Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Georeferencing

Georeferencing is the process of aligning geographic data, such as raster images, scanned maps, or aerial photographs, to a known coordinate system by assigning real-world spatial coordinates to enable integration, viewing, querying, and analysis with other geospatial datasets in geographic information systems (GIS).^[1]^[2]^[3] This technique relates the internal coordinate system of a digital map or image to a ground-based system of geographic coordinates, such as latitude and longitude or Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), allowing precise location referencing on Earth's surface.^[2]^[4] The importance of georeferencing lies in its ability to transform non-spatial or legacy data into usable geospatial information, facilitating applications in fields like urban planning, environmental monitoring, historical analysis, and resource management.^[3]^[5] Without georeferencing, scanned paper maps or unlocated images cannot be overlaid with vector data, satellite imagery, or digital elevation models, limiting spatial analysis such as distance calculations, area measurements, or feature identification.^[2]^[1] It is particularly vital for preserving and reusing historical maps, where georeferencing enables comparison with modern datasets to study landscape changes over time.^[4] The georeferencing process typically involves selecting control points—pairs of corresponding locations between the unreferenced image and a reference map with known coordinates—to define the spatial transformation.^[3]^[5] Common methods include affine transformations for simple scaling, rotation, and translation; polynomial transformations for handling distortion in more complex images; and advanced techniques like rubber sheeting or orthorectification to correct for terrain relief or lens distortion.^[1]^[3] Metadata, including the coordinate system, map projection, and datum (a model of Earth's shape), must be specified to ensure accuracy and compatibility across systems.^[4] In practice, georeferencing is performed using GIS software tools, such as the Georeferencing toolbar in ArcGIS Pro or the Georeferencer plugin in QGIS, which automate control point selection, transformation application, and output in formats like GeoTIFF or GeoPDF that embed spatial information.^[1]^[3] These tools often include error assessment features, like root mean square (RMS) error, to validate the alignment quality.^[5] Post-georeferencing steps may involve clipping extraneous areas or compressing files to optimize storage and performance in GIS workflows.^[3]

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Georeferencing is the process of assigning real-world geographic coordinates, such as latitude and longitude or projected coordinates, to spatial data including images, maps, or scanned documents, in order to align them with a known coordinate reference system (CRS). This alignment relates the internal coordinate system of the data to a ground-based geographic framework, enabling precise spatial positioning.^[1]^[2]^[3] The scope of georeferencing encompasses a range of spatial data types, primarily raster formats like aerial photographs and satellite imagery, but also extends to vector data and historical maps that lack inherent geographic referencing. It focuses on transforming and registering these datasets to a common CRS for integration in geospatial workflows. Importantly, georeferencing differs from geocoding, which involves converting textual addresses or place names into point coordinates, and from geolocation, which identifies the real-time position of devices or users via technologies like GPS.^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8] Central to georeferencing are concepts like spatial alignment, which ensures datasets overlay accurately by adjusting for distortions such as rotation or scaling, and datum transformations, which convert between different reference frameworks to maintain positional consistency. These elements are fundamental to its role in geographic information systems (GIS), where georeferenced data facilitates overlay analysis by allowing multiple layers to be combined and interrogated for patterns or relationships.^[9]^[10] In fields like remote sensing and cartography, georeferencing supports the fusion of diverse datasets for enhanced mapping and environmental monitoring.^[9]

Historical Context

The roots of georeferencing trace back to 19th-century advancements in photogrammetry, where manual techniques for aligning images to geographic coordinates emerged through the use of control points for map rectification. German architect Albrecht Meydenbauer pioneered the application of photography to architectural and topographic surveys in the 1860s, developing methods to measure and rectify images by identifying fixed ground control points to correct distortions and align them with known map positions.^[11] In 1867, Meydenbauer, in collaboration with geographer Otto Kersten, coined the term "photogrammetry" for these practices.^[12] A key milestone occurred in the 1930s with the maturation of aerial photography alignment techniques, as the formation of the American Society of Photogrammetry in 1934 spurred standardized methods for stereoscopic viewing and rectification of aerial images using control points, enabling more accurate large-scale mapping.^[13] Following World War II, georeferencing advanced through the integration of computing technology in the 1960s, particularly via U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) programs that digitized aerial imagery for orthophoto production. The USGS began experimenting with computer-assisted photogrammetry during this decade, using early digital tools to automate aspects of the rectification process into georeferenced orthophotos by applying mathematical transformations based on control points, which significantly reduced manual labor and improved topographic mapping efficiency.^[14] These efforts laid the groundwork for systematic digital georeferencing, transitioning from analog plotting to computational alignment of images with coordinate systems. The digital era saw georeferencing emerge prominently in the 1980s with the rise of geographic information system (GIS) software, which incorporated raster data alignment as a core function for integrating diverse spatial datasets. Commercial GIS platforms, such as those developed by Esri, introduced user-friendly tools for georeferencing scanned maps and aerial photos to standard projections using control points, enabling widespread application in resource management and urban planning.^[15] By the 2000s, evolution toward automated methods accelerated with the integration of Global Positioning System (GPS) and satellite data, allowing direct georeferencing without extensive ground control through integrated sensor models that fused inertial navigation and orbital parameters for real-time image alignment.^[16] A pivotal event was the 1972 launch of the Landsat program, which provided the first systematic multispectral satellite imagery of Earth's land surfaces, necessitating advanced georeferencing protocols to correct for orbital geometry and enable global-scale analysis in applications like land-use monitoring.^[17]

Theoretical Foundations

Coordinate Reference Systems

Coordinate reference systems (CRS) provide the foundational framework for locating positions on the Earth's surface in georeferencing processes. A CRS defines how coordinates relate to real-world locations by specifying a reference framework that accounts for the Earth's irregular shape. A CRS is a coordinate system that is related to the Earth by a datum.^[18] There are three primary types of CRS used in georeferencing: geographic, projected, and local. Geographic coordinate systems (GCS) represent positions using angular measurements of latitude and longitude on an ellipsoidal model of the Earth, such as the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84), which employs degrees as units and is widely used in global positioning systems.^[19] Projected coordinate systems (PCS) transform these angular coordinates into linear units like meters via map projections, for example, the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) system, which divides the Earth into zones to minimize distortion in regional mapping.^[20] Local systems, such as state plane coordinates, are tailored to specific areas for high-precision applications, often using custom datums to reduce errors in localized surveys.^[21] Key components of a CRS include the datum, prime meridian, units, and vertical elements. The datum establishes the reference surface, typically a geodetic datum comprising a reference ellipsoid—such as the Geodetic Reference System 1980 (GRS80) for the North American Datum 1983 (NAD83)—that approximates the Earth's shape, along with parameters tying it to the physical Earth.^[22] The prime meridian, conventionally the Greenwich meridian (0° longitude), defines the origin for longitude measurements, while units specify the measurement scale, such as decimal degrees for GCS or meters for PCS.^[19] Vertical datums, like the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), provide a reference for elevation, often independent of horizontal datums and based on mean sea level or geoid models to handle height measurements.^[23] Transformations between CRS are essential to align data from different frameworks, involving datum shifts and projections. Datum shifts correct for differences in reference ellipsoids and orientations, often using a 7-parameter Helmert transformation, which includes translations, rotations, and scale factors; for instance, converting from WGS84 to NAD83 requires such a transformation to account for their slight positional offsets, typically on the order of 1-2 meters in North America.^[24] Projections mathematically flatten the ellipsoidal surface onto a plane, introducing distortions in area, shape, distance, or direction depending on the method, such as the Transverse Mercator used in UTM.^[25] These transformations ensure compatibility but must be applied carefully to preserve spatial integrity. In georeferencing, a critical prerequisite is ensuring that input data's CRS matches the target CRS to prevent distortions or misalignment. Mismatched systems can lead to errors in positioning, such as scale inaccuracies or positional offsets, so data must be reprojected or transformed beforehand using standardized methods to align with the project's reference framework.^[9] This alignment supports subsequent geometric transformations by providing a consistent spatial base.^[26]

Geometric Transformations

Geometric transformations form the mathematical backbone of georeferencing, enabling the alignment of spatial data from various sources to a common coordinate reference system by modeling distortions such as translation, rotation, scaling, and shearing. These transformations map coordinates from a source system to a target system using parametric equations derived from ground control points (GCPs), ensuring that features in the input data correspond accurately to their real-world positions. The choice of transformation depends on the nature of the distortions; linear models suffice for uniform changes, while higher-order or non-rigid methods address complex deformations.^[27] Affine transformations, also known as first-order or linear transformations, are widely used for their simplicity and ability to handle global distortions while preserving parallelism and straight lines. They involve six parameters: two for scaling (a and e), two for rotation and shear (b and d), and two for translation (c and f). The 2D affine transformation equations are:

\begin{align} x' &= a x + b y + c, \\ y' &= d x + e y + f, \end{align}

where (x, y) are source coordinates and (x', y') are transformed coordinates. A special case is the similarity transformation, which maintains shape (conformal) by incorporating isotropic scaling and a rotation matrix, typically with four parameters: scale factor s, rotation angle θ, and translation components tx, ty. The equations incorporate the rotation matrix as:

\begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix} = s \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta & -\sin \theta \\ \sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix} t_x \\ t_y \end{pmatrix}.

These models require a minimum of three non-collinear GCPs to solve for the parameters.^[27]^[28] For more complex distortions, polynomial transformations extend the affine model to higher orders, capturing non-linear effects like curvature. A polynomial of order n in 2D has (n+1)(n+2)/2 parameters per dimension; for example, second-order (quadratic) uses 6 parameters per axis (12 total), and third-order (cubic) uses 10 per axis (20 total), suitable for moderate to severe distortions in scanned maps or imagery. The general form for second-order is:

x' = a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 y + a_3 x^2 + a_4 x y + a_5 y^2,

y' = b_0 + b_1 x + b_2 y + b_3 x^2 + b_4 x y + b_5 y^2.

Projective transformations, or homographies, address perspective distortions in oblique imagery or scanned maps, using eight parameters (homogeneous coordinates) and requiring at least four GCPs. They model central projection effects, where straight lines remain straight but parallelism is not preserved, with the general form involving a 3x3 matrix normalized to one degree of freedom.^[27]^[29] Thin-plate spline (TPS) transformations provide a non-rigid, elastic alternative for localized distortions, such as those in historical maps due to irregular scanning or aging; TPS minimizes bending energy for smooth interpolation between GCPs without a fixed parametric form, making it ideal for rubber-sheeting applications.^[29]^[9]^[30] Parameters for these transformations are typically estimated using least-squares optimization to fit the model to an overdetermined set of GCPs, minimizing residuals between observed and predicted coordinates. The process begins by establishing a system of equations from the GCP pairs: for m GCPs and p parameters, this yields 2m equations (one per dimension). The least-squares solution solves the normal equations \mathbf{A}^T \mathbf{A} \boldsymbol{\beta} = \mathbf{A}^T \mathbf{b}, where \mathbf{A} is the design matrix of GCP coordinates, \boldsymbol{\beta} the parameter vector, and \mathbf{b} the target coordinates vector. For affine models, this is linear and solved directly via matrix inversion; higher-order polynomials may require iterative non-linear least-squares (e.g., Gauss-Newton) if the model is non-linearized. The goodness of fit is assessed using the root mean square error (RMSE), calculated as \text{RMSE} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} (e_{x_i}^2 + e_{y_i}^2)}{n}}, where e are residuals and n is the number of GCPs; low RMSE (e.g., sub-pixel levels) indicates accurate alignment. More GCPs (ideally 10-16, evenly distributed) improve robustness and reduce overfitting.^[27]^[31]^[29] Non-linear transformations are essential for handling sensor-specific distortions like lens aberrations (radial and tangential) in aerial or satellite imagery, or terrain-induced relief displacement where elevation variations cause projective shifts. Lens distortions are often modeled with polynomial corrections, such as \Delta r = k_1 r^3 + k_2 r^5 for radial components (r is radial distance from principal point), integrated into the overall transformation. Terrain effects require incorporating digital elevation models (DEMs) into orthorectification pipelines, adjusting pixel positions based on viewing geometry to flatten relief distortions. TPS or higher-order polynomials excel here for their flexibility in accommodating these local variations without assuming uniformity.^[32]^[33]^[34]

Core Methods

Ground Control Point Approach

The ground control point (GCP) approach to georeferencing involves identifying and utilizing specific, known locations on both the image and the Earth's surface to establish a spatial relationship between them. GCPs are defined as points on the Earth's surface with precisely measured coordinates, often obtained through surveying techniques such as GPS or total stations, that correspond to identifiable features visible in the imagery, such as landmarks, road intersections, or artificial markers.^[35]^[36] The workflow for applying GCPs begins with the selection of appropriate points, ensuring they are well-distributed across the image to minimize distortion and cover the area of interest; a minimum of three non-collinear points is required for basic affine transformations, while higher-order polynomials or projective models necessitate more, typically four to six for robust results. Once selected, these points are measured by digitizing their pixel coordinates directly on the image using software tools, paired with their known ground coordinates. The transformation parameters are then estimated through a least-squares adjustment process, which minimizes the residuals between the observed image coordinates and the predicted positions based on the ground coordinates, thereby generating a geometric model to resample and align the entire image.^[37]^[38]^[39] This method offers high accuracy, particularly for rectifying scanned maps or historical imagery where precise alignment to modern coordinate systems is essential, as it directly ties the image to verified ground truth and can achieve sub-pixel precision with sufficient points. However, it is labor-intensive, requiring manual identification and measurement of GCPs, which can be time-consuming and prone to human error, especially in featureless or obscured areas; additionally, the approach demands accurate ground surveys, limiting its efficiency for large-scale or real-time applications.^[40] A representative example is the rectification of a historical topographic map, where corner ties—such as prominent road junctions or building corners—are identified on the scanned image and matched to their contemporary GPS coordinates, allowing the map to be warped into alignment with a current geospatial framework for overlay analysis.^[41] In this process, common transformation models like affine or polynomial are applied to handle scaling, rotation, and distortion without delving into alternative automated techniques.^[42]

Direct and Indirect Georeferencing

Direct georeferencing, also known as direct sensor orientation, relies on integrated positioning and orientation systems such as GPS and inertial measurement units (IMUs) embedded in imaging platforms like drones or aircraft to determine the exterior orientation parameters of images without the need for ground control points (GCPs).^[43] This approach enables real-time or near-real-time positioning by recording the sensor's location and attitude at the moment of image capture, facilitating immediate georeferencing for applications in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) mapping.^[44] In photogrammetric processing, direct georeferencing incorporates the collinearity equations to model the perspective projection from the object space to the image plane, where the object coordinates (X, Y, Z) relative to the camera center (X_s, Y_s, Z_s) are transformed via a rotation matrix R and scaled by the principal distance c. The collinearity condition assumes that the object point, camera center, and image point lie on a straight line, expressed as:

\begin{align*} x - x_0 &= -c \cdot \frac{r_{11}(X - X_s) + r_{12}(Y - Y_s) + r_{13}(Z - Z_s)}{r_{31}(X - X_s) + r_{32}(Y - Y_s) + r_{33}(Z - Z_s)}, \\ y - y_0 &= -c \cdot \frac{r_{21}(X - X_s) + r_{22}(Y - Y_s) + r_{23}(Z - Z_s)}{r_{31}(X - X_s) + r_{32}(Y - Y_s) + r_{33}(Z - Z_s)}, \end{align*}

where (x, y) are image coordinates, (x_0, y_0) are principal point offsets, and r_{ij} are elements of the rotation matrix derived from IMU data.^[45] For orthorectification, these equations are simplified by assuming nadir viewing and minimal tilt, reducing computational demands while preserving geometric fidelity in flat terrains.^[46] Indirect georeferencing, in contrast, employs post-processing techniques to refine image orientations through tie-point matching and bundle adjustment, independent of external ground truths.^[47] This method identifies corresponding features across overlapping images to estimate relative positions, using algorithms like Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) or Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF (ORB) for robust descriptor extraction and matching under varying scales, rotations, and illuminations.^[48] Bundle adjustment then minimizes reprojection errors across the image block, optimizing camera parameters iteratively without relying on GCPs, which makes it suitable for archival or unconstrained datasets.^[49] Direct georeferencing minimizes fieldwork by leveraging onboard sensors, though it demands precise system calibration to mitigate errors from IMU drift or GPS inaccuracies, often achieving sub-meter accuracy in controlled UAV flights.^[50] Indirect methods, while more computationally intensive, offer higher precision through self-consistent adjustments, particularly for historical imagery lacking metadata, but require sufficient image overlap for reliable tie points.^[47] Since the 2010s, deep learning has enhanced indirect georeferencing by automating tie-point detection, with convolutional neural networks outperforming traditional SIFT in challenging scenarios like low-texture environments, as demonstrated in aerial triangulation pipelines.^[51] As of 2025, advancements in generative AI have further automated georeferencing pipelines for historical maps by transferring coordinates from reference anchors, improving efficiency in large-scale digitization projects.^[52] For instance, in UAV-based environmental monitoring, direct georeferencing with RTK/PPK can achieve RMSE of 0.02-0.1 m, refined to sub-centimeter levels in indirect workflows via bundle adjustment.^[53] GCPs can serve as a hybrid enhancement for either approach when initial accuracies are insufficient.^[54]

Practical Aspects

Software Tools

Software tools for georeferencing enable the alignment of raster and vector data to geographic coordinate systems through various interfaces, from graphical user environments to command-line utilities. These tools implement transformations based on ground control points (GCPs) or sensor models, supporting applications in cartography, remote sensing, and GIS analysis. Open-source options emphasize accessibility and extensibility, while commercial software often provides specialized features for professional workflows.

Open-Source Options

QGIS includes a built-in Georeferencer plugin that facilitates the alignment of unreferenced raster or vector layers to coordinate systems using GCPs, with support for polynomial transformations up to higher orders for flexible geometric adjustments.^[55] The plugin allows interactive point placement and transformation computation, outputting georeferenced files directly within the QGIS environment. Recent versions, such as 3.40 released in 2024, have enhanced usability for raster handling, though advanced automation relies on plugins or scripting.^[56] GDAL (Geospatial Data Abstraction Library) provides command-line tools like gdalwarp for warping and reprojecting rasters, incorporating GCPs to perform georeferencing transformations such as polynomial or thin-plate spline methods.^[57] This utility is particularly efficient for processing large datasets, supporting input from numerous formats and applying coordinate transformations without a graphical interface, making it ideal for server-side or automated tasks. GRASS GIS offers modules like i.rectify for image rectification, which computes pixel-wise coordinate transformations based on user-defined control points to georeference raster data.^[58] The system excels in batch processing through shell scripting or Python integration, allowing multiple images to be georeferenced sequentially in a single workflow, often within a defined location and mapset structure.

Commercial Options

ArcGIS Pro provides the Transform tool in the Modify Features pane, enabling rubber-sheeting transformations that deform vector features to match more accurate reference data, suitable for fine-tuning alignments.^[59] This tool supports link-based adjustments and is integrated with the broader ArcGIS ecosystem for seamless data management. ENVI, programmable via IDL, features an Orthorectification Module designed for remote sensing applications, handling sensor-specific geometric corrections and GCP-based georeferencing for satellite and aerial imagery.^[60] It supports a wide array of sensors, including Landsat and WorldView, and automates orthorectification workflows to produce planimetrically accurate outputs. ERDAS IMAGINE supports advanced sensor models for georeferencing, integrating photogrammetric tools to apply rigorous geometric corrections based on orbital parameters and tie points in remote sensing data.^[61] The software handles complex transformations for high-resolution imagery, with capabilities for batch orthorectification in professional production environments.

Features and Integration

Key features across these tools include support for transformation types like affine, polynomial (orders 1–3), and spline/rubber-sheeting, which balance global and local accuracy; batch modes via scripting in open-source tools (e.g., GDAL's command-line chaining or GRASS's modular pipelines) or geoprocessing models in commercial ones; and export to formats such as GeoTIFF, which embeds spatial reference information for interoperability.^[57] For instance, QGIS and GDAL natively produce GeoTIFF outputs with embedded projections, while ArcGIS and ENVI offer additional metadata options like RPCs for sensor models. Recent advancements include AI-driven tools for automated GCP selection using computer vision, improving efficiency in large-scale georeferencing workflows as of 2025.^[62] Integration with external libraries, such as OpenCV for computer vision tasks, enhances custom georeferencing scripts; examples include using OpenCV for feature detection combined with GDAL for applying transformations to topographic maps.^[63] This approach is common in automated workflows, where OpenCV identifies potential tie points before GDAL performs the final warp.

Accuracy and Error Analysis

Georeferencing processes are susceptible to various error sources that can compromise the alignment of spatial data with real-world coordinates. Systematic errors often arise from datum mismatches between the reference system and the data source, leading to consistent offsets or distortions across the entire dataset. Random errors, in contrast, stem from imprecise measurements of ground control points (GCPs), such as variations in GPS positioning or manual identification inaccuracies, resulting in unpredictable deviations. Model errors occur when the chosen transformation, like an insufficient polynomial order, fails to capture complex geometric distortions, particularly in areas with terrain variability or lens aberrations.^[9]^[64]^[65] Key metrics for evaluating georeferencing quality quantify these errors in measurable terms. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is widely used to assess residuals between predicted and observed GCP positions, providing a summary of overall fit in ground units; for instance, values below 1 pixel are often targeted for high-resolution imagery to ensure sub-pixel alignment. The Circular Error Probable (CEP) measures positional accuracy by indicating the radius within which 50% of points are expected to lie, useful for applications requiring probabilistic confidence, such as navigation. Thresholds vary by application scale and resolution requirements, often targeting sub-pixel accuracy or errors below 1 meter for high-precision work.^[9]^[66] Assessment methods combine empirical and statistical approaches to validate georeferencing outcomes. Cross-validation, such as jack-knifing, involves iteratively excluding one GCP, recomputing the transformation with the rest, and measuring prediction errors at the held-out point, offering a robust estimate of generalization accuracy superior to simple residual checks. Visual inspection through overlays of georeferenced layers on reference maps detects obvious misalignments, while statistical tests like the chi-square goodness-of-fit evaluate model adequacy by comparing observed residuals to expected distributions under least-squares assumptions. Independent check points, distinct from GCPs, provide unbiased validation, with a minimum of 30 recommended for reliable statistics, per the 2023 ASPRS standards.^[64]^[67] Strategies to improve accuracy focus on refinement and adherence to established protocols. Iterative refinement adjusts parameters through multiple bundle adjustment cycles to minimize residuals, while employing higher-order polynomial models (e.g., second- or third-degree) better accommodates nonlinear distortions, though care is needed to avoid overfitting. Standards from the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) guide these efforts; for example, in legacy aerial mapping at 1:12,000 scale, horizontal RMSE must not exceed 1/3,000 of the flying height to meet design-level requirements, as per 2014 ASPRS standards, ensuring reliable outputs for engineering applications.^[9]^[68] Recent advancements in Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) since 2015 have introduced new challenges in handling uncertainty from crowdsourced data, where positional errors may stem from amateur contributions lacking rigorous GCPs. Approaches include probabilistic modeling to propagate uncertainty through georeferencing pipelines and hybrid validation integrating VGI with authoritative sources, enhancing reliability for dynamic applications like disaster response.^[69]^[70]

References

[1]
Georeferencing Definition | GIS Dictionary - Esri Support
The process of aligning geographic data to a known coordinate system so it can be viewed, queried, and analyzed with other geographic data. Georeferencing ...Missing: authoritative sources
[2]
What does "georeferenced" mean? | U.S. Geological Survey
Georeferencing means that the internal coordinate system of a digital map or aerial photo can be related to a ground system of geographic coordinates.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[3]
Raster Data Georeferencing - GIS & Geospatial Data Services
Oct 24, 2025 · Georeferencing is the process of assigning geospatial positioning information to raster data based on a defined coordinate system.
[4]
Introduction to Geospatial Resources and Formats
Jun 18, 2024 · Georeferencing must be understood as a multi-part process involving the concepts of geographic coordinates and two or three dimensional map ...
[5]
Georeferencing - SERC (Carleton)
May 7, 2007 · Georeferencing is the process of taking a digital image, it could be an airphoto, a scanned geologic map, or a picture of a topographic map, ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
[6]
Geocoding Definition | GIS Dictionary
### Definition of Geocoding from ESRI GIS Dictionary
[7]
The difference between Geocoding & Georeferencing
Nov 4, 2021 · The type of data used: Geocoding typically creates point data from names or addresses, while georeferencing works with spatial data to begin ...
[8]
Geospatial Glossary - GOV.UK
Mar 11, 2021 · In its simplest form, geolocation involves the generation of a set of geographic coordinates and is closely related to the use of positioning ...
[9]
Overview of georeferencing—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
Georeferencing raster data allows it to be viewed, queried, and analyzed with your other geographic data. The georeferencing tools on the Georeference tab ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[10]
Geographic datum transformations—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
A geographic datum transformation is a calculation used to convert between two geographic coordinate systems to ensure data is properly aligned.Missing: georeferencing | Show results with:georeferencing
[11]
[PDF] ALBRECHT MEYDENBAUER - Theulegium
From todays point of view Meydenbauer was not only one of the successful inventors of photogrammetry, but also a pioneer of cultural heritage documentation. 1.
[12]
[PDF] A Look Back; 140 Years of Photogrammetry - ASPRS
He published a paper on this subject in. 1893 in which the first use of the word photogrammetry appears.” The impression of the historical facts given by these ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
[13]
[PDF] One Hundred Years of Photogrammetry - ASPRS
One of the milestones of early photogram- metry, after the formation of the American. Society of Photogrammetry, was the map- ping of Boulder Canyon by ...
[14]
[PDF] 125 Years of Topographic Mapping at USGS - Esri
In the. 1960s, USGS developed the AutoPlot, a device that used stepping motors to move scribing engravers to create a scribe coat negative of the topographic ...
[15]
History of GIS | Timeline of the Development of GIS - Esri
The roots of GIS go back hundreds, even thousands of years in the fields of cartography and mapping. Early maps are used for exploration, strategy, and planning ...
[16]
[PDF] AUTOMATIC GEOREFERENCING OF AERIAL IMAGES USING HIGH
A new concept of automatic aerial image georeferencing using high resolution stereo satellite imagery is proposed. Significant improvements in high ...
[17]
[PDF] The Landsat Program: Its Origins, Evolution, and Impacts - ASPRS
The Landsat program provides continuous, multi-spectral data of Earth's land areas, impacting mapping, monitoring, and resource management. The US pioneered ...
[18]
Well-known text representation of coordinate reference systems
<geodetic reference frame> is described in 8.2; it includes ellipsoid and prime meridian descriptions. <geodetic datum ensemble> is described in 7.6.
[19]
What are geographic coordinate systems?—ArcMap | Documentation
A GCS includes an angular unit of measure, a prime meridian, and a datum (based on a spheroid). A point is referenced by its longitude and latitude values.
[20]
Coordinate Systems — GeoTools 34.x User Guide
A geodetic datum is used with three dimensional or horizontal (two-dimensional) coordinate reference systems, and requires an ellipsoid definition and a prime ...Missing: components | Show results with:components
[21]
Datums, projections, and coordinate systems
Mar 13, 2025 · Simply put, a datum is a set of numbers that define the shape, size, and position of an ellipsoid which best approximates the true surface of ...
[22]
[PDF] Transformations Between NAD83 and WGS84
Consequently, rigorously speaking, a transformation between NAD83 and WGS84 should be interpreted as a transformation between NAD83 (CORS96) and WGS84 (G1150).
[23]
A tutorial on datums - VDatum - NOAA
Vertical datums broadly come in two categories: Three-dimensional datums: those are defined by using a reference ellipsoid and six geocentric parameters ...Missing: prime | Show results with:prime
[24]
Geodetic transformation — PROJ 9.7.0 documentation
This chapter delves into the details of how geodetic transformations of varying complexity can be performed.
[25]
8. Coordinate Reference Systems — QGIS Documentation ...
There are two different types of coordinate reference systems: Geographic Coordinate Systems and Projected Coordinate Systems. On the Fly projection is a ...
[26]
[PDF] Georeferencing & Spatial Adjustment - University of Texas at Austin
Feb 15, 2022 · How Solved? ❑ Geometric Transformations. 1. First-order (“Affine”) transformation. Accomplishes translation, distortion and rotation. Straight ...
[27]
Fundamentals of georeferencing a raster dataset—ArcMap
Georeferencing raster data allows it to be viewed, queried, and analyzed with other geographic data. The Georeferencing toolbar allows you to georeference ...
[28]
(PDF) Image registration using polynomial affine transformation
Aug 6, 2025 · This paper discusses an algorithm to remove geometric error by applying geometric transformation and registering an image with its reference image.
[29]
A Primer on Thin Plate Splines and Their Utility for Georeferencing ...
Feb 14, 2025 · Thin Plate Splines stand out by offering a mathematically robust approach that minimizes bending energy and adapts smoothly to local deformations.
[30]
[PDF] Geometric Transformation
Rectify: Permanently alters the spatial referencing information of a raster dataset by a transformation, which also alters the orientation of the pixels. • ...
[31]
Georeferencing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Basically, three different types of distortion may be present in an SFAP image: lens distortion, image tilt, and relief displacement (see Chapter 3.2).
[32]
Geometric Distortion in Imagery - Natural Resources Canada
Jan 8, 2025 · All remote sensing images are subject to some form of geometric distortions, depending on the manner in which the data are acquired.
[33]
(PDF) Nonlinear Lens Distortion - ResearchGate
The following describes how to transform a standard lens distorted image into what one would get with a perfect perspective. projection (pin-hole camera).Missing: georeferencing | Show results with:georeferencing
[34]
Ground Control Points | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Ground Control Points (GCPs) are defined as points on the surface of the earth of known location used to geo-reference Landsat Level-1 data.
[35]
Digital Images and Georeferencing - UConn MAGIC
Finding Ground Control Points (GCPs). To georeference an image you need GCPs which are visible in the photographs. Some examples of good GCPs are road ...
[36]
[PDF] Test Georeferencing Transformations | Esri
Requiring at least three points, this trans- formation is optimized for both global least- squares fitting (LSF) and local accuracy. It combines a polynomial ...
[37]
Control and Georeferencing | GEOG 480 - Dutton Institute
... ground control points. The GPS/IMU measurements for each photo center will inevitably contain errors, but we can reduce the impact of these errors in ...
[38]
[PDF] Georeference an image using known geographic coordinates of points
Your assignment is to georeference an image – for example an aerial photo (or JPEG file) with the aid of set of ground control points (GCPs) with known ...
[39]
(PDF) ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES AND APPLICABILITY OF ...
Jun 25, 2020 · The conventional method of georeferencing by monitoring ground control points (GCP) provides reliable positioning accuracy in location but ...
[40]
Georeferencing Topo Sheets and Scanned Maps (QGIS3)
... map image itself. Using these sample coordinates or GCPs ( Ground Control Points ), the image is warped and made to fit within the chosen coordinate system.
[41]
[PDF] Georeferencing - Keweenaw Time Traveler
Essentially assigning a real-world geographical location to an image such as a historical map scan. Georeferencing involves identifying ground control points,.
[42]
[PDF] Chapter 1: Overview - Purdue Engineering
– Light rays, which correspond to ground control points, pass as close as possible to their object space locations. • In other words, the EOPs are indirectly ...Missing: method | Show results with:method
[43]
Direct Georeferencing for the Images in an Airborne LiDAR System ...
Sep 5, 2020 · Direct Georeferencing ... Mitishita E., Cortes J., Centeno J.A.S. Indirect georeferencing of digital SLR imagery using signalised lidar control ...
[44]
(PDF) Theoretical accuracy of direct georeferencing with position ...
Theoretical accuracy of direct georeferencing based on collinearity equations is better than that based on space intersection, but practical accuracy of ...
[45]
[PDF] PRINCIPLES OF PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MAPPING
– Collinearity equations/conditions (single camera systems). – GNSS/INS ... – Directly derived (direct georeferencing). Page 90. Laser Scanning. Ayman F ...
[46]
simulation model for the assessment of direct and indirect geo ...
Aug 7, 2025 · ... indirect georeferencing is more accurate than the direct georeferencing. The computed RMSE of indirect georeferencing technique are (±0.0686 ...
[47]
Illumination-Robust remote sensing image matching based on ...
... ORB [9] (fast binary descriptor based on BRIEF [10] (Binary robust ... image tie point matching in real surveying area, except for SIFT. So far ...
[48]
[PDF] Computer vision–based orthorectification and georeferencing of ...
Sep 22, 2016 · Indirect georeferencing methods normally outperform direct georeferencing methods due to the use of GCPs. However, setting up GCPs on the ground ...
[49]
Calibration and accuracy assessment in a direct georeferencing ...
... indirect georeferencing techniques subjected to ... Calibration and accuracy assessment in a direct georeferencing system for UAS photogrammetry ... indirect ...
[50]
(PDF) Photogrammetry now and then - from hand-crafted to deep ...
Dec 8, 2022 · Photogrammetry now and then - from hand-crafted to deep-learning tie points. December 2022; The International Archives of the Photogrammetry ...
[51]
Development and Evaluation of a UAV-Photogrammetry System for ...
Oct 30, 2015 · The accuracy of the results is evaluated under various mapping conditions, including direct georeferencing and indirect georeferencing with ...
[52]
Comparison of four UAV georeferencing methods for environmental ...
... direct georeferencing using Post-Processed Kinematic single ... indirect georeferencing using Ground Control Points (GCP). We tested a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[53]
11.3. Georeferencer — QGIS Documentation documentation
As a next step, you have to define the Target CRS (Coordinate Reference System) for the georeferenced raster (see Working with Projections). If you like ...
[54]
Changelog for QGIS 3.28 · QGIS Web Site
Oct 21, 2022 · Release date: 2022-10-21. QGIS 3.28 Firenze introduces various feature updates, UX modifications, usability enhancements, and improved ...Missing: ML tie- 2023
[55]
gdalwarp — GDAL documentation
The gdalwarp utility is an image mosaicing, reprojection and warping utility. The program can reproject to any supported projection, and can also apply GCPs ...Description · Overview · Memory Usage
[56]
i.rectify - GRASS GIS manual
i.rectify: Rectifies an image by computing a coordinate transformation for each pixel in the image based on the control points.
[57]
Rubbersheet features—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
Rubbersheeting is generally used to make small geometric adjustments to feature data and align it with other features that are more spatially accurate.
[58]
ENVI Orthorectification Module - NV5 Geospatial Software
Broad Sensor Support. The ENVI Orthorectification Module supports a wide range of satellite and aerial based sensors. The module works with image data and ...
[59]
ERDAS IMAGINE: Your Complete Remote Sensing Solution
It provides true value, consolidating remote sensing, photogrammetry, LiDAR analysis, basic vector analysis and radar processing in a single product.Missing: georeferencing | Show results with:georeferencing
[60]
[PDF] Automatic Georeferencing of Topographic Map Sheets Using ...
The whole process is implemented in Python, using various open source libraries: OpenCV for image processing,. Tesseract for OCR and GDAL for georeferencing.
[61]
[PDF] Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry - ESurf
4.1 Error sources of SfM photogrammetry. The error of 3-D reconstruction is influenced by many fac- tors: scale/distance, camera calibration, image network ...
[62]
[PDF] Self-calibration and direct georeferencing in terrestrial laser scanning
Jan 22, 2009 · An additional aim of the thesis is to make a systematic description of the error sources in TLS surveys, where direct georeferencing is employed ...
[63]
[PDF] Georeferencing and Resampling RMSE = √ (RMSEx 2 + RMSEy 2)
Calculating RMSE Root mean square error (RMSE) can be used to estimate the positional accuracy of geospatial data, including the results of a georeferencing ...
[64]
Improving georeferencing accuracy of Very High Resolution satellite ...
Jan 19, 2017 · In that sense, the differences in accuracy between the four tested strategies are mainly due to systematic errors or bias, measured as Mean ...
[65]
[PDF] Cross-Validated Assessment of Geometric Accuracy - ASPRS
Oct 6, 1996 · A cross-validation technique is shown to be capable of providing more accurate estimates of geometric error than the traditional method of using ...Missing: chi- | Show results with:chi-
[66]
[PDF] Bundle Adjustment - Part I Introduction & Application
Jun 8, 2021 · Variance Factor. ▫ Does the variance factor take a value around 1? ▫ suggests a correct model. ▫ Use a statistical test to judge the variance ...Missing: chi- square
[67]
[PDF] ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data
Mar 2, 2015 · This standard defines accuracy classes based on RMSE thresholds for ... is used to determine the flying height based on the desired contour.Missing: georeferencing | Show results with:georeferencing
[68]
Crowdsourced geospatial data quality: challenges and future ...
This special issue gathered papers on the topics of crowdsourced geospatial data quality (Ballatore and Arsanjani Citation2018), thematic uncertainty and ...
[69]
(PDF) “Contextualized VGI” Creation and Management to Cope with ...
Dec 5, 2016 · This paper investigates the causes of imprecision of the observations and uncertainty of the authors who create Volunteer Geographic Information ...