Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Interplanetary dust cloud

An interplanetary dust cloud, also known as the zodiacal cloud, is a vast, flattened disk of microscopic dust particles distributed throughout the inner Solar System, orbiting the Sun and scattering sunlight to produce the observable zodiacal light—a diffuse, triangular glow visible along the ecliptic plane on dark nights.^[1] These particles, typically ranging from 1 to 100 micrometers in size, form a tenuous structure with a density that decreases with distance from the Sun (proportional to approximately r^{-1.3}, where r is the heliocentric distance), concentrated primarily within a few degrees of the ecliptic and extending out to about 5 AU, though sparser beyond Jupiter's orbit.^[2] The cloud's total mass is estimated at around $10^{16} to $10^{17} kilograms, replenished continuously to counteract losses from collisions, Poynting-Robertson drag, and solar wind effects.^[1]^[3] The primary sources of the dust are Jupiter-family comets (JFCs), which contribute 85–95% of the particles at 1 AU through sublimation and fragmentation, with additional inputs from asteroid collisions (about 5–10%) and minor amounts from long-period comets and interstellar dust.^[1] Recent observations from NASA's Juno spacecraft, during its 2011–2016 transit to Jupiter, detected over 15,000 dust impacts and suggested a significant population originating near Mars' orbit (1.5 AU), potentially from its moons Phobos and Deimos or atmospheric ejection, challenging traditional models and indicating a replenishment rate of about 30 kg/s in that region.^[2] Compositionally, the particles are predominantly silicates and carbonaceous materials, often in porous aggregates, with some containing organic compounds and possibly water ice in outer regions, as analyzed from collected samples and remote sensing.^[1] This dust cloud plays a crucial role in Solar System dynamics, influencing planetary atmospheres through impacts (e.g., micrometeorites delivering volatiles to Earth), modulating infrared sky brightness for astronomical observations, and serving as a tracer for exozodiacal dust around other stars via missions like Spitzer and Herschel.^[4] Historical observations date back to Giovanni Cassini in 1693, but modern space-based measurements from probes like Helios and Ulysses have refined models of its three-dimensional structure, revealing asymmetries and temporal variations linked to planetary resonances.^[1]

Definition and Characteristics

Overview

The interplanetary dust cloud, also known as the zodiacal cloud, consists of an ensemble of micrometer-sized dust particles, typically ranging from ~1 to 100 micrometers in size, distributed throughout the inner solar system, primarily within 1 to 5 AU from the Sun.^[2] These particles orbit the Sun and are responsible for scattering sunlight, creating observable phenomena in the night sky.^[4] The cloud's extent is concentrated between approximately 1 AU (Earth's orbit) and beyond Mars at about 2 AU, with detections extending outward to Jupiter's orbit at 5 AU, though density diminishes significantly beyond resonant regions influenced by planetary gravity.^[2]^[4] The density profile of the interplanetary dust cloud is highest near the ecliptic plane, the orbital plane of the solar system, where particle concentrations can reach 3 to 8 × 10⁻¹³ particles per cubic meter, forming a flattened disk-like structure.^[2] At higher ecliptic latitudes, such as 4.5°, the density drops to about one-third of ecliptic levels, reflecting the cloud's confinement to the solar system's primary orbital plane.^[2] This distribution results in the zodiacal cloud being observable as the zodiacal light—a faint, diffuse glow visible along the ecliptic shortly after sunset or before sunrise—due to sunlight scattered by these particles.^[4] Unlike the interplanetary medium, which primarily comprises ionized gas and plasma, the dust cloud represents a distinct particulate component of the solar system's environment.^[5] It also differs from planetary ring systems, which are dense, confined accumulations of dust and larger bodies orbiting individual planets rather than the Sun.^[4] The zodiacal light associated with the cloud was first systematically studied in the late 17th century by astronomer Giovanni Domenico Cassini, who documented its appearance and proposed early explanations involving solar system material in 1693.^[6]

Physical Properties

Interplanetary dust particles exhibit a size distribution spanning approximately 0.1 to 100 micrometers in radius, with the majority of particles peaking in abundance between 10 and 50 micrometers, as determined from analyses of collected samples and in situ measurements. This distribution follows a power-law form for the differential number density n(r) \, dr \propto r^{-\alpha} \, dr, where r is the particle radius and the index \alpha typically ranges from 3.1 to 4.2 depending on the particle source and observational constraints, reflecting a predominance of smaller grains balanced by fewer larger ones that contribute significantly to the total mass.^[7]^[8] The composition of these particles is dominated by silicates such as olivine and pyroxene, alongside carbonaceous materials and trace amounts of metals like iron and nickel, consistent with chondritic abundances observed in stratospheric collections and polar micrometeorites. Isotopic ratios, particularly elevated D/H and ^{15}N/^{14}N values in organic components, indicate origins in the primitive solar nebula, preserving presolar molecular cloud material that survived early solar system processing.^[9]^[10] Optical properties feature a low Bond albedo of approximately 0.05 to 0.15 across visible wavelengths, resulting in strong forward-scattering that produces the observed zodiacal light phenomenon, as inferred from polarimetric and spectrophotometric observations of the dust cloud. Particle porosity, estimated at 20% to 50% based on density measurements of anhydrous and hydrated varieties, yields bulk densities of about 2 to 3 g/cm³, influencing both scattering efficiency and thermal behavior.^[9] Equilibrium temperatures for dust particles near 1 AU range from 200 to 300 K, with a typical value around 280 K for blackbody approximations adjusted for emissivity, decreasing with increasing heliocentric distance due to reduced solar heating. This temperature profile, derived from infrared observations, varies slightly with particle size and composition but maintains thermal equilibrium under Poynting-Robertson drag influences.^[11]^[12]

Origins and Sources

Asteroidal Contributions

The primary mechanism for asteroidal contributions to the interplanetary dust cloud arises from hypervelocity impacts within the main asteroid belt, spanning heliocentric distances of approximately 2 to 3.5 AU. These collisions between asteroids generate fragments through catastrophic disruptions and cratering erosion, continuously replenishing the dust population. Models indicate that the steady-state production rate from such impacts sustains a dust flux at 1 AU on the order of 100 to 500 kilograms per second for asteroidal sources, with the total collisional production in the belt exceeding losses due to radiation forces by a factor of about 16.^[13]^[14] Asteroidal dust particles exhibit distinct compositional traits compared to other sources, characterized by higher crystallinity in silicates such as olivine and pyroxene, lower volatile content due to the absence of significant ices, and Fe-rich signatures prevalent in materials derived from S-type asteroids, which dominate the inner belt. These properties reflect the processed, anhydrous nature of asteroid parent bodies, with iron enrichment stemming from oxidative weathering and collisional heating. Analyses of collected interplanetary dust particles confirm these features, linking them to ordinary chondrite-like compositions from the belt.^[15]^[16] The Yarkovsky effect plays a crucial role in the ejection and transport of small asteroidal particles (roughly 1-100 μm in size) from the belt, inducing semimajor axis drift that perturbs orbits and facilitates escape into interplanetary space or capture by resonances. This thermal force, driven by asymmetric photon emission from rotating bodies, enhances the mobility of sub-kilometer fragments produced in collisions, contributing to the overall dust budget by spreading material beyond the belt's confines. Seminal dynamical models highlight how this effect amplifies the delivery of asteroidal debris to inner solar system regions.^[17]^[18] Notable historical events, such as the catastrophic breakup of the Veritas family progenitor approximately 8 million years ago, have produced transient spikes in dust production, injecting large quantities of fresh debris into the cloud and forming observable infrared dust bands. This event, involving a ~100 km parent body, released material that persists in the zodiacal structure, contributing up to 5-9% of the cloud's infrared brightness in certain wavelengths. Such family-forming collisions underscore the episodic nature of asteroidal dust input.^[19]^[20] In the overall dust budget, asteroidal sources contribute less than 10% of the total zodiacal cloud mass (as of models from 2010 onward), with the radial density peaking around 2.5 AU near the belt's core before declining inward and outward. This distribution aligns with observations of enhanced dust flux through the belt, confirming asteroids as a supplier for the larger-grain component, though comets dominate overall.^[21]^[22]

Cometary Contributions

Comets release dust into the interplanetary medium primarily through the sublimation of volatile ices, such as water ice, as they approach perihelion within approximately 2.7 AU of the Sun, where solar heating drives gas expansion that entrains and ejects embedded solid particles to form the coma and dust tail.^[23] This process is episodic and intermittent, peaking during each orbital passage near the Sun, with individual comets typically ejecting between 10^3 and 10^5 kg of dust per outburst event, though total mass loss per perihelion can reach up to 10^11 kg for active comets like 1P/Halley.^[24] Overall, cometary activity supplies an estimated 10^3 to 10^4 kg/s of dust to the interplanetary cloud, accounting for approximately 90% of particles smaller than 10 μm in size, which dominate the fine-grained component of the zodiacal dust population.^[25]^[23]^[26] The dust particles from comets exhibit distinct compositional traits reflective of their origins in the outer Solar System, including a high proportion of amorphous silicates such as Mg-Fe pyroxene- and olivine-like materials, which form the mineral matrix alongside glassy components like GEMS (glass with embedded metals and sulfides).^[27] Organic refractory material constitutes up to 45-50% by mass in samples from comets like 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and 1P/Halley, comprising complex macromolecules rich in carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen (CHON particles), often in porous, aggregate structures that preserve primitive Solar System chemistry.^[27]^[23] Hydration features, such as minor phyllosilicates or carbonates, appear in some particles, particularly from Jupiter-family comets (JFCs) originating in the Kuiper Belt like 9P/Tempel 1, indicating limited aqueous alteration, whereas Oort Cloud long-period comets tend to show more pristine, less hydrated compositions with higher volatile retention.^[27]^[23] In-situ measurements from the Giotto spacecraft's flyby of 1P/Halley in 1986 provided key insights into these dynamics, revealing a dust flux dominated by micron-sized particles with radiation pressure parameter β (the ratio of radiation force to gravitational force) values ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 for sub-micron grains, which experience significant deflection and form the extended dust tail.^[28] This analysis highlighted how smaller, high-β particles are preferentially ejected and dispersed, distinguishing cometary dust from asteroidal sources. Short-period comets, such as JFCs from the Kuiper Belt, produce dust with more processed organics due to repeated solar passages, while long-period Oort Cloud comets yield relatively unaltered particles with higher organic purity and less thermal metamorphism.^[29] Cometary dust input exhibits temporal variability driven by orbital cycles and stochastic events like comet fragmentation or showers, leading to short-term enhancements in the interplanetary cloud density; for instance, disruptions of large (>100 km) Jupiter-family comets can spike dust production by factors of 10 or more for durations of about 1 million years, influencing zodiacal light brightness and meteoroid streams.^[21] These peaks, occurring roughly every 50 million years, underscore the intermittent nature of cometary contributions compared to steadier asteroidal inputs.^[21]

Other Sources

While asteroids and comets are the primary sources, minor contributions come from long-period comets (beyond JFCs) and interstellar dust, each accounting for less than 5% at 1 AU. Additionally, observations from NASA's Juno spacecraft (2011–2016) detected a significant dust population near Mars' orbit (1.5 AU), suggesting a replenishment rate of about 30 kg/s potentially from Phobos and Deimos or Mars' atmospheric ejection, as of 2020 models.^[1]^[2]

Dynamics and Evolution

Particle Trajectories

Dust particles in the interplanetary medium are subject to complex orbital dynamics dominated by solar gravity, radiation pressure, and drag forces, which determine their trajectories from ejection to eventual removal. Freshly ejected particles from asteroidal or cometary sources initially follow hyperbolic orbits due to the impulsive release velocities combined with radiation pressure, which effectively reduces the solar gravitational attraction. The radiation pressure parameter β, defined as the ratio of radiation force to gravitational force (β = F_rad / F_grav ≈ 0.57 Q_pr / (ρ s), where Q_pr is the radiation pressure efficiency, ρ is material density in g/cm³, and s is particle radius in μm), plays a critical role; for particles smaller than approximately 0.5 μm (for typical ρ ≈ 2 g/cm³), β exceeds 0.5, amplifying the hyperbolic nature and preventing capture into bound orbits unless perturbed. These initially unbound trajectories transition to bound elliptical orbits for particles with β < 0.5 through dissipative effects or scattering, establishing the foundational paths within the zodiacal cloud.^[30] The primary dissipative force shaping these elliptical orbits is Poynting-Robertson (PR) drag, arising from the aberration of sunlight on moving particles, which causes a tangential component that removes angular momentum and leads to an inward spiral. For nearly circular orbits, the rate of change of the semi-major axis a is approximated by da/dt ≈ - (2 β G M_⊙) / (c a), where G is the gravitational constant, M_⊙ is the solar mass, and c is the speed of light; this results in a characteristic lifetime τ ≈ (c a^2) / (4 β G M_⊙), or numerically about 400 (a / 1 AU)^2 / β years for Q_pr ≈ 1.^[31]^[32] Larger particles with lower β experience slower decay, remaining in stable inner solar system orbits for thousands of years, while the drag effect conceptually illustrates the continuous replenishment needed for the dust cloud's persistence. Planetary gravitational perturbations further modify these trajectories, with Jupiter exerting the dominant influence through close encounters that scatter particles, leading to ejection from the solar system or temporary capture into resonant orbits. Simulations show that such interactions can alter eccentricities and inclinations, ejecting up to 80% of certain dust populations beyond Jupiter's orbit while confining others to the inner system.^[33] These perturbations are particularly significant for particles crossing giant planet orbits, introducing stochastic elements to otherwise predictable PR-driven spirals. Recent observations from the Parker Solar Probe (launched 2018, data through 2025) have detected numerous dust impacts in the inner Solar System, supporting models of these perturbed trajectories for small grains.^[34] Size-dependent behavior profoundly influences overall trajectories, as radiation pressure's relative strength varies inversely with particle mass. Particles smaller than about 1 μm, with β > 0.5, are predominantly blown outward on highly eccentric or hyperbolic paths, reaching distances greater than 5 AU before potential ejection or further scattering.^[30] In contrast, larger particles (above 5–10 μm) with β < 0.1 remain confined to the inner solar system, their trajectories dominated by PR drag and minor planetary influences, forming the bulk of the observed zodiacal dust. This dichotomy ensures a size-sorted distribution, with small grains contributing to outer cloud extensions and larger ones to the inner density peak.

Life Cycle Processes

Interplanetary dust particles originate primarily through the ejection of material from cometary sublimation and collisional fragmentation of asteroids and other small bodies within the solar system.^[35] Once released, these particles enter heliocentric orbits where they experience a range of dynamical forces, including Poynting-Robertson drag, which induces an inward spiral migration at rates of approximately 10^{-4} AU per year for micron-sized grains in the inner solar system.^[36] This transport mechanism gradually reduces the particles' orbital semi-major axes, concentrating dust densities toward the Sun while maintaining a steady-state total cloud mass estimated at 10^{16}–10^{17} g.^[36] Destruction occurs through multiple pathways, including thermal sublimation of volatile components near the Sun, where temperatures exceed material stability limits, and accretion onto planetary surfaces, which accounts for roughly 10% of overall particle loss.^[35] Collisions with planets contribute to this removal, particularly for particles crossing terrestrial or Jovian orbits, while solar wind sputtering erodes grain surfaces over time.^[35] For outbound or β-meteoroids ejected by radiation pressure, interactions with the interstellar medium can further degrade particles through additional sputtering and drag.^[35] These processes balance continuous input from sources, yielding equilibrium conditions with residence times of 10^3–10^5 years for most inner solar system dust.^[36] The overall life cycle reflects a dynamic equilibrium, where production rates of approximately 10^{14} g yr^{-1} match removal, punctuated by occasional disruptions from giant impacts on asteroids or comets occurring on timescales of about 10^6 years.^[36] Evolutionary models, such as those incorporating Poynting-Robertson drag, indicate that up to 90% of dust loss in the inner solar system proceeds via this drag mechanism, leading to eventual infall toward the Sun.^[35] These simulations highlight how orbital decay dominates over other losses for bound particles, sustaining the observed zodiacal cloud structure.^[35]

Spatial Distribution

Zodiacal Cloud Structure

The zodiacal cloud exhibits a three-dimensional geometry that is largely symmetric about the ecliptic plane, with a small inclination of 1.7° and a line of ascending nodes at 69° ecliptic longitude, as determined from fits to Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) data.^[37] This structure extends outward to approximately 5 AU for significant densities, influenced by the dynamics of small dust particles, though the highest densities occur within 1 AU of the Sun, where the cloud forms a dense, disk-like configuration.^[38] The overall shape is a flattened lenticular form, with an axial ratio of approximately 1:7 resulting from the effects of solar radiation pressure, which preferentially influences smaller particles and contributes to the cloud's vertical flattening.^[39] Radially, the dust density follows a power-law distribution, with number density n(r) \propto r^{-1.3} to r^{-1.5}, where r is the heliocentric distance, reflecting the accumulation of particles under Poynting-Robertson drag balanced by sources.^[1] ^[40] At 1 AU, all-sky maps derived from IRAS observations in 1983 indicate a typical particle number density of about $10^{-6} particles m^{-3} (or $10^{-12} cm^{-3}) for grains larger than approximately 1 μm. Variations in this radial profile include a depletion in dust density near the Sun, attributed to the sublimation of volatile components in particles at distances below about 0.09 AU (~19 solar radii), creating a dust-free zone observable in white-light coronagraph data from Parker Solar Probe.^[41] Conversely, an enhancement occurs in the asteroid belt region around 2–3 AU, where collisional production from main-belt asteroids significantly boosts local dust concentrations.^[42] Vertically, the cloud features a scale height of approximately 10° at 1 AU, corresponding to a physical height of about 0.17 AU, with the density distribution modeled as n(r,z) \propto \exp\left[-4.97 \left(|z|/r\right)^{1.26}\right], where z is the height above the midplane.^[37] This structure flares outward with increasing heliocentric distance, as the scale height grows proportionally to r, maintaining the overall oblate form. While predominantly isotropic in the azimuthal direction, the cloud shows a slight north-south density imbalance, on the order of a few percent, potentially linked to temporal variations from recent cometary dust injections that perturb the symmetry plane.^[43] ^[44] The density profile is further modulated by particle size effects, where smaller grains experience stronger radiation pressure and contribute to a broader vertical extent, though detailed size dependencies are addressed elsewhere.^[38]

Discrete Features

The interplanetary dust cloud features several discrete structures, including narrow dust bands originating from recent asteroid collisions. These bands appear as localized enhancements in dust density at heliocentric distances of 2–3 AU and are primarily produced by catastrophic disruptions in asteroid families. The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) first detected these features in 1983 through their thermal emission signatures.^[31] A prominent example is the near-ecliptic dust band linked to the Karin cluster, a young subgroup of the Koronis family formed approximately 5.8 million years ago from the breakup of a ~27 km diameter precursor body. This event generated an estimated ~10^{10} kg of dust, forming a band with a width of ~0.1 AU.^[20] Similarly, the Themis family contributes to another dust band, with its older (~1 billion years) precursor body of ~369 km diameter producing observable enhancements tied to collisional debris.^[31] Tenuous planetary dust rings represent another class of discrete features, consisting of interplanetary dust particles temporarily trapped in orbital resonances with inner planets. These rings encircle the orbits of Venus, Earth, and the Moon, where resonant dynamics concentrate dust into toroidal structures. For the Earth, mean-motion resonances create a circumsolar ring with a ~30% density enhancement relative to the surrounding zodiacal cloud near 1 AU.^[45] The Venus ring, imaged by the STEREO and Parker Solar Probe missions, shows a maximum overdensity of ~10% compared to the local interplanetary dust, extending radially and latitudinally around Venus's orbit.^[46] The geocentric ring, including contributions near the Moon's orbit, maintains a low overall density on the order of 10^{-12} g/cm³, reflecting the sparse trapping of micron-sized grains.^[47] Beyond the main asteroid belt, other discrete structures include F-corona enhancements close to the Sun and a dust disk associated with the Kuiper Belt. The F-corona arises from sunlight scattered by interplanetary dust particles within ~10 solar radii, producing brightness peaks observable during solar eclipses and from space-based platforms.^[48] These enhancements trace localized dust concentrations influenced by solar radiation pressure and Poynting-Robertson drag. At distances greater than 30 AU, the Kuiper Belt generates a extended dust disk through mutual collisions of trans-Neptunian objects, with particles diffusing inward over timescales of ~10^4 years due to dynamical perturbations and drag forces.^[49] These discrete features are primarily detected through their mid-infrared emissions at wavelengths of 10–25 μm, where thermal radiation from heated dust grains reveals links to specific parent bodies. IRAS observations of dust bands, for instance, correlate spatial and spectral signatures with families like Themis and Karin, enabling identification of collisional origins without relying on the broader zodiacal cloud geometry.^[50]

Detection and Measurement

Ground-Based Techniques

Ground-based techniques for detecting and characterizing the interplanetary dust cloud primarily rely on remote optical and radio observations from Earth's surface, capturing scattered sunlight and thermal emissions from dust particles. Zodiacal light photometry involves measuring the faint glow produced by sunlight scattered off dust particles using specialized photometers. These instruments quantify the surface brightness as a function of solar elongation θ, which decreases with increasing elongation from the Sun and helps model dust density distributions.^[1] Early historical observations, such as those conducted by William Cranch Bond in 1845, provided foundational photometric data on the zodiacal light's visibility and extent, establishing its link to interplanetary material.^[51] Spectroscopy complements photometry by analyzing the wavelength-dependent signatures of dust composition. In the ultraviolet-visible range, ground-based spectra reveal broad scattering profiles indicative of sub-micrometer particles, while mid-infrared observations detect the prominent 10 μm silicate emission feature arising from Si-O stretching vibrations in dust grains, confirming the prevalence of silicate materials in the cloud.^[52] Radar techniques, particularly using facilities like the Arecibo Observatory, target larger dust particles (tens of micrometers) through meteor head-echo detections at 430 MHz, yielding estimates of the influx flux on the order of 10^{-14} g/cm²/s into Earth's atmosphere. Polarimetry provides insights into particle shapes and orientations by measuring the linear polarization of scattered light, with degrees typically ranging from 20% to 30% in the visible and near-infrared, suggesting elongated or irregular grains rather than perfect spheres.^[53] Ground-based networks facilitate ongoing monitoring of zodiacal light variability, capturing temporal changes in brightness and polarization due to dust dynamics or solar activity influences.^[54] These techniques face significant limitations from Earth's atmosphere, including scattering, absorption, and emission that contaminate signals, particularly in the infrared. Optimal observations occur at high-altitude sites like Mauna Kea, where reduced water vapor and clearer skies minimize interference and enable deeper measurements of the faint zodiacal emission.^[55]

Space-Based Observations

Space-based observations of the interplanetary dust cloud have provided critical in-situ measurements and remote sensing data, enabling precise characterization of dust flux, distribution, and composition beyond the limitations of ground-based telescopes. Early missions like Pioneer 10 and 11, launched in the 1970s, carried meteoroid detectors that recorded impacts from micrometer-sized particles, revealing low dust impact rates in interplanetary space as the spacecraft traversed from Earth orbit to beyond Jupiter.^[56] These detectors used penetration sensors to detect hypervelocity impacts, offering the first direct evidence of the spatial variation in dust density, with higher fluxes observed in the asteroid belt compared to the inner heliosphere.^[57] The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS), operational in 1983, conducted an all-sky survey that mapped thermal emissions from zodiacal dust primarily at 25 μm (though models extend interpretations to longer wavelengths like 250 μm for cooler grains), identifying discrete dust bands associated with asteroid collisions.^[58] IRAS's four-band photometry (12, 25, 60, and 100 μm) resolved the smooth zodiacal background and enhanced structures, such as the circumsolar dust ring, with surface brightness profiles that informed early models of dust temperature around 250 K.^[59] These observations complemented in-situ data by providing global context for dust thermal properties and spatial asymmetries. In the modern era, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) mission, ongoing since the 1990s, has utilized the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) to image the inner zodiacal cloud through scattered sunlight in the F-corona, revealing seasonal variations and a dust-free zone within about 5 solar radii due to radiation pressure blowout.^[48] LASCO's white-light imaging has detected secular increases in F-corona brightness at rates of approximately 0.46% per year, attributed to evolving dust populations near the Sun.^[60] Similarly, the Parker Solar Probe (PSP), launched in 2018, has conducted in-situ measurements during close solar approaches down to 0.17 AU using antenna voltage spikes as proxy dust impact counters, identifying density spikes up to 10 times higher than expected in the innermost heliosphere, linked to dust dynamics under intense solar radiation. Continued measurements from PSP through 2025 have refined models of inner heliosphere dust distributions.^[61] Key instruments for space-based dust detection include impact ionization detectors, as exemplified by the Ulysses mission starting in 1990, which measured particle velocity distributions ranging from approximately 20 to 50 km/s through plasma analysis of impact-generated ions, distinguishing interplanetary from interstellar dust streams.^[62] Hyperspectral imagers on missions like IRAS and later observatories have enabled compositional studies, identifying silicates and organics via emission features in the mid-infrared.^[59] Post-2020 advances from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have leveraged its Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) for high-resolution mid-IR observations, resolving fine structures in zodiacal dust bands and the background emission at 5–28 μm, which helps model the thermal contributions from warm inner-disk grains.^[63] These datasets are integrated into updated dynamical models, such as those originating from Dermott et al. in the 1990s, which now incorporate multi-mission fluxes to simulate asteroid-family contributions and predict band brightness with improved accuracy through refinements in orbital evolution and size distributions.^[64]

Impacts and Effects

Observational Obscuration

The interplanetary dust cloud produces zodiacal light through scattering of sunlight and thermal emission, serving as a major foreground that obscures faint astronomical sources in visible and infrared observations. At 1 AU, this foreground contributes surface brightness levels of approximately 40 nW/m²/sr at 1.4 μm in the near-infrared, with values ranging from tens to hundreds of nW/m²/sr across visible to mid-infrared wavelengths depending on the specific band and viewing geometry, thereby masking extragalactic background light and distant objects.^[65] Subtraction models, such as the empirical model developed from COBE/DIRBE data, account for variations in zodiacal intensity with heliocentric distance and ecliptic latitude, enabling removal of this contamination from survey data. In large-scale astronomical surveys, the zodiacal light's brightness dominates in the mid-infrared and complicates the detection of faint sources such as exoplanets and debris disks by increasing noise levels and requiring precise modeling for source extraction.^[66] Field selection strategies often prioritize regions away from the ecliptic plane to minimize zodiacal interference, where the path length through the dust cloud is shorter, thereby lowering the integrated foreground by factors of 5–10 compared to ecliptic plane views. The obscuration exhibits strong wavelength dependence: it is minimal in the ultraviolet below 0.2 μm, where dust scattering efficiency is low, but peaks at 10–20 μm in the mid-infrared due to the thermal emission from dust grains in equilibrium with solar heating at temperatures around 200–300 K.^[67] Observational strategies to counter this include prioritizing high ecliptic latitude fields, where the path length through the dust cloud is shorter, thereby lowering the integrated foreground by factors of 5–10 compared to ecliptic plane views. Mitigation of zodiacal obscuration relies on predictive tools like zodiacal background calculators derived from 1990s COBE/DIRBE observations, which model the emission across 1.25–240 μm and were instrumental in designing the Spitzer Space Telescope mission launched in 2003, allowing for effective foreground subtraction in deep infrared surveys.^[68]^[69]

Planetary Interactions

Interplanetary dust particles interact with planets primarily through accretion, where gravitational attraction draws particles toward planetary surfaces or atmospheres, leading to impacts that deposit material and influence surface evolution. For Earth, the annual influx of meteoroids and micrometeorites from the interplanetary dust cloud is estimated at approximately 20,000 tons, with particles entering at velocities typically ranging from 10 to 70 km/s.^[70] This flux generates visible meteors upon atmospheric entry and delivers micrometeorites that survive to reach the surface, contributing to the planet's exogenous material budget.^[71] Ablation during entry follows profiles determined by particle size, composition, and speed, with rapid heating causing partial or complete vaporization of volatile components.^[71] Accretion efficiency is enhanced by gravitational focusing, which increases the effective capture cross-section beyond the planet's geometric area. The cross-section σ is given by σ = π R² (1 + v_esc² / v_inf²), where R is the planetary radius, v_esc is the escape velocity, and v_inf is the particle's velocity at infinity.^[72] On airless bodies like the Moon, these impacts drive regolith gardening, a process where micrometeorite bombardment churns the surface layer, mixing and eroding material to depths of several meters over billions of years.^[73] This continual turnover exposes fresh regolith, alters its grain size distribution, and incorporates interplanetary volatiles into the lunar soil.^[74] For planets with atmospheres, such as Earth, entry dynamics involve intense heating and fragmentation, with over 99% of the particle mass typically lost as vapor due to frictional melting and evaporation.^[75] The released vapors and ionized metals from ablation contribute to phenomena like sporadic airglow layers in the mesosphere and charging effects in the ionosphere, influencing plasma densities and electron mobility.^[76] Surviving fragments, often as cosmic spherules, settle as micrometeorites, providing samples of interplanetary dust for analysis. In the outer Solar System, interactions differ due to stronger magnetic fields and ring systems. At Jupiter and Saturn, interplanetary dust particles are captured into magnetospheric orbits, where electromagnetic forces deflect and trap them, feeding tenuous ring structures and enhancing dust populations in the magnetosphere.^[77] This capture process sustains the gossamer rings of Jupiter and contributes to Saturn's E ring extension, with trapped dust interacting with plasma to drive wave-particle dynamics and alter magnetospheric stability.^[78]

Research and Analysis

Sample Collection Methods

Terrestrial collection of interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) primarily occurs in the stratosphere using high-altitude aircraft, such as NASA's U-2 planes, which have been sampling at approximately 20 km altitude since the mid-1970s.^[79] These missions employ inertial impaction collectors to capture unaltered particles entering Earth's atmosphere, yielding chondritic, iron-sulfur-nickel, and mafic silicate types that represent primitive solar system material.^[80] Since 1981, NASA has curated more than 6,900 particles in the 2–100 μm size range as of 2023 through ultra-clean processing at the Johnson Space Center, with the program ongoing and annual yields typically in the hundreds, enabling detailed studies of dust flux and composition.^[81]^[82]^[83] Passive traps in polar regions and ocean sediments provide another key method for accumulating micrometeorites, which include IDPs preserved in ice cores and deep-sea deposits. Antarctic collections, such as those from Dome C and the Transantarctic Mountains, involve melting snow or sieving glacial sediments to recover particles up to 2 mm in diameter, with one notable trap yielding 1.77 g of extraterrestrial material from 15 kg of processed sediment.^[84]^[85] Cleaning protocols, including magnetic separation and chemical etching, distinguish cosmic spherules from terrestrial contaminants based on high-temperature melting features and extraterrestrial elemental signatures like elevated iridium.^[86] Cumulative collections from such sites over decades have amassed grams to kilograms of material, contributing to estimates of Earth's annual IDP influx at around 5,200 tons globally.^[87] Space-based sample collection has advanced through missions deploying aerogel media to gently capture hypervelocity particles without significant alteration. The Stardust mission, launched in 1999 and returning samples in 2006, used silica aerogel blocks to trap over 10,000 dust grains larger than 1 μm from Comet Wild 2's coma, providing analogs for interplanetary dust dynamics despite its primary cometary focus.^[88] Additionally, aerogel grids on Stardust collected seven confirmed interstellar particles during interplanetary cruise phases, offering pristine samples of material traversing the heliosphere.^[89] On the International Space Station, passive collectors like microchannel plates with thin aluminum films have been exposed to the low-Earth orbit environment, recording impacts from IDPs for flux analysis over periods exceeding 700 days.^[90] Post-collection analysis of IDPs relies on standardized pipelines to characterize morphology and provenance, beginning with scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) for non-destructive imaging and elemental mapping.^[91] This technique reveals diverse textures, such as porous, fine-grained structures in chondritic IDPs, with compositions dominated by silicates, sulfides, and metals that distinguish them from terrestrial aerosols.^[9] For age determination, isotopic analysis of cosmogenic ^{26}Al in IDPs, measured via accelerator mass spectrometry, indicates exposure ages exceeding 10^6 years in space, confirming their long transit times through the interplanetary medium before atmospheric entry.^[92] These methods collectively enable tracing IDP origins to asteroid and comet reservoirs, with particle flux rates informing broader models of dust distribution in the inner solar system.^[85]

Key Experiments and Missions

Laboratory hypervelocity impact experiments have been conducted using light-gas guns to simulate collisions among interplanetary dust particles, providing insights into fragmentation processes that sustain the zodiacal cloud. These experiments, targeting materials like hydrous silicates representative of asteroid and comet debris, have demonstrated how impact velocities up to 6 km/s lead to dust production yields influenced by target porosity and composition. Key results include derivation of fragmentation laws where the specific disruption energy Q_D scales approximately with the square of the impact velocity (Q_D \propto v^2), informing models of collisional evolution in the inner solar system. Space missions have provided critical in-situ data on dust dynamics near the Sun. The Helios probes, launched in the 1970s, achieved closest approaches to 0.3 AU and used the Zodiacal Light Experiment to measure density gradients, revealing a radial profile of approximately r^{-1.3} without evidence of a dust-free zone near the Sun. More recently, Japan's DESTINY+ mission, scheduled for launch in 2028, employs the Dust Analyzer to profile asteroid-derived dust during its cruise to (3200) Phaethon, focusing on chemical composition and spatial distribution in the inner solar system to constrain sources of zodiacal dust.^[93]^[94]^[95] Numerical modeling suites integrate dust sources, orbital dynamics, and removal processes to simulate the zodiacal cloud structure. For instance, the 2006 model by Strubbe and Chiang combines collisional production with radiation pressure effects to predict density profiles in debris-dominated environments analogous to the interplanetary cloud. These simulations have been validated against in-situ measurements, such as those from the Cassini Cosmic Dust Analyzer during its interplanetary cruise, which detected bound-orbit dust particles consistent with comet and circumsolar origins at fluxes around $10^{-4} particles m^{-2} s^{-1}.^[96]^[97] Recent reviews in the 2020s have incorporated Parker Solar Probe data, highlighting variability in the inner cloud due to solar wind interactions and small-particle blowout. Observations from the probe's first encounters reveal dust impact rates increasing toward perihelion, with depletions near 7-20 solar radii addressing gaps in prior models of sub-micron grain dynamics.^[98]

References

[1]
[PDF] Zodiacal light observations and its link with cosmic dust: A review
May 18, 2020 · In fact, the zodiacal light originates from the solar light scattered by the tenuous lenticular cloud of interplanetary dust particles ...
[2]
Distribution of Interplanetary Dust Detected by the Juno Spacecraft ...
Nov 11, 2020 · This cloud of dust particles can be observed in reflected sunlight (the Zodiacal light), emission of thermal radiation (Hauser et al., 1984; ...
[3]
Serendipitous Juno Spacecraft Detections Shatter Ideas About ...
Mar 9, 2021 · That luminous glow is the zodiacal light, or sunlight reflected toward Earth by a cloud of tiny dust particles orbiting the Sun.
[4]
Interplanetary dust - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
... interplanetary dust cloud. Effects of radiation pressure and collisions on particle dynamics are discussed, noting the discovery of the variation of the ...
[5]
Zodiacal light observations and its link with cosmic dust: A review
Oct 1, 2020 · The zodiacal light is a nightglow mostly visible along the plane of the ecliptic. It represents the background radiation associated with solar light scattered ...Missing: Olbers | Show results with:Olbers
[6]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032063319305057
[7]
How Long-lived Grains Dominate the Shape of the Zodiacal Cloud
We find that the differential power-law size index −4.2 ± 0.1 for particles generated by JFCs provides a good match to observed data. Our model provides a ...
[8]
[PDF] Properties of Interplanetary Dust: Information from Collected Samples
The idealized goal of this review would be to evaluate the various physical, chemical, isotopic, and mineralogical properties of interplanetary dust in the.
[9]
Isotopic diversity in interplanetary dust particles and preservation of ...
Oct 1, 2014 · The IDP fragments support a model whereby primary dust from the early solar nebula initially formed a variety of reservoirs in the outer solar ...
[10]
AKARI far-infrared maps of the zodiacal dust bands - Oxford Academic
Since the dust located at around 1 au (astronomical unit) from the Sun has a thermal equilibrium temperature of ∼280 K, the ZE exhibits a spectral peak ...
[11]
IRAS observations of the zodiacal background
... presently described in cloud symmetry plane coordinates, where the dust has a gray emissivity and an equilibrium temperature at 1 AU of 280 K.
[12]
Collisional balance of the meteoritic complex - ScienceDirect.com
New models of the “lunar” and “interplanetary” meteoroid fluxes are presented. The spatial mass density of interplanetary meteoritic material at 1 AU is ∼10−16g ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
[13]
[PDF] arXiv:1509.07184v1 [astro-ph.EP] 23 Sep 2015
Sep 23, 2015 · The mass–loss rate around the Earth's orbit is estimated to be ≈ 103 kg s−1 (Grun et al. 1985; Mann & Czechowski 2005). It is, therefore, ...
[14]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.07184
[15]
[PDF] densities and mineralogy of cometary and asteroidal interplanetary ...
IDPs derived from comets - which often contain high concentrations of volatile ices - can be expected to have lower densities compared to asteroidal IDPs which ...
[16]
[PDF] The Effect of Yarkovsky Thermal Forces on the Dynamical Evolution ...
The Yarkovsky effect is a thermal radiation force that causes objects to undergo semimajor axis drift and spinup/spindown as a function of their spin, ...
[17]
Yarkovsky and YORP effects - Scholarpedia
Oct 26, 2013 · The Yarkovsky effect describes a small but significant force that affects the orbital motion of meteoroids and asteroids smaller than 30-40 kilometers in ...
[18]
[PDF] A late Miocene dust shower from the break-up of an asteroid in the ...
Today, collisions in the Veritas family produce one of the prominent dust bands observed by infrared telescopes, and also contribute at least 5 million kg per ...
[19]
Nesvorný et al., Recent Origin of Solar System Dust Bands
Catastrophic collisions have created asteroid families (clusters of asteroids with similar orbital elements) and large amounts of dust. In general, prominent ...
[20]
Comet fragmentation as a source of the zodiacal cloud
This mass is distributed into particles with a range of sizes via a piecewise power-law size distribution. ... Finally, we consider the size distribution of ...
[21]
Asteroidal and cometary dust flux in the inner solar system
In this paper, we study the long-term evolution of dust grains (i.e., r< 100 μm) from main-belt asteroids (MBA) and Jupiter-family comets (JFC) to planets in ...
[22]
Cometary Dust - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
This review presents our understanding of cometary dust at the end of 2017. For decades, insight about the dust ejected by nuclei of comets had stemmed from ...
[23]
[PDF] DUST IN COMETARY COMAE: PRESENT UNDERSTANDING OF ...
In this paper, we present direct information on dust in cometary comae obtained from past in situ missions and from collections of interplanetary dust particles ...
[24]
[PDF] CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF COMETARY DUST
Cometary dust particles are best preserved remnants of the matter present at the onset of the formation of the Solar System. In Space missions, telescopic ...
[25]
[PDF] Studies of cometary dust environments in the context of the Comet ...
Mar 12, 2022 · The solar radiation pressure is typically described by the "beta-parameter", β, which is the ratio of the solar radiation pressure. 20. Page ...
[26]
Key Elements of Comet Composition to Know for Planetary Science
Differences between long-period and short-period comet compositions. Long-period comets originate from the Oort Cloud and often have more pristine, unaltered ...
[27]
[PDF] Radiation Forces on Small Particles in the Solar System t
This article discusses the forces due to solar radiation incident on small particles: radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag, the Yarkovsky effect, and the ...
[28]
[PDF] arXiv:astro-ph/0506674v1 27 Jun 2005
Jun 27, 2005 · Small dust grains are blown out by radiation pressure, as is well known; in addition, gravitational scattering by the giant planets also ...
[29]
[PDF] Origins and Dynamics of Interplanetary Dust Particles
Apr 30, 2005 · The contribution of asteroidal dust to the zodiacal cloud has previously been discussed in terms of a collisional cascade process, first ...
[30]
[PDF] Kuiper Belt Dust Grains as a Source of Interplanetary Dust Particles
In a three-dimensional. Sun-planet-dust system, where the orbit of the dust grain is inclined with respect to the orbital plane of the planet, the dynamics.
[31]
[PDF] Interplanetary Dust - Lunar and Planetary Institute
Sep 4, 2009 · The dust is continually replenished by cometary sublimation, asteroid collisions and other production mechanisms), while evolving dynamically.
[32]
THE ZODIACAL EMISSION SPECTRUM AS DETERMINED BY ...
The total mass we derive for the ZD cloud depends mainly on its optical depth, geometry, and dust composi- tion. The range of values we derive for the cloud ...
[33]
APPENDIX G - NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive
The temperature at 1 AU (T0) is also free. It is assumed that a constant with heliocentric distance is sufficient to deal with local dust properties. The ...
[34]
Sources of Interplanetary Dust - Astrophysics Data System
... scale height of the zodiacal cloud observed at 1 AU. Previous discussions of the observed strengths of these various features indicated that the source of ...
[35]
The Dawn of Dust Astronomy | Space Science Reviews
Oct 14, 2019 · Depending on the particle size, natural meteoroids are outnumbered by man-made space debris: below about 10 μm and above about 100 μm in size ...
[36]
The COBE Diffuse Infrared Background Experiment Search for the ...
The COBE Diffuse Infrared Background Experiment Search for the Cosmic Infrared Background. II. Model of the Interplanetary Dust Cloud. T. Kelsall, J. L. Weiland ...
[37]
PSP/WISPR observations of dust density depletion near the Sun
The zodiacal dust cloud (ZDC) consists of the dust particles that are in orbit around the Sun, which fill the inner interplanetary space in the Solar System.
[38]
The Contribution of Asteroid Dust to the Interplanetary Dust Cloud ...
Other models of the IRAS dust bands suggest production rates up to 1012g/year and also cannot provide a significant source of the dust cloud. Previous article ...
[39]
Temporal variation of the zodiacal dust cloud - Oxford Academic
Abstract. A Markov chain model is constructed to investigate fluctuations in the mass of the zodiacal cloud. The cloud is specified by a three-dimensional.Missing: review | Show results with:review
[40]
The morphology and brightness of the zodiacal light and gegenschein
A considerable north-south asymmetry in the intensity distribution was also found. The position and excess brightness of the gegenschein have also been measured ...
[41]
Structure of the Earth's circumsolar dust ring - ScienceDirect.com
Observations from the Helios spaceprobe proved that this is nearly the case, with the dust volume density actually scaling as 1/r1.3, over the range from 0.3 to ...Missing: geocentric | Show results with:geocentric
[42]
Parker Solar Probe Captures First Complete View of Venus Orbital ...
Apr 15, 2021 · Imaging dust rings, such as the Venus circumsolar ring, opens a new window into how dust is captured and redistributed throughout the solar ...
[43]
[PDF] The Three-Dimensional Structure of the Zodiacal Dust Bands
In the upper panel, emission from another band pair is evident at 6178 latitude; we associate this dust band with the Maria asteroid family.
[44]
Observations of the Solar F-Corona from Space
Sep 12, 2022 · The F-corona's radiance follows power laws, connects to zodiacal light, has a secular increase, and is slightly redder than the Sun. Its shape ...
[45]
[PDF] Structure of the Kuiper Belt Dust Disk - CalTech GPS
Jan 2, 2025 · (1996) and Liou and Zook (1999) undertook a series of numerical simulations to follow the dynamical evolution of KB dust particles from their ...
[46]
[PDF] Physical Properties of Asteroid Dust Bands and Their Sources
(3) The Karin and Veritas family particles contribute by6- 9% in 10-60 m wave- lengths to the total z odiacal cloud brightness within 50 ° and by 9 - 15 ...
[47]
The Zodiacal Light discussed by means of the records of Harvard ...
February 11. Zodiacal light ; this has been conspicuous on every clear evening since full moon. . 1843. October 17. Strong zodiacal light at 4h 45in A.M. 1845.
[48]
[PDF] Rocket Infrared Spectroscopy of the Zodiacal Dust Cloud - DTIC
As sources for the zodiacal dust, this would imply a similar composition for the grains. Whether the 10 micron silicate feature is observable. Page 15. 3 α or ...
[49]
Polarization Spectrum of Near-Infrared Zodiacal Light Observed with ...
Feb 8, 2022 · Among the observed fields, the North Ecliptic Pole shows the maximum degree of polarization of ∼20%, which is consistent with an earlier ...
[50]
New status of the ISON project and results of space debris optical ...
ISON monitors the whole GEO region and tracks the objects at GEO, HEO and MEO. ISON data allows the maintenance of the database of the space objects orbits, ...Missing: light variability
[51]
WIZARD - A New Observation System of the Zodiacal Light
The first light of WIZARD was performed in 2001 at Mauna Kea, Hawaii ... zodiacal light, but they have also revealed limits of ground-based observations.
[52]
Pioneer 11 Meteoroid Detection Experiment: Preliminary Results
The concentration of meteoroids of mass ∼10 -8 gram in interplanetary space, in the asteroid belt, and near Jupiter has been measured.Missing: flux | Show results with:flux
[53]
Results of Pioneer 10 and 11 meteoroid experiments
The meteoroid penetration detectors on Pioneer 11 recorded 87 penetrations (55 on channel 0 and 32 on channel 1) through the 50-micron stainless steel test ...Missing: dust | Show results with:dust
[54]
Zodiacal emission. I - Dust near the earth's orbit - NASA ADS
... 1983 November 22) is shown for all four IRAS bands in Figure 8. The IRAS data were obtained from the Zodiacal Observation History File (version 2, summer ...
[55]
Models for infrared emission from zodiacal dust - ResearchGate
The IRAS survey has provided comprehensive brightness measurements in the infrared, covering the celestial sphere with solar elongation angles ranging from 60° ...
[56]
Dust in the inner solar system - NASA ADS
Recent observations of sun-grazing comets with the white-light coronagraph LASCO aboard SOHO point to the existence of an additional dust component. The dust ...
[57]
The Near-Sun Dust Environment: Initial Observations from Parker ...
Abstract. The Parker Solar Probe (PSP) spacecraft has flown into the densest, previously unexplored, innermost region of our solar system's zodiacal cloud.Missing: counters | Show results with:counters
[58]
The ULYSSES dust experiment - Astrophysics Data System
The ratio of radiation pressure force (Fr~j) over solar gravity (F~~) is ... 1986, "Threedimensional zodiacal dust cloud, a comparative study, Icarus ...
[59]
JWST Background Model - JWST User Documentation
Dec 30, 2016 · At 4–8 μm, the thermal emission from the zodiacal dust is particularly steeply rising, with the surface brightness well described by the Wien ...
[60]
An improved model for the infrared emission from the zodiacal dust ...
In this paper, we attempt to estimate the relative contributions of asteroidal, cometary and interstellar dust to the infrared emission from zodiacal dust ...
[61]
[1704.07166] New Spectral Evidence of an Unaccounted ... - arXiv
Apr 24, 2017 · ... Zodiacal light model, is 42.7+11.9/-10.6 nW/m2/sr at 1.4 um. We also analyzed the data using the Wright Zodiacal light model, which results ...Missing: m²/ | Show results with:m²/
[62]
Simulating the exoplanet yield of a space-based mid-infrared ...
... sky coverage (>99%) throughout the whole year. Besides an imaging ... In our simulations the impact of the zodiacal light on our faint source detection ...
[63]
[astro-ph/9607174] The Hubble Deep Field: Observations, Data ...
Jul 31, 1996 · We present a summary of the criteria for selecting the field, the rationale behind the filter selection and observing times in each band, and ...Missing: zodiacal | Show results with:zodiacal
[64]
The Mid-Infrared Spectrum of the Zodiacal and Exozodiacal Light
Apr 15, 2003 · The exozodiacal spectra are dominated by cold dust, with emission peaking in the far-infrared, while the zodiacal spectrum peaks around 20 um.Missing: dependence minimal UV
[65]
COBE DIRBE Zodiacal Light Prediction Software - Nasa Lambda
This is software written in IDL for calculating the zodiacal light predicted from the DIRBE team interplanetary dust model.Missing: Spitzer mission
[66]
Spitzer: Contributed Software - General
Code to estimate the zodiacal light at each Spitzer band at any time during the mission. ... 1998 model of the COBE DIRBE infrared background using an adaptive- ...
[67]
Mass accumulation of earth from interplanetary dust, meteoroids ...
Sep 1, 2017 · The interplanetary material that enters the Earth atmosphere per day is in the range of 30 - 180 tons with a best guess value of 54 tons per day.
[68]
Impacts of Cosmic Dust on Planetary Atmospheres and Surfaces
Dec 21, 2017 · Neptune's atmosphere shows strong evidence of a recent cometary impact that currently swamps any interplanetary dust input. Jupiter, despite ...
[69]
[PDF] Formation of Stars and Planetary Systems
... cross section of the collision, the second term is the amplifi- cation factor to this cross section due to gravitational focusing. Gravitational focussing thus.Missing: v_inf^ | Show results with:v_inf^
[70]
Secondary Impact Burial and Excavation Gardening on the Moon ...
Aug 30, 2021 · We find that impact gardening is more likely to cycle regolith upward to the surface than to bury regolith to depth.Introduction · Methods · Results · Discussion
[71]
The gardening process of lunar regolith by small impact craters
May 1, 2022 · This research aims to make quantitative analysis to the evolution of the lunar regolith from regional small impacts and apply them in the CE-4 landing area.
[72]
Caveats to Exogenous Organic Delivery from Ablation, Dilution ... - NIH
May 12, 2018 · For those objects that survive to reach the surface, about 60 to >99% of the mass is lost by ablation. Large meteors that fragment are also ...
[73]
Cosmic dust in the earth's atmosphere - RSC Publishing
Jun 7, 2012 · This review discusses the magnitude of the cosmic dust input into the earth's atmosphere, and the resulting impacts from around 100 km to the earth's surface.Introduction · St1. Idps In The Solar... · St2. Metallic Neutral And...<|separator|>
[74]
Magnetospheric capture of interplanetary dust at Jupiter and Saturn.
We will describe the dynamics of captured exogenic dust at Jupiter and Saturn ... ring/halo region and the gossamer rings of Jupiter (Bums et al. Science ...
[75]
Tenuous ring formation by the capture of interplanetary dust at Saturn
Sep 15, 2005 · We examine the capture of interplanetary dust particles by Saturn using both a simple two-dimensional code as well as a three-dimensional ...Missing: feeding | Show results with:feeding
[76]
[PDF] Are the Stratospheric Dust Particles Meteor Ablation Debris or ...
These particles include both interplanetary dust and meteor ablation debris, and are now being collected at an altitt:de of 20 km with NASA's U-2 aircraft. To ...
[77]
A new source of extraterrestrial material for laboratory s - NASA ADS
An illustration of inertial impaction collection of interplanetary dust from the stratosphere. For actual collections a NASA U-2 aircraft is used to ram a 20 ...
[78]
collection and curation of interplanetary dust - AIP Publishing
Since 1981, NASA has conducted a program to collect a representative record of the particle load of the lower stratosphere using impaction collectors flown on.
[79]
[PDF] Constraining the origins of terrestrial stratospheric solid aerosols ...
5070 particles were selected, analysed, curated and the corresponding data was published in the NASA Cosmic Dust Catalogs, covering the period 1981-2020. The.Missing: U2 | Show results with:U2
[80]
The extraterrestrial dust accretion rate on Earth at Dome C, Antarctica
Aug 1, 2025 · The total ET mass flux reaching the top of the Earth atmosphere is 40 ± 20 kilotons.a-1 (Love and Brownlee, 1993), but this number is reduced to ...
[81]
The Extraterrestrial Dust Flux: Size Distribution and Mass ...
Jan 30, 2020 · Our (rank)-size distribution is fit against a power law with a slope of −3.9 (R2 = 0.98) over the size range 200–700 μm. However, the ...
[82]
Geochemical evaluation of cosmic spherules collected from the ...
The present study discusses preliminary results throwing light on the chemical composition of cosmic spherules recovered from the Central Indian Ocean Basin ( ...
[83]
Study: 5,200 Tons of Extraterrestrial Dust Reach Earth's Surface ...
Apr 13, 2021 · Extrapolated to the global flux of particles in the 12-700 μm diameter range, the mass flux of dust at Earth's surface is 5,200 tons/yr (1,600 ...<|separator|>
[84]
Stardust / Stardust NExT - NASA Science
NASA's Stardust was the first spacecraft to bring samples from a comet to Earth, and the first NASA mission to return particles from beyond the Earth Moon ...
[85]
Captured space dust likely came from beyond solar system
Aug 14, 2014 · Seven tiny grains, captured by NASA's Stardust spacecraft, may turn out to be the first confirmed samples of contemporary interstellar dust.Missing: interplanetary | Show results with:interplanetary
[86]
Dust detection in the ISS environment using filmed microchannel ...
May 28, 2005 · Microchannel plates bearing a 60 nm thick aluminum film have been exposed to the external International Space Station (ISS) environment for 756 days.
[87]
Identification and elemental analysis of impact craters on Al foils ...
Oct 16, 2013 · Elemental analyses of the crater features, with Auger electron spectroscopy, SEM-based energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, and scanning ...Methods · Elemental Analysis · Results
[88]
[PDF] OXYGEN ISOTOPE AND 26Al-26Mg SYSTEMATICS OF AN ...
OXYGEN ISOTOPE AND 26Al-26Mg SYSTEMATICS OF. AN INTERPLANETARY DUST PARTICLE ... Interplanetary dust particles, likely to have originated from the breakup ...
[89]
PSP/WISPR observations of dust density depletion near the Sun
No noticeable variations in the brightness of the F-corona axis of symmetry were observed from 2018 to 2020. Key words. methods: data analysis – zodiacal dust – ...
[90]
Destiny + - destiny+ - MPS
DESTINY+ will study the chemical composition and distribution of cosmic dust in the inner solar system.Missing: profiling | Show results with:profiling
[91]
The Case of AU Microscopii - IOPscience
AU Microscopii is a 12 Myr old M dwarf that harbors an optically thin, edge-on disk of dust. The scattered light surface brightness falls with projected ...Missing: zodiacal | Show results with:zodiacal
[92]
Cassini/Cosmic Dust Analyzer in situ dust measurements between ...
Jul 18, 2007 · We report an analysis of the Cosmic Dust Analyzer data obtained during the interplanetary cruise of the Cassini spacecraft between Jupiter and Saturn.
[93]
Parker Solar Probe: Four Years of Discoveries at Solar Cycle Minimum
The Parker Solar Probe's main goal is to study the Sun's magnetic field, corona, and wind. It has made many discoveries, including flying through the ...