Fluentd
Fluentd is an open-source data collector designed as a unified logging layer that decouples data sources from backend systems, enabling the collection, processing, and routing of log data in JSON format across diverse environments.[1] Originally conceived in 2011 by Sadayuki "Sada" Furuhashi, a co-founder of Treasure Data, Inc., Fluentd was open-sourced in October of that year to address challenges in log aggregation for distributed systems, such as inconsistent formats and high resource demands.[1] The project quickly gained traction for its pluggable architecture, which supports over 500 community-contributed plugins for inputs from various sources (e.g., files, HTTP, and system metrics) and outputs to destinations like databases, cloud storage, and analytics platforms.[1] Written primarily in C for performance-critical components and Ruby for extensibility, Fluentd emphasizes reliability through built-in buffering mechanisms (in-memory or on-disk) and failover handling, while maintaining low resource usage—typically 30-40 MB of memory and processing up to 13,000 events per second per core.[1] Hosted under the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) since November 2016, Fluentd achieved graduated status in April 2019, reflecting its maturity and widespread adoption in cloud-native ecosystems.[2] Licensed under Apache 2.0, it is utilized by over 5,000 data-driven companies, with some deployments scaling to collect logs from more than 50,000 servers, making it a cornerstone for observability in microservices, containers, and big data pipelines.[3] Its design promotes structured data handling without requiring extensive parsing, facilitating seamless integration and analysis in tools like Elasticsearch, Splunk, and Hadoop.[1]Introduction
Overview
Fluentd is an open-source data collector designed for building a unified logging layer that decouples heterogeneous data sources from backend processing and storage systems.[3] This approach enables seamless aggregation of logs, metrics, and traces from diverse origins, such as applications, servers, and cloud services, into a centralized stream for analysis. By standardizing data ingestion and forwarding, Fluentd simplifies observability in distributed environments without requiring custom integrations for each data pipeline. The primary purpose of Fluentd is to collect, process, and route log data from multiple sources to various storage or analytics backends, ensuring efficient data flow in complex infrastructures.[1] It emphasizes core principles of reliability through built-in buffering mechanisms to handle network failures or overloads, a lightweight core implementation that minimizes resource overhead, and ease of use via simple configuration files that require minimal setup for deployment.[3] These attributes make it particularly suitable for high-volume logging in production systems. As a Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) graduated project since April 11, 2019, Fluentd benefits from robust community governance and has been adopted by over 5,000 companies worldwide.[2][4] It supports more than 500 plugins for extensibility, allowing customization for specific input sources and output destinations. The basic workflow involves ingesting logs through input plugins, applying filters for parsing and enrichment, buffering data for reliable delivery, and routing it to output destinations such as databases or search engines.[3][1]History
Fluentd was conceived in 2011 by Sadayuki Furuhashi, a co-founder of Treasure Data, Inc., as an internal tool to unify log aggregation across diverse data sources within the company's cloud-based analytics platform.[1] This initiative addressed the challenges of managing fragmented logging in distributed systems, drawing on Furuhashi's experience in data processing.[1] The project was initially developed at Treasure Data's Mountain View headquarters, reflecting the company's focus on scalable data handling for enterprise applications.[1] The source code for Fluentd was released as open-source software in October 2011, primarily implemented in Ruby to facilitate rapid prototyping and extensibility.[1] This early release quickly attracted developer interest, establishing Fluentd as a foundational tool for log management. In 2013, Treasure Data secured $5 million in Series A funding led by Sierra Ventures, which bolstered the company's resources to expand development and community support for Fluentd.[5] On November 8, 2016, the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) accepted Fluentd as an incubating project, aligning it with the growing ecosystem of cloud-native technologies.[2] This milestone enhanced its visibility and governance under a neutral foundation. Fluentd advanced to graduated maturity level on April 11, 2019, becoming the sixth CNCF project to achieve this status after Kubernetes, Prometheus, Envoy, CoreDNS, and containerd.[6] Post-graduation, Fluentd's development emphasized cloud-native adaptations, including native integrations with Kubernetes for containerized logging workflows.[7] In August 2025, the Fluent Package v6 series was released, introducing two channels: a long-term support (LTS) variant for stability and a normal release channel with planned semi-annual updates to incorporate new features and Fluentd core upgrades.[8] Community engagement has since intensified, with significant contributions from major technology firms including Google, Microsoft, Red Hat, ARM, and Amazon, driving enhancements in scalability and interoperability.[9]Technical Foundation
Architecture
Fluentd employs a modular, pluggable architecture that enables extension through a vast ecosystem of over 1,000 community-contributed plugins, covering inputs for data ingestion, filters for processing, and outputs for routing to destinations.[10] This design decouples data collection from consumption, allowing seamless integration with diverse sources and sinks while maintaining a unified logging layer based on JSON-formatted events.[1] At its core, Fluentd operates via a streamlined data flow pipeline: events are ingested from sources using input plugins, parsed into structured records, optionally filtered or modified, buffered asynchronously for reliability, formatted as needed, and routed to outputs based on configuration rules. This pipeline processes timestamped log records in a sequential yet configurable manner, supporting complex routing through labels and match directives to handle multifaceted logging needs.[11] Each event in Fluentd is structured as a triplet comprising a tag, timestamp, and record; the tag—a string identifier like "app.access"—denotes the event's origin and drives routing decisions by matching against filter and output configurations, while the timestamp provides nanosecond-precision timing, and the record holds the payload as a flexible, JSON-like hash of key-value pairs. This tagging system ensures efficient, tag-based dispatching without requiring rigid schemas, promoting adaptability in dynamic environments.[11] Reliability is bolstered by asynchronous buffering in output plugins, which queues events to mitigate failures such as network issues or downstream unavailability; buffer types are configurable, including memory-based for low-latency operations and file-based for durable persistence on disk, enabling retry mechanisms and preventing data loss during transient disruptions.[11][1] Scalability is achieved through horizontal scaling via multi-process workers, where the system spawns multiple independent processes—each handling subsets of plugins—to leverage multi-core CPUs and distribute load, supporting high-throughput scenarios like containerized deployments in Kubernetes by optimizing resource utilization and throughput up to thousands of events per second per core.[12][1] Conceptually, the architecture visualizes a flow from input sources (e.g., logs, metrics) to output sinks (e.g., databases, search engines), with buffering and tagging providing loose coupling that isolates components and facilitates fault-tolerant, scalable log aggregation.[1]Core Components
Fluentd's core components form a modular pipeline that processes log events from ingestion to output, ensuring reliable data collection and routing. These components include input plugins for gathering logs, parsers for structuring data, filters for modification, buffers for queuing, outputs for delivery, formatters for presentation, and a configuration system to define the flow. This pipeline operates on events consisting of a tag, timestamp, and record, allowing for flexible log handling across diverse sources and destinations.[11] Input plugins serve as the entry point, pulling or receiving log data from various sources to initiate the pipeline. They generate structured events by capturing raw logs through mechanisms such as tailing files with thein_tail plugin, which monitors log files for new entries, or listening on network ports via in_tcp and in_udp for syslog or custom protocols, or handling HTTP requests with in_http. For instance, in_tail reads appended lines from files like application logs, assigning tags based on file paths to route events appropriately. These plugins ensure comprehensive coverage of data sources without altering the incoming data initially.
Parsers convert unstructured or semi-structured raw input into discrete, structured events, enabling downstream processing. Integrated within input or filter plugins via the <parse> directive, they support formats like JSON for direct key-value extraction or regex-based patterns to dissect log lines into fields such as timestamp, host, and message. For example, the built-in nginx parser handles access logs by matching predefined patterns to populate event records, while the grok parser uses regular expressions for custom Apache-style logs. This step is crucial for transforming heterogeneous log formats into a uniform Ruby hash representation.[13][14]
Filters process events after ingestion, modifying, enriching, or discarding them to refine the data stream. Applied via <filter> directives that match event tags, they perform operations like adding metadata (e.g., hostname via record_transformer), dropping invalid entries, or reformatting fields. The grep filter, for instance, excludes events matching patterns such as user logouts in access logs, using inclusion or exclusion rules on specific keys. Multiple filters can chain together for complex transformations, ensuring only relevant, augmented events proceed.
Buffers manage event queuing between filters and outputs, providing reliability against failures or high loads by temporarily storing data. They organize events into chunks and support types like memory-based buf_memory for speed in low-risk scenarios or file-based buf_file for persistence across restarts, as used in outputs like out_s3. Retry logic employs exponential backoff—starting at 1 second and doubling up to a configurable maximum like 72 hours—with options for indefinite retries or evacuation to backup directories on unrecoverable errors. This decouples ingestion from delivery, preventing data loss during transient issues.[15]
Output plugins route filtered and buffered events to final destinations, completing the pipeline by forwarding data to storage or analysis systems. Defined in <match> directives that pattern-match tags, they include out_forward for relaying to other Fluentd instances, out_elasticsearch for indexing in search engines, or out_s3 for archival in object storage. For example, out_stdout simply prints events to the console for debugging, while others handle batching and compression for efficiency. Outputs integrate buffers to manage delivery semantics reliably.
Formatters customize the structure of events before output, ensuring compatibility with destination formats. Specified in <format> sections within outputs, they transform records into serialized representations like JSON for human-readable logs or the binary MessagePack for compact, efficient transmission—Fluentd's internal default. The json formatter, for instance, outputs each event as a single JSON line excluding tags unless injected, while the default tab-separated format includes time, tag, and record for legacy compatibility. This allows tailored presentation without altering core event data.[16][17]
Configuration basics tie these components together using configuration files with a directive-based syntax, parsed at startup to define the pipeline. Directives like <source> for inputs, <filter> for processing, and <match> for outputs use tag patterns (e.g., wildcards like **.* for all events) to route flows declaratively. An example configuration might specify <source> @type tail <parse> @type json </parse> </source> followed by <filter> @type record_transformer </filter> and <match> @type forward </match>, enabling straightforward setup of multi-stage pipelines. Fluentd reloads configurations dynamically without downtime via signals.[18][18]
Extensibility and Features
Plugin System
Fluentd's extensibility relies on a modular plugin system that allows users to customize data collection, processing, and forwarding pipelines. Plugins integrate seamlessly into the core event routing mechanism, enabling the ingestion, transformation, and export of log data from diverse sources to various destinations. This architecture supports over 500 community-contributed plugins, which are distributed via RubyGems and enhance Fluentd's capabilities without altering its lightweight core.[3] The plugin system categorizes extensions into specific types to handle different stages of the data pipeline:- Input plugins (prefixed with
in_): Responsible for data ingestion, pulling events from external sources such as files, network sockets, or APIs.[19] - Output plugins (prefixed with
out_): Handle data export, routing events to destinations like databases, cloud storage, or message queues.[19] - Filter plugins (prefixed with
filter_): Process and modify event streams, such as enriching records or dropping irrelevant events based on criteria.[19] - Parser plugins (prefixed with
parser_): Structure unstructured data into Fluentd's JSON-based event format for easier handling.[19] - Formatter plugins (prefixed with
formatter_): Shape output data into formats suitable for specific destinations, like JSON or message packs.[19] - Buffer plugins (prefixed with
buf_): Manage queuing and retry logic to ensure reliable data transmission under varying loads.[19] - Storage plugins (prefixed with
storage_): Provide persistence options for buffering data on disk or in memory.[19]
<type>_<name>.rb (e.g., in_tail.rb) and can generate skeletons using the fluent-plugin-generate tool for rapid prototyping. These plugins are packaged as RubyGems for easy distribution and integration.[19]
Installation occurs via the fluent-gem install <plugin-gem-name> command, such as fluent-gem install fluent-plugin-elasticsearch, which handles dependencies automatically. For the td-agent distribution, use td-agent-gem instead. Plugins are then referenced in configuration files using the @type directive, for example, <source> @type tail </source> to activate an input plugin. Version management is supported through Gemfile specifications or explicit version flags to maintain compatibility across Fluentd releases.[20]
Key examples include the in_tail input plugin, which monitors and tails log files similar to the Unix tail command, capturing new entries in real-time; the out_elasticsearch output plugin, which indexes events into Elasticsearch for search and analytics; and the filter_grep filter plugin, which selects or excludes events matching regular expression patterns in specified fields.[21][22][23]
Maintenance of the plugin ecosystem is community-driven through GitHub repositories, including the fluent-plugins-nursery organization, which coordinates updates, bug fixes, and compatibility testing for various Fluentd versions such as v1 and v0.12. Developers contribute via pull requests, ensuring plugins remain aligned with evolving core APIs and security standards.[24]
Key Features
Fluentd provides a unified logging layer that standardizes log formats across diverse and heterogeneous data sources by structuring events in JSON format, enabling seamless collection, filtering, and routing without custom parsing for each source.[1] This approach decouples inputs from outputs, allowing logs from systems like applications, servers, and cloud services to be normalized for consistent processing and analysis.[1] The tool emphasizes high reliability through features such as automatic retries with exponential backoff (default intervals starting at 1 second and doubling up to a configurable maximum), dead letter queues via buffer evacuation for failed chunks since version 1.19.0, and buffer overflow handling that manages chunks in stages to prevent data loss during high loads or failures.[15] These mechanisms ensure robust failover and high availability, supporting buffering in memory or files to handle network issues or downstream outages gracefully.[1] Fluentd maintains a low resource footprint, typically requiring 30-40 MB of RAM for a vanilla instance, while achieving performance of around 13,000 events per second per core on standard hardware, scalable to higher volumes in multi-process or distributed deployments.[1] This efficiency makes it suitable for resource-constrained environments without sacrificing throughput for log aggregation tasks. Flexibility is a core strength, with tag-based routing that allows complex pipeline configurations by matching events via directives like<match> in the configuration file, directing logs to specific filters or outputs based on tags assigned at ingestion.[18] Beyond logs, it extends to metrics via built-in metrics plugins and traces through compatibility with OpenTelemetry protocols using dedicated input/output plugins.[25][26]
Security features include TLS support for encrypted transport in input and output plugins, configurable via the <transport> section with options for TLS versions (including 1.3 where supported) and certificate validation.[27] Authentication is handled through plugins, such as shared key mechanisms in the forward output for secure node-to-node communication.[28]
Integration with modern infrastructures is native, including deployment as a Kubernetes DaemonSet for cluster-wide log collection from pods and nodes. It also aligns with OpenTelemetry standards, enabling unified handling of logs, metrics, and traces in observability pipelines via protocol-compatible plugins.[29]
As of 2025, recent enhancements in version 1.19.0 include improved buffer evacuation for better error recovery in multi-tenant setups, zstd compression for optimized cloud-native performance, and enhanced metrics reporting, further bolstering reliability and efficiency in distributed environments.[30]
Adoption and Applications
Notable Users
Fluentd has been adopted by major technology companies, including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Red Hat, and ARM, which have contributed to its development since its CNCF graduation in 2019.[9][31] These organizations leverage Fluentd for large-scale log collection and processing in production environments.[31] As of the latest available data, over 5,000 data-driven companies worldwide have relied on Fluentd, with its largest deployments handling logs from more than 50,000 servers.[3] Adoption spans key industry sectors such as cloud providers like AWS and Google Cloud, financial institutions including major banks, and tech giants focused on observability pipelines.[32][33] Within the broader Fluent ecosystem, which includes Fluent Bit, containerized downloads have exceeded 15 billion, underscoring its trust for production-scale operations.[34] As of 2025, post-CNCF graduation, community contributions have grown significantly, with over 219,000 total contributions from 8,954 organizations, including fast-growing startups and enterprises enhancing its extensibility and reliability.[2][35] Case studies include DeFacto, which processes 27.5 million events per 100 hours as of 2023, and Bink, supporting a platform for over 500,000 users as of 2022.[2] In recent years, there has been a noted trend toward using the companion project Fluent Bit for lighter-weight deployments in resource-constrained environments.[36]Use Cases
Fluentd is widely applied in centralized log aggregation scenarios, where it collects logs from distributed systems such as Kubernetes clusters and forwards them to backends like Elasticsearch for unified storage and analysis.[37] In these setups, Fluentd deploys as a DaemonSet or sidecar to tail container logs, parse them into structured JSON format, and route them reliably to central repositories, enabling efficient troubleshooting across large-scale environments.[38] In cloud migration efforts, Fluentd facilitates log routing across multi-cloud environments, such as AWS and Azure, by leveraging its buffering mechanisms to ensure data reliability during transfers.[1] Its file- and memory-based buffers temporarily store events to handle network disruptions or backend unavailability, preventing loss in hybrid or transitioning infrastructures while supporting output plugins for diverse cloud storage targets.[1] Fluentd contributes to observability pipelines by integrating logs with metrics and traces, forming a comprehensive monitoring stack for full-stack visibility.[38] Through its JSON-structured event handling, it enriches log streams for correlation with other telemetry data, allowing teams to query and alert on combined signals in tools like Elasticsearch or Prometheus-integrated systems.[1] For edge-to-cloud forwarding, Fluentd manages high-volume logs from IoT devices or containers, collecting sensor data at the edge—such as from Raspberry Pi setups—and streaming it to cloud services for deeper processing.[39] This push-model approach uses input plugins like HTTP or forward protocols to aggregate and buffer data from resource-constrained environments before reliable transmission, minimizing latency in distributed IoT deployments.[39] Custom processing with Fluentd often involves enriching logs with metadata to support security analytics or compliance auditing, using filters to add contextual details like hostnames or timestamps.[40] The record_transformer plugin, for instance, dynamically appends fields such as pod labels or geolocation data to event records, enabling advanced querying for threat detection or regulatory reporting without altering source applications.[40] In microservices architectures, Fluentd aids debugging by aggregating service-specific logs into a central pipeline, applying filters to isolate issues across interconnected components.[41] For disaster recovery, its persistent buffers ensure log durability during outages, allowing resumption of forwarding once systems stabilize and maintaining audit trails for post-incident analysis.[1]Related Projects
Fluent Bit
Fluent Bit is a lightweight log processor and forwarder designed for resource-constrained environments, such as embedded systems and edge devices. Developed in C by the team at Treasure Data, it was created in 2014 as a complementary tool to Fluentd, addressing the need for a more efficient alternative in scenarios where memory and CPU resources are limited. Unlike Fluentd, which is implemented in Ruby and requires a larger resource allocation, Fluent Bit maintains a minimal memory footprint of under 1 MB, compared to Fluentd's typical 30-40 MB usage, enabling faster parsing and processing while supporting similar data collection pipelines.[42][43][44] The project follows a modular architecture with inputs for collecting data from various sources, filters for enrichment and transformation, and outputs for routing to destinations, optimized particularly for forwarding logs, metrics, and traces to central Fluentd instances or direct backends like Elasticsearch or cloud storage. This pipeline allows Fluent Bit to handle telemetry data efficiently in distributed systems, making it suitable for containerized and IoT applications. As part of the Fluent ecosystem, it shares conceptual origins with Fluentd but emphasizes performance in low-overhead deployments.[45][46] Fluent Bit entered the CNCF as an incubating project in 2018 and achieved graduated status in 2021, reflecting its maturity and widespread adoption within the cloud native community. By 2025, it has surpassed 15 billion downloads, underscoring its scalability and reliability across millions of daily deployments. Often used as an edge agent, Fluent Bit collects data from peripherals and ships it to aggregated Fluentd servers for further processing, enhancing overall logging architectures in hybrid environments.[47][48][49] Recent enhancements as of 2025 include improved OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP) integration for unified logs, metrics, and traces, along with expanded multi-cloud support through plugins for major providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. These updates bolster its role in modern observability stacks, enabling seamless data routing across diverse infrastructures without compromising on efficiency.[50][36]Comparison with Alternatives
Fluentd, implemented in Ruby, offers a lighter footprint compared to Logstash, which relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and JRuby, leading to higher resource demands such as approximately 120 MB of memory usage for Logstash versus Fluentd's around 40 MB.[51][3] This makes Fluentd more suitable for environments where memory efficiency is critical, though both tools can handle high throughput exceeding 10,000 events per second.[51] Logstash excels in parsing unstructured logs through its Grok filter plugin, which uses regular expressions for pattern matching, while Fluentd employs a tag-based routing system that simplifies complex data flows without the overhead of conditional if-then logic.[51] In terms of extensibility, Fluentd benefits from over 500 community-contributed plugins for inputs, filters, and outputs, providing broader integration options than Logstash's approximately 200 centralized plugins.[3][51] Compared to Vector, a Rust-based observability pipeline tool, Fluentd provides a more mature and extensive ecosystem with over 500 plugins, enabling intricate routing and transformations that suit scenarios requiring diverse integrations.[3][52] Vector, however, prioritizes efficiency and built-in reliability features like delivery guarantees and buffer management, achieving higher log collection rates—often over twice that of similar tools in benchmarks—while using less memory, such as 0.2 to 0.5 times the footprint of alternatives under heavy workloads.[53][52] With around 46 sources and a comparable number of sinks, Vector's curated components support high-performance pipelines but may require more custom development for highly specialized routing compared to Fluentd's plugin-driven flexibility.[54][52] Fluentd serves as a central aggregator for log processing and routing, consuming higher resources (around 40-60 MB) and supporting full-featured transformations via its extensive plugin system, whereas Fluent Bit functions primarily as a lightweight forwarder with minimal overhead (under 1 MB memory) and around 100 built-in plugins focused on basic collection and shipping.[55][56][3] This distinction positions Fluentd for backend aggregation in data centers or Kubernetes clusters handling complex enrichment, while Fluent Bit is optimized for edge devices or resource-constrained agents like IoT or container sidecars.[55][56] Migration between the two is facilitated by configuration translation tools that map Fluentd's Ruby-based directives to Fluent Bit's simpler syntax, allowing hybrid deployments where Fluent Bit forwards data to Fluentd for deeper processing.[36] Selection criteria for Fluentd versus alternatives depend on deployment needs: opt for Fluentd in backend roles requiring robust plugin support and vendor-neutral aggregation, use Fluent Bit as an agent for low-overhead forwarding in distributed systems, and choose Vector for performance-critical pipelines emphasizing Rust's efficiency and native reliability.[52][55] Logstash fits ELK Stack ecosystems with strong parsing needs but at a resource cost.[52] Hybrid setups, such as Fluent Bit agents feeding into Fluentd aggregators, are common for scalable observability in cloud-native environments.[55]| Aspect | Fluentd Strengths | Logstash Strengths | Vector Strengths | Fluent Bit Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resource Usage | Low memory (~40 MB); Ruby-based efficiency | Robust JVM parsing but high (~120 MB) | Ultra-low memory; high throughput | Minimal (~1 MB); edge-optimized |
| Ecosystem | 500+ plugins for complex routing | 200+ plugins; Grok for logs | 46+ sources/sinks; built-in reliability | 100+ built-in; simple forwarding |
| Best For | Central aggregation, Kubernetes processing | ELK integration, unstructured parsing | High-performance pipelines | Lightweight agents, IoT/edge shipping |
| Limitations | Slower than Rust tools in benchmarks | JVM overhead; conditional routing | Fewer plugins for niche integrations | Limited complex transformations |