securities trades, and customer wires.^[78] Similarly, the private Clearing House Interbank Payments System (CHIPS) employs multilateral netting to optimize liquidity, settling an average of $1.8 trillion daily in 2023 across participating banks, with finality achieved via Fedwire transfers of net positions.^[79]^[80] Banks maintain correspondent relationships and nostro/vostro accounts for cross-border processing, where SWIFT messages instruct payments settled through chains of intermediary institutions, though this introduces settlement lags and foreign exchange risks addressed by systems like Continuous Linked Settlement (CLS).^[81] Settlement in these systems typically occurs using central bank money to ensure finality and reduce systemic risk, with commercial banks providing liquidity via intraday credit or prefunding to cover obligations.^[82] In deferred net settlement models like ACH, banks' net debit or credit positions are reconciled daily, often requiring collateral pledges to operators for overdraft coverage.^[83] Commercial banks also act as settlement agents for clearinghouses, customizing services such as liquidity provision and collateral management to support trade intermediaries and reduce failed payments through early settlement practices.^[84]^[85] This infrastructure underpins economic transactions by enabling secure, scalable fund movements, though reliance on bank-provided liquidity can amplify credit risks during stress, as evidenced by pre-RTGS vulnerabilities like the 1974 Herstatt Bank failure that prompted modern gross settlement adoption.^[86]

Ancillary Services

Commercial banks provide ancillary services, which encompass fee-based and commission-generating activities distinct from core operations like deposit management, lending, and payment settlement. These services diversify revenue streams, with noninterest income—primarily from fees and commissions—constituting a substantial portion of bank earnings; for instance, by the mid-1980s, such income already represented approximately 25% of operating income for U.S. commercial banks, a share that has since expanded amid competitive pressures and regulatory changes limiting traditional interest margins.^[87] Key examples include service charges on deposits and transactions, insufficient funds fees, and automated teller machine (ATM) usage fees, which together form a significant revenue category, often amplified by deposit account maintenance and overdraft protections.^[88] Fiduciary and trust services represent another core ancillary offering, where banks act as trustees, executors, or custodians for client assets, including safekeeping of securities, real estate holdings in trust, and advisory roles for investment vehicles like mortgage or real estate investment trusts.^[89] National banks, for example, may engage in permissible ancillary activities such as marketing fiduciary products or providing escrow and custodian services without a full trust department, subject to conflict-of-interest safeguards.^[90] These services generate income through management fees and commissions, supporting client wealth preservation while exposing banks to operational risks like self-dealing, which regulators mitigate via strict disclosure requirements.^[89] Investment-related ancillary services include brokerage, underwriting, and advisory functions, such as buying and selling securities on client behalf, providing capital market consultations, and earning commissions from trading or securitization activities.^[91] Commercial banks also offer guarantees, letters of credit, demand drafts, and foreign exchange services, which facilitate trade and risk hedging for a fee, often integrated with merchant processing for credit card reconciliation and payment settlement add-ons.^[92] While these services enhance profitability—evidenced by studies linking higher fee-based output to improved cost efficiency—they introduce non-traditional risks, including market volatility exposure, prompting ongoing regulatory scrutiny to balance innovation with stability.^[93]

Underlying Mechanisms

Fractional Reserve Banking System

Fractional reserve banking is a system under which commercial banks are required to hold only a portion of customer deposits as reserves, typically in cash or central bank deposits, while lending out the remainder to borrowers. This practice allows banks to earn interest income on loans while meeting depositor withdrawal demands based on the empirical observation that not all depositors withdraw funds simultaneously.^[94]^[14] Central banks regulate the minimum reserve ratio to control money supply expansion and liquidity risks; for instance, in the United States, the Federal Reserve maintained a 10% reserve requirement on net transaction deposits above certain thresholds until March 26, 2020, when it was reduced to 0% to enhance lending capacity during economic stress.^[5] With a reserve ratio of r, a bank receiving a new deposit of D can lend out (1 - r)D, which, when redeposited elsewhere, enables further lending in a geometric series, theoretically multiplying the initial deposit by $1/r through the credit multiplier effect.^[95]^[96] For example, under a 10% reserve requirement, a $100 deposit permits $90 in lending, which becomes a new deposit supporting $81 more, and so on, potentially expanding the money supply by $1,000.^[94] This mechanism originated in medieval Europe, where goldsmiths and early bankers issued receipts for stored precious metals but lent out portions upon recognizing that fractional holdings sufficed for typical redemptions, a practice documented as early as the 13th century in Italian banking centers.^[97] In modern systems, it facilitates credit allocation but introduces inherent vulnerabilities, as total claims on banks exceed liquid reserves, heightening the risk of insolvency during coordinated withdrawals known as bank runs.^[98] Historical episodes, such as the U.S. banking panics of 1930–1933, demonstrated how rapid deposit outflows could deplete reserves, leading to failures unless mitigated by lender-of-last-resort interventions or deposit insurance schemes like the FDIC, established in 1933.^[99]^[98] Critics, including some monetary economists, contend that fractional reserves amplify systemic instability by enabling excessive credit expansion without full backing, potentially fueling asset bubbles and moral hazard, though proponents emphasize its role in efficient capital intermediation supported by regulatory oversight.^[73] Empirical data from reserve ratio adjustments, such as the U.S. reductions from 12% in 1992 to 0% in 2020, show correlations with increased lending volumes but also underscore reliance on abundant central bank liquidity to avert runs.^[5]^[100]

Money Creation and the Credit Multiplier

Commercial banks create the majority of money in modern economies through the process of lending, where granting a loan simultaneously generates a new deposit in the borrower's account, expanding the money supply without requiring an equivalent prior inflow of funds.^[71] This occurs under fractional reserve banking, where banks are required to hold only a fraction of deposits as reserves—typically with central banks or as cash—while the rest can support lending activities. For instance, when a bank approves a $100,000 loan, it credits the borrower's deposit account with $100,000, creating broad money (M1 or M2 aggregates) that can be spent into circulation, while the bank records the loan as an asset.^[71] This mechanism is endogenous, driven primarily by demand for credit from creditworthy borrowers rather than by exogenous injections of central bank reserves.^[74] The credit multiplier, also known as the money multiplier, theoretically amplifies an initial deposit or reserve increase into a larger expansion of the money supply through iterative lending across the banking system. In the simplest model, if the reserve requirement ratio (rr) is 10%, the multiplier equals 1/rr = 10, meaning a $1,000 initial deposit could theoretically support up to $10,000 in total deposits after successive rounds of lending and redepositing.^[95] This assumes banks lend out all excess reserves, no cash leakages occur, and the public holds deposits in fixed proportions; the process chains as the loaned funds are spent and redeposited in other banks, each retaining reserves and lending the remainder. However, this exogenous view posits central banks control broad money via reserve adjustments, which empirical evidence contradicts.^[95] In practice, the credit multiplier is unstable and often empirically smaller than theoretical predictions, frequently contracting or even falling below 1 during periods of low loan demand or high risk aversion. U.S. Federal Reserve data from 1959 to 2009 shows the M1 multiplier declining from over 20 to around 1, reflecting banks' loan-led behavior rather than reserve constraints, as central banks supply reserves on demand to prevent settlement failures.^[74] Critiques highlight that banks initiate lending based on profit opportunities, borrower creditworthiness, and capital adequacy rules (e.g., Basel III ratios), with reserves acquired post-facto through interbank markets or central bank facilities; this reverses the textbook causality, rendering the multiplier a descriptive ratio rather than a predictive mechanism.^[101] Post-2008 quantitative easing flooded systems with excess reserves—e.g., U.S. reserves rose from $40 billion in 2007 to over $2.5 trillion by 2014—decoupling reserves from lending and further invalidating the model.^[95] Thus, money creation aligns more with credit demand and regulatory limits than a mechanical multiplier, contributing to boom-bust cycles when unchecked.^[71]

Regulation and Risk Management

Evolution of Regulatory Frameworks

The establishment of modern regulatory frameworks for commercial banks emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, primarily in response to banking instability and the need for a uniform national system. In the United States, the National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864 created a national banking system under the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, imposing capital requirements and restricting real estate loans to curb speculative excesses observed in state-chartered "wildcat" banks.^[102] These acts standardized note issuance backed by U.S. government bonds, reducing currency multiplicity and fraud risks, though they did not fully prevent panics like those in 1873 and 1893.^[42] Globally, similar efforts focused on central banking to provide lender-of-last-resort functions, with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 creating the U.S. central bank to manage elastic currency and supervise member banks, marking a shift toward centralized oversight of commercial deposit and lending activities.^[103] The Great Depression catalyzed stricter separations and protections, fundamentally reshaping commercial banking regulation. The Banking Act of 1933, known as Glass-Steagall, prohibited commercial banks from engaging in investment banking to prevent conflicts of interest and speculative runs that exacerbated the 1930-1933 bank failures, which wiped out over 9,000 institutions.^[102] It also established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), insuring deposits up to $2,500 initially (later raised), which empirically reduced run risks by providing depositor confidence, as evidenced by the absence of insured bank failures during subsequent panics until moral hazard concerns arose.^[42] Internationally, deposit insurance and activity restrictions influenced models like the UK's Banking Act 1979, though enforcement varied, with early frameworks emphasizing capital adequacy over liquidity.^[104] Post-World War II deregulation in the 1970s-1990s reflected economic liberalization and technological changes, loosening constraints on commercial banks amid inflation and competition from non-banks. The U.S. Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 phased out interest rate ceilings (Regulation Q), allowing market-driven deposit rates and expanding Fed oversight to all depository institutions, which increased competition but contributed to thrift failures in the 1980s savings and loan crisis, costing taxpayers $124 billion in bailouts.^[102] The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 repealed key Glass-Steagall provisions, permitting bank holding companies to affiliate with securities firms and insurers, fostering conglomerates but arguably heightening systemic interconnectedness without proportional risk buffers.^[42] Concurrently, the Basel I Accord of 1988, developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, introduced global minimum capital requirements of 8% of risk-weighted assets for internationally active commercial banks, standardizing credit risk measurement to promote stability across borders, though critics noted its crude risk-weighting incentivized regulatory arbitrage, such as shifting assets to lower-weighted categories.^[104] Basel II in 2004 refined this with internal models for risk assessment, emphasizing operational and market risks, but implementation revealed gaps in capturing tail risks during the 2007-2008 crisis.^[54] The 2008 global financial crisis exposed deficiencies in leverage and liquidity oversight, prompting a regulatory pivot toward macroprudential standards. The U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 imposed stress testing, living wills for resolution, and the Volcker Rule limiting proprietary trading by commercial banks to mitigate "too big to fail" risks, while creating the Financial Stability Oversight Council for systemic monitoring; however, empirical analyses indicate it raised compliance costs by billions annually without preventing regional bank stresses like those in 2023.^[105]^[106] Basel III, phased in from 2013, mandated higher Tier 1 capital ratios (4.5% common equity plus buffers totaling up to 10.5%), liquidity coverage ratios (LCR) requiring high-quality liquid assets to cover 30-day outflows, and net stable funding ratios, directly impacting commercial banks by constraining short-term funding reliance and enhancing resilience, as banks globally raised capital from 5.5% pre-crisis averages to over 12% by 2020.^[107] Recent evolutions, including the 2018 U.S. regulatory relief act exempting smaller banks from Dodd-Frank's strictest rules and ongoing Basel III "endgame" proposals for output floors on internal models (set for 2025 implementation), aim to balance stability with credit availability, though debates persist on whether heightened requirements stifle lending amid post-pandemic vulnerabilities.^[108]^[56]

Key Risk Types and Mitigation

Commercial banks are exposed to multiple inherent risks stemming from their intermediation role between depositors and borrowers, with primary categories including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk, as standardized in the Basel Framework by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).^[109] These risks can lead to financial losses, insolvency, or systemic contagion if unmanaged, prompting regulatory mandates for capital buffers, stress testing, and internal controls under Basel III, which requires banks to hold sufficient high-quality liquid assets and maintain liquidity coverage ratios (LCR) above 100% to withstand 30-day stress scenarios.^[109] Mitigation relies on a combination of quantitative measures, such as value-at-risk (VaR) models for market exposures, and qualitative practices like robust governance, though empirical evidence from post-2008 crises shows that over-reliance on models can underestimate tail risks during extreme events.^[110] Credit risk arises from the potential default of borrowers or counterparties on loans and other extensions of credit, representing the largest source of losses for many banks historically; for instance, non-performing loans surged to 5.3% of total loans in U.S. banks during the 2008-2009 recession.^[111] Mitigation strategies include rigorous underwriting using the five Cs of credit (character, capacity, capital, collateral, conditions), portfolio diversification across sectors and geographies to limit concentration, and provisioning loan loss reserves based on expected credit losses under IFRS 9 or CECL standards, which forward-looking models have shown reduce procyclical amplification of downturns by 20-30% in simulations.^[112]^[113] Banks also employ credit derivatives like credit default swaps for hedging, though BIS principles emphasize ongoing monitoring and stress testing to avoid underestimation, as seen in the 2023 regional bank failures where unhedged commercial real estate exposures exacerbated defaults.^[112] Market risk encompasses losses from adverse movements in interest rates, equity prices, foreign exchange, or commodity values affecting trading books or asset-liability mismatches; interest rate risk alone contributed to over $500 billion in unrealized losses on U.S. bank securities portfolios as of March 2023 due to rapid Federal Reserve hikes.^[111]^[114] To mitigate, banks use hedging instruments such as interest rate swaps and futures to offset duration gaps, alongside VaR calculations calibrated to 99% confidence intervals under Basel's standardized or internal models approach, which increased market risk-weighted assets by approximately 75% for global banks in Basel III implementations.^[115] Diversification across asset classes and regular scenario analysis further limit exposure, with empirical studies indicating that dynamic hedging reduces volatility by up to 40% but requires constant rebalancing to counter basis risk.^[116] Liquidity risk materializes when banks cannot meet short-term obligations without incurring significant costs or asset fire sales, often triggered by deposit outflows or funding market freezes, as evidenced by the 2023 Silicon Valley Bank run where uninsured deposits fled amid unrealized bond losses, depleting liquidity in hours.^[117] Management involves maintaining a liquidity cushion of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) per Basel III's LCR and net stable funding ratio (NSFR), mandating coverage of net cash outflows over 30 days under stress at a minimum 100% ratio, which U.S. regulators enforced post-2008 to prevent recurrence of 2007-2008 funding squeezes that amplified subprime losses.^[118] Additional tactics include contingency funding plans, diversified funding sources beyond short-term wholesale markets, and intraday liquidity monitoring, with FDIC data showing compliant banks weathered 2023 stresses better by limiting reliance on volatile uninsured deposits to under 40% of funding.^[65] Operational risk stems from failures in internal processes, people, systems, or external events, including fraud, cyberattacks, or process errors; notable examples include the 1995 Barings Bank collapse from unauthorized trading losses exceeding $1.3 billion and recent cyber incidents like the 2021 Colonial Pipeline hack indirectly straining bank payment systems.^[114]^[119] Mitigation frameworks under Basel III standardize capital charges via the standardized approach or advanced measurement, incorporating business environment factors and loss history, while internal controls like segregation of duties, cybersecurity protocols (e.g., multi-factor authentication and AI-driven anomaly detection), and business continuity planning reduce event frequency—studies indicate robust IT governance cuts operational losses by 25-50%.^[109] Insurance and third-party audits supplement these, though persistent challenges like talent shortages in risk functions underscore the need for ongoing training, as highlighted in 2024 regulatory reviews.^[120]

Critiques of Regulatory Interventions

Critics argue that regulatory interventions in commercial banking, such as capital adequacy requirements under the Basel Accords and post-2008 reforms like the Dodd-Frank Act, often impose disproportionate compliance costs that reduce lending capacity and economic efficiency without proportionally mitigating systemic risks. Empirical analyses indicate that these regulations elevate operational expenses, particularly for smaller institutions, leading to economies of scale favoring larger banks and contributing to industry consolidation. For instance, a study of U.S. community banks found that heightened regulatory burdens post-Dodd-Frank correlated with reduced product offerings and service availability for customers, as smaller banks allocated more resources to compliance rather than credit extension.^[121]^[122] A key critique centers on the procyclical effects of risk-sensitive capital rules, which amplify economic downturns by constraining bank lending when capital buffers erode due to asset value declines. Panel data from nine European countries between 2004 and 2018 demonstrated that Basel II and III requirements significantly reduced loan growth during recessions, as banks deleveraged to meet risk-weighted asset thresholds amid falling collateral values. This dynamic, rooted in the causal link between economic stress and heightened perceived risks, exacerbates credit crunches, as evidenced by moderated lending sensitivity to business cycles under these frameworks.^[123]^[124] Post-crisis regulations like Dodd-Frank have been faulted for stifling credit allocation to small and medium enterprises (SMEs), with compliance costs disproportionately burdening community banks that traditionally serve these borrowers. Research quantifying regulatory impacts estimated that additional rulemaking under Dodd-Frank imposed hiring costs equivalent to 1-2% of assets for banks under $10 billion, diverting funds from lending and prompting mergers to achieve scale efficiencies. Macroeconomic evidence further links tighter bank regulations to reduced loan supply and higher funding costs, with a 10 basis point increase in risk weights associated with measurable contractions in economic activity.^[125]^[126]^[127] Proponents of deregulation contend that such interventions create moral hazards by encouraging shadow banking growth outside regulated perimeters, as overregulated depository institutions cede market share to less scrutinized entities. U.S. House testimony in 2025 highlighted how Dodd-Frank's perimeter expansion led to credit disintermediation, with non-bank lenders filling voids but introducing unmonitored risks. While Basel III introduced countercyclical buffers to offset procyclicality, empirical evaluations suggest limited efficacy in practice, as activation thresholds often lag cycle peaks, failing to fully counteract amplified downturns.^[128]^[129] Overall, these critiques emphasize that regulatory frameworks, while aimed at stability, often prioritize theoretical risk models over empirical outcomes, resulting in higher barriers to entry and reduced capital mobility that hinder growth without eliminating crisis probabilities—as pre-crisis Basel I and II implementations failed to avert the 2008 meltdown.^[130]

Economic Role and Impacts

Facilitation of Capital Allocation and Growth

Commercial banks serve as intermediaries that channel savings from depositors to borrowers, enabling the allocation of capital toward productive investments such as business expansion, infrastructure, and innovation. By pooling small deposits from households and firms, banks create large pools of funds that can be lent out in the form of loans and credit lines, which would otherwise remain idle or fragmented in direct peer-to-peer transactions. This intermediation reduces transaction costs and information asymmetries, as banks specialize in evaluating borrower creditworthiness through due diligence, collateral assessment, and ongoing monitoring, thereby directing capital to projects with the highest expected returns.^[131]^[132] Empirical studies demonstrate that effective banking intermediation enhances economic growth by improving the efficiency of resource allocation. For instance, research across countries shows that sectors with greater dependence on external finance grow faster in economies with developed banking systems, as banks facilitate investment in high-productivity industries. A 2020 analysis found that banks' liquidity creation—transforming illiquid assets into liquid funds for lending—is positively associated with GDP growth, with a one-standard-deviation increase in liquidity creation linked to higher firm-level investment and industry expansion. Similarly, measures of banking development, such as domestic credit to the private sector as a percentage of GDP, exhibit a positive correlation with long-term economic growth rates, with panel data from multiple countries indicating that a 10 percentage point increase in this ratio can boost annual GDP growth by 0.5 to 1 percentage point.^[133]^[134]^[135] This facilitation extends to supporting entrepreneurship and capital deepening, where banks provide working capital loans and term financing that enable firms to scale operations and adopt new technologies. Historical data from post-World War II reconstructions, such as in Europe and Japan, illustrate how expanded commercial banking activity—evidenced by rising loan-to-deposit ratios—coincided with rapid industrialization and GDP per capita increases exceeding 5% annually in the 1950s and 1960s. In contemporary contexts, banks' role in venture debt and SME lending has been credited with sustaining growth in emerging markets, where formal banking penetration correlates with higher rates of firm entry and productivity gains. However, the efficiency of this allocation depends on banks' incentives and regulatory environment, as misaligned credit standards can lead to suboptimal outcomes, though the net effect remains growth-promoting when intermediation functions effectively.^[132]^[136]

Contributions to Financial Stability and Instability

Commercial banks enhance financial stability by serving as intermediaries that match savers with borrowers, providing liquidity through demand deposits and payment systems that support economic transactions on a daily basis. This maturity transformation—accepting short-term deposits and issuing longer-term loans—enables efficient resource allocation and reduces transaction costs compared to direct lending by individuals. Empirical studies indicate that well-capitalized banks with diversified portfolios correlate with lower systemic risk, as measured by Z-scores, which assess distance to default based on profitability, leverage, and volatility.^[137]^[138] Deposit insurance schemes, such as the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) established in 1933, further bolster confidence by protecting small depositors up to $250,000 per account, mitigating the incentive for mass withdrawals during stress.^[139] Despite these stabilizing functions, commercial banks inherently contribute to financial instability through the fractional reserve banking system, where reserves are held against only a portion of deposits—typically 10% or less under pre-2020 U.S. rules—allowing banks to create money via lending but exposing them to liquidity mismatches. This mechanism amplifies economic cycles: during expansions, banks expand credit procyclically, fueling asset bubbles; in contractions, deleveraging exacerbates downturns via fire-sale dynamics. Theoretical models demonstrate that fractional reserves can generate endogenous cycles or chaos, as small shocks propagate through leveraged balance sheets, leading to non-linear instability not present in full-reserve systems.^[140]^[141] Historical evidence underscores this: in the U.S. banking panics of 1930-1933, over 9,000 banks failed due to runs triggered by fractional reserve vulnerabilities and lack of a lender of last resort, contracting the money supply by one-third and deepening the Great Depression.^[142] Leverage in commercial banking further magnifies instability, as seen in the 2007-2009 global financial crisis, where major banks operated at leverage ratios exceeding 30:1, turning subprime mortgage losses—initially estimated at $100-200 billion—into trillions in systemic write-downs through securitization and interconnected exposures.^[143] In this episode, banks' reliance on short-term wholesale funding amplified rollover risks, with institutions like Lehman Brothers collapsing on September 15, 2008, after leverage concealed underlying asset deteriorations. More recently, the March 2023 failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank highlighted ongoing vulnerabilities: SVB, with $209 billion in assets, experienced a $42 billion deposit run in a single day—40% of its total—driven by uninsured deposits over 90% of liabilities, compounded by unrealized losses on long-duration bond holdings amid rising interest rates.^[144] These events, absent robust supervision, eroded market confidence, prompting temporary interventions like the FDIC's systemic risk exception to protect all deposits, yet revealing how concentrated risks in tech lending and duration mismatches can cascade.^[145] Interbank interconnectedness adds another layer of instability, as commercial banks' reliance on each other for funding creates contagion channels; during the 1980s U.S. thrift crisis, over 1,000 institutions failed due to regional real estate exposures and moral hazard from deregulation, costing taxpayers $124 billion in bailouts. While diversification and capital buffers like Basel III accords—requiring 4.5% Tier 1 capital since 2013—aim to counter these effects, empirical critiques note that such measures often lag crises and fail to address inherent procyclicality, with bank failures historically correlating more with rapid asset growth and leverage than external shocks alone.^[139]^[146] Overall, while banks underpin economic function, their structural incentives toward leverage and maturity transformation periodically undermine stability, necessitating vigilant risk management beyond regulatory fiat.

Controversies and Criticisms

Historical Bank Runs and Systemic Failures

The Panic of 1907 originated from the collapse of leveraged speculative investments in the copper market, exacerbated by a failed attempt to corner United Copper shares, which triggered deposit withdrawals from associated trusts and banks amid a broader liquidity contraction.^[147] This led to runs on institutions like the Knickerbocker Trust Company, which suspended operations on October 22, 1907, after losing $8 million in deposits over two days, amplifying contagion through New York City's financial network.^[148] Without a central bank, private interventions by J.P. Morgan provided $25 million in liquidity to stabilize solvent banks, averting total collapse but highlighting the vulnerability of commercial banks to sudden demands for reserves exceeding their fractional holdings.^[148] The event caused a 50% drop in the New York Stock Exchange and contributed to a recession, with non-bank commercial failures rising in subsequent quarters due to credit contraction.^[149] During the Great Depression, systemic bank runs intensified from 1930 to 1933, as depositor panic over asset devaluations—particularly in agriculture and real estate—prompted mass withdrawals without federal deposit insurance, leading to approximately 9,000 commercial bank failures and the loss of $7 billion in deposits.^[150] Bank suspensions totaled 1,350 in 1930 alone, reducing the number of operating U.S. commercial banks to 23,769 by year-end, with failures concentrated in rural areas hit by commodity price collapses and overextended loans.^[151] Fundamentals such as weak balance sheets from prior lending excesses explained most closures, rather than pure panic, though contagion spread via interbank exposures and rumors, contracting the money supply by 30% and deepening deflation.^[152] The absence of a lender of last resort until the Federal Reserve's Reconstruction Finance Corporation in 1932 prolonged the crisis, with over one-third of extant banks failing before the FDIC's inception in 1933.^[153] In the 2008 financial crisis, commercial bank failures surged due to heavy exposure to real estate loans, with the FDIC resolving 25 institutions in 2008 alone and 465 total from 2008 to 2013, marking the highest rate since the Depression era.^[154] Unlike pure liquidity runs, most failures stemmed from insolvency tied to nonperforming mortgages and securitized assets, as evidenced by rapid asset growth and high loan-to-value ratios in the decade prior, rather than aggregate funding strains.^[155] Contagion effects included electronic runs, such as withdrawals via wire transfers, echoing historical patterns but amplified by interconnected derivatives markets, leading to a 20% contraction in bank credit and GDP decline.^[156] Government interventions, including TARP infusions totaling $700 billion, stabilized survivors but underscored persistent risks from maturity mismatches in fractional reserve systems absent robust capital buffers.^[157]

Moral Hazard from Bailouts and Guarantees

Government guarantees, such as deposit insurance and implicit "too-big-to-fail" protections, introduce moral hazard by shielding banks from the full consequences of excessive risk-taking, as losses are partially socialized while gains remain privatized.^[158] In this context, moral hazard manifests when bank managers and shareholders pursue high-risk strategies, knowing that depositors or taxpayers will absorb potential failures rather than the institution bearing the costs directly.^[159] Empirical analyses confirm that such guarantees correlate with increased leverage and asset risk, as banks exploit underpriced insurance to expand portfolios in volatile sectors like real estate or derivatives.^[160] The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), established in 1933, exemplifies this dynamic through its initial flat-premium structure for deposit coverage up to $2,500 (later raised), which failed to calibrate fees to individual bank risk profiles.^[161] This underpricing incentivized thrifts and banks to gamble with insured deposits, as evidenced by econometric studies showing elevated failure rates among high-risk institutions post-insurance adoption.^[159] The 1980s Savings and Loan (S&L) crisis illustrates the scale: deregulation in 1982 allowed S&Ls to invest in speculative commercial real estate and junk bonds, leading to over 1,000 failures by 1995, with taxpayer costs exceeding $124 billion via the Resolution Trust Corporation.^[162] Moral hazard was amplified by regulatory forbearance, where insolvent institutions continued operations, accruing profits for owners while deferring losses.^[161] The "too-big-to-fail" doctrine, articulated during the 1984 bailout of Continental Illinois, further entrenched moral hazard by signaling that systemically important banks would receive extraordinary support, distorting market discipline.^[163] In the 2007-2008 financial crisis, this played out as large institutions like Citigroup and Bank of America engaged in leveraged subprime exposures, anticipating rescues; the U.S. government extended $700 billion via the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and Federal Reserve facilities totaling trillions, rescuing entities deemed critical to avoid contagion.^[164] Cross-country evidence supports this, with banks in jurisdictions offering stronger implicit guarantees exhibiting 20-30% higher risk-weighted assets pre-crisis.^[165] Mitigation attempts, such as risk-based FDIC premiums introduced in 1990 and Dodd-Frank's orderly liquidation authority in 2010, have curbed but not eliminated the incentive distortions, as evidenced by persistent TBTF premiums in bond yields for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).^[166] Studies attribute ongoing vulnerabilities to incomplete credibility of resolution regimes, where market participants still price in bailout probabilities around 50-70% for top-tier banks during stress events.^[167] This persistence underscores how guarantees, while stabilizing short-term liquidity, foster long-term inefficiency by undermining shareholder and creditor oversight.^[168]

Contemporary Issues: CRE Exposure and 2023-2025 Vulnerabilities

Commercial banks, particularly regional and community institutions, maintain significant exposure to commercial real estate (CRE) loans, with CRE comprising a larger share of assets for smaller banks compared to larger ones. As of year-end 2024, regional banks held CRE loans equivalent to over 300% of their Tier 1 capital in many cases, exceeding regulatory thresholds viewed as indicative of heightened risk. This concentration stems from historical lending practices favoring local property development, amplified by low interest rates in the pre-2022 period that encouraged aggressive CRE origination.^[169]^[170]^[171] From 2023 to 2025, CRE vulnerabilities intensified due to structural shifts and macroeconomic pressures. The persistence of remote and hybrid work post-COVID reduced office occupancy rates, leading to elevated vacancies and declining property values, especially in urban markets. Concurrent Federal Reserve interest rate hikes from near-zero levels in early 2022 to over 5% by mid-2023 increased borrowing costs, straining refinancing for the approximately $2 trillion in CRE debt maturing through 2025. Delinquency rates for bank-held CRE loans rose to 1.57% by Q4 2024—the highest in a decade—while commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) delinquencies climbed to 4.7% in February 2024 from 3.1% the prior year, with office loans showing the sharpest increase from 2.4% in February 2023 to 6.6% in February 2024.^[172]^[173]^[174] Regional banks faced disproportionate strain, as CRE loans constituted up to 44% of their portfolios in vulnerable segments, prompting increased loan loss provisions and, in some cases, relaxed underwriting standards to extend distressed loans. FDIC data for Q2 2025 indicated non-owner-occupied CRE past-due and nonaccrual rates at 4.33% for banks over $250 billion in assets, down slightly from peaks but signaling ongoing deterioration. Federal Reserve reports noted slight delinquency upticks in CRE and commercial-industrial loans through H2 2024, with forecasts from rating agencies like Fitch predicting further office sector weakness into 2025 absent occupancy recovery.^[170]^[175]^[176] Despite these pressures, no widespread bank failures attributable solely to CRE materialized by late 2025, though regulators such as the FDIC and Federal Reserve flagged CRE as a key financial stability risk, particularly for institutions with geographic concentrations in office-heavy regions. Midsize banks remained active in CRE lending through 2023-2024, sustaining elevated exposure amid hopes of market stabilization, but causal factors like persistent high rates and subdued demand underscored potential for amplified losses if economic slowdowns occur.^[177]^[178]^[179]

Recent Developments

Technological and Digital Transformations

The acceleration of digital technologies in commercial banking since 2020 has primarily focused on automating core processes like lending, payments, and risk assessment to reduce costs and enhance client responsiveness. Banks have shifted from legacy systems toward cloud-based infrastructures and API integrations, enabling real-time data processing that supports faster transaction approvals and customized financial products for business clients. This transformation was propelled by the need for remote operations during the COVID-19 pandemic, with U.S. commercial banks reporting increased reliance on digital tools for loan origination, though only 28% of executives expressed high satisfaction with these systems as of recent surveys.^[180] Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a cornerstone of these changes, particularly in commercial lending and fraud detection. AI algorithms now analyze vast datasets to automate credit underwriting, reducing processing times from weeks to hours and improving accuracy in assessing borrower risk by incorporating alternative data sources like transaction histories and supply chain metrics. Generative AI is further transforming payment processing, where agentic systems dynamically route transactions and predict cash flow disruptions, potentially cutting operational costs by 20-30% in high-volume commercial environments. Deloitte projects that AI could drive global banking profits to $2 trillion by 2028 through such efficiencies, though commercial banks must address integration challenges with existing infrastructures to realize these gains.^[181]^[182]^[183] Fintech partnerships have complemented internal innovations, allowing commercial banks to embed advanced tools like blockchain for cross-border payments and open banking APIs for seamless data sharing with corporate clients. Adoption of these technologies has risen, with banks leveraging fintech for specialized services such as embedded finance in supply chains, where real-time invoicing and reconciliation minimize working capital needs. However, this reliance introduces dependencies, as evidenced by studies showing that while AI enhances return on assets, uneven implementation can exacerbate vulnerabilities in smaller institutions.^[184]^[185] Cybersecurity remains a critical challenge amid this digital pivot, with legacy systems and expanded attack surfaces amplifying risks from ransomware and phishing targeting commercial accounts. The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) highlighted in 2025 that prolonged use of outdated infrastructure contributes to vulnerabilities, complicating resilience against sophisticated threats like AI-augmented attacks. Banks have responded by investing in multi-factor authentication and AI-driven threat detection, yet incidents rose in 2024, underscoring the need for ongoing regulatory alignment to mitigate systemic exposures without stifling innovation.^[186]^[187]

Adaptation to Post-Pandemic and Geopolitical Shifts

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, commercial banks adapted to elevated inflation and central bank rate hikes by tightening lending standards and benefiting from expanded net interest margins. The U.S. Federal Reserve raised its federal funds rate from near zero in early 2022 to a peak of 5.25-5.50% by mid-2023, enabling banks to charge higher loan rates while deposit costs rose more gradually, boosting profitability for many institutions.^[188] ^[189] However, this environment exposed vulnerabilities in commercial real estate (CRE) portfolios, where delinquency rates climbed to 1.58% by Q1 2025 amid remote work persistence and office vacancies, prompting banks to increase provisions for loan losses and diversify into sectors like industrial logistics.^[190] Geopolitical tensions, particularly Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, compelled banks to enhance sanctions compliance and reduce exposure to high-risk jurisdictions. Western commercial banks curtailed cross-border lending to countries facing elevated geopolitical risks, with U.S. supervisory data showing a measurable decline in such activities, while maintaining operations through local affiliates to mitigate direct losses.^[191] ^[192] The ensuing sanctions regime, involving over 6,400 U.S. measures by 2025 and SWIFT exclusions for select Russian banks, disrupted international payment flows and increased compliance costs, leading institutions to bolster anti-money laundering systems and conduct enhanced due diligence on clients with ties to sanctioned entities.^[193] ^[194] Amid broader supply chain disruptions from geopolitical fragmentation, including U.S.-China trade frictions and energy market volatility, banks facilitated client diversification by providing financing for supplier relocation and inventory buildup. For instance, U.S. commercial banks acted as information brokers, enabling firms to reroute supply chains away from vulnerable regions, which helped stabilize lending volumes in manufacturing sectors despite initial shocks.^[195] Institutions also developed contingency frameworks, such as stress testing for tariff escalations and regional conflicts, to support corporate clients in building resilience against ongoing risks like those in the Middle East, where oil price spikes in 2024-2025 tested energy-related exposures.^[196] ^[197] These adaptations underscored a shift toward portfolio derisking, prioritizing domestic and allied-market lending to counter systemic threats from global instability.

References

[1]
Commercial Banks - Office of Financial Regulation
Commercial Banks: a corporation that accepts deposits, makes loans, pays checks, and performs related services for the public.
[2]
Commercial Bank - Corporate Finance Institute
Functions of a commercial bank include deposit acceptance, credit creation, treasury and payments, and other agency and advisory services. Business banks and ...What is a Commercial Bank? · Functions of Commercial Bank · Credit creation<|separator|>
[3]
Investment Banking vs. Commercial Banking: What's the Difference?
Investment banks differ in that they cater to different clientele. For example, commercial banks serve consumers and some small businesses, while investment ...Overview · Investment Banks · Key Differences
[4]
Types of Banks: Commercial vs. Investment | Britannica Money
Oct 17, 2025 · In the United States, commercial banks collect deposits and issue loans, while investment banks facilitate capital formation and other financial ...
[5]
Reserve Requirements - Federal Reserve Board
The Federal Reserve Act authorizes the Board to impose reserve requirements on transaction accounts, nonpersonal time deposits, and Eurocurrency liabilities.
[6]
[PDF] Reserve Requirements: History, Current Practice, and Potential ...
Laws requiring banks and other depository institu- tions to hold a certain fraction of their deposits in reserve, in very safe, secure assets, have been a ...
[7]
Chapter 9.3: The Role of Commercial Banks
Banks are a critical intermediary in what we call the payment system, which helps an economy exchange goods and services for money or other financial assets.
[8]
Supervision & Regulation - Federal Reserve Board
This includes issuing specific regulations and guidelines governing the formation, operations, activities, and acquisitions of financial institutions. The ...
[9]
1782-1799: A History of America's Banks and The ABA
1782: The First American Bank Congress charters the Bank of North America—the first financial institution chartered by the United States and the first real ...
[10]
Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall) - Federal Reserve History
The Glass-Steagall Act effectively separated commercial banking from investment banking and created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[11]
How Do Commercial Banks Work, and Why Do They Matter?
A commercial bank is a financial institution that accepts deposits, offers checking and savings account services, and makes loans.Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
[12]
The Role of Commercial Banks in the Economy - Investopedia
Commercial banks provide a range of financial services to individuals and businesses so they can carry out simple financial tasks.
[13]
Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States - H.8
Small domestically chartered commercial banks are defined as all domestically chartered commercial banks not included in the top 25. The data for large and ...
[14]
Understanding Fractional Reserve Banking: How It Fuels Economic ...
Fractional reserve banking lets banks use deposits that would otherwise sit idle, earning returns through loans while supporting economic growth. In contrast, ...
[15]
[PDF] Role Of Commercial Banks In Economic Growth And Development
Dec 19, 2022 · Further studies can be done to empirically establish the role of commercial banks in economic growth and development based on country level data ...
[16]
[PDF] Commercial and Industrial Loans Core - FDIC
This reference is intended to give examiners an overview of the basic policy and portfolio considerations necessary to evaluate a bank's commercial and ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
[17]
[PDF] assessment of compliance - basel core principles - Treasury
Nov 13, 1979 · The following introduction to the U.S. self-assessment of compliance with the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision (BCPs) ...
[18]
8 Major Types of Financial Institutions and Banks - Bill.com
A central bank is not a traditional bank: It's an institution that governs the operations of all commercial banks and credit unions within its purview. The ...What is a bank? · The major types of financial... · The major types of banks
[19]
Commercial Banking vs. Investment Banking | American Express
Commercial and investment banks are two different types of financial institutions that provide essential services for businesses.Missing: regulatory definition
[20]
Differences between Banks, Credit Unions and Savings Institutions
Banks emphasize business and consumer accounts, and many provide trust services · Credit unions emphasize consumer deposit and loan services · Savings ...
[21]
8 Common Types of Banks - SmartAsset.com
Apr 9, 2025 · The difference is that banks are for-profit companies while credit unions are not. Credit unions fall under the direction of their own members, ...
[22]
Commercial Banks Help - FDIC
1970 - The definition of Commercial banks is revised to include: national banks; incorporated state chartered banks; trust companies; bank and trust ...
[23]
Traditional Versus Shadow Banking | St. Louis Fed
Feb 1, 2012 · In contrast to traditional banking, however, in shadow banking loans are not funded or serviced by deposits.
[24]
What Is Shadow Banking? - Back to Basics
Shadow banks do something similar. They raise (that is, mostly borrow) short-term funds in the money markets and use those funds to buy assets with longer-term ...
[25]
The warrior monks who invented banking - BBC News
Jan 30, 2017 · As William Goetzmann describes in his book Money Changes Everything, they provided a range of recognisably modern financial services.
[26]
Medieval Banking- Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries | OSU eHistory
Florence, Genoa, Lucca, Venice, and Rome were some of the city-states that gave birth to these banking activities.
[27]
The Financiers of Medieval Florence - The Tontine Coffee-House
Aug 17, 2020 · Another of the early 14th century Florentine financial firms was that of the Bardi, a prominent commercial family not unlike the Peruzzi. The ...Peruzzi · Bardi · Collective Collapse
[28]
How the Medici Family innovated banking systems to better manage ...
Sep 2, 2024 · The Medici family had a long and influential history in banking. They began as humble money lenders in the early 14th century, but soon ...Heads Of The Medici Bank · What Are Banking Systems? · Why Are Banking Systems...
[29]
Financial institutions (article) - Khan Academy
Banking originated in medieval Italy but was based on mathematical knowledge acquired from wide-reaching trade interactions.
[30]
Public Banking in Early Modern Europe | Erasmus Forum
When the Banco di Rialto of Venice began operations in 1587, it was technically a private bank operating under public supervision, conditions of monopoly, and ...
[31]
The Bank of Amsterdam - Beursgeschiedenis.nl
The Bank of Amsterdam (the Amsterdamse Wisselbank), established on January 31, 1609, played a pivotal role in the 17th and 18th-century financial center of ...
[32]
The Bank of Amsterdam and the limits of fiat money
Jan 19, 2023 · We draw on the failure of the Bank of Amsterdam (1609–1820), a public deposit bank and an early precursor to modern central banks, to shed light ...
[33]
The Development of Banking in the Industrial Revolution - ThoughtCo
Apr 30, 2025 · Banking developed during the Industrial Revolution as the demands of entrepreneurs led to a vast expansion of the financial system.Banking Before 1750 · The Role of Entrepreneurs in... · Sources of Finance
[34]
[PDF] Banking and Innovation: Evidence from the Industrial Revolution
Gerschenkron (1962) argued that English banks did not contribute to British industrialization because they were only providing short-term credit.
[35]
Banks and patents during the British Industrial Revolution
Sep 12, 2023 · I study how the development of country banks supported increases in patenting in England between 1750 and 1825.
[36]
Financial institutions and the British Industrial Revolution
Jan 22, 2021 · This scoping paper addresses the role of financial institutions in empowering the British Industrial Revolution.
[37]
BANKING INDUSTRY DURING THE FIRST INDUSTRIAL ... - LinkedIn
Nov 24, 2021 · Thereafter the growth of this form of banking was extremely rapid; by 1844 more than 140 new joint-stock banks had been created which, with ...
[38]
[PDF] National Banking's Role in U.S. Industrialization, 1850-1900
The passage of the National Banking Acts stabilized the existing financial system and encouraged the entry of 729 banks between 1863 and 1866. The national ...
[39]
1900-1919 | FDIC.gov
May 15, 2025 · There are 12,427 commercial banks operating in the United States. Chart of the Number of Commercial Banks operating in the US in 1900. 1907.
[40]
1920–1929 | FDIC.gov
May 15, 2025 · There are 30,291 commercial banks operating in the United States. Chart of the Number of Commercial Banks operating in the US in 1920. 1921.
[41]
[PDF] Moments in History: The Evolution of Bank Chartering - OCC.gov
Dec 7, 2020 · Hamilton's vision was for the federal government to charter a single national bank, with branches throughout the country, to help place ...
[42]
A Brief History of U.S. Banking Regulation - Investopedia
The heavily regulated commercial banks were losing increasing market share to less-regulated and more innovative institutions. This led to a wave of ...The Rise of Free Banking · 1980s Banking Deregulation
[43]
Glass-Steagall Act - History.com
Mar 15, 2018 · The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited bankers from using depositors' money to pursue high-risk investments, but the act was effectively undercut by ...
[44]
[PDF] regulation & deregulation of the us banking industry
This paper summarizes the evolution of these regulations, with a focus on those put into place in the 1930s and later removed in the last part of the 20th ...
[45]
[PDF] Changes in the Number and Size of Banks in the United States ...
The growth and subsequent decline in the number of banks are shown in Table 1 which gives the number of banks and the population per bank in 1S77 &n.& "by five ...
[46]
[PDF] The evolution of financial systems
Germany, Japan, and Britain (where functional special- ization continued to be based on tradition). Universal banking began to spread again after the mid-1960s.Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
[47]
[PDF] A Short History of Financial Deregulation in the United States
The DIDMCA removed interest rate ceilings on deposits, which removed the interest rate advantage that thrifts had held over banks.
[48]
Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (Gramm-Leach-Bliley)
Most notable was Section 20 of the law, which separated commercial and investment banking. The law prohibited bank affiliation with firms that were "engaged ...
[49]
[PDF] The Repeal of Glass-Steagall and the Advent of Broad Banking
GLBA repealed the parts of the. Banking Act of 1933 that separated commercial banking from the securities business, which have come to be known as "Glass ...
[50]
Timeline: 180 years of banking technology - Independent Banker
Nov 1, 2017 · Almost all advances in retail banking within the past century or two owe their existence to a leap forward in technology.
[51]
The Evolution of Banking Technology over 55 Years
From the first magnetic strip on a credit card in 1969 to the use of generative AI for financial advice today, there have been a lot of new innovations and ...
[52]
[PDF] An Historical Appraisal of Information Technology in Commercial ...
The dimensions of technological innovation in commercial banking portray the internal structure of banks as being determined by a combination of changes in ...
[53]
The Great Recession and Its Aftermath - Federal Reserve History
The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 also created new provisions for the treatment of large financial institutions.
[54]
A Brief History of Bank Capital Requirements in the United States
Feb 28, 2020 · Basel III standards were promulgated by the BCBS in December 2010, shortly after the July signing of the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA). In 2013, US ...
[55]
[PDF] The Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III - Asian Development Bank
This paper is an attempt to explain the changes to finance sector reforms under the Dodd-Frank Act in the United States and Basel III requirements globally; ...<|separator|>
[56]
The Evolution of US Bank Capital around the Implementation of ...
Mar 26, 2024 · This Economic Commentary presents the evolution of banks' regulatory capital ratios around the introduction of higher capital requirements.
[57]
[PDF] The Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III on the Fixed Income ...
Feb 24, 2016 · Since changes in market structure and financial regulation could be expected to impact all types of debt, not just high yield debt, this is ...
[58]
How Has the Size Distribution of Banks Evolved Over the Last 30 ...
May 31, 2022 · For example, Basel III increased regulatory capital minimums and buffers, including a capital surcharge for systemically important banks. The ...
[59]
[PDF] Structural changes in banking after the crisis
In response to their new operating landscape, banks have been re-assessing and adjusting their business strategies and models.<|separator|>
[60]
Quarterly Banking Profile - Third Quarter 2024 | FDIC.gov
Dec 12, 2024 · The banking industry continued to show resilience in the third quarter as net interest income increased and asset quality metrics remained generally favorable.Missing: 2008 | Show results with:2008
[61]
How the Basel III “Endgame” Reforms Will Transform US Capital ...
Feb 27, 2023 · The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) finalized revisions to its risk-based capital standards in 2019, commonly referred to as “Basel III Endgame.”
[62]
Commercial Lending and Deposits 101
They create this cache of cash by accepting deposits, meaning that they need clients to open accounts with them and store money with their institution.
[63]
Deposit Explained: Definition, Types, and Examples - Investopedia
There are two primary types of deposits: demand deposits, which allow for immediate withdrawal of funds, and time deposits, which require funds to be held for a ...
[64]
Deposit - Definition, Meaning, Types, and Example
Types of Deposits · 1. Time Deposit · 2. Demand Deposit.
[65]
[PDF] Section 6.1 Liquidity and Funds Management - FDIC
Other considerations include management expertise, the adequacy of institution operations, the location and size of facilities, the nature and degree of bank ...
[66]
The growing importance of bank deposit management - McKinsey
Feb 6, 2025 · Sophisticated deposit management can help banks lower funding costs, improve liquidity, enhance customer loyalty, and boost margins.
[67]
Deposit Insurance FAQs | FDIC.gov
Apr 1, 2024 · Deposits are insured up to at least $250,000 per depositor, per FDIC-insured bank, per ownership category. Deposit insurance is calculated ...
[68]
Brokered Deposits | FDIC.gov
Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act restricts institutions that are less than well capitalized from accepting brokered deposits.
[69]
12 CFR Part 330 -- Deposit Insurance Coverage - eCFR
The purpose of this part is to clarify the rules and define the terms necessary to afford deposit insurance coverage under the Act.
[70]
How Banks Use Loans to Create Liquidity
called “funding liquidity creation” — enables banks to lend out more than what's allowed based on their ...
[71]
Money creation in the modern economy | Bank of England
Mar 14, 2014 · This article explains how the majority of money in the modern economy is created by commercial banks making loans.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
[72]
Banks and the Creation of Money - Economics Help
Apr 30, 2024 · Banks create money by lending, creating a deposit in the borrower's account. This increases the broad money supply, not the narrow money supply ...<|separator|>
[73]
Can banks individually create money out of nothing? — The theories ...
This paper presents the first empirical evidence in the history of banking on the question of whether banks can create money out of nothing.
[74]
[PDF] Money, Reserves, and the Transmission of Monetary Policy
This paper provides institutional and empirical evidence that the money multiplier and the associated narrow bank lending channel are not relevant for ...
[75]
Automated Clearinghouse Services - Federal Reserve Board
As an ACH operator, the Reserve Banks receive files of ACH payments from originating depository financial institutions, edit and sort the payments, deliver the ...
[76]
Growing Volumes on The Clearing House's ACH Network Lead to ...
Mar 12, 2024 · In 2023, EPN processed over 19 billion transactions worth $52.4 trillion. Overall 2023 U.S. ACH network volume increased 4.8%. EPN carried ...Missing: United States
[77]
ACH processing explained: A guide for businesses - Stripe
Jul 23, 2024 · The ACH network handled nearly 31.5 billion payments worth $80.1 trillion in 2023, marking an annual growth of 4.8% in volume and 4.4% in value ...
[78]
Fedwire Funds Service - Annual Statistics
Jan 23, 2025 · Fedwire Funds Service Volume and Value Statistics; Fedwire® Funds Service - Annual Statistics ... 2023, 193,316,782, (1.4), 1,087,195,950, 2.5 ...
[79]
CHIPS Liquidity Algorithm Saves Financial Industry Billions
Apr 2, 2024 · ... CHIPS payments, which in 2023 averaged $1.8 trillion per day, through less liquidity efficient payment channels. By comparing the costs to ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[80]
CHIPS | The Clearing House
The liquidity efficiency of the CHIPS network averages 29:1, meaning that $1 of funding contributed to the network supports $29 in settled payment value. This ...
[81]
[PDF] The role of central bank money in payment systems - August 2003
Systems where settlement involves commercial bank money. This box provides a brief explanation of how settlement takes place in five systems where commercial ...
[82]
The Fed Explained - Payment Systems - Federal Reserve Board
The Reserve Banks also distribute coins and act as a “bank for banks.” In that role, they collect checks deposited by banks, and return unpaid checks to banks ...
[83]
[PDF] Payment Systems | Comptroller's Handbook | OCC.gov
Banks use wholesale and large-value payment systems, such as Fedwire and CHIPS, to transfer funds related to their own operations (e.g., federal funds ...
[84]
Clearing and Settlement Demystified
Settlement banks provide customized commercial banking services to both clearing organizations and the trade intermediaries that are also clearing participants.
[85]
[PDF] Best Practices for Payments, Clearing, and Settlement Activities
The best practices aim to enhance safety and efficiency of financial market infrastructure, focusing on early settlement and reducing failed payments.
[86]
2 Banking and the Payment System in - IMF eLibrary
Commercial banks provide settlement accounts and the liquidity needed to meet their customers' needs in making payments. Interbank settlement occurs through ...
[87]
[PDF] How do banks make money? The fallacies of fee income
fee-based services (say, in the mid-1980s), noninter- est income already represented about $1 out of $4 of operating income generated by commercial banks.
[88]
Trends in the Noninterest Income of Banks
Sep 24, 2019 · A large fraction of banks' revenue comes from noninterest income, which includes items such as overdraft fees and ATM charges.
[89]
12 CFR Part 9 -- Fiduciary Activities of National Banks - eCFR
Examples of ancillary activities include advertising, marketing, and ... services of the bank. (8) Self-dealing and conflicts of interest. A national ...
[90]
[PDF] Activities Permissible for a National Bank, Cumulative ... - OCC.gov
Apr 4, 2012 · The following are examples of these services: − Adviser for Mortgage or Real Estate Investment Trusts. National banks may serve as the advisory ...
[91]
[PDF] Banks' Non-Interest Income and Systemic Risk - Princeton University
activities such as income from trading and securitization, investment banking and advisory fees, brokerage commissions, venture capital, and fiduciary income, ...
[92]
Section 10 - Other Trust Matters | FDIC.gov
Many commercial banks are permitted to provide escrow, safekeeping, custodian, or similar directed-agency services, without having a trust department or ...
[93]
[PDF] Fee-Based Services and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks
The results suggest that banks producing relatively large amounts of fee-based services have been more cost-efficient than their peers over the past decade.
[94]
Fractional Banking - Definition, How it Works, History
Fractional Banking is a banking system that requires banks to hold only a portion of the money deposited with them as reserves. The banks use customer deposits ...Missing: mechanics credible
[95]
Teaching the Linkage Between Banks and the Fed: R.I.P. Money ...
Sep 17, 2021 · For example, if a bank subject to a 10 percent reserve requirement lent an additional $100 of funds, $1,000 (or 100 × 1/divided by0.10) in total ...
[96]
Understanding the Reserve Ratio: Definition, Calculation, and Impact
If a bank had $500 million in deposits, it had to hold $50 million, or 10%, in reserve before the requirement was reduced to 0%.
[97]
Fractional Reserve Banking | Mercatus Center
Jun 28, 2012 · The earliest record of payment by deposit transfer is from Italy around 1200 AD.
[98]
Bank Run - Defined, Causes, Avoid, Recover, History
A bank run may lead to a failure of the institution, requiring regulators and deposit insurers to take over to prevent a cascading effect and a broader systemic ...What is a Bank Run? · Bank Runs in History · Bank Run Mitigation Measures
[99]
Fractional Reserve Banking: Definition, Benefits and Drawbacks
Jul 27, 2022 · In a fractional reserve banking system, banks keep a certain amount of money on hand for safekeeping and then lend the remainder of their ...
[100]
On the instability of fractional reserve banking - ScienceDirect
Fractional reserve banking can endanger stability, leading to cyclic, chaotic, and stochastic dynamics, especially with lower reserve requirements, and can ...
[101]
Zombie Concepts: The Money Multiplier - Joseph Wang
Feb 1, 2021 · The money multiplier theory links base money to broad money, but the author argues it's inaccurate, as banks are not constrained by reserves.
[102]
Chronology of Selected Banking Laws | FDIC.gov
Nov 16, 2021 · Links to historically important laws affecting the banking industry in the United States are listed below, along with short descriptions highlighting major ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[103]
Milestones | About | United States Committee on Banking, Housing ...
1864, National Bank Act created the national banking system. · 1913, Federal Reserve Act established the central bank. · 1927, McFadden Act barred interstate ...
[104]
History of the Basel Committee - Bank for International Settlements
The 1988 Accord called for a minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets of 8% to be implemented by the end of 1992. Ultimately, this framework was ...
[105]
Major Regulations Following the 2008 Financial Crisis - Investopedia
Federal responses following the financial crisis of 2008 include the Dodd-Frank, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and the inception of the CFPB.
[106]
Fifteen Years of Dodd-Frank: A Legacy of Missed Targets and ...
Jul 23, 2025 · The Act was based on a mistaken belief that the 2008 crisis stemmed from unregulated financial markets. It spawned hundreds of separate ...
[107]
Basel III - Overview, History, Key Principles, Impact
Due to the impact of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis on banks, Basel III was introduced to improve the banks' ability to handle shocks from financial stress ...
[108]
Bank Capital Standards - Federal Reserve History
Mar 8, 2024 · Bankers may have become more comfortable with thinner capital positions and riskier business models as a result of some changes in banking ...
[109]
Basel Framework - Bank for International Settlements
The Basel Core Principles provide a comprehensive standard for establishing a sound foundation for the regulation, supervision, governance and risk management ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
[110]
Basel Regulatory Framework - Federal Reserve Board
Basel III is a comprehensive set of reform measures, developed by the BCBS, to strengthen the regulation, supervision, and risk management of the banking sector ...
[111]
Major Risks for Banks - Overview, Regulations, and Examples
Major risks for banks include credit, operational, market, and liquidity risk. Since banks are exposed to a variety of risks, they have well-constructed risk ...Missing: framework | Show results with:framework
[112]
[PDF] 2025 Principles for the management of credit risk
The principles cover: establishing a suitable credit risk environment; sound credit-granting; maintaining credit administration, measurement and monitoring; ...
[113]
Credit Risk - Corporate Finance Institute
Lenders seek to manage credit risk by designing measurement tools to quantify the risk of default, then by employing mitigation strategies to minimize loan loss ...What Is Credit Risk? · Mitigating Credit Risk · The 5 Cs Of Credit
[114]
Operational Risk Management: An Evolving Discipline | FDIC.gov
Jul 10, 2023 · This proposed framework, sometimes referred to as Basel I-A, is designed to modernize the risk-based capital rules and minimize potentially ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
[115]
Basel III endgame: Complete regulatory capital overhaul - PwC
Operational risk standardized approach would increase RWA by $2 trillion · Market risk RWA would rise by approximately 75% across all banks · Credit risk diverges ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
[116]
Market Risk - Overview, Types, and How To Mitigate
Because the risk affects the entire market, it cannot be diversified in order to be mitigated but can be hedged for minimal exposure. As a result, investors may ...
[117]
Understanding Liquidity Risk in Banks and Business, With Examples
Effective liquidity risk management involves ensuring the availability of sufficient cash, liquid assets, and accessible borrowing lines to meet both expected ...Understanding Liquidity Risk · In Companies · How Individuals Can Manage...
[118]
[PDF] Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision
A bank should establish a robust liquidity risk management framework that ensures it maintains sufficient liquidity, including a cushion of unencumbered, high ...
[119]
What Are the Top Operational Risks for Banks? - ZenGRC
Jun 10, 2024 · Bank operational risks include cybersecurity threats, third-party vendor risks, internal and external fraud, and system failures.Operational vs Strategic Risks · Top Operational Risks · Risk Identification and...
[120]
Top 5 operational risks for banks in 2025 - Intuition
Sep 30, 2024 · Top 5 operational risks to watch · 1. Cybersecurity threats · 2. Technological disruptions · 3. Regulatory compliance · 4. Talent management · 5.
[121]
How Are Small Banks Faring under Dodd-Frank? | Mercatus Center
Dodd-Frank has proved burdensome to small banks, and customers are seeing the effects of the increased regulatory burden through reduced product and service ...
[122]
Banking Trends: How Dodd–Frank Affects Small Bank Costs
James DiSalvo and Ryan Johnston examine how Dodd–Frank has affected banks with less than $10 billion in assets.
[123]
Did Basel regulation cause a significant procyclicality? - ScienceDirect
Our findings show that the risk-sensitive requirements of the Basel II and III regulations have procyclical effects on bank lending in nine European countries.
[124]
[PDF] Did Basel regulations cause a significant procyclicality? ?
This paper examines the procyclical effect of risk-sensitive capital regulation on bank lending. We find evidence that the sensitivity of bank lending to ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[125]
Quantifying the Costs of Additional Regulation on Community Banks
May 30, 2013 · We quantify the cost of increased regulation on community banks. We do so by modeling the impact of new regulatory costs as the hiring of additional staff.
[126]
[PDF] The macroeconomic effects of bank regulation: New evidence from a ...
Apr 14, 2025 · Bank regulation reduces economic activity by increasing funding costs and reducing loan supply, and a 10 basis point reduction in bank risk ...
[127]
[PDF] Do Banking Regulations Disproportionately Impact Smaller ... - CSBS
Jul 29, 2025 · This study investigates whether smaller community banks incur a higher regulatory compliance cost burden relative to larger institutions by ...
[128]
Financial Services Committee Examines Impacts of Dodd-Frank 15 ...
Jul 15, 2025 · Overregulation of the banking system has led to disintermediation of credit, pushing more lending outside of regulatory perimeter. Federal ...
[129]
Basel III: Is the cure worse than the disease? - ScienceDirect
We agree with critics of Basel III that there is a real danger that reform will limit the availability of credit and reduce economic activity. But the ...
[130]
[PDF] 171 The Cost of Bank Regulation: A Review of the Evidence
Banks commonly complain that regulatory requirements are costly; regulatory agencies often invoke high regulatory costs as an excuse for leaving matters ...
[131]
Banks: At the Heart of the Matter - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Although banks do many things, their primary role is to take in funds—called deposits—from those with money, pool them, and lend them to those who need funds ...Missing: GDP studies
[132]
[PDF] Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence
This paper reviews, appraises, and critiques theoretical and empirical research on the connections between the operation of the financial system and ...Missing: facilitation | Show results with:facilitation
[133]
Financial markets and the allocation of capital - ScienceDirect.com
Financial markets appear to improve the allocation of capital. Across 65 countries, those with developed financial sectors increase investment more in their ...Missing: facilitation | Show results with:facilitation
[134]
How banks affect investment and growth: New evidence | CEPR
Jul 2, 2020 · In recent work, we provide evidence that banks' liquidity creation is associated with higher economic growth across countries and industries, ...
[135]
The Impact of Banking Sector Development on Economic Growth
First, banking development has a positive impact on growth, in which banking development is measured by criteria such as money supply to GDP ratio, bank credit ...
[136]
[PDF] The contribution of bank intermediation to economic growth
In general, financial development plays an essential role in promoting economic growth by mobilizing savings, allocating resources efficiently, promoting ...
[137]
[PDF] Determinants of financial stability: an empirical study of commercial ...
This study aims to explain the factors that have an effect on financial banking stability measured by Z- score as determinants of all six banks listed in MSM of ...
[138]
(PDF) Determinants of Commercial Banks' Financial Stability
Feb 4, 2024 · This current study aims to estimate the factors that contribute to improving the financial stability of commercial banks that operate in MENA-States
[139]
[PDF] The Banking Crises of the 1980s and Early 1990s - FDIC
The rise in the number of bank failures in the 1980s had no single cause or short list of causes. Rather, it resulted from a concurrence of various forces ...
[140]
[PDF] On the Instability of Fractional Reserve Banking - Heon Lee
Jul 9, 2025 · This paper also provides empirical evidence that is consistent with the prediction of the model. JEL Classification Codes: E42, E51, G21.
[141]
[2305.14503] On the Instability of Fractional Reserve Banking - arXiv
May 23, 2023 · This paper develops a dynamic monetary model to study the (in)stability of the fractional reserve banking system.
[142]
Banking Panics of 1931-33 | Federal Reserve History
Bank panics in 1930 and 1931 were regional in nature, but the financial crisis spread throughout the entire nation starting in the fall of 1931.
[143]
[PDF] Origins of the Crisis - FDIC
The resulting growth in leverage made financial institutions “vulnerable to financial distress or ruin if the value of their investments declined even modestly” ...
[144]
[PDF] svb-review-20230428.pdf - Federal Reserve Board
Apr 28, 2023 · SVB failed due to mismanagement, low regulatory standards, insufficient supervision, and delayed action by supervisors, who did not force SVB ...
[145]
[PDF] Material Loss Review of Silicon Valley Bank
Sep 25, 2023 · SVB failed due to its business model, growth emphasis, long-term investments, failure to heed market risk, and ineffective communications, ...
[146]
What Failing Banks Have in Common: Lessons from 160 Years of ...
Jun 23, 2025 · What Failing Banks Have in Common: Lessons from 160 Years of US Banking History · 1. Rising Losses and Falling Solvency · 2. Increasing reliance ...
[147]
Bank Panic of 1907: Causes, Effects, and Importance - Investopedia
It resulted from the collapse of highly-leveraged speculative investments propagated by easy money policies pursued by the U.S. Treasury in the preceding years.
[148]
The Panic of 1907 | Federal Reserve History
The panic's impact is still felt today because it spurred the monetary reform movement that led to the establishment of the Federal Reserve System. Moen and ...
[149]
Bank failures and the cost of systemic risk: Evidence from 1900 to ...
Our estimates suggest that a bank failure shock has a pronounced effect on non-bank commercial failures for multiple subsequent quarters. We also investigate ...
[150]
The 8 Largest Bank Failures In US History - Bankrate
Jul 25, 2025 · Recent bank failures. During the Great Depression, from 1930 to 1933, approximately 9,000 banks failed, taking with them $7 billion in ...<|separator|>
[151]
1930–1939 | FDIC.gov
May 15, 2025 · During 1930, there are about 1,350 bank suspensions. The number of commercial banks operating in the United States has declined to 23,769.
[152]
[PDF] Failing Banks - MIT Sloan
Aug 29, 2024 · Of these failing banks, 2,904 fail before. 1935 and 2,207 fail after 1959. Figure 1 plots the rate of bank failures over time. The figure.
[153]
[PDF] Depression-Era Bank Failures - Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
In the years immediately before the 1934, when the FDIC began insuring bank deposits, over one- third of all extant banks failed. Many observers argue that ...
[154]
2008 in Brief - Bank Failures | FDIC.gov
There were 25 bank failures in 2008. See detailed descriptions below. For more bank failure information on a specific year, select a date from the drop down ...
[155]
[PDF] Commercial bank failures during the Great Recession: the real ...
The primary driver of commercial bank failures during the Great Recession was exposure to the real estate sector, not aggregate funding strains. The main “ ...
[156]
Understanding the Speed and Size of Bank Runs in Historical ...
May 26, 2023 · In 1988, a Texas bank also known as First Republic failed in what the FDIC called an “electronic run, via ATMs and wire transfers” (FDIC, 1998, ...
[157]
[PDF] The Causes of U.S. Commercial Bank Failures This Time Around
Why have U.S. commercial banks failed during the ongoing financial crisis that began in early 2008 with the failure of Bear Stearns? The seemingly obvious ...
[158]
[PDF] 16 The Moral Hazard Implications of Deposit Insurance - IMF eLibrary
This problem, known as “moral hazard,” has taken on new sig- nificance with the rapid spread of explicit deposit insurance. Most countries are reluctant to ...
[159]
[PDF] 7. Deposit Insurance and Moral Hazard, Risk, and Incentives - FDIC
These studies report evidence that supports that moral hazard—the incentive for managers and shareholders to take advantage of underpriced deposit insurance by ...
[160]
[PDF] Bank Runs and Moral Hazard: A Review of Deposit Insurance
We then discuss economic costs of deposit insurance that result from moral hazard and review the empirical evidence on the impact of deposit insurance on ...
[161]
[PDF] The Savings and Loan Crisis and Its Relationship to Banking - FDIC
Although in a free-market economy competition is normally consid- ered healthy, regulatory forbearance in the thrift industry and moral hazard created market -.
[162]
[PDF] Evidence from the Savings and Loan Crisis
The first is moral hazard, in which as- sistance incentivizes S&Ls to take on excessive risk, as profits from risky loans accrue to S&L owners but losses are ...
[163]
[PDF] Moral Hazard and the Financial Crisis - Cato Institute
Thus, inadequate control of moral hazards often leads to socially excessive risk-taking—and excessive risk-taking is certainly a recurring theme in the current ...
[164]
[PDF] THE MORAL HAZARD PARADOX OF FINANCIAL SAFETY NETS
Moral hazard plays a central role in almost every narrative of the recent financial crisis: the government's implicit guarantees led to ex-.
[165]
[PDF] Bank Bailouts and Moral Hazard? Evidence from Banks' Investment ...
The goal of this paper is to estimate a dynamic model of a bank to explain how bank bailouts exacerbate moral hazard. In the model, a bank makes an endogenous ...
[166]
[PDF] Deposit insurance, moral hazard and market monitoring
Previous empirical evidence concerning the impact of deposit insurance on bank risk taking and the potential for banking sector fragility is mixed. For ...
[167]
Moral Hazard and Government Guarantees in the Banking Industry ‡‡
Feb 2, 2015 · The main insight is that, as any other form of insurance, risk-insensitive and complete deposit insurance worsens banks' incentives to behave ...
[168]
Ending Too-Big-To-Fail - Financial Stability Board
The SIFI Framework aims to address the systemic risks and the associated moral hazard problem for institutions that are seen by markets as too-big-to-fail.
[169]
[PDF] 2025 Risk Review | FDIC
Credit risks varied by loan type in 2024, with greater asset quality deterioration in certain commercial real estate (CRE) and consumer loan portfolios. • ...
[170]
[PDF] Too-Many-to-Ignore: Regional Banks and CRE Risks
Sep 30, 2025 · These histograms compare the CRE exposure distributions on 2014 and 2024 year ends, for regional and large banks each. CRE exposure is ...
[171]
U.S. Banks' Exposure to Risk from Commercial Real Estate Screener
This data analysis examines 157 of the largest banks in the United States to calculate their exposure to commercial real estate. We calculate each bank's ...
[172]
Is CRE Lending Still A Time Bomb For The U.S. Financial System ...
Jul 31, 2025 · Fitch Ratings forecasts a deterioration in CRE credit through 2025, especially in office loans, projecting US CMBS (commercial mortgage-backed ...
[173]
Banks Face a $2 Trillion Commercial Real Estate Debt Maturity Wall.
Now: US community and regional banks are almost five times more exposed to the CRE sector than big banks—with the largest total direct CRE exposure falling on ...
[174]
[PDF] GAO-24-107282, COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE: Trends, Risks, and ...
Sep 24, 2024 · 15 The loan delinquency rate of office properties increased from about 2.4 percent in February 2023 to about 6.6 percent in February 2024, ...
[175]
Global Banking Sector Grapples with Mounting Credit Quality ...
Oct 16, 2025 · The Commercial Real Estate (CRE) sector stands out as a major vulnerability, with regional banks holding a disproportionate 44% of their total ...
[176]
FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile Second Quarter 2025 | FDIC.gov
Aug 26, 2025 · Banks with greater than $250 billion in assets reported a non-owner-occupied CRE PDNA rate of 4.33 percent, down from the recent peak of 4.99 ...
[177]
[PDF] 2024 Risk Review - SECTION 4 - Credit Risks - FDIC
The banking industry remained active in CRE lending in 2023, and CRE loan exposure remained elevated, particularly among midsize banks.
[178]
[PDF] Financial Stability Report - Federal Reserve Board
Apr 11, 2025 · Delinquency rates for commercial and industrial (C&I) and CrE loans increased slightly in the second half of 2024, while delinquency rates for ...<|separator|>
[179]
Commercial Real Estate and the Banking Sector | Congress.gov
Sep 12, 2024 · Bank regulators have identified CRE as a key risk to financial stability, particularly within the office subsector. Further, CRS, using proxies ...
[180]
The future of the commercial banking industry - Deloitte
In our survey, 45% executive respondents did not experience digital loan origination, and only 28% were satisfied or very satisfied with their experiences.Finding A New Compass To... · Helping Commercial Customers... · Enhancing Digital...
[181]
2025 banking and capital markets outlook - Deloitte
Oct 13, 2024 · Net interest income in 2025 for the US banking industry should decline as deposit costs remain relatively high, per Deloitte's estimates. As ...
[182]
AI in commercial banking: Transforming payment processing and ...
Apr 17, 2025 · Generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) and agentic AI present a paradigm shift in how banks can approach payment routing and related processes.<|separator|>
[183]
How AI Is Reshaping Commercial Lending - Interview with Tom Byrne
Apr 21, 2025 · Tom Byrne of nCino shares how AI is changing commercial lending, from smarter onboarding to rethinking how bankers work.
[184]
Transforming banking: Examining the role of AI technology ...
The results show that banking and finance artificial intelligence technology innovation positively impacts banks' return on assets, highlighting its role in ...Transforming Banking... · 3. Methodology, Model, And... · 4. Results And Discussion
[185]
[PDF] Banking: The future is back | Trends shaping the industry in 2025 ...
Jan 8, 2025 · Generative AI is set to revolutionize banking by transforming routine tasks, enhancing customer experiences and reshaping roles, much like.
[186]
[PDF] Cybersecurity and Financial System Resilience Report 2025
Jul 2, 2025 · Prolonged use of older or legacy systems can also introduce security vulnerabilities, create system maintenance challenges, and cause issues ...
[187]
Cybersecurity in banking: Trends and tactics for 2025 | Baker Tilly
Jan 16, 2025 · Key trends shaping the banking and cybersecurity environment · Digital transformation · AI and automation · Cloud security · Regulatory compliance.
[188]
[PDF] Banking Sector Performance during two periods of sharply higher ...
Interest rates affect banks through earnings, lending, funding costs, and the fair value of assets. This article examines the increase in interest rates in 2022 ...
[189]
The Federal Reserve's responses to the post-Covid period of high ...
Feb 14, 2024 · Here we review the sequence of actions taken by the Committee between late 2020 and mid-2023 as well as discuss some issues it contemplated along the way.
[190]
COVID's Impact: Banks continue to work through post-pandemic ...
May 20, 2025 · The commercial real estate (CRE) loan delinquency rate across US banks climbed just five basis points sequentially in the first quarter to 1.58%.
[191]
[PDF] Geopolitical Risk and Global Banking
Using U.S. supervisory data and new geopolitical risk indices, we show that banks reduce cross-border lending to countries with elevated geopolitical risk but ...
[192]
[PDF] Geopolitical Risk and Global Banking - Federal Reserve Board
Banks reduce cross-border lending to high-risk countries but continue via affiliates, and reduce domestic lending when geopolitical risk rises abroad.
[193]
The evolution of the US–Russia sanctions regime
Aug 23, 2025 · Since 2022, US sanctions have caused a 15-fold drop in US-Russia trade, with over 6,400 sanctions imposed, and a 60% decrease in FDI stock.
[194]
[PDF] impacts of the russian invasion of ukraine on financial market ...
Geopolitical risks from the Russian invasion of Ukraine and resulting sanctions may be disruptive mainly for Ukrainian, Russian and international banks ...
[195]
Overcoming constraints: How banks helped US firms reroute their ...
May 16, 2025 · Commercial banks can act as both financiers and information brokers, helping firms weather shocks and reconfigure their supply chains more ...
[196]
Geopolitical Risks on the Rise: Practical Advice for Banks
Aug 22, 2024 · Yet again, proactive contingency planning is key. This includes developing strategies to support clients facing supply chain disruptions and ...
[197]
Geopolitical conflict and its impact on global markets - U.S. Bank
Oct 16, 2025 · Oil and equity markets have reacted sharply to Middle East conflicts but quickly stabilized as investors assessed limited escalation risks.