Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Image plane

In optics, the image plane is a plane conjugate to an object plane, where a sharp image of object points is formed, at least within the approximations of Gaussian optics.^[1] This plane lies in image space, where rays from an object point converge to form a real or virtual image, with its location determined by the object distance, image distance, and the optical power of the system via the relation \frac{n}{z} + \frac{n'}{z'} = \phi, where n and n' are refractive indices, z and z' are object and image distances from the principal planes, and \phi is the system's power.^[2] Distinct from the focal plane—which applies specifically to objects at infinity—the image plane's position shifts with finite object distances, enabling precise imaging in systems like lenses and mirrors.^[1] In practical applications, such as photography and microscopy, the image plane corresponds to the location of the film, sensor, or intermediate optics where the focused image appears, often coinciding with the rear principal plane for thin lens approximations.^[2] For complex optical systems, multiple image planes may exist, including intermediate ones that can introduce aberrations if not carefully managed, such as by placing field lenses to relay the image without degradation.^[1] In computer vision and camera modeling, the image plane represents the two-dimensional projection surface in a pinhole camera model, positioned at the focal length from the camera center, where 3D world points are mapped via perspective projection to yield 2D coordinates.^[3] This concept underpins fields from astronomical imaging to machine vision, where accurate alignment of the image plane ensures optimal resolution and minimal distortion.^[4]

Fundamentals in Optics

Definition

In optics, the image plane is defined as a two-dimensional plane perpendicular to the optical axis in which the image of an object is formed through the convergence of light rays following refraction or reflection by an optical element such as a lens or mirror.^[5] This plane represents the locus of points where rays originating from a corresponding object point intersect after passing through the system, ensuring that the entire object plane maps to a conjugate image plane for sharp focus.^[6] The concept of the image plane emerged in the 19th century amid the formalization of geometric optics, notably through Carl Friedrich Gauss's seminal work Dioptrische Untersuchungen (1841), which established foundational principles for image formation using principal planes and ray tracing.^[7] Hermann von Helmholtz further advanced this framework in his Treatise on Physiological Optics (1867), applying it to the eye's retinal image plane and distinguishing between real and virtual images in visual perception.^[8] These developments emphasized the image plane's role in both instrumental and physiological optics, shifting from qualitative descriptions to quantitative geometric models. A key distinction exists between the real image plane, where light rays physically converge to form a tangible image that can be projected onto a screen, and the virtual image plane, from which rays appear to diverge as if originating behind the optical element, preventing projection.^[9] This differentiation arises from the ray paths: converging for real images on the opposite side of the optics, and diverging for virtual images on the same side.^[2] Understanding the image plane requires familiarity with prerequisite concepts, including the optical axis, which serves as the reference line passing through the centers of curvature of spherical surfaces or the symmetry axis of the system.^[7] Principal planes are hypothetical planes perpendicular to the optical axis where the effective refraction occurs, simplifying the analysis of image location without detailing internal ray paths.^[7] As a special case, the focal plane coincides with the image plane when the object is at infinity, capturing parallel incoming rays.^[6]

Geometric Formation

In geometric optics, the image plane is formed through the intersection of light rays originating from an object point and redirected by optical elements such as lenses or mirrors. For an ideal point object, ray tracing employs specific rays to define this process: the chief ray, which passes from the object point through the center of the aperture stop and determines the location of the image point, and the marginal rays, which extend from the object point to the edges of the aperture stop and define the bundle's extent. In the paraxial approximation, assuming small angles relative to the optical axis, these rays, along with all others in the bundle, converge precisely at a single image point on the image plane.^[7]^[10] In converging optical systems, light rays diverge from the object point, interact with the lens or mirror—where refraction or reflection bends them according to Snell's law—and subsequently reconverge at the corresponding image point. The image plane is thus established as the surface perpendicular to the optical axis where these image points for various object points lie in focus, forming a sharp inverted replica of the object in the ideal case. This geometric configuration ensures that the entire ray bundle from each object point intersects at the designated plane, enabling coherent image reconstruction.^[11]^[12] Deviations from ideality arise due to aberrations, which blur the convergence and thus the sharpness on the image plane. Spherical aberration occurs when peripheral marginal rays focus at a different point than paraxial rays, shortening the effective focal length for off-axis portions of the bundle, while chromatic aberration causes different wavelengths to refract variably, dispersing the focus along the axis. However, in the ideal geometric model, these effects are neglected to emphasize perfect ray intersection at the image plane.^[13]^[14] A conceptual diagram illustrates this formation: an off-axis object point emits diverging rays toward a converging lens, with the chief ray passing undeviated through the lens center and marginal rays bending symmetrically at the lens surfaces; all rays then intersect at the image point on a plane parallel to the lens, behind it, highlighting the inverted and magnified image geometry.^[11]

Mathematical Formulation

Paraxial Ray Approximation

The paraxial ray approximation, also known as Gaussian optics, is a fundamental simplification in geometrical optics that models light rays propagating close to the optical axis of an imaging system. Paraxial rays are defined as those making small angles with the optical axis, typically less than 10°, where the small-angle approximation sin θ ≈ θ (with θ in radians) holds with errors below 0.5%. This allows for linearizing the behavior of rays, facilitating the mathematical description of image formation on the image plane without accounting for complex nonlinear effects.^[15]^[16] The core assumptions of the paraxial approximation involve neglecting higher-order terms in the expansions of trigonometric functions within Snell's law of refraction (n₁ sin θ₁ = n₂ sin θ₂) and the law of reflection. Under this regime, Snell's law simplifies to n₁ θ₁ ≈ n₂ θ₂, and reflection to θᵢ ≈ θᵣ, resulting in linear differential equations for ray paths that treat ray heights and angles as first-order quantities. These assumptions enable straightforward ray tracing and the prediction of first-order optical properties, such as focal lengths and image positions, by considering only rays with small heights and slopes relative to the chief ray.^[17]^[18] However, the paraxial approximation has inherent limitations, particularly in wide-angle optical systems where ray angles exceed the small-angle threshold, leading to significant distortions such as barrel or pincushion effects and other aberrations. In such cases, the neglect of higher-order terms causes deviations from ideal image formation, necessitating exact ray tracing methods that employ full trigonometric evaluations of Snell's law to capture nonlinear ray behaviors accurately. This distinction highlights paraxial optics as a first-order model, contrasted with exact optics that accounts for all ray deviations.^[19]^[20] The paraxial ray approximation was systematically developed by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1841 through his treatise Dioptrische Untersuchungen, which laid the groundwork for modern lens design by introducing these linear principles to analyze optical systems rigorously. This historical framework remains the basis for deriving key relations in first-order optics, such as the thin lens equation.^[21]^[16]

Lens and Mirror Equations

The thin lens equation relates the object distance u, image distance v, and focal length f of a thin lens under the paraxial approximation, given by

\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{u} + \frac{1}{v}.

This equation determines the location of the image plane at distance v from the lens, where the image forms for an object at distance u. To derive it, consider a thin converging lens with focal length f. An object of height h is placed at distance u to the left of the lens. A ray from the object tip parallel to the optical axis passes through the focal point on the right side at distance f. Another ray from the object tip through the lens center travels undeviated. These rays intersect at the image tip of height h' at distance v to the right. Using similar triangles formed by the parallel ray (height h over base u - f) and the focal ray (height h' over base f), the relation \frac{h}{u - f} = \frac{h'}{f} holds. Similarly, from the undeviated ray and parallel ray intersection, \frac{h}{f} = \frac{h'}{v - f}. Eliminating h and h' yields (u - f)(v - f) = f^2, which rearranges to the thin lens equation.^[22] A common sign convention used in many physics textbooks assigns positive values to object distances measured opposite to the direction of incident light propagation and to image distances measured in the direction of light for real images. For lenses, the object distance u is positive when the object is to the left of the lens, the image distance v is positive for real images to the right and negative for virtual images to the left, and the focal length f is positive for converging lenses and negative for diverging lenses. This convention ensures consistency for calculating the image plane position, with real images (positive v) forming on the image plane beyond the lens.^[23] For spherical mirrors, the mirror equation takes the identical form

\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{u} + \frac{1}{v},

where f = R/2 and R is the radius of curvature, determining the image plane via reflection under paraxial conditions. To derive it, consider a concave spherical mirror with radius R. An object at distance u sends paraxial rays (small angles to the axis) to the mirror. By the law of reflection, incident angle equals reflected angle relative to the surface normal at the incidence point. For a ray parallel to the axis, it reflects through the focal point at f = R/2. Another ray through the mirror's center (pole) reflects back along itself. These intersect at the image at distance v. Using geometry, the sagitta approximation for small heights h gives the relation from similar triangles: the parallel ray deviates by angle \theta \approx h/R, leading to \frac{h}{u} = \frac{h'}{v} for heights, and combining with the focal relation yields \frac{1}{u} + \frac{1}{v} = \frac{2}{R} = \frac{1}{f}. For convex mirrors, f is negative. The same sign convention applies: u > 0 for objects in front, v > 0 for real images (in front of the mirror for concave), and v < 0 for virtual images (behind the mirror).^[24] The transverse magnification m, which relates the object size to its extent on the image plane, is given by

m = -\frac{v}{u} = \frac{h'}{h},

where the negative sign indicates inversion for real images. This formula applies to both thin lenses and spherical mirrors, linking the image plane's scale directly to the distances from the lens equation.^[23] For example, consider a converging thin lens with f = 10 cm and an object at u = 15 cm. Substituting into the lens equation gives \frac{1}{v} = \frac{1}{10} - \frac{1}{15} = 0.0333 cm^{-1}, so v = 30 cm (real image on the image plane 30 cm to the right). The magnification is m = -30/15 = -2, meaning the image is inverted and twice the object height.^[23]

Applications in Optical Systems

Photography and Projection

In photographic cameras, the image plane is the location where the light-sensitive sensor or film is placed to record the image, with light rays converging to form a sharp reproduction of the subject. The focus mechanism operates by adjusting the distance between the lens and the image plane, ensuring that rays from objects at various distances meet precisely at this plane for optimal clarity.^[25]^[3] This positioning allows for the lens equation to determine the required distance for focus, accommodating different subject depths without delving into derivations here. Depth of field arises from the allowable deviation in image plane position, governed by the circle of confusion—a measure of the maximum blur diameter considered acceptable in the final image. Factors such as the aperture's f-number play a key role; lower f-numbers (larger apertures) yield shallower depth of field by enlarging the circle of confusion, while higher f-numbers enhance it for broader sharpness.^[26]^[27] In projection systems, the image plane corresponds to the screen, where the projection lens forms an inverted real image from the light source and imaging device, enabling visibility when rays converge on the surface. Keystone correction addresses geometric distortion caused by angular misalignment between the projector and screen, digitally trapezoidally adjusting the image to restore rectangular proportions and maintain fidelity.^[28]^[29] The historical development of image plane management in photography began with the daguerreotype process in 1839, which employed fixed planes and manual plate positioning without adjustable focus. Over time, advancements led to rangefinder and ground-glass focusing in view cameras, culminating in modern autofocus systems; phase detection autofocus, introduced commercially in the Minolta Maxxum 7000 in 1985, uses split-image sensors to detect phase differences for rapid, precise lens-to-plane adjustments.^[30]^[31]

Microscopy and Astronomy

In optical microscopy, the image plane plays a critical role in forming high-magnification views of specimens through compound systems. The objective lens captures light diffracted by the specimen and focuses it to create a real, inverted intermediate image at a specific plane. In fixed-tube-length designs, this plane is typically located at the microscope's tube length (such as 160 mm) from the objective's rear focal point. In infinity-corrected designs, common in modern microscopes, the objective produces parallel light rays, with the intermediate image formed by a tube lens at a standardized position, typically 200 mm from the objective shoulder.^[32]^[33] This intermediate image plane, often positioned at the eyepiece field diaphragm, serves as the foundation for further magnification, where direct and diffracted light interfere to produce detailed grayscale patterns representing the specimen's structure.^[34] The eyepiece then relays this intermediate image to the final image plane on the retina or detector, projecting a virtual or real image for observation, with total magnification being the product of the objective and eyepiece magnifications (adapted for high values, such as 200x from a 20x objective and 10x eyepiece).^[32] The resolution at the image plane in microscopy is fundamentally limited by the objective's numerical aperture (NA), which determines the angular range of light rays that can contribute to image formation. Higher NA values enable the capture of more diffraction orders from the specimen, reducing the size of the Airy disk—a central bright spot surrounded by diffraction rings—at the intermediate image plane and thus improving the ability to distinguish fine details.^[35] The lateral resolution d is given by d = \frac{0.61 \lambda}{\text{NA}}, where \lambda is the wavelength of light; for example, increasing NA from 0.20 to 1.30 can shrink the Airy disk radius, yielding sharper images with NA up to 1.30 in oil-immersion objectives.^[35] In compound microscopes, this multi-stage process—primary image formation by the objective followed by secondary magnification by the eyepiece—allows for progressive refinement of the image plane, essential for resolving sub-micron features in biological samples.^[34] In astronomical telescopes, the image plane is typically the focal plane at the prime focus of the primary mirror, where incoming starlight converges to form an initial image for viewing through an eyepiece or detection by instruments.^[36] In Cassegrain designs, a convex secondary mirror intercepts light before it reaches the prime focus, reflecting it back through a hole in the primary mirror to a shifted focal plane, often at the rear of the telescope tube, which increases the effective focal length and compactness while maintaining diffraction-limited performance.^[36] This configuration, using a paraboloidal primary and hyperboloidal secondary, positions the final image plane at the intersection of reflected rays, enabling high-resolution imaging of distant celestial objects despite the secondary's central obscuration.^[36] Adaptive optics enhances the sharpness of the image plane in ground-based astronomical telescopes by correcting wavefront distortions caused by atmospheric turbulence. Real-time measurements from wavefront sensors, using natural guide stars or artificial laser guide stars, drive deformable mirrors to adjust the incoming light's phase, reducing blurring and achieving near-diffraction-limited resolution at the focal plane.^[37] For instance, the Very Large Telescope (VLT) at ESO's Paranal Observatory employs a multi-conjugate adaptive optics system with laser guide stars and a 1170-actuator deformable mirror, attaining a Strehl ratio of 0.1 at 650 nm for improved exoplanet detection and black hole studies.^[38] Similarly, the Keck Telescope's laser guide star system with a 349-actuator deformable mirror delivers high-contrast imaging at 3.4 μm, enabling detailed observations of galaxies and faint objects that rival space-based capabilities.^[38] While the Hubble Space Telescope benefits from a distortion-free path above the atmosphere, ground-based systems with adaptive optics, such as those on the Gemini South Telescope, provide uniform correction over wide fields for multi-conjugate applications.^[38]

Image Plane in Computer Graphics

Projection and Screen Space

In computer graphics, the image plane is defined as a virtual two-dimensional plane serving as the target for projecting three-dimensional world coordinates to produce a flat, rendered image of a scene. Positioned typically at z = -d from the camera's viewpoint along the optical axis, it functions analogously to the film or sensor plane in a physical camera, where projected points represent the intersection of viewing rays with this surface. This setup enables the simulation of depth and spatial relationships in a 2D output. The concept of the image plane in computer graphics, particularly for perspective projection, was formalized during the 1960s amid early advancements in interactive systems, with key contributions from pioneers like Ivan Sutherland, whose work on 3D viewing laid foundational techniques for CGI. As a brief conceptual inspiration, it draws from the optical image plane where rays physically converge, but in graphics, it remains a computational construct without physical rays. Projections onto the image plane fall into two primary categories: perspective and orthographic. Perspective projection emulates realistic vision by having all projectors converge at a single center of projection (the eye point), causing distant objects to appear smaller through diminution; this is achieved via similar triangles, where the scaling factor for a point (x, y, z) relative to the image plane at z = -d is d / -z, yielding projected coordinates x' = x * (d / -z) and y' = y * (d / -z). In matrix form using homogeneous coordinates, the perspective projection is commonly represented as

P = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{2n}{r - l} & 0 & \frac{r + l}{r - l} & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{2n}{t - b} & \frac{t + b}{t - b} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -\frac{f + n}{f - n} & -\frac{2fn}{f - n} \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix},

where n and f are the near and far clipping planes, and l, r, b, t define the left, right, bottom, and top bounds of the view frustum; post-multiplication by this matrix followed by perspective division (dividing by the w-component) maps points to the image plane. Orthographic projection, by contrast, employs parallel projectors perpendicular to the image plane, maintaining constant object sizes irrespective of depth and preserving parallelism among lines, which suits applications like engineering blueprints. The corresponding matrix directly scales and translates the view volume without division, as in the symmetric case

O = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{2}{r - l} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{r + l}{r - l} \\ 0 & \frac{2}{t - b} & 0 & -\frac{t + b}{t - b} \\ 0 & 0 & -\frac{2}{f - n} & -\frac{f + n}{f - n} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix},

mapping x and y to [-1, 1] while normalizing z accordingly. Once projected onto the image plane, coordinates enter screen space through normalized device coordinates (NDC), a device-independent range of -1 to 1 for x and y (and typically 0 to 1 or -1 to 1 for z), which standardizes the output before the final viewport transform scales and offsets them to pixel positions on the display (e.g., 0 to width-1 for x). This NDC mapping ensures projections are resolution-agnostic, facilitating consistent rendering across varied hardware.

Rendering Pipeline Integration

In the rasterization-based rendering pipeline, the image plane serves as the target for projected vertices following the vertex transformation stage, where 3D model coordinates are converted to clip space via the model-view-projection matrix.^[39] Once in clip space, primitives are clipped against the viewing frustum, and the surviving geometry undergoes perspective division to normalize coordinates to the canonical view volume, mapping them onto the image plane in normalized device coordinates (NDC).^[40] Rasterization then generates fragments by sampling the image plane at discrete pixel locations, interpolating attributes such as depth and texture coordinates across the primitive surface; these fragments proceed to the fragment shading stage, where per-pixel computations determine final color values for the framebuffer.^[41] This integration ensures efficient hardware-accelerated rendering in systems like OpenGL and DirectX, where the image plane acts as the intermediary between geometric projection and pixel-level processing. In ray tracing pipelines, the image plane defines the origin and direction for primary rays cast from the virtual camera into the scene, with each pixel corresponding to a ray's starting point on the plane and its direction determined by the plane's position relative to the eye point. These rays intersect scene geometry to compute radiance, and techniques like importance sampling distribute additional rays around primary ones on the image plane to reduce aliasing artifacts, enhancing image quality without exhaustive sampling. This approach contrasts with rasterization by tracing rays outward from the image plane rather than projecting inward, enabling global illumination effects while maintaining the plane as the sampling grid for the final image. The image plane's coordinates in NDC are mapped to the viewport—a rectangular region on the display surface—via a scaling and translation transformation that aligns the projected plane with screen pixels, typically specified by width, height, and offset in APIs like DirectX. Clipping occurs prior to this mapping, discarding geometry outside the near and far planes of the frustum to prevent invalid projections onto the image plane, ensuring only visible content contributes to the rendered output.^[41] In real-time graphics frameworks such as OpenGL and DirectX, the perspective divide explicitly normalizes the image plane's homogeneous coordinates, dividing x, y, and z by w to produce perspective-correct interpolation during rasterization.^[39] Modern extensions in virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) rendering address distortions introduced by wide-field-of-view optics, where the image plane is pre-warped to counteract lens aberrations like barrel distortion, ensuring undistorted perception when viewed through headset displays.^[42] This involves rendering to a distorted image plane buffer before final output, with techniques such as vertex displacement or shader-based radial corrections integrated into the pipeline's fragment stage to maintain real-time performance.

References

[1]
intermediate image planes, conjugate planes - RP Photonics
An image plane is then a plane in which a sharp image of those object points appears, at least within Gaussian optics.
[2]
[PDF] Section 4 Imaging and Paraxial Optics
This plane of effective refraction into image space is called the Rear Principal Plane P'. The distance from the Rear Principal Plane to the Rear Focal ...
[3]
[PDF] CS231A Course Notes 1: Camera Models
In this construction, the film is commonly called the image or retinal plane. The aperture is referred to as the pinhole O or center of the camera. The distance ...
[4]
[PDF] Chapter 8 Optics
The corners of the rectangle and the location of the center of projection define four planes (top, bottom, left and right) that bound the view volume.
[5]
Introduction to Lenses and Geometrical Optics - Evident Scientific
... image plane on the right-hand side of the lens. The distance between the ... perpendicular to the optical axis of the lens, then the lens would focus ...
[6]
[PDF] 6.637 Geometric Optics - MIT
Sep 13, 2007 · Two planes are said to be an object and image pair if all rays from any point in the object plane pass through the corresponding point in the ...
[7]
[PDF] First Order Optics
The image location is known as the focal plane and is our first introduction into the cardinal points. Figure 3. Marginal and Chief Rays. The cardinal points ...
[8]
(PDF) The vision of Helmholtz - ResearchGate
Jun 4, 2021 · Helmholtz's contributions to understanding the eye as an optical instrument, the sensations of vision, and perception were expressed in the ...
[9]
[PDF] GEOMETRIC OPTICS
Summarizing we say that plane mirrors produce virtual images the same distance behind the mirror that the object is in front. We note also that the image is the ...
[10]
CHAPTER 1 Optical Aberrations - SPIE Digital Library
An object ray passing through the center of the aperture stop and appearing to pass through the centers of the entrance and exit pupils is called the chief (or ...
[11]
[PDF] Lecture 28 – Geometric Optics - Purdue Physics department
What about ray tracing? Page 11. Tray Tracing Example. • Transfer ... Chief and marginal rays. Chief ray: any ray from an object point that passes through the.
[12]
[PDF] Ray Optics for Imaging Systems Course Notes for IMGS-321 11 ...
Dec 11, 2013 · 3.1 PARAXIAL RAY TRACING EQUATIONS. 99. Marginal and chief rays traced through the three-surface optical system. The refraction at the first ...
[13]
Anatomy of the Microscope - Optical Aberrations
Sep 11, 2018 · Spherical Aberration - These artifacts occur when light waves passing through the periphery of a lens are not brought into focus with those ...
[14]
[PDF] Chromatic aberrations in lens design - SPIE
We will describe the consequences of this aberration for the colour correction of optical systems, and show that stable chromatic correction requires the.<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
Paraxial Approximation, Rays & Optics Explained - Avantier
Paraxial approximation simplifies optical calculations by assuming small-angle paraxial rays. Explore its role in paraxial optics, limitations, and commonMissing: definition assumptions limitations
[16]
Gaussian Optics – paraxial approximation - RP Photonics
Gaussian optics is a framework for describing optical phenomena, which is based on geometrical optics and the paraxial approximation.Missing: 1841 | Show results with:1841
[17]
Understanding paraxial ray tracing - Ansys Optics
The underlying assumptions of paraxial optics are that the ray makes a small angle and small height with respect to the chief ray. Because of this, Snell's Law ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
[18]
2.6: Gaussian Geometrical Optics - Physics LibreTexts
Sep 16, 2022 · ... Snell's Law are replaced by the angles themselves: ... because it is second order in yA and therefore is neglected in the paraxial approximation.
[19]
https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/optics/geometrical-optics-101-paraxial-ray-tracing-calculations/
[20]
Optical Aberrations - RP Photonics
Frequently encountered problems are barrel distortions and pincushion distortions. Such problems are particularly observed in wide-angle objectives. Zernike ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
[21]
Paraxial Region - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
In 1841, Professor Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777–1855) published his famous treatise on optics (Dioptrische Untersuchungen) in which he demonstrated that, so far ...
[22]
Chapter 1 - Geometrical Optics - SPIE Digital Library
A marginal ray travels from the point where the object and the optical axis cross the edge of the aperture stop. In Fig. 1.7, the lens edge is the aperture stop ...
[23]
Thin-Lens Equation:Cartesian Convention - HyperPhysics Concepts
The lens equation can be used to calculate the image distance for either real or virtual images and for either positive on negative lenses.
[24]
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/University_Physics_(OpenStax)/University_Physics_III_-_Optics_and_Modern_Physics_(OpenStax)/02%3A_Geometric_Optics_and_Image_Formation/2.03%3A_Spherical_Mirrors
[25]
How Focus Works | B&H eXplora
Mar 19, 2015 · Lenses direct light, and focus is achieved by adjusting the lens's distance from the sensor until light converges at the sensor plane.
[26]
https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/imaging/depth-of-field-and-depth-of-focus/
[27]
Depth of Field in Photography Defined: the Basics | B&H eXplora
Jul 28, 2015 · Depth of field (DOF) is defined as the area in a projected image, forward and aft of the focal plane, which also appears to be in focus in the image.Depth Of Field, Part I: The... · Factors Affecting Dof · Circle Of Confusion...
[28]
What Is Keystone Correction for Projectors? And Why You Should ...
Jun 15, 2022 · Keystone correction aims to solve electronically what is inherently an optical problem. The projector will digitally adjust the image in the opposite direction ...
[29]
Perfect Your Projection: Easy Keystone Correction with BenQ ...
Keystone correction adjusts digital distortion along the vertical, horizontal, and rotational axes to compensate for a misaligned lens.
[30]
History of the Camera: When was Photography Invented? - Adorama
Aug 15, 2023 · In 1839, Louis Daguerre created the daguerreotype, which was much closer to the photographic camera concept we know today.
[31]
A Brief History of Focusing
Jan 25, 2014 · This isn't nearly as much of an issue today, as it was in the late 70s and early 80s when the first autofocus cameras were being developed.
[32]
Microscope Conjugate Field Planes - Nikon's MicroscopyU
The tutorial explores the geometrical relationship between image planes in a microscope, including the intermediate image plane (I(3)) and the retina image (I( ...
[33]
Microscopy Basics | Image Formation - Zeiss Campus
The direct light and the light from the higher order diffraction maxima are focused by the objective to form an image in the intermediate image plane at the ...
[34]
Understanding Numerical Aperture & Image Resolution - ZEISS
Jun 5, 2024 · Learn how numerical aperture affects image resolution in microscopy. Explore the changing diffraction pattern in this tutorial.
[35]
Two-mirror telescopes: Cassegrain, Gregorian and variants
Effective focal length is determined by extending marginal ray converging from the secondary to the final focus backwards to the point of intersection with the ...
[36]
Adaptive Optics - ESO
Adaptive optics allows the corrected optical system to observe finer details of much fainter astronomical objects than is otherwise possible from the ground.Missing: Hubble | Show results with:Hubble
[37]
Astronomical adaptive optics: a review | PhotoniX | Full Text
May 1, 2024 · This paper provides a comprehensive review of AO progress for large aperture astronomical optical telescopes including both night-time and day-time solar ...
[38]
Coordinate Systems - LearnOpenGL
... coordinates to normalized device coordinates (NDC). These NDC are then given to the rasterizer to transform them to 2D coordinates/pixels on your screen.
[39]
The Perspective and Orthographic Projection Matrix - Scratchapixel
The orthographic projection matrix offers a different view of three-dimensional scenes by projecting objects onto the viewing plane without the depth ...Remapping The Z-Coordinate · Taking The Field-Of-View... · Test Program<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
https://www.scratchapixel.com/lessons/3d-basic-rendering/perspective-and-orthographic-projection-matrix/building-basic-perspective-projection-matrix.html
[41]
[PDF] Realistic Lens Distortion Rendering - Semantic Scholar
Two approaches to integrate realistic lens distortions effects into any graphics pipeline are presented, both based on the most widely used camera model in ...