Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

HANS device

The HANS device, an acronym for Head and Neck Support, is a restraint system designed to protect drivers from severe head and injuries, particularly basilar skull fractures, during high-impact crashes by limiting the head's forward and rotational movement relative to the . It consists of a rigid, U-shaped collar made primarily of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer that rests on the driver's shoulders and is secured by the seat harness, connected via adjustable tethers to anchors on the sides of the . The device works by transferring crash forces from the neck to the stronger muscles and bones of the upper and shoulders, reducing neck tension by up to 81%, forces by 72%, and overall neck loading by 78% in frontal impacts. Developed in the early 1980s by biomechanical engineer Dr. Robert Hubbard, a professor at , and professional racecar driver Jim Downing, Hubbard's brother-in-law and a five-time IMSA GT champion, the HANS device was inspired by the 1981 death of their mutual friend and racer Patrick Jacquemart in a crash that highlighted the vulnerability of the head and neck to "whiplash" forces. After over two decades of research and testing, including early prototypes evaluated at in 1989, the device entered commercial production in 1991 and was first worn in competition by Downing himself during an IMSA race in 1986, with actor and racer adopting it in 1988. Initial resistance from drivers due to concerns over , comfort, and added weight delayed widespread use, but the device's efficacy was demonstrated in crashes like that of IndyCar driver Richie Hearn in 2002, who survived a 139g impact with only a broken foot. The HANS device's adoption accelerated dramatically following the fatal crash of driver Dale Earnhardt Sr. at the , which was attributed to a and prompted a reevaluation of racing safety standards. recommended its use shortly after on October 17, 2001, following the death of ARCA driver , and made it mandatory across its top three series by 2005; similar mandates followed in (2001), Formula 1 (2003), and SCCA (2012). Today, it is required in most major motorsport sanctioning bodies worldwide, with over 150,000 units sold since inception as of 2014 and no fatalities from in 's premier series or since its implementation. The device has proven instrumental in high-profile survivals, such as driver Ryan Newman's crash, where he emerged with non-life-threatening injuries despite extreme forces, underscoring its role in transforming motorsport safety.

Overview

Description

The HANS device, an acronym for Head and Neck Support, is a safety restraint employed in motorsports to safeguard drivers from severe head and neck injuries during collisions. It features a U-shaped, collar-like structure that rests on the shoulders without encircling the neck, providing a rigid yet lightweight barrier against excessive motion. Constructed primarily from high-strength, low-weight materials such as carbon fiber composites or injection-molded polymers with engineered reinforcements, the device ensures durability without compromising mobility or adding undue bulk to the driver's setup. Physically, it anchors securely beneath the driver's shoulder harnesses for stability, while flexible tethers attach to specialized anchors on the , creating a tethered system that integrates seamlessly with existing safety gear. The device's primary role is to limit the forward flexion and rotation of the head in high-impact crashes, thereby preventing basilar skull fractures and associated injuries by redirecting forces through the stronger and harness assembly. This design evolved from earlier head restraint prototypes, refining the balance of protection, comfort, and practicality for competitive racing environments.

Purpose and Mechanism

In motorsports crashes, rapid deceleration causes the driver's to be restrained by the shoulder harness, while the unrestrained helmeted head continues forward due to , resulting in a whipping motion relative to the body. This kinematic sequence subjects the to axial loading, where the head's creates excessive flexion and at the cervical spine. The HANS device counters this by tethering the helmet to the shoulder harness, ensuring the head and torso decelerate in unison and distributing crash forces across the device's structure rather than isolating them to the . By limiting forward of the head, the device reduces relative motion between the head and shoulders, thereby minimizing injurious forces (which slide vertebrae laterally) and tensile forces (which stretch ligaments and joints). In conceptual force terms, without the device, the inertial acts primarily forward at the head- junction, amplifying and ; with it, these vectors are redirected downward and laterally through the tethers to the harness, aligning the head's path with the torso for even load sharing. This mechanism primarily targets severe injuries from unrestrained head movement, including basilar skull fractures caused by flexion-distraction at the base, atlanto-occipital dislocations from excessive joint and , and diffuse axonal injuries resulting from rapid angular accelerations of the within the . By substantially lowering peak neck loads—such as reducing by up to 80% and by over 70% in simulated frontal impacts—the device keeps forces below critical injury thresholds for the craniovertebral junction.

Design and Components

Key Elements

The HANS device features a primary structure consisting of a rigid U-shaped that positions across the driver's shoulders and collarbone to provide foundational support during impacts. This is typically constructed from carbon fiber reinforced composites, offering an optimal strength-to-weight ratio essential for applications. Connecting the collar to the helmet are adjustable tethers, which are flexible straps usually made from high-strength synthetic materials such as , designed to link the collar's side anchors to corresponding points on the . These tethers are specified to a standard length of 18 inches (450 mm) and incorporate mechanisms for tension adjustment to ensure proper fit without restricting normal head movement. Anchor points integrate the device securely, involving helmet modifications such as drilled 1/4-inch (6 mm) holes or pre-installed clips for tether attachment, positioned approximately 6 inches forward from the 's rear centerline and 1.5 inches above the base molding. The system also incorporates harness integration, where the sits beneath the shoulder belts of a 2- or 3-inch to prevent slippage and maintain positioning under load. Overall material properties emphasize lightweight design, with professional models weighing approximately 550 grams (under 1 kg) to minimize added burden on the driver. The components exhibit high tensile strength, as validated by SFI 38.1 and FIA 8858 certifications.

Variations and Models

The HANS device has evolved through several generations of models, each designed to balance protection, weight, and affordability while maintaining core safety principles. The HANS III, the third generation, features an injection-molded with a hollow collar that reduces weight compared to earlier versions, making it a cost-effective option for a wide range of racers. The HANS IV, introduced as the fourth generation, further lightens the design by approximately 10% over the HANS III through an updated and hollow core, positioning it as the lightest entry-level model available. Premium variants like the HANS and HANS Lite utilize aerospace-grade for significant weight savings—up to 185 grams lighter than the HANS III in the Lite version—offering enhanced performance for competitive applications while certified to SFI 38.1 and FIA 8858-2010 standards. The HANS Zero, the latest model as of 2025, employs proprietary techniques and advanced aerospace-grade , achieving approximately 15% weight reduction over the Pro Ultra Lite (around 260 grams lighter than the HANS III), with fire-retardant padding and compatibility with Quick Click anchors, certified to SFI 38.1 and FIA 8858-2010. Youth and small-frame versions adapt the standard models for younger or smaller drivers, such as the Youth HANS III, which scales down the dimensions while preserving the injection-molded design and hollow collar for lightweight protection suitable for karting or junior series. Size adaptations across models are tailored to individual widths, typically available in five sizes (extra small to extra large), measured around the chest below the with a driving suit, ensuring a secure fit without restricting movement. Angle variations accommodate different seat recline positions, with options like 10° for upright seating in sprint cars, 20° for standard reclined positions in stock cars and saloons, and 30° for more laid-back setups in formula cars and sports racers, allowing the device's yoke-to-collar angle to align with the driver's posture for optimal load distribution. Series-specific adaptations include lower-profile designs in carbon fiber models like the Pro Ultra Lite for open-wheel racing, where space constraints demand minimal bulk, and configurations optimized for harness routing—such as 20° models for stock car shoulder-over-harness setups versus 30° for formula cars with under-arm routing. Accessories enhance versatility and compliance, including quick-release anchors like M6 or M61 systems for rapid helmet detachment, compatible with both SFI and FIA certifications, and replacement tethers that must be swapped every five years or after any crash, incident, or signs of wear to maintain integrity. Shoulder padding kits and contour pads provide additional comfort adjustments, while post collar anchors ensure secure belt integration across all models.

History and Development

Origins and Invention

The HANS (Head and Neck Support) device was conceptualized and invented in the early 1980s by Dr. Robert Hubbard, a biomechanical engineer and professor at , and Jim Downing, a five-time IMSA GT champion and Hubbard's brother-in-law. Their collaboration was motivated by the high incidence of basilar skull fractures in motorsports crashes, where unrestrained forward and lateral head motion relative to the torso caused fatal neck injuries, as identified through biomechanical research and analysis of racing fatalities. The invention stemmed directly from a 1981 IMSA road racing incident that killed one of Downing's fellow competitors due to a from violent head whipping during impact, prompting the duo to address this vulnerability in high-speed motorsports like and . Drawing on Hubbard's expertise in crash biomechanics, including studies of neck loading in frontal decelerations, they initiated research and development in 1981 to create a restraint that would limit head without restricting visibility or . Early prototypes evolved from rigid collar concepts, which proved cumbersome, toward a lightweight U-shaped connected by to the , designed specifically for frontal impact protection by anchoring the head to the shoulder harness. The first was completed in , with Downing wearing an early version during races starting in 1986 to gather real-world feedback. Initial testing occurred in 1989 using crash sled simulations at , employing anthropomorphic dummies fitted with racing harnesses—the first such tests tailored to motorsport conditions. These prototypes demonstrated the tether system's ability to reduce energy loading on the head and by % in simulated decelerations. Hubbard filed for a patent in 1985, resulting in U.S. Patent No. 4,638,510, issued in 1987, which described the core tether mechanism for preventing excessive head rotation and translation during high-velocity frontal crashes in performance vehicles. This foundational design emphasized compatibility with standard five-point harnesses and helmets, setting the stage for iterative refinements based on sled test data.

Key Milestones in Adoption

The death of driver during the , resulting from a , served as a pivotal catalyst for the widespread adoption of the HANS device across motorsports. This tragedy accelerated safety reforms, leading to mandate the use of head and neck restraint systems, including the HANS device, starting in October 2001 for its top series, with full implementation in the 2002 season. Following suit in open-wheel racing, the (then operating as ) required the HANS device for all oval track events beginning in the 2001 season, expanding to all race types by 2002 after earlier partial mandates and incidents like the fatal crash of Gonzalo Rodriguez. The FIA then adopted the device for Formula 1, making it mandatory for all drivers from the 2003 season onward after rigorous testing and approval under the FIA 8858 standard. This decision influenced Champ Car, which, as the continuation of from , enforced the HANS requirement across its events, aligning with broader safety protocols by 2005. By 2010, the FIA extended mandates to most of its international series, requiring FIA 8858-approved frontal head restraints like the HANS device for events under its governance, building on earlier implementations in top-tier categories. The device's global proliferation continued into the mid-2010s, reaching disciplines such as rally—where the FIA's incorporated it by the early 2000s and national bodies like Motorsport UK mandated it for all championships by 2016—and select karting series for senior competitors, driven by evolving safety standards. Key to this adoption were influential factors including research initiatives by the FIA Institute (now part of the FIA Foundation), which partnered with HANS Performance Products in 2006 to advance head and neck restraint technologies and develop international standards. Additionally, strategic partnerships with manufacturers, such as Simpson Performance Products' 2012 acquisition of HANS, facilitated mass production, certification improvements, and broader distribution to support integration across diverse racing formats. Dr. Robert Hubbard passed away on February 5, 2019. In 2024, NHRA mandated head and neck restraints for vehicles exceeding 150 mph or running the quarter-mile in 7.49 seconds or quicker. The HANS IV, a lighter and more affordable model, was released in February 2025.

Usage in Motorsports

Mandates by Sanctioning Bodies

The requires the use of a head and neck restraint system certified to SFI Specification 38.1 for all competitors in its top-tier series across oval and road course events, a mandate implemented in October 2001 following the death of driver . This regulation applies universally to ensure protection against basilar skull fractures during high-impact collisions. The (FIA) mandates frontal head restraint (FHR) systems, including the HANS device, under Appendix J of the for various international championships, with required to FIA Standard 8858-2010 (superseding earlier 8858-2002 version). Formula 1 adopted this requirement in 2003, followed by the (WRC) in the same year. Other sanctioning bodies have similarly integrated HANS or equivalent FHR systems into their rules. The International Motor Sports Association (IMSA) has required FIA-approved head restraints since 2005 for its endurance racing series, emphasizing compatibility with six-point harnesses. The (NHRA) adapts the device for , mandating SFI 38.1-certified restraints for vehicles exceeding 150 mph or running quarter-mile elapsed times of 7.49 seconds or quicker, effective from 2024 but with prior requirements in and classes. The Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) enforces head and neck restraints meeting SFI 38.1 or FIA 8858 standards in club racing events, with tech inspections verifying compliance prior to competition. Non-compliance with these mandates typically results in severe penalties, including event disqualification, monetary fines, or temporary , as enforced by stewards to uphold standards. Exceptions are granted in and historic under bodies like the FIA Historic Database or SCCA's divisions, where period-correct equipment may supersede modern restraints to preserve authenticity.

Fitting and Practical Considerations

The sizing process for a HANS device begins with key measurements to ensure a proper fit, including circumference, chest circumference, and the angle of the . circumference is typically measured around the base of the , with sizes categorized as small (12.5–16 inches), medium (14–17.5 inches), or large (16–20 inches) to accommodate varying builds. Chest circumference is measured around the chest below the while wearing a driving suit (adding 1 inch if not available), which helps determine if the device's yoke will rest comfortably on the collarbones without restricting movement. The angle influences model selection, with devices available in fixed angles (e.g., 20° or 30°) or adjustable versions from 10° to 40° in 5° increments to match the vehicle's seating , ideally between 60° and 90° from horizontal. Professional fitting by a certified or at a racing supply shop is strongly recommended to verify these measurements in a seated position with full gear, as individual shapes can affect fit and prevent issues like excessive pressure or slippage. Integration involves securing the device to a compatible five- or six-point and installing anchors on the for attachment. To attach, the driver slides the U-shaped over the so it straddles the and rests firmly on the chest, positioning it under the shoulder belts of the . The shoulder belts should contact 1/3 to 2/3 of the yoke's shoulder pads, ideally 1–2 inches below the yoke's high point, with their inner edges no more than 3 inches apart and covering at least half the on each side for optimal load distribution. are then adjusted: the rear allows 1–2.25 inches of forward movement from a neutral chin-horizontal position, while side permit no more than 0.5 inches of lateral motion, ensuring equal lengths on both sides with 1–2 inches of overall play for natural head motion. anchors, required for HANS-compatible models, are installed using manufacturer-supplied —often involving or clipping into pre-designated points on the shell—followed by attaching the posts by aligning and sliding them into place, then tugging to confirm security. This process typically requires an assistant for precision and should be tested in the vehicle to confirm no interference with visibility or controls. Maintenance of the HANS device focuses on regular inspections to preserve integrity, particularly after each event or any contact. Post-race checks should examine tethers for fraying, chafing, or stretching, as well as anchors for and the yoke for cracks or wear on padding and friction materials. The device should be kept clean with mild soapy water and stored dry, away from sunlight to avoid material degradation. Replacement intervals include tethers every 5 years from the date of manufacture or sooner if damage is evident, and the full device after any significant impact or at the 5-year recertification mark, whichever comes first; rubber components like the yoke may need periodic replacement if worn. Professional recertification by the manufacturer is required every 5 years to maintain compliance and functionality. User adaptations emphasize compatibility and comfort adjustments to suit individual needs, especially in extended races. The device requires a HANS-compatible with integrated anchor points (e.g., Snell SA2020 (valid until December 31, 2030) or FIA 8860-2018 rated) to allow secure connection without modifying the helmet structure. For driver comfort during long sessions, tethers can be fine-tuned up to ±1 inch for better head mobility and visibility, while adjustable padding on the yoke and can be repositioned to reduce points on the and shoulders. Some models offer modular designs for customizing fit to body type or seat variations, ensuring the device remains secure without causing fatigue, though initial discomfort may occur until broken in. These adaptations prioritize maintaining protective function while enhancing wearability in demanding conditions.

Effectiveness and Impact

Scientific Evidence

Scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of the Head and Neck Support (HANS) device primarily derives from biomechanical testing and real-world crash data analyses, demonstrating substantial reductions in head and neck injury risks during frontal impacts. tests conducted using anthropomorphic test dummies have shown that the HANS device limits forward head excursion, thereby decreasing key injury criteria such as the () and the Neck Injury Criterion (NIJ), keeping head accelerations below tolerable thresholds (e.g., 62 g versus 107 g without the device). Similarly, NIJ values, which assess combined neck tension, , and , were lowered by up to 58% in finite element modeling of tests, indicating a 40-50% overall reduction in head-neck injury potential compared to unrestrained conditions. These findings are corroborated by SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-3324, which reported an 80% reduction in flexion-distraction forces on the neck during simulated frontal crashes. Real-world data from professional series further validate these laboratory results, particularly in preventing basilar fractures and craniovertebral (CVJ) injuries. In , following the mandatory adoption of the HANS device in October 2001, there have been zero reported fatalities from basilar fractures in the top series, a stark contrast to the four such deaths between May 2000 and February 2001 (, Kenny Irwin, Tony Roper, and ). Over the period from 2001 to 2009, experienced an average of 220 high-impact crashes per year, yet no CVJ fatalities occurred, compared to an expected 15 based on pre-mandate trends, with no such fatalities reported as of 2025. Earlier field data from the (CART) series in 2000-2001, involving 28 incidents and 33 drivers, recorded zero cervical fractures or dislocations and only one minor , attributed to HANS usage in all cases ( Technical Paper 2002-01-3350). Analyses of international crashes, including those under FIA , confirm the device's role in mitigating . A review of professional incidents since the HANS in Formula 1 and other series reported no fatal CVJ injuries, with testing integrated into the evaluation showing peak tension forces reduced from 1350 lbs (approximately 6000 N) to 296 lbs (approximately 1315 N) and forces to 210 lbs (approximately 935 N), well below thresholds of 740 lbs (3300 N) for tension and 700 lbs (3115 N) for shear (SAE Technical Paper 942466). These force reductions, observed in over 500 combined crash events across series from 2000 onward, highlight a consistent decrease in upper , with overall neck loads lowered by 78% in frontal scenarios. In comparative studies of head and protection methods, the HANS device has demonstrated superior in frontal impacts relative to alternatives such as restraints (e.g., those integrated into vest-style systems) or skirt modifications. Sled evaluations indicated that while restraints provide some limitation on head motion, they fail to the HANS's 81% in or 72% in forces, often allowing greater forward whipping and higher NIJ scores. skirts, designed to with shoulder harnesses, offered minimal benefits in isolating loads, with tests showing only partial mitigation of extension moments compared to the comprehensive tethering mechanism of the HANS, which outperformed all tested devices in reducing total injury risk ( Technical Paper 2002-01-3304).

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its proven benefits in frontal impacts, the HANS device has faced for restricting head , which some drivers can lead to increased neck fatigue during prolonged sessions, particularly in endurance racing where sustained comfort is essential. Although studies and user reports indicate that modern designs do not significantly impair , the rigid collar and tethers limit lateral and upward rotation compared to unrestrained motion, potentially contributing to driver discomfort over long durations. Lighter variants, weighing around 0.5 kg, mitigate this fatigue better than heavier models, but the added bulk remains a noted drawback for some users. The device is primarily optimized for frontal and near-frontal crashes (0 to 30 degrees ), offering limited in side impacts or rollovers without complementary systems such as full-containment seats, side nets, or roll bars. In lateral collisions, the HANS provides minimal restraint against head , relying on vehicle structure or additional padding to prevent , as its design focuses on tethering the to the torso during forward deceleration. Similarly, during rollovers, the restraint's effectiveness diminishes without proper mounting and integration, as uncontrolled tumbling can exceed the tethers' capacity to maintain alignment. Initial adoption of the HANS device encountered significant resistance in the late 1990s and early 2000s, primarily due to its added weight of approximately 0.5-1 kg, which drivers argued could affect performance, and its high cost upward of $2,000 for custom fits. Prominent figures like criticized the bulky design for discomfort and inconvenience, including difficulties in entering and exiting vehicles quickly, leading to widespread reluctance among and other series participants until mandates were enforced post-. Rare incidents of tether entanglement during extrication have also been reported, highlighting potential risks in post-crash scenarios, though these are mitigated in newer models with quick-release features. Ongoing research addresses these shortcomings through hybrid head and neck restraints, which integrate elements of traditional HANS designs with enhanced lateral support to better handle multi-directional crashes, including side and impacts. These advancements aim to combine the frontal protection of the original HANS—demonstrated in scientific testing to reduce neck loads by up to 80%—with improved versatility, while exploring integrations like supplemental padding akin to principles for broader crash vectors.

References

  1. [1]
    The Physics Of: How the HANS Device Saves Lives - Car and Driver
    Jan 14, 2012 · When g-loads build during a forward impact, the HANS device assures that the driver's helmeted head moves with his torso so vulnerable neck and ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  2. [2]
    How Has the HANS Device Changed Car Racing? | HowStuffWorks
    Feb 15, 2019 · The Head and Neck Safety device was developed by the late Dr. Bob Hubbard. HowStuffWorks looks at the impact it has made in car racing.The Car · The Restraint System · The Driver's Gear · The Helmet
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    MSU Mechanical Engineer Made Racing Safer
    Feb 20, 2020 · HANS, or Head and Neck Support, was developed by Hubbard and his brother-in-law and former racecar driver Jim Downing. "Anytime that any type of ...Missing: motorsport | Show results with:motorsport
  5. [5]
    Safety HANS Device - NASCAR 101
    A HANS device (Head and Neck Support device) is a type of head restraint, a safety device in motorsports. Head restraints are mandatory when competing.
  6. [6]
    HANS DK18347311FIA HANS III
    ### Summary of HANS III Device (Part # DK18347311FIA)
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    A revolution in preventing fatal craniovertebral junction injuries ...
    Jul 12, 2016 · Crash sled testing with and without the HANS device elucidated reductions in neck tension, neck compression, head acceleration, and chest ...Missing: kinematics | Show results with:kinematics
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Hans® Device Owners Manual - Tiger Performance
    Basic Concept: In a crash without a HANS® device, the shoulder harness and seat belt restrain the driver's torso but only the neck restrains the head and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Effect of HANS Device on Brain Pressure Values in Finite ...
    diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in a miniature pig. The first approach modeled the CSF using linear elastic isotropic solid elements with low shear modulus ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    HANS DK14237311FIASFI HANS III
    ### HANS III Device Components Summary
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Quick Start Guide HANS Device
    THREADLOCKER - All HANS Device anchors are supplied with screws coated with a dry threadlocker compound. You must use threadlocker when assembling HANS helmet ...Missing: material | Show results with:material
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    [PDF] HANS Device - Quick Start Guide - Summitracing
    The flats of the anchor collar should be parallel with the ground and the point of the anchor should face the rear of the helmet. Gently pry helmet liner ...
  16. [16]
    HANS Devices
    ### Summary of HANS Device Models
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    General HANS FAQ - Impact Racing
    The HANS Device is the only head & neck restraint that allows exceptional vision via slack tethers and exceptional safety due to the way it works.Missing: components | Show results with:components
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Dr. Robert Hubbard, Who Developed the Life-Saving HANS Device ...
    Feb 6, 2019 · Dr. Hubbard partnered with IMSA legend Jim Downing following a fatal IMSA crash in 1981. Together, they began to develop what became known ...
  30. [30]
    Dr. Bob Hubbard and Jim Downing - Sports Car Club of America
    It is for the creation of the revolutionary HANS device, and their resulting contribution to driver safety, that Bob Hubbard and Jim Downing were nominated for ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  31. [31]
    Dr. Robert Hubbard, inventor of HANS Device, dies - NASCAR.com
    Feb 6, 2019 · Dr. Robert Hubbard, who made major advances in motorsports safety with the invention of the HANS device, died Tuesday.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  32. [32]
    Early concept HANS device | National Museum of American History
    Hubbard began designing his device after his brother, Jim Downing, an American road racer, lost a fellow racer to a skull fracture in a racing accident. The ...
  33. [33]
    Obituary: Inventor of HANS device Dr Robert Hubbard - Autosport
    Feb 6, 2019 · After some early experiments Hubbard filed a patent in 1985, and then Downing raced with a prototype Model 1 HANS for the first time at the ...
  34. [34]
    HANS device - Wikipedia
    A HANS device is a type of head restraint and a safety device in motorsports. Head restraints are mandatory when competing with most major motorsports ...
  35. [35]
    Mandated 10 years ago, HANS device has ushered in era of safety
    Aug 4, 2011 · That dark day, Feb. 18, 2001, ultimately led NASCAR officials to mandate the use of the Head and Neck Support (HANS) device to prevent basilar skull fractures.Missing: motivations studies
  36. [36]
    How Dale Earnhardt changed NASCAR, before and after his death
    Feb 18, 2021 · NASCAR didn't mandate the HANS device until even later. In late 2001, Blaise Alexander was killed in an ARCA race at Charlotte; he died almost ...
  37. [37]
    First HANS Device Highlights new Motorsports Hall of Fame of ...
    Feb 3, 2022 · The first HANS device worn in competition at Daytona 35 years ago highlights a new safety exhibit at the Motorsports Hall of Fame of America (MSHFA).
  38. [38]
    Detroit Grand Prix notebook: CART to take HANS-on approach
    Jun 17, 2001 · CART mandated last year that all of its drivers must wear the HANS (head and neck restraint system) at oval tracks. CART stated recently that ...
  39. [39]
    HANS protection mandatory on all CART ovals next year - Autoweek
    Aug 22, 2000 · CART's team owners have mandated that next season all Champ Car driversmust wear the HANS (Head and Neck Support) device for all oval-track ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  40. [40]
    AUTO+ Medical - Safety in our HANS - FIA
    Apr 11, 2019 · Hubbard was the engineer behind HANS, which was designed to prevent head and neck flexion-distraction injuries during high-velocity frontal ...
  41. [41]
    HANS made compulsory for 2003. - Crash.net
    Sep 12, 2024 · Sport Council decided that the system will be made compulsory in Formula One from January 1, 2003." The HANS device is already in use in America ...Missing: mandatory | Show results with:mandatory
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Frontal Head Restraints (FHRs) - Motorsport UK
    From 1 January 2016 the use of an FIA-homologated FHR is mandatory in Motorsport UK National Events * for the following competitors: All drivers and co-drivers ...
  44. [44]
    HANS partners with FIA Institute - Motorsport.com
    Oct 6, 2006 · Topics discussed included circuit safety, head and neck restraint technologies, and the development of new international standards for ...
  45. [45]
    Simpson Performance Products Acquires HANS Performance ...
    Sep 27, 2012 · Simpson Performance Products, Inc. today announced the acquisition of HANS Performance Products. This expands Simpson racing safety products.Missing: Foundation | Show results with:Foundation
  46. [46]
    Simpson Performance Products Acquires HANS ... - PR Newswire
    Sep 27, 2012 · This expands Simpson racing safety products to include the prestigious HANS Device Head & Neck Restraint System. "We are glad to have the HANS ...Missing: Foundation | Show results with:Foundation
  47. [47]
    [PDF] FIA STANDARD GUIDELINES FRONTAL HEAD RESTRAINT (FHR ...
    Any painted HANS® device must respect the flame-resistance requirement of. FIA Standards 8858-2002 and 8858-2010. PADDING. Padding is authorised only between ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] CB IPC 21-05 Sporting Regulations Update 022421 V1 - IMSA
    Feb 25, 2021 · 21.1.4. Drivers must wear a Frontal Head Restraint (FHR) that is approved according to FIA standard. 8858-2002 or 8858-2010. Drivers ...Missing: neck | Show results with:neck
  49. [49]
    driver gear requirements - Sports Car Club of America
    The use of a head and neck restraint system that has been certified in accordance with SFI 38.1 or FIA 8858-2002 or 8858-2010 is required; an SFI 38.1 or FIA ...Missing: mandatory | Show results with:mandatory
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Tech-Head-Neck Restraint Sizing - Hans by Simpson
    Refer to the general Head and Neck Restraint sizing chart below for proper HANS® Device system fitment. This system sizing chart is for both ADULT and YOUTH ...
  52. [52]
    How to Measure and Adjust Your Simpson Hybrid Head Restraint
    ### Summary of Sizing, Fitting, and Adjusting Simpson Hybrid Head Restraint
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    Hans Device, Schroth Racing Belts, Bell Helmets, Butlerbuilt Race ...
    HPP recommends changing tethers every five years. • Competitors should inspect the HANS Device and tethers after any impact where the device comes into use.Missing: maintenance intervals
  55. [55]
    HANS Recertification - Page 2 - ApexSpeed
    Oct 10, 2022 · It's time to have my HANS device recertified. There are several outfits out there that do the work. Anyone have good experience with a ...
  56. [56]
    Comprehensive Buying Guide for HANS (Head and Neck Support ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · The HANS device is a U-shaped collar worn around the driver's neck, attaching to the helmet via tethers. It works by restricting the head's ...Missing: function | Show results with:function
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Quick Start Guide HANS Device - Summitracing
    The Adjustable provides award-winning HANS performance plus additional comfort by adjusting the angle of the device in 5-degree increments. Does the HANS ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Advancing Racing Safety: An Overview - Research
    The HANS device outperformed all other devices by effectively reducing neck tension and limiting forward head excursion and whipping. Barrier Development ...
  59. [59]
    Does The HANS Device Block Racing Driver Peripheral Vision?
    Sep 13, 2025 · , we examine how the HANS device impacts peripheral vision and ... visibility, and how drivers can still see to the sides and even look ...
  60. [60]
    Helmet Accessories: Choosing Speed, Comfort, Safety - Holley
    Nov 3, 2023 · It's another tool that helps prevent fatigue.” ... “Another option is the D-ring-style anchor, where the HANS device essentially loops into this ...
  61. [61]
    Stop Doing That…Do This Instead: Fitting a Frontal Head Restraint
    Feb 1, 2021 · The original HANS (head-and-neck support) device was developed to prevent drivers from sustaining basilar skull fractures by maintaining the ...
  62. [62]
    What is more important for track use, HANS or roll over protection?
    Dec 5, 2017 · I think impacts are more likely than rollovers and I have a Hans and harness bar with belts. But as I said they are right if you roll. You could ...Hans Device without roll bar - CorvetteForumHANS Side Impact Performance - CorvetteForumMore results from www.corvetteforum.com
  63. [63]
    rpm.espn.com: Drivers weighing pros and cons of HANS
    Jul 6, 2001 · Many drivers are still shunning the device, citing everything from discomfort from its bulky design to downright stubbornness for not wearing it.<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    HANS Device History: A Tragic Parable About Safety & NASCAR
    Feb 26, 2021 · Today's Tedium is looking at the HANS safety device used in auto racing and the tragedy that took place before its adoption.
  65. [65]
    HANS & FHR Safety Information | TRS Motorsport
    HANS and FHR devices reduce head and neck movement during impacts, connecting helmet to harness. FHR is mandatory in some motorsports.Missing: WRC | Show results with:WRC<|control11|><|separator|>