Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Key Stage 1

Key Stage 1 (KS1) constitutes the initial phase of compulsory in under the statutory , encompassing Years 1 and 2 for pupils aged 5 to 7. This stage prioritizes the development of foundational , , and scientific understanding through structured programmes of study in core subjects—, , and —alongside foundation subjects including and design, , , , , music, and . remains a statutory requirement, though not part of the , while modern foreign languages are non-statutory at this level. The curriculum emphasizes practical, enquiry-based learning to foster curiosity and basic skills, such as for word reading in English, place value and number bonds in , and observation of natural phenomena in science. Assessments are designed to gauge progress without : a mandatory phonics screening check occurs at the end of Year 1, involving decoding 40 words to identify early reading proficiency, with optional national tests in reading, , , , and , plus teacher assessments, available at the end of Year 2. These measures aim to support targeted interventions, though empirical data indicate persistent gaps, with not all pupils—particularly from backgrounds—achieving expected foundational competencies by the stage's conclusion, underscoring causal links between early skill acquisition and later academic outcomes. Introduced as part of the 1988 Education Reform Act's framework and refined in subsequent iterations, Key Stage 1 reflects a policy emphasis on systematic instruction over whole-language approaches, backed by evidence of improved reading attainment, while allowing schools flexibility in sequencing content to meet pupils' developmental needs. Defining characteristics include year-specific targets in early years for rapid progress in decoding and basic operations, transitioning to consolidated application by Year 2, with no formal attainment targets but expectations for fluency in multiplication tables (2, 5, 10) and precise problem-solving. Pre-key stage standards exist for pupils working below expectations, enabling tailored support without diluting core expectations.

Overview

Definition and Scope

Key Stage 1 (KS1) constitutes the first formal phase of the in , comprising Years 1 and 2 of compulsory for children aged 5 to 7. This stage succeeds the non-statutory (ages 3–5) and precedes (ages 7–11), marking the transition to structured subject-based learning in state-maintained schools, academies, and free schools that adhere to the curriculum framework. Established under the and refined through subsequent legislation, KS1 applies specifically to , with devolved education systems in , , and operating distinct structures post-1990s reforms. The scope of KS1 encompasses statutory programmes of study that outline the essential knowledge, skills, and understanding pupils must acquire across core subjects—English, , and —and foundation subjects, including art and design, , , , , , and . These requirements mandate a minimum content threshold for teaching, emphasizing foundational , , and scientific inquiry while integrating cross-curricular elements like screening (administered at the end of Year 1 since 2012) and teacher assessments at the stage's conclusion. Schools retain flexibility in delivery methods, such as thematic or subject-specific approaches, but must ensure progression toward national standards, with non-compliance risking inspection scrutiny. The framework, last comprehensively updated in 2014, prioritizes evidence-based progression over rote memorization, though implementation varies by school autonomy under freedoms granted since 2010.

Educational Objectives

The educational objectives of Key Stage 1, encompassing Years 1 and 2 for pupils aged 5 to 7, center on establishing foundational knowledge and skills to foster educated citizens capable of appreciating human creativity and cultural heritage. These objectives integrate the National Curriculum's purposes by promoting pupils' spiritual, moral, cultural, mental, and physical development while preparing them for subsequent stages of education and adult responsibilities. Emphasis is placed on core subjects—English, mathematics, and science—to build fluency in reading, numeracy, and basic scientific observation, alongside foundation subjects that encourage curiosity about the world through exploration of history, geography, art, and physical activity. In English, objectives target ensuring all pupils read easily and fluently with , develop wide reading habits for pleasure and , and acquire an extensive alongside skills in writing and . Mathematics objectives focus on cultivating confidence with , place value, basic operations, shapes, and measures such as , , time, and money, with pupils expected to master number bonds to 20 by the end of Year 2. Science aims to enable pupils to observe natural phenomena closely, ask simple questions, and perform basic tests, laying groundwork in concepts like , animals, everyday materials, and seasonal changes. Foundation subjects support holistic development: objectives involve using tools to create simple products and evaluate designs; introduces algorithms, programming basics, and safe technology use; builds mastery of movements, coordination, and team participation to promote lifelong health. Collectively, these objectives prioritize high expectations for all pupils, including those with special educational needs, through adapted teaching that maintains breadth and rigor. By the end of Key Stage 1, pupils are intended to demonstrate emerging independence in learning, basic problem-solving, and an initial understanding of their place in and the .

Historical Development

Origins in the Education Reform Act 1988

The , which received on 29 July 1988, introduced the as a statutory requirement for maintained schools in , marking a shift from locally determined curricula to a centralized framework aimed at ensuring consistent educational standards and pupil entitlement to a broad range of knowledge. Section 1 imposed duties on the Secretary of State, local education authorities, governing bodies, and head teachers to promote the spiritual, moral, cultural, mental, and physical development of pupils through the curriculum, while Section 2 explicitly defined the as encompassing provision for core and other foundation subjects across specified key stages. This reform addressed prior inconsistencies where local variations often resulted in uneven attainment, particularly in , by mandating structured progression in subjects essential for foundational learning. Section 3 of the delineated the four key stages of compulsory education, with Key Stage 1 defined as the initial phase beginning in the academic term following a pupil's fifth birthday and concluding at the end of the term in which they reach age seven, typically covering Years 1 and 2 in primary schools. For Key Stage 1, the specified three core subjects—English, , and —that formed the mandatory baseline for all pupils, supplemented by foundation subjects including , , , , , and , totaling ten subjects alongside separate requirements for . These categories were intended to balance knowledge acquisition with skill development, with programmes of study tailored to the developmental needs of young children, emphasizing basic literacy, numeracy, and scientific understanding alongside creative and physical activities. Under Section 4, the Secretary of State was empowered to establish the detailed through secondary legislation, including attainment targets (knowledge, skills, and understanding expected by stage end), programmes of study (content to be taught), and arrangements to evaluate against benchmarks. For Key Stage 1, this enabled the of age-appropriate , initially focused on teacher observations and optional tasks rather than , to ascertain achievements in relation to attainment levels 1 to 2. The framework's implementation commenced gradually, with core subjects for Key Stage 1 first applying from September 1990 via subsequent orders, reflecting the Act's design for phased rollout to allow schools adaptation time. This structure originated the concept of Key Stage 1 as a , assessable unit of , influencing subsequent refinements while embedding consistency in early years provision.

Key Reforms from 2010 Onward

In 2010, following the formation of the , Education Secretary initiated a comprehensive review of the to address perceived declines in standards and over-prescription in previous frameworks. This review, informed by an expert panel's 2011 report, emphasized a knowledge-rich approach, mastery of fundamentals, and reduced content in non-core areas to allow greater depth in English, , and . The revised for 1 was drafted in 2013 and implemented from September 2014, introducing higher expectations across core subjects. In , pupils were required to develop fluency in number facts, including counting in steps of 2, 5, and 10 by the end of Year 1, and mastering multiplication tables up to 12×12 by the end of Year 2—advances previously deferred to Key Stage 2. English programmes of study prioritized systematic for decoding words, alongside explicit teaching of , , and from Year 1, with composition tasks demanding varied sentence structures. retained a focus on disciplinary knowledge, such as observing changes and classifying living things, while information and communication technology was replaced by , mandating basic programming concepts. These changes applied to maintained schools, with academies and free schools—whose numbers expanded significantly post-2010—retaining flexibility to adopt or adapt them. A key assessment-related reform was the introduction of the Year 1 screening check in June 2012, following a 2011 pilot, to evaluate pupils' decoding skills using 40 words (20 real, 20 pseudowords) and identify early reading difficulties. This statutory check, rescored at a threshold of 32 correct answers, reinforced the curriculum's emphasis and correlated with subsequent improvements in reading attainment, as evidenced by rising outcomes. Further refinements occurred in 2023, when statutory end-of-Key Stage 1 national tests in reading, , and writing were discontinued from the 2023/24 academic year, shifting to optional teacher assessments to alleviate primary workload while maintaining curriculum expectations. This amendment, enacted via the Education (National Curriculum) (Key Stage 1 Assessment Arrangements) () (Amendment) Order 2023, preserved attainment targets but removed mandatory testing, prompting guidance for voluntary implementation.

Impact of Devolution on Structure

Devolution of legislative powers over education to the , , and following referendums in 1997 and the establishment of devolved institutions in 1998–1999 enabled each jurisdiction to reform primary education structures independently from England's centralized framework. Prior to devolution, the had imposed Key Stages across , with and maintaining separate but broadly aligned systems; post-devolution, this uniformity eroded as devolved governments prioritized local priorities, leading to the abandonment or modification of Key Stage 1 (ages 5–7) equivalents in favor of more flexible, outcomes-based models. In , reinforced divergence from structures, which were never fully adopted; the Act 2005 and subsequent Experiences and Outcomes framework, implemented from August 2010 for early levels (covering primary 1–4, ages approximately 5–8), emphasized broad capacities over phased assessments, eliminating rigid 1-style subject divisions and statutory end-of-phase testing. , initially aligned with until the early 2000s, introduced the play-led Foundation Phase in September 2010 for ages 3–7, supplanting 1's subject-specific requirements with seven areas of learning; this culminated in the for , made statutory from September 2022, which removed Key Stages entirely by prioritizing four purposes and six areas of learning and experience, with full rollout by 2026. retained a 1 structure (Primary 1–2, ages 5–7) under the revised , statutory from September 2007, preserving phased progression akin to 's but with adaptations for local contexts, such as mandatory and enhanced cross-community integration provisions. These reforms fragmented UK-wide structural coherence for early primary education, complicating mobility for families across borders and highlighting England's isolation in maintaining mandatory Key Stage 1 curricula, assessments like the Year 1 phonics screening check (introduced 2012), and teacher assessment at Year 2 end. While devolved systems in Scotland and Wales shifted toward holistic, less prescriptive frameworks—attributed by policymakers to better suiting regional needs—Northern Ireland's closer alignment reflects historical ties and shared assessment emphases, though all jurisdictions now operate without a unified Key Stage 1 blueprint.

Curriculum Framework

Core Subjects and Requirements

The core subjects in the for Key Stage 1 in are , , and , which maintained schools are legally required to teach through detailed programmes of study designed to build foundational knowledge and skills. These subjects emphasise systematic progression, with and allocated significant teaching time—typically 5-7 hours weekly for each—to ensure mastery of basics like , , and scientific . , while allocated fewer hours (about 2 per week), integrates practical enquiry to foster curiosity about the natural world. English requirements centre on spoken language, reading (word recognition via phonics and comprehension), writing (transcription, composition, and handwriting), and grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary. Pupils must learn to decode words using the alphabetic code, develop fluency in reading aloud, and write simple sentences with correct spelling and punctuation, with a statutory requirement for daily phonics teaching from Year 1. The programme promotes a love of literature through exposure to high-quality books and poetry, while ensuring pupils discuss texts, ask questions, and use spoken English to clarify thinking. Mathematics focuses on number (place value, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division), measurement, geometry (properties of shapes, position and direction), and basic statistics (interpreting data). By the end of Key Stage 1, pupils are expected to count to 100, recall multiplication facts up to 10x10, and solve problems using concrete objects and pictorial representations, with an emphasis on mental arithmetic and reasoning. The curriculum requires quick recall of number bonds to 20 and development of mathematical vocabulary to explain methods. Science comprises working scientifically (asking questions, observing, identifying patterns, and fair testing) alongside substantive content: plants (structure and requirements), animals including humans (basic needs, senses, nutrition), everyday materials (properties and changes), and seasonal changes or living things in habitats (Year 1 and 2 specifics). Teaching prioritises hands-on experiences, such as classifying animals or observing plant growth, to build conceptual understanding without formal experiments until later stages. Schools must ensure progression from observation in Year 1 to grouping and classifying in Year 2.

Foundation Subjects

In the , Key Stage 1 (ages 5-7) requires schools to teach seven foundation subjects alongside the core subjects of English, , and to ensure a broad and balanced . These subjects—art and design, , , , , music, and —each have specified programmes of study outlining the knowledge, skills, and understanding pupils should acquire by the end of the stage. Unlike core subjects, foundation subjects receive less prescriptive assessment mandates, allowing flexibility in delivery while maintaining statutory requirements for maintained schools. Art and design emphasises developing through , , , and other , with pupils expected to use a range of materials, explore colours and textures, and respond to artists' works. introduces basic concepts of , including programming simple algorithms, using technology safely, and creating digital content, reflecting the 2014 curriculum update that replaced with a focus on . involves practical design processes, such as planning, making, and evaluating models or products using mechanisms, structures, and textiles, often integrated with real-world problem-solving. Geography in Key Stage 1 covers locational knowledge of the , basic use, and human/physical features like , seasons, and settlements, encouraging fieldwork and spatial . focuses on changes within living memory, significant events, lives of notable individuals, and , using sources like artefacts and stories to develop chronological understanding. Music requires pupils to listen, sing, play simple instruments, and improvise, building on early years foundations to appreciate musical elements like rhythm and pitch. Physical education mandates competence in , , games, and (with schools required to teach swimming to at least 25 metres for most pupils by year 6, starting foundations in KS1), promoting physical development and healthy lifestyles. These subjects are not statutorily required in academies or free schools, though they must provide a broad , leading to variations in emphasis but alignment with expectations for . Empirical reviews, such as those by the Education Endowment Foundation, indicate that targeted teaching in foundation subjects supports without diluting core priorities, provided time allocation balances breadth and depth.

Integration of Skills and Knowledge

In the English for Key Stage 1, skills and knowledge are integrated through subject-specific programmes of study that embed procedural competencies within the acquisition of core factual content, rather than treating skills as standalone elements detached from disciplinary contexts. This structure, outlined in the 2014 framework, requires pupils to apply foundational abilities—such as phonics-based decoding in reading or basic operations—in tandem with building subject knowledge, for example, using skills to explore patterns in while linking to observational recording . The approach prioritizes cumulative progression, where early mastery of skills like and enables access to broader knowledge domains, such as identifying common animals in or sequencing daily routines in . Cross-subject application is facilitated by teacher discretion in lesson planning, with the explicitly stating that English and skills underpin performance in foundation subjects; pupils, for instance, practise writing simple to describe geographical features or use positional language from in physical education activities involving movement. This integration contrasts with earlier thematic models, reflecting post-2010 reforms that shifted emphasis from decontextualized "cross-curricular skills" to knowledge-led instruction, supported by evidence that contextual skill practice enhances retention and transfer. Recent guidance reinforces this by advocating systematic instruction to unlock for non-fiction texts across subjects, ensuring skills serve knowledge expansion rather than vice versa. Empirical outcomes from this model include improved foundational proficiency, as pupils who integrate skills with domain-specific content demonstrate better application in assessments; for example, Year 1 screening pass rates rose from 58% in 2012 to 82% by 2019, correlating with enhanced reading for in science and . In , schools often sequence units thematically—such as a topic on seasons combining meteorological from with data handling in and descriptive writing in English—to foster coherent skill reinforcement without diluting subject integrity. This method aligns with cognitive principles where interleaved of skills amid builds deeper understanding, though varies by school in allocating time beyond the mandated minimums for core subjects (e.g., 3.5 hours weekly for ).

Assessment and Evaluation

Phonics Screening in Year 1

The Phonics Screening Check is a statutory, light-touch assessment conducted individually with all Year 1 pupils in , typically during the week commencing 9 , to evaluate their phonic decoding skills at an age-appropriate level. Introduced nationally in as part of reforms emphasizing systematic in early reading instruction, the check serves to confirm mastery of decoding real and unfamiliar words while identifying pupils needing targeted intervention to prevent reading difficulties. The assessment comprises 40 words presented in a booklet, with roughly equal numbers of real words and pseudo-words (non-real "alien" words designed to test pure decoding without reliance on or context cues). Pupils read each word aloud to their teacher, who scores correct pronunciations based on grapheme-phoneme correspondences and blending, awarding 1 mark per item for a total out of 40. The threshold for meeting the expected standard is set annually by the Standards and Testing Agency, consistently at 32 marks since 2013, with results reported to parents by the end of the summer term and aggregated data published nationally. Pupils not achieving the threshold must retake the check in Year 2, enabling schools to track progress and allocate support. National pass rates have risen from 58% in 2012 to around 80% in recent years, correlating with mandated programs, though pupil-level data indicate persistent gaps for disadvantaged groups. Empirical analyses, including a 2024 Education Policy Institute study using longitudinal pupil data, find no robust evidence that the itself drives sustained improvements in later or reduces attainment gaps, attributing gains more to broader teaching emphases than the screening mechanism. Meta-analyses affirm systematic instruction's efficacy for decoding ( +0.48 standard deviations), supporting the 's diagnostic role in ensuring early mastery, but critics question its validity for prediction and potential narrowing of reading curricula. Schools administer the flexibly within the national window, with accommodations for pupils with special educational needs, and results inform teacher judgments rather than high-stakes accountability.

End-of-Stage Assessments and Teacher Judgments

At the end of Key Stage 1 (typically Year 2, ages 6-7), teacher assessments in evaluate pupils' attainment against expectations in core subjects, drawing on evidence from ongoing observations, work, discussions, and optional tests. These judgments classify performance as working towards the expected standard, meeting the expected standard, or working at greater depth for English reading, English writing, , and . Teachers apply interim frameworks specifying " can" statements, such as for requiring pupils to "recall and use and facts to 20 fluently" to meet expectations. Historically statutory until the 2022/23 , these assessments informed performance and parental , with processes ensuring across teachers and via local authority or oversight. From the 2023/24 , end-of- 1 assessments became optional, removing requirements for submission to the while retaining guidance for voluntary use to support internal and transition to 2. opting in may still administer non-statutory tests in reading and to supplement judgments, but relies solely on without formal testing. The frameworks emphasize secure knowledge application over rote performance, with writing assessments particularly subjective due to reliance on moderated samples exhibiting features like "legible, joined " and varied sentence structures. Empirical reviews, such as those from the Education Endowment Foundation, indicate teacher assessments correlate moderately with test outcomes but can vary by up to 10-15% in without robust moderation, underscoring the need for evidence-based calibration. This approach prioritizes formative insights for early intervention, though critics note potential inflation of judgments in high-stakes contexts prior to optionality.

Shifts to Optional Testing Post-2023

From the academic year 2023/2024 onward, end-of-Key Stage 1 (KS1) assessments in transitioned from statutory requirements to optional practices, as announced by the (DfE). This shift eliminated the mandate for schools to administer tests in English reading, English grammar, punctuation and spelling (GPS), and , or to submit teacher assessment judgments in English reading, English writing, , and to local authorities or the DfE. The DfE continues to develop and supply optional KS1 test materials, including past papers and mark schemes, alongside non-statutory teacher assessment frameworks to support schools that choose to assess pupil performance against national standards. Guidance emphasizes that while participation is encouraged for diagnostic purposes and to inform teaching, there is no to report outcomes to parents or central authorities, reducing administrative burdens on primary schools. The screening check in Year 1 remains a statutory , ensuring continued on early reading proficiency amid the broader optional framework. Early data from the 2023/2024 cycle, drawn from voluntarily participating, indicate meeting expected standards rates of approximately 71% in reading, 62% in writing, 71% in , and 82% in science, based on a sample of over 1,000 pupils; however, these figures reflect self-selected usage rather than comprehensive national benchmarks. Participation varies by school, with some continuing assessments to benchmark progress toward expectations, while others prioritize internal evaluations or formative methods. This optional model aligns with post-pandemic emphases on workload reduction, though empirical evaluations of its impact on pupil attainment remain pending as of 2025.

Variations by Jurisdiction

England: Mandates and Evidence-Based Practices

In , the mandates that all maintained schools teach specified subjects during Key Stage 1 (ages 5-7), comprising core subjects of English, , and , alongside foundation subjects such as art and design, computing, design and technology, geography, history, music, and . and a daily act of collective worship are also required, with the curriculum framework emphasizing progression in knowledge and skills through structured programmes of study. Academies, while not statutorily bound to follow the full , must provide a broad and balanced , and recent legislative proposals under the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill aim to extend mandatory adherence to the curriculum across all state-funded schools, including academies, to ensure consistency in foundational skills like and . A central in instruction is the prioritization of systematic as the initial and dominant approach to teaching reading, formalized following the 2006 Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading (Rose Review), which analyzed over 100 studies and concluded that discrete, systematic programs yield superior decoding and word recognition outcomes compared to analytic or methods. This requires schools to deliver daily, high-quality sessions blending grapheme-phoneme correspondences, with the statutory Phonics Screening Check administered at the end of Year 1 to identify pupils needing intervention, a measure introduced in 2012 and linked to subsequent rises in reading attainment rates from 58% meeting standards in 2012 to 82% by 2019. Evidence underpinning these mandates draws from randomized trials and longitudinal data, with the Education Endowment Foundation reporting average impacts of +5 months' progress in reading from systematic , attributed to its explicit focus on causal mechanisms of decoding rather than incidental exposure. National evaluations of England's intervention, including early assessments and reteaching for non-passers, correlate with reduced gaps in reading proficiency, particularly for pupils, though causal attribution is complicated by concurrent factors like reforms. In , mandates for mastery-based —emphasizing conceptual understanding before procedural fluency—are supported by trials showing sustained gains in problem-solving, contrasting with prior progression models that accelerated coverage at the expense of retention. These practices reflect a shift toward explicit instruction grounded in , including spaced retrieval and cumulative review to build , as opposed to discovery-based alternatives lacking equivalent empirical backing in early stages. While the Rose Review's endorsement of has faced critique for overstating methodological superiority in some meta-analyses, which find comparable effects across systematic variants, England's framework enforces it to standardize effective decoding pathways amid evidence of persistent deficits pre-2006. Schools must publish schemes used, promoting validated programs like those aligned with validations, to facilitate accountability and replication of evidenced outcomes.

Wales: Shift to Curriculum for Wales

The Curriculum for Wales (CfW) replaced the for starting in September 2022 for primary schools, including Key Stage 1 (Years 1 and 2, ages 5-7), marking a departure from the previous structure of prescribed subjects and attainment levels. This phased implementation extended statutory status to all primary learners by the 2022-2023 , with full rollout across ages 3-16 mandated by September 2026, allowing schools initial flexibility to adopt elements progressively. The shift abolished distinct key stages and the Foundation Phase (previously covering ages 3-7), introducing instead a single continuum of learning focused on broad progression frameworks rather than rigid phase boundaries. Central to CfW for Key Stage 1 are six Areas of Learning and Experience (AoLEs)—Languages, and Communication; and ; Science and Technology; ; Expressive ; and and —alongside mandatory elements like Relationships and Sexuality Education and the study of Welsh and English. These replace the earlier subject-specific programs of study (e.g., detailed content for or ) with school-led curricula emphasizing of , skills, and experiences to achieve four overarching purposes: fostering ambitious, capable learners; ethical, informed citizens; enterprising, creative contributors; and healthy, confident individuals. Cross-curricular responsibilities in , , and digital skills are embedded throughout, promoting holistic development over isolated subject silos, though schools retain autonomy in sequencing content within national progression codes. Assessment in Key Stage 1 under CfW relies on professional judgment informed by national progression steps (e.g., Developing, Developing+, Secure), eliminating end-of-stage national tests like those previously aligned with levels 1-2 in core subjects. This formative approach prioritizes ongoing observation and evidence of learner progression toward the four purposes, with schools expected to report holistically to parents rather than through standardized metrics. Early implementation has highlighted challenges in and design consistency, as noted in monitoring, with variable progress across primary settings amid efforts to address attainment disparities through localized adaptations.

Northern Ireland: CCEA Alignment

In , Key Stage 1 comprises Years 3 and 4 of , serving pupils aged approximately 7 to 8, and extends the play-based learning of the preceding Foundation Stage (Years 1 and 2). The Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) administers the statutory Curriculum, which prioritizes skills development over rigid subject silos, fostering cross-curricular integration to build foundational competencies. This framework, revised in 2007, grants teachers substantial flexibility in sequencing content while mandating coverage of essential knowledge and skills. The organizes learning into six Areas of Learning: Language and Literacy, and , The (encompassing and , , and ), The World Around Us (integrating early , , and geography), Personal Development and Mutual Understanding (focusing on social, emotional, and ), and Environment and Society (addressing , employability, and ethical awareness). Overarching these are three Cross-Curricular Skills—Communication, Using , and Using —plus Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities, which emphasize problem-solving, self-management, and . CCEA supplies detailed guidance, including attainment targets and exemplars, to ensure alignment with developmental progression from Foundation Stage. Assessment at Key Stage 1 conclusion relies on teacher evaluations in Language and and and , calibrated against CCEA's standardized criteria and support materials, without national standardized tests. Phonics instruction integrates into Language and Literacy as a component of reading strategies, but lacks a mandatory phonics screening check akin to England's Year 1 requirement; some schools implement voluntary checks, yet policy favors approaches over isolated decoding assessments. From the 2025-26 academic year, CCEA introduces optional system-level sample assessments in literacy and numeracy to gauge overall performance trends, replacing prior informal monitoring while preserving school-level autonomy. This CCEA-aligned structure diverges from England's content-heavy, phonics-mandated model by embedding subjects within thematic areas, aiming to cultivate adaptable learners through experiential methods, though critics note potential gaps in explicit skill mastery due to interpretive flexibility. CCEA's ongoing role includes resource development and validation of school planning to maintain statutory compliance.

Outcomes and Empirical Evidence

Literacy and Numeracy Gains from Phonics Emphasis

Systematic phonics instruction in Key Stage 1 has demonstrated substantial gains in decoding skills, as evidenced by national phonics screening check pass rates rising from 58% in 2012—the year of its introduction—to 81% by 2016 and stabilizing around 80-82% in subsequent years through 2019 and beyond. The Education Endowment Foundation's meta-analysis of 228 studies indicates phonics yields an average +5 months of additional progress in early reading, with stronger effects (+8 months) in one-to-one settings and applicability particularly to younger primary pupils, emphasizing explicit teaching of letter-sound correspondences for word reading and spelling. Evidence links these decoding improvements to broader literacy outcomes, including a positive between Year 1 phonics check performance and Year 5 reading scores in the 2021 Progress in International Study (PIRLS), where a 1-point increase in the check score associates with nearly 4 additional points in PIRLS, contributing to England's 4th-place ranking out of 43 countries. Quantitative analyses post-2012 show gradual gains in Key Stage 1 and 2 , though a 2024 Education Policy Institute , using pupil-level data with controls for prior attainment and demographics, finds no statistically significant improvement in Key Stage 1 reading or writing attainment attributable to the check's introduction. Regarding , no direct causal gains from emphasis are established in Key Stage 1 evaluations, with focusing primarily on domains rather than cross-subject transfer. Concurrent Key Stage 1 attainment has remained stable or slightly improved, reaching 70% meeting expected standards in 2023, suggesting no evident from reallocating instructional time to . While some interventions combine and supports, -specific instruction shows no measured detriment to early skills, though long-term interactions remain underexplored.

International Comparisons and PISA Insights

In the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2021, which assesses among fourth-grade students (approximately age 10, post-Key Stage 1 and into ), England achieved an average score of 558, ranking fourth out of 43 participating countries and jurisdictions, behind only (587), (573), and (567). This marked an improvement from England's eighth-place ranking in PIRLS 2016 (score of 555), coinciding with sustained emphasis on systematic in Key Stage 1 since the 2006 Rose Review and the mandatory phonics screening check introduced in 2012. High-performing jurisdictions like integrate within a balanced literacy approach emphasizing oral language and comprehension from early primary years, while —another strong reader in earlier cycles—prioritizes play-based learning in early grades before formal , yet England's results suggest that explicit early instruction correlates with robust primary reading outcomes relative to peers. PISA 2022 results for 15-year-olds indicate that England's reading performance remained stable at 505 (unchanged from 2018), above the average of 476 and outperforming countries like the (504) and (480), though trailing leaders such as (543) and (516). This relative strength in reading literacy at secondary level may trace to foundational gains from Key Stage 1 , as longitudinal analyses link early decoding proficiency to sustained comprehension; for instance, students passing the Year 1 check show better later reading trajectories than non-passers, even controlling for initial ability. However, England's score declined to 489 (from 501 in 2018), just above the average of 472 but below top performers like (575), highlighting potential limitations in early numeracy emphases within Key Stage 1 compared to integrated problem-solving foci in East Asian systems. Science scores fell to 500 (from 505), still exceeding the mean of 485. Cross-national evidence tempers attributions of solely to these outcomes: high-PISA reading nations like and employ analytic alongside rich vocabulary exposure rather than England's exclusive synthetic method, and PISA reading scores have not risen post- reforms despite PIRLS gains, suggesting early bolsters decoding but requires complementary skills like for long-term impact. Critics note no clear causal uplift in PISA from intensity alone, as broader systemic factors—such as and socioeconomic —influence persistence of early advantages. Nonetheless, England's primary reading ascent in PIRLS underscores ' role in closing early gaps, with PISA stability indicating partial carryover amid secondary challenges.

Long-Term Academic Trajectories

Pupils attaining high standards in Key Stage 1 (KS1) reading and writing demonstrate substantially better long-term outcomes in , with KS1 performance serving as a robust predictor of GCSE English achievement. Analysis of a revealed that 97% of pupils scoring in the high band on KS1 reading and writing tests (equivalent to at least level 2A in reading and 2B in writing, combined score ≥6.4) achieved grade 4 or above in GCSE English by age 22, including resits, compared to just 35% in the low band (combined score <4.6). Similarly, 72% of pupils with a KS1 combined score of 5.4 (level 2B equivalent) secured grade 4 or higher in GCSE English, highlighting the gradient effect of early proficiency. These patterns extend beyond English, as foundational decoding and comprehension skills acquired through systematic in Year 1 enable broader access, with evidence indicating interventions yield average gains of five months in early reading development, forming a base for sustained progress. In , early KS1 skills similarly forecast later attainment, though longitudinal data specific to is sparser than for . Proficiency in foundational during KS1 accelerates growth in mathematical achievement, supporting advanced reasoning and problem-solving required for GCSE-level . Children identified as below expected levels in early years (preceding or aligning with KS1 entry) face elevated risks of underperformance, with 27% failing to achieve grade 4 in both GCSE English and maths—versus 11% at or above expectations—underscoring the compounded trajectory risks when basic skills lag. Overall, KS1 trajectories reflect causal foundations in empirical skill-building: weak early performance compounds disadvantages, with nearly half (48%) of pupils failing GCSE basics in core subjects traceable to age-5 underachievement in and precursors. Conversely, mastery of KS1 benchmarks correlates with higher secondary attainment across subjects, as underpins content access while enables quantitative reasoning; projections suggest sustained KS1 gains could elevate English pass rates to 85% by 2024 if trends hold. While aggregate impacts of tools like the phonics screening check show mixed signals on KS2 reading trends, individual-level early interventions maintain decoding advantages that persist into when reinforced.

Criticisms and Debates

Challenges of Progressive vs. Systematic Methods

Progressive methods in Key Stage 1 , often characterized by child-led and , face empirical challenges in building foundational and skills compared to systematic approaches involving explicit, structured . Meta-analyses indicate that unguided or minimally guided techniques yield lower effect sizes for skill acquisition, with alone producing negative outcomes relative to explicit methods in reading and domains. In , whole-language emphases, which embed incidentally through context cues, result in weaker decoding proficiency, as students over-rely on guessing from pictures or syntax rather than grapheme-phoneme mapping, leading to persistent gaps in by age 7. Systematic methods, such as for reading and direct procedural instruction for numeracy, demonstrate superior outcomes in randomized trials and national implementations, but implementation poses distinct challenges. The UK's Rose Review in 2006, drawing on evidence from trials like , established that systematic accelerates reading gains by three times over analytic or progressive alternatives, prompting mandatory adoption and the Phonics Screening Check, where pass rates rose from 58% in 2012 to 81% by 2019. However, teachers report difficulties in fidelity due to insufficient training, time constraints in crowded curricula, and the need for daily discrete sessions, which can strain resources in understaffed Key Stage 1 settings. For disadvantaged pupils, progressive methods exacerbate inequities by assuming uniform prior knowledge, whereas systematic instruction provides causal scaffolding for phonological awareness and arithmetic facts, reducing achievement gaps as evidenced by higher effect sizes for at-risk groups. Critics of systematic approaches, often from progressive-leaning , argue for balanced to foster , yet longitudinal from phonics-mandated systems refute claims of negligible superiority, attributing persistent low to incomplete rather than methodological flaws. In , explicit sequencing outperforms for procedural in primary years, avoiding misconceptions from premature without mastery of basics. Overall, while systematic methods demand upfront investment in teacher expertise, their evidence-based efficacy in causal skill development outweighs progressive flexibility for 1's core competencies.

Resource Demands and Teacher Workload

Primary teachers in , responsible for Key Stage 1 (ages 5-7), report average weekly working hours of 50-52, with 53% perceiving their workload as unmanageable, contributing to high attrition rates where excessive demands rank as the primary reason for departure. Key contributors include lesson planning, marking pupil work, and data management for tracking progress against expectations, areas where time reductions since 2016 have not alleviated perceptions of overload. The statutory phonics screening check at the end of Year 1 imposes additional burdens, with teachers dedicating an average of 12 hours annually to related preparation, administration, and familiarization sessions, alongside adaptations like incorporating pseudo-word decoding practice. This has prompted 52% of schools to modify Year 1 instruction, emphasizing systematic decoding over broader activities, which some educators argue narrows the and elevates needs for targeted interventions. Financial demands include average expenditures of £623 per on materials and £228 on , though over half of schools incur no extra costs post-initial due to reusable resources. Planning requirements exacerbate demands, as 38% of teachers view detailed, individualized lesson formats as unnecessary administrative hurdles rather than pedagogical aids, particularly in primary settings where flexible, age-appropriate schemes are essential but often underdeveloped. Government reviews recommend collaborative planning, termly schemes of work, and reliance on quality-assured textbooks to mitigate this, yet implementation varies, leaving many Key Stage 1 educators reliant on ad hoc resourcing that extends preparation time. While 72% of Year 1 teachers find phonics check results diagnostically useful for pupil grouping and support, critics highlight persistent "teaching to the test" pressures that divert effort from holistic development without commensurate long-term gains in comprehension or writing.

Equity Concerns and Socioeconomic Factors

Pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, often identified by eligibility for free school meals (FSM), exhibit persistent attainment gaps in Key Stage 1 assessments. In 2023, 41% of disadvantaged pupils met the expected standard across reading, writing, and mathematics combined, compared to 62% of their non-disadvantaged peers, reflecting a gap of 21 percentage points. Similar disparities appear in individual subjects; for instance, in writing, 53% of FSM-eligible pupils achieved the expected standard versus 72% of non-eligible pupils in earlier cohorts. These gaps, typically ranging from 15-25 percentage points, originate from pre-school differences in cognitive readiness and widen through primary education due to cumulative effects. Causal factors include limited home literacy environments and reduced parental involvement in low-SES households, which constrain foundational skills like acquisition essential for KS1 progress. A longitudinal analysis spanning 95 years confirms the stability of this SES-attainment link in primary schools, with family background explaining up to 50% of variance in early performance independent of school quality. Post-pandemic data show these disparities exacerbated, with disadvantaged pupils' screening pass rates at 68% in 2023/24, trailing non-disadvantaged by approximately 10 points. The , allocating £1,345 per disadvantaged pupil in 2023/24 to fund targeted support, has modestly improved relative attainment for FSM-eligible children in some regions, narrowing gaps by 2-5 percentage points in primary phases. However, absolute gaps remain entrenched, as school interventions alone inadequately address entrenched home-based deficits; evaluations indicate no full closure despite over a decade of funding, with disadvantaged pupils comprising 25.7% of the pupil population yet underrepresented in high achievers. Equity concerns highlight systemic limitations in equalizing outcomes, as KS1 curricula emphasize uniform standards that disadvantage those entering with lower readiness, perpetuating cycles of underachievement linked to later and disparities. Despite efforts like expanded FSM access, underscores that socioeconomic influences—via mechanisms like nutritional and early —exert causal primacy over schooling, rendering full elusive without broader familial interventions.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] The national curriculum in England - Framework document - GOV.UK
    Key stage 1. 146. Key stage 1 programme of study – years 1 and 2. 147. Year 1 programme of study. 148. Year 2 programme of study. 151. Lower key stage 2 – years ...
  2. [2]
    The national curriculum: Overview - GOV.UK
    Key stage 1 (KS1). Child's age, Year, Assessment. 5 to 6, Year 1, Phonics screening check. 6 to 7, Year 2, Optional tests in maths, English reading and grammar ...Key stage 1 and 2 · Curriculum · Key stage 3 and 4 · Early years foundation stage
  3. [3]
    A strong foundation in Reception and key stage 1 sets children up ...
    Oct 8, 2024 · Not all children are finishing key stage 1 with the foundational skills and knowledge they need – particularly the most vulnerable and ...
  4. [4]
    Pre-key stage 1 standards - GOV.UK
    Apr 15, 2024 · Teachers can use pre-key stage standards for those pupils working below the standard of key stage 1 (KS1) but who are engaged in ...
  5. [5]
    The national curriculum: Key stage 1 and 2 - GOV.UK
    Key stage 1 and 2. Compulsory national curriculum subjects at primary school are: English; maths; science; design and technology; history; geography; art ...
  6. [6]
    Optional key stage 1 teacher assessment guidance 2026 - GOV.UK
    This guidance supports the recommended approach for schools that choose to carry out optional teacher assessment ( TA ) at the end of key stage 1 ( KS1 ).
  7. [7]
    National curriculum in England: framework for key stages 1 to 4
    Dec 2, 2014 · The national curriculum provides pupils with an introduction to the essential knowledge they need to be educated citizens.The school curriculum in... · The national curriculum in... · Inclusion
  8. [8]
    Education Reform Act 1988 - Legislation.gov.uk
    The National Curriculum. 3. Foundation subjects and key stages. 4. Duty to establish the National Curriculum by order. 5. Courses leading to external ...
  9. [9]
    Education Reform Act 1988 - full text
    Apr 5, 2020 · Its major provisions concerned the curriculum (the National Curriculum, religious education and collective worship, establishment of curriculum ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] school reforms in England and Wales 1979-1994 - NFER
    The Education Reform Act 1988 introduced the National Curriculum and imposed a duty on each governing body, with the LEA (as appropriate) and the head teacher, ...
  11. [11]
    Education Reform Act 1988 - Legislation.gov.uk
    3Foundation subjects and key stages. (1)Subject to subsection (4) below, the ... below, the key stages in relation to a pupil are as follows—. (a)the ...
  12. [12]
    National Curriculum - STEM Learning
    The Education Reform Act 1988 outlined the form this policy would take and introduced Key Stages (periods of school education); Attainment Targets (AT) (the ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The school curriculum in England - UK Parliament
    Mar 26, 2021 · The national curriculum is divided into four key stages. It includes different subjects at different stages, but maths, sciences, English, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Era of Centralisation: the 1988 Education Reform Act and its ...
    The 1988 Act created a National Curriculum for state schools and set up mechanisms for controlling assessment at the end of four 'key stages'. The statutory ...
  15. [15]
    Education reform: new national curriculum for schools - GOV.UK
    Sep 12, 2013 · The new national curriculum will provide a rigorous basis for teaching, a benchmark for all schools to improve their performance.
  16. [16]
    'Tough and rigorous' new national curriculum published
    Jul 8, 2013 · Year 1 pupils will also be expected to do basic fractions, two years ahead of the existing curriculum, and algebra is to be taught from age 10.
  17. [17]
    The purpose of education - GOV.UK
    Jul 9, 2015 · In 2012, we therefore introduced the year 1 phonics screening check to help teachers identify pupils falling behind with their phonic knowledge, ...
  18. [18]
    Primary school standards continue to rise - GOV.UK
    Sep 4, 2018 · The new national curriculum and assessments have set a higher standard in schools and today's rising results show more pupils are meeting that standard.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Education (National Curriculum) (Key Stage 1 Assessment ...
    Mar 28, 2023 · This Order may be cited as the Education (National Curriculum) (Key Stage 1 Assessment. Arrangements) (England) (Amendment) Order 2023 and comes ...
  20. [20]
    Comparing the school curriculum across the UK
    Jul 29, 2024 · The revised national curriculum has been implemented since 2014, and there have been related changes to exams and assessments. The Labour ...
  21. [21]
    Education is changing | GOV.WALES
    The new curriculum is being rolled out gradually, so by 2026 all learners will be taught under the Curriculum for Wales. A guide to the new Curriculum for Wales.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Science programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2 - GOV.UK
    The science programs aim to develop understanding of biology, chemistry, and physics, and the nature of science, with secure knowledge and concepts. Schools ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] English programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2 - GOV.UK
    The single year blocks at key stage 1 reflect the rapid pace of development in word reading during these two years. Schools are, however, only required to teach ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Mathematics programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2 - GOV.UK
    Key stage 1 focuses on whole numbers, counting, place value, shapes, and measures. Key stage 2 includes lower and upper stages, with programs for years 3-6.
  25. [25]
    National curriculum in England: framework for key stages 1 to 4
    Dec 2, 2014 · The full national curriculum framework for key stages 1 to 4, including programmes of study and attainment targets.Missing: mandates | Show results with:mandates
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Review of the national curriculum in England - GOV.UK
    ... cross-curricular manner. ... Q30 What are the most important factors to consider in developing the. National Curriculum for Key Stage 1 to ensure a smooth ...
  27. [27]
    Strong foundations in the first years of school - GOV.UK
    Oct 8, 2024 · This report examines how schools secure the foundational knowledge and skills that every child needs by the end of key stage 1 to give them the best chance of ...
  28. [28]
    Phonics screening check administration guidance - GOV.UK
    Guidance for headteachers, teachers and school staff administering and scoring the phonics screening check in key stage 1.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Phonics screening check: information for parents - GOV.UK
    The purpose of the phonics screening check is to confirm that all children have learned phonic decoding to an age appropriate standard.
  30. [30]
    2026 phonics screening check assessment and reporting ... - GOV.UK
    Sep 29, 2025 · The phonics screening check is designed to confirm whether pupils have learnt phonic decoding to an age-appropriate standard. It will identify ...
  31. [31]
    Year 1 Phonics Screening Check - Oxford Owl for Home
    The phonics screening check is taken individually by all children in Year 1 in England, and is usually taken in June. It is designed to give teachers and ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Phonics screening check 2025: technical specification - GOV.UK
    Mar 1, 2025 · The data consists of pupil-level information for all year 1 pupils and those pupils in year 2 who did not meet the expected level in the 2024 ...
  33. [33]
    Phonics screening check attainment: methodology
    Oct 9, 2025 · Pupils in year 1 (age 5 or 6) must take the phonics screening check. Any year 2 pupils who did not meet the standard in year 1 or did not take ...
  34. [34]
    What can quantitative analyses tell us about the national impact of ...
    Nov 5, 2024 · A new report published by the Education Policy Institute (EPI) examines the impact of the national phonics screening check (PSC) on early reading development ...
  35. [35]
    Phonics | EEF
    Evidence suggests that the effectiveness of phonics is related to the pupil's stage of reading development, so it is important that teachers have professional ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    Optional key stage 1 teacher assessment guidance - GOV.UK
    Guidance for schools and local authorities involved in the administration and internal moderation of optional key stage 1 (KS1) teacher assessment.<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Non-statutory teacher assessment frameworks at the end of key ...
    Apr 29, 2024 · Frameworks for teachers who wish to make non-statutory teacher assessment judgements for pupils at the end of key stage 1 (KS1).
  39. [39]
    [PDF] National Curriculum teacher assessments at Key Stage 1 - GOV.UK
    All children in their final year of a key stage must be assessed. Most of the children will be in the year group with similarly aged pupils; for example, ...
  40. [40]
    Optional key stage 1 teacher assessment - GOV.UK
    Sep 29, 2025 · Teacher assessment at the end of KS1 is optional, including any related moderation and reporting activities. The KS1 teacher assessment ...
  41. [41]
    Optional key stage 1 tests: access arrangements - GOV.UK
    Guidance for schools about access arrangements available for pupils participating in the optional key stage 1 (KS1) national curriculum tests in 2026.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Key stage 1 teacher assessment guidance 2022-23
    Oct 10, 2022 · This document expands on the KS1 assessment and reporting arrangements. It supports schools in making statutory TA judgements for pupils at the ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Evaluation of the trial assessment arrangements for key stage 1
    The DfES document 'Excellence and Enjoyment' (DfES, 2003) set out a proposal to trial an approach to assessment at the end of key stage 1 that uses national ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    National curriculum assessments: optional key stage 1 tests - GOV.UK
    Sep 29, 2025 · National curriculum assessments: optional key stage 1 tests. Guidance for headteachers, teachers and test administrators involved in ...
  45. [45]
    KS1 Guide 2026 (OPTIONAL) - Nexus
    Jul 5, 2025 · Key Stage 1 is no longer statutory - the final statutory year was 2023. The DfE encourage schools to undertake KS1 assessments but they do not ...
  46. [46]
    KS1 outcomes in 2023/24 and the future of optional KS1 SATs
    Nov 11, 2024 · Insight's sample suggests that the outcomes for 2023/24 KS1 SATs were as follows: Reading 71%, Writing 62%, Maths 71% and Science 82%, based on ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: what parents need to know
    Dec 17, 2024 · The Bill will require all state-funded schools – including academies – to teach the national curriculum. This means parents can be assured that ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Independent review of the teaching of early reading
    Dec 1, 2005 · Orders for English from Key Stage 1. 12. All maintained schools with primary aged pupils are required to teach phonics, the content of which is.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] A national intervention in teaching phonics: a case study from England
    The intervention is a national program in England to teach systematic synthetic phonics as the first approach to reading words, with early assessment of ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Guidance Report IMPROVING LITERACY IN KEY STAGE 1 - ERIC
    This report focuses on improving literacy in Key Stage 1 (ages 5-7), recommending developing speaking/listening, reading, phonics, and writing skills.
  51. [51]
    The importance of reading in early years education | EEF
    In Key Stage 1, there is very extensive and consistent evidence that systematic phonics teaching should be included as part of an overall balanced approach ...
  52. [52]
    Reconsidering the Evidence That Systematic Phonics Is More ...
    Jan 8, 2020 · Based on Rose (2006), systematic phonics became a legal requirement in state-funded primary schools in England since 2007, and to ensure ...
  53. [53]
    What maintained schools must or should publish online - GOV.UK
    Schools with key stage 1 provision must publish a list of any phonics or reading schemes they use. What schools with key stage 4 provision must publish. Schools ...
  54. [54]
    Implementing major education reforms - Senedd Research
    May 24, 2021 · The Curriculum for Wales will be introduced in September 2022 in early years, primary school and Year 7 (usually the first year of secondary ...
  55. [55]
    Curriculum for Wales: annual report 2024 [HTML]
    Jul 4, 2024 · These changes are outlined in Key Changes for September 2023. ... Research with schools and learners on the early implementation of Curriculum for ...
  56. [56]
    Curriculum for Wales - Hwb
    General guidance for designing your curriculum across all areas of learning and experience. Assessment arrangements.Introduction to Curriculum for... · Designing your curriculum · Health and Well-being
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Curriculum for Wales 2022 A guide to - Hwb
    The Curriculum for Wales 2022 includes structure, progression, and inclusive elements. It aims to raise standards, reduce the attainment gap, and prepare ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] The new Curriculum for Wales
    The new curriculum for 3-16 year olds allows schools flexibility, is implemented in phases starting September 2022, and is optional for year 7 in secondary ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Curriculum for Wales (CfW) implementation - Senedd Business
    Apr 27, 2023 · All primary and around half of secondary schools are operating under CfW. Research is ongoing, and progress is variable, with some areas faster ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Key Stages 1 & 2 - CCEA
    Pupils meet the statutory curriculum requirements through compulsory Areas of Learning and optional courses that lead to general and/or applied qualifications.Curriculum · Using ICT · Mathematics and Numeracy · Overview<|control11|><|separator|>
  61. [61]
    The Curriculum for four to 11-year-olds | nidirect
    Cross-curricular skills, Other skills. Communication, Being creative. Using mathematics, Working with others. Using ICT, Self management. Using ICT, Managing ...
  62. [62]
    Curriculum Areas of Learning - CCEA
    Key Stages 1 & 2 · Language and Literacy · Mathematics and Numeracy · The Arts · The World Around Us · Personal Development & Mutual Understanding · Physical ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Northern Ireland Schools; Curriculum, governance and policy
    Even though the curriculum does not require teachers to integrate AfL practices into their teaching, it is strongly recommended as best practice (CCEA. 2007).
  64. [64]
    [PDF] NI Curriculum Overview - BBC
    Pupils are assessed by their teachers in English and Maths at the end of Key Stages 1 and 2. Teachers are required to make use of assessment materials provided ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Givan announces new Key Stage assessments in Northern Ireland
    Mar 19, 2025 · The new system-level sample assessments will evaluate the literacy and numeracy of pupils at the end of Key Stages 1, 2 and 3.Missing: alignment | Show results with:alignment
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Guidance on Assessment in the Primary School
    See The Northern Ireland Curriculum Primary (CCEA, 2007): Foundation Stage: pages 17–22. Key Stages 1 and 2: pages 50–56. See also the sections on Language and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    The Northern Ireland Curriculum Primary - CCEA
    Sep 12, 2025 · This document sets out the requirements of the revised Northern Ireland Curriculum (hereafter referred to as the Northern Ireland Curriculum)
  68. [68]
    Fulfilling the unmet potential: Harnessing ambition, autonomy, and ...
    Jun 19, 2024 · Amidst the curriculum that provides significant autonomy for teachers, all pupils across NI engage in standardised testing from Primary 4 (Key ...
  69. [69]
    6-Year-Olds in England Get a Phonics Check. American Kids ...
    Jan 2, 2025 · The percentage of kids passing the phonics check on their first try soared from 58% in 2012 to 82% in 2019. (The check was paused in 2020 and ...
  70. [70]
    Has the Phonics Screen Improved Children's Reading? - Rastle Lab
    Nov 12, 2024 · It turns out that there are positive, gradual gains in reading comprehension at both KS1 and KS2 in the years following introduction of the PSC.
  71. [71]
    Key stage 1 and phonics screening check attainment
    Oct 12, 2023 · 60% of pupils met the expected standard in writing, up from 58% in 2022. 70% of pupils met the expected standard in maths, up from 68% in 2022.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Literacy and numeracy interventions in the early years of schooling
    This report reviews literacy and numeracy interventions in early schooling, including conclusions about specific interventions and general principles.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] PIRLS 2021: National Report for England - GOV.UK
    England by their key stage 1 reading outcome. Key stage 1 reading outcome. Percentage of pupils. 10th percentile. 50th percentile. 90th percentile. Range.
  74. [74]
    England moves to fourth in international rankings for reading
    May 16, 2023 · England came fourth out of the 43 countries that tested children of the same age in the Progress International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS).
  75. [75]
    Children in England ranked fourth globally for reading - BBC
    May 16, 2023 · Primary school children in England have ranked fourth in the international rankings for reading. The latest results in the Progress in ...
  76. [76]
    PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading
    PIRLS 2021 provides the only internationally comparative fourth grade achievement results collected during the COVID-19 pandemic.Countries’ Reading Achievement · Trends in Reading Achievement
  77. [77]
    PISA 2022: national report for England - GOV.UK
    Dec 5, 2023 · England's PISA 2022 results, with an international comparison of mathematics, reading and science performance of 15-year-old pupils.
  78. [78]
    PISA 2022 Results (Volume I) - OECD
    Dec 5, 2023 · Volume I, The State of Learning and Equity in Education, describes students' performance in mathematics, reading and science; examines ...United Kingdom · Full Report · Indonesia · Country Notes: Brazil
  79. [79]
    The importance of early phonics improvements for predicting later ...
    Jul 17, 2019 · The results suggested that fail–pass students performed substantially better than fail–fail students, even after performance on the initial phonics check was ...
  80. [80]
    Phonics teaching in England needs to change – our new research ...
    Jan 19, 2022 · We found that England's emphasis on synthetic phonics is different compared to high performing English language countries in the Programme for ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    Phonics teaching in England needs to change – our new research ...
    Jan 20, 2022 · We found that England's emphasis on synthetic phonics is different compared to high performing English language countries in the Programme for ...
  82. [82]
    The impressive motivated reasoning of the 'science of reading' experts
    So, lets recap: There is no evidence that phonics has improved SAT or PISA results if you track all outcome measures, and no evidence that PIRLS results have ...
  83. [83]
    Early literacy skills and long(er) term outcomes: part one
    Sep 12, 2023 · Almost all (97%) of those with high early literacy skills had achieved a grade C/4 or better in GCSE English by the age of 22, compared with ...
  84. [84]
    The relationship between early literacy and GCSE English attainment
    Nov 11, 2020 · A total of 72% of pupils with a score of 5.4 at Key Stage 1 (Level 2B in reading and writing) went on to achieve grade 4 or higher and 49% grade ...
  85. [85]
  86. [86]
    Half of pupils who get low GCSE grades already judged to be ...
    Sep 2, 2022 · The findings reveal that one in four (27 per cent) children assessed as being below expected levels at age five fail to achieve a grade 4 pass ...
  87. [87]
    Study links GCSE grades to KS1 results | Tes Magazine
    May 17, 2018 · If key stage 1 improvements continue at the same rate in future, then 85 per cent of pupils would get an English grade 4 or higher in 2024, the ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance
    Alfieri et al. (2011) found that across domains and settings, inquiry-based methods with minimal or no guidance are less effective than explicit instruction ( ...
  89. [89]
    Report of the National Reading Panel | NICHD
    The meta-analysis indicated that systematic phonics instruction enhances children's success in learning to read and that systematic phonics instruction is ...
  90. [90]
    Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read
    Systematic phonics instruction helped children learn to read better than all forms of control group instruction, including whole language.
  91. [91]
    The problems with phonics: 4 universal issues teachers are facing
    Jan 11, 2024 · There is not enough time to teach phonics. Clocks. Teaching phonics through a validated systematic synthetic phonics programme requires time.
  92. [92]
    The Challenges of Teaching Phonics Beyond KS1 - Scholastic UK
    Jun 12, 2025 · Another challenge to teaching phonics beyond KS1 is the lack of training available for phonics instruction. Many teachers, especially in ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Disputing recent attempts to reject the evidence in favour of ...
    Jun 21, 2023 · Both articles call into question the robustness of the empirical evidence on the effectiveness of systematic phonics, and this article addresses ...Missing: progressive | Show results with:progressive
  94. [94]
    Misconceptions Inquiry versus Explicit Instruction
    Explicit instruction is recommended as one of the six instructional practices essential to math instruction with strong research evidence.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Teacher workload survey 2019 brief - GOV.UK
    This research brief summarises the findings from the Teacher Workload Survey (TWS). 2019, which is a large-scale nationally representative survey of ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Teacher recruitment and retention in England - UK Parliament
    Dec 12, 2023 · Teacher numbers haven't kept pace with pupil growth, pupil-teacher ratio increased, and postgraduate teacher recruitment was below target, ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Phonics screening check evaluation - GOV.UK
    Exploratory analysis of National Pupil Database (NPD) data suggests that the check provides additional information on pupils' progress as their literacy skills.
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Eliminating unnecessary workload around planning and teaching ...
    Teachers spend an undue amount of time planning and resourcing lessons, and there are clear measures that should be taken by Government, Ofsted, schools, and.Missing: Stage | Show results with:Stage
  99. [99]
    Attainment at Key Stage 1 in 2023 - FFT Education Datalab
    Jul 3, 2023 · The disadvantage gap · 41% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard in all three subjects in 2023 (up from 38% in 2022) · 62% of ...
  100. [100]
    Writing results for 6 to 7 year olds - Ethnicity facts and figures
    Apr 20, 2020 · The data for FSM-eligible pupils shows that: 53% met the expected standard in writing, compared with 72% of non-eligible pupils; 83% from the ...
  101. [101]
    Annual Report 2023: Disadvantage - The Education Policy Institute
    Disadvantaged pupils have, on average, lower attainment, than other pupils and this disadvantage gap widens as pupils progress in their education. In 2022, the ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Factors influencing primary school pupils' educational outcomes
    The review provides evidence of a negative association between primary children's attainment and poor socio-economic circumstances of their home environment ( ...
  103. [103]
    Persistent association between family socioeconomic status and ...
    We show for the first time that over 95 years in Britain the association between family SES and children's primary school performance has remained stable.Missing: Stage | Show results with:Stage
  104. [104]
    Phonics screening check attainment, Academic year 2023/24
    Oct 10, 2024 · This publication previously included the results of end of KS1 assessments. These became non-statutory from the 2023/24 academic year onwards.
  105. [105]
    Assessing the impact of Pupil Premium funding on primary school ...
    Mar 29, 2021 · A regression model suggests that relative attainment for poor pupils improved markedly in the Pupil Premium era, even in regions like the North ...
  106. [106]
    Pupil premium: overview - GOV.UK
    Jun 9, 2025 · The pupil premium grant provides funding to improve educational outcomes for disadvantaged pupils in state-funded schools in England.
  107. [107]
    Schools, pupils and their characteristics, Academic year 2024/25
    Jun 5, 2025 · Free school meal eligibility continues to increase. 25.7% of pupils are eligible for free school meals, up from 24.6% in 2024. This represents ...
  108. [108]
    Education: inequalities and attainment gaps - POST Parliament
    Nov 11, 2024 · Research shows that educational attainment gaps are also linked to other life outcomes including employment, income, health and criminality.
  109. [109]
    Socio-economic influences on children's life chances - GOV.UK
    Jun 9, 2016 · A new Social Mobility Commission report highlights wide division in parenting and children's life chances.
  110. [110]
    Inequalities in education, and attainment gaps - POST Parliament
    Apr 29, 2021 · Factors associated with inequality and attainment gaps include economic disadvantage, ethnicity, disability, gender, and whether a child has been in care.