Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Geohash

Geohash is a geocoding system invented in by Gustavo Niemeyer that encodes a geographic location, specified by coordinates, into a short alphanumeric string using base-32 encoding. This encoding interleaves the representations of values to represent a rectangular on Earth's surface, with the string length determining precision—shorter strings identify larger areas (up to thousands of kilometers), while longer ones pinpoint locations within meters. The system employs a 32-character consisting of the digits 0–9 and the lowercase letters b–z excluding i, l, and o, and operates hierarchically, subdividing the globe into a grid where adjacent cells share common prefixes, enabling efficient spatial partitioning. Geohash facilitates geospatial indexing by converting coordinates into compact, sortable keys that simplify database queries for proximity searches, range filtering, and -based services without requiring complex geometric computations. It is integrated into various technologies, including databases like for spatial data retrieval and for efficient indexing of data, as well as applications such as tracking in messaging platforms. Despite its rectangular grid introducing minor distortions near poles and the date line, Geohash's simplicity and URL-friendly format have made it a foundational tool in modern geospatial computing.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

Geohash is a geocoding system that encodes geographic coordinates—specifically —into a compact, hierarchical using base-32 encoding based on a , which interleaves the binary representations of the coordinates to preserve spatial proximity. This method transforms two-dimensional location data into a one-dimensional alphanumeric identifier, maintaining up to the specified length of the without information loss within that resolution. The primary purpose of Geohash is to generate short, unique identifiers for geographic points, facilitating efficient storage, querying, and sharing of location data in databases, URLs, and other systems where traditional decimal coordinates may be cumbersome. By providing a human-readable and URL-safe format, it simplifies the representation of locations for practical applications such as mapping services and data exchange. For example, the Geohash string "u4pruydqqvj" encodes the coordinates approximately 57.64911° N, 10.40744° E, corresponding to a location near , , with high precision determined by its 11-character length. This hierarchical structure allows for variable precision, where truncating the string coarsens the represented area while retaining the core location.

Key Features and Benefits

Geohash employs a custom base-32 encoding consisting of digits 0-9 and lowercase letters b-h, j-k, m-n, and p-z, deliberately excluding a, i, l, and o to minimize visual confusion with other characters and ensure compatibility in URLs and text-based systems. This design enhances human readability and reduces errors during manual entry or transcription. A core feature is its hierarchical structure, where each additional character refines the location precision by subdividing the geographic area, allowing adjustable resolution based on application needs. For instance, a 5-character Geohash covers approximately 4.8 km × 4.8 km, while a 9-character string achieves about ±2.4 meters accuracy on the x-axis. Nearby locations share common prefixes in their Geohash strings, enabling efficient identification of spatial proximity through simple string comparison. These attributes yield significant benefits for geospatial tasks, including compact representation that is shorter and easier to store than separate latitude and longitude coordinates. The system's support for range queries via prefix matching simplifies spatial indexing in databases, avoiding the need for full coordinate computations while maintaining query efficiency. Overall, Geohash facilitates easier sharing, storage, and processing of location data in human-facing and computational contexts.

History and Development

Origins and Invention

The concept underlying Geohash draws inspiration from G.M. Morton's 1966 work on Z-order curves for spatial indexing in geodetic databases, which proposed interleaving coordinates to preserve locality in file sequencing. Geohash was invented by Gustavo Niemeyer in 2008 following a year of development, with the system publicly released into the on February 26, 2008, via the announcement of geohash.org. The initial design focused on encoding pairs into short, hierarchical strings that facilitate proximity-based queries by sharing prefixes for nearby locations. In its original implementation, Geohash employed base-32 encoding using the alphanumeric characters 0-9 and bcdfghjkmnpqrstvwxyz to produce compact, URL-safe strings that avoid visual confusion with letters like a, i, l, and o. This choice emphasized web-friendliness, enabling easy integration into services for and caching. Early adoption milestones included the launch of geohash.org features such as maps for and GPX exports for waypoints, supporting immediate use in GPS navigation tools. By May 2008, the system's popularity surged through its adaptation in recreational expeditions, which relied on GPS devices to reach algorithmically generated coordinates.

Variations and Extensions

One early encoding similar to Geohash, introduced in 2009, employed encoding instead of the standard to achieve higher character density for compact representations, particularly in systems like OpenStreetMap's short link mechanism. The 64-bit Geohash, formalized around 2013-2014, extends the original encoding to use a full 64-bit integer representation by interleaving 32 bits each from quantized values, enabling finer precision in fixed-length encodings suitable for database indexing. In 2016, the Hilbert-Geohash variant was proposed, adapting the to replace the in Geohash, which improves clustering of nearby points and locality preservation for geospatial queries, though it increases . A more recent extension, GeohashPhrase from 2019, maps Geohash strings to memorable phrases using a predefined , facilitating human-readable location encoding while maintaining compatibility with standard Geohash decoding for applications requiring easy memorization or verbal communication. Community-driven implementations have proliferated, including the geohash library, which provides efficient encoding, decoding, and neighbor-finding functions, supporting both and representations for integration into geospatial applications and research.

Technical Details

Encoding Algorithm

The Geohash encoding generates a string representation of a geographic location by interleaving the binary digits of the normalized coordinates, creating a linear approximation of a Z-order (Morton) curve that preserves spatial locality to some extent. Invented by Gustavo Niemeyer in and placed in the , this method recursively bisects the coordinate ranges to determine bits, which are then grouped into base-32 symbols for compactness. The process begins by normalizing the coordinates to fit within unit intervals. For \lambda, the normalized value is \frac{\lambda + 180}{360}, mapping the range [-180, 180] to [0, 1]. For \phi, it is \frac{\phi + 90}{180}, mapping [-90, 90] to [0, 1]. To obtain the representation for a desired requiring n total bits, each normalized value is multiplied by $2^n and the part's digits are extracted (discarding the to avoid floating-point issues in practice). However, the uses iterative to generate bits directly. For a total of n = 5k bits with k characters, receives \lceil n/2 \rceil bits and \lfloor n/2 \rfloor bits, ensuring comparable in degrees despite the differing ranges.
  • Initialize intervals: longitude [\lambda_{\min}, \lambda_{\max}] = [-180, 180], latitude [\phi_{\min}, \phi_{\max}] = [-90, 90].
  • For each bit i = [0](/page/0) to n-1 (starting from the most significant bit):
  • This produces a binary string where even-indexed bits (starting from 0 as MSB) correspond to and odd-indexed bits to latitude.
The resulting binary string is divided into groups of 5 bits, each converted to a value (0-31) and mapped to the Geohash base-32 : 0123456789bcdefghjkmnpqrstuvwxyz (noting the omission of 'a', 'i', 'l', 'o' for ). For example, consider encoding the coordinates of at \phi = 37.7749^\circ, \lambda = -122.4194^\circ to 5 characters (25 bits). The bisection process yields the binary string 0100110110010001111011110 (interleaved and bits, MSB to LSB). Grouping into 5-bit chunks: 01001 (9), 10110 (22 = 'q'), 01000 (8), 11110 (30 = 'y'), 11110 (30 = 'y'), yielding the geohash "9q8yy". The binary interleaving can be formalized as follows for m_\text{lat} and m_\text{lon} bits per coordinate (with n = m_\text{lat} + m_\text{lon}): \text{lat_bits} = \left\lfloor \frac{\phi + 90}{180} \times 2^{m_\text{lat}} \right\rfloor, \quad \text{lon_bits} = \left\lfloor \frac{\lambda + 180}{360} \times 2^{m_\text{lon}} \right\rfloor The interleaved value is constructed by merging bits starting from the MSB: \text{hash_value} = \sum_{k=0}^{\min(m_\text{lat}, m_\text{lon})-1} \left( \text{lon_bits} \times 2^{2k+1} + \text{lat_bits} \times 2^{2k} \right) + \text{extra terms if } m_\text{lon} > m_\text{lat} where bit indices are from the least significant bit (k=0 as LSB). This integer is then segmented into 5-bit fields for base-32 encoding. For the example with m_\text{lon}=13, m_\text{lat}=12 (25 bits total), the process yields the binary leading to base-32 digits '9', 'q', '8', 'y', 'y'.

Representations and Precision

Geohash is primarily represented as a textual string encoded in base-32 using the consisting of digits 0-9 and lowercase letters bcdfghjkmnpqrstuvwxyz, which excludes a, i, l, and o to minimize visual confusion with numerals. Each character in this string corresponds to 5 bits of interleaved data, allowing the full string to be decoded back into the bounding coordinates of a rectangular geospatial . At the binary level, Geohash interleaves the representations of the normalized (ranging from -90 to 90 degrees) and (ranging from -180 to 180 degrees) by alternately taking bits from each, starting with . This produces a compact string that can be packed into a 64-bit , facilitating efficient , computation, and comparison in systems like databases or spatial indexes. The spatial of a Geohash depends on its string length, with each additional character refining the size by a factor related to base-32 subdivision. Longer strings yield smaller and higher accuracy, though dimensions vary by : is uniform globally, while decreases toward the poles due to the converging meridians. The approximate size in degrees can be estimated as $2^{-\text{digits} \cdot \log_2(32)/2}, or roughly $2^{-2.5 \cdot \text{digits}} degrees per dimension, since each character adds 5 bits (2.5 bits on average per coordinate). To convert to kilometers, multiply by Earth's mean radius of approximately 6371 km and \pi / 180 radians per degree, yielding about 111 km per degree for and $111 \cos(\phi) km per degree for at \phi. The table below summarizes representative precision levels, showing approximate maximum errors (half the cell size) in kilometers or meters at the for illustration:
DigitsLatitude ErrorLongitude Error (at )
1±2,500 km±2,500 km
5±2.4 km±2.4 km
9±2.4 m±2.4 m
12±0.93 cm±1.86 cm
These values establish the scale of resolution, from continental to sub-meter accuracy, with longitude errors scaling by cosine of latitude.

Geospatial Properties

Geometrical Structure

Geohash divides the Earth's surface into a hierarchical grid of rectangular cells through repeated binary splits of the interval from -180° to 180° and the interval from -90° to 90°. This subdivision process encodes geographic positions by progressively narrowing the bounds around a point, forming a quadtree-like spatial where coarser levels represent broad areas and finer levels pinpoint smaller regions. The resulting structure organizes space into nested grids, with each additional geohash character refining the resolution by subdividing an existing cell into 32 subcells via base-32 encoding of interleaved coordinates. This hierarchical refinement enables scalable spatial partitioning, where removing trailing characters coarsens the grid to larger encompassing cells, facilitating operations like range queries over variable precision levels. At its core, the geometrical layout follows a , or Morton order, which preserves spatial locality by interleaving latitude and longitude bits such that nearby points tend to share longer common prefixes in their geohash strings. However, this linearization of introduces distortions, especially near cell edges, where spatially adjacent locations may receive codes with differing prefixes, potentially affecting proximity-based interpretations. In visualization terms, the grid manifests as a nested partitioning where adjacent cells sharing prefixes delineate contiguous spatial zones; for example, single-character geohashes delineate 32 large global regions, each spanning thousands of kilometers and covering broad continental or oceanic expanses.

Distance and Proximity Behavior

Geohash facilitates proximity detection through its prefix-sharing mechanism, where locations in the same or adjacent grid cells exhibit identical initial characters in their hash strings. A longer shared prefix corresponds to a finer subdivision of the hierarchical grid, implying greater spatial closeness and enabling efficient neighbor queries via simple string prefix matching in storage systems. This approach reduces the complexity of spatial searches to lexicographical operations, as points with matching prefixes up to a certain length are guaranteed to lie within a defined rectangular region. However, the mapping from hash similarity to geographic distance exhibits non-linearity stemming from the . While intervals in degrees maintain uniform north-south physical lengths of approximately 111 km per degree globally, east-west lengths for degrees contract by a factor of \cos(\phi) as \phi increases toward the poles, resulting in elongated cells at higher latitudes. Consequently, points with closely matching hashes may represent varying actual distances depending on their location; for instance, a fixed hash precision yields roughly square cells near the but increasingly narrow ones northward or southward. To mitigate these inconsistencies in proximity and bounding box queries, applications often incorporate multiple neighboring geohashes—up to eight adjacent cells plus the central one—to encompass the target area comprehensively. This expansion ensures that database queries capture all relevant points within a specified radius, compensating for potential omissions due to cell boundaries or shape distortions without requiring full distance computations for every candidate. For points within the same cell defined by latitude interval \Delta \phi and longitude interval \Delta \lambda, the maximum intra-cell distance approximates the bounding box diagonal: d_{\max} = R \sqrt{(\Delta \lambda \cdot \cos \phi)^2 + (\Delta \phi)^2} where R \approx 6371 km is Earth's mean radius and \phi is the cell's central latitude; this bound establishes the precision limits for proximity assumptions at a given hash length.

Applications

Core Use Cases

Geohash enables by encoding latitude and longitude coordinates into compact alphanumeric strings that can be embedded directly into URLs, facilitating the creation of short links to specific map locations. Originally developed in by Gustavo Niemeyer as a URL-shortening service, it allows users to generate concise, shareable identifiers for geographic points, such as through the geohash.org demonstration tool that maps these strings to visual representations. This approach simplifies location sharing in web contexts by replacing lengthy coordinate pairs with human-readable, fixed-length codes. In database systems, Geohash serves as an efficient indexing mechanism for storing and querying point-based geospatial data, where the string-based representation supports prefix matching for range searches. Both SQL and databases leverage this property to perform spatial queries, such as finding all points within a bounding box, by indexing on shared prefixes that correspond to hierarchical grid cells. This method reduces storage overhead and accelerates proximity-based retrieval without requiring specialized geospatial extensions in early implementations. Geohash generates unique, compact identifiers for waypoints in GPS devices and mobile applications, aiding in the organization and exchange of location data through formats like GPX. Its URL-safe encoding makes it ideal for APIs in location-sharing services from the late 2000s, allowing coordinates to be transmitted as strings without encoding issues in protocols. For instance, early services used Geohash to pass location parameters securely and efficiently in requests.

Modern Integrations and Extensions

In database systems, Geohash has been natively integrated into since the early 2010s to support geospatial indexing and querying of geo_point and geo_shape fields, enabling efficient aggregation of location data into grid-based buckets for applications like mapping and proximity searches. Similarly, employs Geohash encoding within its 2d indexes for planar geospatial data management, while 2dsphere indexes use a distinct encoding for spherical calculations; both facilitate operations such as $geoNear aggregations that compute distances and sort results based on location coordinates. In and real-time tracking, Geohash's compact string representation reduces data transmission size, making it suitable for low-bandwidth device location reporting in scenarios like smart cities. For instance, it has been applied to enable regional queries for using taxi trajectory data, supporting mobility prediction and through geohash-tagged for analysis. Geohash serves as a key encoding method in AI and for handling geospatial data, particularly by converting coordinates into categorical features that preserve spatial hierarchy for model training. In recommendation systems, it enables proximity-aware sequential modeling, where geohash prefixes group nearby locations to improve predictions for user preferences, such as suggesting venues based on visit history. Extensions like GeohashPhrase address usability gaps in post-2020 human-AI interactions by translating geohash codes into phrases, such as "a young dog kicks the fancy hydrant," which encode precise locations for voice or text-based communication. This facilitates seamless integration in AI-driven interfaces for tasks like emergency reporting or service requests, where users describe positions verbally, and systems decode them to geohash grids for processing.

Limitations and Challenges

Edge Cases

Geohash exhibits notable anomalies in polar regions, where latitudes approach ±90°. Due to the convergence of meridians, the longitudinal extent of cells diminishes dramatically, approaching zero width at the poles themselves. This results in extremely narrow cells in longitude, causing nearby points separated by small longitudinal differences to receive hashes with little to no shared prefix, complicating proximity-based queries that rely on prefix matching. For instance, points near the North Pole at slightly different longitudes, such as 89.999° N, 0° E and 89.999° N, 1° E, may yield divergent prefixes despite their physical closeness. The , corresponding to the 180° meridian, introduces a significant discontinuity in Geohash encoding because is linearly mapped from -180° to 180°. Geographically adjacent points on opposite sides of this line, such as those at 0° , 179.999° E and 0° , -179.999° E (equivalent to 180.001° W), are proximal but produce hashes with dissimilar prefixes—often starting with characters like "x" on one side and "b" on the other—due to the binary representation spanning the full range of the encoding . This boundary requires explicit special handling, such as expanding searches to include wrap-around neighbors, to ensure accurate retrieval of nearby locations. Crossings of the and the (0° ) similarly provoke abrupt changes in Geohash values during continuous movement. These lines delineate halves of the latitude and longitude encoding intervals, respectively, so points immediately on either side belong to distinct binary subspaces and thus share no common prefix. For example, locations at 0.0001° N, 0° E and 0.0001° S, 0° E, or at 50° N, -0.0001° E and 50° N, 0.0001° E, will have entirely different initial characters in their hashes, despite minimal spatial separation. This behavior stems from the hierarchical division process and necessitates careful consideration in applications involving or boundary-spanning regions.

Non-Uniformity and Performance Issues

Geohash exhibits non-uniform sizes primarily due to the Earth's , where remains consistent in degrees across a given level, but width in degrees translates to progressively smaller physical distances at higher . This results in cells becoming elongated and narrower near the poles, with the approximate physical width of a given by the physical multiplied by the cosine of the , leading to degradation in that can compromise query efficiency for polar or high- regions. For instance, at a fixed encoding length, the same number of bits covers less ground distance as increases, necessitating longer hashes for equivalent compared to equatorial areas. In handling large datasets, Geohash supports efficient prefix-based queries for hierarchical bounding box searches, leveraging its structure to achieve O(log n) average-case performance akin to balanced indexes. However, it underperforms for exact point matches and non-rectangular queries, as the grid-based approximation introduces space amplification—scanning oversized rectangular cells that require subsequent geometric filtering, unlike ' adaptive bounding boxes. Benchmarks in environments show GiST (an implementation) delivering lower query costs (0.28–29,263.75) than Geohash prefix scans (0.42–2.64) for spatial operations on sizable datasets, highlighting Geohash's limitations in for precise or irregular searches. A key criticism of Geohash stems from its Z-order curve's relatively poor locality preservation compared to Hilbert curves, where spatially adjacent points are less likely to share long common prefixes, resulting in clustered but not optimally proximate encodings. This inferiority increases false positives in radius-based proximity searches, as the may retrieve distant points within the same or adjacent cells, necessitating extensive post-query and reducing overall . Studies comparing space-filling curves confirm Hilbert variants exhibit superior clustering properties, with lower average Levenshtein distances in locality tests (outperforming Z-order in approximately 51.8% of cases across sampled points), underscoring Geohash's drawbacks for applications demanding tight spatial correlation. To address these non-uniformity and performance challenges, indexing strategies in GIS software integrate Geohash grids with mechanisms, partitioning data via coarse grid prefixes for rapid initial filtering before refining with adaptive tree-based searches to better accommodate uneven distributions and minimize false positives. Such approaches, as implemented in multi-level grid- hybrids, enhance query throughput for large-scale spatial data by balancing the simplicity of Geohash hierarchies with R-trees' precision in dynamic environments.

Similar Geocoding Methods

Locational codes, also known as , represent an early precursor to Geohash, originating from G.M. Morton's on geodetic data management. These codes employ binary interleaving to map two-dimensional coordinates into a one-dimensional , preserving spatial locality by ensuring nearby points share longer common prefixes in their binary representations. Unlike Geohash, which applies base-32 encoding for human-readable strings, Morton codes remain in binary form, making them suitable for computational indexing but less intuitive for direct human use. Google's Plus Codes, introduced in 2015, offer a hierarchical alphanumeric system designed to provide accessible digital addresses, particularly in regions lacking traditional street numbering. Built on the open-source (OLC) framework announced earlier that year, Plus Codes encode latitude and longitude by alternating digits in a base-20 system (using 20 alphanumeric characters, excluding confusing ones like 'O' and 'I'), dividing the globe into progressively smaller rectangular cells starting from 20° × 20° grids and refining to about 14 cm resolution. This linear hierarchical approach contrasts with Geohash's , as Plus Codes prioritize simplicity and shareability over strict locality preservation, allowing shortened codes (e.g., "8FVC9G8F+5W") when combined with a locality reference like a name. What3words, founded in 2013, diverges from alphanumeric encoding by assigning unique three-word phrases to each 3m × 3m square on Earth's surface, covering approximately 57 trillion locations with a proprietary dictionary of approximately 25,000 words per language (40,000 for English) across 61 languages as of 2025. The system uses a flat grid rather than a like Z-order, mapping words to coordinates via a fixed that ensures no two locations share the same phrase, emphasizing memorability and ease of verbal communication over computational efficiency. , as the underlying technology for Plus Codes, shares this non-Z-order structure but focuses on open, code-based encoding without linguistic elements, enabling offline decoding and integration into mapping tools. These methods collectively highlight a of geocoding strategies, from Z-order foundations to accessibility-oriented alphanumeric and word-based systems.

Comparisons with Alternatives

Geohash employs a for mapping latitude and longitude into a linear string, offering simplicity in implementation but resulting in poorer locality preservation compared to systems like Google's Geometry, which utilizes a . The Z-order approach in Geohash can cause spatially adjacent points to have dissimilar codes due to edge effects in the grid, leading to jumps across distant regions, whereas the in maintains better spatial continuity, where nearby points are more likely to share similar prefixes. This makes superior for applications requiring uniform spherical coverage, though its complexity in handling hierarchical cells on a projected icosphere increases development overhead relative to Geohash's straightforward string encoding. In contrast to tree-based spatial indexes such as R-trees and KD-trees, Geohash provides linear storage via compact alphanumeric strings, avoiding the structural overhead of dynamic node balancing and bounding box maintenance inherent in these methods. R-trees excel at handling arbitrary query radii and complex geometries like polygons by adaptively grouping features into minimum bounding rectangles, enabling efficient overlap and intersection operations, but they incur higher memory usage and slower insertion times due to frequent rebalancing. KD-trees, optimized for point data, offer logarithmic search times for nearest neighbors but suffer from performance degradation in high dimensions and overlapping splits, making Geohash preferable for prefix-based bounding box queries where costs are unnecessary. Performance benchmarks indicate that Geohash is generally slower than for proximity searches on large datasets due to string operations versus integer-based indexing. Regarding precision uniformity, Geohash exhibits latitude-dependent cell sizes, with distortions near the poles, while and hexagonal alternatives like Uber's provide more consistent resolutions across the globe. Implementation ease favors Geohash, as its algorithm integrates readily into databases like without specialized libraries, unlike the more intricate setup for R-trees or . For use case suitability, Geohash is particularly effective for web-friendly location encoding and URL-based sharing due to its human-readable strings, whereas alternatives like are better suited for analytics involving hexagonal grids, such as population density mapping or ride-sharing optimizations at , where uniform neighbor connectivity reduces aggregation errors. H3's integer representation also enables faster computations than Geohash's strings, making it preferable for high-volume spatial joins, though Geohash remains viable for simpler, point-based proximity tasks.

Standardization

Formal Standards

Geohash entered the public domain upon its invention in 2008, enabling open development and widespread informal use that eventually prompted formal standardization efforts. In December 2023, the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), through its WAVE committee, published CTA-5009, titled "Fast and Readable Geographical Hashing," to provide a stable, authoritative specification for the system. This standard builds on established practices, offering precise algorithms for encoding and decoding while serving as a reference for registrations such as IANA CBOR tags. CTA-5009 defines Geohash using a base-32 encoding comprising digits 0-9 and lowercase letters b, c, d, e, f, g, h, j, k, m, n, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, selected to minimize visual confusion between similar characters. Encoding interleaves representations of , with each character representing 5 bits (2.5 bits per coordinate on average), resulting in rectangular regions bounded by and longitude lines. The standard mandates lowercase output for encoders and recommends case-insensitive decoding for robustness, while specifying precision by hash length—for instance, a 9-character Geohash achieves approximately 2.3 meters resolution (varying by ). It also outlines interoperability requirements, including support for tag 301 and integration with JWT/CWT claims or CRS wrappers for coordinate reference systems. Post-2023, CTA-5009 has seen adoption in geospatial standards and protocols, such as IANA's tags and references in IETF drafts for location claims, enabling consistent implementation in APIs, devices, and data exchange formats. A 2024 revision (CTA-5009-A) refined details like tag assignments and errata, further solidifying its role. These developments ensure cross-system compatibility, mitigating variations from prior informal descriptions and promoting reliable use in applications requiring geographic indexing.

Licensing and Implementation

Geohash was placed into the by its inventor, Gustavo Niemeyer, through an announcement on February 26, 2008, ensuring no restrictions on its use, modification, or distribution. This open status allows developers and organizations to implement the algorithm freely without licensing fees or attribution requirements, promoting broad adoption across various applications. Implementation of Geohash is facilitated by numerous open-source libraries available in popular programming languages, enabling straightforward integration into software systems. For instance, the library pygeohash provides functions for encoding and decoding latitude-longitude coordinates to and from Geohash strings, supporting efficient geospatial indexing. Similarly, the JavaScript library offers comparable encoding and decoding capabilities, making it suitable for web-based applications. Best practices for embedding Geohash include selecting appropriate precision levels based on required accuracy—typically 5 to 12 characters for most use cases—and combining it with spatial databases for querying nearby locations, while verifying outputs against the algorithm's binary subdivision to avoid edge errors near grid boundaries. The original geohash.org website serves as a key community resource, offering tools for converting coordinates to Geohash strings, generating maps, and exporting data in formats like GPX for GPS devices, which has supported experimentation and since its launch. The nature eliminates barriers to such resource development, fostering a of additional tools and extensions without legal hurdles. Following its formalization in CTA-5009 (published December 2023, revised ), the standard reinforces this openness by detailing the algorithm for compliant implementations while preserving the unrestricted licensing, encouraging interoperability in standards like without imposing new constraints.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Spatio-temporal Indexing in Non-relational Distributed Databases
    Gustavo Niemeyer invented geohashes in 2008 with the purpose of geocoding specific points as a short string to be used in web URLs (http://www.geohash.org/).
  2. [2]
    GeoHash | Wolfram Function Repository
    Jun 10, 2024 · The Geohash system was invented by Gustavo Niemeyer in 2008. Despite limitations, Geohash has been used successfully in Elasticsearch ...
  3. [3]
    Geohash encoding/decoding - Movable-type.co.uk
    A geohash is a short alphanumeric string expressing a location, identifying a rectangular cell. Longer strings provide greater precision.
  4. [4]
    What is Geohashing? Examples and Use Cases - PubNub
    Apr 11, 2024 · Geohashing (or geohash) is a geocoding method used to encode geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) into a short string of digits and letters.
  5. [5]
    Implementing geohashing at scale in serverless web applications
    Jun 22, 2020 · A geohash is used to identify a rectangular area around a fixed point. The length of the hash determines the precision of the area identified.
  6. [6]
    geohash.org - General geocaching topics
    geohash.org. niemeyer. By niemeyer. February 26, 2008 in General geocaching topics. Followers 1. Reply to this topic; Start new topic ...
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Geohash Concepts — pygeohash 3.2.0 documentation
    Geohashing uses a base-32 encoding system with the following characters: 0123456789bcdefghjkmnpqrstuvwxyz (note the omission of a, i, l, and o to avoid ...
  9. [9]
    What is the precision of Geohash? - GIS StackExchange
    Sep 26, 2014 · One symbol (letters or digits) is base 32 (5 bits). Each first bit is used for high or low window, then subsequent bits divide the precision by 2.Measuring accuracy of latitude and longitude - GIS Stack ExchangeUsing geohash for proximity searches - GIS Stack ExchangeMore results from gis.stackexchange.com
  10. [10]
    Morton, G.M. (1966) A Computer Oriented Geodetic Data Base and ...
    Mar 5, 2014 · Morton, G.M. (1966) A Computer Oriented Geodetic Data Base and a New Technique in File Sequencing. IBM Ltd., Ottawa.
  11. [11]
    Labix Blog
    ### Summary of Geohash Announcement from https://web.archive.org/web/20080305223755/http://blog.labix.org/#post-85
  12. [12]
    Shortlink - OpenStreetMap Wiki
    Sep 10, 2024 · The URL is composed of https://osm.org/go/ followed by a binary quadtile address, encoded in ASCII (modified base64), with chars at the end to ...Missing: geohash | Show results with:geohash
  13. [13]
    Geo Library for Amazon DynamoDB – Part 1: Table Structure
    Sep 21, 2013 · The library uses 63 bits to represent the Geohash, and the hash is stored as 64-bit long value in the table. This attribute is indexed using ...Geo Library For Amazon... · Geohash · Hash KeyMissing: 2014 | Show results with:2014
  14. [14]
    Hashing Geographical Point Data Using the Hilbert Space-Filling ...
    The results show that the Hilbert curve is, to some extent, applicable within the context point data hashing, but that the complexity increment is not ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] A Review of Location Encoding for GeoAI: Methods and Applications
    This paper aims to fill this gap. We first provide a formal definition of location encoding, and discuss the necessity of location encoding for GeoAI research ...
  16. [16]
    python-geohash 0.8.5 - PyPI
    Project description​​ python-geohash is a fast, accurate python geohashing library. python-geohash 0.8 introduced uint64 representation. python-geohash 0.7. 1 ...
  17. [17]
    Geo::Hash(3pm) — libgeo-hash-perl - bookworm - Debian Manpages
    Oct 13, 2022 · Geohash is a latitude/longitude geocode system invented by Gustavo Niemeyer ... Perl itself. See perlartistic. 2022-10-13, perl v5.34.0 ...
  18. [18]
    Notes on Geohashing
    Geohashing is an excellent way to reduce one type of problem (proximity search) to another, seemingly unrelated one (string prefix matching).
  19. [19]
    San Francisco (GPS Coordinates, Nearby Cities & Power Plants)
    San Francisco is located on the latitude of 37.77493 and longitude of -122.41942 and has a geohash of 9q8yyk8yuv26. DD Cooordinates. Geohash Coordinates ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Geohash.NET is a C# library for encoding and decoding string and ...
    It was developed by Gustavo Niemeyer in 2008 and has since become a popular method for encoding and indexing spatial data. The concept behind geohashing is ...Geohash.Net · How It Works · BenchmarksMissing: original | Show results with:original
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Location Attestation and access control for Mobile Devices using ...
    Geohash is a lati- tude/longitude geocode system invented by Gustavo Niemeyer and has been made public. It is a hierarchical spatial data structure which ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] A Survey of Learned Indexes for the Multi-dimensional Space
    Mar 11, 2024 · Here, the multi-dimensional data is "rst projected into the one-dimensional space using Z/Morton-order [140, 144]. ... A geohash-based index for ...
  25. [25]
    Geohashes and You - Mapzen
    Jun 5, 2015 · Geohashes work by reducing a two-dimensional longitude, latitude pair into a single alphanumeric string where each additional character adds precision to the ...Missing: original post
  26. [26]
    Understanding Efficient Spatial Indexing - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 23, 2025 · The Geo Hash is a technique used to convert geographical coordinates into a single-string representation. This representation can then be used ...
  27. [27]
    sacridini/Awesome-Geospatial - GitHub
    By default it uses OpenStreetMap and GTFS data, but it can import other data sources. ... rust-geohash - Geohash for Rust. rust-geojson - Library for serializing ...
  28. [28]
    GeoHash tag based mobility detection and prediction for traffic ...
    Jul 16, 2020 · In this paper, we present a study on the mobility of the population which can be monitored by sensors, GPS devices through location detection.Missing: bandwidth | Show results with:bandwidth
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Proximity-aware Self-attention-based Sequential Location ... - arXiv
    Oct 24, 2023 · The geography encoder first utilizes the Geohash to encode a geographic coordinate to a string of letters and digits. For instance, the GPS ...
  30. [30]
    Project 3: Spatiotemporal Analysis with Spark (v 1.0)
    [1 pt] Climate Change: Using two-character geohash aggregates across the entire NAM grid, determine temperature trends over the past 5 years. With the regions ...
  31. [31]
    GeohashPhrase™ - QA Locate
    A GeohashPhrase™ is a native language phrase that encodes a geohash, a way of expressing geographic coordinates, and can be decoded to a specific geohash.Missing: 2019 | Show results with:2019
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Geo-process lookup management - DiVA portal
    Apr 5, 2017 · [10] Wikipedia(2015) and Gustavo Niemeyer(original author and inventor)(Feb,08),. “Geohash.” https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Vector Geographic Data Display Method Based on Geohash - eGrove
    Jun 30, 2020 · Under the same precision requirement, the length of Geohash encoding increases with the increase of latitude. The reasons are as follows: (1) ...Missing: cell | Show results with:cell
  34. [34]
    Geometry and GiST Combination Outperforms Geohash and B-tree
    Jan 19, 2021 · In this article, we explore spatial search performance and describe when to use Geohash, geometry, and geography data types along with indexes such as GiST and ...
  35. [35]
    Hashing geographical point data using the space-filling H-curve
    ### Summary of Comparisons: Z-order (Geohash) vs. Hilbert Curves
  36. [36]
    and R-Tree-Based Hybrid Index for Unevenly Distributed Spatial Data
    This paper proposes a hybrid indexing method based on the grid-indexing and R-tree methods, called R-MLGTI (R-Multi-Level Grid–Tree Index).
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Extended Morton Codes - High-Performance Graphics 2025
    [G.M. Morton 1966] – A Computer Oriented Geodetic Data Base: and a New Technique in File Sequencing, Research Report IBM. Ltd., Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  39. [39]
    Efficient Encoding and Decoding Extended Geocodes for Massive ...
    We employ DGGS-based Morton codes with more than 64 bits for precise 3D coordinates of point cloud and compare the encoding/decoding performance between two ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  40. [40]
    Plus codes: A new way to help pinpoint places on the map
    Today, plus codes are now searchable on Google and Google Maps. Plus codes are a useful way of representing locations that don't have specific street addresses.
  41. [41]
    Open Location Code: Addresses for everything, everywhere
    Apr 30, 2015 · The Open Location Code system allows people to derive plus codes from latitude and longitude coordinates that already exist everywhere.
  42. [42]
    google/open-location-code - GitHub
    Open Location Code is a library to generate short codes, called "plus codes", that can be used as digital addresses where street addresses don't exist.Wiki · Issues 33 · Activity · Workflow runs
  43. [43]
    what3words Raises $500K Seed For Its Location-Pinpointing Push ...
    London-based U.K. startup what3words has closed a £500,000 (circa $800,000) $500,000 seed round of financing from a group of angel investors ...
  44. [44]
    what3words /// The simplest way to talk about location
    Every 3 metre square of the world has been given a unique combination of three words. Used for e-commerce and delivery, navigation, emergencies and more.About · Jobs · App · API plans and pricingMissing: 2013 | Show results with:2013
  45. [45]
    Geospatial Indexing Explained: A Comparison of Geohash, S2, and ...
    Jan 3, 2024 · Geospatial indexing, or Geocoding, is the process of indexing latitude-longitude pairs to small subdivisions of geographical space, ...Geohash · Google S2 · Uber H3
  46. [46]
    Breaking Down Location-Based Algorithms: R-Tree, Geohash, S2, and H3 Explained
    ### Summary of Comparisons: Geohash vs. R-tree, S2, H3
  47. [47]
    Advantages of R-trees in comparison to geohashes
    Jul 27, 2014 · Geohash are very simple and effective way of indexing spatial features, particularly point features. Line and polygon features are little harder to index, but ...Using geohash for proximity searches - GIS Stack ExchangeEfficiency differences between quadtree and geohashes [closed]More results from gis.stackexchange.comMissing: benchmarks | Show results with:benchmarks
  48. [48]
    Geospatial Indexing: Geohash vs S2 vs QuadTree - PrepLoop
    •Performance comparison: Geohash prefix queries in PostgreSQL take 20 to 40 milliseconds for 1 million entities, S2 cell lookups with proper indexes take 5 ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Geohash | H3
    Because Geohash encodes latitude and longitudes pairs, it is subject to significant differences in area at different latitudes. A degree of longitude near a ...
  50. [50]
    Managing geolocations with H3 indexing in ClickHouse® - Altinity
    Nov 21, 2024 · In summary, H3 is generally better for advanced geospatial queries, particularly proximity-based operations, while Geohash is simpler but less ...Missing: suitability | Show results with:suitability
  51. [51]
    CTA Publishes Fast and Readable Geographical Hashing
    CTA's WAVE committee published CTA-5009, Fast and Readable Geographical Hashing. This document exists to remediate that. It describes the practice as it exists ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] CTA-5009-A FINAL - Consumer Technology Association
    Geohashes are often used to identify locations by describing a region that encloses the location, including any uncertainty associated with the location data. ...
  53. [53]
    [XML] cbor-tags.xml - Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
    ... data="https://shop.cta.tech/collections/standards/products/fast-and-readable-geographical-hashing-cta-5009">Fast and Readable Geographical Hashing (CTA-5009 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    pygeohash - PyPI
    PyGeoHash is a Python module that provides functions for encoding and decoding geohashes to and from latitude and longitude coordinates.
  56. [56]
    js-geohash - NPM
    Sep 15, 2022 · js-geohash. About. JavaScript geohash library. this library is based on python-geohash. License. The MIT License (MIT).Missing: open source
  57. [57]
    Fast and Readable Geographical Hashing
    Fast and Readable Geographical Hashing (CTA-5009-A). Geographical hashes (“Geohashes”) are short strings of letters and digits that identify a specific ...