Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Highness

Highness is a formal title denoting high rank within or hierarchies, typically prefixed as "His Highness," "Her Highness," or "" when addressing princes, princesses, and certain other non-sovereign members of royal families. The term derives from the English word signifying loftiness or elevated status, reflecting the bearer's superior social and political position. In European traditions, Highness distinguishes individuals below the sovereign level—addressed as —from lower titled with or , establishing a clear for and precedence in courtly and diplomatic interactions. Often qualified as "" for close relatives of monarchs, such as heirs apparent or spouses, the style underscores hereditary privilege without implying supreme authority. Its usage persists in modern constitutional monarchies, including the , where it governs official communications and ceremonial etiquette. Historically, the title evolved from medieval address forms emphasizing feudal elevation, adapting over centuries to codify monarchical lineages amid shifting dynastic alliances.

Definition and Etymology

Core Meaning and Protocol

Highness denotes an style of address for individuals of elevated or rank who lack authority, such as princes, dukes, or electors subordinate to a or . This contrasts with , which from the onward exclusively signified ruling kings, emperors, or their consorts, reserving the higher form for those exercising supreme dominion while positioning Highness holders as hierarchically inferior yet distinguished from lesser titles like . Standard protocols mandate "" for direct spoken address to such figures, transitioning to informal equivalents like "" or "Ma'am" in sustained conversation after initial formality, accompanied by bows or curtsies in settings to affirm precedence. In third-person references or written , "His Highness" or "Her Highness" precedes the name, often with qualifiers such as "" for close royal kin or "" for certain princely houses; envelopes typically read "His Highness [Name], of [Domain]" to uphold without implying . The style's function in denoting non-sovereign precedence is empirically rooted in European charters and diplomatic agreements, including the 1375 grant of Durchlaucht () by Emperor Charles IV to electors, and 17th-century precedents like Gaston d'Orléans's 1631 adoption of or the 1633 accord elevating the Duke of Savoy's style, which codified its use to signal authority below imperial or royal without encroaching on ruling prerogatives.

Linguistic and Historical Roots

The term "highness" derives from hēahnes (also spelled heahnes or heanes), an abstract noun formed by combining hēah ("high," denoting physical or metaphorical elevation) with the suffix -nes (indicating quality or state), thus signifying height, loftiness, or . This Germanic formation traces to Proto-Indo-European roots such as *h₂el- or al-, connoting grown tallness or upward prominence, as seen in Latin altus ("high") and its derivative altitudo ("height" or "depth," implying superiority in stature or status). In pre-Conquest , hēahnes extended beyond literal altitude to abstract notions of excellence or high position, reflecting early societal valuations of hierarchical distinction rooted in physical and symbolic dominance. Post-Norman Conquest influences from hauteur or related forms like hault ("high," from Latin altus) integrated into , adapting the term to denote social and elevation in feudal contexts. By the late 14th century, "" emerged as a formal address for and , predating compounds like "" and appearing in charters and diplomatic records to affirm superior . Earlier Latin precedents in Carolingian royal charters (circa 8th–10th centuries) invoked monarchical "highness" (celsitudo or equivalents) to portray rulers as elevated by divine ordinance, thereby justifying feudal obligations where to elevated lords maintained order through reciprocal protection and stability. Such titles embodied causal in medieval : implied and jurisdictional precedence, as superiors' oversight ensured subordinate , a echoed in 11th-century Anglo-Norman charters granting lands under phrases denoting "high" lords, of later absolutist divine right doctrines. This linguistic underscored hierarchies not as arbitrary but as structurally necessary for societal cohesion, with "highness" serving as both descriptor and enforcer of ranked interdependence.

Historical Origins

Medieval and Feudal Foundations

In the Carolingian period (8th-10th centuries), royal diplomas and charters began employing Latin terms such as celsitudo (highness) to evoke the elevated, quasi-divine status of monarchs, distinguishing their authority from lesser lords amid the empire's fragmentation into sub-kingdoms. This underscored causal mechanisms of feudal , where explicit assertions of "highness" reinforced vassalage oaths and land grants, stabilizing alliances against centrifugal forces like local revolts. Primary evidence from charters of and reveals "highness" not as a fixed but as a descriptor of monarchical preeminence, used to legitimize immunities and judicial rights over fragmented polities. By the 11th-12th centuries in the and Anglo-Norman realms, "highness" extended to denote princes and ducal heirs, marking their precedence below kings yet above counts in feudal hierarchies. Chronicler (c. 1075-1142), drawing from Norman eyewitness accounts, records supplications addressing Duke William (later Conqueror) as "your highness" in diplomatic exchanges, illustrating its role in codifying respect during inheritance negotiations and averting succession violence. Similarly, in HRE documents, electoral princes received styles implying "highness" to affirm within imperial vassalage, as fragmented territories demanded clear titular distinctions to enforce tribute and without escalating to outright independence wars. This titular evolution causally mitigated disputes by embedding hierarchy in written protocols; for instance, Vitalis notes "highness" invocations in pleas to King Henry I, where formalized address bridged noble grievances and royal arbitration, preserving feudal cohesion amid dynastic claims like those post-1066 Conquest. Empirical patterns from over 200 surviving Carolingian-era charters show "highness" motifs correlating with periods of reform (e.g., 814-843 aftermath), where titles preempted partition-induced chaos by prioritizing imperial over local prestige. Such usage laid groundwork for "Highness" as a vassalage marker, prioritizing empirical precedence over egalitarian pretensions in polities reliant on personal oaths rather than centralized .

Renaissance Standardization

During the , European courts transitioned from inconsistent feudal address to structured protocols, with "Highness" increasingly reserved for non-reigning members of royal houses and elevated princes to denote their elevated yet subordinate status. In the Habsburg realms, this shift accelerated in the late amid dynastic expansions, where the title distinguished archducal lines from lesser , fostering clearer hierarchies in multinational . By the early , French ordinances under monarchs like Francis I began codifying "Altesse" for princes of the blood, limiting its use to prevent dilution among aspirant nobles. This standardization peaked in the 17th century with absolutist reforms; Louis XIV's 1666–1674 verification of noble titles rigorously enforced "Highness" for legitimate non-sovereign royals, aligning court etiquette with centralized authority and excluding pretenders. The 1648 Peace of Westphalia further entrenched the title in the Holy Roman Empire, applying "Electoral Highness" to prince-electors to affirm their de facto sovereignty and autonomy from imperial overreach, thereby clarifying diplomatic precedence amid post-war fragmentation. Such codification promoted diplomatic precision, reducing ambiguities in treaties and alliances that had plagued medieval negotiations. However, Enlightenment critics like condemned these hierarchies in his 1755 Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, arguing that titles like "Highness" institutionalized artificial distinctions of rank, exacerbating moral and social disparities beyond natural differences. Empirically, absolutist systems incorporating such formalized correlated with enhanced monarchical longevity; data on 961 European rulers from 1000–1800 show primogeniture-based absolutisms experienced fewer depositions (average 0.12 per reign versus 0.28 in elective systems), attributing to reduced disputes.

European Usage

Continental Monarchies

In the courts of continental European monarchies, the style of "Highness" (or equivalents such as French Altesse, German Durchlaucht, and Spanish Alteza) denoted intermediate ranks within multi-layered nobilities, often distinguishing princes of the blood or territorial rulers from those entitled to "Majesty" or "Royal Highness." In France under the Bourbon dynasty, direct sons of the king, including the Dauphin, bore the style of Royal Highness (Altesse Royale) as Fils de France, while collateral princes of the blood—such as those of the houses of Condé, Conti, or Orléans beyond the immediate siblings—were typically addressed as plain Highness (Altesse), reflecting a hierarchy that prioritized proximity to the throne but allowed for negotiated elevations among extended kin. This usage persisted into the 18th century, with figures like Philippe II, Duke of Orléans, initially holding Highness before ascending to regency and Royal Highness status. In the fragmented principalities of the , particularly German states, Durchlaucht—rendering ""—was reserved for electors (Kurfürsten) and princes (Fürsten) exercising , underscoring territorial sovereignty over dynastic purity alone. Electors of (Wittelsbach), , and the employed this style from their elevations as electors in the early onward, with the extending to mediatized houses post-1806 that retained sovereign-like privileges despite Napoleonic reorganizations. Unlike stricter bloodline delineations elsewhere, grants of Durchlaucht frequently hinged on imperial diets or diplomatic accords, as seen in the consistent application to ruling houses irrespective of marital alliances outside circles. Spanish usage post-Bourbon accession in 1700 aligned infantes (royal siblings and descendants) with Alteza Real (Royal Highness), but the broader nobility—including grandees and viceregal appointees—occasionally invoked plain Alteza for princely distinctions tied to Habsburg legacies or governorships. This fluid continental framework contrasted with more rigid conventions by emphasizing political and territorial leverage; elevations to Highness often resulted from grants or electoral roles, enabling non-royal dynasties to claim with blood relatives of monarchs through land and precedence rather than unadulterated .

British and Scandinavian Traditions

In the British monarchy, the style "Highness" was applied to princes who were grandchildren or more remote descendants of the sovereign in the male line, distinguishing them from the "Royal Highness" reserved for children of the monarch since the Restoration period. During the reign of George I (1714–1727), royal grandchildren were designated princes but styled simply "Highness," reflecting a hierarchical restraint in titular usage that contrasted with more expansive continental practices. This evolved under George II, who in 1737 extended "Royal Highness" to grandchildren, a practice formalized by Letters Patent in 1864 for all sons' children of the sovereign. Prior to the 1917 Letters Patent issued by George V, which limited "Royal Highness" to the sovereign's children, their sons' children, and the eldest son of the Prince of Wales' eldest son, certain non-immediate princes—such as the children of Prince Henry of Battenberg in 1886—retained "Highness" until specific parliamentary or royal grants elevated them. Hanoverian influences further illustrated this measured approach, as post-1837 separation from the British crown, princes of the continued to bear British-derived titles like "Prince of and " often with "," but cadet branches occasionally aligned with "" for lesser proximity to the . This titular conservatism, embedded in Britain's constitutional framework following the , prioritized parliamentary oversight in royal grants over absolutist inflation, fostering stability in Protestant successions amid European upheavals. In Scandinavian monarchies, "Highness" similarly denoted princes outside the immediate dynastic core, with employing it for non-heir apparent descendants until 19th-century elevations aligned closer lines with "." Danish princes historically alternated between "His Highness" for extended family and "" for sovereign's children and heirs, as seen in dynastic adjustments emphasizing succession clarity over prolific titular expansion. Sweden's , established in 1818, promptly adopted "" for princes like Oscar I (created Duke of Södermanland with that style), integrating French marshal Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte's lineage into a restrained tradition post-Napoleonic realignments. These traditions underscored a causal link between titular restraint and monarchical endurance: by limiting "Highness" to verifiable hereditary proximity and subjecting grants to parliamentary or constitutional vetting, and courts avoided the perceived excesses of absolutist , contributing to unbroken Protestant lines that weathered 19th-century revolutions elsewhere.

Eastern European Variants

In the , grand dukes of the Romanov dynasty—comprising the sons and male-line grandsons of reigning emperors—were entitled to the style of "," a designation superior to "" to reflect the empire's autocratic preeminence. This protocol, embedded in court etiquette from the early , emphasized dynastic continuity amid vast territorial expansions incorporating , , and Asian populations. The title's application solidified under successive Romanovs, with grand dukes serving as military and administrative figures whose styling reinforced imperial unity; for instance, Peter III held the grand ducal rank prior to his 1762 accession, illustrating its role in designations. In the -Lithuanian Commonwealth's , native nobility eschewed stratified titles like "Highness," instead employing equivalents such as "Wasza Miłość" (Your Grace) for magnates, underpinned by the szlachta's legal equality and lack of feudal hierarchies. However, select families received foreign conferrals of "Highness," as in Austrian grants to princes in the , adapting to diplomatic norms post-partitions. Amid overlordship in principalities, rulers of and —styled domnitori or hospodars—were diplomatically addressed as "Highness" to navigate protocols while asserting , a practice persisting into independent states like , where Prince Carol received "" in 1878 upon unification. Similarly, in post-1878 Bulgaria, Prince and successor Ferdinand I initially bore "His Highness" as kniaz, elevating to "" only upon kingship in 1908, mirroring adaptations in . The 1815 indirectly shaped these variants by reorganizing Eastern territories, including under Russian , where tsarist "" protocols extended to local elites, fostering administrative consistency across multi-ethnic domains without regard to confessional or linguistic divides.

Compound and Modified Styles

Royal and Imperial Extensions

The style of (HRH) serves as a compound elevation of the base "Highness," reserved for members of royal houses in direct proximity to the reigning sovereign, such as children, siblings, or certain grandchildren, thereby signifying dynastic closeness without conferring sovereign status or regality. This distinction underscores a of tied to bloodline rather than territorial rule, originating in British usage where it was first applied to James, , in 1680, and later extended systematically to the sovereign's immediate kin under , whose sons received formal peerages and the style upon majority or creation as dukes. The term's adoption reflected empirical hierarchies in court etiquette, prioritizing sovereign adjacency over mere nobility. In , "" proliferated through dynastic intermarriages and alliances, adapting to local monarchies while maintaining its core linkage to ; for instance, Prussian courts incorporated it following post-Napoleonic concordats that aligned Hohenzollern protocol with precedents amid shared Protestant networks. Imperial variants emerged prominently in the Habsburg domains after II's proclamation of the on August 11, 1804, prompting archdukes to adopt "" (HI&RH) to encapsulate the dual imperial dignity of alongside crowns of and , a compound affirming composite without elevating below the emperor's . Nineteenth-century diplomatic manuals codified these extensions' precedence, positioning and immediately below —reserved for reigning emperors and kings—but above or the accorded to non-royal grand dukes and princes, ensuring ceremonial order reflected causal dynastic authority rather than egalitarian pretense. This ranking, evident in treatises, facilitated interstate relations by standardizing in treaties and audiences, with empirical violations rare due to the styles' role in averting precedence disputes among allied courts.

Serene and Illustrious Forms

, rendered in German as Durchlaucht, was formally accorded to princely houses (Fürstenhäuser) within the established in 1815, particularly those mediatized during the Napoleonic rearrangements of 1802–1814, signifying their elevated yet non-sovereign standing as former territorial rulers now subsumed under larger states. This predicate preserved the internal autonomy and matrimonial equality with reigning dynasties for these families, as confirmed by the Confederation's constitution, which upheld pre-mediatization privileges without restoring sovereignty. The title distinguished mediatized princes from lower , emphasizing continuity of prestige amid the of over 300 entities by 1806. Illustrious Highness, corresponding to Erlaucht in usage, was a subordinate variant extended to mediatized comital families by decision of the federal Diet on February 13, 1829, acknowledging their prior status as immediate (Reichsgrafen) of the while barring sovereign attributes. In rarer Italian contexts, equivalents like Altezza Illustrissima appeared for certain princely linked to houses such as in the , denoting illustrious descent without full princely , though documentation remains sparse beyond genealogical records. occasionally employed analogous forms for elevated non-royal branches, but these lacked the systematic post-Napoleonic codification seen in Germanic traditions. These forms facilitated continuity by enabling equal marriages with —mediatized princes intermarrying with grand ducal lines, for instance—without imposing significant fiscal demands on successor states, as privileges were largely rather than extractive. Critics in 20th-century contexts, such as post-1918 , dismissed them as anachronistic relics exacerbating class divisions, yet empirical records indicate no measurable economic burden, with titles persisting privately amid abolished public entitlements. This reclassification balanced historical legitimacy against modern centralization, prioritizing causal preservation of elite networks over egalitarian erasure.

Grand Ducal and Princely Distinctions

The title of "Highness" applied to grand dukes signified their sovereignty over extensive territories ranking below kingdoms but above duchies, with the style justified by the territorial elevation rather than mere dynastic lineage. The inaugural grant occurred on August 27, 1569, when elevated from Duke of to Grand Duke of via , entitling him and his successors to "His Highness the Grand Duke." This Tuscan precedent established "Highness" as standard for grand ducal rulers, emphasizing control over a unified principality encompassing and surrounding domains, distinct from lesser ducal titles. Successors, such as Cosimo III (r. 1670–1723), continued this usage, reinforcing the territorial basis amid Habsburg influence in . In Luxembourg, the grand ducal style initially aligned with "Highness" upon the territory's designation as a grand duchy at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, granted to William I of the Netherlands as compensation for Nassau losses, though it quickly incorporated "Royal Highness" due to the monarch's concurrent kingship. This evolution highlighted a hybrid territorial-dynastic justification, as the grand duchy maintained distinct sovereignty under the House of Nassau-Weilburg, separate from Dutch royal protocols. Non-reigning grand ducal family members retained "Grand Ducal Highness" for descendants, preserving the style's linkage to the realm's elevated status without ascending to full royal precedence. Princely distinctions employed "Highness," often modified as "Serene Highness" for sovereign rulers of principalities, underscoring territorial independence akin to grand duchies but on a smaller scale. In , the Grimaldi dynasty has persistently used "His " for reigning princes since formal recognition, as with Albert II (r. 2005–present), denoting the principality's compact Mediterranean domain without royal elevation. Similarly, Liechtenstein's princes adopted "" following the 1719 imperial elevation by , which consolidated and Schellenberg into an immediate imperial under Prince Anton Florian, prioritizing territorial immediacy over feudal vassalage. These forms contrasted dynastic princes, who used plain "Highness" without sovereign territorial claims, and were protocolically distinguished by salutes—typically 19 guns for "Highness" holders versus 21 for "," reflecting hierarchical precedence in courts.

Non-European and Islamic Applications

Ottoman and Middle Eastern Dynasties

In the , the Turkish term Hazretleri served as the stylistic equivalent to "Highness," applied to imperial princes (), high-ranking officials, and other dignitaries within the dynastic hierarchy. Sons of sultans, known as , were formally addressed as Şehzade Efendi Hazretleri, denoting a comparable to princes of the blood and reflecting the caliphal prestige of the Ottoman sovereign. This usage persisted through the empire's evolution, emphasizing hierarchical distinction rooted in Islamic sovereignty rather than strictly European precedents. The 19th-century reforms (1839–1876), initiated by the under Sultan , facilitated the adaptation of such titles in diplomatic contexts to align with European norms amid modernization efforts. These reforms modernized foreign relations by establishing permanent embassies and adopting Western protocols, including the translation and equivalence of honorifics like Hazretleri to "Highness" in international correspondence and treaties, thereby bridging traditional Islamic hierarchies with contemporary statecraft to counter territorial losses and internal decay. This causal integration preserved dynastic authority while enabling pragmatic engagement with European powers, as evidenced by the empire's capitulatory agreements and military reorganizations. In parallel, among Middle Eastern Ismaili communities, the title "His Highness" was self-applied by Aga Hasan Ali Shah, the 46th Nizari Ismaili Imam, following his investiture as by Persian Qajar Shah Fateh Ali Shah in 1818. After fleeing persecution and settling in British India, British colonial authorities recognized his spiritual and temporal leadership over Ismaili followers, addressing him with the style "His Highness" from the mid-19th century onward—a precedent extended to successors like , who received formal British conferral in 1886. This adoption stabilized the sect amid colonial pressures by merging Persian-Islamic legitimacy with European diplomatic recognition, fostering modernization in and without eroding religious tradition.

Gulf Monarchies and Saudi Arabia

In , the title "His " (sahib al-sumuw al-malaki in ) is extended to the sons and grandsons of Abdulaziz Ibn Saud, the kingdom's founder who unified its territories in 1932 through conquests and alliances among tribal factions under Wahhabi doctrine. This styling distinguishes the core Al Saud lineage—numbering in the thousands of eligible males—from collateral branches, which may receive "His Highness," reinforcing hierarchical control within the amid the challenges of managing a reliant on oil revenues. Protocol refinements in the mid-20th century, including diplomatic exchanges during the , formalized these usages in international correspondence, aligning with the kingdom's structure. In the Gulf emirates, such as and the constituent states of the , ruling emirs and sheikhs are styled "His Highness," a convention adopted during the period to standardize diplomatic etiquette. The General Maritime Treaty of 1820, which established truces among the coastal sheikhdoms (later known as the ), initiated formal relations with that influenced titulature, evolving from tribal sheikh designations to European-inflected forms like "His Highness Sheikh [name] bin [father] Al [family]." For , this style persists for the , as seen in official designations since independence in 1971, while in the , it applies to rulers of emirates like and , underscoring their semi-autonomous tribal confederations bound by federal pacts post-1971. These titles reflect pre-oil era consolidations of leadership, where authority derived from kinship networks rather than elective or meritocratic systems. The application of "Highness" in these polities has empirically supported durability by embedding in familial loyalties, facilitating resource allocation from hydrocarbon wealth—Saudi Arabia's proven reserves exceed 260 billion barrels, with production averaging 9-10 million barrels daily since the —and enabling rapid decision-making unencumbered by parliamentary checks. Critics, including analysts noting the over 10,000 Saudi princes eligible for stipends, argue this fosters and , yet the absence of successful coups or revolutions since unification demonstrates causal efficacy in maintaining order through co-optation and tribal patronage, contrasting with instability in neighboring non-monarchical states.

Afghan and Central Asian Contexts

In the Kingdom of Afghanistan, which endured from 1926 until the republican coup of July 17, 1973, siblings of reigning kings bore the rank of sardar (for males) or sardar begum (for females), entitled to the style "His/Her ". This distinction applied specifically to brothers and sisters of the sovereign, while children of the king held princely or princessly titles with "His/Her ". The protocol crystallized under King Mohammed Zahir Shah, who succeeded to the throne on November 8, 1933, following the assassination of his father, King Nadir Shah; it reflected adaptations from British colonial diplomacy, given 's treaty relations with British India since the 1921 Anglo-Afghan Treaty, alongside enduring Persian titular influences from the heritage. Central Asian khanates and emirates, such as the Emirate of Bukhara (which persisted until its 1920 absorption into Soviet Turkestan), employed honorifics paralleling "Highness" in pre-modern and diplomatic usage, often rendered in Persianate forms like janab or elevated khan variants denoting exalted status. Kazakh khans, ruling semi-autonomous hordes until Russian conquest by 1847, used khan as a sovereign title implying supreme nobility without a direct European "Highness" equivalent, though local Turkic-Mongolic customs connoted similar hierarchical reverence in oral and written address. These styles drew from Persian and steppe nomadic traditions, with limited formalization until 19th-century interactions with Russian and British empires prompted hybrid diplomatic protocols. Following the 1973 overthrow of Zahir Shah, the royal family in symbolically upheld pre-republican titles, including "Highness" for collateral lines, in assertions of dynastic ; international bodies, such as the , acknowledged Zahir Shah's stature through invitations to forums like the 2002 Emergency Loya Jirga, where honorifics evoked monarchical legacy amid transitional politics. Ahmad Shah Khan, son of Zahir Shah, maintained claims to headship until his death on January 21, 2024, preserving these distinctions in contexts without restored .

Colonial and Imperial Extensions

British Commonwealth Realms

![Heraldic royal crown](./assets/Heraldic_Royal_Crown_(Common) The style "Royal Highness" (HRH) was applied in British dominions such as Canada and Australia prior to 1949 primarily through members of the British royal family appointed as governors-general, reflecting the shared monarchy across the Empire. For instance, HRH Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught and Strathearn, served as Governor General of Canada from 1911 to 1916, exercising viceregal functions while retaining his hereditary style. Similarly, royal tours and official visits by HRH holders reinforced the style's ceremonial role in dominion contexts, distinct from routine administrative use in the metropole. The 1917 Letters Patent issued by King George V on 30 November restricted HRH and the title of prince or princess to the sovereign's children, the sovereign's sons' children, and the eldest son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales, curbing its proliferation amid post-World War I economies and anti-foreign title sentiments across the Empire. This limitation impacted dominion applications by reducing the pool of eligible royals for viceregal posts, as subsequent appointments like Alexander Cambridge, 1st —formerly Alexander of Teck—served as of the from 1923 to 1931 without the HRH style post-renunciation of German titles. His wife, HRH , however, retained HRH as a daughter of a sovereign's son, highlighting how the style persisted in entourages of royal appointees. In realms like , HRH usage during pre-1949 royal visits integrated with local customs, including protocols, but remained tied to royals rather than conferred on indigenous leaders. Unlike the hereditary embedding in Britain's domestic aristocracy, dominion applications emphasized ceremonial and representational functions aligned with evolving autonomy, avoiding local hereditary grants and focusing on the monarch's personal representatives. This adaptation underscored the style's portability within the while preserving its exclusivity to the core royal line.

Other European Colonial Influences

In the , following the restoration of authority in 1816 after the , the colonial administration formalized relations with the principalities of and through treaties that preserved Javanese royal authority under . The sultans of these realms, such as III (r. 1810–1811, 1813–1823), were styled "Zijne Hoogheid" () in official correspondence and documents, integrating the European with traditional Javanese titles like Kanjeng Sri Hamengkubuwono. This recognition, extended to subsequent rulers including VII (r. 1877–1921), who served in the Army, legitimized local governance structures and minimized direct administrative costs by leveraging native hierarchies to collect taxes and maintain order. Colonial records indicate that this policy contributed to relative stability post-Java War (1825–1830), with fewer large-scale revolts in vassal states compared to directly administered regions, as sultans acted as intermediaries enforcing policies. Portuguese colonial administration in Goa from the 16th century onward incorporated local elites, particularly Hindu Brahmins who converted to Christianity, into a nobility system that hybridized indigenous status with European titles, though "Alteza" (Highness) was reserved primarily for viceroys and high imperial appointees rather than routinely extended to Goan nobility. Viceroys, starting with Afonso de Albuquerque's conquest in 1510, wielded authority styled with imperial precedence, and documents from the era reference "Sua Alteza" in communications involving Portuguese India, reflecting the extension of metropolitan courtly forms to colonial governance. This framework facilitated control over trade and land revenues by co-opting local leaders, but without the systematic elevation to "Highness" seen in Dutch Java, relying instead on grants of fidalgo status and ecclesiastical privileges to secure loyalty. In the (1908–1960), adaptations of European titles were limited, with colonial policy emphasizing the instrumental use of traditional chiefs as tax collectors and labor recruiters without formal elevation to styles like "Highness." Belgian administrators, inheriting Leopold II's exploitative structures, maintained hierarchies for indirect but subordinated chiefs to European oversight, avoiding conferral of honorifics that might imply or prestige equivalent to metropolitan . Archival evidence from the period shows this approach prioritized extraction—yielding rubber and minerals worth billions in adjusted value—over title hybridization, resulting in frequent resistance from uncooperative rulers rather than the stabilized alliances observed in Dutch Java.

Post-Colonial Adaptations

In , the nine hereditary sultans retained their pre-colonial titles and styles following independence from on August 31, 1957, with English translations incorporating "Highness" for heirs and close kin, such as "Tunku" or "Tengku" prefixed by "His or Her Highness" in formal diplomatic contexts. This adaptation preserved indigenous hierarchies within the federal constitutional framework, where the rotating Yang di-Pertuan Agong (elected from among the sultans) holds supreme status, while subsidiary rulers maintain autonomy over state religious and customary affairs. Empirical records indicate no formal revocation of these styles, reflecting a deliberate fusion of and to underpin identity amid multi-ethnic governance. Tonga, achieving independence on June 4, 1970, under a revised constitutional order building on the framework, continued styling non-heir princes and noble kin as "His Highness" or equivalents like for select lineages, adapting European-influenced protocols to Polynesian chiefly ranks. The 1970 adjustments affirmed noble privileges without dilution, as seen in proclamations extending titles to figures like Prince Tungi (later in subsequent grants), ensuring dynastic continuity amid modernization pressures. This retention supported social cohesion in a small island kingdom, where titles delineate land rights and ceremonial roles tied to ancient tu'i (kingly) lineages predating colonial contact. In , post-independence from on October 4, 1966, the under King Moshoeshoe II preserved paramount chiefly styles equivalent to "Highness" for principal descendants and sub-chiefs, formalized from pre-colonial Basotho hierarchies but retained despite republican-leaning constitutional debates. norms, rooted in male primogeniture among eligible high-ranking kin, linked title elevation to authority over grazing lands and , with no post-1966 legislative abolition despite interventions in 1970 and 1986 that temporarily sidelined the king. Archival evidence shows these adaptations mitigated ethnic fragmentation by embedding monarchical prestige in national symbolism, countering full republican shifts observed elsewhere in southern Africa. While some analyses from post-colonial theorists frame such title retentions as vestiges of that entrench , potentially neocolonial in sustaining hierarchical deference, quantitative studies of stability in titled monarchies reveal correlations with lower conflict incidence and higher cultural preservation indices compared to title-abolishing republics. These critiques, often emanating from academic circles with documented ideological skews toward , overlook precedents for graded —evident in oral histories and pre-19th-century artifacts—prioritizing causal continuity over imposed . In practice, voter referenda and pacts in these states affirm public endorsement of titular traditions as bulwarks against erosion in globalizing contexts.

Republican and Secular Usages

Iberian and Latin American Republics

In Spain, Carlist pretenders to the throne during the , such as Carlos María Isidro, adopted the style of "Alteza Real" to assert legitimacy amid dynastic conflicts and periods of political instability, including challenges from liberal and republican factions. This usage persisted despite the movement's traditionalist opposition to centralized republicanism, reflecting self-assumed titular assertions outside official sanction. Later claimants, like Javier de Borbón-Parma, similarly employed "Alteza Real" in the , even as 's Second Republic () formally abolished noble titles. In , following the collapse of the Second in 1867, descendants of Emperor and Archduke Maximilian retained courtesy titles incorporating "Alteza," such as for the Princes of Iturbide, originally decreed during the imperial period but invoked in exile under the republican regime that prohibited noble distinctions. The 1917 Constitution explicitly banned recognition of hereditary titles, rendering such usages private or honorific rather than legally binding, often limited to international or familial contexts. This pattern extended to self-proclaimed heirs, who periodically styled themselves with "Alteza Imperial" absent state endorsement. Portugal's republican establishment in 1910 ended monarchical rule, yet the Braganza pretenders, led by , continued employing (Alteza Real) as a dynastic , unrecognized domestically but observed in private and foreign protocols. Legal prohibitions on titles mirrored those in , emphasizing self-assumption over official revival. In , after the 1889 proclaimed the republic and exiled Emperor Pedro II, the preserved imperial styles like "" (Alteza Imperial) for family members, including such as Pedro de Alcântara, despite constitutional bans on . This persisted into the , with branches invoking "Alteza Imperial y Real" in ceremonial events and claims to headship, functioning as symbolic assertions amid republican legal irrelevance. Such repurposings highlight a distinction from reigning monarchies, where titles derive from sovereign grant rather than exiled persistence or pretender initiative.

United States and Democratic Contexts

In the early years of the republic, debates over presidential titles highlighted tensions between monarchical traditions and egalitarian ideals. During the 1787 Constitutional Convention and subsequent Senate discussions in 1789, proposals included "His Highness, the President of the and Protector of Their Liberties," advanced by figures like and supported by , who favored "Highness" to convey dignity and prevent perceptions of weakness. These suggestions, often viewed retrospectively as reflective of elite anxieties over republican simplicity, were rejected on September 27, 1789, in favor of the unadorned "," emphasizing a deliberate break from hereditary pomp to affirm . Despite domestic rejection of such titles, U.S. diplomatic protocol extends courtesies like "Your Highness" or "Your Royal Highness" to foreign princes and nobility during official interactions, acknowledging international hierarchies without endorsing them internally. This practice, outlined in State Department guidelines and military protocol manuals, applies to non-sovereign royals such as princes, reflecting pragmatic reciprocity in bilateral relations rather than ideological endorsement. For instance, U.S. presidents have hosted figures like Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, using "His Royal Highness" in addresses, preserving formalities for alliance-building. In democratic Samoa, the fa'amatai chiefly system integrates equivalents of "Highness" for paramount titles (Tama aiga), blending customary hierarchy with republican governance. Holders of these titles, such as the , are styled "His Highness," as with Tuimaleali'ifano Va'aletoa Sualauvi II, who assumed the role on July 5, 2017, while retaining his Tama aiga title since 1977. This usage, rooted in pre-colonial paramountcy, persists in 's 1962 constitution, where the O le Ao o le Malo () is selected from Tama aiga lineages, providing ceremonial stability amid electoral politics. Such retention underscores how egalitarian frameworks in non-European democracies often accommodate hierarchical precedents to mitigate factional , contrasting with stricter title abolitions elsewhere. The ironic persistence of honorifics in these contexts critiques pure egalitarian pretensions, as formal rejection of titles like in the U.S. has not eliminated informal status gradients, which empirical analyses link to heightened populist disruptions in title-absent systems lacking stabilizing hierarchies. In Samoa's hybrid model, conversely, chiefly equivalents correlate with institutional continuity, averting the executive overreach observed in flatter republican structures. This pattern suggests causal realism in governance: human societies' innate hierarchies, when unacknowledged, foster instability, whereas explicit precedents anchor democratic processes against demagogic erosion.

African and Oceanic Non-Royal Examples

In post-apartheid , inkosis function as recognized traditional under the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act of 2003, wielding authority over customary affairs within designated areas, including of disputes and community conflicts. These inkosis, equivalent to paramount chiefs in the , command respect analogous to elevated styles through communal protocols and rituals, such as ceremonies that affirm their role in maintaining . Anthropological analyses highlight how this authority, rooted in pre-colonial kinship structures, effectively resolves disputes by invoking ancestral precedents and consensus-building, reducing reliance on formal courts in rural . Prior to the 1974 , non-royal nobles held titles like and Dejazmach, denoting high provincial governors with quasi-autonomous powers, though without the explicit "Highness" reserved for Le'ul princes; remnants of these hierarchies persist informally among communities and in customary practices, where elders invoke similar prestige for arbitrating inheritance and territorial claims. This pre-revolutionary system, documented in imperial decrees, paralleled European noble elevations by granting and judicial oversight, aiding causal stability in feudal-like domains until the Derg's abolition of . In , Fijian chiefly titles such as for high male chiefs emerged prominently under British colonial influence following the 1874 Deed of Cession, when thirteen paramount chiefs, including Seru Cakobau, transferred sovereignty while preserving indigenous hierarchies for administrative purposes. These , denoting exalted lineage-based authority, facilitated in vanua (tribal districts) by leveraging taboos, , and communal assemblies, as evidenced in ethnographic accounts of post-cession where chiefs mediated inter-clan feuds over resources. Such roles underscore a functional to "highness" in non-royal contexts, embedding causal mechanisms for reconciliation that anthropological studies link to sustained social cohesion amid modernization.

Modern Developments and Debates

Retention in Contemporary Monarchies

In the , the style of "" (HRH) persists for working members of the royal family following the 2020 departure of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex from senior roles. The Sussexes retained their HRH designation by agreement but ceased its use, distinguishing active protocol adherents like the , whose HRH styles underscore ongoing ceremonial responsibilities amid public scrutiny. This retention, as of 2025, supports operational clarity in a slimmed-down under III. Jordan's Hashemite maintains "" as the standard address for princes, exemplified by Al-Hussein bin Abdullah II, ensuring dynastic protocol stability in a region of political volatility. Princes such as Hamzah bin Al Hussein continue to hold HRH styles, reflecting consistent application without recent dilutions. This approach, unchanged through 2020-2025, bolsters monarchical cohesion amid internal challenges like the 2021 royal rift. Denmark's 2022 title reforms under Queen Margrethe II rationalized appellations by reclassifying four non-working grandchildren as counts and countesses, yet preserved HRH for principal heirs, including then-Crown Prince Frederik and Prince Christian. Effective January 2023, these adjustments addressed clarity and resource allocation amid familial tensions, with core retention evident in King Frederik X's accession protocols on January 14, 2024. Such measures empirically correlate with sustained institutional approval, prioritizing functional unity over expansive titular inflation.

Revocations and Title Controversies

In January 2022, Queen Elizabeth II directed that , would cease using the style "His Royal Highness" (HRH) in any official capacity, following a U.S. civil lawsuit alleging sexual assault linked to ; this measure accompanied the removal of his military affiliations and royal patronages, though he retained the title amid ongoing legal pressures. The decision reflected accountability for personal conduct tarnishing the monarchy's reputation, with Andrew settling the suit out of court later that year without admitting liability. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex (Prince Harry and Meghan Markle) reached an agreement in January 2020, formalized after their withdrawal as working royals, stipulating they would not actively employ their HRH styles, particularly in commercial endeavors, while retaining the designation privately as grandchildren of the sovereign under 1917 . This Sandringham Summit outcome preserved titles without public usage obligations, though 2025 incidents, such as Meghan's reported inclusion of HRH on a personal , sparked claims of breach despite the non-official allowance. Reports in October 2025 indicated Prince William, as , intends to issue new upon accession to limit or revoke princely and HRH styles for non-working royals, potentially targeting the Sussexes and their children to streamline the institution and enforce accountability precedents set by Andrew's case. Such moves, if enacted, would extend beyond Sussex-specific tensions to broader reforms, drawing on historical precedents like the 1917 revocation of German-derived titles by King George V during wartime . Advocates for revocations emphasize egalitarian accountability, arguing that scandals erode and necessitate stripping privileges to uphold institutional , as seen in left-leaning critiques prioritizing merit over . Opponents, often from traditionalist perspectives, counter that hierarchical titles foster long-term , citing empirical patterns where constitutional monarchies average higher rankings on stability metrics than republics, though causation remains debated absent direct . Restoration efforts are rare; for instance, no formal HRH reinstatement occurred for , post-1996 divorce, underscoring the enduring nature of such suspensions once imposed for cause.

Symbolic Role and Cultural Critiques

The title "Highness" serves as a symbolic marker of hierarchical distinction within social structures, reflecting evolved human tendencies toward status signaling that facilitate group organization and conflict reduction. posits that such hierarchies emerge rapidly across species, including humans, to allocate power, influence, and resources based on dominance or prestige, thereby promoting cooperation and stability in large-scale societies. Titles like "Highness," denoting ranks below sovereigns such as princes or dukes, embody this vertical by visually and verbally reinforcing chains of , which empirical studies link to efficient and reduced intra-group compared to flatter structures. Critiques of "Highness" often frame it as emblematic of , accusing titles of perpetuating unearned and social division, a view amplified in narratives that portray hereditary distinctions as relics obstructing . However, such disdain overlooks historical evidence favoring the longevity of hierarchical systems; constitutional monarchies incorporating titles have demonstrated superior stability, comprising only 15% of global governments yet outperforming republics in governance continuity and economic performance over centuries. Revolutionary egalitarian experiments, by contrast, frequently devolved into or instability, as seen in the French Revolution's rapid shift to imperial rule, underscoring that rigid anti-hierarchical ideologies disrupt causal mechanisms of order more than they resolve inequities. In contemporary diplomacy, "Highness" retains practical symbolic weight, influencing protocols in international forums where titles signal respect for established ranks and avert diplomatic faux pas. For instance, during 2020s state visits and multilateral engagements, including those involving United Nations observers from monarchies, usage of "Your Highness" in addresses upholds traditions that grease interpersonal and institutional interactions, evidencing the title's enduring role in fostering predictable elite coordination amid global pluralism. This persistence counters cultural dismissals by demonstrating tangible benefits in cross-cultural causality, where symbolic deference correlates with smoother negotiations over purely egalitarian alternatives.

Precedence and Variations

Hierarchical Rankings

In monarchical hierarchies, the style of "Highness" denotes a rank immediately below "" or "," typically accorded to princes, princesses, and other close relatives of the sovereign, while surpassing titles such as "," "Grace," or "" reserved for lesser or . This positioning is codified in precedence tables, where "Highness" holders receive defined honors, including specific orders of seating at ceremonies and reduced salutes compared to sovereigns. For instance, in , members of the royal family styled ""—a variant of Highness—merit a , equivalent to the standard royal salute but subordinate in overall precedence to the monarch's position at the apex of the order. European court guides enforce this ladder with precision to maintain order and avert breaches of etiquette; "Highness" thus commands deference from "" but yields to "" in processions, audiences, and diplomatic rankings. During VII's accession on January 22, 1901, updated protocols reaffirmed these distinctions, ensuring foreign princes titled "Highness" were placed after Majesties in official listings while above ambassadors, as detailed in contemporaneous court circulars adapting Victorian precedents for the new reign. In contrast to Europe's inflexible structures, 19th-century diplomatic treaties with Asian states often permitted more adaptable application of "Highness," equating select local rulers to this rank via equivalencies—such as 11 or more guns signaling eligibility—rather than rigid pedigree, reflecting pragmatic concessions in unequal agreements to facilitate over colonized territories. This flexibility mitigated cultural clashes but preserved the core Western in joint ceremonies, where European envoys upheld "Highness" below their own sovereigns.

Protocol Across Cultures

In European monarchies, protocol for individuals bearing the title of Highness typically involves physical gestures of respect upon introduction: men offer a neck bow, while women perform a , executed as a slight dip with one foot behind the other. These actions are not strictly obligatory but serve as traditional markers of , varying in depth by —shallower in modern compared to more formal Continental practices. Verbal address commences with "Your Royal Highness," transitioning in ongoing conversation to "Sir" for males or "Ma'am" (pronounced with a short 'a' as in "") for females, thereby avoiding direct use of names or pronouns that might imply familiarity. This third-person-style sustains hierarchical distance, distinguishing from more name-inclusive norms elsewhere. In Islamic royal contexts, such as monarchies, deference leans toward verbal restraint and spatial protocols over gendered physical gestures; subjects await initiation of speech, refrain from unprompted contact, and employ titles like "Your " appended with the holder's governmental role, reflecting cultural emphases on and rather than performative bows or curtsies. Head nods or salaams may substitute for bows, prioritizing symbolic submission without uniform physicality. These cultural deviations highlight etiquette's adaptation to local values—physical in for , restraint-oriented in Islamic traditions for internalized respect—ensuring behavioral norms align with societal causal structures over imposed . Modern diplomatic manuals, including those updated in 2025, incorporate such variances for events, advising flexibility in hybrid formats where virtual interfaces preclude traditional gestures but mandate preserved formal address.

Etymological and Linguistic Variants

The French term altesse, denoting "highness" as a title of respect, derives from altezza and entered French usage in the , reflecting a semantic emphasis on elevated status akin to physical or metaphorical height. In courtly contexts, it appears as Votre Altesse, paralleling English "" for princes and other nobles, with phonetic adaptation softening the Latin root altus (high) through Romance evolution. In German-speaking regions, Durchlaucht serves as the equivalent for "Serene Highness," literally translating to "through-lucidity" or brightness, a calque from Latin superillustris (most illustrious), which shifted semantically to imply transcendent clarity and sovereignty rather than mere elevation. This form gained formal recognition in 1825 via the German Confederation's diet, granting it to mediatized princely houses, and was prevalent in Habsburg multilingual courts where Latin, German, and French titles coexisted, necessitating protocol adaptations for diplomatic precedence. Italian variants include (highness), directly influencing , but extend to serenissima ("most serene") in sovereign contexts, as in the Republic of Venice's self-designation Serenissima Repubblica, an indicator of republican sovereignty evoking calm authority over turbulent seas, later echoed in princely titles post-republican transitions in other states. This serene variant highlights a phonetic and conceptual divergence from height-focused terms, prioritizing in Mediterranean courtly linguistics.

References

  1. [1]
    HIGHNESS Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    the quality or state of being high; loftiness. · (initial capital letter), a title of honor given to members of a royal family (usually preceded by His, Her, ...Missing: honorific | Show results with:honorific
  2. [2]
    Imperial and Royal European Titles - Styles and Ranks
    Highness, often used with a personal possessive pronoun (His/Her/Your Highness, the first two abbreviated HH) is an attribute referring to the rank of the ...
  3. [3]
    A Guide to British Noble Titles | Merriam-Webster
    The many titles of the British peerage are used in the traditions, hierarchies, and ceremonies of government and society, not to mention costume dramas.
  4. [4]
    Royal Styles and the uses of "Highness" - Heraldica
    This is a summary on the history of the style of Highness for sovereigns and their families. What follows is a compilation from various sources listed at ...Missing: charters | Show results with:charters
  5. [5]
    Burk's Peerage and Knightage - The Kingdom of Talossa
    CORRESPONDENCE: On the envelope, “His Highness _____ Prince of Talossa”, or socially “His Highness Prince _____”. · PERSONAL ADDRESS: “Your Highness” or “Voastra ...
  6. [6]
    highness, n. meanings, etymology and more
    The earliest known use of the noun highness is in the Old English period (pre-1150). highness is a word inherited from Germanic. See etymology. Nearby entries.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  7. [7]
    Highness - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Old English "heanes" (high + -ness), the word means "royalty, excellence, nobility," with "Your Highness" used for royalty since c. 1400.Missing: OED | Show results with:OED
  8. [8]
    Appendix I - Indo-European Roots - American Heritage Dictionary
    alt1, alto, haughty, hawser; altimeter, altiplano, altitude, altocumulus, altostratus, enhance, exalt, hautboy, from Latin altus, high ("grown tall"), deep.Missing: elevation | Show results with:elevation
  9. [9]
    Old English: The Anglo-Saxon Language - Fajardo-Acosta.com
    Oct 4, 2018 · ... heahnes ("highness"); agent nouns constructed with with suffixes like -ere, -end, -a, -bora; examples: ridan ("to ride"), ridere ("rider ...Missing: derivation | Show results with:derivation
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Shigeto Kikuchi - The University of Tokyo - Academia.edu
    Representations of monarchical "highness" in Carolingian royal charters, in: Problems and Possibilities of Early Medieval Charters, hrsg. v. Jonathan Jarrett & ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] on the use of sanction clauses under the early Carolingians[1]
    [7] Shigeto Kikuchi, “Representations of monarchical 'highness' in Carolingian royal charters,” in Problems and possibilities of early medieval charters, ed ...
  13. [13]
    The Immunity in Carolingian Italy - jstor
    our highness concerning the properties of the church of the blessed martyrs, Alexander and Vincent, which is known to be under his episcopal jurisdiction ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Book IV - Mel Lockie
    Sep 27, 2021 · ORDERICUS VITALIS. TRANSLATED, WITH NOTES, AND THE ... I submit these considerations to your highness. [1] Without its being ...
  15. [15]
    A guide to the noble titles of medieval Europe for writers
    Aug 5, 2023 · The wife of a British Marquess is a Marchioness, but a French one is a Marquise. The position and territory of the title is a Marquisate or a ...Emperor · Kings · Relatives Of A KingMissing: hautece haultece<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Book III - Mel Lockie
    Sep 27, 2021 · Ordericus Vitalis has inserted it in the sixth book of his ... highness, offering myself and my faithful services to your majesty ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Heirs of Alcuin: Education and Clerical Advancement in Ninth ...
    We also resolutely and humbly advise your Highness that, following the practice of your father, there be public schools [scolae publicae] established by ...Missing: 9th- 12th
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Spanish Habsburgs and Dynastic Rule, 1500–1700
    ... Habsburg ruling group. The rivalry revolved in practical terms around titles (duke, grand duke and king), styles of address (Your Highness and Your Royal ...
  19. [19]
    Nobility of France - Almanach de Saxe Gotha
    Henry IV began to crack down on the usurpation of titles of nobility, and in 1666-1674 Louis XIV mandated a massive program of verification of titles of ...
  20. [20]
    Osnabrück Peace Instrument - Everything Peace of Westphalia
    As to the Assemblies of the Deputies of the Empire, her Majesty of Sweden and his Electoral Highness of Brandenburg shall have their Deputies there in the ...
  21. [21]
    Princes' Justifications of War in Early Modern Europe: The ...
    In particular the 1648 Peace of Westphalia, which became a kind of role ... Highness, By the Advice of His Council, Setting forth, On Behalf of this ...
  22. [22]
    Rousseau's Critique of Inequality
    Rousseau's Discourse on the Origin of Inequality among Mankind, published in 1755, is a vastly influential study of the foundations of human society, ...
  23. [23]
    Delivering Stability—Primogeniture and Autocratic Survival in ...
    Apr 28, 2014 · In AD 1000, Europe was dominated by autocratic states with succession orders based on election, or the principle of agnatic seniority, according ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Royal Styles and Titles of Great Britain - Heraldica
    Franz , styled count of Hohenstein, was created prince of Teck in Wurttemberg on Dec 1, 1863 with the style of Serene Highness (Durchlaucht). He was serving ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Bill of Rights 1689 - UK Parliament
    The Bill firmly established the principles of frequent parliaments, free elections and freedom of speech within Parliament – known today as Parliamentary ...
  26. [26]
    History of the Style and Title of the Danish Monarchs
    Jan 19, 2022 · Dynastic children of the monarch and of the heir apparent are accorded the style of His/Her Royal Highness, while other members of the dynasty ...
  27. [27]
    Danish Styles and Titles | Unofficial Royalty
    Mar 3, 2025 · ... Denmark with the style His Royal Highness. In 2005, Queen Margrethe II gave her husband the title The Prince Consort of Denmark. In her New ...
  28. [28]
    Oscar I of Sweden - Wikipedia
    ... name of "Charles John"; Oscar was then created a Prince of Sweden with the style of Royal Highness, and further accorded the title of Duke of Södermanland.Missing: century | Show results with:century
  29. [29]
    Kingdom of Sweden - House of Bernadotte - Almanach de Saxe Gotha
    The members of this family bear the title Prince or Princess of Sweden together with the formal appellation of His or Her Royal Highness. All dynasts bear a ...
  30. [30]
    Grand duke | Nobility, Ruling Families, Monarchies - Britannica
    Oct 3, 2025 · Grand duke, title of sovereign princes ranking between kings and dukes and of certain members of the Russian imperial family.
  31. [31]
    Catherine the Great assumes power | July 9, 1762 - History.com
    Jul 3, 2019 · On July 9, 1762, the wife of Russia's new emperor, Peter III ... Grand Duke Peter, who was also Sophie's cousin on her mother's side.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    The Nobility and Titles in Poland - Grocholski
    The highest group within the knightly/noble estate (equivalent to Western European higher nobility, and in fact even higher than that, because having, as the ...
  33. [33]
    Kingdom of Bulgaria - House of Wettin - Almanach de Saxe Gotha
    The Principality of Bulgaria (Bulgarian: Княжество България, Knyazhestvo ... Highness. royalarmsofbulgaria.jpg. The Genealogy of The Royal House.
  34. [34]
    Faq#7: What was the Congress of Vienna? - The Napoleon Series
    Certain French modifications have been maintained. Bavaria, Saxony, and Wurtemberg retain their royal title. Many states still have a strong French influence ...Missing: Eastern | Show results with:Eastern
  35. [35]
    Mediatized Imperial States of The Holy Roman Empire
    The constitution of the German Confederation of 1815 confirmed the mediatization, but gave certain rights to the mediatized princes, such as first instance ...
  36. [36]
    Count | Titles of Nobility & Royalty in Europe - Britannica
    Sep 10, 2025 · The federal Diet, in 1829, however, recognized their right to the special style of Erlaucht (“Illustrious Highness”). Italy. With the decay ...
  37. [37]
    Italian Noble and Princely Families 2: July 2007- 2022 | Page 13
    Jul 20, 2007 · I also already wrote about the German title of fürstlicher Graf (Princely Count) and Erlaucht (Altezza Illustrissima). Varon is a Spanish ...
  38. [38]
    Cosimo I | Duke of Florence & Tuscany, Grand Duke of ... - Britannica
    Oct 3, 2025 · Finally on Aug. 27, 1569, Pope Pius V conferred the title of grand duke (granduca) of Tuscany on Cosimo. This title, however, was not ...Missing: highness | Show results with:highness
  39. [39]
    Why Does Guillaume of Luxembourg Hold the Title of Grand Duke ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · Luxembourg's use of the title “Grand Duke” goes back to the political reshuffling of Europe in the 19th century. At the Congress of Vienna in ...Missing: highness | Show results with:highness
  40. [40]
    Luxembourg Styles and Titles | Unofficial Royalty
    Mar 24, 2025 · The male line descendants of a reigning grand duke, other than the heir, would use the style Grand Ducal Highness. This practice was followed by ...
  41. [41]
    H.S.H. Prince Albert II - Palais Princier de Monaco
    Prince Albert II received an Honorary Doctorate in philosophy from the Pontifical University of Maynooth in Ireland. 26th October 2000: His Serene Highness ...
  42. [42]
    The History of the Princely House | Das Fürstenhaus von Liechtenstein
    Prince Franz Josef II was the first prince ever to take up residence in Liechtenstein in 1938. He also succeeded in preserving the country's independence during ...Missing: highness | Show results with:highness
  43. [43]
    The Story Behind Royal Gun Salutes | Guide London
    Feb 23, 2022 · The standard Royal salute of twenty-one guns is reserved for heads of state and, on occasion, heads of government. When the salute is given from ...
  44. [44]
    Nobility of the Ottoman Empire - Almanach de Saxe Gotha
    Hazretleri: style equivalent to Highness. Kaimakam: Lieutenant-Colonel (army) ... Pashazada: son of a Pasha, used as an alternative courtesy title to Bey.
  45. [45]
    Turkish And Ottoman Nobility And Royalty - Noble Titles for Sale
    Jan 10, 2018 · Islam (equivalent today to Highest Judge) and the chief of the eunuchs (Highness until 1909, an office equivalent somewhat today to Minister of
  46. [46]
    [PDF] reform in the - ottoman empire - PSI424
    Tanzimat were the diplomatic pressures exerted by the great powers. Such pressure was highly significant. The Ottoman statesmen were painfully aware of it ...
  47. [47]
    the modernization of ottoman diplomacy in the tanzimat period
    Ottoman diplomacy modernized significantly during the Tanzimat period, adapting Western practices and principles. Sultan Mahmud II established permanent ...
  48. [48]
    AGA KHAN, TITLE OF | Ismaili.NET - Heritage F.I.E.L.D.
    Imam Hasan Ali Shah, the 46th Imam was the bearer of the title Aga Khan. Fateh Ali Shah, the Qajari emperor invested him in 1818 in Tehran.
  49. [49]
    Our Founder | The Institute of Ismaili Studies
    His Late Highness Prince Karim Aga KhanXA title granted by the Shah of Persia to the then Ismaili Imam in 1818 and inherited by each of his successors to ...
  50. [50]
    Sir Sultan Muhammad Shah, Aga Khan III – Titles, Decorations and ...
    1. Title of Aga Khan was first granted to Aga Hassanaly Shah, the 46th Ismaili Imam, by the Shah of Persia, in the 1830s.
  51. [51]
    Regime Stability in Saudi Arabia : The challenge of succession ...
    ... grandsons of King Ibn Saʿud, the ʿAbd al-ʿAziz branch, are referred to as 'His Royal Highness' (Arab. sahib al-sumuw al-malaki), thus distinguishing them ...
  52. [52]
    Succession in Saudi Arabia Q
    HRH Sultan bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, Royal Saudi Air Force (Ret.) ... scendants of Abdul Aziz call themselves “His Royal Highness” (HRH). Conse ...
  53. [53]
    qatar - Royal Ark
    STYLES & TITLES: The Sovereign: Shaikh (personal name) bin (father's name) Al-Thani, Amir of the State of Qatar, with the style of His Highness. The consort ...Missing: Emir | Show results with:Emir
  54. [54]
    [PDF] KINGS FOR ALL SEASONS: - Brookings Institution
    Emir, crossing another red line, telling him that “we will not allow you, your highness, to take Kuwait into the abyss of autocracy.”75. When the government ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    [PDF] After King Abdullah - The Washington Institute
    “HRH,” meaning “His Royal Highness,” conferred on the sons and grandsons of Ibn Saud). The main line of the House of Saud numbers in the hundreds (King. Saud ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  56. [56]
    AFGHAN - Royal Ark
    STYLES & TITLES: The Sovereign: King of the God granted Kingdom of Afghanistan and its dependencies, with the style of His Majesty. The wife of the ...
  57. [57]
    Bārakzay dynasty | Afghan History, Rulers & Dynasties - Britannica
    Nāder Khan, on his assassination in 1933, was succeeded by his son Zahir Shah, who reigned until July 17, 1973, when he was deposed and a republic was ...
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    KHAN - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    Aug 25, 2017 · Khan (ḵān), a Turkish high title indicating nobility. Its meaning and designation, however, depends upon the historical and social contexts in which it is used.
  60. [60]
    Afghanistan: Legal Loopholes Give Shah Chance To Head Next ...
    "Does his highness, besides [his presence in Afghanistan for] the inauguration [of the loya jirga], present himself as a candidate or not? It is one of the ...Missing: title | Show results with:title
  61. [61]
    Ahmad Shah Khan, Crown Prince of Afghanistan - Today's AI Wiki
    Ahmad Shah, Crown Prince of Afghanistan (1942-1973) and head of the House of Barakzai (2007-2024), lived through the monarchy's overthrow and exile.<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Royalty and Australian society - National Archives of Australia
    relating to the visit to Australia of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales ... The Dominions Office in London asked the Prime Ministers of Australia, Canada, ...
  63. [63]
    HRH and Prince/Princess - Debretts
    With this ruling of 1917, George V restricted the usage of the style HRH and the title of Prince or Princess tothe children of the monarch, the children of ...
  64. [64]
    Alexander, Earl of Athlone, 1874-1957
    Known up to 1917 as His Serene Highness Prince Alexander, he was educated at. Eton, leaving there to enter Sandhurst and in 1894 was gazetted a 2nd. Lieutenant ...
  65. [65]
    Alexander Augustus Frederick William Alfred George Cambridge
    Alexander was the 4th and youngest child of the Duke and Duchess (Fat May, grand-daughter of George III). He was styled His Serene Highness but was called Alge, ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Māori and Royal Visits, 1869-2015: From Rotorua to Waitangi
    Apr 29, 2018 · 86 New Zealand Journey: A Tour of New Zealand by Her Majesty the Queen and His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh. 1953-1954 (Wellington ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] The Crown and the constitution - UK Parliament
    Aug 4, 2025 · The “Dominions” were defined as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South ... use the style “Royal Highness”. 53. In practice, however, this ...
  68. [68]
    Why did George V issues letters patent - Royal History Geeks
    Feb 23, 2016 · On 30 November 1917,of 1917, letters patent were issued declaring that henceforth only the children of the sovereign, sons of sons of the ...
  69. [69]
    Hamengkubuwono III - Wikipedia
    De volledige titel van de vorst was Zijne Hoogheid Sampeyan Dalam ingkang Sinuhun Kanjeng Sri Sultan Hamengkubuwono III Senapati ing Alaga Ngah 'Abdu'l ...
  70. [70]
    Epistrategus (set no. 5), figure no. E6-2 Portrait resemblance ...
    Mar 1, 2024 · ... Dutch East Indies Army, was His Highness Sampeyan Dalam ingkang Sinuhun Kanjeng Sri sultan Hamangkubuwono VII Senapati ing Alaga Ngah 'Abdu ...
  71. [71]
    The Javanese Nobility under the Dutch - jstor
    The ruler, having little information about or control over the local chiefs, tended to distrust them and was constantly engaged in reducing their independence.
  72. [72]
    Portuguese Goa - World History Encyclopedia
    Jun 11, 2021 · Goa, located on the west coast of India, was a Portuguese colony from 1510 to 1961. The small coastal area was conquered by Afonso de Albuquerque (c. 1453-1515)
  73. [73]
    Indo-Portuguese Nobility, Goa, India (16th Century)* - InsideInside.org
    House of Local nobility of Goa, consisting mostly of Hindu Brahmins who had converted to Christianity, built after the Portuguese arrived in Goa in 1510.
  74. [74]
    Belgian Congo | History & Facts | Britannica
    Sep 5, 2025 · They had no role in legislation, but traditional rulers were used as agents to collect taxes and recruit labour; uncooperative rulers were ...
  75. [75]
    MONARCHY, SULTANS AND KINGS IN MALAYSIA | Facts and Details
    On 13 December 2006, Duli Yang Maha Mulia Sultan Mizan Ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Mahmud Shah (His Royal Highness the Sultan of Terengganu) performed the oath of ...
  76. [76]
    Tonga - NettyRoyal
    Jan 16, 2024 · Titles. The King of Tonga is styled His Majesty. The heir apparent is crown prince and styled His Royal Highness. The other sons and grandsons ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    [PDF] the legacy of the 1875 tongan constitution
    tanusia ma'a tonga tuNu'aho was given the title His serene Highness prince tungi in 2008 by his uncle late King George tupou V.129. His royal Highness late ...
  78. [78]
  79. [79]
    Government and Change in Lesotho, - 1800-1966
    English title was His Highness. Sesotho customary law; Basotho customary law ... One decade after Moshoeshoe's death, in 1880, a literary source.
  80. [80]
    (PDF) Unification of Traditional Rulership with Politics as A Colonial ...
    Apr 5, 2025 · It explores how these colonial legacies persist in post-independence ... Highness, the Oba of Benin, advocates for more power for traditional ...
  81. [81]
    COLONIALISM AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE - jstor
    titles from "Majesty" to "Highness", and the rise of minor chiefs to about the same status. Audrey. Richards put the case of British-ruled Africa well. The.
  82. [82]
    Títulos de señalamiento | Historia de la Dinastía Carlista
    Jun 25, 2017 · ... alteza real». Y el príncipe contestó, muy serio: «Valor señora». Con pasaporte falso, Carlos María Isidro cruzó el canal de la Mancha de ...
  83. [83]
    Títulos carlistas - A las catacumbas
    Aug 31, 2008 · Duque de Aranjuez, Infante de España Su Alteza Real Don Sixto Enrique de Borbón y Borbón-Busset, Duque de Aranjuez, Infante de España ...
  84. [84]
    El Carlismo y su sino (II) - by David de Maistre
    Dec 8, 2024 · ... título de Alteza Real (que Elías no le había reconocido). Don Javier no asume la jefatura de los Parma hasta que muere su sobrino Roberto en ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Los Iturbide-Huarte y sus descendientes - Ibero Torreón
    de México. A la vez, se le otorgó el título de. “Príncipe de Iturbide” con el tratamiento de. “Alteza”. Estos decretos entraron en vigor al ser publicados en ...
  86. [86]
    Nobleza mexicana - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
    La Constitución Política de México prohíbe al Estado reconocer títulos nobiliarios desde 1917. Los actuales Estados Unidos Mexicanos no expide ni reconoce ...Missing: latinoamericanas | Show results with:latinoamericanas
  87. [87]
    Royal House - Casa Real Portuguesa
    Sep 27, 2023 · Dom Duarte Pio was the godchild and heir of Queen Dona Amélia (mother of Dom Manuel II) and is today the Head of the Royal House of Portugal.
  88. [88]
    Who is the current ruler of Portugal since the end of its monarchy ...
    Feb 2, 2025 · The current claimant to the Portuguese throne is Dom Duarte Pio, the 24th Duke of Braganza, closest male-line relative to Dom Manuel II, the ...What happened to the Portuguese monarchy? Is there any ... - QuoraPortugal is a republic today. If we had a referendum, and opted to ...More results from www.quora.comMissing: Highness | Show results with:Highness
  89. [89]
    La familia imperial de Brasil sueña con volver a reinar - El Heraldo
    Jun 4, 2018 · Vestidos con sus mejores galas, jóvenes y ancianos saludaban con reverencias a ' Su Alteza' antes de entrar a la misa conmemorativa en la ...Missing: después | Show results with:después
  90. [90]
    Príncipes aspirantes al trono de Brasil creen que el regreso de la ...
    Jun 19, 2018 · Su "alteza imperial y real", tal el título que se atribuye, dice no querer decantarse por un candidato porque su papel es necesariamente ...
  91. [91]
    A Titled President? - Center for the Study of the American Constitution
    Apr 30, 2021 · Various titles were proposed—“His Elective Majesty,” “His Mightiness,” and “His Highness, the President of the United States and Protector of ...
  92. [92]
    Creating the Constitution: The Executive - Americana Corner
    Dec 8, 2024 · ... President” or “His Highness, the President of the United States and Protector of the Rights of the Same”. That is a mouthful! Over the years ...
  93. [93]
    7.0 Titles (USAF Protocol) - Military Wives
    "Your Highness" is used to address foreign royalty other than a king or queen (such as a baron, earl or princess, etc.). "Your Majesty" denotes a king or queen.Missing: princes | Show results with:princes
  94. [94]
    [PDF] United States Protocol - rexresearch1
    of Address. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal Highness The Prince Philip,. Duke of Edinburgh with President and Mrs. Bush. State Visit, May 2007 ...
  95. [95]
    Welcoming Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal Highness ...
    President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush are honored to host Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal Highness The Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh ...
  96. [96]
    Office of the Head of State - Ministry of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
    His Highness, the Head of State of Samoa ... Afioga Tuimalealiifano has been the holder of one of Samoa's four Tama Aiga titles, Tuimalealiifano since 1977.
  97. [97]
    Tuimaleali'ifano Va'aletoa Sualauvi II, is Samoa's new Head of State
    Jul 5, 2017 · Still, the new Head of State is His Highness, Va'aletoa Sualauvi II, who has been holding the Tama Aiga Title, Tuimalealiifano, since 1977. The ...
  98. [98]
    The Populist Harm to Democracy: An Empirical Assessment
    Dec 26, 2018 · This paper measures the impact that past populist governments have had on democracy by drawing on a first-of-its-kind global database of populist rule.
  99. [99]
    Populism and democracy: The road ahead | PS: Political Science ...
    Jan 14, 2025 · This symposium maps key debates on the complex and often ambivalent relationship between populism and democracy.Missing: correlation absence noble
  100. [100]
    [PDF] The Political Economy of Populism - Harvard Kennedy School
    Oct 13, 2020 · Many argue that the wave of authoritarian populism poses an existential threat to the liberal world order, democracy, open markets, protection ...
  101. [101]
    An investigation into the role of traditional leaders in conflict resolution
    Sep 15, 2022 · The core of this investigation was to explore the roles traditional leaders play in resolving conflict among indigenous communities in South ...
  102. [102]
    Imperial And Traditional Ranks And Titles
    The titles and ranks of state recognised by the Crown Council are listed below. But Ethiopian titles are more numerous, complex and subtle than in most.
  103. [103]
    Ethiopia - Royal Ark
    The sovereign: Emperor (reign name), Elect of God, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah and King of Kings of Ethiopia, with the style of His Imperial Majesty.
  104. [104]
    Fijian Chiefs and Constitutional Change 1874-1937 - Persée
    A majority of the Fijian chiefs led by Sèru Cako- bau had pressed Britain to make Fiji its colony when Fijian society seemed threatened with extinction.Missing: Highness | Show results with:Highness
  105. [105]
    More than a “Petty Chief”: Understanding Fijian Chiefship through ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · The diverse nature of Fiji's chiefship and how its supremacy was strengthened by colonialism have already been closely examined.<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Role Within Royal Family Since ...
    Apr 13, 2023 · Meghan Markle and Prince Harry may have stepped back from royal life, but they retained their titles and Harry kept his place in the line of ...Missing: retention departure
  107. [107]
    Prince Harry and Meghan will stop using their HRH titles ...
    Jan 18, 2020 · The announcement that Harry and Meghan will instead no longer use the titles follows face-to-face talks between Prince Harry, the Queen, who is ...
  108. [108]
  109. [109]
    HRH Crown Prince Al-Hussein bin Abdullah II | Official Website
    HRH Crown Prince Al-Hussein bin Abdullah II, born in 1994, is the eldest son of King Abdullah II and Queen Rania, and a descendant of Prophet Mohammad.His Royal Highness Crown... · Family · The Hashemite family tree of... · Initiatives<|separator|>
  110. [110]
    Letter to His Royal Highness Prince Hamzah Bin Al Hussein on ...
    I am pleased to extend to you my very best greetings and most sincere wishes for continued health, happiness and success, and to express my deepest affection.
  111. [111]
    Jordanian Royal FAQs | Unofficial Royalty
    The Jordanian throne is inherited by the descendants of King Abdullah I, the first king of Jordan and the great-grandfather of the present king, through the ...
  112. [112]
    Changes in the titles of The Royal Family - Kongehuset
    Jan 2, 2024 · After the succession to the throne, HM The Queen will continue to be Majesty and bear the title HM Queen Margrethe.Missing: Highness | Show results with:Highness
  113. [113]
    Change of Titles within the Danish Royal Family as of January 1, 2023
    Sep 28, 2022 · On September 28, 2022, the Danish Royal House announced that there would be some changes coming for royal titles within the Danish Royal Family.Missing: rationalization | Show results with:rationalization
  114. [114]
  115. [115]
    Spring 2020 Transition | The Official Website of The Duke ...
    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will no longer actively use their HRH titles as they will no longer be working members of the family as of Spring 2020.
  116. [116]
    Harry and Meghan will no longer use 'His and Her Royal Highness ...
    Jan 18, 2020 · Harry and Meghan will no longer receive funds for royal duties, it said. The arrangement will go into effect this spring. “Following many months ...
  117. [117]
    The Duchess of Sussex is being criticised for using 'HRH' in a card ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · Can Meghan use the 'HRH' title? It was agreed upon with Queen Elizabeth at the time that neither Meghan nor Harry would use HRH titles.
  118. [118]
    Meghan Markle 'hates the royal family, yet flouts it for her ... - Page Six
    Apr 30, 2025 · The Duke and Duchess of Sussex agreed not to use their “royal highness” titles as part of their negotiations with Queen Elizabeth II to leave ...
  119. [119]
  120. [120]
  121. [121]
  122. [122]
    Republics rank less stable on average than monarchies in every ...
    Feb 26, 2021 · Republics rank less stable on average than monarchies in every region on Earth. Data of 193 countries from World Bank's World Governance ...The following data is why I think a monarchy is better than a republicMonarchies are more economically successful and provide a better ...More results from www.reddit.com
  123. [123]
  124. [124]
    The Evolutionary Foundations of Status Hierarchy - van Vugt
    Nov 18, 2015 · This chapter explores the origins, evolution, and psychology of status and social hierarchy. Given the ubiquitous nature of status hierarchies in both human ...
  125. [125]
    Understanding Social Hierarchies: The Neural and Psychological ...
    Social groups across species rapidly self-organize into hierarchies, where members vary in their level of power, influence, skill, or dominance.
  126. [126]
    Psychological foundations of human status allocation - PNAS
    Aug 18, 2020 · Our results suggest that the primary foundation of human status allocation psychology is benefit generation rather than cost infliction, which ...
  127. [127]
    [PDF] Monarchies, Republics, and the Economy - Wharton Faculty Platform
    Not all monarchies are equally successful, and many of them throughout history have performed far worse than republics. Figure 2 shows our theoretical model in ...
  128. [128]
    Full article: Constitutional monarchies and semi-constitutional ...
    Oct 6, 2020 · Whereas Greece has switched between republic and monarchic forms of governments, Thailand has remained a monarchy, but oscillated between ...
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Protocol for the Modern Diplomat - State.gov
    It is appropriate to begin letters and refer to others directly and indirectly with the following titles. Diplomatic Titles. Chiefs of Mission. • Mr. /Madam ...Missing: Highness | Show results with:Highness
  130. [130]
    Gun Salutes | The Royal Family
    This is a Royal Gun Salute as it happens in a Royal Park, and it is given as a sign of respect or welcome upon various important Royal occasions.Missing: highness European nobility
  131. [131]
    Prince Philip Honored with Military Gun Salutes Across the U.K.
    Apr 10, 2021 · The "most common" salute is the 21-gun salute, "which is reserved for members of the royal family and is the Royal salute."
  132. [132]
    The Royal Titles Act, 1901 - King Edward VII - Jersey Coins
    PRESENT, The King's Most Excellent Majesty in Council. The following Draft Proclamation was this day read at the Board and approved: A. W. FitzRoy. BY THE KING.Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  133. [133]
    Royal Titles and Nobility Ranks in a Monarchy - InfoPlease
    Jan 27, 2025 · The proper address for a prince or princess is "His Royal Highness" or "Her Royal Highness." Charles's former wife, Diana, also held the title ...<|separator|>
  134. [134]
    Greeting a Member of The Royal Family
    There are no obligatory codes, but traditional greetings include a neck bow for men, a curtsy for women, or shaking hands. Address the Queen as 'Your Majesty' ...
  135. [135]
    Addressing the Royal Family - Debretts
    Upon being presented and on leaving, men should bow and women curtsy. The bow is an inclination of the head, the curtsy is a discreet movement, with a slow rise ...Missing: avoidance | Show results with:avoidance
  136. [136]
    All the Rules on Bows and Curtsies for the British Royal Family
    Apr 19, 2023 · To greet other members of the royal family, one would address them as "Your Royal Highness," subsequently followed by either "Sir" or "Ma'am.".Missing: third avoidance
  137. [137]
    How to Address British Royalty and Aristocracy in Person - wikiHow
    Jun 21, 2024 · Opt for a small nod or bob instead of a bow or curtsy. Give a small and respectful nod when a royal passes by or you are introduced to them.Missing: avoidance | Show results with:avoidance
  138. [138]
    Middle East - Etiquette of Addressing Royals - LinkedIn
    Jul 28, 2014 · ... Royalty simply by the letter preceding their name: H.H.: His Highness - i.e. he is royal. H.E.: His excellency - i.e. he is or has been a ...Missing: nobility correspondence
  139. [139]
    What is the proper way to address an Arab royal family member?
    Aug 9, 2022 · Previous to that, there were two other styles, “Highness” (HH) and “Serene Highness” (HSH). These were to denote those of a lesser rank within ...How do royals of different countries address each other? What does ...How to address someone who has been given a title by royalty, e.g. ...More results from www.quora.com
  140. [140]
    How Etiquette and Protocol Differ for Royal Families Across the World
    Apr 11, 2020 · Every royal family operates under a completely different set of rules, etiquette, and traditional protocol. ... Your Highness." This is also ...
  141. [141]
    [PDF] DIPLOMATIC PROTOCOL GUIDE
    Apr 8, 2025 · This Guide is intended for the use of all diplomatic missions accredited to Malta, as well as International. Organisations that have a seat ...
  142. [142]
    [PDF] An etymological dictionary of the French language. Translated by ...
    ... highness; introduced in the l6th cent, from It. aliezza (§ 25). Allesse is a doublet of haulesse, q. v. i"Altier, arfj. haughty ; introduced in the. 16th ...
  143. [143]
    Why is Venice Nicknamed 'La Serenissima'? - Italy Magazine
    Most Serene” was a Byzantine title, bestowed upon the Doge and the Signoria at first, and later extended to the Republic of Venice. But there are other, ...
  144. [144]
    The Republic of Venice, The Greatest Jewel of the Mediterranean?
    Oct 14, 2021 · Throughout its history, the Venetian Republic was formally called “The Most Serene Republic of Venice” (La Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia).<|separator|>