Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Frontage

Frontage is the front of a plot of land or building that abuts a , , , or other public way, typically measured as the horizontal linear extent of this interface. In , it denotes the width of a lot at its street-facing edge, which directly impacts , development potential, and , with desirable frontages—such as those on waterfronts or prominent avenues—commanding premiums due to visibility and utility. ![Market square in Telč, illustrating aligned historic building frontages][float-right] In and , frontage shapes the streetscape by defining how structures interface with public realms; passive frontages, like blank walls or setbacks, can reduce appeal, whereas active frontages—characterized by transparent windows, entrances, and articulated facades—encourage vitality, safety, and economic activity along thoroughfares. This dimension has informed regulations, such as minimum frontage requirements for lots to ensure adequate spacing and access, and has evolved in modern design to prioritize human-scale enclosures over expansive, vehicle-oriented layouts. Historically, exemplary frontages, as seen in town squares with continuous, ornamented building lines, demonstrate how cohesive frontage treatment enhances communal spaces without reliance on centralized .

Etymology and Historical Development

Linguistic Origins

The term "frontage" is formed by combining the noun "front," signifying the foremost or facing part, with the "-age," a productive element in English derived from and "-aticum," used to denote an action, process, condition, or extent. This morphological structure emerged in the 1620s, marking its initial application to denote the linear extent of or abutting a , such as a or watercourse. The root "front" traces to Old French front (attested from the ), meaning "forehead" or "brow," which itself derives from Latin frontem (accusative of frons), denoting "forehead, brow, or forefront," with connotations of outward-facing prominence. In English, this base shifted from anatomical and metaphorical senses to spatial ones, particularly in description, independent of earlier military usages of "front" as a (from the 15th century onward). The records the earliest evidence for "frontage" before 1642, in the legal commentary of Robert Callis on the Statute of Sewers (23 Hen. VIII, c. 5), where it refers to the measurable portion of adjacent to navigable waters or highways, emphasizing and for purposes of and rights. Such 17th-century legal texts, focused on riparian and liabilities, established "frontage" as a precise for boundary-facing extent, distinguishing it from broader or obsolete senses like features or alignments.

Evolution in Property Contexts

In the 19th century, amid rapid urbanization spurred by the , frontage transitioned from a simple linear boundary measure to a pivotal attribute in land subdivision, emphasizing direct street access for residential and commercial development. In the United States, expanding cities like standardized urban lots at approximately 25 feet of street frontage to support dense building patterns and infrastructure extension, as evidenced by subdivision plats that calculated total developable frontage in miles for orderly city growth. Similar practices emerged in the , where enclosure acts and urban conveyances increasingly specified frontage lengths to allocate access rights along emerging roads, facilitating the shift from agrarian to industrial . During the 20th century, frontage gained formal standardization in property records and surveys, embedding it as a core descriptor in deeds and cadastral documentation across the and . In the , post- municipal surveys and the Public Land Survey System's influence extended to urban plats, where deeds routinely detailed frontage measurements—such as 50 to 100 feet for typical lots—to delineate and access entitlements, as seen in records from burgeoning industrial hubs. The , lacking a comprehensive national , integrated frontage specifications into title deeds and valuation practices by the early , reflecting its role in assessing development potential amid ongoing . This era's emphasis on precise frontage notation supported equitable subdivision and taxation, drawing from empirical land use patterns rather than prior descriptions. Post-World War II automobile proliferation amplified frontage's commercial significance, prioritizing road adjacency for vehicular access and visibility in strip developments. US household car ownership surged from 44% in 1940 to 75% by 1960, driving demand for properties with extensive highway frontage to enable drive-in retail and service stations, which outperformed pedestrian-focused sites in revenue potential. In both the and , this shift manifested in that favored linear commercial frontages along arterials, as auto-oriented designs required setback adjustments and integration, fundamentally altering property usability from walkable to drive-thru models.

Definition and Core Concepts

Primary Definition

Frontage denotes the linear of a property lot's that directly abuts a public street, , or , representing the width of the lot at its front edge along that abutting feature. This dimension is determined by the across the front line, excluding any curved or irregular adjustments unless specified in local standards. Measurements are typically recorded in feet in the United States or meters in metric systems, providing an objective quantification of access exposure rather than aesthetic or functional attributes. A key distinction exists between lot frontage, which captures the full exposure of the property boundary to the abutting , and building frontage, which measures the width of the structure's facade oriented toward that same frontage. Lot frontage emphasizes the parcel's legal and spatial interface with public rights-of-way, independent of any constructed elements, while building frontage pertains to the architectural plane's extent. This separation ensures clarity in contexts like subdivision planning, where lot dimensions dictate compliance, separate from building placement. The concept is empirically grounded in property surveys and recorded plats, which delineate frontage through precise markings, bearings, and distances derived from field measurements and geodetic data. These documents verify frontage without invoking subjective interpretations, relying instead on verifiable coordinates and monumentation to establish the linear extent at the lot's anterior .

Types of Frontage

Street frontage, also known as or frontage, refers to the linear extent of a property's that abuts a public , facilitating vehicular and . This type predominates in suburban and rural plats, where deeds specify measurements such as 100 feet of frontage to denote the accessible edge along a . Waterfront frontage denotes the segment of a property line directly adjacent to a , such as a , , or , often conferring riparian rights for flowing waters or littoral rights for standing bodies. In riparian contexts, this frontage grants owners privileges like access to the watercourse proportional to their boundary length, as seen in deeds for riverine properties where measurements like 200 feet of frontage define ownership extent along the bank. Hybrid frontages arise on corner lots, which possess dual street frontages at intersecting roads, with the primary front typically measured as the shorter boundary line unless local codes specify otherwise. Double frontage lots, distinct from corners, feature boundaries parallel to two streets, requiring front yard compliance on both sides and often measured independently for each abutting road. In dense urban areas, properties may exhibit frontage on pedestrian pathways or alleys, though such configurations prioritize over vehicular norms and are measured similarly to street types but with emphasis on adjacency.

Measurement and Technical Aspects

Calculation Methods

Frontage is calculated by measuring the linear between the side lines of a lot along the that abuts the or , typically using a straight-line parallel to the abutting feature. This method prioritizes the perpendicular width at the frontage line, excluding curvatures in the unless local codes explicitly require arc-length computation for irregular or bowed frontages. For regular rectangular lots, the measurement is straightforward, taken directly from the plat map or on-site survey between intersection points of the side lines with the front boundary. Irregular lots, such as those with angled or varying widths, often employ averaging techniques, such as dividing the sum of the narrowest and widest sections by two to approximate effective frontage length. Alternatively, measurements may reference the or use geometric projections to ensure replicability, aligning with direct distance measurement principles in land surveying. Traditional relied on tools like 100-foot metal tapes or chains for on-site direct (DDM), calibrated to hundredths of a foot for . Contemporary methods leverage digital tools, including GPS-enabled devices for real-time positioning and computation, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for overlaying data with aerial imagery, and maps for baseline verification. These approaches enhance accuracy to sub-foot levels, particularly for remote or complex terrains, while cross-referencing multiple data layers mitigates errors from signal variability or historical map distortions.

Factors Influencing Measurement

Physical , such as slopes and changes along the property boundary, can reduce effective frontage by constraining the buildable or accessible portion, as steeper gradients limit feasibility and require adjustments in surveys to reflect usable linear extent rather than gross boundary length. Easements and encroachments further subtract from net frontage, as utility easements or overhanging structures render segments unusable for private purposes, necessitating deductions in to determine the actual available for or . Right-of-way dedications, often required for public access, diminish private frontage by transferring boundary portions to governmental control, with surveys calculating net frontage exclusive of these strips. In contexts, variations introduce dynamic boundaries, prompting legal surveys to employ standardized datums like the mean high water line, derived from long-term observations to mitigate discrepancies from daily fluctuations in water levels. This approach ensures consistent measurement, as instantaneous high could inflate frontage while lows deflate it, with empirical data from benchmarks showing annual variations up to several meters in coastal areas.

Applications in Real Estate

Valuation Impacts

In , frontage directly impacts property value through enhanced road access, which facilitates multiple entry points and reduces circulation inefficiencies, and , which boosts exposure to vehicular traffic. For properties along major thoroughfares, appraisers apply the front foot valuation method, calculating worth as the linear footage of frontage multiplied by a market-derived per foot from comparable of similar-depth parcels. This approach reflects causal drivers like potential and customer draw, where superior frontage correlates with 20-50% higher per-square-foot values in high-traffic corridors compared to interior lots, based on data adjustments for . Empirical evidence from residential markets confirms a premium for wider frontage, as it enables better building orientation and subdivision feasibility. A U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development study of house price trends found that each additional 10 feet of frontage width increases sale prices by about 7 percent, attributable to improved and perceived utility over total lot area alone. In urban areas, this uplift stems from frontage's role in highest-and-best-use determinations, where adequate width supports flexible development—such as multi-unit configurations—while narrow frontage (<50 feet) restricts options, elevating per-unit costs by limiting efficient site layout and access. Conversely, limited frontage imposes economic penalties by constraining subdivisibility and amplifying costs per developable , countering assumptions that alone enhances value without empirical support for access trade-offs. Appraisal emphasize frontage over lot in highest-and-best-use analyses, as it governs viability for revenue-generating uses like strips, where and ingress/egress dictate potential. Properties with suboptimal frontage thus trade at discounts, with hedonic models showing irregular or narrow configurations reducing prices by 5-15% relative to rectangular lots of equivalent area due to heightened frictions.

Development and Usability Considerations

In site planning, sufficient frontage width facilitates multiple access points, enabling efficient vehicle entry and egress for larger developments or homes requiring side-by-side , whereas narrow lots often restrict designs to single-access configurations that hinder maneuverability for emergency vehicles or deliveries. Properties with broader frontage also simplify connections, as the extended along the allows direct tie-ins to , , and electrical lines without necessitating lengthy private extensions or shared easements, reducing installation complexities and long-term maintenance burdens. Conversely, minimal frontage constrains buildable area near the street, often limiting facade designs and forcing deeper lot utilization, which can optimize backyard space but complicates grading and work due to elongated runs. Flag lots, characterized by a narrow stem—typically 20 to 40 feet—connecting the main parcel to , illustrate these trade-offs by prioritizing depth for larger habitable areas while minimizing exposure. This configuration enhances privacy through physical setback from traffic but reduces usability via extended driveways that amplify , paving, and drainage costs, often shared among neighbors in subdivisions. Such lots demand careful planning for along the stem, where insufficient width may require trenching that disrupts during construction or repairs. Greater frontage heightens exposure to roadside hazards like traffic and potential from runoff, necessitating to maintain livability; for instance, properties adjacent to high-volume experience noise levels that impair indoor , with barriers or adding development costs that studies show can yield net benefits through reduced annoyance but require upfront investments exceeding program averages for effective deployment. In practice, wider frontage amplifies these exposures proportionally to the facade length, prompting site-specific buffers or vegetative screening to accessibility gains against environmental drawbacks, though narrow designs mitigate direct impacts at the expense of overall site flexibility.

Role in Urban Planning and Architecture

Zoning and Regulatory Requirements

Many municipal zoning codes in the United States impose minimum frontage requirements on residential lots, typically ranging from 50 to 100 feet or more, to ensure adequate access, setback compliance, and perceived safety for emergency vehicles and utilities. For instance, some jurisdictions mandate at least 75 feet for single-family homes in established neighborhoods, while others require 120 to 140 feet in suburban districts. These standards trace their legal foundation to the 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., which upheld comprehensive zoning ordinances—including lot size and frontage minima—as a valid exercise of police power to promote public health, safety, and welfare, provided they are not arbitrary. Proponents of these minima argue they prevent and facilitate servicing, but empirical analyses reveal stronger associations with exclusionary outcomes, such as elevated costs and restricted to opportunity-rich areas for lower-income households. Minimum frontage rules contribute to this by rendering narrower or subdivided lots unbuildable without variances, effectively limiting development on underutilized urban parcels and favoring projects viable only for larger-scale developers with resources to assemble multiple lots. Such restrictions infringe on owners' to fully utilize their , often without compensation, by imposing dimensional standards that prioritize uniformity over market-driven subdivision, as seen in cases where pre-existing smaller lots become nonconforming and lose development potential. Deregulation experiments provide evidence that relaxing these minima boosts supply without inducing disorder. In Oregon's 2019 statewide reforms, which eased restrictions including lot size minima, home price growth slowed in affected areas over five years, alongside increased multifamily permitting. Similarly, upzoning initiatives that reduce frontage and density barriers have yielded about 9% higher supply within 5-10 years, demonstrating that targeted reductions in regulatory stringency enhance affordability by enabling denser, smaller-lot construction absent the predicted negative externalities. These findings underscore how frontage minima, while framed as safety measures, often serve to preserve neighborhood exclusivity at the expense of broader availability, with causal links to and wealth disparities rather than verifiable public safety gains.

Contributions to Streetscape and Accessibility

Active frontages, characterized by transparent windows, entrances, and displays along the property boundary, enhance streetscape by fostering visual interest and human-scale at the level. indicates that higher-quality active frontages correlate with improved public perceptions of safety, comfort, and liveliness in spaces, as measured through surveys in diverse settings like Bangladesh's active streets where frontage elements such as and seating positively influence experience. Uniform building lines without excessive variation contribute to coherent forms by maintaining a consistent wall, which supports enclosed, environments; however, studies linking such uniformity to walkability gains often show correlations rather than causation, as higher-income areas with better-maintained frontages confound results without adequate controls for socioeconomic variables. Direct frontage access improves accessibility by minimizing circulation distances to building entries and surrounding destinations, particularly in layouts where plot frontages under 20 meters enable shorter paths to amenities compared to deeper lots requiring detours. In mixed-use contexts, at least 50% frontage along streets has been associated with preferences for segments with buildings under six stories, reducing perceived barriers and encouraging foot over vehicular dominance. Larger setbacks, however, introduce barren zones that extend effective walking distances and diminish direct , as pedestrians must navigate expansive lawns or before reaching entrances. In high-rise developments, blank walls arising from elevated podiums or minimal ground-level articulation often result in monotonous streetscapes that heighten walker discomfort and perceived tedium, prompting faster passage rather than lingering. Historic precedents like Victorian row houses, prevalent in U.S. cities from the 1880s to 1910, demonstrate superior street-level engagement through flush facades with bay windows, stoops, and ornate detailing that invite interaction without setbacks, contrasting modern zoning-induced retreats that prioritize light and air over contiguous interfaces. While frontage alignment to the street edge yields these empirical advantages, overregulation mandating uniformity risks suppressing architectural diversity, potentially yielding sterile environments absent contextual adaptation.

Legal and Economic Implications

Property Rights and Taxation

In certain jurisdictions, frontage serves as the basis for special assessments, levied on a per-foot or front-foot formula to fund public improvements such as sidewalks, sewers, or road widenings that directly benefit abutting . For instance, in , these taxes are calculated based on the length of frontage rather than overall property value, aiming to allocate costs proportional to presumed benefits from proximity to the improvement. Critics contend that such front-foot methods can impose regressive burdens on owners of smaller or shallower lots, as fixed per-foot charges fail to scale with total land area or value, potentially exacerbating inequities for with comparable frontage but limited depth. Frontage also delineates key property rights, particularly in waterfront contexts under riparian doctrines, where ownership extends to the water's edge, conferring privileges such as reasonable for boating, fishing, or docking. In states like and , these rights attach to parcels with direct shoreline frontage, excluding non-adjacent owners and enabling exclusive use of adjacent submerged lands or bottomlands. However, these entitlements are vulnerable in proceedings, where governments frequently condemn narrow frontage strips for , severing and requiring compensation for diminished riparian utility, as seen in highway expansion cases. Empirical analyses highlight limitations in frontage-centric taxation, noting that assessments often disregard lot depth, which can result in overvaluation of shallow parcels relative to deeper ones and incentivize inefficient land configurations, such as elongated "flag lots" to maximize frontage while minimizing taxable exposure. This approach presumes uniform benefit distribution along the frontage line without accounting for rear-area usability, potentially distorting optimal parcel shapes and contributing to underutilized urban footprints.

Disputes and Case Examples

Boundary disputes over property frontage often arise from encroachments, where structures or fences extend onto adjacent land or public rights-of-way, necessitating surveys to establish original plat lines. In Boerst v. Opperman (2018), the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that circuit courts must first attempt to determine boundaries from original surveys or deeds before considering secondary evidence like acquiescence, resolving a dispute where frontage measurements conflicted due to historical inaccuracies in lot descriptions. Similarly, Phillips v. Blowers (1968) in Minnesota involved a fence erected along a claimed boundary that reduced the disputing party's frontage access, with the court upholding survey evidence over long-term occupation to prevent arbitrary reductions in street-facing measurements. Eminent domain cases in the 19th century frequently contested frontage losses from road widenings, balancing public infrastructure needs against private property rights. In Bauman v. Ross (1897), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the widening of Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., where landowners challenged the assessment of benefits against remaining parcels to offset taken frontage; the Court affirmed that non-contiguous benefited lands could not be charged, but adjacent remnants must receive just compensation for diminished access and value tied to reduced street exposure. Such rulings established precedents for compensating frontage-specific impacts, as pure setback without access impairment often yielded no recovery, highlighting causal links between frontage length and property utility in pre-automobile urban contexts. Contemporary political disputes illustrate tensions over frontage road implementations, where access mandates clash with local opposition. In Oklahoma's 2024 ACCESS Oklahoma turnpike expansion, the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority (OTA) planned to mitigate highway barriers, but the City Council rejected the proposal on , citing overdevelopment risks and inadequate community input; OTA subsequently dropped frontage roads and interchanges, sparking debates on whether such infrastructure favors developers by enabling sprawl versus preserving neighborhood cohesion. Proponents argued frontage roads enhance property values through better connectivity, while critics, including residents, contended they undermine controls on density, revealing how frontage provisions can politicize without uniform empirical backing for net benefits. Zoning-related frontage disputes pit developers seeking variances against communities enforcing minimum frontage rules to overdevelopment. For instance, developers often challenge requirements mandating sufficient frontage for lots to ensure aesthetic and , claiming hardship from irregular parcels; courts grant relief only if literal enforcement precludes reasonable use, as in cases where reduced frontage still allows viable without subdividing uniquely shaped . Community pushback succeeds when proposals exceed frontage-based limits, preserving streetscapes but occasionally stifling economic utilization, as evidenced in suburban battles over apartment complexes where frontage constraints limit units per facade to prevent visual clutter. These conflicts underscore that while frontage minima promote orderly growth, rigid application can favor incumbent interests over adaptive , with outcomes hinging on localized of or valuation impacts rather than abstract claims.

Related Infrastructure and Concepts

Frontage Roads

Frontage roads, also known as service roads, are local roadways constructed parallel to controlled-access s to provide direct access to abutting properties and connect them to the highway via ramps, thereby separating slower local traffic from higher-speed mainline vehicles. The term's first documented use dates to 1863. This configuration emerged as an engineering solution to mitigate on primary thoroughfares by isolating ingress and egress movements, allowing freeways to maintain throughput for long-distance travel while preserving property access without full right-of-way acquisitions for at-grade intersections. In design, frontage roads may operate as one-way or two-way pairs flanking the mainline, with one-way setups favored for reducing conflict points, such as left turns across opposing , and minimizing queuing that spills onto ramps. guidelines specify converting existing two-way frontage roads to one-way operation when ramp queues exceed storage capacity or when safety analyses indicate high crash rates from cross-movements. Operational modeling demonstrates that such parallel roads can enhance mainline speeds in densely developed corridors by diverting up to 20-30% of local trips, though this separation increases overall route lengths for users, potentially elevating vehicle-miles traveled. While effective for congestion relief on the freeway proper, frontage roads impose ongoing burdens on public funds, including resurfacing and for extended low-volume segments that taxpayers subsidize without proportional revenue from tolls or assessments. They can exacerbate by facilitating along corridors, raising long-term infrastructure costs through induced land consumption and fragmented that discourages compact growth. Empirical alternatives include or partial-cloverleaf interchanges with consolidated access points, which limit continuous parallel roads to high-density zones and reduce total pavement square footage by 15-25% compared to full frontage systems, per corridor studies, though these require upfront land takings.

Waterfront and Specialized Frontages

Waterfront frontage refers to the linear extent of a abutting navigable waters such as , lakes, or oceans, granting riparian or littoral that scale with its length. Riparian owners hold proportional to the waterbody's navigable , often determined by methods like the proportionate medial line, which divides the based on each parcel's frontage share to allocate and usage . These include reasonable for , wharf construction, and resource extraction, but exclude interference with adjacent owners' equivalent entitlements. Unlike static land frontages, measurements fluctuate due to natural processes of and accretion, which dynamically adjust boundaries over time. Gradual accretion—deposition of soil or sediment—extends the owner's holdings incrementally, while recedes them, potentially reducing usable frontage without compensation unless avulsion (sudden, perceptible change) occurs, preserving prior lines. In coastal areas, these shifts have led to documented losses, such as bluff along shorelines driven by waves and high water levels, altering frontage lengths by meters annually in vulnerable zones. owners must monitor and sometimes litigate these changes, as courts apply the avulsion doctrine to sudden events like storms, preventing automatic title shifts. Specialized waterfront uses, particularly dockage, leverage frontage length to enhance utility and economic value in coastal markets. Riparian rights permit pier or dock construction extending proportionally from the frontage to reach navigable depths, often limited to avoid encroachment. In Florida's coastal regions, properties with direct dock access command premiums of 30-50% over inland comparables, with data from 2024 sales showing waterfront parcels appreciating faster due to boating demand. Installing a compliant dock can yield 150-200% return on construction costs through added value, as federal limits on slips constrain supply and elevate demand for private access. However, waterfront frontages face heightened vulnerabilities, including risks that impose substantial economic burdens. Annual U.S. flooding damages range from $179.8 billion to $496 billion as of 2024 estimates, with waterfront properties in high-risk zones experiencing sale price discounts of up to 10-20% due to perceived threats from sea-level rise and storms. Regulatory overlays, such as mandatory wetlands , further constrain by designating non-buildable zones—typically 50-100 feet wide—along shorelines to protect ecosystems, effectively shrinking usable frontage and elevating compliance costs. These restrictions, while aimed at preserving and , limit dockage expansions and habitable area, imposing opportunity costs estimated in forgone value; for instance, buffer requirements have reduced buildable acreage in regulated areas, contributing to higher per-unit land prices without commensurate public benefits in some analyses. Empirical critiques highlight that such rules, often rooted in precautionary environmental policies, can exacerbate economic inefficiencies by prioritizing ecological preservation over productive use, particularly in markets where frontage drives revenue from or commerce.

References

  1. [1]
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/frontage
  2. [2]
    FRONTAGE | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
    the front part of a building that faces a road or river, or land near a road or river. The property has about two miles of river frontage.
  3. [3]
    What is Frontage? | Edmonton Real Estate Definition - Gimme-Shelter
    Jan 21, 2025 · Frontage is the width of a lot, measured at the front part of the lot. In Edmonton real estate, the term frontage appears on most real estate listings.
  4. [4]
    FRONTAGE - Real Estate Glossary - Square Yards
    Frontage is nothing but the measurement of the boundary separating a plot of land or a structure from the road it faces.
  5. [5]
    Frontage Types and the Public Realm | Planetizen Courses
    Jul 29, 2016 · This course reviews the 10 primary frontage types and how each shapes the public realm. This course focuses on understanding the features and distinctions of ...
  6. [6]
    Frontage (Building) - UpCodes
    The length of an exterior building wall or structure of a single premise orientated to the public way or other properties that it faces.
  7. [7]
    10-19-6: FRONTAGE OR STREET FRONTAGE:
    Street frontage is measured between side property lines of a lot along the property line that abuts the street.
  8. [8]
    Putting up a good front - MSU Extension
    Aug 16, 2013 · Building frontages serve to frame the public space and create the enclosure (or public room) where social interaction takes place.
  9. [9]
    Frontage - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    late 13c., "forehead," from Old French front "forehead, brow" (12c.), from Latin frontem (nominative frons) "forehead, brow, front; countenance, expression.
  10. [10]
    https://www.etymonline.com/word/-age
  11. [11]
    https://www.etymonline.com/word/front
  12. [12]
    Frons - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    late 13c., "forehead," from Old French front "forehead, brow" (12c.), from Latin frontem (nominative frons) "forehead, brow, front; countenance, expression ( ...
  13. [13]
    frontage, n. meanings, etymology and more - Oxford English Dictionary
    There are six meanings listed in OED's entry for the noun frontage, one of which is labelled obsolete. See 'Meaning & use' for definitions, usage, and ...
  14. [14]
    Notes on 19th Century Lot Sizes
    Nov 15, 2012 · The conventional wisdom has long held that 19th century New York building lots were uniformly 25 feet wide.Missing: development | Show results with:development
  15. [15]
    [PDF] A History of the Rectangular Survey System
    This classic research contribution is a detailed reference which will undoubtedly be well used by historians, land use specialists, surveyors , and attorneys ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Why the United Kingdom does not have a cadastre
    The UK does not have a cadastre which makes it unusual amongst major economies. This raises the question as to whether the absence of a cadastre undermines ...
  17. [17]
    History of Cadastral Systems - International Federation of Surveyors
    Apr 15, 2020 · Cadastral systems are the foundation and an integral component of parcel-based land information systems (LIS) that contain a record of interests in land.
  18. [18]
    A Postwar Nation - Environmental Review Toolkit
    Automobile ownership increased exponentially following World War II as America became a country of people obsessed with their cars. Auto makers responded to the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Commercial Development and the Automobile, 1910-1970
    These design and spatial adaptations led to clear differentiations between the older pedestrian-oriented commercial buildings and the newer auto-based forms.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Restructuring the Commercial Strip - Institute for Local Government
    The strip came along with the post-World War II demand for suburban development that physically transformed the nation. ... enhanced frontage treatments to auto ...
  21. [21]
    Frontage | UpCodes
    The width of a lot or parcel abutting a public right-of-way measured at the front property line. Go To Full Code Chapter. Related Code Sections.
  22. [22]
    Frontage - Real Estate Definition
    The linear measurement along the front of a parcel, that is, the portion facing a road, waterway, walkway, etc. that would be considered the most valuable ...
  23. [23]
    5-20-1: LOT AREA, FRONTAGE, AND COVERAGE:
    Lot frontage is measured along the right-of-way line between opposite-side boundaries of the lot. Lot frontage on cul-de-sac bulbs is measured at the actual ...
  24. [24]
    How To Find Property Lines: 11 Free Methods | Quicken Loans
    Nov 13, 2024 · The line that measures across the front of your property is known as your frontage, and the property lines on the side of your home are known as ...
  25. [25]
    Basics On Property Lot Split Plat Surveys And Creation
    Nov 1, 2019 · New lots must meet all zoning and planning requirements in the area in terms of both lot size and frontage. From here, lot split plans will ...
  26. [26]
    How to Read a Survey Plat | Ferikes Bleynat & Cannon PLLC
    Sep 12, 2024 · A survey plat is a detailed drawing created by a licensed land surveyor that shows the precise location and boundaries of a parcel of land.Missing: frontage | Show results with:frontage
  27. [27]
    What is road frontage and why is it important? | Eagle River Realty
    May 6, 2025 · A property with good frontage is generally more visible from the street, contributing to its curb appeal and making it easier for potential buyers or renters ...
  28. [28]
    Types of Lots | firsttuesday Journal
    Feb 4, 2020 · Cul-de-sac lot: a lot facing the rounded turn-around portion of a dead-end street. · Corner lot: a lot located at the intersection of two streets ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    What is “Riparian”? | Michigan Lakes and Streams Association, INC
    In Michigan, 'riparian' refers to properties touching or having frontage on flowing water like rivers, streams, or creeks, and is commonly used for any  ...
  30. [30]
    Methods of Riparian Allocation | Waterfront Property Owners | NLC
    Nov 15, 2019 · The purpose of any riparian survey is to equitably subdivide the riparian rights within a lake, river, or ocean among the property owners.
  31. [31]
    Corner lot: which is the front? - Cyburbia
    Jun 12, 2009 · On a corner lot, the front lot line is the shorter of any two adjacent lot lines having frontage on a street. If a lot is bounded on two ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
  32. [32]
    Double frontage lot Definition - Law Insider
    Double frontage lot means a lot having frontage on two parallel or approximately parallel streets other than alleys. Double frontage lots are prohibited except ...
  33. [33]
    2.2 Glossary of Terms - Buffalo Green Code
    Pedestrian Priority Frontage (PPF). A frontage line, mapped in an N-1D or N-1C zone, which is regulated to achieve an elevated standard for pedestrian quality.
  34. [34]
    Property Frontage: A Guide to Measuring Your Land's Face
    Dec 4, 2024 · Frontage refers to the width of a property where it faces or borders a street, waterway, or other access point.
  35. [35]
    How to (accurately) measure the frontage or width of a property
    Jun 7, 2023 · While manually measuring the property and consulting sources like Pricefinder, RPData, PropertEASE, or Street-Directory can provide a good ...
  36. [36]
    https://www.baselineequipment.com/land-surveying-accurate-distance-measuring
  37. [37]
    5.5 Land Surveying and Conventional Techniques for Measuring ...
    To measure distances, land surveyors once used 100-foot long metal tapes that are graduated in hundredths of a foot. An example of this technique is shown in ...
  38. [38]
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gis.toptoshirou.landmeasure.Glandmeasure&hl=en_ZA
  39. [39]
    GIS Mapping Tools: Features, Benefits, and How to Choose the ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · GIS mapping tools are used to visualize, measure, and analyze property data by combining geospatial information with high-resolution aerial ...
  40. [40]
    LandGlide: GPS Property Line Map App
    LandGlide uses GPS to pinpoint your locations property line map and access key parcel data on any mobile device.Missing: frontage | Show results with:frontage
  41. [41]
    Topography 101: Why It Matters for Homebuyers and Real Estate ...
    Oct 8, 2024 · Topography impacts property value, livability, and development potential, affecting drainage, flood risk, and construction costs. It is ...What Is Topography? · 1. Drainage And Water Runoff · 3. Land Slope And...
  42. [42]
    What factors do commissioners consider when valuing and dividing ...
    Sep 2, 2025 · Location and features matter: Waterfront, road frontage, views, soil, floodplain, and topography affect value and are factored into the split.Apply The Law · Key Requirements · AnalysisMissing: measurement real
  43. [43]
    15 Ways an Appraiser Determines Land Value - Rethink Rural
    A property's value can be affected by easements and encumbrances that may make some of its land unusable. Land on the property could have an easement for a ...1. Access · 9. Historical Management... · 11. Land Use And Zoning...
  44. [44]
    Factors to consider in the valuation of land - NEREJ
    Jun 19, 2014 · Location, unique features, road frontage, accessibility, deed restrictions, and municipal tax burdens are factors to consider when valuing land.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Mean High Water Manual
    Chapter 1: Preface and Introduction. 1.1 Preface. 1.1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this manual is to establish a uniform method for determining water level.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] aquatic land boundaries in washington state - WA DNR
    A network of benchmarks is established for every water level measurement station and each tidal benchmark is related vertically to the local tidal datum. At ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Maine Principles of Ownership Along Water Bodies
    to deal with disputes concerning them. A. Boundaries along Tidal Water. Tidal ... The rod, pole, or perch is an ancient surveying measurement used for land.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] 15. Appraisal and Valuation - California Department of Real Estate
    The report consists of a brief description of the property, the type of value sought, the purpose served by the appraisal, the date of value, the value opinion ...
  49. [49]
    Appraisal Process, Economic Areas, and the Approaches to Value
    ... frontage in feet. The front foot is generally used in the appraisal of residential and commercial land where parcels are of uniform depth, but differ in ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Property Valuation Lesson 12 Site Analysis - Proeducate
    Commercial: Location/frontage on a major thoroughfare typically draws a premium in commercial properties. This too provides superior exposure, which is ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Recent House Price Trends and Homeownership Affordability
    and each additional 10 feet of frontage width raises prices by about 7 percent. ... As of 1994, the coastal cities had a 15 percent price premium. At their ...
  52. [52]
    Factors Affecting the Price of Cost-Equivalent Land - MDPI
    Therefore, frontage should have a positive effect on the price of cost-equivalent land, and the coefficient is expected to have a positive value as well. (8).<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Influence of lot size and shape on redevelopment projects
    Aug 9, 2025 · They concluded that irregularly shaped lots provide landowners with fewer benefits, that is, higher reconstruction costs and lower price ...
  54. [54]
    Influence of lot size and shape on redevelopment projects
    This paper analyzed the influence of lot size and shape on the externalities of local environments using a hedonic approach.
  55. [55]
    What is Better: Frontage or Depth? | Real Estate Question
    May 1, 2024 · Frontage is the width of the lot at the front, and depth is how long the lot is – how deep it goes. So, let's say you have a commercial storefront.
  56. [56]
    A Guide to Wide Frontage Home - Buildi
    Mar 20, 2024 · Impressive curb appeal: With more frontage on display, this provides a bigger canvas for your facade to make a real impression on passers-by and ...
  57. [57]
    Lot Dimensions: A Complete Guide for Buyers & Builders - SellofLand
    Influence on Property Valuation. Lots featuring broader frontages often command higher market prices due to enhanced curb appeal and development potential, ...
  58. [58]
    What Is A Flag Lot In Real Estate? | Bankrate
    Dec 14, 2022 · Pros of a flag lot · More privacy: Homes on flag lots often can't be seen from the street, offering greater privacy than most curb-site lots.Missing: usability | Show results with:usability
  59. [59]
    What is a flag lot and what are the Pros and Cons of owning one
    Mar 30, 2024 · Flag lots also provide a sense of security, as access to the property is limited to the homeowners and their guests. Cons of Flag Lots: However, ...Missing: frontage minimal usability
  60. [60]
    What Is a Flag Lot? Pros, Cons & Buying Considerations - Kukun
    May 27, 2023 · What Are the Cons of Having a Flag Lot? ... Limited street frontage: Flag lots have a narrow access point or driveway leading to the main road.<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    A sound investment? Traffic noise mitigation and property values
    Results show that noise mitigation raised property prices by 10–12 percent. The property price benefits exceed programme investment cost with each $1 spent on ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The Traffic Noise Externality: Costs, Incidence and Policy Implications
    In principle, the construction of a sound barrier may reduce not only noise exposure but also air pollution and it may improve visual amenities by blocking ...
  63. [63]
    Why You Want to Buy Real Estate with Frontage - Gimme-Shelter
    Jul 6, 2017 · More frontage means more space is possible between houses. This is great if you want to build a storage shed, or just have some space to walk ...
  64. [64]
    Zoning 101 - Page 5 of 5 - HousingForward Virginia
    For example, a zoning ordinance might require that residential lots have a minimum frontage of 50 feet. This means that to be buildable, a lot must have at ...
  65. [65]
    Urban Minimum Lot Sizes: Their Background, Effects, and Avenues ...
    Aug 14, 2023 · Minimum lot sizes have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years as an impediment to homeownership, a prime enabler of exclusion by municipalities.
  66. [66]
    Flag Lots: A Modest Step Towards Increased Urban Density
    Jul 25, 2024 · To be fair, there are more practical arguments in favor of minimum frontage requirements and uniform plot lines, including allowing better ...Missing: pros cons usability
  67. [67]
    § 7.5 R-15 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. - American Legal Publishing
    Frontage: 120 feet at the setback line (150 feet for corner lot). B. Building locations (minimum setbacks from lot lines).
  68. [68]
    Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. | 272 U.S. 365 (1926)
    Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.: If they are not arbitrary or unreasonable, zoning ordinances are constitutional under the police power of local ...Missing: Euclidean | Show results with:Euclidean
  69. [69]
    Euclidean Zoning - Historic Documents - City of Euclid
    Euclidean Zoning is a type of zoning named for the Village of Euclid where zoning was upheld in 1926 as a legitimate governmental power.Missing: frontage minima
  70. [70]
    Rethinking Zoning to Increase Affordable Housing
    Dec 22, 2023 · As such, exclusionary zoning practices are associated with higher housing costs and racial segregation, exacerbating the racial wealth gap.7.
  71. [71]
    Policy Minute: Exclusionary Zoning - NYU Furman Center
    Jan 27, 2022 · Exclusionary zoning creates barriers to housing supply and restricts access to high-opportunity neighborhoods for low-income families.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] “Why Not In Our Community?” Removing Barriers to Affordable ...
    Increasing required minimum frontage by 10 feet drove up prices by. 6.1% to ... obsolete building regulations that impede infill development. These ...
  73. [73]
    Zoning Reforms and Housing Affordability: Evidence from the ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · Using a synthetic control approach we find that the reform lowered housing cost growth in the five years following implementation: home prices ...
  74. [74]
    Making housing affordable? The local effects of relaxing land-use ...
    Upzoning increases housing supply by about 9% in 5-10 years, but has no significant effect on rents, making it a viable policy for affordability.Missing: deregulation experiments<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Understanding Exclusionary Zoning and Its Impact on Concentrated ...
    Jun 23, 2016 · Exclusionary zoning is an oft-mentioned policy that keeps affordable housing out of neighborhoods through land use and building code requirements.
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Zoning as a Barrier to Multifamily Housing Development - HUD User
    While zoning policies restricting density (especially density in the form of multifamily housing) indicate that land-use regulations may be exclusionary, their.
  77. [77]
    The relationship between the quality of active frontages and public ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · The results suggest that the quality of an active frontage can significantly affect people's perceptions of a public space in terms of its safety, comfort, ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Analyzing the Importance of Streetscape and Quality of Active Street ...
    This article intends to carry out an empirical investigation of the components of pedestrian walkways in different active streets in Bangladesh. The research ...
  79. [79]
    Understanding cities through urban morphology at large scale
    The proposed “EO + Morphometrics” approach paves the way for the large-scale identification of interpretable urban form patterns and study of associated ...Missing: uniform | Show results with:uniform
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Pedestrian accessibility in grid layouts: the role of block, plot ... - Voog
    The findings show how dimensions of plot frontages and depths, street widths and block lengths affect pedestrian accessibility in gridiron urban environments.
  81. [81]
    Analysis of the impact of street-scale built environment design near ...
    The results indicate that pedestrians and cyclists have similar preferences for road segments with building lower than 6 floors, 50% retail shops in frontage, ...
  82. [82]
    Let's cover blank walls with public murals
    Feb 3, 2017 · Blank walls discourage walking because they make a walk seem boring and therefore longer, and because empty and lightly maintained spaces feel ...
  83. [83]
    The Responsibility of the Building to the Street | Planetizen Features
    Feb 16, 2023 · When buildings instead impose flat, empty walls on the street, pedestrians experience stress and discomfort. They walk faster, as if trying ...Missing: rise cons
  84. [84]
    Queen Anne Style 1880 - 1910
    The Queen Anne style typifies the architecture of the Victorian age. With its distinctive form, abundance of decorative detail, corner tower, expansive porches.
  85. [85]
    The Problem with Setbacks - Strong Towns Archive
    Oct 24, 2017 · When land values go up, land is more valuable, so we want to waste less of it. Thus, setbacks motivate us to consolidate land into fewer lots.Missing: eroding level
  86. [86]
    Frequently Asked Questions - Special Assessments
    In some cases, properties within an SSD might span multiple jurisdictions. For example, a flood control district, defined by a watershed, could include ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Land Valuation - Vanguard Appraisals, Inc.
    Sep 13, 2021 · LOT SIZING TRIAGULAR SHAPED LOTS. •We must use the 1/3 2/3 rule to calculate the Frontage or the. Rear. •The “2/3 rule” applies when the front ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] General Overview of Riparian Rights in Florida
    Private riparian rights are not limited to owners of direct waterfront properties, but may be held by owners of property which is not directly adjacent to ...
  89. [89]
    Riparian Rights in Michigan
    The State of Michigan defines riparian rights as “those rights which are associated with the ownership of the bank or shore of an inland lake or stream.”
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Summary of Major Eminent Domain Cases & Legislation
    May 31, 2022 · Facts: The frontage of a property along a highway was condemned to expand the highway. The property owner did not retain an expert witness ...
  91. [91]
    Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Sherrod - Justia Law
    This is an eminent domain case, involving the taking of a strip for highway widening purposes from the front of a tract of land, a portion of which tract ...
  92. [92]
    Foot-Frontage Rule: Understanding Property Tax Assessment
    Here are a couple of examples of abatement: Example 1: A property owner with a lot that has 50 feet of frontage on a newly improved street may be assessed a ...
  93. [93]
    Boerst v. Opperman Part 3—The Supreme Court Breakdown
    Oct 7, 2018 · If the boundary line cannot be so determined, the circuit court looks to the best evidence of the boundary line. The circuit court's ...
  94. [94]
    Phillips v. Blowers :: 1968 :: Minnesota Supreme Court Decisions
    The issue erupted into litigation when, on August 18, 1964, defendant erected a fence upon what he claimed to be the "true and correct property line" as ...
  95. [95]
    Bauman v. Ross | 167 U.S. 548 (1897)
    Bauman v. Ross concerns the Fifth Amendment and just compensation for land taken for a highway, and the ability to consider benefits to non-taken land.Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  96. [96]
    Agency makes changes to proposed Oklahoma toll road following ...
    The OTA removed plans for frontage roads and three interchanges on the turnpike after the Norman City Council on Aug. 27 refused to support a resolution.Missing: mandates | Show results with:mandates
  97. [97]
    ACCESS Oklahoma rejection spurs debate over frontage roads | News
    Sep 6, 2024 · The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority revealed it will not build frontage roads or other amenities within Norman, following the city council's rejection of ACCESS ...Missing: mandates | Show results with:mandates
  98. [98]
    Variance Standards: What is hardship? And when is it unnecessary?
    May 27, 2014 · A property owner can prove unnecessary hardship, even if the owner has some reasonable use of the property without the variance.Missing: frontage disputes
  99. [99]
    [PDF] DEALING WITH DEVELOPMENT CONTROVERSY - Walker, MI
    The density and intensity planned for the land use districts should be able to be related to lot sizes, density, lot coverage, and other regulations. If the ...Missing: assessments inefficient
  100. [100]
    8.1.18 Frontage Roads - Texas Department of Transportation
    Queuing on the frontage road routinely backs up from an intersection to within 100-ft of a freeway entrance or exit ramp gore;. The LOS of a signalized ...
  101. [101]
    8.1 Design Considerations - Texas Department of Transportation
    In these cases, at least 100-ft of separation distance should be provided between the intersection of the entrance ramp and frontage road travel lanes and the ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Attitudes Concerning Two-Way and One-Way Frontage Roads
    Freeway frontage roads should be made one-way at the earliest possible time. OPPOSition to change increases the longer the frontage roads remain two-way. 3. The ...
  103. [103]
    (PDF) Frontage Roads: An Assessment Of Legal Issues, Design ...
    Operational simulations of various freeway systems demonstrated that frontage roads may improve the operation of freeway mainlanes in heavily developed areas, ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Freeway Design Decisions for Revised Frontage Road Policy
    In addition, recent concerns with issues such as congestion, safety, sprawl, cost, route circuity, and the undermining of mass transit modes necessitates a ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Planning Tool of Access Management – Not Always Frontage Roads
    This study was prepared to provide an access management plan for the section of Highway. 16 between Highway 36 and Range Road 2-3 to address the need to ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Frontage Roads for Freeway Corridors: An Evaluation of Access and ...
    If the local community agrees to pay partial or total costs of construction and/or maintenance, the chance of approving the frontage road increases.
  107. [107]
    What Are Riparian Rights & Why Are They Important? - Axley Attorneys
    May 4, 2023 · Each riparian owner is entitled to the exclusive right to reach navigable water, to have reasonable access to and from navigable water, and to have reasonable ...Missing: frontage | Show results with:frontage
  108. [108]
    Accretion, Reliction, Accession, and Avulsion in Real Estate
    Jan 31, 2022 · Accretion, reliction, accession, and avulsion are all terms that involve changes in the size of property due to movements of water and soil.
  109. [109]
    [PDF] Effects of Erosion and Accretion on Coastal Landforms
    Bluffs found along New York's Great Lakes shorelines are affected by erosion resulting from a variety of factors including waves, high water levels, groundwater.
  110. [110]
    ACCRETION/AVULSION: THE LEGAL LITTORAL DIVIDE - SGR Law
    Such owners are entitled to lands made by accretion or reliction in front of their property and contiguous thereto in certain proportions according to the ...<|separator|>
  111. [111]
    An Overview of Riparian Rights and Access Disputes - Farrell Fritz
    Sep 13, 2022 · Riparian rights refer to a system of allocating water rights among waterfront landowners primarily providing access to the navigable portions of a waterway.
  112. [112]
    Does "Waterfront" Add More Value to a Home?
    Nov 25, 2024 · Waterfront properties are valued at least up to 30% to 50% higher than inland comps. The wide range of pricing differences can be confusing for ...
  113. [113]
    Is 2025 the Right Time to Build a Dock? Cost Trends & Market ...
    Apr 16, 2025 · Real estate data shows that quality docks can return 150-200% of their construction cost in added property value, making them one of the most ...
  114. [114]
    Flooding Costs the U.S. Between $179.8 and $496.0 Billion Each Year
    Jun 10, 2024 · The total annual economic burden of flooding in the United States is between $179.8 and $496.0 billion. The JEC Democratic staff's analysis ...Missing: waterfront | Show results with:waterfront
  115. [115]
    How could rising floodwaters impact your home's value?
    In addition, the study found that homes in a higher risk flood zone saw a greater decrease in sale price than homes in a less risky flood zone. Inland ...Missing: waterfront | Show results with:waterfront
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Wetland Economics - USDA ERS
    Wetland conversion or degradation deprives society of water quality, water quantity, fish and wildlife habitat, and recreation benefits, or increases the cost ...Missing: buffers | Show results with:buffers