Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lambda-CDM model

The ΛCDM model (Lambda cold dark matter), also known as the concordance model or of , is the prevailing theoretical framework describing the origin, evolution, and large-scale structure of the within the context of . It assumes a homogeneous and isotropic on large scales (the ), with a total parameter of unity (Ω = 1) indicating spatial flatness, and incorporates three main components: ordinary (baryonic) matter making up approximately 4.9% of the energy budget, non-baryonic (CDM) comprising about 26.8%, and represented by a Λ accounting for roughly 68.3%. This model successfully explains a broad array of observational data, including the power spectrum and temperature anisotropies of the (CMB), the distribution of galaxies and clusters forming large-scale structures, the abundance of light elements from , and the late-time accelerated driven by . The ΛCDM model builds on the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) of , incorporating an early of cosmic to address the horizon and flatness problems, followed by a radiation-dominated , a matter-dominated era where gravitational instabilities amplify primordial density fluctuations to form structures, and a current dark energy-dominated . is assumed to be non-relativistic (cold) and collisionless, interacting primarily through gravity, which enables the hierarchical formation of galaxies and clusters via the merging of smaller halos. The dark energy component, modeled as a constant vacuum energy density (Λ), provides that counteracts gravitational attraction, leading to the observed acceleration since z ≈ 0.6. Relativistic components like photons and neutrinos are included but contribute negligibly to the present-day energy density. Fully specified by just six independent parameters—the present-day physical densities of baryons (Ω_b h² ≈ 0.0224) and (Ω_c h² ≈ 0.120), the angular scale of the sound horizon at recombination (θ_* ≈ 1.041), the optical depth to (τ ≈ 0.054), the amplitude of the scalar power spectrum (A_s ≈ 2.1 × 10^{-9}), and the scalar (n_s ≈ 0.965)—the ΛCDM framework achieves an excellent fit to high-precision data from missions like Planck, with a best-fit of 13.787 ± 0.020 billion years and a present-day Hubble constant of H_0 ≈ 67.4 km/s/Mpc. These parameters are constrained through Bayesian analysis of anisotropies, , distance measurements, and weak lensing surveys, demonstrating the model's robustness while highlighting mild tensions, such as the Hubble constant discrepancy between CMB inferences and local measurements. Emerging from refinements to earlier models in the 1980s and 1990s, ΛCDM gained prominence with the 1998 discovery of cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae, which necessitated the inclusion of Λ, and was further solidified by COBE's detection of anisotropies in 1992 and subsequent missions like WMAP (2001–2010) and Planck (2009–2013). Despite its successes, ongoing observations probe potential extensions, such as evolving or massive neutrinos, to address discrepancies on small scales like the "cusp-core" problem in dwarf galaxies or the σ_8 tension in structure growth. The model's predictive power continues to guide experiments like and the , aiming to verify its foundations or reveal new physics.

Model Fundamentals

Definition and Assumptions

The Lambda-CDM model, also known as the concordance model of cosmology, provides a theoretical framework for understanding the origin, composition, and evolution of the universe. It posits a universe that began with a hot Big Bang and expands according to general relativity, described by the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) metric. This metric assumes a spatially flat geometry and incorporates four primary components: cold dark matter (CDM), which dominates gravitational clustering; baryonic matter, the ordinary matter forming stars and galaxies; radiation, relevant in the early universe; and a cosmological constant Λ, interpreted as dark energy driving the current accelerated expansion. The model rests on several foundational assumptions. Central to it is the , which states that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales, allowing the use of a single scale factor to describe its overall expansion. It further assumes as the correct theory of gravity on cosmological scales, a flat spatial curvature (k = 0) consistent with observations, a hot as the initial condition, and a brief period of cosmic inflation in the very early universe to generate the nearly scale-invariant primordial density perturbations observed today. The Lambda-CDM framework is specified by a minimal set of six free parameters, which fully determine its predictions for observables like the and large-scale structure: the physical density Ω_b h², the physical density Ω_c h², the angular scale of the sound horizon at recombination θ_*, the to τ, the amplitude of the primordial scalar power spectrum A_s, and the scalar n_s. The evolution of the universe in this model is governed by the first Friedmann equation, derived from general relativity: H^2 = \left( \frac{\dot{a}}{a} \right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho - \frac{k c^2}{a^2} + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}, where H is the Hubble parameter, a(t) is the scale factor, ρ is the total energy density (sum of matter, radiation, and other contributions), G is the gravitational constant, c is the speed of light, and k = 0 for flatness. In the early matter-dominated era, expansion decelerates under the influence of CDM and baryons, while the present Λ-dominated phase leads to acceleration as dark energy comes to dominate.

Key Components

The Lambda-CDM model posits that the universe is composed of four primary energy components: , baryonic matter, , and , each contributing distinct physical roles to the cosmic evolution. These constituents interact primarily through , with their relative influences varying across cosmic time due to differing equations of state. (CDM) consists of non-baryonic, collisionless particles that behave as pressureless dust, possessing non-relativistic velocities at the time of . These particles cluster efficiently under to form extended gravitational halos around galaxies and larger structures, without significant electromagnetic interactions that would dissipate their energy. In the present epoch, CDM accounts for approximately 27% of the total , facilitating hierarchical through gravitational instability where small density perturbations amplify into galaxies and clusters over time. Baryonic matter, often termed ordinary matter, comprises protons, neutrons, electrons, and their bound states such as atoms, , and interstellar gas. Unlike CDM, it interacts strongly via the electromagnetic force, leading to radiative processes like and galactic disks, though its gravitational role is subordinate to CDM on large scales. Dark energy, denoted by the cosmological constant Λ, is modeled as a uniform component with constant that permeates space and exerts , driving the observed accelerated . In the of , it is interpreted as arising from the of quantum fields, providing a repulsive gravitational effect that dominates the late-time dynamics. Radiation includes relativistic species such as photons from the cosmic microwave background and neutrinos, which were the dominant energy form in the very early universe due to their high velocities and scaling as the inverse fourth power of the scale factor. Today, their contribution is negligible compared to matter and dark energy, but they influenced the initial conditions for structure growth. The model's flat geometry is encapsulated in the total energy density parameter relation \Omega_{\rm total} = \Omega_m + \Omega_\Lambda + \Omega_r \approx 1, where \Omega_m = \Omega_b + \Omega_c combines the matter densities from baryons (\Omega_b) and CDM (\Omega_c), \Omega_\Lambda is the density parameter, and \Omega_r accounts for . This governs the from matter-dominated in the past to domination today.

Cosmological Parameters

Parameter Values

The standard six parameters of the Lambda-CDM model, as determined from the Planck 2018 () analysis using temperature, polarization, and lensing data combined with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, are as follows: the density \Omega_b h^2 = 0.02236 \pm 0.00015, the density \Omega_c h^2 = 0.120 \pm 0.001, the of the sound horizon at recombination $100\theta_{MC} = 1.04092 \pm 0.00031, the scalar n_s = 0.9649 \pm 0.0042, the amplitude of the scalar perturbations \ln(10^{10} A_s) = 3.0448 \pm 0.0014 (corresponding to A_s \approx 2.1 \times 10^{-9}), and the to \tau = 0.0544 \pm 0.0073. These imply a derived Hubble constant H_0 = 67.4 \pm 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} (or h \approx 0.674). These parameters imply a total matter density \Omega_m \approx 0.315, comprising approximately 5% baryonic matter (\Omega_b \approx 0.049) and 25% cold dark matter (\Omega_c \approx 0.264), with the remainder dominated by dark energy at \Omega_\Lambda \approx 0.685; the radiation density is negligible in the present epoch. Baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from the (DESI) Year 1 data release in 2024 and Data Release 2 in 2025, when analyzed alone, yield a consistent but slightly lower matter density \Omega_m \approx 0.295 with similar precision for the flat Lambda-CDM model, indicating broad agreement with Planck results but with a mild ~1.8σ tension in \Omega_m. When combined with CMB data, DESI results maintain overall consistency with the Planck parameters but introduce mild tensions of 2.3σ in \LambdaCDM, such as a slight shift in the Hubble constant toward h \approx 0.67--0.685, and a preference for dynamical dark energy models at ~3.1σ, without significantly altering the core model fit. These values predict a universe age of approximately 13.8 Gyr and a \rho_c = 3H_0^2 / (8\pi [G](/page/G)), setting the scale for the total .
ParameterBest-Fit Value (Planck 2018)Uncertainty
density\Omega_b h^20.02236\pm 0.00015
Cold dark matter density\Omega_c h^20.120\pm 0.001
Scalar n_s0.9649\pm 0.0042
Scalar amplitudeA_s (at k=0.05 Mpc^{-1})$2.1 \times 10^{-9}Derived from \ln(10^{10} A_s) = 3.0448 \pm 0.0014
Hubble constantH_0 (km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1})67.4\pm 0.5
density\Omega_m0.315\pm 0.007
density\Omega_\Lambda0.685\pm 0.007

Measurement Methods

The primary methods for measuring cosmological parameters in the Lambda-CDM model rely on analyzing large-scale observational datasets from various cosmic probes, employing statistical techniques to fit theoretical predictions to the data. These approaches extract constraints on parameters such as the density, density, and primordial fluctuation amplitude by comparing observed patterns in the universe's structure and evolution against model expectations. Cosmic microwave background (CMB) analysis provides one of the most precise probes through measurements of temperature and polarization anisotropies, observed by satellites such as Planck. These anisotropies encode information about the early universe's plasma oscillations and gravitational potentials, allowing parameter estimation via the computation of angular power spectra. Likelihood maximization techniques are applied to fit these spectra to theoretical templates generated by Boltzmann codes like or CAMB, incorporating foreground subtraction and instrumental noise modeling to isolate the primary CMB signal. Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) serve as a standard ruler, originating from sound waves in the early universe's photon-baryon fluid that imprint a characteristic scale of approximately 150 Mpc on the distribution of galaxies today. This scale is measured through correlation functions or power spectra from large galaxy surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), which map millions of galaxies across cosmic volumes. Reconstruction algorithms correct for redshift-space distortions and nonlinear evolution to sharpen the BAO feature, enabling distance measurements at various redshifts that constrain the expansion history. Type Ia supernovae act as standardized candles for probing the universe's expansion rate, with their peak luminosities calibrated via the Phillips relation and further anchored using stars in the distance ladder. Observations from surveys like the Supernova Legacy Survey and the Dark Energy Survey compile light curves to infer distances and redshifts, constructing a Hubble diagram that tests the and . Photometric and spectroscopic corrections account for host galaxy properties and dust extinction to ensure uniformity in intrinsic brightness. Gravitational lensing and clustering measurements constrain the by probing the distribution of on large scales. Weak lensing quantifies the coherent distortion of background shapes due to foreground mass concentrations, analyzed through two-point functions or spectra from surveys like the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and the Survey (). Complementarily, clustering via —elongations in the observed distribution due to peculiar velocities—traces the growth rate of structure, with modeling incorporating bias parameters and Alcock-Paczynski effects to fit the observed spectrum. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are widely used to explore the posterior distributions of cosmological parameters, sampling the likelihood surface efficiently to account for degeneracies and uncertainties across datasets. These algorithms, such as the Metropolis-Hastings sampler implemented in tools like CosmoMC, generate chains that converge to the Bayesian posterior, enabling joint analyses of multiple probes to resolve tensions and tighten constraints. A key aspect of parameter fitting involves the primordial power spectrum of scalar fluctuations, parameterized as P(k) \propto k^{n_s-1}, where k is the and n_s is the , which is matched to observed spectra from and large-scale structure data.

Historical Development

Early Foundations

The foundations of the Lambda-CDM model trace back to early 20th-century efforts to reconcile with observations of the on large scales. In 1917, introduced the term into his field equations to construct a static, finite model, countering the attractive force of that would otherwise cause collapse. This addition allowed for a closed in , with positive and uniform matter distribution, though Einstein later regarded it as a theoretical expedient after observational evidence emerged for expansion. Theoretical advancements soon challenged the static paradigm. In 1922, derived solutions to Einstein's equations assuming a homogeneous and isotropic universe, demonstrating that it could expand or contract dynamically depending on the matter and . Independently, in 1927, proposed an expanding model, interpreting it as originating from a "primeval atom" that fragmented into galaxies, and he estimated the expansion rate from available data. These solutions revived the idea of a dynamic , setting the stage for the framework. Observational confirmation followed in 1929, when established a between the distance and recession velocity of extragalactic nebulae, providing for universal expansion with a constant of proportionality later known as the Hubble constant. Building on this, and collaborators in the 1940s developed the hot model, predicting primordial nucleosynthesis of light elements like during the early universe's high-temperature phase, when nuclear reactions froze out as expansion cooled the . The need for non-baryonic matter arose from dynamical studies of galaxies and clusters. In 1933, analyzed the Coma cluster using the and found that the observed velocities of galaxies required far more mass than visible stars accounted for, inferring "missing mass" to bind the system gravitationally. This hypothesis gained support in the 1970s through spectroscopic observations by and W. Kent Ford, who measured flat rotation curves in spiral galaxies like , indicating that orbital speeds remained constant at large radii rather than declining as expected from Keplerian dynamics, implying an extended . By the early 1980s, the evidence for led to the development of the (CDM) model, which posited that the missing mass consists of non-baryonic, non-relativistic (cold) particles that interact primarily through . Proposed initially by James Peebles in 1982 and formalized by Joel Primack, , and others in 1984, the CDM paradigm explained the formation of large-scale structure through gravitational instability amplifying primordial density fluctuations, enabling hierarchical merging of dark matter halos to build galaxies and clusters. This framework resolved issues in earlier models with or baryons alone, which failed to produce the observed distribution of structures. Theoretical refinements addressed fine-tuning issues in the model. In 1981, proposed cosmic , a brief phase of exponential expansion driven by a , which resolved the by allowing causally disconnected regions to thermalize and the by diluting initial curvature irregularities. Key observational validation came from the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite, launched in 1989; its Far Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer confirmed the cosmic microwave background's blackbody spectrum at 2.735 K in 1990, matching predictions for relic radiation from recombination. COBE's Differential Microwave Radiometers then detected intrinsic anisotropies in 1992 at the 10^{-5} level, providing initial evidence for fluctuations seeding large-scale .

Modern Formulation

The modern formulation of the Lambda-CDM model emerged in the late 1990s and early through the convergence of key astronomical observations that provided compelling evidence for a flat dominated by and a . In 1998, two independent teams reported observations of Type Ia supernovae at high redshifts, revealing that the 's expansion is accelerating rather than decelerating as previously expected. The High-Z Supernova Search Team, led by , analyzed 16 distant supernovae and found that the data favored a with a positive , implying Ω_Λ > 0 and a total density parameter Ω_total ≈ 0.8–1.0 when combined with other constraints. Concurrently, the Supernova Cosmology Project, led by , examined 42 high-redshift supernovae and reached similar conclusions, estimating Ω_Λ ≈ 0.7 and providing the first direct evidence for driving the acceleration. These results, published back-to-back, marked a pivotal shift, necessitating the inclusion of a Lambda component in cosmological models. Subsequent measurements of the () further solidified the framework by confirming a flat geometry. The experiment, a balloon-borne that observed the in 1998–1999, produced high-resolution maps in 2000 showing the first two acoustic peaks in the angular power spectrum, which indicated a flat with Ω_total ≈ 1 within 10% uncertainty. Similarly, the MAXIMA experiment's 1998–1999 flight yielded maps in 2000 that supported flatness through the positions of the first acoustic peak, constraining the curvature parameter to near zero and aligning with inflation-inspired predictions. These ground-breaking balloon observations provided the first direct evidence for the spatial flatness required by the Lambda-CDM model. The launch of the (WMAP) satellite in 2001 revolutionized the field by delivering all-sky, high-precision maps from 2001 to 2010, enabling fits to a six-parameter Lambda-CDM model including density, density, Hubble constant, amplitude of fluctuations, , and to . The 2003 first-year data release confirmed the model's predictions with unprecedented accuracy, measuring Ω_Λ ≈ 0.7 and establishing the "concordance cosmology" era where multiple datasets aligned on a flat with ~70% , ~25% , and ~5% . Parallel efforts by the (SDSS) in the 2000s mapped millions of galaxies, validating the component through measurements of large-scale structure that matched simulations, with correlation functions and power spectra consistent with ΛCDM predictions on scales up to hundreds of megaparsecs. The synthesis of these observations—supernovae, , and large-scale structure—into a cohesive model relied on fitting the Friedmann equation to combined datasets, including early (BAO) detections from SDSS in 2005, which provided a standard ruler for expansion history and reinforced Ω_total = 1. This multi-probe approach in the early cemented Lambda-CDM as the standard cosmological paradigm, with parameter uncertainties reduced to a few percent.

Predictive Framework

Expansion History

The expansion history in the Lambda-CDM model describes the evolution of the universe's scale factor a(t) over cosmic time, governed by the Friedmann equation derived from general relativity under the assumptions of homogeneity and isotropy. This evolution transitions through phases dominated by radiation, matter, and dark energy, each characterized by distinct scaling laws for the Hubble parameter H(t) = \dot{a}/a. The redshift-dependent form of the Friedmann equation is H(z) = H_0 \sqrt{\Omega_r (1+z)^4 + \Omega_m (1+z)^3 + \Omega_\Lambda}, where H_0 is the present-day Hubble constant, z is the redshift, and \Omega_r, \Omega_m, \Omega_\Lambda are the density parameters for radiation, non-relativistic matter (baryons plus cold dark matter), and the cosmological constant \Lambda (representing dark energy), respectively, with \Omega_r + \Omega_m + \Omega_\Lambda = 1 for a flat universe. In the initial radiation-dominated era, lasting until approximately t \approx 5 \times 10^4 years after the Big Bang, the energy density is dominated by relativistic particles, leading to a \propto t^{1/2} and a decelerating expansion. This phase ends at the matter-radiation equality redshift z_{\rm eq} \approx 3400, where the matter density catches up to the rapidly diluting radiation density. The subsequent matter-dominated era, spanning from t \approx 5 \times 10^4 years to about 10 Gyr after the Big Bang, features a \propto t^{2/3} as gravitational attraction from matter slows the expansion. Matter domination gives way to dark energy at the matter-\Lambda equality redshift z_\Lambda \approx 0.3. The current \Lambda-dominated era, beginning around 10 Gyr after the (approximately 3.8 Gyr ago), is marked by a \propto \exp(H t) due to the constant density, resulting in accelerated that commenced approximately 6 Gyr ago. This phase implies eternal without recollapse. The lookback time to redshift z, representing the time light has traveled from an object at that redshift, is computed as t_L(z) = \int_0^z \frac{dz'}{H_0 (1 + z') E(z')}, where E(z) = \sqrt{\Omega_m (1+z)^3 + \Omega_\Lambda} (neglecting the subdominant \Omega_r term at low z). The precise timelines and transition redshifts depend on the measured cosmological parameters, such as those from the Planck mission.

Structure Formation

In the Lambda-CDM model, the seeds for cosmic structure formation are primordial density fluctuations arising from quantum vacuum perturbations during the epoch of cosmic inflation. These nearly scale-invariant, Gaussian fluctuations are amplified by gravitational instability following the Big Bang, particularly after recombination when baryonic matter decouples from photons and falls into the deeper potential wells of cold dark matter (CDM) overdensities. The initial conditions are set by the power spectrum imprinted in the cosmic microwave background, providing a nearly Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum with spectral index n_s \approx 0.96. Once the universe enters the matter-dominated era, these perturbations grow via . In the linear regime, the density contrast \delta evolves according to the D(z), normalized such that D(0) = 1. During matter domination, the solution to the perturbation equation yields \delta \propto a, or equivalently D(z) \approx 1/(1+z) at high redshifts where the \Lambda is negligible. As \Lambda begins to dominate at late times (z \lesssim 0.5), the growth transitions to a slower rate, approximately D(z) \propto \Omega_m^{0.55}(z) in flat Lambda-CDM cosmologies, suppressing further amplification of structures compared to a pure matter-dominated universe. This linear growth directly governs the evolution of the P(k), which quantifies the amplitude of fluctuations on comoving scales [k](/page/K). In the linear regime, the dependence is P(k, [z](/page/Z)) = D(z)^2 P(k, 0), where P(k, 0) is the present-day spectrum shaped by the power and the accounting for early-universe physics. The in Lambda-CDM introduces suppression of power on small scales ([k](/page/K) \gtrsim 0.1 \, h \, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}) due to the Meszaros effect during the radiation-matter transition and Silk damping from baryon-photon diffusion before recombination, rather than significant CDM free-streaming, as CDM particles are non-relativistic with negligible velocity dispersion. This spectral shape, combined with the hierarchical nature of collapse, predicts the emergence of a filamentary cosmic web characterized by vast voids, thin walls, and dense filaments. Structure formation proceeds hierarchically in CDM cosmologies, with small-mass halos collapsing first from moderate overdensities in the early , subsequently merging to assemble larger s that host galaxies, groups, and clusters. This bottom-up process contrasts with top-down scenarios and arises because the power spectrum P(k) increases toward smaller scales (smaller es), favoring early formation of low-mass objects. The statistical distribution of halo es is described by the Press-Schechter formalism, which posits that the probability of a region collapsing into a halo of M follows from the excursion set theory of Gaussian fields, yielding a mass dn/dM \propto \frac{\rho}{M} \frac{\delta_c}{\sigma(M)} \frac{d \ln \sigma}{d \ln M} \exp\left( -\frac{\delta_c^2}{2\sigma^2(M)} \right), where \rho is the mean density, \delta_c \approx 1.686 is the critical linear overdensity for spherical collapse, and \sigma(M) is the rms fluctuation smoothed on scale M. This predicts a steep decline in the number of massive halos and an abundance of small ones, consistent with the merging hierarchy.

Observational Successes

Cosmic Microwave Background

The (CMB) provides one of the strongest confirmations of the Lambda-CDM model, as its temperature and polarization anisotropies are direct relics of quantum density fluctuations amplified during cosmic inflation and evolving through the early . In this framework, primordial scalar perturbations seed gravitational potentials that imprint on the CMB at the epoch of recombination, when the universe cooled sufficiently (at redshift z \approx 1100) for electrons and protons to form neutral , decoupling photons from baryons and allowing the plasma to become transparent to . These anisotropies, observed today as tiny fluctuations of order $10^{-5} relative to the mean CMB of 2.725 K, encode the initial conditions and dynamics of , with the Lambda-CDM predictions matching observations across angular scales from degrees to arcminutes. On large angular scales (low multipoles \ell \lesssim 10), the dominant contribution to temperature anisotropies arises from the Sachs-Wolfe effect, where photons experience a as they climb out of potential wells formed by overdensities at recombination. This ordinary Sachs-Wolfe term, arising from the intrinsic temperature difference and the shift, produces a plateau in the angular power spectrum C_\ell, reflecting the nearly scale-invariant primordial power spectrum of perturbations. The effect is particularly pronounced for super-horizon modes that enter the horizon after recombination, providing a clean probe of the potential depth set by and baryons in Lambda-CDM. At intermediate scales ($10 \lesssim \ell \lesssim 1000), the CMB power spectrum exhibits a series of acoustic peaks due to baryon-photon oscillations in the tightly coupled before recombination. These oscillations, driven by gravitational and opposed by acting as a restoring , compress and rarefy the -baryon , imprinting scale-dependent enhancements in the fluctuations; the first , corresponding to the sound horizon at recombination, appears at an angular scale of \theta \approx 0.6^\circ (multipole \ell \approx 220), a hallmark of spatial flatness in Lambda-CDM as dictated by the total \Omega_\mathrm{total} \approx 1. Higher-order peaks reflect the of these oscillations, with baryon loading suppressing odd peaks relative to even . On the smallest observed scales (high \ell \gtrsim 1000), the power spectrum transitions to a damping tail caused by Silk damping, where random scattering during the final stages of recombination diffuses anisotropies on scales below the mean free path, exponentially suppressing fluctuations. The CMB polarization, generated by Thomson scattering of quadrupole temperature anisotropies off free electrons near recombination, further validates Lambda-CDM through its distinct patterns. Scalar perturbations primarily produce E-mode polarization, which correlates with the temperature gradient and peaks at slightly smaller scales than the temperature acoustic features, while tensor perturbations from inflationary gravitational waves generate both E- and B-mode patterns, with the latter exhibiting a curl-like signature immune to scalar contamination. The full angular power spectrum for temperature (and analogously for polarization) is computed via line-of-sight integration as C_\ell \propto \int \mathrm{d}k \, k^2 \, P(k) \, [\Delta_\ell(k)]^2, where P(k) is the primordial power spectrum of curvature perturbations and \Delta_\ell(k) are the transfer functions incorporating recombination physics, Silk damping, and projection effects from the last-scattering surface. High-precision measurements from the Planck satellite in 2018 demonstrate that Lambda-CDM predictions match the observed temperature power spectrum C_\ell to within 1% across the full range of multipoles, underscoring the model's success in describing early-universe acoustics and initial conditions. This agreement also tightly constrains cosmological parameters, such as the baryon and dark matter densities, from the peak positions and amplitudes alone.

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) originate from pressure waves in the primordial baryon-photon plasma, which propagate at the sound speed until recombination at z \approx 1090, defining a characteristic comoving scale r_s \approx 150 Mpc. This scale freezes into the matter distribution as baryons decouple from photons shortly after recombination, imprinting a preferred separation in the large-scale structure of the . In the \LambdaCDM model, this frozen scale serves as a standard ruler, calibrated precisely by (CMB) measurements of the sound horizon at recombination. In the late universe, the BAO signature manifests as an excess in clustering at scales around 150 Mpc, providing a direct probe of the cosmological expansion . By measuring the apparent position of this in surveys, astronomers infer the D_A(z) and the Hubble parameter H(z) at various redshifts, testing the \LambdaCDM predictions for energy-driven . The BAO appears prominently in the two-point correlation function \xi(s), where s is the comoving separation, peaking at s = r_s. To account for distortions due to redshift-space effects and the assumed fiducial cosmology, the observed scale is rescaled by dilation parameters, including the isotropic dilation parameter \alpha = \left( \alpha_\perp^2 \alpha_\parallel \right)^{1/3}, where \alpha_\perp = \frac{D_M(z)}{D_M^\mathrm{fid}(z)} \frac{r_d^\mathrm{fid}}{r_d} and \alpha_\parallel = \frac{H^\mathrm{fid}(z)}{H(z)} \frac{r_d}{r_d^\mathrm{fid}}, with D_M(z) = (1 + z) D_A(z) and r_d denoting the sound horizon at the drag , slightly larger than r_s due to Silk . As of the () DR2 results in 2025, the BAO scale has been confirmed to sub-percent precision (e.g., 1.1% parallel and 1.3% transverse to the ) across redshifts up to z \approx 3.5, aligning closely with the \LambdaCDM expansion history and reinforcing the model's validity. The Alcock-Paczyński effect further tests the of BAO measurements by comparing clustering along and across the ; any distortion in the observed of the BAO feature would signal deviations from a homogeneous, isotropic , but current data show consistency with \LambdaCDM expectations.

Galaxy Clustering

Galaxy clustering refers to the observed tendency of galaxies to aggregate into patterns on large scales, a phenomenon central to testing the Lambda-CDM model. In this framework, the distribution of galaxies traces the underlying matter density field, modulated by gravitational instability from primordial quantum fluctuations amplified during . The model's predictions for clustering are derived from linear and N-body simulations, capturing both the amplitude and anisotropy of the galaxy distribution function. The P(k), which quantifies the amplitude of density fluctuations as a function of k, exhibits a characteristic shape in Lambda-CDM due to dominance. On small scales (large k), P(k) \propto k^{n_s - 4}, reflecting the suppression from the , with n_s \approx 0.96 leading to an effective slope of approximately -3, transitioning to suppression on large scales (small k) with a turnover at k \approx 0.01 \, h \, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}, set by the scale of matter-radiation equality when free-streaming radiation prevented efficient . This turnover arises from the that filters the primordial spectrum, ensuring acoustic oscillations from the baryon-photon fluid imprint subtle wiggles before damping. Observations of galaxy clustering, particularly through redshift surveys, confirm these predictions with high fidelity. The (SDSS) and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS), conducted in the early 2000s, measured the power spectrum and derived the clustering amplitude parameter \sigma_8—the root-mean-square density fluctuation in spheres of 8 h^{-1} Mpc radius—to values consistent with Lambda-CDM expectations within approximately 5%. These surveys, covering hundreds of thousands of galaxies out to redshifts z \approx 0.2, demonstrate that the observed P(k) shape and normalization align closely with theoretical templates assuming \Omega_m \approx 0.3 and \sigma_8 \approx 0.8. Redshift-space distortions further probe the model's dynamics, as peculiar velocities induced by gravity distort the apparent positions of galaxies along the line of sight. The Kaiser effect, arising in the linear regime, boosts the power spectrum along this direction by a factor of (1 + \beta)^2, where \beta = f / b with bias b and growth rate f. This anisotropy, predicted analytically, is evident in survey data and allows measurement of the growth rate f \approx \Omega_m^{0.55}(z), an approximation valid for flat Lambda-CDM cosmologies across a wide redshift range. Combining \sigma_8 with f via redshift-space distortions yields \sigma_8 f, providing a direct test of structure growth that matches Lambda-CDM to percent-level precision in large-scale surveys. On larger scales, Lambda-CDM predicts the of the cosmic web through hierarchical , where initial Gaussian fluctuations evolve into , walls, and voids via . N-body simulations like the Millennium Simulation reproduce this filamentary network, with preferentially tracing dense ridges while voids occupy underdense regions spanning tens of megaparsecs. These simulations, run with $10^{10} particles in a (500 \, h^{-1} \, \mathrm{Mpc})^3 volume, confirm that the observed void and filament distributions from surveys align with Lambda-CDM, underscoring the model's success in describing the large-scale environment.

Current Challenges

Measurement Tensions

One of the most prominent challenges to the Lambda-CDM model is the Hubble tension, which arises from a significant discrepancy between measurements of the Hubble constant H_0 derived from the (CMB) and those from local distance ladder methods. The Planck satellite collaboration, analyzing CMB data, infers H_0 = 67.4 \pm 0.5 km/s/Mpc under the assumptions. In contrast, the SH0ES team, using Cepheid variables and Type Ia supernovae with observations from the and , reports a higher value of H_0 = 73.0 \pm 1.0 km/s/Mpc as of 2025. This difference corresponds to a tension of approximately 5σ, indicating that the probability of such a discrepancy occurring by chance is exceedingly low within the Lambda-CDM framework. A related issue is the S_8 tension, which concerns the amplitude of matter density fluctuations on scales of 8 h^{-1} Mpc, parameterized as S_8 = \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_m/0.3}, where \sigma_8 is the root-mean-square fluctuation amplitude and \Omega_m is the present-day matter density fraction. data from Planck yield S_8 = 0.834 \pm 0.016. However, weak gravitational lensing surveys such as the Year 3 and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) measure lower values, around S_8 \approx 0.776 for DES and S_8 = 0.766^{+0.021}_{-0.020} for KiDS, indicating a ~3σ discrepancy with results. These late-universe probes suggest suppressed structure growth compared to early-universe predictions, challenging the consistency of Lambda-CDM parameters. Recent 2025 analyses from KiDS-Legacy continue to highlight this tension but suggest it may be less severe with refined modeling. Recent baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the (DESI) Data Release 2 further highlight these issues. The DESI BAO data, spanning redshifts from 0.4 to 3.5 using over 14 million galaxies and quasars, prefer parameters in mild 2.3σ tension with Planck CMB constraints under Lambda-CDM. Specifically, these results exacerbate the Hubble tension by favoring a lower H_0 aligned more closely with CMB inferences, while partially alleviating the S_8 tension through better agreement in matter clustering amplitude. Proposed resolutions include early dark energy models, which introduce a transient component in the early universe to adjust expansion history and reconcile discrepancies. Another measurement tension involves the primordial abundance of lithium-7 (^7Li), predicted by (BBN) within Lambda-CDM. BBN calculations, informed by CMB-derived baryon density \Omega_b h^2 \approx 0.0224, forecast a primordial ^7Li abundance about 3-4 times higher than observed in metal-poor halo stars, where the Spite plateau indicates an underabundance at the 4-5σ level. This "" persists despite refinements in rates and stellar depletion models, suggesting potential gaps in BBN physics or observation interpretation, as confirmed in 2025 analyses. The "axis of evil" refers to an apparent alignment of low-\ell ( and octupole) multipoles in the power spectrum, where the preferred axes point toward the plane with a probability of ~1% under statistical . Detected in and confirmed in Planck data, this feature may indicate a violation of cosmic homogeneity on large scales, though analyses suggest it could be a statistical fluke amplified by foregrounds or look-elsewhere effects. Ongoing studies with polarization data continue to assess its significance.

Dark Matter Discrepancies

The Lambda-CDM model, while successful in predicting large-scale , encounters discrepancies on small scales, particularly in the distribution and properties of halos within dwarf galaxies and satellite systems. These issues arise from comparisons between N-body simulations of (CDM) and observational data, highlighting mismatches in the predicted versus observed substructure. One prominent challenge is the , where CDM simulations predict central density profiles with a steep cusp, characterized by \rho \propto r^{-1}, as described by the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile. In contrast, kinematic observations of dwarf galaxies, derived from rotation curves and velocity dispersions, reveal shallower, cored profiles with approximately constant central densities (\rho \approx constant) over scales of hundreds of parsecs. This discrepancy persists in low-mass systems, where baryonic processes like supernova feedback are expected to be less dominant, suggesting potential limitations in the CDM paradigm for resolving inner halo structures. Related to this is the missing satellites problem, in which CDM simulations overpredict the number of subhalos capable of hosting luminous dwarf galaxies. For a -mass halo, simulations forecast hundreds of subhalos with masses exceeding $10^7 M_\odot, yet observations identify only about 50 satellite galaxies around the , even after accounting for recent discoveries of ultra-faint dwarfs. This underabundance implies that many predicted subhalos remain dark or fail to form stars efficiently, challenging the model's expectations for substructure abundance. The too-big-to-fail problem exacerbates this issue by identifying a of massive subhalos—those with maximum circular velocities V_{\rm max} \gtrsim 25 km/s—that simulations deem too dense and stable to avoid hosting bright satellites comparable to the . However, such luminous counterparts are not observed among the Milky Way's satellites, indicating that these subhalos are unexpectedly underluminous despite their size and density. Further complicating the picture is the diversity problem, where observed rotation curves exhibit a wide range of inner slopes, from steeply rising to nearly flat, even among systems with similar maximum speeds (V_{\rm max} \approx 30-70 km/s). CDM simulations, by contrast, tend to produce more uniform profiles, failing to reproduce this observed scatter in central without invoking varied baryonic efficiencies across galaxies. Astrometric data from the mission, particularly Data Release 3 (2022), have confirmed a thin disk-like alignment of satellite galaxies around the , known as the "plane of satellites," with many classical satellites concentrated in a planar structure only a few kiloparsecs thick. This coherent, anisotropic distribution contrasts with the isotropic, randomly oriented subhalo accretion predicted by CDM simulations, suggesting possible environmental influences or modifications to halo assembly on galactic scales.

Cosmological Principle Violations

The Lambda-CDM model relies on the , which posits that the is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales, enabling the use of the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric to describe cosmic evolution. However, observations suggest potential violations of this principle, manifesting as anisotropies and inhomogeneities that challenge the model's assumptions of uniformity. These deviations, if confirmed, could indicate new physics or require modifications to the standard framework, though many are debated as statistical flukes or observational artifacts. Isotropy violations are prominently observed in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The CMB dipole, measured by Planck at an amplitude of approximately 3.4 mK, is conventionally attributed to the solar system's peculiar velocity relative to the CMB rest frame, around 370 km/s toward the constellation Leo. However, analyses of the dipole's alignment and amplitude across multiple datasets reveal potential excesses or inconsistencies, suggesting intrinsic cosmic anisotropies beyond local motion. For instance, the hemispherical power asymmetry in the CMB, where power in low-multipole moments (ℓ < 30) is about 10-20% higher in one hemisphere compared to the opposite, has persisted in Planck data with a significance of around 3σ. This asymmetry, first noted in WMAP and confirmed in Planck, aligns roughly with the CMB dipole direction and may hint at a primordial modulation of the inflationary potential or large-scale magnetic fields. Recent 2025 studies continue to explore this feature. Further evidence for isotropy violations comes from extragalactic surveys. Dipoles in the distribution of radio sources and quasars often align with the CMB dipole direction, but with amplitudes 2-4 times larger than expected from kinematic effects alone under . For example, the (NVSS) radio catalog shows a dipole amplitude of about 0.4% in source counts, exceeding the predicted kinematic value by roughly 3σ, while quasar catalogs like those from the exhibit similar alignments with amplitudes up to 0.02 in fractional number density variation. These findings suggest possible anisotropic clustering or evolution, potentially linked to large-scale velocity flows or violations of the Copernican principle. 2025 analyses confirm ongoing tensions in radio dipoles. Homogeneity violations appear on scales of ~1 Gpc through the detection of unusually large cosmic structures. The Keenan-Barger-Cowie (KBC) void, a underdense region spanning about 300 Mpc around the local universe, exhibits a density contrast of -0.3 relative to the cosmic mean, implying a peculiar velocity of ~300 km/s that tensions with Lambda-CDM simulations at the 4-6σ level. Similarly, the , a filamentary structure extending over 400 Mpc with a mass exceeding 10^17 solar masses, surpasses the expected maximum size in Lambda-CDM by factors of 2-3 in length, challenging the homogeneity assumption on these scales. Such structures, if not rare statistical outliers, suggest enhanced matter clustering or modified gravity effects that disrupt the uniform distribution predicted by the model. A conventional perspective on these violations invokes gauge freedom in general relativity, where the definition of homogeneity and isotropy can depend on coordinate choices in inhomogeneous models like . This freedom allows apparent violations to be recast as artifacts of gauge selection, preserving the underlying physical uniformity without altering parameters. Nonetheless, distinguishing genuine violations from gauge effects requires multi-probe consistency checks across , galaxy surveys, and weak lensing.

Recent Developments and Extensions

Evolving Dark Energy Hints

Recent observations from the (DESI) in 2025, based on (BAO) measurements from its second data release, indicate a preference for dynamical dark energy over the constant cosmological constant assumed in the . These results suggest that the equation-of-state parameter w(z) deviates from -1, with fits to the (CPL) parametrization showing a preference for w_0 > -1 and w_a < 0 in quintom-like scenarios, corresponding to a significance of 2.8–4.2σ when combined with supernova and cosmic microwave background data. This parametrization models the dark energy density as evolving with the scale factor a according to w(a) = w_0 + w_a (1 - a), where w_0 is the present-day value and w_a captures the evolution, differing from the Lambda-CDM case where w = -1 constantly. High-redshift galaxy observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) in 2024 and 2025 have revealed an unexpected abundance of massive galaxies at redshifts z > 10, exceeding predictions from standard Lambda-CDM simulations. These detections imply a potentially faster expansion rate in the early universe, which could be accommodated by models of evolving dark energy, such as early dark energy (EDE) that temporarily boosts the expansion during the epoch of recombination and structure formation. Such scenarios help explain the rapid buildup of stellar mass in these primordial galaxies without requiring modifications to dark matter properties. The longstanding issue of missing baryons, where approximately 30-50% of the predicted baryonic matter remains undetected in the local universe, may also connect to evolving dark energy through its influence on the ionization history and intergalactic medium. If dark energy varies over time, it could alter the timing and extent of reionization, potentially hiding baryons in warmer, more diffuse ionized gas structures that are harder to observe. Recent 2025 measurements have located more of these baryons in extended ionized hydrogen halos around galaxies, but the full accounting remains incomplete pending further simulation-based confirmation, leaving room for dynamical dark energy effects. Data from the in 2025 further supports hints of evolving dark energy, with analyses of galaxy clustering and weak lensing showing deviations from a constant \Lambda.

Extended Models

The Lambda-CDM model, while successful on large scales, faces tensions that have motivated several theoretical extensions, including modifications to dynamics, dark matter properties, and gravitational laws, as well as more radical departures from homogeneity assumptions. These extensions aim to reconcile discrepancies such as the Hubble constant tension and small-scale structure anomalies without altering the model's core successes. Dynamic dark energy models replace the cosmological constant with evolving s, allowing the equation-of-state parameter w to deviate from -1. In models, a slowly rolling drives acceleration with w > -1, potentially alleviating tensions by permitting time-varying expansion rates that better fit and acoustic data. Phantom dark energy, conversely, features w < -1 due to negative , leading to a "" singularity where accelerated expansion overwhelms bound structures in finite time, though it has been constrained by observations favoring milder deviations. Warm dark matter (WDM) proposes particles with higher thermal velocities than , suppressing small-scale power and addressing issues like the overabundance of satellite galaxies and cuspy density profiles in galactic cores, for example by smoothing out cusps predicted by simulations. However, WDM's free-streaming lengths conflict with () anisotropies, which require cold-like behavior to match the observed power spectrum on scales beyond 1 Mpc. exacerbates this conflict by further damping fluctuations, rendering it inconsistent with data that demand minimal relativistic contributions at late times. Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) alters at low accelerations, below $10^{-10} m/s², to explain galactic rotation curves without , predicting flat velocities that match observations while alleviating cold 's small-scale problems like missing satellites. MOND's scale-dependent law, originally proposed as an empirical fix, has been formalized in relativistic extensions like tensor-vector-scalar gravity, though it struggles with cluster-scale dynamics and CMB predictions. Interacting dark energy-dark matter models, where energy transfers between components via coupling terms proportional to densities, mitigate both Hubble and S_8 tensions by suppressing matter clustering growth, with phenomenological fits improving concordance across datasets like Planck and . Beyond these, inhomogeneous models such as Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) spacetimes introduce local voids to explain the Hubble tension, where observers in an underdense region measure higher expansion rates than the global average, fitting distances without altering . String theory-inspired landscapes propose a of vacua with varying constants, allowing our universe's \Lambda to be statistically selected from a distribution, potentially resolving fine-tuning issues in Lambda-CDM through principles.

References

  1. [1]
    Planck 2018 results - I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of ...
    The 6-parameter ΛCDM model continues to provide an excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift, describing the ...
  2. [2]
    Graphic History to Cosmology Introduction - Nasa Lambda
    ΛCDM assumes that the universe is composed of photons, neutrinos, ordinary matter (baryons, electrons) and cold (non-relativistic) dark matter, which only ...
  3. [3]
    ΛCDM Model of Cosmology - Nasa Lambda
    We illustrate a brief and simplified picture of theorized stages in the evolution of the universe, to provide a context for discussing ΛCDM parameters.
  4. [4]
    Mission science
    Jun 25, 2020 · It is called the lambda-CDM model, where lambda indicates the dark energy and CDM stands for cold dark matter. Albert Einstein in 1921 ...
  5. [5]
    Parameters - Nasa Lambda
    Standard ΛCDM requires only 6 independent parameters to completely specify the cosmological model. The specific set of six parameters used to define the ...
  6. [6]
    [1807.06209] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters - arXiv
    Jul 17, 2018 · Abstract:We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the CMB anisotropies.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 25. Cosmological Parameters - Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · The recent ACT results [39] demonstrate very well the reconstruction of the mass power spectrum. 31st May, 2024. Page 11. 11. 25. Cosmological ...Missing: Lambda- | Show results with:Lambda-
  8. [8]
    Is the Observable Universe Consistent with the Cosmological ... - arXiv
    Jul 12, 2022 · The Cosmological Principle (CP) states the universe is isotropic and homogeneous on large scales. This paper surveys observational hints for ...
  9. [9]
    [astro-ph/0401162] Gravitational Lensing by Dark Matter Caustics
    Jan 9, 2004 · ... non-baryonic collisionless particles with very small primordial velocity dispersion. Such particles are called cold dark matter (CDM). The ...
  10. [10]
    Cold dark matter: Controversies on small scales - PNAS
    The cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model has been remarkably successful in explaining cosmic structure over an enormous span of redshift.
  11. [11]
    Hierarchical galaxy formation - Oxford Academic
    We describe the GALFORM semi-analytic model for calculating the formation and evolution of galaxies in hierarchical clustering cosmologies.Introduction · Formation of dark matter haloes · Formation of discs and spheroids
  12. [12]
    [2311.06365] Dark energy in quantum field theory - arXiv
    Nov 10, 2023 · Abstract:In this dissertation, the nature of Dark Energy (DE) is examined from both theoretical and phenomenological perspectives.
  13. [13]
    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of ...
    Apr 3, 2024 · We present cosmological results from the measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in galaxy, quasar and Lyman-\alpha forest tracers
  14. [14]
    Baryon acoustic oscillation theory and modelling systematics for the ...
    This paper provides a comprehensive overview of how fitting of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) is carried out within the upcoming Dark Energy Spectroscopic ...
  15. [15]
    BayeSN distance ladder: H0 from a consistent modelling of Type Ia ...
    We estimate H0 from the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) distance ladder, inferring SN Ia distances with the hierarchical Bayesian SED model, BayeSN.
  16. [16]
    The Hubble constant determined through an inverse distance ladder ...
    We apply an inverse distance ladder approach, combining strong-lensing time-delay distance measurements with SN Ia data.
  17. [17]
    KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and ...
    We present a joint cosmological analysis of weak gravitational lensing observations from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000), with redshift-space galaxy ...
  18. [18]
    DES Year 3 Cosmology Results: Papers | Dark Energy Survey
    This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a ...
  19. [19]
    Cosmological parameter estimation and Bayesian model ...
    ... Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to explore the posterior distribution of the cosmological parameters (see e.g. Paper IV). For any given model M ...
  20. [20]
    Einstein's 1917 static model of the universe: a centennial review
    Jul 20, 2017 · We present a historical review of Einstein's 1917 paper 'Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity' to mark the ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Alexander Friedmann and the origins of modern cosmology
    Oct 1, 2012 · Friedmann's 1922 paper cited the original papers by Einstein and ... Einstein was ready to accept the idea of the expanding universe.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] A homogeneous universe of constant mass and increasing radius ...
    Jun 13, 2013 · Original paper: Georges Lemaître, Un univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant, rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des ...
  24. [24]
    A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic ...
    The data in the table indicate a linear correlation between distances and velocities, whether the latter are used directly or corrected for solar motion.
  25. [25]
    galaxy clusters
    What did Zwicky think that the dark matter in Coma and other galaxy clusters might be? An illuminating sentence in his 1937 paper provides a rather clear answer ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness ...
    This collection of seminal papers from PRD highlights research that remains central to developments today in particle physics, quantum field and string theory, ...
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
    Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, RA Knop, P. Nugent, PG Castro, S. Deustua, S. Fabbro, A. ...
  30. [30]
    [astro-ph/0004075] The Cosmological Constant - arXiv
    Apr 6, 2000 · This is a review of the physics and cosmology of the cosmological constant. Focusing on recent developments, I present a pedagogical overview of cosmology.Missing: Turner 1992
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Physical Cosmology Structure Formation
    May 5, 2011 · The right-hand side of equation (3) is called the linear growth factor D(a) = D+(a). Different values of Ωm, ΩΛ lead to different linear growth ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Power Spectra for Cold Dark Matter and its Variants - astro-ph - arXiv
    Oct 23, 1997 · Title:Power Spectra for Cold Dark Matter and its Variants. Authors:Daniel J. Eisenstein, Wayne Hu (IAS, Princeton). View a PDF of the paper ...
  35. [35]
    Clustering in real space and in redshift space - Oxford Academic
    Nick Kaiser, Clustering in real space and in redshift space, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 227, Issue 1, July 1987, Pages 1–21 ...
  36. [36]
    Planck 2018 results - VI. Cosmological parameters
    We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB).
  37. [37]
    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · We present baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from more than 14 million galaxies and quasars drawn from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument ( ...
  38. [38]
    [1203.3551] The Primordial Lithium Problem - arXiv
    Mar 15, 2012 · The primordial lithium problem is that 7Li observations are 3-4 times lower than predicted by BBN theory, creating a 4-5 sigma mismatch.
  39. [39]
    The Primordial Lithium Problem - Annual Reviews
    Nov 23, 2011 · Deuterium and 4He measurements agree well with expectations, but 7Li observations lie below the BBN+WMAP prediction by a factor of three to four ...
  40. [40]
    The axis of evil – a polarization perspective - Oxford Academic
    Abstract. We search for an unusual alignment of the preferred axes of the quadrupole and octopole, the so-called axis of evil, in the cosmic microwave back.
  41. [41]
    Cold dark matter: Controversies on small scales - PMC
    Bulgeless dwarf galaxies and dark matter cores from supernova-driven outflows. ... The dearth of halo dwarf galaxies: Is there power on short scales? Phys Rev ...
  42. [42]
    The Core‐Cusp Problem - de Blok - 2010 - Advances in Astronomy
    Nov 25, 2009 · This paper gives an overview of the attempts to determine the distribution of dark matter in low surface brightness disk and gas-rich dwarf galaxies.
  43. [43]
    [1009.4505] Notes on the Missing Satellites Problem - arXiv
    Sep 23, 2010 · The Missing Satellites Problem (MSP) broadly refers to the overabundance of predicted Cold Dark Matter (CDM) subhalos compared to satellite galaxies known to ...
  44. [44]
    Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way ...
    Simulations predict massive Milky Way subhaloes are too dense to host bright satellites, making galaxy formation stochastic, and at least six such subhaloes ...
  45. [45]
    The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves
    The diversity of observed rotation curves is also unexpected in alternative dark matter scenarios, substantially diminishing their appeal. This is because ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  46. [46]
    Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · Here, w0 is the present-day equation-of-state value, and wa describes how w evolves with redshift. Notably, ΛCDM is recovered by setting w0 = −1 ...
  47. [47]
    Part 1: Key Results from the DESI DR2 - Astrobites
    In today's bite, we will outline some key results and measurements from DESI's second data release. More discussion of the results and their ...
  48. [48]
    Explanation of high redshift luminous galaxies from JWST by early ...
    Among the most promising solutions to this tension are Early Dark Energy (EDE) models. In this study, we employ an axion-like EDE model in ...
  49. [49]
    An EAGLE view of the missing baryons - Astronomy & Astrophysics
    Results from the EAGLE simulation suggest that the missing baryons are strongly concentrated towards the filament axes.
  50. [50]
    Half of the universe's hydrogen gas, long unaccounted for, has been ...
    Apr 11, 2025 · New measurements, however, seem to have found this missing matter in the form of very diffuse and invisible ionized hydrogen gas, which forms a halo around ...
  51. [51]
    Latest Dark Energy Survey Data Suggest Possible ... - NOIRLab
    Mar 19, 2025 · The Dark Energy Survey suggests dark energy might evolve over time, with a 4% smaller BAO scale than predicted, and a time-evolving nature.Missing: H0 tension
  52. [52]
    [1908.04281] Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s - arXiv
    Aug 12, 2019 · This paper examines interactions between dark matter and dark energy, using a model with coupling proportional to dark energy density, to ...
  53. [53]
    [1304.1961] Quintessence: A Review - arXiv
    Apr 7, 2013 · Quintessence is a canonical scalar field introduced to explain the late-time cosmic acceleration. The cosmological dynamics of quintessence is reviewed.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  54. [54]
    Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with Causes a Cosmic Doomsday
    Aug 13, 2003 · The simplest explanation for dark energy is a cosmological constant, for which w = - 1 . However, this cosmological constant is 120 orders of ...
  55. [55]
    Small Scale Problems of the ΛCDM Model: A Short Review - MDPI
    The ΛCDM model, or concordance cosmology, as it is often called, is a paradigm at its maturity. It is clearly able to describe the universe at large scale, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Hot Dark Matter - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The important fact about hot dark matter is that, being composed of massive and high velocity components, it tends to spread structures such as galaxies, and if ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Hot Dark Matter - UC Berkeley Astronomy w
    Hot dark matter (HDM) is primarily neutrinos, which would smooth out matter density fluctuations. HDM is a small fraction of total dark matter.Missing: conflict | Show results with:conflict
  58. [58]
    A historical perspective on modified Newtonian dynamics
    I review the history and development of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) beginning with the phenomenological basis as it existed in the early 1980s.
  59. [59]
    [2205.05422] A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for ...
    May 11, 2022 · Our results show that, while the \LambdaLTB model can successfully explain away the H_0 tension, it is favored with respect to the \LambdaCDM ...
  60. [60]
    Multiple $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with string landscape features ...
    Such cosmology corresponds to a time-dependent dark fluid model or, alternatively, to its scalar field presentation, and it motivated by the string landscape ...Missing: beyond | Show results with:beyond