Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Flexural modulus

The flexural modulus, also known as the bending modulus or modulus of elasticity in bending, is a mechanical property that quantifies a material's stiffness or resistance to deformation under bending loads, calculated as the ratio of the applied stress to the resulting strain in the outer fibers of a specimen during elastic flexural deformation.^[1] This property is particularly relevant for engineering materials such as unreinforced and reinforced plastics, composites, and high-modulus polymers, where it provides insight into how a material will behave when subjected to flexural forces without permanent deformation.^[2] Flexural modulus is typically measured using standardized three-point or four-point bending tests, with the three-point method being the most common, where a specimen is supported at two points and loaded at the center until a specified strain level is reached—such as 5% strain per ASTM D790 or 3.5% strain per ISO 178—to ensure measurements remain in the linear elastic region.^[1] The formula for flexural modulus E_f is derived from beam theory: E_f = \frac{L^3 m}{4 b d^3}, where L is the support span, m is the slope of the load-deflection curve, b is the specimen width, and d is the thickness; this apparent modulus approximates but does not exactly equal Young's modulus due to non-uniform stress distribution in bending.^[3] Values vary widely by material—for instance, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) ranges from 1,540 to 2,880 MPa at 23°C, while epoxy foams exhibit 2,000 to 2,500 MPa—highlighting its dependence on composition, temperature, strain rate, and specimen geometry.^[1] In practical applications, flexural modulus is crucial for designing load-bearing components like beams, automotive panels, and snap-fit assemblies, enabling engineers to predict deflection and ensure structural integrity under service conditions; it also serves as a key quality control metric in manufacturing to verify material consistency and performance.^[4] Unlike tensile modulus, which assumes uniform stress, flexural testing better simulates real-world bending scenarios but requires careful specimen preparation to avoid artifacts from shear or compressive effects in thicker samples.^[5]

Fundamentals

Definition

The flexural modulus, also known as the bending modulus, is an intensive material property defined as the ratio of flexural stress to flexural strain within the elastic deformation range, quantifying a material's resistance to bending under load.^[6] This measure indicates how stiff a material is when subjected to flexural forces, where higher values correspond to greater rigidity and lower deformability in bending scenarios.^[7] Flexural modulus is expressed in units of pressure, typically Pascals (Pa) or gigapascals (GPa), and remains independent of the specimen's geometry or size, making it a characteristic intrinsic to the material.^[8] In practical terms, it relates to the initial linear portion of the stress-strain curve obtained from bending tests, providing insight into elastic behavior without permanent deformation.^[9] The concept of flexural modulus originated from advancements in beam theory, with the term formalized in the early 20th century building on the foundational Euler-Bernoulli beam theory developed around 1750, which describes beam deflection under transverse loads.^[10] For example, structural steels exhibit flexural moduli around 200 GPa, reflecting their high stiffness, while polymers like high-density polyethylene typically range from 1 to 1.4 GPa, indicating more flexible behavior suitable for applications requiring some compliance.^[11]^[12]^[13]

Relation to Other Material Properties

For isotropic and homogeneous materials subjected to small strains, the flexural modulus is conceptually equivalent to Young's modulus, serving as a measure of the material's stiffness under bending loads that aligns with tensile or compressive behavior in uniaxial tests.^[7] This equivalence arises because, in such materials, the flexural response is governed by the same elastic properties that define Young's modulus, making the flexural modulus an apparent representation of the overall elastic stiffness in flexural contexts.^[14] In contrast, the flexural modulus differs from the shear modulus, which quantifies resistance to shear deformation and shape changes at constant volume, whereas flexural modulus primarily reflects the tensile and compressive stiffness experienced during bending.^[7] Similarly, it is distinct from the bulk modulus, which measures resistance to uniform volumetric compression, as flexural modulus focuses on directional deformation under bending moments rather than isotropic pressure effects.^[14] The flexural modulus plays a central role in applying Hooke's law to bending scenarios, where the relationship between bending stress (σ) and strain (ε) is expressed as σ = E_f ε, with E_f denoting the flexural modulus; this linear proportionality holds within the elastic limit, allowing the modulus to characterize the material's recovery from deformation upon load removal.^[15] In orthotropic materials, such as composites or wood, the flexural modulus exhibits directional dependence, varying with the orientation of the load relative to the material's principal axes, unlike the scalar nature of Young's modulus in isotropic cases.^[15] This variation stems from differing tension and compression moduli in principal directions, resulting in a derived flexural modulus that is not independent but influenced by anisotropic stiffness properties.^[16]

Theoretical Basis

Derivation from Beam Theory

The derivation of the flexural modulus begins with the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, which assumes that plane sections perpendicular to the beam axis remain plane and perpendicular after bending, the beam is slender (length much greater than cross-sectional dimensions), transverse shear deformations are negligible, and the material is linearly elastic, homogeneous, and isotropic.^[17]^[18] These assumptions lead to a linear strain distribution across the beam height. Consider a beam element under pure bending. The axial strain \epsilon_x at a distance y from the neutral axis varies linearly: \epsilon_x = -y / \rho, where \rho is the radius of curvature and the negative sign indicates compression on the concave side.^[17]^[19] Applying Hooke's law for uniaxial stress, the normal stress is \sigma_x = E_f \epsilon_x = -E_f y / \rho, where E_f is the flexural modulus.^[18] The internal bending moment M resisting the applied moment is obtained by integrating the stress over the cross-section:

M = \int_A \sigma_x (-y) \, dA = \int_A E_f (y^2 / \rho) \, dA = (E_f / \rho) \int_A y^2 \, dA = E_f I / \rho,

where I = \int_A y^2 \, dA is the second moment of area (moment of inertia) about the neutral axis, and the curvature \kappa = 1/\rho. Thus, the moment-curvature relation is M = E_f I \kappa.^[17]^[19]^[18] To derive the flexural modulus from deflection, consider a simply supported beam of length L and flexural rigidity E_f I subjected to a central point load F. The maximum deflection \delta at midspan is given by integrating the beam's governing differential equation E_f I \, d^4 v / dx^4 = q(x), yielding \delta = F L^3 / (48 E_f I).^[20] Solving for E_f gives

E_f = \frac{F L^3}{48 \delta I}.

This expression allows E_f to be determined experimentally from measured load F, deflection \delta, span L, and moment of inertia I.^[20] For a rectangular cross-section of width b and height h, the moment of inertia is I = b h^3 / 12. If the load-deflection response is linear, the slope m = dF / d\delta of the curve relates to E_f via m = 48 E_f I / L^3. Substituting I yields the general formula

E_f = \frac{L^3 m}{4 b h^3}.

In isotropic materials, E_f equals the Young's modulus, but flexural tests account for potential differences in anisotropic or composite materials.^[21]^[21]

Assumptions and Validity

The theoretical model for flexural modulus, rooted in Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, depends on several fundamental assumptions to ensure accurate predictions of bending stiffness. Primarily, the material must display linear elastic behavior, where the stress-strain relationship follows Hooke's law with a constant modulus of elasticity, limiting applicability to the elastic regime before yielding or plastic deformation occurs.^[17] Additionally, small deflections are assumed, such that plane sections originally perpendicular to the beam's neutral axis remain plane and perpendicular to it after bending, preserving geometric linearity.^[22] The material is further presumed to be homogeneous and isotropic, with uniform properties across the cross-section, and transverse shear deformation is entirely neglected, attributing deflection solely to bending curvature.^[17] These assumptions hold valid under specific conditions that align with slender beam geometries and low-strain loading. The theory applies effectively to beams where the span-to-depth ratio is at least 16 (or higher, up to 60 for composites, per ASTM D790), minimizing the influence of shear effects.^[22]^[2] Flexural strains must remain within the linear elastic range, typically up to 5% for plastics and composites as per ASTM D790, to ensure accurate modulus calculation without significant plasticity.^[5]^[2] The model becomes invalid for large deformations, where geometric nonlinearities dominate, or for viscoelastic materials, which exhibit time-dependent strain responses under sustained loads, requiring alternative dynamic or rheological approaches for characterization.^[23] For scenarios beyond these limits, such as thicker beams where shear deformation cannot be ignored, the transition to Timoshenko beam theory provides a more accurate framework by incorporating transverse shear strain and rotary inertia. This adjustment results in an apparent flexural modulus that is lower than the Euler-Bernoulli prediction, as the total deflection includes a shear contribution that effectively reduces the perceived bending stiffness.^[24] In composite materials, the assumptions extend to requiring uniform fiber distribution throughout the matrix to approximate homogeneous and isotropic behavior; non-uniform distributions can lead to stress concentrations and localized failures, compromising the validity of the derived flexural modulus.^[25]

Measurement Methods

Flexural Testing Standards

Standardized protocols for measuring flexural modulus ensure consistency and reliability in evaluating the bending stiffness of materials, particularly plastics and composites. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International has established ASTM D790 as the primary standard for determining the flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics, including high-modulus composites and electrical insulating materials.^[2] This standard specifies test specimens typically measuring 127 mm in length, 12.7 mm in width, and 3.2 mm in thickness for molded materials, with a support span of 16 times the specimen thickness to minimize shear effects.^[26] Loading is applied at a controlled crosshead speed, such as approximately 1-2 mm/min for Procedure A, which targets an outer fiber strain rate of 0.01 min⁻¹ to capture the material's elastic response.^[26] The flexural modulus, denoted as E_f, is calculated as the initial tangent modulus, derived from the slope of the steepest linear portion of the stress-strain curve within the elastic limit.^[5] The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provides ISO 178 as the equivalent international standard for the determination of flexural properties in rigid and semi-rigid plastics, harmonizing closely with ASTM D790 but emphasizing metric units.^[27] Under ISO 178, preferred specimen dimensions include a length of 80 mm (±2 mm), width of 10 mm (±0.2 mm), and thickness of 4 mm (±0.1 mm), with a support span of 64 mm, equivalent to 16 times the thickness (h).^[3] The test employs similar strain rates, ensuring the flexural modulus is computed as the secant modulus between 0.05% and 0.25% strain on the stress-strain curve, applicable to both three-point and four-point configurations as specified.^[28] Across these standards, general guidelines mandate a linear stress-strain response for valid modulus determination, as nonlinearity indicates yielding or viscoelastic effects that invalidate the elastic assumption.^[29] Results must report the flexural modulus E_f alongside confidence intervals, typically derived from at least five replicate specimens (n ≥ 5) to account for variability in material homogeneity and testing conditions.^[30] ASTM D790 was originally approved in 1970 and has undergone periodic revisions to incorporate advancements in materials and testing precision, such as the 2017 update that refined procedures for composites and aligned with international standardization principles.^[31]^[2] Similarly, ISO 178, first published in 1972, was last revised in 2019 to enhance applicability to modern semi-rigid plastics while maintaining compatibility with global testing practices.^[27] These evolutions reflect ongoing efforts by ASTM and ISO to address emerging material challenges since the mid-20th century.^[32]

Three-Point Bending

The three-point bending test is a widely used experimental method to determine the flexural modulus of materials, particularly rigid plastics and composites, by subjecting a beam-shaped specimen to bending under a concentrated load at its center. In this setup, the specimen is supported symmetrically at two points near its ends, with the distance between the supports defined as the span length L, which is typically set to 16 times the specimen thickness h to minimize shear effects in standard procedures. A load F is applied vertically at the midpoint between the supports using a loading nose, while the resulting central deflection \delta is recorded, often via a universal testing machine equipped with a three-point bend fixture.^[2]^[26] The test procedure involves placing the rectangular specimen, with width w and thickness h, on the supports and gradually applying the load at a constant crosshead speed proportional to the specimen dimensions, such as 1.3 mm/min for a 3.2 mm thick sample, to ensure quasi-static conditions. Deflection data is captured in the initial linear elastic region of the load-deflection curve, where the flexural modulus is calculated from the slope of this portion; the test is typically conducted at a controlled temperature of 23°C and relative humidity of 50%. This method's advantages lie in its simplicity, requiring only basic fixturing and instrumentation, making it accessible for routine quality control and research applications.^[2]^[33]^[34] For rectangular cross-section beams, the flexural modulus E_f is derived from classical beam theory and given by the formula

E_f = \frac{L^3 F}{4 w h^3 \delta},

where this expression applies in the linear regime and represents the ratio of stress to strain at the outer fibers, with F/\delta effectively capturing the initial stiffness. A unique aspect of this configuration is that the maximum bending stress concentrates at the outer fibers directly beneath the central loading point, which is particularly useful for brittle materials as it facilitates early detection of failure initiation and fracture points during testing.^[34]^[26]

Four-Point Bending

The four-point bending test involves placing a rectangular specimen on two lower support spans separated by an outer span length L, with loads applied symmetrically at two upper loading points separated by an inner span length a, typically a = L/3. This configuration creates a region of constant bending moment between the inner loading points, where the shear force is zero, allowing for pure bending conditions in that central area.^[35]^[36] The procedure follows a setup similar to the three-point bending test but utilizes two loading points instead of one, which distributes the applied force more evenly and minimizes shear effects across the specimen. The test is conducted by applying a gradually increasing load to the specimen until a specified deflection or failure occurs, with measurements taken at the mid-span using a deflectometer or crosshead displacement. This method is particularly suited for determining flexural modulus in specimens with longer spans, as it provides greater accuracy by isolating the bending response in the central region.^[37]^[38] The flexural modulus E_f is calculated from the mid-span deflection \delta under load P, using the formula derived from Euler-Bernoulli beam theory for the specific geometry:

E_f = \frac{P a (3L^2 - 4a^2)}{48 \delta I}

where I = \frac{b h^3}{12} is the moment of inertia, b is the specimen width, and h is the thickness. For the common ratio a = L/3, this simplifies to:

E_f = \frac{23 P L^3}{108 b h^3 \delta}

or equivalently, E_f = \frac{23 L^3 m}{108 b h^3}, where m = P / \delta is the slope of the initial linear portion of the load-deflection curve.^[35]^[39] This test is preferred for polymer matrix composites due to its uniform stress distribution, which minimizes edge effects and provides more reliable modulus values compared to configurations with localized loading. It is standardized in ASTM D7264 Procedure B for such materials, ensuring consistent evaluation of flexural stiffness in applications requiring high precision.^[35]^[40]

Factors Influencing Flexural Modulus

Material Anisotropy

In anisotropic materials, such as wood and fiber-reinforced polymers, the flexural modulus exhibits significant directional dependence due to the inherent structural alignment of their constituents. For wood, which is orthotropic with principal directions along the longitudinal (grain), radial, and tangential axes, the flexural modulus along the grain typically ranges from 10 to 15 GPa for common hardwoods like oak or ash, reflecting the stiff cellulose microfibrils aligned parallel to the fiber direction. In contrast, across the grain (radial or tangential directions), the modulus drops dramatically to approximately 0.5 GPa or less, as the load is borne primarily by the more compliant lignin and hemicellulose matrix, resulting in ratios of transverse to longitudinal modulus often below 0.1.^[41] This anisotropy arises from the cellular structure of wood, where mechanical properties vary by up to 20-fold between directions.^[41] In unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer composites, the flexural modulus further illustrates this orientation effect, with distinct longitudinal and transverse values. Along the fiber direction (parallel), the flexural modulus approximates the longitudinal tensile modulus E_1, which can reach 115 GPa for carbon fiber systems like T700/602, dominated by the high-stiffness fibers. Transversely (perpendicular to fibers), it aligns closely with the matrix-dominated modulus E_2, typically around 8-10 GPa, as the load transfers inefficiently through the weaker polymer matrix and fiber-matrix interface.^[42] These differences highlight how fiber orientation governs load-bearing capacity, with parallel configurations providing superior stiffness for structural applications. To accurately measure flexural modulus in anisotropic materials, specimens must be oriented relative to the principal material axes during testing, ensuring the loading direction aligns with the intended anisotropy plane; misalignment can lead to erroneous values. For predictive purposes, especially in laminated composites, classical laminated beam theory is employed to compute effective flexural properties by integrating individual ply contributions, accounting for stacking sequence and interlaminar effects.^[43] In isotropic materials, flexural modulus approximates Young's modulus under ideal beam theory assumptions, whereas in anisotropic cases, it deviates further due to coupled Poisson's ratio effects (lateral strain influences) and shear deformation coupling, which introduce additional compliance not captured in uniaxial tension tests.

Temperature and Environmental Effects

The flexural modulus of materials exhibits significant temperature dependence, particularly in polymers where it decreases as temperature increases due to enhanced molecular mobility. In amorphous polymers, the modulus remains relatively stable below the glass transition temperature (Tg), but above Tg, it drops dramatically by factors of 10 to 100 or more as the material transitions from a glassy to a rubbery state, reflecting a shift from rigid to compliant behavior.^[44]^[45] For metals, the flexural modulus shows only minor variations with temperature under typical conditions, with reductions of less than 10% up to several hundred degrees Celsius, until elevated temperatures induce creep mechanisms that lead to time-dependent deformation and effective stiffening loss.^[46]^[47] Environmental factors further influence flexural modulus, especially in composites prone to degradation. Moisture absorption in polymer-matrix composites causes plasticization of the matrix, reducing the flexural modulus by 20-50% through swelling and weakened interfacial bonding between fibers and matrix.^[48]^[49] Similarly, ultraviolet (UV) exposure degrades surface stiffness in exposed composites by inducing chain scission and oxidation in the polymer matrix, leading to a flexural modulus decrease of up to 40-50% after prolonged irradiation, depending on exposure duration and intensity.^[50]^[51] To assess these effects, flexural testing can be conducted under controlled environmental conditions, with standards such as ASTM D790 permitting setups for elevated temperatures to evaluate modulus variations.^[2] Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) provides a complementary approach by measuring the storage modulus—a viscoelastic analog to flexural modulus—across temperature and frequency ranges, revealing transitions like Tg and relaxation processes in polymers.^[52]^[53] For viscoelastic materials such as polymers, the time-temperature superposition principle enables prediction of long-term flexural behavior by shifting modulus data from short-term tests at various temperatures to construct a master curve, facilitating extrapolation to service life conditions without extended experimentation.^[54]^[55]

Applications

In Structural Engineering

In structural engineering, the flexural modulus is a key parameter for designing load-bearing beams and plates, where it facilitates the calculation of deflections and stresses to ensure serviceability and safety under bending loads. For isotropic materials like steel used in I-beams for buildings and bridges, the flexural modulus approximates the Young's modulus at 200 GPa, enabling engineers to limit sagging deflections—for instance, to span/360 for live loads in floor systems—via standard beam theory equations such as δ = (5wL⁴)/(384EI), where I is the moment of inertia. This application is critical in structures like highway bridges, where excessive deflection could compromise ride quality or induce fatigue. Finite element analysis (FEA) further integrates the flexural modulus as an orthotropic property to model complex bending behaviors in software like ANSYS, particularly for non-isotropic components such as laminated timber beams or hybrid steel-concrete plates. Engineers input the flexural modulus alongside other elastic constants to simulate stress distributions and deformations under distributed loads, optimizing designs for large-scale structures like multi-story frames where traditional hand calculations are impractical. This approach allows for iterative refinement, ensuring predicted deflections align with codes like Eurocode 3 or AISC 360. Safety factors in design account for variability in flexural modulus, especially in materials prone to time-dependent effects; for timber structures, the effective flexural modulus is adjusted via creep multipliers rather than direct load-duration factors, as the base modulus of elasticity remains unadjusted per the National Design Specification (NDS). Under sustained loads, such as dead loads in roof beams, deflections are amplified by a factor of 1.5 (for seasoned lumber) to reflect viscoelastic creep, effectively reducing the operational flexural modulus and preventing excessive long-term sagging in applications like glulam trusses. This adjustment ensures a safety margin against progressive deformation over decades.^[56] The flexural modulus is particularly critical in automotive chassis design, where it informs material choices for balancing vibration control and weight optimization in load-bearing frames. For steel or aluminum chassis components, a high flexural modulus (e.g., 70-200 GPa) minimizes resonant frequencies under road-induced vibrations, while FEA simulations use it to reduce mass by up to 20% without exceeding deflection limits, enhancing fuel efficiency and handling in vehicles like trucks. This property enables precise tuning of torsional stiffness, vital for stability during cornering or payload variations.^[57]

In Composite Materials

In composite materials, the flexural modulus plays a critical role in predicting and optimizing the bending stiffness of layered structures, particularly through models like classical laminate theory (CLT). CLT calculates the effective flexural modulus E_f for multidirectional laminates by integrating the orthotropic properties of individual plies, accounting for fiber orientation and stacking sequence to determine overall plate stiffness.^[58] For unidirectional carbon fiber/epoxy composites, the longitudinal flexural modulus typically ranges from 100 to 150 GPa, reflecting the high stiffness along the fiber direction that CLT approximates effectively for design purposes.^[59] This approach enables engineers to tailor laminate configurations for desired flexural behavior without extensive physical testing, prioritizing the balance between in-plane and bending extensional stiffness matrices. Testing flexural modulus in composites often requires adaptations to standard methods due to the materials' thin, anisotropic nature. The ASTM D790 procedure, originally for plastics, is modified for high-modulus composite laminates by adjusting span-to-thickness ratios (e.g., 32:1 or higher) and incorporating end tabs to prevent slippage in thin specimens, ensuring accurate measurement of bending properties.^[31] Complementing these flexural tests, short-beam shear (SBS) methods like ASTM D2344 evaluate interlaminar shear strength, which influences overall flexural performance by revealing weaknesses in ply interfaces that could otherwise compromise modulus readings.^[60] These adaptations are essential for validating CLT predictions in practical composite systems. In aerospace applications, such as aircraft wings, high flexural modulus in carbon fiber composites is leveraged for superior stiffness-to-weight ratios, allowing structures to withstand aerodynamic loads while minimizing mass. For instance, wing skins and spars utilize unidirectional carbon/epoxy layups with E_f values exceeding 100 GPa to maintain aeroelastic stability under flexure.^[61] However, failure modes like delamination—initiated by interlaminar stresses—can reduce the apparent flexural modulus in impacted laminates, as the separation of plies alters load distribution and effective thickness.^[62] Hybrid composites, combining glass and carbon fibers (e.g., in alternating plies), further tailor flexural modulus for cost-performance optimization through strategic layering that balances high-modulus carbon for primary loading with economical glass for secondary support.^[63] This anisotropy-driven design enhances durability in flexural-critical components without excessive expense.

Limitations and Comparisons

Differences from Young's Modulus

The flexural modulus and Young's modulus are equivalent for isotropic materials when tested under conditions where shear deformation and geometric nonlinearities are negligible, such as in slender beams analyzed using Euler-Bernoulli beam theory.^[7] In such cases, the flexural modulus E_f, derived from the ratio of bending stress to strain at the outer fibers, matches Young's modulus E, which measures uniaxial tensile or compressive stiffness, because the bending response is dominated by extensional strains without significant transverse shear contributions.^[14] Key differences arise in geometries prone to shear effects, such as short or thick beams, where unaccounted shear deformation leads to an underestimation of the apparent flexural modulus compared to Young's modulus. In three-point or four-point bending tests, the total deflection includes both bending and shear components; neglecting the latter in calculations—using pure bending formulas—results in a lower E_f since observed deflections are larger than predicted by bending alone. For example, analyses of beam tests show that flexural modulus can be underestimated by up to 35% in configurations with significant shear, particularly when the span-to-depth ratio is low.^[64] Conversely, in anisotropic materials like fiber-reinforced composites, the flexural modulus does not equal a single directional Young's modulus but represents an effective value that averages the directional stiffnesses, weighted by the parabolic strain distribution across the beam thickness. This averaging effect means E_f integrates contributions from longitudinal, transverse, and shear properties, often differing from uniaxial measurements along principal axes.^[65] Experimentally, flexural tests frequently yield a higher modulus than tensile tests for polymers due to surface effects, where the outer layers—stressed most in bending—may exhibit greater stiffness from processing-induced skins or reduced defects compared to the bulk material uniform in tension. Data for common plastics, such as polyamides or polyesters, typically show flexural moduli 5-10% higher than Young's moduli, reflecting this disparity rather than a true material difference.^[66] Young's modulus is preferred for applications involving uniform uniaxial loading, such as tension members, while flexural modulus is more appropriate for components dominated by bending, like beams or panels, as it directly captures the relevant deformation mode.^[7]

Sources of Error in Measurement

One major source of error in flexural modulus measurement arises from specimen preparation and geometry. Nonuniform dimensions, such as variations in thickness or width, can lead to inaccurate stress and strain calculations, resulting in scatter of 5-15% in the measured flexural modulus (E_f). Surface defects, including machining marks or cracks, introduce stress concentrations that further contribute to variability. Misalignment of the specimen in the test fixture can cause uneven loading, exacerbating these issues and leading to erroneous modulus values.^[67] Loading artifacts during the test also significantly impact results. Slippage at the supports or loading nose can alter the effective span length and load distribution, introducing errors in deflection measurements. In viscoelastic materials, loading rate sensitivity is particularly problematic; higher test speeds can increase the apparent modulus by promoting time-dependent stiffening effects.^[67] Data analysis errors often stem from the interpretation of load-deflection curves. For nonlinear responses, incorrect selection of the tangent modulus (e.g., choosing an inappropriate initial slope) can overestimate or underestimate E_f. Employing statistical methods, such as least-squares regression to fit the linear portion of the curve, helps mitigate this, but poor curve fitting still leads to inaccuracies.^[2] Standards emphasize repeatability to ensure reliable measurements, typically requiring a coefficient of variation less than 10% across multiple specimens. Proper calibration of load cells and displacement transducers is essential, as inaccuracies here can propagate through the entire calculation of E_f. In three- or four-point bending tests, adherence to these practices minimizes overall uncertainty.^[30]

References

[1]
Flexural Modulus - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Flexural modulus is an engineering measurement that determines how much a sample will bend when a given load is applied.
[2]
D790 Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced ...
Jul 24, 2017 · 1.1 These test methods are used to determine the flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics, including high modulus composites ...
[3]
The Definitive Guide to ISO 178 | Instron
ISO 178 is a test method for determining the flexural properties of rigid and semi-rigid plastics by performing a three-point bend test on a universal testing ...
[4]
What is ASTM D790 and Why It Matters? - Strongwell
Using this standard, we can determine the flexural strength and flexural modulus (also called modulus of elasticity), which are critical to withstand bending ...
[5]
ASTM D790 3-point flexure test plastics - ZwickRoell
The ASTM D790 standard describes a test method used to determine the flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics, including high modulus ...
[6]
Flexural Modulus - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Flexural modulus is defined as a measure of a material's stiffness when subjected to bending, typically expressed in units of GPa, and in the context of the ...
[7]
Flexural Modulus: Definition, Calculation, and Importance - Xometry
Mar 16, 2023 · Flexural modulus is a mechanical property that describes a material's stiffness or resistance to a bending action. Learn more about it here.Missing: science | Show results with:science
[8]
Flexural Modulus: Units, Formula & Material Table - SpecialChem
Jul 11, 2025 · Flexural modulus denotes the ability of a plastic material to bend. It measures the material's stiffness or its resistance to bend. Stiffness ( ...Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
[9]
What is Flexural Modulus?- Definition and Formula
The flexural modulus or bending modulus is an intensive property that is computed as the ratio of stress to strain in flexural deformation.
[10]
[PDF] Euler-Bernoulli Beams - Professor Terje Haukaas
Aug 21, 2023 · The Euler-Bernoulli beam theory was established around 1750 with contributions from. Leonard Euler and Daniel Bernoulli.
[11]
AISI 1040 Carbon Steel As Rolled Mechanical Properties
Flexural modulus, 208, –, 216, GPa. Flexural strength (modulus of rupture), 375, –, 460, MPa. Shear modulus, 80, –, 85, GPa. Bulk modulus, 161, –, 176, GPa.
[12]
High Density Polyethylene - HDPE - AZoM
May 11, 2001 · Typical Properties ; Tensile Strength (MPa), 32 ; Flexural Modulus (GPa), 1.25 ; Notched Izod (kJ/m), 0.15 ; Linear Expansion (/°C x 10-5), 12.
[13]
Understanding the different types of Moduli - Tensile vs Shear vs ...
Nov 6, 2024 · Flexural modulus (Eflex) describes the object's tendency to flex when acted upon by a moment. It is also referred to as bending modulus and is ...
[14]
Bending Modulus - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Bending modulus, or flexural modulus, is a material's ability to resist bending, measured as the slope of the stress-strain plot, or the ratio of stress to ...
[15]
[PDF] Mechanics of Composite Materials with Different Moduli in Tension ...
Perhaps more important is the fact that the actual flexural modulus is a quantity derived from the tension and compression moduli, i.e., the flexural modulus is ...
[16]
[PDF] Euler-Bernoulli Beams: Bending, Buckling, and Vibration
Feb 9, 2004 · Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory: Displacement, strain, and stress distributions. Beam theory assumptions on spatial variation of displacement ...
[17]
[PDF] Flexural Stresses In Beams (Derivation of Bending Stress Equation)
Beam has a longitudinal plane of symmetry and the bending moment lies within this plane. 3. Beam is subjected to pure bending (bending moment does not change ...
[18]
[PDF] Module 7 Simple Beam Theory - MIT
We will start by analyzing beam bending in the plane e1,e2. Combined bending in different planes can be treated later by using the principle of superposition.
[19]
[PDF] DA6-BeamFormulas.pdf - Purdue Engineering
w = load per unit length, lbs./in. ∆ = deflection or deformation, in. x = horizontal distance from reaction to point on beam, in. List ...
[20]
[PDF] Example 1: Rectangular Three Point Bending
A rectangular specimen is tested in three-point bending. The goal is to determine the maximum flexural strength and Young's Modulus using given dimensions and ...
[21]
[PDF] 2.5. THEORIES OF STRAIGHT BEAMS | TAMU Mechanics
Mar 2, 2017 · The Bernoulli–Euler beam theory is based on certain simplifying assumptions, known as the Bernoulli–Euler hypothesis, concerning the kinematics ...
[22]
Development and validation of a method for linear-viscoelastic ...
The method uses flexural vibrations of specimens to determine the flexural storage and loss modulus from their resonance curves. A test setup has to be ...
[23]
[PDF] Refinement of Timoshenko Beam Theory for Composite and ...
Nov 1, 2007 · Timoshenko [1] derived a new beam theory by adding an additional kinematic variable in the displacement assumptions, the bending rotation, and a ...
[24]
The influence of different fiber sizes on the flexural strength of ...
The highest flexural modulus value due to differences in fiber size was observed at a fiber size of 13.19 ± 1.16 GPa, and the lowest at a fiber size of 2 mm is ...
[25]
ASTM D790 | Instron
ASTM D790 allows only one test speed, whereas ISO 178 allows a second (faster) test speed to be used after modulus is measured. ASTM D790 What Does it Measure?Missing: assumptions | Show results with:assumptions
[26]
ISO 178:2019 - Plastics — Determination of flexural properties
In stock 2–5 day deliveryThis document specifies a method for determining the flexural properties of rigid and semi-rigid plastics under defined conditions.
[27]
3-Point Bend Test on Plastics - ISO 178 - ZwickRoell
Flexural modulus and flexural strength: The flexural modulus is a measure of the stiffness of the material and indicates how well it can resist flexural loads.
[28]
ASTM D790 Flexural Test of Plastics & Composites - TestResources
ASTM D790 is used to measure how strong or stiff a material is. Flexural strength, as well as flexural modulus, are measures of a material's ability to resist ...
[29]
[PDF] Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 7 Flexural Strength Testing ...
Abstract: This guide is intended to aid the establishment of good practice in flexural testing of beam test-pieces of non-ductile materials, ...
[30]
[PDF] Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and ...
Scope*. 1.1 These test methods are used to determine the flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics, including highmodulus composites and ...
[31]
[PDF] Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and ...
Published April 2003. Originally approved in 1970. Last previous edition approved in 2002 as D 790 – 02. 2 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ...
[32]
How to Perform an ASTM D790 Plastic Flexural 3 Point Bend Test
Test Procedure: · Die cut, saw, or injection mold your samples to a shape specified in the ASTM specification. · Place the test bar on the 3 point bend fixture ...Test Procedure · Tips · Equipment Required
[33]
A Complete Guide to the Three-Point Bending Flexural Test
Oct 24, 2024 · The three-point bending flexural test measures a material's resistance to bending forces by applying load at the midpoint of a beam supported at both ends.Test Procedure And Standards · Analyzing Results · Calculating Flexural...
[34]
Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Polymer Matrix ...
Feb 19, 2021 · Procedure A is used for three-point loading and Procedure B is used for four-point loading. This test method was developed for optimum use ...
[35]
Flexure tests on composites - ZwickRoell
The flexural modulus is determined between 0.05% and 0.25% strain (ISO 14125) or 0.1% and 0.3% strain (ASTM D7264). The central support span can be 1/3 (ISO ...Missing: four- | Show results with:four-<|separator|>
[36]
Flexural Properties of Composites by ASTM D7264 - Intertek
Procedure B outlines a four point loading system for two equal loading points. This test method is designed for polymer matrix composites and uses a standard 32 ...
[37]
ASTM D7264 Polymer Composite Flexural Testing - ADMET
ASTM D7264 is a testing standard designed to measure the flexural stiffness and strength properties of polymer matrix composites.
[38]
Mechanical Testing of Composites - Addcomposite
Oct 8, 2025 · Flexural Modulus: Ef = L³m / (4bh³) Where: P = load, L = support ... Can be used to test anisotropic materials in different orientations.
[39]
Comprehensive Guide to the Flexural Bending Test - TestResources
Nov 7, 2024 · In a four-point test, the load is applied at two points, creating a larger area of maximum stress and providing more accurate measurements of ...
[40]
[PDF] Mechanical Properties of Wood - Forest Products Laboratory
The modulus of elasticity determined from bending, EL, rather than from an axial test, may be the only modulus of elasticity available for a species.
[41]
Investigation of a New Stacking Pattern of Laminates with ... - NIH
Apr 18, 2025 · Material parameters of unidirectional carbon-fiber composite. Material, E1/GPa, E2/GPa, G12/GPa, ν 12. T700/602, 115, 8.36, 4.56, 0.30. Open in ...Missing: E2 | Show results with:E2
[42]
On the equivalent flexural and shear moduli of laminated beams
Equivalent flexural and shear moduli of laminated beams of rectangular cross-section made of orthotropic layers are defined by an analytical approach.
[43]
Isotropic and anisotropic elasticity and yielding of 3D printed material
Aug 15, 2016 · In this paper, the elasticity and yielding performance of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material created by 3D printing is investigatedIsotropic And Anisotropic... · 1. Introduction · 4. Constitutive Modelling<|control11|><|separator|>
[44]
Material Selection for Elevated Temperature Applications
The temperature dependency of the modulus in such materials is related to the crosslink density. The relationship of the DTUL modulus is similar to that ...
[45]
General Model of Temperature-dependent Modulus and Yield ...
Dec 6, 2019 · A general model was developed to predict the temperature-dependent modulus and yield strength of different thermoplastic polymers.Missing: flexural | Show results with:flexural
[46]
Effect of Temperature on Strength and Elastic Modulus of High ...
Aug 10, 2025 · This paper presents the effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of high-strength alloy structural Q460 steel.
[47]
The physics of high temperature creep in metals - IOPscience
The rate of creep strain is very dependent on temperature, stress applied and composition of the metal.Missing: flexural | Show results with:flexural
[48]
[PDF] On the relationship between moisture uptake and mechanical ...
Water absorption in the composite decreases flexural modulus by 14%, strength by 20%, and the glass transition temperature by 18%.
[49]
Influence of moisture absorption on flexural properties of syntactic ...
The extent and the effect of moisture absorption are related to the wall thickness and volume fraction of the particles present in the composite.3. Results · 3.1. Water Absorption · 4. Discussion
[50]
Effect of UV exposure on the (a) flexural modulus and (b) flexural...
Effect of UV exposure on the (a) flexural modulus and (b) flexural strength of different samples. · Schematic flow chart outlining the procedure for the YAG:Ce, ...
[51]
[PDF] degradation effects of solar radiation on the mechanical properties ...
A similar degradation trend was observed for the flexural modulus. After 122 days, the flexural modulus of sample A had decreased by 47.2%, that of sample B by ...
[52]
Basics of Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) - Anton Paar Wiki
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) is a characterization method that can be used to study the behavior of materials under various conditions.
[53]
Introduction to Dynamic Mechanical Analysis and its Application to ...
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) is an extremely powerful technique to characterize the thermal and mechanical properties of solid samples.
[54]
[PDF] time-temperature superposition, ta-246 - TA Instruments
Time-temperature superposition (TTS) allows us to characterize the viscoelastic properties of a material at various temperatures over an experimentally ...Missing: flexural | Show results with:flexural
[55]
Effect of Temperature and Strain Rate on the Flexural Behavior of ...
Dec 2, 2019 · Time-temperature superposition principle (TTSP) was used to establish the master curve of the storage modulus as a function of time in dynamic ...
[56]
Weight Optimization of Chassis of an Automotive Vehicle using ...
Jan 26, 2023 · This research aims to optimize the weight of the chassis. For this we have taken three materials like structural steel, carbon fiber and Aluminium silicon ...Missing: flexural | Show results with:flexural
[57]
Flexural Testing of General Multi-Layered Composites - Sage Journals
A spcial case of the classical lamination plate theory was found to give excellent predictions of the flexural modulus. Comparison with the experimental data ...
[58]
Overview of materials for Epoxy/Carbon Fiber Composite - MatWeb
Flexural Modulus, 3.38 - 638 GPa, 490 - 92500 ksi, Average value: 98.8 GPa Grade Count:106. 37.0 - 285 GPa @Temperature -55.0 - 177 °C, 5370 - 41300 ksi
[59]
Interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) ASTM D2344 - ZwickRoell
The short beam shear test can be performed according to different standards, including ASTM D2344, EN 2563 or EN ISO 14130. Specimen length, specimen width and ...
[60]
‍Explained: How Aircraft Wings Are Built to Bend - Airways Magazine
Jul 20, 2025 · Carbon fiber composites enable the selective application of stiffness, supporting areas that require it while allowing movement elsewhere. NASA ...
[61]
Delamination of Composite - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The damages caused due to growth of such delamination results in decreases of strength, toughness, and fatigue-life.
[62]
Mechanical Performance/Cost Ratio Analysis of Carbon/Glass ...
Hybrid composites combining carbon and glass fibers are increasingly studied for their potential to enhance mechanical properties and cost efficiency.
[63]
[PDF] ANALYSIS OF THE THREE-POINT-BEND TEST FOR MATERIALS ...
The flexural modulus can be underestimated by 35 percent, and the shear modulus by 25 percent.
[64]
Comparison between flexural and tensile modulus of fibre composites
The difference between flexural and tensile Young's modulus, as experienced experimentally, is analysed theoretically.
[65]
Tensile or Flexural Strength/Stiffness – is there really a difference?
Flexural and tensile moduli are similar, but flexural strength is roughly 1.5 times higher than tensile strength. For demanding applications, use the lower ...
[66]
[PDF] Errors Associated with Flexure Testing of Brittle Materials - DTIC
Errors in flexure testing include wedging stress, contact stress, load mislocation, beam twisting, friction, contact point tangency shift, and neglect of ...