Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Joint All-Domain Command and Control

Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) is a U.S. of strategy to integrate capabilities across land, maritime, air, space, and domains, enabling the joint force to sense, make sense of, and act on battlefield at speeds surpassing adversaries. The approach emphasizes connecting sensors from all military services into a unified network powered by , , and cloud infrastructure to facilitate real-time data sharing and , addressing limitations in systems designed for slower, domain-specific operations. Initiated to counter advanced anti-access/area-denial capabilities from competitors like and , JADC2 builds on prior concepts such as multi-domain operations, aiming for a "" that allows any asset to target threats dynamically without domain silos. Key features include resilient communications, standards for , and emphasis on human-machine teaming to maintain commander intent amid high-tempo warfare. While prototypes and exercises have demonstrated sensor-to-shooter linkages, full operational capability remains elusive due to technical integration hurdles, cultural resistance among services to , and outdated policies restricting information flow. Critics argue that JADC2's centralization risks undermining decentralized principles, potentially prioritizing algorithmic outputs over tactical judgment and exposing networks to cyber vulnerabilities in contested electromagnetic spectra. assessments highlight persistent gaps in enterprise-level architecture and , underscoring the need for iterative testing against realistic peer threats to validate efficacy.

Definition and Objectives

Core Concept and Scope

Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) is the U.S. Department of Defense's operational concept for synchronizing capabilities across multiple domains to achieve superior in high-intensity conflicts. It focuses on connecting sensors, networks, and effectors to enable commanders to sense, make sense of, and act on information faster than adversaries, addressing limitations in systems that operate in domain-specific . At its core, JADC2 emphasizes the rapid translation of into actionable through automated processes, allowing joint forces to integrate inputs from disparate sources for cross-domain effects, such as directing a informed by space-based or air-launched munitions guided by sensors. This requires standardized protocols and resilient architectures to facilitate machine-to-machine interactions, reducing in decision cycles that could otherwise span hours or days in peer competitions. The scope of JADC2 extends to all warfighting domains—land, maritime, air, space, cyber, and the electromagnetic spectrum—encompassing tactical, operational, and strategic echelons while prioritizing among U.S. services, allies, and coalition partners. It incorporates advanced technologies like for and , alongside secure cloud-based infrastructures to handle petabyte-scale information flows amid contested environments, with implementation targeted through iterative prototyping rather than monolithic programs.

Strategic Imperative Against Peer Adversaries

The U.S. Department of Defense's pivot toward Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) stems from the 2018 National Defense Strategy's emphasis on with peer adversaries and , whose advanced capabilities necessitate a shift from siloed, domain-specific operations to integrated, resilient command structures capable of operating in highly contested environments. These adversaries have developed sophisticated (A2/AD) systems, including integrated missile defenses, hypersonic weapons, and cyber-electromagnetic tools, designed to disrupt U.S. and deny access to key theaters such as the Western Pacific and . For example, 's has prioritized multi-domain integration to counter U.S. naval and air assets, achieving temporal advantages through synchronized effects across air, sea, space, and domains before U.S. forces can respond effectively. JADC2's strategic imperative lies in countering these A2/AD threats by enabling decentralized, data-driven that fuses inputs from all domains to deliver convergent effects at speeds, thereby restoring U.S. advantages in dominance and operational tempo. Adversary A2/AD capabilities specifically target centralized command nodes and connectivity, as seen in Russia's demonstrated use of and precision strikes to isolate forces during operations in , underscoring the vulnerability of legacy systems to disruption and the need for resilient, distributed architectures. Without JADC2, U.S. joint forces risk being outpaced in contested electromagnetic spectra and degraded networks, where even brief delays in could cede initiative to numerically inferior but highly integrated opponents. This imperative extends to deterrence, as JADC2 facilitates and rapid response to gray-zone aggressions, such as China's incursions in the or Russia's hybrid tactics, by providing commanders with real-time awareness to impose costs without escalating to full conflict. assessments highlight that penetrating A2/AD environments demands not just technological connectivity but doctrinal adaptation to decentralize authority, ensuring forces can maintain coherence amid jamming, spoofing, and kinetic attacks that characterize peer-level warfare. Ultimately, JADC2 represents a causal for aligning U.S. command processes with the physics of modern conflict, where speed of decision equates to survival against adversaries who have closed previous technological gaps through asymmetric domain integration.

Historical Development

Origins in Post-Cold War Joint Concepts

The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 marked a pivotal shift toward joint operations in the U.S. military, enacted to address service parochialism and command inefficiencies revealed in prior conflicts like . By strengthening the authority of the Chairman of the , empowering unified combatant commands, and mandating joint duty for senior officer promotions, the act fostered across services in the post-Cold War era, where threats transitioned from bipolar superpower confrontation to regional contingencies and asymmetric challenges. Its effects were evident in the 1991 , where coalition forces achieved rapid victory through coordinated air, land, and sea operations, yet exposed persistent gaps in real-time data sharing and cross-service command structures. Building on this foundation, the Department of Defense released Joint Vision 2010 in February 1996, outlining a framework for achieving via four operational concepts: dominant maneuver, precision engagement, full-dimensional protection, and focused logistics, all enabled by superior information operations. This vision emphasized awareness through integrated sensors and communications, serving as an early conceptual precursor to all-domain by prioritizing the fusion of from multiple sources to support joint force commanders. Joint Vision 2010 identified critical enablers like , , , , , personnel, and facilities to transform these ideas into capabilities, reflecting post-Cold War optimism in the Revolution in Military Affairs driven by advancing information technologies. Joint Vision 2020, issued in June 2000, extended these principles into a network-centric paradigm, envisioning a to connect forces for rapid, precise decision-making across domains. It highlighted the need for shared and collaborative engagement, concepts that anticipated JADC2's emphasis on seamless data flow from disparate sensors to effectors, amid emerging recognition of persistent conflicts and the limitations of platform-centric warfare. These post-Cold War joint visions collectively shifted from service-specific silos toward integrated , laying the doctrinal groundwork for later evolutions in multi-domain operations by institutionalizing information superiority as a force multiplier.

Formalization and Key Milestones (2018–2022)

The formalization of Joint All-Domain (JADC2) built upon service-specific multi-domain concepts, transitioning to a unified (DoD) framework to integrate command and control across air, land, maritime, , cyber, and electromagnetic domains. In October 2017, the U.S. Army updated Field Manual (FM) 3-0 to emphasize operations in contested environments, laying groundwork for multi-domain , though the full Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) was elaborated in subsequent 2018 publications and experiments that highlighted the need for joint sensor-to-shooter connectivity. By 2019, DoD conducted its first major JADC2-oriented exercise in December, simulating responses to threats using cross-service to test early networked . In 2020, inter-service agreements advanced the concept, including an Army-Air Force memorandum establishing Combined JADC2 (CJADC2) as a prototype for allied , while the Air Force's Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) demonstrated machine-to-machine targeting in exercises like ABMS Onramp 3. These efforts addressed gaps in legacy stovepiped systems, prioritizing cloud-based and AI-driven analytics for rapid targeting. The elevated JADC2 as a priority capability, with service doctrines—such as the Navy's Distributed Operations and Marine Corps' Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations—aligning to support joint all-domain effects. The pivotal formalization occurred in 2021 with the signing of the classified JADC2 Strategy by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on May 13, articulating a vision for an "internet of military things" to enable commanders to sense, decide, and act at machine speeds against peer threats like China and Russia. Follow-on summits in June refined implementation paths through a cross-functional team overseeing data standards, secure networks, and automation. This strategy emphasized five lines of effort: building a data enterprise, enhancing human decision-making, advancing technical enablers, integrating nuclear command and control, and enabling mission partner sharing. By early 2022, Deputy Secretary of Defense signed the JADC2 Implementation Plan on March 15, providing detailed tasks, timelines, and metrics for prototyping and fielding capabilities, with initial deliveries targeted for fiscal year 2023 onward. This plan operationalized the strategy by mandating resilient infrastructure, augmentation, and experimentation via events like Project Convergence and ABMS, marking the shift from conceptual development to executable joint force transformation. An unclassified strategy summary released on March 17 underscored the imperative for layered security and rapid iteration to counter adversary anti-access/area-denial tactics.

Technical Framework

Architectural Components and Data Integration

The JADC2 architecture employs a federated data fabric to enable seamless information sharing across domains, echelons, and security classifications, integrating sensors and systems from air, land, sea, space, and cyber operations. This framework, detailed in the Department of Defense's 2022 Reference Architecture, outlines operational and technical designs for standardized data exchange, emphasizing modular, open systems to achieve synchronized capabilities by 2030. Core components include advanced sensing networks that collect, correlate, and aggregate data from remote sensors, assets, and open sources across the . transport relies on secure, resilient communications with to maintain connectivity in contested environments, supporting high-bandwidth transmission for operations. Processing layers utilize and algorithms to fuse multi-domain —encompassing friendly, adversary, and neutral entities—into actionable , accelerating decision cycles through automated analysis and validation. Data integration is facilitated by common standards, metadata tagging, and standardized interfaces that ensure , with strategic objectives rendering data visible, accessible, understandable, linked, trustworthy, , and secure. Semantic frameworks and enable fusion of disparate data from legacy and modern systems, supporting sensor-to-shooter pathways without proprietary silos. This approach addresses challenges in aligning service-specific priorities by prioritizing enterprise-level methodologies over siloed developments.

AI, Machine Learning, and Automation Roles

Artificial intelligence () and (ML) are integral to Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), primarily enabling the fusion of multi-domain sensor into actionable intelligence to accelerate commanders' decision cycles. These technologies process massive volumes of heterogeneous from air, land, sea, space, and domains, transforming raw inputs into validated knowledge through automated analysis and . In the "make sense" phase of JADC2 operations, AI/ML algorithms perform at the edge, integrating disparate sources to generate unified and predictive models for threat identification. Automation supports machine-to-machine transactions, allowing direct extraction, consolidation, and processing of from sensing without human intervention, which sustains operations in degraded or contested environments. This capability reduces latency in the observe-orient-decide-act , enabling object tracking and early warning across tactical to strategic levels. The Chief Digital and Office (CDAO) governs /ML integration in Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2), ensuring alignment of requirements, resourcing, and acquisitions while establishing standards for and software use. Experimental efforts, such as the Global Information Dominance Experiments (GIDE) co-sponsored by CDAO and the Joint Staff, demonstrate these roles through quarterly iterations since 2021, involving all services, 11 combatant commands, and allies. GIDE phases, including V through VIII in 2023, leverage for automated pooling via servers, achieving up to 98% utilization of previously unanalyzed for proactive responses and fires. in these tests extends to decision support, handling routine assessments to alleviate human cognitive burdens and facilitate scalable command structures.

Networks, Infrastructure, and Security Protocols

The Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) depends on a resilient that integrates , systems, and emerging technologies to enable seamless exchange across land, sea, air, space, and cyber domains. This includes modernization of beyond-line-of-sight communications via (SATCOM) and high-frequency (HF) systems, alongside synchronized interoperable waveforms and for high-bandwidth, low-latency connectivity in contested environments. Federated fabrics and nodes provide global reach, supporting standardized interfaces for transport and eliminating single points of failure through redundant pathways. Infrastructure supporting these networks emphasizes cloud-based systems, modular open-system approaches for , , and timing (PNT), and a shared layer to connect disparate platforms. The Department of Defense () strategy outlines lines of effort (LOEs) for developing cyber-hardened technologies and evolvable services, ensuring sufficient speed, bandwidth, and resilience for even under degradation. As of 2023, efforts like the Air Force's Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) digital infrastructure consortium aim to prototype cloud-integrated networks, though full capabilities remain in development without delivered operational systems. Security protocols for JADC2 incorporate the DoD's Zero Trust architecture, adopted in November 2022, which shifts from perimeter-based defenses to continuous "never trust, always verify" verification across users, devices, and data flows. This entails , least-privilege access, dynamic policy enforcement, micro-segmentation of networks, and with advanced to mitigate risks in interconnected systems. Layered cyber defenses, including metadata tagging for secure data classification and AI-assisted , address vulnerabilities amplified by expanded , while emphasizing protection of senior leadership and nuclear command networks. Challenges persist in legacy gaps and electromagnetic contestation, necessitating ongoing DevSecOps integration for agile threat response.

Implementation and Experimentation

Major Prototyping Efforts and Joint Exercises

Project Convergence serves as the U.S. Army's primary experimentation series for prototyping Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) capabilities, focusing on integrating sensors and effectors across land, air, sea, space, and cyber domains to enable rapid . Launched in 2021, the exercise series tests joint force through live, virtual, and constructive environments, involving participants from the Army, Navy, , Marine Corps, and coalition partners. In Project Convergence 21, conducted from April to August 2021 at , , and other sites, the joint force demonstrated initial JADC2-enabled effects, such as linking long-range fires with and assets for targeting in contested environments. This iteration emphasized data sharing via tactical networks and AI-driven analytics to shorten the sensor-to-shooter timeline. Subsequent events, like Project Convergence 22 in October-November 2022, expanded to include space-based assets and cyber operations, with over 15,000 personnel validating multi-domain task forces in scenarios simulating peer adversary threats. The series paused in 2023 for refinement, resuming with Capstone 4 in 2024 and advancing to Capstone 5 in the Indo-Pacific region starting April 2025, where forces tested persistent JADC2 nodes for operational handover to combatant commands. These exercises have prototyped tools like the Army's Prometheus software for command and control fusion, integrating with Air Force Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) increments. Beyond exercises, dedicated prototyping includes the Department of Defense's $1.8 billion investment in 2022 for satellite under the Space Development Agency's Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture, aimed at providing resilient transport layers for JADC2 data relay. In July 2025, received a $315 million to rapidly prototype Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) systems in partnership with Technologies, focusing on scalable software architectures for joint . The , in October 2025, announced plans to expand C2 prototyping, building on five years of breakthroughs in tactical data links and to align with JADC2's unified vision. Joint Staff-led JADC2 Campaign Plan experiments, such as Experiment 2, have tested cross-service , enabling near-real-time information sharing among , , , and Marine Corps nodes to support effects convergence. These efforts underscore a shift from siloed service prototypes to integrated joint demonstrations, though GAO assessments highlight ongoing challenges in defining requirements and achieving full .

Service-Specific Contributions and Interoperability Tests

The has advanced JADC2 through Project Convergence, a campaign of learning initiated in 2020 under Army Futures Command oversight to prototype joint all-domain operations and integrate systems with other services' capabilities. In iterations such as Project Convergence 22 (PC22), conducted from to 2022, the tested offensive and defensive capabilities, enabling data passage at unprecedented scales to inform JADC2 requirements and demonstrate multi-service alignment. Project Convergence Capstone 4 in March 2024 further emphasized tactical-to-operational experimentation, while the 2025 "Part B" phase continues annual warfighting assessments to refine network overhauls for joint . The Navy contributes via , its designated JADC2 component focused on to link sensors, platforms, and decision nodes across domains, with extensions to allied forces through a agreement signed in February 2025. This initiative has enabled over-the-air software updates to fleet assets as routine by early 2024 and supports scalable "kill chains" for thousands of targets in the , progressing ahead of the 2022 Naval Force Structure timelines. also integrates commercial solutions, as demonstrated in mid-2023 deployments via the . The 's Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) serves as its primary JADC2 effort, developing a cloud-based architecture for sensor integration, , and resilient command-and-control across air, space, and other domains since its launch. ABMS emphasizes rapid kill-chain architectures and digital infrastructure, with a $303 million contract awarded to in October 2024 for planning and analysis to connect joint assets. The program has reorganized elements to address JADC2 complexities, incorporating industry input for faster development as discussed at the 2024 Air Force Association symposium. The enhances JADC2 by prioritizing space-based command-and-control, aiming to orbit resilient nodes for joint sensing and decision superiority, as outlined in its August 2023 comprehensive . Space capabilities underpin JADC2 by providing foundational connectivity for multi-domain operations, with contributions including maneuverable geosynchronous satellites under a $905 million program through 2029 to support nuclear and conventional C2. The Marine Corps advances JADC2 through Project Dynamis, a service-level initiative launched in September 2025 to modernize command, control, communications, and computers infrastructure, accelerating AI-driven decision-making and integration as a joint "kill web" enabler. Envisioned as a CJADC2 , Dynamis focuses on network upgrades and aligns with for stand-in forces, testing interoperability in contested environments without claiming to resolve all JADC2 challenges unilaterally. Interoperability tests occur primarily through joint exercises and prototyping events, such as the Army-led Project Convergence series, which in PC22 integrated Air Force and other service technologies to validate JADC2 data flows and tactical C2 modernization. Valiant Shield 2024, a multinational exercise, tested legacy system integration into digital JADC2 frameworks, involving joint forces and contractors to enhance command-and-control precision. Bold Quest Island Marauder in October 2023 advanced Navy CJADC2 efforts by experimenting with allied data sharing and multi-domain synchronization. High-level coordination, including a June 2022 service chiefs summit hosted by the Air Force, has aligned contributions across branches, with ongoing multi-nation training emphasizing real-world JADC2 validation amid a $9.5 billion investment horizon. These efforts reveal progress in cross-service data fusion but highlight persistent challenges in full-spectrum interoperability against peer threats.

Challenges, Criticisms, and Controversies

Technical and Operational Obstacles

A primary technical obstacle to JADC2 is the lack of among legacy systems across military services, which often employ formats and incompatible architectures developed under siloed acquisition processes. Integrating these systems requires substantial or translation layers, complicating information sharing and increasing in decision cycles. The Department of Defense's CJADC2 efforts, as assessed in 2025, highlight the absence of a comprehensive , exacerbating these challenges by failing to standardize protocols across domains. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities represent another critical technical hurdle, as JADC2's emphasis on interconnected networks across air, land, sea, space, and domains amplifies risks of widespread compromise from single points of failure. Reliance on outdated standards, such as a 48-year-old pervasive in weapons and systems, exposes the architecture to exploitation by adversaries targeting flows. A 2022 analysis noted that up to 32% of major U.S. defense contractors remain vulnerable to common threats, potentially undermining the secure essential for JADC2's sensor-to-shooter loops. Operationally, cultural and organizational persist as barriers, with service-specific doctrines and reluctance to share data hindering multi-domain coordination. deficiencies compound this, as personnel require proficiency in live-virtual-constructive (LVC) environments to simulate JADC2 scenarios, yet current capabilities fall short for air operations centers and cross-domain tasks. The Joint All-Domain Command and Control Strategy acknowledges that evolving missions and coalition dynamics demand overcoming these obstacles through focused modernization, but progress remains impeded by policy inertia and fragmented oversight.

Budgetary Constraints and Oversight Failures

The Department of Defense () has increased funding for Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) initiatives, with expenditures rising significantly from fiscal year (FY) 2017 to FY 2020, and approximately 30 related efforts requesting between $2.2 billion and $2.6 billion in the FY 2023 budget. However, as of January 2023, had not developed an overall assessment of the total cost or schedule for achieving JADC2 capabilities, contributing to uncertainties in resource allocation across multiple service-specific programs. This absence of a comprehensive cost baseline has raised concerns about potential inefficiencies, as parallel prototyping efforts—such as the Army's Project Convergence and the Air Force's Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)—proceed without fully aligned budgetary priorities, risking fragmented spending. Budgetary constraints have further complicated JADC2 implementation, exacerbated by broader federal fiscal pressures that necessitate integrating new capabilities with legacy systems rather than wholesale replacements. In FY 2024, the Chief Digital and Office (CDAO), tasked with advancing JADC2, saw its budget more than double from the prior year to support a , yet ongoing congressional budget disputes as of January 2024 limited access to these funds, jeopardizing early deployment goals. Defense acquisition programs, including those underpinning JADC2, have historically experienced overruns in about 30% of cases exceeding initial estimates, which could slow modernization and integration if not addressed through tighter fiscal controls. Oversight failures stem primarily from the lack of a unified framework to guide JADC2 investments and measure progress, as highlighted in a April 2025 Government Accountability Office () assessment of Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2), the extension of JADC2. Despite 's attempts since inception to define and coordinate efforts, the absence of such a framework has led to uncoordinated service-led initiatives, duplicative capabilities, and inadequate mechanisms for sharing across experiments. For instance, the Air Force's ABMS planning as of January 2023 remained incomplete in specifying how it would contribute to broader JADC2 objectives or integrate with other services' efforts, underscoring gaps in joint oversight. recommended that establish an investment-guiding framework and cross-effort lesson-sharing protocols to mitigate these risks, but implementation remains pending. These deficiencies reflect systemic challenges in acquisition, where decentralized authority often prioritizes service-specific needs over holistic joint requirements, potentially inflating costs without commensurate operational gains.

Strategic Vulnerabilities and Feasibility Debates

Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) introduces strategic vulnerabilities primarily through its emphasis on expansive and interconnectivity, creating a vastly expanded for cyber adversaries. The integration of sensors, platforms, systems, and infrastructure across domains heightens risks from compromises and , with defense contractors already facing targeted attacks from state actors like and . For instance, reliance on commercial technologies exposes civilian —such as grids and communications—to wartime disruption, as adversaries could exploit software vulnerabilities to infiltrate JADC2's backbone. Additionally, centralized nodes risk single points of failure, akin to the February 24, 2022, Viasat satellite hack that severed Ukrainian communications during 's invasion, underscoring how contested environments could degrade JADC2's assumed seamless connectivity. Critics highlight further vulnerabilities from over-dependence on vulnerable communications and (EW) countermeasures by peers like and , which have invested heavily in and capabilities. Classification barriers impede integration of and domains, limiting real-time multidomain options and exacerbating risks in degraded operations. JADC2's push for AI-driven decision-making also raises concerns over diminished human judgment in dynamic battlespaces, potentially eroding tactical adaptability if systems falter under adversarial pressure. Feasibility debates center on JADC2's foundational assumptions of assured connectivity and rapid data dominance, which analysts argue overlook resilient peer threats and historical precedents of communication blackouts. Proponents view it as essential for countering anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) strategies, yet implementation lags due to service-specific silos and absent Department of Defense (DoD) frameworks for investment prioritization and progress tracking, leading to inefficient, isolated prototyping. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted in April 2025 that without a comprehensive governance structure, efforts risk duplication and failure to address data classification hurdles that stifle sharing. Organizational complexities compound doubts, with geographic combatant commands retaining component-centric planning that hinders multidomain synchronization, compounded by legal ambiguities in space and authorities. Real-world exercises reveal unproven assumptions, as seen in Ukraine's rejection of NATO multidomain training amid Russian defenses and Israel's October 7, 2023, surveillance failures against , suggesting JADC2 may overpromise against adaptive foes. While some defend JADC2 as a necessary evolution for peer competition, skeptics, including West Point scholars, contend it prioritizes technological ambition over warfighter needs, potentially centralizing control at expense and ignoring basics like distributed, resilient command. These debates underscore tensions between innovation and realism, with recommending clarified multidomain concepts and experimentation to weigh costs against benefits before full-scale commitment.

Future Prospects and Geopolitical Implications

Planned Advancements and CJADC2 Expansion

The Department of Defense intends to demonstrate an advanced implementation of CJADC2 through the Global Information Dominance Experiments (GIDE) scheduled for late 2025, aiming to showcase integrated across domains at operational speeds. This effort builds on prior iterations by emphasizing fusion from sensors to effectors, with a focus on achieving "information advantage" in contested environments. Key prototyping initiatives include the 's expansion of under the of the Battle Network, with deliberate deployments of Tactical Operations Centers-Light (TOC-L) prototypes—following 16 kits fielded in 2023—and enhancements to Cloud-based (CBC2+) for unified interfaces across echelons by 2025 and beyond. The Army's Project Convergence 2025 will extend a common operating picture to additional units, integrating data from and coalition sources for improved targeting and fires coordination. Meanwhile, the Marine Corps launched Project Dynamis in September 2025, establishing a to accelerate AI-driven precision warfare, including "kill web" sensor-shooter linkages tested with units like the . Advancements in specific architectures target , such as Open DAGIR, which received a $100 million other transactional authority award to in December 2024 for developing a tactical to connect hardware and software across domains. The Joint Fires Network (JFN), iterated in 2024 for operations, provides automated and targeting, with plans for broader deployment following tests like Valiant . Maritime expansion includes a 2025 multinational sea demonstration led by the , incorporating zero-trust security for secure data sharing among partners like , , , , and . CJADC2 expansion emphasizes allied integration, evolving toward a "combined joint" framework with international data meshes to enable coalition forces' secure, resilient communications in multi-domain operations. This includes iterative fielding of data-centric security protocols and AI-enabled analytics to support commanders in sensing, deciding, and acting across land, sea, air, space, and cyber domains with partners. DoD officials have highlighted the need to overcome bureaucratic hurdles to accelerate these capabilities, with momentum building through exercises that prototype end-to-end workflows.

Potential Transformative Effects on Modern Warfare

JADC2 envisions a networked that fuses data from sensors across air, land, sea, space, cyber, and electromagnetic domains to enable commanders to sense, make sense of, and act on information with unprecedented speed and precision. This aims to compress the observe-orient-decide-act (, allowing U.S. forces to outpace adversaries in peer conflicts by delivering effects in minutes rather than hours or days, as traditional siloed command structures often require. For instance, real-time data sharing could synchronize joint fires, , and cyber operations to disrupt enemy command nodes before they fully respond, shifting warfare from sequential domain engagements to simultaneous, converged effects. A core transformative potential lies in achieving decision superiority through automated analysis and machine-human collaboration, where processes vast datasets to provide actionable insights, reducing cognitive overload on operators and minimizing delays from human-only processing. In modern warfare scenarios against advanced foes like China's , which is developing analogous systems, JADC2 could enable dynamic retasking of assets—such as reallocating space-based sensors to support ground maneuvers mid-battle—fostering a resilient "kill web" over rigid kill chains. This would enhance awareness by creating a accessible at all echelons, potentially increasing lethality while decreasing risks through precise, all-domain attribution of threats. Critics within analysis, however, note that realizing these effects hinges on overcoming integration hurdles, as unproven assumptions about seamless could falter in contested environments with jammed networks or degraded satellites. Nonetheless, successful implementation might redefine deterrence by imposing prohibitive costs on aggressors, compelling them to operate within U.S. decision advantages, akin to how air superiority historically shaped 20th-century conflicts. Proponents argue this could extend to non-kinetic domains, enabling preemptive or operations informed by multi-domain , thus broadening the spectrum of warfare outcomes beyond physical destruction.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Summary of the Joint All-Domain Command and Control Strategy
    Mar 17, 2022 · The JADC2 strategy articulates DoD's approach for advancing Joint Force C2 capabilities necessary to support U.S. national security interests.
  2. [2]
    DOD and Air Force Continue to Define Joint Command and Control ...
    Jan 13, 2023 · Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) is a long-term effort to connect military assets across space, air, land, sea, and cyber domains.
  3. [3]
    Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office > Initiatives > CJADC2
    The Combined Joint All Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) warfighting approach aids the modern Combined Joint Force Commander in achieving decision advantage.
  4. [4]
    Pathways to Implementing Comprehensive and Collaborative JADC2
    Sep 27, 2022 · Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) is the DoD's concept to connect sensors and communications from all of the military services—Air ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) - Congress.gov
    Jul 1, 2021 · These capabilities include electronic warfare, cyber weapons, long-range missiles, and advanced air defenses. U.S. competitors have pursued A2/ ...
  6. [6]
    C4ISR & JADC2: Navigating the Next Frontier in Military ... - IDGA
    Aug 9, 2024 · JADC2 is a DoD acronym that stands for Joint All Domain Command and Control. The goal of JADC2 is to enable the Joint Force to act at all ...
  7. [7]
    DOD Officials Discuss Advancements in Joint All-Domain Command ...
    Feb 28, 2022 · Joint All-Domain Command and Control, aka JADC2, is a system being developed that aims to connect any sensor to any shooter in any domain ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    JADC2 Faces 'Huge Weakness': Old Policies, Old Tech
    Mar 3, 2021 · Other military officials at the conference also cautioned that some major policy and technological fixes need to happen before a real fusion of ...
  9. [9]
    A Solution Desperately Seeking Problems: The Many Assumptions ...
    May 3, 2022 · With the tendency of military leaders to focus on metrics, JADC2 could have a deleterious effect on tactical decision-making, resulting in ...Missing: controversies criticisms
  10. [10]
    Mission (Command) Complete: Implications of JADC2 - NDU Press
    Jul 19, 2024 · As the joint force operationalizes the JADC2 concept, it will cause friction for existing C2 doctrine and practices, resulting in diminished ...Missing: controversies criticisms
  11. [11]
    GAO-25-106454, DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL
    Apr 8, 2025 · Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) is a Department of Defense (DOD) concept aimed at improving command and control by ...Missing: features achievements
  12. [12]
    [PDF] GAO-25-106454, DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL: Further ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) is a Department of. Defense (DOD) concept aimed at improving command and control by ...
  13. [13]
    Research Guides: JADO - Joint All-Domain Operations: Reports
    Sep 23, 2025 · The 2018 National Defense Strategy shifts strategic focus to preparing for high-end conflict against peer adversaries – specifically Russia and ...Missing: imperative | Show results with:imperative
  14. [14]
    The imperative for hypersonic strike weapons and ... - Atlantic Council
    Oct 9, 2025 · China and Russia have invested heavily in systems designed to deny US forces access to key theaters and to strike their forward-deployed assets ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Assessment of Joint All Domain Command and Control ... - RAND
    Mar 2, 2023 · Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) is emerging as the preeminent operational concept in the U.S. Department of Defense. It is ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] What Is JADC2, and How Does It Relate to Training? - RAND
    Adversary A2AD capabilities can deny U.S. forward forces the ability to maintain connectivity to centralized C2 nodes. Thus, C2 in any near-peer conflict ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] DOD C3 Modernization Strategy
    Electromagnetic Spectrum (EMS) superiority is a joint all-domain warfighting imperative. DoD operations and joint functions are increasingly dependent on ...
  18. [18]
    Outcomes Of JADC2 Will Provide Decisive Advantage
    Sep 23, 2021 · While an ultimate outcome of JADC2 is to win in a conflict if necessary, the more immediate outcomes are deterring a fight and managing crises so bullets never ...Missing: necessity | Show results with:necessity
  19. [19]
    Achieving Decision Dominance through Convergence - AUSA
    Feb 2, 2022 · JADC2 contributes to information dominance and facilitates rapid convergence of effects, achieving the critical advantage of speed, which is the ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Goldwater-Nichols at 30: Defense Reform and Issues for Congress
    Mar 17, 2025 · The Goldwater-Nichols Act sought to address these structural deficiencies by making the Chairman, rather than the collective Joint Chiefs of ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ii The Goldwater Nichols Act Of 1986: Impact And Implications For ...
    This study concludes that the Goldwater-Nichols Act established an overarching framework within the Department of Defense that successfully transformed the ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Joint Vision 2010. America's Military: Preparing for Tomorrow. - DTIC
    Joint Vision 2010 provides an operationally based template for the evolution of the Armed Forces for a challenging and uncertain future. It must become a.Missing: JADC2 | Show results with:JADC2
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Joint Vision 2020 - DTIC
    The development of a concept labeled the global information grid will provide the network-centric environment required to achieve this goal. The grid will ...
  24. [24]
    Battle Networks and the Future Force - CSIS
    Nov 2, 2021 · This CSIS brief is the second in a series on the future of battle networks and Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2). This paper examines ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Network Centric Warfare - dodccrp.org
    Jul 27, 2001 · 2.2.2 Joint Vision 2020 and Network Centric Warfare. 2.2.3 ... selectively network various types of sensors that exist in the physical domain with ...Missing: JADC2 | Show results with:JADC2
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Challenges and Options for All-Domain Command and Control
    Rumbaugh, “WPC Executes Milestone Air Force-Army Integration Exercise,” April 25, 2018. ... Headquarters, Department of the Army, FM 3-0 Operations, October 2017b ...
  27. [27]
    Return of CJADC2: DoD officially moves ahead with 'combined ...
    May 16, 2023 · “CJADC2” isn't entirely new. It was the term used by officials back in 2020 when the Army and Air Force inked an agreement to build out a ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks Clears Plan to Implement ...
    Mar 18, 2022 · The JADC2 cross-functional team will lead the execution of the implementation plan and the JADC2 strategy that was first announced in June 2021.
  29. [29]
    Second Summit Develops Joint All Domain C2 Implementation Plan
    Jun 15, 2021 · The JADC2 Strategy, developed through the discussions during the first summit, was signed by the Secretary of Defense on May 13. U.S. Strategic ...Missing: announced | Show results with:announced
  30. [30]
    [PDF] DOD and Air Force Continue to Define Joint Command and Control ...
    Jan 13, 2023 · Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) is a long-term effort to connect military assets across space, air, land, sea, and cyber domains.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) - Congress.gov
    Jan 21, 2022 · U.S. competitors have pursued A2/AD capabilities as a means of countering traditional U.S. military advantages— such as the ability to project ...
  32. [32]
    JADC2: Getting to Real-Time Object Data and Tracking in All ... - SAIC
    Joint all-domain command and control will require a semantic framework that integrates multi-domain battlespace data from disparate military IT systems.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Joint All-Domain Command and Control for Modern Warfare - RAND
    Some key issues raised by applications for the JADC2 include the concern that almost all algorithm development is currently driven by commercial demands and.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    CJADC2 Interoperability: AI-/ML-based Sensor Fusion at the Edge
    AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms, vital enablers in CJADC2, help to automate decision-making by rapidly analyzing diverse data sets from various sensors ...
  35. [35]
    AI's Role in US Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2 ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · AI driven JADC2 platforms are reshaping how missions are planned, executed, and adapted in real time.
  36. [36]
    With dreams of JADC2, Pentagon relaunches AI-driven command ...
    Feb 1, 2023 · Global Information Dominance Experiments V through VIII seek to jolt ponderous Pentagon processes into the age of AI, big data, and the cloud.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] DoD Zero Trust Strategy
    Nov 22, 2022 · Zero Trust is the term for an “evolving set of cybersecurity paradigms that move defenses from static, network-based perimeters to focus on ...
  38. [38]
    Project Convergence 21 to showcase abilities of the joint force | Article
    Aug 16, 2021 · The series of exercises will have “joint use” cases that will test joint, all-domain situational awareness, as the Army will link with other ...
  39. [39]
    Project Convergence: An Experiment for Multidomain Operations
    Our mission is to gain the ability to converge effects across all warfighting domains: air, land, sea, cyber, and space. This convergence of cross-cutting ...
  40. [40]
    Project Convergence 2022 - Team March enters the arena with new ...
    Nov 10, 2022 · Project Convergence allows military decision-makers to comprehend where we are with technology, find the shortfalls, and guide future decisions.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    No Convergence in 2023: Army deliberating the path ahead for ...
    Feb 8, 2023 · Part of this calculus means the service will not be hosting Project Convergence this year and it has not yet decided when the event will return, ...
  42. [42]
    Project Convergence headed to Indo-Pacific Command in April
    Mar 11, 2025 · As part of the Project Convergence Capstone 5 exercise, forces will leave capabilities behind for operational use in the Indo-Pacific.
  43. [43]
    Army starting Project Convergence 'Part B' - Federal News Network
    Apr 4, 2025 · After wrapping up this year's "capstone" event in southern California, the Army will take its warfighting technology experiment to the Pacific.
  44. [44]
    DOD awards $1.8B for satellite prototypes to power JADC2
    Feb 28, 2022 · The Pentagon's Space Development Agency issued a trio of prototype awards worth a combined $1.8 billion to develop a satellite network that it ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
  45. [45]
    Booz Allen Awarded $315 Million Rapid Prototyping Contract to ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · Booz Allen is partnering with L3Harris Technologies (NYSE: LHX) for this rapid prototyping effort aimed at enabling Combined Joint All-Domain ...
  46. [46]
    Air Force looks to scale up C2 prototyping, experimentation efforts
    Oct 3, 2025 · Air Force looks to scale up C2 prototyping, experimentation efforts. "All of the major C2 breakthroughs that we've had in the last five years ...
  47. [47]
    Army Overhauling Networks for JADC2 - National Defense Magazine
    Jul 11, 2023 · Officially launched in 2020 with oversight from Army Futures Command, Project Convergence is the service's contribution to the JADC2 campaign, ...
  48. [48]
    Air Force supports JADC2 concept during Project Convergence 22
    Dec 28, 2022 · Project Convergence is an Army Futures Command-led combined joint force, or CJF, an experiment designed to develop offensive and defensive capabilities.
  49. [49]
    Project Convergence shows JADC2 alignment, leaders from 3 ...
    Oct 21, 2022 · The successes of Project Convergence, which kicked off this month and continues through November, show the services are aligned and not disjointed.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Data passed 'at a magnitude never seen before' at Army's Project ...
    Mar 8, 2024 · Project Convergence aims to experiment with new technologies and concepts, which ultimately inform potential requirements for systems to be ...
  51. [51]
    Project Overmatch Achieves Historic Milestone with Five Eyes ...
    Feb 26, 2025 · As the Navy's contribution to the Joint Staff-led Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) initiative, Project Overmatch is working closely ...
  52. [52]
    Over-the-air updates now 'matter of course' through Project Overmatch
    Feb 15, 2024 · The Navy is able to deliver over-the-air software and capability updates to ships through its secretive effort known as Project Overmatch.
  53. [53]
    JADC2 Network Key to Managing Forces Across the World, Says ...
    Apr 10, 2024 · What CJADC2 means to the Navy in the Indo-Pacific is providing a “maritime kill chain at thousands of targets, not onesy and twosy,” Moller said ...Missing: specific | Show results with:specific
  54. [54]
    DoD Successfully Deploys Commercial AI Solutions for COD Project
    Sep 11, 2024 · In mid-2023, the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) partnered with Project Overmatch (the Navy's program focused on connecting U.S. military sensors, ...
  55. [55]
    Air Force Reorganizes to Tackle JADC2 Complexities
    Jul 12, 2023 · The Air Force launched the ABMS program to build a resilient command-and-control infrastructure to connect and integrate sensors, move and manage data.
  56. [56]
    Air Force taps Leidos to lead digital infrastructure for ... - Defense One
    Oct 2, 2024 · The $303 million contract charges the company with leading the planning and analysis for the Advanced Battle Management System's digital ...
  57. [57]
    Air Force developing new architecture for JADC2 'kill chains,' wants ...
    Aug 8, 2023 · A key Air Force official said the service is developing an “architecture” to address integrated “kill chains” for its new battle network framework.
  58. [58]
    Discussions at AFA Focus on the Role of Industry in Making JADC2 ...
    Apr 17, 2024 · JADC2 has come a long way, especially in the Air Force's ABMS program. However, the AFA Warfare Symposium shows there is still a lot of work ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Comprehensive Strategy for the Space Force
    Aug 1, 2023 · The Space. Force's unique capabilities will be crucial features that enable the Joint Force to realize the. JADC2 vision. It is important that ...
  60. [60]
    Space Force Sets Sights on Putting JADC2 in Orbit
    Jul 12, 2023 · The goal of the JADC2 initiative is to connect sensors to shooters and ensure warfighters get the right information at the right place and time.
  61. [61]
    Can JADC2 Help DOD Build New Nuclear Command and Control?
    Jul 16, 2024 · The Space Force expects to award $905 million in contracts over the next five years through a new Maneuverable GEO program, which aims to form a ...
  62. [62]
    Marine Corps Launches Project Dynamis - ExecutiveGov
    Sep 24, 2025 · The Marine Corps has launched Project Dynamis to accelerate AI-enabled decision advantage and modernization in support of CJADC2. "United States ...Missing: JADC2 | Show results with:JADC2
  63. [63]
    Marines Corps' Project Dynamis envisioned as CJADC2 'integrator ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · Marines Corps' Project Dynamis envisioned as CJADC2 'integrator' for joint force. The Marine Corps knows it can't “solve JADC2 for everybody,” ...
  64. [64]
    Marine Corps' Upcoming Project Dynamis to be Its 'JADC2 Accelerator'
    Feb 14, 2024 · The first is modernizing the Marine Corps' command, control, communications and computers (C4) network and infrastructure, including increased ...
  65. [65]
    AF supports joint exercise to modernize tactical C2 capabilities
    Dec 27, 2022 · Project Convergence is an Army Futures Command-led combined joint force, or CJF, an experiment designed to develop offensive and defensive ...
  66. [66]
    Joint force, international partners, contractors test command and ...
    Jul 19, 2024 · “For us, the Joint All-Domain Command and Control, the JADC2 objective is fundamentally to integrate stovepiped legacy systems into a digital ...
  67. [67]
    NIWC Atlantic Advances CJADC2 Efforts at Bold Quest Island ...
    Oct 17, 2023 · NIWC Atlantic leaders said the experimentation directly supported Combined Joint All Domain Command and Control, or CJADC2, a concept largely ...
  68. [68]
    Air Force hosts service chiefs to discuss JADC2 - AF.mil
    Jun 29, 2022 · Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. CQ Brown, Jr. met with his fellow service chiefs from the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Space Force June 24 to share advancements.Missing: specific | Show results with:specific
  69. [69]
    Multi-Nation Training Efforts and Real World Use Help Advance $9.5 ...
    Nov 12, 2024 · Advancing the US Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) effort means conducting nearly constant training exercises and test and evaluation events.Missing: specific | Show results with:specific
  70. [70]
    The Top Three Challenges Impeding the DoD's CJADC2 Vision
    Nov 2, 2023 · The top three challenges are: acquisition (siloed systems), organizational (siloed solutions), and technical (proprietary systems and data ...
  71. [71]
    Interoperability by Design for JADC2 Systems - RTI
    Jan 14, 2024 · One of the most challenging issues facing JADC2 systems is interoperability ... interoperability between systems, including legacy systems.
  72. [72]
    Exposing The Data Makes JADC2 Possible - Breaking Defense
    Jul 30, 2021 · Rather, its foundation lies upon numerous legacy systems. This hits upon one of the main challenges of the migration to JADC2: the DoD can't ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  73. [73]
    JADC2 Could Introduce Cyber Risks At Unprecedented Scale
    Nov 23, 2022 · A June report from cybersecurity risk assessor Black Kite suggests that upward of 32 percent of the top U.S. defense contractors are vulnerable ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  74. [74]
    Solving the Hidden Challenges of JADC2 - Booz Allen
    Overcome JADC2 cultural and policy barriers to data governance, data sharing across services, and open data platforms.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  75. [75]
    DoD Spending On JADC2 Jumps, With Increased Focus On ...
    Sep 21, 2021 · The Defense Department has increased spending on Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2)-related technologies significantly from fiscal year 2017 to 2020.<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    JADC2 spending is sprawling. DoD should keep watch, but Let It Go.
    Oct 20, 2022 · Approximately 30 JADC2-related initiatives combined to request between $2.2 billion and $2.6 billion in the Pentagon's FY23 budget, according to Travis Sharp ...Missing: overruns | Show results with:overruns
  77. [77]
    The Pentagon's Paradigm Shift: JADC2, industry, and the new reality ...
    Oct 11, 2022 · This is because JADC2 is not a program, but a paradigm. It proposes a new vision of warfare, one that relies on data, networks, and artificial ...
  78. [78]
    Budget disputes put Pentagon's early JADC2 goals in jeopardy
    Jan 24, 2024 · “We doubled, or more, our budget in CDAO from [FY]23 to [FY]24 and don't have access to that funding right now to make that minimum viable ...Missing: cost overruns
  79. [79]
    USA Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) Market ...
    ... budget overruns, with 30% exceeding initial cost estimates. These financial constraints can slow the pace of modernization and limit the integration of ...
  80. [80]
    Empty Promises? A Year Inside the World of Multi-Domain Operations
    Jan 22, 2024 · High-level efforts in recent years such as the U.S. Joint All-Domain Command and Control system have yet to take major steps. This hubris ...
  81. [81]
    Multiple Dilemmas
    ### Summary of Challenges and Recommendations for JADC2
  82. [82]
    Defense Command and Control: Further Progress Hinges on ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · GAO is recommending that DOD (1) develop a framework for CJADC2 that helps guide investments and measures progress; (2) devise a mechanism for sharing lessons ...Fast Facts · What Gao Found · Why Gao Did This StudyMissing: oversight | Show results with:oversight
  83. [83]
    DoD Plans GIDE to Show CJADC2 'Ultimate Example' by 2025
    Aug 6, 2024 · Holtzman said the GIDE experiment he is describing to reach the ultimate example of CJADC2 will take place at the end of 2025. “We have some ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  84. [84]
    Army Experiment Brings Military Closer to Joint All-Domain ...
    May 20, 2025 · The fourth Project Convergence capstone in 2024 had a basic version of this common operating picture, and the 2025 version expanded that to ...
  85. [85]
    Marine Corps Gets Serious About CJADC2 with Project Dynamis
    Sep 23, 2025 · CJADC2 is the U.S. military's effort to link shooters and sensors in a seamless “kill web” using artificial intelligence to quickly speed up ...Missing: JADC2 | Show results with:JADC2
  86. [86]
    3 Progress Areas as DOD's CJADC2 Enters 2025 - GovCon Wire
    Jan 16, 2025 · 3 Progress Areas as DOD's CJADC2 Enters 2025 · Open DAGIR · Joint Fires Network · Future Maritime Mission · Stay ahead in GovCon · Related Articles.Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  87. [87]
    CJADC2 concepts gain momentum - Military Embedded Systems
    Jul 31, 2025 · CJADC2 won't happen today, at the end of 2025, or even next year, but the tools are there if the DoD can get out of its own way and integrate AI ...Missing: planned advancements
  88. [88]
    Decision Superiority Through Joint All-Domain Command and Control
    Nov 19, 2020 · JADC2 is C2 for the digital age—the architecture needed to produce faster and better decisions for our warfighters from the tactical edge to the ...
  89. [89]
    Battle Networks and the Future Force - CSIS
    Aug 5, 2021 · This paper examines the importance of battle networks to modern military operations and presents a framework of five functional elements that make up a battle ...