Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Grooveshark

Grooveshark was a web-based music streaming platform owned and operated by Escape Media Group, founded in 2006 by students Josh , Andrés Barreto, and Sam Tarantino, that permitted users to upload digital audio files for on-demand streaming and sharing, amassing a large catalog through user contributions that predominantly consisted of unlicensed copyrighted material. The service, which launched publicly around 2007–2008, gained significant popularity in the pre-Spotify era for offering free, ad-supported access to millions of tracks via a user-friendly interface, including features like creation and social sharing, but operated without formal licensing deals with major record labels, relying instead on a flawed "" model that courts later determined involved deliberate infringement by company personnel. Its defining controversy stemmed from lawsuits filed by , Sony Music Entertainment, and starting in 2011, alleging willful copyright violations; after years of litigation, including evidence of employees uploading thousands of protected songs, Escape Media settled in April 2015 by permanently shutting down the service, wiping its servers, and publicly acknowledging "very serious mistakes" in handling music rights, avoiding potentially massive damages but marking the end of operations. Despite its innovative approach to music discovery and community-driven libraries, Grooveshark's legacy is one of causal defiance of laws, highlighting tensions between technological disruption and established rights holders in the digital music landscape, with co-founder 's untimely death months after closure adding a tragic note.

History

Founding and Early Development (2006–2009)

Grooveshark originated as a project of Escape Media Group, Inc., incorporated in early 2006 by freshmen , Sam Tarantino, and Andrés Barreto in . Greenberg, aged 19 and serving as chief technology officer, met Tarantino through a campus entrepreneurs' club, where they conceived a digital music sharing platform amid the rise of networks like and . The initial iteration launched as a limited-use file-sharing application incorporating basic social networking features and options for paid downloads, but it failed commercially due to competition from established free alternatives. A beta relaunch added functionalities but similarly underperformed, prompting a strategic pivot in late 2007 toward on-demand streaming, modeled after YouTube's success, with an ad-supported and subscription-based revenue approach abandoning downloads. To build the service's music library, company employees were directed in early 2007 to source and upload copyrighted tracks to central servers, seeding content that reached one million files by early 2008; this included the introduction of "SharkByte" software in mid-2007 to cache user-submitted files, marking a shift from pure distribution to a hybrid centralized model by June 2007. Licensing negotiations with major labels such as , , and Warner were initiated around mid-2007 but rejected, reinforcing reliance on user and employee uploads. The streaming-focused "GrooveShark Lite" client debuted publicly in April 2008, enabling browser-based playback and rapid user adoption that prompted Greenberg to leave university full-time. elements were fully discontinued by October 2008 in favor of the streaming architecture. Early 2009 saw a royalty agreement with for certain content, though marred by reporting inaccuracies; however, this preceded 's lawsuit against Escape Media in May 2009 alleging willful infringement, alongside mounting takedown notices, signaling escalating legal scrutiny during the platform's foundational growth phase.

Launch and Expansion (2008–2012)

Grooveshark publicly launched its web-based music streaming service on April 15, 2008, enabling users to search for, stream, and share community-uploaded tracks via a Flash player. The platform emphasized user-generated content, allowing individuals to upload songs directly, which facilitated rapid library expansion without formal licensing agreements at the outset. In October 2008, the company discontinued its initial peer-to-peer (P2P) network components to concentrate exclusively on centralized streaming, streamlining operations amid growing legal scrutiny from copyright holders. During 2009, Grooveshark released an updated version of its web app, enhancing search speed, playback reliability, and playlist management to improve and retention. This iteration supported broader accessibility, contributing to through word-of-mouth and SEO-optimized discoverability. By 2011, the service introduced a redesign featuring Twitter-like activity on user profiles, visual album art integration, and social sharing tools, which encouraged community engagement and viral spread. Expansion accelerated into 2012, with the adoption of an web player in September, replacing the dependency to better support mobile devices and emerging browser standards. This shift enabled features like genre-based radio stations and cross-device syncing, broadening appeal amid competition from licensed services. User numbers reportedly hovered around 30 million by early 2012, reflecting substantial adoption driven by free access and a catalog exceeding millions of tracks, though the platform faced intermittent traffic fluctuations due to takedown notices. A further overhaul in October 2012 refined navigation and recommendation algorithms, solidifying its position as a popular unlicensed alternative.

Maturation and Technical Shifts (2012–2015)

In early 2012, Grooveshark advanced its platform by launching a beta HTML5 webapp on January 13, designed for music streaming across iOS and Android mobile browsers, thereby bypassing restrictions imposed by app stores on native applications. This technical shift from the prior Flash-based player, which had been standard since 2008, improved cross-device compatibility amid declining Flash support. By September 5, 2012, Grooveshark released an updated full player, opting for a unified web-based interface over inconsistent native apps to ensure reliable access on various devices. Concurrently, efforts to restore mobile presence included the reinstatement of its official app in on August 28, 2012, though it was removed again three days later due to ongoing disputes with content owners. These adaptations supported user base expansion, with registered accounts approaching 30 million by the mid-2010s despite operational challenges. From late 2012 onward, the service added approximately 200,000 users monthly, reflecting maturation in audience retention and platform appeal.

Shutdown and Aftermath (2015)

On April 30, 2015, Grooveshark's parent company, Escape Media Group, announced the immediate shutdown of the service as part of a confidential settlement with major record labels , Sony Music Entertainment, and , resolving lawsuits filed since 2011 alleging willful . The agreement required Grooveshark to cease all operations, permanently delete all music files and user data from its servers, and destroy associated computer equipment to prevent further distribution of copyrighted material. The settlement followed a September 2014 summary judgment by U.S. District Judge Thomas P. Griesa, who ruled that Grooveshark was liable for direct infringement after internal emails revealed that employees and founders, including , had systematically uploaded thousands of copyrighted tracks—such as 5,977 songs from —without authorization, undermining claims of DMCA safe harbor protection. This exposed Escape Media to statutory damages potentially reaching $150,000 per infringed work, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, though exact settlement terms remained undisclosed to avoid a trial that could have imposed the maximum $736 million fine. In an official statement signed by founders Greenberg, Sean Annis, and Sam Tarantino, the company apologized to rights holders, stating, "We are sorry to everyone for what we have done... We regret that we were not able to secure the licensing agreements that would have allowed us to operate in a manner that we believed would have been fair and equitable to everyone involved." The founders acknowledged personal responsibility, having previously signed guarantees exposing their assets to , and emphasized the service's intent to innovate in discovery despite failing to obtain licenses for user-uploaded content. Post-shutdown, the Grooveshark website redirected visitors to the apology statement, rendering all playlists, accounts, and uploaded tracks inaccessible and irretrievable, affecting millions of active s who had relied on the for streaming and sharing. The closure marked the end of an eight-year operation that had streamed ed music billions of times without permission, prompting record labels to hail it as a deterrent against similar unauthorized services, while highlighting ongoing tensions between technological innovation and rigid enforcement in the pre-widespread licensed streaming era. No criminal charges were filed against the founders, but the personal financial exposure from the guarantees contributed to Escape Media's dissolution.

Technology and Platform

Core Architecture and Players

Grooveshark's core architecture centered on a centralized that enabled users to digital audio files, such as MP3s, to company servers for and indexing. These user-uploaded files formed the basis of the service's music , which was searchable through an integrated and streamable without requiring downloads. The system distinguished itself by relying on contributions rather than pre-licensed , facilitating rapid library growth but raising concerns. The frontend evolved from an initial Flash-based application to a single-page web app by 2010, employing Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture via the JavaScript MVC framework with EJS templating for efficient rendering of dynamic elements like playlists and search results. Key libraries included for DOM manipulation, for interactive components such as and drag-and-drop functionality, and SlickGrid for handling large datasets in virtual scrolling grids. This setup supported seamless navigation within a hash-based structure, mimicking desktop client experiences. Media playback relied heavily on technology, with the 2008 launch of Grooveshark Lite introducing a dedicated Flash app for browser-based streaming access to the full library. Users needed Flash installed to enable core features like continuous playback, rewinding, and playlist organization directly in the web interface. Later enhancements included integration for casting streams to external devices from desktop or mobile, implemented amid hardware-specific constraints. Platform extensions encompassed a desktop application developed using pre-GitHub frameworks for offline-like capabilities and an app for mobile streaming, broadening access beyond the web player. These components collectively handled over 1 billion monthly streams for more than 20 million by supporting upload, sharing, and organization workflows.

Key Features and Innovations

Grooveshark's core functionality revolved around a user-upload model, where individuals could upload files and other via a supporting batch transfers of entire music folders. These uploads populated a shared, searchable accessible to all registered users for on-demand streaming without requiring downloads. The platform included a robust , playlist creation tools for organizing tracks, and features like track rewinding alongside high-quality audio playback. Social integration formed a key aspect, enabling users to share individual songs, playlists, or feeds via external networks such as and , with genre-based tagging and friend recommendations to facilitate music discovery. A 2015 site revamp enhanced this with a personalized music feed that adapted to user preferences and customizable profiles featuring . In April 2013, Grooveshark launched Broadcast, an innovative tool allowing users to function as DJs by live-streaming playlists to followers, incorporating chat, audience song suggestions via links, voting on requests, and the option to hand control to listeners. Broadcasters could add recorded commentary between tracks and access , with stations pausing upon logout; this user-driven radio format contrasted algorithmic competitors by prioritizing interactive, community-led curation over automated selection. The feature supported ad potential with labels and artists, extending beyond traditional streaming. The platform's "listen anywhere" capability provided seamless multi-device access, predating widespread adoption in licensed services and enabling offline queuing for broadcasts. This crowdsourced library expansion, incentivized early on by payments to uploaders, innovated content scaling through user participation rather than exclusive licensing deals.

Business and Operations

Founders and Organizational Structure

Grooveshark was founded on November 3, 2006, by freshmen , Sam Tarantino, and Andrés Barreto in , initially as a music-sharing platform coded in a dorm room. The service operated under the parent company Escape Media Group, Inc., a privately held entity bootstrapped without significant external venture funding, which allowed the founders to retain control amid rapid user growth. Sam Tarantino served as chief executive officer (CEO), overseeing strategic vision and business operations, while Josh Greenberg acted as chief technology officer (CTO), leading technical development and architecture. Andrés Barreto contributed as co-founder and chief operating officer (COO), focusing on operational scaling. The organizational structure remained relatively flat and founder-driven, reflecting its startup origins, with expansion to approximately 145 employees by 2015 across engineering, content moderation, and sales teams headquartered in Gainesville. This lean hierarchy prioritized agility but faced challenges in formalizing compliance roles amid escalating legal pressures from the music industry.

Revenue Streams and User Growth

Grooveshark operated on a freemium model, offering free access supported by advertising while generating additional revenue through tiered premium subscriptions. The free tier included display ads and audio advertisements between tracks, which formed a core revenue stream alongside subscription upgrades. Premium options, introduced to incentivize upgrades, included Grooveshark Plus at $6 per month for ad-free desktop streaming and Grooveshark Anywhere at $9 per month, which extended access to mobile devices and offline downloads. These subscriptions provided enhanced features like unlimited playlist creation and higher-quality streams, though adoption rates remained limited due to the platform's reliance on user-uploaded content and persistent legal uncertainties. User growth accelerated rapidly following the public beta launch in 2008, reaching approximately 30 million registered users by 2011 through viral sharing of playlists and embeds on and blogs. The platform peaked at around 35 million monthly circa 2012, streaming over billion tracks monthly from a exceeding 15 million songs. Growth faced setbacks in early 2012, with dipping to about 12 million amid heightened legal pressures and technical shifts, before partial recovery later that year. This expansion was driven by the service's model, which allowed unrestricted uploads and searches, contrasting with licensed competitors and fostering organic virality despite copyright disputes.

Legal Battles

DMCA Safe Harbor and Early Challenges

Grooveshark operated as a user-generated music streaming platform, relying on the (DMCA) Section 512 safe harbor provisions to shield itself from secondary liability for user-uploaded content. Under Section 512(c), service providers qualify for protection if they lack actual knowledge of specific infringing material, do not receive financial benefit from infringement while possessing the right and ability to control it, expeditiously remove or disable access to notified infringing content, maintain a designated DMCA agent, implement a policy terminating repeat infringers, and accommodate technical measures to protect copyrights. The company designated a DMCA agent with the U.S. Copyright Office and publicly asserted compliance, arguing that its model mirrored platforms like by facilitating user uploads and streams without direct hosting of licensed catalogs. Early legal challenges emerged shortly after the platform's public beta launch in and wider expansion in , as major record labels questioned Grooveshark's safe harbor eligibility. In March 2009, Recordings Inc. and other labels sued Escape Media Group (Grooveshark's operator) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of , alleging willful through unauthorized uploads and streams of thousands of sound recordings. Labels contended that Grooveshark failed key safe harbor preconditions, including inadequate enforcement of repeat infringer terminations—evidenced by lax account suspensions despite repeated DMCA notices—and that company insiders, including founders, had personally uploaded infringing files, imputing actual knowledge of widespread infringement from . These suits highlighted systemic compliance gaps, such as delayed responses to notices and reliance on automated filters that critics argued were insufficient against volitional employee conduct. One early resolution came in October 2009, when dropped its separate infringement lawsuit against Grooveshark, opting instead to license its catalog for royalties, which the service touted as validation of its . However, this settlement did not quell broader challenges; and others persisted, amassing evidence of over 100,000 infringing files and accusing Grooveshark of exploiting the DMCA's notice-and-takedown regime by reinstating content or ignoring patterns of abuse, thereby undermining the statute's intent to deter willful facilitation. Academic analyses described this as potential "safe harbor abuse," where platforms profited from infringing access while nominally complying, raising questions about the DMCA's efficacy in balancing innovation against rights holders' enforcement burdens. These initial disputes foreshadowed deeper litigation, with labels arguing that Grooveshark's operational knowledge—gleaned from internal seeding of popular tracks—disqualified it from , a claim later substantiated in court findings of direct infringement.

Litigation with Major Labels

In November 2011, filed a federal against Escape Media Group, the operator of Grooveshark, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of , alleging that the service had facilitated the unauthorized uploading and streaming of over 100,000 sound recordings owned by UMG labels such as Interscope, Geffen, and , seeking damages potentially exceeding $15 billion. The suit claimed direct infringement by Grooveshark employees, including executives like co-founder , who personally uploaded thousands of copyrighted tracks to seed the library, as evidenced by server logs and internal communications. In December 2011, Sony Music Entertainment and amended the complaint to join as plaintiffs, expanding the case to encompass subsidiaries including , Atlantic Recording Corporation, Elektra Entertainment Group, and others, asserting willful infringement of approximately 5,000 specific sound recordings that were uploaded and streamed millions of times without licenses. The labels argued that Grooveshark's induced user uploads of pirated while executives ignored or concealed notices, disqualifying the service from DMCA safe harbor protections due to its lack of good-faith implementation of anti-infringement measures. Discovery revealed extensive evidence of internal knowledge, including emails where employees discussed evading detection and boasting about the site's unauthorized library growth, supporting claims of secondary for contributory and vicarious infringement. On September 29, 2014, Judge Thomas P. Griesa granted partial to the plaintiffs, ruling that Escape Media was liable for direct infringement of the specified recordings—totaling 5,977 unauthorized copies streamed at least 36 million times—and for willful violations, opening the door to statutory damages up to $150,000 per work. This decision hinged on uncontested facts that Grooveshark's own staff initiated the infringing uploads, undermining defenses of .

Court Decisions and Forced Closure

In October 2014, a U.S. District Court in ruled that Escape Media Group, the operator of Grooveshark, was liable for in a case brought by major record labels including , Sony Music Entertainment, and , finding that the platform's employees had personally uploaded copyrighted material without authorization. On April 24, 2015, U.S. District Judge Thomas P. Griesa determined that Grooveshark's infringement of approximately 5,000 sound recordings—by artists such as , , and —was willful, disqualifying it from statutory damages caps and exposing the company to potential liability of up to $736 million in a forthcoming trial. The rulings stemmed from a lawsuit alleging direct and secondary infringement, as Grooveshark lacked licenses for the streamed content and its architecture facilitated unauthorized user uploads, undermining claims to DMCA safe harbor protections. Founders and Sam Tarantino were held personally liable for inducing infringement through internal practices like seeding the library with pirated files. On April 30, 2015, hours before the damages trial was set to begin, Escape Media settled the suit by agreeing to immediately cease operations, dissolve the company, and transfer its assets to the plaintiffs, averting further penalties but resulting in Grooveshark's permanent shutdown. In a public statement on the site's landing page, the company acknowledged "very serious mistakes" in failing to secure proper music rights and apologized to artists and labels, marking the end of the service after nearly a of operation.

Reception and Impact

User and Critical Praise

Grooveshark garnered significant praise from users for its expansive music exceeding 15 million songs, enabling free, ad-free streaming of virtually any track or full without geographic restrictions. Users frequently highlighted the platform's user-friendly , ability to upload personal music collections for seamless access across devices, and features like collaborative creation and sharing, which fostered . At its peak in the early , the service attracted approximately 35 million monthly active users, reflecting widespread adoption driven by these conveniences over competitors like , which imposed limits on free-tier playback. Critics echoed user sentiments, often ranking Grooveshark among the top music streaming options for its unrestricted access and superior discovery tools, including genre-based radio and personalized recommendations. In a 2013 Business Insider review, the service was deemed "the best streaming site," surpassing alternatives by allowing unlimited, interruption-free listening to demanded content without subscription barriers. Lifehacker's 2010 reader poll crowned it the premier streaming service, securing 31% of votes ahead of due to its on-demand flexibility and lack of algorithmic constraints. Common Sense Media awarded a 4-out-of-5 in 2015, commending its speed, fun interactivity, and cost-free model despite content sourcing concerns. Such acclaim underscored Grooveshark's innovative appeal in democratizing music access prior to its 2015 shutdown.

Criticisms from Industry Stakeholders

The (RIAA), representing major labels including , Sony Music Entertainment, and , accused Grooveshark of facilitating widespread through user-uploaded content lacking proper licenses, depriving rights holders of royalties. In a 2011 lawsuit filed by and eight affiliated labels such as Atlantic Recording Corporation and Zomba Recording LLC, the plaintiffs alleged that Grooveshark's platform hosted millions of unlicensed tracks, with internal emails from company employees demonstrating deliberate uploading of copyrighted material to build the library, undermining claims of DMCA safe harbor protection. EMI Music initially joined the criticism by suing Grooveshark in 2007 for infringement but settled in October 2009 by licensing its catalog instead, highlighting a pathway to legitimacy that Grooveshark largely failed to pursue with other majors. By January 2012, all three major labels had active suits, with EMI alleging breach of a prior royalty agreement where Grooveshark acknowledged debts but paid nothing and failed to provide accounting statements. A U.S. federal judge ruled in September 2014 that Grooveshark's operators were liable for direct and secondary infringement across nine labels' copyrights, citing evidence of willful violations rather than mere user-generated content. Industry stakeholders emphasized the service's role in enabling on a massive scale, with potential damages exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars per the statutory maximum of $150,000 per willful infringement. The settlement, which forced Grooveshark's shutdown, included an admission from its founders of "very serious mistakes" in failing to secure licenses for the bulk of its , a concession that validated the labels' long-standing position that the platform prioritized unauthorized distribution over fair compensation for creators. This outcome reinforced criticisms that Grooveshark's model, while innovative for users, systematically eroded revenue streams essential to the ecosystem, prompting ongoing RIAA actions against similar "clones" seeking to replicate its unlicensed approach.

Broader Influence on Music Streaming

Grooveshark's user-driven model, which enabled uploading, searching, and sharing of over 15 million tracks with social features like collaborative playlists, demonstrated strong consumer demand for on-demand music discovery and personalization, influencing the feature sets of subsequent legal platforms. Its emphasis on seamless, ad-supported access to vast catalogs prefigured the freemium structures adopted by services like Spotify, which launched its U.S. operations in 2011 amid growing piracy concerns. The platform's peak of 35 million registered users and billions of monthly streams underscored the viability of streaming over downloads, pressuring incumbents to accelerate innovation; former executive stated that "Grooveshark’s existence pushed to improve." By highlighting user preferences for and instant access, Grooveshark contributed to the evolution of algorithmic recommendations and sharing tools in modern services, even as its unlicensed operations faced industry backlash. The 2015 shutdown, following a settlement paying $75 million to major labels, removed a major unlicensed competitor and directed users toward licensed alternatives like , , and Rdio, reinforcing the shift toward royalty-paying models that compensated artists. Co-founder Sam Tarantino reflected that the service "showed what was possible, even if imperfectly," positioning Grooveshark as a catalyst for the industry's transition from physical sales and illegal file-sharing to sustainable streaming economics, with global revenues exceeding $10 billion by 2020. This outcome validated labels' enforcement strategies while validating streaming's potential to supplant .

References

  1. [1]
    Grooveshark - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Legal Name Escape Media Group Inc ; Operating Status Closed ; Company Type For Profit ; Founders Andres Barreto, Josh Greenberg, Sam Tarantino.
  2. [2]
    Grooveshark co-founder Josh Greenberg, 28, found dead - BBC News
    Jul 20, 2015 · The co-founder of a recently-shut down music streaming website has been found dead in his Florida home, local police have said.Missing: launch | Show results with:launch
  3. [3]
    UMG Recording, Inc. v. Escape Media Group, Inc. et al, No. 1 ...
    Escape s Internal Records of Uploads onto Grooveshark Escape s records provide data confirming the uploading of thousands of unique files to Grooveshark by ...
  4. [4]
    Co-Founder of Grooveshark Found Dead in His Home - VICE
    Jul 20, 2015 · Grooveshark launched in April 2008, and was shut down when it was sued multiple times by major record labels.
  5. [5]
    Music streaming service Grooveshark shuts down to settle ... - Reuters
    May 1, 2015 · The settlement ends a four-year legal battle and came as Grooveshark's parent company, Escape Media Group, was facing hundreds of millions of ...
  6. [6]
    Digital Music Provider Grooveshark Dismantled in Major Victory for ...
    May 4, 2015 · On April 30, 2015, digital music provider Grooveshark—owned by Escape Media Group, Inc. ("Escape")—agreed to permanently shut down its ...
  7. [7]
    Grooveshark is dead, long live paid streaming services - WIRED
    May 1, 2015 · Music streaming service Grooveshark has announced its immediate closure in a blog post. "Despite best of intentions, we made very serious mistakes.
  8. [8]
    Why Grooveshark failed - The Verge
    Jul 28, 2015 · Sometime in early 2006, Josh Greenberg, a freshman at the University of Florida, began attending meetings at a school club for budding ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  9. [9]
    Grooveshark Explained: The Ins and Outs of a Music Pioneer
    ### Summary of Grooveshark's Founding and Early Years (2006–2009)
  10. [10]
    Grooveshark is done - Copyhype – .
    Oct 1, 2014 · As the court explains, Grooveshark began in 2006 as a peer-to-peer network that allowed users to copy and distribute digital music files among ...Missing: history timeline
  11. [11]
    Grooveshark In Retrospect
    ### Timeline and Details for Grooveshark (2006–2009)
  12. [12]
    Grooveshark Launches Web Media Player - TechCrunch
    Grooveshark Launches Web Media Player. Contributor. 10:56 PM PDT · April 15, 2008. grooveshark.jpg Music sharing and sales startup Grooveshark has launched ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  13. [13]
    The New Grooveshark: Faster, Prettier And Still Phenomenal
    Oct 26, 2009 · It's a great web-based music search, play and management tool that's been around since April last year. You can use the app to instantly look for, share and ...
  14. [14]
    Grooveshark redesign adds music streaming activity streams, visual ...
    Oct 11, 2011 · It's a much-needed facelift that implements Twitter-style activity streams on your profile page, which show off who you're following, the music ...
  15. [15]
    Grooveshark circles back again, swaps app for HTML5 - Engadget
    Sep 6, 2012 · Users can now manage their music collection from any device, and can also listen to genre-based stations, browse popular music, tune in to their ...
  16. [16]
    Grooveshark CEO [EXCLUSIVE]: The future of ... - Industria Musical
    During recent years you have struggled to keep going with some bad years around 2012 passing from around 30 million users to 12 million in early 2012 and back ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  17. [17]
    Grooveshark Music Site Gets a Makeover - NBC News
    Oct 17, 2012 · Starting today (Oct. 17), controversial streaming music service Grooveshark has a stylish new look that matches its generous music features.Missing: 2008-2012 | Show results with:2008-2012
  18. [18]
    Grooveshark launches HTML5 webapp for streaming music in ...
    Jan 13, 2012 · Music streaming service Grooveshark just launched an HTML5 player in beta for streaming music to most devices ... Jan 13, 2012, 10:57 AM PST.
  19. [19]
    Official Grooveshark app for Android returns to Play Store - The Verge
    Aug 28, 2012 · “After working closely with Google to get rogue apps removed, we're delighted that the official Grooveshark app has been reinstated,” ...
  20. [20]
    Grooveshark app for Android removed from Google Play once again
    Aug 31, 2012 · It just made its return earlier this week, but Grooveshark's Android app has once again been removed from the Google Play store.
  21. [21]
    Grooveshark Is Coming Back - Business Insider
    Sep 17, 2013 · Tarantino claims to be adding 200,000 users a month, including big growth in mobile. The company has grown to 85 employees, after cutting from ...Missing: expansion 2008-2012
  22. [22]
    Music streaming service Grooveshark shuts down to settle ... - Reuters
    May 1, 2015 · The settlement ends a four-year legal battle and came as Grooveshark's parent company, Escape Media Group, was facing hundreds of millions of ...
  23. [23]
    Grooveshark Shuts Down to Settle Copyright Infringement Suit
    Apr 30, 2015 · Last week, ahead of a damages trial, Judge Griesa ruled that because Grooveshark's infringement was willful, it could be held liable for up to ...
  24. [24]
    Grooveshark Shuts Down After Eight Years - Rolling Stone
    which launched in 2007 — had been served with a $17 billion lawsuit in 2011 from a coalition of the major ...
  25. [25]
    Grooveshark is dead - The Verge
    Apr 30, 2015 · No details on the settlement itself are currently available. Last week a judge opened the door for a jury to impose the maximum fine of $150,000 ...
  26. [26]
    Report: Judge Rules Against Grooveshark in Summary Judgment ...
    Sep 30, 2014 · Escape was charged with infringing copyright across 5,977 songs and streaming copyrighted tracks 36 million times. “Each time Escape streamed ...
  27. [27]
    Grooveshark shuts down, apologising to labels for lack of music ...
    May 1, 2015 · Streaming music service Grooveshark has shut down as part of the settlement following its loss of a copyright-infringement lawsuit brought by major labels.
  28. [28]
    Grooveshark music-sharing service closes down - BBC News
    May 1, 2015 · Grooveshark was set up in 2006 and had, at its peak, about 35 million users per month who were allowed to upload any song they chose. Employees ...Missing: growth 2012-2014
  29. [29]
    Grooveshark - PCMag UK
    May 17, 2014 · Grooveshark features quality audio, strong social networking, the ability to upload MP3 files and rewind tracks, making it one of the most ...
  30. [30]
    The Tech Behind the New Grooveshark | Jerod Santo
    Dec 15, 2010 · Grooveshark's Flash application was built with a Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture and they were keen on retaining that paradaigm with ...
  31. [31]
    Creative Developer & Architect - Chris Dolphin
    Sep 10, 2014 · Grooveshark was a web-based music streaming service originally built on Flash, and available on Android, Desktop, and mobile web. Users could ...
  32. [32]
    Grooveshark APK for Android - Download
    Rating 7.8/10 (31) · Free · AndroidJul 20, 2021 · Grooveshark is a music streaming service that is mix of free content (the radio service) and subscription. You find music either by searching for it or for ...
  33. [33]
    Grooveshark.com Free Online Streaming Song Music Player
    May 31, 2009 · Upload – A simple Java program installs instantly and allows you to upload entire folders of music in minutes. Then listen and share. Note: ...
  34. [34]
    Grooveshark Lets You Stream and Share Your Tunes Online
    Jan 7, 2010 · To upload your music you'll need to have Java installed and then start through the uploading process. First you need to select the music you ...
  35. [35]
    Grooveshark - PCMag UK
    Jun 14, 2018 · Grooveshark features quality audio, strong social networking, the ability to upload MP3 files and rewind tracks, making it one of the most ...
  36. [36]
    Grooveshark gets more social with site revamp - CNET
    Feb 25, 2015 · The community aspect is one key feature designed to appeal to people interested in the social realm of sharing and discovering music.
  37. [37]
    Grooveshark's Broadcast Is A User-Created Radio Station Platform
    Apr 22, 2013 · Grooveshark unveiled a new service called Broadcast that allows users to create their own radio-like Web station -- akin to Sirius for the ...
  38. [38]
    Grooveshark adds a new feature: broadcasting - Los Angeles Times
    Apr 22, 2013 · Grooveshark will show each user a list of live broadcasts by the people they're following. The site will also offer links to popular broadcasts ...
  39. [39]
    How Grooveshark Created an SEO Marketing Machine
    May 24, 2023 · As more users signed up for accounts and engaged with the service, Grooveshark was able to monetize its user base through advertising and ...
  40. [40]
    Grooveshark Music Service Pays You To Upload Music - TechCrunch
    Sep 7, 2007 · Here's an interesting idea. Offer DRM-free downloads at 99 cents per track and pay regular users to upload the files in their music collection.
  41. [41]
    Gainesville Remembers Grooveshark Co-Founder With 'Josh ...
    Apr 20, 2016 · Greenberg founded Grooveshark with two college friends, Andrés Barreto and Sam Tarantino, in 2006 while they were freshmen at the University of ...
  42. [42]
    How A Music-Tech Shark Got His Groove Back - Forbes
    Oct 19, 2016 · When a five-year-long, $17 billion lawsuit brought by the major record labels forced Grooveshark co-founder Sam Tarantino to shutter his ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Grooveshark: Founder, Leadership & Team - Wellfound
    View founders and team members of Grooveshark on AngelList. Explore jobs, salary, equity, and funding information. Read about work-life balance, perks, ...
  44. [44]
    Autopsy on Grooveshark co-founder Josh Greenberg - Gainesville Sun
    Dec 22, 2015 · Greenberg was co-founder of Grooveshark, an online music service that at one time had 145 employees and more than 30 million monthly users, but ...Missing: founders | Show results with:founders
  45. [45]
    Former Grooveshark Execs Detail Rise and Fall of Streaming Pioneer
    May 14, 2015 · Two former executives, DeYoung and John Ashenden, 28, who have moved on to other jobs, told the company's rags-to-riches-to-rags story.
  46. [46]
    What is Grooveshark's business model? - Vizologi
    Grooveshark, founded in 2006, was a web-based music streaming service that allowed users to upload, share, and listen to music tracks.
  47. [47]
    Grooveshark: Revenue, Competitors, Alternatives - Growjo
    Reaching an audience of more than 30 million users, Grooveshark was at one point, one of the largest on-demand music services on the Internet. We are dedicated ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  48. [48]
    Grooveshark once had 35 million users. Now, the music-streaming ...
    May 1, 2015 · Say goodbye to Grooveshark, an online music-streaming service that once boasted 35 million users who listened to songs for free.Missing: 2012-2015 | Show results with:2012-2015<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    From Startup to Success: A Case Study on Growing a Music Startup ...
    Grooveshark's freemium model was another critical factor in its growth. By offering both free, ad-supported accounts and premium, ad-free accounts, Grooveshark ...
  50. [50]
    Grooveshark Insists It's Legal; Points Out That Using DMCA Safe ...
    Apr 20, 2011 · One of the issues with the DMCA safe harbor rule is whether it protects all technology that complies with its rules or whether someone who ...Missing: early challenges
  51. [51]
    Grooveshark Is Now Deadshark: How an Illegal Streaming Service ...
    May 7, 2015 · Grooveshark has operated in defiance of the copyright laws for nearly 10 years; that is until the courts found Tarantino and Greenberg to be personally liable.
  52. [52]
    Jumping the Grooveshark: A Case Study in DMCA Safe Harbor Abuse
    Dec 22, 2011 · This commentary examines the controversy over Grooveshark, an on-demand music streaming service that has provided access to much of the catalogs ...Missing: early challenges
  53. [53]
    EMI Drops Suit Against Grooveshark Music Service, Licenses It ...
    Oct 13, 2009 · EMI has dropped its copyright infringement lawsuit against the music streaming service Grooveshark, opting instead to license its sound ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Jumping the Grooveshark: A Case Study in DMCA Safe Harbor Abuse
    It raises questions about how such reliable access could have been sustained under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's notice and take-down regime and ...
  55. [55]
    Assessing the DMCA Safe Harbors: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
    Aug 18, 2010 · In my view, Grooveshark reflects the cynical and “bad” approach to the DMCA safe harbor. Grooveshark does not offer breakthroughs in technology.Missing: early | Show results with:early
  56. [56]
    A Timeline: Universal Music Group vs. Grooveshark vs. Digital Music ...
    Apr 12, 2012 · Late last year Universal Music Group sued streaming music service Grooveshark claiming that they consciously pirated thousands of songs.
  57. [57]
    Music streaming website Grooveshark shuts down - Global News
    May 1, 2015 · In 2011, Universal Music brought a US$15-billion lawsuit against the service, claiming the website had uploaded more than 100,000 songs without ...
  58. [58]
    Grooveshark infringed record labels' copyrights: U.S. judge | Reuters
    Sep 29, 2014 · Plaintiffs in the case included Arista Music, Arista Records, Atlantic Recording, Elektra Entertainment Group, LaFace Records, Sony Music ...Missing: major details
  59. [59]
    Warner and Sony Join Universal's Lawsuit Against Grooveshark
    Dec 15, 2011 · EMI's December 2009 deal with Grooveshark ended a copyright infringement lawsuit against the music service. In August 2010 independent rights ...
  60. [60]
    https://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204026804577100653326656634.html
  61. [61]
    Judge rules Grooveshark's copyright violations were willful
    Apr 28, 2015 · The judge's ruling allows the jury to consider awarding damages against the company of up to $150,000 for each of the 5,000 songs which are a ...
  62. [62]
    How the Music Industry Finally Sunk Grooveshark - VICE
    Sep 30, 2014 · Grooveshark finally lost a major court case to the recording industry, but not because it was hosting millions of unlicensed songs at the time of the lawsuit.<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Grooveshark loses copyright suit over uploaded songs
    The judge found that Grooveshark illegally uploaded 5,977 copies of songs streamed by users at least 36 million times, with each use being a copyright violation ...
  64. [64]
    [Updated]: Grooveshark Liable for Copyright Infringement
    Sep 30, 2014 · In a decision from the US District Court in Manhattan, Grooveshark was found liable for copyright infringement of nine record companies, Arista ...
  65. [65]
    Grooveshark copyright violations 'willful,' judge says before trial
    Apr 24, 2015 · Last September, Griesa ruled that Escape and its founders, Samuel Tarantino and Joshua Greenberg, were liable for the illegal uploads of ...
  66. [66]
    Grooveshark Shuts Down - Billboard
    Apr 30, 2015 · Escape Media, parent company to music streaming service Grooveshark, has agreed to settle with Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
  67. [67]
    Grooveshark Is the Best Streaming Site - Business Insider
    Aug 28, 2013 · Grooveshark emerges as a top streaming site, offering a unique music experience.Missing: praise | Show results with:praise
  68. [68]
    Grooveshark: Free global music streaming with ... - AlternativeTo
    Feb 28, 2009 · Comments and Reviews ... Comment summary: Grooveshark was praised for its extensive music library, affordability, and user-friendly interface.
  69. [69]
    Best Music Streaming Service: Grooveshark - Lifehacker
    The race for the top slot was a tight one. Grooveshark took home the prize with 31% of the vote beating out Pandora (29%) by a little more than 200 votes.
  70. [70]
    Grooveshark Website Review | Common Sense Media
    Rating 4.0 · Review by Dana AndersonNov 4, 2015 · User-sourced music-sharing site is fun, fast, and free. Read Common Sense Media's Grooveshark review, age rating, and parents guide.
  71. [71]
    Grooveshark infringed record labels' copyrights - U.S. judge | Reuters
    Sep 29, 2014 · The online streaming service Grooveshark suffered a legal defeat on Monday when a U.S. judge found its operators liable to nine record ...
  72. [72]
    Major Labels Easily Win Lawsuit Against Grooveshark - Techdirt.
    Sep 30, 2014 · Basically, Grooveshark didn't even do anything to hide its attempts to infringe. There are cases where the evidence can be read in multiple ways ...
  73. [73]
    Grooveshark now feels lawsuit wrath of all major music labels - CNET
    Jan 5, 2012 · A breach-of-contract lawsuit filed yesterday against Grooveshark means that all the major recording labels are suing the popular music ...
  74. [74]
    Grooveshark, EMI Suit: Major Music Label Accuses Digital ... - HuffPost
    Jan 5, 2012 · In its complaint, EMI said Grooveshark has acknowledged in writing or orally owing royalties, but has neither paid anything nor provided any ...
  75. [75]
    Grooveshark to Shut Down - The Hollywood Reporter
    Apr 30, 2015 · Escape Media, parent company to music streaming service Grooveshark, has agreed to settle with Universal Music Group, Sony Music ...
  76. [76]
    Music-streaming service Grooveshark shuts down - CNET
    Apr 30, 2015 · Controversial service had faced paying damages of hundreds of millions of dollars in copyright infringement lawsuit filed by record labels.
  77. [77]
    Music streaming service Grooveshark shuts down to settle ... - Reuters
    The settlement ends a four-year legal battle and came as Grooveshark's parent company, Escape Media Group, was facing hundreds of millions of dollars in damages ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  78. [78]
    Grooveshark Shuts Down, Apologizes "Without Reservation" To RIAA
    May 1, 2015 · We failed to secure licenses from rights holders for the vast amount of music on our service. That was wrong. We apologize. Without reservation.
  79. [79]
    Grooveshark clone hit with $17 million RIAA settlement - RAIN News
    Dec 15, 2015 · A New York federal court granted the RIAA more than $13 million in piracy damanges and $4 million for willful counterfeiting. Not only did the ...
  80. [80]
    Grooveshark, the Free Music Service That Used to Scare the Big ...
    Apr 30, 2015 · Last week, a U.S. District Court judge told a jury that Escape could be liable for up to $736 million in damages after losing a copyright case.