Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gisella Perl

![Gisella Perl's memoir cover](./assets/Gisella_Perl_-I_was_a_doctor_in_Auschwitzcover Gisella Perl (December 10, 1907 – December 16, 1988) was a Hungarian-born Jewish gynecologist who, after to Auschwitz-Birkenau in , performed hundreds of clandestine abortions without anesthesia or instruments to avert the immediate extermination of pregnant prisoners by Nazi authorities, as both mothers and newborns faced gassing upon discovery. Born in to an Jewish family, Perl graduated at the top of her class from in Cluj, becoming one of Romania's first female physicians despite antisemitic barriers, and established a practice specializing in gynecology and . In the camp's infirmary, she prioritized maternal survival amid selections targeting the vulnerable, later testifying that these interventions were the only means to preserve women's lives under the regime's policy of eliminating pregnancies to maintain labor efficiency. Liberated in 1945, she emigrated to the , where she resumed practice in , contributed to early research, and published her I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz in 1948, detailing the ethical dilemmas and horrors she witnessed without euphemism or exaggeration. Perl's actions, driven by the causal certainty of death for pregnant inmates, underscore the stark choices imposed by the Holocaust's machinery, later influencing discussions on in extremis.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood

Gisella Perl was born on December 10, 1907, in Sighet, , a region then under Hungarian administration and now part of , to an Orthodox Jewish family headed by Moris (Moshe) Perl and Phrida (Phridelle) Perl. She grew up in a strictly observant household with six siblings, where religious practices, family cohesion, and education formed the core of daily life despite the limitations imposed by traditional gender roles in early 20th-century Jewish communities. permeated her childhood, instilling values of perseverance and moral duty that later influenced her personal resolve. As a child, Perl exhibited exceptional academic promise, distinguishing herself through in an environment that rarely encouraged advanced pursuits for girls. By age 16, around 1923, she graduated at the top of her gymnasium class—the only girl and the only Jewish student to do so—overcoming societal and communal barriers that typically confined females to domestic roles. Her father's strict yet supportive guidance emphasized self-improvement and learning, fostering a drive for achievement amid the Orthodox framework and the subtle undercurrents of exclusion faced by Jews in interwar . These formative experiences in Sighet's Jewish milieu cultivated the resilience that defined her trajectory.

Medical Training and Early Influences

Gisella Perl, born in 1907 in , to an Jewish family, demonstrated exceptional academic aptitude from a young age, graduating at the top of her class in 1923 as the only female and Jewish student to achieve this distinction. Despite her father's initial religious objections to women pursuing , Perl's determination prevailed, leading her to enroll in the University Medical School in (now ), where she became the first Jewish woman admitted amid Romania's policies that restricted Jewish enrollment to approximately 4 percent of the student body, proportional to the Jewish population. These quotas, implemented in the to limit Jewish access to , posed significant barriers, yet Perl's academic excellence secured her place in a field dominated by non-Jewish males. Perl completed her medical studies at the University of Cluj, graduating with merit around after navigating the rigorous curriculum and discriminatory environment. Her training emphasized empirical approaches to and , reflecting the era's advancements in clinical , though Jewish students like Perl often faced exclusion from certain resources and networks. During this period, she encountered firsthand the empirical challenges of healthcare disparities, particularly in rural , where limited access to medical care exacerbated maternal and reproductive health issues among women from impoverished backgrounds. Perl's commitment to gynecology stemmed from early observations of societal inequalities in , including high rates of preventable complications in and due to and inadequate care, motivating her to specialize in a field demanding precise, evidence-based interventions in reproductive . Familial values of , combined with her personal resolve against antisemitic and patriarchal barriers, shaped her focus on addressing causal factors in female-specific ailments rather than symptomatic alone. Following , she undertook initial residency in gynecology, honing skills in surgical and obstetric techniques that underscored the importance of biological realism in managing and maternal outcomes.

Pre-Holocaust Professional Career

Establishment as a Gynecologist

Following her medical qualification in , Gisella Perl established a private gynecological practice in Sighet, , where she focused on women's reproductive health, including infertility treatments. She married Dr. Krauss, an internist or , and the couple collaborated professionally, maintaining a joint medical office that served the local Jewish and broader community until the escalation of disruptions. Perl's approach emphasized empirical observation of patient outcomes, particularly in addressing common gynecological issues such as cervical conditions contributing to infertility, though specific pre-war innovations remain sparsely documented beyond her clinical reputation. As antisemitic policies proliferated in during the late —culminating in the Goga government's citizenship revisions of January 1938 and professional quotas—Jewish physicians encountered mounting barriers, including limitations on practice licenses and patient access. After Northern Transylvania's annexation by in August 1940 under the Second Vienna Award, Hungarian laws further restricted Jewish professionals; a capped Jewish representation in free professions like at 6 percent, compelling many, including Perl, to limit services primarily to Jewish patients amid economic boycotts and surveillance. Despite these constraints, Perl continued her practice in Sighet, treating infertility and obstetric cases until her deportation in 1944, demonstrating resilience against discriminatory edicts that systematically marginalized Jewish medical expertise.

Research and Practice in Romania

Gisella Perl, having graduated from in Cluj (then Kolozsvár) with merit, established a gynecology and practice in her hometown of Sighet, (part of until 1940), where she collaborated with her husband, Ephraim Krauss, to operate a local serving the community. This partnership enabled comprehensive care, with Perl focusing on women's reproductive health amid the socioeconomic challenges of a rural Jewish , including limited resources that exacerbated conditions like and nutritional deficiencies impacting and maternal outcomes. Her routine practice involved delivering thousands of babies and managing complex cases through empirical observation and intervention, demonstrating causal connections between environmental factors—such as and poor —and reproductive complications. Perl pursued innovative research into during this pre-war era, developing methods to address underlying physiological causes in patients previously deemed untreatable, with reported successes in restoring for couples facing idiopathic or structural barriers. These efforts prioritized verifiable physiological data over anecdotal remedies, aligning with emerging gynecological standards, though specific publication details from remain sparse in available records; her approaches foreshadowed later post-war specializations but were grounded in local case studies from Sighet's diverse patient base. She balanced this intensive workload with family life, raising a son and daughter while sustaining a high-volume practice that demanded long hours, illustrating the personal resilience required amid professional demands in a tightening . By the early 1940s, escalating antisemitic policies under Romania's and subsequent Axis-aligned regimes, followed by Hungary's 1940 annexation of , imposed professional restrictions on Jewish physicians, including quotas and exclusionary laws that curtailed access to hospitals and patients, though Perl maintained her practice until the 1944 ghettoization of Sighet's . These measures reflected broader causal dynamics of fascist ideology prioritizing ethnic purity, which systematically undermined Jewish medical contributions by linking professional competence to racial criteria rather than empirical merit, as evidenced in contemporaneous decrees barring from state roles.

Deportation and Imprisonment in Auschwitz

Deportation from Sighet

In March 1944, occupied , prompting Hungarian authorities, under intense German pressure, to initiate the rapid roundup and ghettoization of the country's Jewish population, including the approximately 15,000 Jews in Sighet, , where Perl resided. By late April or early May, Sighet's Jews were confined to a established in the city, with severe restrictions on movement, food, and sanitation, as part of the broader systematic dispossession and isolation preceding . Gisella Perl, her husband Ephraim Krauss, their son, and her parents were among those forced into the ; her daughter, however, remained hidden with a non-Jewish family designated as . The entire Jewish population of Sighet was deported to Auschwitz-Birkenau in May 1944, with transports occurring primarily between May 19 and 24, loaded into overcrowded, sealed cattle cars lacking ventilation, food, water, or sanitary facilities. Perl's group endured an eight-day journey under these brutal conditions, marked by extreme deprivation, illness, and deaths en route, as documented in survivor accounts of Hungarian deportations during this phase, when over 400,000 were transported to Auschwitz in a matter of weeks. Upon arrival at Auschwitz-Birkenau, deportees faced immediate selections on the ramp, where officers, including , divided arrivals—primarily sending the elderly, children, and those deemed unfit for work directly to gas chambers, while sparing a minority for forced labor. Perl was separated from her husband, son, and parents, who were ultimately murdered in the camp; her medical profession was identified during the selection process, leading to her assignment to the labor pool rather than immediate extermination, as the Nazis exploited skilled prisoners for camp operations.

Initial Experiences in the Camp

Upon her arrival at Auschwitz-Birkenau in May 1944 amid the mass deportation of Hungarian Jews, Gisella Perl immediately encountered the camp's selection process, directed by SS physician , in which arriving prisoners were divided based on perceived fitness for labor. Those deemed unsuitable—including children, the elderly, and the visibly ill—were segregated and marched toward gas chambers, with Perl observing the ominous smoke and flames emanating from the crematoria as evidence of their fate. Directed to the overcrowded women's , Perl adapted to squalid conditions marked by extreme deprivation: prisoners subsisted on starvation rations of roughly 200-300 grams of bread daily supplemented by watery soup, inducing swift emaciation, weakness, and vulnerability to rampant infectious diseases such as , , and . SS guards enforced order through pervasive brutality, routinely whipping or beating inmates for infractions like slowing during marches or failing to meet work quotas, often resulting in on-site fatalities; Perl and fellow survivors later corroborated estimates from eyewitness accounts indicating thousands perished daily from gassings, executions, , and untreated illnesses during the peak of Hungarian transports in mid-1944. Within days, Perl discerned the lethal peril of under explicit camp policy, as SS directives—communicated directly by Mengele—required reporting expectant women for immediate selection and gassing to preclude births that could strain resources or defy extermination aims, with discovered cases swiftly dispatched to crematoria either alive or post-execution. This recognition stemmed from initial observations of selections targeting visible pregnancies and verbal orders emphasizing their eradication, underscoring how reproductive status amplified mortality risks amid the regime's systematic .

Medical Role and Actions in Auschwitz

Assignment as Prisoner-Doctor

In Auschwitz-Birkenau, Gisella Perl's expertise as a gynecologist prompted the to co-opt her into medical service as a shortly after her arrival in May 1944. Initially assigned to oversee blood extractions from inmates, her specialized knowledge led to her designation as head of the women's infirmary, where she was tasked with inspecting arriving female prisoners for health conditions, including gynecological issues, and reporting findings to camp officials to facilitate selections for labor or extermination. This role positioned her among a small group of prisoner-doctors selected by physician to manage rudimentary care in , the experimental block for women, under constant threat of death for non-compliance. Perl operated in extreme deprivation, lacking access to surgical instruments, anesthetics, or medications; her "hospital" consisted of a single room with a table, straw mattresses, and occasional paper bandages, with no running water or sterilization capabilities. She treated infections from wounds, such as whip-lacerated breasts, using only a solitary knife sharpened on stone, performing procedures bare-handed to prevent or amid rampant and outbreaks that claimed thousands of lives monthly. These interventions relied on verbal reassurance and basic hygiene where possible, as formal supplies were withheld to ensure prisoner mortality rates remained high. During selections and examinations, Perl encountered Mengele directly, observing his arbitrary choices of women for pseudoscientific experiments involving sterilization, organ removal, and infection inducement, which he justified under pretexts but which served no valid medical purpose. As a subordinate prisoner-doctor, she was compelled to assist in under his oversight, witnessing his unhindered authority to dispatch non-compliant staff or experimental subjects to the gas chambers, a dynamic that underscored the coerced of survival in the camp's medical .

General Medical Interventions

In Auschwitz, Gisella Perl, as a prisoner-physician, collaborated with four other doctors and four nurses to deliver care to female inmates amid severe resource shortages and under perpetual threat of execution by personnel, including , for any perceived defiance or inefficiency. These efforts focused on to prioritize patients with potential for survival and utility within the camp's forced labor system, directing the severely ill back to barracks to evade hospital sweeps that often culminated in selections. Perl conducted surgeries and wound care using improvised instruments, such as a sharpened on rocks, supplemented by paper scraps for bandaging when sterile materials were unavailable. She addressed common camp ailments including rashes treated with scavenged ointments and temporary blindness managed via smuggled vitamin injections, often relying on verbal reassurance to calm patients lacking pharmacological options. To combat infectious outbreaks like and , which ravaged prisoner populations due to and sanitation failures, Perl's team applied basic symptomatic interventions, though success rates were constrained by the absence of antibiotics or hygiene infrastructure. In one protective measure, she substituted her own blood samples for those of inmates testing positive for contagious conditions during Nazi-mandated screenings, thereby falsifying results to avert immediate execution by gassing. These actions, drawn from Perl's firsthand accounts, underscore the pragmatic calculus of harm minimization in an environment where non-intervention equated to passive in mass death.

Management of Pregnancies and Abortions

In Auschwitz, Gisella Perl performed clandestine abortions on pregnant Jewish women to conceal their condition from guards and camp physicians, as discovery typically resulted in immediate execution or transfer for fatal medical experiments. The camp's policy mandated the extermination of pregnant inmates upon detection, with no provisions for childbirth or maternal survival, leading Perl to conduct these interventions systematically after witnessing initial killings. She reported encountering pregnancies across all trimesters and prioritized procedures that minimized visible evidence to evade searches during roll calls or selections. Perl estimated conducting abortions on hundreds of women during her imprisonment from May 1944 to January 1945, utilizing her fingers for manual disruption of the or improvised tools scavenged from camp scraps, performed in concealed sites such as corners or stalls without , antiseptics, or surgical instruments. These operations occurred under extreme constraints, including malnutrition-induced weakness in patients and the constant threat of interruption by kapos or guards, with Perl relying on her pre-war gynecological expertise to induce fetal expulsion covertly. Complications were frequent due to the absence of and follow-up care, including severe infections, hemorrhaging, and from unsterile conditions, though Perl attempted rudimentary post-procedure monitoring using smuggled rags or poultices when possible. Successful cases allowed women to resume forced labor appearances, thereby avoiding lethal selections for several months, as non-pregnant deemed fit for work faced delayed extermination compared to those identified as "useless." Perl documented no viable births post-intervention under her care, aligning with her stated goal of eliminating detectable pregnancies entirely within her purview.

Ethical Dilemmas and Controversies

Rationales for Abortions

Gisella Perl rationalized abortions as a means to avert the certain death of pregnant prisoners under Auschwitz's selection processes, where detected pregnancies led to immediate extermination. Empirical observations confirmed that women identified as pregnant during routine inspections faced 100% fatality, as they were directed to gas chambers without exception. Perl recounted that witnessing these outcomes prompted her to intervene surgically to eliminate visible signs of pregnancy, thereby concealing the condition and enabling maternal survival. A secondary rationale involved shielding women from Josef Mengele's experiments, which targeted pregnant inmates for lethal procedures including induced labor followed by or . Perl noted that Mengele sought twins or other specimens for his research, often resulting in the mother's death alongside the fetus. By performing early-term abortions under clandestine conditions, she aimed to prevent such exploitation, viewing the procedure as a lesser harm compared to guaranteed annihilation. Perl further prioritized adult women's preservation on the grounds that surviving mothers could potentially rebuild families and societies after , whereas fetuses in the camp's starvation-riddled environment lacked any realistic path to viability. In her , she articulated: "It was up to me to save the life of the mothers, if there was no other way, than by destroying the life of their unborn children," emphasizing the where maternal offered post-war absent for the unborn. This calculus stemmed from the camp's causal reality: unaddressed pregnancies yielded zero survivors, while interventions yielded mothers who endured to .

Criticisms from Religious and Pro-Life Perspectives

Pro-life advocates contend that Perl's performance of abortions in Auschwitz inherently contradicted the principle of sanctity of life, as the procedure terminates a developing human organism whose biological continuity from establishes it as deserving protection equivalent to born persons, regardless of the extremity of circumstances. This perspective holds that no situational coercion, including Nazi threats of maternal execution or experimentation, justifies direct killing of the innocent, prioritizing prohibitions over utilitarian calculations. Such views draw parallels to contemporary debates, where exceptions for life-threatening cases are rejected to avoid eroding foundational , arguing that invoking Holocaust-era actions risks exceptionalism that undermines consistent ethical standards. Orthodox Jewish critiques similarly interrogate the halachic framework applied to Perl's decisions, focusing on whether the camp's conditions satisfied —the overriding imperative to save endangered life—sufficiently to permit fetal termination. Traditional sources permit abortion only in cases of direct, immediate threat to the mother's survival, such as complications in labor where the fetus endangers delivery, but stricter interpretations, as articulated by groups like the Jewish Pro-Life Foundation, classify broader coercive dangers (e.g., potential selection for death upon pregnancy detection) as falling short of this threshold, viewing abortion instead as a prohibited act akin to " and " of the unborn. These positions emphasize that halachic exceptions derive from narrow biblical precedents, like the (pursuer) status of a fetus blocking birth, and caution against expansive applications under duress that could normalize interventions beyond verifiable mortal peril. Historical evidence of limited successful pregnancies concealed until birth in Auschwitz underscores debates over alternatives, with records indicating a small number of infants born to Jewish women in the family camp (BIIb section) prior to late 1944 mass liquidations, or hidden by non-Jewish prisoners who evaded detection longer. While such outcomes were empirically rare—due to routine searches, malnutrition, and immediate infanticide policies upon discovery—these instances highlight potential non-lethal strategies, like communal concealment efforts, that some religious critics argue should have been prioritized over abortion to uphold dual protections for mother and child, avoiding reliance on Holocaust uniqueness to rationalize otherwise impermissible acts.

Broader Debates on Necessity vs. Morality

Scholars and ethicists have engaged Perl's actions through the lens of consequentialist ethics, emphasizing the net preservation of life amid genocidal conditions. By performing abortions on an estimated 3,000 pregnant prisoners, Perl ensured that no detectable pregnancies reached Nazi selection processes, where discovered women faced immediate gassing or lethal experiments, averting the deaths of those mothers and enabling subsequent survival rates unattainable otherwise. Post-liberation testimonies and Perl's own account indicate that many of these women emigrated after the war and bore children, with Perl asserting that her interventions facilitated the rebirth of Jewish families numbering in the thousands, aligning with utilitarian calculations prioritizing aggregate human flourishing over individual in a total extermination context. Deontological critiques, rooted in absolute prohibitions against intentional killing of innocents, argue that Perl's direct fetal terminations violated immutable moral principles, irrespective of outcomes or camp exigencies. Religious analyses, including , frame as intrinsically evil, positing that even choiceless scenarios cannot nullify the sanctity of nascent , and warn that ratifying such acts risks normalizing ethical beyond Holocaust exceptionalism. Conservative bioethicists extend this to caution against a , where extreme necessities erode foundational norms, potentially justifying expansions in contemporary policy detached from existential threats. Bioethics literature sustains this tension, with no empirical records of large-scale maternal-fetal survivals in Auschwitz intervention, underscoring the factual void of alternatives while debates persist on whether Perl's precedents inform or exceptionalize modern . Consequentialist defenses predominate in secular analyses of camp medicine, yet deontologists maintain that moral integrity demands non-complicity in killing, even under duress, highlighting enduring philosophical divides without resolution in Perl's .

Liberation and Immediate Post-War Period

Liberation from Auschwitz

In late 1944, as Soviet forces approached, Nazi authorities initiated the evacuation of Auschwitz, forcing approximately 58,000 prisoners on death marches westward amid freezing conditions and summary executions to prevent liberation by the Allies. Gisella Perl, who had arrived at the camp in May 1944 and served as a prisoner-physician for seven months, was among those transferred out before the Red Army's arrival, avoiding the fate of roughly 7,000 emaciated inmates left behind in the main camp. Perl's group was relocated first to a near for continued forced work, then onward to Bergen-Belsen in by early 1945, where overcrowding, outbreaks, and deliberate neglect had already claimed thousands of lives. There, she persisted in rudimentary medical interventions despite scant resources, treating inmates ravaged by and in what she later described as a site of extreme brutality. Bergen-Belsen was liberated on April 15, 1945, by advancing forces of the 11th Armoured , who encountered over 50,000 survivors in skeletal condition amid piles of unburied corpses. At that moment, Perl was aiding a in labor, delivering the camp's first born in freedom—a symbolic act amid the chaos of initial Allied medical for the severely malnourished and ill. Following liberation, she received emergency care as part of the broader effort to stabilize thousands in displaced persons facilities, marking the transition from immediate peril to gradual recovery.

Family Losses and Personal Trauma

Perl's husband, , a , was beaten to death by guards mere days before the of Auschwitz-Birkenau on January 27, 1945. Her son, sent to the camp alongside her in March 1944, perished in a shortly after arrival, as did her parents, who were separated from her immediately upon from Sighet, . Most of her extended family, including siblings and other relatives, were systematically murdered during , with camp selections and gassings directly causing these deaths under the Nazis' extermination policies. The abrupt separations and executions inflicted acute grief on Perl, yet the camp's survival demands—starvation, forced labor, and disease—necessitated suppressing emotional responses to maintain functionality as a prisoner-doctor. Post-liberation, this compounded into profound ; Perl wandered through war-torn for 19 days seeking surviving kin, only to confirm the scale of her losses, which triggered despair linked to the neurobiological alterations from prolonged extreme stress observed in . Long-term effects manifested as chronic mental scars, with Perl's experiences exemplifying the persistent post-traumatic symptoms, such as intrusive recollections and emotional numbing, causally tied to Auschwitz's dehumanizing conditions including witness to mass killings and medical atrocities. In reconstructing these events, she prioritized empirical details over sentimental reflection, emphasizing verifiable facts of deaths amid the imperative to document for historical accountability rather than personal .

Post-War Career and Emigration

Relocation to the

Following her liberation from Auschwitz-Birkenau in January 1945, Gisella Perl navigated the displaced persons camps in post-war before securing passage to the in 1947. She arrived in , where the large Jewish immigrant community provided initial support amid the uncertainties of resettlement. Upon entry, Perl encountered intense bureaucratic scrutiny from the , which interrogated her extensively to rule out any collaboration with Nazi authorities during her time as a prisoner- in the camps. This suspicion stemmed from her documented role in the Auschwitz infirmary, despite her status as a survivor and victim of . As a foreign-trained from , she also faced significant barriers to professional reintegration, including stringent state licensing requirements that delayed her ability to resume clinical work. These challenges reflected broader postwar obstacles for seeking to rebuild in , compounded by the need to validate foreign credentials and adapt to a medical system wary of unverified practitioners. Perl's determination to establish herself in persisted, leveraging personal forged in extremity to address these institutional hurdles.

Resuming Medical Practice

After obtaining citizenship in 1951, Gisella Perl resumed her medical practice as a gynecologist at in , where she specialized in treatments and on the labor floor. Encouraged by to continue her profession despite challenges as a foreign-trained survivor, she applied her pre-war expertise in gynecology to address issues prevalent among and others during the post-war . Perl delivered approximately 3,000 babies in , focusing on empirical interventions to support and healthy pregnancies without engaging in contemporaneous politicized movements. In 1966, she established a private practice on in , treating thousands of patients until her retirement in the , during which she co-authored nine academic papers on pregnancy-related conditions between 1955 and 1972. Her work emphasized clinical outcomes in women's reproductive health, prioritizing data-driven approaches to amid rising demand for such services.

Writings and Publications

I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz

Gisella Perl's memoir I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz was first published in 1948 by International Universities Press in New York, marking one of the earliest English-language accounts by a female Holocaust survivor detailing medical experiences in the camps. The book originated as a raw, dictated narrative compiled from Perl's personal recollections shortly after her liberation from Bergen-Belsen in April 1945, reflecting the immediate post-war urgency to document Nazi atrocities without embellishment. The content centers on Perl's role as an inmate gynecologist at Auschwitz-Birkenau from May 1944 onward, where she was compelled to assist in selections for the gas chambers and conduct makeshift medical interventions amid extreme deprivation. Perl describes the systematic Nazi policy of exterminating pregnant women and newborns—killing mothers upon discovery of and immediately murdering infants to enforce labor quotas and prevent —necessitating her secret performance of abortions using rudimentary tools like glass shards and soap bars to avert certain death. She also recounts forced collaborations with SS physician during examinations and the causal logic of camp operations, where withholding food, water, and sanitation directly precipitated mass mortality rates exceeding 90% among arrivals within months. The memoir's factual basis aligns with Perl's direct observations, corroborated by patterns in other prisoner testimonies regarding Auschwitz's medical block conditions, selection processes, and extermination protocols, as documented in post-war trials and survivor archives. Its unvarnished depiction avoids sensationalism, tracing decisions like induced miscarriages to the explicit Nazi directives that rendered incompatible with survival, thereby prioritizing maternal preservation over in a system designed for total elimination. Perl's account emphasizes empirical realities of collapse—such as rampant and from contaminated water—over moral framing, grounding ethical dilemmas in the camps' engineered of .

Content and Reception of the Memoir

I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz, published in 1948 by International Universities Press, provides a firsthand account of Gisella Perl's tenure as a prisoner-physician at Auschwitz-Birkenau from her arrival in May 1944 until the camp's liberation in January 1945. The memoir chronicles the extreme medical challenges faced by female inmates, including rampant disease, starvation-induced health crises, and the SS policy of exterminating pregnant women and mothers with young children during selections. Perl describes performing clandestine abortions—estimated by her at dozens to hundreds—using bare hands, glass shards for dilation, and no or sterilization, motivated by the certainty that detected pregnancies led to immediate gassing. The narrative emphasizes improvised care for gynecological issues, such as treating infections from camp conditions and concealing pregnancies through manual interventions, alongside observations of Nazi medical experiments and the psychological toll on . Short chapters focus on specific episodes, like in the camp's "maternity block" where infants were typically killed, underscoring the absence of viable options for maternal or fetal survival under camp protocols. Perl's text integrates personal reflections on professional duty amid horror, framing her actions as compelled adaptations to prevent total loss of life. Reception highlighted the memoir's value as empirical testimony on underrepresented aspects of camp life, particularly women's reproductive fates, aiding scholarship with details corroborated by other survivor accounts of similar practices. Early reviews praised its unflinching detail and , influencing curricula on Nazi medical abuses and adaptations into media like the 2003 film Out of the Ashes, which drew positive commentary for accessibility without sensationalism. Widely translated, it has shaped educational narratives on prisoner-doctors' roles. Critiques address inherent limitations of trauma-induced recall, with scholars noting potential selective emphasis or of events common in early postwar memoirs lacking contemporaneous . Debates persist on the scale of abortions, as Perl's estimates lack verification amid camp secrecy, and some later retellings inflate figures beyond her original claims, prompting of numerical precision. Conservative commentators have contested the portrayal of procedures as straightforwardly redemptive, advocating examination of intrinsic ethical tensions despite contextual necessities.

Legacy and Recognition

Honors and Memorials

The Gisella Perl Osler Student Society at the was established to honor her legacy, emphasizing values of compassion, perseverance, and self-sacrifice exemplified in her medical work during imprisonment at Auschwitz. This student organization within the John Sealy School of Medicine serves as a memorial to her resilience as a under duress. Perl's actions received recognition from U.S. Jewish and Holocaust remembrance institutions, including archival collections and public programs at the documenting her testimony and experiences as a prisoner-physician. Similarly, the has featured lectures and exhibits on her role in addressing medical crises faced by women in the camps. These commemorations highlight her contributions to survivor narratives rather than formal accolades. In , where Perl resided after emigrating from the , she was acknowledged by and the community for her efforts to preserve lives amid camp conditions, though without induction into major halls of fame or receipt of international prizes like the Nobel. Her honors remain principally tied to her status as a survivor and the ethical dilemmas she navigated as a .

Influence on Holocaust Narratives

Gisella Perl's 1948 memoir I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz provides a firsthand primary source on female prisoners' experiences in Auschwitz-Birkenau, particularly the perils of pregnancy under Nazi policies that mandated selection of expectant Jewish women for gas chambers upon discovery. The account details clandestine medical interventions by prisoner physicians to avert such fates, offering empirical data on reproductive dynamics and survival tactics amid systematic extermination efforts. Scholars have cited the in analyses of Nazi concentration camp and gynecology, highlighting its role in elucidating -doctor collaborations and the regime's targeted elimination of potential Jewish births as part of broader doctrines. These references underscore Perl's contribution to documenting unromanticized within the camps' coercive structures, where was repurposed for harm minimization rather than heroic abstraction. The work has shaped cultural representations, inspiring the 2003 Showtime television film Out of the Ashes, a of Perl's tenure as a prisoner gynecologist assisting inmates while navigating oversight. In 2024, the play Mere Waters, premiered at the Connelly Theater during the Summer Festival, adapts her narrative to examine maternal survival imperatives in context. Such adaptations propagate Perl's testimony into broader historiography, prioritizing causal accounts of camp medical realties over sanitized interpretations.

Ongoing Ethical Discussions

Perl's clandestine abortions in Auschwitz, performed to avert maternal execution and experimentation by Nazi physicians such as , continue to feature in debates over abortion ethics, particularly regarding exceptions in restrictive laws. Advocates for , including outlets aligned with Jewish feminist perspectives, invoke her estimated 3,000 procedures as exemplifying the to prioritize women's survival in life-threatening contexts, drawing parallels to modern bans like Texas's 2021 law that lack broad exceptions. This framing posits her actions as consonant with medical oaths to minimize harm amid coercion, though such sources often emphasize narrative utility over absolute fetal protections. Counterarguments from pro-life viewpoints stress the inviolable principle of life's sanctity, cautioning against extrapolating camp-specific exigencies to elective abortions today. While acknowledging the unparalleled brutality—where pregnancy equated to certain death for both mother and fetus—critics argue that Perl's utilitarian choices, however heroic, underscore ethical absolutes rather than precedents for broader permissions; diluting these risks normalizing procedures absent comparable threats. Jewish pro-life analyses, rooted in halakhic traditions permitting abortion only when the mother's life is directly endangered (pikuach nefesh), reevaluate her decisions as a tragic adherence to survival ethics but not a template for non-lethal scenarios, highlighting tensions with Orthodox interpretations that view fetal life as endowed with inherent dignity from conception. Academic literature contrasts Perl's maternal prioritization with alternatives like Dr. Erno Vadasz's efforts to deliver viable infants in less lethal sub-camps, debating whether such interventions established patterns for "coerced medicine" under totalitarian regimes or reinforced adaptive in . These analyses probe precedents for autonomy versus institutional overrides, noting Perl's post-war remorse as evidence of enduring moral friction, yet affirm her calculus as defensible given empirical certainties of Nazi . Reevaluations in Jewish forums further dissect compatibility with Talmudic precedents, concluding her interventions aligned with preserving communal continuity amid , though not without invoking debates on fetal . Recent media, including a 2024 off-Broadway dramatizing her life, has reignited scrutiny over truth versus inspirational narrative, with some questioning whether hagiographic portrayals elide the procedures' grim realities—unsterile, instrument-less terminations—to bolster pro-choice exceptionalism. Balanced critiques, such as those decrying analogies in rhetoric, warn that instrumentalizing Perl's trauma distorts causal realities of camp dynamics, where agency was illusory, urging focus on verifiable historical ethics over politicized utility.

Personal Life and Death

Marriage and Family

Gisella Perl married Ephraim Krauss, a , prior to the Second World War while practicing medicine in Sighet, Romania. The couple had two children, a son and a daughter; Perl's daughter was placed with a non-Jewish family for safekeeping before the 1944 deportations from northern Romania. Following the war's end in Europe, Perl did not remarry and instead prioritized reestablishing her gynecological practice amid relocation to the United States in 1947. She sustained connections with her surviving daughter, Gabriella Krauss Blattman, reuniting postwar and relocating to Herzliya, Israel, in 1979 to reside near her and her grandson.

Later Years and Death

Perl relocated to Herzliya, Israel, in 1979 to live with her daughter and grandson following her retirement from medical practice in the United States. In her later years, she volunteered at Shaare Zedek Hospital's gynecology clinic in Jerusalem, continuing to assist patients until shortly before her death. She occasionally gave lectures recounting her Auschwitz experiences, maintaining a low-profile existence focused on family and reflection without notable personal scandals or health-related controversies. Perl died on December 16, 1988, in at the age of 81 from natural causes. She was buried in Sanhedria Cemetery in .

References

  1. [1]
    Managing Pregnancy in Nazi Concentration Camps - NIH
    Dr. Gisella Perl was born in 1907 to an orthodox Jewish family in Sighet, a small town in Transylvania (Romania). She was a precocious child who became ...Missing: biography facts
  2. [2]
    Managing Pregnancy in Nazi Concentration Camps: The Role of ...
    Jul 30, 2018 · Dr. Gisella Perl was born in 1907 to an orthodox Jewish family in Sighet, a small town in Transylvania (Romania). She was a precocious child who ...Missing: biography facts
  3. [3]
    Gisella Perl Society - UTMB Health
    Born on December 10, 1907, Gisella Perl was a Hungarian Jewish gynecologist who served countless women while being imprisoned in Auschwitz. During her ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  4. [4]
    Gisella Perl and Our 'Haunted Present' | Jewish Book Council
    Apr 25, 2022 · She was a trailblazing physician and infertility researcher; a wife, a mother, a Jew, and a prisoner of the Nazis in the 1940s. Her memoir, I ...Missing: biography facts
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Gisella Perl (1907 -1988)
    While in Auschwitz-Birkenau she assisted multiple women to either abort their pregnancies or to give birth and then to murder the newborn so as to save the ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  7. [7]
    Grapevine: 100 for Rose of Jericho | The Jerusalem Post
    Dec 22, 2009 · Her late sister, gynecologist Gisella Perl, was known as the angel of Auschwitz. ... Although they came from a strictly observant religious family ...
  8. [8]
    The Auschwitz doctor who couldn't 'do no harm' - BBC
    May 26, 2020 · Judaism played a central role in Perl's childhood. She was born in the late 19th Century in Sighet, a small town in Hungary (after the war, it ...
  9. [9]
    This Auschwitz Doctor Saved Women's Lives Was Also a Fellow ...
    Mar 3, 2017 · Gisella Perl showed academic promise at a young age. At the age of 16 she was the only woman—and the only Jewish person—to graduate from her ...Missing: overcoming barriers
  10. [10]
    Gisella Perl - Spartacus Educational
    Gisella Perl was born into a Jewish family in Hungary in 1907. At 16 years old, Gisella Perl graduated first in her secondary-school class, the only woman and ...
  11. [11]
    OUT OF DEATH, A ZEST FOR LIFE - The New York Times
    Nov 15, 1982 · Dr. Perl, 72 years old, is recognized in Israel, where she now lives, and elsewhere by grateful women who fall to their knees and call her ''Gisi Doctor.''Missing: siblings | Show results with:siblings
  12. [12]
    The Abortionist of Auschwitz - Aish.com
    After studying medicine in Germany, Gisella became one of Europe's early female doctors, specializing in gynecology, delivering babies and offering medical care ...
  13. [13]
    Antisemitic legislation passed in Romania - Zachor Foundation
    Antisemitic legislation passed in Romania. After Octavian Goga's National ... The gravest of the anti-Jewish measures was a law enacted on January 22, 1938, to ...Missing: physicians 1940
  14. [14]
    Antisemitism in Romania - Wikipedia
    Antisemitism in Romania manifested in the country's legislation during its early times following Romania's foundation as a modern state in the mid-19th ...Missing: Gisella Perl
  15. [15]
    DR. PERL, NAZI VICTIM, GETS U.S. RESIDENCE
    Perl and her husband, a surgeon, operated a hospital at Sighet, Rumania. Her husband and their son were killed in a Nazi gas chamber, he added, and her parents ...
  16. [16]
    Gisella Perl: Angel and Abortionist in the Auschwitz Death Camp
    Nov 17, 2009 · Gisella Perl was a successful Jewish gynaecologist in Sighet, Romania before the Second World War. She was best known for her innovative research into female ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  17. [17]
    1944: Key Dates | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    Explore a timeline of key events during 1944 in the history of Nazi Germany, World War II, and the Holocaust.
  18. [18]
    Deportation from Sighet | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    In May 1944, the entire Jewish population of Sighet was deported to Auschwitz. Most individuals were gassed upon arrival.Missing: Gisella Perl details<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Deportation of Hungarian Jews | Anne Frank House
    Almost all of them were murdered. In March 1944, Nazi Germany occupied Hungary. Until then, Hungary had been an ally of Germany, but the Hungarian government no ...
  20. [20]
    Josef Mengele | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    Nov 15, 2024 · SS physician Josef Mengele conducted inhumane, and often deadly, medical experiments on prisoners at Auschwitz.Nazi Medical Experiments · Josef Mengele (Photo) · A group of SS officers...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Female Jewish Prisoner Physicians and Medicine in Auschwitz ...
    May 2, 2025 · The first of these women, whose story is perhaps the most well-known in and outside of academia, is Dr. Gisella Perl. Gisella Perl was born ...
  22. [22]
    Risking it all to save strangers—Remembering Gisella Perl
    Jun 15, 2021 · Between 1955 and 1972, Perl authored or co-authored nine academic papers on the treatment of diseases common in pregnancy. Her work investigated ...
  23. [23]
    This Jewish gynecologist saved hundreds of pregnant women's lives ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · The true story of Dr. Gisella Perl, who provided clandestine abortions for her fellow camp prisoners, is being told in a new off-Broadway drama.
  24. [24]
    Why Do Pro-Lifers Compare Abortion to the Holocaust? | HLI
    May 3, 2016 · The similarities between the Nazi and abortion Holocausts go far deeper than a high body count. There are many points of similarity between the Holocausts.
  25. [25]
    Children born in Auschwitz / Fate of children / History / Auschwitz ...
    Children born to Jewish women were put to death until November 1944, when the mass extermination of the Jews was halted. Children born in the family camp for ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Lessons From Gisella Perl, Reflections on the Texas Abortion Ban
    Feb 28, 2022 · Born in nineteenth-century Sighet, Gisella came of age in an observant Jewish household. ... She and her family were corralled into the Sighet ...Missing: childhood | Show results with:childhood
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Ethical Dilemmas? Choiceless Choices? The Human Condition?
    Gisella Perl found herself in a similar position in which it became necessary for her to kill a baby to save her own life, the life of the mother and of ...
  28. [28]
    Obstetrics and Gynecology in Third Reich concentration camps
    Feb 6, 2024 · Another shocking testimony of the horrors of the holocaust is described by Gisella Perl (1907-1988) in her book “I Was a Doctor at Auschwitz”.
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Lifelong impact of extreme stress on the human brain: Holocaust ...
    Mar 20, 2021 · The lifelong psychological and neurobiological changes in people who survived extreme stress were identified more than 70 years after the Holocaust.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Layers of Trauma in Gisella Perl's I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz
    4 Perl represents one of the few figures in the inbetween position, aiding fellow prisoners and writing about it, which is why reading her memoir through ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Life-Saving Women Doctors of Auschwitz
    After the war, Gisella Perl and Olga Lengyel wanted to help women have healthy and successful births, whereas Lucie Adelsberger wanted to make a difference in.
  33. [33]
    COVER STORY; Entering the Gray Areas Of Survivalist Morality
    Apr 13, 2003 · When Dr. Perl first arrived at the camp, Dr. Mengele ordered her to round up pregnant women for ''Red Cross trucks,'' trucks that Dr.
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    I was a Doctor in Auschwitz
    In stockI was a Doctor in Auschwitz ... Perl's memoir is the extraordinarily candid account of women's extreme efforts to survive Auschwitz. Perl recalls her life before ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  36. [36]
    I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz | Encyclopedia.com
    The Nazi invasion of Hungary ended her days of normalcy. Her memoir, I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz, is brief but unforgettable. Each of the short chapters conveys ...
  37. [37]
    I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz - Bloomsbury Publishing
    Feb 28, 2019 · Gisela Perl's memoir I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz is a searing document that speaks to the soul of humanity. Perl tells her readers about the ...Missing: childhood | Show results with:childhood
  38. [38]
    TELEVISION REVIEW; A Doctor (and Inmate) at Auschwitz
    Apr 12, 2003 · In other words, it is approachable and never feels exploitative. Adapted from Dr. Perl's memoir, ''I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz,'' the film, ...Missing: reception | Show results with:reception
  39. [39]
    I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz by Gisella Perl | Book review | The TLS
    Jul 17, 2020 · In this review. I WAS A DOCTOR IN AUSCHWITZ. 129pp. Lexington Books. £24.95. Gisella Perl. Gisella Perl was born in Transylvania in 1907. Her ...
  40. [40]
    Collections Search - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    Feb 21, 2024 · Gisella Perl, who was a gynecologist at Auschwitz. Dictabelt 01 and 08 include parts 1 and 2 of Rachel Rosmarin - her tattooed prisoner ...
  41. [41]
    A Jewish Doctor in Auschwitz: Gisella Perl
    Gisella Perl was a Hungarian Jewish gynecologist who was imprisoned at Auschwitz. While there, she acted to address the terrors that were visited upon women by ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  42. [42]
    SheNYC Arts Summer Theater Festival 2024 | Discount NYC Tickets
    A Jewish abortion play about mothers, daughters, faith and survival through the Holocaust. In 1944, Gynecologist Gisella Perl arrives at Auschwitz and is ...
  43. [43]
    Leave the Holocaust Out of Your Abortion Debate - Tablet Magazine
    May 22, 2019 · The pro-life anti-abortion movement has been appropriating the Holocaust since the 1970s, with leaders such as Right to Life founder and ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  44. [44]
    Gisella Perl became a doctor and worked alongside her ... - Facebook
    Mar 8, 2024 · Gisella Perl became a doctor and worked alongside her husband, a surgeon named Ephraim Krauss. They had two children, a boy and a girl.
  45. [45]
    The Tragic Heroism Of Gisella Perl, “The Angel of Auschwitz”
    Mar 9, 2016 · Forced to work for the notorious Dr. Josef Mengele, Gisella Perl risked everything to save the lives of pregnant women who would otherwise ...Missing: Romania | Show results with:Romania
  46. [46]
    Gisella Perl: I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz: Home
    It will highlight the extraordinary life of a Jewish physician sent to Auschwitz in 1944, where she was ordered to work for the notorious Dr. Joseph Mengele.Missing: hurdles | Show results with:hurdles
  47. [47]
    ‎⁨'Angel of Auschwitz' dies at 88 in Israel⁩ — ⁨⁨J ...
    Dec 2, 1988 · Gisella Perl, “the angel of Auschwitz," was a volunteer in Shaare Zedek Hospital's gynecology clinic until her death last week at the age of 88.
  48. [48]
    Dr. Gisella Perl (1907-1988) - Memorials - Find a Grave
    Birth: 10 Dec 1907. Sighetu Marmaţiei, Municipiul Sighetu Marmaţiei, Maramureș, Romania ; Death: 16 Dec 1988 (aged 81). Herzilya, Tel Aviv District, Israel.