Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

God complex

A god complex is an informal psychological descriptor for an individual's persistent of personal , , and superiority over others, often resulting in arrogant, entitled, and controlling interpersonal dynamics that prioritize self-aggrandizement. The term originated in 1913 with British psychoanalyst , who applied it to pathological characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance akin to divine entitlement, predating formal conceptualizations of (NPD). While not a standalone clinical in frameworks like the , it aligns empirically with grandiose 's core features—such as exploitative , lack of , and fantasies of unlimited success—which correlate with relational dysfunction, leadership overreach, and resistance to feedback in observational studies. This pattern frequently emerges in high-stakes domains like or , where unchecked self-belief can amplify decision-making errors, though adaptive confidence may mimic milder forms without the pathological disregard for evidence or others' .

Definition and Characteristics

Core Psychological Traits

A god complex manifests as a persistent pattern of inflated self-perception, wherein individuals exhibit an unshakable conviction in their own superiority, , and to from others. This trait cluster emphasizes , characterized by an exaggerated belief in one's abilities, influence, and , often leading to behaviors that prioritize personal dominance over collaborative or empathetic interactions. Unlike adaptive , which acknowledges limitations, the god complex involves a rigid dismissal of contradicting one's self-view, fostering a where the individual positions themselves as uniquely qualified to dictate outcomes. Key traits include profound arrogance coupled with inflexibility, where individuals resist alternative perspectives and impose their will assertively. A marked lack of is central, as those affected often disregard others' emotional needs or boundaries, viewing subordinates as extensions of their own agenda rather than autonomous agents. Difficulty accepting or assuming further defines this profile; challenges to their provoke defensiveness or retaliation, with externalized to preserve an unassailable . Controlling and manipulative tendencies emerge as mechanisms to enforce compliance, alongside intense toward perceived rivals, reinforcing isolation from equitable relationships. These traits overlap substantially with grandiose , though a lacks formal diagnostic in manuals like the , representing instead an extreme variant of narcissistic without necessarily meeting full disorder criteria. Empirical observations link such patterns to interpersonal dysfunction, including exploitative drives and relational instability, where high masks underlying vulnerabilities like unresolved or unchecked reinforcement of superiority. The traces to early psychoanalytic work by in 1913, who framed it as a narcissistic of , underscoring its roots in exaggerated self-deification rather than verifiable competence.

Distinctions from Formal Diagnoses

The "god complex" is not recognized as a formal psychiatric diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), distinguishing it from codified disorders that require specific, observable criteria for identification and treatment. Instead, it functions as a colloquial descriptor for extreme grandiosity and self-perceived infallibility, often applied in non-clinical contexts without necessitating impairment in social, occupational, or other functioning as demanded by formal diagnoses. While overlapping with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD)—characterized in the by a pervasive pattern of , fantasies of unlimited success, belief in personal uniqueness, need for excessive admiration, sense of entitlement, interpersonal exploitativeness, lack of , envy, and arrogant behaviors—a does not encompass the full spectrum of NPD traits, particularly the relational deficits and exploitative tendencies. For instance, individuals exhibiting a may display inflated self-belief akin to NPD's but lack the consistent evidence of impairment or admiration-seeking that defines NPD as a Cluster B requiring long-term patterns from early adulthood. This distinction underscores that traits can appear as subclinical exaggerations of normal confidence rather than the maladaptive rigidity of NPD. In manic or hypomanic episodes of , grandiosity may manifest episodically with elevated mood, increased energy, and inflated , including god-like self-perceptions, but these are transient (typically lasting days to weeks) and resolve with mood stabilization, unlike the chronic, trait-like stability of a . Similarly, psychotic conditions such as or feature fixed, non-bizarre delusions of grandeur (e.g., literal beliefs in divine identity) with impaired testing and often accompanying hallucinations or disorganized thinking, whereas a generally retains intact testing, framing superiority as metaphorical or aspirational rather than literally delusional. These boundaries highlight the god complex's position outside formal psychopathology, serving more as a for extreme than a basis for clinical intervention unless comorbid with diagnosable conditions.

Historical and Etymological Origins

Early Psychological Conceptualization

The term "god complex" was first articulated by British psychoanalyst Ernest Jones in his chapter titled "The God Complex: The Belief that One is God, and the Resulting Character Traits," originally composed around 1910–1913 and later included in Essays in Applied Psychoanalysis, Volume II (1951 edition). Jones conceptualized it as a pathological narcissistic trait wherein an individual harbors an unconscious identification with divine attributes, leading to a profound sense of personal omnipotence and infallibility. This belief, while not typically involving literal claims of deity, results in behavioral patterns such as aloof detachment from others, self-admiration, overconfidence, auto-erotic isolation, and an intolerance for contradiction or criticism. Rooted in Freudian psychoanalytic principles, Jones attributed the god complex to libidinal fixations and regressions akin to infantile , where the ego expands to encompass god-like powers as a against feelings of inadequacy or Oedipal conflicts. He emphasized its distinction from frank or religious , positioning it instead as a that impairs relational dynamics by eliciting demands for and fostering toward perceived inferiors. Individuals exhibiting this complex, according to Jones, often thrive in roles requiring but falter under , as their self-perceived precludes self-doubt or collaborative input. This formulation predated formalized classifications, such as those in the , and framed within broader discussions, influencing subsequent psychoanalytic explorations of grandiosity as a defensive rather than mere . Jones' work, drawing on clinical observations from early 20th-century case studies, underscored causal links to early developmental arrests, where unresolved prevents mature integration. Empirical validation was limited to anecdotal psychoanalytic evidence at the time, reflecting the era's reliance on methods over controlled experimentation.

Evolution of the Term

The term "god complex" was first coined by British psychoanalyst Ernest Jones in 1923, who described it as "a belief that one is (a) God," linking it to delusional grandiosity within psychoanalytic theory. Jones, a close associate of Sigmund Freud, introduced the concept in discussions of narcissism and megalomania, viewing it as an extreme manifestation of ego inflation rather than a literal divine identification. This early usage positioned the term within Freudian frameworks, emphasizing unconscious drives and overcompensation for inferiority, though Jones distinguished it from formal psychosis by noting its presence in otherwise functional individuals. By the mid-20th century, the term gained traction beyond strict psychoanalysis, appearing in psychiatric literature to characterize patterns of infallibility and superiority without achieving diagnostic status in classification systems like the DSM. It evolved from a niche psychoanalytic descriptor to a broader descriptor of personality traits associated with narcissism, often invoked in critiques of authority figures exhibiting unchecked hubris. Psychoanalysts and psychologists, such as those building on Alfred Adler's superiority complex ideas, referenced it informally to explain behaviors in leaders and professionals, but it remained non-clinical, lacking empirical validation through standardized criteria or prevalence studies. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, "" transitioned into popular and cultural lexicon, detached from its psychoanalytic roots, frequently applied to describe arrogance in fields like , , and where empirical evidence of harm—such as surgical errors linked to overconfidence—highlighted its real-world implications. This shift reflected a dilution of its original precision, with media and discourse using it pejoratively for any perceived self-importance, often without distinguishing it from related concepts like in , as noted in critiques of its colloquial overuse. Despite this popularization, psychological research has not elevated it to a formal construct, prioritizing measurable traits like those in validated scales for over anecdotal labels.

Relation to Jehovah Complex

Defining Jehovah Complex

The Jehovah complex denotes a form of wherein an individual harbors delusions of grandeur and aligns their self-perception with divine attributes, such as and . This involves an inflated ego that manifests in behaviors reflecting perceived god-like superiority, including a profound lack of and an unyielding of personal . Unlike transient arrogance, it represents a persistent psychological pattern akin to egotistical self-inflation, often observed in psychoanalytic contexts. Key indicators include the individual's tendency to impose judgments on others as if wielding ultimate ethical or existential power, drawing implicitly from the biblical depiction of as a sovereign judge. Such a complex may overlap with related constructs like the , where the person deludes themselves into believing they possess salvific or redemptive qualities, yet it distinctly emphasizes identification with a deity's authoritative and punitive traits rather than purely messianic benevolence. Empirical observations in link this to broader narcissistic tendencies, though it lacks formal diagnostic status in manuals like the , positioning it as an informal descriptor for extreme .

Key Differences and Overlaps

The and both represent informal psychological constructs rooted in and delusions of grandeur, sharing core overlaps in manifesting as an inflated sense of self-importance and perceived . Individuals exhibiting either trait often display resistance to criticism, a conviction of superior abilities, and behaviors implying , such as overriding others' input in processes. These similarities stem from underlying narcissistic tendencies, where the expands to god-like proportions, leading to interpersonal conflicts and impaired . A primary difference lies in the specificity of divine identification: the Jehovah complex, as conceptualized in Jungian analysis, denotes a neurosis involving explicit egotistical alignment with Jehovah-like attributes, such as authoritative judgment or messianic redemption, often with religious undertones. In contrast, the God complex encompasses a broader, less religiously framed belief in personal omnipotence and privilege, applicable to secular contexts like professional dominance without invoking theological parallels. This distinction highlights the Jehovah complex's narrower focus on qualities associated with the Judeo-Christian deity, potentially linking it to messiah complex variants where delusions involve saving others under divine mandate. Overlaps extend to clinical implications, as both can exacerbate in high-stakes environments, fostering exploitative dynamics; for instance, historical psychoanalytic literature notes their convergence in leaders who demand unquestioned obedience, blurring lines between ego inflation and pathological entitlement. However, the Jehovah complex's religious connotation may render it more prone to delusional disorders in vulnerable populations, whereas the God complex aligns more readily with narcissistic personality traits lacking overt spiritual claims. Empirical differentiation remains limited due to their non-standardized status in diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5, relying instead on observational case studies.

Psychological Underpinnings

The god complex is frequently characterized as an extreme manifestation of narcissistic , where individuals exhibit an unshakable belief in their own , superiority, and god-like over others. This aligns closely with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders () criteria for (NPD), particularly the grandiose type, which includes patterns of exaggerated self-importance, preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited power or success, and a requirement for excessive admiration. Psychoanalyst , in his 1913 essay "The God Complex," first conceptualized as a pathological trait involving delusions of personal and entitlement, framing it as a form of akin to divine self-perception. Grandiosity in the context of a god complex extends beyond typical narcissistic traits by implying not just superiority but an quasi-divine exemption from error or accountability, often leading to interpersonal exploitation and lack of empathy—core NPD features observed in clinical studies. Research on NPD subtypes distinguishes grandiose narcissism, marked by overt arrogance and dominance, from vulnerable narcissism, with the former directly overlapping god complex behaviors such as dismissing others' input as inferior or demanding unquestioned obedience. Empirical assessments, including structured interviews and self-report scales like the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, correlate high grandiosity scores with attitudes of personal exceptionalism that mirror god complex descriptions, though the latter lacks formal diagnostic validity. While not a distinct clinical entity, serves as a descriptive for narcissistic in non-clinical literature, potentially exacerbating risks like impaired relationships and professional overreach when unchecked. Longitudinal studies of NPD indicate that grandiose traits, including those evoking god-like self-views, may stem from early compensatory mechanisms against perceived inadequacies, reinforcing a cycle of and defensiveness. This linkage underscores causal pathways where unresolved narcissistic wounds evolve into rigid beliefs of supremacy, distinguishable from adaptive by their and disregard for evidence-based .

Potential Causes and Risk Factors

The development of traits associated with a , characterized by extreme and a sense of , appears to involve a combination of genetic, developmental, and situational factors, though remains limited due to its status as an informal construct rather than a formal diagnosis. Studies on related phenomena, such as grandiose and , indicate moderate for narcissistic traits, with twin studies estimating genetic influences at approximately 40-60% across various operationalizations of . Non-shared environmental factors, rather than shared family environment, account for much of the remaining variance, suggesting that unique individual experiences play a key role in trait expression. Early life adversities, including emotional , inconsistent , or excessive parental overvaluation, have been linked to the emergence of grandiose narcissistic features as a defensive response to . For instance, (ACEs) such as abuse or household dysfunction correlate with higher levels of grandiose in adulthood, potentially fostering compensatory beliefs in personal superiority to mitigate feelings of inadequacy. Peer-reviewed analyses emphasize that these patterns may arise from disrupted attachment processes, where children internalize inflated self-views to cope with unreliable caregiving. Situational factors, particularly prolonged exposure to unchecked power, represent an acquired risk, as evidenced by syndrome—a condition observed in political and corporate leaders wherein authority insulates individuals from criticism, amplifying self-aggrandizement. Research on U.S. presidents and U.K. prime ministers over the found hubris traits manifesting after 2.5-3 years in office on average, with symptoms including disproportionate concern with image and loss of contact with reality, driven by the causal mechanism of corrupting through reduced . This syndrome's underscores power as an , independent of prior , though preexisting narcissistic tendencies may exacerbate it. Neurobiological hypotheses, such as alterations in function or pathways linked to reward from dominance, remain speculative and require further validation through longitudinal studies.

Manifestations in Real-World Contexts

In Leadership and Authority Figures

A god complex in manifests as an exaggerated conviction of personal and , prompting authority figures to centralize power, reject advisory input, and cultivate environments of enforced adulation. Leaders displaying these traits often prioritize their intuitive judgments over or collective expertise, viewing dissent as disloyalty rather than constructive feedback. This pattern aligns with grandiose , where self-perceived superiority fosters autocratic decision-making and a dismissal of institutional checks. Psychoanalytic origins trace the concept to Ernest Jones's 1913 essay "The God Complex," which characterized it as a narcissistic of grandeur and unlimited capability, frequently observed in those wielding unchecked . In political and organizational contexts, such complexes correlate with hubristic behaviors, including the erosion of and an inflated assessment of one's influence, as amplifies preexisting narcissistic tendencies. Empirical studies link these traits to impaired leadership efficacy, with narcissistic leaders exhibiting higher rates of risky, self-aggrandizing policies due to overconfidence in their judgment. Historical analyses suggest manifestations in authoritarian figures who demanded deification or absolute , though retrospective diagnoses rely on incomplete records and risk from ideological lenses. For instance, psychological profiles of highlight parallels, such as enforced personality cults and intolerance for opposition, which sustain the leader's as an unerring . In modern corporate or governmental settings, similar dynamics appear in executives or officials who micromanage subordinates while insulating themselves from , often resulting in organizational stagnation or ethical lapses. The causal pathway implicates power's corrupting influence: prolonged authority without counterbalances reinforces delusions of , as subordinates' validates the leader's . Research indicates that environments lacking term limits or robust oversight exacerbate this, with god-complex-driven leaders prone to strategic miscalculations, such as overextension in conflicts or suppression of . Mitigating factors include institutional mechanisms for rotation and mandatory consultation, which empirical models show reduce the incidence of unchecked .

In Professional Fields like Medicine and Science

In , the is frequently associated with surgeons, manifesting as an exaggerated belief in one's and , often exacerbated by the high-stakes of procedures and hierarchical environments. A survey of over 1,000 surgeons and non-surgeons found that traits like stubbornness and overconfidence—core elements of the —were self-endorsed more by surgeons, suggesting of these tendencies within the . Thematic analyses of disciplinary hearings against surgeons from 2016 to 2020 identified the as a recurring theme in ethical failings, linked to prioritizing over and wounded leading to defensiveness against criticism. This mindset can contribute to adverse outcomes, including abuses of in hierarchical surgical cultures where to senior doctors is ingrained, potentially undermining patient-centered care and collegial feedback. For instance, senior surgeons exhibiting autocratic behaviors, such as being snide or dismissive in operating theaters, model to trainees, perpetuating a cycle that prioritizes dominance over collaborative . Historical prestige in , where early successes in life-saving interventions fostered unchecked without rigorous evidence demands, further entrenched this complex among some practitioners. In scientific fields, the appears less explicitly documented as a colloquial trait compared to , but analogous overconfidence manifests in resistance to falsification and insistence on simplistic models despite uncertainty, as observed in discussions of experimental design pitfalls. Empirical studies on scientists' emphasize hubris-like biases, such as amplifying perceived expertise, though these are framed more as cognitive errors than a god-like self-view. Unlike 's procedural immediacy, science's iterative may mitigate overt expressions, yet institutional pressures for groundbreaking claims can incentivize god-like certainty in preliminary findings, as critiqued in analyses of the where researchers defend flawed results with undue authority. Efforts to counter the god complex in these fields include promoting humility training; for example, medical education programs aim to instill patient-centered perspectives to offset ego-driven attitudes, recognizing that while passion drives excellence, unbridled overconfidence erodes trust and safety. In both medicine and science, the complex's persistence underscores the need for systemic checks, such as mandatory peer review and ethical oversight, to align professional authority with empirical accountability.

Criticisms and Debates

Validity as a Psychological Construct

The term "god complex" lacks formal as a distinct psychological disorder in major diagnostic manuals, such as the or , where it is absent as an independent category. Instead, it functions primarily as a colloquial descriptor for extreme , often overlapping with traits of (NPD), including inflated self-importance and fantasies of unlimited success or power. This absence from standardized criteria reflects its origins in early rather than empirical validation through controlled studies or psychometric testing. Historically, the concept traces to British psychoanalyst , who in described a "" as an unconscious narcissistic belief involving fantasies of and infallibility, particularly in physicians exhibiting detachment from patients' emotional realities. However, subsequent psychiatric literature has not elevated it to a validated construct, with critics noting insufficient —defined as the degree to which the term measures a theoretically coherent entity separate from related phenomena like NPD. Empirical research on narcissism, such as factor analyses of NPD symptoms, supports grandiosity as a core dimension but does not isolate a "" subscale with reliable predictive or diagnostic utility. Critics argue that the term's informal use risks pejorative application, potentially pathologizing adaptive or without evidence-based thresholds, as seen in unsubstantiated claims against professionals like surgeons. While some studies link self-perceived superiority to relational dysfunction in narcissistic traits, these findings do not substantiate a unique "" entity, attributing outcomes instead to broader . Proponents of retaining the descriptor emphasize its value in clinical observation, but this is countered by calls for precision in to avoid conflating with measurable constructs. Overall, its validity remains limited to descriptive utility within research, pending rigorous psychometric development.

Weaponization in Cultural and Political Discourse

The term "god complex" has been deployed in cultural and political discourse as a pejorative label to discredit figures exhibiting strong self-assurance or decisive leadership, often framing policy disagreements as symptoms of personal pathology rather than legitimate ideological differences. This rhetorical strategy sidesteps empirical evaluation of actions or outcomes, instead invoking psychological shorthand to imply infallibility or megalomania, which can erode public trust in institutions without advancing substantive debate. Such usage proliferates in opinion journalism and commentary, where it serves to amplify partisan narratives, particularly amid high-stakes elections or controversies. In American politics, accusations of a god complex have targeted prominent conservatives, with former President Donald Trump facing repeated claims from media figures and mental health professionals. For instance, psychiatrist Justin Frank, in a 2018 Salon interview, described Trump's worldview as embodying a "God complex," asserting it reflected an erotic attachment to violence and a belief in superior knowledge, despite ethical prohibitions under the American Psychiatric Association's Goldwater Rule against remote diagnoses. Similarly, a 2019 CNN analysis portrayed Trump's public statements as indicative of divine self-conception, echoed by former aide Anthony Scaramucci. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis drew comparable criticism in a 2022 New York Times opinion piece by Frank Bruni, which attributed his governance style to hubris bordering on divinity. These instances, drawn from left-leaning outlets, illustrate how the term functions to pathologize challenges to prevailing norms, such as on education or public health mandates, without citing clinical evidence. The label has appeared less frequently against left-leaning leaders in mainstream U.S. media but surfaces in conservative critiques, as with President in 2024 Sky News Australia commentary, where host Gabriella Power and commentator Brad Polumbo accused him of a "" for resisting calls to withdraw from the presidential race despite evident cognitive concerns. This disparity highlights potential selective application, with empirical analyses of media coverage suggesting disproportionate invocation against right-leaning figures who disrupt institutional consensus, potentially reflecting biases in journalistic institutions. Internationally, Indian Prime Minister faced similar charges in a 2024 article, portraying his electoral rhetoric as messianic, while Zimbabwean leaders have been lambasted in Politicsweb for perpetuating a "chef mentality" of unchecked . Critics argue this weaponization undermines discourse by conflating colloquial arrogance critiques with unverified psychological claims, fostering a culture of armchair expertise that prioritizes moral grandstanding over causal analysis of leadership behaviors. In tech and cultural spheres, entrepreneur encountered the accusation in a 2024 Dispatch essay by , linking it to his political interventions and motto "," though such pieces often blend factual reporting with interpretive bias. Overall, the term's casual invocation risks diluting scrutiny of actual traits, as documented in peer-reviewed literature, while enabling attacks that evade accountability for accusers' own ideological commitments.

Cultural Impact and Depictions

In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818), Victor Frankenstein exemplifies the god complex through his ambition to animate lifeless matter, positioning himself as a creator rivaling divine power, which precipitates moral and physical ruin. Similarly, in Herman Melville's Moby-Dick (1851), Captain Ahab's monomaniacal pursuit of the white whale reflects a god-like delusion of mastery over nature and fate, underscored by regal and divine imagery that elevates his vengeful quest to quasi-theological proportions. In television, Walter White's arc in (2008–2013) illustrates the god complex's evolution from resentment to omnipotence, as his methamphetamine empire fosters an unshakable conviction in his infallibility and right to dictate others' lives, culminating in declarations of self-deification. Films and graphic novels often depict antagonists with such traits as utilitarian saviors; Adrian Veidt, or , in Alan Moore's (1986–1987), orchestrates global catastrophe under the rationale of enforced peace, driven by a that justifies mass sacrifice as god-like benevolence. Anime and manga portray the god complex through vigilante justice, as seen in Light Yagami of (2003–2006), who wields a supernatural notebook to eradicate criminals, progressively embracing a messianic identity as "Kira," the arbiter of a purified world, wherein his initial moral intent devolves into tyrannical self-worship. These representations frequently serve as cautionary narratives, highlighting how inflated self-perception leads to , ethical collapse, and downfall, reinforcing cultural critiques of unchecked in positions of power.

Societal Implications and Misuse

In positions of societal , such as political or corporate , a can foster authoritarian tendencies by promoting unchecked overconfidence and dismissal of dissenting views, often resulting in policies that prioritize the leader's vision over or collective welfare. This pattern has been linked to suppressed and heightened organizational , as subordinates face psychological strain from environments where is absent and is assumed. For example, historical analyses of authoritarian regimes attribute escalations in conflict or economic mismanagement to leaders' delusions of grandeur, where self-perceived superiority overrides . On a broader scale, the proliferation of traits via social media platforms exacerbates societal fragmentation, as users cultivate inflated self-perceptions of influence, leading to widespread dissemination of unverified claims and erosion of communal trust. Platforms' algorithmic reinforcement of echo chambers amplifies this, with individuals treating online validation as divine endorsement, which correlates with increased and reluctance to engage in compromise. In cult-like structures, leaders exploiting such traits impose isolation on followers, extracting resources under the guise of infallible guidance, as seen in documented cases where adherents suffer financial and emotional devastation. The concept's misuse arises primarily from its status as a non-clinical, colloquial label, frequently deployed in discourse to pathologize political opponents without rigorous , thereby undermining substantive critique. outlets, often exhibiting ideological biases, have applied it to figures like U.S. politicians and , framing policy assertiveness as messianic rather than strategic . This rhetorical weaponization dilutes the term's utility, conflating with effective leadership and discouraging accountability through attacks, particularly in environments where mainstream sources prioritize narrative over verifiable .

References

  1. [1]
    What Is a God Complex? Traits, Causes, and Effects - Verywell Health
    Apr 4, 2025 · Someone with a God complex holds themselves in high regard and views their abilities, accomplishments, and influence in an exaggerated way. This ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF NARCISSISM AND NARCISSISTIC ...
    Ernest Jones (1913/1974) described and conceptualized narcissism as a pathological character trait in a paper on the "God Complex." Those with a God Complex ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Controversy - the God Complex - Investigative Psychiatry
    Nov 19, 2023 · The God Complex is a perceived, unvalidated concept that is used more in a colloquial sense than as a formal psychological term.
  5. [5]
    God Complex: What It Means and Why People Have Them
    Sep 19, 2025 · A god complex is a pattern in which an individual believes they have great power, ability, infallibility, influence, and are superior to others.What Gives Someone a God... · How This Complex Impacts...
  6. [6]
    Jones, E. (1909-1910). The God-Complex. In Essays in Applied ...
    Jones, E. (1909-1910). The God-Complex. In Essays in Applied Psychoanalysis (Vol. 2). London The Hogarth Press Ltd. and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
  7. [7]
    The God Complex: Understanding the Belief in Personal Superiority
    Feb 7, 2025 · When we talk about a god complex, we refer to a psychological phenomenon where an individual believes they possess extraordinary power and ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  8. [8]
    [PDF] THE BOOK WAS - ia801303
    The God Complex. The Belief that One is God, and the Resulting Character Traits. CHAPTER VI. The Influence of Andrea del Sarto's Wife on his Art ..
  9. [9]
    (PDF) The Narcissism Spectrum Model: A Synthetic View of ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... god-complex” by Ernest. Jones (1913; see also W. Reich, 1933/1949; Waelder, 1925). In this vein, most theoretical development and empirical.
  10. [10]
    (PDF) Brief history of narcissism - Academia.edu
    ... God-complex.” He described people with the God-complex as aloof, inaccessible, self-admiring, self-important, overconfident, auto-erotic, and ...
  11. [11]
    3 SIGNS YOU ARE IN THE PRESENCE OF A NARCISSIST
    Dec 22, 2022 · Ernest Jones (1913) was the first to construe extreme narcissism, which he called the "God-complex", as a character flaw. He described people ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [MAGAZINE] THE GOD DELUSION: RAPPERS AND THEIR GOD ...
    Jun 3, 2014 · The term 'God complex' was first coined by the the psychoanalyst Ernest Jones in 1923 referring to 'a belief that one is (a) God'. If we ...
  13. [13]
    The Era of Self-Deprecation Is Over. It's God Complex Time
    Jan 19, 2022 · “God complex” is just another term pulled from the psychiatry world ... Its origin is in psychoanalysis, specifically in the writing of ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  14. [14]
    God Complex and Mental Health Professionals - krishna s vora
    May 10, 2014 · The term “God Complex” was first used by Ernest Jones. According to him, God complex is a belief that one is akin to God. It is a stubborn ...
  15. [15]
    God Complex (Meaning + Treatments) - Practical Psychology
    Aug 23, 2023 · While Freud didn't use the term "god complex," his work on the human ego laid the groundwork for understanding why some people might develop ...
  16. [16]
    Jehovah complex - APA Dictionary of Psychology
    APA Dictionary of Psychology. Search Button. Jehovah complex. Share button. Updated on 04/19/2018. a form of megalomania in which the individual experiences ...
  17. [17]
    Jehovah Complex Definition | Psychology Glossary - AlleyDog.com
    Jehovah complex refers to a neurosis characterized by an inflated ego. The individual presents symptoms of delusion of grandeur and perceives himself as having ...
  18. [18]
    Jehovah complex - Psychology Dictionary
    Jehovah complex. a form of megalomania in which the individual experiences delusions of grandeur and identifies with qualities associated with God.
  19. [19]
    JEHOVAH COMPLEX Definition in Psychology
    The Jehovah Complex is a psychological phenomenon characterized by delusions of grandeur, a lack of self-criticism, and a feeling of omnipotence.
  20. [20]
    Messiah complex - APA Dictionary of Psychology
    Apr 19, 2018 · The individual may harbor the delusion of being divine. See also Jehovah complex. Browse Dictionary. Browse By a Browse By b ...
  21. [21]
    Signs of Jehovah Complex - The God Complex
    Aug 26, 2024 · Causes of the God Complex. Understanding the origins of a God Complex involves considering a variety of psychological and environmental factors.
  22. [22]
    Jehovah complex - EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
    Aug 1, 2020 · Jehovah complex is a term used in Jungian analysis to describe a neurosis of egotistical self-inflation. Use included in psychoanalytic ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  23. [23]
    Jehovah Complex | PDF - Scribd
    Jehovah complex is a term used in Jungian analysis to describe a neurosis involving an egotistical and inflated sense of self.
  24. [24]
    Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Descriptive Features and ...
    This article brings the scattered literature on narcissistic personality disorder ... 35. Jones E. The God Complex (1973). Jones E (Ed.), Essays in Applied ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Understanding the ... - Cronicon
    Dec 25, 2023 · While the term “narcissistic personality disorder” was not explicitly mentioned, Jones' 1913 portrayal of individuals with a “God Complex” can ...
  26. [26]
    Child, family, and narcissistic political leadership - NIH
    May 21, 2025 · It is already known that narcissism is called “God complex” (Levy et al., 2011). Narcissistic personality disorder is considered by ...
  27. [27]
    The Etiology of Narcissism: A Review of Behavioral Genetic Studies
    First, regardless of the operationalization used to define narcissism, results are consistent and show a moderate genetic basis for narcissistic traits. ...
  28. [28]
    (PDF) Grandiose Narcissism: Traits, Origins, and Implications
    Aug 4, 2025 · Genetic and environmental influences are discussed, highlighting the moderate heritability of narcissistic traits and the role of non-shared ...
  29. [29]
    Adverse childhood experiences leading to narcissistic personality ...
    Nov 22, 2024 · Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is associated with a complex interplay of genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors.Missing: etiology | Show results with:etiology
  30. [30]
    Adverse childhood experiences and grandiose narcissism
    Journal of Research in Personality. (2011). N. Dhawan et al. Prevalence and treatment of narcissistic personality disorder in the community: A systematic review ...
  31. [31]
    Hubris syndrome: An acquired personality disorder? A study of US ...
    Feb 12, 2009 · A common thread tying these elements together is hubris, or exaggerated pride, overwhelming self-confidence and contempt for others (Owen, 2006) ...Introduction · Relationship between hubris... · Neurobiology of hubris...
  32. [32]
    Hubris syndrome - PubMed
    Hubris syndrome is associated with power, more likely to manifest itself the longer the person exercises power and the greater the power they exercise.
  33. [33]
    Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and ...
    Oct 25, 2022 · This review summarizes current knowledge about narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Each section brings the reader up to date on ...
  34. [34]
    Narcissism. - APA PsycNet - American Psychological Association
    The God complex. In E. Jones, (Ed.), Essays in applied psychoanalysis ... The double-edged sword of grandiose narcissism: Implications for successful and ...
  35. [35]
    The God Complex: How to Spot an Everyday Psychopath - Newsweek
    Mar 9, 2018 · It's the God complex—a psychological fantasy when someone perceives themselves as superior in every way to everyone else, and rules are for mere ...
  36. [36]
    How to Deal With People Who Think They Don't Need You
    Feb 5, 2019 · You might work for, or be close to, someone you think has a “God Complex.” Even though you agree to share the effort in an important task ...
  37. [37]
    What defines a great surgeon? A survey study confronting ... - NIH
    Jun 28, 2023 · The fact that stubbornness and overconfidence (key characteristics of the “God complex”) were more mentioned by surgeons themselves is ...
  38. [38]
    Character failings in the surgeon fallen from grace - PubMed
    Jan 8, 2021 · We identified three overarching themes that are explored in depth: 'the god complex', 'reputation over integrity' and 'wounded pride'. We ...
  39. [39]
    Using Hofstede's framework to explore surgical cultures and their ...
    ... doctors as superiors and doctors controlling consultations. Hierarchy and the 'God complex' are not uncommon, sometimes leading to abuses of power amongst ...
  40. [40]
    Senior surgeons as role models in the operating theatre - NIH
    The god complex was a theme identified in previous work [10] and was exemplified by senior surgeons described as being 'snide', 'snappy', 'autocratic ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Research and Publishing in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Feb 15, 2021 · The “God complex” among early Surgeons meant that what they thought was true did not need scientific evidence. It is only in more recent times ...
  42. [42]
    Making Mistakes in a Good Direction - The God Complex and ...
    the tendency for people to want to state definite known answers or utilize simplistic models with confidence ...
  43. [43]
    Positioning humility within healthcare delivery - From doctors' and ...
    “Just like ego/attitude and god-complex can be 'taught' the opposite is true too. Students need to see examples through. 'More is caught than taught ...
  44. [44]
    Narcissistic personality disorder. - APA PsycNET
    Military Medicine, 160(1), 40–41. Jones, E. (1951). The god complex. In E. Jones, (Ed.), Essays in applied psychoanalysis (Vol. 2, pp. 244-265). London ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III-R
    Jones. (1913/1964) describes the narcissistic "God complex" as an unconscious belief that in- volves fantasies of power, wealth, omniscience, and protecting ...
  46. [46]
    The effects of narcissistic personality on relational and sexual behavior
    Aug 5, 2025 · Consequently, individuals with an exaggerated and inflated sense of selfimportance are sometimes described as having a "God complex" (Zara and ...Missing: definition reviewed
  47. [47]
    Psychiatrist Justin Frank on Trump's "God complex": He is "erotically ...
    Nov 13, 2018 · It's called the “God complex” and it's essentially saying, “I know more than anybody else.” At some deep level Donald Trump thinks he is the ...Missing: discourse | Show results with:discourse
  48. [48]
    Trump is either trolling everyone or thinks he's like a god | CNN Politics
    Aug 22, 2019 · ... God complex. His former communications director Anthony Scaramucci, who was fired by Trump and was then a surrogate for him, has fully ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  49. [49]
    Opinion | Ron DeSantis's God Complex - The New York Times
    Ron DeSantis's God Complex ... Frank Bruni is a contributing Opinion writer who was on the staff of The Times for more than 25 years. After ...
  50. [50]
    'God complex': Joe Biden will 'stubbornly cling' to fight against Trump
    Jul 4, 2024 · I think he has a little bit of a God complex he thinks he's the only one who can beat Trump and save America.
  51. [51]
    Joe Biden has a 'bit of a god complex' - Facebook
    Jul 18, 2024 · Commentator Brad Polumbo believes US President Joe Biden has a “bit of a god complex”..
  52. [52]
    Prime Minister Modi's God Complex - The Diplomat
    May 28, 2024 · He mocked the opposition, accusing them of doing a “mujra” – the dance of nautch girls historically associated with Muslim prostitutes ...
  53. [53]
    The God Complex of our politicians - OPINION - Politicsweb
    Jun 27, 2013 · The God complex plays, itself out each and every day, especially in Zimbabwe, where we have a "chef" mentality. For example, ZANU (PF) has ...Missing: discourse | Show results with:discourse
  54. [54]
    Elon Musk's God Complex - Jonah Goldberg - The Dispatch
    Dec 26, 2024 · Elon Musk's God Complex: His favorite motto, 'vox populi, vox dei' is theological nonsense and a dangerous lie.Missing: discourse | Show results with:discourse
  55. [55]
    What Frankenstein teaches us about the dangers of playing God
    Jun 19, 2022 · As one of the first works of science-fiction, it explores the dangers of humans pursuing new technologies and becoming God-like.
  56. [56]
    Imagery, Ahab's God Complex, and the Hatred of Nature in Herman ...
    The regal/godly imagery in reference to Ahab, the blacksmith, and the carpenter allows the reader to see Ahab's god complex. Ahab uses this imagery to refer to ...
  57. [57]
    'Breaking Bad': 31 Most Badass Quotes - The Hollywood Reporter
    Jun 26, 2023 · Walter's God complex manifested itself early in season five. ... It's not Breaking Bad without Walter White, and in the most closely ...
  58. [58]
    Adrian Veidt as Ozymandias: Watchmen's Obscure Villain | Page 2 of 2
    Sep 21, 2019 · This tendency is closely related to the twisted god complex that Ozymandias and Alexander the Great share. Perhaps Ozymandias's desire for ...
  59. [59]
    Why Death Note's Light Was Never Smart - CBR
    Nov 6, 2021 · Light's god complex gets the better of him when he wants the world to know about Kira. He uses this Kira persona as a threat to criminals and a ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    The God Complex in Powerful Men: A Psychological and ... - LinkedIn
    Sep 7, 2024 · Understanding the God Complex​​ The term "God complex" was coined by British psychoanalyst Ernest Jones in his 1913 essay "The God Complex." It ...
  61. [61]
    The God Complex: A Silent Alliance Between Power and Ignorance
    Jun 10, 2025 · The God complex begins when someone forgets their limits and starts believing they embody the ultimate truth. Once they come into contact ...
  62. [62]
    How Social Media Gives People a God Complex (and Why That's a ...
    Sep 7, 2021 · Social media is creating a world of millions of people who believe themselves to be God. The danger is that the longer you remain God, the more ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
  63. [63]
    I Think My Pastor is a Cult Leader.
    Jun 30, 2021 · In worst-cases, they have what is considered a God-complex. Jesus warned us in the Book of Matthew: “For false Christs and false prophets ...
  64. [64]
    Trump's 'god complex' and self-serving policies - Al Mayadeen English
    May 17, 2025 · Trump's god complex and self-serving policies fall into the class-domination structure of American governance.Missing: discourse | Show results with:discourse