Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Game of skill

A game of skill is an activity, contest, or amusement where the outcome is predominantly determined by participants' judgment, mental acuity, physical dexterity, or strategic decision-making, rather than random chance.^[1] This contrasts with games of chance, such as lotteries or roulette, where success relies primarily on unpredictable elements like dice rolls or card draws, though many games incorporate both skill and chance to varying degrees.^[2] Legally, the classification hinges on tests like the "material element test," which assesses whether skill is the dominant factor influencing results, often evaluated through whether outcomes improve reliably with practice and experience.^[3] In jurisdictions worldwide, this distinction affects regulatory treatment, with skill games typically facing fewer gambling restrictions than pure chance games, enabling real-money competitions in formats like esports or card tournaments.^[4] Prominent examples include chess, where strategic foresight prevails; poker variants like Texas Hold'em, ruled skill-dominant in multiple U.S. courts due to bluffing and odds calculation; and backgammon or rummy, which reward tactical play over luck.^[5] Controversies arise in borderline cases, such as fantasy sports or video games with loot mechanics, where regulators debate predominance amid evolving online platforms, underscoring ongoing legal scrutiny to prevent disguised gambling.^[6]

Definition and Core Characteristics

Fundamental Definition

A game of skill is a contest or activity in which the outcome is determined primarily by participants' mental or physical abilities, such as strategy, knowledge, dexterity, attention, experience, and adroitness, rather than by random chance.^[1]^[7] These abilities represent learned capacities that enable players to influence results through deliberate actions, distinguishing skill-based pursuits from those reliant on probabilistic elements like dice rolls or random draws.^[3] In legal and analytical contexts, the predominance of skill is assessed by evaluating whether superior performance correlates with expertise rather than luck, even if minor chance factors exist, as in chess where the initial color assignment introduces negligible variability outweighed by strategic depth.^[8]^[9] Core to this definition is the causal mechanism linking player proficiency to success: outcomes emerge from cognitive or motor processes honed through practice, where tactical decisions, pattern recognition, or precision execution directly shape results.^[10] Empirical analysis often quantifies this by comparing variance in player performance; for instance, repeated play by skilled individuals yields consistent advantages, unlike chance-dominant scenarios where results approximate randomness regardless of effort.^[11] This framework privileges verifiable player agency over stochastic events, ensuring that games like chess or competitive puzzles embody skill through reproducible excellence tied to individual capability.^[12]

Distinction from Games of Chance

A game of skill is fundamentally distinguished from a game of chance by the primary determinant of its outcome: in skill-based games, success depends predominantly on participants' mental or physical abilities, strategic decision-making, knowledge, practice, and experience, which allow superior performers to consistently outperform others over repeated plays.^[13] In contrast, games of chance rely on random, uncontrollable elements such as dice rolls, card shuffles, or lottery draws, where participant actions exert negligible influence on the result, rendering outcomes independent of ability.^[2] This causal distinction arises from first-principles analysis: skill involves deliberate, repeatable actions that exploit patterns or probabilities through expertise, whereas chance introduces irreducible randomness that equalizes all participants regardless of preparation.^[14] Empirically, the boundary can be assessed by observing performance stability across iterations. In skill-dominant games like chess, top-ranked players maintain high win rates (e.g., grandmasters achieving over 80% success against novices) due to honed tactics, as variance from chance diminishes with expertise; repeated trials reveal persistent hierarchies based on measurable proficiency metrics such as Elo ratings.^[15] Conversely, in pure chance games like roulette, long-term outcomes converge to house edges (typically 2.7-5.26% depending on the variant), with no player's skill altering expected returns, as confirmed by probabilistic models showing independence from input.^[16] Quantitative methods, such as fitting player data to skill parameters via regression and evaluating ranking consistency, further delineate the two: skill games exhibit low intertemporal rank correlation variance, while chance games show random reshuffling akin to uniform distributions.^[17] Many games incorporate both elements, complicating classification; the predominance test—prevalent in legal frameworks—evaluates whether skill causally outweighs chance in influencing outcomes, often requiring that a reasonably skilled player can materially affect results through effort rather than luck alone.^[6] For instance, backgammon involves dice (chance) but strategic cube decisions and pip management (skill), with studies indicating skill accounts for approximately 60-70% of variance in professional play.^[13] This threshold matters for regulatory purposes, as games where chance predominates (e.g., slot machines, with return-to-player rates fixed by random number generators) face stricter gambling prohibitions, whereas skill-prevalent ones (e.g., esports titles like StarCraft II) evade such restrictions by demonstrating outcome predictability via player aptitude.^[18] Empirical validation of predominance avoids subjective bias by prioritizing data-driven metrics over anecdotal claims, ensuring distinctions reflect causal reality rather than institutional preferences.^[19]

Key Elements Constituting Skill

Skill in games primarily involves the capacity for players to exert influence over outcomes through deliberate, informed actions that can be honed via practice and experience, distinguishing it from random variance inherent in chance elements. This influence arises from differential abilities among players, where superior performers demonstrate consistent advantages in strategic, planning, and execution facets, as modeled in simplified games like stud poker variants.^[20]^[21] Empirically, skill predominance is evident when repeated play reveals widening performance distributions, such as broader Elo rating spreads, indicating that player decisions outweigh probabilistic fluctuations over time.^[13] A core element is strategic decision-making, whereby players assess available information—including rules, opponent tendencies, and probabilistic outcomes—to select actions that maximize expected success. In games like chess or poker, this entails calculating risks and adapting to incomplete information, enabling skilled participants to outperform others systematically rather than through luck alone.^[20] Practice refines this by building pattern recognition and heuristic efficiency, leading to measurable improvements uncorrelated with random draws.^[21] Another fundamental component is planning and foresight, involving the formulation of multi-step sequences that anticipate future states and contingencies. This element underscores skill's causal role, as it allows players to structure games toward favorable equilibria, evident in simulations where algorithmic strategies yield intransitive yet predictable hierarchies of dominance.^[20] Unlike chance, which introduces irreducible variance, planning enables regression to skill-based means in longitudinal data, where top performers maintain win rates above 50% against inferiors across thousands of trials.^[13] Execution proficiency constitutes the application of strategy under constraints like time limits or physical demands, encompassing precision, speed, and error minimization. In execution-heavy games, such as basketball or esports, this translates to hand-eye coordination and reaction times that correlate with training volume, producing outcomes where skill variances exceed chance-induced noise.^[20] Quantitative assessments, including actions-per-minute metrics or win-probability models, confirm that execution skill amplifies strategic edges, with empirical benchmarks showing skill-dominant games exhibiting rating standard deviations surpassing hybrid chance-skill thresholds.^[13] Finally, adaptability and learning form an integrative element, as skill evolves through feedback loops that refine mental models without altering underlying chance mechanics. Skilled players exploit these loops to converge on optimal play, resulting in performance stabilization that isolates skill from transient luck, as validated by tournament simulations and rating system analyses.^[21] This adaptability ensures that in skill-prevalent games, long-run success rates reflect inherent abilities rather than isolated random events, providing a verifiable demarcation from pure chance pursuits.^[13]

Classification Criteria

Legal Tests for Skill Predominance

In jurisdictions regulating gambling, courts determine whether a game qualifies as one of skill—thus often exempting it from prohibitions on games of chance—by evaluating the relative influence of skill and chance on outcomes. The predominant approach in the United States, adopted by most states, is the dominant factor test, also known as the predominance test, which assesses whether skill is the controlling or dominant element in determining the result, rather than chance.^[6]^[22] Under this test, the game's inherent character is examined objectively, independent of a particular player's abilities; for instance, if repeated play by skilled participants consistently yields better results due to judgment, strategy, or dexterity overpowering random elements, skill predominates.^[6]^[18] Application of the dominant factor test involves analyzing the game's structure, rules, and mechanics holistically. Courts may consider factors such as whether outcomes improve with practice, the predictability of results among experts versus novices, and the extent to which chance events (e.g., dice rolls or random draws) can be mitigated by skillful decisions.^[23] For example, in games like chess or golf, skill overwhelmingly dictates success, rendering chance negligible, whereas slot machines fail the test due to random payouts independent of player input.^[22] This test has been upheld in cases involving contests and promotions, where even incidental chance elements do not disqualify the game if skill governs the majority of outcomes.^[24] Some states employ stricter standards, such as the material element test, which deems a game one of chance if random factors play any significant or material role, regardless of skill's overall dominance.^[25] This approach, used in jurisdictions like Arizona and Washington, heightens scrutiny on whether chance introduces meaningful uncertainty that skilled players cannot reliably overcome, potentially classifying hybrid games (e.g., those with strategic choices amid probabilistic events) as gambling.^[25]^[23] A rarer any chance test prohibits classification as skill if even minimal random elements exist, applied in states demanding absolute absence of chance for exemption from gambling laws.^[23] These variations reflect state-specific statutes, with over 30 states favoring the more permissive predominance framework to accommodate contests like daily fantasy sports, where statistical analysis and expertise have been ruled to outweigh inherent uncertainties in athlete performance.^[26]^[27] Internationally, analogous tests appear in frameworks like India's, where the Supreme Court has ruled games such as rummy as skill-based if substantial psychological knowledge and expertise predominate over chance, influencing commercial legality under public gambling acts.^[27] Empirical evidence, including longitudinal player data showing skill-based win rates stabilizing over trials, supports predominance findings but is weighed against game design risks like undisclosed algorithms introducing variability.^[25] Courts emphasize that the test protects against disguised gambling while permitting legitimate competitions, though outcomes remain fact-specific and subject to evidentiary burdens on operators to demonstrate skill's causal primacy.^[6]^[18]

Empirical and Quantitative Measures

Empirical measures of skill predominance in games rely on analyzing large datasets of player outcomes to decompose variance into components attributable to stable player abilities versus random fluctuations. One established approach involves estimating latent skill levels for players that maximize the likelihood of observed game results, then assessing how well these skill rankings predict actual outcomes compared to random permutations. If the skill-based ranking outperforms random ranking in explanatory power—typically by explaining more than 50% of outcome variance—the game is deemed skill-dominant. This method, applied to games like chess and poker, reveals near-total skill predominance in chess (where top players consistently win against inferiors) but mixed results in poker, depending on format.^[13]^[17] Simulation-based quantitative tests further distinguish skill from chance by modeling repeated plays under controlled conditions. In Texas Hold'em poker, for instance, statistical simulations of millions of hands with fixed player strategies demonstrate that skilled players achieve positive expected win rates over sufficiently large samples (e.g., thousands of hands), as luck-induced variance diminishes while skill-driven edges persist. These tests quantify skill's role by computing the proportion of long-run outcomes deviating from chance expectations, often using metrics like the standard deviation of win rates normalized against pure-luck baselines such as coin flips. Similar frameworks have been extended to card and board games, employing bootstrap resampling to estimate confidence intervals for skill's contribution, confirming predominance where repeatable performance correlations exceed 0.5.^[28]^[29] Additional metrics include win probability thresholds and hierarchy depth analysis, where skill manifests as consistent outperformance across skill differentials. A model's parameter for luck (β) can be fitted such that a better player wins approximately 73% of matchups at a defined skill gap (Δs = 1 level), allowing quantification of game "depth"—deeper hierarchies indicate greater skill influence, as seen in chess versus more luck-dependent games like backgammon. In fantasy sports contests, regression analyses of user performance data show skill accounting for 60-80% of variance in outcomes when controlling for random athlete performances, via metrics like adjusted R-squared from player selection models. These approaches prioritize longitudinal data to ensure robustness against short-term luck, though they require assumptions about skill stationarity and may understate chance in highly variant environments without massive sample sizes.^[30]^[31]

Historical Evolution

Origins in Traditional and Philosophical Contexts

The concept of games of skill, distinguished from those dominated by chance, emerged in ancient civilizations through practical play and reflective discourse on human agency versus randomness. In Mesopotamia and Egypt around 3000–2500 BCE, early board games like the Royal Game of Ur incorporated dice for random movement alongside strategic decisions, illustrating an implicit recognition that player choices could influence outcomes despite aleatory elements.^[32] Similarly, Senet in ancient Egypt, dating to circa 3100 BCE, blended path-navigation strategy with throw-based progression, where superior play could mitigate chance's impact, reflecting cultural views of games as microcosms of fate tempered by cunning.^[33] In ancient Greece, from the 8th century BCE, philosophers formalized distinctions between tyche (chance or luck) and techne (skill or artifice), applying them to recreational pursuits. Plato, in works like The Republic (circa 375 BCE), critiqued excessive dice games (kypeloi) as yielding to fortune over reason, advocating instead for contests honing virtue, such as strategic board games like petteia (a precursor to checkers), where intellect prevailed.^[34] He likened life itself to a "dice-game" in which individuals must skillfully manage throws, emphasizing control over responses rather than random events.^[35] Aristotle, in Physics (circa 350 BCE), defined chance as incidental causes producing unintended effects, contrasting it with purposeful skill in activities like archery or tactical games, and he condemned gambling on pure chance as eroding rational deliberation.^[36] These views positioned skill-dominant games as extensions of ethical training, fostering phronesis (practical wisdom) against automaton (spontaneous luck). Roman traditions, building on Greek foundations from the 3rd century BCE onward, perpetuated this binary in ludus practices, favoring dice (tesserae) for chance-based diversion while elevating ludus latrunculorum (a skill-oriented war game akin to chess) for intellectual merit among elites.^[37] Cicero (1st century BCE) echoed Stoic principles, attributing success in skill games to disciplined foresight rather than Fortuna's whims, influencing later ethical treatises that valorized mastery over contingency.^[34] Across these contexts, the skill-chance divide underscored causal realism: outcomes traceable to player actions warranted approbation, while random dominance invited moral caution, prefiguring enduring debates on agency in human endeavors.^[38]

Emergence in Modern Legal Frameworks

The distinction between games of skill and games of chance emerged in modern legal frameworks during the 19th century, as legislatures and courts responded to the proliferation of commercial gambling amid industrialization and urbanization, seeking to prohibit addictive lotteries and wagering houses while exempting contests where participant ability could reasonably influence outcomes.^[39] In the United Kingdom, the Gaming Act 1845 constituted a foundational statute, declaring wagers on games unenforceable as contracts and targeting the suppression of gaming houses, but it preserved a differentiation that tolerated games where skill—such as in bowling or tennis—predominated over mere hazard, thereby curbing chance-based vices without broadly criminalizing skillful competitions.^[40]^[41] This legislative approach reflected a causal recognition that games of pure chance fostered dependency akin to lotteries, whereas skill-oriented activities aligned with public interests in merit-based endeavor, influencing subsequent common law interpretations that upheld enforceability or legality for the latter.^[42] Early judicial applications in the UK emphasized empirical evaluation of game mechanics, exempting pursuits like chess or billiards from prohibitions otherwise applied to dice or roulette, setting precedents for balancing regulatory control with economic allowances for skilled pastimes.^[43] In the United States, the framework evolved through state-level adjudication in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with courts interpreting anti-gambling statutes and constitutional bans on lotteries—typically defined as schemes of unequal chance—by adopting the "predominance test" to classify mixed games.^[11] Under this test, a game qualifies as one of skill if competent play can overcome random elements over repeated instances, as opposed to single-event dominance by fortune; this standard, rooted in cases debating whether constitutional "lotteries" encompassed only pure chance operations, enabled exemptions for activities like horse racing (where training and strategy mattered) while invalidating slot machines or roulette.^[12]^[44] By the mid-20th century, over 45 states employed variations of this test, prioritizing quantitative assessments of skill's influence—such as win rates among experts versus novices—to delineate legal boundaries, though applications varied by jurisdiction and game type.^[45]

Exemplary Games

Pure Skill Games

Pure skill games are contests where outcomes depend entirely on participants' abilities, with no randomness or chance influencing results. These games feature deterministic mechanics, perfect information for all players, and symmetric starting conditions, enabling the more skilled competitor to win consistently over multiple engagements. Unlike mixed games, pure skill variants exclude elements like dice rolls or card draws, focusing solely on strategy, tactics, and execution.^[46]^[47] Chess stands as a quintessential pure skill game, originating in India around 600 CE during the Gupta Empire as chaturanga, a precursor simulating battlefield tactics. Players alternate moving pieces—such as pawns, knights, and queens—across an 8x8 checkered board under fixed rules, aiming to checkmate the opponent's king by placing it under inescapable attack. The absence of probabilistic factors allows computational analyses to evaluate positions objectively, with top players like Magnus Carlsen achieving win rates exceeding 80% against lower-rated opponents in classical formats.^[48]^[49] Checkers, or draughts, provides another example, contested on an 8x8 board where players advance pieces diagonally and capture by jumping adjacent opponents. Emerging in ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia by the 3rd millennium BCE in proto-forms, modern international draughts emphasizes forward planning and piece promotion to kings for enhanced mobility. The game's solvability—demonstrated in 2007 when Jonathan Schaeffer's Chinook program proved perfect play leads to draws in English draughts—underscores its reliance on skill, as superior computation equates to unbeatable defense.^[50] Other pure skill games encompass abstract strategy titles like Go, involving territorial encirclement on a 19x19 grid without random draws, and physical dexterity challenges such as billiards, where precise cue control determines potting success. These games are legally distinguished from gambling in most jurisdictions, permitting prize competitions without regulatory hurdles tied to chance-based wagering.^[51]^[52]

Skill-Dominant Games with Minimal Chance

Skill-dominant games with minimal chance incorporate limited random elements, such as occasional dice rolls or card draws, but outcomes are overwhelmingly determined by players' strategic decisions, foresight, and tactical execution, rendering chance subordinate to proficiency.^[53] In these games, skilled participants consistently outperform novices over repeated plays, as evidenced by win rates that correlate strongly with experience and decision-making quality rather than probabilistic variance.^[54] Legal analyses often classify them under the "predominance test," where skill must demonstrably outweigh chance to avoid gambling restrictions, supported by empirical data like player rankings and tournament results showing low variance in elite competitions.^[6] Backgammon exemplifies this category, featuring dice rolls that introduce positional variability but allowing expert players to mitigate luck through superior bearing-off strategies, pip counting, and doubling cube decisions; studies indicate top players achieve win rates exceeding 60% against averages due to these skills dominating the game's 20-30% chance component.^[55] Similarly, contract bridge involves initial hand deals as the primary random factor, yet bidding conventions, play signaling, and declarer techniques enable skilled partnerships to control outcomes, with world-class teams maintaining over 55% victory margins in matchpoints attributable to expertise rather than distribution luck.^[56] Other instances include cribbage, where pegging and hand management skills overshadow the luck of dealt cards, yielding consistent advantages for proficient players in tournament settings, and deck-building games like Dominion, where shuffling introduces minor asymmetry but engine optimization and resource prioritization ensure skill-driven dominance, as quantified by player Elo ratings that stabilize outcomes beyond initial variance.^[55]^[57] In digital formats, arcade-style titles such as Breakout variants emphasize paddle control and trajectory prediction over any physics randomness, with high scores reflecting practiced reflexes and pattern recognition rather than aleatory factors.^[58] These games highlight causal realism in gameplay, where minimal chance serves primarily to prevent perfect predictability, fostering deeper strategic layers without undermining merit-based success.^[54]

Legal and Regulatory Dimensions

Implications for Gambling Laws

Games predominantly involving skill are typically exempt from gambling regulations in jurisdictions where statutes define gambling as requiring a material element of chance, thereby avoiding prohibitions on unlicensed wagering, prize contests, or betting operations.^[47]^[3] This exemption stems from the absence of the "gamble" inherent in chance-based activities, allowing skill-based competitions to operate without the licensing, taxation, or oversight applied to casinos or lotteries.^[59] For instance, federal U.S. law provides safe harbor for contests of skill meeting criteria such as no predetermined outcomes and prizes based on participant performance, without prohibiting intrastate or interstate skill gaming outright.^[18] In the United States, this classification creates patchwork implications across states, where skill-dominant games evade gambling-specific taxes—often 50% or higher on gross revenue—and regulatory burdens, leading to unregulated markets that generate billions in untaxed play.^[60] Pennsylvania courts, for example, ruled in 2024 that electronic skill games fall outside the state Gaming Act, exempting operators from the 54% slot machine tax rate while sparking lawsuits from casinos seeking parity.^[61]^[62] Such exemptions foster industry growth in esports and daily fantasy sports but raise concerns over consumer vulnerabilities, including addiction risks akin to gambling despite skill predominance, prompting calls for targeted oversight without full reclassification.^[63]^[64] Internationally, similar dynamics apply in the European Union, where skill-based activities like fantasy sports are regulated under frameworks distinguishing them from chance games, as in the UK's 2017 Skill Games Regulations treating them as non-gambling.^[65] This leads to lighter restrictions but exposes gaps in cross-border enforcement and fraud prevention, as skill games proliferate on digital platforms without uniform anti-money laundering or age verification mandates.^[66] Policy implications include lost public revenue from forgone gambling levies—estimated in the U.S. alone at tens of billions annually from unregulated skill variants—and debates over whether predominant-skill thresholds sufficiently mitigate harms, influencing legislative pushes for hybrid models balancing innovation with safeguards.^[60]^[67]

Notable Court Cases and Precedents

In United States v. DiCristina (E.D.N.Y. 2012), a federal district court ruled that Texas Hold'em poker qualifies as a game of skill rather than chance under the Illegal Gambling Business Act (18 U.S.C. § 1955), dismissing charges against the operator of an underground poker club. The court relied on expert analyses, including computer simulations and player data, demonstrating that skilled players outperform novices over repeated hands, with skill determining long-term outcomes despite short-term variance from chance elements like card distribution.^[68]^[69] This decision applied the predominant factor test, weighing whether skill or chance dominates results, but was overturned by the Second Circuit in 2013, which interpreted the federal statute's definition of "gambling" to include betting on games of skill or chance without requiring chance predominance.^[70] In White v. Cuomo (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021), the New York Court of Appeals upheld the legality of daily fantasy sports (DFS) contests, classifying them as games of skill exempt from the state constitution's gambling ban. The court examined statistical evidence showing that DFS outcomes correlate strongly with participants' knowledge of player statistics, injury reports, and matchup analysis, rather than random events, applying the predominant factor test to conclude skill controls results in contests spanning multiple real-world games.^[71]^[72] This precedent contrasted with rulings in states like Illinois, where courts using a similar test found certain DFS formats impermissibly chance-dominated due to single-game dependencies, prompting operators to exit those markets.^[73] State-level cases on electronic skill games have further refined the predominance test's application. In Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Devices (Pa. Super. Ct. ongoing appeals as of 2024), Pennsylvania courts evaluated "skill" machines requiring timed button sequences and memory challenges, deeming them skill-predominant when player proficiency yields consistent wins above chance levels, exempting them from slot machine regulations despite regulatory challenges.^[74] Similarly, in Dragon Ascent Video Gaming Machine SC LLC v. South Carolina (S.C. Ct. App. 2025), a magistrate found skill predominates in a video device involving pattern-matching, but upheld its illegality under state-specific gambling statutes prohibiting any prize-awarding games with betting elements.^[75] These rulings highlight jurisdictional variances, with the predominant factor test—assessing skill's control over outcomes via objective measures like win rates and replicability—serving as the core framework in most U.S. states, though federal law under IGBA broadly proscribes organized betting irrespective of predominance.^[76]

Contemporary Developments

Rise in Esports and Digital Platforms

The emergence of esports as a professional competitive domain underscores the adaptation of skill-based games to digital environments, where player proficiency in strategy, reflexes, and coordination determines outcomes with minimal reliance on chance. Early precursors date to 1972, when Stanford University hosted the first organized video game tournament featuring Spacewar!, attracting 24 participants and marking the inception of competitive electronic gaming.^[77] Subsequent milestones in the 1980s, such as Atari's 1980 Space Invaders Championship with over 10,000 entrants, demonstrated growing public interest, while the 2000s saw institutionalization through entities like Major League Gaming, founded in 2002 to professionalize console-based competitions.^[78]^[77] By the 2010s, broadband internet and multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) titles like League of Legends propelled esports into mainstream viability, with South Korea licensing professional players as early as 2000 to foster structured leagues.^[77] Digital platforms have accelerated this trajectory by enabling real-time global connectivity and spectator engagement, transforming isolated play into broadcast spectacles. Streaming services such as Twitch, launched in 2011 as a spin-off from Justin.tv, revolutionized accessibility, allowing millions to watch live matches and fostering community-driven prize pools that reward skill mastery.^[79] Platforms like YouTube Gaming complemented this by integrating video-on-demand replays, contributing to an esports audience projected at 318 million viewers in 2025, including 261 million regular enthusiasts.^[80] The global esports market, valued at $2.13 billion in 2024, is anticipated to expand at a 23.1% CAGR through 2030, driven by sponsorships, merchandise, and entry fees predicated on competitive merit rather than probabilistic elements.^[81] This digital proliferation aligns with legal classifications distinguishing esports from gambling, as outcomes hinge predominantly on participants' abilities—mental acuity, practice, and tactical execution—rather than random variance, exempting many tournaments from restrictive wagering laws in jurisdictions like the United States.^[3]^[25] Broader skill-based digital platforms, such as peer-to-peer multiplayer apps excluding loot boxes or random generators, have similarly surged, with the overall skill gaming sector reaching $40.69 billion in 2024 and forecasted to double by 2032 through user-versus-user matchmaking that prioritizes equitable skill matching.^[82]^[83] These platforms mitigate chance via algorithms ensuring balanced contests, reinforcing empirical evidence that sustained success correlates with deliberate skill acquisition over fortuitous events.^[84]

Industry Growth and Economic Factors

The global skill gaming market, encompassing competitive video games, mobile skill-based apps, and esports titles where player ability predominates over chance, reached approximately USD 40.7 billion in revenue in 2024.^[82] Projections indicate expansion to USD 46.4 billion in 2025, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 11.9% through 2032, driven by digital platform proliferation.^[82] In the United States, a key market, the sector was valued at USD 9.9 billion in 2024 and is forecasted to hit USD 25.4 billion by 2032 at a CAGR of 12.5%.^[85] Real-money skill gaming subsets, such as platforms enabling cash prizes for verifiable skill competitions, are expected to grow from USD 22.1 billion in 2025 to USD 81.6 billion by 2035, reflecting a CAGR of 13.9%.^[86] Economic expansion stems from heightened smartphone penetration and broadband internet access, enabling real-time multiplayer engagement and low-latency competitions essential for skill differentiation.^[85] Advances in mobile technology and 5G networks have lowered barriers to entry, boosting user participation in skill-dominant formats like puzzle battles and strategy games.^[82] The integration of esports—where titles such as League of Legends and Counter-Strike exemplify pure skill mechanics—has amplified revenues through sponsorships, advertising, and merchandise, with global esports income surpassing USD 1.4 billion as early as 2022.^[87] These factors have sustained post-pandemic momentum, as remote digital interactions persisted beyond COVID-19 lockdowns, outpacing broader gaming segments in skill-focused niches.^[88] Monetization models in skill gaming prioritize entry fees, in-app purchases, and viewer-driven streams over chance-based lotteries, circumventing stricter gambling regulations and attracting investment.^[89] Rising disposable incomes in emerging markets, coupled with youth demographics favoring competitive play, further propel adoption, with platforms reporting doubled user bases in regions like Asia-Pacific since 2020.^[90] However, variability in growth estimates across analysts—ranging from 8% to 14% CAGR—highlights dependencies on regulatory clarity and platform innovation, as unsubstantiated hype in promotional reports may inflate projections.^[91]

Debates and Controversies

Disputes Over Specific Game Classifications

Poker has been a focal point of disputes regarding its classification as a game of skill or chance, primarily due to the random distribution of cards juxtaposed against strategic elements like betting, bluffing, and probability assessment. In the United States, courts often apply a "predominant factor" test to determine if skill outweighs chance in determining outcomes over multiple plays. A 2012 federal ruling in New York by Judge Jack Weinstein in United States v. DiCristina held that Texas Hold 'Em poker constitutes a game of skill under the Illegal Gambling Business Act, citing statistical evidence that skilled players outperform novices over repeated sessions, as random card draws average out while decision-making skill persists.^[92]^[93] This decision was echoed shortly after in a Pennsylvania trial court case dismissing charges against poker operators, marking the first state-level affirmation of poker as skill-dominant.^[94] However, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to resolve the federal ambiguity in 2014 by not hearing an appeal in a related case, leaving classifications inconsistent across states.^[95] Internationally, India's Allahabad High Court in 2025 ruled poker a skill game, exempt from gambling prohibitions, based on the necessity of expertise in odds calculation and psychology over mere luck.^[96] Daily fantasy sports (DFS) platforms like DraftKings and FanDuel have similarly sparked legal contention, with operators arguing that contest outcomes hinge on user-selected player statistics, matchup analysis, and roster optimization rather than single-event results akin to traditional betting. In 2015, a New York federal court initially classified DFS as gambling, prompting industry lobbying and legislative carve-outs in over 40 states affirming it as skill-based.^[97] The Illinois Supreme Court in 2020 upheld this in Illinois v. DraftKings, ruling DFS contests exempt from gambling laws because skill in data-driven predictions predominates, distinguishing them from chance-dependent wagers on actual game outcomes.^[98] Critics, including some state attorneys general, counter that DFS resembles sports betting due to monetary stakes and outcome unpredictability influenced by unforeseen player injuries or performances, leading to ongoing regulatory scrutiny despite federal deference to states post-2018 PASPA repeal.^[99] Empirical studies support the skill classification, showing that top DFS performers leverage advanced analytics and historical data, achieving win rates far exceeding random selection.^[100] Backgammon, while less litigated, has faced classification debates emphasizing its dice rolls against positional strategy and doubling cube tactics. A 1979 English High Court ruling in R v. Bray deemed backgammon a skill game, as proficient players mitigate luck through optimal moves and probability evaluation, influencing its legal tolerance in gambling-restricted venues.^[101] U.S. jurisdictions variably align, with some statutes explicitly listing it as skill-exempt, though disputes arise in unlicensed play contexts where chance elements invite gambling charges.^[102] These cases underscore broader tensions: empirical analyses, such as computer simulations of poker hands, demonstrate skill's long-term dominance (e.g., professional edges of 5-10% over chance variance), yet short-term luck fuels perceptions of gambling, perpetuating jurisdictional variances without uniform standards.^[69]^[11]

Criticisms of Skill-Based Gaming Models

Critics argue that skill-based gaming models, often promoted as alternatives to pure chance-based gambling, can foster addictive behaviors comparable to traditional gambling due to intermittent reinforcement and near-miss effects, even when skill predominates.^[103] A 2023 study on skill-based electronic gaming machines found that players experienced higher rates of gambling harm and problem gambling than with standard machines, attributing this to features like rapid play and perceived control that exacerbate loss-chasing.^[104] In Virginia, skill games ranked among the top three activities reported by callers to the state gambling addiction hotline as of February 2024, highlighting their role in driving help-seeking for compulsive play.^[105] Regulatory shortcomings represent another focal point of criticism, as these models frequently exploit legal distinctions between skill and chance to evade gambling oversight, taxes, and consumer protections. Unregulated skill games lack mandatory age verification, responsible gaming tools, and operator licensing, increasing accessibility to minors and vulnerable populations while forgoing revenue for public services.^[106] In Pennsylvania, courts have ruled that skill games fall outside the state Gaming Act, exempting them from taxes imposed on slot machines—up to 54% on revenue—resulting in an estimated $1 billion in untaxed activity as of 2024.^[61] This regulatory gray area has prompted calls for reform, with industry analyses noting heightened crime risks, such as money laundering and disputes at unregulated machines, absent in taxed casino environments.^[67] Skeptics further contend that many skill-based models overstate the dominance of skill, incorporating subtle chance elements that disadvantage novices and funnel losses to skilled players, thereby mimicking gambling's predatory dynamics under a veneer of meritocracy. Less-skilled participants in these games incur disproportionate costs, as empirical data from machine analyses reveal outcomes where chance variability undermines true skill differentiation.^[103] Consumer surveys indicate widespread perception that "skill" games function as de facto chance devices, with 56% of respondents associating them with elevated crime and safety threats to venues hosting them.^[106] Such criticisms underscore broader concerns that without stringent dominance-of-skill tests, these models prioritize operator profits over player welfare, perpetuating financial and temporal harms akin to unregulated gambling.^[107]

References

[1]
Game of Skill Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
Game of skill refers to any game, contest, or amusement of any description in which the designating element of the outcome is the judgment, skill, or deftness ...
[2]
Games of Skill vs Games of Chance - Business Law - LegalMatch
Oct 20, 2022 · A game of skill and a game of chance are not that noticeable difference. In many instances, a game will have elements of both chance and skill.
[3]
The Legality of Skill Gaming - the Skillz Developer Documentation
A game is classified as a game of skill if the game falls predominantly closer to the skill end of the continuum. The Material Element Test. The material ...
[4]
Game Of Skill Vs Chance Explained - Legalkart
Sep 3, 2025 · Games of skill are activities where the outcome is primarily determined by the player's knowledge, strategy, and skill level.
[5]
Skill vs. Chance: What You Should Know About the Different Types ...
Some examples include poker, Texas Hold 'Em, rummy, and other card games. Dominoes, backgammon, and chess are also examples of skill-based games. The rewards ...
[6]
Games of Skill v. Games of Chance – The Legal Analysis
Aug 16, 2018 · Traditional games of chance are lotteries, where you buy a ticket to match randomly drawn numbers to win money, and craps, where the prize is ...
[7]
Online Ludo: A Legal Conundrum and a Lurking Risk for Gambling ...
In contrast, in a game of skill, the outcome is determined mainly by mental or physical skill, knowledge, training, attention, experience, and adroitness of the ...
[8]
[PDF] a better legal definition of gambling - Albany Law Review
Even chess, for example, which is typically considered a prototypical game of skill, has an element of chance as far as the initial draw of white and black ...
[9]
[PDF] RECONSIDERING THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF GAMBLING
Jun 9, 2023 · any less a game of skill than chess—it simply means that it is comparatively more a game of chance.81. Second, whether a contest is of skill ...
[10]
(PDF) Skill in Games - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · This paper uses a simplified version of stud poker to better understand the concept of differential player skill in games.<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
Better Good Than Lucky: A Legal Analysis Of Poker As A Skill Game ...
Jul 1, 2024 · As attitudes toward gambling liberalize across the country, it is time for courts to treat poker as the evidence demands—as a game of skill.
[12]
[PDF] The Hazards of Using Illogic to Define Legality of Games of Mixed ...
soccer was a game of skill and therefore legal, the Kentucky Attorney. General relied on the recognition that the game contained no element of systemic ...
[13]
Measuring skill and chance in games - ScienceDirect.com
In this paper, we suggest a new empirical criterion for distinguishing games of skill from games of chance. All players are ranked according to a “best-fit” ...
[14]
How To Recognise Games Of Skill - A Principles-Based Framework
Sep 15, 2022 · The first step in this framework is to distinguish formats that are games of skill from games of chance and this article posits a set of first-level principles.
[15]
Skill vs. Chance Quantification and Relative Ranking for Popular ...
This paper presents a data-driven statistical framework to quantify the role of skill in games, addressing the long-standing question of whether success in a ...
[16]
[PDF] Measuring skill and chance in games - EconStor
Dec 20, 2017 · In this paper, we suggest a new empirical criterion for distinguishing games of skill from games of chance: All players are ranked according ...
[17]
[PDF] Measuring skill and chance in games - Uni Trier
Mar 7, 2018 · In this paper, we suggest a new empirical criterion for distinguishing games of skill from games of chance: All players are ranked according ...
[18]
Skill Gaming Legal Guide – Gaming Law - Walters Law Group
For example, the game of Blackjack involves chance card flips and the skill of the player in deciding whether to “hit” or “stand.” Since this game involves at ...
[19]
Skill, Chance, and the Case for the Predominant Purpose Test
Apr 24, 2025 · This Contribution argues that states should adopt the predominant purpose test to resolve the issue of whether DFS constitutes gambling.
[20]
(PDF) Skill in Games - Academia.edu
This paper uses a simplified version of stud poker to better understand the concept of differential player skill in games. Players with very different ...
[21]
Skill in Games on JSTOR
Differences in players' skill are important determinants of relative player success in most real games such as poker, chess, basketball, business, ...
[22]
A Legal Guide to Skill Gaming - Braslow Legal
Jul 15, 2020 · The Dominant Factor test asks whether the outcome of the game is determined more by the participants' skill rather than by chance (i.e. events ...
[23]
Skill or Chance – Is it legal? - CDC Gaming
Mar 6, 2019 · The tests used by the US states are the “Predominant Factor Test”, the “Material Element Test”, and the “Any Chance Test”. The Predominant ...
[24]
Is it a game of chance or a game of skill? - Thompson Coburn LLP
Dec 1, 2015 · The "Dominant Factor Test" uses four factors to determine if a contest is a game of skill or chance, focusing on which is more important.
[25]
Keeping the Skill in Skill Gaming – Removing Chance from Esports
Jul 7, 2025 · In this article, we break down how US law treats skill-based games, what tests courts apply, and how developers can mitigate the chance elements in their games ...
[26]
What determines if a game is one of Skill or Chance?
Apr 14, 2020 · It is the character of the game rather than a particular player's skill or lack of it that determines whether the game is one of chance or skill.
[27]
[PDF] Toward Legalization of Poker: The Skill vs. Chance Debate
Most states use the 'predominance test'- if the element of skill in a particular game predominates over chance, then the game is permitted (see, e.g., Alexander ...
[28]
[PDF] Distinguishing Luck from Skill through Statistical Simulation: A Case ...
To investigate the perential question of how to measure luck versus skill, we perform a detailed simulation study of Texas Hold'em poker hands.
[29]
Skill vs. Chance Quantification for Popular Card & Board Games
Oct 18, 2024 · This paper presents a data-driven statistical framework to quantify the role of skill in games, addressing the long-standing question of whether success in a ...
[30]
Luck, skill, and depth of competition in games and social hierarchies
Nov 6, 2024 · With this definition, a level is the skill difference Δs between two players such that the better one wins 73% of the time and our parameter β ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Predominance of Skill in Determining Winning Outcome in Fantasy ...
Aug 31, 2024 · This study goes beyond measuring the effect of skill and chance on a user's performance. Also, it focuses on quantifying several other ...
[32]
The Cultural Evolution of Games of Chance - NIH
Chance-based gambling has been a recurrent cultural activity throughout history and across many diverse human societies.
[33]
https://playworldgame.com/en-us/blogs/news/the-history-and-evolution-of-board-games
[34]
Gaming and the Greek obsession: Examining Ludomania in Ancient ...
We will investigate the origins of Ludomania, the link between games and the gods and ponder on the philosophical insights provided by the great minds of the ...
[35]
Philosophers, Spectators at the Game of Life? - Sententiae Antiquae
Sep 12, 2019 · “Plato likened life to a dice-game in which we need both to throw what is advantageous and to use the dice well after we've thrown them.
[36]
Aristotle's views on chance and their contemporary relevance
In this article I first set out Aristotle's explanation of chance as a term that refers to an event that occurs unusually and that appears significant in the ...
[37]
Games and Gambling in Ancient Rome
The Romans loved games of chance and were particularly fond of dice and ... The Roman dice were made of ivory, stone, or of close-grained wood, and ...
[38]
(PDF) Conceptual and Historical Reflections on Chance (and ...
In this essay, we try to sketch the main lines of development of several of these concepts from the ancient Greeks up to modern times, or more precisely, from ...<|separator|>
[39]
How Securities Trading Became Legally Not Gambling
After many years, hundreds of court cases and finally federal legislation, trading on listed exchanges was declared, as a matter of law, to be not gambling.
[40]
Gaming Act 1845 - Legislation.gov.uk
Any Game of mere Skill, such as Bowling, Coyting, Cloyshcayls, Half Bowl, Tennis, or the like, is declared an unlawful Game, or which enacts any Penalty for ...
[41]
[PDF] GAMING HISTORY & LAW
The Act is principally concerned with the suppression of gaming houses but also differentiates between games of chance and games of skill, the latter now being ...
[42]
Gaming in the Early Nineteenth Century: The Gaming Act 1845
This chapter focuses on the enactment of the Gaming Act of 1845. Its fundamental contribution to the history of the legal control of commercial gambling was ...
[43]
https://www.chapmanlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/5chaplrev87.html
[44]
[PDF] Following Suit With the Second Circuit: Defining Gambling in the ...
The different common law tests focus on the main issue of whether a game is one of skill or chance. Many argue that poker is a game of skill and therefore under.
[45]
[PDF] Why Pay-to-Play Daily Fantasy Sports are Games of Skill Under the ...
Jan 25, 2016 · Federal Law and 45 of the 50 US States allow skill based gaming. ... games” are to be considered games of skill under the Predominance Test).
[46]
Skill-Based Gaming (Part I): What is a Skill-Based Game?
Jan 21, 2016 · Skill-based games can be pure skill games where no element of chance is involved (think a free-throw shooting contest). Alternatively, skill ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[47]
What are skill-based games, and what is their risk of gaming fraud?
Unlike chance-based games where players rely on luck to win, skill-based games put the user's skills to the test · Regulators use three main tests to decide ...<|separator|>
[48]
History of Chess: The Basics
May 15, 2018 · We know that chess originated from the Gupta Empire (600CE), of India. However many people firmly believe that chess was played by the ancient Egyptians.Missing: verifiable | Show results with:verifiable<|separator|>
[49]
Is chess a game of skill or chance? To what extent?
Feb 16, 2014 · Chess is purely a game of skill with no room for chance. That is, it is in principle possible for there to be a perfect chess player that plays optimally.
[50]
Draughts - Cyningstan
Called "checkers" in North America, draughts is a game of pure skill between two players. There are many regional variations on draughts, but the one ...
[51]
The Three Types of Skill-Based Real-Money Games - artaev at law pllc
Aug 26, 2021 · Pure-skill games are legal under U.S. federal law, as well as in the majority of U.S. states. Because skill games involve the opportunity to ...
[52]
Skill-Based Games vs Gambling: Key Differences - EJAW
Sep 18, 2025 · ... skill-based games for money. These are different from traditional gambling because the outcomes depend on player abilities rather than chance.
[53]
Luck and Skill in Modern Board Games
Jul 27, 2016 · Some classic examples are: Texas Hold'em is a game with high skill and high luck; Chess is a game with high skill and low luck; Sorry! is a ...
[54]
Games of Skill vs Games of Chance: How are they different?
Mar 15, 2022 · An example of a pure game of skill might be chess or checkers. ... Sports betting casino games such as roulette and spin wheel games are two ...Skill-Based Games · 1. Card Games · Games Of Chance
[55]
Games with a good mix of strategy, skill, and luck ... - BoardGameGeek
Aug 26, 2005 · I'm thinking of games such as Cribbage (easily our most played), Pedro (a trick-taking card game traditional in the South), Backgammon (one of ...Simple skill or luck based games for a research projectPoll: Which of these games are mostly luck vs mostly skillMore results from boardgamegeek.com
[56]
any other games where luck not involved apart from chess??
Mar 31, 2011 · Games like Knuckles, tic-tac-toe, Carrom, snooker, checkers, and Risk with strategy are skill-based, not involving luck.
[57]
What are popular board games that have no luck/chance involved?
Dec 3, 2022 · Games with random elements whose effects are marginal or non-dominating to an experienced player: 7 Wonders, Balderdash, Dominion, Hanabi, ...What are some board games that require mostly skill with little to no ...What are some examples of mathematical games that require no ...More results from www.quora.com
[58]
Skill-based games – What are they? | University of Nevada, Reno
Already mentioned, arcade games can be listed as skill games. Also, trivia, word, and puzzle games are popular in skill gaming. The creators also use sports ...
[59]
31 U.S. Code § 5362 - Definitions - Law.Cornell.Edu
The term “unlawful Internet gambling” means to place, receive, or otherwise knowingly transmit a bet or wager by any means which involves the use, at least in ...
[60]
[PDF] Sizing-the-Illegal-and-Unregulated-Gaming-Markets-in-the-US.pdf
Nov 30, 2022 · Examples of unregulated gaming include so-called “skill games” – electronic machines bearing similarities to slot machines that, except in ...
[61]
In the battle over how to legislate skill games, everyone is playing for ...
Aug 26, 2024 · Courts in Pennsylvania have determined that skill games fall outside of the state's Gaming Act, and are thus not subject to the same regulations and taxes as ...
[62]
Skill games battle lines drawn in Pennsylvania - The Center Square
Apr 10, 2025 · In July, 12 casinos filed a lawsuit demanding that unregulated skill game operators pay the same 54% tax rate applied to slot machines, arguing ...
[63]
What are Skill Games? Not just Slot Machines? Legal where?
May 28, 2025 · Despite claims of being “different from gambling,” skill games can still lead to financial losses, loss of time perception, increased ...
[64]
Gaming the System: Skill games create regulatory confusion across ...
Oct 16, 2023 · As skill games spread, critics highlight dangers and call for stronger regulation · Skill games fall into a gray area of the law in many states.
[65]
[PDF] Regulation of Fantasy Sports in the US, the UK, and Europe
Jan 25, 2024 · Since 2017, fantasy sports betting activities have been considered as skill games under the. Skill Games Regulations. Gambling or Not Gambling?
[66]
Understanding the Legal Status of Skill-Based Gaming in ... - Decree A
Apr 14, 2024 · Explore the legal status of skill-based gaming within gambling law, covering jurisdictional differences, regulatory challenges, ...<|separator|>
[67]
Unregulated skill gaming– is it time for regulation? - IMGL
Yet, many games blend skill and chance, creating a legal gray area contingent on jurisdictional definitions of gambling. Each game necessitates evaluation ...Missing: low | Show results with:low
[68]
Poker Is More a Game of Skill Than of Chance, a Judge Rules
Aug 21, 2012 · The judge's reason: poker is more a game of skill than a game of chance, so game operators should not be prosecuted under the federal law.
[69]
[PDF] Is Texas Hold 'Em A Game Of Chance? A Legal and Economic ...
We argue that courts' conception of a dominant factor— whether chance swamps the effect of skill in playing a single hand of poker—is unduly narrow.<|separator|>
[70]
UNITED STATES v. DiCRISTINA (2013) - FindLaw Caselaw
Because we find that the plain language of the IGBA covers DiCristina's poker business, we REVERSE the judgment of acquittal and REMAND to the District Court ...
[71]
New York Court of Appeals Rules That Interactive Fantasy Sports ...
Mar 25, 2022 · The New York Court of Appeals held on March 22, 2022 that IFS contests do not constitute “gambling” within the meaning of New York's constitutional prohibition ...
[72]
What Comes Next After Daily Fantasy Sports Gambling in New York?
Sep 15, 2022 · The New York Court of Appeals, in the case of White v. Cuomo,[1] upheld the validity of a 2016 law authorizing daily fantasy sports (DFS) gambling in New York ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable<|separator|>
[73]
Pick 'Em Under Pressure: Illinois Forces DFS Operators to Leave the ...
Apr 29, 2025 · The Court applied the "predominant factor test"—one of the common standards to distinguish games of skill from games of chance—and concluded ...
[74]
Supreme Court Of Pennsylvania Will Take Up Question Of What ...
Jul 17, 2024 · The Commonwealth Court additionally found that the games were not otherwise illegal gambling devices because of the role that skill plays in ...<|separator|>
[75]
DRAGON ASCENT VIDEO GAMING MACHINE SC LLC v. SOUTH ...
Feb 5, 2025 · A magistrate found the device to be a game where skill predominated over chance but still concluded the device was illegal under South Carolina ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
[76]
Overview of US Federal Gaming Law - Lexology
Feb 24, 2021 · The 'predominance' or 'dominant factor' test asks courts to assess which of the two elements – skill or chance – is 'the dominating factor in ...
[77]
The complete history of esports: from origins to present day
Apr 8, 2025 · Esports began in 1972 with the Spacewar! tournament at Stanford University, offering a Rolling Stone subscription as a prize.
[78]
History of Esports - About Us - SIUE
Tournament hosts such as the World Cyber Games and the Electronic Sports World Cup debuted, followed by the launch of Major League Gaming (MLG) in 2002. Today, ...
[79]
From Gamers to Athletes: The Rise of Esports as a Global ...
Mar 13, 2025 · The gaming industry, fueled by platforms like Twitch and YouTube, has surged into a multi-billion-dollar powerhouse, projected to exceed $207 billion in 2026.
[80]
Esports Industry Data and Analytics: A Deeper View - News
May 20, 2025 · The esports audience is projected to reach 318 million in 2025, with 261 million enthusiasts. The market is projected to reach $4.3 billion in ...Top 10 Esports By Peak... · Esports Organization... · Esports Player Statistics
[81]
Esports Market Size, Share & Trends | Industry Report, 2030
The global esports market size was estimated at USD 2.13 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 23.1% from 2025 to 2030.Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[82]
Skill Gaming Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, 2032
The global skill gaming market size is projected to grow from $ 40.69 billion in 2024 to $ 101.97 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 11.9% during the forecast ...Missing: excluding | Show results with:excluding
[83]
MONETIZED COMPETITIVE PEER-TO-PEER SKILL-BASED GAME ...
Jun 14, 2022 · Skill-based game platforms enable immediate game play that can be either synchronous or asynchronous, allow for the matching of competitors of ...
[84]
https://www.technology.org/2025/10/20/the-rise-of-social-and-skill-based-gaming-in-2025/
[85]
Skill Gaming Market Size, Share & Growth Report 2032
The U.S. Skill Gaming Market was valued at USD 9.89 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 25.43 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 12.53% from 2025- ...
[86]
Real Money Skill Games Market Size [2035], Share, Growth Report
The Real Money Skill Games Market stood at $22.1 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to $81.6 billion by 2035, at a CAGR of 13.92%.
[87]
https://www.ethletelabacademy.com/post/analysis-of-growth-in-the-esports-industry-trends-revenue-and-opportunities
[88]
Drivers of Global Gaming Industry's Growth | BCG
Jun 9, 2023 · The COVID-19 pandemic spurred growth in various media and technology sectors in 2020. Within media, gaming outpaced other segments with an 8% ...
[89]
Skill Gaming Market Size And Share | Industry Report, 2030
The global skill gaming market size was estimated at USD 40.85 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 14.2% from 2025 to 2030.
[90]
Global Skill Gaming Market Size, Share and Analysis 2032
In terms of revenue, the global skill gaming market size was valued at around USD 34.16 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 106.78 billion, by 2032.
[91]
Real Money Skill Games Market Analysis and Future Opportunities
Rating 4.5 (99) The Real Money Skill Games Market Is Set To Grow At An Estimated CAGR Of 8.2% From 2025 To 2034, Rising From $5.3 Billion In 2024 To $11.7 Billion By 2034.<|control11|><|separator|>
[92]
Court Finds Texas Hold 'Em Poker is a Game of Skill
A federal court ruled Texas Hold 'Em is a game of skill, not gambling, based on studies showing skill is the predominant factor, not just luck.
[93]
Judge Rules Poker Is A Game Of Skill, Not Luck - NPR
Aug 22, 2012 · A judge in New York City has ruled that poker is more skill than chance, and thus not gambling. The case had become a rallying point for poker enthusiasts.
[94]
Second Court Rules Poker is a Game of Skill | Gambling and the Law®
For the second time in two weeks, a trial court has found that poker is a game of skill, and therefore not gambling. Both cases involved criminal charges being ...
[95]
Supreme Court Deals Itself Out of Poker Case - NBC News
Feb 24, 2014 · The US Supreme Court has declined to decide whether poker is a contest of skill or is instead a game of chance covered by a federal law directed at illegal ...
[96]
Skill Over Chance in the Legal Spotlight - Why Poker and Rummy ...
Feb 18, 2025 · Allahabad High Court rules poker and rummy as skill-based games, not gambling. Explore the legal implications, industry impact, and need for ...
[97]
Fantasy Sports are Skill-Based, Claims Draftkings
DraftKings, under attack for allegedly offering online illegal sports gambling, said fantasy sports are skill-based games-and ones that are already legal.
[98]
Another Win: Illinois Supreme Court Rules Fantasy Sports Contests ...
Apr 21, 2020 · The Illinois Supreme Court sided with the fantasy sports industry holding that daily fantasy sports contests are indeed contests of skill and thus not gambling ...
[99]
Taking a Gamble on Fantasy Sports, or Is It?
Nov 11, 2024 · A look at how states have approached the question of whether fantasy sports are gambling and help them resolve disputes involving fantasy ...
[100]
Distinguishing Fantasy Sports from Sports Betting
Fantasy sports leagues are games of skill. Managers must take into account a myriad of statistics, facts and game theory in order to be competitive.
[101]
Playing Guide: Backgammon: Luck or Skill?
May 5, 2019 · Backgammon is a game of skill. It involves strategy, tactics and probability. This was even once confirmed in a court of law.
[102]
Skill Game Protection Act: Understanding Its Legal Definition
Applies to online skill games like poker, chess, and backgammon. Focuses on player skill rather than chance. Permits competition only among players, not ...
[103]
Skill-Based Electronic Gaming Machines: Features that Mimic Video ...
Apr 23, 2024 · Skilled gambling games can be especially costly for less-skilled gamblers, by corollary, due to losses being funnelled to both skilful gamblers ...
[104]
Skill-based gambling machines pose unique gambling addiction risks
Sep 5, 2023 · People who play skill-based gambling machines (SGMs) have higher rates of gambling harm and problem gambling, a recent study by Central Queensland University ...
[105]
Virginia Explained: The never-ending battle over skill games
Feb 5, 2024 · Skill games are routinely among the top three activities callers identify when they seek help from the state's gambling addiction hotline, she ...<|separator|>
[106]
The Dangers of "Skill" Games: Consumer Attitudes
Aug 23, 2023 · "Skill" games are seen as chance-based, lack player protections, are easily accessible to children, increase crime risk, and are taxed lower ...
[107]
Breaking the Illusion of Skill: The Hidden Risks of Skill-Based ...
Plus, because they're unregulated, players are further led to believe skill machines are not a gambling device. When it comes to skill games, and all gambling ...