Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

High comedy

High comedy is a genre of literary and dramatic comedy distinguished by its reliance on intellectual wit, subtle satire, and eloquent dialogue to critique social follies, pretensions, and the intricacies of upper-class life, evoking laughter through reasoned insight rather than physical antics.^[1] Unlike low comedy, which prioritizes slapstick, exaggeration, and bodily humor for broad, immediate appeal, high comedy demands engagement with nuanced character motivations and verbal dexterity, often portraying characters whose verbal elegance masks underlying absurdities.^[2]^[3] This form emerged prominently in European theater and literature from the 17th century onward, with roots in classical traditions but refined in works that targeted aristocratic vanities and moral hypocrisies.^[2] Defining characteristics include epigrammatic repartee, irony that unmasks hypocrisy without descending into vulgarity, and resolutions that affirm rational social order, as seen in Molière's Tartuffe, where pious fraudulence is dismantled through sharp exposition.^[3] Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest exemplifies the pinnacle of high comedy through its playful inversion of Victorian earnestness via punning absurdities and fabricated identities, achieving enduring influence by blending levity with philosophical acuity.^[3] Jane Austen's novels, such as Pride and Prejudice, extend the mode into prose, employing ironic narration and dialogue to dissect courtship rituals and class snobberies with precise, understated humor.^[4]^[3] High comedy's significance lies in its capacity to elevate comedy beyond mere entertainment, fostering self-reflection among audiences attuned to its cerebral demands, though it has occasionally been critiqued for elitism in prioritizing verbal sophistication over universal accessibility.^[2] Its legacy persists in modern adaptations, underscoring the timeless efficacy of intellect-driven ridicule in illuminating human foibles.^[3]

Definition and Characteristics

Core Principles

High comedy constitutes a genre of comedic art that prioritizes intellectual engagement, manifesting through verbal wit, intricate wordplay, and satirical dissection of human pretensions and societal norms. This form elicits laughter by illuminating logical inconsistencies in social conduct and the absurdities arising from inflated self-regard or hierarchical vanities, rather than relying on immediate sensory or bodily disruptions.^[3]^[2] Such humor demands audience inference, rewarding perceptive analysis of behavioral causal chains—where pretensions unravel through their own internal contradictions—over unmediated visceral responses.^[5] The conceptual framework of high comedy crystallized in literary criticism as a deliberate counterpoint to coarser comedic modes, foregrounding cerebral sophistication to provoke reflective amusement at universal follies. Critics delineated it by its capacity to provoke "thoughtful laughter" via exposure of intellectual or moral discrepancies in elite or aspirational figures, thereby critiquing entrenched social dynamics without descending into mere spectacle.^[2]^[6] This orientation privileges a realism grounded in observable patterns of human interaction, where comedy emerges from the predictable yet ironic outcomes of self-deceptive rationalizations, fostering insight into causal drivers of folly.^[5] Central to high comedy's efficacy is its appeal to audiences attuned to nuanced verbal dexterity, enabling layered commentary on power structures and ethical lapses that evade blunt confrontation. By constructing scenarios where characters' articulated hypocrisies boomerang via inexorable logic, it underscores the primacy of principled reasoning in unmasking pretense, distinct from happenstance or exaggeration for its own sake.^[3]^[2]

Mechanisms of Humor

High comedy generates amusement through verbal and cognitive techniques that demand active interpretive effort, primarily irony, paradox, epigrams, and repartee, which dissect social pretensions or logical flaws via linguistic precision rather than physical or exaggerated elements. Irony operates by expressing the contrary of what is meant, creating a deliberate mismatch between surface meaning and intent to reveal underlying absurdities or hypocrisies.^[7] Paradox constructs apparent contradictions that, when unraveled, expose coherent yet counterintuitive realities, compelling the mind to reconcile oppositions. Epigrams condense insightful commentary into terse, aphoristic forms that amplify impact through economy of words and unexpected twists.^[8] Repartee manifests in swift, adversarial verbal exchanges where participants counter with ingenuity, often inverting an opponent's premise to expose its weakness.^[9] These devices hinge on the audience's familiarity with shared cultural, historical, or philosophical references to grasp allusions and resolve embedded incongruities, yielding a cognitive payoff akin to intellectual mastery. Such reliance on contextual knowledge aligns with aspects of superiority theory, where humor emerges from perceiving flaws or ignorances in others or systems, enhanced by the viewer's elevated comprehension.^[10] Incongruity theory further elucidates the process: laughter follows the detection of an expectation violation followed by its logical reconciliation, requiring semantic integration absent in more primitive jests.^[11] Empirical evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) corroborates the cognitive demands, revealing heightened activation in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex, superior frontal gyri, and temporoparietal junctions during appreciation of incongruity-resolution humor—semantic constructs demanding abstract reasoning—compared to unresolved nonsense variants.^[12] These prefrontal regions underpin executive functions like perspective-taking and coherence-building, distinguishing high comedy's humor from forms reliant on immediate sensory or emotional triggers.^[13] Such neural patterns indicate that effective high comedy engages deliberative processing over reflexive responses, fostering amusement through mental exertion rather than visceral surprise.^[14]

Distinction from Low Comedy

Fundamental Contrasts

High comedy distinguishes itself structurally by employing intellectual wit and satire to dissect universal human vices, such as vanity or hypocrisy, through logical exposition that illuminates their causal underpinnings in social pretense and self-deception.^[2] This rational targeting enables audiences to recognize patterns of flawed reasoning, as seen in portrayals of social climbers whose absurd pretensions expose the futility of status-seeking absent genuine merit.^[6] In contrast, low comedy generates humor via physical mishaps, exaggerated accidents, or references to bodily functions, relying on visceral reactions like surprise or schadenfreude rather than analytical insight.^[15] Such mechanisms prioritize immediate, undiscriminating amusement over any probing of behavioral causes, often reducing complex human experiences to mere corporeal spectacle.^[16] The accessibility of each form underscores a divide in cognitive demands and outcomes: high comedy necessitates cultural literacy and reflective engagement, yielding sustained intellectual satisfaction through recognition of shared follies.^[17] This elevates its truth-revealing capacity, as the humor's layered irony prompts causal understanding of why flaws persist, fostering potential for personal or societal correction. Low comedy, while universally approachable via innate responses to physicality, risks superficiality by evoking transient laughs without encouraging deeper scrutiny, a limitation critiqued for reinforcing unexamined impulses over reasoned critique.^[18] Empirical patterns in performance longevity support this, with intellectually oriented works like Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest sustaining revivals and educated audiences through repeated viewings drawn to its satirical precision on Victorian hypocrisies.^[19] Slapstick equivalents, by comparison, achieve broad initial appeal but exhibit fleeting cultural retention, as their reliance on ephemeral physical gags diminishes replay value absent intellectual anchors.^[20]

Instances of Blending

In William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream, first performed around 1595–1596, high comedy manifests in the eloquent wordplay and romantic intrigues among the noble characters, such as the lovers' debates laced with puns and irony, while low comedy emerges through the rude mechanicals' farcical reenactment of Pyramus and Thisbe, featuring slapstick mishaps like a botched wall and mock death throes.^[21]^[22] This fusion underscores class-based satire, with the artisans' crude performance parodying theatrical pretensions, yet the dominance of physical gags in the subplot can eclipse the subtler verbal critiques of Athenian hierarchy, reducing opportunities for audiences to engage causally with social follies via intellectual reflection rather than visceral reaction. The Monty Python comedy group, formed in 1969 and prominent through the 1970s, exemplifies modern blending in sketches like "The Ministry of Silly Walks" from their BBC series (aired 1969–1974), where cerebral absurdity—satirizing bureaucratic inefficiency through philosophical non-sequiturs—merges with physical exaggeration of gait disorders, amplifying visual chaos over precise ideological dissection.^[23]^[24] Such combinations, rooted in Oxbridge-educated creators' ironic take on British institutions, broadened commercial viability by appealing to diverse viewers but often fragmented satirical focus, as empirical audience data from the era shows higher retention for gag-heavy segments than those demanding contextual erudition.^[25] These overlaps, driven by performative demands for immediate gratification in theater and television, empirically correlate with diluted causal critique: low elements trigger reflexive amusement, bypassing the deliberative processing essential for high comedy's exposure of elite hypocrisies, as evidenced in reception studies where blended works prioritize entertainment metrics over sustained societal probing.^[26]^[27] Pure high forms thus preserve efficacy by eschewing pandering dilutions, maintaining humor's role in unmasking pretensions through uncompromised reasoning.

Historical Development

Ancient and Early Modern Foundations

The roots of high comedy trace to ancient Athens in the 5th century BCE, where Aristophanes developed Old Comedy as a vehicle for incisive political satire directed at contemporary figures and policies. His plays, performed at festivals like the City Dionysia, employed verbal invective, wordplay, and allegorical contests to mock demagogues and intellectuals, as seen in The Knights (424 BCE), which lampooned the politician Cleon through a fantastical allegory of slaves competing for favor under their master Demos, representing the Athenian demos. ^[28] This approach prioritized critique of real societal flaws—such as wartime demagoguery during the Peloponnesian War—over mere escapism, establishing a precedent for humor grounded in observable corruptions rather than abstract fantasy. ^[29] While incorporating choral elements and exaggeration, Aristophanes' emphasis on rhetorical sparring and public accountability influenced subsequent forms of wit-driven comedy that targeted causal mechanisms of social dysfunction. ^[30] In the early modern period, particularly 17th-century France, high comedy evolved through neoclassical refinements that amplified dialogue-based exposure of hypocrisy, bridging classical satire to sophisticated character studies. Molière's Tartuffe, premiered on May 12, 1664, exemplifies this by portraying the titular character's feigned piety and manipulation of Orgon's household, revealed through pointed conversations and ironic reversals that unmask religious pretense without resorting to physical antics. ^[31] The play's structure—centered on verbal confrontations and moral unmasking—drew from empirical observations of clerical abuses in Louis XIV's France, prompting initial bans by the Compagnie de Saint-Sacrement for its perceived attack on true devotion, yet ultimately vindicated for distinguishing genuine faith from performative deceit. ^[32] This focus on interpersonal dynamics and societal vices, echoing Aristophanes' grounded critiques, solidified high comedy's role in dissecting real-world hypocrisies via intellectual precision rather than broad farce. ^[33]

Enlightenment and Romantic Era Advancements

In the 18th century, English coffeehouses emerged as vital hubs for intellectual exchange, where patrons engaged in verbal duels and satirical discourse that elevated wit as a meritocratic counter to hereditary privilege.^[34] These venues, often dubbed "penny universities," facilitated debates on politics, literature, and society, honing the sharp, reasoned repartee characteristic of high comedy's critique of aristocratic pretensions.^[35] By 1700, over 2,000 coffeehouses dotted London alone, drawing writers and thinkers who refined satire as a tool for exposing social follies through intricate verbal logic rather than crude antics.^[36] Richard Brinsley Sheridan's The School for Scandal, premiered on May 8, 1777, at the Drury Lane Theatre, advanced this tradition by deploying elaborate plots and asides to satirize scandal-mongering among the elite.^[37] The play's central screen scene, where hidden characters overhear gossip, underscores the Enlightenment valorization of rational scrutiny over unchecked sentiment, revealing hypocrisy through exposed motives rather than physical farce.^[38] Sheridan's intricate dialogue, blending Restoration influences with neoclassical precision, targeted the emotional excesses of fashionable society, positioning wit as a corrective force aligned with reason's triumph over illusion.^[39] As Enlightenment rationalism yielded to Romantic emphases on individual psychology, Jane Austen's early 19th-century novels introduced subtler layers to high comedy, critiquing the marriage market via understated irony and character introspection. In works like Pride and Prejudice (1813), Austen dissects mercenary unions through free indirect discourse, illuminating characters' self-deceptions without overt moralizing.^[40] This shift incorporated Romantic depth—probing emotional interiors—while retaining Enlightenment irony to debunk societal vanities, as seen in Elizabeth Bennet's witty rebukes of entailment-driven proposals.^[41] Austen's method thus refined high comedy's arsenal, merging causal insight into human folly with precise, evidence-based social observation.^[42] During the Victorian era, high comedy reached a peak of formalization through the comedy of manners, adapting its witty dissection of social pretensions to the hypocrisies arising from rapid industrialization and the expansion of a bourgeois middle class that mimicked aristocratic veneers. Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest, premiered on February 14, 1895, at St. James's Theatre in London, stands as a pinnacle example, employing epigrams and paradoxes to expose the era's moral earnestness as a facade for triviality and double standards in marriage, inheritance, and propriety.^[43]^[44] Wilde's dialogue, such as Lady Bracknell's interrogation on social credentials, underscored causal links between rigid conventions and personal absurdities, privileging intellectual inversion over physical farce to critique how industrial wealth enabled superficial upward mobility without genuine refinement.^[45] In the early 20th century, this tradition refined further amid Edwardian shifts toward phonetic and linguistic realism, reflecting empirical observations of class barriers in an urbanizing society. George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion, first performed on October 16, 1913, at the Hofburg Theatre in Vienna before its London run, satirized social mobility by centering on Professor Henry Higgins's experiment in transforming Cockney flower girl Eliza Doolittle's speech to mimic upper-class accents, grounding the humor in documented phonetic principles rather than mere wordplay.^[46] Shaw's preface to the play detailed the scientific feasibility of such transformations, drawing on contemporary phonetics research to highlight how accent perpetuated class divisions, with Eliza's rebellion illustrating causal tensions between imposed identity and innate agency.^[47] This approach maintained high comedy's elitist edge, appealing to theatergoers versed in linguistic nuances, even as mass media like music halls and early cinema favored broader, less cerebral entertainments for the working classes.^[48] These refinements incorporated sharper empirical critiques of gender dynamics and imperial underpinnings, without diluting the form's intellectual demands. In Pygmalion, Eliza's post-transformation assertion of independence challenged Victorian-era gender subservience, using satire to reveal how linguistic "elevations" exposed women's economic dependencies in a post-industrial economy.^[49] Similarly, Wilde's trivialization of earnest imperial duties in character backstories subtly undermined the era's civilizing mission rhetoric, prioritizing domestic hypocrisies over colonial grandeur. Yet, amid the rise of print serials and vaudeville by 1910, which democratized humor for mass audiences, high comedy's reliance on verbal precision ensured its niche among educated elites, resisting dilution into populist spectacle.

Notable Examples Across Media

Literary Works

Voltaire's Candide, ou l'Optimisme (1759) satirizes philosophical optimism, particularly Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's doctrine that this world constitutes "the best of all possible worlds," through the protagonist's picaresque misfortunes and Pangloss's comically persistent rationalizations.^[50] The narrative employs concise, absurd twists—such as the 1755 Lisbon earthquake devastating the city while Pangloss upholds causal necessity—to generate intellectual humor by contrasting rote metaphysics with empirical devastation, demanding readers recognize the disconnect between abstract theory and observable suffering.^[50] This structure privileges causal realism, where disasters arise from tangible events like seismic forces rather than providential design, evoking laughter through the futility of unyielding optimism amid verifiable human and natural calamities.^[51] Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice (1813) deploys verbal irony and situational misunderstandings to dissect follies within England's rural gentry, as characters navigate courtship rituals that reveal pretensions and misjudgments in social hierarchy.^[52] The comedy hinges on empirical economic pressures, including primogeniture laws entailing estates to male heirs, which left daughters like the Bennets vulnerable to penury without advantageous marriages, transforming romantic pursuits into calculated transactions amid stagnant agricultural incomes averaging £2,000 annually for minor gentry holdings.^[53] Austen's portrayals draw from observed gentry finances, where female inheritance was curtailed by coverture doctrines merging a wife's assets with her husband's upon marriage, compelling pragmatic alliances over sentiment to avert destitution.^[54] This undercuts idealized romance narratives, foregrounding causal drivers like inheritance disparities—exacerbated by the Agricultural Revolution's uneven wealth distribution—that propel the plot's witty exposures of vanity and error.^[55] Miguel de Cervantes's Don Quixote (Part I, 1605; Part II, 1615) exemplifies high comedy via the knight-errant's delusional chivalric quests clashing against prosaic reality, satirizing outdated ideals through layered narrative irony that invites intellectual engagement with perception versus fact.^[56] The protagonist's misreadings of windmills as giants or inns as castles generate humor from cognitive dissonance, rooted in first-principles scrutiny of how romanticized literature distorts causal understanding of the material world, as evidenced by Sancho Panza's grounded retorts highlighting practical economics like mule maintenance costs amid futile adventures.^[56] Cervantes's technique demands readers parse the knight's self-deception against verifiable Spanish rural conditions, including post-Reconquista land enclosures that marginalized minor nobility, yielding thoughtful amusement at the perils of unmoored idealism.^[2]

Theatrical Productions

Theatrical high comedy relies on performers' mastery of timing, pauses, and intonation to heighten the impact of verbally intricate satire, distinguishing it from visual gags by demanding precise delivery that underscores social ironies.^[57]^[58] In live stage settings, this dynamic fosters an environment where audiences must actively process layered wordplay and asides, amplifying the critique of pretensions through rhythmic pacing rather than physical action.^[58] Molière's The Misanthrope, premiered on June 4, 1666, at the Théâtre du Palais-Royal in Paris, critiques the hypocrisy of French salon society through its alexandrine verse, often in rhymed couplets, and strategic asides that reveal characters' duplicitous motives amid feigned civility.^[59] The play's structure, centered in a lavish aristocratic salon, exposes the tension between sincerity and social artifice, with protagonist Alceste's rants against flattery demanding actors' exact timing to balance outrage and comic exaggeration.^[60]^[61] In the 18th century, Richard Brinsley Sheridan's The School for Scandal (first performed May 8, 1777, at Drury Lane Theatre) and The Rivals (January 17, 1775, at Covent Garden) solidified high comedy's stage legacy, satirizing gossip and romantic intrigue among the British elite with epigrams that historically drew packed houses of educated patrons.^[62]^[63] These works' verbal precision, reliant on ensemble delivery for escalating scandals, evidenced success through repeated revivals and acclaim as "laughing comedies" that rewarded intellectually engaged viewers over broad farce.^[64] Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest, debuting February 14, 1895, at St. James's Theatre in London, epitomized late Victorian high comedy with its paradox-laden dialogue skewering marriage and identity, achieving 86 performances in its initial run amid enthusiastic reception from sophisticated audiences.^[65] The play's success hinged on actors' rhythmic delivery of bons mots, such as inversions of social norms, which required precise timing to provoke laughter through recognition of absurd pretensions rather than overt slapstick.^[19] This format inherently counters passive spectatorship by necessitating vigilant attention to verbal cues, preserving high comedy's emphasis on intellectual acuity in performance.^[57]

Film and Contemporary Adaptations

Wes Anderson's The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) represents a contemporary film adaptation that preserves elements of high comedy through its deadpan dialogue, symmetrical visual style, and satirical commentary on interwar European decline and socioeconomic upheaval.^[66]^[67] Directed by Anderson and featuring Ralph Fiennes as the concierge Gustave H., the film draws on literary influences like Stefan Zweig's works to blend verbal wit with allegorical critique of fascism's rise, earning critical acclaim for its intellectual humor amid ensemble performances.^[68] Its box office success, grossing over $172 million worldwide on a $25 million budget, demonstrates viability for stylized satire without resorting to physical gags.^[66] Adaptations of Jane Austen's novels, such as Ang Lee's Sense and Sensibility (1995), often encounter dilution of original wit to enhance mass appeal, introducing visual spectacle or simplified romantic tropes that prioritize emotional accessibility over Austen's ironic social commentary on class and marriage.^[69] Critics note that Hollywood versions, including Joe Wright's Pride and Prejudice (2005), amplify dramatic tension and scenic beauty—such as lavish English countryside shots—to attract wider audiences, potentially undermining the novels' subtle verbal repartee and causal analysis of Regency-era hypocrisies.^[70] This trend reflects commercial pressures, as evidenced by the films' strong earnings (e.g., Sense and Sensibility at $94 million globally), but invites fan backlash for straying from Austen's precise, dialogue-driven satire. In web series and podcasts, outlets like The Onion have adapted print satire into video formats, such as the Onion News Network series (2011–2012), employing mock news segments with verbal absurdity to target institutional absurdities.^[71] However, these efforts achieve modest viewership compared to viral memes; The Onion's digital content, while sustaining a niche audience post-2024 ownership change by global citizens, lags behind crude, image-based humor in shareability metrics, as memes dominate social platforms due to brevity and low cognitive demand.^[72]^[73] This disparity underscores challenges in translating high comedy's causal depth to non-verbal, algorithm-driven media, where empirical engagement data favors immediacy over layered critique.^[74]

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Claims of Elitism and Inaccessibility

Critics contend that high comedy, characterized by verbal intricacy, ironic detachment, and satire targeting social mores, inherently alienates working-class audiences by demanding levels of education and cultural literacy not universally possessed. This form of humor, often exemplified in comedy of manners plays like those of Molière or Oscar Wilde, presupposes knowledge of historical contexts, literary references, and elite behaviors, which proponents of inclusivity argue excludes non-elites and reinforces hierarchical cultural norms.^[75]^[76] Such accusations frequently cite empirical disparities in participation rates, interpreting lower attendance among lower socioeconomic groups as evidence of deliberate snobbery rather than a mismatch in preferences. Studies consistently show that performing arts engagement, including comedy productions, correlates strongly with higher education levels; for example, a 2014 analysis of UK theater data identified education as the primary determinant of attendance across genres, including comedies, with less educated individuals participating at rates up to 50% lower.^[77]^[78] Left-leaning commentators in academia and media, institutions noted for systemic biases favoring egalitarian narratives, often frame these patterns as high comedy's failure to democratize access, advocating instead for dominance of broadly appealing lowbrow formats under the guise of equity.^[75]^[79] These claims portray the genre's intellectual demands as a barrier perpetuating irrelevance in mass culture, dismissing its merit-based structure as an elitist relic amid pushes for humor stripped of sophistication to ensure universal comprehension. Surveys of humor appreciation reveal class-based divergences, with working-class respondents favoring direct, affiliative styles over the subtle cues required for highbrow irony, yet critics attribute non-engagement to exclusionary design rather than innate taste variations.^[75]^[79]

Defenses Based on Intellectual Value

Proponents argue that high comedy, through its reliance on irony, satire, and verbal wit, fosters cognitive skills essential for discerning complex realities, unlike low comedy's reliance on physical farce or vulgarity, which primarily offers temporary relief without deeper analytical engagement. Empirical studies indicate that exposure to sophisticated humor enhances divergent thinking and problem-solving, as humor processing activates neural pathways associated with creativity and pattern recognition, leading to improved performance on subsequent cognitive tasks.^[80] For instance, research on satirical content shows it prompts viewers to question assumptions and evaluate arguments more rigorously, correlating with heightened critical thinking in political contexts.^[81] This causal mechanism positions high comedy as a tool for elevating public discourse, where audiences learn to unpack layered meanings, contrasting with escapism in lowbrow forms that reinforce simplistic emotional responses without challenging underlying causal structures.^[82] Critiques of elitism in high comedy overlook its inherent accessibility via widespread print publications and public performances since the early modern era, where works like those of Molière or Restoration playwrights reached diverse audiences through theaters and affordable editions, rewarding intellectual effort rather than privileging innate traits. Self-selection occurs as individuals invest time in mastering allusions and subtext, building personal competence akin to skill acquisition in any demanding pursuit, rather than excluding based on arbitrary barriers. Higher-educated groups' preference for such comedy reflects acquired cultural capital from engagement, not gatekeeping, as evidenced by patterns in comedy consumption data linking education levels to appreciation of complex narratives.^[10] This democratizes sophistication, enabling broader societal uplift through replicable practices of wit appreciation, unhindered by modern egalitarian pressures that equate accessibility with simplification. High comedy resists cultural tendencies toward homogenization that prioritize universal appeal over rigor, a dynamic observable in the post-1960s erosion of literary fiction engagement amid shifts emphasizing inclusivity over canonical depth. National Endowment for the Arts surveys document a drop in U.S. adults reading creative literature from 56.9% in 1982 to 46.7% by 2002, with further declines to under 50% in recent decades, paralleling reduced emphasis on intellectually demanding works in education and media.^[83] Comprehension efficiency in silent reading has similarly waned since baseline 1960s assessments, suggesting causal links to diluted standards that favor low-effort content, undermining truth-oriented discourse.^[84] By upholding standards of intellectual merit, high comedy counters this leveling, preserving a venue for unvarnished causal analysis in cultural expression.^[85]

Cultural and Intellectual Impact

Societal Influences

High comedy has exerted societal influence by satirizing pretensions among the elite, thereby fostering critical reflection on hypocrisies embedded in social norms and institutions. Molière's Tartuffe, premiered in 1664, targeted religious imposture, portraying the titular character's feigned piety as a means of personal gain, which prompted immediate backlash including a ban by the French Parlement on grounds of offending the church.^[86] Molière defended the work's intent as corrective, arguing that comedy's laughter exposes vices like hypocrisy more effectively than direct admonition, encouraging audiences to recognize and amend flaws in their own conduct.^[86] The play's revised version, performed successfully in 1669 under royal protection, sustained public discourse on authentic versus performative devotion, contributing to a gradual erosion of unquestioned clerical authority in French society.^[87] In the early 19th century, Jane Austen's novels dissected the Regency marriage system's prioritization of financial security over compatibility, using irony to highlight the absurdities of entailment and dowry-driven unions. Pride and Prejudice (1813) contrasts mercenary pairings, such as Charlotte Lucas's pragmatic match with Mr. Collins, against merit-based affection, implicitly critiquing how economic pressures distorted personal agency.^[88] This portrayal aligned with contemporaneous shifts toward companionate ideals, as evidenced by rising elopements and settlements emphasizing mutual consent by the 1820s, with Austen's works referenced in period conduct literature advocating rational partner selection over status alone.^[42] Her emphasis on intellectual parity in relationships challenged aristocratic pretensions without endorsing sentimental excess, promoting instead a realism that valued evidence of character over social veneer. Such critiques permeated beyond elite audiences through parodic adaptations and oral retellings, enabling cross-class dissemination of anti-pretension motifs. Restoration examples like William Congreve's The Way of the World (1700) lampooned intrigue-laden betrothals among the gentry, with plot devices of disguised identities and thwarted schemes reappearing in cheaper broadside ballads and folk theater by the mid-18th century, heightening popular wariness of upper-class affectations.^[89] This indirect propagation underscored high comedy's role in normalizing skepticism toward unearned privilege, prioritizing verifiable merit and self-awareness as antidotes to systemic posturing.

Enduring Relevance and Debates

High comedy persists in niche cultural spheres despite its marginalization in mainstream entertainment, where audience metrics favor lowbrow formats for their immediate accessibility. Data from cultural taste surveys reveal that higher-educated consumers selectively engage with sophisticated comedic forms, viewing them as markers of distinction, while lowbrow preferences prevail among broader demographics seeking uncomplicated amusement.^[90]^[91] This bifurcation underscores high comedy's empirical endurance among audiences equipped for its intellectual demands, rather than yielding to egalitarian pressures for universal palatability.^[92] Psychometric research corroborates this viability, demonstrating positive correlations between intelligence and the comprehension of nuanced humor styles integral to high comedy, such as verbal wit and irony. A 2017 study in Cognitive Processing reported that individuals scoring higher on verbal and nonverbal IQ tests exhibited stronger preferences for black humor, which shares high comedy's reliance on cognitive processing over visceral reaction.^[93] Similarly, analyses of humor production link elevated IQ to adeptness in crafting and appreciating complex jests, suggesting high comedy's role in signaling and reinforcing cognitive acuity within discerning groups.^[94]^[95] Critics dismissing such preferences as elitist overlook these measurable affinities, which empirically sustain high comedy's niche relevance against lowbrow hegemony. Prospects for high comedy's evolution intersect with AI-driven content generation, promising scalable wit but risking superficial mimicry devoid of contextual depth. Experiments with models like GPT-4 yield passable jokes, yet professional assessments highlight AI's shortfall in replicating the cultural intuition underpinning authentic high comedy.^[96]^[97] Proponents of preservation argue that high comedy counters proliferating anti-intellectualism by upholding discourse standards where precision and subversion expose fallacies, a causal mechanism evidenced by its historical calibration to elite conversational norms.^[95] Debates thus pivot on whether algorithmic outputs can preserve this function or merely commodify wit, diluting its capacity to challenge societal complacencies through genuine causal insight.^[98]

References

[1]
HIGH COMEDY definition in American English - Collins Dictionary
comedy appealing to, and reflecting the life and problems of, the upper social classes, characterized by a witty, sardonic treatment. cf. low comedy.
[2]
A Vocabulary for Comedy | Dr. Philip Irving Mitchell
High Comedy: Pure or serious comedy, as contrasted with LOW COMEDY. High ... A few of the many examples of low comedy in Shakespeare are: the porter ...Missing: theater | Show results with:theater
[3]
High Comedy Definition & Examples - Lesson - Study.com
High comedy is a sub-genre of comedy that emphasizes wordplay, wit, and social status. It frequently emphasizes intellectual viewpoints.
[4]
What is high comedy? - Novlr Glossary
High comedy is a mode of humor often employed in the works of literary greats, frequently used to poke fun at the aristocracy's follies.Missing: theater | Show results with:theater
[5]
High and Low Comedy: Definition & Meaning - Literature Analysis
High Comedy is an intellectual comedy work filled up with a sophisticated wit, witty dialogue, satire, biting humor, or criticism of life.
[6]
(PDF) J. Milner Davis. “High Comedy”. In Encyclopedia of Humor ...
Nov 12, 2016 · An account of the genre of high comedy, its history and characteristics and its relation to the field of humour studies.
[7]
Learn the Differences Between Irony, Sarcasm, Satire, and Paradox
Feb 20, 2025 · The English language can be tricky and misunderstood. This is perhaps nowhere more true than with the rhetorical devices irony, sarcasm, satire, and paradox.
[8]
https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004400061/BP000005.xml
[9]
[PDF] Noel Coward's contribution to the comedy of manners. - ThinkIR
It was the fashion of the day to speak wlttily and to use epi- grams. The dramatists, no doubt, were able to present more gllttering epigrams and repartee than ...
[10]
[PDF] Comedy taste: Highbrow/lowbrow comedy and cultural capital
May 1, 2010 · Because of their lack of (high) cultural knowledge, they evaluate the highbrow comedy in a more superficial way. This confirms Kuipers ...
[11]
The Dual-Path Model of Incongruity Resolution and Absurd Verbal ...
It is well accepted that the humor comprehension process involves incongruity detection and resolution, which then induces a feeling of amusement.
[12]
Neural substrates of incongruity-resolution and nonsense humor
The present paper analyzes the neural correlates of processing and appreciating incongruity-resolution and nonsense cartoons.Missing: intellectual | Show results with:intellectual
[13]
https://practicalneurology.com/columns/practice-management/expert-opinion-in-search-of-the-cerebral-funny-bone-brain-deficits-and-their-neuropsychological-correlates-with-humor/30869
[14]
Humor Appreciation Involves Parametric and Synchronized Activity ...
Oct 18, 2016 · The present study has several important implications for understanding neural correlates of humor processing. First, both experiment 1 and ...Missing: intellectual | Show results with:intellectual
[15]
Encyclopedia of Humor Studies
Often called low comedy because of its preoccupation with bodily functions and desires, such physical comedy always requires considerable skill and warrants ...
[16]
The Fundamentals of Physical Humor | Psychology Today
Jul 14, 2021 · Physical humor is universal, linked to bodily needs, and uses physical limitations as a source of amusement, referencing corporal concerns.Missing: functions | Show results with:functions
[17]
What is the difference between high and low comedy? - eNotes.com
Sep 5, 2011 · What is the difference between high and low comedy? Quick answer: High comedy involves sophisticated humor that appeals to intellectual ...Missing: theory | Show results with:theory
[18]
The Universality of Physical Humor | Psychology Today
May 16, 2022 · Physical humor highlights vulnerabilities like body size, strength, coordination, health, and traits affecting survival and reproduction, such ...
[19]
The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) by Oscar Wilde
The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) by Oscar Wilde is a popular play that is still widely performed in English-language theatres and also in many other ...Missing: repeat | Show results with:repeat
[20]
The Demise of Physical Comedy | The New Yorker
Jun 28, 2013 · A new Harold Lloyd is unthinkable because physical comedy depends on the proximity and possibility of death, which no longer seems acceptable to viewers.
[21]
Comedy in A Midsummer Night's Dream | Types & Examples - Lesson
Comedy in Shakespeare's plays can be broadly divided into high comedy and low comedy. High comedy requires wit and includes Shakespearean comedy, or pun ...
[22]
[PDF] A Critical Deconstruction of Humor in William Shakespeare's A ...
But comedy that is rich with blended high and low language is more than lawless chaos. Aboulafia claims that,. […] When one regularly inhabits different ...<|separator|>
[23]
Why Monty Python Was Funny: Analysis and Writing Lessons for ...
Mar 10, 2025 · Monty Python's revolutionary approach to comedy demonstrates that humor can be simultaneously intellectual and silly, structured and anarchic, accessible and ...
[24]
Why Monty Python Made me go to College, or Why the Humanities ...
This paper explores the transformative role of Monty Python's humor in fostering an appreciation for higher education and the humanities.
[25]
Monty Python Analysis | My Mediafactory Blog
Aug 27, 2023 · It's known for its absurd and surreal humour. Here are some factors that contributed to its unique performance and impact. Visual Comedy is a ...Missing: blending cerebral physical<|separator|>
[26]
Comparison Of High Comedy And High Satire | ipl.org
Comedy has many subcategories, such as high, low, and satire. Low comedy takes minimal complex thinking to understand and is straightforward. Quick ...Missing: blending | Show results with:blending
[27]
(DOC) COMEDY & SATIRE: THE DIFFERENCE - Academia.edu
It is often broken down into “high” and “low” designations based on the sophistication of the humour. Satire is usually considered a form of high comedy.
[28]
Aristophanes' Knights and Fifth-Century Political Rhetoric
The focus of my interest is Aristophanes' Knights (produced in 424 BCE) and the satire of Athenian domestic and imperialist policy. In this comedy, Aristophanes ...Missing: 5th allegory wit
[29]
(PDF) Old Comedy, Public Intellectuals and the Origins of Dissent ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Indeed, Old Comedy was the first great example of mass communication in which political satire was used to dissent and protest against political ...Missing: 5th BCE allegory verbal wit
[30]
Aristophanes | Research Starters - EBSCO
His works are characterized by their sharp political satire, often targeting prominent figures and societal issues of his time, including war and changing ...Early Life · Life's Work · SignificanceMissing: allegory verbal
[31]
Hypocrisy and Its Manifestation in Moliere's Tartuffe - StudyCorgi
Jul 24, 2022 · In the comedy, Moliere showed the most common type of hypocrisy of the 17th century: the religious one. He created the play based on the ...
[32]
Molière Writes Tartuffe | Research Starters - EBSCO
The genius of Molière was in his exposing social hypocrisy and folly through satire. The art of comedy enhances some imperfections and weaknesses. By ...Missing: exposure dialogue high
[33]
4.3 Molière and the evolution of French comedy - Fiveable
His plays satirized human folly and societal flaws, using stock characters and clever wordplay to expose hypocrisy and challenge norms. Molière's impact on ...<|separator|>
[34]
https://www.publicdomainreview.org/essay/the-lost-world-of-the-london-coffeehouse/
[35]
How coffee forever changed Britain - BBC
Nov 19, 2020 · Coffeehouses helped spread modern democracy, spur the Enlightenment and birth periodical literature. So why did King Charles II's cronies ...
[36]
Coffee House Culture in 18th Century England - Sylvia Prince
Jul 21, 2021 · Politics and trade dominated coffee house news. But patrons also wanted gossip, satire, and moralizing tales. Many coffee houses offered ...Coffee As Medicine · Coffee Houses As Meeting... · Print Culture And The Coffee...
[37]
The School for Scandal | Royal Shakespeare Company
Tinuke Craig's hot pink production of Richard Brinsley Sheridan's 1777 The School For Scandal ... 'Satirical stand-off still strikes a chord'. Telegraph.. 'A ...
[38]
https://www.brewminate.com/sentiment-and-sensibility-sheridan-and-the-school-for-scandal/
[39]
Sheridan's The School for Scandal: Sentiment, Scandal, and Charity
... satirical purpose of the comedy itself. In its satire, realism, and employment of "humours" (Harmon & Holman). The sentimental comedy: "Just as the comedy of ...
[40]
Analysis of Jane Austen's Novels - Literary Theory and Criticism
Mar 31, 2019 · The six novels that constitute the Austen canon did not evolve in a straightforward way. Austen was, memoirs relate, as mistrustful of her ...
[41]
Why Jane Austen's Stories Still Matter - Pamela Aidan
Jul 24, 2024 · She exposes the absurdities of the marriage market and the precarious position of women who must navigate it. These themes, though specific ...
[42]
[PDF] How Jane Austen Uses Marriage to Get What She Wants
In my thesis, I use Sense and Sensibility, Pride and. Prejudice, and Emma to discuss how Austen uses the marriage plot in the con- text of the 18th century.Missing: subtle psychological insights
[43]
Hypocrisy, Folly, and Victorian Morality Theme Analysis - LitCharts
A witty wordsmith, Wilde exposes the hypocrisy of the Victorians' strict social mores through puns, paradoxes, epigrams, and inversions.
[44]
The Importance of Being Earnest: Oscar Wilde and ... - SparkNotes
The Importance of Being Earnest was an early experiment in Victorian melodrama. Part satire, part comedy of manners, and part intellectual farce.
[45]
https://www.online-literature.com/wilde/being_earnest/
[46]
Pygmalion: Study Guide - SparkNotes
George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion, first premiered in 1913, is a satirical play that investigates issues of class, identity, and social mobility.Missing: transformation realism
[47]
Pygmalion: Summary, Characters, Themes and More
Sep 28, 2024 · Satire. Satire is a powerful tool in Shaw's Pygmalion, used to critique the rigid class structures and superficial social values of Edwardian ...
[48]
How is satire used in 'Pygmalion' by George Bernard Shaw? - Quora
May 22, 2016 · George Bernard Shaw utilizes satire in the play “Pygmalion” in order to ridicule the rigidity and hierarchy of British society.
[49]
The Transformation of Identity in George Bernard Shaw's "Pygmalion"
Oct 22, 2024 · "Pygmalion" is not just a satire of social pretensions, but a profound commentary on the resilience and dignity of the human spirit. Did you ...Missing: realism | Show results with:realism
[50]
Satire and Irony - CliffsNotes
In Candide, Voltaire no doubt enjoyed himself parodying the genre: his hero traveled far and wide; Pangloss was hanged but survived; Cunégonde was reported to ...
[51]
A candid view of Candide | Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaire
Jul 1, 2011 · Julian Barnes pays tribute to Voltaire's Candide, a satire that remains as fresh and pertinent today as when it was written in the 18th century.
[52]
Small Worlds: The Comedy of Manners (Chapter 7)
Austen's Pride and Prejudice (1813) exemplifies how the novelistic comedy of manners both continues and transforms older modes of narrative satire. Austen's ...
[53]
The Economics of Jane Austen's World » JASNA
The Austens fell into a group Edward Copeland describes as the “pseudo-gentry”: socially holding kinship to the landed gentry while dependent on earned income ...Missing: realism | Show results with:realism
[54]
Money and Morality in Pride and Prejudice – Serena E. Suson
As Austen chronicles the changing face of the gentry, she outlines the lifestyle that imposes itself on both commercial and landed fortune.
[55]
[PDF] Social class and wealth in Jane Austen's “Pride and Prejudice”
The novel is set in early 19th century. England, a time when class distinctions were rigid and marriage was primarily an economic transaction. The Bennet family ...
[56]
8 Examples Of Lowbrow Humor In Highbrow Literature - HuffPost
Aug 13, 2014 · 8 Examples Of Lowbrow Humor In Highbrow Literature · 1. Don Quixote by Miguel de · 2. The Corrections by Jonathan · 3. Moby-Dick by Herman · 4.
[57]
What Is Comedic Timing? How to Tell Jokes With Ease - Backstage
Jun 21, 2022 · Comedic timing uses pauses, cadence, delivery, and pacing to land a joke, affecting how a joke lands with an audience.
[58]
Guide to Comedic Timing: 3 Tips for Improving Comic Timing - 2025
Jun 7, 2021 · Comedic timing is the pacing of a joke's delivery, using pacing and rhythm to heighten the comedic effect, including how quickly you speak and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[59]
The Misanthrope | New University | UC Irvine
Nov 1, 2011 · Molière wrote “The Misanthrope” in 1666 as a comedy of manners in verse form. Throughout this work, he rails against the hypocrisy and ...
[60]
The Misanthrope: Analysis of Setting | Research Starters - EBSCO
The Misanthrope is a comedic play by Molière that explores themes of social hypocrisy, love, and moral integrity, set primarily in the lavish salon of the ...
[61]
[PDF] MOLIÈRE'S THE MISANTHROPE: MASKING THE TRUTH
May 6, 2004 · In the opening scene, Moliére promptly criticizes the pervasive social hypocrisy through a heated ethical discourse between two of his main ...
[62]
Analysis of Richard Brinsley Sheridan's Plays
May 20, 2019 · Of Sheridan's plays, The School for Scandal, a comedy of manners, is universally acclaimed as his masterpiece. Also applauded are The Rivals, ...
[63]
Sheridan's THE SCHOOL FOR SCANDAL - Red Bull Theater
The Critic; or, A Tragedy Rehearsed, a behind-the-scenes satire (ancestor to Noises Off!) on authorship, criticism, and potboiler historical spectacle, and the ...
[64]
The Rivals Study Guide | Literature Guide - LitCharts
Sheridan's comedies were also considered to be “laughing comedies,” as separated from the crying comedies which were extremely moralistic and known to provoke ...
[65]
Oscar Wilde and the comedy of manners | History of Theatre II Class ...
Oscar Wilde revolutionized the comedy of manners in late 19th-century theater. His witty plays like "The Importance of Being Earnest" skewered Victorian ...
[66]
The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) - IMDb
Rating 8.1/10 (945,033) The Grand Budapest Hotel: Directed by Wes Anderson. With Ralph Fiennes, F. Murray Abraham, Mathieu Amalric, Adrien Brody. A writer encounters the owner of ...Full cast & crew · The Grand Budapest Hotel · Parents guide · TriviaMissing: satire | Show results with:satire
[67]
The Grand Budapest Hotel Review: A Wes Anderson Action-Comedy
Rating 4.5 · Review by Eric KohnFeb 6, 2014 · A comedic allegory for wartime relationships, “The Grand Budapest Hotel” explores the tragedies of socioeconomic collapse in the wake of ...
[68]
The Grand Budapest Hotel at 10: Wes Anderson's Worldbuilding
Mar 28, 2024 · The action of The Grand Budapest Hotel takes place in 1932, in the midst of a burgeoning fascist occupation analogous to the beginning of World ...<|separator|>
[69]
[PDF] Jane Austen: A Study of Film Adaptations - Digital Commons @ USF
Apr 1, 2011 · Two modern adaptations of Austen's novels are 1995's Clueless and 2001's Bridget Jones's Diary. I will compare and contrast the novels with the ...
[70]
How to adapt Jane Austen – and why it's so hard to get right | CNN
Aug 7, 2022 · Make a so-so adaptation and you risk the wrath of Austen's legions of readers: Take “Persuasion,” which caused a massive stink before it was ...
[71]
The Onion - YouTube
The Onion News Network has returned. 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, from now until the end. Not watching is an act of defiance.
[72]
Are the news media in their Onion era? - Reason Magazine
May 18, 2025 · The Onion today appears to be thriving: After being sold for parts and shuffled between private equity balance sheets, it was purchased in April 2024 by fans.
[73]
The Onion: Home
The Onion brings you all of the latest news, stories, photos, videos and more from America's finest news source.Newsletters Welcome Back · Donald Trump · Latest - The Onion · The Onion Store
[74]
'Funny Because It's True' tells the history of satirical paper 'The Onion'
Mar 23, 2025 · NPR's Scott Detrow speaks with Christine Wenc, author of the new book Funny Because It's True: How the Onion Created Modern News Satire.Missing: viral success memes<|control11|><|separator|>
[75]
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781501510441-006/html
[76]
Oscar Wilde's Problem Play: A Woman of No Importance - jstor
The minor characters create high comedy with their amusing opening dialogue ... His words are full of elitism and disrespect for her. You were the ...<|separator|>
[77]
https://culturecase.org/research/2014/03/education-levels-determine-theatre-attendance/
[78]
Who engages in the arts in the United States? A comparison of ... - NIH
Jul 8, 2021 · Socioeconomic factors showed mixed associations with the different types of arts engagement. Higher levels of education and parental education ...
[79]
Working class prefers comedy and the intellectual class goes for ...
Aug 24, 2012 · According to its results, the so-called "intellectual class" prefers dramas, the "working class" opts for comedies and the wealthier are ...
[80]
Humor experience facilitates ongoing cognitive tasks: Evidence from ...
Jan 27, 2023 · Previous research has shown that the positive emotion associated with humor can lead to cognitive benefits, especially in creativity and memory.Introduction · Results · Discussion
[81]
Stand-up Political Comedy, Public Engagement, Critical Thinking ...
Jun 11, 2024 · This study hypothesised that (a) exposure to online comedy about political issues promotes public engagement, critical thinking, and opinion sharing.Literature · Method · Implications
[82]
What Comedy Can Teach Us About Critical Thinking - The Science PT
Dec 7, 2014 · Finding humor is critical thinking. Comics explore alternative interpretations, like critical thinkers who seek hidden truths, not just obvious ...
[83]
Twilight of the Books | The New Yorker
Dec 17, 2007 · The results, first reported by the N.E.A. in 2004, are dispiriting. In 1982, 56.9 per cent of Americans had read a work of creative literature ...
[84]
The Decline of Comprehension‐Based Silent Reading Efficiency in ...
Mar 7, 2016 · In the 1960 study, approximately 12,000 students from first grade through college were assessed on silent reading rate and comprehension. In ...
[85]
Americans Reading Fewer Books Than in Past - Gallup News
Jan 10, 2022 · Americans say they read an average of 12.6 books during the past year, a smaller number than Gallup has measured in any prior survey dating back to 1990.
[86]
Moliere's Defense of Comedy and Its Moral Purpose
Molière defends comedy as a tool for correcting vices, using laughter to expose hypocrisy and encourage moral reflection in his audience.Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
[87]
Social and Political Issues in Moliere's “Tartuffe” and Voltaire's ...
Dec 26, 2023 · In social circles, Moliere's Tartuffe gives more attention to the religious and the hypocrisy issues pertinent in the society. The author uses ...
[88]
[PDF] A Love That Lasts: Jane Austen's Argument for a Marriage Based on ...
In her novel. Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen expresses her idea that marriage should not be based on the pressures of society but rather on sincere love and ...
[89]
[PDF] The Marriage Perspectives in "Pride and Prejudice" and Their ...
Apr 12, 2024 · Jane Austen not only criticizes marriages based on wealth and social status but also emphasizes the importance of mutual understanding, empathy, ...
[90]
[PDF] Comedy and distinction: the cultural currency of a 'good' sense of ...
... Superiority Theory, Incongruity Theory, and. Relief Theory. Superiority Theory suggests humour is a result of what Thomas Hobbes calls “a sudden glory” (1991 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[91]
[PDF] Television and taste hierarchy: The case of Dutch television comedy
But the strongest indication here is the asymmetry: higher educated people disapprove of lowbrow comedy, while lower educated people don't even know highbrow ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
[92]
Comedy Taste: Highbrow/Lowbrow Comedy and Cultural Capital
Findings indicate that lower-educated individuals tend to prefer lowbrow comedy for its simplicity and familiarity, while higher-educated audiences enjoy more ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
[93]
Cognitive and emotional demands of black humour processing - NIH
Jan 18, 2017 · Black humour preference and comprehension are positively associated with higher verbal and nonverbal intelligence as well as higher levels of education.
[94]
Dynamic impact of intelligence on verbal-humor processing
Intelligence (measured by IQ) varies across individuals. An individual's IQ has been evidenced to be positively associated with verbal-humor production.
[95]
Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is ...
A good sense of humor is sexually attractive, perhaps because it reveals intelligence, creativity, and other 'good genes' or 'good parent' traits.
[96]
An AI walks into a bar... Can artificial intelligence be genuinely funny?
Jul 29, 2024 · We asked a professional comedian to deliver some jokes written by artificial intelligence on stage. What happened reveals a lot about just ...
[97]
AI meets comedy: Viewers' reactions to GPT-4 generated humor ...
This study explores the viewer experience of GPT-4-generated humor translations compared to human translations for dubbing purposes.
[98]
https://zmescience.com/future/ai-is-now-funny-enough-to-make-you-laugh-but-can-it-ever-be-truly-humorous/