Importins are a family of transport receptors, also known as karyopherins, that mediate the active transport of proteins and other macromolecules from the cytoplasm into the nucleus through the nuclear pore complex (NPC).[1] These proteins recognize specific nuclear localization signals (NLS) on cargo molecules, such as classical NLS (cNLS) consisting of basic amino acid clusters, and facilitate their docking and translocation across the NPC in an energy-dependent manner powered by the Ran GTPase cycle.[2] First identified in the early 1990s as cytosolic factors essential for NLS-mediated nuclear envelope binding, importins play a critical role in regulating nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, which is vital for processes like gene expression, cell cycle progression, and signal transduction.[3]The importin family is broadly divided into importin α and importin β subfamilies, with distinct structural and functional roles in the classical nuclear import pathway.[2] Importin α acts as an adaptor protein that specifically binds to cNLS motifs on cargo proteins via its armadillo repeat domains, forming a heterodimer with importin β, which directly interacts with nucleoporins in the NPC to enable translocation.[1] In the nucleus, the GTP-bound form of Ran (RanGTP) binds to importin β, causing dissociation of the complex and release of the cargo, while importin α is recycled to the cytoplasm via additional factors like CAS (cellular apoptosis susceptibility protein).[2] Mammalian cells express multiple isoforms, with seven importin α variants (α1–α7) exhibiting tissue-specific expression and substrate preferences, and over 20 importin β family members that handle diverse cargos, including those with non-classical NLS.[4]Beyond classical import, importins contribute to broader cellular functions, including mitotic regulation, spindle assembly, and viral replication, where dysregulation has been implicated in diseases like cancer and neurodegeneration.[5] For instance, importin β family members can sequester mitotic regulators in the cytoplasm during interphase and release them upon RanGTP gradients near chromosomes.[6] Their versatility underscores importins as key regulators of nuclear architecture and homeostasis, with ongoing research exploring therapeutic targeting in pathologies involving aberrant nucleartransport.[7]
Fundamentals
Definition and Role
Importins are a family of soluble transport receptors belonging to the karyopherin superfamily that mediate the active, energy-dependent import of proteins bearing nuclear localization signals (NLS) from the cytoplasm into the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). These receptors can operate as monomeric proteins or as heterodimers, such as the classical importin α/β complex, where importin α serves as an adaptor for NLS recognition and importin β facilitates docking to the NPC.[8][9][10]The core function of importins relies on the asymmetric distribution of the small GTPase Ran across the nuclear envelope, establishing a Ran-GTP gradient that drives directional transport. In the cytoplasm, where Ran-GTP levels are low due to the cytoplasmic localization of Ran's GTPase-activating protein (RanGAP), importins bind NLS-containing cargo proteins to form a transport complex. This complex diffuses through the NPC, a large aqueous channel in the nuclear envelope, via interactions with nucleoporins rich in phenylalanine-glycine repeats. Upon reaching the nucleus, high Ran-GTP concentrations—generated by the nuclear-restricted Ran guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RanGEF)—promote Ran-GTP binding to importin β, which dissociates the complex and releases the cargo for nuclear functions. The importin-Ran-GTP complex is then recycled back to the cytoplasm, where Ran-GTP hydrolysis regenerates importin for reuse. This cycle ensures efficient, vectorial transport essential for eukaryotic cellular organization.[4][11][10]Importins play a pivotal role in fundamental eukaryotic processes, including the nuclear import of transcription factors required for gene expression, signaling proteins that propagate cellular responses, and ribosomal components that support protein synthesis, thereby maintaining nuclear-cytoplasmic compartmentalization. Their activity is critical for cellular homeostasis, as disruptions in importin function—often linked to mutations or pathological conditions—can impair nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, leading to proteostasis collapse, aberrant gene regulation, and diseases such as neurodegeneration and cancer.[12][13][14]
Classification
Importins are broadly classified into two primary families: the importin-α (karyopherin-α) family and the importin-β (karyopherin-β) family, which together mediate diverse aspects of nucleocytoplasmic transport.[4] The importin-α family functions primarily as adaptor proteins that recognize classical nuclear localization signals (cNLS) on cargo proteins via arrays of armadillo repeats, facilitating their linkage to the transport machinery.[4] In humans, this family includes seven isoforms encoded by the KPNA1 through KPNA7 genes, which are subdivided into three subfamilies—α1 (KPNA1, KPNA5, KPNA6), α2 (KPNA2, KPNA7), and α3 (KPNA3, KPNA4)—based on sequence homology and functional similarities.[15] These isoforms display tissue-specific expression, enabling specialized regulation of nuclear import in different cell types and developmental contexts.[15]The importin-β family, in contrast, consists of direct-binding receptors that engage the nuclear pore complex through their characteristic HEAT repeats, allowing translocation without requiring adaptors in many cases.[16] Humans possess around 20 members of this family, with importin-β1 (encoded by KPNB1) serving as the canonical representative that typically heterodimerizes with importin-α for transport.[4] Certain β-family members, such as importin-4 (IPO4) and importin-7 (IPO7), operate as β-like monomers to independently recognize and import specific non-classical cargos.[17]Functionally, the diversity of importins supports distinct pathways: α/β heterodimers predominantly handle classical cNLS-bearing cargos, while solo β-family members accommodate non-classical signals or alternative substrates.[4] Some β-family importins also participate in export or bidirectional transport, expanding their roles beyond unidirectional import.[4]
Historical Development
Discovery
The discovery of importin marked a pivotal advancement in understanding nuclear protein import, building on earlier identification of nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in the 1980s. In 1994, Dirk Görlich and colleagues isolated a 97-kDa cytosolic protein from Xenopus egg extracts that was essential for the initial step of NLS-dependent nuclear protein import.[18] This protein, initially termed importin and later recognized as importin-β (also known as karyopherin-β), was shown to promote the selective binding of karyophilic proteins to the nuclear envelope in a signal-dependent manner.[18] Sequence analysis revealed 44% identity with the yeast nuclear pore-associated protein SRP1p, suggesting evolutionary conservation.[18]Shortly thereafter, in 1995, the same group identified importin-α as the NLS-binding adaptor subunit, forming a heterodimeric complex with importin-β.[19] Importin-α, a 60-kDa protein, was found to specifically recognize classical NLS motifs, while importin-β facilitated docking to the nuclear pore complex.[19] This separation of functions was demonstrated through biochemical fractionation and functional reconstitution experiments, establishing the cooperative roles of the two subunits in mediating import substrate recognition and targeting.[19]Early characterization relied on in vitro nuclear reconstitution assays using digitonin-permeabilized mammalian cells, which deplete endogenous cytosol while preserving nuclear integrity.[18] These systems allowed the demonstration that importin, in combination with the small GTPase Ran (also known as TC4), reconstituted energy-dependent, NLS-specific nuclear import into isolated nuclei.[18] The assays highlighted the Ran-dependent nature of the process, with GTP hydrolysis driving translocation through nuclear pores.[18]
Key Milestones
In the mid-1990s, the elucidation of the Ran-GTP hydrolysis cycle marked a pivotal advancement in understanding importin-mediated nuclear transport, demonstrating how the small GTPase Ran, in its GTP-bound form, dissociates importin-cargo complexes in the nucleus to ensure directionality, with key studies identifying the cycle's role between 1995 and 2000.[20] Shortly thereafter, in 1999, the crystal structure of importin-β bound to the importin-β-binding domain revealed its architecture as a superhelical scaffold composed of 19 tandem HEAT repeats, providing the first structural basis for its flexibility and interactions with nucleoporins.[21] Concurrently, the discovery of multiple importin-α isoforms, encoded by the KPNA gene family, highlighted their tissue-specific expression and functional diversification, with initial identifications occurring in the late 1990s and early 2000s.[15]During the 2010s, research uncovered importins' vulnerability to viral hijacking, exemplified by the HIV-1 Rev protein, which exploits importin-β and other receptors like transportin and importin-5 for nuclear entry to facilitate viral gene expression.[22] Parallel investigations linked importin overexpression to cancer progression, with studies showing elevated levels of KPNB1 (importin-β1) and KPNA2 (importin-α1) in tumor cells, correlating with deregulated E2F activity and enhanced nuclear import of oncogenic factors like c-Myc.[23]Recent advances from 2023 to 2025 have refined isoform-specific mechanisms, including a 2024 study demonstrating that importin-α1 and α3 exhibit distinct preferences for viral NLS-bearing cargoes, such as those from bat adeno-associated virus (AAV), enabling targeted nuclear import during infection.[24] In 2025, investigations revealed how fluctuating importin levels during THP-1 monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation suppress nuclear import while enhancing proteasomal degradation of cell cycle proteins, thereby promoting cellular reprogramming.[25] That same year, structural and biochemical analyses established that KPNB1 (importin-β1) mediates nonclassical nuclear import of valosin-containing protein (VCP) to support DNA damage repair.[26] Additionally, a 2025 review synthesized evidence for phase separation of FG-nucleoporins in the nuclear pore complex, illustrating how importins partition through these dynamic barriers to facilitate selective cargo transit.[27]
Molecular Structure
Importin-α
Importin-α, also known as karyopherin-α, is an adaptor protein essential for nuclear import, characterized by a modular architecture comprising approximately 500–550 amino acids in most isoforms. The protein features an N-terminal importin-β-binding (IBB) domain, typically spanning the first 40–70 residues, which is rich in basic amino acids and facilitates interaction with importin-β to form a functional heterodimer for transport. The bulk of the protein consists of 9–10 tandem armadillo (ARM) repeats, each about 42 amino acids long, that fold into a right-handed superhelical solenoid structure with a concave inner surface. This curved solenoid, approximately 100 Å long and 20 Å wide, provides a scaffold for binding nuclear localization signals (NLSs) on cargo proteins.[28][4][29]The ARM repeats form two distinct NLS-binding sites: a major site in repeats 2–4 and a minor site in repeats 6–8, located along the inner concave groove of the solenoid. Monopartite classical NLSs primarily engage the major site through electrostatic interactions with basic residues like arginines and lysines, while bipartite NLSs span both sites, with the spacer region influencing binding orientation. In the absence of cargo, the IBB domain exerts an autoinhibitory effect by binding to these NLS sites, particularly the major groove, thereby masking them and preventing non-specific interactions; this regulation ensures that importin-α remains inactive until cargo engagement displaces the IBB. Crystal structures reveal that the IBB mimics an NLS, occupying the binding pockets with its basic residues, which underscores the competitive nature of this autoinhibition.[30][4][31]Multiple isoforms of importin-α exist across species, with seven in humans (encoded by KPNAs), arising from variations in ARM repeat sequences and linker regions that subtly alter the binding groove's electrostatic properties and flexibility. These differences lead to isoform-specific cargo affinities; for instance, KPNA1 (importin-α5) exhibits a preference for monopartite NLSs due to optimized interactions in its major binding site, while others like KPNA2 favor certain bipartite signals. Such isoform diversification enables tissue- and context-specific nuclearimport, with structural variations in the ARM repeats—such as residue substitutions affecting hydrogen bonding—contributing to differential binding strengths without major changes to the overall solenoid fold.[15][32]
Importin-β
Importin-β, encoded by the gene KPNB1 in humans, is a protein consisting of 876 amino acids that folds into an elongated superhelical structure composed of 19 tandem HEAT repeats.[33][34] Each HEAT repeat comprises approximately 40 residues forming two antiparallel α-helices (A and B) connected by a short linker loop, with the inner concave surface lined by conserved hydrophobic residues that contribute to overall stability.[35] Flexible linkers between these repeats enable significant conformational flexibility, allowing the protein to undergo bending and extension akin to a molecular spring during interactions.[36]The functional domains of importin-β are distributed across its HEAT repeat architecture. The N-terminal region, encompassing the first several HEAT repeats (typically 1–5), forms an arch-like domain that specifically binds Ran-GTP, a critical regulator of nuclear transport directionality.[37] In the central portion, spanning HEAT repeats 6–13, hydrophobic patches on the protein's surface mediate interactions with phenylalanine-glycine (FG) motifs in nucleoporins, facilitating transit through the nuclear pore complex.[38] The C-terminal domain, involving the latter HEAT repeats (14–19), contributes to cargo specificity, particularly in isoforms or family members that bind substrates directly without an adaptor.[35]The importin-β family encompasses multiple members sharing this HEAT repeat-based fold but with variations in repeat number and arrangement for specialized functions. The canonical member, KPNB1 (also known as importin-β1 or karyopherin-β1), exemplifies the standard 19-repeat structure used in classical nuclear import pathways.[34] In contrast, other family members such as importin-4 (IPO4) feature an extended architecture with 24 HEAT repeats forming a longer superhelix, enabling monomeric binding to non-classical cargos like histone complexes.[39] Similarly, importin-7 (IPO7) can operate as a monomer with a comparable HEAT repeat solenoid but specialized arrangements in its C-terminal repeats to accommodate diverse substrates, such as ribosomal proteins, in non-classical import processes.[40] These structural adaptations in family members underscore their roles in pore navigation while maintaining the core superhelical motif for flexibility.[41]
Domain Interactions
Importin-α and importin-β form a stable heterodimer essential for classical nuclear import, primarily through the interaction between the N-terminal importin-β-binding (IBB) domain of importin-α and a specific site on importin-β. The IBB domain, comprising approximately 40-70 residues rich in basic and hydrophobic amino acids, binds to the concave surface of importin-β's solenoidstructure, particularly involving HEAT repeats 7 and 8. This binding occurs via hydrophobic interactions and electrostatic contacts, wrapping the flexible IBB around importin-β in a superhelical manner that stabilizes the complex with an affinity of approximately 1 μM. The heterodimer formation shields the IBB domain, preventing its interference with cargo recognition sites on importin-α while enabling the overall complex to engage with nuclear pore components.[21]The interaction with Ran-GTP plays a critical role in regulating domain interfaces within the importin-β structure, particularly at its N-terminal region. Ran-GTP binds to importin-β through multiple sites, including the N-terminal CRIME domain (residues ~1-200) and additional regions around acidic loop 8 as well as HEAT repeats 12-15, with high affinity (Kd ~10-50 nM). This binding induces a significant conformational change in importin-β, transitioning it from an open, extended apo form to a more compact state that allosterically displaces the IBB domain of importin-α.[37] The resulting dissociation of the α-β heterodimer releases the cargo-importin-α complex in the nucleus, driven by the long-range structural rearrangement in importin-β's HEAT solenoid.[42] This mechanism ensures directionality in transport, as the Ran-GTP gradient maintains low cytoplasmic concentrations of the free heterodimer.[43]Beyond the core heterodimer, importin-β engages in dynamic interactions with FG-nucleoporins (FG-Nups) via multiple low-affinity binding sites distributed across its HEAT repeats. These sites, including hydrophobic pockets on the convex and concave surfaces (e.g., pockets Ia, Ib, and others spanning HEAT 2-19), facilitate rapid, transient associations with FG motifs, with individual affinities in the micromolar to millimolar range (Kd ~1-100 μM).[38] Such multivalent, low-affinity interactions enable efficient translocation through the nuclear pore complex by allowing sequential binding and release, without stable entrapment.[44] In apo forms, autoinhibition mechanisms further modulate these domains: for importin-α, the IBB domain binds intramolecularly to its own armadillo (ARM) repeats, occluding classical nuclear localization signal (NLS) sites and preventing nonspecific cargo engagement (autoinhibitory Kd ~0.1-1 μM); for importin-β, the apo conformation limits FG-Nup access until cargo or IBB binding induces an open state.[31] These regulatory interactions ensure controlled assembly and prevent aberrant binding in the cytoplasm.[45]
Nuclear Import Mechanism
Cargo Binding
Importin-α serves as the primary adaptor for recognizing classical nuclear localization signals (NLSs) on cargo proteins in the cytoplasm, facilitating the formation of a ternary complex with importin-β. The armadillo (ARM) repeat domain of importin-α features two distinct binding sites—major (ARM repeats 2–4) and minor (ARM repeats 7–8)—that accommodate monopartite or bipartite NLS motifs through electrostatic interactions with basic residues. For instance, the monopartite NLS from simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen, PKKKRKV, binds primarily to the major site, while bipartite NLSs, such as KRPAATKKAGQAKKKK from nucleoplasmin, span both sites for enhanced affinity.[4][46]The N-terminal importin-β-binding (IBB) domain of importin-α interacts with importin-β via hydrophobic and electrostatic contacts, recruiting it to form a stable heterodimer that shields the IBB and exposes the NLS-binding sites on importin-α for cargo engagement. This heterodimer assembly is promoted by the low concentration of Ran-GTP in the cytoplasm, which prevents premature dissociation and allows stable cargo binding; in contrast, high nuclear Ran-GTP levels would otherwise disrupt the complex.[47][48][49]The cooperativity between importin-α and -β in the heterodimer enhances binding specificity and efficiency, as importin-β displaces the autoinhibitory IBB domain of importin-α, enabling high-affinity NLS recognition that is not achievable by importin-α alone.[50]In non-classical pathways, members of the importin-β family can directly interact with cargos bearing extended or atypical signals, bypassing importin-α. For example, the arginine-rich motif of HIV-1 Tat protein binds directly to importin-β through its HEAT repeats, enabling nuclear import independent of classical NLS adaptors.[51][10]
Transport Across Nuclear Pore
The importin-cargo complex translocates through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) via facilitated diffusion, mediated by transient interactions between importin-β and the phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeat domains of FG-nucleoporins (FG-Nups). Importin-β, composed of 19 tandem HEAT repeats forming a superhelical structure, binds FG repeats through hydrophobic grooves on its concave surface, allowing rapid on-off kinetics that enable the complex to navigate the FG-rich central channel without permanent entrapment.[38] These interactions occur at multiple binding pockets along the importin-β surface, with varying affinities that facilitate stepwise progression through the pore. In contrast, the importin-α-cargo subcomplex is shielded within the importin-β scaffold, minimizing direct exposure to the FG barrier and ensuring efficient transit.[52]The directionality of this transport is governed by the asymmetric distribution of Ran GTPase, establishing a steep RanGTP gradient across the nuclear envelope, with high concentrations in the nucleus due to the localized action of the chromatin-bound guanine nucleotide exchange factor RCC1 and cytoplasmic GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1.[53] This gradient promotes net inward movement by stabilizing the importin-cargo association in the cytoplasm (low RanGTP) while favoring dissociation upon nuclear entry (high RanGTP), preventing retrograde diffusion.[54] The importin complex, typically ranging from 0.2 to several MDa depending on cargo size, exhibits conformational flexibility that allows passage through the NPC's central channel, which has an effective diameter of approximately 40 nm.[55]Recent structural and biophysical studies have elucidated how liquid-liquid phase separation of FG-Nups contributes to selective barrier formation within the NPC, creating a hydrogel-like mesh that the importin-β surface partitions into via hydrophobic FG interactions, thereby accelerating transit rates.[56] Additionally, isoform-specific variations in importin-α enhance transport efficiency for particular cargos; for instance, importin-α3 demonstrates superior facilitation of nuclear entry for certain viral proteins in lung tissues, highlighting adaptive roles in pathogen responses.[57]
Cargo Release
Upon entering the nucleus, the high concentration of Ran-GTP binds to importin-β with high affinity, inducing an allosteric conformational change that displaces the importin-β-binding (IBB) domain of importin-α from its binding site on importin-β.[58] This displacement releases the cargo previously bound to importin-α via its nuclear localization signal (NLS), ensuring targeted unloading within the nucleus.[58] The Ran GTPase cycle establishes this directionality, with nuclear RCC1 promoting GTP loading on Ran and cytoplasmic RanGAP catalyzing hydrolysis to GDP, generating a steep Ran-GTP gradient across the nuclear envelope.The efficiency of cargo release is driven by an approximately 200-fold higher concentration of Ran-GTP in the nucleus compared to the cytoplasm, which overwhelmingly favors dissociation over re-association of the import complex. Accessory proteins such as nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) contribute by importing Ran-GDP back into the nucleus, where it is reloaded with GTP by RCC1, thereby sustaining the gradient essential for repeated cycles of transport. Subsequent GTP hydrolysis of Ran by RanGAP in the cytoplasm reinforces the process by preventing premature re-engagement of importins with nuclear components during receptor recycling.The mechanism confers specificity by exploiting the nuclear Ran-GTP abundance to inhibit cargo re-binding to importins, as the GTP-bound form of Ran sterically and allosterically blocks the cargo-binding interfaces on both importin-α and importin-β.[58] This ensures unidirectional release and minimizes futile cycling within the nucleus.Recent findings from 2025 highlight a nonclassical example where karyopherin-β1 (KPNB1, also known as importin-β1) mediates the nuclear import and Ran-GTP-dependent release of valosin-containing protein (VCP), enabling its role in DNA damage repair inside the nucleus.[26]
Receptor Recycling
After delivering cargo to the nucleus, importin-β forms a complex with Ran-GTP, which is then exported back to the cytoplasm through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) via interactions between importin-β and FG-repeat nucleoporins. This retrograde transport mirrors the anterograde import mechanism but relies on the high nuclear Ran-GTP concentration to drive complex formation. In the nucleus, the Ran-binding domain 1 (RanBD1) of RanBP2 at the NPC aids in dissociating the Ran-GTP-importin-β complex upon arrival in the cytoplasm, facilitating receptor release.Importin-α is recycled separately from importin-β, forming a ternary complex with the export receptor CAS (cellular apoptosis susceptibility protein) and Ran-GTP in the nucleus, which translocates through the NPC to the cytoplasm. This CAS-Ran-GTP-importin-α complex ensures efficient return of importin-α for reuse in subsequent import cycles.Upon reaching the cytoplasm, the GTP bound to Ran in both recycling complexes is hydrolyzed to GDP by the concerted action of RanGAP (Ran GTPase-activating protein) and RanBP1 (Ran-binding protein 1), which together stimulate RanGAP's activity over 10^5-fold. This hydrolysis disassembles the complexes, releasing free importin-α and importin-β while regenerating Ran-GDP, which is re-imported into the nucleus by NTF2 (nuclear transport factor 2) to complete the cycle.The energy derived from Ran-GTP hydrolysis maintains the Ran-GTP gradient across the nuclear envelope, providing directionality to the entire nuclear transport process by preventing unproductive back-diffusion of receptors. Recent studies have shown that fluctuations in importin levels can modulate the efficiency of these recycling and degradation cycles; for instance, reduced importin-β during cell differentiation promotes proteasomal degradation of nuclear cell cycle proteins by limiting their re-import and retention.[59] Similarly, importin-β regulates the timing and stability of mitotic proteins like CENP-F, influencing their degradation at specific cell cycle stages.[60]
Cargo Specificity
Nuclear Localization Signals
Nuclear localization signals (NLSs) are short amino acid sequences within cargo proteins that direct their import into the nucleus by interacting with importins, primarily through recognition by importin-α for classical motifs. These signals ensure selective transport across the nuclear pore complex, with their sequences varying in composition and structure to accommodate diverse cargoes.[61]Classical NLSs are categorized into monopartite and bipartite types, both enriched in basic residues such as lysine (K) and arginine (R). Monopartite NLSs consist of a single cluster of 4–6 basic amino acids, exemplified by the sequence PKKKRKV from the SV40 large T antigen, which follows a consensus of K(K/R)X(K/R) where X represents any amino acid. Bipartite NLSs feature two basic clusters separated by a flexible linker of 10–12 residues, as seen in nucleoplasmin with the consensus (K/R)(K/R)X10–12(K/R)3/5, allowing the signal to adopt an extended conformation for binding. These classical signals are predominantly recognized by importin-α, which briefly engages them via its armadillo (ARM) repeat domains.[61]Non-classical NLSs bypass importin-α and directly interact with importin-β or related karyopherins, often featuring pyrimidine-rich stretches or hydrophobic motifs rather than basic clusters. Pyrimidine-rich NLSs, such as those in certain RNA-binding proteins, incorporate motifs like RX2–5PY for binding to transportin (an importin-β family member), enabling nuclear entry without the classical adaptor. Hydrophobic motifs in non-classical signals, as in the parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), involve extended hydrophobic surfaces that engage importin-β's concave groove, distinct from basic residue interactions.[62]Emerging studies from 2024–2025 have identified novel motifs in viral proteins, expanding non-classical NLS diversity. For instance, probing of the TAF8 NLS revealed charge-independent targeting by importin-α, suggesting hybrid motifs with reduced reliance on cationic residues for recognition. Additionally, the M-motif, a non-conventional hydrophobic-rich sequence found in viral proteins like SARS-CoV-2 ORF6, facilitates β-only import while inhibiting classical pathways, highlighting adaptive viral strategies for host nuclear hijacking.[63][64]Recognition of NLSs by importin-α relies on electrostatic interactions between basic K/R residues and negatively charged aspartate/glutamate residues in the ARM repeats, with bipartite linkers providing flexibility to span the major and minor binding sites on the receptor. This modular binding accommodates sequence variations while maintaining specificity, as monopartite signals primarily occupy the major site and bipartite ones utilize both via linker conformational adjustments.[65]
Diverse Cargo Examples
Importins transport a wide array of cellular proteins essential for nuclear functions, demonstrating their role in facilitating diverse physiological processes. Classical examples include transcription factors such as STAT1, which relies on importin α/β for nuclear entry via its bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS).[66] Histones, critical for chromatin assembly, are primarily imported by importin β, enabling their incorporation into nucleosomes during cell division and gene regulation.[11] Similarly, numerous ribosomal proteins are shuttled into the nucleus by importin β to support ribosome biogenesis in the nucleolus.[11] Transcription factors like p53 utilize a bipartite NLS recognized by importin α/β for nuclear entry in response to DNA damage.[2]Viral proteins also exploit importin-mediated transport to hijack host nuclear machinery. The HIV-1 Rev protein undergoes nuclear import directly mediated by importin β1, allowing it to facilitate viral RNA export.[67] HIV-1 integrase (IN) depends on transportin 3 (TNPO3) and importin 7 for its nuclear localization, essential for proviral DNA integration into the host genome.[68][69] Ebola virus VP24 protein binds importin α and utilizes the α/β pathway for nuclear import, where it interferes with host antiviral responses.[70] More recently, the large tumor antigen (LTA) of Black Sea Bass polyomavirus has been shown to enter the nucleus via importin α/β1, highlighting importins' role in viral replication across species.[71]Beyond these, importins handle signaling molecules and structural components with broad regulatory impacts. NF-κB, a key transcription factor in immune responses, is imported by importin α/β to activate gene expression in the nucleus.[11]Valosin-containing protein (VCP), involved in proteasomal regulation and protein quality control, interacts with importin β1 (KPNB1) for its nuclear translocation, influencing ubiquitin-dependent processes.[26] Nuclear actin-related proteins, such as cofilin, are transported by importin pathways to modulate cytoskeletal dynamics within the nucleus.[11]
Genetic and Expression
Human Genes
In humans, importins are encoded by multiple genes belonging to the karyopherin family, which facilitate nuclear transport by recognizing and shuttling cargo proteins across the nuclear envelope. The α-importins, also known as importin-α subunits, are encoded by seven genes in the KPNA (karyopherin alpha) family, located on chromosomes 1, 3, 6, 7, 13, and 17. These genes include KPNA1 (also known as RCH1), KPNA2 (RCH2), KPNA3 (QIP2), KPNA4 (IPOA3), KPNA5 (IPO1A), KPNA6 (IPOA5), and KPNA7. For instance, the KPNA1 gene spans approximately 93 kb on chromosome 3q21.1 and encodes a protein of 538 amino acids.[72]The β-importins, or importin-β-like proteins, are encoded by a larger set of genes, with KPNB1 (karyopherin beta 1) located on chromosome 17q21.2. Other notable β-family genes include IPO4 (importin 4) on chromosome 14q12 and IPO7 (importin 7) on chromosome 11p15.4, contributing to a total of approximately 20 karyopherin genes in the human genome that encode importin-related transport receptors.[73][74][75]Evolutionarily, the human importin genes arose from gene duplications of ancestral karyopherins, leading to the diversification of the α and β subfamilies, with no known functional pseudogenes reported in this family. Isoforms from these genes may exhibit specialized functions in cargo recognition, though primary roles remain tied to nuclear import.
Regulation Patterns
Importin gene expression is primarily regulated at the transcriptional level through tissue-specific promoters and responsiveness to cellular signals. For instance, the promoter region of the KPNA2 gene, encoding importin α1, contains elements that drive differential expression in embryonic stem cells versus differentiated fibroblasts, enabling cell type-specific control of nuclear import during development.[76] Under stress conditions, importins like importin 13 exhibit altered transcriptional activation, facilitating nuclear translocation of stress-response factors to coordinate adaptive gene expression programs. Hormonal signals, including steroid hormones, indirectly influence importin transcription by modulating nuclear receptor activity, which in turn affects downstream importin-mediated transport of transcriptional regulators. Post-translational modifications, particularly phosphorylation, fine-tune importin activity and stability. Phosphorylation of the importin β-binding (IBB) domain on importin α1 by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) during mitosis disrupts its interaction with importin β, thereby inhibiting nuclear import and promoting cargo release at specific cell cycle stages.[77] This modification exemplifies how phosphorylation acts as a switch to modulate IBB autoinhibitory functions, ensuring timely regulation of transport.[78] Importin levels also fluctuate dynamically during the cell cycle and differentiation; recent studies demonstrate that reduced importin α/β levels in monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation enhance nuclear proteasomal degradation of cell cycle regulators, preventing aberrant proliferation.[59]Feedback mechanisms involving the Ran GTPase cycle and microRNAs further control importin availability and function. The Ran cycle maintains a nuclear GTP-bound Ran gradient that promotes disassembly of importin-cargo complexes in the nucleus, recycling importins to the cytoplasm and preventing their accumulation, which is essential for sustained transport efficiency.[79] Additionally, microRNAs provide post-transcriptional regulation; for example, miR-101-3p directly targets KPNA2 mRNA, suppressing its expression and thereby limiting nuclear import of oncogenic factors in responsive cell types.[80] These layers ensure precise spatiotemporal control of importin activity in response to cellular needs.
Pathophysiological Implications
Disease Associations
Dysfunction in importin-mediated nucleartransport has been implicated in various cancers, particularly through alterations in importin alpha family members like KPNA2. Overexpression of KPNA2 is associated with aggressive tumor phenotypes and poor patient survival in breast cancer, correlating with larger tumor size, higher grades, and negative hormone receptor status.[81] In melanoma, KPNA2 exhibits high expression levels and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via activation of the NF-κB/p65 signaling pathway, contributing to metastatic progression.[82] Additionally, CREB1 overexpression enhances KPNA2 expression in melanoma tissues and cell lines, further driving oncogenic processes.[83] A truncated form of importin alpha, identified in breast cancer cells such as ZR-75-1, inhibits the nuclear import of p53 by binding to its nuclear localization signal, leading to cytoplasmic retention of this tumor suppressor and potentially facilitating tumorigenesis.[84][85] In melanoma, nucleartransport factor 2 (NTF2), which interacts with importin beta to facilitate RanGDP import and receptor recycling, suppresses metastatic behavior; increased NTF2 expression reduces cell proliferation, motility, and metastasis while enhancing apoptosis in WM983B cells.[86]Importin impairments also contribute to neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's disease (PD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/frontotemporal dementia (FTD). In PD, oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction disrupts the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and nucleocytoplasmic transport, leading to importin-mediated defects that impair nuclear protein import and exacerbate dopaminergic neurodegeneration.[87] A 2024 study further demonstrates that such mitochondrial impairments lead to mislocalization of transcription factors, such as CREB, to the cytoplasm, compromising NPC integrity in PD models. In ALS/FTD, mutations in valosin-containing protein (VCP) cause mislocalization of nuclear proteins like TDP-43 and FUS to the cytoplasm, driven by defective nuclear import pathways involving importins; this aggregation-prone redistribution is a hallmark of disease pathology.[88]Beyond cancer and neurodegeneration, importin alterations are associated with fertility defects and viral infections. In Drosophila models, null mutations in importin alpha 1 (Dα1) result in male and female sterility due to impaired germline stem cell renewal and gametogenesis defects, highlighting its paralog-specific role in reproductive processes.[89][90] Viruses such as Ebola and HIV exploit importin pathways for replication; Ebola virus VP24 binds to the NLS-binding site on karyopherin alpha 5 (importin alpha), inhibiting nuclear import of interferon signaling factors like STAT1 to evade host immunity.[91] Similarly, HIV-1 utilizes importin 7 to facilitate nuclear entry of its reverse transcription complex, enabling infection of non-dividing cells like macrophages.[92]HIV-1 Vpr further interacts with the nuclear transport machinery to promote viral preintegration complex import.[93] In 2025 research, altered importin levels, particularly palmitoylation of importin alpha, have been shown to disrupt mitotic spindle orientation during cellular differentiation, leading to craniofacial developmental defects in models like Xenopus laevis.[94] Importin-7 dysregulation also impairs osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells under mechanical stress, contributing to differentiation defects.[95]
Emerging Therapeutic Targets
Recent research has identified small-molecule inhibitors targeting importin β's interactions with FG-nucleoporin repeats as promising agents for disrupting nuclear transport in cancer, particularly to curb metastasis. For instance, importazole binds importin β and blocks its RanGTP-mediated release, inhibiting nuclear import and exhibiting antiproliferative effects in prostate cancer xenografts, a model relevant to metastatic progression. Similarly, ibetazol, a 2024-developed covalent inhibitor, binds Cys585 on importin β1 to selectively halt both classical (importin α-dependent) and direct nuclear import pathways without cytotoxicity up to 60 µM, showing potential for oncology applications by disrupting oncogenic transcription factor localization.[12] These inhibitors exploit the β-FG interaction essential for translocation through the nuclear pore complex, offering specificity over broad transport blockade.[11]For viral infections, post-2023 studies highlight ivermectin (IVM) derivatives and analogs as inhibitors of importin-mediated viral protein nuclear import. IVM, repurposed from its antiparasitic role, blocks importin α/β1-dependent localization of dengue virus NS3 at low nanomolar concentrations (e.g., 12.5 ng/mL in Huh7 cells), reducing viral replication in vitro and extending survival in AG129 mouse models when combined with atorvastatin.[96] Emerging isoform-specific inhibitors from 2024 viral studies, such as ligands I1 and I2, competitively bind importin α to disrupt Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) NLS peptide interactions, preventing nuclear entry of viral factors with high selectivity for α isoforms.[97] These advances suggest isoform-targeted drugs could minimize off-target effects in antiviral therapies.[98]Gene therapy approaches focus on silencing overexpressed KPNA genes in tumors and enhancing importin α for neurodegenerative clearance. RNA interference-mediated depletion of KPNA7, a cancer-specific isoform, dramatically reduces proliferation in pancreatic (e.g., Hs700T) and breast (e.g., T-47D) cancer cells by inducing mitotic defects and nuclear deformation, positioning it as a viable siRNA target without broad toxicity.[99] In neurodegeneration, upregulating importin α via gene delivery could reverse TDP-43 aggregation in ALS/FTD by solubilizing pathological phase transitions and restoring nuclear import, as supported by insights from 2023 and 2024 studies into VCP/p97's role in directing prion-like proteins to the nucleus for clearance.[100][101]Prospects include phase separation modulators for nuclear pore complex (NPC)-related diseases and isoform-specific antiviral drugs. By 2025, importin α-targeted modulators are poised to counteract NPC dysfunction in neurodegeneration, where FG-nucleoporin phase separation barriers fail, leading to aberrant transport; enhancing α's chaperone-like activity against TDP-43 liquid-liquid phase separation could mitigate ALS/FTD pathology.[13] These strategies emphasize importins' therapeutic versatility across oncology, virology, and neurology.