Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Joint Surveillance System

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) is a ground-based network jointly operated by the and the to provide long-range air surveillance across the continental , supporting both national defense missions under and civil . Established in the early as a successor to the (SAGE) system, the JSS integrates military and civilian capabilities to detect and track over vast areas, enabling rapid response to potential threats while facilitating efficient airspace management. The system's core consists of approximately 47 remote long-range sites, primarily equipped with version 4 (ARSR-4) installations offering detection ranges up to 250 nautical miles in three dimensions, feeding data to four continental Sensor Operation Control Centers (SOCCs) for processing and dissemination. Key to the JSS's effectiveness is its dual-use architecture, which allows cost-sharing between the Department of Defense and FAA, optimizing taxpayer resources for overlapping surveillance needs without compromising security or safety priorities. Ongoing optimizations by units such as the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron ensure radar performance amid evolving threats, including periodic upgrades like the $291 million enhancement completed in the mid-2010s to bolster homeland defense capabilities. This infrastructure has proven indispensable for maintaining air sovereignty, with real-time data integration supporting intercept operations and airspace deconfliction, though it faces challenges from technological obsolescence and the need for continuous adaptation to advanced airborne threats.

History

Origins in Cold War Air Defense

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) originated from the United States Air Force's expansive radar networks constructed during the Cold War to detect and track incoming Soviet bombers, a primary threat following the Soviet Union's 1949 atomic bomb test. In response, the Air Defense Command (ADC), reactivated in 1946, deployed the temporary Lashup system in 1948 using surplus World War II-era radars like the AN/CPS-5 to provide initial coverage across key regions. This evolved into the Permanent Net, approved in 1949, comprising 75 fixed radar stations operational by the late 1950s, supplemented by mobile units and the Ground Observer Corps for low-altitude detection. By the mid-1950s, these disparate radars were integrated under the (SAGE) system, developed from 1951 and achieving initial operations in 1958 with the first direction center at McGuire AFB. SAGE employed AN/FSQ-7 computers to automate from over 100 radar sites, including long-range search radars like the AN/FPS-20 and height-finders such as the AN/FPS-6, enabling real-time tracking and interceptor control across 23 direction centers and 8 regional combat centers by 1963. Backup systems like BUIC (Backup Interceptor Control), operational from 1962 with AN/GSA-51 computers in BUIC II by 1966, provided redundancy amid concerns over SAGE vulnerabilities. These networks, spanning continental U.S., Alaska's DEW Line (completed 1957 with 57 stations), and , formed the backbone of North American air defense. As the bomber threat diminished with the rise of intercontinental ballistic missiles in the , cost efficiencies and dual civil-military needs prompted a transition to peacetime . The JSS, formalized as a USAF-Federal Administration (FAA) program in the late , repurposed many radars—such as upgraded AN/FPS-66 and ARSR-3 models—for shared and defense, replacing and BUIC. Initial changeovers began in 1979, with full operational capability achieved in 1983 featuring 46 long-range radar sites feeding four Region Operations Control Centers (ROCCs) equipped with H5118ME computers, reducing manpower by thousands compared to while maintaining sovereignty over North American airspace.

Establishment of Joint FAA-DoD Partnership

The joint partnership between the (FAA) and the Department of Defense (DoD), primarily through the U.S. , for the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) emerged from negotiations throughout the 1970s, during which the DoD sought to transfer most peacetime tracking duties to the FAA while retaining military access for defense operations. This arrangement leveraged existing Cold War-era military infrastructure for civil , enabling shared data feeds to support both FAA airspace management and air sovereignty missions, thereby avoiding redundant investments amid post-Vietnam fiscal pressures. The partnership formalized a division of roles: the FAA assumed primary operation and maintenance of long-range surveillance radars, while the established Regional Operations Control Centers (ROCCs) for tactical . The transition to JSS began integrating joint-use radars into () operations as early as March 29, 1979, marking the initial shift from the legacy () system. By fiscal year 1983, the first ROCC achieved formal approval and initial operational capability, with subsequent centers following suit to provide automated tracking across the continental . This structure ensured continuous atmospheric air defense coverage, with FAA radars feeding real-time data to military systems for threat identification and response coordination. The JSS thus represented a pragmatic evolution of earlier ad hoc civil-military sharing, prioritizing empirical efficiency in over siloed operations.

Post-Cold War Adaptations and Expansions

Following the end of the in 1991, the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) adapted to a reduced emphasis on Soviet bomber incursions, prioritizing cost-efficient dual-use operations for civil and residual military surveillance. Over-the-Horizon (OTH-B) sites on the east and west coasts, constructed by the late 1980s, were shifted to standby status in March 1991 amid diminished strategic threats, exemplified by the Christmas Valley facility. In , upgrades replaced the obsolete with the , maintaining northern coverage with minimally attended facilities. Region Operations Control Centers (ROCCs) increasingly integrated with (AWACS) aircraft for enhanced , compensating for site consolidations. Modernization efforts focused on replacing aging radars with advanced three-dimensional systems. In July 1988, received a to manufacture 40 AN/FPS-117-based ARSR-4 radars, with installations commencing in the mid-1990s to supplant - and 1960s-era equipment across JSS sites, improving low-altitude detection and data automation. Additional phased-array radars, such as AN/FPS-115 variants, were deployed in the 1990s at sites including Thule Air Base in for early warning, extending JSS-linked capabilities to intercontinental threats. By 1995, Federal Aviation Administration-operated facilities like Oceana (Z-321/J-01) with AN/FPS-91A and Bucks Harbor (Z-110/J-54) with AN/FPS-66A augmented the network, reflecting greater reliance on civilian infrastructure post-drawdown. Expansions included software enhancements to ROCCs for fusing data from diverse sensors. Modifications enabled display and relay of Over-the-Horizon Backscatter (OTH-B), Relocatable Over-the-Horizon Radar (ROTHR), and inputs to NORAD's , operational by the mid-1990s. The system supported non-traditional missions, such as counter-narcotics interdiction; JSS radars provided long-range detection along U.S. southern borders and smuggling routes, feeding data to joint FAA-DoD operations and agencies like U.S. Customs..pdf) Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) commissions prompted site rationalizations, with several Air Force-operated radars deactivated and transferred to FAA control—such as those at former Air Defense Command facilities—to sustain coverage without full military staffing, aligning with post-Cold War budget constraints. These changes preserved a network of approximately 37-46 primary sites by the late , emphasizing automated processing over manned gap-fillers discontinued in 1986. Overall, adaptations enhanced and efficiency, adapting causal priorities from massed aerial attack to diverse peacetime contingencies like intrusion detection and orbital tracking.

System Architecture

Surveillance Radars

The surveillance radars of the (JSS) primarily comprise long-range, three-dimensional (ARSR-4), which detect and track aircraft across vast areas for both civil and air defense. These radars replaced older two-dimensional systems under the FAA-Air Force Radar Replacement Program, with 44 ARSR-4 units deployed by the late 1990s to enhance detection accuracy and reliability. The ARSR-4 operates in the L-band frequency range of 1215-1400 MHz as a solid-state, unattended system, delivering a maximum detection range of 250 nautical miles and altitude coverage up to 100,000 feet. It utilizes dual elevation s—a low with approximately 7-degree width transmitting nine pulses and a high for extended coverage—to provide range, , and height data essential for three-dimensional tracking. Military designations include FPS-130(V), and the radars are positioned mainly along U.S. borders and coasts to form a perimeter network, supplemented by interior sites. Recent modernizations incorporate the Common ARSR (CARSR), an L-band successor deployed at select continental U.S. sites, offering a 200-nautical-mile range and improved resilience against environmental factors, as demonstrated by recovery efforts following a 2022 failure at . CARSR integrates seamlessly with ARSR-4 to maintain overlapping coverage extending 200 miles offshore and across the nation. Raw radar returns from these systems are preprocessed for track formation and transmitted via secure networks to JSS Sector Operations Control Centers, enabling correlated air pictures for FAA and Department of Defense users. The 84th Evaluation continuously evaluates and optimizes ARSR-4 and CARSR performance to support national monitoring and defense.

Sector Operations Control Centers

The Sector Operations Control Centers (SOCCs) function as centralized facilities within the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) for fusing data from multiple sources, correlating tracks, and directing air defense operations across assigned sectors. These centers integrate inputs from JSS long-range , FAA-operated Air Route Surveillance (ARSR), tethered , and gap-filler sites to maintain continuous of civilian and military , enabling rapid identification of potential threats such as unidentified or incursions. Personnel at SOCCs perform real-time track analysis, threat assessment, and coordination with alert fighters, exercising operational control over assets like F-15 Eagles and F-16 Fighting Falcons to scramble intercepts when necessary. Key SOCC locations include the at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, , covering western U.S. airspace; the at , responsible for the eastern sector; the Alaskan NORAD Region facility at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, ; in ; and two centers at Canadian Forces Base , supporting binational coverage. Staffing comprises a mix of U.S. , , personnel, Title 5 civilians, and members, operating 24/7 to ensure seamless civil-military coordination under the FAA-DoD partnership. Technologically, SOCCs historically relied on the AN/FYQ-93 automated data processing system, installed starting in 1983, which automated track correlation and display for up to four continental U.S. centers and supporting sites. This was superseded by the Battle Control System-Fixed (BCS-F) around 2005, providing enhanced battle management, weapons control, and integration with broader networks like 's command structure. The BCS-F enables decentralized command, theater missile warning, and selective data forwarding to higher echelons, such as region operations centers or headquarters. Recent upgrades underscore ongoing modernization; for instance, the completed a $13.1 million agile operations project in October 2024, enhancing the Battle Control Center's flexibility for threat response and data handling. These centers contribute to approximately 73% U.S. coverage in their sectors post-upgrades, prioritizing and real-time decision-making amid evolving aerial threats. By 1996, shifted toward Sector Air Operations Centers (SAOCs) in some , reflecting with air operations frameworks, though SOCC terminology persists in operational contexts.

Data Processing and Communication Networks

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) relies on dedicated at Sector Operations Control Centers (SOCCs) to fuse raw plots from multiple into coherent air tracks. Raw , consisting of information tagged with site identifiers, is preprocessed at facilities before to SOCCs via secure interfaces. These inputs enable automated tracking algorithms that initiate tracks using an N-out-of-M scan logic, upgrade tentative tracks to confirmed system tracks (with capacities up to 300 system tracks per tracker), and perform , , and to handle maneuvering targets. Track-to-track across up to ten resolves redundancies based on factors such as , , and codes, yielding a unified master track file for . Historically, the AN/FYQ-93 computer system, deployed from 1983 to 2006 and developed by , served as the core processing suite at SOCCs, ingesting plot from JSS radars to generate tracks for detection, identification, and forwarding to higher command levels. This system facilitated the integration of surveillance into displays for operators, supporting both FAA and defense operations through use agreements. Communication networks linking radars to SOCCs employed dedicated landlines and relays initially, evolving to support simultaneous feeds to civil and military endpoints, including real-time transmission of track in standardized JSS message formats. Processed tracks were then disseminated via secure data links to the Continental United States Region Operations Control Center (CONUS ROCC), (NORAD), and FAA en route centers, enabling coordinated airspace monitoring. Modernization efforts have transitioned SOCC processing to the Battle Control System-Fixed (BCS-F), which supplants the AN/FYQ-93 with enhanced operating systems for integrating diverse sensor feeds, including legacy JSS radars alongside newer inputs like over-the-horizon systems. BCS-F improvements emphasize distributed across networked workstations using protocols, allowing scalable fusion and reduced latency in handling. Underlying networks incorporate encrypted channels and fiber-optic backhauls for high-bandwidth , ensuring against while maintaining between and FAA infrastructures. These upgrades address legacy limitations in volume, as evidenced by early overload issues in handling during high-threat scenarios.

Operational Framework

Airspace Monitoring and Threat Detection

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) performs monitoring via a network of long-range radars that detect and track aircraft across the continental , , and parts of , supplying data for both civil and military defense operations. These radars encompass 149 operational sites, including perimeter-based ARSR-4 models offering up to 200 miles of offshore coverage and interior CARSR systems, which collectively ensure broad-area surveillance critical for maintaining . Detection begins with radar returns capturing aircraft positions, altitudes, and velocities, followed by track correlation using data or (IFF) interrogations to classify targets as cooperative civil flights or potential non-cooperative entities. The system evaluates these tracks in through interfaces, identifying performance deviations or gaps in coverage that could impair monitoring efficacy. Threat detection protocols prioritize rapid identification of anomalous tracks, such as unidentified lacking responses or exhibiting unauthorized flight paths, enabling alerts for potential intrusions or violations. Baseline evaluations by units like the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron assess radar configurations for optimal threat discernment, incorporating multi-year , on-site testing, and component optimizations conducted in coordination with federal partners. Post-9/11 enhancements have emphasized perimeter radar extensions to bolster early warning against asymmetric threats, integrating JSS feeds with broader air defense networks for coordinated response.

Coordination Between Civil and Military Users

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) enables coordination between civil and military users by integrating radar data from (FAA)-operated long-range surveillance radars with U.S. defense systems, creating a unified picture for both air traffic management and threat assessment. This joint network, spanning the continental , , and , relies on real-time data feeds from approximately 44 (ARSR) sites, primarily maintained by the FAA, which are shared with military Sector Operations Control Centers (SOCCs). Military controllers at these centers, such as the Western Air Defense Sector's facility at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, correlate tracks from civil en route radars and long-range radars to identify aircraft, distinguish routine civil flights from potential threats, and issue tactical directives without compromising FAA safety protocols. Operational coordination is supported by standardized procedures in FAA and directives, including FAA JO 7010.1T, which outlines JSS facility roles and interagency data exchange to ensure military access to civil surveillance while adhering to separation standards for commercial and traffic. In practice, this involves military queries to FAA Air Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCCs) for data verification and reservations during intercepts, allowing rapid handoff of unidentified tracks from civil controllers to defense assets like fighter interceptors. The 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron, under , conducts ongoing optimizations of JSS radars to enhance data accuracy and latency, benefiting both FAA air traffic efficiency—handling over 50,000 daily flights—and DoD homeland defense missions. Joint maintenance and validation efforts further strengthen this partnership, exemplified by collaborative technical inspections of shared radar sites. In February 2024, the Western Air Defense Sector and FAA jointly inspected ARSR facilities in Arizona, confirming radar performance metrics such as detection range exceeding 200 nautical miles and azimuth accuracy within 0.5 degrees, ensuring reliable feeds for dual-use applications. This integration traces back to the incorporation of FAA radar data into the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) framework by the early 2000s, as detailed in Department of Defense assessments, which highlighted its role in fusing civil volume data—covering 95% of U.S. airspace—with military gap-fillers for comprehensive coverage. Such mechanisms minimize redundancies, with military SOCCs processing up to thousands of tracks per hour from FAA sources, enabling causal prioritization of threats amid high civil traffic densities.

Integration with Broader Air Defense Networks

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) integrates with broader air defense networks by delivering real-time to the (NORAD) and U.S. Northern (USNORTHCOM) architectures, enabling fused for both civil and military domains. systems within the JSS, including long-range sites across the continental , feed track directly into these entities to support and threat assessment, with optimization efforts ensuring compatibility for national defense missions. This occurs through secure communication links that incorporate () inputs into NORAD's framework, allowing military operators to access comprehensive air pictures derived from joint-use sensors. Air defense sectors, such as the under , leverage JSS radar coverage from approximately 45 joint sites in the continental U.S., supplemented by systems like the for northern approaches, to monitor and respond to potential threats. The 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron, a specialized U.S. unit, conducts baseline evaluations and optimizations of JSS long-range radars to maintain integration with the broader enterprise, including evaluations coordinated with , the , and U.S. Customs and Border Protection for enhanced track correlation and reliability. These efforts ensure that JSS data supports operational requirements like intercept coordination, with radars providing detection ranges exceeding 200 nautical miles to feed into regional fusion centers. In practice, this integration facilitates dual-use functionality, where peacetime civil air traffic data transitions seamlessly to military applications during heightened alert states, as demonstrated in NORAD's patrols relying on JSS inputs for unidentified tracking since the system's establishment in the . Modernization under Instruction 13-101 mandates interoperability testing for JSS radars before full operational integration, prioritizing data links that align with principles without compromising FAA safety standards. Such connectivity extends to allied networks via NORAD's binational structure, though primary emphasis remains on U.S. continental defense, with empirical validations through squadron-led exercises confirming track handoff accuracy above 95% in simulated scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Radar Technologies and Capabilities

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) primarily utilizes long-range, three-dimensional () surveillance radars operating in the L-band range (approximately 1.2–1.4 GHz), enabling detection of aircraft position, altitude, and velocity over extended distances. These radars, shared between the (FAA) and Department of Defense (), include fixed-site installations like the Air Route Surveillance Radar Model 4 (ARSR-4, military designation AN/FPS-130) and transportable systems such as the , which provide automated tracking with minimal human intervention at remote locations. The core technology emphasizes solid-state transmitters for reliability and reduced maintenance, with phased-array or mechanically scanned antennas supporting 360-degree azimuthal coverage and altitude resolution down to 3,000 feet in some models. The ARSR-4, introduced in the mid-1990s as the newest fixed radar in the JSS network, is a state-of-the-art system jointly procured by the FAA and , capable of detecting and tracking high-performance as well as phenomena up to 250 nautical miles in range. Its L-band operation minimizes attenuation from atmospheric conditions, allowing persistent surveillance for and applications, with full 360-degree and coverage for en route monitoring. Complementing this, the serves as a minimally attended, long-range for continental U.S. and Alaskan sites, offering a detection range exceeding 250 nautical miles (approximately 470 km) through (AESA) technology, which enhances (ECCM) resilience and multi-target tracking. Additional deployable radars, such as the AN/TPS-75, integrate into the JSS for tactical augmentation, providing medium-range surveillance optimized for joint operations with ranges up to 200 nautical miles and automated for real-time threat assessment. These systems collectively enable non-cooperative target identification, with capabilities for velocity measurement via Doppler processing and integration with broader networks for fused , though older models like legacy ARSR variants offer reduced altitude precision compared to modern units. Upgrades focus on to improve clutter rejection and low-altitude coverage, addressing limitations in terrain-obscured environments.

Coverage Areas and Performance Metrics

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) comprises approximately 47 long-range radars strategically positioned around the periphery of the continental , enabling overlapping surveillance coverage over the nation's and extending up to 200-250 nautical miles offshore. These radars, shared between the Department of Defense and the , form an integrated grid that blankets the continental U.S., with additional contributions to monitoring approaches from and . The system's design ensures redundancy and minimal gaps, supporting both civil and military air defense operations. Key performance is driven by the (ARSR-4), the primary radar type in the JSS, which offers an instrumented detection range of 250 and coverage up to 100,000 feet altitude, including look-down capabilities for low-altitude targets from elevated sites. Accuracy metrics include range precision of 1/16 (approximately 116 meters), accuracy of 0.176 degrees, and height resolution of 3,000 feet (914 meters). The ARSR-4 employs pulse Doppler processing with eight filters to suppress ground clutter, enhancing detection reliability in challenging environments. Operational testing confirms adequate search and detection performance across its coverage volume.
ParameterSpecification
Detection Range250
Maximum Altitude100,000 feet
Range Accuracy1/16
Azimuth Accuracy0.176 degrees
Height Accuracy3,000 feet
Frequency BandL-band (1215-1400 MHz)
Upgrades such as the Canadian ARSR-4 (CARSR) further optimize coverage by realigning beam patterns, maintaining uninterrupted surveillance amid evolving threats.

Modernization Efforts and Upgrades

The Joint Surveillance System underwent significant modernization through the joint (FAA) and U.S. (USAF) procurement of Model 4 (ARSR-4) systems, which replaced numerous legacy long-range radars with solid-state, three-dimensional technology to enhance reliability, reduce maintenance costs, and improve surveillance capabilities. These upgrades, initiated in the , integrated ARSR-4 radars into the JSS network, providing extended detection ranges and seamless data sharing between civil and military users for sovereignty. A key phase of this effort included a five-year, $291 million upgrade to the JSS radar suite, focused on enhancing by modernizing hardware and operational integration between the USAF and FAA. This investment addressed aging infrastructure vulnerabilities, incorporating advanced to support NORAD's air defense mission while maintaining dual-use for . Ongoing upgrades are managed by the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron (RADES), which continuously evaluates and optimizes JSS long-range radars, including ARSR-4 and complementary Canadian ARSR systems, to ensure uninterrupted coverage extending 200 miles offshore across the continental . These efforts involve realignment of radar orientations and software updates to mitigate gaps, improve threat detection accuracy, and adapt to evolving aerial threats without disrupting operations. Such optimizations prioritize empirical performance metrics, like signal-to-noise ratios and rates, over unverified projections, ensuring causal links between hardware adjustments and enhanced system resilience.

Effectiveness and Strategic Role

Contributions to National Security

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) bolsters U.S. by delivering integrated essential for maintaining over the continental , , and portions of surrounding oceanic regions. This joint U.S. Air Force and initiative facilitates the detection and tracking of atmospheric aerial threats, enabling of air defense forces to counter potential incursions by unauthorized or hostile . By fusing civil and data, the JSS supports NORAD's mission to monitor North American , providing real-time that underpins rapid response to violations. Specialized units, such as the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron, continuously evaluate and optimize the system's long-range radars to ensure peak performance for national defense, transitioning seamlessly from peacetime air traffic monitoring to wartime threat neutralization. This optimization enhances detection reliability across vast coverage areas, contributing to the overall resilience of homeland air defense networks against diverse aerial risks. The collaborative structure of the JSS yields fiscal efficiencies that amplify its security value, with the FAA assuming ownership and maintenance of key facilities, thereby saving the Air Force roughly $48 million annually in operational costs without compromising military access to critical data feeds. This cost-sharing model sustains robust, dual-purpose infrastructure, allowing defense resources to focus on core warfighting priorities while leveraging civilian investments for enhanced threat vigilance.

Empirical Performance in Exercises and Operations

The Joint Surveillance System's radars, predominantly the Model 4 (ARSR-4), underwent rigorous operational test and evaluation (OT&E) from May 1994 to August 1995 at sites including Mt. Laguna, , and the Los Angeles Air Route Traffic Control Center. These tests assessed detection, tracking, and accuracy under simulated operational conditions, including T-38 flights, CV-580 calibration routes, and injected target scenarios with up to 790 search and 800 beacon targets. The ARSR-4 demonstrated detection probabilities of at least 80% for 2.2 square meter radar cross-section targets across 5 to 200 nautical miles, often exceeding this threshold (e.g., ≥86% at minimum enroute altitudes in flight tests), meeting or surpassing Department of Defense requirements for primary target detection in clutter environments. Range performance extended to 250 s with 360-degree coverage up to 100,000 feet above level, enabling processing of up to 800 aircraft returns within volume, an improvement over predecessor ARSR-3 systems in marginal coverage areas. Accuracy metrics included (RMS) range errors of 1/16 , errors of 0.176 degrees (or 2 arc correction points), and height errors of 3,000 feet within 200 s for , with targets achieving finer precision such as 1/32 RMS range for stationary objects. Subclutter visibility reached 51 decibels, minimizing degradation from returns, while false alarm rates remained low at approximately 7 × 10⁻⁵ (e.g., one dropped report in 14,229 processed). Weather detection capabilities identified five National Weather Service levels (2 through 6), though limited adverse conditions during testing highlighted inconsistencies in data output to downstream systems like the Display Approach Radar and Control (DARC)/ interfaces, with occasional false reports from anomalous . Delay in report generation stayed within 1.5 seconds for most tracks (maximum observed 1.55 seconds), deemed operationally insignificant. While the met core thresholds, reliability fell short in mean time between critical failures (below 1,500 hours), attributed to issues like strobe anomalies and power recovery faults, prompting recommendations for fixes prior to full deployment. Ongoing evaluations by the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron (RADES), a specialized unit, ensure JSS radar optimization for real-time air and missions across the continental , , and . This includes monitoring fixed long-range radars for NORAD-integrated operations, with continuous assessments maintaining high readiness for threat detection and track correlation, though detailed exercise-specific metrics such as those from air drills remain classified or unreleased publicly. In operational contexts, the system's supports daily , including post-9/11 air alerts, but empirical data from large-scale exercises like Vigilant Shield are not declassified to quantify detection rates or response efficacy against simulated incursions.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Joint Operations

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) facilitates joint operations by integrating Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Department of Defense (DoD) radar assets into a shared network, enabling cost sharing for surveillance infrastructure that serves both air traffic control and national air defense. This dual-use model avoids the duplication of expenses that separate systems would incur, with radars jointly owned or operated under agreements where FAA assets provide data feeds to NORAD and Air Force sectors. Historical assessments indicate that the JSS achieved substantial efficiencies over prior architectures, operating at approximately one-fortieth the cost of the SAGE system, requiring 5,000 fewer crew members for management, and generating annual operating savings of about $100 million through consolidated command, control, and communications. Operational costs for the JSS include sustainment of radar sites, data processing centers, and integration links, with the U.S. allocating $449 million in 2025 for these elements within its operations and . Major investments, such as a $291 million upgrade to the JSS suite over five years completed by 2017, enhanced detection ranges and reliability for both civil and military users, distributing upgrade expenses across entities rather than isolating them. These expenditures reflect the causal trade-offs of joint operations: upfront integration and modernization costs are elevated due to compatibility requirements, but long-term is streamlined by shared facilities and personnel oversight under frameworks like the Joint Radar Planning Group. Benefits manifest in empirical resource efficiencies and strategic leverage, as the system delivers a unified continental air picture without parallel military investments in civil airspace monitoring. By 1982, JSS upgrades to existing radars enabled automated data transmission, reducing manpower needs and operational redundancies compared to standalone defense networks. The joint framework has sustained effective dual-purpose surveillance for over four decades, with no documented instances of significant cost overruns attributable to sharing protocols outweighing the avoidance of separate FAA-DoD builds, which could have doubled infrastructure outlays. Net assessments, informed by budgetary integrations since the 1970s, affirm positive returns through economies of scale, though periodic DoD funding supplements FAA-owned sites highlight uneven burden-sharing resolved via interagency memoranda. Overall, the JSS exemplifies causal realism in defense economics, where integrated operations yield verifiable savings in acquisition, operations, and personnel without compromising core functionalities for either user.

Criticisms and Limitations

Technical and Reliability Challenges

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) encounters sustainment difficulties stemming from its legacy radar components, many of which originated in the as replacements for even older infrastructure. Radars such as the ARSR-4 (AN/FPS-130), integral to JSS operations, are engineered for high availability with preventive maintenance downtime capped at approximately 24 hours annually, yet the overall system's age contributes to escalating repair demands and parts scarcity amid broader (FAA) challenges with obsolete equipment. This obsolescence has prompted ongoing optimization efforts by units like the 84th Approach Control (RADES), which evaluate performance, data integration, and operational efficacy to mitigate degradation in long-range coverage across the continental . Data processing bottlenecks represent another technical hurdle, as evidenced by a 1991 Government Accountability Office (GAO) assessment revealing that the Air Attack Warning System struggled to handle simultaneous inputs from JSS radars and sensors, resulting in unprocessed tracks and potential gaps during high-volume scenarios. These limitations arise from outdated computational architectures, such as the legacy AN/FYQ-93 processors phased out by 2006, which lacked the capacity for real-time of multi-sensor feeds without overload. Remote site locations exacerbate reliability concerns, complicating timely interventions for environmental stressors or component failures, though JSS designs emphasize unattended to minimize human-error risks. Despite these issues, empirical downtime metrics remain low relative to system lifespan, underscoring the robustness of solid-state designs in ARSR-4 units, but fiscal pressures from rising costs—driven by diminishing support for parts—underscore the need for modernization to avert escalating failure rates. Logistical dependencies on periodic FAA crews for site visits further strain resources, particularly in harsh terrains where access delays could amplify outage durations beyond planned minima.

Resource Allocation and Overlap with Emerging Technologies

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) draws resources primarily from U.S. operation and (O&M) budgets, supplemented by contributions for shared radar , encompassing personnel, site sustainment, and software updates across approximately 44 long-range radar sites. Historical allocations include line item 0102325F, with funding levels such as $1.687 million in 2000 for system enhancements and $46.95 million in earlier O&M trends for core surveillance functions. These expenditures support 24/7 operations, including and depot-level , though specific annual figures fluctuate; for instance, 2016 saw a $2.8 million reduction for JSS air defense radars amid broader efficiency adjustments. Originally designed to yield $100 million in annual operating cost savings over legacy systems like , the JSS's fixed-site model nonetheless incurs ongoing physical demands, such as power and access road upkeep at remote locations. Modernization initiatives, including life-extension programs for Air Route Surveillance Radar-4 (ARSR-4) units, add to resource commitments, with FAA-specific costs estimated at $90.5 million to sustain eight sites through beacon-only transitions and radar upgrades. The 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron conducts periodic optimizations of JSS long-range radars to maintain performance metrics, diverting engineering and testing resources from nascent programs. In the broader , , and () portfolio—estimated at around $40 billion annually across U.S. intelligence elements—JSS funding competes with allocations for distributed , where ground-based radars provide high-resolution, weather-penetrating coverage but at the expense of mobility and resilience against anti-access/area-denial threats. The JSS exhibits functional overlap with emerging technologies, particularly in continental air domain awareness, where space-based assets like proliferated low-Earth orbit satellites enable persistent global monitoring with lower marginal operational costs once deployed, potentially reducing reliance on fixed radars for wide-area search. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drone swarms offer tactical, on-demand surveillance that complements or supplants JSS for low-altitude tracking, as evidenced by military shifts toward AI-augmented UAV networks for real-time threat response, though these lack the JSS's established integration with FAA air traffic control. AI-driven data processing further intersects by enabling multi-sensor fusion in next-generation architectures like Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), where JSS feeds could be ingested alongside satellite and drone inputs, but legacy system upgrades strain budgets needed for such algorithmic advancements. Resource trade-offs arise in this context, as sustaining JSS's analog-era roots—vulnerable to electronic warfare and physical sabotage—may forestall investments in resilient, software-defined alternatives, per Government Accountability Office assessments urging better ISR capability integration to avoid siloed expenditures. Empirical performance data from exercises underscores JSS's reliability for known airspace sovereignty but highlights gaps against hypersonic or stealthy intruders, prompting causal scrutiny of whether reallocating O&M funds toward hybrid networks would yield superior cost-effectiveness without coverage voids.

Debates on Privacy and Civil Liberties Implications

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS), comprising long-range radars jointly operated by the U.S. Air Force and (FAA), provides continuous monitoring of airspace over the continental and parts of , inherently covering civilian areas. While this capability supports air defense and , it has elicited limited discourse on and , primarily within broader discussions of integrated architectures rather than targeted critiques of the JSS itself. Unlike or unmanned aerial systems, JSS radars detect aircraft positions, speeds, and altitudes without inherent capability for individual-level tracking, relying on returns from transponders and returns that are aggregated for threat assessment and . Privacy safeguards for JSS operations are embedded in Department of Defense (DoD) directives, including adherence to the Privacy Act of 1974 and DoDI 5400.11, which govern data collection, maintenance, and dissemination from systems like JSS. Aviation resource management data, including radar-derived tracks, falls under System of Records Notice F011 AF XO A, ensuring controlled access and limiting routine uses to authorized government purposes such as national security and safety. Recorded radar data is archived for seven years but requires approval from Air Combat Command for release, mitigating unauthorized disclosure risks. Post-9/11 enhancements in FAA-NORAD data sharing have integrated JSS feeds into mutual operations without documented instances of civil liberties infringements specific to the system, as shared radar tracks focus on anomalous or unidentified aircraft rather than routine civilian flights. In modernization efforts, such as integration with (NextGen), proponents emphasize enhanced across JSS and other sensors to address low-altitude gaps, while acknowledging the need for frameworks that protect amid increased interagency sharing. Reports on integrated highlight policy requirements for balancing security with , including reviews of authorities to prevent overreach, though no empirical evidence links JSS upgrades to privacy erosions. organizations, such as the ACLU and , have raised analogous concerns about persistent aerial domain awareness enabling potential into domestic monitoring, but these critiques predominantly target optical or drone-based technologies rather than radar networks like JSS, where detection is non-discriminatory and flight data from transponders is voluntarily broadcast for operational safety. Debates remain subdued due to the system's established role in public airspace management, where FAA oversight ensures compliance with norms, such as options for operators to request withholding of personal identifiers from public registries. Hypothetical risks, including linkage of JSS tracks to for non-security purposes, have not materialized into verifiable controversies, underscoring a causal of national defense imperatives over unsubstantiated fears in this domain.

Recent Developments

Digital and Automation Upgrades

The ARSR-4 radar, deployed as part of the Joint Surveillance System since the late 1990s, represents a foundational digital upgrade over legacy ARSR-1, ARSR-2, and ARSR-3 systems, featuring all-solid-state architecture with advanced digital signal processing, including Doppler filtering for clutter rejection and subclutter visibility of 51 dB. This enables automated processing of up to 800 aircraft returns within primary coverage, with detection probabilities exceeding 80% for 2.2 m² targets at ranges of 5-200 nautical miles and beacon detection beyond 211 nautical miles. Digital outputs in Common Digitizer 2 (CD-2) format facilitate seamless integration with air traffic control and defense command systems at 9600 bps per user port, supporting up to 20 configurable interfaces for military and joint operations. Automation enhancements in the ARSR-4 include built-in test (BIT) and fault test (FIT) capabilities, achieving 99.9% fault detection down to eight or fewer line-replaceable units, alongside automatic reconfiguration of redundant boards and transmitter subsystems during failures. Remote Maintenance Monitoring System (RMMS) and Remote Monitoring Subsystem () enable automated diagnostics, performance monitoring, and control from multiple terminals, reducing manual intervention and improving operational availability targeting 0.99742. These features address reliability gaps in older analog systems, such as extending effective range to 250 nautical miles—50 nautical miles beyond ARSR-3—while incorporating integrated environment simulators for automated and plot tracking. The JSS Connectivity (JSS-C) program further digitized data sharing by establishing a secure network that integrates sensor inputs from ARSR-4 and other , enhancing real-time communications between and Department of Defense entities for air defense coordination. Ongoing optimizations by the 84th , as of 2021, evaluate and refine these long-range for improved in surveillance and threat assessment, ensuring compatibility with modern command-and-control architectures amid evolving airspace demands. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including occasional software-induced delays in report generation (mean ~1.02 seconds under load) and the need for uninterruptible power supplies to mitigate recovery issues post-power loss.

Adaptation to New Threats like Drones and Hypersonics

The Joint Surveillance System (JSS), relying primarily on long-range L-band radars such as the Model 4 (ARSR-4), encounters inherent limitations in countering small drones, which feature low cross-sections () often below -20 dBsm, operate at altitudes under 400 feet, and maneuver slowly to evade detection amid ground clutter. These characteristics degrade the in ARSR-4 returns, as the 's design prioritizes high-altitude, high-speed aircraft over micro- or small UAS with comparable to birds. Hypersonic threats exacerbate challenges through speeds exceeding Mach 5, inducing extreme that overwhelms traditional pulse-Doppler processing, alongside potential attenuation from ionized sheaths formed during atmospheric reentry or glide. JSS radars, operating in the 1215-1390 MHz band, lack the frequency agility or high-power needed for precise hypersonic tracking without supplementary sensors. Adaptations have centered on hardware and software enhancements to the ARSR-4, deployed across 44 JSS sites since the early as replacements for systems, extending effective range to 250 nautical miles while incorporating three-dimensional elevation scanning and modes to penetrate low-altitude clutter from terrain or weather. A $291 million program completed around 2017 improved for automated target initiation and reduced false alarms, enabling better discrimination of low-flying threats potentially including larger tactical drones. The 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron continues annual optimizations of JSS long-range radars, integrating real-time data fusion with feeds to enhance against non-cooperative aerial intruders, as demonstrated in evaluations supporting North American Aerospace Defense Command operations. Despite these improvements, JSS adaptations remain supplementary for drone threats, with ARSR-4 primary returns analyzed for utility in detect-to-engage chains but requiring augmentation by short-range X-band radars, electro-optical/ sensors, or radiofrequency detectors for small UAS under 55 pounds, as long-range systems alone yield detection ranges limited to 50-100 km for such targets. For hypersonics, the system's role is confined to initial atmospheric detection of phases or slower cruise variants, with tracking handed off to specialized assets like over-the-horizon or space-based systems, reflecting causal constraints in physics where L-band favors volume search over precision hypersonic cueing. Ongoing efforts emphasize networked rather than standalone JSS overhauls, prioritizing empirical validation through exercises to mitigate gaps exposed by proliferated low-cost swarms and peer hypersonic glide vehicles.

Future Outlook and Potential Replacements

The U.S. Air Force continues to prioritize modernization of the Joint Surveillance System's long-range radars to sustain airspace sovereignty and integrate with architectures. Efforts by the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron, through the Air Route Surveillance Radar version four program, evaluate and optimize JSS radars for enhanced performance against emerging aerial threats, including low-altitude and stealthy targets. A key advancement occurred in April 2025, when the accepted its first AN/TPY-4 multi-mission radar from , designed to replace legacy AN/TPS-75 systems in control and reporting centers. This gallium nitride-based radar provides 360-degree , extended-range detection of small radar cross-section threats, and resistance to jamming, enabling simultaneous air defense, missile warning, and ground . By 2027, the service aims to deploy an initial increment of resilient command, control, and communications capabilities, including advanced sensors, to bolster JSS-linked battle management in contested environments. While no comprehensive replacement for the JSS network is programmed, future architectures may transition select fixed-site components toward distributed, mobile under the Advanced Battle Management System, leveraging unmanned aerial systems, space-based assets, and AI-driven to distribute loads and reduce to precision strikes on ground infrastructure. This evolution prioritizes resilience over singular platforms, informed by analyses of peer competitors' anti-access capabilities, though full implementation depends on budgetary and technological maturation.

References

  1. [1]
    84th RADES optimizing the nation's LRR systems for air surveillance ...
    Sep 22, 2021 · This one-of-a-kind unit evaluates and optimizes the joint surveillance system, or JSS, long-range radars, or LRR, all over the continental ...
  2. [2]
    About Us - Western Air Defense Sector
    It was at this time that the United States Air Force phased out is radar sites in favor of the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) of radars. The Air Force ...
  3. [3]
    Our History | Washington State Military Department
    After 23 years of successful operations, SAGE gave way in 1983 to an upgraded system using faster, more powerful computers and improved communications and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    702nd Computer Systems Squadron and System Support
    1, 1980, with the mission to train, equip, and provide personnel to support hardware and software for the NORAD Joint Surveillance System. As the U.S. Air ...
  5. [5]
    US Air Force News - AF.mil
    The Air Route Surveillance Radar system version four evaluates and optimizes the joint surveillance system, or JSS, long-range radars, or LRR, all over the ...
  6. [6]
    84th RADES critical to national security - Hill Air Force Base
    Apr 20, 2017 · Key to this homeland security effort was a five-year, $291 million upgrade of the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) radar suite, which is ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] afi13-101.pdf - Air Force - AF.mil
    Feb 18, 2025 · These systems include Joint Surveillance System (JSS), North Warning System. (NWS), Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS), Wide Area ...
  8. [8]
    The Legacy of the United States Cold War Defense Radar Program
    JSS was an Air Force/FAA cooperative effort to provide a peacetime air surveillance and control system to replace SAGE and BUIC systems. Region Operations ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A Brief History of NORAD
    Aug 30, 2012 · With the beginning of the Cold War, American defense experts and political leaders began planning and implementing a defensive air shield, ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  10. [10]
    [PDF] the Legacy of the United States Cold War Defense Radar Program
    Jun 1, 1997 · In the lower forty-eight states, the Air Force and Federal Aviation Administration cooperated with the Joint Surveil- lance System (JSS) and ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Joint Surveillance System - Archived 8/97 - Forecast International
    Aug 3, 1996 · From the USAF perspective, the Joint. Surveillance System (JSS) is an Air Force/FAA program to provide modern command and control of air defense.Missing: history partnership
  12. [12]
    [PDF] GGD-89-93 Drug Smuggling: Capabilities for Interdicting Private ...
    Jun 9, 1989 · Joint Surveillance System. National Narcotics Border Interdiction ... Air interdiction is one of several drug interdiction programs with a prin-.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Ubiquitous Surveillance Notional Architecture for System- Wide DAA ...
    Aug 17, 2017 · The ARSRs include weather monitoring. • The ARSR-4 is the only FAA en route radar with three dimensional (3D) capabilities. • The military ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    ARSR-4 Air Route Surveillance Radar - United States Nuclear Forces
    Feb 24, 2000 · The ARSR-4 was fielded through a $1 billion Congressionally mandated joint FAA and Air Force program, and each station costs over $12 million.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Existing Surveillance Technologies for Upper Class E Traffic ...
    Jul 26, 2023 · ARSRs are capable of surveilling en route traffic with ranges up to 250 NM and altitudes up to 100,000 ft (e.g., ARSR-4).
  16. [16]
    [DOC] A Memorandum on Comparisons of Weather and Aircraft Surveillance
    Sep 11, 2017 · The ARSR-4 transmits two beams, both broad in elevation; a low beam having a width of about 7o on which 9 pulses are transmitted, and a high ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] lnltlated By: AES-210 - Federal Aviation Administration
    The ARSR-4 shall provide search radar detection and reporting (range, azimuth, and height) of aircraft and meet the following per- formance requirements: (a) ...
  18. [18]
    84th RADES optimizes nation's LRR systems for air surveillance ...
    Sep 23, 2021 · The Air Route Surveillance Radar system version four evaluates and optimizes the joint surveillance system, or JSS, long-range radars, ...
  19. [19]
    NORAD, FAA long-range radar back in operation after catastrophic ...
    Sep 5, 2023 · The Common Air Route Surveillance Radar, or CARSR, at Battle Mountain, Nevada, suffered a catastrophic failure on Dec. 27, 2022, when snow ...
  20. [20]
    CARSR - FortWiki Historic U.S. and Canadian Forts
    May 29, 2020 · The Common Air Route Surveillance Radar (CARSR) is a new long-range L-band radar with a range of 200 nm.
  21. [21]
    CONR is presently divided into two defense sectors
    CONR is presently divided into two defense sectors: the Western Defense Sector, with its headquarters located at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash.; and the ...
  22. [22]
    Eastern Air Defense Sector
    Dominate the air domain in the EADS assigned Area of Operations through vigilant detection, rapid warning and precise tactical control of NORAD and USNORTHCOM ...About Us · Contact Us · EADS Airman is NCR Air... · History
  23. [23]
    AN/FYQ-93 - United States Nuclear Forces - Nuke
    Apr 23, 2000 · The AN/FYQ-93 and AN/GSQ-235 systems are to be replaced by the Region/Sector Air Operations Center (R/SAOC) Modification which is in the ...Missing: JSS | Show results with:JSS
  24. [24]
    Control and Reporting Center (CRC) - 552nd Air Control Wing
    It performs decentralized command and control of joint operations by conducting threat warning, battle management, theater missile defense, weapons control, ...Missing: Sector | Show results with:Sector
  25. [25]
    EADS celebrates completion of agile operations project - DVIDS
    Oct 31, 2024 · The Eastern Air Defense Sector marked the completion of its $13.1 million agile operations project with a ribbon-cutting ceremony on Oct. 31 in its Battle ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    NORAD Selected Chronology - Nuke
    16 Mar 96 -- CINCNORAD directed a change in names of the Region and Sector Operations Control Centers (ROCC/SOCC) to Region and Sector Air Operations Centers ( ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Joint Surveillance System Distributed Tracker - DTIC
    1. 1.1 The purpose of the JDT system is to accept radar plot data from up to ten Joint Surveillance System (JSS) radars and perform the tracking function to ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Air Attack Warning System Cannot Process All Radar Track Data
    The 14 Alaskan radars are also considered part of the Joint Surveillance System and forward radar plot data to the Alaskan regional center. Airborne Warning and.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Battle Control System – Fixed (BCS-F)
    BCS-F Increment 2 replaced the legacy AN/FYQ-93 system. The BCS-F Increment 3.1 upgrade provides a new air defense operating system that integrates the ...Missing: processing | Show results with:processing
  30. [30]
    84th RADES optimizing the nation's LRR systems for air surveillance ...
    Sep 22, 2021 · This one-of-a-kind unit evaluates and optimizes the joint surveillance system, or JSS, long-range radars, or LRR, all over the continental United States, ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] ORDER JO 7010.1T - Federal Aviation Administration
    Jun 24, 2008 · Joint Surveillance System facilities are defined in FAA Order 6430.2. 9. Definitions. a. Safety Evaluations, part of the ATO's Safety ...
  32. [32]
    WADS Partners with the FAA for Joint Technical Inspections in Arizona
    Feb 6, 2024 · It consists of long and short-range surveillance radars and radios primarily operated and maintained by the FAA with the Western Air Defense ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Statement by Honorable Paul McHale, Assistant Secretary of ...
    Jul 21, 2005 · Additional integration takes place in the form of radar feeds from the FAA that have been incorporated into the NORAD joint surveillance system.
  34. [34]
    ARSR-4 Air Route Surveillance Radar - United States Nuclear Forces
    Jul 24, 2011 · The Joint Surveillance System is a network of long range surveillance radars, primarily operated and maintained by the Federal Aviation ...
  35. [35]
    Western Air Defense Sector | Washington State Military Department
    It was at this time that the United States Air Force phased out is radar sites in favor of the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) of radars. The Air Force ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Only Radar Capability - DTIC
    At the completion of the ARSR-4 implementation, the JSS sites in CONUS will include 38. ARSR-4 sites plus 6 older sites and 1 military-only site, a total of 45 ...Missing: ROCC | Show results with:ROCC
  37. [37]
    [PDF] NTIA Special Publication 01-44 - DAU
    Jan 1, 2001 · The Air Route Surveillance Radar-4 (ARSR-4) is the newest radar in the nationwide Joint Surveillance System (JSS) providing air defense and air.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Air Route Surveillance Radar Model 4 (ARSR-4) Operational Test ...
    The Air Route Surveillance Radar Model 4 (ARSR-4) is a state-of-the-art, three-dimensional, long-range radar. The system is being jointly procured by the ...Missing: FPS-
  39. [39]
    [PDF] DE-EE0005380 Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm Effects on Sea ...
    Sep 30, 2013 · ARSR-4. 250 nmiles. 1.215-1.4GHz. AN/FPS-130. Joint Surveillance System, for atmosphere defense jointly operated with Air Force. ADS-B. Will ...
  40. [40]
    FPS-117 - Lockheed Martin
    FPS-117 is a ground-based radar for medium to long range air surveillance, with multi-role capability, extended range, and low power consumption.
  41. [41]
    84th RADES optimizes TPS-75, AF's primary ground deployable radar
    Oct 26, 2021 · 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron TPS-75 FAA radar optimization joint surveillance system long range radar 505th Command and Control Wing Hill ...
  42. [42]
    Defensive Watch | Air & Space Forces Magazine
    The aging SAGE network has been replaced by the Joint Surveillance System (JSS). Shared with the Federal Aviation Administration, JSS has forty-seven sites ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] NORAD's Surveillance Capabilities and Responsiveness Are Sound
    Mar 28, 2024 · Today, the northern approach to Canada and the United States is covered ... ClimateViewerMaps, “Joint Surveillance System (JSS) Air Route ...
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    ARSR-4 - Radartutorial.eu
    ARSR-4 is a long-range, 3D, solid-state, unattended radar using dual elevation beams, with 250 NM range, 3.5kW average power, and 1.5º beamwidth.Missing: JSS | Show results with:JSS
  46. [46]
    [PDF] ARSR-4 (FPS-130) - Archived 08/2003 - Forecast International
    Aug 5, 2002 · Description. The ARSR-4 is a long-range, 3D, dual- use, fixed-site radar. The military version has the nomenclature FPS-130(V). Sponsor.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
    ... Radar Approach Control ($2,280), Battle Control System ($671), Air Traffic. Control and Landing System ($616), Joint Surveillance System ($449), and Tactical ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] sum AIRWAY FACILITIES REGIONAL OFFICE AM) SYSTEM ...
    (7) Joint Surveillance System (JSS). (8) Remote Maintenance Monitoring (RMM) Program. (9) NAS Performance Reporting Systems (NAPRS). (10) Providing ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] History of the Aircraft Control and Warning System in Alaska: Air ...
    Constructed during the 1950s, the system consisted of a mixture of coastal surveillance early warning sites, interior ground control and intercept sites, and ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] AIR FORCE - Loc
    The Joint Surveillance System (JSS) provides command, control, and ... in the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Air. Force and CAP ...
  51. [51]
    Radar Modernization Proposal - Federal Aviation Administration
    Aug 7, 2024 · The President's FY 2025 FAA budget proposal calls for a dedicated capital investment of $8 billion over the next five years to replace aging facilities.Missing: JSS | Show results with:JSS
  52. [52]
    84th RADES optimizing the nation's LRR systems for air surveillance ...
    Sep 22, 2021 · This one-of-a-kind unit evaluates and optimizes the joint surveillance system, or JSS, long-range radars, or LRR, all over the continental ...Missing: metrics | Show results with:metrics
  53. [53]
    AN/FYQ-93 - Wikipedia
    The JSS was a joint USAF/FAA radar use program. The ACC portion of the JSS was composed of four CONUS SOCCs equipped with FYQ-93 computers, and 47 ground-based ...Missing: Operations | Show results with:Operations
  54. [54]
    FAA Actions Are Urgently Needed to Modernize Aging Systems
    Sep 23, 2024 · Last year, FAA determined that 51 of its 138 systems are unsustainable, citing outdated functionality, a lack of spare parts, and more. Over ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] ARCHIVED REPORT ARSR-4 (FPS-130) - Forecast International
    Aug 3, 2002 · The second element, performed jointly with the Air Force, entailed procuring 44 new ARSR-4 radars (including one for field support and training ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    [PDF] RDT&E PROGRAMS (R-1)
    123 0102325F Joint Surveillance System. 7. 1,687. 2,099. U. 124 0102326F Region/Sector Operation Control 7. 18,586. 21,428. 13,239. 6,611 U. Center ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Operation and Maintenance Funding. Trends in Army and Air Force ...
    Joint Surveillance System. 46,888. 46,950. 12331F. Communications (416-L). 19,300. 28,579. 12411F. North Atlantic Defense System. 19,747. 12,778. 12412F. North ...
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Recommendation on Transition - ROSA P
    interdiction data as part of the FAA/DOD Joint Surveillance System (JSS). Locations where primary radar is removed could become beacon-only sites, and be ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Programs
    Collectively, they account for a major portion of U.S. intelligence spending that, according to media estimates, amounts to some $40 billion annually. This ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    DOD Can Better Assess and Integrate ISR Capabilities and Oversee ...
    GAO-08-374, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: DOD Can Better Assess and Integrate ISR Capabilities and Oversee Development of Future ISR ...
  62. [62]
    AI on the Edge of Space
    This paper examines how artificial intelligence can augment space domain awareness (SDA) and orbital warfare functions to help avoid operational surprise in ...Missing: Joint Surveillance overlap drones
  63. [63]
    AI Military Drones: Smarter Defense & Surveillance | DaaS
    Oct 17, 2025 · Military drones have become a key part of modern defense. They provide 24-hour aerial surveillance and unsurpassed situational awareness.Missing: Joint overlap<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    The Return of Air Defense | Air & Space Forces Magazine
    In 1983, the six remaining vacuum-tube-technology Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) centers were replaced by four Joint Surveillance System Region ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Integrated Surveillance for the Next Generation Air ... - dtic.mil
    protection of civil liberties and privacy. This ... (primarily ARSR [interior and Joint Surveillance System]) plus DoD ATC radars and other ... ISST as important ...
  66. [66]
    How no one spotted a bunch of 'objects' floating in NORAD airspace
    Feb 16, 2023 · Since 9/11, the FAA and NORAD have shared radar data and members of both organizations regularly embed with each other, according to retired Maj ...
  67. [67]
    Domestic Drones | American Civil Liberties Union
    US law enforcement is greatly expanding its use of surveillance drones, and private actors are also seeking to use the technology for personal and commercial ...Missing: radar | Show results with:radar
  68. [68]
    Surveillance Drones | Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Surveillance drones or unmanned aerial systems (UASs) raise significant issues for privacy and civil liberties. Drones are capable highly advanced surveillance ...
  69. [69]
    FAA Moves to Protect Aircraft Owners' Private Information
    Mar 28, 2025 · Private aircraft owners and operators can now electronically request that the FAA withhold their aircraft registration information from public view.Missing: NORAD concerns
  70. [70]
    ADS-B Privacy | Federal Aviation Administration
    Mar 22, 2025 · The FAA acknowledges the desire of some operators to limit the availability of real-time ADS-B position and identification information for a specific aircraft.Missing: NORAD | Show results with:NORAD
  71. [71]
    [PDF] New Generation of Counter UAS Systems to Defeat of Low Slow and ...
    Existing air defence systems were never designed to deal with LSS air vehicles. They may provide some capability, but suffer from significant limitations ...
  72. [72]
    Performance Comparison of FAA Radars Against Multiple Aircraft
    Dec 29, 2023 · The study compares FAA radar performance using Matlab, analyzing target detection, SNR, RCS, and Doppler frequency, and includes beam ...Missing: exercises | Show results with:exercises
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Air Missile Defense Radar Amdr An Spy 6 V - Tangent Blog
    Sep 12, 2025 · against a variety of aerial threats, including cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and aircraft. ... System * Joint Surveillance System (JSS) * ...
  74. [74]
    NTIA Federal Long-Range Spectrum Plan - 1300 to 10,000 MHz
    The DOD and FAA recently deployed a modernized Air-Route Surveillance Radar Model 4 (ARSR-4) ... Additionally, the DOD operates tactical data links, drone command ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Appendix A NAS-wide Encounter Rate Evaluation using Historical ...
    Route Surveillance Radar-4 (ARSR-4) returns for non-cooperative VFR aircraft. ... None of the analyses included mitigation to separate UAS aircraft from aircraft ...
  76. [76]
    Joint Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
    This chapter discusses the role of Joint Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (JISR) in support of countering Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS).<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Air Force Accepts Long-Awaited First New Radar for Ground Battle ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · The Air Force accepted its first new TPY-4 radar from Lockheed Martin and will start government-led testing of the system.
  78. [78]
    Lockheed Martin Delivers First U.S. Air Force TPY-4 Radar
    Apr 7, 2025 · Detect and Deter: TPY-4 detects smaller, harder-to-detect, next-generation threats. The radar can see targets in jamming and provides long-range ...
  79. [79]
    Air Force aims to field new moving target indication capability in 2027
    May 29, 2024 · The service plans to field the “first increment” of a resilient command, control and communications capability in 2027.Missing: replacements | Show results with:replacements
  80. [80]
    USAF to replace replacing JSTARS a wide area ground surveillance ...
    USAF to replace replacing JSTARS a wide area ground surveillance, battle management command and control platform with Advanced Battle Management System or ABMS.
  81. [81]
    What Does the Future Look Like for Battle Managers?
    Feb 16, 2024 · The Air Force is starting to modernize its command and control enterprise, but the future for battle managers in the short term is unclear.