Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Issue One

Issue One is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit organization founded in 2013 to reduce the influence of money in politics through bipartisan advocacy and public education efforts.^[1] The group unites Republicans, Democrats, and independents to address systemic issues in American democracy, including campaign finance transparency, election administration, ethical standards for officials, and the regulation of digital information flows.^[1] Its core mission emphasizes building collaborative power to repair political institutions, arguing that unchecked financial influences and partisan divisions undermine representative governance.^[2] Key initiatives include the ReFormers Caucus, which comprises over 200 former members of Congress and executive branch officials who lobby for reforms such as strengthening lobbying disclosure rules and limiting foreign influence in elections.^[1] Issue One has contributed to legislative successes, notably supporting the 2022 Electoral Count Reform Act, which clarified procedures for certifying presidential election results to prevent disruptions like those following the 2020 contest.^[3] Other projects focus on election integrity, such as the National Council on Election Integrity, which advocates for secure voting infrastructure and combats misinformation, and the Faces of Democracy campaign highlighting election workers' roles.^[4] The organization also critiques opaque donor networks amplifying election-related falsehoods, mapping connections among advocacy groups to promote accountability.^[5] While Issue One maintains a crosspartisan profile and holds high ratings from evaluators like Charity Navigator for accountability and impact, its advocacy on restricting political spending has drawn scrutiny from outlets questioning its ties to progressive donor networks like the Democracy Alliance, potentially influencing its policy priorities despite bipartisan framing.^[6]^[7] These efforts underscore its role in pushing for structural changes amid ongoing debates over political funding and institutional trust, though measurable reductions in money's role remain elusive given entrenched legal precedents like Citizens United v. FEC.^[8]

History

Founding and Early Development

Issue One was founded in 2013 by Nick Penniman, a journalist and media executive, as a nonprofit organization focused on bipartisan political reform to curb the influence of money in politics.^[9]^[1] Penniman, who previously served as founder and executive director of the Huffington Post Investigative Fund and director of the Schuman Center for Media and Democracy at the Aspen Institute, established the group in Washington, D.C., with an initial emphasis on educating the public and policymakers about campaign finance challenges.^[9]^[10] From its inception, Issue One positioned itself as crosspartisan, aiming to bridge divides between Republicans, Democrats, and independents to advocate for systemic changes in electoral processes and government ethics.^[1] The organization's early efforts centered on building awareness of how unlimited contributions and dark money distort democratic representation, drawing on Penniman's background in investigative reporting to highlight specific cases of undue influence.^[7]^[11] In the years immediately following its founding, Issue One expanded its foundational work by forging initial partnerships with former elected officials and reform advocates, laying the groundwork for broader coalitions that would later include over 200 ex-members of Congress.^[1] This period marked a shift from narrow campaign finance advocacy toward integrating related issues like ethics enforcement, though the core mission remained rooted in reducing financial distortions in politics.^[1] By 2014, the organization had formalized its structure under its current nonprofit status, enabling sustained operations amid a political landscape increasingly dominated by post-Citizens United spending surges.^[12]

Key Milestones and Expansion

Issue One marked early expansion through the growth of its ReFormers Caucus, which surpassed 200 members in 2018, establishing it as the largest bipartisan coalition of former U.S. Congress members, governors, and Cabinet officials advocating for political reforms across all 50 states.^[13] That year, the organization contributed to the House's creation of the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress, yielding 202 recommendations to enhance legislative efficiency, and to the Senate's adoption of electronic filing for campaign finance reports, improving transparency.^[14] By 2020, Issue One broadened its scope beyond campaign finance to election administration, launching the National Council on Election Integrity and securing $15 million for the "Count Every Vote" campaign to fund secure election infrastructure and counter disinformation.^[14] This initiative reflected organizational growth in coalition-building, partnering with election officials and civic groups to address certification challenges observed in prior cycles.^[15] In 2022, Issue One commemorated roughly a decade of operations by expanding its network to over 300 former officials, civic leaders, and election workers, while achieving passage of the Electoral Count Reform Act, which clarified vice presidential roles in certifying results and reformed objection thresholds under the 1887 Electoral Count Act.^[15]^[14] The organization also initiated the Council for Responsible Social Media to mitigate platform-driven harms to youth and democracy, alongside the Faces of Democracy campaign for election worker support and funding.^[14] Subsequent milestones included securing a minimum pay floor for House staff in 2023 to retain talent and modernize operations, a priority Issue One had advanced for years.^[14] In 2024, its advocacy aided the Senate's bipartisan approval of the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act, merging enhanced child privacy rules with safety measures against online exploitation.^[14] These developments underscore Issue One's evolution from money-in-politics focus to integrated efforts on ethics, elections, and digital accountability, evidenced by scaled programs like "How Elections Work" and persistent bipartisan engagement.^[1]

Organizational Structure

Governance and Operations

Issue One operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization governed by a board of directors that provides strategic oversight and ensures alignment with its mission of political reform. The board consists of 19 members drawn from bipartisan political figures, business leaders, and philanthropists, including former U.S. Representatives Carlos Curbelo (R-FL) and Richard Gephardt (D-MO), chaired by Whitney Hatch, with David Gerson as secretary and Barbara Brenner Buder as treasurer.^[16] An advisory board of 23 experts, such as former Senators Bill Bradley (D-NJ) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), offers counsel on policy and operations without formal voting authority.^[16] Executive leadership directs daily operations, with founder Nick Penniman serving as CEO since the organization's inception, overseeing advocacy, research, and coalition-building efforts.^[17] Co-founder Amelia Leonardi functions as chief operations officer, chief financial officer, and chief of staff, managing administrative functions, financial compliance, and staff coordination to support policy initiatives.^[18] The operational model emphasizes crosspartisan collaboration, with staff teams focused on legislative advocacy, public education, and fiscal sponsorships for aligned projects, while sharing administrative resources with the affiliated Issue One Action, a separate 501(c)(4) entity with overlapping board members.^[1]^[19] Financial operations follow standard nonprofit practices, with audited statements prepared annually as of June 30, reporting revenues primarily from contributions and grants to fund activities without direct government financing.^[12] Governance adheres to IRS requirements for independent board decision-making, conflict-of-interest policies, and transparency in operations, though specific bylaws are not publicly detailed beyond core nonprofit frameworks.^[19] This structure enables agile responses to reform priorities, such as ethics legislation and election integrity, through coordinated staff and coalition networks exceeding 200 former officials.^[1]

Leadership and Key Personnel

Issue One is led by its founder and CEO, Nick Penniman, who established the organization to advance bipartisan reforms in campaign finance, government ethics, and electoral integrity. Penniman previously founded and directed the Huffington Post Investigative Fund, led the Schuman Center for Media and Democracy, and served as publisher of Washington Monthly magazine, among other roles in media and advocacy.^[9] He co-authored the 2016 book Nation on the Take: How Big Money Corrupts Our Democracy and What We Can Do About It, which critiques the influence of money in politics based on investigative reporting.^[9] ^[20] The board of directors, which provides governance oversight, is chaired by Whitney Hatch, former regional director for New England at the Trust for Public Land and former vice president of regulatory affairs at GTE Corporation.^[16] The board comprises 19 members with expertise across politics, business, and nonprofits, including former U.S. Congressman Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), who co-founded the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus; former House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-MO) and CEO of Gephardt Government Affairs; Katie Fahey, founder of Voters Not Politicians and executive director of The People; and Diana Aviv, former CEO of Feeding America.^[16] This composition reflects Issue One's emphasis on cross-partisan collaboration, drawing from Democratic and Republican alumni as well as private-sector leaders.^[16] Amelia Leonardi, co-founder and chief operating officer, also serves as chief financial officer and chief of staff, managing operations, finance, and strategic alignment with the CEO.^[18] Under her leadership, Issue One incorporated as 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) entities, grew its operating budget by over 130%, and doubled its staff headcount.^[18] Leonardi's prior experience includes serving as COO at Represent.US and director of operations at the Center for International Studies.^[18] Among key staff, Policy Director Michael McNulty oversees election protection initiatives, money-in-politics reforms, and related advocacy.^[21] Senior Research Director Michael Beckel directs research on political spending and ethics issues.^[22] In April 2025, Issue One expanded its advocacy team with additions such as Mike Piel as director of philanthropy to support fundraising and organizational growth.^[23]

Activities and Initiatives

ReFormers Caucus

The ReFormers Caucus, initiated by Issue One, constitutes the largest bipartisan assembly of former U.S. elected and appointed officials committed to structural reforms addressing perceived dysfunctions in the American political system, including undue influence from special interests.^[24] Comprising over 200 members as of June 2018, the group includes former members of Congress, 18 governors, 10 ambassadors, 10 cabinet secretaries, and other high-level officials from both major parties.^[13] ^[24] It publicly launched on October 26, 2015, with initial signatories emphasizing the need for sustainable changes based on firsthand governance experience.^[25] Co-chaired by former Representative Connie Morella (R-MD) and former Representative and Ambassador Tim Roemer (D-IN), the caucus operates on five guiding principles: real-time disclosure of political contributions to enable public scrutiny; rigorous enforcement of existing campaign finance and ethics laws; comprehensive ethics and lobbying restrictions to curb post-office influence peddling; initiatives to boost civic participation and voter access; and enhancements to congressional operations for greater accountability and reduced partisanship.^[24] ^[25] These priorities target root causes such as opaque funding flows and weakened institutional norms, which members attribute to eroded public trust in government.^[24] Key activities include issuing public statements to promote institutional stability, such as a 2020 call for Americans to trust state and local election officials' processes amid delayed vote counts, citing decades of secure administration despite occasional logistical challenges.^[26] In February 2021, co-chairs Wamp and Roemer urged a return to bipartisan congressional leadership to counter polarization. Members have also endorsed specific probes, with dozens signing a December 2021 letter praising the bipartisan House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, Capitol events for upholding democratic accountability.^[27] The caucus expanded representation to all 50 states by adding figures like former Representative Scott Taylor (R-VA) and former Senator Mark Begich (D-AK).^[28] While the caucus presents itself as cross-partisan, Issue One's founding by progressive activist Nick Penniman and ties to left-leaning networks like the Democracy Alliance raise questions about potential prioritization of certain reforms, such as stringent donor disclosure, over others like spending limits that might constrain allied interests.^[7] Nonetheless, the inclusion of prominent Republicans, including former Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY), underscores its operational bipartisanship in advocating empirically grounded fixes to money's role in politics.^[29]

Advocacy on Congressional Pay and Ethics

Issue One has prioritized reforms to enhance ethical standards in Congress, emphasizing independent oversight to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest. The organization supports codifying the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) into law to ensure its permanence as an external watchdog investigating potential violations by House members.^[30] In March 2023, members of Issue One's ReFormers Caucus called for a thorough investigation into Representative George Santos and urged the House Ethics Committee to formalize the OCE's role, arguing that such measures would bolster public trust in congressional integrity.^[30] The group has also backed legislation prohibiting members of Congress from trading individual stocks, viewing it as a key step to eliminate insider advantages and perceived self-dealing. In July 2024, ReFormers Caucus co-chairs praised the introduction of the bipartisan ETHICS Act by Senators Gary Peters, Jeff Merkley, Josh Hawley, and Jon Ossoff, which would ban such trading and require divestment into blind trusts.^[31] Issue One reiterated this support in a September 2024 letter from the ReFormers Caucus endorsing an updated ETHICS Act framework, highlighting provisions like prohibiting spouses and dependent children from trading stocks tied to members' nonpublic information.^[32] Additionally, Issue One has critiqued the limitations of the House and Senate Ethics Committees in a report titled "The Ethics Blind Spot," which examines their handling of cases and argues for structural changes to foster higher ethical standards.^[33] Regarding congressional pay, Issue One's advocacy centers on improving compensation for staff rather than members, positing that low junior-level salaries contribute to high turnover, institutional knowledge loss, and greater susceptibility to external influences like lobbyists, which undermine ethical governance. A 2022 report, "Fair Pay: Why Congress Needs to Invest in Junior Staff," documented that inadequate pay hinders recruitment from diverse backgrounds and exacerbates financial pressures in Washington, D.C.^[34] Follow-up analysis in the June 2024 "The Road to Fair Pay" report noted progress, with the share of staff assistants earning below a living wage dropping from 70% in 2020 to 28% in 2023, though Senate staff lagged behind House counterparts (40% vs. 20% below living wage).^[35] The organization recommends establishing a Senate pay floor at $45,000 (mirroring the House since 2022), indexing salaries to inflation, providing paid internships, and increasing office budgets to support these changes, as endorsed by the ReFormers Caucus.^[36] These measures, Issue One argues, would enhance diversity—such as raising representation of people of color among staff—and reduce reliance on special interests, thereby indirectly strengthening ethical accountability.^[35] In August 2021, Issue One applauded House actions to raise maximum staff salaries and bolster human resources, describing staff as the "backbone of Congress."^[37]

Efforts on Election Integrity and Voting Rights

Issue One launched the National Council on Election Integrity in advance of the November 2020 presidential election, convening over 40 bipartisan leaders including former members of Congress, governors, and election experts such as co-chairs Barbara Comstock, Donna Edwards, and Tim Roemer.^[4] The council aimed to combat election disinformation, ensure safety, security, and accessibility amid the COVID-19 pandemic, and defend the legitimacy of U.S. elections through public statements and advocacy.^[4] A cornerstone of these efforts was the "Count Every Vote" campaign, initiated in October 2020 with a $15 million investment in public education, media appearances exceeding 200 mentions, and four television advertisements promoting patience in vote counting and peaceful power transfer.^[4] Post-election, the initiative focused on neutralizing narratives of widespread fraud, supporting certification processes, and facilitating a smooth transition, while the council issued statements urging adherence to legal processes.^[4] In 2022, Issue One advocated for the Electoral Count Reform Act, incorporated into the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act, which clarified certification procedures and raised the threshold for congressional objections to electoral votes from one to one-fifth of each chamber.^[38] To bolster election infrastructure, Issue One's "Don’t Mess With US" campaign secured $400 million in federal funding for state election administration in 2020, followed by $425 million allocated for cybersecurity enhancements.^[38] The organization has also prioritized protecting election officials and workers from threats, launching the Faces of Democracy campaign to amplify their perspectives in policy discussions and advocating for consistent federal funding to modernize voting systems and legal safeguards against harassment.^[39] In October 2024, Issue One partnered with States United Democracy Center on a project to highlight the role of women election officials in maintaining secure elections, producing educational videos amid research indicating higher vulnerability to attacks for female officials.^[40] On voting rights, Issue One opposes post-2020 legislative efforts in over 43 states to restrict access, such as limits on mail-in voting or early voting periods, arguing these undermine turnout without addressing verified integrity issues.^[41] The group endorsed the Freedom to Vote Act in 2021 as a bipartisan compromise including automatic voter registration and Election Day as a holiday, and supports renewal of the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to restore preclearance requirements for states with histories of discriminatory practices.^[42] ^[43] Additionally, Issue One has critiqued groups promoting unsubstantiated claims of noncitizen voting, releasing analyses in October 2024 tracing funding to such narratives while emphasizing verifiable transparency measures like public machine inspections.^[44] In August 2024, it published a National Election Integrity Toolkit outlining state-level safeguards and voter education resources.^[45] These initiatives reflect Issue One's emphasis on balancing security enhancements with expanded access, though critics from conservative perspectives contend they underemphasize fraud prevention in favor of administrative trust.^[38] The Council for Responsible Social Media (CRSM) is a crosspartisan initiative launched by Issue One on October 12, 2022, comprising over 50 leaders from government, industry, academia, and civil society to develop solutions addressing social media's documented harms to youth mental health, civic cohesion, and national security.^[46]^[47] The group emphasizes bipartisan collaboration to advocate for platform accountability, data privacy enhancements, and content moderation reforms without endorsing outright censorship.^[48] Co-chaired by former U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt, its membership includes former Meta executive and whistleblower Frances Haugen, former U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and representatives from technology firms and election officials.^[48]^[2] CRSM's core activities center on policy advocacy and stakeholder convenings to influence federal legislation. In July 2023, the council urged Congress to enact safeguards protecting minors from addictive algorithms and excessive data collection, citing evidence from Surgeon General reports on social media's role in adolescent anxiety and depression rates, which rose 60% among teen girls from 2010 to 2019 per CDC data.^[49] It applauded the Biden administration's May 2023 advisory on youth mental health risks from platforms, pushing for algorithmic transparency and parental controls as interim measures.^[50] The group collaborated with the Senate Judiciary Committee on hearings examining platform accountability and partnered with Cornell University and the U.S. Institute of Peace in July 2023 for a "Peace Games" simulation involving congressional members to model social media's influence on election interference and polarization.^[11]^[51] Additional initiatives include public education and research dissemination. CRSM has released national polls highlighting public support—over 70% of Americans favor stricter age verification and limits on personalized feeds for minors—and contributed to Issue One's broader technology reform efforts, such as opposing unchecked data harvesting by platforms.^[52] In May 2025, the University of Notre Dame hosted a CRSM convening to outline a regulatory roadmap, focusing on enforceable standards for algorithmic bias mitigation and foreign influence detection, drawing on input from national security experts.^[47] By mid-2025, the council expanded with new members like the Digital Democracy Initiative, reinforcing its multi-sectoral approach to countering social media's role in amplifying misinformation during elections, where platforms facilitated over 500 million interactions with disputed claims in 2020 per MIT studies.^[53]^[52]

Research and Public Education

Issue One produces research reports and analyses focused on political reform issues, including election administration, campaign finance transparency, and the influence of technology platforms on democracy. In December 2024, the organization released a report examining how vulnerabilities in social media moderation enabled foreign adversaries to interfere in the 2024 U.S. election cycle, recommending congressional actions to enhance platform accountability.^[54] Earlier that month, Issue One published "Flooding the Gap," a post-election analysis documenting successes and challenges in U.S. election operations, such as staffing shortages and resource allocation, based on data from state and local officials.^[55] These reports draw on empirical data from government records, expert interviews, and quantitative assessments to advocate for policy changes.^[56] The organization's research extends to federal funding mechanisms, as evidenced by a July 2024 analysis of Help America Vote Act (HAVA) grants, which tracked how $425 million in election security funds were allocated and spent by states from 2018 to 2023, revealing disparities in cybersecurity upgrades and voter access improvements.^[57] Issue One also commissions public opinion surveys, such as a September 2025 YouGov poll assessing voter support for congressional oversight of government spending, finding that 68% of respondents favored strengthening the "power of the purse" to counter executive overreach.^[58] Annual impact reports, like "Fix Democracy First" released in December 2024, compile data on lobbying expenditures—totaling over $4.1 billion in 2023—and anonymous donor influences to underscore the need for ethics reforms.^[56] Public education efforts center on campaigns that inform citizens about democratic processes and threats. The Faces of Democracy initiative, launched to support election workers, includes multimedia resources and a 2022 report detailing the mechanics of U.S. elections, from ballot processing to certification, while addressing worker shortages that affected over 40% of jurisdictions in 2022.^[59]^[60] This campaign features testimonials from bipartisan election officials to counter misinformation and promote recruitment, partnering with universities to fill staffing gaps amid a 20-30% vacancy rate in some areas as of August 2023.^[61] Issue One's broader outreach, including narrative studies from September 2022, aims to reframe public discourse on reforms by emphasizing evidence-based stories of corruption's costs, distributed through articles, webinars, and policy briefs to foster grassroots awareness.^[62] These activities position Issue One as a convener of data-driven education, though critics note the organization's reform advocacy may selectively highlight issues aligned with its funding priorities.^[12]

Policy Positions

Campaign Finance Reform

Issue One advocates for reforms to diminish the role of large-scale private funding in elections, emphasizing transparency and accountability to counteract the influence of wealthy donors, lobbyists, and special interests on elected officials.^[8] The organization contends that the post-Citizens United era has amplified dark money and super PAC expenditures, with undisclosed groups spending over $1 billion since 2010, thereby obscuring donor identities and undermining public oversight.^[63] Their approach prioritizes closing legal loopholes that enable coordination between candidates and independent expenditure groups, alongside mandating disclosures of top funders in political advertisements.^[63] Central to these efforts is the proposed Political Accountability and Transparency Act (PATA), which seeks to enforce stricter independence for super PACs from candidates, prohibit leadership PACs—often utilized by lawmakers as personal slush funds—from expenditures on personal luxuries, and require revelation of major donors in ads.^[63] Issue One has mobilized crosspartisan coalitions, including former lawmakers from the ReFormers Caucus, to lobby for bundler disclosure rules in the 2020 and 2024 election cycles, aiming to reveal intermediaries who aggregate contributions from undisclosed sources.^[8] They have also tracked fundraising pressures, analyzing Federal Election Commission reports to quantify how congressional members devote substantial time to "dialing for dollars," diverting focus from legislative work to reelection bids that demand millions in quarterly hauls.^[64] Research from Issue One highlights empirical patterns in spending dominance, such as their "Outsized Influence" analysis documenting that 12 megadonors accounted for $3.4 billion in federal election contributions since the 2010 Citizens United decision—equivalent to one-thirteenth of total funds raised and one-quarter from the wealthiest zip codes.^[65] Complementary studies identify nine firms profiting from election-related consulting amid denialism claims in the 2022 midterms.^[8] On the legislative front, Issue One supported the 2018 Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act, which implemented online filing for Senate reports, expediting public access to data previously delayed by manual processing.^[66] At the state level, Issue One endorses public financing models like Maine's Question 1 "Clean Elections" initiative, which provides matching funds to candidates forgoing large private donations, and similar Seattle measures to curb pay-to-play dynamics.^[67] They monitor over 125 state bills on finance reforms introduced in 33 legislatures within recent sessions, advocating enforcement mechanisms such as audits and training for compliance.^[68] These positions align with broader critiques of Federal Election Commission paralysis, where partisan deadlocks have stalled investigations into violations.^[8] While Issue One frames these as bipartisan imperatives for restoring constituent primacy, implementation faces resistance from incumbents reliant on established fundraising networks.^[1]

Government Ethics and Transparency

Issue One advocates for robust government ethics reforms to enforce stricter standards on public officials, emphasizing prevention of corruption through accountability mechanisms and public disclosures. The organization supports protecting and expanding the authority of the independent Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), which investigates allegations against House members, while proposing the creation of a comparable independent ethics office for the Senate to ensure consistent oversight across chambers.^[69] These measures aim to address perceived weaknesses in self-policing by Congress, where partisan influences have historically undermined enforcement, as evidenced by past attempts to weaken the OCE shortly after its 2008 establishment.^[69] In the realm of congressional conduct, Issue One has endorsed bipartisan legislation prohibiting members of Congress and their immediate family members from trading individual stocks, a practice criticized for potential conflicts of interest amid access to nonpublic information. For instance, on September 3, 2025, the group praised the introduction of such a bill in the House, arguing it would elevate ethical standards and enhance public confidence by curbing insider advantages.^[70] This position aligns with broader calls for revolving door restrictions, limiting former lawmakers' ability to immediately lobby their ex-colleagues, to mitigate undue influence from special interests.^[69] For the executive branch, Issue One pushes to fortify the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) by clarifying its supervisory role over agency ethics officials and designating it as a central repository for all ethics decisions to promote uniformity and public access.^[71] The organization has repeatedly urged incoming administrations to issue executive orders strengthening ethics pledges, including mandatory financial disclosures and protections for Inspectors General against political interference in investigations of executive misconduct. On January 24, 2025, Issue One joined watchdogs in pressing the incoming Trump administration to adopt enhanced ethics rules, underscoring the need for an ethics overseer to coordinate training and compliance.^[72] Such reforms respond to documented ethical lapses, like those involving former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, where inadequate enforcement allowed prolonged conflicts.^[73] Transparency in lobbying represents a core pillar, with Issue One seeking to overhaul the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) of 1995, which it views as antiquated and riddled with exemptions obscuring billions in annual special interest spending. Key proposals include closing the "shadow lobbying" loophole, which permits former officials to advise clients on policy without registering as lobbyists if they avoid direct contact with covered officials.^[74] By mandating comprehensive registration and real-time reporting, these changes would illuminate influence networks, enabling better scrutiny of potential quid pro quo arrangements. Issue One's crosspartisan coalitions have amplified these efforts, framing them as essential to restoring democratic integrity without partisan overreach.^[69]

Broader Electoral Reforms

Issue One advocates for independent redistricting commissions to draw congressional district boundaries, arguing that such bodies reduce partisan gerrymandering by removing self-interested politicians from the process.^[75] The organization has published analyses documenting extreme gerrymanders in states like North Carolina and Wisconsin, where maps entrenched one party's control despite competitive statewide electorates, as evidenced by efficiency gaps exceeding 10% in favor of the drawing party.^[76] In 2020, Issue One filed a bipartisan amicus brief in a Michigan federal court case defending the state's voter-approved nonpartisan commission, emphasizing that independent processes produce maps more reflective of voter preferences, with empirical data from states like Arizona showing reduced partisan bias in post-reform districts compared to pre-reform baselines.^[77] The group also prioritizes reforms to the presidential election certification process, particularly through its support for the Electoral Count Reform Act (ECRA) enacted in December 2022 as part of the omnibus spending bill.^[3] ECRA clarified the vice president's ceremonial role in counting electoral votes, eliminated the ability of a single member from each chamber to force objections, and raised the objection threshold to one-fifth of both houses—changes Issue One promoted to prevent exploitation of ambiguities exposed in the 2020 election disputes, where over 140 House Republicans and several senators attempted to object based on unsubstantiated fraud claims.^[78] Issue One's National Council on Election Integrity lobbied for the legislation, citing historical precedents like the 1877 Hayes-Tilden crisis, where vague rules led to prolonged uncertainty, and arguing that the reforms enhance causal safeguards against disruptions without altering core electoral outcomes.^[38] Beyond these, Issue One has endorsed broader bipartisan measures for election infrastructure, including increased federal grants under the Help America Vote Act—such as $425 million allocated in 2020 for cybersecurity and administration—to bolster state capacities against interference, based on data showing vulnerabilities in 40 states' systems prior to enhancements.^[57] However, the organization does not publicly advocate for alternative voting systems like ranked-choice voting or nonpartisan open primaries, focusing instead on institutional guardrails that preserve plurality voting while addressing verifiable flaws in districting and certification mechanics.^[79]

Funding and Financial Backing

Major Donors and Revenue Sources

The ReFormers Caucus functions as a project of Issue One, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to political reform advocacy, and lacks independent financial reporting or revenue streams. Funding for the Caucus derives from Issue One's overall budget, which in fiscal year 2022 totaled $6,980,798 in revenue, predominantly from private contributions and foundation grants, with expenses of $6,280,243.^[80] By fiscal year 2023, Issue One's revenue had risen to $14,827,410, reflecting increased philanthropic support amid expanded initiatives, including bipartisan reform coalitions like the Caucus.^[7] Major known revenue sources include grants from established philanthropic entities, often channeled through donor-advised funds that prioritize progressive-leaning causes such as campaign finance restrictions and government transparency. For instance, the William & Flora Hewlett Foundation provided $1.2 million in 2017 to support Issue One's early reform efforts.^[7] In 2022, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors contributed $250,000, while the Hopewell Fund—part of the Arabella Advisors network known for facilitating anonymous progressive donations—gave $100,000.^[7] The following year, 2023, saw $350,000 from the Silicon Valley Community Foundation and $366,500 from the Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, both vehicles for high-net-worth individuals' giving.^[7] Issue One maintains historical connections to the Democracy Alliance, a consortium of wealthy progressive donors including figures like George Soros, which directed $1.6 million to a predecessor organization shortly after Issue One's 2014 founding.^[81] Individual support has included past backing from Jonathan Soros, son of George Soros and a philanthropist active in democracy reform spaces.^[7] These funding patterns, drawn from sources with documented left-of-center priorities, underscore a reliance on institutional philanthropy that favors regulatory interventions in elections and lobbying, even as the ReFormers Caucus draws bipartisan former officials; such donors rarely disclose full contributor lists, limiting transparency into ultimate origins.^[7] Issue One publishes IRS Form 990 filings but does not itemize all donors, consistent with nonprofit norms for protecting privacy while adhering to minimum disclosure thresholds.^[82]

Ties to Broader Networks

Issue One's funding connections link it to a network of philanthropic organizations predominantly aligned with progressive priorities in democracy reform and governance. Among its publicly acknowledged supporters in the Patriots Circle are the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Skoll Foundation, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the Democracy Fund.^[83] The Sixteen Thirty Fund, managed by Arabella Advisors, functions as a fiscal sponsor for left-leaning advocacy groups and has channeled funds to initiatives favoring campaign finance restrictions that critics argue disproportionately limit conservative grassroots organizing. Similarly, the Democracy Fund, established by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, has invested over $200 million since 2013 in election reform efforts, including grants to organizations promoting public financing of campaigns, often in coalition with progressive policy advocates. These ties extend to broader donor ecosystems, including an ongoing association with the Democracy Alliance, a consortium of wealthy progressive contributors coordinating investments in electoral and policy reforms.^[7] The Democracy Alliance, which includes donors like George Soros and Tom Steyer, has historically directed resources toward reducing private political spending, aligning with Issue One's advocacy but raising questions from conservative analysts about the organization's bipartisan claims given the network's partisan funding patterns. While Issue One emphasizes cross-partisan coalitions, such as its ReFormers Caucus comprising over 200 former lawmakers from both parties, its financial backers' emphasis on structural changes like public matching funds has been critiqued as enabling left-leaning advantages in low-dollar mobilization.^[1] Empirical analyses of similar foundation grants indicate that such networks prioritize transparency measures that, in practice, amplify institutional voices over individual donors, potentially skewing influence toward established progressive entities.^[7] No major conservative donor networks, such as those affiliated with the Koch family or Republican megadonors, appear in Issue One's disclosed affiliations, underscoring a funding asymmetry despite its nonpartisan framing.^[7] This reliance on progressive-leaning foundations has prompted scrutiny from outlets tracking nonprofit influence, which highlight how such connections may embed ideological priors in ostensibly neutral reform efforts, including underreporting of donor impacts due to 501(c)(3) and (c)(4) privacy rules.^[81]

Reception and Impact

Claimed Achievements and Bipartisan Efforts

The Council for Responsible Social Media, launched by Issue One in late 2022, claims to have influenced congressional discussions on social media harms by collaborating with the Senate Judiciary Committee to facilitate a hearing on child protection measures in 2023.^[11] It asserts that its advocacy elevated the broader reform conversation on Capitol Hill, including calls for enacting safeguards against mental health and civic impacts, as evidenced by public statements urging Congress to prioritize holistic reforms in July 2023.^[49]^[84] Proponents highlight the council's role in endorsing bipartisan legislation, such as the Platform Transparency Act introduced by Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Mitt Romney (R-UT) in June 2023, which seeks greater researcher access to platform data on harms like misinformation and addiction.^[85]^[86] The group also supported the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which advanced through the Senate Commerce Committee in July 2024 with backing from both parties, positioning it as a potential vehicle for requiring platforms to mitigate risks to minors.^[87]^[88] Bipartisan efforts are central to the council's structure, comprising over 50 leaders from diverse sectors including former Democratic Congressman Richard Gephardt and Republican Senator Chuck Hagel as co-chairs, alongside experts in national security, mental health, and technology.^[48]^[52] This cross-partisan composition facilitated joint advocacy, such as partnering with the Notre Dame Democracy Initiative in May 2025 to convene policymakers, industry representatives, and academics for developing regulatory roadmaps addressing online polarization and misinformation.^[89]^[90] The council maintains that these collaborations have fostered consensus on evidence-based reforms, transcending partisan divides by emphasizing empirical harms over ideological conflicts.^[91]^[92]

Criticisms and Conservative Perspectives

Conservatives have criticized organizations like Issue One for advocating campaign finance restrictions that infringe on First Amendment protections for political speech, arguing that such reforms prioritize government control over individual and associational rights.^[93] The Institute for Free Speech, a nonprofit defending speech rights in elections, has specifically faulted Issue One's proposals for empowering regulators to oversee and limit independent expenditures, which it views as a mechanism to suppress advocacy rather than curb corruption.^[94] Post-Citizens United v. FEC (2010), which equated independent political spending with protected expression, Issue One has highlighted the decision's role in enabling "dark money" while calling for enhanced disclosure and potential limits—measures conservatives contend would disproportionately hinder grassroots and outsider campaigns challenging entrenched politicians.^[95] A core conservative objection is that "reform" initiatives, including those Issue One supports like small-donor public matching and spending caps, function as incumbent protection schemes by preserving politicians' fundraising advantages from office perks, media access, and donor networks while restricting challengers' ability to compete through private funding.^[96] The Heritage Foundation has argued that historical data shows contribution limits and public financing do not diminish undue influence but instead subsidize incumbents who already hold structural edges, such as franking privileges and official residencies valued at millions annually.^[96] For instance, pre-Citizens United bans on corporate speech were selectively enforced against conservative-leaning groups, fostering perceptions of biased application that reforms would exacerbate under expanded bureaucracy.^[93] Conservative thinkers further contend that Issue One's emphasis on transparency as insufficient—pushing instead for systemic overhauls—ignores evidence that disclosure alone empowers voters without curtailing expression, as seen in the rapid growth of online platforms post-2010 that democratized information flow.^[94] Critics like former FEC Chairman Bradley Smith, aligned with free-speech advocacy, have noted that purported corruption links between donations and policy are anecdotal and unproven causally, with studies showing no consistent quid pro quo beyond normal lobbying dynamics present regardless of funding levels. While Issue One cites bipartisan backing, including from some Republicans, skeptics highlight that genuine conservative reform prioritizes deregulation of speech over federal empowerment, viewing the group's ethics and disclosure pushes as veiled attacks on Citizens United's equalization of voices against media monopolies often sympathetic to progressive causes.^[96]

Empirical Evidence on Reform Efficacy

Empirical studies on campaign finance regulations, such as contribution limits and public financing, indicate limited efficacy in reducing corruption or altering election outcomes in meaningful ways. A cross-national analysis of political finance reforms found that while they may marginally mitigate corruption by diminishing reliance on private funds and enhancing sanctions for violations, the effects are inconsistent and often depend on enforcement quality rather than the reforms themselves.^[97] In U.S. contexts, post-2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act data show that bans on soft money led to shifts toward independent expenditures via 527 groups and super PACs, with total spending rising and no clear decline in perceived quid pro quo corruption.^[98] Similarly, state-level contribution caps have not demonstrably increased electoral competition, as challengers often face fundraising disadvantages against incumbents who benefit from established networks.^[99] Evidence from matching funds and spending reimbursements, as examined in French municipal elections, suggests these mechanisms can influence candidate entry by encouraging broader participation but primarily advantage incumbents through reduced financial risk, without substantially lowering overall expenditures or corruption rates.^[100] A meta-analysis of campaign finance limits in developing countries reinforces this, revealing no robust link to shifted electoral outcomes or reduced undue influence, as self-financing and unregulated channels often fill gaps created by restrictions.^[101] These findings align with critiques that such reforms fail to address root causes like voter information asymmetries, instead channeling money into less transparent avenues, with academic sources—often from institutions favoring regulation—overstating preventive impacts relative to causal evidence.^[102] Government ethics and transparency measures, including disclosure requirements and conflict-of-interest rules, yield modest reductions in corruption according to a meta-analysis of global data, with effect sizes small and amplified only when paired with prosecutorial enforcement rather than information release alone.^[103] Longitudinal studies across 128 countries from 1984–2003 correlate freedom of information laws with slight drops in public-sector graft, but causality is weak, as transparency often exposes rather than prevents malfeasance without behavioral incentives for officials.^[104] Experimental evidence indicates that publicizing corruption data can deter petty bribery in low-trust settings by altering beliefs about peer compliance, yet it risks entrenching corrupt equilibria if revelations overwhelm civic response capacity.^[105] Peer-reviewed assessments highlight that transparency's anticorruption promise is overstated in media and advocacy narratives, frequently ignoring how it can politicize oversight or enable selective enforcement.^[106] Broader electoral reforms, such as ranked-choice voting (RCV), show inconsistent impacts on key outcomes like turnout and representation. Analyses of U.S. implementations, including San Francisco since 2002, find no systematic boost in voter participation beyond what race competitiveness explains, with turnout varying by local factors rather than the system itself.^[107] A 2025 review of RCV's democratic effects concludes it may enhance candidate focus on broader appeals but lacks evidence for reducing negative campaigning or polarization, as winners under RCV can diverge more ideologically from median voters compared to plurality systems.^[108] Comparative studies suggest RCV mitigates spoiler effects in multi-candidate races but increases ballot complexity, potentially suppressing marginal voters without improving policy convergence or trust in outcomes.^[109] Overall, rigorous evaluations indicate these reforms achieve procedural tweaks but fail to deliver promised causal improvements in efficacy or equity, often at higher administrative costs.^[110]

References

[1]
About Us - Issue One
Issue One is a leading crosspartisan political reform group in Washington, D.C.. We were founded in 2013 to reduce the influence of money in politics through ...Team · Our Impact · Fiscal SponsorshipsMissing: date | Show results with:date
[2]
Issue One: Home
because fixing our broken ...About UsJobsTeamLatest - Issue OneContact
[3]
Issue One and the National Council on Election Integrity celebrate ...
Dec 23, 2022 · Issue One and the National Council on Election Integrity celebrate final passage of ECA update. “Our nation is stronger today because our ...
[4]
National Council on Election Integrity - Issue One
Featured Work · Issue One, NCEI co-chairs, and Faces of Democracy members denounce Congress for failure to invest in our critical election infrastructure · Issue ...
[5]
New Issue One investigation illuminates connections, secretive ...
Oct 24, 2024 · A new Issue One investigation maps out the ecosystem of the Only Citizens Vote Coalition, highlighting the major groups, their officers, and their known ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[6]
Rating for Issue One - Charity Navigator
Rating 4/4 · Review by Charity NavigatorWe unite Republicans, Democrats, and independents in the movement to fix our broken political system and build an inclusive democracy that works for ...
[7]
Issue One - InfluenceWatch
Issue One has kept its association with the Democracy Alliance. Influence. Issue One works by educating the public on the issue of campaign finance reform. It ...Missing: date mission
[8]
Money in Politics - Issue One
We need to know who is influencing our elected officials in order to hold them accountable. That begins with a transparent campaign finance system.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[9]
Nick Penniman - Issue One
Nick Penniman. Founder and CEO. Prior to founding Issue One, Nick was the founder and executive director of the Huffington Post Investigative Fund, director ...
[10]
Nick Penniman - | Knight First Amendment Institute
Nick Penniman is the founder and CEO of Issue One. Prior to founding Issue One, he was the founder and executive director of the Huffington Post Investigative ...
[11]
Meet the change leaders: Nick Penniman, CEO of Issue One
Apr 18, 2024 · Nick Penniman is founder and CEO of Issue One, an organization fighting to protect U.S. elections, lessen political polarization, limit the ...
[12]
ISSUE ONE - GuideStar Profile
Jul 15, 2024 · Issue One is the leading crosspartisan political reform organization dedicated to revitalizing American democracy. We educate the public, ...
[13]
Issue One's ReFormers Caucus Surpasses 200 Member Milestone
Jun 14, 2018 · Murphy (D-PA), Joseph Cao (R-LA), Charlie Dent (R-PA), our 200th ReFormer, and Jack Buechner (R-MO), our 201st. Issue One's ReFormers are from ...Missing: timeline achievements
[14]
Our Impact - Issue One
In late July 2024, the U.S. Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act in a historic and bipartisan vote. The bill, which combines two pieces of ...Missing: nonprofit history expansion
[15]
Issue One celebrates 10 years of strengthening democracy
Nov 29, 2022 · Issue One has been uniting Republicans, Democrats, and independents in the movement to fix our broken political system and build an inclusive democracy that ...Missing: nonprofit date<|separator|>
[16]
Board & Advisors - Issue One
Board · Whitney Hatch · David Gerson · Barbara Brenner Buder · Diana Aviv · Bill Burgess · Elaine Walsh Carney · Julie Ann Crommett · Carlos Curbelo.
[17]
Issue One's Nick Penniman recognized as one of the most influential ...
May 8, 2025 · Issue One's Founder and CEO Nick Penniman has been recognized as one of the most influential people in Washington, D.C., by Washingtonian in ...
[18]
Amelia Leonardi - Issue One
As the co-founder, chief operations officer, chief financial officer, and chief of staff at Issue One, Amelia works closely with the CEO to align daily ...
[19]
[PDF] financial statements june 30, 2024 - Issue One
Jun 30, 2024 · The Organization shares resources with Issue One Action, an independent and autonomous organization with overlapping governing board members.
[20]
https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/nation-on-the-take-9781632861108/
[21]
Expert Archives - Issue One
Michael McNulty is the Policy Director at Issue One. In this role, he leads Issue One's election protection efforts, drives money-in-politics reform, and ...
[22]
Team Archive - Issue One
No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
[23]
Issue One announces new advocacy team and organizational ...
Apr 24, 2025 · Issue One is proud to announce a series of new hires and strategic moves that will bolster the organization's mission to safeguard democracy.Missing: governance structure
[24]
ReFormers Caucus - Issue One
Issue One's ReFormers Caucus is the largest bipartisan coalition of its kind ever assembled to advocate for sweeping reforms to fix our broken political system.
[25]
The ReFormers Caucus Goes Public - Issue One
Oct 26, 2015 · Christine Todd Whitman (R-NJ). These former elected officials bring with them a wealth of experience and a hunger for sustainable reforms to one ...
[26]
Issue One's ReFormers Caucus calls on Americans to trust the ...
For decades, state and local election officials have safely and securely run our elections. While this election may require more time to count every vote cast ...
[27]
Members of Issue One's ReFormers Caucus Praise Bipartisan Jan. 6 ...
Dec 17, 2021 · The full list signatories includes: Honorable J. Gresham Barrett (R-SC); Honorable Mark Begich (D-AK); Honorable Douglas Bereuter (R-NE) ...
[28]
Issue One's ReFormers Caucus expands to all 50 states
Mark Begich (D-AK) are the newest members of the ReFormers Caucus. Congressman Nye served as the representative for Virginia's 2nd Congressional District from ...
[29]
ReFormers Caucus Archives - Issue One
members of Issue ...
[30]
Members of Issue One's Bipartisan ReFormers Caucus Urge House ...
... Committee Leadership to Conduct a Thorough Investigation into Rep. George Santos and to Codify the Office of Congressional Ethics. Mar 03, 2023. Share.
[31]
Co-chairs of Issue One's ReFormers Caucus praise advancement of ...
Jul 24, 2024 · Last week, Sens. Gary Peters (D-MI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Josh Hawley (R-MO), and Jon Ossoff (D-GA) introduced the bipartisan ETHICS Act, ...
[32]
[PDF] RFC-Letter-ETHICS-Act-Senate-Floor-Vote.pdf - Issue One
Sep 16, 2024 · The revised ETHICS Act framework is a pragmatic commonsense reform that includes the following provisions that we support: 1. Prohibits ...
[33]
The Ethics Blind Spot - Issue One
In “The Ethics Blind Spot,” Issue One analyzes and contrasts the case histories of the two ethics oversight bodies in the US House of Representatives.Missing: salaries | Show results with:salaries
[34]
[PDF] Fair Pay: Why Congress Needs to Invest in Junior Staff | Issue One
We educate the public and work to pass legislation on Capitol Hill to increase transparency, strengthen ethics and accountability, reduce the corrosive ...Missing: organization | Show results with:organization
[35]
[PDF] The Road to Fair Pay | Issue One
Jun 1, 2024 · While the portion of congressional staff assistants making less than a living wage has fallen from 70% in 2020 to 28% in 2023, 40% of Senate ...
[36]
The Road to Fair Pay - Issue One
Jun 13, 2024 · Providing fair salaries would make it possible for people from all social and economic backgrounds to work for Congress and live in the nation's capital.
[37]
“Staff are the backbone of Congress,” Issue One applauds move to ...
Aug 12, 2021 · The House of Representatives will be raising the maximum salary for staff, in tandem with the House Committee on Administration announcing the creation of a ...Missing: raise | Show results with:raise
[38]
Free & Fair Elections - Issue One
the Electoral Count Reform Act — which will ...
[39]
Election Protection - Issue One
Learn about our work to elevate the voices of election officials and workers in the policy debate through our Faces of Democracy campaign.
[40]
States United and Issue One Launch Project to Uplift Women ...
Oct 21, 2024 · The effort aims to educate voters on the essential contributions these officials make to our free, fair, and secure elections. Research shows ...
[41]
“In the wake of a successful election, legislators should be working ...
Mar 12, 2021 · ... introduced by lawmakers in more than 43 states around the country to limit voting access, the National Council on Election Integrity ...
[42]
National Council on Election Integrity urges action ahead of key vote ...
Oct 20, 2021 · The Freedom to Vote Act is a good-faith compromise led by Senator Joe Manchin that includes common sense proposals supported by voters across ...
[43]
Voting Rights & Access - Issue One
Voting Rights & Access. The right to vote is sacred and protected under the Constitution. We push back against efforts to limit access to the ballot box and ...
[44]
Who's Behind the Only Citizens Vote Coalition? - Issue One
Oct 24, 2024 · Records reviewed by Issue One illuminate connections, secretive donors behind groups pushing false narratives that noncitizens are voting in US elections.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[45]
[PDF] Elections 2024 | Issue One
Aug 9, 2024 · Voters can also learn about transparency measures state and local election officials use, such as public inspections of voting machines, voter ...<|separator|>
[46]
Diverse stakeholders and communities unite to combat social ...
Oct 12, 2022 · Today, Issue One announced the launch of the Council for Responsible Social Media (CRSM), a crosspartisan and bipartisan group of national ...
[47]
Notre Dame to convene government, industry and academic leaders ...
May 13, 2025 · The Council for Responsible Social Media is a project of Issue One that comprises more than 50 government, industry and academic leaders to ...
[48]
Council for Responsible Social Media features Haugen ... - CNBC
Oct 12, 2022 · The Council for Responsible Social Media says it aims to address the harmful impacts social media can have on kids, communities and national ...
[49]
Issue One and its Council for Responsible Social Media call on ...
Jul 24, 2023 · Issue One and its Council for Responsible Social Media are calling on Congress to holistically address the social media crisis by enacting responsible ...
[50]
Council for Responsible Social Media Co-chairs Applaud Biden ...
May 24, 2023 · The Council for Responsible Social Media, a project of Issue One, launched in October 2022 with a mission to address the harms that social ...Missing: initiatives | Show results with:initiatives
[51]
Issue One's Council for Responsible Social Media partners with ...
Jul 20, 2023 · The Council for Responsible Social Media, a project of Issue One, launched in 2022 with a mission to address the harms that social media has ...
[52]
Technology Reform - Issue One
Issue One and its Council for Responsible Social Media call on Congress to adopt responsible social media safeguards now. Today, Issue One and its Council ...
[53]
DDIA Joins Bipartisan Council for Responsible Social Media
Jun 23, 2025 · In 2025, DDIA became a member of Issue One's Council for Responsible Social Media, a multi-sectoral group of leaders focused on finding ...
[54]
New Issue One report details how Big Tech's failures empowered ...
Dec 4, 2024 · This report analyzes how these vulnerabilities emerged, the strategies foreign adversaries employed, and what Congress must do to ensure that ...
[55]
[PDF] Flooding the Gap | Issue One
Dec 23, 2024 · On many levels, elections across the United States this year were a success. Election officials across the country, who had been preparing ...
[56]
[PDF] Fix Democracy First - Issue One
thanks ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
[57]
Federal Funding for American Elections - Issue One
Jul 22, 2024 · This analysis highlights how local and state election officials have utilized their HAVA election security grant funds to date.
[58]
[PDF] From: YouGov To: Issue One Date: September 17, 2025 Re: Public ...
Sep 17, 2025 · The congressional power of the purse, which means that Congress – not the president or Supreme Court – has control over how the government ...
[59]
Faces of Democracy - Issue One
Issue One's Faces of Democracy campaign, powered by election workers themselves, aims to strengthen our country's critical election infrastructure.Missing: organization | Show results with:organization
[60]
[PDF] Faces of Democracy: How Our Elections Work and the Challenges ...
“So there was. Election officials and workers are Americans from all walks of life. They're Democrats, Republicans, and independents. Grandpar- ents and parents ...
[61]
Election Offices Need Staff - Issue One
Aug 17, 2023 · Election offices are facing a staffing crisis as the 2024 election approaches. Local election offices and colleges can tackle this problem together.
[62]
[PDF] new narrative for American democracy - Issue One
Sep 29, 2022 · Issue One is the leading cross-partisan political reform group in Washington, D.C. We unite Republicans,. Democrats, and independents in the ...<|separator|>
[63]
Increasing the accountability of political spending - Issue One
A variety of loopholes exist in America's outdated campaign laws that undermine the bedrock constitutional values of accountability and transparency, ...
[64]
Fundraising Pressures & Campaign Spending - Issue One
We pour over campaign finance reports to track fundraising trends and raise awareness of the pressure that lawmakers face to raise funds for their reelection ...
[65]
Outsized Influence - Issue One
Apr 20, 2021 · “This research shows the alarming influence of just a handful of wealthy megadonors in our political system,” said Issue One Founder and CEO ...
[66]
https://issueone.org/articles/senate-candidates-to-begin-e-filing-campaign-finance-reports-after-issue-one-backed-policy-is-signed-into-law/
[67]
A Chance for Campaign Finance Reform in Maine and Seattle
These measures represent an important step forward in the world of money-in-politics reform. Maine. Maine voters will see Question 1, the “Clean Elections” ...<|separator|>
[68]
How to Effectively Enforce Campaign Finance Laws - Issue One
Additionally, the Board offers trainings for all candidates in C-SMART, an online financial reporting engine. All campaigns are subject to a Board audit after ...
[69]
Ethics & Accountability - Issue One
and enforce — stronger ethics, accountability, and transparency laws for Congress, the executive branch, and for lobbyists ...
[70]
Issue One praises introduction of bipartisan stock trading ban in the ...
Sep 3, 2025 · It is time to bring to the floor this bipartisan and long overdue legislation that will help increase transparency and ethical standards in ...
[71]
Issue One comments on the Office of Government Ethics' (OGE ...
Issue One strongly believes it is vital to the health of our democratic system that government officials live up to high ethical standards. OGE, as the ...Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
[72]
Issue One joins government watchdogs in urging Trump ...
Jan 24, 2025 · “Ensuring transparency and ethical leadership is a critical component to restoring the public's trust in their government and making sure that ...
[73]
Executive Branch Ethics - Issue One
Issue One joins more than 40 organizations calling on Biden Administration to prioritize transparency. Issue One today joined more than 40 organizations ...Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
[74]
Lobbying Reform - Issue One
We work to modernize the outdated Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA), creating greater transparency around the billions special interests spend each year.<|control11|><|separator|>
[75]
Gerrymandering - Issue One
Explore our work to support independent redistricting so that Congress ... Issue One in the news: March 2022 media mentions recap. Our March 22 event in ...
[76]
[PDF] Extreme Gerrymanders | Issue One
Issue One is the leading crosspartisan political reform group in Washington, D.C. We unite Republicans, Democrats, and independents in the movement to fix ...
[77]
Issue One joins bipartisan amicus brief in Michigan redistricting case ...
Feb 11, 2020 · “That is why Issue One believes that independent commissions represent the best tool yet for drawing congressional districts.” In 2017, Issue ...
[78]
Issue One Action urges swift passage of the Electoral Count Reform ...
Aug 2, 2022 · Issue One Action announced a new digital advertising blitz to help bolster the case for modernizing the Electoral Count Act.
[79]
There is no silver bullet to fixing our broken political system.
Oct 3, 2019 · I started Issue One five years ago to recruit more voices from inside and outside Washington into the movement fixing our ailing democracy.Missing: broader | Show results with:broader
[80]
Issue One - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica
Every organization that has been recognized as tax exempt by the IRS has to file Form 990 every year, unless they make less than $200,000 in revenue and have ...Missing: donors | Show results with:donors
[81]
Issue One Action - InfluenceWatch
Issue One Action supports a parallel caucus within congress: The Congressional Reformers Caucus. Members of this parallel caucus promote Issue One Action- ...
[82]
Financial Statements and 990s - Issue One
Issue One is committed to transparency. Below you will find our most recent financial statements and form 990s. FY 2021 Issue One 990, 2021 Financial ...
[83]
Patriots Circle Members and Supporters - Issue One
The David & Lucile Packard Foundation · Skoll Foundation · Sixteen Thirty Fund · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The Democracy Fund · Bohemian Foundation ...Missing: major sources
[84]
In case you missed what we've been up to… - LinkedIn
Jan 2, 2024 · Issue One's Council for Responsible Social Media (CRSM) made an impact on Capitol Hill and elevated the social media reform conversation among ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
[85]
Senator Coons, colleagues introduce legislation to increase ...
Jun 8, 2023 · This bill has been endorsed by the Council for Responsible Social Media, American Psychological Association, Mozilla, Children and Screens: ...
[86]
Romney leads bipartisan bill for social media transparency
Jun 9, 2023 · The bipartisan effort seeks transparency in social media data collection and researcher access ... Council for Responsible Social Media, a ...
[87]
Director of our Council for Responsible Social Media Alix Fraser ...
Jul 23, 2024 · Director of our Council for Responsible Social Media Alix Fraser calls for the Senate to #PassKOSA for the future of our kids and our ...<|separator|>
[88]
The Kids Online Safety Act can be a bipartisan triumph - The Fulcrum
Jun 20, 2024 · Our Council for Responsible Social Media has brought together bipartisan policymakers with experts, parents and each other to figure out how ...
[89]
Notre Dame to convene government, industry and academic leaders ...
May 13, 2025 · Notre Dame and the Council for Responsible Social Media will work in tandem to address the negative civic impacts of social media in America, ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
[90]
[PDF] The Future of Social Media and Democracy - Notre Dame News
In May 2025, the Notre Dame Democracy Initiative gathered Issue One's. Council for Responsible Social Media (CRSM) for a private conference on.
[91]
Council for Responsible Social Media - Issue One
A crosspartisan group of leaders addressing the negative mental, civic, and public health impacts of social media in America.Missing: early | Show results with:early
[92]
It's time for responsible social media - Research!America
Apr 17, 2023 · One of the most powerful is the Council for Responsible Social Media, launched last autumn and led by Issue One, a cross-party “political ...
[93]
Issue One Launches Plan to “Return Government to the American ...
Dec 14, 2016 · Institute For Free Speech. About Us. Back ... Issue One Launches Plan to “Return Government to the American ...
[94]
Issue One Interview Unwittingly Undermines Narrative of Campaign ...
Aug 23, 2017 · Institute For Free Speech. About Us. Back ... Issue One Interview Unwittingly Undermines Narrative of Campaign Finance Corruption.
[95]
Dark Money Illuminated - Issue One
Sep 11, 2018 · 15 dark money groups in the post-Citizens United era accounted for over 75 percent of the more than $800 million in political dark money spent between January ...
[96]
Campaign Finance "Reform": The Good, The Bad and the ...
Amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) will be debated in the U.S. Senate as early as mid-July 1999 and in the U.S. House of Representatives ...
[97]
Do Political Finance Reforms Reduce Corruption? | British Journal ...
Oct 30, 2019 · The authors argue that political finance reform mitigates corruption by reducing private money's importance in politics and increasing the sanctions for ...
[98]
[PDF] DEVELOPING EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR CAMPAIGN FINANCE ...
novel arguments for or against campaign finance reform may require greater ... Whether spending affects electoral competition and incumbent protection. • ...
[99]
Do campaign finance reforms truly help make elections more ...
Proponents of campaign finance reform claim that putting limits on how much money can be raised and spent to support a political candidate leads to more ...<|separator|>
[100]
[PDF] The Impact of Campaign Finance Rules on Candidate Selection and ...
These results appear to be driven by the reimbursement of campaign expenditures, not spending limits. We do not find such effects in municipal elections, which ...
[101]
(PDF) The Reverberation of Campaign Finance Regulations on ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Hence, campaign finance regulation could be instrumental in changing electoral outcomes and improving these conditions. 2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES.
[102]
Campaign finance rules and their effects on election outcomes - CEPR
May 8, 2022 · This column studies the impact of campaign finance regulations in French local elections. The authors find that such regulations, particularly state ...
[103]
[PDF] Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect ...
The analysis shows that that transparency has a significant, though small, overall effect size in reducing government corruption. While legal transparency with ...
[104]
[PDF] Evidence on the Impact of Transparency - The World Bank
Aug 6, 2025 · laws are correlated with changes in public sector corruption. They analyze data from 128 countries between 1984 and 2003, and use propensity ...
[105]
Transparency reduces bribery by shaping beliefs in a public goods ...
Jul 1, 2025 · Our findings indicate that when information about corruption is not publicly shared, individuals are more likely to offer bribes, exacerbating a collective ...
[106]
To know is to act? Revisiting the impact of government transparency ...
Sep 26, 2023 · This article integrates research from different disciplines to better understand when and how transparency reduces corruption.
[107]
Research and data on RCV in practice - FairVote
We did not control for other factors, such as competitiveness of races on the ballot, which could drive turnout. Ranked choice voting and voter turnout.
[108]
What We Know About Ranked Choice Voting, Updated for 2025
Mar 6, 2025 · This paper examines whether ranked choice voting (RCV) enhance American democracy by better representing the people and increasing the focus ...
[109]
Beyond the Spoiler Effect: Can Ranked Choice Voting Solve the ...
This analysis shows that IRV tends to produce winning candidates who are more divergent ideologically from their state's median voter than do other forms of ...
[110]
[PDF] The Cost of Ranked Choice Voting - ESRA
Elections costs were obtained from seven local governments which switched to RCV and seven matched control governments for ten years before and after RCV was.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy