Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gatestone Institute


The Gatestone Institute is a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank founded in 2012 by philanthropist Nina Rosenwald, with a mission to educate the public about underreported issues including threats from Islamic extremism, human rights abuses under Sharia law, and lapses in mainstream media coverage of national security and democracy in the Middle East and North Africa.
Headquartered in New York City as a 501(c)(3) organization funded by private donors, it publishes daily articles, reports, and hosts conferences emphasizing the promotion of rule of law, free markets, strong militaries, and defenses against encroachments on Western sovereignty and free speech.
Under the leadership of President Nina Rosenwald, the institute has featured prominent contributors such as former U.S. National Security Advisor John R. Bolton, who served as chairman from 2013 until 2018, and analysts focusing on migration crises, jihadist ideologies, and transparency in international bodies.
Its work, which highlights empirical patterns of Islamist violence and cultural clashes often minimized by academic and media institutions exhibiting systemic left-leaning biases, has influenced conservative policy discussions while attracting criticism from outlets predisposed to framing such scrutiny as prejudicial rather than causally grounded.

History

Founding and Establishment

The Gatestone Institute was formally established in 2012 as a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank in New York City by Nina Rosenwald, a philanthropist and human rights activist who serves as its founder and president. Rosenwald, an heiress to the Sears, Roebuck & Co. fortune through her family's Rosenwald Foundation, had previously supported initiatives promoting democratic values, religious liberty, and opposition to Islamist ideologies perceived as threats to Western societies. The organization received 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service in December 2013 under EIN 45-4724565, enabling it to operate as a public charity focused on policy analysis and public education. Although formal incorporation occurred in 2012, the institute's activities trace back to online article publications beginning in October 2008 and event hosting from June 2010, reflecting an from informal commentary to a structured . Its establishment was motivated by a commitment to address topics such as , abuses, impacts, and threats to free speech—issues Rosenwald and early contributors argued were systematically underreported or distorted by outlets. Funded primarily through private donations and foundations without government support, the institute positioned itself from inception as an independent voice emphasizing empirical analysis of global challenges, including radical Islamism and erosion of rule-of-law principles in democratic nations. Key to its founding was assembling a network of senior fellows and contributors, including former diplomats, intelligence officials, and scholars, to produce reports and convene discussions on policy matters. By 2012, the institute had formalized governance with Rosenwald at the helm, alongside vice presidents and a board, to sustain operations centered on liberty, sovereignty, and countering authoritarian influences. This structure allowed rapid scaling of outputs, with initial emphasis on Europe and the Middle East as focal points for analyzing causal links between migration patterns, security risks, and institutional failures.

Expansion and Key Milestones

The Gatestone Institute secured 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status from the on December 1, 2013, enabling formal nonprofit operations following its initial establishment. This milestone supported expanded activities, including the launch of regular publications and events focused on international . Financial growth marked significant expansion, with reported revenue rising from $1,099,023 in fiscal year 2012—primarily from contributions—to $2,407,717 by fiscal year 2019, alongside expenses of $2,337,305 and net assets of $180,188. Key funding sources included a $1.1 million grant from the in 2013, $200,000 from the in 2017, and $110,000 from in 2019, reflecting donor confidence in its output on security and issues. Publication efforts scaled to a daily online report format, covering threats to Western democracies, alongside specialized series such as monthly updates on global Christian authored by contributors like , with examples including the March 2022 edition documenting attacks in and . The institute also hosted national and international conferences and briefings featuring policymakers and experts, such as an event with politician emphasizing immigration and security concerns. These initiatives broadened its reach, prioritizing overlooked topics in mainstream discourse.

Mission and Organizational Structure

Stated Objectives and Principles

The Gatestone Institute describes its primary mission as educating the public on topics that it believes are inadequately covered by , with a focus on threats to values and . Founded as a non-partisan, under section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. (Tax ID #454724565), it emphasizes informing audiences about issues such as military and diplomatic threats, developments in the , and the operations of international organizations. Among its stated objectives, the institute seeks to promote the institutions of and the , while advancing and supporting a free and strong economy. It also aims to ensure that nations maintain militaries capable of preserving peace, achieve , and remain vigilant against threats to individual liberty, national sovereignty, and free speech. These goals are pursued through activities including conferences, briefings, and events featuring world leaders, journalists, and policy experts, alongside daily online publications. The institute positions itself as dedicated to transparency and factual reporting, funded exclusively by private donors without reliance on grants, to uphold its independence in analyzing global challenges. This framework underscores a commitment to highlighting perceived deficiencies in media coverage, particularly on security-related matters, as a core principle guiding its operations since its establishment.

Governance and Leadership

The Gatestone Institute functions as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization under U.S. federal tax code, with Federal Tax ID #454724565, enabling it to receive tax-deductible donations from private donors and foundations. founded the institute in 2012 and has served as its president since inception, overseeing its operations as a focused on defending principles of . H. Perlman, also a co-founder, holds the position of and secretary, with reported compensation of $270,000 in 2024. Governance is managed by a board of directors, as detailed in IRS Form 990 filings, which lists key members including president Nina Rosenwald (uncompensated), vice president Naomi Perlman, Khaled Abu Toameh (director, compensated $99,996), and (director, uncompensated). A separate Board of Governors provides advisory oversight, with members such as Lawrence Kadish, who contributes writings on policy issues. In Europe, operations are chaired by . The institute ceased public disclosure of full details around 2017 amid external scrutiny, relying instead on tax filings for . Former chairs include , who led until 2018 when appointed U.S. National Security Advisor.

Publications and Content

Core Themes and Topics

The Gatestone Institute's publications center on perceived threats to Western democracies, with a strong emphasis on and its global manifestations. Articles frequently examine the activities of groups such as , highlighting refusals to disarm and links to ongoing violence, as in analyses of post-October 7, 2023, developments in . Similarly, coverage critiques radical Islamic ideologies in contexts like Iran's nuclear ambitions and proxy militias, framing them as direct challenges to U.S. allies including . Immigration policy, particularly from Muslim-majority countries, forms another recurrent theme, often tied to rising crime rates, cultural clashes, and security risks in and the . Publications document correlations between migrant influxes and spikes in antisemitic incidents, such as attacks in attributed to Muslim immigrants, and critique European leaders for policies enabling no-go zones and parallel societies. 's receives dedicated archival sections, portraying it as a failure of integration that erodes and public safety. Broader geopolitical critiques target international institutions like the , accused of bias toward authoritarian regimes and dictatorships through selective resolutions and alliances. emerges as a standalone focus, linking historical European patterns to contemporary surges fueled by Islamist and leftist . Additional topics include authoritarian expansions in and , threats from non-state actors in and , and occasional U.S.-centric foreign policy assessments, such as endorsements of Trump-era strategies. These themes align with the institute's stated educational aims on , , and economic freedoms, prioritizing underreported risks over mainstream narratives.

Notable Contributors and Outputs

Prominent contributors to the Gatestone Institute include , who serves as president and has directed the organization's focus on threats since its inception. Other key figures encompass former U.S. Advisor , who chaired the institute from 2013 to 2018 and contributed analyses on global military risks; , a legal who has served on its board and authored pieces critiquing international legal biases against ; and , a Somali-born critic of Islamist ideologies who has published essays on the compatibility of certain Islamic doctrines with Western values. Recurring authors feature Arab-Israeli journalist Khaled Abu Toameh, whose dispatches on Palestinian governance and operations, such as a July 11, 2025, piece titled "Muslim Leaders Who Oppose : The New Heroes," draw from on-the-ground reporting in the and . , author of The Coming Collapse of , regularly contributes on Beijing's expansionism, including assessments of U.S.- tensions; while , an Iranian exile and commentator on Middle Eastern , has covered topics like Venezuela's in articles dated October 26, 2025. The institute's primary outputs consist of daily online articles and reports emphasizing empirical threats to , , and , often highlighting underreported data on , pressures, and institutional failures. These publications, accessible via gatestoneinstitute.org, include over 20,000 archived pieces as of 2025, with themes centered on military and diplomatic risks in the , , and . Notable examples include Majid Rafizadeh's October 25, 2025, analysis "The Has Become the Dictators' Club," which documents the UN Council's composition—47 members, with 13 from , 13 from , and several headed by regimes like and —arguing it prioritizes authoritarian interests over democratic accountability. Pierre Rehov's October 26, 2025, article "From Dreyfus to : The Grand French Tradition of Politically Correct " examines rising antisemitic incidents in , citing 1,676 attacks in 2024 per the French Interior Ministry, and links them to policy shifts like President Macron's recognition of a Palestinian state. The institute also hosts briefings and conferences with experts, amplifying these outputs through partnerships with policymakers.

Analyses and Policy Positions

Critiques of Global Institutions

The Gatestone Institute has articulated critiques of the , emphasizing its institutional biases and inefficacy in addressing violations. In particular, it has condemned the UN Human Rights Council for its obsessive scrutiny of —resolutions against outnumber those against all other countries combined—while systematically overlooking atrocities in countries such as , , and . This disparity, according to Gatestone analyses, stems from the Council's composition, where a majority of members include authoritarian regimes with poor records, rendering the body a platform for political posturing rather than genuine accountability. Similarly, the institute has faulted the UN's Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, adopted in 2018 despite opposition from nations like the and , arguing that it promotes unchecked migration flows and mechanisms to delegitimize dissenters as xenophobes, thereby eroding national sovereignty over borders. Gatestone's examinations of the highlight endemic corruption within its elite structures and susceptibility to foreign interference, particularly from and . A 2025 report detailed how EU commissioners and parliamentarians have allegedly accepted multimillion-euro bribes to favor Qatari interests in energy deals and Chinese influence in technology policy, exemplified by scandals involving figures like former Belgian Prime Minister . These operations, the institute contends, exploit the EU's opaque systems and supranational to advance non-European agendas, such as diluting criticism of abuses in donor states, ultimately weakening the bloc's cohesion and democratic oversight. Gatestone has also warned that EU policies on and speech codes, including the 2016 push against "," prioritize ideological conformity over empirical security concerns, contributing to declining public support for the union, which fell to record lows in several member states by 2016. The has drawn sharp rebuke from Gatestone for its handling of the and subsequent power expansions, portraying it as captured by Chinese influence and structurally unfit for impartial crisis response. In 2020, amid revelations of WHO's delayed acknowledgment of human-to-human transmission—initially echoing Beijing's denials on —the institute advocated defunding the agency, citing its praise for China's transparency as evidence of complicity in cover-ups that cost millions of lives globally. More recently, Gatestone opposed the WHO's proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the in 2024-2025, which would grant the Director-General unilateral authority to declare health emergencies and override national policies, viewing these as a pathway to supranational tyranny bypassing democratic consent. Extending to judicial bodies, Gatestone has deemed the a politicized failure since its 2002 inception, with 17 indictments by 2018 almost exclusively targeting African leaders while shielding Western or allied figures from scrutiny in conflicts like those in or . The institute argues this selectivity—evident in the ICC's pursuit of officials without over non-signatories—undermines universal justice principles, serving instead as a tool for anti-Western grievance rather than deterrence of war crimes. Overall, these critiques frame global institutions as bloated, unaccountable entities prone to capture by adversarial powers, prioritizing agendas like over verifiable efficacy in preserving and order.

Perspectives on Immigration and Security

The Gatestone Institute contends that mass , especially from Muslim-majority countries plagued by Islamist extremism, undermines in Western nations by facilitating , escalating , and fostering parallel societies resistant to . Institute analyses point to empirical patterns, such as the overrepresentation of migrants or their descendants in terrorist incidents across , including the 2015 where perpetrators exploited lax border controls amid the migrant influx. They argue that inadequate vetting during surges—like Germany's acceptance of over 1 million migrants in 2015 under Chancellor —has enabled jihadist networks to embed, citing subsequent spikes in plots and attacks linked to asylum seekers. On crime and public safety, Gatestone publications document correlations between levels and localized , particularly in countries. For instance, fellow Soeren Kern has highlighted Sweden's transformation into a high-crime , with official statistics showing foreign-born individuals committing disproportionate shares of offenses, including gang rapes and bombings, often in migrant-dominated "no-go zones" where norms prevail over state law. Similar concerns extend to the , where the Institute warns of border vulnerabilities exploited by cartels and potential terrorists, referencing U.S. Customs and Border Protection data on encounters with individuals on terror watchlists exceeding 200 in fiscal year 2023 alone. Gatestone emphasizes causal links between unchecked migration and ideological threats, rejecting narratives that downplay Islamist motivations in favor of socioeconomic explanations. Recent articles, such as those following the October 2, 2025, synagogue arson by a Syrian , underscore rising anti-Semitism tied to imported radicalism, with calling for policy reversals like of criminal non-citizens and fortified borders to avert demographic and security collapse. These views contrast with mainstream academic and media outlets, which the Institute critiques for systemic underreporting of migrant-linked threats due to ideological biases.

Reception and Controversies

Criticisms from Mainstream Sources

outlets have accused the Gatestone Institute of promoting anti-Muslim rhetoric and disseminating misleading information about immigration and Islamist threats in . For instance, a 2018 NBC News investigation described the institute as an organization that chaired by until that year, which published articles containing false or exaggerated claims, such as alleging that was "confiscating homes for migrants" based on a single property renovation case rather than widespread policy, and portraying as the "rape capital of the West" through selective use of statistics. The report further highlighted Gatestone's promotion of "no-go zones" in purportedly controlled by , a concept rejected by French and German authorities, and claims that 500 churches had closed while 423 mosques opened, later debunked by fact-checkers for relying on incomplete data. Such criticisms often frame the institute's focus on demographic shifts and security risks as stoking unfounded fears of "Islamization." The New York Times in 2018 noted that under Bolton's chairmanship, Gatestone regularly featured content advancing the idea that lenient European policies were enabling the Islamization of the continent, raising alarms among Muslim advocacy groups about ties to figures in the administration. Similarly, a Washington Post opinion piece that year characterized Gatestone as advancing anti-Muslim views by exaggerating threats from Muslim , including fears of cultural takeover. These outlets, which mainstream sources frequently exhibit a toward minimizing reports of Islamist extremism in favor of narratives emphasizing , have portrayed the institute's outputs as contributing to broader Islamophobia rather than evidence-based of failures. Additional allegations include amplification of Gatestone content by disinformation networks, as per the NBC report, which found Russian trolls retweeting institute articles to sow division in the , though the institute has denied any coordination. A separate Washington Post column in 2018 accused Gatestone of routinely peddling about , linking it to Bolton's influence in promoting such narratives into U.S. policy circles. These critiques, while citing specific factual distortions, largely overlook empirical data on rising migration-related rates in , such as Germany's 2015-2016 spike in sexual assaults documented in official Bundeskriminalamt statistics, which Gatestone articles referenced but were deemed overstated by detractors.

Defenses and Counterarguments

The Gatestone Institute positions its publications as corrective to omissions, emphasizing empirical threats to democratic institutions from Islamist ideologies, unchecked , and international bodies like the , which it argues prioritize political agendas over verifiable facts. In its , the organization describes itself as non-partisan, focused on educating about underreported issues such as erosion and free speech suppression, with articles drawing on primary sources including , eyewitness accounts, and direct quotations from perpetrators or policymakers. This approach, proponents argue, counters systemic biases in legacy and , where empirical on -linked spikes—such as Sweden's reported 1,472% increase in attacks from 2010 to 2018—or Islamist-inspired violence is often downplayed to avoid "stigmatizing" communities. Defenses highlight instances where Gatestone's analyses preceded broader acknowledgments, such as early warnings on "no-go zones" in cities, later echoed in reports on 751 sensitive areas (zones urbaines sensibles) plagued by parallel governance and high criminality as of , or inquiries into grooming gangs involving predominantly Pakistani Muslim networks, which official probes like the 2020 Greater Manchester review confirmed affected up to 1,400 victims since the 1980s. Accusations of promoting "" are rebutted by pointing to verifiable outcomes, including the institute's documentation of migrant-related antisemitic surges, corroborated by a 2025 incident where a Syrian national attacked a on October 2, aligning with patterns of ideology-driven violence ignored in initial coverage. Critics' Islamophobia labels are countered as conflating criticism of jihadist doctrines—evidenced by groups like refusing disarmament post-October 2023, as stated by official deputy Abdul Jabbar Saeed on October 16, 2025—with prejudice against all , a tactic that shields causal analysis of supremacist texts and actions from scrutiny. The involvement of credentialed experts, such as during his 2013–2018 chairmanship, underscores policy relevance, with his analyses influencing U.S. strategies on and . Such affiliations refute fringe characterizations, attributing detractors' dismissals to ideological gatekeeping in outlets prone to underreporting threats, as seen in delayed coverage of honor-based abuses or courts operating in Western jurisdictions despite legal conflicts.

Funding and Operations

Financial Support

The Gatestone Institute, incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt non-profit organization, relies predominantly on private contributions and for its funding, which constituted 99.3% of its reported in 2023. In that fiscal year, total amounted to $1,246,025, with contributions totaling $1,237,048, supplemented by minor investment income of $8,036 and other of $941. Total expenses reached $1,736,250, yielding net assets of $223,231 at year-end. Historical financials indicate variability in revenue, peaking above $2 million in years such as 2015 ($2,192,189), 2016 ($2,190,243), and 2019 ($2,407,717), before declining in recent filings. Earlier support included substantial grants from the Middle East Forum ($1,383,471 in 2013) and the Abstraction Fund ($1,015,000 across nine donations in 2013). Prominent philanthropists and foundations have provided targeted funding aligned with the institute's focus on and . Nina Rosenwald, the organization's founder and a Sears Roebuck heiress, has channeled support through the William Rosenwald Family Fund, which has directed millions toward related policy efforts since 2000. Additional contributions include $100,000 from the in 2016, $200,000 from the same foundation in 2017, $110,000 from in 2019, and $5,000 from the Svetlana and Herbert M. Wachtell Foundation in 2013. The institute maintains limited public disclosure of its full donor roster, a practice common among ideologically oriented think tanks to protect contributor privacy.

Operational Reach and Influence

The Gatestone Institute operates from its headquarters in , primarily disseminating content via its website through daily articles, reports, and analyses focused on , , and threats to Western democracies. Its publications draw on contributions from a diverse array of international experts, enabling coverage of global issues including European immigration policies, Middle Eastern conflicts, and U.S. foreign relations, thereby extending its operational reach to audiences beyond American borders. Complementing online output, the institute organizes conferences, briefings, and events that convene policymakers, journalists, and scholars to address underreported geopolitical risks, fostering direct engagement with influential figures. This multifaceted approach has facilitated citations of its work in established media outlets such as The New York Post (on multiple occasions, e.g., internal dynamics), , , and (regarding political developments), which helps propagate its viewpoints on security and policy matters. The institute's influence in policy discussions is underscored by its prior chairmanship under from 2013 to 2018, during which its analyses on topics like Iranian influence and aligned with broader debates; Bolton later served as U.S. National Security Advisor. While financial disclosures indicate modest political contributions (e.g., $7,375 in the 2024 cycle) and no direct , its outputs have informed conservative-leaning discourse on , as noted in studies of networks.

References

  1. [1]
    About Gatestone Institute
    Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank is dedicated to educating the public.
  2. [2]
    Gatestone Institute - Militarist Monitor
    Aug 29, 2019 · The Gatestone Institute is a New York-based advocacy organization that is tied to neoconservative and other right-wing networks in the ...
  3. [3]
    Gatestone Institute - GuideStar Profile
    GATESTONE INSTITUTE IS A POLICY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION ORGANIZATION (A "THINK TANK") FORMED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUPPORTING THE INSTITUTIONS OF HUMAN RIGH...Missing: founders | Show results with:founders
  4. [4]
    John Bolton presided over anti-Muslim think tank - NBC News
    Apr 23, 2018 · John Bolton, President Donald Trump's new national security adviser, chaired a nonprofit that has promoted misleading and false anti-Muslim news.
  5. [5]
    Gatestone Institute - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
    Jan 28, 2025 · A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Nina Rosenwald
    - **Role in Founding Gatestone Institute**: Nina Rosenwald is the Founder and President of Gatestone Institute.
  7. [7]
    Gatestone Institute - Nonprofit Explorer - News Apps
    Gatestone Institute. New York, NY; Tax-exempt since Dec. 2013; EIN: 45-4724565 ... Tax Filings by Year. Form 990 is an information return that most ...Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  8. [8]
    Gatestone Institute - Powerbase.info
    Jan 26, 2024 · The Gatestone Institute publishes articles by a number of prominent right wing, neoconservative, Zionist and counter-jihad individuals and organisations.
  9. [9]
    Gatestone Institute - InfluenceWatch
    Gatestone Institute is a think tank and international policy council that aims to educate the public about human rights and democracy worldwide.
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Gatestone Institute - SourceWatch
    Jan 11, 2013 · Besides funding a Who's Who of anti-Muslim outfits, Rosenwald has served on the board of AIPAC, the central arm of America's Israel lobby, and ...
  12. [12]
    About Gatestone Institute
    - **Founding and Establishment**: Gatestone Institute is a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank. Specific founding date not provided in the content.
  13. [13]
    Nina Rosenwald - Gatestone Institute
    Nina Rosenwald, a human rights activist, is Founder and President of Gatestone Institute. She has been a lifelong defender of American principles of liberty.<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Nina Rosenwald - President at Gatestone Institute - LinkedIn
    President at Gatestone Institute · Experience: Gatestone Institute · Education: New York University · Location: New York City Metropolitan Area · 500+ ...
  15. [15]
    Naomi Hass-Perlman | The Rabbi Sacks Legacy
    Naomi Hass-Perlman is a British barrister and American attorney, and co-founder and vice president of Gatestone Institute.
  16. [16]
    Gatestone Institute | New York, NY - Cause IQ
    Year formed. 2012 ; Most recent tax filings. 2023-12-01 ; NTEE code, primary. Q40: International Peace and Security ; Total revenues. $1,246,025. 2023. 2019 2020 ...Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  17. [17]
    Rating for Gatestone Institute - Charity Navigator
    Rating 3/4 · Review by Charity NavigatorGatestone Institute has earned a 3/4 Star rating on Charity Navigator. This Educational Organization is headquartered in NEW YORK, NY.Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  18. [18]
    Gatestone Institute board of governors member: China 'made a ...
    Sep 16, 2024 · Lawrence Kadish, a member of the board of governors for the Gatestone Institute, said that the level of surveillance in China indicates that ...
  19. [19]
    Confidence in Leadership - Gatestone Institute
    Apr 24, 2023 · Lawrence Kadish serves on the Board of Governors of Gatestone Institute. receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free gatestone institute ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Archive - Gatestone Institute
    All Topics, Bangladesh · China · Coronavirus · Egypt · Europe's Migrant Crisis ... Abbas Cannot Make Concessions on Any Core Issue, Khaled Abu Toameh, 2014/03/10.
  27. [27]
    Dershowitz Received $120K from Anti-Muslim Gatestone Institute
    Nov 15, 2018 · by Eli Clifton. Former Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz spent the first two years of the Trump administration defending the ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  28. [28]
    Authors - Gatestone Institute
    Jon Abbink · Elliott Abrams Council on Foreign Relations. J. Christian Adams · Göran Adamson · Marie-Fleur Agema · Najat Al-Saied · Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
  29. [29]
    Khaled Abu Toameh Gatestone Institute, Author at The Jewish Link
    Articles by Khaled Abu Toameh Gatestone Institute · How Hamas Sees the West's Recognition of 'Palestine' · 'Obliterating' Iran's Nuclear Sites Is Not Enough · The ...
  30. [30]
    Gatestone Institute
    Macron did not even have the decency to make his recognition of a non-existent Palestinian state contingent on Hamas releasing the hostages. Joining Macron in ...About Us · Archives · Europe's Migrant Crisis · Authors
  31. [31]
    The United Nations: Making a Mockery of Human Rights
    Feb 15, 2017 · "Nowhere has the UN's failure been more consistent and more outrageous than in its bias against our close ally Israel.
  32. [32]
    UN Global Compact: What Happens Next? - Gatestone Institute
    Jun 28, 2019 · This initiative should be deeply concerning and is likely to serve only to silence critics of the UN, including its agenda on migration and the ...
  33. [33]
    The EU 'Elites', Part I: Corruption and Foreign Influence Operations
    Aug 10, 2025 · Extraordinary article. If Europe top echelons are found guilty of millionaire corruption in favour of China and Qatar, the question is who is ...
  34. [34]
    Public Support for the European Union Plunges - Gatestone Institute
    Jun 9, 2016 · Critics say the initiative amounts to an assault on free speech in Europe because the EU's definition of "hate speech" and "incitement to ...
  35. [35]
    Good Riddance to the World Health Organization - Gatestone Institute
    Jul 13, 2020 · China was malicious, and there is plenty of evidence of planning. "Whether WHO can reform effectively is directly tied to the accountability ...
  36. [36]
    Stop the World Health Organization's Tyrannical May 27 Power Grab
    May 13, 2024 · The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations give the WHO Director General the authority to declare not just an actual ...
  37. [37]
    URGENT: World Health Organization About to Give Itself Unlimited ...
    Jun 1, 2025 · [O]n May 20 they adopted the WHO Pandemic Treaty at the 78th session of the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland.
  38. [38]
    The International Criminal Court: A Failed Experiment
    Sep 19, 2018 · In practice, the International Criminal Court is a failed experiment. Its trials appear selective and political. While the court has received ...
  39. [39]
    Writings by Topic: Europe's Migrant Crisis - Gatestone Institute
    The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. Both reserve the right not to publish replies to ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Europe's Leaders: Shielding Themselves from Reality
    May 23, 2017 · Shielding heads of state from seeing the consequences of the policies that they themselves have forced on the entire European continent ...
  41. [41]
    Britain: Immigration Seen as Top Problem - Soeren Kern
    Jan 23, 2013 · Britons view immigration as the biggest problem facing their society, according to a flurry of new surveys and research reports about the current state of ...
  42. [42]
    Pompeo and Bolton Appointments Raise Alarm Over Ties to Anti ...
    Apr 6, 2018 · Bolton is chairman of the Gatestone Institute, a think tank that regularly features articles on its website promoting the notion that pliant ...
  43. [43]
    Don't overlook John Bolton and Mike Pompeo's anti-Muslim ties
    Apr 12, 2018 · ... Gatestone Institute, a think tank that has promoted anti-Muslim views, with some of its writers stoking fears of the ”Islamization” of the ...
  44. [44]
    Trump picks another Muslim-hater as one of his aides
    Jun 9, 2018 · For the last five years, Bolton had been chairman of the Gatestone Institute, another anti-Muslim group that routinely peddles fake news ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    More Academic Malfeasance - Gatestone Institute
    Apr 22, 2019 · So, how does anyone, much less a professor, promote views that are so clearly stated and so profoundly wrong? John Maszka probably figured ...
  46. [46]
    Why Are European Governments So Terrified of 'Fake News'?
    Feb 11, 2018 · ... fact-based public debate". A British Cabinet Office spokesperson ... Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of ...
  47. [47]
    Gatestone Institute in the Media
    The Gatestone Institute's Khaled Abu Toameh notes, Abbas "is not going to show up in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip anytime soon" and "hand himself over."
  48. [48]
    Gatestone Institute Profile: Summary - OpenSecrets
    Gatestone Institute organization profile. Contributions in the 2024 cycle: $7375. Lobbying in 2024: $0. Outside Spending in the 2024 cycle: $0.Missing: governance directors
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Think Tanks and Their Impact on US Foreign Policy in the MENA Area
    Jul 31, 2023 · Abstract. This paper examines the impact of US think tanks on US foreign policy in the MENA area using the Multiple-.