Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Interphase

Interphase is the longest and most active phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle, during which a cell grows, performs its normal metabolic functions, duplicates its DNA, and prepares for mitotic division, comprising approximately 90% or more of the total cycle duration in proliferating cells.^[1] In materials science, interphase refers to the three-dimensional region at the boundary between two phases in a composite material, exhibiting properties distinct from the adjacent bulk phases.^[2] It is divided into three distinct subphases—G1 (gap 1), S (synthesis), and G2 (gap 2)—that collectively ensure the cell achieves the necessary size, resources, and genetic fidelity before entering mitosis.^[3] Unlike the visible chromosomal movements of mitosis, interphase is characterized by diffuse chromatin and ongoing cellular activities, with the cell existing in a state of metabolic engagement rather than division.^[4] The G1 phase occurs immediately following mitosis and involves cell growth, protein synthesis, and organelle production, lasting variably from hours to days depending on external signals and nutrient availability, during which the cell assesses its environment at a key restriction point to commit to division.^[1] This is followed by the S phase, where DNA replication precisely duplicates the genome into sister chromatids, typically spanning 10–12 hours in mammalian cells and ensuring each daughter cell will receive an identical set of chromosomes.^[1] In the G2 phase, the cell continues to grow, repairs any DNA damage from replication, and synthesizes proteins essential for mitosis, such as tubulin for the mitotic spindle, culminating in checkpoints that verify readiness for division.^[1] Overall, interphase is critical for maintaining genomic integrity and cellular homeostasis, with dysregulation linked to diseases like cancer; for instance, in rapidly dividing human cells, it may occupy about 23 hours of a 24-hour cycle, underscoring its dominance over the brief mitotic phase.^[1] Checkpoints throughout interphase, particularly in G1 and G2, act as regulatory mechanisms to halt progression if conditions are unfavorable, preventing errors in DNA replication or unequal chromosome distribution.^[3]

Biological interphase

Definition and overview

Interphase is the longest phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle, comprising approximately 90% of its total duration, during which the cell grows, performs its routine metabolic functions, and prepares for division without visible condensation of chromosomes.^[5] Unlike the brief mitotic phase that follows, interphase lacks the dramatic structural changes associated with nuclear and cytoplasmic division, allowing the cell to maintain its normal architecture while accumulating resources for replication and segregation.^[6] Historically, interphase was first described by Walther Flemming in 1882 as a "resting stage" between mitotic divisions, observed through staining techniques in plant cells where no apparent nuclear changes occurred beyond an increase in cell size.^[7] This view persisted until the mid-20th century, when advancements in autoradiography and microscopy, notably by Alma Howard and Stephen Pelc in 1953, revealed interphase as a dynamic period of intense activity, including DNA synthesis and cellular preparation.^[7] Key characteristics of interphase include sustained metabolic activity, with the nuclear envelope remaining intact and chromatin dispersed throughout the nucleus to facilitate ongoing processes such as transcription and translation.^[6] In contrast, during mitosis, the nuclear envelope breaks down, and chromosomes condense into distinct structures for segregation, highlighting interphase as the preparatory and maintenance-dominant segment of the cycle.^[6] Interphase plays a critical role in promoting cell growth, ensuring the fidelity of DNA replication, and minimizing errors that could arise during subsequent division, thereby safeguarding genomic integrity across generations of cells.^[8] Disruptions in interphase regulation, such as aberrant progression through its subphases, are strongly associated with diseases like cancer, where uncontrolled proliferation stems from faulty checkpoint mechanisms.^[7]

Stages of interphase

Interphase, the longest phase of the cell cycle, is divided into three sequential subphases: G1 (gap 1), S (synthesis), and G2 (gap 2), which together prepare the cell for mitosis.^[1] These stages occur in temporal progression, with the cell undergoing growth, DNA replication, and final preparations before division./07:_Cell_Division/7.03:_The_Cell_Cycle) The G1 phase follows mitosis and represents the initial growth period, during which the cell increases in size and synthesizes proteins and organelles to restore its full complement after division.^[1] This phase is highly variable in duration, lasting from several hours to days depending on cell type and environmental conditions; for instance, in typical mammalian fibroblasts, it occupies about 11 hours within a 24-hour cell cycle.^[9] During G1, the cell assesses its environment and accumulates resources needed for subsequent replication.^[10] The S phase is characterized by the synthesis of DNA, during which the genome is duplicated in a semi-conservative manner, ensuring each daughter cell receives an identical copy and maintaining genetic fidelity.^[11] DNA content doubles from the diploid 2n level to 4n as each chromosome is replicated into two sister chromatids, while the number of chromosomes remains 2n./02:_Chromosomes_Mitosis_and_Meiosis/2.04:_The_Cell_Cycle_and_Changes_in_DNA_Content) Centrosomes also duplicate during this phase to provide organizing centers for the mitotic spindle.^[1] The S phase typically lasts 6-8 hours in mammalian cells.^[9] In the G2 phase, the cell continues to grow and synthesizes proteins essential for mitosis, while also checking DNA integrity to repair any replication errors from the S phase.^[1] Microtubules begin reorganizing to form the framework for the mitotic apparatus.^[12] This phase generally lasts 3-4 hours.^[9] Transitions between these stages are tightly controlled; notably, the restriction point in late G1 commits the cell to proceed through the cycle and complete division, independent of external growth signals thereafter.^[13] DNA content specifically doubles only during the S phase, marking a key irreversible step in interphase progression./02:_Chromosomes_Mitosis_and_Meiosis/2.04:_The_Cell_Cycle_and_Changes_in_DNA_Content)

Molecular mechanisms and regulation

The progression through interphase is tightly regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their cyclin partners, which form heterodimeric complexes that drive phase-specific transitions via phosphorylation of target substrates. In G1 phase, cyclin D binds to CDK4 or CDK6, forming complexes activated by cyclin-dependent activating kinase (CAK) phosphorylation at threonine 172 (CDK4) or 177 (CDK6), enabling nuclear translocation and initial phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) at serine 807/811 to release E2F transcription factors and promote G1/S transition.^[14] Cyclin E then associates with CDK2, activated by CAK at threonine 160, to further hyperphosphorylate Rb, degrade p27 via ubiquitination, and initiate DNA replication licensing.^[14] During S phase, cyclin A-CDK2 complexes, also CAK-activated at threonine 160, phosphorylate replication proteins like RPA and PCNA to ensure faithful DNA synthesis and prevent re-replication by targeting CDC6.^[14] In G2 phase, cyclin A/B-CDK1 complexes prepare for mitotic entry, with activation involving CAK phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of inhibitory sites (T14/Y15) by CDC25 phosphatases, while cyclin B peaks to coordinate progression.^[14] Cell cycle checkpoints in interphase monitor genomic integrity and halt progression upon detecting anomalies. The G1/S checkpoint assesses DNA damage through the p53-Rb pathway: DNA lesions activate p53, which transcriptionally induces p21/CDKN1A to inhibit cyclin E-CDK2, maintaining hypophosphorylated Rb that represses E2F targets essential for S-phase entry, thereby preventing replication of damaged DNA.^[15] The S-phase checkpoint, triggered by replication stress or stalled forks, involves ATR kinase (recruited to single-stranded DNA via ATRIP) phosphorylating Chk1 at serines 317/345, which inhibits CDC25A to block CDK2 activity and stabilizes replication forks.^[16] ATM kinase complements ATR in response to double-strand breaks, activating Chk2 via phosphorylation at threonine 68 for autophosphorylation and downstream signaling.^[16] The G2/M checkpoint ensures complete replication and repair, with ATR-Chk1 and ATM-Chk2 pathways converging to inhibit CDC25B/C, preventing CDK1 activation and mitotic entry if damage persists.^[16] Broader regulatory pathways integrate these controls during interphase. The DNA damage response (DDR) coordinates repair or apoptosis: unrepaired lesions via p53 activation lead to p21-mediated arrest or pro-apoptotic gene induction, while ATR/ATM-Chk1/Chk2 enforce checkpoint fidelity across G1, S, and G2.^[15] Telomere maintenance occurs primarily in S phase, where shelterin proteins (TRF1, TRF2, POT1) facilitate replication by recruiting helicases like BLM/WRN to resolve G-quadruplexes and t-loops, with residual stress activating ATR to promote telomerase recruitment via TPP1-POT1 for end elongation and counteracting shortening.^[17] Epigenetic modifications, such as histone acetylation by HATs like p300/CBP, enhance chromatin accessibility and gene expression during interphase, influencing cell cycle genes by acetylating H3K27 to activate E2F targets in G1/S while countering repressive H3K27me3 marks.^[18] Dysregulation of these mechanisms drives uncontrolled proliferation, notably in cancers where overactive CDKs bypass checkpoints; for instance, cyclin D-CDK4/6 amplification or loss of inhibitors like p16 promotes Rb inactivation and G1 progression.^[19] Mutations in p53, occurring in approximately 50% of human tumors, impair G1/S arrest and DDR, allowing damaged cells to enter S phase and accumulate genomic instability.^[20]

Role in cellular processes

During interphase, cells engage in extensive metabolic activities that support growth and maintenance, including the biogenesis and expansion of organelles such as mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), particularly in the G1 phase. Mitochondrial fusion and elongation occur during the G1-S transition to meet the increased metabolic demands for DNA replication and cellular expansion. Similarly, ER morphology expands in preparation for heightened protein synthesis and lipid metabolism needs. Protein synthesis, mediated by ribosomes, is a hallmark of interphase, with ribosomal biogenesis and translation occurring continuously to produce cellular components essential for growth. Energy production through glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in the cytoplasm and mitochondria, respectively, generates ATP and NADH to sustain these biosynthetic processes throughout interphase. Interphase also facilitates active gene expression and intracellular signaling, enabling cells to respond to environmental cues. Housekeeping genes, which maintain basic cellular functions, undergo continuous transcription within the nuclear architecture during interphase, often localized in specific chromatin domains for efficient expression. External signals like growth factors activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in the G1 phase, promoting progression through the cell cycle by phosphorylating downstream targets that regulate proliferation. Concurrently, RNA processing—including capping, splicing, polyadenylation—and nuclear export of mature mRNAs occur in the nucleus, ensuring timely delivery to cytoplasmic ribosomes for translation. In non-dividing cells, interphase extends into a quiescent G0 phase, a variant of G1, allowing specialized functions such as neurotransmitter production in neurons while preserving tissue homeostasis through reversible cell cycle exit. This state enables long-term maintenance of differentiated phenotypes without replication, supporting organ stability in multicellular organisms. Pathologically, interphase can be dysregulated, as seen in cellular senescence where progressive telomere shortening leads to prolonged G1 arrest and a persistent interphase-like state, contributing to aging and tissue dysfunction. Additionally, viruses like human papillomavirus (HPV) hijack interphase mechanisms, with viral genomes integrating into host DNA during the S phase to disrupt normal cellular control and promote oncogenesis.

Interphase in materials science

Definition and characteristics

In materials science, the interphase refers to a distinct three-dimensional zone, typically 1-100 nm thick but sometimes extending to micrometers, located between the matrix and reinforcement phases in multiphase materials such as polymer composites. This region arises from chemical and structural gradients at the boundary, resulting in properties that differ from those of the adjacent bulk phases, such as altered molecular orientation, density, or composition due to interactions like adsorption or diffusion.^[21]^[22]^[23] The concept of the interphase originated in the 1960s through early theoretical models for predicting elastic properties in multiphase materials, notably introduced by B. Paul in his work on elastic constants where transitional zones between phases were considered to influence overall behavior. Its understanding evolved significantly in the late 20th century with advances in microscopy techniques that enabled visualization of nanoscale interphase structures and confirmed its role beyond idealized boundaries.^[24]^[25] Key characteristics of the interphase include gradual transitions in mechanical properties, such as a decrease in modulus from the rigid reinforcement (e.g., fiber) to the compliant matrix, which can significantly affect load transfer and overall composite performance. These properties are influenced by factors like interfacial adhesion, wetting during processing, and curing conditions, leading to types such as rigid (brittle) interphases that enhance stiffness but may promote cracking, or ductile (compliant) ones that improve toughness through energy dissipation. Interphases often exhibit reduced shear strengths compared to the bulk matrix due to reduced chain entanglement and stress concentrations.^[26]^[27]^[28] Unlike the idealized zero-thickness interface, which represents a mere two-dimensional boundary in classical models, the interphase possesses finite thickness and volume, allowing it to contribute measurably to the composite's thermo-mechanical behavior and necessitating its inclusion in advanced predictive models.^[21]^[29]^[30] (Note: This materials science context is distinct from the biological interphase in cell cycles.)

Formation and properties

Interphases in materials science, particularly in polymer-matrix composites, form primarily through mechanisms occurring during material processing, such as diffusion at the fiber-matrix boundary, where polymer chains migrate toward the reinforcement surface, creating a gradient region with altered molecular ordering.^[26] Chemical reactions, including transcrystallization in semicrystalline polymers, also contribute, as fiber surfaces act as nucleating sites that induce epitaxial crystal growth perpendicular to the interface, forming a distinct crystalline layer distinct from the bulk matrix.^[31] Additionally, environmental factors like humidity during processing can induce moisture gradients that alter the interphase by promoting hydrolysis or swelling at the boundary, leading to a more diffuse transition zone.^[32] The physical properties of interphases are characterized by their nanoscale dimensions and distinct mechanical and thermal behaviors compared to bulk phases. Interphase thickness typically ranges from 20 to 50 nm in systems like carbon fiber-epoxy composites, measurable using techniques such as small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for structural gradients or atomic force microscopy (AFM) for surface topography and modulus mapping.^[23] Mechanically, interphases often exhibit reduced shear strengths compared to the bulk matrix due to reduced chain entanglement and stress concentrations, which can initiate debonding under load.^[33] Thermally, interphases show altered conductivity, with effective values influenced by phonon scattering at boundaries, potentially reducing overall composite thermal performance by up to 20% in fibrous systems.^[34] Chemically, interphases display compositional gradients, such as higher cross-link density near the interface in epoxy-based composites, arising from localized curing reactions that enhance molecular packing but increase brittleness.^[35] These gradients can lead to stress concentrations that promote interfacial debonding, particularly under cyclic loading.^[36] The incorporation of additives like silane coupling agents modifies these properties by forming covalent bonds across the interface, improving adhesion and increasing cross-link density in the interphase region, thereby enhancing load transfer efficiency.^[37] Experimental characterization of interphases relies on advanced techniques to probe bonding and mechanical variations at the nanoscale. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can identify chemical bonding changes in the interphase from silane treatments in glass fiber composites. Nanoindentation, often combined with AFM, maps modulus gradients, revealing softer interphases in unsized carbon fiber-epoxy systems with thicknesses around 20-50 nm and reduced stiffness near the fiber surface. These methods confirm the interphase's role in dictating composite performance, with modulus variations across the boundary in carbon fiber-epoxy examples.^[38]

Applications and significance

In composite materials, the interphase plays a critical role in enhancing load transfer between fibers and the matrix, thereby improving overall mechanical performance. For instance, in carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites used in aerospace applications, interphase failure is a primary contributor to delaminations, which account for a significant portion of structural failures under cyclic loading. Tailoring the interphase through fiber sizings, such as applying compatible coatings during manufacturing, strengthens adhesion and significantly improves fatigue resistance by mitigating crack propagation at the fiber-matrix boundary.^[39]^[40]^[41] Modeling and prediction of interphase behavior are essential for optimizing composite design, with the Cox shear-lag model providing a foundational approach to describe stress transfer. This model assumes that interfacial shear stress arises from differential axial displacement between the fiber and matrix, given by the equation

\tau = \frac{E_f r}{2} \frac{du}{dz},

where \tau is the interfacial shear stress, E_f is the fiber modulus, r is the fiber radius, and \frac{du}{dz} is the axial strain gradient along the fiber (simplified single-fiber form). Complementary finite element simulations that incorporate explicit interphase zones enable detailed prediction of stress distributions and failure initiation, accounting for realistic gradients in properties across the interphase.^[42]^[43]^[44] The significance of interphases extends to advanced materials like nanocomposites, where clay-polymer interphases enhance barrier properties by creating tortuous paths that impede gas permeation, leading to up to several orders of magnitude improvement in permeability compared to neat polymers. However, in bio-based composites, weak interphases often result from poor compatibility between natural fibers and matrices, contributing to brittleness and reduced toughness under mechanical stress.^[45]^[46]^[47] Recent advances as of 2025 include nanoscale engineering of interphases for sustainable applications, such as integrating graphene for conductive boundaries in electronics and improving interphase stability in recyclable composites to reduce waste. Looking to future directions, interphase degradation during recycling processes poses environmental challenges, as hydrolysis and thermal exposure weaken adhesion in recovered fibers, complicating reprocessing and increasing waste generation in sustainable material cycles.^[48]^[49]^[50]

References

[1]
An Overview of the Cell Cycle - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI
G1, S, and G2 together are called interphase. In a typical human cell proliferating in culture, interphase might occupy 23 hours of a 24 hour cycle, with 1 hour ...
[2]
Cell Cycle (Mitosis) – Introduction to Living Systems
The cell cycle has two major phases: interphase and the mitotic phase (Figure 8.4). During interphase, the cell grows and DNA is replicated. During the mitotic ...
[3]
Cell Cycle - National Human Genome Research Institute
A cell spends most of its time in what is called interphase, and during this time it grows, replicates its chromosomes, and prepares for cell division.
[4]
Genetics, Mitosis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
In interphase, a nuclear envelope surrounds the nucleus, the DNA is replicated in the S phase, and the sister chromatids join together at the central portion of ...
[5]
The Eukaryotic Cell Cycle - NCBI - NIH
At the molecular level, however, interphase is the time during which both cell growth and DNA replication occur in an orderly manner in preparation for cell ...
[6]
A Journey through Time on the Discovery of Cell Cycle Regulation
Feb 17, 2022 · In biology, the cell cycle refers to the sequence of events that a cell must go through in order to divide. These events, which always occur in ...
[7]
Genetics, Cancer Cell Cycle Phases - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
During interphase, some subdivisions are important to cell division and maintenance of the genetic material. The subdivisions consist of G1, S, and G2.[1] The ...
[8]
Duration of cell cycle phases for a typical c - Human Homo sapiens
For a typical rapidly proliferating human cell with a total cycle time of 24 hours, the G1 phase might last about 11 hours, S phase about 8 hours, G2 about 4 ...
[9]
The Cell Cycle and Mitosis – Fundamentals of Cell Biology
Figure 08-01 shows an overview of the stages of the cell cycle. Collectively, we consider G1, S, and G2 to be interphase (i.e., the phases “in between” M phase) ...Cell Cycle Checkpoint... · Specific Cyclins And Their... · Studying Cells: Experimental...
[10]
DNA Replication - The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
DNA replication is a semiconservative process in which each parental strand serves as a template for the synthesis of a new complementary daughter strand.
[11]
Microtubule dynamics at the G2/M transition: abrupt breakdown of ...
Our results indicate that the interphase-mitosis (G2/M) transition of the MT array does not occur by a simple redistribution of tubulin at constant polymer ...
[12]
Regulation of G1 Cell Cycle Progression - PubMed Central - NIH
The Restriction Point (R). If cells are deprived of growth factors prior to R, they exit the cell cycle into a state of quiescence known as G0. One of the ...
[13]
Cyclin-dependent protein kinases and cell cycle regulation ... - Nature
Jan 13, 2025 · Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDKs) are closely connected to the regulation of cell cycle progression, having been first identified as the kinases able to drive ...
[14]
Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling - Nature
Mar 31, 2022 · Thus, loss of p53 or RB function leads to cell cycle dysregulation and malignant proliferation. RB function is lost in many tumors. The RB ...Cell Cycle Control By Rb · P53-P21-Rb Signaling · P53-P21-Rb Target Genes...
[15]
the checkpoint effector kinases Chk1 and Chk2 and the DNA ...
Chk1 and Chk2 activation occurs through distinct mechanisms. Chk1 activation is primarily downstream of ATR in response to genotoxic insults including stalled ...
[16]
Telomere maintenance and the DNA damage response - NIH
Oct 17, 2024 · Replication of telomeres in human cells occurs across S phase and largely originates from origins within subtelomeric regions, proceeding ...
[17]
Epigenetic modifications of histones in cancer | Genome Biology
Nov 20, 2019 · The epigenetic modifications of histones are versatile marks that are intimately connected to development and disease pathogenesis including human cancers.
[18]
A review on the role of cyclin dependent kinases in cancers
Oct 20, 2022 · The abnormal activation of CDKs results in uncontrolled cancer cell proliferation and the induction of cancer stem cell characteristics.
[19]
Why are there hotspot mutations in the TP53 gene in human cancers?
Nov 3, 2017 · The p53 gene contains homozygous mutations in ~50–60% of human cancers. About 90% of these mutations encode missense mutant proteins that ...
[20]
9.4 Interface and interphase in composites - Fiveable
Interphase region exhibits unique properties distinct from both the reinforcement and bulk matrix · Characteristics of the interphase significantly influence ...
[21]
Interphase in Polymer Nanocomposites - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Jan 13, 2022 · The thickness of the interphase is defined as hads = aRg with a in the range of 0.5–0.8. Meanwhile, the conformation of the adsorption chain can ...
[22]
Characterizing Interphase Properties in Fiber Reinforced Polymer ...
Aug 1, 2010 · With contact resonance force microscopy, the average interphase thickness was found to be (49 ± 5) nm, (64 ± 12) nm, and (139 ± 21) nm for ...
[23]
Role of Interphase on the Elastic Behavior of Composite Materials
4. Paul, B. 1960. "Prediction of Elastic Constants of Multiphase Materials," Transaction of the ASME, 218:36-41.
[24]
The interphase in epoxy composites | Semantic Scholar
This article introduces the concept of an interphase in epoxy composites as being an identifiable entity which in some circumstances can control composite ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Interface in composite materials | Philosophical Transactions of the ...
The major factors that influence the interactions between high-performance fibres and organic resins will be established and discussed, as illustrated in a few ...
[26]
Interphase in polymer-matrix composites - Illinois Experts
The interphase in polymer composites is defined as a region which may develop at the interface between the reinforcement and the matrix and possesses the ...
[27]
[PDF] Control of the Properties of the Interface in Organic Matrix Composites
Jul 5, 1991 · Drzal (6) has suggested that the interphase is more rigid than the bulk matrix while Piggott (7) has postulated that the interphase is softer.
[28]
(PDF) The Interface and Interphase in Polymer Matrix Composites
Aug 6, 2025 · More comprehensively, this interaction takes place through the interphase, which is understood as a distinct three-dimensional individual phase ...
[29]
Interphase and interface? - ResearchGate
Oct 9, 2013 · Interface is the two dimensional BOUNDARY between two surfaces. Interphase is the three dimensional REGION between two phases.
[30]
The Interface and Interphase in Polymer Matrix Composites
25 The distinction between the two is that the latter deals more with the behavior, as opposed to the physical properties, of the nanoscale material. The latter ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Experimental detection of a transcrystalline interphase in glass-fibre ...
The interphase in composites is the part of the matrix surrounding the fibre surface and possessing local properties different from those of the bulk matrix.
[32]
Effect of humidity during manufacturing on the interfacial strength of ...
A composite material is a three phase system (fibre, matrix, and interphase), and the effect of humidity in each phase could affect its mechanical performance.
[33]
The Effects of Interphase Properties on Interfacial Shear Strength in ...
A reduction in interfacial shear strength with temperature was observed for all three types of samples tested. The magnitude of this decrease was found to ...Missing: mechanical | Show results with:mechanical
[34]
Interphase Influence on the Effective Thermal Conductivity ... - NIH
Dec 30, 2024 · This study proposes a two-scale approach to determining the effective thermal conductivity of fibrous composite materials.
[35]
Effect of Cross-Link Density on Interphase Creation in Polymer ...
Results show that as cross-link density increases, the length scale of cooperatively rearranging regions (CRRs) decreases. This decrease hinders communication ...
[36]
Chapter: Appendix J: Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites
In composites, fiber-matrix debonding, cracks, and friction slippage improve energy absorption; this is different from the behavior of noncomposite materials.<|control11|><|separator|>
[37]
Nanoscale characterisation of interphase in silane treated glass ...
The properties of the interphase formed between a glass fibre and a polymer resin have been characterised based on novel techniques.
[38]
Interphase Chemical Mapping Of Carbon Fiber-epoxy Composites ...
Apr 11, 2017 · "Interphase Chemical Mapping Of Carbon Fiber-epoxy Composites By Afm-ir Spectroscopy" The properties and performance of carbon fiber ...
[39]
Characterisation of interphase nanoscale property variations in ...
It is widely accepted that the mechanical behaviour of polymer composites is highly dependent on the interphase between fibre and matrix. An appropriately ...
[40]
Determination of Mechanical Properties of Polymer Interphase ...
Direct contact measurement of the mechanical properties in the interphase region has been performed via high-resolution scanning probe nanoindentation ...
[41]
Recent advances of interphases in carbon fiber-reinforced polymer ...
Mar 15, 2022 · The interface plays an important role in adhesion and force transfer between fibers and resin, and its microstructure and properties determine ...
[42]
How to Identify the Defects and Damage in Composites Materials ...
Apr 29, 2025 · This chapter explores the impact of various defects on composite performance, focusing on matrix cracks, delaminations, and fiber cuts/holes.
[43]
Glass fibre sizing: A review - ScienceDirect.com
The review covers size formulation, sizing effects in fibre and composite processing, sizing and fibre performance, sizing and interphase adhesion, and sizing ...
[44]
A generalized shear-lag theory for elastic stress transfer between ...
Mar 15, 2022 · The original shear-lag theory proposed by Cox in 1952 is generalized for fibres with variable radius and with symmetric and asymmetric ends.
[45]
Evaluation of Global Load Sharing and Shear-Lag Models to ...
When Cox's model is applied to concentric cylinders with matrix surrounding the fiber, s is generally considered equal to R (the outer radius of the matrix ...
[46]
Role of the interphase zone in the effective mechanical properties ...
This study conducts a comprehensive numerical analysis to examine how the interphase zone influences the mechanical behavior of multiphase metal matrix ...
[47]
Gas barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites
In this review, we summarize the state-of-the-art progress on the use of platelet-shaped fillers for the gas barrier properties of PNCs.
[48]
Biobased Nanomaterials The Role of Interfacial Interactions for ...
Jan 31, 2023 · Weak interfacial binding of lignin within synthetic polymer composites results in unsatisfactory mech. properties that limit their ...
[49]
Interfacial bonding mechanisms of natural fibre-matrix composites
Interfacial bonding in natural fiber composites is generally due to interdiffusion, electrostatic adhesion, chemical reactions, and mechanical interlocking.
[50]
Interface engineering for high performance graphene electronic ...
Jun 10, 2015 · To apply CVD-grown graphene to electronic devices, graphene must be isolated from this interface and delivered to a target dielectric substrate.Missing: interphases | Show results with:interphases
[51]
Degradation of fiber/matrix interface under various environmental ...
Aug 1, 2023 · In this paper, molecular investigations of interfacial degradation between fiber and matrix under various environmental and loading conditions are reviewed.
[52]
Localized Interphase Degradation in PCL-Cellulose Biocomposites ...
Jan 20, 2020 · This work reveals that a poly(ε-caprolactone) matrix undergoes localized, heterogeneous polymer degradation in the fiber-matrix interphase region during melt- ...